The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packet 03-06-07 March 6, 2007 s,oo P.M. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA WELCOME ALL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED. ALL MEETINGS PROVIDED WITH WIRELESS INTERNET ACCESS FOR PUBLIC CONVENIENCE. PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES AND PAGERS PRIOR TO ENTERING THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS. PLEASE MUTE THE VOLUME ON ALL LAPTOPS AND PDAfS WHILE IN USE IN THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS. GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES - Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: CONSENT AGENDA - These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. REGULAR AGENDA - Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items, which the Commission will discuss individually usually in the order listed on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS - These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesday at 6:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 A.M., then public hearings will be heard at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and aSRs anyone wishing to speaR to come forward, one at a time. Comments will be limited to five minutes. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman will aSR for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the board. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION - Please state your name and address, speaRing clearly into the microphone. If you have bacRup material, please have eight copies for distribution. NON-AGENDA ITEMS - These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBLIC COMMENT - Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting of general public comment. Please limit comments to five minutes. DECORUM - Please be respectful of others opinions. MEETINGS - All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 6:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 A.M., unless otherwise advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. The Board schedules additional worRshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of these worRshops. Assistive Listening Device is available to anyone with a hearing disability. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Director at (712) 462-1777 or TOO (772) 462-1428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS www.co.st-Iucie.fl.us &mm0ni/h tncls¡Jc Chris Craft, Chairman Joseph E. Smith, Vice Chairman Doug Coward Paula A. Lewis Charles Grande District No.5 District No. I District NO.2 District No. I District No.4 March 6, 2007 1,00 P.M. Invocation Pledge of Allegiance ,If) I. I¡~ MINUTES . . il ty1 J¡¡)1t.vv¡J/APprove the minutes from February 27,2007 meeting. tur1 ADJ' 2. PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATIONS , A. Resolution No. 07-083 - Proclaiming the weeR of March 13, 2007 through March 19, 2007, as ~"O )fh ,\t \ , r "Surveyor's WeeR" in St. Lucie County - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the attached (Jft^1I" ~Sl~ \ Resolution No. 07-083 as drafted. I. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT 4. CONSENT AGENDA /3 t i/n 5cn I !JJerll)o. Tlern-5 ~ th-nrn c5'¡n:J-h oµ I ó/¿!c _.,",4 - THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WILL RECESS AFTER THE REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS AND RECONVENE AT 6:00 P.M. FOR THE PUBLIC HEARINGS Regular Agenda March 6, 2007 Page Two PUBLIC HEARINGS 5tt ,,' COUNTY ATTORNEY 1\ùD\L¡W,O'J~rdinance 07-009 - Off Road Vehicles - Consider Staff recommendation to adopt proposed Ordinance No. \ \ . ~\~~~-009. Cvl~ (/' . ¡w:r 5B. GROWTH MANAGEMENT M P í()ýe....1 Petition of Mercedes of Homes for a 12-month extension of the date of expiration for the project I:mown as ¡.. ~ h Celebration Pointe PUD and major adjustment to the conditions of approval for property located at the ~',rrÎfY',6í]11 J' southeast corner of the intersection of Peterson Road and South JenRins Road. Draft Resolution No. 07-039. (, A/)::,tI Consider staff recommendation to approve Draft Resolution No. 07-039. ./lA1 ~Vi1 fcJ '. J /1 / 5C. GROWTH MANAGEMENT 'f:Jn /--iN€.. J.v April í 7 g a r;1 ,,(J PM c/r a s ~OOì\ tAe r(,^ Pk r G spoçç, Þ Ie , 1\ f)(¡)Vc¡\~-O Petition of A.W. Riverlanding, L.L.C., for a Change in Zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single - Family - 2 "p :),\'1,Jh du/acre) and CO (Commercial Office) Zoning Districts to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - River ~~r¡~b~e{\~' Landing) Zoning District and Final Planned Development Site Plan Approval for the project I:mown as River f1 Landing - PUD. Draft Resolution No. 07-003. - Consider staff recommendation to approve Resolution No. 07- 003, subject to seventeen limiting conditions of approval. 5~JI ,GROWTH MANAGEMENT ìVðfr(/),f-o ClJl'fíAVC'.. t-o fUo~vJ¡ ÀJ¡ µo 7 vtf &¡Jf1.-0> uS 5(Jo/LfA.cr~f'J.re1 as [JciY),b!e Ilpf(l'v ~A) Consider Draft Developers Agreement DVA 07-001, approving Developers Agreement between Inc'om . / . GI'^' .~~ Properties 31, Inc., King's Center and St. Lucie County - Consider Staff recommendation to approve the [ì/IYlV¡Yl.ber J Developer's Agreement 07-00t 5~~! GROWTH MANAGEMENT M,o ~ì (,y' h ~~ -h~ tt, f\)rl v" 1 .h Petition of St. Lucie OaRs Commercial, LLC, for a Change in Zoning from the CG (Commercial General) and , J 61,,1 PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development - St. Lucie Oa~s) Zoning Districts to the PNRD (Planned Non- ('","11"'·,'\[..,'~ Residential Development (St. Lucie Oa~s Commercial) Zoning District and Preliminary Planned Unit AlP vvl Development Site Plan approval, for the project to be ~nown as St. Lucie OaRs Commercial - PNRD and (i IfY:\V\ ¡Vb consisting of a four-story, 88 room hotel and approximately 16,200 square feet of restaurant/office space. Draft ¡i /1' ~ Resolution No. 07-002. Consider Staff recommendation to approve a Change in Zoning from the CG Vi! (Commercial General) and PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development - St. Lucie OaRs) Zoning Districts to the PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development (St. Lucie Oa~s Commercial) Zoning District and Preliminary Planned Unit Development Site Plan, subject to limiting conditions. 5'. t COUNTY ATTORNEY .~ ffrV:ÓIl )~Public Hearing - Petition for Abandonment of a portion of Roc~ Road North of 1-95 to Angle Road - ~ SiVl' Resolution 07-022- Consider Staff recommendation to continue this Public Hearing to May 1, 2007, at 6:00 (I .}v/I\ 'y p.m. or soon thereafter as possible. i ~bst{ END OF PUBLIC HEARINGS -~"''''''''''..." 1] ~. """"=",0"""""'"'"' ,. . CONSENT AGENDA y,,,",""" 0,,", '" -"!m I. WARRANTS Approve warrant list No. 22 2. COUNTY AnORNEY A. Resolution 07-304 - Extension of Declaration of State of Local Emergency - Indian River Drive - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Declaration and authorize the Public Safety Director to sign the Declaration. B. Resolution 07-082 - Extension of Open Air Burning - Consider Staff recommendation to approve Resolution 07-082 and authorize the Chairman to sign the Resolution. C. Ordinance No. 07-010 - Permission to advertise proposed Ordinance No. 07-010 (Animal Registration) for a Public Hearing. Consider Staff recommendation to advertise proposed Ordinance No. 07-010 (Animal Registration) for a Public Hearing on April 3, 2007 at 6:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as may be heard. D. Contract for Sale and Purchase - Paradise ParR Stormwater Improvement - Consider Staff recommendation to approve the Contract for Sale and Purchase from Peter Zecca for the purchase price of $116,000.00 and authorize the Chairman to sign and direct Staff to proceed with the closing and record the Warranty Deed in the Public Records of St. Lucie County. I. PUBLIC WORKS A. Engineering Division - Wor~ Authorization No.9 (C05-04-190) for Professional Surveying Services with LBFH, Inc., for Pulitzer Road and Orange Avenue - Consider staff recommendation to approve Wor~ Authorization No.9 (C05-04-190) for Professional Surveying Services with LBFH, Inc., for Pulitzer Road and Orange Avenue in the amount of $8,400.00, and authorize the Chairman to sign. B. Engineering Division - Solida Drive Culvert Replacement - Consider Staff recommendation to approve awarding the Solida Drive Culvert Replacement Project to low bidder, Johnson-Davis, Inc., in the amount of $119,298.00, establish project budget and authorize the Chairman to sign. C. Engineering Division - First Amendment to WorR Authorization No.1 to the contract for Professional Engineering Services related to Stormwater Management with Inwood Consulting Engineers, for additional survey and geotechnical services for Harmony Heights Stormwater Improvements Phase I in the amount of $19,494.00. - Consider Staff recommendation to approve the First Amendment to Wor~ Authorization No. 1 to the contract for Professional Engineering Services related to Stormwater Management with Inwood Consulting Engineers, for additional survey and geotechnical services for Harmony Heights Stormwater Improvements Phase I in the amount of $19,494.00 and authorize the Chairman to sign. 4. PARKS AND RECREATION Disposal of Capital Equipment - Consider Staff recommendation to approve the removal of listed capital equipment items from the County's Fixed Asset Inventory. 5. PURCHASING A. Street Resurfacing Annual Contract - Consider Staff recommendation to approve to award Invitation to Bid 07-029, Street Resurfacing Annual Contract to the lowest bidder, Ranger Construction Industries, Inc., for a not to exceed $1,054,186.80 and authorize the Chairman to sign the Amendment. B. Fixed Asset Inventory - Property Removal Record - Consider Staff recommendation to approve the removal of listed records from the Fixed Asset Inventory from various St. Lucie County Departments. C. Fixed Asset Inventory - Property Removal Record - Consider Staff recommendation to approve the removal of listed records from the Fixed Asset Inventory from the St. Lucie County ClerR of Courts. ,-" Consent Agenda March 6, 2007 Page Two 6. PUBLIC SAFETY A. Purchase of a desRtop computer - Consider Staff recommendation to approve the purchase of a desRtop computer with standard specifications in the amount of $1,160.00, approve Budget Amendment BA07-044 and Equipment Request 07-312 and authorize the Chairman to sign. B. State Homeland Security Grant Time Extension Modification - Consider Staff recommendation to approve Modification #1 to Agreement 07-DS-3W-10-66-01-248, State Homeland Security Grant Agreement. 'S¡W,II r ,w ,,'. '" ANNOUNCEMENTS March 6, 2007 nûmm ~ ,. 1. Fort Pierce Spread the Shade Plant a Tree Give Away will be on Saturday, March 10, 2007 from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. at the Heathcote Botanical Garden located at 210 Savannah Road, Fort Pierce 2. The Board of County Commissioners and the Treasure Coast Education & Research Development Authority will meeting on Tuesday, March 13,2007 at 2:00 p.m. at the UF/IFAS IRREC Auditorium. 3. A Public meeting will be held on Wednesday, March 14, 2007, at 6:00 p.m. to introduce new Noise Officer, Joe Arbeit, and Vic Johnson with Falcon Airline Academy at the Airport Administrative Offices, St. Lucie County International Airport, 3000 Curtis King Boulevard, Fort Pierce, FL. Contact m 462-1732 if there are any questions. 4. The Board of County Commissioners regular meeting on March 20, 2007 will begin at 3:00p.m, breaR at 5:00 p.m. and reconvene at 6:00 p.m. 5. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Monthly Informal Meeting on Friday, March 23, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. in the Conference Room #3. 6. The St. Lucie County Veterans Services Department and the United Veterans will hold the 16th annual United Veterans Golf Classic on April 21, 2007 at Fairwinds Golf Course. For more information contact Veterans Services at 337-5670. 7. The St. Lucie County Master Gardeners are holding their USpring Into Gardening Festival" on Saturday, April 28, 2007 from 8:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. at the St. Lucie County Extension Office on Picos Road. For more information contact the Extension Office at 462-1660. 8. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a WorRshop on Homeland Security on Monday, April 30, 2007 at 2:00 p.m. in the County Commission Chambers. 9. The Board of County Commissioners Budget WorRshops will begin Thursday, July 19, 2007 and run through Wednesday, July 25, 2007. 10. The July 10th Regular Board of County Commissioners Meeting and the July 17th Regular Board of County Commissioners meeting have been canceled due to lacR of quorum. Three Commissioners will be attending the Airport Conference on July 10th and three Commissioners will be attending the National Association of Counties (NACO) Conference on July 17th. 11. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Budget Millage Adoption Meeting on July 31, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. in the County Commission Chambers. 12. The Board of County Commissioners will hold the Preliminary Budget Public Hearing on Thursday, September 6, 2007 at 6:00 p.m. 13. The Board of County Commissioners will hold the Final Budget Public Hearing on Thursday, September 13, 2007 at 6:00 p.m. NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action ta~en by the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted the opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (772) 462-1777 or TDD (772) 462- 1428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting. March ., 2007 1,00 P.M. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA WELCOME ALL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED. ALL MEETINGS PROVIDED WITH WIRELESS INTERNET ACCESS FOR PUBLIC CONVENIENCE. PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES AND PAGERS PRIOR TO ENTERING THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS. PLEASE MUTE THE VOLUME ON ALL LAPTOPS AND PDAfS WHILE IN USE IN THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS. GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES - Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: CONSENT AGENDA - These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. REGULAR AGENDA _ Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items, which the Commission will discuss individually usually in the order listed on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS - These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesday at 6:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 A.M., then public hearings will be heard at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and aSRs anyone wishing to speaR to come forward, one at a time. Comments will be limited to five minutes. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman will aSR for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the board. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION - Please state your name and address, speaRing clearly into the microphone. If you have bacRup material, please have eight copies for distribution. NON-AGENDA ITEMS - These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBLIC COMMENT - Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting of general public comment. Please limit comments to five minutes. DECORUM - Please be respectful of others opinions. MEETINGS - All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 6:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 A.M., unless otherwise advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. The Board schedules additional worRshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of these worRshops. Assistive Listening Device is available to anyone with a hearing disability. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Director at (712) 462-1777 or TOO (772) 462-1428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS www.co..t-Iucle.fl.us Chris Craft, Chairman Joseph E. Smith, Vice Chairman Doug Coward Paula A. Lewis Charles Grande District No.5 District No. I District No.2 District No. I District No.4 March 6, 2007 1,00 P.M. Invocation Pledge of Allegiance I. MINUTES Approve the minutes from February 27, 2007 meeting. 2e PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATIONS A. Resolution No. 07-083 - Proclaiming the weeR of March 13, 2007 through March 19, 2007, as "Surveyor's WeeR" in St. Lucie County - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the attached Resolution No. 07-083 as drafted. I. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT 4. CONSENT AGENDA THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WILL RECESS AFTER THE REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS AND RECONVENE AT 6:00 P.M. FOR THE PUBLIC HEARINGS -~ - .1"1" Regular Agenda March 6, 2007 Page Two -. PUBLIC HEARINGS C NTY ATTORNEY dinance 07-009 - Off Road Vehicles - Consider Staff recommendation to adopt proposed Ordinance No. 07-009. GROWTH MANAGEMENT Petition of Mercedes of Homes for a 12-month extension of the date of expiration for the project I:mown as Celebration Pointe PUD and major adjustment to the conditions of approval for property located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Peterson Road and South JenRins Road. Draft Resolution No. 07-039. Consider staff recommendation to approve Draft Resolution No. 07-039. GROWTH MANAGEMENT Petition of A.W. Riverlanding, L.L.C., for a Change in Zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single - Family - 2 dulacre) and CO (Commercial Office) Zoning Districts to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - River Landing) Zoning District and Final Planned Development Site Plan Approval for the project Rnown as River Landing - PUD. Draft Resolution No. 07-003. - Consider staff)f!commendation to app?,ve Resolution No. 07- /3, subject to seventeen limiting conditions of approval. [J,;,....:1. --...t- fÜ 'I/¡7 ~ ~OWTH MANAGEMENT - Consider Draft Developers Agreement DVA 07-001, approving Developers Agreement between Incom Properties 31, Inc., King's Center and, St. Lucie County - Consider Staff recommendation to approve the Developer's Agreement 07-001. y ~ j"l..e A).J- /-'¿)çÝ ~~. GROWTH MANAGEMENT . . _ f[} . Petition of St. Lucie OaRs Commercial, LLC, for a Change in Zoning from the CO (Commercial General) and PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development - St. Lucie OaRs) Zoning Districts to the PNRD (Planned Non- Residential Development (St. Lucie Oa~s Commercial) Zoning District and Preliminary Planned Unit Development Site Plan approval, for the project to be Rnown as St. Lucie Oa~s Commercial - PNRD and consisting of a four-story, 88 room hotel and approximately 16,200 square feet of restaurant/office space. Draft Resolution No. 07-002. Consider Staff recommendation to approve a Change in Zoning from the CG (Commercial General) and PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development - St. Lucie OaRs) Zoning Districts to the PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development (St. Lucie OaRs Commercial) Zoning District and Pr~nminary Planned Unit Development Site Plan, subject}<JAimiting conditions../J M ~Nr.~"''::'.-/) tJ.",r/71..- t6/~ 3- r'L 5 COUNTY ATTORNEY Public Hearing - Petition for Abandonment of a portion of RocR Road North of 1-95 to Angle Road - Resolution 07-022- Consider Staff recommendation to continue this Public Hearing to May 1, 2007, at 6:00 p.m. or soon thereafter as possible. END OF PUBLIC HEARINGS CONSENT AGENDA - ,'J;F I. WARRANTS Approve warrant list No. 22 2. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Resolution 07-304 - Extension of Declaration of State of Local Emergency - Indian River Drive - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Declaration and authorize the Public Safety Director to sign the Declaration. B. Resolution 07-082 - Extension of Open Air Burning - Consider Staff recommendation to approve Resolution 07-082 and authorize the Chairman to sign the Resolution. C. Ordinance No. 07-010 - Permission to advertise proposed Ordinance No. 07-010 (Animal Registration) for a Public Hearing. Consider Staff recommendation to advertise proposed Ordinance No. 07-010 (Animal Registration) for a Public Hearing on April 3, 2007 at 6:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as may be heard. D. Contract for Sale and Purchase - Paradise ParR Stormwater Improvement - Consider Staff recommendation to approve the Contract for Sale and Purchase from Peter Zecca for the purchase price of $116,000.00 and authorize the Chairman to sign and direct Staff to proceed with the closing and record the Warranty Deed in the Public Records of St. Lucie County. I. PUBLIC WORKS A. Engineering Division - Wor~ Authorization No.9 (C05-04-190) for Professional Surveying Services with LBFH, Inc., for Pulitzer Road and Orange Avenue - Consider staff recommendation to approve Wor~ Authorization No.9 (C05-04-190) for Professional Surveying Services with LBFH, Inc., for Pulitzer Road and Orange Avenue in the amount of $8,400.00, and authorize the Chairman to sign. B. Engineering Division - Solida Drive Culvert Replacement - Consider Staff recommendation to approve awarding the Solida Drive Culvert Replacement Project to low bidder, Johnson-Davis, Inc., in the amount of $119,298.00, establish project budget and authorize the Chairman to sign. C. Engineering Division - First Amendment to Wor~ Authorization No.1 to the contract for Professional Engineering Services related to Stormwater Management with Inwood Consulting Engineers, for additional survey and geotechnical services for Harmony Heights Stormwater Improvements Phase I in the amount of $19,494.00. - Consider Staff recommendation to approve the First Amendment to WorR Authorization No.1 to the contract for Professional Engineering Services related to Stormwater Management with Inwood Consulting Engineers, for additional survey and geotechnical services for Harmony Heights Stormwater Improvements Phase I in the amount of $19,494.00 and authorize the Chairman to sign. 4. PARKS AND RECREATION Disposal of Capital Equipment - Consider Staff recommendation to approve the removal of listed capital equipment items from the County's Fixed Asset Inventory. 5. PURCHASING A. Street Resurfacing Annual Contract - Consider Staff recommendation to approve to award Invitation to Bid 07-029, Street Resurfacing Annual Contract to the lowest bidder, Ranger Construction Industries, Inc., for a not to exceed $1,054,186.80 and authorize the Chairman to sign the Amendment. B. Fixed Asset Inventory - Property Removal Record - Consider Staff recommendation to approve the removal of listed records from the Fixed Asset Inventory from various St. Lucie County Departments. C. Fixed Asset Inventory - Property Removal Record - Consider Staff recommendation to approve the removal of listed records from the Fixed Asset Inventory from the St. Lucie County ClerR of Courts. Consent Agenda March 6, 2007 Page Two 6. PUBLIC SAFETY A. Purchase of a desRtop computer - Consider Staff recommendation to approve the purchase of a desRtop computer with standard specifications in the amount of $1,160.00, approve Budget Amendment BA07-044 and Equipment Request 07-312 and authorize the Chairman to sign. B. State Homeland Security Crant Time Extension Modification - Consider Staff recommendation to approve Modification #1 to Agreement 07-DS-3W-10-66-01-248, State Homeland Security Crant Agreement. ANNOUNCEMENTS March 6, 2007 1. Fort Pierce Spread the Shade Plant a Tree Give Away will be on Saturday, March 10, 2007 from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. at the Heathcote Botanical Garden located at 210 Savannah Road, Fort Pierce 2. The Board of County Commissioners and the Treasure Coast Education & Research Development Authority will meeting on Tuesday, March 13, 2007 at 2:00 p.m. at the UFIIFAS IRREC Auditorium. 3. A Public meeting will be held on Wednesday, March 14, 2007, at 6:00 p.m. to introduce new Noise Officer, Joe Arbeit, and Vic Johnson with Falcon Airline Academy at the Airport Administrative Offices, St. Lucie County International Airport, 3000 Curtis King Boulevard, Fort Pierce, FL. Contact 772 462-1732 if there are any questions. 4. The Board of County Commissioners regular meeting on March 20, 2007 will begin at 3:00p.m, breaR at 5:00 p.m. and reconvene at 6:00 p.m. 5. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Monthly Informal Meeting on Friday, March 23, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. in the Conference Room #3. 6. The St. Lucie County Veterans Services Department and the United Veterans will hold the 16th annual United Veterans Golf Classic on April 21, 2007 at Fairwinds Golf Course. For more information contact Veterans Services at 337-5670. 7. The St. Lucie County Master Gardeners are holding their "Spring Into Gardening Festival" on Saturday, April 28, 2007 from 8:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. at the St. Lucie County Extension Office on Picos Road. For more information contact the Extension Office at 462-1660. 8. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a WorRshop on Homeland Security on Monday, April 30, 2007 at 2:00 p.m. in the County Commission Chambers. 9. The Board of County Commissioners Budget WorRshops will begin Thursday, July 19, 2007 and run through Wednesday, July 25, 2007. 10. The July 10th Regular Board of County Commissioners Meeting and the July 17th Regular Board of County Commissioners meeting have been canceled due to lacR of quorum. Three Commissioners will be attending the Airport Conference on July 10th and three Commissioners will be attending the National Association of Counties (NACO) Conference on July 17th. 11. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Budget Millage Adoption Meeting on July 31, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. in the County Commission Chambers. 12. The Board of County Commissioners will hold the Preliminary Budget Public Hearing on Thursday, September 6, 2007 at 6:00 p.m. 13. The Board of County Commissioners will hold the Final Budget Public Hearing on Thursday, September 13, 2007 at 6:00 p.m. NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action ta\:?en by the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted the opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (m) 462-1m or TDD (m) 462- 1428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING Date: February 27,2007 Convened: 9:00 a.m. Adjourned: 11 :25 a.m. Commissioners Present: Chris Craft, Chainnan, Joseph Smith, Paula A. Lewis, Doug Coward, Charles Grande Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator, Ray Wazny, Asst. County Administrator, Faye Outlaw, Asst. County Administrator, Dan McIntyre, County Attorney, Vanessa Bessey, Environmental Resources Director, Don West, Public Works Director, Heather Young, Asst. County Attorney, Leo Cordeiro, Solid Waste Director, Beth Ryder, Community Services Director, Debra Brisson, Parks and Rec. Director, Lauri Case, Utilities Director, Neil Appel, Purchasing Director, Diana Lewis, Airport Director, Jim David, Mosquito Control Director, Ed Fry, Clerk of Courts, Millie Delgado-Feliciano, Deputy Clerk 1. MINUTES It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Lewis, to approve the minutes of the meeting held February 20, 2007, and; upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 2. PROCLAMA TION/PRESENT A TIONS A. A presentation was made by Ms. Vel Thompson on the City of St. Petersburg N- Team's Code Assistance Program. Mr. Richard Allison area resident, addressed the Board and gave a brief overview on how he first had heard about this program and his contact with Ms. Thompson. Staff was directed to come back with a proposal to discuss this issue during the budget session for consideration of seed funding for the program. Staff was also directed to contact the municipalities and attempt to workout a partnership with them for such a program. B. A presentation was made by Mr. Ed Fry, Clerk of Courts, on the Court Technology and Public Web Site. The Clerk of Circuit Court presented an update on Court Technology and illustrated how the imaging of documents has assisted in expediting infonnation to all entities dealing with our court system, i.e. State Attorney, Public Defender and the Sheriffs Department. He also advised the Board of confidential infonnation being deleted from the documents, i.e. social security numbers and financial infonnation. The Clerk of Court demonstrated the "Docket Managers" program where it shows the daily case load for the judges and the courts. He also provided a demonstration on the Public Web Site and the new technology added providing access to deed sales and other public infonnation for a subscription fee. Mr. Fry advised the Board the Finance Department had received the Certificate of Achievement for Financial Reporting. ,'\ ì 1 M~R - I 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS Ms. Patricia Spradling, 925 Jackson Way, Hutchinson Island, addressed the Board regarding various problems she is having with the Melon Patch Bed and Breakfast in the area. She advised the Board of the numerous Code Violations, i.e. noise, alcohol serving, the owner not living on premises, bright signage and parking. The Assistant County Attorney advised the Board Code Enforcement had visited the site and had not sited any violations. The only issue found was decking on the premises that was not permitted properly. Mr. Richard Allison, area resident, addressed the Board and stated he saw both positives and negatives about the establishment. He had spoken with Ms. Townsend regarding the noise and the parking problem and she stated she would work on these issues. He stated he felt he had not been impacted by noise or traffic. Con. Coward recommended having a more thorough discussion on this issue by placing it on a regular board meeting agenda. Com. Grande stated he would like more information on the permitted uses before it comes before the Board again. Mr. Floyd Grisby, Jackson Way resident addressed the Board and advised them of the Code Enforcement Officers visit to the establishment. The officer had been noticed while parked in the area and the music noise was reduced considerably before an accurate reading of decibels could be taken and also the violation of Code 7.1 0.20. The County Administrator advised the Board he would place this item on the March 13, 2007 meeting agenda for discussion 4. CONSENT AGENDA (1 :0035) Com. Grande advised the Board of his intent to submit changes to our regulations referenced with item C2A. Com. Coward stated he felt there were two public hearing to be scheduled on this matter and they will have time to review and hopefully they will be corrected by then. Com. Grande stated he was making sure everyone knew what he was doing, he was not imposing changes. Com. Smith addressed C2-E and the language. The Assistant County Attorney addressed Com. Smith's question and stated they would need Board approval for new management. The lease requires they obtain Board approval if they are selling the business. The Airport Director addressed the question and stated it would be up to the Commission if they wanted to hire a management company as the fixed based operator, however this would be very costly. Com. Coward wanted to make sure these leases have nothing to do with the new flight school being proposed. He asked the basic perimeter be laid out so that there is no negative affect on the surrounding residents. It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Grande, to approve the Consent Agenda, and; upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 1. WARRANT LIST The Board approved Warrant List No. 21. 2 02/23/Q7 FZABWARR FUND 001 001167 001172 001174 001177 001180 001182 001404 001415 001418 001419 001424 001814 101 101001 101002 101003 101004 101006 102 102001 102803 102805 105 ~ .001 107002 107003 107005 107006 107204 113 114 116 117 119 127 128 129 130 136 138 140 140001 140128 140132 140334 140339 140341 140342 140349 150 1 J 183001 183003 183004 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD WARRANT LIST #21- 17-FEB-2007 TO 23-FEB-2007 FUND SUMMARY TITLE General Fund FTA Section 5303 Grant FY 05 CDBG Grant FY 05 FHFC Disaster Relief Grant Section 112/MPO/FHWA/Planning 2006 US Dept Housing HUD Shelter Plus Gr CSBG Grant FY07 05 CDBG Sup Disaster Recovery TDC Planning Grant FY 07 FDCA EMPA FY07 FDCA-Construct County EOC Dept of Financial Services My Safe Floridian Aquifier Well Monitoring Transportation Trust Fund Transportation Trust Interlocals Transportation Trust/80% Constitut Transportation Trust/Local Option Transportation Trust/County Fuel Tx Transportation Trust/Impact Fees Unincorporated Services Fund Drainage Maintenance MSTU Paradise Park, S L C Stormwtr Imp. SFWMD-Paradise Prk Swtr Imprv Phs I Library Special Grants Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund Fine &. Forfeiture Fund-Wireless Sur Fine & Forfeiture Fund-E911 Surchar Fine & Forfeiture Fund-800 Mhz Oper F&F Fund-Legal Aid F&F Fund-Court Related Technology FL Dept Juvenile Justice-DMC Civil Harmony Heights 3 Fund Harmony Heights 4 Fund Sunland Gardens Fund Sunrise Park Fund Holiday pines Fund Pine Hollow Street Lighting MSTV Kings Hwy Industrial Park Lighting Parks MSTU Fund SLC Public Transit MSTU Monte Carlo Lighting MSTU#4 Fund Palm Lake Gardens MSTU Fund Port & Airport Fund Port Fund Industrial Park West-EDA Airport Layout Plan Update Const. Apron & Environmental Mitiga Drainage Improvements #407701 Construction of Airport Rescue & Fi Construction of Access Road forARFF Airport Layout Plan Impact Fee Collections Plan Maintenance RAD Fund Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.-County Teen Court Ct Admin.~ Teen Court EXPENSES 646,437.72 53.96 30,450.95 24,320.00 676.65 1.14 12,751.08 116.84 61.56 3,190.20 111,456.58 388.26 119.05 4,195.07 12,254.91 30,634.02 5,306.37 11,201. 68 26,738.25 8,416 .92 233,926.92 1,350.00 204,736.74 1,758.35 142,613.53 1,236.58 2,877.24 5,147.24 16,264.72 614.58 57.65 227.86 497.33 555.70 138.39 859.20 361.57 483.32 19,563.81 127,802.38 1,426.57 248.85 5,470.63 3,862.06 12,000.00 14,235.08 9,600.00 25,552.00 4,405.00 4,405.00 749.22 2,706.14 1,203.9l 23,366.91 400.00 264.50 220.68 PAGE PAYROLL 662,203.59 642.52 0.00 0.00 5,089.78 0.00 1,722.09 1,325.47 747.51 0.00 0.00 2,321.81 1,391. 91 45,341.28 0.00 42,758.26 34,981.15 19,215.21 0.00 85,483.49 6,349.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 92,711.02 1,019.04 38,481. 08 0.00 0.00 7,453.74 753.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,717.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,130.41 3,268.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,728.70 1 02/23/97 F'ZABWARR FUND 183006 185007 185008 210 216 310002 310003 310202 316 316301 317 382 401 418 451 458 461 471 478 479 491 505 505001 611 ') ..i 630 801 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD WARRANT LIST #21- 17-FEB-2007 TO 23-FEB-2007 FUND SUMMARY TITLE Guardian Ad Litem Fund FHFA SHIP FY06/07 FHFA Hurricane Housing Recovery Impact Fees I&S County Capital 1&8 Impact Fees-Parks Impact Fees-Public Buildings FDEP Land/Water Fund "River Pk" County Capital FDOT Intermodal Improvements County Capital-St Revenue Share Bnd Environmental Land Capital Fund Sanitary Landfill Fund Golf Course Fund S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund SH Util-Renewal & Replacement Fund Sports Complex Fund No County Utility District-Operatin No Cty Util Dist-Renewal & Replace No Cty Util Dist-Capital Facilities Building Code Fund Health Insurance Fund Property/Casualty Insurance Fund Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund Impact Fees Fund Law Library Tax Deed Overbid Agency Fund Bank Fund GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 26,436.40 85.33 15,642.44 24,159.32 22,106.48 20,042.44 220.00 32,163.08 5,510.00 20,447.70 807,281.38 137,014.00 582,857.12 23,070.32 13,319.82 44.51 21,260.07 4,173.35 71. 66 15,946.59 8,503.76 325,860.33 108.80 900.00 198,342.30 9,309.93 144,010.88 274,582.48 4,533,431.36 PAGE PAYROLL 0.00 1,021. 00 2,987.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 64,907.79 22,043.15 1,965.89 539.54 16,999.14 7,955.52 868.32 1,451. 98 65,599.82 10,192.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,268,369.49 2 2. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Second Amendment to the March 9, 2004 Agreement with Clarion Associates- The Board approved the Second Amendment to the March 9, 2004 Agreement with Clarion Associates and authorized the Chairman to sign the Second Amendment. B. Resolution No. 07-080- Extending State of Local Emergency - Ban on Open Air Burning in St. Lucie County- The Board approved Resolution No. 07-080 and authorized the Chairman to sign the Resolution. C. Contract for Sale and Purchase Paradise Park Stormwater Improvement- Eleanor Johnson Morris Tax ID 1433-701-0442-000/5- The Board approved the Contract for Sale and Purchase from Eleanor Johnson-Morris for the purchase price of $25,000.00, and authorized the Chairman to sign the Contract and directed staff to proceed with the closing and record the Warranty Deed in the Public Records of St. Lucie County. D. Contract for Sale and Purchase - Contract for Sale and Purchase paradise Park Stormwater improvement- Roneesha Octavien Smith Tax ID 1433-701-0440- 000/1- The Board approved the contract for Sale and Purchase from Roneesha Octavien Smith for the purchase price of $25,000 and authorized the Chairman to sign the Contract and directed staff to proceed with the closing and record the Warranty Deed in the Public Records of St. Lucie County . E. B & E Houck Enterprises, Inc.- Consent to Subleases- The Board approved to the sublease agreements submitted by B & E Houck Enterprises, Inc. F. 3904 N. Kings Highway First Amendment to September 1,2000 Lease Agreement- The Board approved the proposed first amendment to the September 1, 2000 lease agreement with James and Brenda Gibbons. G. Hurricane Housing Recovery Plan- The Board approved the Declaration of Covenants for Obtainable Dwelling Units in Cortez Village. H. Extension of Declaration of State of Local Emergency- Indian River Drive- The Board approved the extension of the Declaration of State of Local Emergency and authorized the Public Safety Director to sign the Declaration. I. Contract for Sale and Purchase- Paradise Park Stormwater Improvement- Blance Forrester- Tax ID 1433-701-0530-000/9- The Board approved the Contract for Sale and Purchase from Blance Forrester for the purchase price of $25,000 authorized the Chairman to sign the contract and directed staff to proceed with the closing and record the Warrant Deed in the Public Records of St. Lucie County. J. Contract for Sale and Purchase - Paradise Park Stormwater Improvement Mr. and Mrs. Frank Robinson- Tax ID 1433-801-0144-000/3- The Board approved the contract for Sale and Purchase from Mr. & Mrs. Robinson for the purchase price of $30,000 authorized the Chairman to sign the Contract and directed staff to proceed with the closing and record the Warranty Deed in the Public Records of St. Lucie County. K. St. Lucie County International Airport- First Amendment to August 27, 2002 Lease Agreement with T. Bennett- The Board approved the proposed First Amendment to the August 27,2002 Lease Agreement with T, Bennett, and authorized the Chairman to sign the amendment. L. Budget Amendment Number BA07 -042 requesting the transfer of $2,030.00 from Equipment Maintenance Account Number 001-1410-546000-100 to 3 Machinery and Equipment Account Number 001-1410-564000-100 - The Board approved the transfer of $2,030 from Equipment Maintenance to Machinery & Equipment as requested. M. St. Lucie County Utilities - Seventh Amendment with Severn Trent Environmental Services, Inc.,- The Board approved the Seventh Amendment and authorized the chairman to sign the Amendment. N. Contract for Sale and Purchase- Paradise Park Stormwater Improvement- BJS Properties, Inc.- Tax ID 1433-701-0457-000/3- Tax ID 1433-701-0255-000/7- The Board approved the Contract for Sale and Purchase from BJS Properties, Inc., for the purchase price of $67,000.00 authorized the Chairman to sign the Contract and directed staff to proceed with the closing and record the Warranty Deed in the Public Records of St. Lucie County. 3. PARKS AND RECREATION Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.) Waiver of Fees/Lawnwood Complex- The Board approved St. Lucie County Sheriffs Department's request to waive rental fees in the amount of $700.00 for use of the Lawnwood Complex parking area to hold its D.A.R.E. Carnival April 9-15, 2007. 4. PARKS REFERENDUM Lawnwood Soccer Fields/The Collage Companies (C06-06-334) Change Order No. 2- The Board approved Change Order No.2 for The collage Companies in the amount of $14,628 for the additional work on the Lawnwood Complex soccer fields. The Board also approved a 195 day extension for substantial completion of the project 5. PUBLIC WORKS A. Engineering Division- Repair of Bridges Related to Hurricane Wilma- First Amendment to Work Authorization No.2 to the Professional Engineering Services Contract for Bridge Evaluation and Design with Jenkins and Charland, Inc., in the amount of $35,655.00- /The Board approved the First Amendment to Work Authorization No.. 2 in the amount of$35,655.00 and authorized the Chairman to sign. B. Road and Bridge Division- Approve a Bid Waiver and Equipment Request (EQ07 -310) for a Sole Source Equipment purchase from Hydraulic Truck Conveyor, Inc.- The Board approved the Bid Waiver and Equipment Request (EQ07-310 for Sole Source Equipment purchase from Hydraulic Truck Conveyor in the amount of $34,686.50 and also approved Equipment Request EQ07-311 to purchase a new 72" Hydraulic Sweeper in the amount of $3,995.00 from Southern Track and Pump. C. Road and Bridge Division- The Board approved the Bid Waiver to purchase two Dump Trucks (EQ07-241 and EQ07-242) in the amount of$85,541.00 each from Rechtien International. D. Road and Bridge Division- The Board approved clarification of the contract to Piggyback the Marion County Board of County Commission Contract No. 04B-077; Chip Seal CRS-2 and Granite Mixture Purchase and Application WITH Florida Highway Products; Inc., which was approved by the Board of County Commission on January 23,2007 to include a not to exceed an amount of $250,000.00 and authorized the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. 4 6. GRANTS Authorize Amendment No.1 to Contract C-15305/3600001008( St. Lucie County Contract C05-11-637) between St. Lucie County and the South Florida Water Management District to extend the term of the grant contract from 1/27/2007 to 7/25/2007. The amendment does not amend the grant amount or the scope of work- The Board approved the amendment to Contract C05-11-63 7. 7. MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Adoption of Resolution No. 07-070 to establish a budget for Fiscal year 2007 for the for the South Florida Water Management District Grant for Water Savings Incentive Program in the amount of $50,000- The Board approved Resolution No. 07-070. 8. HUMAN RESOURCES Cellular Phones- Authorization - Issuance and Usage- The Board approved the Cellular Phones Authorization; Issuance and Usage Policy. 9. PURCHASING A. Fourth Amendment to Contract No. COO-09-539 with Harbor Branch Environmental Laboratory, Inc., - The Board approved the Fourth Amendment to Contract No. COO-09-539 and authorized the Chairman to sign the Amendment as prepared by the County Attorney. B. Award of Bid No. 07-026 Customs Building HV AC Renovations to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, Sea Coast AlC and Sheet Metal, Inc.,- The board approved awarding Bid No. 07-026 to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, Sea Coast Air Conditioning and Sheet Meal Inc., for the total amount of$ 114,301.00 and authorized the chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. C. Cancel Assignment of contract C05-12-686 from AlA Employment of Miami to Capital TempFunds, Inc.- The Board approved the cancellation of the assignment of contract C05-12-686 from A 1 A Employment of Miami to Capital TempFunds, Inc. D. First Amendment to Contract C06-05-346 with Snappy Auto Care, Inc.- The Board approved the first amendment to contract C06-05-346 with Snappy Auto Care Inc., for Maintenance Services for cars and pick up trucks and authorized the Chairman signing the amendment as prepared by the County Attorney. E. First Amendment to Contract C02-03-331 with Baker & Taylor, Inc.,- The Board approved the first amendment to contract C02-03-331 with Baker & Taylor, Inc., for Book Leasing Program and authorized the Chairman to sign the amendment as prepared by the County Attorney. 10. COMMUNITY SERVICES A. Approval of Amendment No.2 to the contract between the State of Florida Department of Health and St. Lucie county for operation of the Health Department - the board approved Amendment No.2 to the contract and authorized the Chairman to sign all pertinent documents necessary. B. FDOT Joint Participation Agreement Supplement No. 1 which will provide $275,000 in additional funding of the Intermodal transit facility located at 8th and Avenue D- The Board authorized the Chairman to sign the FDOT JP A Intermodal supplement number one and all the necessary documents pertaining to the grant. 5 C. Approval to execute a sub-recipient and interlocal agreement with the city of Port St. Lucie in order to administer the 2005 Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery Program funding in the amount of$1,332,433.00- The Board approved executing a sub-recipient and interlocal agreement with the City of Port St. Lucie in order to administer the 2005 Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery Program funding in the amount $1,332,433.00 and authorized the Chairman to sign any necessary documents. D. Approval to execute a sub-recipient and interlocal agreement with the City of Ft. Pierce in order to administer the 2005 Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery Program funding in the amount of$I,332,433.00- The Board approved executing a sub-recipient and interlocal agreement with the City of Ft. Pierce in order to administer the 2005 Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery Program funding in the amount of$I,332,433.00 and authorized the Chairman to sign any necessary documents. 11. CENTRAL SERVICES Millennium Marble Tile, Inc.- Contract No. C06-1 0-675- Release of retainage. Project: Courthouse annex granite façade panels- Mechanically refasten dimensional stone utilizing new anchor system at lower panels (second phase)- The board approved the release of retainage in the amount of $18,780.70, to Millennium Marble Tile for the Courthouse Annex granite facade project, Contract No. C06-10-675. 12. SOLID WASTE Reduction of Retainage from 10% to 5% as per the Contract with ERC General Contracting Services, Inc., and approve Pay Request No.6 in the amount of $221 ,806.00- The Board approved the reduction of retainage from 10% to 5% as per the Contract with ERC General Contracting Services, Inc., and approved Pay Request No.6 in the amount of $221,806.00. REGULAR AGENDA 5.A No public hearings scheduled 6. COUNTY ATTORNEY Joint Site Agreement with St. Lucie County School Board- Relocation of Ft. Pierce Central High School- Consider staff recommendation to approve the Joint Site Agreement and authorized the Chairman to sign the Agreement It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Lewis, to approve the Joint Site Agreement with St. Lucie County School Board, and; upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. RA-l ADMINISTRA nON Port St. Lucie Ordinance No, 07-22- Consider staff recommendation to approve and send the attached letter to Mayor Christensen amending Ordinance No. 07-22 to limit the utility service area expansion from the current 5-mile extension to serve only the Allied Universal property on Rangeline Road. The County Attorney gave an update on the issue. He advised the Board the City of Port St. Lucie advised the County they did not wish to provide bulk service to the County for Allied Chemicals. The City of Port St. Lucie also indicated they were going to expand the utility boundaries 5 miles from the existing city limits, to the west of Rangeline Road and north of Midway Road. The County advised the City that in the County's opinion, the utility transfer agreement entered into in July of 1994 required the County's consent. 6 In addition, the County created a utility district under Florida Statute Chapter 153 where the city in their own presentation identified it requiring consent. The City approved the first reading of the ordinance at this point. The second reading is scheduled for March 12, 2007. The County has sent a letter to the City requesting they not adopt the Ordinance extending the utility boundary 5 miles west to Rangeline and north of Midway, but restrict it to Allied. The County Attorney advised the Board of their options including initiating a Conflict Resolution. As indicated in the letter to Mayor Christensen, it was suggested Allied be removed from the picture. Com. Grande stated he did not see the two alternatives indicted in the second page of the letter Com. Craft suggested the correction be made on the second page, first paragraph, it should read "City Council" not City Commission. Com. Lewis indicated the two alternatives may be what is being indicated on the first page. Com. Coward stated the term "case by case" basis was not acceptable to him and felt the county needed to pursue the bulk agreement further. He does not wish to create a competing utility and prefers to work with the City of Port St. Lucie in creating a bulk service agreement utilizing additional capacity they have that can be used in our service area by this bulk agreement however, the county would maintain control of area consistent with the land development approval process. If the City does not agree with this then Plan B would be, to set up development agreements with potential developers and pursue our own facility, but he would prefer not to do this. He opposes this language being in the letter. Com. Craft suggested having time to work this issue out with the city in an amicable way. The County Attorney recommended the following language first page second paragraph second to last and last line to read: "to consent to the City providing the County on a bulk basis utility services within the County's utility service area". Com. Craft requested this be limited to Allied and not talk about anything else. This would avoid getting lost. He would like to take Allied off the table. Com. Lewis stated she concurred with Com. Coward and she thought the original question was the bulk water. She is not wild about the "case by case" agreement and does think the concept of just Allied being served and taken off the table she would entertain this idea. Com. Craft requested they deal with the letter at this point. Com. Lewis stated she would like to have the "case by case" language deleted from the letter. Com. Grande stated concurred with this direction along with Allied being taken off the table. The County Attorney recommended also adding to the letter this is a unique case and but for our consent they could not provide the service. Only in this limited circumstance and no others and because we have a business who needs service and the city is in a position to provide services is the County consenting. Com. Smith stated he read the letter's second paragraph as stating the County would still need to consent. 7 The County Attorney stated the County does have the ability to provide service to this area. Com. Craft stated would prefer to leave other issues to the interlocal and not to the letter. The County Attorney recommended the following revisions to the letter per Board direction. 1) striking the sentence containing the term "customer by customer basis", paragraph 2 last sentence. 2) paragraph 3, after the words "we believe" insert "providing" and delete "that", continue with "utility service to the existing Allied Universal facility is a unique circumstance." We would therefore propose to the City that the County would agree to consent, in this limited circumstance under the GDU Agreement and the District Statue to the City providing utility service". The County Attorney also stated in the first paragraph page two "to change the term to City Council" rather than City Commission". It was the consensus of the Board to revise the letter addressed to the Mayor of the City of Port St. Lucie as recommended by the County Attorney. The Board had a brief discussion on utilities. The Chairman addressed the meeting held on Friday with regards to the voter referendum on property taxes and the sales tax. There being no further business to be brought before the Board, the meeting was adjourned. Chairman Clerk of Circuit Court 8 . J AGENDA REOUEST ITEM NO. ~ II DA TE: March 6, 2007 REGULAR [X] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Resolution No. 07-083 - Proclaiming March 13,2007, through March 19,2007, as "SURVEYORS' WEEK" in S1. Lucie County, Florida. BACKGROUND: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution No. 07-083 as drafted. COMMISSION ACTION: [~APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 4-0 Comm. Smith Absent CE: County Attorney: ~ Review and Approvals Management & Budget purchasing Originating Dept, Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable)___ Eff. 5/96 RESOLUTION NO. 07-083 A RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING MARCH 13, THROUGH MARCH 19, 2007, AS "SURVEYORS' IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA 2007, WEEK" WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. Since the colonial days of this Nation, surveyors have been influential citizens and leaders of our country, and the role of the surveyor has been, and remains, of vital importance to the development of our country. 2. George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and Abraham Lincoln, former Presidents of the united States, served their fellow man as surveyors. 3. The citizens of St. Lucie County, Florida, recognize the valuable contributions of the surveying profession to history, and quality of life in St. Lucie County, Florida, the State of Florida, and the United States of America; and make important decisions based on the knowledge and expertise of licensed surveyors and mappers. 4. The surveying profession requires a four-year degree, the knowledge of mathematics, the related physical and applied sciences, and requirements of law for evidence. 5. Surveyors are uniquely qualified and licensed to determine and describe land and water boundaries for the management of natural resources and protection of private and public property rights. 6. The continual advancements In instrumentation have required the surveyor not only to be able to understand and implement the methods of the past, but also to learn and employ modern technology in finding solutions to meet the challenges of the future. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: 1. This Board does hereby proclaim March 13, 2007, through March 19, 2007, as "SURVEYORS' WEEK" in St. Lucie County, Florida. 2. This Board does hereby recognize the many contributions and the continual dedication of surveyors to the citizens of St. Lucie County, the State of Florida, and the united States. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 6th day of March, 2007. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. /;IJ DATE: March 6, 2007 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [X ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Heather Sperrazza Lueke Assistant County Attorney SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 07-009 -Off Road Vehicles BACKGROUND: See CA No. 07-0179 FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION CONCLUSION: Staff recommends approval of proposed Ordinance No. 07-009. COMMISSION ACTION: CE: '[)(1 APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: ~ Approved 4-0 Comm. Smith Absent Do I M. Anderson County Administrator [X] County Attorney: [ ] Road & Bridge.: J}/ Review and Approvals ]Management & Budget: [ ]Purchasing: [ ) Parks & Recreation Director [ ] Solid Waste Mgr [ ]Finance:(check for copy only, if applicable) Effective 5/96 INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM COUNTY ATTORNEYS OFFICE ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM; Heather Sperrazza Lueke, Assistant County Attorney C.A. NO: 07-0179 DATE: March 6, 2007 SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 07-009 - Off Road Vehicles BACKGROUND: Driving, riding, and use of motorcycles, motor bikes, minibikes, dirt bikes, trail bikes, dune buggies, motor scooters, jeeps, or other forms of off-highway motor vehicles on public and private property within the unincorporated county is and can be the cause of noise and dust and of the destruction of plants, other ecological damage, and damage to landscaping and other personal and real property, which conduct adversely affects the comfort and privacy of the occupants and residents of the county. Because the conduct may be intermittent, fleeting, moving or caused by persons who are minors, the noise and public nuisance provisions of this code, as well as other legal remedies, are inadequate to control the conduct and its adverse effects. Based on the recommendation of the St. Lucie County Sheriff (see letter, attached), it is necessary to the public welfare to regulate the use of motorcycles, motor bikes, minibikes, dirt bikes, trail bikes, dune buggies, motor scooters, jeeps, or other forms of off-highway motor vehicles on public and private property. The purpose of this Ordinance is to exercise the general police power in order to protect the enjoyment and use of public and private property, to protect the rights of privacy, to preserve property and personal values, and to promote peace and quiet within the city by regulating the use of motorcycles, motor bikes, minibikes, dirt bikes, trail bikesJ dune buggies, motor scooters, jeeps, or other forms of off-highway motor vehicles on public and private property. This Ordinance would prohibit the use of off-highway motor vehicles on public property which is not held open for vehicular use and on private property where the operator does not have the written permission of the property owner. A violation of this Ordinance would result in a $100 fine. RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends approval of proposed Ordinance No. 07-009. Respectfully submitted, , I .. jJ\ ,rJ)/ ,/ /L/V~ if; 1 ~Jr L- Heather Sperrazza Lueke Assistant County Attorney HL/ cc: Adam M. Fettermanl General Counsell St. Lucie County Sheriff ORDINANCE NO. 07-009 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 1- 20, TRAFFIC, ST. LUCIE COUNTY CODE AND COMPILED LAWS, BY CREATING ARTICLE IV, OFF-ROAD VEHICLES: PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS: PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE: PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE: PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION; AND PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. Driving, riding, and use of motorcycles, motor bikes, minibikesl dirt bikesl trail bikes, dune buggies, motor scooters, jeeps, or other forms of off-highway motor vehicles on public and private property within the unincorporated county is and can be the cause of noise and dust and of the destruction of plants, other ecological damage, and damage to landscaping and other personal and real property, which conduct adversely affects the comfort and privacy of the occupants and residents of the county; and, 2. Because the conduct may be intermittent, fleeting, moving or caused by persons who are minors, the noise and public nuisance provisions of this code, as well as other legal remedies, are inadequate to control the conduct and its adverse effects; and, 3. Based on the recommendation of the St. Lucie County Sheriff, it is necessary to the public welfare to regulate the use of motorcycles, motor bikes, minibikes, dirt bikesl trail bikes, dune buggies, motor scooters, jeeps, or other forms of off-highway motor vehicles on public and private property; and, 4. The purpose of this Ordinance is to exercise the general police power in order to protect the enjoyment and use of public and private property, to protect the rights of privacy, to preserve property and personal values, and to promote peace and quiet within the city by regulating the use of motorcycles, motor bikes, minibikes, dirt bikes, trail bikes, dune buggies, motor scooters, jeeps, or other forms of off-highway motor vehicles on public and private property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Struck tkreugk passages are deleted. -1- Underlined passages are added. St. Lucie County, Florida: PART A. AMENDMENT OF CHAPTER 1- 20 (TRAFFIC) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES AND COMPILED LAWS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, TO CREATE ARTICLE IV, (OFF-ROAD VEHICLES). Chapter 1-20 (Traffic) of the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances and Compiled Laws is hereby amended to create Article IV (Off-Road Vehicles) to read as follows: ARTICLE IV. OFF-ROAD VEHICLES Section 1- 20- 62. Operation Regulated. (a) No person shall operate upon the private property of another or upon any public property which is not held open to the public for any vehicular use and which is not subject to the provision of the State Uniform Traffic Control Law. a motor vehicle. including a motorcycle. motor bike. minibikes. dirt bikes. trail bikes. dune buggies. motor scooters. jeeps. or other form of off-highway motor vehicle. (b) The provisions of this section shall not prohibit the operation of off-highway motor vehicles upon the property of another when the motor vehicles are: (1) Authorized emergency vehicles; (2) Used for ingress to and egress from. and parking upon. parking lots or structures open to the public or private parking lots; (3) Motor vehicles operated upon property used for a motor vehicle riding area which has received approval from the County and is being operated as a business; (4) The property of any governmental agency. including any motor vehicle riding facility operated by the County; (5) Upon the property of another when the operator has the written consent of the owner or person in lawful possession of the property; (6) Used by the owner of the land. the owner's family. employees. agents. or lessees; (7) Upon private property for ingress and egress only. Section 1-20-63. Prima Facie Violation. The operation of any motorcycle. motor bike minibikes. dirt bikes. trail bikes. dune buggies. motor scooters. jeeps. or other form of off-highway motor vehicle upon any vacant or unim~roved lands within the unincorporated county shall constitute a prima facie violation Strucl< thrðugR passages are deleted. -2- Underlined passages are added. of this Article. unless operator is able to exhibit signed written permission by the owner of the land for such use. Section 1-20-64. Liability of Parents of Children Under Eighteen Each parent of guardian of any child under the age of eighteen (18) years may be charged under this Article with having permitted a violation of this Article. Subsequent to receipt of a written warning from the Sheriff. each parent or. guardian so warned shall be assumed knowingly to have permitted any subsequent violation and shall be subject, upon conviction. to penalties identical to those provided for the violator for having permitted a violation of this Article. Section 1-20-65. Penalty PART B. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, and adopted prior to January 1, 1969, St. Lucie County ordinances and St. Lucie County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict. PART C. SEVERABILITY AND APPLICABILITY. If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance. If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person, property, or circumstance, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any person, property, or circumstance. PART D. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE. The Clerk is hereby directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of Administrative Code and Laws, Department of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida 32304. PART E. EFFECTIVE DATE. Struck threugh passages are deleted. -3- Underlined passages are added. This ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State. PART F. ADOPTION. After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows: Chairman Chris Craft Vice Chairman Joseph E. Smith Commissioner Paula A. Lewis Commissioner Charles Grande Commissioner Doug Coward xxx XXX XXX XXX XXX PART G. CODIFICATION. Provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated in the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County, Florida, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or other appropriate word, and the sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intention; provided, however, that Parts B through F shall not be codified. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this _day of ,2007. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: County Attorney Strud< threugh passages are deleted. -4- Underlined passages are added. . . Member National Sheriffs' Association Member Florida Sheriffs' Association Telephone: (772) 461-7300 · Fax: (772) 489-5851 Reply to: 772-462-3225 Fax: 772-462-3351 ~ 11 eriff KEN J. MASCARA 4700 West Midway Road, Fort Pierce, Florida 34981 ~ú C I E >- ¡... < '~ cO -:\11 "'" November 14, 2006 «~t~C El ~.f~·'.." ''''''~ i1f~~" I) - ; iI"í., (t- Dan McIntyre, Esq. 81. Lucie County Attorney 2300 Virginia Ave., 3rd Floor Fort Pierce, FL 34982 o NOV 1 E\ 1006 .> Q# ~~ Re: Recreational and Off-Road Vehicles. Dear Dan: I hope this letter finds you well as we head into what I am sure what will be a busy holiday season. I have been asked to contact you regarding a long-standing law enforcement problem we have faced in the county. As you may know, numerous ATV and off-road motorcycle riders use private property on a regular basis for their off-road riding pursuits. Unfortunately, this causes a number of law enforcement problems for us as well as noise and nuisance problems for the neighboring property owners. When we seek to enforce trespass laws on anyone particular parcel, they often move to another parcel. A County Ordinance to support our efforts in prohibiting the unauthorized use of private properties in this manner would greatly help us in enforcing the law, as well as in preserving the quality oflife that our law-abiding residents deserve to enjoy. I have enclosed for you a copy of Chapter 73 of the Port 81. Lucie City Code which deals specifically with this issue. The Sheriff has asked that you and the Board of County Commissioners consider promulgating such an Ordinance to govern the unincorporated areas of 81. Lucie County. As you can see, the Port 81. Lucie Ordinance does not in any way restrict a property owner's right to use his or her property in this manner, but rather prohibits the use by trespassers. I will be happy to assist pursuing this matter in anyway I can. Please let me know your and the Board's feeling on this so that I may report back to the Sheriff. 8~'.n....ce. ..' j¡;. /1 7 ....., . , . ,/ ,I , ,c' , It' ,.' J// cc: Mr. Doug Anderson Chief Deputy Garry Wilson Maj. Michael Monahan /cll ~.--,....,..,..<"....,.",,-~ CHAPTER 73: RECREATIONAL AND OFF-ROAD VEHICLES R«:re8.t:kJDJÚ Veb.k:les Definition Registration and inspection tag Use as a residence prohibited Parking O/f-Road Vebk:ks Findings and purpose Operation regulated Prima facie violation Liability of parents of children under eighteen Penalty ¡1!,'. ¡~¡~~;'.' RECREATIONAL VEHICLES lž£); t3m"D ~'~.J.'.~.,.' BFINmON. r~", t¡~pr the purpose of this subchapter the following ~~on shall . apply . unless the context clearly t;~~i~S or requITes a different meaning. ~RBOŒA.710NAL VEHICLE. Every licensed ~nd conveyance designed, used, or maintained 'b' as ~ travel trailer, motor home, camper, boat :' oat trailer, or other similar use. ~e, § 20-16)(Ord. 72-8, passed 7-11-72; Am. ',< - , passed 2-24-81) ';,.' ~ REGlSTRAnON AND INSPECTION TAG. A1I recre . :fati anonal vehicles shall bear a current state };yj~n and inspection tag. \~, ~ §2~;~~(Ord. 72-8, passed 7-11-72) I 73.03 USE AS A RESIDENCE PROHIBITED. No recreational vehicle shall, at any time, be used as a residence, temporarily or permanently. ('78 Code, § 20-17)(Ord. 72-8, passed 7-11-72; Am. Ord. 81-7, passed 2-24-81) Penalty, see § 73.99 I 73,04 PARKING. (A) Parking in designated areas. Recreational vehicles may be parked in designated areas which the city may designate from time to time. ('78 Code, § 20-19) (Ord. 72-8, passed 7-11-72) (B) Parking of recreational vehicles in residential district. No recreational vehicle shall be parked or stored in any residential area unless the vehicle is stored inside an enclosed garage or other structure, parked on a paved driveway or parked to the side or rear of the principal structure, provided the applicable lO-foot rear lot setback is maintained. ('78 Code, § 20-21) (Ord. 81-7, passed 2-24-81; Am. Ord. 85-106, passed 9-24-85; Am. Ord. 89-108, passed 10-23-89; Am. Ord. 93-67, passed 12-20-93) Penalty, see § 73.99 OFF-ROAD VEHICLES I 73.15 FINDINGS AND PURPOSE. (A) The City Council finds that the driving, riding, and use of motorcycles, motor bikes, minibikes, dirt bikes, trail bikes, dune buggies, motor scooters, jeeps, or other forms of off-highway motor vehicles on public and private property within the limits of the city is and can be the cause of noise and dust and of the destruction of plants, other ecological damage, and damage to landscaping and other personal and real property, which conduct adversely affects the comfort - ~ Z /'T' cn...¡ cn- -f =r- > ,.,.,,.,., ,C') .... ¡: .... ., := õ z en :~ 'r I ¡ :11" 11 Ilj i. HI ! ~ .1' . '.¡ I , " I I. '...J ,.' Ii r¡.¡lt.· I ¡ I :III, ¡Hi¡ I ! II i , . I., i 111: : 11/'¡' . I" III i i I.-I !¡í :::t ,.'\1.: I ¡ 'Ii ;'i!¡ :q. ,......'.. "I' ·:,1' j U ;¡j r~ i, f '! II! "I' ¡J, '. IU ~'W '.:¡'.( tl'i....,. . t~.. 1 ,". '?t ¡ ; § 73.17 PRIMA FACIE VIOLATION. 14 Port 51. Lucie . Traffic Code and privacy of occupants and residents of the city. Because the conduct may be intermittent, fleeting, moving, or caused by persons who are minors, the noise and public nuisance provisions of this code, as well as other legal remedies, are inadequ~te to control the conduct and its adverse effects. The provisions of this subchapter relating to the regulations of motorcycles, motor bikes, minibikes, dirt bikes, trail bikes, dune buggies, motor scooters, jeeps, or other forms of off-highway motor vehicles are therefore necessary for the public welfare. (B) The City Council declares that the purpose of this section is to exercise the general police power in order to protect the enjoyment and use of public and private property, to protect the rights of privacy, to preserve property and personal values, and to promote peace and quiet within the city by regulating the use of motorcycles, motor bikes, minibikes, dirt bikes, trail bikes, dune buggies, motor scooters, jeeps, or other forms of off-highway motor vehicles on public and private property within the city. ('78 Code, § 20-31)(Ord. 80-21, passed 6-24-80) f 73.16 OPERATION REGULATED. (A) No person shall operate upon the private property of another or upon any public property which is not held open to the public for any vehicular use and which is not subject to the provision of the State Uniform Traffic Control Law, a motor vehicle, including a motorcycle, motor bike, minibike, dirt bike, trail bike, dune buggy, motor scooter, jeep, or other form of off-highway motor vehicle. (B) The provisions of this section shall not prohibit the operation of off-highway motor vehicles upon the property of another when the motor vehicles are: (1) Authorizedemergency vehicles; (2) Used for ingress to and egress from, and parking upon, parking lots or structures open to the public or private parking lots; (3) Motor vehicles operated upon property used for a motor vehicle riding area which has received, a £p!.oV1!L!'!C?_fll.tþ':e.~!L~~~_~being operated as a business; ,. ",- .. (4) The property of any governmental agency, including any motor vehicle riding facility operated by the city; 'j. (5) Upon property of another and wh ¡; operator has the written consent of the owner or~" in lawful possession of the property;.,' (6) Used by the owner of the land h' his family, employees, agents, or lessees; (7) Upon private property for ingress egress only. ('78 Code, § 20-32)(Ord. 80-21, passed 6-24-80) Penalty, see § 73.99 The operation of any motorcycle, motor b~' minibike, dirt bike, trail bike, dune buggy, ma' scooter, jeep, or other form of off-highway motorve '~~ upon any vacant or unimproved lands within the' limits as described in § 73.16(A), shall constitute a pi' facie violation of this subchapter, unless the operatat able immediately to exhibit signed written permissio~~ the owner of the land for such use: "~, ('78 Code, § 20-33)(Ord. 80-21, passed 6-24-80) 'Ii Penalty, see § 73.99 ,".!:' ,~: ~:~J " f 73.18 LIABIIlTY OF PARENTS OF CHILD UNDER EIGHTEEN. ~~, ;~~f Each parent or guardian of any child under thek of 18 years may be charged under this subchapter wL having permitted a violation of this subchap: Subsequent to receipt of a written warning from,;: Chief of Police, each parent or guardian so warned s;; be assumed knowingly to have permitted any subseque" violation and shall be subject, upon conviction,,;@ penalties identical to those provided for the violator f~ having permitted a violation of this subchapter. ;1 ('78 Code, § 20-34)(Ord. 80-21, passed 6-24-80)\, Penalty, see § 73.99¡ '~ .~ ~~ § 73.99 PENALTY. (A) A person violating the provisions of §§ 73.0: through 73.04 shall be punished by a fine of $25, upÞ five days in jail, or both. Each day upon which any sue vióla:tióIlshall-6ct1ifshalrconstitute a separatc offe¡\S ('78 Code, § 20-22)(Ord. 81-7, passed 2-24-81) (B) Whoever shall violate the provisions of; Recreational and Off-Road Vehicles c".."..,;§§ ,73.15 thr,ougfi, ~ _7_3:~t,~,tS~all"~âP~~ _~?_~v~ct!fO~'TObOe, ,",' uniShed by a me no 0 exce... 'He sum 0 ~ . :~8 code, § 20-35)(Ord. 80-21, passed 6-24-80) I! : \ 15 ~. -··.."'-r-- ,CD ¡e:: , \'tn. 121 , ,r'" t -~= . - "'f"~ .:;ci)..... ;~... !~ :,6 '2 en "':G" ;:~ J'" ~: ì~ ~:.~. D!'.~" , i i ! : i ¡ ,'j I ''\ ~~.,~ i;~~: Agenda Request Item Number Date: 515 03/06/07 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ] [ X ] [ ] [ ] Quasi-J D [ To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Presented By ~;/. IÑf Growth Management Director Petition of Mercedes Homes for a 12-month extension of the date of expiration for the project known as Celebration Pointe PUD and a major adjustment to the conditions of approval for property located at the southeast comer of the intersection of Peterson Road and South Jenkins Road. - Draft Resolution No. 07-039. Growth Management SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: Mercedes Homes has requested a 12-month extension of the date of expiration and a major adjustment to the conditions of approval for the project known as Celebration Pointe. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: On February 20,2007, this Board continued the public hearing on this item until March 6, 2007, in order to allow the developer time to address several areas of concern in regard to the construction of the project. On May 15, 2005, this Board granted approval to Resolution 05-142, which corrected errors contained in Resolution 05-008, On January 18, 2005, this Board granted Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development approval and a Change in Zoning to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Celebration Pointe) Zoning District. At their November 18, 2004, meeting the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 6 to 1 (Mr. Hearn) with two members (Mr. Trias and Ms. Morgan) absent, recommended approval of the requested Preliminary Planned Unit Development Approval and a Change in Zoning to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Celebration Pointe) Zoning District. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the request as contained in Resolution No. 07-039. ~ COMMISSION ACTION: L..=J APPROVED c=J OTHER D DENIED RRENCE: CoordinationJ Signatures Mgt. & Budget: -l Environ. Res. Dept. Jt; Purchasing: Road and Bridge Div. County Attorney ~ Originating Dept.: ~ Finance: c.. I aJ(:;. M:f Approved 4-0 Comm. Smith Absent Motion to approve staff recommendation with additional language as stated by the County Attorney and Mr. Nix Crowth Management Director. 56 From: To: Date: Subject: Joseph Mule' Outlaw, Faye 3/5/20075:41 PM Fwd: Celebration Pointe cc: Anderson, Douglas; Burgess, Charline; Felton, Barbara; Lestrange, Ch... Faye, Here is a brief synopsis, from Code Enforcement Assistant Supervisor Shelly Prestridge, of what has been going on, not only at Celebration Point but also at Whispering Oaks and Bent Creek over the past two-plus weeks. Please be advised that there was no activity observed today, Monday 3/5, at either of the two sites within the County's jurisdiction, and we did not see any problems, nor receive any communication from the City of Fort Pierce indicating any Code violations at Bent Creek. Please know further that this Office will keep you and the Board apprised of any new developments, as they occur, on Code issues concerning these three construction sites, especially as they affect the neighboring residents. J' »> Anne Prestridge 3/5/2007 4:58 pm »> 2/16/07 I received a complaint that work was being started before 7:00 am. at Celebration Pointe. 2/20/2007 During my inspection at 6:35, I found several men cutting a concrete pipe and several dump trucks in line running while one was being loaded all before the 7:00 a.m. starting time. 2/20/07 Went out in the afternoon and could not find a foreman to speak with about the working hours. 2/21/07 Went out and no work was being done. I faxed a copy of the noise ordinance to Kevin and explained that he needed to comply with the ordinance. 2/23/07 The work hours were posted on-site at all of the entrances and the water truck was on-site. The only work being done was to Swain Rd. 3/1/07 I rec'd another complaint about work being done. Complainant was not sure which developer was doing the work. 3/2/07 1. Went out before 7:00 am and found a man moving a tractor at 6:52 in the morning at Celebration and told him that the job was shut down until further notice. 2. Also found work being done at Whispering Oaks on the East side but by the time I got done speaking with the gentleman from Celebration it was just after 7:00. I informed him (Whispering Oaks) that if he was caught again that I would have to shut his job down also. After coming into the office I e-mailed the findings to Joseph Mulé and Charlene Burgess and attached photos. 3. At approximately 11:30, I went out and posted the stop work orders on site at Celebration and also hand delivered one to Mr. Hutchinson at the office of Guettler and Sons. 4. At 12:00 I went and spoke with the Foreman at Whispering Oaks and he is aware of the ordinance and his guys are not to start work before 7:30 am._Also, Bent Creek was working full force and I called and reported that to the City of Ft. Pierce. 5. At 2:30 Joe Mulé, Ms. Outlaw and I did another site inspection of Celebration and there was no site work being done. Because of the high winds and dirt being kicked up. water had been sprayed onto the site nearest the complainant's property. The road work (under a separate permit), filling in the open hole, was completed. We spoke with the complainant's brother and tried to speak with the complainant but he was not home. E-mail addresses are public records under Florida Law and are not exempt from public-records requirements. If you do not want your e-mail address to be subject to being released pursuant to a public-records request do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing, via the United States Postal Service. Commission Review: March 6, 2007 GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: Bob Nix, AICP, Director of Growth Management FROM: Hank Flores, Planning Manager DATE: SUBJECT: February 27, 2007 Petition of Mercedes Homes for a 12-month extension of the date of expiration for the project known as Celebration Pointe PUD and a major adjustment to the conditions of approval. On February 20, 2007, this Board held a public hearing on the request of Mercedes Homes for a 12-month extension of the date of expiration of the approved Planned Unit Development known as Celebration Pointe - PUD, consisting of 755 units on 147.14 acres located at the southeast corner of the intersection of South Jenkins Road and Peterson Road and a Major Adjustment to the conditions of approval. The public hearing on this item was continued until March 6, 2007, in order to allow the developer time to address several areas of concern in regard to the construction of the project. These areas of concern have not been verified by staff at the time of the writing of this report. Among these concerns were the following: 1. Noise and dust created by the stockpile of excavated dirt on the property. There are several large piles of dirt on the subject property resulting from the construction of the retention ponds for the project. As a result of these piles, dust has been blowing on adjacent properties. Residents stated that they could not leave windows open without dust accumulating on and in their dwellings. They also complained about noise from the project. The applicant appeared before the Board and stated that approximately 200,000 cubic yards of material had been excavated for the retention ponds. This material has been stored on site. The applicant did not provide a time line on when the piles would be removed. 2. Working before the approved county hours of 7 AM. Residents of the area stated that that construction on the project had taken p1ace before 7 AM, the allowed start time for construction activities. Section 1-13.8-19(n) of the St. Lucie County Code and Compiled Laws states that if permits for construction were issued prior to December 6,2006, the permitted hours of construction are between 7:00 February 27,2007 Page 2 Subject: Celebration Pointe - PUD AM. and Sundown. If permits for construction were issued on or after December 6, 2006, the hours of operation are between 7:00 AM. and 6:00 P.M. on weekdays and 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on Saturday. Staff recommends that the following condition, which is consistent with other projects, be added to any 12-month extension: The hours of operation for construction activities shafl be limited to the time period from 7:00 A.M. to 5:30 P.M., Monday through Friday, 7:00 A.M. to 1:00 P.M. Saturday, and no work on Sundays. No construction shafl take place on Federal Holidays. The hours of operation restrictions do not apply to sales activities. The hours of operation shafl be clearly posted on the subject property in a conspicuous location for viewing by the public. 3. The Mishoes, owners of and adjacent property to the east and north of White Way Dairy Road, stated that the land clearing firm for the project was accessing the work site through their property. 4. Routing of on site drainage to adjacent property. Odell Tolson appeared before the Board and stated that the developer had placed a drainage pipe leading from the Celebration Pointe site to his property and that this pipe drains run-off onto his property. 5. Removal of a fence from adjacent property owners' land. The Mishoes also stated that there had been a fence located along their property line adjacent to their driveway. The boundary survey provided as a part of the review of the project indicates that a fence was located on the property line between the driveway portion of the Mishoe's property and the Celebration Pointe project. On February 26, 2007, Ron Harris, County Surveyor, contacted Richard LaVenture, surveyor of the project, and Mr. LaVenture confirmed that there was/is a fence located along this portion of the property. Survey Note #11 provided on the survey states that, "Ownership of fences is unknown". A fence was also indicated as being located within the boundary of the subject property adjacent to the Mishoes' property along the main area of their property. A copy of the survey is attached. 6. Height of the single-family homes adjacent to Peterson Road. Pat Langel appeared before the Board and stated that he believed that the homes located adjacent to Peterson Road were to be a maximum of one story in height. A review of the minutes of the Board's January 18, 2005, public hearing regarding the project confirms that the developer of the project stated that the homes along Peterson Road would be one story in height. However, the Board did not add that condition to the resolution approving the Celebration Pointe development. Should the Board wish to accept the applicant's offer, staff recommends adding the following condition of approval: Single-family homes proposed for location on the northern property limits of the subject property adjacent to Peterson Road shafl be limited to a maximum height of one-story. The Final Plat for the project shafl provide a note indicating that these homes shafl not exceed one story. A copy of the minutes supporting this condition is attached. February 27, 2007 Page 3 Subject: Celebration Pointe - PUD In the developer's original request, revisions and additions to the conditions of approval were sought. Staff supports the amendment of Condition #1 has revised to read as follows: 1. The developer shall convey to St. Lucie County, in manner and form acceptable to the County Attorney, 45 feet of additional right of way for Peterson Road along the North property line of the subject property. Twelve (12) months from the recording of this resolution or the recording of the Road Improvement Agreement, the developer shall construct Peterson Road to County specifications to include pedestrian and bicycle paths. The applicant has proposed revising Condition #3. Staff does not support the applicant's proposed revision of Condition #3 to read as follows: 3. No two adjoining single-family homes shall have the same front architectural elevation, Staff supports maintaining the original wording of Condition #3 so it will also apply to the new townhomes. The applicant would also like to add an eighth condition of approval to allow for the construction of Dry Models for the proposed project: Staff supports adding the proposed new condition to read as follows: 8. Pursuant to Section 11.03.01(C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the developer, his successors or assigns, shall be allowed a building permit for up to a maximum of four (4) residential units to be issued after approval of a Preliminary Record Plat and construction plans but before approval of a Final Plat. The following are staff recommendations for additional conditions of approval. A new Condition #9 is proposed should the Board choose to accept the offer made by the applicant at the public hearing on January 18, 2005, to limit the height of the homes in the area adjoining Peterson Road to one story (see attached minutes): 9. The single-family homes proposed for location on the northern property limits of the subject property adjacent to Peterson Road shall be limited to a maximum height of one-story. The Final Plat for the project shall provide a note that these homes shall not exceed one story. Should the Board wish to limit the hours of construction activity on the site, staff proposes the following condition, which is standard on all PUD's since the Board's latest action on the Waterstone project: 10. The hours of operation for construction activities shall be limited to the time period from 7:00 A.M. to 5:30 P.M., Monday through Friday, 7:00 A.M. to 1 :00 P.M. Saturday, and no work on Sundays. No construction shall take place on Federal Holidays. The hours of operation restrictions do not apply to sales activities. The hours of operation shall be clearly posted on the subject property in a conspicuous location for viewing by the public. Attached are two copies of Draft Resolution No. 07-039. The first resolution - Resolution 07- 039A - was included in the February 20, 2007, staff report and the second resolution - Resolution 07 -039B - is provided based upon staffs recommendations for additional conditions of approval. February 27, 2007 Page 4 Subject: Celebration Pointe - PUD Also attached to this staff report is a response from the developer's new attorney Cythia Angelos of Weiss, Handler, Angelos & Cornwell, PA. concerning the issues brought forward by the public at the February 20,2007, public hearing. Please let this office know if you have any questions on this matter. SUBMITTED: '&k!l.~ Bob Nix, AICP Growth Management Director cc: Anthony P. Guettler, Esq. - Weiss, Handler, Angelos & Cornwell, P.A. Robert Raynes, Jr., Esq - Gunster Yoakley Kevin Gillen - Mercedes Homes File (2-620) E. Growth Management- Consider Draft Resolution 05-008 granting Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Approval and change in zoning from RS-3 and RM- 5 to thc PIJ)- ('c!ehration Poinlc for properly loealed allhe soulhwesl corner orlhe inlerseclion or Norlh Jenkins Road ami Pclerson Road and (he condilions conlained therein. Mr, Bob Raines, attorney for the petitioner, addressed the Board. Com. Coward advised the Board and those present of his contact with Mr. Raines. Com. Lewis, Com. Hutchinson, Com. Smith and Com. Craft all acknowledged meeting with the representative. Com. Coward stated he would like to see this developer work with the other developers in the developmdll or PderRol1 Road and this has not heen addressed. Mr. TOllY l'vIaharis.'\Jnit.:d Ilomcs statcd (hl')' do no( have any prohlem in working with sl;lI1" ill eonslruelion or Ihe mad li'om Jenkins to (heir prollerty. Mr. Greg Boggs, Thomas Lucido & Associates, reviewed the projcct and advised the BO¡U'd the project docs not need 10 utilize White Way Dairy Road. Ms. Connie Meschue, 1401 Swaine Road, addressed the Board in opposition to the project. Mr. John Odom, 1611 Jenkins Road resident, addressed the Board regarding the project and stated he purchased property to protect himself from development and asked if the project could use a different area for their entrance. He would like for them to eliminate one of their southern entrances to their project. Mr. Pat Langel, area resident, addressed the Board and expressed her concern with the traffic the project would gei1erate. He lives at the northwest comer of the project and asked a lOft. wall be placed between himself and the project. MI.tardozza, President United Homes, addressed Mr. Langel's request and stated they proposed 1 story homes 111 the area. - .. Mr. TUllY M;lh;Iris. Ilniled I fOIIll'S slakdlhcy had adjllsted Iheir site pia II 10 have a 250 n. hlllli:r between their structure and Mr. Langel's home. Mr. Arden Rudd, lOll S. Jenkins Road resident, asked if a traffic signal would be installed at Jenkins and Peterson Road. Mr. John Donahue, LBF&H, the traffic engineers stated that the current level of service would not be exceeded. They did a signal warrant study at both Orange Avenue and Okeechobee Road. The reports came back both intersections would be functioning properly with this development. The traffie study did indicate that as you are traveling southbound on Jenkins, a left hand turn lane would be needed at both entrances and as you head northbound on Jenkins, a right turning lane would be necessary into the Southelll entrance of the development. It was l110ved hy <. '0111. Smith. s<:<:olllled hy <. ·om. <. 'ran, to approve Resolution No. 05·()OX, to include thc ¡¡ddition¡¡1 requests nmde ¡¡nd obligations thc Bo¡¡rd ¡¡sked li'om the developer reg¡mling Swain ¡¡nd Peterson Ro¡¡ds h¡¡ving minimum stand¡¡rds in place lor not only the ro¡¡dway but also for the pedestrian system (rclketing the agreel11ent whcre thc developer stated they would financially contrihute to Peterson Roml and ¡¡t the minimum. the construction for Peterson <111<\ Swain would not only be the ro¡¡dw¡¡y, hut the pcdestrian system also ). and; upon roll call, motion carried un¡¡nimously. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 RESOLUTION NO. 07-039A FILE NO.: BCC-12007956 A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR A 12-MONTH EXTENSION OF THE FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS CELEBRATION POINTE - PUD CONSISTING OF 318 SINGLE- FAMILY LOTS, 292 SINGLE-STORY VILLAS, AND 145 TWO- STORY TOWNHOUSES FOR A TOTAL OF 755 UNITS FOR 147.14 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF SOUTH JENKINS ROAD AND PETERSON ROAD WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. On January 18, 2005, this Board, through Resolution 05-008, granted Final Planned Unit Development approval for the project known as Celebration Pointe - PUD, a proposed 755 unit project consisting of 318 single-family lots, 292 single-story villas, and 145 two- story townhouses on 147.14 acres of property located at the southeast corner of the intersection of South Jenkins Road and Peterson Road. 2. The developer of Celebration Pointe - PUD has requested that the 12-month extension of the Final Planned Unit Development through Resolution No. 05-008, be extended for a period of 12 additional months from its date of scheduled expiration, January 18, 2007, with the new date of expiration being January 18, 2008. 3. The developer of Celebration Pointe - PUD has requested revisions to the conditions of approval and the addition of one condition. 4. On February 20,2007, the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing, of which due public notice was published and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet at least 10 days prior to the hearing. That meeting was continued to the March 6, 2007, Board of County Commissioners meeting. 5. On March 6,2007, the public hearing on this item was heard. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. Pursuant to Section 11.02.06(B)(2) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the Planned Unit Development, approved through Resolution 05-008, is hereby extended for a File No.: BCC-12007956 March 6, 2007 Resolution No. 07-039 Page 1 1 period of 12 additional months from its scheduled date of expiration, January 18, 2007, with 2 the new expiration date being January 18, 2008, for the property described as follows: 3 4 THE NORTH 3/4 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 35 5 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, LESS AND EXCEPT THE WEST 40 FEET FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF- 6 WAY AND LESS AND EXCEPT ROAD AND CANAL RIGHTS-OF-WAY. 7 8 TOGETHER WITH 9 10 THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, LESS WEST 40 11 FEET, FOR ROAD RIGHT OF WAY AND LESS THE CANAL RIGHT OF WAY, 12 13 TOGETHER WITH 14 15 THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF NORTHWEST 1/4, LESS CANAL RIGHT OF 16 WAY AND THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF NORTHWEST 1/4, LESS THE EAST 17 40 FEET AND LESS CANAL RIGHT OF WAY, AND THE NORTH 3/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 18 OF NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND THE NORTH 3/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 19 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, LESS THE NORTH 30 FEET OF THE 20 EAST 5 FEET, 21 22 TOGETHER WITH 23 24 THE SOUTH 1/4 OF NORTHWEST 1/4 OF NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND THE 25 SOUTH 1/4 OF NORTHEAST 1/4 OF NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND THE 26 SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, LESS 330.52 FEET, AND 27 LESS THE TRACT 143 FEET X 207.28 FEET, AND THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE 28 NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, LESS SOUTH 330.52 FEET, AND LESS THE 29 ROAD RIGHT OF WAY, 30 31 TOGETHER WITH 32 33 THE EAST 1/2 OF NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE 34 SOUTHEAST 1/4 LYING WEST OF CANAL 29, LESS ROAD RIGHT OF WAY. 35 36 TOGETHER WITH 37 38 THE SOUTH 330.52 FEET OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4, 39 LESS NORTH 97.32 FEET, OF THE WEST 143 FEET, OF THE EAST 163 FEET AND THE 40 SOUTH 330.52 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE 41 SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND THE NORTH 1/4 OF NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF 42 SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND THE NORTH 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 43 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, LESS THE ROAD RIGHT OF WAY. 44 45 ALL LYING IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, 46 FLORIDA. 47 File No.: BCC-12007956 March 6, 2007 Resolution No. 07-039 Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 (Tax Identification Numbers: 2418-221-0001-000-5; 2418-233-0001-000-2; 2418-234-0001- 000-5; 2418-312-0001-000-4; 2418-313-0003-000-1; and 2418-311-0002-000-8) (Location: Southeast corner of the intersection of South Jenkins Road and Peterson Road) B. Condition #1 cited within the resolution has been revised as follows: 1. The developer shall convey to 81. Lucie County, in manner and form acceptable to the County Attorney, 45 feet of additional right of way for Peterson Road along the North property line of the subject property. Twelve (12) months from the recording of this resolution or the recording of the Road Improvement Agreement, the developer shall construct Peterson Road to County specifications to include pedestrian and bicycle paths. C. Condition #3 cited within the resolution has been revised as follows: 3. No two adjoining single-family homes shall have the same front architectural elevation. D. Additional Conditions #8, 9, and 10 read as follows: 8. Pursuant to Section 11.03.01 (C) of the 81. Lucie County Land Development Code, the developer, his successors or assigns, shall be allowed a building permit for up to a maximum of four (4) residential units to be issued after approval of a Preliminary Record Plat and construction plans but before approval of a Final Plat E. This Final Planned Unit Development extension shall expire on January 18, 2008, unless building permits are issued or another extension has been granted in accordance with Section 11.02.06, S1. Lucie County Land Development Code. F. The Certificate of Capacity granted by the Growth Management Director shall remain valid until January 18, 2008. G. The S1. Lucie County Growth Management Director is hereby authorized and directed to cause the notation of this resolution to be made on the Official Zoning Map of S1. Lucie County, Florida, and to make notation of reference to the date of adoption ofthis resolution. H. A copy of this resolution shall be placed on file with the S1. Lucie County Growth Management Director. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Chris Craft xxx Vice-Chairman Joseph E. Smith xxx File No.: BCC-12007956 March 6, 2007 Resolution No. 07-039 Page 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 Commissioner Paula A. Lewis xxx Commissioner Doug Coward xxx Commissioner Charles Grande xxx PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 20th Day of February 2007. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS S1. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS Deputy Clerk County Attorney hf H:\WORD\Petitions\BCC\Finished2007\CelebrationPointeEXT -RES2.doc File No.: BCC-12007956 March 6, 2007 Resolution No. 07-039 Page 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 RESOLUTION NO. 07-0398 FILE NO.: BCC-12007956 A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR A 12-MONTH EXTENSION OF THE FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS CELEBRATION POINTE - PUD CONSISTING OF 318 SINGLE- FAMILY LOTS, 292 SINGLE-STORY VILLAS, AND 145 TWO- STORY TOWNHOUSES FORA TOTAL OF 755 UNITS FOR 147.14 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF SOUTH JENKINS ROAD AND PETERSON ROAD WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. On January 18, 2005, this Board, through Resolution 05-008, granted Final Planned Unit Development approval for the project known as Celebration Pointe - PUD, a proposed 755 unit project consisting of 318 single-family lots, 292 single-story villas, and 145 two- story townhouses on 147.14 acres of property located at the southeast corner of the intersection of South Jenkins Road and Peterson Road. 2. The developer of Celebration Pointe - PUD has requested that the 12-month extension of the Final Planned Unit Development through Resolution No. 05-008, be extended for a period of 12 additional months from its date of scheduled expiration, January 18, 2007, with the new date of expiration being January 18, 2008. 3. The developer of Celebration Pointe - PUD has requested revisions to the conditions of approval and the addition of one condition. 4. On February 20,2007, the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing, of which due public notice was published and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet at least 10 days prior to the hearing. That meeting was continued to the March 6, 2007, Board of County Commissioners meeting. 5. On March 6,2007, the public hearing on this item was heard. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. Pursuant to Section 11.02.06(B)(2) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the Planned Unit Development, approved through Resolution 05-008, is hereby extended for a File No.: BCC-12007956 March 6, 2007 Resolution No. 07-039 Page 1 1 period of 12 additional months from its scheduled date of expiration, January 18, 2007, with 2 the new expiration date being January 18, 2008, for the property described as follows: 3 4 THE NORTH 3/4 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 35 5 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, LESS AND EXCEPT THE WEST 40 FEET FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF- 6 WAY AND LESS AND EXCEPT ROAD AND CANAL RIGHTS-OF-WAY. 7 8 TOGETHER WITH 9 10 THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, LESS WEST 40 11 FEET, FOR ROAD RIGHT OF WAY AND LESS THE CANAL RIGHT OF WAY, 12 13 TOGETHER WITH 14 15 THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF NORTHWEST 1/4, LESS CANAL RIGHT OF 16 WAY AND THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF NORTHWEST 1/4, LESS THE EAST 17 40 FEET AND LESS CANAL RIGHT OF WAY, AND THE NORTH 3/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 18 OF NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND THE NORTH 3/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 19 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, LESS THE NORTH 30 FEET OF THE 20 EAST 5 FEET, 21 22 TOGETHER WITH 23 24 THE SOUTH 1/4 OF NORTHWEST 1/4 OF NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND THE 25 SOUTH 1/4 OF NORTHEAST 1/4 OF NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND THE 26 SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, LESS 330.52 FEET, AND 27 LESS THE TRACT 143 FEET X 207.28 FEET, AND THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE 28 NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, LESS SOUTH 330.52 FEET, AND LESS THE 29 ROAD RIGHT OF WAY, 30 31 TOGETHER WITH 32 33 THE EAST 1/2 OF NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE 34 SOUTHEAST 1/4 LYING WEST OF CANAL 29, LESS ROAD RIGHT OF WAY. 35 36 TOGETHER WITH 37 38 THE SOUTH 330.52 FEET OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4, 39 LESS NORTH 97.32 FEET, OF THE WEST 143 FEET, OF THE EAST 163 FEET AND THE 40 SOUTH 330.52 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE 41 SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND THE NORTH 1/4 OF NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF 42 SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND THE NORTH 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 43 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, LESS THE ROAD RIGHT OF WAY. 44 45 ALL LYING IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, 46 FLORIDA. 47 File No.: BCC-12007956 March 6, 2007 Resolution No. 07-039 Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 B. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 C. 17 18 19 20 21 D. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 E. 39 40 41 42 F. 43 44 45 G. 46 47 48 49 (Tax Identification Numbers: 2418-221-0001-000-5; 2418-233-0001-000-2; 2418-234-0001- 000-5; 2418-312-0001-000-4; 2418-313-0003-000-1; and 2418-311-0002-000-8) (Location: Southeast corner of the intersection of South Jenkins Road and Peterson Road) Condition #1 cited within the resolution has been revised as follows: 1. The developer shall convey to St. Lucie County, in manner and form acceptable to the County Attorney, 45 feet of additional right of way for Peterson Road along the North property line of the subject property. Twelve (12) months from the recording of this resolution or the recording of the Road Improvement Agreement, the developer shall construct Peterson Road to County specifications to include pedestrian and bicycle paths, Condition #3 cited within the resolution has been revised as follows: 3. No two adjoining single-family homes shall have the same front architectural elevation. Additional Conditions #8, 9, and 10 read as follows: 8. Pursuant to Section 11.03,01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the developer, his successors or assigns, shall be allowed a building permit for up to a maximum of four (4) residential units to be issued after approval of a Preliminary Record Plat and construction plans but before approval of a Final Plat. 9. The single-family homes proposed for location on the northern property limits ofthe subject property adjacent to Peterson Road shall be limited to a maximum height of one-story. The Final Plat for the project shall provide a note that these homes shall not exceed one story. 10. The hours of operation for construction activities shall be limited to the time period from 7:00 A.M, to 5:30 P.M., Monday through Friday, 7:00 A.M. to 1 :00 P.M. Saturday, and no work on Sundays. No construction shall take place on Federal Holidays. The hours of operation restrictions do not apply to sales activities. The hours of operation shall be clearly posted on the subject property in a conspicuous location for viewing by the public. This Final Planned Unit Development extension shall expire on January 18, 2008, unless building permits are issued or another extension has been granted in accordance with Section 11.02.06, St. Lucie County Land Development Code. The Certificate of Capacity granted by the Growth Management Director shall remain valid until January 18, 2008. The St. Lucie County Growth Management Director is hereby authorized and directed to cause the notation of this resolution to be made on the Official Zoning Map of St. Lucie County, Florida, and to make notation of reference to the date of adoption of this resolution. File No.: BCC-12007956 March 6, 2007 Resolution No. 07-039 Page 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 H. A copy of this resolution shall be placed on file with the St. Lucie County Growth Management Director. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Chris Craft xxx Vice-Chairman Joseph E. Smith xxx Commissioner Paula A. Lewis xxx Commissioner Doug Coward xxx Commissioner Charles Grande xxx PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 20th Day of February 2007. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS Deputy Clerk County Attorney hf H :\WORD\Petitions\8CC\Finished2007\CelebrationPointeEXT -RES2.doc File No.: BCC-12007956 March 6, 2007 Resolution No. 07-039 Page 4 m Mercedes HOMES Febmary 28, 2007 Mr. Hank Flores Senior Planner St Lucie County Growth Management 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Re: Celebration Pointe Dear Mr. Flores: Please accept this letter confirming that we have engaged Wiess, Handler, Angelos & Cornwell, P A to represent us regarding the Site Plan Extension Request and all other matters regarding Celebration Pointe project. Please copy all future correspondence regarding this project to Ms. Cynthia Angelos, Wiess, Handler, Angelos & Cornwell, P A, 10521 SW Village Center Drive, Port St. Lucie, FL 34987. If you have any questions or need additional information, please don't hesitate to call. ¡¿'relY'/J~ KevÌ1~~ Mercedes Homes Vice President of Land Acquisition And development Cc: Faye Outlaw tTreasure Coast Vivision 3585 S. fJiV, Corporate parR:way . PaCm City, PCoriáa 34990 œ/ione (772) 286-9090 . PaJ((772) 287-6221 WEISS. HANDLER. ANGELOS & GORNWELL. :RA. CYNTHIA G. ANGELOS.... STEPHANIE S., COLLISON' 't' WILLIAM ..I, CORNWELL"''' DAVID K. FRIEDMAN ROBERT BLAIR GOLDMAN ANTHONY P. GUETTL.ER HENRY B. HANDLER CAROL A. KARTAGENER+ ANNETTE ..I. SZOROSY HOWARD I, WEISS"'''''' NORMA ECHARTE WIENER ATTORNEYS AT LAW 10521 SW VILLAGE CENTER DRIVE SUITE 101 PORT ST. LUCIE, FL 34987 PORT ST, LuCII!: (772) 345-5297 (LAWS) FAX (772) 345-5296 WWW.WEISSANDHANDL.ER.COM E-MAlLCANaELOS@WHACLAWS.COM BOCA RATON OFFICE ONE BOCA PLACE 2255 GLADES ROAD SUITE 216A SOCA MTON, FL.ORIDA 33431 BOCA RATON (561) 997-9995 PALM BEACH (561) 734-8008 OF COUNSEL. RAOUL LIONEL FELDER + HARRY WINDERMAN ... FL. VA BARS *... FL. GA BARS ""*FL, NY BARS . ADMITTED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA +,J':!Y BAR. NOT ADMITTED IN FL ~ BOARD CERTIFIED MARITAL & FAMILY LAW 't' CERTIFIED CIRCUIT CIVIL MEDIATOR February 28, 2007 .-,'. ¡. ~ ç VIA EMAIL ONLY Hank Flores Senior Planner, Department of Growth Management St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982 Re: Celebration Point PUD ("Development") - Request for One Year Site Plan Extension Response to your email of February 28, 2007 Dear Mr. Flores: We are in receipt of the above referenced email, the draft Resolution, and the draft Memorandum to the Board of County Commissioners ("Board") dated February 27, 2007. After reviewing draft Resolution No. 07-039 ("Resolution"), we strongly object to the additional conditions proposed by staff; specifically, condition #9 and condition #10. These additional conditions were added to the Resolution as a direct result of public comments and individual opinions expressed at the Board meeting of February 20,2007, and not as a result of any direct action of the Board. In addition, said comments and opinions have not been confmned by County staff and should not be added to the Resolution as a condition of approval unless directed by the Board at the public hearing after the applicant has had an opportunity to present the facts. Additionàlly, said conditions are inconsistent with our recent meetings with the neighbors and inconsistent with the St. Lucie County Land Development Regulations. Hank Flores Senior Planner, Department of Growth Management S1. Lucie County February 28, 2007 Page 2 After reviewing the draft Memorandum, we request that the following be added as attachments thereto: (1) the Memorandum from Kevin Gillen to Faye Outlaw dated February 27, 2007; (2) the survey of the Tolson property, certified by Scott J. Morgan Inc. dated February 27, 2007, which shows that Development is not draining onto the Tplson property, and (3) the entire minutes from the January 18, 2005 meeting of the BoQtd. Said attachments have been enclosed herewith. Additionally, we respectfully request that staff clarify that the "areas of concern" raised at the February 20, 2007 Board meeting have not been verified or confirmed by County staff Very truly yours, '-'~ !;"..:,¡. " APG/kld enclosure(s) cc: Robert Nix, Director of Growth Management Faye Outlaw, Assistant Client S:\CLlENTS\MERCEDES HOMES INC\MISC MATIERS\CELEBRA TION POINTE\L-PLORES-1.doc Memorandum To: Faye Outlaw, Asst County Administrator CC: Cynthia Angelos From: Kevin Gillen Date: February 27, 2007 Re: Update Celebration Pointe Development Per our phone conversation yesterday, below is a brief outline of our progress addressing surrounding neighbors concerns raised in the February 20, 2007 Board of County Commission meeting. · Immediately after the public meeting, and hearing some of the concerns raised by the neighbors, many for the fIrst time, I met with some of the neighbors in the hallway, passed out my business card and offered to meet them on site Friday February 23rd at 2:30 pm. · We reviewed the meeting video and documented every issue and concerns raised by our neighbors. · We called and chased off contractors showing up to work during the county mandated 2 day shutdown. "., ~ · We posted 3 temporary "Work Hours" signs, plus passed out the noise ordinance to our contractors and posted a copy in our on-site office. · We met with our contractor to address each and every concern raised. Mr Mishoe (Cell Phone tower property) I have had two phone conversations with Mr. Mishoe since the meeting, plus sent the attached letter. On the phone prior to sending the letter, I have asked Mr. Mishoe what can we do to resolve his concerns. Based on my last discussion with him on Friday, he said he will not be satisfied until we are shut down. He has not indicated to me what we can do to resolve his concerns. but suggested it would take a tri-Partv agreement between Mercedes. our contractor and the COWlty. but provided no details. Based on his comments in the public meeting and his concerns that we tore down his fence and gate and are accessing our property through his property, we have instructed our contractor to stop using that access Wltil we can survey and determine where the canal February 28,2007 property stops and his property starts. In addition, we have asked our surveyor to provide the original location of the fence. Finally, in his public comment he added as matter of public record that ... his wife pays $4000 per year in property taxes?? Mr. Tou1son (Swain Road) After the meeting Tuesday, I have talked with Mr. Toulson three times. What seemed to be his biggest concern was Mercedes agreeing to provide and pay for the hook up of his utilities. In addition, he expressed concern over the drainage pipe in the berm behind his property and the timing of building the wall around the three homes. Our surveyor verified that the pipe slopes away from his property and was installed to drain water ftom his property to our property. We discussed the perimeter wall and the plan that he referred to at the meeting as agreed to by the 3 homeowners and Mercedes. One of the three homeowners has since rejected that plan, which leaves us back with the original plan that was depicted on the site plan at Site Plan Approval meeting, which is berm with an 8' high wall. I have explained the timing of the wall.. that until Swain r9ad is complete we don't have a drainage system to move any surface water from the rear of the three homes. Once the drainage is complete on Swain can we grade a swale between the berm and the owner's properties to move the water and then build the wall. Swain Road improvement should be complete within the next 30 days. We should be able to apply for the wan permit soon. In addition, we are reviewing and discussion with Mr Toulson the commitments made to him by United Homes. On the first day of the imposed shut down, I ran into Mr. Toulson onsite and we both witnessed another project working (dwnp truck hauling dirt) prior to 7:00 am and he suggested that the other project was what the other neighbors were hearing early in the morning and not ours. Pat Langel. Chris Langel. Tom Gladwin. and Arden Rudd An had similar concerns of 1) noise (starting too early) and dust, Wayne Hall (of Mercedes), our contactor and I met with Pat Langel, Chris Langel, Arden Rudd and Tom Gladwin. We gave them an overview of our siteplan and pointed out the fact that we are one of five active development projects nearby. We pointed out that during our 2 day shut down, we noticed at least 2 other projects were working prior to 7:00 am, although we do not know their permitted work hours. The neighbors realize that they have had problems with some of the other surrounding projects' work hours and windblown dirt/dust. In addition, The Langels and Mr. Gladwin indicated that United Homes hàd agreed to limit certain homes along the northern property line to single story homes. They want to us to agree to honor the same limitation. Weare meeting with each one of the above again to address their specific concerns. These meetings are currently scheduled for Wednesday and Thursday this week. February 28, 2007 At our meeting on Friday, we offered to be on site every Friday from 11 :00 am to appro x 1:00 pm to be available to address any neighbors concerns. We plan on mailing out a letter to all surrounding neighbors to offer the same to help all parties open the lines of communication. We hope we can avoid a similar situation as we encountered at the Feb 20th meeting where we had to hear our neighbor complaints for the first time at a public meeting. Faye, I apologize in missed something in the above, but I had to put this together very quickly. Hope this helps. Please call if I can be of any further assistance. WEISS. HANDLER. ANGELOS & GORNWELL. ~A BOCA RATON OFFICE ONE BOCA PLACE 2255 GLADES RO.40 SUm!: 218A , BOCA I'tATON, P'LOAlDA 33431 SOCA RATON (5151> 997-QQQ5 PALM "~H (561) 734-8008 CYNTHIA G. ANGELOS·' STEPHANIE S. COLUSON·... WILLIAM oJ. CORNWELl.· * DAVID K. J"RIEOMAN ROBERT BLAIR (J()I.I)MNI ANTHONY P. OUIt'lTL!!R HENRY B. HANDLER CAROL A. KARTAGEH&:R+ ANNItTTE oJ. SZCAOSY HO~D I. ~SS··· NORMA I!:CHAATE WI!!N!!R A1TOftNIt'fS AT LAW 10521 SW VILLAGE CENTER DRIVE SUITE 101 PORT ST. LUCIE, F'L 34987 PoftT ST. wCllt (772) 345-52g7 (LAWS) ~ (772) 34SoS2ge WWW.WElSSANDHANDLEA.CCM E-MAIL CANOÐ.A)S@o.yHAcU.WS.COM 01' cOUNSEL RAOUL. UONEL FELDER + foU\RRY WlNDERMAN * FL. VA BARS * * FL., GA BARS '·'FL, NY' BARS . -'OMITTED UN~ STATItS DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERI'f DISTRICT O~ FLDRICA + NY BAR, NOT ADMITTED IN FL .. BOARD CERTIFIED MARITAL Z5. FAMILY LAW ... CERTIFIED CIRCUIT CIVIL MÐ)IATOR Februaty 23, 2007 VIA OVERNIGHT MAIL Monte Mishoe ,3 ~ 71 East Quail Ct In:v.emess FL 34452 Re: Celebration Point PUD ("Property") Dear Mr. Mishoe: We represent Mercedes Homes Inc. ("Mercedesj with regards to the above referenced Property. In order to address your conœms raised at the February 20, 2007 meeting of the St. Lucie County Board of County CommisSiOners" regarding Celebration Point, Mercedes bas stopped all access to the Property via Whit.eway Dairy Road until we can address your concerns. In addition, Mercedes hereby r&-affirms their previous offer to replace the fence referenced at the above Board meeting and rebuild said fence on the property line. Also, in order that we may fWly address your conccms, please send us a copy of the survey you referenced at the above BCìát.d meeting which identifies the original location of the ren"c and the property line; Mercedes wm reimburse you for any copy costs inCUITed in copying the surveyor mailing such survey to our office address above. As you aware the next Board meeting is March. 6, 2007; as such, please contact us regarding these issues at your earliest possible convenience. I I I ! I I I I ¡ ì ¡ , ¡ f I I I I I ¡ I I i I ¡ I I j ¡ I ¡ I I ! I ! ¡ 1 ¡ t, Monte Mishoe 3171 East Quail Ct Inverness FL 34452 February 23, 2007 Page 2 Very truly yours, WEISS, HANDLER, ANGELOS &CO ,P.A. ANTHONY P. GUETILER For the Fmn S:\CUENTS\MERCBDBS HOMES INC\MISC MATI'HRSlL-MlSHOE-I.cIoc I I ¡ ¡ ! ! ¡ ¡ j i i ¡ I I ¡ ¡ ¡ f f j SURVEYOR'S NOTES: 1. ELEVATIONS SHOVtN HERfON REFERENCE NATIONAL GEODETIC I/ERTlCAl DATUM 1929 (NGW 29), 2. LOT LINES SHOWN HEREON ARE PER ONSlTE CONSlHUCTlON PLANS fOR CELEBRATION POINTE. SCALE 1"=40' t { WH/IEWAYDAI!!YROAD J Þ~l W f-- ~ < o Q CL ..r ~ ZW~ OC/)z ¡:: « ::> « :r: 8 a::: Q.w CD õ w 3 ---I ,.: W '" ~ PARCEL 10: 2418-313-0002-000-4 Q C§I~ n::~ '" ~b ~~ (/) ~ J PARCEL 10: 241e-JIJ-0004-000-8 I.EW'iO;.. LB LICENSED BUSINESS LS LICENSED SURVEYOR R/W mGHT-Of-WAY INV INVERT <l CENTERLINE SPECIAL PURPOSE SURVEY PURPOSF Of SURVEY' TO SHOW THREE 4" PVC PIPES WITH THEIR INI/ERT ElEVATIONS REFlECTING DIRECTION Of FlOW fOR EACH PIPE SHOVlI'I. SKE"" NO.: . CelebraUon Painte SWAIN BERM.dwg NOT VALID "'lHOUT lH. SIGNA NIlE NO) CIIIG1IW. RAISED KAL or A FLORtOA tJCENSa) SUA'Æ'I'OR AND NAPPER. CERTIFICATION' I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SKETCH SHOWN HEREOi'! IS A CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY DONE UNDER MY DIRECTION AND IS lHUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST Of' MY KNO'M.ECOE AND BELIEF. NO SEARCH Of' THE PUBLIC RECORDS MADE fOR ERRORS OR OUISSlONS Of SAID DESCRIPTION, EASEMENTS Of RECORD NOT SHOI'oN UNLESS ·FURNISHED. I fURTHER CERTIfY THAT THIS SURVEY MEETS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS SET FORTH IN RULE 61017-6 f.A.C. BY THE FLORIDA B(;ARD OF SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY. \d Scott J. Morgan, Inc. Professional Surveying & Mapping 1484 NE Oak lone Dr. Jensen Beach. Fl 34957 Phone: (772) 260-1536 fox: (712) 334-5018 OA1& "" SX£1I:II: 02/27/07 "ElD WR'ÆY VA1t. 08/26/07 FIno 1I0OI<: CP, PACE 37 PLAT IIOOtCI . PACE SCALE: 1" = 40' ".0." 2006003 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING Date: January 18, 2005 p.m. Tape: 1-5 p.m. Convened: 6:00 Adjourned: 11 :35 Commissioners Present: Chairperson, Frannie Hutchinson, Paula A. Lewis, Doug Coward, Chris Craft, Joseph Smith Others Present: Doug Anderson , County Administrator, Ray Wazny, Asst. County Administrator, Fay Outlaw, Asst. County Administrator, Dan McIntyre, County Attorney, Don West, Public Works Director, Randy Stevenson, Asst. Growth Management Director, Paul Phillips, Airport Director, Roger Shinn, Central Services Director, Ed Cox, Growth Management Director, Millie Delgado-Feliciano, Deputy Clerk 1. MINUTES (1-027) It was moved by Com. Smith, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve the minutes of the meeting held January 11, 2005; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 2. PROCLAMATIONSIPRESENTATION The County Administrator read upcoming events and schedule meetings. 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS (1-1119) Mr. Chris Humphreys, area resident, addressed the Board regarding the loud music coming the Skatetown. Com. Smith addressed the issue after visiting the home of Mr. Humphrey. He stated it ' was an issue ofloud base noise being heard and felt by Mr. Humphrey. The County Attorney reviewed the history of the noise ordinance. The revised ordinance sets standards at decibel levels as well as vibration levels. Mr. Humphrey stated the existing noise ordinance is not working as it should. 1 The County Attorney stated he would review the standards and also review the standards of the surrounding counties and get back to the Board with the results. Mr. Paul Schall, Ft. Pierce resident, addressed the Board in support of the Indian River Drive restoration project. Mr. John Arena, Ft. Pierce resident, commented on the televising of the BCC meetings and asked why the meetings are not broadcasted as often when they have long discussions on development issues. 4. CONSENT AGENDA (1-600) It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Lewis, to approve the Consent Agenda; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 1. WARRANT LIST The Board approved Warrant List No. 16. 2. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Lennard Road MSBU- Permanent Drainage Easement- Patti Joyce Kane -Resolution No. 05-034 Accepting Pennanent Drainage Easement- The Board approved Resolution No. 05-034. B. Resolution No. 05-035 Extending the State of Emergency for Hurricane Frances; and Resolution 05-036 Hurricane Jeanne- The Board approved Resolution Nos. 05-035 and 05-036. 3. AIRPORT A. Award Bid 05-008- to Commercial Fence Contractors Inc. ,for fencing at the St. Lucie County International Airport- The Board approved awarding bid 05-008 to Commercial Fence Contractors in the amount of $123,957.92. B. Award Bid 05-008 to instaIl perimeter fencing at the Lucie County International Airport- The Board approved awarding bid 05-008 for the installation of fencing to Commercial Fence Contractors in the amount of $159,322.92. 4. SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT Permission to apply for FDLFlAlcohol Testing Program- Intoxilyzer 8000- Phase III grant- The Board approved the request to apply for the FDLE Intoxilyzer 8000 Phase III grant and authorized the Chairperson to sign the required grant applications documents. 5. GROWlH MANAGEMENT 2 Request of Packers of Indian River for:final plat approval for the project to be known as Packers of Indian River Replat one- The Board approved the :final plat of the Packers of Indian River and authorized its final execution. 6. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Approval of additional Analyst position, Job Code 547, Pay Grade 20, to be jointly funded by Mosquito Control District and Public Works Code Compliance Division for the remainder ofFY 2004/05- In FY 2005/06 the Analyst will be fully funded by IT- The Board approved an additional Analyst position PS05-808 in the amount of $43,000 ftom the date ofhire through September 30,2005. 7. ADMINISTRATION Replacement of exi~g audio recording devices for BOCC - The Board approved replacement equipment for digital audio recording and archiving, approved Budget Amendment # 05-119 and EQ05-279, EQ 05-280 and EQ 05-281. 8. CENTRAL SERVICES A. Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. C04-04-323 Centex Rooney Schenkel Shultz Design Builders, LC- Rock road Jail Expansion Project- The Board approved Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. C04- 04-323 to increase the Direct Owner Purchase Program by $500,000 :&om the original amount of $3,000,000. to a new total of $3,500,000 and authorize the Chair to sign as prepared by the County Attorney. There will be no increase in cost to the project. B. Change Order No 8 to Contract No. C03-06-452- Administration Building AdditionIBarth Construction Inc., - The Board approved Change Order No.8 to Contract No. C03-06-452 to increase the contract sum in the amount of $3,858.00 and authorized the Chairman to sign the Contract Change Order as prepared by the County Attorney. 9. PUBLIC WORKS A. Jenkins Road Emergency Repair- Repair of water/sewer line caused by a subcontractor in County right of way- The Board authorized proceeding with Jenkins Road Emergency Repairs in the amount of $50,000.00 and authorized the Chainnan to sign. B. Approval of Work Authorization # 3 with Kimley Horn & Associates for the preparation of Bid Documents for improvements at the intersection of US 1 & Indrio Road, and pennission to advertise for bids- The Board approved Work Authorization # 3 in the amount of $2,999,00 and authorized the Chainnan to sign the Work 3 Authorization and granted pennission to advertise for bids for this project. REGULAR AGENDA (1-953) 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Grey Twig Lane M.S.B.U.- Second Public Hearing- Potable Water Improvements, PSL UtiIities- Consider staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 05-007 to levy a non-ad valorem special assessment on the Grey Twig Lane M.S.B.U. approve the attached preliminary assessment roll; approve funding the project through the In· House Revolving Loan Fund, and authorize staff to proceed with construction of the project. It was moved by Com. Craft, seconded by Com. Smith, to adopt Resolution No. 05-007, and; upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. B. Enviromnental Resources Division- Consider Draft Ordinance No. 05-007 (formally known as 04-008) amending the St. Lucie County Land Development Code by amending Chapter 6.00.00 Vegetation Protection and Preservation to provide for a series of general amendments updating, clarifying and amending the County's Vegetation Protection and Preservation Standards and regulations; and amending Section 11.05 .06 Vegetation Removal Permits to provide for clarification of the procedures in regard to the issuance of a Vegetation Removal Permit. Mr. Paul Schall, area resident, addressed the Board and stated he felt the property owners were being charged double when they are required to mitigate for tree removal. Mr. John Donahue, Government Affairs, Chamber of Commerce, addressed the Board in support of the changes. Mr. Eric Haney, area resident addressed the Board and asked they consider, what he understands is a potential appeal for the ag moratorium for building and with the recent Canker spotting in northwest St .Lucie County, that maybe this be a factor and it be considered as something that does not fall into that blanket moratorium as he would call it an "act of God", it would be something to consider in the future. Mr. Jay Macumber Indrio Road, addressed the Board and asked they consider the mitigation people being able to buy other land to provide their mitigation. Some are buying high value land within the Urban Service Boundary and are replacing it with low value land outside the Urban Service Boundary, this can be a real issue. He asked they consider some comparable value in that equation. 4 Mr. Charles Grande, Hutchinson Island, advised the Board of the many large ag property owners had representatives at the meeting and they contributed to the revisions of the ordinance. Com. Craft stated he would still maintain the existing agriculture operations be changed to 5 years. His reasoning being that there is more than enough property in existing grove operations which can be utilized by developers. He would like to prohibit existing lands being stripped to put new agricultural areas in when we have many citrus grove owners looking to sell to developers. Com. Coward stated he concUITed going to the 5 year. The issue is preventing agricultural lands from being stripped of natural land through the exemption clause and then being converted into a non-agricultural use. Con. Coward suggested the five years, but having a clause where the Board has the ability to revisit the issue under a natural disaster. Com. Smith asked if a compromise of 4 years would be agreeable to the Board members. Com. Craft stated we have plenty of agricultura1land and there is no need to strip any more land of native vegetation to say that it is for agricultural reasons. Com. Coward stated while agrees with Com. Craft he would agree to double existing exemption from 2 to 4 in order to move forward. Com. Smith stated he would be amenable to the 4 year recommendation. Com. Hutchinson stated she would prefer to stay with the 3 years as recommended by the Community and its efforts of full year of meetings. Com. Lewis stated she feels the 3 years is reasonable however, she would agree to the 4 years if that seems to be a point where the Board can agree. Com. Coward asked for more discussion on item B-1 page 13 regarding the 25% set aside. He stated they may be putting in extra hurdles which may preclude the county from utilizing this option. Com. Coward stated the would like to come up with a reasonable perimeter that would allow for the larger DR! projects to still work with us on setting aside 25% which is the most preferable option. Staff stated the smallest environmentally significant land site is about 50 acres. 1ft the Board would consider 50 acres this seems to be a site that is ecologically functioning. Com. Coward concurred. Com. Lewis requested clarification on this issue and asked if he was looking at a habitat preservation clause of less than 15% or 50 acres. 5 Com. Coward asked if the Board felt this was reasonable. The COWlty Attorney stated the Board may wish to consider adding the words "whichever is less" after the 15% or 50 acres. He also stated regarding the natural disaster clause, the Board may want to see some standard which can be applied WlifonnIy that is straight forward and Wlderstood by everyone. He suggested using the standards which are in the land development code for granting a variance which talk about it cannot be a self created hardship and the Board may want to add the words, " a natural disaster". The variance cannot injure or hann surroWlding properties, it must be the minimum variance that would make reasonable use of the land, it has to be consistent with the spirit of the Comp Plan. If the Board is inclined to move forward and adopt some sort of standard that would allow the Board to waive the 4 year or 3 year, he suggested they try to tie this into section 10.01.02 this is the standards for granting variances. The language which can be added is, " The BeC may grant a variance from the 4 year requirement if the applicant demonstrates that a variance is appropriate under the standards of 10.01.02. It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Craft, to approve Draft Ordinance No. 05-007 with two specific amendments, the Ag exemption which is 60003 D2 moving the 3 years to 4 and also adding the language outlined by the COWlty Attorney regarding the variance waiver procedure, and on page 13, 3B1A to add to additional flexibility language to read "or 50 acres whichever is less", and; upon roll call, the vote was as follows: Aye's; Coward, Smith Craft, Lewis; Nay; Hutchinson; motion carried by a vote of 4 to 1. (1-2483) C. Growth Management - Consider Draft Resolution No. 05-009 approving the petition of Covenant Investment Properties, LLC (Laura R. Sivalia, Agent) for a change in zoning from CN to CO zoning district for property located 1205 West Midway Road. Com. Hutchinson advised the Board that she had received a letter from the White City Improvement Club in support. It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Craft, to approve Resolution No. 05- 009; and upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 6 RA-l ADMINISTRATION (1-2765) Resolution No. 05-040- Extension of the Maturity Date of the County's Improvement Revenue Note, Series 2004 (Land Acquisition)- Consider staff recommendation to approve Resolution No. 05-040 as drafted. It was moved by Com. Craft, seconded by Com. Lewis to approve Resolution No. 05- 040, and; upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. (1-2808) D. Growth Management - Application ofLennar Homes, Inc., for Preliminary PUD approval for he project known as Bent Creek- Consider approval of Draft Resolution 04-221 which would grant Preliminary PUD approval to the Bent Creek project as amended. Com. Coward advised the Board and those present of his contact with Mr. Waldman as well as the Land Use Attorney, Ms. Angelos. Com. Hutchinson advised the Board and those present of her contact with Ms. Angelos and also the residents of Hartman Road. Com. Lewis, Com. Craft and Com.. Smith, also conftrmed having contact with the representatives of the project. Ms. Cynthia Angelos, Attorney for the applicant, addressed the Board. Ms. Angleos stated, Lennar Homes will be dedicating an additional 1 0 feet to the County which will create a 50 ft. beginning of a right of way for Swain Road should the County in the future decide to utilize Swain Road as an access to Orange Avenue. There is also a 40 ft. landscaped buffer between the project and Sandalwood development. Also the developers are contributing an additional $490 per home above the impact fees to the St. Lucie County School Board, as well as $154.00 per home up and above the impact fees to the Fire District. Ms. Connie Meschu, property owner on Swaine Road asked the Board recognize the fact they own the property on Swain and the north side of White Way Dairy Road. They wish to have on the record that this property would need to be acquired by the County from them. They are against the closing of White Way Dairy Road since it is their access to the property. It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Lewis, to approve Draft Resolution No. 04-221 as amended to include the all weather shelter, the crossing on Peterson Road, the FPUA loop system, the roundabouts, the dedication of the park to the County when asked, the voluntary agreements with the School Board, the Fire District and North S1. Lucie River, and; upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 7 (2-620) E. Growth Management- Consider Draft Resolution 05-008 granting Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Approval and change in zoning from RS-3 and RM-5 to the PUD- Celebration Pointe for property located at the southwest comer of the intersection of North Jenkins Road and Peterson Road and the conditions contained therein. Mr. Bob Raines, attorney for the petitioner, addressed the Board. Com. Coward advised the Board and those present of his contact with Mr. Raines. Com. Lewis, Com. Hutchinson, Com. SIilith and Com. Craft all acknowledged meeting with the representative. Com. Coward stated he would like to see this developer work with the other developers in the development of Peterson Road and this has not been addressed. Mr. Tony Maharis, United Homes stated they do not have any problem in working with staff in construction of the road from Jenkins to their property. Mr. Greg Boggs, Thomas Lucido & Associates, reviewed the project and advised the Board the project does not need to utilize White Way Dairy Road. Ms. Connie Meschue, 1401 Swaine Road, addressed the Board in opposition to the project. Mr. John Odom, 1611 Jenkins Road resident, addressed the Board regarding the project and stated he purchased property to protect himself from development and asked if the project could use a different area for their entrance. He would like for them to eliminate one of their southern entrances to their project. Mr. Pat Langel, area resident, addressed the Board and expressed her concern with the traffic the project would generate. He lives at the northwest comer of the project and asked a 10ft. wall be placed between himself and the project. Mr. Cardozza, President United Homes, addressed Mr. Langel's request and stated they proposed 1 story homes in the area. Mr. Tony Maharis, United Homes stated they had adjusted their site plan to have a 250 ft. buffer between their structure and Mr. Langel's home. 8 Mr. Arden Rudd, 1011 S.Jenkins Road resident, asked if a traffic signal would be installed at Jenkins and Peterson Road. Mr. John Donahue, LBF&H, the traffic engineers stated that the current level of service would not be exceeded. They did a signal warrant study at both Orange Avenue and Okeechobee Road. The reports came back both intersections would be functioning properly with this development. The traffic study did indicate that as you are traveling southbound on Jenkins, a left hand turn lane would be needed at both entrances and as you head northbound on Jenkins, a right turning lane would be necessary into the Southern entrance of the development. It was moved by Com. Smith, seconded by Com. Craft, to approve Resolution No. 05- 008, to include the additional requests made and obligations the Board asked from the developer regarding Swain and Peterson Roads having minimwn standards in place for not only the roadway but also for the pedestrian system (reflecting the agreement where the developer stated they would financially contribute to Peterson Road and at the minimum, the construction for Peterson and Swain would not only be the roadway, but the pedestrian system also ), and; upon roll call, motion carned unanimously. 6. PUBLIC WORKS Lakewood Park Stormwater Design of Capital Improvements- Consider staff recommendation to approve to negotiate with Hazen & Sawyer Engineers for a proposal to provide design and pennitting of Phase 1,2,& 3 for capital improvements to Lakewood Park Stormwater. It was moved by Com. Craft, seconded by Com. Lewis, to approve staff recommendation, and; upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 7. AIRPORT (3-332) St. Lucie County International Airport Part 150 Study Group Recommendation- Consider staff recommendation to approve the recommendation of the Airport Part 150 Study Group for inclusion in the S1. Lucie County International Airport Part 150 Noise Study Update. Ms. Lisa Waters with the MEA Group made the presentation. Com. Coward stated he would like to review the issue further with the Growth Management staff. No action necessary. 8. GROWTH MANAGEMENT (3-1763) 9 Staff provided a report on the meeting held on Friday, January 14, 2005 between Waterstone Development and affected residents. The Asst. Growth Management Director reviewed the memo issued by the Asst. County Administrator on January 14, 2005 as a summary of the outstanding issues. (see attachment # 1). Mr. Hugh Evans outlined the response to each of the issues. (see attachment # 2) as well as the revisions to the plans. Ms. Susie Caron, 8500 Immo Road resident, addressed the Board regarding the following issues: 1) illegal berm (mulch) this has been rectified 2) rental issues - residents are opposed to rental of units 3) resident is proposing a 15ft. solid concrete/b10ck wall all the way to Emerson Com. Coward stated he would prefer to have natural buffer as opposed to a stone wall if he lived in the area. Ms. Caron stated it would take 5 years to fill in the buffer with the trees meanwhile they would be able to see the development and they do not wish to see it or hear it. If a hmricane strikes again next year, then they would be back to square one. Com. Craft stated he believed the developer proposed two or three times the vegetation Ms. Caron is speaking of. Mr. Evans stated he did not have a problem raising the fence to 8 ft. if he could get a variance so that they could get up to the 14 ft. level. Com. Craft stated as opposed to a concrete wall, he felt what is being proposed even though 5 years down the line, long term is much better. It will leave a much better finished product. Ms. Caron stated she did not trust what is being promised. Com. Smith questioned what the solid buffer would mean to the developer. Mr. Evans stated structurally the wall is a very expensive project He is not prepared to answer this question tonight. They will be coming back in February with a full landscaping plan. Com. Coward stated he cannot support abandoning the new existing concept proposed by the developer for the buffer. 10 Com. Craft stated he suggested an 8ft. fence on top of the 4 ft. benn which is 3 ft. shy of what Ms. Caron is requesting in height with additional vegetation. . Mr. Evans said they would have to apply for a variance but did not see a problem, they could maintain a 14ft. minimum in the area. Com. Smith stated a wall would give the residents a sure height number opposed to not being sure if it will be 12ft.,14ft. or 15ft. Com. Coward assured Ms. Caron that they would not be waiting 5 years since the developer is placing substantial size trees in the area. If the developer does not adhere to the minimum standard, they will continue to close the job down. Mr. Frank Stewart, area resident, addressed the Board and stated he would prefer a vegetation and tree buffer opposed to a wall. He also asked if the developer was going to replace the trees on his property that were destroyed. Mr. Evans stated they would be replacing the trees that were destroyed. Mr. Jay Macumber, 8680 Indrio Road resident stated he understood the reluctance of the Com. Coward to construct a wall and suggested a possible combination of a concrete wall and a benn. Com. Coward stated he would work with the developer ifhe was willing to place the money he would spend on a wall towards substantial size trees in the area. Timothy Gillias, PartnerlWaterstone project addressed the Board on the design and pennitting side of the project and it is not about the money, but the engineering effort it would take to do all the changes and asked the Board to consider their side. Com. Hutchinson questioned where they would be working while the berm is being constructed. The developer stated he would like to continue the construction of the utilities. They would like to propose ruff in the berm and while that is being done they can work on the lift stations. He would like to do a 500ft run at one time. The developer continued to point out on the map of their intent. The County Attorney suggested conceptually approving the plan and directing staff to work with the developer and the residents to bring back a formal modification to the PUD with more specificity landscape plans, profiles, phasing plan that shows the henn will be built first, all the details that are important and in the plan which would leave little doubt. Mrs. Stewart addressed the Board with her concerns with the benn should she decide to build another house or sell a piece of her property. 11 It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Craft, to move forward with the conceptual plan to include the modifications as discussed Le. minimum fence height 14ft, minimum height trees of 12ft., and have the more detailed plan brought back to the Board for modifications through the PUD process with the Wlderstanding they are attempting to achieve a minimum of 14 ft., and maximize landscaping with mature trees along the property line and attempt to replace the damaged trees to the maximum extent possible, these things would be part of the conceptual approval which they would expect to see in the formal plans brought back to the Board; The developer asked that this be considered a minor PUD modification opposed to having to go through the advertising process again for the PUD amendment and also that the Board address the ability to go back to work. The County Attorney stated they would everything they can to not have this come back unnecessarily.if it can be done as a minor they will attempt to make sure that happens and also suggested lifting the work order. The Contractor addressed the work area where they need to start. Mr. Gillias stated they would like to work on the two lift stations the outfall structure and while this is going on, submit the plans with the details of the benn so that there can be authorization to go ahead and start framing in the benn and create the separation so that they can work the balance of the site. He requested for the purpose of the meeting to put in the two lift stations, the outfall structure until they submit the plans for the benn. Com. Coward asked if they would stay 500ft. from the south property line. Mr. Gillias said this was reasonable except for the outfall. Com. Coward asked the County Administrator be given the ability to issue a stop work order independently from the Board if the developer does not follow what has been stated by the Board. The Contractor asked if they were to cease on the benn. The Board instructed the Contractor to cease any work on the benn until all has been finalized. Mr. Evans stated they should be able to put in the plans one day next week. Com. Hutchinson requested the plans also be made available to the residents. It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Craft, to approve in concept the overall plan include some modifications as stated, the minimum height on the fence of 14ft., the trees to be substantial in size, minimum 12 ft., the 500ft. set back from property line for all construction with the exception of one outfall station to the southeast comer 12 and also giving the County Administrator to initiate a stop work order independent of the Board should any violations occur of items discussed; Mr. Evans stated he wished to submit the landscaping plan for review from the architect to staff and if the Board does not agree it can be changed, otherwise he agrees with all requested by the Board. And; upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. There being no further business to be brought before the Board, the meeting was adjourned. Chairman Clerk of Courts 13 Commission Review: Februar 20, 2007 GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: FROM: Bob Nix, AICP, Director of Growth Management Hank Floreiplanning Manager DATE: February 13, 2007 SUBJECT: Petition of Mercedes Homes for a 12-month extension of the date of expiration for the project known as Celebration Pointe PUD and a major adjustment to the conditions of approval. Mercedes Homes is requesting a 12-month extension of the date of expiration of the approved Planned Unit Development known as Celebration Pointe - PUD, consisting of 755 units on 147.14 acres located at the southeast corner of the intersection of South Jenkins Road and Peterson Road and a Major Adjustment to the conditions of approval. On January 18, 2005, through Resolution 05-008, this Board granted Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Approval to the project. The developer is requesting the 12-month extension in order to finalize the completion of improvements for the project due to several delays in the relocation of Florida Power & Light Company power poles and delays with the lift stations required by the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority. The applicant has also proposed revisions to the conditions of site plan approval. The first proposed revision is to Condition #1, which reads as follows as contained in Resolution 05-008: 1. Prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit for the proposed project, the petitioner, his successors or assigns, shall convey to St. Lucie County, in manner and form acceptable to the St. Lucie County Attorney, 45 feet of additional right-of-way for Peterson Road along the north property line of the subject property and shall construct this roadway to minimum St. Lucie County specifications to include pedestrian and bicycle paths. To the extent permitted under the County's Code and Compiled Laws, any such dedication may be considered eligible for Road Impact Fee Credits. When the petition was presented to the Board of County Commissioners on January 18, 2005, the developer of the project, United Homes International, had agreed to dedicate the north 45 feet of the subject property adjacent to Peterson Road to St. Lucie County. At the hearing, the Commission requested that the developer also improve Peterson Road to County specifications to include bike paths and sidewalks and the developer agreed. When the subsequent owner, Mercedes Homes, began the process of improvements to the project, it was determined that they would need to mitigate for the loss of a large oak tree, which is located in the right-of-way for Peterson Road. The original mitigation plans did not take into account the mitigation of the February 13, 2007 Page 2 Subject: Celebration Pointe - PUD File No.: tree, because it was not planned to be constructed by a private party. If the road were constructed by St. Lucie County, no mitigation would be required. The applicant has proposed a change to the above referenced condition as stated in their letter (copy attached) that would be tied to the Final Plat. After consulting with the Public Works Department - Engineering Division, staff provides the following suggested language: 1, Prior to the iss~ance of the first BlIilding Permit for the proposed project, the petitioner, his S~Gcessor:s or assigAs, shall convey to St. l~cie COllnty, in manner and form acceptable to the St. LlIcie Co~nty Attorney, 45 feet of additional right of way for PetersoR Road along the north property liRe of the s~Ðject property and shall construct this roadway to minimum St. Lucie Cmmty specifications to inclllde pedestrian and bicycle paths. To the exteAt permitted under the COllnty's Code and Compiled Laws, aAY such dedicatioA may be cORsidered eligible for Road Impact Fee Credits. The developer shall convey to St. Lucie County. in manner and form acceptable to the County Attorney. 45 feet of additional riaht of way for Peterson Road alona the North property line of the subiect propertY. Twelve (12) months from the recordina of this resolution or the recordina of the Road Improvement Aareement. the developer shall construct Peterson Road to Countv specifications to include pedestrian and bicycle paths. The applicant has proposed revising Condition #3 for clarification as follows: 3. No two adjoining sinale-family homes shall have the same front architectural elevation. The applicant would also like to add an eighth condition of approval to allow for the construction of Dry Models for the proposed project: The condition reads as follows: 8. Pursuant to Section 11.03.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the developer, his successors or assigns, shall be allowed a building permit for up to a maximum of four (4) residential units to be issued after approval of a Preliminary Record Plat and construction plans but before approval of a Final Plat. Attached is a copy of Draft Resolution No. 07-039, which, if approved, would grant a 12-month extension to the approved Planned Unit Development known as Celebration Pointe- PUD and a major adjustment to the conditions of approval. Staff recommends approval of the attached Draft Resolution No. 07-039. Please let this office know if you have any questions on this matter. SUBMITTED: Bob Nix, AICP Growth Management Director cc: Robert Raynes, Jr., Esq - Gunster Yoakley Kevin Gillen - Mercedes Homes File 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 RESOLUTION NO. 07-039 FILE NO.: BCC-12007956 A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR A 12-MONTH EXTENSION OF THE FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS CELEBRATION POINTE - PUD CONSISTING OF 318 SINGLE- FAMILY LOTS, 292 SINGLE-STORY VILLAS, AND 145 TWO- STORY TOWNHOUSES FOR A TOTAL OF 755 UNITS FOR 147.14 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF SOUTH JENKINS ROAD AND PETERSON ROAD WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. On January 18, 2005, this Board, through Resolution 05-008, granted Final Planned Unit Development approval for the project known as Celebration Pointe - PUD, a proposed 755 unit project consisting of 318 single-family lots, 292 single-story villas, and 145 two- story townhouses on 147.14 acres of property located at the southeast corner of the intersection of South Jenkins Road and Peterson Road. 2. The developer of Celebration Pointe - PUD has requested that the 12-month extension of the Final Planned Unit Development through Resolution No. 05-008, be extended for a period of 12 additional months from its date of scheduled expiration, January 18, 2007, with the new date of expiration being January 18, 2008. 3. The developer of Celebration Pointe - PUD has requested revisions to the conditions of approval and the addition of one condition. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. Pursuant to Section 11.02.06(B)(2) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the Planned Unit Development, approved through Resolution 05-008, is hereby extended for a period of 12 additional months from its scheduled date of expiration, January 18, 2007, with the new expiration date being January 18, 2008, for the property described as follows: THE NORTH 3/4 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, LESS AND EXCEPT THE WEST 40 FEET FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF- WAY AND LESS AND EXCEPT ROAD AND CANAL RIGHTS-OF-WAY. File No.: BCC-12007956 February 20, 2007 Resolution No. 07-039 Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 TOGETHER WITH THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, LESS WEST 40 FEET, FOR ROAD RIGHT OF WAY AND LESS THE CANAL RIGHT OF WAY, TOGETHER WITH THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF NORTHWEST 1/4, LESS CANAL RIGHT OF WAY AND THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF NORTHWEST 1/4, LESS THE EAST 40 FEET AND LESS CANAL RIGHT OF WAY, AND THE NORTH 3/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND THE NORTH 3/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, LESS THE NORTH 30 FEET OF THE EAST 5 FEET, TOGETHER WITH THE SOUTH 1/4 OF NORTHWEST 1/4 OF NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND THE SOUTH 1/4 OF NORTHEAST 1/4 OF NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, LESS 330.52 FEET, AND LESS THE TRACT 143 FEET X 207.28 FEET, AND THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, LESS SOUTH 330.52 FEET, AND LESS THE ROAD RIGHT OF WAY, TOGETHER WITH THE EAST 1/2 OF NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 LYING WEST OF CANAL 29, LESS ROAD RIGHT OF WAY. TOGETHER WITH THE SOUTH 330.52 FEET OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4, LESS NORTH 97.32 FEET, OF THE WEST 143 FEET, OF THE EAST 163 FEET AND THE SOUTH 330.52 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND THE NORTH 1/4 OF NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND THE NORTH 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, LESS THE ROAD RIGHT OF WAY. ALL LYING IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. (Tax Identification Numbers: 2418-221-0001-000-5; 2418-233-0001-000-2; 2418-234-0001- 000-5; 2418-312-0001-000-4; 2418-313-0003-000-1; and 2418-311-0002-000-8) (Location: Southeast corner of the intersection of South Jenkins Road and Peterson Road) File No.: BCC-12007956 February 20, 2007 Resolution No. 07-039 Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 B. Condition #1 cited within the resolution has been revised as follows: 1. The developer shall convey to St. Lucie County, in manner and form acceptable to the County Attorney, 45 feet of additional right of way for Peterson Road along the North property line of the subject property. Twelve (12) months from the recording of this resolution or the recording of the Road Improvement Agreement, the developer shall construct Peterson Road to County specifications to include pedestrian and bicycle paths. C. Condition #3 cited within the resolution has been revised as follows: 3. No two adjoining sinale-familv homes shall have the same front architectural elevation. D. Additional Condition #8 reads as follows: 8. Pursuant to Section 11.03.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the developer, his successors or assigns, shall be allowed a building permit for up to a maximum of four (4) residential units to be issued after approval of a Preliminary Record Plat and construction plans but before approval of a Final Plat. E. This Final Planned Unit Development extension shall expire on January 18, 2008, unless building permits are issued or another extension has been granted in accordance with Section 11.02.06, St. Lucie County Land Development Code. F. The Certificate of Capacity granted by the Growth Management Director shall remain valid until January 18, 2008. G. The St. Lucie County Growth Management Director is hereby authorized and directed to cause the notation of this resolution to be made on the Official Zoning Map of St. Lucie County, Florida, and to make notation of reference to the date of adoption of this resolution. H. A copy of this resolution shall be placed on file with the St. Lucie County Growth Management Director. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Chris Craft xxx Vice-Chairman Joseph E. Smith xxx Commissioner Paula A. Lewis xxx Commissioner Doug Coward xxx Commissioner Charles Grande xxx File No,: BCC-12007956 February 20, 2007 Resolution No. 07-039 Page 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 20th Day of February 2007. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS County Attorney Deputy Clerk HF H:\WORD\Petitions\BCC\Finished2007\CelebrationPointeEXT -RES.doc File No.: BCC-12007956 February 20, 2007 Resolution No. 07-039 Page 4 l"- e ,jl e ¡.¡¡ ... N en ci Q) CD z+~ <") E LO ~ (j) j- I'Ø 0 ~ l"- N .i! c: I d I'Ø 0 ~ ~ ..., 0 'Q en ~ Q) C\I I'Ø Q. "C "'C"'"" ~1 -~ Q) Q. Ü Q. ~ ~ 0 I'Ø Ü :!: Q) aJ ~ .è- c: :J o U æ .O! II:: c: .~ ~ ... ~ ~ 0 0- p.o~ UU!4S i ! Ji . . In C :E ! ! p~ BU80 J8pnH ~ U) <'! '" N Ò P!i peaus IBUB::) t~-o ~ ! o m ~ 8 .5; '1::: ~ 2 <'! ~ ~ ò 21 <'! '" ó p~ u°II'80 õ ð '" ó I I I I 1 I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I ------------------------~ ---------------------------- ------------------------------------- ,{¡unoa aaqO¡¡:I9a>/o A petition of Mercedes Homes for a 1 2-month extension of an approved Planned Unit Development known as Celebration Pointe-PU D In I ;{iiillj¡i;,:~rJi~!f~~~i~~.ý;]r.t; STARCHER'tE , , I' . I . .. CARLOW CIR·:· :::·G··;·:..:····..·:·'.:1;.I:Ü:r· .]J,.. . " , ~;i¡~!¡'rj¡lf¡I~[lf6~~lf¡~ì¡¡rl L _RSON RD '. .... .' '. .... .' '. .... PETERSON ~î - "- - I '-- \ - I - \ 0 I a:: ~ n w z z w I \ m \ L L-- - _<''lTlP \ I :::; :;:.~:)i;:{/:;~;.i:r.'Î.'t? ;:;:'::'~'./:.: ~.:."'~¿,,:::, i;':;':: '1).;:, :;:~ :i:: ::~::..; :::::\. ;;.~;:, ';:: .. .....,. ...,:f....... ,.~ ..... ·..···~1LJ~ \ ~ !f';f:~·!';j~I:I~~·;j:~:I@lgl 11 í I 0 a:: \ ,~. ~ P~~ (P "O~ P 1 : Il~!!~'i!~·[~:~;;·~q.~:i¡~.f:~W~;~~~ I I 'I . ..,....., '.. ...~~ ..(/'. p. Jf· ·it;..· 'tHl .. I :..:.::':':":':.\':,:':',:-:':..,:. ':'::':"'.::' ;'::-.:' :,:.::::.; ,", :.:.' .. .:. ,:", ...: ,......," ..,n ~~ WHITE WAY. DAIRY. RD ~ - J: It) r-- (7) W ~ ~ I a:: ............... %0. w I- - = ~ t~g;i'·~~~Ã'~~ :.,'Ci"";;!...,..·.,.i'r',' [ - ~ ...p............. ..~ ~ ~'P - - '-----' , -- /);;..;:;;,;;: ~ ~ ,;.;;,,';;:;.:"," ""'i', '.i.'};'+:;'?i;;;;~'; J: It) (7) ~~m¡"'lifif{i f:jf;;;!:~¡i:r@.r;¡:~;~m·ti.~~Jr: Þi]ffiÛ~~!~!'r\~~1;;:t)m'li~?i~:;¡:~~¡;¡ w ~ I-' en a:: li~'¡1';fi~jr~!~~(~¡'~~~¡1~,i~;it~I~i·¡ Îl~1êj¡¡~~~I-~tl~;!~. w I- ~ . ..... '.', ',. .... ...... .... if :l'ëi:;'!i!;f\f:';;~i;@;F~¡: '~;:1~ff;~i~if,'ii[!;;r~"':;'~)!;~II;;:;;~~;~{~~!:;t~i!j¡ii \t;~;:::::::·~·:~:};:;;:::i::::::~::i¡::~;:::¡:'::·~~:¡::t:i:;'::¡:;:::;::::~t I .......u"rUN.. uu Ïi~lj ". I :·::>?;.',:::.:.!}::::i~:::\·i:·::,:::':(' ;;·;.'::::.t(~i::~:;:~;·i:·i·:::·:::·;;·;.'}:.::;:::;:':;~~:\<>:::'?;:::::.:.:.~::;':::.':::':::.' ::,·::·::i;:;::. :.:: Bee 1 2 007956 ~ Subject property 5è.Å~ ~~~_ N A (jrtTWtli .NlDI6jfeme7lt :tJ'9N"tmenr mJ City of Fort Pierce Map prepared January 30, 2007 .... ........... ...............:... Zoning Mercedes Homes dcr-iI 'IJ' T IU RS-4L- IRS-, ~~~~:~';\¡;,:;¡ : ,~i~i~~~,}:~;'J :. CARLOW. CIR .'.':,C) ·:··.;·.·..:::::.:.·X.ti1J:·.; ¡'.J:f;.!..'.. 11~!~jll¡liil: iI21!!li~ii,¡ .... ..... "'I ..... I' I, ..... IL , , ,I 4 I . . II 7 -, RS-3 . ....... ...." ~..... ~6"'"'' ....... ..' ... I ~: ;·;i#..iJiti :.::: ,:,:.;:/~UCX(::·::::(.:·:)ti.;.): ..... ~w_. iiE:;:';:'?{:'~'::;:::;;:::;':;"; ;'ffF!ljjf¡¡1!fifj&Œ':'::!:~:::::~:'::':'i ~ '0;¡@,:f€;i~íifu Ar>.1 l~ ~ '~i:l~¡~ ,i~i,;;~ffxi~~i[; . ~~~~ §¿~~~~~.. :!j>i~::·::·;:::;}:;;:),,:{:.·:)~r~':·:·r:··::~.='·;!;~··(.:::::·::·;.9.t~~8 ~_~ :;;",',i'i;~\~,: :;;~ij~ii~;'~~ I I ~ ~ ~ ,:..::::....:.:.:::....:.:... ¿r.::::;.C;...y.:j',':L'-:I:';;": ..' . . .. . . . :-= WHITE,WAV¡DAIRV¡RD ~ _ 'i'/'Xf(iiii ~ ~ ~ It) en W ':-? II\R-1 ~-2'tlM@':';;;j)i~,g; ~~. - ~ S - CO ;ir'ùi'!)i'iB" Z~~~~~~~~~~",¡.. ,;@'!@:i';'g;;:@'~i ~ GRAHAMRD ......... ....... "// '// I.t) .............................. . ............................. J: .' :.:":'::-:.-:.':'.-::::.:;'.;:;::' ~// '// ~ :.:;:::::'::::-::::::"::::'.:;:::::: :. '::::i.'.::'.:;:::::::'';:::'::;:::i.:.:: RS-2 ,u. '?¿iJ;i.i;MN'j",1 AR-1 ~ IIB'm", ...tÎ........ 'f'F I~~{}:·:::.;.:..........,:.:......>'.:::.,.:...:::·I I RM-1' '. . .......... ...... .. ,.... .. ...... .. .' .,.,..... . . .. . BCC 12007956 ~ Subjectproperty 9:-~udç,&,~~ N fir_Iii .JllflNlBemnrl 09"'7'_1 Î\ ¡:::~·§{:~r~;~i~;:m City of Fort Pierce Map prepared January 30, 2007 ~ P[ETERSON RD I ~ --~-4 ~ \ I ~-" \ 0 I ......... ~ ~ AR-1 .'"v-, w ~' ~ , m \ rL - RS 2 - M e reed es H 0 m es Land Use In .l ¡ifJif'1i¡~;~¡¡ U~~iiJ,~!t S:AR~Hí~TÎVE , I . ':CARLOW CIR: :...·b.::::·..··..··x.ür:r ·]..ttil~ MXD . . , na.AI RM L I'IVI [RSO~ RD ~ ~ "~ ""';""'BENfCRêÊì(BLVO' L- -~ -~ I \ jri¡&~~·i~; ti \~M';j'~£mi;tt:fl¡:~ I f-- ~j~J~;;'~:!' J: ·i!J.j,~~;¡i~ti¡,~~l; \ c I a:: n ~ w . .............. ...I£?LONG·'....··..·..··..·..· , z i~iig..t.!t,\!~i z I ~ w R UI m \ L L- ..............::.:;. . .... ..~ \ I ·:tAt::(/· .(':i'?: ;:·//:.;·:·:/f'::{·,··::·.:,·:· ....~, ........... .' ï:-> ~........... ''',' ..... . ;'!.;:::;-::i::i·:·i:::'·':: ;:'!'r .:'.:::' .~ :\:"?!\f!!.~:::;?:';:\ :.:.' :;:';; i:·.;. , ~./ ~ ~ ~ ¡!~;¡~~::~:t:;};::.:·.... :'!{;\. \;. ~,·.:·~:t·:it:::::;1:;::;:d::;!;:r~: ~*.: :{::;:; I I f--- RU " ~ ~ .j::t?;",,·.,. i'. ":. ~::'··'..i··'i"·i"··;' ".: "i¡;;.;" ~ z ~ ..... ....:..... .... . ··l.[:1.:.lJ.:J:t':':, c:a;~'" I ~ ~ ;{·l:.:;::.::'l::;:·i·f.~:::.\ i.ij::.: : {:'::: :.::~.:.:.:"..::,:':'..';.::.':': .....: .~~.~: ~ ~ ..................(.. ·····n:x.j··tU;il:~·:l·¡:··· J ~ ~ .:..::.::....:.:.:':.....:.: .::..... :...... .:...:.:....... ......... .' ...... . .... ~ II'TE.WAV.DAJRv.RD ~ f--- ¡¡i~f~I~~ ~ W//J. RM ~ :I: LO 0) RU w ~ F ~U ~ i:!/!!%%" 1m ' I a:: '>:"""".::")',." ~~~ . W l- f--- == ~ ~~;;i;JM:~iir;(, ~r,~ .";<"/:'('b" I f----¡ f--- 'm_~ ~~~_ --- ~ - .~}{;'-:/!;; ."::;; '·::H.'>':'ti2.·.¥'iP,!\XD?\ J: GRAHAM RD LO 0) W ~ I-' en a:: w I- RU ~ ".... ""',..'::¡¡' "'i'" ,;·:··,.,·1 MH- ······,'tJG-_'.m - ;;¥:~I _. ............... L·..··..····· =,~. F :}::i';:;: :'~;'::':'~:':" . ': :~: :::.~. !~:::: ;:::~:: ~: :.~:'::':'::.: ::. ........;::,:...:.......:: :...:........:.:,:.,~ , ..... ..:........:.:, ..........:::.,.:......:.".. ...... ...... .:..,...... BCC 1 2007956 ~ Subject property .9:- .,.¿~ ~~~ N A {jrlTWrÆ .JI(tnU1Ø-r 09H'7'hrlimr ~ City of Fort Pierce ................ 'f;~~: ~.:;..:~.~..~:.:.::. ~;:.:.: ~ Map prepared January 30, 2007 Mercedes Homes I i\ BCC 12007956 ~ Subject property City of Fort Pierce 5k-~~~~_ (jrtTWtÆ Jltill1llif{lertUf7Ú :D9'IZT/'mImt N A Map prepared January 30,2007 ~~f''1to: (, w·vYr1 I~]¡tf. £- (I V; (1:'1JI¡~, \t~\ R t~;:'^ IV{.) ?wb ~~ß nit: EDWIN M. FRY, Jr., CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT SAINT LUCIE COUNTY FILE' 2600805 0411312005 at 01:33 PM OR BOOK 2213 PAGE 762-772 DccType:RESO RECORDING: S95.OD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 RESOLUTION 05-008 FILE NO.: RZ-cJ4.0151PUD-Ð4-016 A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS CELEBRATION POINTE - A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, AND A CHANGE IN ZONING FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of 81. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: CHANGE IN ZONING 1. United Homes International. Inc.. presented a petition for a change in zoning from the R5-3 (Residential, 5ingle-Family-3 dulaere) and RM-5 (Residential, Multiple-Family-5 du/acre) Zoning Districts to the PUD (Planned Unit Development- Celebration Pointe) Zoning District for certain property in St. Lucie County, Florida depicted on the attached maps as Exhibit "A" and described in Part "B" below. 2. On November 18. 2004, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing, of which due notice was published and mailed to aU property owners within 500 feet at least 10 days prior to the hearing and recommended to this Board that the requested change in zoning from the RS-3 (Residential, Slngle-Family- 3 dulacre) and RM-5 (Residential, Multiple-Family - 5 du/aere) Zoning Districts to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Celebration Pointe) Zoning District be granted. 3. On January 18, 2005, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing a notice of such hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property and granted final approval to the property described below. 4. The proposed change in zoning is consistent with the 51. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and meets the requirements of Section 11.06.03 of the 81. Lucie County Land Development Code. SITE PLAN 6. The petitioner is proposing the development of 755 units consisting of 318 single-family lots, 292 single-story villas, and 145 two-story townhouses for property located at the Southeast comer of the intersection of North Jenkins Road and Peterson Road. File No.: RZ-04-015/PUD-04-016 January 18. 2005 Resolution 05-008 Page 1 7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 . 12. 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 3S 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 8. 9. 11. 13. 14. The Development Review Committee has reviewed the site plan for the proposed project and found it to meet minimum technical requirements. On November 18, 2004, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing, of which due public notice was published and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet at least 10 days prior to the hearing, and recommended to this Board that Preliminary Development Plan approval for the project to be known as Celebration Pointe be granted. 10. On January 18, 2005, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing a notice of such hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property, and granted Preliminary and Final Development Site Plan approval for the property described below. The proposed project is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives, and standards of the 81. Lucie County Land Development Code, the S1. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, or other matters affecting the public health, safety, and general welfare. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed project on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping, and screening. The proposed project will be constructed, arranged, and operated so as notto interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable district regulations. The proposed project will be served by adequate public facilities and services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Sf. Lucie County, Florida: CHANGE IN ZONING A. The property on which this Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development is being granted is described as follows: THE NORTH 314 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, LESS AND EXCEPT THE WEST 40 FEET FOR ROAD RIGHT- OF-WAY AND LESS AND EXCEPT ROAD AND CANAL RIGHTS-OF-WAY. File No.: RZ-04-0151PUD-04-016 January 18, 2005 Resolution 05-008 Page 2 1 2 TOGETHER WITH 3 4 THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, LESS WEST 40 5 FEET, FOR ROAD RIGHT OF WAY AND LESS THE CANAL RIGHT OF WAY, 6 7 TOGETHER WITH B 9 THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SOUTHWEST 114 OF NORTHWEST 1/4, LESS CANAL RIGHT OF 10 WAY AND THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF NORTHweST 1/4, LESS THE 11 EAST 40 FEET AND LESS CANAL RIGHT OF WAY, AND THE NORTH 3/4 OF THE 12 NORTHEAST 114 OF NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND THE NORTH 314 OF THE 13 NORTHWEST 114 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, LESS THE NORTH 14 30 FEET OF THE EAST 5 FEET, 15 16 TOGETHER WITH 17 18 THE SOUTH 1/4 OF NORTHWEST 1/4 OF NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND THE 19 SOUTH 1/4 OF NORTHEAST 1/4 OF NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SOUTHWEST 114 AND THE 20 SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST OFTHE SOUTHWEST 1/4, LESS 330.52 FEET, AND 21 LESS THE TRACT 143 FEET X 207.28 FEET, AND THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE 22 NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 114, LESS SOUTH 330.52 FEET, AND LESS THE 23 ROAD RIGHT OF WAY, 24 25 TOGETHER WITH 26 27 THE EAST 1/2 OF NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE 28 SOUTHEAST 1/4 LYING WEST OF CANAL 29, LESS ROAD RIGHT OF WAY. 29 30 TOGETHER WITH 31 32 TH E SOUTH 330.52 FEET OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4, 33 LESS NORTH 97.32 FEET, OF THE WEST 143 FEET, OF THE EAST 163 FEET AND THE 34 SOUTH 330.52 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST 114 OF THE NORTHWEST 114 OF THE 35 SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND THE NORTH 1/4 OF NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF 36 SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND THE NORTH 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 37 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, LESS THE ROAD RIGHT OF WAY. 38 39 ALL LYING IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, 40 FLORIDA. 41 42 (Tax Identification Numbers: 2418·221-0001-000-5; 2418-233-o001-DOO-2¡ 2418-234-0001- 43 000-5; 2418-312-oD01-OO0-4¡ 2418·313-0003-000-1; and 2418-311-0002-000-8) 44 ~ 45 (Location: Southeast corner of the interseetion of,"*, Jenkins Road and Peterson 46 Road) 47 48 File No.: RZ-04-015fPUD-04-016 January 16, 2005 Resolution 05-008 Page 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1B 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 4S 46 47 48 SITE PLAN B. Pursuant to Section 11.02.05 of the S1. Lucie County Land Development Code. the Final Site Plan for the project to be known as Celebration Pointe . A Planned Unit Development, is hereby approved as shown on the site plan drawings for the project prepared by Thomas Lucido & Associates, Inc., dated August 31,2004, and date stamped received by the St. Lucie County Growth Management Director on January 18, 2005, for the property described in Part "8" below, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to the Issuance of the first Building Permit for the proposed project, the petitioner. hi. successors or as.lgns, shall convey to St. Lucie County. In manner and form acceptable to the St. Lucie County Attorney. 45 feet of additional right-of- way for Peterson Road along the north property line of the subject property and shall construct this roadway to minimum St. Lucie County specifications to Include pedestrian and bicycle paths. To the extent permitted under the County's Code and Compiled Laws, any such dedication may be considered eligible for Road Impact Fee Credits. 2. Prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit for the proposed project, the petitioner, hi. successors or assigns, shall construct Swain Road to mln¡mum Sl Lucie County specifications to Include pedestrian and bicycle paths. 3. No two adjoining homes shall have the same front architectural elevation. 4. Prior to Final Plat approval for this project, the developers, their successors and assign.. shall have entered Into an enforceable utility service agreement with Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority to ensure the provision of water and sewer services. This agreement shall be in a form consistent with Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority regulations regarding utility service extensions and service provisions. 5. The irrigation system within this project shall be designed to accept reuse water from the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority as the preferred method of Irrigation. 6. Prior to the Issuance of any land clearing permits for the Celebration Pointe development, the developers, their successors and assigns, shall clearly delineate all areas to be preserved and/or protected. Cellneatlon shall be either the placing of slit fencing, safety fencing or similar type of materials. Flagging shall not be used except as a guide for the Installation of the fencing materials. All land clearing activities shall be in accordance to the specific conditions/standards outlined in the Land Clearing Permit. 7. Prior to the Issuance of any land clearing permits for the Celebration Pointe development, the developers, their sueeeNO'" and assigns, the Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) currently under review by South Florida Water Management District and Army Corps of Engineers shall be required to be approved. File No.: RZ-04-015/PUD-04-016sJanuary 18, 2005 Resolution 05-008 Page 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 GENERAL c. This Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Site Plan approval shall expire on January 18.2007, unless final plat approval Is granted or an extension is granted in accordance with Section 11.02.06(8)(3), 81. Lucie County Land Development Code. D. A Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, was granted by the Growth Management Director on January 18, 2005. E. A copy of this resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described in Section A, which plan shall be placed on file with the St. Lucie County Growth Management Director. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Paula A.Lewis Vice-Chairman John D. Bruhn AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson Commissioner Doug Coward Commissioner Cliff Barnes ATTEST: .-"'" BY hf H:\WORD\Petitions\BCC\Fjnished200S\CelebrationPointe.PD\CelebrationPointeRES.wpd File No.: RZ-D4-015/PUD-04.Q16 January 18. 2005 Resolution 05-008 Page 5 1 2 3 4 5 Exhibit "A" 6 7 8 9 Certificate of Capacity 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 File No.: RZ-04-015/PUD-04-o16 January 18. 2005 Resolution 05-006 Page 6 8t Lucie County Certificate of Capacity Date 1/1812005 Certificate No. 1833 This document certifies that concurrency will be met and that adequate public facility capacity exists to maintain the standards for levels of service as adopted In the St Lucie County Comprehensive Plan for: 1. Type of development Preliminary and Pinal PUD Number of units 755 Number of square feet 2. Property legal description Be Tax ID no. 2418-221-0001-000/5 +5 SE enr of N. Jenkins Rd and Peterson Rd Celebration Pointe 3. Approval: Building Resolution No. 05-008 Letter 4. Subject to the following conditions for concurrency: See Resolution Owner's name United Homes International, Inc. Add ress 7975 NW 154th Street, Ste 400 MiarIÙ Lakes FL 33016 6. Certificate Expiration Date 1/1812007 This Certificate ot Capacity Is transferable only to subsequent owners of the same parcel, and is subject to the same terms, conditions and expiration date listed herein. The expiration date can be extended only under the same terms and conditions as the underlying development orderissued with this certificate, or for subsequent development order(s) issued for the same property, use and size as described herein. SIgoedJJ1~ þ¿ Growth Management Director St Lucie County, Florida Date: 1/1812005 Tuesday, January 18, 200~ Page 1 of2 1 2 3 4 5 Exhibit "8" 6 7 Location Maps and Site Plan Graphics 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 File No,: RZ-04-o15/PUD-Q4-016 January 1 B. 2005 Resolution 05-008 Page 8 . o en c Q) E -- o CO :L5 -c:¡::; Q) CO ......c -- .... e: Q) =»1: ..J" /' ... \ \, .~ '\ ~, í ---...~, j '<. , \ \ .--.:.;.-. <010 ....."'1""'" 00 I I ~V °0 eN =»0:: Q... I' II J' ,I II i I I ¡ j .~ " /' / ./ - -.., ) \ ~........ I '" I '-~'1 -¡¡¡;....... \ \ ~ \ I _____,._'__.\ l-___ ..__ \ i \__ ~ ¡ 'O- j I .... .... ¡ ,/ ,.... I i I I ¡ I ! ¡ ! --- --, ~- Aaun~~IO z~ 'l ,41 r~ . ~ i '" ,(I) '~ð ~ \{ ~ -.--- .....,- r- "'- J ã ..,./. ....~- ..-~"'!'? ,.i''''~''' ---- --...-- ~ ~ - .... .... v t ~ z ~ 8- e CL Q. III 2 .Ç=T1 ~.'Î: ~ : ¡ ! ~ . ; f! þ c:: a u i - I ! '",- - ·., "... -.--.--.- .....".-,.--.., ,. -,-- ..-..--,. .,.-----,." ..on,.. - ,--.-."... ...---.---..,.,----,-,--,.-.. - - .-...-, -,. -----,--- --------- --,-.-----,--.--.-,-.-..-----....- ,-.'- --., .-.....- ·"1 A Petition of United Homes International, Inc. for a Change in Zoning from the RS-~ (Residential, Single-Family-3 du/acre) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development-Celebration Pointe) Zoning District. R:! I- 1 - L--- l- I- - I- _ I- =~ I-- ~=c - n I L r-- .--- I I - ~ - - --I- '- '- ~, \- I...... I I I I ~\ I I I I l \ \ r \ \ ,\\ I r 1 - , .. , /,,/~ " .....-'>..':<~%~ L/: . .,/' - / , " ... .., :-_::>/>:~ n ~.iJY~ /,h .«?::j ·'·1 .. ri" L- [", >, " .... ./ ) \ ,.... y VxX xx »~ ~ XX~ xx~ ,. " / " :....... ../...... .... /,.>.:.>.~''>j [¿;<Y;;~~;)';;~' ~. ~. .~7~· , '~ ;. :'.7-:'- ", ::::: /.:~'7.:·.;';j 0:.' ..' " ... .. ". ." ......" '" " .,~ ,. .... ..,.' ,:'1 ," .. , . './"'~ - K >< - , I---i 1--= L-- ~_ .., - ------ - ,,' i,' . '. I' , :< :....., ¡" '.'" .. ...~/'-.~ ,"' ... .. ~ ..~ " :< x x [ Grãham Rd "",, ".... , ".-::<.' ":.~-:'>.:::\ 'X x , " / /. ' ,'XXx Y )( Y n', '.., ,"', '\IV ',(')¿ y b('XxY)¡ )<'X")()(""'~ )<X~ .'...--..../ --- . .,~ ,., rxX)< "><x'K.x';(. ~~X'x'.'>< ~ x~.>< x)O >- ~ ~~ .~~~~ xxxþ ><'V~ x>x~ ,> ~V'X)<~ ~F X x )( 'X )( )( 'X 'X'A'x )( x )( x )()( }j If .;xX "><x~'><x 'F~N?xV ,,)( )( 'X 'X x ,")t 'X ~ X X X ),:; ~ x)r:'X xVx Xy~)('\c~ x x X ~)( )< X)C >< )< 'X)O ì;Y\c~,::5II; )<V~ '\V'S \1( 'X >< ")I,><x ~ ..."e'- x )< x ,><'X)( >< "x 'X 'X (\\x X.X~ X t-, 'X)(~~~)( 'Ii. ~~ "~V~ ~ «7/ ~ rJS:~ (f~Y'XY)('><xx ~ ~ ~ -j'/ ~ >< 'X 'X y.#'x X,~.~ 11)("\/ ~~ - XX)<X '>( >< x '><"'x ><x- 'xV ~ )(~>< ~V .x ~ - ><x'X X 1< X)<x -~x'X)( ~/' = ^ v<2<xV0 x XV< )< ~)'K 'X 1< x 'JIo( IX ~ ~XXX: rxX)'YY<x~ ^~'><x ~~~><~ ~ ¥ ,('<?X)(X~^x"X'\(' X >< X X. x >( x y x Xy ~ ~ ~"><'x__ if)('J<..rY X><-)\<~x '~ 1JJl ~ _ ¿< ~~ ,x.. ,X)(0x\<.'X ~ >< ).")<~~ x< _ - ....XXx Xy)¡ 'Xxxx-Xx'X X - /'. )( >< ~XXXXX 'C\ ~ .,' Lt) Q) ~ !! m ! 011 ]; IX X x X'x^x xx xx I)< xx )< ~V x XX%x >< >2" ><xx x x 7:: IX X )õ ~ ~><x IX)<)<XX V<x N?xXX x -- ] ~ x x ,x bXx PUD 04-016 & RZ 04-015 5è ..LHC..:e, &,~ GIS ........~__ N! A ",.- ,", : . ':~.<~ Subject parcets ! ~ Ft. Pierce City Umits 1__'_____'_0'___ ____._..__._______.______.__ __ __. .. _ ~__.__..~_~..... Map prepared November 1, 2004 ".'" " ".". __._ N' ......._ _.... _ ...... .._ .. ____. _____. __.._________._.__._'M._.___..._._____.__.___._______ __'N . _.... I a H ÌI; t a¡! il! I 't. fill I ItI(. I ·-1 ¡ I I JIJ,I ,I , I Iii I · -I I ! ,III II" tllij1mr¡rd ¡¡¡!rIil!f I IrJllllfIWjtt!J.f~iìf!11 il 1....11"11111111 ¡ irTrr ;;1 I hi II f,f.111 II ..tfu' if 111,;:11 ~ Ih II I. I I ) ~i I J' I )1 J I I...~Q · I I .1 IJJ JI , III I ,,' ·IJ .. dllJld. I II.. lit I . , I ~ 0 . I J:~-'''Î' I '.. - .. - m,: , ~ ~~ II 'I :~ if J þ If f" I ]I. I' .. In ! 11 .11 :b III ---- ~.-:~... It Ii: ,- ~"',-, ,.,'., ";;..'....." "':--r"1fl'l ~-r---- ~, , II I 'I. I r) .1, I , I I J I · I 1.j," Ud ~ ,-,--::--:---;-,-:.l:.::"_--=-..~ I t.:;'_~:.__ r - II o;; I . ............... _. .--..... . c~~'~ '. ~'n1> . 1t Ì'). mw 'fJL EDWIN M. FRY, Jr., CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT SAINT LUCIE COUNTY FIlE" 2637663 06lO2l2OO5 at 02:54 PM OR BOOK 2260 PAGE 1468 -146S1 Doc Type: RESO RECORDING: $18,50 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 RESOLUTION 05-142 FLE NO.: RZ-04-0151PUD-04-011 A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE VOTE, CONDITION #2, AND CONDITION #5 CITED WITHIN RESOLUTION 05-008, ADOPTED ON JANUARY 18, 2005, FOR PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS CELEBRATION POINTE, AND A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA FOR PETITIONER UNITED HOMES INTERNATIONAL, INC. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. On January 18, 2005, this Board held a public hearing and voted to grant Preliminary and Final PUD approval and a Change in Zoning classification through Resolution 05-008, for Petitioner United Homes International, Inc. 2. Following the recordation of Resolution 05-008, staff determined that the vote cited within that resolution was in error 3. Following the recordation of Resolution 05-142, staff determined that Condition #2 cited within that ordinance contained an error. 4. Following the recordation of Resolution 05-142, staff detennined that Condition #5 cited within that ordinance contained an error. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Sl Lucie County, Rorida: A. The vote which this Change in Zoning effects is as follO'tNs: Chairman Frannie Hutchinson AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE Vice-Chairman Doug Coward Commissioner Paula A. Lewis Commissioner Joseph E. Smith Commissioner Chris Craft File No.: RZ-04-0151PUD-04-016 May 17. 2005 Resolution ~142 Page 1 · 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 B. Condition #2 cited within the resolution should have read as follows: 2 . Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy (CO) for the proposed project, the petitioner, his successors or assigns, shall construct Swain Road to minimum St. Lucie County specifications to include pedestrian and bicycle paths. C. Condition #5 cited within the resolution should have read as follows: 5. The irrigation system within this project shall be designed to accept water from the on- site retention areas. Permits shall be required to be obtained from the South Florida Water Management District. D. All the terms, findings, and conditions otherwise cited in Resolution Q5.OO8, approved on January 18,2005, are hereby incorporated by reference in Resolution 05-142. E. A copy of this resolution shall be retained in the petition file with the St. Lucie County Growth Management Director. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Frannie Hutchinson AYE Vice-Chairman Doug Coward AYE Commissioner Paula A. Lewis AYE " Commissioner Joseph E. Smith Commissioner Chris Craft AYE ATTEST: hf H:\WORD\Petitions\BCC\Finished2OO5\CelebrationPointe.PD\CelebrationPolnteRES.wpd File No.: RZ-04-015JPUD-04-016 May 17. 2005 Resolution 05-142 Page 2 ß(,c..- \';)¡001~5C GunsterYoakley ATTORNEYS AT LAW CELEBRATING BO YEARS Our File Number: 28038.00075 Writer's Direct Dial Number: (772) 288-1980 December 15,2006 VIA HAND DELIVERY Mr. Gil Backenstoss St. Lucie County Growth Management Department 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 Ji-\11 ~ i ['JU ( Re: Celebration Pointe PUD Dear Mr. Backenstoss: Please find enclosed an application for a Minor Site Plan Adjustment to the Celebration Pointe PUD. Also enclosed is a check in the amount of $300.00, made payable to the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners, along with the following materials: 1. Twenty copies of the Master and Final Site Plan; 2. One copy ofthe St. Lucie County Property Appraiser Tax Map; and 3. Two copies of an aerial of the Property. On January 18, 2005, the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners approved Resolution 05-008 (the "Resolution'), which' granted Preliminary and Final Site Plan approval for the above referenced project. Pursuant to the Resolution, the Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Site Plan approval granted by the Board of County Commissioners expires on January 18, 2007, unless final plat approval is granted or an extension is granted in accordance with Section II.02.06(B)(3), ofthe St. Lucie County Development Code. An application for Final Plat approval for the project has been filed. However, it appears that there is a chance that the Final Plat will not be approved by January 18,2007 as required by the Resolution. Accordingly, pursuant to Section I1.02.06(B)(3), of the St. Lucie County Development Code, please consider this letter our request for a I2-month extension of the Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Site Plan approval for the Celebration Pointe PUD. Weare requesting an extension due to the following delays we have encountered that were beyond our control. 1. FPL labor disputes and workload in the Ft. Pierce area have caused a four (4) month delay in FPL's ability to relocate conflicting power poles on Peterson Road and Jenkins Gunster, Yoakley & Stewart, PA 800 SE Monterey Commons Boulevard, Suite 200 . Stuart, FL 34996-3346 . (7721288-1980 . Fax: (772) 288-0610 . www.gunster.com fORT LAUDERDALE' MIAMI· PALM BEACH' STUART, VERD BEACH' WEST PALM BEACH Mr. Gil Backenstoss December 15,2006 Page 2 Road. As of this writing the power poles are still not relocated. Condition #1 of the Resolution requires the additional 45 ft ROW be dedicated to the county and improvements to Peterson Road be completed before the first issuance of a building pennit. 2. For the same reasons given in item 1 above, we are encountering a two (2) month scheduling delay for the pulling of power cable to energize the project. Without power, we cannot energize the lift stations for FPUA acceptance and FDEP certification. 3. Four (4) months of production were lost due to FPUA's reluctance to commence condemnation procedures to secure required utility easements for off site improvements. The requirement for condemnation was stipulated in the Utility Supply Agreement with FPUA. 4. The original final plat, submitted in November 2005 by John Donahue, P.E., VP of LBFH, Inc., appears of have been misplaced by the County. We were not made aware of this until we began calling for the status of our plat application in April 2006. The County position was that they never saw the plat, which prompted us to follow up on the matter with Mr. Donahue, who reaffinned that he submitted our final plat in November 2005. We resubmitted our final plat to the County at the end of June 2006. This situation caused a (6) month delay in getting the plat recorded. 5. On two separate occasions, we were given the wrong ROW pennit application by the St. Lucie County Engineering Department resulting in a series of plan re-submittals and lost time. In the first instance, we were handed the wrong application in person and followed through with the pennit requirements thinking we had the correct application. In the second instance, we were directed to the St. Lucie County Engineering website, which also contained the wrong application. This resulted in over a month in delays. 6. ROW pennit applications along with six (6) sets of accompanying plans for Swain Road, and one (1) copy of the Jenkins Road plans, were apparently misplaced by St. Lucie County Engineering Department, which caused over two (2) months of delays. In addition to the time extension we would also like to request the following additional modifications to the Resolution. Please note that this modifications should not result in any changes to the approved site plan. . In accordance with the County Commission's request to work together with other developers in the construction of Peterson Road we respectfully request a modification to the Resolution due to (i) delays in other developers submittal of plans to the County regarding review and approval of the construction of Peterson Road; and (ii) contract disputes between Florida Power & Light and their subcontractors which have caused delays in moving power poles that are located in the proposed Peterson Road right-of- way. Accordingly we are requesting that Paragraph 1 under Section B of the Resolution be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following paragraph: Gunster, Yoakley & Stewart, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Mr. Gil Backenstoss December 15,2006 Page 3 1. As part of the Final Plat of the proposed project, the developer, his successor or assigns, shall conveyor dedicate by plat to St. Lucie County, the northernmost 45 feet of the subject property along Peterson Road for additional right-of-way. To the extent pennitted under the County's Code and Complied Laws, any such dedication may be considered eligible for Road Impact Fee Credits. Prior to the recording of any Final Plat for the project, the developer, his successor or assigns, shall either construct to minimum St. Lucie specifications to include pedestrian and bicycle paths or provide sufficient security in accordance with Section 11.04.00 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code for the construction of a section of Peterson Road that extends ftom Jenkins Road to the eastern edge of the project's boundary. . We hereby request that Paragraph 3 under Section B of the Resolution be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following paragraph: 3. No two adjoining single-family homes shall have the same ftont architectural elevation. . We hereby request that a new paragraph be added under Section B of the Resolution which reads as follows: Pursuant to Section 11.03.01(C), of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code the developer shall be allowed to pull building pennits for a maximum four (4) residential units, after approval of a Preliminary Record plat and construction plans, but before approval of a Final Record Plat, provided no certificate of occupancy is issued prior to recordation of the Final Plat. Your cooperation and prompt attention regarding this matter is greatly appreciated. cc: Mr. Kevin Gillen Stuart 222748.1 Gunster, Yoakley & Stewart, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW ~"t~ OFFICE USE ONLY: DATE FILED: J ... ,~... ('), REVIEW FEE: -\ ~ c Ò CONCURRENCY FEE: RECEIPT NO: RECEIPT NO: SP NUMBER: ~ P (V\ '(\ - \ ~O\) l~S RESOLUTION NO: CERT. CAPACITY NO: ~">'.'f,",,,,_,_i><._d_;_~,j-__~~¥_'''''''''''''-'','''''.''''''''''''''·'"'¡' ,~I!(!)@~~~ ,'" COUNTY', FLORIDA - >< .. __~"" ~ "OW w _. i._ ST. LUCIE COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 2300 Virginia Ave Fort Pierce, FL 34982 772-462-2822 APPLICATION FOR MINORIMAJOR ADJUSTMENT TO A SITE PLAN AND CERTIFICATE OF CAPACITY DIRECTIONS FOR SUBMITTAL Please complete the requested information and submit all items to the St. Lucie County Growth Management Department, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. The proper non-refundable application fee must accompany all applications. For additional details on the information necessary for a submission of a site plan, please refer to Section 11.02.00, St. Lucie County Land Development Code. For assistance in submitting the application, please contact the St. Lucie County Growth Management Department, Planning Division. Minor Site Plan Adjustment I Major Site Plan Adjustment Plat Fees Required Review Fee To Maior Site Plan ( $300.00 To Maior Site Plan $350.00 Less than 10 acres $425.00 $425.00 10 - 49 acres $250.00 $500.00 50 + acres $250.00 + $2.50/acre over 50 acres To Minor Site Plan $150.00 To Minor Site Plan $400.00 $250.00 To PUD/PNRDIPMUD $300.00 To PUDIPNRD/PMUD $600.00 Dlus $5 Der acre Concurrency Fee To PUD/PNRDIPMUD $250.00 To PUDIPNRDIPMUD $200.00 REVIEW FEES AND THRESHOLD FOR REVIEW \~. Type of Adjustment (please check one) Minor Site Plan [ V"] Major Site Plan [ ] Type of Site Plan (please check one) Minor Site Plan Major Site Plan PUD/PNRD/PMUD [ ] fA Submission of Application Initial submission shall include the following: I) One (I) original of the completed site plan application. 2) Twenty (20) copies of the site plan graphics. (24 inches by 36 inches sheets) (site plan, landscaping plan, boundary and topographic surveys) showing approved project and proposed adjustment. 3) Five (5) copies of the Transportation Impact Report (if applicable). 4) Five (5) copies of the Environmental Impact Report (if applicable). 5) One (I) copy of the St. Lucie County Property Appraiser Tax Map (Scale I :200) with property under petition highlighted. 6) Two (2) copies of Aerial. Applications for Site Plan approval must be completed and filed with the department before 4:30 PM each business day to meet applicable filing deadlines. For an application submission to be determined complete, all required materials must be present at the time~of sub",~io!" 'è':,-; ..",.'.. ~ JAN 1'7 2001 Project Information .-- /¿~J LocationlSite Address d e,"1 k; "1 S Site Plan Name (~ ( <- ~rC<.~n ./) t=b "'\. .+e.... ~ '-tl g - '3, 'j -000-:; - 000/' I ~f18 ·-'"3fd- - ooe' ~OOOß Property Tax ID # ;). '-f' ~ _. j I I '-ooo'}.. -000/11 I J..'flf - 23f -Oðo I --000/::'- :HfI8- ;)33 '-000 J ,- 0001'- Legal Description $e:.e... 4~i..,,4J 6~ t.,l?lf Ií\" (attach extra sheets if necessary) Section I 'g Township 3SS Range 'lot.- Parcel Size Acres I t(7. It{ Square Foot b L/1J Cf'll K , Land Use Zoning District PUD J /<#1*5".,. Ils~?J Classification KvY\ , Re-5íJ~iI'l~A' S¡JhJu¡,~,(){'1 ().t.(fn~(o1'ð &of 1~G' S ; "'J 1-(..., Description of Project «IItJ ¡IVt\l If, - -k"" lia W\lt~ / ( vi'Residential Number of Residential Units/Subdivided Lots ( ] Commercial Total Square Footage TypeofConsnuction (Check aU appropriate boxes) ( ] Industrial Total Square Footage ( ] Please specify What is the purpose of y\ ~S~ ~~~ '"T"Ð T\~ Covl?tL \(è'tre:.... 01-- ~:J ~\:-t~~ the proposed adjustment? ~..... p. \;tr" o.f- ~"" ""I'O¡.Jos~ A 0.\ ~""^" '-It.) A,..¡.J. 1\2.~ IA Jo...u. Number and size of ,..J I A outparcels (if applicable) Date project originaUy .-.- 18, ~(IS' / Relll~J ^(ovê~t,td-- I~ J ).{Jok approved ~ti .., .., lL"'.... Resolution/Order I ;1 number of original 1( ~.'1 O~ -oaf{ 05-10.11- approval f Minor Adjustment to Minor Site Plan 1. Increasing any dimension of anyone structure by not more than 25 percent; or, 2. Altering the location of anyone primary structure or group of structures by not more than 50 feet; or 3. Altering the net density of anyone stage or phase by not more than 10 percent; or 4. Altering the location of any circulation element by not more than 50 feet. The relocation of any circulation element by more than 50 feet will be a major adjustment unless the relocation results in a reduction of impervious surface area; or 5. Altering the location of any open space by not more than 50 feet; or, 6. Reducing the total amount of open space by not more than 5 percent or reducing the yard area or open space associated with any single structure by not more than 5 percent; or, 7. Altering the location, type or quality of landscaping elements. 8. The addition or relocation of any accessory structure or use as long as the proposed addition or relocation does not conflict with any portion of any required open space, building separation requirements or other provisions of the Land Development Code. Major Adjustment to Minor Site Plans Any other adjustment, including the cumulative effects of separate minor adjustments made since July 1, 1984, to an approved minor site plan shall require approval by the Community Development Director of a new Minor Site Plan. Minor Adjustment to a Major Site Plan 1. Increasing any dimension of anyone structure by not more than 25 percent; or, 2. Altering the location of anyone structure or group of structures by not more than 100 feet; or, 3. Altering the net density of anyone stage or phase by not more than 10 percent; or, 4. Altering the location of any circulation element by not more than 50 feet. Relocation of any circulation element by more than 50 feet will be considered a major adjustment unless the relocation results in a reduction in impervious surface area; or, 5. Altering the location of any open space by not more than 50 feet; or, 6. Reducing the total amount of open space by not more than 5 percent or reducing the yard area or open space associated with any single structure by not more than 5 percent; or, 7. Altering the location, type, or quality of landscaping elements. 8. The addition or relocation of any accessory structure or use so long as the proposed addition or relocation does not conflict with any portion of any required open space, building separation, or other provisions of the Land Development Code. Major Adjustment to Minor Site Plans Any other adjustment to the approved site plan shall be considered a Major Adjustment and shall be granted only upon application to and approval by the Board of County Commissioners. SPECIAL NOTICE (pLEASE READ~:RE SIGNING ACKNOWLEDGMENTS BEWW) Submission oftbis application does not constitute the granting of site plan adjustment approval. All appropriate requirements must be met prior to 1his project being presented for approvaJ to the appropriate authority. St Lucie County reserves the right to request additional information to ensure a complete review of this project. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Applitut WormatieD (property Developer) Name: MeueJi) l~e5 ./'1G Address: 351r r z...J Grp¿ruek Pa~7 f')11/I (,,, Æ '1'f1'l1J PboDe:11).~'-'iO 0 I Fax: '7,2 '163-7'1(3 Apt ID~atiOD {jÞ",:? (4:t.l "'I~ S '" -4- Name: ~...>'t s~ "loa k(~ 1 Sk~..k,a.- \ Address: i'CO $£ M "'" fCJt..t.O_t fo""."", t"Ú' í3í .,~ .$ ,k~v ." s ~",__-t- . Pi- ],4 T9 b ; PlaoDe:71.2. :;.'(/- ("110 Fa~ 71). ').ð'óJlOb (0 Property Owau IBfonnatioD This application will Dot be coDSidered complete without the notarized signature of all DrODertv owøers of record. which shall serve as an acknowledgmeD fthe submission of this appJicatio or site plan adjustment approval. The property OWJJer's signature below shall also serve as autho" r ve applican to behalf of said property owner. , ~ !(bt / e-4. Ø/1t "J/ Property OwBer Sipatun Property OwDer Name (please PriBt)' MailiagAddnss: ;.1420 M,q,O't S-L--e-ef ,S...lIlÇc pr¿j(~rf of Lb-¡/\d {)VI;)(V,?, /JIIe~·"lf'S 1:64t~ ( r- V ¡ II{ t:.. . ('4- t¡ :;t Co I 'f . ~'1- I iJ L 4;..1 tJ A./e.,b t..-P' ( PbODe: (ì'f9) '{3"'&182- J STATEOFFLO~A I- . COUNTY OF 't" I ^ T'" -- - """"""""d........ .....l!:I::1t.. (,;..) day of ~. 2OillL, by ¡¿(!~ ".J-/.. R" Jw-,+ "0 . m,fcÁA who is personally known to me or who bas produced J, t. ~ f:;'''f¡i ,:.' fJ J! :>!:,JT:¥l.K.'i1t]1~. 1'1-:>; ~.~-~ as identification. ~4~~~'!:! PA-~Æ~Em~ '.:\. ~'. . ...ìt.ii§ '"'!\."_" - of. . .:u¡; .. . , . ~..... ~ ~~~~~~~~ ~-tA.'K~..!2..~~~i ...*~~~~I" _ _ . - .'!i... ~. ..~~,¡; ~~~~~~ ~. . ,- ~'8'L.. ~,QI;...'., -~. ~ . .~~~~\I ~~~~¡w1F. . _ ...... ,,'J_. '_",!",. .... " ~.!i.' ~~~~ :g.~.-;;: ~ rYl~ j Q X (R. 4. fVl Q r ¡(li) (S<oI) Type 0 rlnt Name ofNotaIy ~~4tu'~ ~~~~ Nota."V Public Titlë Commission Number NOTARY PUBUC·STATE OF FLORIDA W Joyce A. Mariano Co~lÌ1ÍSsion # DD472405 ExplTes: . SEP. 15, '2009 Bonded Thru Atlantic Bonding Co., Inc. · EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCELl: 2418-313-0003-000/1 THE SOUTH 330.52 fEET Of THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 LESS THE NORTH 97.32 FEET OF THE WEST 143 FEET OF THE EAST 163 FEET AND THE SOUTH 330.52 FEET OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 AND THE NORTH 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 AND THE NORTH 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4, LESS ROAD RIGHT-OF- WAY. ALL IN SEc.ïION 18, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST. PARCEL II: 2418-312-0001-000/4 THE SOUTH 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 AND THE SOUTH 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OFTHE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 AND THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 LESS THE SOUTH 330.52 FEET AND LESS A TRACT 143 X 207.28 FEET AND THE SE 1/4 OFTHE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 LESS THE SOUTH 330.52 FEET AND LESS ROAD RIGHT-Of-WAY. ALLIN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST. PARCEL III: 2418-311-0002-000/8 THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 AND THE NW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 LYING WEST OF CANAL 29, LESS ROAD RIGHT-Of-WAY, ALL IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 3S SOUTH RANGE 40 EAST. PARCEL IV: 2418·234-0001-000/5 THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 LESS CANAL RIGHT-Of-WAY AND THE SW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 LESS THE EAST 40 FEET AND LESS CANAL RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND THE NORTH 3/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 AND THE NORTH 3/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4, LESS THE NORTH 30 FEET AND THE EAST 5 FEET, ALL IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST. PARCEL V: 2418-233-0001-000{2 SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 LESS THE WEST 40 FEET FOR ROAD RIGHT-Of-WAY AND LESS CANAL RIGHT-Of-WAY, ALL IN SECTlON 18, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST. LESS EASEMENT FOR RADIO TOWER. ~·.-~II_- __.... ~ SeD 1& 2005 14:2& itnn:w K. na', Js:., ~ or TIlE C:r:BCtn'r CODa'r - ~ IIDCIB UJUII'U w P'IU" 210511637 (')'R 'FInOJC' ~::\~4 PAQIi 317. R.cozdcd OD/¡&/:aOO& at:. 12: DO N DOC ~a¥: $191901.50 P.02 .r- · , · . · ,. . . .... . .. .., ... . '0 . . Of . _. , .- . , I .~( ... . ~ ~ fJ:'1.Jú.:~~ ~~.1~IO @f ·~/~1('þðf1J1 SP!SCIAL W.ARRANTYDBBD . THIS DBBD, "a1:hil~'" alScp..... 2005, ~ocaHU..M. HODKJN, AS 'TJU1STBB tJNDD. nwST .A.GJ1mUIniITD.A.TBD 0C'l'0BB p.'2OCØ. bøwJa·.. tM11ÎD1åDa 1\Dad Land ~ witþ ID oØIœ 1f.~~1 NW 17t1J W... Suite ~04..Ft..~ PJmjða.33309 "CBlANI'Oll". IIId 10 LAND Alms. LP. . bèIØnre JIadted ~ wJIoIa poIt ofIlce addna 112020 MIÎD StnICIt, 8uita I\So. JrvIDa, ~ 92614, u ~" , " (WhøVer'Ulld__ tbe..~~"IIId~'~ fo~1I!I1I1 tœ parbeI to tbillDII:rumma ad 1he....... r.,p¡.,.._Iif,tlwallldlllllll¡pø·ut"øuJivûþlú. ~ Lha ~_II..1ØIIl .. of ondioDI.) ., . . ...... GOIp. ... . WITNBS SBTH: . That thD ŒANTOR, ~ IDI in CODIIdatio.a. oftbllUlD ofT.DoQm (SI0.00) aDd 0Iher good 1IJd''VI1aab18 ~Ja.håDd 'paid to ~bJ iIid'~ ~whereof' ilhonIbyaabowladpd, by1htleptllllltl doet ~.....IIIJ, ....øaIIIp. ~ 0UIMJ1Dd CfRIIinn \Jato the U!tA.N'l'SB tbD~' dID:lbed'IiII' . o' . IIId dPf.a Iåu1 ~_ID roll . ~1uWäål åd wiLu.tw w·ti.ëouo'L, òt'~:r..udO~S~~~·~·Wit· . SÈ&BXHIBlTUA.D A.Tl'.ACHBDHB1ŒTÒ.ANDJlADBAPAR1'lJ'PAm1l'·" . ThiI GQIMI9IDC8 illUbject to the fbIløwiøa: : 1. :a.t __ tall for the,. 2005l1li nbIequeDt,... 2. 1baIo ØJIIICIrI ~ OIL t1w IttIKW ~ "B". , TØQB.~w:II.Ia ~ the.....,~.... ap~~.t~.he1,?,:,am. C?"in , mrWl1-x'~' TO HAW AND TO HOLD tile -. mfee itIppIc fbnMIr. Tho bClDdtlIDd obJipt1au.benaDder IbIIlbmreto II1d b.bb1dIDgup~\twhlln. ~~ '. "- . . '" ..., . KIÇ,lv,d Ot-le-oe 11¡IOMl flu.- Tu-COX, CASTLe. . "ICHO PMM_ OOZ . . ' UN JJC.X.)A ;'!.Jc.. ,tAW :JIIJ" ~ Seþ 16 2005 14:26 P.03 ". -, . ~ .. . "',\ admåÜ*Ir.arI.lllcceuanaduitplaftlla11llplCti......... . ~dÞeI" 8JUyWlD:l1lttllltllloto aD 68 pnm¡..-..., Gaa"..",¡¡d,lDdwDI.... tbI........tbeJøl1l. G1IImI ofCJltAlmJa, IdI JIlin lad ...... ..,,....œ:~~....., o1Iima . tba"bi.tIIrouP"'uadcr~""""...odIK. ... TNWJ.'.I'NUSWBIRBOP, t1It~...--...~tob,~W~da1 ad "'.b Ibøve writtBn. , .. .. ... . . ...... .... ... ... . Sip,ect IJIIed ad dtIi.;.tbCt . ¡:-af ~~ Pdat Nama: ~ ~~ ~~~~~ . .... ...... . u .. .. . '" II . . .. " II ~¡¡~ - II. -à.Idñ, A& Tmot -- na.t ~"".~_P. 2003. bøwnu tb81......llDIId Lad Trust . : . .. . STArn Ot' rLOlUDA . - . . ... . ,.... .1 .. . . .. . .. . . COt1NTYOPBRDWARD : .. .. . . ." .. Tbe tbre&øiDa ÎDItruIIHIIIt ~ acbøwIedpd bafbreÌDD tIIÌ. ~_ ot~. 2005 by'" M. HocUda. u Truøe. lID ÎI påòaåiJIJ boWn to Die or hIi P:rOduœd a PJ.Odda ddveñ liceaseu ið~, . My eo"""¡,1Iino .BIpJnI: N I StatII i ~.~. :. .. .. -" . " . . RIGIIVld 08-10-05 11:30.. Fra- To-COX, CASTLE, , NICHO PI,I DOl , . ( 1 OK.tIOOK ~:.fC,4 1'.... ::I" , S8þ 16 200& 14:26 P.OI! . . .. I ,-..... ". .. . ..1..&"'14' ~ '. .... . .. ..'.. . .".... .... "... -'. . . . ;.~~':~~ f~~' iol1:::ii:.t\:7;r t .....~1 ~- :à;~.~ ~~···:{l·~~AM$f~Y.f:~~?'~.$'-m')'r. ~~-:-';"'" \~.,,;,:,\ti ,J!::.,! '';~'~Ii:'$''o(o'~'\':,~\~¡'': ",~ "'_. . . I,~~ "0 ,'".' .... PMOEL., . .:. ...-,;:: .-.,.., .r-f ...........,......,'~ .,.~'r ..·\r~. ..,.....,"''C-T.''f'''.,.. :'\': "",: . " ..'"..',. ....J ""''''1 of,.. .........: . .".... ..... A PARCEL OF lAND LYING IN SI!CTION '8. TCJWNtJHP 3a ,..:nrm. RANGE 40 EAST, aT, LUCIE COUNTY, fLOftlDA BEING MORE PARTICULAaL Y De8CftlISI!D AS FOLLOWS: . " '0' .... _.. Of" . .. .""...,. FOR A POINT Opr RI!PI!ft..!!NCE COMMENCI ATtHI! &SOUTHWISST CORNeR OF THE NOR1'tIWE8T (114) wUAR'I2R OF &AID 8EC11ON 11; '11i&NCE NORTH 8r14'4r &.QT. ALONG THE åOUnt UNWtOF"8AI'Q NORtHWB8r~1I4) QUARTER. A DISTANCE OP .0.00 PH! TO THE EAST RIGHT-oF-WAY'llNE OF JENKINS ROAD¡ THI!NCI! NORTH ocr1nr WI!8T. AL.ONG &AID EAST RlØIÌfT ..oP-WAY LINE, A DlSTANOE OF 44.&0 FEET.TO .THE MOR1H RlOHT~F-YIA.Y.UNE OF NORTH ST. LUCE RIVER WATSR CONTROL DISTRICT (NSLfMICþ) CANAL NO. 38 AND 11i1: POINT OF BeGINNING. I THENCE CONTINUE NOR'IJt ~15'fi7ltWE8T,.ALONG SAIP ~~GHT-OF-WAY LINE OF JENKINS ROAD. A DISTANCE OF ~ FEEr:TQ "ßtI; SoUJ:H RIGHT.. OF.JNAY UNE OF Hi * aNI RQH)¡ 111E1tC1! NORTH "D'SS· EAST, ALONG SAID ' SOUTH RlGHT..QF.WAY UNE, A DISTANCE OF ~281.11 f&&TTO TH& &AST LINE OF THE W&8T (1/J) HALF OFTHIi NORTHWEST (114) QUARTER OF SAID ØECTlON 'I8;'THENGE ØOlJTtI ocr.01"Jr..aA8T:·AI..CØJ tSAlP·.~ue..A '. . DISTANCe OF 1140.. FeeT.TO THE NORTH.LlNE OF 1HE,:8QU'I'ttWEST (1(4) . QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST (1)4) QUARTER OF TWe NORTA\fJEST (1/4) QUARTER OF SAID SEC110N 18; 1HËNCE NOR1H IO"Z&"'" ~..ALONG SAID NORTH,UNE. A DlSTANCI! or 011.43 FEET: TI:IENCE so~· vYI$T. A blSTANCE OF G22.18 FEE1TO THE NORTH UNE 'Or: MID . ~ 'NO: . 38¡ lMENCE S'OU.TH 80·'..·.. WAT, ALOHa SAID NQRTH. UN~ IA DISTANCE OF '881.94 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE OF JENKINS ROAD AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING. . . I . . PARCEL 2 . .' A PARC;J..Q¡::.1.AND-L.v.&NQ.4N SECTION l' ~RANc;e.40 .EAS1'. ST. t.ut:lE CdùPm'. flURIDA ~G MORE PAfmCU~~T DescRIBED AS F.OLL0W8: .. . .... . : . . FORA POINT OF REFERENCE. COMI/IIiNCE-'T'THE CORNER OF . THI NOR'TH.V'fE&T (114) ~1Ø ~ SAID 8EC11ON 18' TlI . NORTH 89-14'48"~, ALONG THE 80UTH LfN80fr 8M) (114' QUARTER.' 'A DISTANCE OF H7.CJ:I Æ&T; THENCI! SOUTH OO"DI'22" I!AST. DISTANCe Of A4B:J FEET TO THE 8óU1'H ftIGHt-òJr-WAY i.IM! Of' NOft1'H 8T LUC1E RIVER' WATeR CONTROL DI8TftICT OANÅL NO. sa ~D THJæ 'POINT PF I E~INNlNG. I I I . '" I· . . 0f'LQ0Ca 1Q311e017 , . ...... ..' ..... " .' . .. ' , " . . R.Ç.IVld 08-1&-05 11:IOal PrOl- Ta-COX, CASTL!, , NICHO Par. 004 f ~ ØUUA ~~.4 ~ 4UU SSP 16 2005 14:26 P.05 . , f· . . . i , ... . ".. . .THEtCEN~14~1J.~.ALDNB"DsøU1H~YJ.lNe.A.. . '.. ." .'f!:.a.-f ett,7b"BEW........gq:o ~DØUN"~'i\If'. ," :".:' ,.:: ::.'~~t(r r ........ .' ....... ROAD:,",l5RCE'eotmMJo-Drl2")W!ST:~MlØWE8TJUaPrr-eF.wAY·.· ..... .... 1. UN£, A DISTANCE 01* 7.IU5 Æèt: iiíiNëè SOUTH "'10" WI8T. A. . .DISTANCe err 131.DZ PIœT; THINC! SOUTH GcrorIr WEST. A ~8TANCE OF 804.14 FEET; THI!NOE NORTH aror1lrl!A8T, A'DIå1ANCI'ÒP 1":02 FeeT TO SAID WE8I'&RL Y RIGHT..or WAY UN&; THENClBOUTH ocrcJI'121 WI:8T, ALONa SAID 'J'JE8T&ti..~ RIGHT-oF-WAY; LINE. A DllTANœ Of~.'M J"O THE . SounI UNE OFTHI! NORTH (114) Q~OFTHE (1/4). . QUARTER OF THE SOUT1:lEAST (114) QùM1ËR OF THE 80 . (114) . QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 18; "('HENCE ~ ..ar.....~,ALPNØ SAID soOTH UNE. A DIStANCE Of 1282.77 ~ tHËNÇË NORTH' OOW2%'WEST. A . DISTANCE OF 1+10.04 FeET TO THe aouTH RIGHT-orr-WAY UNe! OF'8AlD NSlRWCD C'ANAL NO. 38 AND THE POINT ~ eEOINNING.· .. . PARCEL 8 A PARCEL OF ~D LYIN~ IN SE~N 18. TCMINSHIP ~ 8P\1T1ÌJ~AN~E 40 . . ÊA8T, aT. wCle COUN1Y, PL.ORIDA·8E1NG MoJœ'PART1CU~Y DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: I '. . . ," i FOR A POINT OF REFERENCE. COMMENCE! AT tHE SOUTHWEST. CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST (114) QUARTER OF SAID seCTION 18; TI:IENCE NORTH "14'48- EAST. ALONG THE SOUTH UNE OF MID NORnIWE8T (114) QUARTER, A Ulti IANC.:I: Of 1888.08 FEET TO THE INTER8EtrnOH OF A NOR'rHéRL Y PROJECTION OF THI! I!A8T RIGHT-oF-WAY UNI! OF SWAIN R~; THENCE . SOUTH oo-œ12M WEST, ALONG MID NORTtERl Y PROJEcmONt A DISTANCE OF 74.11 FEET TO THIi soum·RlGHT-oF-WAY UNE OF WHIT.& WAY DAIRY . ROAD ~ND THE POINT 011fæOlNNING. .. . ..... .... ~ .' ... . THENCE NORTfl er1~'4r E'AST, ALONG'MlD SOUTH.RlGf"IJ"~ÌwAYUNE, 'A OISTANCE Of 188.88 FEET TO THE WEST RlGHT-oF·WAY UN! \ofF NORTH ST. LUCIE RIVER WATeR CONTROL DISI'RICT (N8LRWCD) CNW. ~.' 28 '(FIVE MILE Ç~i " II! rOLLÇWlN~ I'"9U" (AI) COU"8~ ~~~ ~D.~ ~OHT· OF.WAYUNE:-·. . ...... .... ... .....---....:. -..... ..... ..... t··-....,.·..·..· ..' . . . I I SOUTH 11-.'40- EAST, A DISTANcE OF 230.02 FEET¡ . ¡ SOUTH 1rS'24· EAST. A DISTANCE OF 214.08 FEET; I SOUTH 12-02" 1· EAST, A DISTANCE OF 344.21 FEET: . . 80\IrH 1$-.·zr'l!AST, Â DISTANCe OF 414.10' Æ!T TO E eoLJ11i UNE' or THE NOR1'HWE8"r.(1I4) QUAR"I'nR or THE 8OUTHEA8T (114) I UARTER OF SAlÒ'8ÊéT10N 18¡ THSNë'E SOUTH Bi-ai'U'WE8T; ALbMG'SAI &bUTH lINE'A DISTANCE OF 2154.41 FEET; THEHœ 8OU11i erI)8Ì10'y.øT. NØ-mE SOUTH UNE OF THE EAST & HALF OF·THE NORTHEAST (114) UARTER OF 1}E ~~t1(4) QU .'". ~~~.~ 18,.~:~T~.?f~~. ORLDOCS 10346817' I . .. .. . .. . ... ...... " ,'! ' R.ç.IY,~ 08-18-0& II:S0~. FIliiii'" T~X CASTL!, I "ICHO P~.. 00& . .. . ~ ....0 . ..,.. .. ... . .. . ....0 ., _ . .. ~ ____ P.DS Sep 1& 2005 14:2& ¿ . UM ~ ~~.. L~ .U~ . . ... . . - \ ..:. .:' " .f.EE]'.m.II:IE.EMT.RIBHT.ø<WAY.LNiœ.~NóR'rH.... :', .:'. :., ~~::~t~~?~~~~~1 . ·=r~=f~.~:·'~~ . AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING. '" ' . -. I,m'~~ .l'. ...;:-, ~ ~ J ". :: '. ..... ".. .. . ,.....p."'...... t' ., _".. .....,,·.......·M ",. I .... ......."-'"........["............... .- . I I I I I I I , I . .,.. -,a'.. ."to ·_·...1"101 . .' .: . , . . . .. I I .".". .... .- ....... .j". '. .-- ......... I ! . . .0 . ... ORLDOOS 103488111 i . . ' . ! . ' " Rlallved 08-18-05 11130.. FrQII- To-COX, CASTLE. " NICHO P.,. 008 MERCEDES HOMES, INC The undersigned Mercedes Homes, Inc. hereby designates and authorizes the following to act on its behalf and for its benefit with respect to certain matters relating to the physical development and construction of Celebration Pointe: Robert M. Kush Keith Buescher Ken Mitchell Rob Smithwick Don Jackson James L. Sigmund ~ CFO President of Corporate Operations President of Land Division Treasme Coast Division President, Regional VP of Land Development ~._ Director of Finance Land Acquisition Name IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this Consent as of October 13, 2005. Mercedes Homes, Inc. By: ~~ Name: Keith Buescher, Director and President of Corporate Operations OWNER'S A1JTHORIZATION AND CONSENT The undersigned LO Land Assets, LP ("Owner"), hereby consents, designates and authorizes Mercedes Homes, Inc. ("Contractor") to act on its behalf and for its benefit with respect to certain matters relating to the physical development and construction of the real property held by Owner located in the master-planned communities commonly known as Celebration Pointe ("Property"). A definitive legal description of the Property is attached hereto as Exhibit "A". I. AuthorizationlRi2ht To Relv: This Authorization and Consent is intended to allow Contractor to obtain permits, prepare and submit plans, execute subdivision applications and agreements, and carry out various responsibilities and obligations normally required by or associated with the development of the Property. This includes the right to act on behalf of and for the benefit of Owner for the purpose of submitting. obtaining, authorizing or executing any and all: a) permits; b) development variances; c) waivers of conditions/standards; d) developmentfunprovement plans; e) extensions of time; f) design reviews; and g) other similar permits! authorizations related to the foregoing. Owner expressly agrees that any governmental agency, employee or representative shall have the right to rely upon this Authorization and Consent in dealing with Contractor and accepting its authority with respect to matters affecting the Property. 2. No Waiver: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary that may be contained herein, in no event shall this Authorization and Consent relieve Contractor of any obligations it currently has or which may arise to Owner pursuant to any other existing agreements, øptions, or other understandings related to or in respect of the Property ("EÚlting Agreements"). Likewise, nothing contained herein shall be deemed to modify, diminish or waive any terms of any such Existing Agreements or rights which Owner may have thereunder. 3. No Advene ActioDlIndemnltv: Contractor shall be obliged to act with all appropriate diligence and good faith with respect to any action taken pursuant to this Authorization and Consent. Nothing contained herein shall permit Contactor to take any action which may diminish or adversely affect the Property or the value thereof, or expose Owner to any liability above or beyond that which it has expressly accepted pursuant to the Existing Agreements. Contactor agrees to indemnify and hold Owner harmless from arid against any and all liability, costs, or damages of any kind in nature whatsoever, including attorney's fees, which arise out of or are related in any way to Contractor's misuse or breach of the terms of this Authorization and Consent. Date: September 22, 2005 LO LAND ASSETS, LP, a Delaware limited partnership By: LE LAND ASSETS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company Its General Partner ' . By: ~ e::¡;;?~ Name: Susan D. Vavak Title: Vice President EXHBIT "A" Parcell: The Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 LESS the West 40 feet for right-of-way and LESS canal right-of-way, Section 18, Township 3S South, Range 40 East. Parcel2: The East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 and the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 lying West of Cana129, in Section 18, Township 35 South, Range 40 East. Parcel 3: The South 330.52 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 , LESS the North 97.32 feet of the West 143 feet of the East 163 feet AND the South 330.52 feet of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 and the Nort1Í 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 and the North 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 18, Township 3S South, Range 40 East LESS road right-of- way. Parcel 4: 1be South 1/4 of the Northwest of the Northeast 1/4 of1:h:e Southwest 1/4 and the South 1/4 of the NortheaSt 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 AND the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4, LESS the South 330.52 feet and LESS a Tract 143 feet x 207.28 feet and tlie Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 LESS the South 330.52 feet of Section 18, Township 35 S~uth, Range 40 East, LESS road ri8ht-of-way. ParcelS: The Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4, LESS canal right-of- way, and the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 , LESS the East 40 feet and LESS canal right-of-way, and the North 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 and the North 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 LESS the North 30 feet of the East 5 feet of Section 18, Township 35 South, Range 40 East. Parcel 6: The North 3/4 of the West 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 18, Township 35 South, Range 40 East, Less and Except the West 40 feet for road right-of-way and Less and Except Road and Canal rights-of-way. ALL.L YING AND BEING IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA Ciainn' Choice Q) ...J t:: ...... a Cl Q.. B ~~ tIS t:: t:: 'S a:)~ ~ .;-: ~ ~ /" ~ ,..." Ù 1ooo"J.;/'/ > /~ C1j ::¡ ~ ;: , .' ).... ..,,¡ ~ ',</>:>g I.... ~~)- ~ ~ Q) ....... Q) \.) I Iln! ","WlH~ I I 'r ; I I I I I I I I II:: ~ z ~ ø z ::::¡ II:: _0 ~ ~ § " õ§ ¡[ ~... ~ ~ ~ :;; N I III - ,,- !- '" ----,--- § ... § U l III z~ ~ ~ ì !; U) U) ::::¡ w (H N3~ - ~LD I'-=- -I- L 6'\ 1 - I '111/ ~ ..J ~CD ~§ " d:~~g 'tJ§ bo> !...~; 0::.... .11) ~~~~ ¡:'" £ - ::I ~\ I I II/~~ ~ Ff "\ \ '~\:z D:: I I I I / ìt:::: ~ '<. ..J J&!""- I~ ~ )- 71 1 i~ I\~~ / :z ~- ë J (/~ /9 '- - I I ~.om == ¡::::, -:1 = , ~U~ ~1F )¿ ~ I J~i ;ï8h !r-"""" o~~~ ~~(I) ;!j jiiiIIII""'"' ~~~~ ~Iõ!bg III~<IÞ ~;::r¡~ 0"''':''' ....It'ONQ) .9~ ~... 0 Lf.!JIVM ¡¡§ " §~" n ~ 8~ bg 0> ¡¡¡§<:g '" ._ N....,... CD ~~::;~ !!¡'" o.~ eN ¡z .§~" !!¡... -;;:§ ~~ B~ .,~... :; III§U'I~ j;:t N ~§b!C ¡~.tT ~~b:£ ~...~8 ~~~~ III~~~ ~....~~ ¡C"Im.... < 0>'" ~~;!~ N"':m ~M~§ ....CDC")"'" .9~ ..J~"" .9~ .~b!<l .9~ < ~o 0.'" '2"'0>0; ~§ " iIIINrm ...aoMII) ~~ g .9~ ~§ '" '" 'EN '" 0.'" '" ~ -;;:§ ~ ~§~" ON ... ..J~ N m~~~ .9~ -;:~~g <h ! ~~ '2~t\!Q) ~~~~ ~CDCÐM ..Jco....r-- .9~ f-~ ... N J~i [ LO ~ " § " §§~tT .~~g £§~~ - b:ß ,2 § b", <'" Š"'~lr ~~.,'" d!~~'" .......t")M ::C"'!~ ~:~ V)~LO~ ~Ll)N - ~ :;; '" '" N " N '" ! - I ~ n ... I N ~'" :;; ~ '" .;;:~ L-- N .... -- ~ ~ H l 3 ~N ~ -' I :;~ L- ¡L i¡ ~l----------= ~,¡¡ -~ "'''...~ ~~~-~ -- li~""'-- -.---¡ I~: ~~ --II I ~ WUIH H31\,H ~3c o~ - - -1 ~ J.AAU C~ 3 '!II. \1 ... '--"":I ~ ., J '" ~ 3rw I UL "" \\o.s~~ _ -~m .l~ FE]] ,~[ L~ ( ~~CNE\~~O\l fA OE~U~j b~ ~ !ê~~... -, i ~~Irel~ ~I I 55 ~ I .s:!§:C4: ~¡;¡b!C ::I Õ <('I') .........COQ) "M<"!.... ~e:!~ ... '" § " ~ ê ~ ~ ~ '" ... N ~~t § b~ N~~ ~~~ ~Q)'Ot ;!j r u :J ~~~~ ~S<b~ cð<CC") .,.....(7)..,. ...JC"'......,. ~~~~ ¡¡M 15'" 1111 ..... {.j C!J I... ~ ~ ...... ~ <-.J b 1::.... :¡ t\] o ..... G I.. <I> Q¡ 13 "'\ :¡ ..... ... I:: ~ ~'" i .... fI. ~ .~ ~ .C<! >08 .< ).... ",0= /- '" ~ ...; '" i ...; ...: o o N o <1 ... " e ! e ~ :; ..I ...: o o ~ en ~ ... Õ 1/1 IV :g~ en" 1:;1; ~~ Z :I :lEu 0.." en; i= õe a.. Ie c:l .2 E "e t! 0 .Q- -!~ 0" , IV III .. ~j o t! %~ II': it ¡e ..a.. .2E .~~ ÛÎ" =-!! OGl 0..:1 <0 ~ NN 0 co 0> 01 N co r-- M r-- ... ... ... ... NN ~~ 0> 0> c; 10 10 10 lOeD eD r-- èõ èõ ~rë èõ èõ ... ... <õa; M 10 0 r-- 0 0 10 N N M N... ;;; ;;; ... 1010 ... 0 N N N NN N 0 eDeD eDM 0 ... M M M M ~ .,. ;:çM M MM MM N M CD M M M MM M ~ ... ;;; ... C? ... ... c;;e;; U?1l? 0 ~ .,. .,. Ir? .,. <? .,. .,. .,. 10 10 .,..,. 10 .,. 10 .,. .,. .,. .,..,. .,. <? '?C? <? <(C{ ~ ,.,. , , iJ; N N NN N'" r-- r-- èõ r-- r-- 0> r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- ... ..... r--r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- r--r-- 10 II) r-- r--o> 0> 0> 0> r--N NN N N NN co co ð; .,. ð; ð; .,. ð; ð;ð; ð; .,. ð; coco ð;ð; ð; co ð; ð; ð; ð;ð; ð;ð; ð; ð;c; 0 00 ð;~ r-- r--r-- r-- r-- r--r-- r-- r-- 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 010> ..... 0> .,. ~~ ;;; ... ... ;;; ..... ..... ... ... ... ~~ ~ ~ .,. .,. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ .,. .,. ~~ ~~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ M ~~ MM M MM MM M M M M M M MM M MM M M MM MM 00 ~ ...J...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J...J ...J ...J ...J ...J...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J...J ...J ...J...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J...J ...J ...J ...J...J ...J ...J u.u. U. U. U. U. U. U. U. U. u.u. u. u. u. u.u. u.u. u. u. u. u. u. u. u. u. u.u. u. u.u. u.u. u. u.u. u. u.u. u. u. u.u. u.u. ~ "fi"fi I'll I'll m Æ ÆÆ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ .!!! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~l E E E ~ ..0 I'll ¡;¡ ¡;¡ßj Q)Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) II) Q) II) II) Q) II) Q) II) II) Q)Q) (!) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) 0.. 0..0.. Q) ä:ä: ä: ä: ä: ä: ä: ä: ä: ä: ä:ä: ä: ä: ä: ä:ä: ä:ä: li! ä: ä: ä: ä: ä: ä:ä: ä:ä: ä: 7ií 1iS1ñ ä: ,- 'Ë 'Ë 'Ë 'Ë 'Ë 'Ë 'Ë 'Ë 'Ë ~ 1::1:: 1:: 1:: 1:: 1:: 1:: 1:: 1:: 1:: 1::1:: 1:: 1:: 1:: 1::1:: 1::1:: 1:: 1:: 1:: 1:: 1:: 1::1:: 1::1:: 1:: ÕÕ ~ ~~ 1::~ I'll I'll I'll I'll I'll I'll '" I'll I'll 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0'- ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 0 u.u. u. u. u. u. u. u. u. u. u.u. u. u. u. u.u. u.u. U u. u. u. u. u. u.u. u.u. u. u.J: u.::2 N J: ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 0.. " " > 0:: u. u. u.u. u. u. u. u. u.u. " " ã5 ,~ ð = = ~~ = .r: = = .r: .r: 0:: " 0:: c C 0> .,. .,. .,. ;¡: .,. .,. .~ 0:: ~ '" en " " " " " 11 Q) "" " ~ " " " " " " " 0 " Q) Q) Q)Q) ~ ~ ~ Q) Q) Q) ~o:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: m .8 ~ " " " 0::0:: 0:: " 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: i c ... .... .... 0:: ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ " Q) 0:: 0:: 0:: ãJ é3 é3 é3 <en 0:: en en en en ]!i m m "" Q) en m m m en en m en m m c: c c c: c: ~ ~ en m m en c: c: 0::0:: " c: If: c: c: c: c: c: c: c: c: c: c: = = == = = .r: = == 1'11'- m co ~ ~ ~ ~ jí c: c: c: c: ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ B ßj ~ ~ ~ r-- r-- r--r-- r-- r-- ¡::;: r-- r--r-- ,- ... c: r-- ~ ~ ~ ~ c: c: ~ c: c: ~ ... c: c: c: c: c: c: c: c: c: c: c: c: c: c: c: II) 1: c: 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 ,- Q) ..... Q) Q) Q) Q) c: c: c: c: c: II) Q) '~ '~ c: Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) ;1:: 0 I'll I'll Q) ... ... ... ..... ... ... ... ... ... ... III e>.... c: .... .... .... .... ... :I ... Q) Q) Q) Q) .... .... 0 .... .r: .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ~ .r: .r: .r: .... ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ 5en Q) )( 0 0 .... .... .... .... u u u u .... 0 en en en en en en en en en 0.. en en en en en en en en en en en 0'" ... ce 10 10 ... ... 0> r-- 0> en en en en ... ... 100> ... 10 r-- ... ... ... ... ... ... ... èõ c; c; co co co ... Z Z zz z z z z zz " ON C; 0 r-- .,. N M Ñ 0 ... 0 0 CD ~ NN 00 N CO 0 èõ èõ ~ ~ èõ èõ èõ CO CO CO èõ 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 " Mr-- N N r-- CO r-- N C;; 0> CO r--r-- r-- r-- ... N CD 10 ~ r-- 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 < NN ... 0.. ... ... N ... 10 ... 10 0> 0> 0> NN ... ... N ... N ... ... ... ... ... ... ... N N N ... r-- r-- r--r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- r--r-- ~ IV C U. <J: t! u ~ I!! ~,g¡ en en en en en en en en GI >- ::2 ::2 Ìj' € W.... ,!! ,!! ,!! ,!! ,!! Q) 5!(!) Q) c CII =:8 E~ ,!!! en I'll I'll ,_ c: 'S ~ CII I!! :I :I :I :I :I :I :I.r: Q) c: c: I'll ~~ S2Æ .9 .9 .9 0 .9 0 .9~ 0 0.. F F l- ce ...J ...J ...J ~ :I E! (!) Q) c: .s ~ t!! Q) IV E c 0 ...J U t! = ti- c: C:en1! GI 'E Q) 2~ ãJ ~~ E E E E E E E E E c c: CII g.!!!1- ~ ~ c: c: 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 Q) Q) c: I'll .!!!Q) ~~ß " " " " " " "" " ce ce3 ...J (!)o.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 ~ 0.. IV C ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 u. 0 .r: Z ::2 ... J:!ß en en ~ .... :Q:2 OQ) .. > I'll ~ '" ~ ~ en (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) ...Ju. (!) CD en c:'t: ~ E E E ¡g c: e> .... ~ en .... c ~ c: 'C: :s ~ä! c: c: c: c: c: c: c: 'C: Q) c: ~ .r:I'II I'll 0 Q) 0 .r: 0,- m .r: .r: .r: .r: .r: .r: .r: om .r: 0 o.r: .r: .r: .r: I'll .r:Q) I'll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0:: ....u ::2 I- en I- u 0.. 1-0:: ce(!) :;:¡ .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... 00.. .... 0 .5 g ~ ...J 00 00 o 0 00 00 ~ ~ ~. c: .5 .5 .5.5 .5 .5 .5 .5 .5.5 ~ en m !ß!ß en en en m m en c: Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q)Q) IV :I ¡:::- 5! .S! 0 0 0 E E E E E E E E E E c 0 ...J U 0 0 0 0 I'll Q) ::::¡ ::::¡ ::::¡ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 en .r: c: 0.. J: J: J: J: J: J: J: J: J:J: 't: Q) ~ !:!:!. ~ c: ~ ~ u ~ ~ l- I- I- 'õ .S! ti ti ãJ ãJ ~ c: c: ::> ::> ::> æ æ æ æ æ æ æ æ œ œ GI .r: 'E 'E ~ ~ g m ! 'E E E E E E E E E ~ .s E c :I " 0 ~ c: c: CÐ CII .!!! '" ~ ~ ~ c: c: c: c: c: c: c: c: c: c: ~ ...J ...J " :I ~ ~ c: c: c: c: I'll ~ '" 0 0 0 0 .g 0 0 0 ~ 0 c: c: c: c: c: c: c: c: c: c: ¡¡¡ en :I ~ en ~ Q) Q) '" I'll 1:5 Q) en en ~ ¡;¡ '" ë3 " " " " ~ ~ " :I 52 52 52 " Q) II) ~ Q) Q) ~ Q) Q) ~~ Z 0:: Z ce ce ce ...J ...J 0.. Z Z 0.. en 0 0 0 0 0 0 (!) 0 ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J 10 .,. 10 C; ð ð r-- CD M 0 r-- co c; ~ co 10 S r-- co C; r-- ð ð C; r-- 10 N 0> 10 S 10 r-- 0 M N co M 0 r-- ð C; co co 10 NO> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 N 0 0 ... 0 0 0 0 0 0 C; N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 M 0 C; 0 ... C; 10 C; N M ð C; C; N C; c; M C; ð N C; N C; N C; ð M ð N 10 0 C; ... c; N M ~ 10 :s¡ r-- co 0> 0 ; NM 0 0 c; 0 N 0 0 0 0 2: 0 2: 2: 0 0 C; 0 0 0 M M M M .,. .,..,. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2: 0 0 0 g N N N N N N N NN e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2: 0 00 0 ... ... ... M .,. M ... ... ... ... M M M ~ M M M M ~ M CO) M M ~ M ; ; ; ; N N CO) ;;; N M 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 ~ 0 ... ... ... ... ... M ~ ~ ~ ~ M M M M M ... ;;; ... ;;; .,. .,. ~ Ñ ~ N ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 r-- ;;; ;;; ... ;;; ;;; ;;; M M M M èõ N M ;;; ;;; ;;; ;;; ;;; ;;; ;;; ;;; ~ M CO) 10 10 10 10 II) 10 10 10 10 10 r-- M r-- r-- r-- r-- co co co co co M co co co co M co co co co co co co co co co 0 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 0 0 0 0 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... IV .,. CO) M M M M M M M M M .,. .,. .,. .,. .,. .,. .,. .,. .,. M .,. M M M CO) M M CO) CO) .,. .,. .,. .,. .,. M .,. .,. .,. .,. .,. ~ .,. .,. .,..,. a.. N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NN N ....: o o ~ o '? .... "CI I!! I'll a. I!! a. i ..J ....: o o ~ en ~ .... Õ III I'll :! en"CI ~1: ~I!! .... .. z:;, :¡¡U a.."CI 1I):¡j 'i= 'õ e ~B .2 E il!! ,aO ~"i U"CI ,I'll ~j o I! :ca. :~ 'g~ ~!. ~e ..a.. oSE ale :§... .!!I'g õi ~ð ~ oco CõU; co <õ(õ §~ CD .0 a> a> CD a> a> <n NM ~~ .... .... .... <n .... .... .... MM C?C? M .... MM C?'? <7 .,..,. NCO , NN NN 1'--0 .1'-- .. .. .. .1'-- NN NN NCO .... co 1'--1'-- 1'--1'-- I'--<n ~:£ ~~ CõU; CõU; u;(õ ..... <n<n 1'--1'-- I'-- I'-- 1'--0 ....8 ~~ .... .... Me;; CO a> ~~ .... .... .... .... M~ ~M MM ~~ ~~ NN NN NN N. MM MM ~~ MM MM a> a> a> a> a> a> aIM MM MM MM MM 00 ...J ...J ...J...J ...J ...J ...J...J C(C( C(C( c(c( c(...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J...J ...J ...J ...J...J ...J...J u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. 00 00 00 C,)u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. ££ m nI 1/1 ccÆ Q) ~~ ~ ~ E E Q)~ ~ 25 '" '" ~ '" '" '" ñiñi e!) Q)Q) Q) .92 Q) Q) a.. a.. Q) è3t:: "Ë 'Ë 'Ë ñi ë:ë: t::ë: Q)a.. E E ,- 'Ë 'Ë 'Ë "Ë ãi "- ë: I~ nit:: Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) E €Ui !:!I a.. E nI nInI ,!!! 5 t::t:: e: e: e: e: e: e: ,S t:: ~ > ,!!! nI '" nI nI nit:: t:: -:;, ~~ 00 .ao '~ '~ ~'~ '~ '~ 2: 0 ~~ ~~ ~~ ::¡¡~ 0 "'- U ::¡¡C,) u.u. enu. _u. e: e:::¡¡ U. a.. en 0 I~ 0 ã5 ~~ ~ 88 88 .... '" as t5 u.u. u. ¡¡:¡¡: ¡¡:¡¡: ¡¡: 'S 'C £en I'-- .or:E ££ J:: a:: ££ ££ '1ij'C a..E .. ~ e: 00 00 000 .. .. .~ ~~ Q) 0 ~~ Q) 'C~ ~'C <n<n <n <n <n<n <n Q) Q) ~~ ~o ~~ iiiC,) ~èñ a:: e: .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ~~ .. >- I/IJ:: c(a:: -- ¡;- i; ¡'C tsts ~f e:.!!! '" '" ª"~ ££ £0 ~~ o ~ èñèi5 ëi5èi5 èi5èi5 -0:: == ££ ...J,19 e: e: I'-- I'-- 1'--'2 ene: ïü ïü I'-- I'-- I'-- I'-- ¡:::J:: ~en ~32 0- 00 ~.m ~1 a!:;¡ 00 00 0,2' e: e: C,)5 .... .... ... e: e: e: e: e: e: e: ,~ i :> :> .... .... .... .... ....J: e:£ Q) Q) ~::¡¡ III ~~ ~ñi -§~ ïii ïü ïü ïü ïii ïü 00 ~~ ~~ ~en ~g ...., ...., III en¡¡: ::¡¡::¡¡ ::¡¡::¡¡ ::¡¡::¡¡ ::¡¡en ww en en enW I!! zz ze!) ....0 C,)en 00 00 00 00 .... .... zz ZZ Z:J co en c;~ <nen "CI <n 00 o<n 00 a>o NN NN NN NN 1'--1'-- 00 00 ON <n co COO I~ 00 OM MI'-- ....N 00 00 00 00 .... .... 00 00 0.... a>.... ..... <nO I'-- I'-- I'--a> ....CO I'--CO NN NN NN NN MM 1'--1'-- 1'--1'-- 1'--1'-- COM ....N MCO ~ I'll e: c e: u. c( t! >- Gi ::¡¡ II J:: ~ c ë :> ~ a' r::: 0 nI nI 0 0 0:: Z cj t:: .s ! ñi '~ Q) oð E ~ ~ E 0 ::¡¡¡ I'll C,) ~ c "'~ ..J =0::: t! e: t::. ... !J! I e: .!!! II ~ 0 c Q) '" '" e: ~ 0 J:: Gi :> '#. en Z e!) ~ ¡::- I'll en c ...., !:!!. u. 0""'''''' J:: C,)C,) ¡¡ t: '2>- ~ 11 Q) Q) u..or: .. nI Q) Gi'c"c e: E c :>:5 :5 ,g¡ ae:e: ,a ~ J:::> 'C J:: J:: e: 0 0 onl 0 W en en ¡¡j C(C,)C,) ....,cc cc Q) .s .s.s .s'.5 - e: ~ c( c(c( c(c( Q) 0 00 00 0 E Q) J: J:J: J: J:.s a. > 0 0 0 CJ .s a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. ... j ... j ... - 1 .s .s .s ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J .!!! ~ .!!! e: :ß ~ E '" '" Q) C,) '" '" 1/1 ~ i! i i i I I i nI nI nI nI nI E ...J 0 E I'll Q) Q) Q) ::¡¡ ::¡¡ ::¡¡ ::¡¡ ::¡¡ a. ...J ~ 0 c E E E '" ~ '" ~ 0 J: .2 .:2 .:2 .:2 .:2 .:2 .or: .or: .or: I .or: ~ :II ..J 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ '" J: J: J: cc t::. ~ Q) J:: t: æ ... æ )( )( Q) 'C 'C 'C 'C 'C 'C 'C 88 ~ J:: I- ...., ~ :ß 'e: '¡: Gi e: e: e: e: e: e: e: j C,) C,) C,) 0 C,) C,) e: II nI 'C 'C a ~ ~ ~ nI nI ~ '" a. 0 e: ~ ~ ~ ~ e: e: e: ñi e: e: e: a ...J ...J ...J J:: J:: ë ë ë ë - S ± :> '" nI ~ e: e: e: I!! e: cD 1/1'" e: e Gi '> 0 ~ ~ Q) Q) Q) Q) nI 0 0 .9 0 0 0 0 ~~ Q) Q) Q) Q) Æ ...J Q) ...J ...J J: J: 0 ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J 0 cc cc cc cc l- e!) Z > 0:: a:: 0:: ::¡¡ 0:: M 0 I'-- N <n N <n <n c; ! co <n <n <n N ! 0 0 8 N ~ M I'-- M <n a> co a> 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 M N N M ! c; c; M c; N c; c; c; c; c; c; c; c; ! I'-- co Ñ § .... c; c; c; 00 M M 0 0 0 0 c; c; 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 ~ M M M M M N .... ~ ~ Ñ M ~ N N 0 0 0 0 0 M N M ~ M 0 0 e: ãi 0 0 0 .... .... N M M M M M ..,. . 0 0 0 0 0 ;;; N M M 0 0 ,~ <n <n <n . .... ;;; ~ M N N N N N N <n I'-- I'-- I'-- I'-- M M M 0 0 ë ~ co co co N M I'-- co co co co co co co co co co co I'-- I'-- I'-- I'-- I'-- co co M co 0 0 0 15. . . . ;;; ;;; .... . 0 . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 . . ;;; . 0 0 0 Q) I'll M . . . ..,. . . 0 0 0 .î ~ a.. N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N .... .... .... _""""""',""''''''''''';;';,.".i..f'''.,.'''-""'''''''''''''''',''':''''''',''',fP'' ...-i¡;<:,¡"'C',',.... . .. ". ~ . ..0 _ . GROWTH MANAGEMEN BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS February 5, 2007 Joe Smith 1800 Anywhere DR. Anywhere, FL 34982 USA In accordance with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, you are hereby advised that Mercedes Homes has petitioned St. Lucie County for a 12 month extension of the final planned unit development site plan approval on 147.14 acres ofland. for the development of755 units, and for a Major Adjustment to the conditions of approval, for the project known as Celebration Pointe - PUD, for the following described property: Location: Southeast corner of the intenection of South Jenkins Road and Petenon Road. THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST The public hearing Oil the petitioll will be held øJ 6:00 P.M., or tIS SOOll theretIfter tIS possible, Oil February 20, 2007, County Commissioner's CIuImbers, St. Lucie COIllit)' AtlministTøtioll lJIdlding AIUlfa; 2300 Vuginiø Avenue, Fort Pierce, FIorid4 All interested persons will be given an opporttmity to be heard at that time. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. The County Planning Division should receive written comments to the Board of County Commissioners at least 3 days prior to a scheduled hearing. County policy strongly encourages your input and comment at the public hearing of this matter before the Planning and Zoning Commission and County Commission, rather than by contact outside of the scheduled public hearing(s). We encourage you to speak at these public hearings, or provide written comments for the record. The proceedings of the Board of County Commissioners are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary, a public hearing may be continued to a date-certain. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Director at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (772) 462-1777 or T.D.D. (772) 462-1428. If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parcel, please forward this notice to the new owner. Please call (772) 462-2822 if you have any questions, and refer to: File Number: BCC 12007956. Sincerely, ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Chris Craft, Chairman JOSEPH E. SMITH. District No, 1 . OOUG COWARD. District No, 2 . PAULA A. LEWIS. District No.3. CHARLES GRANDE. District No.4 . CHRIS CRAFT. DiStrict No.5' County Administrator - Douglas M. Anderson Website: www.co.st-lucie.fl.us 2300 Virginia Avenue - Fort Pierce, FL. 34982-5652 Administration: (772) 462-1590 Planning: (772) 462-2822 GISlTechnical Services: (772) 462-2822 FAX: (772) 462-1581 Economic Development: (772) 462-1550 FAX: (772) 462-1579 Tourist Development: (772) 462-1535 1 (800) 344- TGIF FAX: (772) 462-2132 , S1: LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTYCOMMI$SIONERS , PUBLIC' HEARING AGENDA FEBRUARY 20, 2007 NOTICE OF 12 MONTH EXTENSION The St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners proposes to adopt the ~ by iesoIution: RESOLUTION NO. 07-039 ARBSOLunON GRANTING A,I2 MON'IH EXTENSION OF'I1Œ FINAL PLANNED UNrr DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN APPROVAL ON 147.14 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT 'I1Œ SOU'IHBAST CORNER OF 'I1Œ INTBRSBC110N OF SOU11I JENItJNS ROAD AND PB'ŒRSONROAD~FOR 11Œ DEVBLQPMBNT OF 7" UNITS. AND A MAJOR. AiDuSTMBNT ro 11Œ CONDl'l1ONS OF APPROVAL. FOR 11Œ PROJECrlCNOWN AS CBUDIRATIONPOJN'I'B- PUD. APPLICANT: MBRCBIB BOMBS, THE NORm 3/4 OF TIE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH. RANGE 40 EAST. LESS AN) EXCEPT T1iE WEST 40 FEET FOR ROAD RIGHT-oF-WAY AND' LESS AND EXCEPT ROAD AND CANAL RJGHTS..OF-WAY. TOGETHER WITH 11£ SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF 11£ NORTHWEST 1/4, LESS WEST 40 FEET, FOR ROAD RIGHT OF WAY AKJ LESS THE CANAL RIGHT OF WAY, TOGETHER WITH, THE SOUTHEAiT 1/4 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF NORTHWEST 1 /~ LESS CANAL RIGHT OF ,WAY AND TIE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SOUTHEAST, 1/4 OF NORTHWEST 1)/4, LESS THE EAST 40 FEET AND LESS CANAL RIGHT ,OF WAY, AND THE NORTH 3/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF 'NORTHWEST 1 /4 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 AM) THE NORTH, 3/4 OF TJ£ NORTHWEST 1/4 OF'THE NOR11iEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, ,LESS Tt£ NORTH 30 FEET OF Tt£ EAST 5 FEET, ' TOGETHER WITH, THE SOUTH 1/4 OF NORTHWEST 1/4 OF NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND Tt£ soum 1/4 OF NORTHEAST 1/4 OF NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SOUTHWEST 114 AND THE SÖlmIWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST OF ni: SOUTHWEST 1/4, LESS 330.52 FEET, AND lESS THE TRACT 143 IUT X 207.28 FEET, AND,TJ£ SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF TJ£ NORTHWEST 1/4 OF nE SOUTHWEST 1/4, LESS SOUTH 330.52 FEET, AND LESS 11iE ROAD RIGHT OF WAY, TOGETHER WITH THE EAST 1/2 OF NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4"AND NORTHWEST 1 /4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1 /4 LYING WEST OF CANAL 29. LESS ROAD RIGHT OF WAY. ' '" TOGETHER WITH THE SOUTH 330.52 FEET OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4, LESS NORTH 97.32 FEET,OF THE WEST 143 FEET. OF 11£ EAST 163 FEET AND 11£ SOUTH 330.52 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/ 40F THE NORTHWESTJ/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 AN> THE NORTH 1/4 OF NORTHEAsT ,114 OF, THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SOUTHWEST 1/4' AND THE NORTH 1/4 OF'11£ NORTHWEST 1/4 OF M SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF'TJ£ SOUTHWEST 1/4, lESS TJ£ ROAD RIGHT OF WAY. AU. LYING IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. WCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. I..cx:Iti<-: SouIbr:IIt c:orœr of Ibe ~~ of South JeIIkiDa RaId I11III PetiInJD RaId. The PUBUC HEARING on this ,itf;In wi be held in the CommIssIon Chambers, Roger Poitras Annex, 3rd Floor, St. Lucie County Admi IistraIion Bulding, 2300 ViginIa AY8f1J8, Ñxt Pierce, FIaida on February 20, 2Ø11, ~ at 8:00 P.M. or as soon Iher8aftef as pœsIJIe. Action can bet.aken at this meeting, ã1he ifem can be oonIinued loa future dale and1lme. AU interesl8d persons wiI be ~ an opportLriy 10 be heard. WriIIBnOOlT1l1'l!!Jl1t I8CeIved in advance d 1he public' hearirY«I wII alsO be conSidered" WriIIen cxrnrnents 10 1he Board of CoI.nty CorTmissioners ,shoUld be receNed by the Growth Management [)ep¡M1ment - PIaming Division at least 3 days prior 101he scheduled tvøing. '"The peIiIion fie Is available lor review at 1he Growth Management Department 0IIiœs IocaIed at 2300 VIrginia AVfJIfaI8, 2t1d, Floor, Fort Pierce, Florida. PIE,ase cal772Ia162-28221f you have an¡ questions or require IåIioI1aI i1fomiaIIon. ' ' The St. Lucie County Board of County Ccmnissioners has 1he power 10 nMew and grant any appicatio.lS within their area d respalSÜlÏly., ' The ,crcœedi of the Board of 'County Cori1missIoners are 'eIecIrOIlicaIy 'r8Oorded. PURSuANT 1ß ~ 288.0105. 'florida ~.... If a person,decides 10 appeal any deCision made by 1he, Boardd County CcmnIssioI..". with respect 10 any matIBr oorllliclered at arneetii1g or ~ he wit need a record d 1he proœedi 19B. For such pu'pOBI, he ,may need to ensure that a'Verbatim record, . d 1he ~ is made, which, record, inckIdes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be baSed. ,Upon 1he request d arry party =~=~~::=~~~ . upon request. If it becorn8s necessary, a publiC hearing may be oontinued frorri tine 10 time as may be necessary to a daIe-œrtain. Anyone with a cIsabiIity requiring 8ICCOI, n ,IOdation to attend this meeting should ooi1IaCtthe St. Lucie Qlunly Community Services DirecIDr at leastfa1y-eight (48) hours prior 10 1he meeting m7721462·1m orT.D.D. 772/462·1428. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA ISI CHRIS CRAFT, CHAIRMAN PUBLISH'DATE: FEBRUARY 8 2ØJ7 v, ..--._---." ...-..... To: Submitted By: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Agenda Request Item Number Date: 5~ 03/06107 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ] [ ] [ ] [ X ] Quasi-JD [ X ] Board of County Commissioners Presented By Growth Managem~nt f; ¿ IV-+ Growth Management Director Petition of A. W. Riverlanding, L.L.C., for a Change in Zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single - Family - 2 du/acre) and CO (Commercial, Office) Zoning Districts to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - River Landing) Zoning District and Final Planned Development Site Plan Approval for the project known as River Landing - PUD. Draft Resolution No. 07-003. A. W. Riverlanding, L.L.C., is proposing a 99 unit town home residential Subdivision known as River Landing PUD for property located east of South 25th Street and .17 miles north of West Midway Road. N/A. On February 20, 2007 the Board of County Commissioners continued this petition to March 6, 2007. On November 29, 2005, Resolution No. 05-357, this Board approved the Preliminary PUD site plan for the River Landing PUD. Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution No. 07-003, subject to seventeen limiting conditions of approval. , COMMISSION ACTION: ~ APPROVED 0 DENIED c=J OTHER County Attorney: J:tâï~" Originating Dept.: _ ____ Finance: Coordination! Signatures Mgt. & Budget: ~ Purchasing: Environ. Res. Dept.: , I ~Û MSBU Coordinator: County Engineer: i \I ~ Approved 4-0 Comm. Smith Absent Motion to continue to April 17, 2007 at 6p.m. or os soon thereafter os possible os requested by applicant. .& f)OCC ~ North. Fork Property O\t\rners 2630 Rainbow Drive Ft. Pierce., FIa. Dear St. {¿ucie C-ounty Planmn.g& 7ßning Board, Board of County Comm1sSioncrs Property Id. 3403-502-{)()86-OOO/3 '3403-502-0e93--oeo/S Name: Rivers Landing South 25th Street/Midway Rd. \\'e oppose the Planned Vnit~veloIJIl)ent Jor the above property for -00 +to'\f\Tlhouse5. This property is locate along the North Fork of The St. Lucie River designated .A-.6onthe Flood f:lazardMaps. A portion of this property that has ingress from 'Midway Road is'located in an old Ox Bo\\T. The majority of this property is located -in the FloodPlain. The Planned \JnitÐeve1opment is not consistent \,\'ith 6.05.00 \'~llud~ states preVeI'1tor .regulate the developmen1 of-flood barriers "Wbicb "\\riU unnaturally divert floodwaters or which may -increase fIoedhazædsto -other -lands. Nor 11.02.07 ·B. "Effect on nearby property. 1. The proposed buik.tiQ;g or use wtlf not have an tmdue adverse .effect .upon .neatby".property, :thecbar.acterof tl\e neighOOdteod~ -traffic -ceJ\dit;ØftS~'pMk1ftg. -utility facilities and,other malters affecting 1be pubnc·b~.atth.. safety and welfare. Th.is'¡s amulti-far-nilyPUIJ .and Rez-oning .¡tis 'Inconsistent with the single famny 'bofnesin this area. ~~~ere1);., ß/L_ (!rtih ~ 1. '. Dear St. Lucie CiMløty PlaøøÏBg & Zooiøg Boar-d & St. Lucìe COIIDty COlDIÛìsSioaers: Re: Rivers Laoding The White City Improvement Club met on September a, 2005 at that meetiogwe,voted'to object to placing '99+ towDhouse just Dortbof Midway Road DB die .East side of South2Sth Street 'on propelly adjaœnt to the North Fnrk 'Of the 81. Lucie River this property is located in the Flood Plain. Te put t9WUltouse iB this area is ~9UBterpr-øductWe t-ø -eur St. Lucie County Comprehensive PIaB aøð our'La&dDeve1opmeøt Regulations. This project "ill not protect theUealth Safety and Welfare of the residents. SiRceFeIy, . þJ7YY/-;C þ~u þ)# V'fr ¡j~. ~. ~ J-do' ~ '¡ Property Id. 3403-502-0086-000/3 3403-502-0093-000/5 Name: Rivers Landing South 25th StreetlMidway Rd. We the undersigned oppose the Planned Unit Development for the above property for 99 townhouses. This property is locate along the NortbFork of The St. Lucie River designated A-6 on the Flood Hazard Maps. A portion of this property that has ingress from Midway Road is located in an old Ox Bow. The majority of this property is located in the Flood PlaiD.. The Planned Unit Development is not consistent with 6.05.00 which states prevent or regulate the development of flood barriers which will unnaturally divert floodwaters or which may increase Dood hazards to other lands. Nor 11.02.07 B. Effect on nearby property. t. The proposed building or use WIll not have an undue adverse effect upon nearby property, the character of tbe neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities and other matters affecting the public health, safety and welfare. -:¡ Rivers Landing P.U.D. Nam.e Address City /Phone C1'Î~) f& L/- ~ I ~G: "Î71-~ ,J,7JtJ~ fi ~J13¥tt( ~. if-bl- 7 f3S" fll -{flM:f¿ I-~f- -:?6 tJ ~' r-: ~.' ,frCf F=L ,~ LJ~'1_llll5 ~~fv~ ctSSq~~ ~f~ f+ð7- . ;¡~'J~ ~.'8C¡ ~D2.¡:-t.¡J~. ... ~ ~ 2 ';'8"/ ~ ID. ~. f' ~ <L> P:'" è.{-f.¿, '" - J.. ..¡ g <'f ¿~ ~j('~ 2SS-Q ~~ IJeV 4· (172) , 1/0<1 ,./-!J( S- ~ .... ~ . Rivers Landing P.U.D. Name Address City ¡Phone ~~AJ¿f ¡Jt~Uv Q830 k,tt h^~.) d~ : iL (;J; f-I'c¿ lfhl-lto7« ~cl \"\\<\\\.er ~&o ~''''~da- ~~ ,\).\ C\e:.-e L-\tQ\.' \ lÞ il, a(){\w~~sJ~\ ~58C¡ ~ 'r163 Dr ~. P"ercX d-1LQ'llSI .., , " I Commission Review - March 6, 2007 GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: Bob Nix, Growth Management Director Hank Flores, Planning Manager FROM: Larry Szynkowski, AICP, Senior Planner DATE: February 26, 2007 SUBJECT: Petition of A. W. Riverlanding LLC., through agent Gentile Holloway Q'Mahoney & Associates, Inc for Final Planned Unit Development Site Plan approval for the project to be known as River Landing - PUD This petition was continued from February 20, 2007 at the request of the agent to March 6, 2007. The applicant, A. W. Riverlanding LLC., is proposing a residential development of 99 Townhouse units in 15 buildings on 27.88 acres of land located on the east side of South 25th Street, approximately 0.17 mile north of West Midway Road for the project to be known as River Landing - PUD. As a Planned Unit Development, the applicant proposes to develop the subject property with some flexibility. But, the major issue is that the residential structures are proposed to be built within a floodplain at the base flood elevation. The Staff Memorandum and supporting documentation for the proposed project is provided for your review. 1. The petitioner proposes to build the residential structures on stem walls. St. Lucie County Code Section 6.05.03 states that: should solid foundation perimeter walls be used to elevate a structure, openings sufficient to facilitate the unimpeded movements of flood waters shall be provided. Therefore, the stem wall proposed by the petitioner shall not be constructed per Code. The Florida Model Code and the FEMA Guidelines also recommend: ... there must be a minimum of two openings on different sides of each enclosed area sufficient to facilitate automatic equalization of flood hydrostatic forces 2. The petitioner proposes that residential structures be constructed with the lowest floor at the base flood elevation, which is at 9 feet. Code Section 6.05.03 states that: New construction or substantial improvement of any residential shall have the lowest floor, including basement, elevated to or above the base flood elevation. The Model Floodplain Mitigation Code of the Florida Department of Emergency Management states: In all A-Zones where base flood elevation data have been provided (Zone AE )...AII new construction or substantial improvement of any residential building ...shall have the lowest floor, including basement, elevated to no lower than one foot above the base flood elevation. The higher that the lowest floor is, then the probability that the living area will not be flooded will increase. The people living there have less flood damage and also have lower insurance premiums. The Rate for a $100,000 building with $25,000 contents will be 36.8% lower at 1-foot above base flood elevation (FEMA Insurance Liaison). Staff deduces that the Code is inadequate to implement the purpose of the Flood Damage Prevention Code. That purpose is to promote the public health, safety and general welfare and to minimize the public and private losses due to flood conditions in specific areas and should be revised to raise the lowest floor level of new and improved buildings to a minimum of 1-foot above base flood elevation. 3. The petitioner has also proposed that landscaping be planted at or below base flood elevation. The difficulty with that is the damage inflicted upon these plants when flooded especially with the volume and velocity of floodwaters. There have been in recent years storms with high rainfall amounts both over short spans as with Wilma and long spans as with Frances. The petitioner has not made accommodations for plants that can survive periods underwater, He has not considered the cost of damage to the landscaping or the landscape property insurance to the future homeowners association. The only Insurance Company that will provide landscape property damage coverage to associations is Citizens, the state entity. The insurance cost for five buildings would be about $30,000 per year. The insurance for fifteen buildings would be about $90,000 annually. It is not likely that the buyers for the River Landing PUD would afford those premiums annually. Therefore, the entire landscaped area should be designed at above flood elevation. The Planned Unit Development (PUD) District is intended to achieve residential land development of a superior quality through encouragement of flexibility and creativity in design options. The options should have new technology, efficient use of the land and encourage an environment of stable character. This PUD does not provide much in land development technology. It clusters 99 townhouses over roughly eleven (11) acres of floodplain. Building at base flood elevation increases the likelihood of flood damages to the townhouses, contributes to the threat to safety of residents and raises the costs of living in the development for property flood insurance. The "design options" should include lowest floor and landscaping elevations 1-foot above base flood elevations with no stem wall foundations Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this continuation. I Lawrence ~zynKowsKI - I-'ostponemem Ltr ¿'-l ~-u I . pm . ""'r"~"''''·''·'''''''>:''''··'''o'O'-''''··'''·-'~----·-~~·-···-· GENTILE HOLLOWAY O'MAHONEY .. ,~::- '.: r. ~ ~ ~ !i . . l.ar.d!õc~Ç>f: A~c;'¡tcc!..~ ;"'J.ii"'r:,:¡..O;:.¡1'1.1l'::n..·¡,.f..N!"e;r....ai Con~"'¡"an't.!> . lc.-Ofloon7 February ]9, 2{)01 ' (~""~ G. fu,m.!Ie:. !'ASLA !-,il. "r.yHt..~~"'l....~.¡'5Lt-. ¡:~i¡y D'\.t.JN:I!'1r..',.'. ¡..!iLI- ," .. Mr. Hank Flores Planning Manager 'St. Lucie County p]¡mning Division - Growth Management Dept. 2~(){) Virginia Avenue. 2nd Floor FfPierce, FL 34982-5652 Re: Request to CODtinue ~~ February 20th meeting to March 6111 meeting River LandiDg P.V.Ð. (Filial Site Plan Approval) DeM.',Mt'. Flores: "'';'" ......:.. "., ::.., ", On behidf of the Applicant, A.W. River Landing LLC, we hereby request that this matter instelÌd be sched\!,led for the CC)ïiniyGommission meeting on March 6"', 2007 in order to allow for sufficient time to address a few of the new ,conditions of approval that have been added to the resolution since our Preli~inary PUDl\pprovaL ' ' ' 'A.W; River Landing LLC would like to request a meeting with staff to incluck: Robert Nix and yòurself within the following week to disclJSli these conditions. The purpQ~f:of tbis meeting is so tþat we can clarify the vagueness and ambigiUty in the final st¢f report and resolution. - ..... ,... ".. .,.... _ Thank you for your consideration ofthisrelJuc:st and,please contaft me at your earliest convenience so we C)!I1 schedule a meeting by thee d of this week." ' " JasÞJ1 Litterick, ASLA . Lan4scape Architect Gentìlè,HoUoway O'Mahoney & Associate~, Inc. "-'.' ~...,"'""'_.."...-.'""'_..,.."'"-'""...~.~.~. :9Cf} Ccm:n!b"CF.~. Si.õM 101 ..;upiVr. fitJl"rd.t ~45ö S6~~575-9557 ~j:-5-75·5::;@f-""'X #"~..:i.md~.a~-~Nt.eCt-!'I.cnm .;'~ -- rdyt:: I , I I :1 j il 'I II Ii ~ GROWTH MANAGEMENT BOCC AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL COVER SHEET Division: Planning Prepared by: Larry SzYnkowski Meetina Date: March 6, 2007 Agenda Subject: River Landing PUD 06-011 Residential Final PUD Plan with 99 units on 27.88 acres, on the east side of 25th Street approximately .17 miles north of Midway Road. Rezoning RZ 06-18 from RS- 2 (Residential, Suburban - 2 du/acre) CO (Commercial, OffIce) Zoning Districts to PUD (Planned Unit Development) Zoning District. Draft Resolution No. 07-003 Attachments: Yes- X No- Public Hearing Required: Yes- X No- Meetina Time Deadlines for Proiects Deadlines Sign-offs BOCC Meeting Date County Polley Internal March 6, 2007 March 6, 2007 Deadlines per Planning Div Project Name, & File F Outlaw Deadlines Number PUD ~11 RZ 06-018 Contact Name & Number J Llttørlk 5811575-9557 If PH requIred - 27 days Deadline - APO & Map 02107/07 Date: 10/23/06 prior- Request to GIS Initial: 15 days prior - Monday Deadline - Ad Info to February 19, 2007 Date: 01/19/07 support staff Initial: 12 days prior- 9 AM Deadline- Pkg to February 19, 2007 Date: 01/19/07 Thursday 15 days prior- Monday Planning Mgr for Appr Initial: 13 days prior - 13 days prior - Deadline to submit February 21, 2007 Date: 01/19/07 Wednesday Wednesday legal ad to paper Initial: 8 days prior - 13 days prior - Noon Deadline-Pkg to February 21, 2007 Date: Monday Wednesday GM Exec Secy Initial: 8 days prior - 13 days prior - To GM Asst Dlr or Dlr- February 21, 2007 Date: Monday Wednesday out by Thursday Initial: 8 days prior - 12 days prior - 5 PM Deadline to Plan February 22, 2007 Date: Monday Thursday Mgr-final slgnoffs Initial: 7 days prlor- 9 AM Deadline to walk February 23, 2007 Date: Tuesdav 11 days prlor- Frldav sign-off Items Initial: 7 days prior- Noon Deadline to February 26, 2007 Date: Tuesday 8 days prior- Monday complete slgn-offs Initial: & days prior- 5 PM Deadline-pkgs to February 27, 2007 Date: Wednesday 7 days prior- Tuesday ExecSecy Initial: 5 days prior- 9 AM Staff Mtg to March 1, 2007 Date: Thursday 5 days prior- Thursday review agenda Items I Initial· Agenda Request Item Number Date: SI 02120107 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ J [ J [ J [ X ] Quasi-JD [ X ] To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Presented By Growth Management ff e--I- ,~~ Growth Man gement Director Petition of A. W. River1anding, L.L.C., for a Change in Zoning from the RS-2 (REþsidential, Single - Family - 2 dulacre) and CO (Commercial, Office) Zoning Districts to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - River Landing) Zoning District and Final Planned Development Site Plan Approval for the project known as River Landing - PUD. Draft Resolution No. 07-003. SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: A. W. Riverlanding, L.L.C., is proposing a 99 unit town home residential Subdivision known as River Landing PUD for property located east of South 25th Street and .17 miles north of West Midway Road. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A. PREVIOUS ACTION: On November 29, 2005, Resolution No. 05-357, this Board approved the Preliminary PUD site plan for the River Landing PUD. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends appròval of Draft Resolution No. 07-003, subject to seventeen limiting conditions of approval. COMMISSION ACTION: [=:J APPROVED CJ DENIED [=.J OTHER CONCURRENCE: Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator County Attorney: ~ Originatin~ Dept.: "'3. Al7 Finance: Coordinationl Signatures Mgt. & Budget: ~ Environ. Res. Dept.: , County Engineer: . Purchasing: MSBU Coordinator: Transmittal Master List River Landing Final PUD Plan 06-011 Primary Distribution Environmental Resources Department - Amy Mott Public Works Surveyor - Ron Harris Road, Bridge, & Transportation - Don Pauley Stormwater Management- Mike Halter General Engineering - John Frank Zoning Supervisor - Paula Bushby Attorney Prop Acquisition - JoAnn Riley Sheriff s Department - Major Monahan St Lucie County Fire District - Captain Derek Foxx Ft Pierce Fanns/North St Lucie Water Control District - Ray Garcia Property Appraiser's Office - Maurice Snyder IF AS - Jeffrey Gellermann Residential Only School Board of St Lucie County - Marty Sanders Community Services (Transit) - Jody Bonet Geographical Based St Lucie County Utility Department - Ray Murankus Airport Authority - Diana Lewis City ofFt Pierce - Beach/Recor City of Port St Lucie - Cheryl Friend Ft Pierce Utilities Authority - David Mellert Education and Research Authority - Jane Bachelor Sent Received 08/07/06 05/31/06 08/07/06 08/10/06 08/07/06 08/25/06 04/19/06 05/15/06 08/07/06 08/11/06 04/19/06 05/03/06 04/19/06 04/25/06 08/07/06 10/18/06 08/07/06 Commission Review - February 20, 2007 GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division MEMORANDUM TO: THROUGH: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Bob Nix, Grpt!th Management Director Hank FloresWlanning Manager Larry Szynkowski, AICP, Senior Planne~ January 11, 2007 DATE: SUBJECT: Request of A. W. Riverlanding LLC., for a Change in Zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 dulacre) and CO (Commercial, Office) Zoning Districts to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - River Landing) Zoning District and Final Planned Development Site Plan Approval for the project known as River landing . PUD East side of South 25th Street, approximately 0.17 miles north of West Midway Road. RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/acre) and CO (Commercial, Office) PUD (Planned Unit Development - River Landing) LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: FUTURE LAND USE: PARCEL SIZE: PROPOSED USE: RS (Residential Suburban) and RU (Residential Urban) 27.88 acres Section 7.01.00 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Any permitted, conditional or accessory use in the Agricultural and Residential zoning districts that do not exceed the density reflected in the Future Land Use Maps of the Comprehensive Plan. Any use not identified in the zoning 3district regulations is a prohibited use in that district. In addition, up to three percent of the project gross area can be developed as commercial to serve the residential component of the project. 99 multiple-family units in 15 buildings - 1 - four unit building, 5 - five unit buildings, 3 - six unit buildings, 4 - eight unit buildings, and 2 - ten unit buildings. February 13, 2007 Page 2 Subject: River Landing Final PUD Plan File No's.: PUD06-011, RZ 06-018 PROPOSED DENSITY: SURROUNDING ZONING: 3.55 dwelling unit per acre North: AG-1 (Agricultural-1 du/acre) South: AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential-1 du/acre) East: RS-3 (Residential, Single-Family - 3 du/acre) West: CG (Commercial, General) SURROUNDING FUTURE LAND USE: North: RS (Residential Suburban) South: RU (Residential Urban), COM (Commercial) and CPUB (Conservation-Public) south of Midway East: RS (Residential Suburban) West: COM (Commercial) SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: residential development South: commercial development East: residential development West: undeveloped FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: Station #6 (350 East Midway Road), is located approximately 3.5 miles to the east. UTILITY SERVICE: The subject property will be serviced by the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority (FPUA). TRANSPORTATION SERVICE: RIGHT-OF-WAY ADEQUACY: The existing right-of-way width for South 25th Street is 130 feet. The existing right-of-way width for West Midway Road is 100 feet. The developer dedicated the west 20 feet of the subjed property for the expansion of South 25th Street and 25 feet of additional right-of-way for the expansion of West Midway Road. SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: South 25th Street is scheduled for expansion to a four-lane roadway. The intersedion of South 25th Street and West Midway Road is scheduled for improvements. TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: Certificate of Capacity. **.4.444.AA*******************************.A.AA.~********************** February 13, 2007 Page 3 Subject: River Landing Final PUD Plan File No's.: PUD06-011, RZ 06-018 STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SeT FORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In reviewing this application for proposed rezoning, the Board of County Commissioners shall consider and make the following determinations: 1. Whether the proposed rezoning is in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code; The proposed change in zoning and petition for Final Planned Unit Development is consistent with the St. Lucie County land Development Code. There are a total of 99 multiple-family units proposed in this development. The east portion of the subject property (12.83 acres) has a Future Land Use Classification of RS (Residential Suburban), which possibly allows a maximum of 2 dwelling units per acre (26 units) and the west and south portions of the subject property (15.05 acres) have a classification of RU (Residential Urban), which possibly allows a maximum of 5 dwelling units per acre (75). Based on the Future land Use Designation, a total of 101 units might be possible. The site plan that is submitted as a part of this rezoning to PUD is consistent with the provisions of the Land Development Code. 2. Whether the proposed amendment Is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan; The proposed River landing - PUD is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives, and standards of this Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County. Policy 1.1.1.1 of the 51. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan establishes maximum residential densities for the Future Land Use Classification of RS (Residential Suburban) at 2 dwelling unit per acre and RU (Residential Urban) at 5 dwelling units per acre. The proposed project is to be developed with a maximum residential density of 3.55 units per acre; therefore, the proposed project is consistent with this policy. Policy 1.1.9.4 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan establishes regulations providing that existing on-site native upland habitat be incorporated into required site plans as a part of open space areas, required landscaping, or as a part of minimum yard areas, as is practicable. The proposed project has 6.24 acres of native uplands preserved. 3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed zoning is inconsistent with the existing and proposed land uses; The proposed change in zoning to PUD for the purpose of allowing the construction of a multiple-family residential development is not inconsistent with the proposed future land use classification of the subject property and surrounding properties. The St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan designates February 13, 2007 Page 4 Subject: River Landing Final PUD Plan File No's.: PUD06-011, RZ 06-018 the subject property with a Future Land Use Classifications of RS (Residential Suburban) and RU (Residential Urban). The proposed PUD has a gross density of 3.55 dwelling units per acre. 4. Whether there have been changed conditions that require an amendment; There have not been changes that would require an amendment. The site is located inside of the Urban Service Boundary of St. Lucie County. 5. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in demands on public facilities, and whether or to the extent to which the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities, including but not limited to transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage, schools, solid waste, mass transit, and emergency medical facilities; The proposed site plan would create additional demands on water/sewer facilities in this area. The subject property is located inside of the Urban Service Boundary of St. Lucie County. Water and sewer service is to be provided by FPUA. The public school system can be expected ,to be responsi61e for the education of an additional 34 students. Drainage will be handled through a master drainage system which requires permits from the South Florida Water Management District (S.F.W.M.D.), as well as, a St. Lucie County Stormwater permit. Attached is a memo from Christopher Lestrange, District Code Compliance Manager, concerning the drainage for this project. Electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, air conditioning equipment and other service facilities must be designed and located in order to prevent flood water from entering these systems during a storm event. 6. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The proposed change in zoning and development of this site as a residential planned unit development is not expected to result in any adverse environmental impact. The 27.88 acre site consists of 18.4 acres of abandoned citrus, 7.08 acres of hardwood forest, and 1.45 acres of wetland hardwood forest. There will be direct impact on 0.094 acres of wetlands. The preliminary site plan was revised several times. The Final Development Site Plan will have much less impact to the native habitats and river buffer. The final design results in 7.86 acres (28.9 % of the total site) of native habitat preserve areas. This translates to 6.39 acres of the existing 7.08 acres (90%) of hardwood forest being preserved and 1.239 acres of the existing 1.45 acres (85%) of wetland hardwood forest being preserved with an additional 0.23 acre of wetland hardwood forest being created in the area of the existing residence. The project will result in 0.094 acres of direct impact and 0.111 acre of secondary impact to Wetland Hardwood Forest. No native habitat will be altered by this creation. February 13, 2007 Page 5 Subject: River Landing Final PUD Plan File No's.: PUD06-o11, RZ 06-018 There are two gopher tortoise burrows located on the site. The site plan shows the burrows located within the Preserve Area. A condition of approval has been included addressing possible impacts to Gopher Tortoises. The St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan (01/2004) states that the North Fork of the St. Lucie River is a designated Aquatic Preserve. To the end of preserving the nature of the river and its shoreline, the Comprehensive Plan called for additional Land Development Regulations for the North Fork, as well as, its tributaries. The final design of this project exceeds the minimum 75 foot native river buffer by 200 plus feet throughout the project. It also meets, and about two-thirds of it exceeds, the minimum 300 foot buffer prohibiting road right-of-way (public or private - except for individual driveways), on-site drainage retention pond or system (except for lawfully permitted drainage conveyance outfalls), wastewater lift station, petroleum or chemical storage area, or other activity that would contribute to the degradation of the water quality within the North Fork System. A revised Preserve Area Management Plan was provided that would help to ensure proper management of the preserve areas. The Final Plan differs from the Preliminary Plan by relocating the recreation area further west near the entrance. While the total number of units remains the same as the Preliminary Plan, some 6-unit buildings have replaced 4-unit buildings. The developer plans to clear all development areas in the initial stages of the construction. Existing trees along the perimeter and proposed open spaces will be preserved as shown on the Tree Preservation Plan and Landscape Plan. All tree mitigation requirements are met, and exceeded, by the preservation of 6.39 acres of the existing 7.08 acres (90%) of hardwood forest, or 22% of the total site area. The developer will need to use construction methods that allow the flow of floodwaters though all foundations. There is also a concern that utilities will be built at elevations lower than the 9 foot base flood elevation of most of the area that is in NFIP Flood Zone AE. The developer must build these water, sewer and electrical facilities in a manner that they will eliminate flood waters from infiltrating into the water system and sewage discharges into the flood waters. FLOOD DAMAGE MITIGATION The project is located in Flood Zone AE, which requires a minimum flood elevation of 9 feet per Map Panel Number 12111C 0280F 0188F. The project is also located within the floodplain of North Fork of the St. Lucie River. The subject property has an elevation of approximately five feet along the North Fork, which varies to approximately seven feet. The property has an elevation of nine feet or above on the very Northwest and very Southwest areas of the Site, along February 13, 2007 Page 6 Subject: River Landing Final PUD Plan File No's.: PUD06-Q11, RZ 06-Q18 South 25th Street, and consists of approximately 1.2 acres. Of the entire site, 95% of this property is below the Base Flood Elevation of 9 feet. The applicant has proposed constructing the townhouses at the base flood elevation of 9-feet. FEMA Regulations for residential construction in a floodplain require structures to be elevated at or above base flood elevation. Staff is recommending that the lowest floor of all buildings to be occupied have a base elevation of one (1) foot above the base flood elevation of 9-feet. Therefore, the lowest floors of all townhouses are recommended to be elevated a minimum of 10-feet. Also, according to the above Section, the applicant is required to show that the foundation allows unimpeded movement of floodwaters in a flood situation. Stem walls shall not be allowed to be constructed. Section 6.05.03 of the County Land Development Code requires openings in foundations below flood level to allow for the unimpeded flow of floodwater. Per the applicant's engineer, the site has equal amounts of cubic feet of fill to the cubic feet of cut. Compensating storage shall be provided for any excess fill, during any of the construction, including road and parking facilities. The applicant's engineer also states that the project "cut and fill balance' will be accomplished from the lake excavation that volume exceeds the amount of fill and some of the excavated material will be hauled away. He designed the project with 100% flood plain compensatory storage and provided the drainage calculations to show the amount of storage pre vs. post 'cut and fill' and also compensated for the additional site run off. Elevation certificates, required by the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), need to be provided to and approved by staff before each building passes foundation and rough plumbing inspections by the St. Lucie County Building Official. Water and sewer lines are proposed to be installed below the 9 foot base flood elevation and shall be required to be installed in order to meet Federal Guidelines that require that these facilities be constructed so as to not allow flood waters to infiltrate these systems during a storm event. The access roads and parking facilities are below base flood elevation by as little as 0.60 feet to as much as 2.50 feet. The finished floor elevations are proposed at the base flood elevation. The Landscape Plan includes plantings that will be below the base flood elevation. The applicant needs to provide information as to what will happen to the new plants under flood conditions. Most of the proposed electrical lines will also be below the flood elevation and will require that they be designed so as to not allow floodwaters to enter and accumulate. This requirement is consistent with Federal and County law. The elevation of most of the site would have the site lighting and utilities, according to the photometric plan, place electrical lines below base flood elevation. Section 6.05.02 (A. (5.) of the Land Development Code states: Electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, air conditioning equipment February 13, 2007 Page 7 Subject: River Landing Final PUD Plan File No's.: PUD06-011, RZ 06-018 and other service facilities shall be designed and/or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding. The applicant's engineer has stated that the sanitary sewer plans require a rain water stopper for all the manholes. Sewer rain guards will also be installed on all manholes. The lift station for the project is being built outside of this site, off of the Southwest comer of the River Landing site along 25th street right-of-way line. The Existing grade elevation for the lift station is approximately 10.00 feet. The applicant's engineer has informed the lift station engineers to design the top of the wet well at a minimum Elevation of 10.50. 7. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in an orderly and logical development pattern specifically identifying any negative affects of such patterns; An orderly and logical development pattern would result with the proposed PUD Site Plan and PUD Zoning. 8. Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public interest, and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this Code; The proposed amendment would not be in conflict with the public interest and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. COMMENTS: The applicant, A. W. Riverlanding LLC., ,is proposing a residential development of 99 units in 15 buildings on 27.88 acres of land located on the east side of South 25th Street, approximately 0.17 mile north of West Midway Road for the project is to be known as River Landing - PUD. As a Planned Unit Development, the applicant proposes to develop the subject property with some flexibility. Section 7.01.03(1) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that 35% of the site must consist of open space, a minimum of 15% of which must be native upland habitat preserved in its natural condition. The proposed planned development maintains 16.67 acres (60.7 percent) of the project area in total common open space. Lakes contain 5.85 acres, landscapinglcommon areas contain 2.79 acres, native upland habitat contains 6.39 acres, wetlands (natural and created) contain 1.45 acres, and the recreational area contains 0.33 acre. The applicant is also dedicating an additional 20 feet of right-of-way along South 25th Street. The remainder of the project consists of those areas designated for residential development (buildings, roadway, driveways, and sidewalks). Staff has determined that the proposed zoning district designation and the Final Planned Unit Development site plan would be compatible with the existing and proposed uses in the area and this petition would meet the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie February 13, 2007 Page 8 Subject: River Landing Final PUD Plan File No's.: PUD06-011, RZ 06-018 County land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Attached is a copy of Draft Resolution No. 07-003 which, if approved, would grant Final Planned Unit Development approval for the project to be known as River landing - PUD, subject to the referenced conditions. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending that this petition be approved, as set forth in Draft Resolution No. 07- 003, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Plat for the River Landing PUD shall not be recorded until constructible engineering plans are approved, and all common improvements are either: i. built and accepted or approved by St. Lucie County; or ii. appropriate security is provided to St. Lucie County in a form approved by the County Attorney and an amount approved by the County Engineer, including an amount necessary to cover the period of maintenance required by the Land Development Code. 2. No final site plan construction Development Permits shall be issued by the County until complete sets of sealed constructible final engineering plans, supporting calculations and survey data for all site work and offsite improvements are submitted to the County and approved by the Public Works Department, Utilities Department, Environmental Resources Department, Growth Management Department, 51. Lucie County Fire District, and any other agency or County Department that may be determined by the Director of Growth Management to be necessarily involved in the review and approval of the constructible final engineering plans for the site work and offsite improvements. The determination of whether or not plans submitted by the applicant constitute a complete set of constructible plans shall be made by the departments involved in the plan review within five business days of the date the plans are received in the Department of Growth Management. 3. As part of the Final Plat for the proposed River Landing project, the petitioner, his successors or assigns, shall convey to St. Lucie County, the west 20 feet of the subject property for additional right-of-way for South 25th Street. To the extent permitted under the County's Code and Compiled Laws, any such dedication may be considered eligible for Road Impact Fee Credits. These Road Impact Fee Credits shall be transferable from the Developer to any townhome owner within the River Landing PUD. These credits may only be used in association with town homes permitted in the River Landing Subdivision. 4. As part of the Final Plat for the proposed River Landing project, the petitioner, his successors or assigns, shall convey to St. Lucie County, the south 30 feet along West Midway Road of the subject property for additional right-of-way for West Midway Road. To the extent permitted under the County's Code and Compiled Laws, any such dedication may be considered eligible for Road Impact Fee Credits. These Road Impact Fee Credits shall be transferable from the Developer to any town home owner within the River Landing PUD. These credits may only be used in association with town homes permitted in the River Landing Subdivision. 5. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy (CO) for the first building permit, the February 13, 2007 Page 9 Subject: River Landing Final PUD Plan File No's.: PUD06-D11, RZ 06-018 petitioner, his successor or assigns, shall construct a northbound right turn lane on South 25th Street at the project entrance per County Standards. 6. The developer, his successors or assigns shall either construct or, provide a fee in lieu of, based on an engineer's estimate and agreed to by the Coun~ Engineer, for the construction of a 6-foot wide sidewalk along the project's frontage on South 25 Street. 7. All site improvements, including, but not limited to, buildings, water/sewer lines, landscaping, and common electrical lines, shall be constructed so as to meet Federal Emergency Management Agency requirements. Among the requirements is that the buildings be constructed as to allow for the unimpeded flow of floodwaters. No stem wall construction is to be allowed. A minimum of two openings having a total net area of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding shall be provided. The bottom of all openings shall be no higher than one foot above grade. Openings may be equipped with screens, louvers, valves, or other coverings or devices provided that they permit the automatic entry and exit of floodwaters. Electrical lines and water/sewer lines shall be so constructed so that no floodwaters may infiltrate the systems. Sanitary sewers shall be required to contain a rain water stopper for all manholes. 8. The finished floor elevation of all habitable buildings shall be at one (1) foot above the flood elevation as determined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency National Flood Insurance Program Map. The elevation certificates required by NFIP shall be required to be provided to and approved by the Building Official before each of the buildings passes foundation and rough plumbing inspection by the St. Lucie County Building Official. 9. Prior to receiving a landlvegetation clearing permit, the developers, their successor or assigns, shall provide an analysis of what will happen to plantings installed below the flood elevation to the Environmental Resources Department for their approval before any landscaping commences. 10. An environmental professional, experienced in handling Gopher Tortoises, shall be retained for any relocation that may need to be done in the course of the construction, as was recommended on page 13 of the EIA. An addition to this condition shall be that prior to issuance of a St. Lucie County Vegetation Removal Permit, a pre-clearing meeting be conducted with the clearing contractors to provide educational materials (poster & pamphlets) to inform them of the protocol that shall be followed should a gopher tortoise or a gopher tortoise burrow be encountered. If a gopher tortoise is encountered during site construction, all work shall be halted and the environmental professional shall be contacted to relocate it to an area within the preserve area. 11. An executed (signed) copy of the conservation easement document must be provided to SLC ERD prior to the issuance of a SLC Vegetation Removal Permit. Also, within 60 days of issuance of a permit a recorded copy of the easement document will be required to be submitted. The conservation easement shall be made in favor of St. Lucie County and shall encompass the entire 7.86 acres of habitat preserve area. 12. A condition of approval shall be that prior to issuance of a SLC Vegetation Removal Permit, a revised set of Civil Plans showing the proper locations of the silt fencing and barricades must be supplied to ERD. Currently, the Civil Plans show the silt fence being proposed through the middle of the preserve area. Please revise to show the silt fence location to be along the entire western edge of the 7.86 acres of habitat preserve and tree preservation barricades around the individual trees proposed for preservation along the northern and southern property boundaries. 13. A condition of approval shall be that prior to clearing of the 5' mulch path throughout the preserve area an on-site meeting shall be arranged, with SLC ERD staff and the person(s) responsible for clearing the path, to field determine the best possible layout of the path to avoid impacting any February 13, 2007 Page 10 Subject: River landing Final PUD Plan File No's.: PUD06-011, RZ 06-018 native vegetation. 14. A condition of approval shall be that all Category I and II invasive exotics are removed from the property (and that none are planted - the latest landscape plan lists Ugustrum lucidum and Livinstona chinensis to be planted) prior to the first certificate of occupancy is granted. 15. Prior to issuance of any building permits or vegetation removal permits for any portion of the River Landing - PUD project, the developers, their successor or assigns, shall submit to St. Lucie County Environmental Resources Department a Preserve Area Management Plan updated to reflect the revised site layout. 16. The applicant shall be required to submit to St. Lucie County an annual monitoring report demonstrating compliance with the above conditions. The requirement for this report shall begin on the anniversary date of commencement of construction and shall continue on that date until two (2) years after the completion of the development. For the purpose of this condition, "completion of the developmenr shall mean the issuance of the 97th Certificate of Occupancy or the Certificate of Occupancy for the 98th percentile of the final project density in the event that less than 99 units are constructed on this site. 17. The hours of operation for construction activities shall be limited to the time period from 7:00 A.M. to 5:30 P.M., Monday through Friday, 7:00 A.M. to 1:00 P.M. Saturday and no work on Sundays. No construction shall take place on Federal Holidays. The hours of operation restrictions do not apply to sales activities. In the event the County adopts uniform hours of operation for construction activities that apply county wide, then such hours of operation shall supersede the hours of operation set forth herein. Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter. SUBMITTED: T3 ðt I \ Bob Nix, AIC~ --t Growth Management Director cc: Jason Utterick Pat Lentini County Administrator County Attorney File ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM AAA4AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA¿AAA TO: Larry Szynkowski , Development Review Planner FROM: Amy Mott, Environmental Regulations Manager DATE: October 9,2006 RE: River Landing Final PUD ERD Report **************************************************************************************************************** This 27.88 acre site is located north of Midway Road, east of South 25th Street, and is bordered on the west by the North Fork of the St. Lucie River. The existing cover is 18.4 acres of abandoned citrus, 7.08 acres of hardwood forest, and 1.46 acres of wetland hardwood forest. The site plan was revised several times resulting in much less impact to the native habitats and river buffer than were originally proposed. The applicant was originally proposing to locate the club house in the middle of the preserve area and construct a cul-de-sac road with 14 large lots in the spur of the property that is south of the wetland and north of Midway Road. That design would have resulted in 100% impact to the western wetland and only 4.17 acres of native habitat preserve areas. The applicant has chosen to satisfy their tree mitigation requirement by using Section 6.00.05D.3.b of the Land Development Code, which requires preserving a minimum of 25% of the existing upland habitat and specifies that the preserve area shall not measure less than 15 % of the total site. The final design results in 7.86 acres (28.9 % of the total site) of native habitat preserve areas. This includes 6.39 acres (90%) of the existing 7.08 acres of hardwood forest habitat being preserved and 1.366 acres (due to 0.094 acres of direct impact and 0.11 acres of secondary impact) of the existing 1.46 acres (94%) of wetland hardwood forest being preserved with an additional .23 acres of wetland hardwood forest being created in the location of the existing residence. No native habitat will be altered by the wetland creation. There are two gopher tortoise burrows located on the site. The site plan shows the burrows located within the Preserve Area; therefore they are to be preserved in place, however please see Condition of Approval #1 regarding the possible encountering of C:\DOCUME~1ISZYNKOWlIlOCALS~1\TEMP\RIVER LANDING FKA GULFSTREAM PROPERTY PUD - FiNAl REPORT2.DOC gopher tortoises during construction. The final design of this project exceeds the minimum 50 foot native upland river buffer by over 200 feet. It also meets, and about two-thirds of it exceeds, the minimum 300 foot buffer prohibiting road right-of-ways, on-site drainage retention pond or system (except for lawfully permitted drainage conveyance outfalls), wastewater lift station, petroleum or chemical storage area, or other activity that would contribute to the degradation of the water quality within the North Fork System. The buffer along the North Fork, which will consist of preserved native habitat, will help to provide protection of water quality, preserve natural functions, preserve wildlife habitat and maximize natural resources values. In order to ensure the continued, adequate, and appropriate management of, and the continued protection from adverse impacts of, the habitat preserve area, a Preserve Area Management Plan will be provided to The River Landing PUD Homeowner's Association. The final PAMP, which will be recorded in the public records of the County, covers the ownership, and assignment of management and maintenance responsibility of the preserve. The initial exotic removal and the signage for preserve area boundaries will be the responsibility of the developers, their successor or assigns prior to turning the project over to the future owners. From that point, the preserve areas shall be maintained in a natural vegetative state and be free of exotic and nuisance species as defined by the Florida Pest Council. The habitat preservation area will be platted in its entirety as separate tract or tracts and covered by a Conservation Easement dedicated to, or made in favor of, the County. The PAMP will be revised to incorporate the nine principles of the Florida Yards and Neighborhoods Program promoting "green" practices such as native plant landscaping, water conservation, and minimization of fertilizers and pesticides, and the plan in its entirety will be included as an exhibit to the HOA documents. Areas of the site proposed for impacts contain many large specimen Oak trees as well as small, oak trees that would be easy to relocate. The applicant is proposing to preserve and/or relocate as many of these trees as possiblelfeasible. The site will be heavily landscaped with native plant species in order to reduce watering, fertilizer and pesticide usage given this property's adjacency to the North Fork. Erosion control and vegetation barricades will be employed during construction. A Preserve Area Management Plan was reviewed and approved and should help to ensure proper management of the preserve areas by the future Property Owners Association. The developer plans to clear all development areas in the initial stages of the construction. Existing trees along the projects north and south perimeters and proposed open spaces will be preserved as shown on the Tree Preservation Plan and Landscape Plan. All tree mitigation requirements are met, and exceeded, by the preservation of6.39 acres (90%) of the existing 7.08 acres of hardwood forest, or 22.9% of the total site area. Conditions of Approval: 1) Prior to issuance of any building permits or notice of vegetation removal permits for any portion of the River Landing PUD project, the developers, their successor or assigns, shall C:\DOCUME~1\SZYNKOWl\LOCAlS-1\TEMP\RIVER LANDING FKA GULFSTREAM PROPERTY PUD - FINAl REPORT2.DOC have an environmental professional, experienced in gopher tortoises, conduct a gopher tortoise survey, per Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission guidelines. Should any gopher tortoise burrows be identified within the area of impact, the developers, their successor or assigns shall obtain an approved FFWCC permit for on-site relocation and complete the relocation prior to clearing the area of impact. An addition to this condition shall be that prior to issuance of a St. Lucie County Notice of Vegetation Removal, a pre-clearing meeting be conducted with the clearing contractors to provide educational materials (poster & pamphlets) to inform them of the protocol that shall be followed should a gopher tortoise or a gopher tortoise burrow be encountered during site construction. If a gopher tortoise is encountered, all work shall be halted and the environmental professional shall be contacted to relocate it to an area within the preserve area. 2) Prior to issuance of any building permits or notice of vegetation removal permits for any portion of the River Landing PUD project, the developers, their successor or assigns, shall provide a final executed (signed) and recorded copy of the conservation easement document must be to the Environmental Resources Department prior to the issuance of a SLC Vegetation Removal Permit. St. Lucie County shall be listed as at least one of the grantees of the conservation easement and the conservation easement shall encompass the entire 7.86 acres of habitat preserve area. 3) Prior to issuance of any building permits or notice of vegetation removal permits for any portion of the River Landing PUD project, the developers, their successor or assigns, shall provide to the Environmental Resources Department a revised set of Civil Plans showing the proper locations of the silt fencing and barricades. Currently, the Civil Plans show the silt fence being proposed through the middle of the preserve area. Please revise to show the silt fence location to be along the entire western edge of the 7.86 acres of habitat preserve and tree preservation barricades around the individual trees proposed for preservation along the northern and southern property boundaries. 4) Prior to issuance of any building permits or notice of vegetation removal permits for any portion of the River Landing PUD project, the developers, their successor or assigns, shall conduct an on-site meeting with Environmental Resources Department staff to determine the best possible layout of the 5 foot wide mulch path proposed through the preserve area so as to avoid impacting any native vegetation. 5) Prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for any portion of the River Landing PUD project, the developers, their successor or assigns, shall remove all Category I and II invasive exotics from the property (please be sure that none are planted - the latest landscape plan lists Ligustrum lucidum and Livinstona chinensis to be planted). 6) Prior to issuance of any building permits or notice of vegetation removal permits for any portion of the River Landing PUD project, the developers, their successor or assigns, shall provide to the Environmental Resources Department a revised Preserve Area Management Plan updated to reflect the revised site layout and designed to be used as a C:\DOCUME-1\SZYNKOWLIlOCAlS-1\TEMPlRIVER LANDING FKA GULFSTREAM PROPERTY PUD - FINAL REPORT2.DOC guide by the future homeowners association for the long term management of the preserve area, incorporating the nine principles of the Florida Yards and Neighborhoods Program promoting "green" practices such as native plant landscaping, water conservation, and minimization of fertilizers and pesticides, and the plan in its entirety will be included asan exhibit to the HOA documents. Furthermore, the final Preserve Area Management Plan, prepared for, and available to, the future homeowners of River Landing PUD project, and discuss any specific management practices recommended that would encourage continued (i.e.; post-development) usage ofthe site by of the wildlife (i.e.; maintaining shallow areas within the stormwater ponds for wading birds to forage, providing a specific list of native plants that provide wildlife food). The final Preserve Area Management and Monitoring Plan be recorded in the public records of the County. 7) Prior to issuance of any building permits or vegetation removal permits for any portion of the River Landing PUD project, the developers, their successor or assigns, shall submit to St. Lucie County Environmental Resources Department a final and approved Plat clearly platting the preserve areas in its entirety or as separate tracts. 8) Prior to issuance of any building permits or vegetation removal permits for any portion of the River Landing PUD project, the developers, their successor or assigns, shall submit to St. Lucie County Environmental Resources Department a plan to ERD identifying which trees will be relocated on site, outlining the root pruning and relocation techniques to be employed by the applicant prior to relocation, and areas where the trees will be relocated. C:\DOCUME~1ISZYNKOWl\LOCALS-1\TEMP\RIVER lANDING FKA GULFSTREAM PROPERTY PUD - FINAL REPORT2.DOC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 RESOLUTION NO. 07-003 FILE NO: PUD 06-011, RZ 06-018 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM THE RS-2 (RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMIL Y - 2 DU I ACRE) ZONING DISTRICT AND THE CO (COMMERCIAL, OFFICE) ZONING DISTRICT TO THE PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT - RIVER LANDING) ZONING DISTRICT AND FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS RIVER LANDING - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. A W Riverlandina. LLC, presented a petition for Final Planned Unit Development approval for the project to be known as River Landing for the construction of 99 townhomes on 27.88 acres located at the east of 25th Street approximately .17 miles north of West Midway Road. 2. The Development Review Committee has reviewed the site plan for the proposed project and found it to meet minimum technical requirements. 3. On September 15, 2005, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing, of which due public notice was published and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet at least 10 days prior to the hearing, and recommended that the Board of County Commissioners approve the Preliminary Unit Development for the project to be known as River Landing - PUD for the property depicted on the attached Maps as Exhibit "A" and described in Part B below. 4. On November 29, 2005, the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing, of which due public notice was published and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet at least 10 days prior to the hearing. That Board approved the Preliminary Unit Development for the project to be known as River Landing - PUD for the property depicted on the attached Maps as Exhibit "A" and described in Part B below. 5. On February 6, 2007 the Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing of which due public notice was published and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet at least 10 days prior to the hearing, and the Board of County Commissioners approved a Change in Zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/acre) Zoning District and the CO (Commercial, Office) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - River Landing) Zoning District and Final Planned Development Site Plan Approval for File No.: PUD 06-011 February 20, 2007 Resolution No. 07-003 Page 1 1 the project known as River Landing for the property depicted on the attached Maps as 2 Exhibit "A" and described in Part B below. 3 4 6. The proposed project is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives, and 5 standards of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the St. Lucie County 6 Comprehensive Plan, and the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County. 7 8 7. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the 9 character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, or other matters 10 affecting the public health, safety, and general welfare. 11 12 8. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed 13 project on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping, and 14 screening. 15 16 9. The proposed project will be constructed, arranged, and operated so as not to interfere 1 7 with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable 18 district regulations. 19 20 10. The proposed project will be served by adequate private facilities and services. 21 22 23 24 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. 25 Lucie County, Florida: 26 27 A. Pursuant to Section 11.02.05 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the Final 28 Site Plan for the project to be known as River Landing - A Planned Unit Development be, and 29 the same is hereby approved as shown on the site plan drawings for the project prepared by 30 Gentile Holloway O'Mahoney & Associates, Inc., dated August 3, 2006, and date stamped 31 received by the St. Lucie County Growth Management Director on August 6, 2006, for the 32 property described below, subject to the following conditions: 33 34 1. The Final Plat for the River Landing PUD shall not be recorded until constructible 35 engineering plans are approved, and all common Improvements are either: 36 37 a. built and accepted or approved by St. Lucie County; or 38 3 9 b. appropriate security Is provided to St. Lucie County In a form approved by the 40 County Attomey and an amount approved by the County Engineer, Including an 4 1 amount necessary to cover the period of maintenance required by the Land 42 Development Code. 43 44 2. No final site plan construction Development Permits shall be Issued by the County until 45 complete sets of sealed constructible final engineering plans, supporting calculations 4 6 and survey data for all site work and offslte improvements are submitted to the County 47 and approved by the Public Works Department, Utilities Department, Environmental File No.: PUD 06-011 February 20, 2007 Resolution No. 07-003 Page 2 1 Resources Department, Growth Management Department, St. Lucie County Fire District, 2 and any other agency or County Department that may be determined by the Director of 3 Growth Management to be necessarily involved In the review and approval of the 4 constructible final engineering plans for the site work and offslte Improvements. The 5 determination of whether or not plans submitted by the applicant constitute a complete 6 set of constructible plans shall be made by the departments Involved In the plan review 7 within five business days of the date the plans are received In the Deparbnent of Growth 8 Management 9 10 3. As part of the Final Plat for the proposed River landing project, the petitioner, his 11 successors or assigns, shall convey to St. Lucie County, the west 20 feet of the subject 12 property for additional right-of-way for South 25th Streel To the extent permitted under 13 the County's Code and Complied Laws, any such dedication may be considered eligible 14 for Road Impact Fee Credits. These Road Impact Fee Credits shall be transferable from the 15 Developer to any town home owner within the River landing PUD. These credits may only 16 be used in association with townhomes permitted in the River Landing Subdivision. 17 18 4. As part of the Final Plat for the proposed River Landing project, the petitioner, his 19 successors or assigns, shall convey to St Lucie County, the south 30 feet along West 20 Midway Road of the subject property for additional right-of-way for West Midway Road. 21 To the extent permitted under the County's Code and Compiled Laws, any such dedication 22 may be considered eligible for Road Impact Fee Credits. These Road Impact Fee Credits 23 shall be transferable from the Developer to any townhome owner within the River Landing 24 PUD. These credits may only be used in association with townhomes permitted in the 25 River Landing Subdivision. 26 27 5. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy (CO) for the first building permit, the 28 petitioner, his successor or assigns, shall construct a northbound right turn lane on South 2 9 25th Street at the project entrance per County Standards. 30 31 6. The developer, his successors or assigns shall either construct or, provide a fee in lieu 32 of, based on an engineer's estimate and agreed to by the County Engineer, for the 33 construction of a 6-foot wide sidewalk along the project's frontage on South 25th Street. 34 35 7. All site Improvements, including, but not limited to, buildings, water/sewer lines, 36 landscaping, and common electricallin.., shall be constructed so as to meet Federal 37 Emergency Management Agency requirements. Among the requirements is that the 38 buildings be constructed as to allow for the unimpeded flow of floodwaters. No stem waD 3 9 construction Is to be allowed. A minimum of two openings having a total net area of not 40 less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding shall 41 be provided. The bottom of all openings shall be no higher than one foot above grade. 42 Openings may be equipped with screens, louvers, valves, or other coverings or devices 43 provided that they permit the automatic entry and exit of floodwaters. Electrical lines and 44 water/sewer lines shall be so constructed so that no floodwaters may infiltrate the 4 5 systems. Sanitary sewers shall be required to contain a rain water stopper for all 46 manholes. 47 48 8. The finished floor elevation of all habitable buildings shall be at one (1) foot above the File No.: PUD 06-011 February 20, 2007 Resolution No. 07-003 Page 3 1 flood elevation as determined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency National 2 Flood Insurance Program Map. The elevation certificates required by NFIP shall be 3 required to be provided to and approved by the Building OffIcial before each of the 4 buildings passes foundation and rough plumbing inspection by the St. Lucie County 5 Building OffIcial. 6 7 9. Prior to receiving a landlvegetation clearing permit, the developers, their successor or 8 assigns, shall provide an analysis of what will happen to plantings Installed below the 9 flood elevation to the Environmental Resources Department for their approval before any 10 landscaping commences. 11 12 10. An environmental professional, experienced In handling Gopher Tortoises, shall be 13 retained for any relocation that may need to be done in the course of the construction, 14 as was recommended on page 13 of the EIA. An addition to this condition shall be that 15 prior to Issuance of a St. Lucie County Vegetation Removal Pennit, a prv-clearing meeting 16 be conducted with the clearing contractors to provide educational materials (poster & 1 7 pamphlets) to inform them of the protocol that shall be followed should a gopher tortoise 18 or a gopher tortoise burrow be encountered. If a gopher tortoise is encountered during 19 site construction, all work shall be' halted and the environmental professional shall be 20 contacted to relocate it to an area within the preserve area. 21 22 11. 11. An executed (signed) copy of the conservation easement document must be provided 23 to SLC ERD prior to the Issuance of a SLC Vegetation Removal Permit. Also, within 60 2 4 days of issuance of a permit a recorded copy of the easement document will be required 25 to be submitted. The conservation easement shall be made In favor of St. Lucie 2 6 County and shall encompass the entire 7.86 acres of habitat preserve area. 27 28 12. A condition of approval shall be that prior to Issuance of a SLC Vegetation Removal 2 9 Permit, a revised set of Civil Plans showing the proper locations of the silt fencing and 30 barricades must be supplied to ERD. Currently, the Civil Plans show the silt fence being 31 proposed through the middle of the preserve area. Please revise to show the silt fence 32 location to be along the entire western edge of the 7.86 acres of habitat preserve and tree 33 preservation barricades around the Individual trees proposed for preservation along the 34 northern and southern property boundaries. 35 36 13. A condition of approval shall be that prior to clearing of the S' mulch path throughout the 37 preserve area an on..1te meeting shall be arranged, with SLC ERD staff and the penson(s) 38 responsible for clearing the path, to field determine the best possible layout of the path to 39 avoid Impacting any native vegetation. 40 41 14. A condition of approval shall be that all Category I and II Invasive exotics are removed 42 from the property (and that none are planted - the latest landscape plan lists Ugustrum 4 3 lucidum and Uvlnstona chlnensls to be planted) prior to the first certificate of occupancy 44 is granted. 45 4 6 15. Prior to issuance of any building permits or vegetation removal permits for any 47 portion of the River landing - PUD project, the developers, their successor or assigns, 48 shall submit to St. Lucie County Environmental Resources Department a Preserve Area File No.: PUD 06-011 February 20, 2007 Resolution No. 07..Q03 Page 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 Management Plan updated to reflect the revised site layout. 16. The applicant shall be required to submit to St. Lucie County an annual monitoring report demonstrating compliance with the above conditions. The requirement for this report shall begin on the anniversary date of commencement of construction and shall continue on that date until two (2) years after the completion of the development. For the purpose of this condition, "completion of the developmenf' shall mean the issuance of the 97th Certificate of Occupancy or the Certificate of Occupancy for the 98th percentile of the final project density in the event that less than 99 units are constructed on this site. 17. The hours of operation for construction activities shall be limited to the time period from 7:00 A.M. to 5:30 P.M., Monday through Friday, 7:00 A.M. to 1:00 P.M. Saturday and no work on Sundays. No construction shall take place on Federal Holidays. The hours of operation restrictions do not apply to sales activities. In the event the County adopts uniform hours of operation for construction activities that apply county wide, then such hours of operation shall supersede the hours of operation set forth herein. B. The property on which this Final Planned Unit Development approval is being granted is described as follows: PARCEL 1 THE SOUTH 543 FEET OF LOTS 58 AND 59, WHITE CITY SUBDMSION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, AT PAGE 23, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; LESS THE WEST 40 FEET OF THE SOUTH 543 FEET OF LOT 58. ALL LYING IN SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 2 THE EAST % OF THE WEST 600 FEET OF LOT 60, SHEEN'S SURVEY OF WHITE CITY, SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, AT PAGE 23, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; LESS AND EXCEPTING THAT PART THEREOF LYING SOUTH OF THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF MIDWAY ROAD (STATE ROAD NO. 712). (Tax 1D#'s: 3403-502- 0086-0003,3403-502-0093-0005) (Location: East of South 25th Street and .17 miles north of West Midway Road) C. This Final Planned Unit Development approval shall expire on February 19, 2009, unless an extension is granted in accordance with Section 11.02.06(B)(3), St. Lucie County Land Development Code or a building permit has been issued. D. This Final Planned Development Site Plan approval granted under this resolution is specifically conditioned to the requirementthatthe petitioner, A W Riverlanding, L.L.C., including any successors in interest, shall obtain all necessary development permits and construction authorizations from the appropriate Local, State, and Federal regulatory authorities, including but not limited to; the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the South Florida Water Management District, and the Ft. Pierce File No.: PUD 06-011 February 20, 2007 Resolution No. 07-003 Page 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Farms Water Management District prior to the issuance of any local building permits of authorizations to commence development activities on the property described in Part B. E. The certificate of capacity, attached as Exhibit "B", shall be valid for the same period as this order. If this order expires or otherwise terminates, the certificate of capacity shall automatically terminate. F. A copy of this resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described in Part A. which plan shall be placed on file with the St. Lucie County Growth Management Director. G. A copy of this resolution shall be mailed. return receipt requested to the developer and agent of record as identified on the site plan applications. H. The Director of Growth Management shall coordinate the issuance of further site Development Permits. No final site construction authorizations or site Development Permits shall be issued until all requirements for such permits are met. I. This resolution shall be recorded in the Public Records of St. Lucie County. The recording of this resolution does not authorize the commencement of anyon-site development activities without obtaining such further development permits as may be required. All applicable conditions of approval as set forth above, and all applicable code requirements must be met to satisfaction of the County before final site construction permits are issued. J. This Order shall be recorded in the Public Records of St. Lucie County. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Chris Craft xxx XXX XXX XXX XXX Vice-Chairman Joseph E. Smith Commissioner Paula A. Lewis Commissioner Doug Coward Commissioner Charles Grande File No.: PUD 06-011 February 20, 2007 Resolution No. 07-003 Page 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 20th day of February 2007 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: County Attorney Deputy Clerk ljS\WORD\RiverLanding PUD-RES 07-0030.doc File No.: PUD 06-011 February 20, 2007 Resolution No. 07-003 Page 7 1 2 3 4 EXHIBIT "A" 5 6 7 . General Location Map 8 . Area Subject to Final Planned Unit 9 Development Approval 10 . Site Plan Graphics 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 File No.: PUD 06-011 February 20, 2007 Resolution No. 07-003 Page 8 () co ~ ....J 0 to 0 ....J I 11 0 c.o ¡¡;.¡ N C) 0 z+~ cD N C N .... Q) .&I "C a:: I iJ c oð ~ N ~ 0 co .~ I ::< 'C ....J ~ ~ It! L.. ~ C- O> 0 ~1 ~ C- .> I C- c.o ~ 0 It! a:: 0 ~ 3: (:) « :::> a.. .èo c: '" 8 ~ êt c: ·111 ~ 1 0 P8O~ UU!~S ~ ii 'II ~ CD " ~ 1 p~ IBUB:) JapnH . II) 0 ., N Ó PI:! pø8US 1""80 .z-o G ~ ! o !8 .èo c: '" 8 .1; 'I: ~ ! ¿' p}:BU!18 ~ ~ 1 o 1 ... ó p}: UO¡µs:> õi ð ... ó 1 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I _________________________1 ----------------------------- -------------------------------------- ,(¡uno:) 88qOq08fl>/O A petition of A W River Landing, LLC for Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) DEVINE RD c 82 -------------- ~ en J: ~ LO N en 97 W MIDWAY RD .j'/7' '\4/'J'I' _GRAY.TWiG LN 17 -,,, r· 2O'1"}1" 1,4 I" t.. -_L __I ~lrlWIRì I I 10 \ 11 I 12 13 I '4 I PUD 06-011 & RZ 06-018 - - I "'''' ,I '.'_eN"" 1 // / / V _ _ _ _ _ :4_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~// \J~:=~':':< ----- I I __,J ../ 55 1 I r 13 1121"-1'0 I. I ~1 7&_-/ ~I: _~==::-~L= !ñ , , our. OT 2~ J: t'; 7 / 17 " ,. N 1/" 1. '0": ¡......... en I .... I I" ? I I ¡" '4; ,_ _ 551 I I '- oc-- I : 13 . _ "í ¡:- , lD f?~\~:1Ef?-f?D- _: 11 10 \ I 1':::-: - \ 12 . \ _ __m____~7mm__m__L..\~ '\, '.~, I ---~s: · \\\28 I . . \~--~~\"\~:i_ Œm .~ \~\--~~~ ~ -- ~ ~ \ }'e..- ~ ~ ·~fii¡~;:¡ L----- 1\ II ~.". II I ~~2? :J 61 I 1 I I I 1 1'71"¡ot<o¡3f~ 0~~'¡7" 14~ 1-.... -'-- 1.1.. J -'-"73 rr t'~ ~, ~4 f' '1' í 128 I 1 W 1ST ST · j -'q'l~rl . 7! I'II'I'J~I ï ---- ~ ,. I" I,M I" 111 \ ...!.] _1_1_1_1_1_1 62 L r \ w -- --RIVER¡BRA1NcH¡DR............ ~ 1 " · · · · · "I" I· "I, 1" r S· " , 1, , 4 'J ·1. 7 1 · J. 10 "14, J h( ~ ~I 1 RIVER HA~MO~K LN_ - -c...7 f-- 1 'r- -r - 1- -1-'0- l1\t" 13 / 5è"¿~~~ (jrtTWtli .M41U1(Itmllmt :Dtylartmnlt 62 1/2 . , .¡ 1~1 ï.ï OJrLO 16 , , " 14 I , , " 14 N A - - r Legend ~ Subject property Map prepared October 26, 2006 Zoning DEVINE RD L.-- '-- AR-1 Dr::' " I 1 I I I I I I I 1 ' _ _ _ _ ~ _CG_ _ _ _ _ _ 82 97 W MIDWAY RD 1 AR-1 CN A W River Landing, LLC - - I ",~,~-1 ,~, ~,~:,:, , /1 / t~~G PUE C~-j3I'I. 54 __~II< - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~~ 1 · .J -I I I lOUT OT24 I / 17 I / 18 18 19 2{ 21 I /..... 15 I I" I , 14 I' 55 1 2 I II I --_ I I - _ Ol.D - _ j :' 13 ~ "í .l /RJ~'.\:C:R-RD:':' _: _ ~ - 11 10 I I __ I P~. ·IV _ _~<:':~ __ ~7___ _ _ ___ _ _ ___ ~__ ~ ~~_, .. '~\~~ ': , . .. O~-~~;/4~: \ O~ ~ ..z ~ ~,~"__ I-'i W@ c\~ ~ ~1 ~ \ 1- ~tf,: &n' ~ 7 ~ ~ LL :;;, CG AR-1 ~ AR-1 ~ ,x:.~::':: ~ 61 ~ î\.~~ -- -- . ~ ~ ¡¿ :,~~~I~~ ,.... ,I CO AR-1 r "'" A '~~5~4 ~~' ~ - .. 62 r r ~ f 7! 151 13J'I I jL ~ r;.ï,5~Mï12ï,,\ 1.] _1_1_1_1_1_1 , ã~ ,lL 'A3 · --J 7 10,l" 14 1 15 62 1/2 ~: 016 LO ~ l. 511 t· ·~117~ ~,. ~ f) ~:: w 1~~~:-~1 3 ~ III.... 1'3 I i I. ,. ~ 1 I '----.L ......... RIVER BRANCH DR_.....- - ] ;:; _ 30 29 ,. 27 J ,. '[.5 \'4 {.3 I 22 21 I 20 r S ,. 15 14 .... I . :?: :n.·~ 1 I 2 3 : -5 -.. · I 7 I · j. 10 " 1- j _ _ ~j 1 ';- L RIVER HAMMOCK LN_ '- - -, I -, ~ I.. - -r r~l -'0 "Y'" 13 I J ( " 14 ~.Á~~~~_ AN (jrfTWtli .M1Z7UI{f_t :tJtyND'tmInt ~ Subject property Map prepared October 26, 2006 I- en J: It; ~ CO) AR-1 - ~ . . 7 . r-!~ ~ 13 2 I, GRAY.TWIG LN 17 ,. 7.' 20 121 22 \'3 '4 1,5 I R~B-: rì'ï~Oi~~R~ I I AR-1 10 I " I' 1~···'I"'3 I '4 I PUD 06-011 & RZ 06-018 \ IT" Legend A W River Landing, LLC PUD 06-011 & RZ 06-018 Legend ~ Subject property /"' "/ . /J ~-" ..'/C /___t.-tV'1..e. ¿....OWH.~ v ~.'-- (jrtnVHi .7IIanourrm""t Department Map prepared October 26, 2006 'I · J I ",.."C'\ ,Ä'___ ~~u~ø' III , :"-'- PE,,,:,!,~ ..uw.!Uwa ~-Ä,Ä)/ ' 1"- ¡ 'I ¡. tJj!, i ¡il PÛ~-'~_?<-- -19¿tl/" IJ]1J' II.~ ¡- ~jð:fIIIHUJ .1p~ . ~ df ill I ¡,å J .,..- I~ ~ ({. i ~ j 1 i 9 i~l J I (f) ~ : ~!.';: f '..;.' 5 ~ ~I ~ .Ih Itli a . a··j ¡ïum w~a R hllB "'J~~'lt §. " i .11J ~,j_.,;.", 2;,. . ......... C) . "':¡' ------...- ! ¡ , I ! s· = ~. ¡ ~ r ii ~ ! !¡ ~i i ¡ I si'~. I I 111 ~. II ~ · : :~!! J) Ing Ii g I I I~;! .~ .; .. i ~ 'I I siB ¡' i ~~~ ~ ã !~~h~ .~ âh - !U~~~~~nnl;i b I: aå~-h=hhbmdg G! ----------¡ i I ~ .. .!I ~~ : t I III ill .ä IlIoloU ~i I ~ I I I ~ i ~ I J( ~!¡ I ! ¡ f : ~ uih ih ,1111 II. ill ~.I Ii ,........."'11 - I ..: ~ 4_'._'.' - ìS. IGsz:lI}I2.OS_ ': J ¡. I .. j I ~à If ~~ ~,n tJ ~ I -*.!. ---( ~ Þ ~5 -- - -- - ¡;;-"T ¡ ¡ 65:3120 'II a H .: ì I !.,I b~BI~ &Id' I¡'fl~ I.-I If ~ .'1. ~:BU sf-II ;II~~ ¡IIIR~i I~~:! II~:II I §d', ."11,1, i2R!¡f II' ¡'I ¡Ilii. 'I,ll! ~ -dl':11I -ql~ =1: !!II.., I., hi . I 'ß ~ i) ~ ~ i ' H¡:iª of I ~" ~fJ~~~ f,.,I~1 ill.'¡, ~I ij,!I,~ ],ß~,., ~ c ¡if I! jJ!!~ UJ5g 1,ei ]t§~ ~ Hhl. ~ tiin ..IIÎ! MJ ~dU 11 Ii ; ~1 I i i ~i ~ o Z ILl q ~, ~ ....I!i! ~ ~ Ih o ~ 00(3 1 2 3 4 EXHIBIT "B" 5 6 7 . Certificate of Capacity 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 File No.: PUD 06-011 February 20, 2007 Resolution No. 07-003 Page 9 CERTIFICATE OF CAPACITY 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 (772)-462-2822 Date: 2/6/2007 Certificate No. 2568 This document certifies that concurrency will be met and that adequate public facility capacity exists to maintain the standards for levels of service as adopted in the St Lucie County Comprehensive Plan for: 1. Type of development 99 Residential Condominiums Number of units 99 Number of square feet 2. Property legal description & Tax ID no. 340350200860003 Northeast corner of 25th St & Midway Rd River Landing River Landing 3. Approval: Building Permit Resolution No. 07-003 Letter 4. Subject to the following conditions for concurrency: See 21 Conditions in Res. No. 07-003. Owner's name AW River Landing LLC Address 1200 S Rogers Cir#11 Boca Raton FL 33487 6. Certificate Expiration Date 2/6/2009 This Certificate of Capacity is transferable only to subsequent owners of the same parcel, and is subject to the same terms, conditions and expiration date listed herein. The expiration date can be extended only under the same terms and conditions as the underlying development orderissued with this certificate, or for subsequent development order(s) issued for the same property, use and size as described herein. BoB N/X Growth Management Director: St Lucie County, Florida Signed ö,t l-r Date: 1/19/2007 .-.Lhll1;Ei AI ¡¿ I')[)L£ Concurrency Review by: Sign~ -..... -"'" Date: 1/19/2007 Friday, January 19, 2007 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 . ". v RESOLUTION 05·357 FILE NO: PUD-04-o291RZ-04-032 A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS RIVER LANDING - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. Gentile Hollowav O'Mahonev and Associates. Inc.. presented a petition for Preliminary Planned Unit Development approval for the project to be known as River Landing for the construction of 99 multiple-family units to be located on 15.83 acres on the east side of South 25th Street, approximately 0.17 mile north of West Midway Road. 2. The Development Review Committee has reviewed the site plan for the proposed project and found it to meet minimum technical requirements. 3. On September 15, 2005, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing, of which due public notice was published and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet at least 10 days prior to the hearing, and recommended that the Board of County Commissioners deny the Preliminary Planned Unit Development approval for the project to be known as River Landing - PUD, for the property depicted on the attached Maps as Exhibit MAli and described in Part B below. 4. On November 1, 2005, the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing, of which due public notice was published and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet at least 10 days prior to the hearing, and granted Preliminary Development Plan approval for the project to be known River Landing - PUD. That meeting was continued to the November 29, 2005, Board of County Commissioners meeting. 5. On November 29, 2005, this Board conttnued the public hearing on this item. 6. The proposed project is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives, and standards of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County. 7. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, or other matters affecting the public health, safety, and general welfare. File No.: PUD-04-029/RZ-Q4-032 November 29. 2005 EDWIN M. FRY Jr Für,~,: Ç'or.iÿyLERK OF THE ÇIRUlIT OmA ~~7a ~'D~."0:30AM T ............,""': $88 50 ... - 2201 Doc . Tn-:ResO Resolution 05-357 Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 8. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed project on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping, and screening. 9. The proposed project will be constructed, arranged, and operated so as not to interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable district regulations. 10. The proposed project will be served by adequate private facilities and services. NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. Pursuant to Section 11.02.05 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the Preliminary Site Plan for the project to be known as River Landing - A Planned Unit Development be, and the same is hereby approved as shown on the site plan drawings for the project prepared by Gentile Holloway O'Mahoney and Associates, Inc., dated November 14, 2005, and date stamped received by the St. Lucie County Growth Management Director on November 23, 2005, for the property described below, subject to the following conditions: 1. An envirohmental professional, experienced in handling Gopher Tortoises, shall be retained for any relocation that may need to be done in the course of the construction, as was recommended on page 13 of the EIA. An addition to this condition shall be that prior to issuance of a St. Lucie County Vegetation Removal Permit, a pre-clearing meeting be conducted with the clearing contractors to provide educational materials (poster & pamphlets) to inform them of the protocol that shall be followed should a gopher tortoise or a gopher tortoise burrow be encountered. If a gopher tortoise is encountered during site construction, all work shall be halted and the environmental professional shall be contacted to relocate it to an area within the preserve area. 2. An executed (signed) copy of the conservation easement document must be provided to SLC ERD prior to the Issuance of a SLC Vegetation Removal Permit. Also, within 60 days of issuance of a permit a recorded copy of the easement document will be required to be submitted. 3. Prior to issuance of a SLC Vegetation Removal Permit, a revised set of Civil Plans showing the proper locations of the silt fencing and barricades must be supplied to the Environmental Resources Division. 4. Prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit for the proposed project, the petitioner, his successors or assigns, shall convey to St. Lucie County, in manner and form acceptable to the St. Lucie County Attorney, the west 20 feet of the subject property for additional right-of-way for South 25th Street. To the extent File No.: PUD-04-o29/RZ-04-o32 November 29, 2005 Resolution 05-357 Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2'4 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 permitted under the County's Code and Compiled Laws, any such dedication may be considered eligible for Road Impact Fee Credits. 5. The developer, his successor or assigns shall provide an estimate of the cost of construction for a northbound right tum lane on South 25th Street at the project entrance. Payment shall include a 15 percent contingency and be in a form acceptable to the County Attorney. 6. Prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit for the proposed project, the petitioner, his successors or assigns, shall convey to S1. Lucie County, in manner and form acceptable to the S1. Lucie County Attorney, the south 30 feet along West Midway Road of the subject property for additional right-of-way for West Midway Road. To the extent permitted under the County's Code and Compiled Laws, any such dedication may be considered eligible for Road Impact Fee Credits. B. The property on which this Preliminary Planned Unit Development approval is being granted is described as follows: PARCEL 1: THE SOUTH 543 FEET OF LlOTS 58 AND 59, WHITE CITY SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, AT PAGE 23, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; LESS THE WEST 40 FEETOF THE SOUTH 543 FEET OF LOT 58. ALL LYING IN SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. TOGETHER WITH: PARCEL 2: THE EAST Va OF THE WEST 600 FEET OF LOT 60, ACCORDING TO SHEEN'S SURVEY OF WHITE CITY. SECTION 4. TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST. AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1. AT PAGE 23, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; LESS AND EXCEPT. THAT PART THEREOF LYING SOUTH OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF STATE ROAD NO. 712 (MIDWAY ROAD). (Tax 101: 1304-111..0002-0001) East side of South 25th Street, approximately 0.17 mile north of West Midway Road) C. This Preliminary Planned Unit Development approval shall expire on November 29, 2007, unless an extension is granted in accordance with Section 11.02.06(B)(3), S1. Lucie County Land Development Code or final planned unit development approval has been granted. (Location: D. A copy of this resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described in Section A, which plan shall be placed on file with the S1. Lucie County Growth Management Director. File No.: PUD-04-029/RZ-04-032 November 29, 2005 Resolution 05-357 Page 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2'4 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Doug Coward Vice-Chairman Chris Craft AYE AYE AYE Commissioner Paula A. Lewis Commissioner Joseph E. Smith AYE NAY Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 29th Day of November 2005. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA ·.f '~, BY . ~~. ATTEST: .... hf H:\WORD\Petitions\BCC\FINISHED.05\RiverLandingPreliminaryPUD.PD\RiverLandingPreliminaryPU-RES.doc File No.: PUD-04-D29/RZ-Q4-032 November 29, 2005 Resolution 05-357 Page 4 · General Location Map · Area Subject to Preliminary Planned Unit Development Approval · Site Plan Graphics 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 EXHIBIT "A" File No.: PUD-04-029/RZ-04-032 November 29, 2005 Resolution 05-357 Page 5 ó c: u) ~.æ ~.! o 0 _0 -f/) o en Ie( .!!oð +:i~ c: Q) Q) c: C>o .c CU ;E o t ¡¡ tJ i a: c os ~ N ('t) o I ~ N ~ oð en N o ~ Q :J a. .. I ~l ~I ;~ ~l .+. ~ .... - ... Auno:> NqO¡¡:¡N1IO :g ?3 ..... 1ií ::I œ ::I c( " I!! I'Ø Q. I!! Q. ~ I'Ø :E b § 8 c 'e :I J ~ A peti~ion of Gentile Holloway Q'Mahoney & Associates, Inc., for Preliminarty F?lanned Unit Development Approval for the Project to be known as River Landing \ ~ DEVINE i I- / '¡; '" I ~ ~ //' I-- :Q - r-- I I I h I EVA'ST ---' '-- I I I rn I I ---1 I /~ÌÎ~:n - u Q a: z w ~ w ~ \ ~ C) a: ~\~ ~ - I ~~L%\ l~ = ~ ~ r-j¡ I - ~ '~\dF i~ - ~ ~ \" I 'i I \ I r?:..:?- Mlrl:'¡'-~DI I I )¢:fl~G' -1 "T I ?ë ~ I T l T I f~' I 1 I -;':31;': ~ ~ 0J II lJJ :IE ~ ;: .J li'jBiWDj T -(~. w ~ w I I x rrif'" I FLEj 1 f rr I ï-~ ~ '. _ ... ~ll~ J (_ 1 I J I I I RIVERiï""'ILN~ / ];1>- ~NW,ooJI.N-l.1 I -{l I L,UCY1LN I 1 i I I - ~ T T T l I ~ I I iõd I I I ~-10ri~I.NU ~I 1~~~t¡T'f''''iCREIEKU¡-<- 7 / ~I' I I r T Tl ~GREGORYLN-N~ ~~ -r ( ! I I , r :Q\O 0 I I PUD 04-029 Legend Sè;- .;(.t~ h..~ N A &RZ 04-032 ~ Subject property ~.....,tlÍ M.,..-t "-...,... Map prepared August 1, 2005 !i !~ .. ¡.r. i! . ü.s:þþ rï:í \.f~~'J~Stþþ~l'r.~:.' P7 I. . \'I.~;'\~I. .;. ~! r~ \ \ %",'~¿' ;~ ~:" ~'l l'. J. ë,t. Þ~Pf ~ \. - -:"..'..':;., #" J. a I I :1, .. \» . ¡¡ Þ ~'" ~".' ..;.>..... ¡" ~".. ..,r ". ...: r" 7' /ail '-'" / ~ -----....~.. ;":' Is Þh fl' ":At' ~.- -, J, A#~~. ...... ...,.... t l' L I' '/;..;..-.1.;, / -' ':-:-:: ".,":.'- :.'.:-:.:. .;";';::1. 'r'~ _ I 'f", ., "'_'~' ~-4-~~..--;-.... ...... '.' '. ..,..<:......i......: . ~ ~ . ~ . -~;¡; ... ... .. .... P. . - ~ . .'. . ."".' ';.:: :'. :::,~.¡;.:.:.;;:~~ '.d-::'-::" ':: ß :::-: :./;::~ .-;; ;;: - :.~ ::o\'·:..{~~~::;·:-::.S~;;r ~·~;./'H / ';"-::-:f~: .-:::r..t..¡: ~ ~~ : ~t '~ ·'1' !"'~rà ~t:1 " J$ !... J~f:"':-' .;.'.,"'.:-: .....,~.-:; "'~'''\'"J It·,· · .,.. \....... .>«, · '-" ....... .... ..:.~....\ =... 'c ... ..<! ¡ I..:..' i^·· "''::'..,...~ '" ~,~. E'.-' ..,\_. .. Þ, 0' · :','1'1' ''''',:,;.:... '" - '~-:r';"~'- ~ .. \Ii. ' ~:····~...t·····+Il;t-I\þ-~·~: . \, .. ...¡ "f:=::=~"~ \{;.~: .¡.g]t~' ....! tl!~: <J ~ n_\ ,t "~ , -!t . ...... "...·t IIJ , , !{ _I ~ ~ " , ...... . . ,;~' ,., I ~ '. . ~ I h ~. ., . , "! ..... "'r",. ,,' · .' <, . 'Ii" ;' ;1 , . , \ :i t .J:~~""'; '¡t:: .' ¡':l -":: j'rFI.J .. ~: V') "1 . 'f ~:~ j~" !; '. _ , ", .. . ......" I - . ._on . ·t .': ,I .¡¡ 'I. ,;". " ~'.' _._.._ , .;. "f: ~¡ ~. I¡ - ~ ];;. ~~~~ "j ~:. \ \ : . ,,' ....... ¡" IJ I ; I 11.,6,_....~. jo " . . ~. 1 II . J «;t:¡¡í 5 )~i '. "~:~I : : II ~ ~I'I'"'' " , r..¡ ,",::, JlI'II 'Ii , ; I : I ' ' ': ~..' ,. : : i,. ~ ~f; :r f í: I , : tj I ~ , '~ -... " II f ~ ..., ,....co· ,. '.. _h "I "f ~ ¡ ~" ¡.., ,. . 1, .. ..__..- . . ,'J.;,¡ It ( -"I.'" " "...., " I... . I ~ d! 'r.~: :1, i: , ::. 'Î:¡ .,:~ .,)~ ! %to I }. : I Œ! ¡ ~ ~ ~ ., ',I: I ¡. '-" , - ':'.= · 'I 'I . ;1 ,,'. , , ' ., .. !' .: , ' . l' 1.. ~, 'I Ie. I ~ . .. ~ "'i} !:.. :\.., . , j'[-6'I' 'l¡ . 1} il-' ., ~ ."',~ ': . ~, ~ . [;l ~! ' >. ~"~ ';~ ,: ~ 'I 1 ~::: :. ":. '~Jm nu. 1-1: ne.!;¡~ j' i ;;¡J¡i u I: ;f, , ,l zSV"~:~"'"' ;')j : I'll : ~ .\ ·"'1'1 H~; ~:~~ ~¡W~ n ¡ Ik t t· ~,.;o:; '. I: .. "', If"'l I" .h ¡ J!:' i ..! !'~I¡e ~I "~ 1!~ 11:1 1 ; ~ ~j ~ I. IH . . >a ~ Hr, '0 !.. .~ ~: :V~ ll'f!;;Þ1 "IJ-"! ;: ",-, ~ : . 11 II i ¡Lnail h I' .r.", I ,. ,/. .' 11 ..-----¡ I 1ft I r "If (1Iå¡;.@, I - ; ----.-'- : : . i'k.J '11111 i f! ~t~ ( ! : J i~lllù~nll!ln ~.!iJI I, ' . _n :=::-:-:.=.:.:::7:-::"~.l L _E _,_ J T- .;:........ ".-.!"oõii~:::....._ ::-. .===_ -, .. ~.. '.,-y.' ---..._- 1-" I l'~ '71"~:-:~t-"~J: ¡ ',~~r ,", -- ~"i m"; -q, . n_ '. œ R ;, I ¡. , .. " . d,r::M'"-, ~. ¡:'t!: ¡ fT'í .41 8 '~ . :. , ~ ~' ;, " .... '. " ., i+1. ": " . .. --µ. r;lc..::.;,1 I:' .;:-. :::j i;.::...~ ' ~.h::::. ¡..;".. >-- . _ ~"'. . ~ I " , h Îti ¡I! ß' 'di . 1m ! ~ I ~ ., ~ ~ ill! ~ì ¡~ Ii i¡ illf~, :.~' t*..~f,l..JI~ ffflÙ.. i.~il~ .lfiUJfi ji! I '. ,¡ I! f¡ II r. lIJ \ I( 6 !¡, h . nl 1\!n:. ni' ~'~li~L !.!d' ~¡:,,' ri, ;,..!.I ~.'~ i,' i" ~!..~(: ~!l t; hi ~ it 1il4H ·Jt ! ~ ~¡Ii!'! i~~~ ~~I~n ,nß ~~í:!! It? :1 ?:. 'l ;¡ "l~"i"J" -!I "'Ir!j' t ,!hi .æ!.~~, 1 i1..z....~. ~ " ,\. ¡ "';',,: ir. ~;'!.'!.h: ~'.,", ' ~I ¡~ . ~jf~.i" ~,:., :!':. . I . '1 ;,! f '1 ~ j j>-:! I : :;¡j '>0 . fi ~ .; ...'. i. ~; :';}i k,:h¡ . î :.:1 .~i!t~j -'I; . "·'1 Ò:!d ..th ....... ii¡lfIiI' .., ¡¡r.",:;it 79ù J't~lJ(.~. '0- .fu.Z¡'UJJ2j3 %J¿~ld0 1,1'~~I, ~~".;~, ., f: l ši ~J]\ '1"'" " " I". fi¡ ': ¡~ . : ; i ;' u f f Id ; i r J;5u; '3 :I"- ~ I I _I~ ..L~\I ¡ 'f§I" ~¡'1¡jr ~';'l·F-=ffl1., !;! J; ·~:·~lf: 1~11 ~. ->--. 'I) 4 ~ .': I io !r i ,. ~.; b .! ~I! ~! c 3 ühl.1 , f 0_ ~ ! (Í) Q ì ~...- - Q If e- . ~ I!i¡ I! fIl, . k'l , tilth Ã I!¡b, ~h1h !:~-." a ij~~;UI ~-y ~~~~~, ~--L ~~çi . ~I~u { .. ......,.:_::....~ I "'., r r', '" c r-~ ,.~ .2'-Jr.fl {,,! Jit "(;{oI)lI" :.r J!, ·~g!1 ,ì~ ði"'- .... U'ii ~! ~ sB;1 Rli H f!; ~I~~= n !:: ~.'- I . . i Public Worb Department Code Compliance Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982-5652 MEMORANDUM TO: Hank Flores FROM: Christopher M. Lestrange, P.E. SUBJECT: River Landing - Stormwater Management Summary DATE: November 16,2005 The following is a summary of the drainage design prepared by the Applicant's Engineer, Florida Consulting Engineers, Inc. EXISTING CONDITION The site generally drains ftom west to east to on-site wetlands prior to its outfall to the North Fork of the St. Lucie River along its eastern boundary. Existing furrows running ftom west to east drain portions of the site and portions of properties to the north and south to the North Fork. All but a small portion of the site adjacent to South 25th Street is located within a FEMA delineated floodplain. The Flood Insurance Study prepared by FEMA has established the 100 year (1.0% probability per year) base flood elevation at elevation 9.0 and the 500 year (0.2% probability per year) base flood elevation at 11.0. The site topography ranges ftom elevation 2.0 in the wetlands to 10.0 along South 25th Street. PROPOSED CONDITION The Applicant proposes a surface water management system with a lake water surface control elevation established at elevation 2.35. The system will mimic the existing hydrology of the site by routing stormwater through a dry and wet detention area and a control structure that discharges to the on-site wetlands. Per the analysis provided, the rate of runoff ftom the 25 year, 3 day design storm (9.51 inches of rain) to the wetlands is approximately 20 percent of that modeled for the site prior to development. The maximum water surface elevation in the lake ponds to elevation 4.15 during this storm event. The system provides 150 percent of the water quality storage volume required by state water quality standards for discharge to the North Fork. lof2 Swales have been provided along the northern and southern boundary of the project to maintain the historic drainage through the site to allow runoff from the adjacent properties to flow through the site and outfall to the North Fork. The Applicant proposes to replace 107 acre-feet of floodplain storage with an equivalent amount below the existing toO year base flood elevation of 9.0. The entire 19 acre-feet of runoff generated from the developed site for the 100 year, 3 day storm (11.55 inches of rain) is contained below the overflow elevation of the lake set at elevation 4.50. Compensatory storage above this elevation is spread over a 200 foot wide spillway at elevation 4.50 parallel to and 340 feet from the bank of the North Fork to direct floodwaters toward the river. The minimum road elevation proposed is 6.5. Finished floor elevations have been set at elevation 9.0. SUMMARY The surface water management system meets or exceeds all State and County water quality and quantity discharge standards and has provided compensatory floodplain storage in accordance with accepted engineering standards. The project has obtained a South Florida Water Management District Environmental Resource Permit for the system and will be required to obtain a S1. Lucie County Stormwater Permit prior to any development activity on-site. 20f2 RIVER LAN DING ST. LUCIE COUNTY, F'LORIDA ~~ r!3wg Florida Con.unlng .....1........ Inc. Date: ..JANUARY 3, 2007 PROJECT DATA: THE AREA OF THE PROJECT TOTAL AREA = PRE-DEVELOPMENT SITE WIDE STORAGE) = POST-DEVELOPMENT SITE WIDE STORAGE) = BASIN 100 YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION = 27.57 ac. 5.50 inches 3.58 inches 9.00 SUMMARY: PRE-DEVELOPMENT STORAGE SOIL STORAGE = SITE WIDE SOIL STORAGE = 5.50 27.573 X 5.50 = 12.64 ac. ft, AVERAGE SITE ELEVATION = STORAGE DEPTH = SURFACE STORAGE TO 100 YR FLOOD STAGE = 5.5749 (Please see attached calculations) 9.00 5.5749 = 3.43 ft. 27.5730 x 3.43 = 94.44 ac,ft. TOTAL PRE-DEVELOPMENT STORAGE = 94.4403 + 12.638 = 107.08Iac.ft. POST -DEVELOPMENT STORAGE SOIL STORAGE = SITE WIDE SOIL STORAGE = 3.58 (SEE CALCULATIONS) 27.573 X 3.58 = 8.23 ac. ft. SURFACE STORAGE TO 100 YR FLOOD STAGE = 99.00 ac. ft. See Stage/Storage cales TOTAL POST-DEVELOPMENT STORAGE = 99.00 + 8,2259 = 107.23ac.ft. COMPARE PRE-DEVELOPMENT TO POST-DEVELOPMENT TOTAL SITE STORAGE PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT AT ELEVATION TOTAL SITE STORAGE POST DEVELOPMENT AT ELEVATION NET CHANGE = 9.00 = 9.00 = 107.08 ac.ft. 107.23 ac.ft. 0.15 BC.ft. GAIN Page 1 of 1 06:06/2005 MON 10:15 FAX @OOli002 FORT PIERCE UTILITIES AUTHORITY "Commlned to Quality· 206 South Sixth Street (34950) Post Office Box 3191 ~ort Pierce. Florido 34948·3191 PhOne 772-466-1600 Fox 772-a65-6984 Via: Fax 561·362-7188 June 6, 2005 Zuhair M. Jalloul, P.E., Presid~nt Florida Consulting Engineers. Inc. 4081 N.W. Boca Raton Blvd. Boca Raton, FL 33431 Re: WaterlWastewater Availability River Landing - South 25th Street, PCN # 340350200850006 Dear Mr. Jalloul: On February 11, 80 Hutchinson sent you a letter stating that FPUA water and wastewater was available for the above-referenced project. In our recent phone conversation, you indicated that the South Florida Water Management District needed more specific information from FPUA regarding our capacity to serve new development. This tetter is intended to provide that specific information. Fort Pierce Utilities Authority does have adequate water capacity to serve the River Landing development. There have been two issues regarding FPUA's available capacity to serve new developments. The issue raised by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection was that of firm capacity at the water treatment plant (WTP). That issue should be resolved this week, as we have already submitted documentation that will increase the firm capacity of the WTP to 13.8 mgd. This will provide 2.8 mgd of excess capacity over our present maximum day water demand of 11 mgd. Using a 1.5 maximum day peak demand factor and average of 203 gpd per residential connection from FPUA billing records, this excess capacity will accommodate 9,180 residential units. ' At FPUA's projected rate of growthl this firm capacity should meet the needs of new growth for at least three to four years. Planning is already in progress for an expansion of the WTP to about 17 mgd firm capacity, which will. be completed in approximately two years. The second issue that was raised by the South Florida Water Management District is FPUA's permitted groundwater withdrawal under our current water use permit and how much reserve capacity remains on that allocation. The maximum day withdrawal is not an issue, as we are permitted for 14.6 mgd and our current maximum day is about 11.5 mgd. FPUA's current annual allocation equates to 11 mgd on a daily average. Our average daily groundwater withdrawal for 2004 was 9.5 mgd, which leaves 1.5 mgd ReceIved By A"~ 04 .' Growth Managømem 06/06/2005 MON 10:15 FAX ~OO2l002 Zuhair M. Jalloul, P.E., President June 6, 2005 Page 2 reserve capacity. Using the average of 203 gpd per residential connection from FPUA billing records, this reserve capacity would accommodate 7,390 new equivalent residential connections (ERCs). There are 4,141 ERCs already permitted, for which FPUA has reserved water capacity by signing the DEP permits and developer agreements. This includes permitted units in the FPUA and St. Lucie County utility service areas. We have informally reserved capacity for another 631 ERCs, bringing the total ERCs of reserved capacity to 4,772. Subtracting this from the gross excess capacity yields 2.618 ERCs of water supply reserve capacity to serve new development. At the projected rate of growth for FPUA's water system, this should be sufficient to accommodate new growth at least through the end of 2006 and probably well into 2007. FPUA has submitted an application for a water use permit with increased allocations to accommodate future growth beyond this period. The new permit should be issued well before our remaining reserve capacity is utilized or committed. I hope this letter has clarified the issues related to FPUA's ability to provide potable water for the River Landing development. If you have any remaining questions or if I can be of further assistan~e, please call me. Sincerely, FORT PIERCE UTILITIES AUTHORITY #;L.4~ ~ William G. Thiess, P.E. Director of WaterNVastewater Systems WGT/fkm pc: Elie J, Boudreau)(, III, P.E., Director of Utilities, FPUA David A. Mellert, Environmental Engineer, FPUA Richard Stenberg, WRlWWS Superintendent, FPUA Bo Hutchinson. Engineer 1, FPUA L.lc..p.cill'<Ri.., u~...... oS 2S 51 0&-46·0~ III 10 FL C~~.I,4''''.I2,ðlX TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING MEMORANDUM Larry Szynkowski, Senior Planner Andrew Riddle, Planner November 22, 2006 River Landing - TIR After reviewing the above referenced Transportation Impact Report, staff has determined that the report complies with Section 11.02.09(A)(4), with the following determinations: Trip Generation: Trip Distribution: Mode Choice: Trip Assignment: "Residential CondominiumlTownhouse" (ITE 230) Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.85 Ln(X) + 2.55 Rate: Ln(T) = 0.85 Ln(99) + 2.55 How many trips: 636 average trips/day; (In: 50%,318; Out: 50%, 318) PM Peak Hour Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.82 Ln(X) + 0.32 Rate: Ln(T) = 0.82 Ln(99) + 0.32 How many trips: 60 PM Peak hour of Generator; (In: 67%, 40; Out: 33%, 20) The report analyzed where the trips are going by using the existing trips producers and attractors on the transportation network and using the St. Lucie Urban Area MPO Spring 2003 count data (with a corresponding growth rate for each impacted link). Staff also reviewed the existing trips against the MPO Spring 2005 count data. Auto occupancy. No transit modes of travel analyzed. The report analyzed the routes and available paths for trip assignment. The following exhibit shows the pre-development volumes, the project trips, and the post-development volumes. November 22, 2006 Page 2 Subject: River Landing Transportation Impact Report LOS Project LOS Pre-Development LOS Trips Post-Development LOS 25th Street South North of Bell Avenue 16,100 0 261 16,361 0 South of Bell Avenue 16,100 0 337 16,437 0 South of site 16,100 0 299 16,399 0 South of Midway Road 15,400 B 89 15,489 B Sunrise Boulevard South of Bell Avenue 3,400 C 0 3,400 C Citrus Avenue South of Midway Road 8,500 C 0 8,500 C Oleander Boulevard South of Bell Avenue 10,600 C 13 10,613 C South of Midway Road 6,200 C 19 6,219 C US 1 South - North of Midway Road 37,922 F 19 37,941 F South of Midway Road 41,322 F 38 41,360 F Midwav Road West of Selvitz Road 18,722 F 89 18,811 F West of 25th Street South 13,988 0 89 14,077 0 East of 25th Street South 21,819 F 121 21,940 F East of Sunrise Boulevard 20,375 F 121 20,496 F East of Oleander Boulevard 20,375 F 89 20,464 F East of US Hwy 1 4,848 C 19 4,867 C Conclusion: The transportation impact report for the proposed residential development indicates that the links on Midway Road and US 1 fail to meet the level of service standard. The County has included in its first three years of the Five Year Capital Improvements Program improvements to Midway Road (Project 4104-FY 09: Midway Road, US 1 to 25th Street - Road widening, bike facility, and landscaping; Project 440015 Midway & Selvitz Traffic Signals). The FDOT 2007-2011 adopted Work Program has included necessary road improvements to US 1, which will provide the capacity necessary to maintain adopted level of service for State transportation facilities (Project 230288-2; SR-5/US-1 from Rio Mar Drive to north of Midway Road - addition of lanes and reconstruction). The impacts from the development on Midway Road have less than one percent, therefore the project does not create a deficient road segment in accordance with Section 5.03.03(A)(3)(b) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. The programmed road improvements to US 1 and Midway Road will provide the capacity necessary to ensure the adopted level of service for transportation facilities in accordance with Section 5.03.03(A)(2)(c & d) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. . . ~'Z. OC;~O\~ SP NUMBER: ~~ () ~b' C\ \, RESOLUTION NO: CERT. CAPACITY NO: OFFICE USE ONLY DATE FILED: REVIEW FEE: CONCURRENCY FEE: RECEIPT NO: RECEIPT NO: -- I<'¡..... .' . ,"',...,',,'.' .._." "_'" ,,",,'. , "~I!~l@Þ~-';"'" ';'/," COUNTY '- FLORIDA - . ....~ '. ." ,:...: ' '._ "..~ '"n,'.'_ ST. LUCIE COUNTY GROWTH~AGEMENTDEPTARMENT 2300 VIRGINIA AVENUE FORT PIERCE, FL 34982-S6S2 772-462-2822 APPLICATION FOR CHANGE IN ZONING TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PUD, PNRD, PMYD) and CERTIFICATE OF CAPACITY DIRECTIONS Please complete the requested infonnation and submit all items to the St. Lucie County Growth Management Department, 2300 Virginia. Avenue, Ft Pierce, FL 34982. The proper non-refundable application fee must accompany all applications. For assistance in submitting the application, please contact the St. Lucie County Growth Management Department, Planning Division. REVIEW FEES and THRESHOLDS PRELIMINARY PLAN <lJNAL PLAN) Required Review Fcc Less than 20 acres $ 1500.00 I~ $5.00 per acre over SO acres 20 acres to 49 acres $ 1,800.00 SO + acres $ 2,000.00 + $ 5.00 per acre over SO acres CODcurnDcy ree $200.00 I~ MiDlmum Slu PUD S conti¡uous acres of land under common ownership or control , PNRD In Residential Land Use 10,000 square feet minimum lot size (under common ownership or control) In Commercial Land Use 20,000 square feet minimum lot size (under conimon ownership or control) In Industrial Land Use 20,OOò square feet minimum lot size (under common ownership or control) In Mixed Land Use 20,000 square feet minimum lot size (under common ownership or control) PMUD I acre of land per proposed land use within a Planned Mixed Use Dcveloomcnt under common ownership or control Plat Fee - (no imDrovements) I NJA ($2S0.00) I Planned Development Extension I $300,00 I Initial submission shall include the followin¡: I) One (1) original of the completed site plan appJication. 2) Twenty (20) copies of the site plan graphics. (24 inches by 36 inches sheets) 3) Twenty (20) copies of the landscape plan. 4) :Twenty (20) copies of the required boundary and topographic survey. 5) Five (5) copies of the Transportation Impact Report (if applicable). 6) Five (S) copies of the Environmental Impact Report (ifapplicable). 7) Five (5) copies of the Preliminary Drainage Data. 8) Two (2) copies of Aerial. 9) One (I) copy of the St. Lucie County Property Appraiser Tax Map (Scale I :200) with property under p~.~tion hi~hJighted !' " ''"',~ "'>~~";~:~ JJ l All applications for a Planned Development must be completed-and filed with the Department before 4:30 PM each business day to meet applicable filing deadlines. For an application submission to be determined complete, all required materials must be present at the time of submission. PROJECT INFORMATION ILOCA nON/SITE ADDRESS East side of South 25th Street, approximately .17 miles north of West Midway Road PUDIPNRDIPMVD NAME River Landing PUD , PROPERTY TAX ID NUMBERS 3403-502-0086-000/3 3403-502-0093-000/5 LEGAL DESCRIPTION (attach extra SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DECRIPTION sheets if necessary) - '. . -. SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP ~6 RANGE 40 PARCEL SIZE t\CRES ~7.88 SQUARE FOOTAGE 1,214,302 ZONING DISTRICT RS-2 and CO LAND USE CLASSIFICATION RS and RU DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT PROPOSED IS 99 MULTIPLE FAMILY UNITS IN 15 BUILDINGS. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION (Check .¡ ] RESIDENTIAL ' ER OF RESIDENTIAL 99 all appropriate boxes) UNITS/SUBDIVIDED LOTS ] COMMERCIAL rOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE ] INDUSTRIAL "'OTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE , ] OrnER (PLEASE SPECIFY) NUMBER AND SIZE OF N/A OUTPARCELS (IF APPLlCABLE\ DESCmBETHEREASONFOR mE REQUESTED CHANGE IN ZONING IS THE PROPOSED REZONING IN CONFLICT WITH ANY PORTION OF THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT. CODE OR TBEST. LUCIE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN? The proposed ~¡'a~e in-;~~~-;~-d~tition f~~-Fin;ÎPlanned ü~ïi- Deveì~p~;~t is ~~~;¡;tent withthe-St~~de County 'I Land Development Code. Based on the existing land use designations we would be allowed to develop the property with 101 units. Consequently. the proposed zoning and petition for Final Planned Unit Development is consistent with the St. ¡ Lucie County Comprehensive Plan as well. I I I ---... .. .......... ... .... ... .. ..-. -....-...-... --'-.." -...-.--..-___...._.....__...____..._-..J Tbe following information you provide is very important in determining tbe outcome of your Rezoning request. It is required by the St. Lucie Land Development Code that appropriate findings be made to' justify a Rezoning approval.. Please use additional pages, if necessary, to justify your request. 1.) Describe the reason for the requested change in zoning: r-'-'--"- .........-..-' -,. ,..-...,.,....-... -- ,.,-.-,.---. ,__.__._.n...._. ,-..-, ..---..- ..'.. ..- -,...,-.. ..-.....-.,-. ...... .... .'-'-"" ,........ '.-..............-....'.'-........---.....-.-.-..-¡ ¡We are proposing a change in zoning from RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) and CO (Commercial, Office) ¡ ¡Zoning Districts to a (Final) Planned Unit Development Zoning District. The proposed change will all 99 multi-family units I Ion 27.88 acres. ! 1_______.,__._...._. ..._,_______.__._ .-,..---..,.-........--."...-.....--,-.-.--..-'...------..,.-"-"-",,,.,----,, ....--..-.-_,_..,..,.........,..._...-, ,-,-..-...._,___..J 2.) Is the proposed rezoning in conflict with any portion of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code or the St. Luicc County Comprehensive Plan? E---'-··----·-..·..··---'-···--'···--'--..-'-··'··'·-'"---..--..---,',,---.,---.-.----,,-.-.-.-.'-..-,-.,-.,....--"-'-".'-'-----'---''''-' The proposed change in zoning and petition for Final Planned Unit Development is consistent with the St. Lucie County I Land Development Code. Based on the existing land use designations we would be allowed to develop the property with I 1101 units. Consequently, the proposed zoning and petition for Final Planned Unit Development is consistent with the St. ¡ 'Lucie County Comprehensive Plan as well. ' I 1__.....-...--........--,..-.....--.-..--, ..--. ..-,.._'.. ,.. -.. ..,.. ..,........-. - -,....,-, .....,.--.....,- -. ,-..--....__..--_..,.._'.........,..,....' ....., ......-... -...,.. ',. '.,..... ........,..,.' ____.._....__... '3.) H:)w is :.'1e propo!:cd change in :mnin!: compatible with the existing U5e¡ in dIe ar.:a? r:;:,.--......'........,...'..................'.... . ,,'...........,..,'.....'... "....'......, 0, ,,'.....','.. ,-., .... "-"-" ..'~.... ,'. ...........--. '............'..-, -- ---,-_..-. ...........- ,'"'' ,..-.-..............,....,.,..,.......,..-,.......,....,.-,....,..- ..- _.. '--. I The proposed change in zoning to PUD for purposes of allowing the construction of a multi-family residential development ¡ lis compatible with the existing uses in the area. To the north, northwest, and east of the subject property are residential ¡ ¡existing uses. To the south is a commercial development. ! I I L_._,_.....__,...._.._,._...."._......_.__. ...._..'..._m.____'.......____.'........ .,.._"..._,....,_,_..._......_....,.,...,.,'_.............,__..,.....__.._,.. _....,...,. '._............, ..'..... ,.,.._"....._...._......__,...___...._. 4.) How is the proposed change in zoning compatible with the Land Use designation on this property? ¡-._--1.._....".... ._. .._._.:". ".,." ._·.~.__..._...M..' .'.~.,...........~,.. ._. ....'~- ··_'.·n'··..·.._·..._.....·..·-.....·,·, ,_._._, ..._",_....__.~_..__....... '·N....·..,.._...... ,....._.. .._.. .......;"............,._............ ,'.k.. .....". "__." ,...... __. . _.."...._ '.,_....... .'..."_.~~"~..._._...._..__._ ,........,,~.....,_u..,.w,.-:. ¡The proposed River Landing PUD is consistent with goals, objectives and standards of the St. Lucie County ¡ ¡ Comprehensive Plan. Policy 1.1.1.1 of the St. Lucie Comprehensive Plan establishes a maximum residential densities for t ;RS at 2 dwelling unit per acre and RU at 5 dwelling units per acre. The proposed project is to be developed with a ¡ ¡maximum of 3.55 units per acre, therefore the proposed project is consistent with this policy. ¡ ¡ I ~__,__...._._..__...__'"~"_...".............,..........,..-._._'!"""...~. _....~_....,.."'.._.__,..._""'__, ..,__~_"..,_.,·,~.....___.......~_....'_..'w.._._.___.__..__ ."....,..-.'_~_........_".....'_...~....."".....,...._...__.._'.<>... ...._,-....,......"..........,.."..._..........._..__...._....1. S.) What conditions have changed in the immediate area that wammts consideration of this change in zoning? ¡-.-.--..--'-..'-...'....... -....-.- .............. ,"''''-'' .---..,---.- ----..,......-...,..-.." ..' .-..-. "-"" .........-..,'-.........,........ ..-,..........--,.....,., ......... ...........,.............' '-," '..'....-..................' ·-......·-·1 ¡There have not been changes that would require an amendment. The site located inside the Urban Service Boundary of ¡ [:I~_coun:_w~r~nd ~==~ ~~~ ~-=~d~:_by~~~ _____ ___.__ .______.._.___ __. .__1 6.) What are the anticipated impacts of the proposed rezoning on the existing and future public facilities in this area? ~---_._._,.-_.,._._.- ,-------.....'..-----. -.-,--..-.-.....-.--,'......-,-.,.,--.--..,-,----. ,....-.....,--....--...- ,.--,...-........-.. ,"-'-- ,.......-.....--- '.......-.:--..-.---"1 The proposed project will create additional demands on water/sewer facilities in the area. The proposed project is located ì inside the Urban Service Boundary of St. Lucie County. Water and sewer service will be provided by FPUA. The public ! ISChOOI system can be expected to be responsible for the education of an additional 34 students. Drainage will be handled ¡ 'through a master drainage system which requires permits from the SFWMD as well as St. Lucie County Stormwater J ~~ ' l!______._"___.______.___._,____,__,.......__,_.,..._._...____._..,__..,__,....__.._..___,..,___-'-__._....,.,_.._.._........_...,......___ " 7.) What are the anticipated environmental impacts of the proposed rezoning? If no adverse impacts arc anticipated, please explain why? ,...--"--'- ...-..-'......'...-'..-'-...-...'----.-'.'-,..--.-------. --'-...-..---,...',..-...-'-..'-...~_.-,--.-...-...',' .-.....,....-....- ..-,·-......_'-_.."..-·..~.._·.._.._.._·..__....·----l ¡The project change in zoning and development of this site as a residential planned unit development is not expected to f ¡result in any adverse environmental impact. The 27.88 acre site consists of 18.4 acres of abandoned citrus, 7.08 acres of hardwood forest and 1.46 acres of wetland hardwood forest. A Preserve Area Management Plan was reviewed and 'approved and should help to ensure proper management of the preserve areas by the future Property Owners Association. I C____ ._,:...._........._.,'..,.....___.....,....... _"'_" ..'.........., ",,,,_, ._....,.,_. w._..___.._.....·. .._ _..._._........__... _._...._., ........__....,.. _.._... ,_,'..._...___.. ....,........,...._........_.._.____...._._. 8.) Will the proposed rezoning result in an orderly and logical development pattern? Please explain. 6].---...,..,.-.......,....-.....-....,..------,- ..-,....,-..----.. ".."...........,--.......-,-" .,..-............. --....,..-. .."....--.-,....-..----....,-.....-- ....,..,,-..... ..,--....--:---.-'-...... We feel that the proposed change in zoning will result in an orderly and logical development pattem. Based on the ! existing land use designation of RS and RU, the proposed PUD will allow for a residential development that is compatible with the surrounding residential developments. ... ST. LUCIE COUNTY APPLICATION FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CHECKLIST Hive you shown or provided the roUowing required inrormatioD: BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION: (Rcfcr to Scction 11.02.09(A)(2), St. Lucic County Land Dcvelopment Codc) Yes No Acrial Photograph (subjcct property highlightcd)' .¡ Location Skctch .¡ BoundarylTopographic Survcy Positive Outfall .¡ Floo1plain~·'.\1'~:;;r . ' U . J,,_.i.... ..~._ ;-~. ." ... '.. ... .~. .~,' ..,' .'.~ Drainagc Basin Boundarics Prcliminary, SFWMD Pcrmit Data SITE PLAN INFORMATION: (Rcfer to Scction 11.02.09(A)(3), St. Lucic County Land Devclopmcnt Codc) Yes No Ycs No Location, Dimension, and Setbacks for all .¡ Parking ct Loading Areas .¡ buildin2s Idcntification of maximum buildable area under .¡ W atcrlW astcwater Facilities review Identification of all eascments .¡ Idcntification of all Drainagc Facilitics .¡ Identification of adjacent driveways .¡ Location of all strcets .¡ Location of all open spaces .¡ Landscaping Plan .¡ Lighting Plan Phasing Plan Transportation Impact Report .¡ Environmental Impact Report .¡ Vegctation Rcmoval 'plan .¡ Sca Turtlc Protcction Plan If you answered !!2 to any of the above questions, please explain in the space below: r-'''''' ..---.....,-.,..-.,--, .' ,---.--..'-..,-,-,.---,.-.-.,-,..,-.-----.... '._,-,-'.,. .--'----.---.,..,-.,--. ..,-.--- --.------., ,....---.-- -.,'..--,-...-. '-,-.___'_..._.'__.____.____¡ ¡The proposed change in zoning and petition for Final Planned Unit Development is consistent with the St. Lucie Còunty I ¡Land Development Code. Ba~ed on the existing land usa designations we would be allowed to develop the property with f 1101 units. Consequently, the proposed zoning and petition for Final Planned Unit Development is consistent with the St. ¡ 'Lucie County Comprehensive Plan as well. I I , .---.-.-,.,. _.,-.< ." .".. .~>-".,..~',..,_.. ......-.- -... ._...._.. ..... _....... . ,.__,. ._'"~. ..,....~,___, ""..",. ,."._,_- -, _. ~ _. .....___ _..." '·'"n. _ _ '., .... _,,"' ..... ~'_~_._ ......._.._. ..,...... _. .'_..._....~..~. .. .._....._.... ... .....~_..'_. _,._._ I .,_...,_ ..,._..._.,._..._.._.. '.'" ..._.__..,____..,.._..-1 i SPECIAL NOTICE (PLEASE READ BEFORE SIGNING ACKNOWLEDGMENTS BELOW) Submission of this application docs not constitute the granting of approval. All appropriate requirements must be met prior to this project being presented for approval to the appropriate authority. 81. Lucie County reserves the right to request additional information to ensure a complete review of this project. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Agent Information Phone: (Zr...'1fl/...r3?)';a..: Name: Jae;on . ¡..Ii tterick, t::HO Addl'Cll:1907 Commerce Lane. Suite 101 Jupiter, FL 33458 Phone: 5 75 . 9557 Fu:575.5260 " '··~:';;·;;.('?i~;~·""':""·- -. Property Owner Information This application will not be considered complete without the notariæd signature of all DruMm ownCI'Jl of record. which shall serve as an knowledgment ofthc submission or this application for site plan approval. The property owner's signature below shall also serve as authorization ve applicant or agent ,to act on behalf of said property owner. rty Owner Signature MailingAddress:/.1@ r. "09""" QHlL"'f/ ðs~tL"~~ ..)/ ~,4>..¡ PhODe: ðt,/- "Ý·/3 7~ STATE OF FLq,RIDA COUNTY OF ~ ö,. .Ac.iJ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2. q '/I-. OFFICE USE ONLY Project Reviewer: day of -fÅi1 "ll . 20aiz.... by L tlþ t ~ DRC-Review: who is personally known to me cv who has produced Approval Date: Comments: ß~eLð.. El~.,t Type or Print Name of Notary r-··...Rüi&-mo--:=1 " : @I)_'CGIIIIIII DCa.... : lit. ~,__ .. . . : " '. ..... "'" ca)tU-4254: : - f.~'~" FIondI NBaaIw AlIII.. Inc : I......... .......................\............1 Notarv Public Title (Seal) Commission Number · GENTILE HOLLOWAY O'MAHONEY George G, Gentile. FASLA M, Troy Holloway. ASLA Emily Q'Mahoney, ASLA &. A550CIAfE5 II~C Landscape Architects I'lanners and Environmental Consultants' LC-0000177 March 31, 2006 Mr. Hank Flores, AICP Planning Manager - Current S1. Lucie County - Growth Management Départmeqt 2300 Virgìnia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 RE: RIVER LANDING PUD- ST. LUCIE COUNTY - CHANGE IN ZONING TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WITH A FINAL PLAN APPROVAL GHO-JOB#OS-1117 Dear Mr. Flores: ! On behalf of the applicant A W River Landing LLC, Gentile Holloway O'Mahoney & Associates, Inc. acting as their agent, is requesting a change in zoning to a Planned Unit Development with a Final Plan approval for land located on the East side of 25th Street, approximately .17 miles north of Midway Roaci. The property is currently made up of two separate parcels. The North parcel is currently zoned RS-2, Res. Single Fainily 2 and CO, Commercial Office with an underlying land use· of RS, Res, Suburban and RU, Res. Urban. The South p8fcel is currently zoned RS-2, Residential Single Family 2 with an underlying land use of RU, Res. Urban. The applicant is requesting the approval òf a 99 multi-family residential Planned Unit Development (PUD) located on 27.88 acres of land. The subject site is .currently located within the Urban Service Boundary. This property received Preliminary Planned Unit Development ApprovaÍ on November 1,2005 for a 99 unit multi-family development. / Based on a conversation with you, the following are the items included with this request: 1. Application filing fees made payable to S1. Lucie County: a: Change in Zoning, Final Plan and Plat Fee - $1,000.00 2. Application for Change in Zoning and justification statement - 1 copies; 3. Site Plan and Landscape Plans prepared by Gentile Holloway O'Mahoney & Associates, Inc. - 20 copies; 4. S1. Lucie County Aerial- 2 copies; 5. S1. Lucie County Ownershiprrax Map - 1 copy 6. Civil Engineering prepared by Florida Consulting Engineers, Inc. - 20 copies; 7. Architectural Plans prepared by StatIan Lundberg Architects - 20 copies. . The proposed plat for River Landing will be submitted under separate cover at a later date. Should you have any questions regarding the enclosed, please let me know. cc: Joe Guttuso, Leonard Albanese & Sons Builders, Inc. .... r#':f 1907 Commerce Lane, Suite 101 T:\~~~~~~er Landing\Application Materials\cover letter.doc S61-575-5260 FAX wIVW,landsc:ape-architects,com -M.4R 31 ' h.4ir 1 lrI ,,, ... . · GENilLE HOLLOWAY O'MAHONEY & ,<550CIA1E5 I"C Landscape Architects Planners and Environmental Ri L d· PUD Consultants' LC-0000177 ver an lng, St. Lucie County, Florida REZONING TO PUD WITH A CONCURRENT FINAL SITE PLAN REVIEW JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT March 31, 2006 George G, Gentile, FASLA M, Troy Holloway, ASLA Emily OMahoney, ASLA REQUEST/LOCATION: Gentile Holloway O'Mahoney & Associates, Inc. as agent for the applicant is requesting a change in zoning to a Planned Unit Development for land located on the East side of 25~ , Street, approximately .17 miles north of Midway Road. The property is currently made up oftwosepæ:ate parcels. The North parcel is currently zoned RS-2, Res. Single Family 2 and CO, Commercial Office with an undeÌ'1ying land use of RS, Res. Suburban and RU, Res. Urban. The South parcel is currently zoned RS-2, Residential Single Family 2 with an underlying land use ofRU, Res. Urban. The applicant is reqúesting the approval of a 99 multi-family residential Planned! Unit Development (PUD) located on 27.88 acres of land. The subject site is currently located within the' Urban Service Boundary. This property received Preliminary Planned Unit Development Approval on November 1, 2005 for a 99 unit multi-family 'development. ,The following are the conditions of approval associated with this approval: I 1. An environmental professional, experienced in handling Gopher Tortoises, shall , be' retained for any relocation that may need to be done in the course of the construction, as was_ recommended on page 13 of the EIA. An addition to this condition shall be that prior to issùance of a St. Lucie County Vegetation Removal Permit, a pre-clearing meeting be conducted with the clearing contractors to provide educational materials (poster & pamphlets) to inform them of the protocol that shall be followed should a gopher tortoise or a gopher tortoise burrow be encountered. If a gopher tortoise is encountered during' site construction, all work shall be halted and the environmental professional shall be contracted to relocate it to an area within the preserve area. 2. An executed (signed) copy of the' conservation easement document must be , provided to SLC ERD prior to the issuance of a SL V Vegetation Removal Permit. Also, within 60 days of issuance of a permit a recorded copy of the easement document will be required to be submitted. 3. Prior to issuance of a SLC Vegetation Removal Permit, a revised set of Civil Plans showing the proper locations of the silt fencing and banicades must be 1907 Coi1ilÐØüeïdt¡Q the Environmental Resources Division. Jupiter, FloriŽI/33458 561-575-9557 561-575-5260 FAX MAR 3 1 www.landscape:architects.com 2006 River Landing Final PUD Approval March 31, 2006 Page 2 4. Prior to issuance of the first Building Permit for the proposed project, the petitioner, his successors or assigns, shall convey to St. Lucie County, in manner and form acceptable to the St. Lucie County Attorney, the west 20 feet of the subject property for additional right-of-way for South 25th Street. To the extent permitted under the County's Code and Compiled Laws, any such dedication may be considered eligible for Road Impact Fee Credits. 5. Prior to the issuance of the fIrst Building Permit for the proposed project, the petitioner, his successors or assigns, shall convey to St. Lucie County, in,manner and form acceptable to the St. Lucie County Attorney, the south 25 feet along West Midway Road of the subject property for additional right-of-way for West - Midway Road. Tó the extent permitted qnder the County's Code and Compiled Laws, any such dedication may be considered eligible for Road Impact Fee Credits. - 6. At such time as the construction of the widening of West Midway Road is completed, . the ,developer, his successors or assigns shall connect the internal roadway system of the pr,oject with West Midway Road. 7. The uses within the Seven Work-Live units shall be restricted to the permitted, accessory, and conditional uses allowed in the CO (COIpmercial, OffIce) Zoning rn~d . The proposed changes from the previous approval are as follows: · Relocation of the recreational area from near the upland preserve area closer to the entrance. The recreational area has minimum change in acreage, however, we are still offering the same amenities: · Redistribution of the units, such as some of the some 4 unit building have been replaced with 6 unit building. The overall unit count has stayed the s~e. · With the redistribution of units and the relocation of the recreation area, the conservation easement haS been adjusted accordingly. The total Preserve area acreage has not changed,based on thes~ changes. The project proposes a total of 99 multi-family residential units located on 23'/38.33' wide by 113.5' deep lots. The proposed density for the project is3.55 dwelling units per acre. Housing types will be two-story town-homes. The petitioner is proposing a gated community with the main entrance on 25th Street. A 20' wide emergen,cy'accesshas also been provided at the south end of the project (At cul-de-sac) along Midway Road. A Knox Box will provide emergency vehicles to enter and exit the property at this location. A varYing width right of way occupies the entry to the site off of 25th Street. The entrance continues as a 50' right-of-way, which terminates at the East end of the project with a , T:\CLIENT Fll.ES\RiVCT Landing\Application Materials\Project Summary Rev. 2-16-0S.doc River Landing Final PUD Approval March 31, 2006 Page 3 100' wide (50' radius) cul-de-sac. All of the residential units are accessible from a 24' wide, two-way road with 4' concrete sidewalks along both sides of the road. As part qf the planned unit development, we are proposing the following setbacks: Front: 20' Rear: 15' Side: 15' Side Comer: 20' The project also proposes a 5.85 acre water tract to serve as the projects retention and a 7.7 acre Preserve area which is 28.1% of the total 'site (15% minimum required). 15' wide Landscape buffer easements have also been incorporated along the rears of the lots abutting the overall propertY boundary which contains a p' vinyl coated chainlink fence. The water tract, Preserve area and landscape buffer easements have all been used in .' calculating the 60.7% open space proposed for the project (35% minimum required). Inter-relationship of Proposed Uses: The proposed plan is designed to encourage pedestrian access throughout the project with sidewalks along both sides of the road and pedestrian connections to the proposed canoe launch along the St. Lucie River. The recreation parcel is located at the terminus of the main road and contains a pool and cabana facility with restrooms and parking. CONSISTENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The proposed site plan is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies set forth in the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. ZONINGILAND USE: The subject property is currently zoned as RS-2 (Residential, Single Family - 2 du/ac) and CO (Commercial, Office) with an existing land use designation of RS (Residential Suburban) and RU (Residential Urban). SURROUNDING ZONING AND LAND USE DESIGNATIONS EXISTING ZONING EXISTING FLU , SUBJECT PROPERTY RS-2 and CO RS and RU NORTH AG-l RS SOUTH AR-l/CG COM/RU " EAST AG-l RS, WEST CG COM , T:\CLIENT FILES\River Landing\Application Materials\Projcct summary Rev. 2-16-OS.doc River Landing Final PUD Approval March 31, 2006 Page 4 RELATIONsmp WITH ADJACENT USES: The site is currently vegetated (Uncleared) with one single family residence located at the "Finger' area along the south side of the subject property which is currently accessed from ,Midway Road. It is surrounded by vegetated prope,rty and a few single family homes. We have clustered all of the units to the southern portion of the site to maintain a reasonable distance from the RS land ~se (2 DU's/Acre) to the North of our property while still providing all of the proposed preserve area to the East side of the project to provide sufficient. buffering óf the North Fork of the St. Lucie River from the proposed development. We the clustering of the proposed development along the south side of the site makes for a better transition to the commercial and residenti3l urban land uses fO,und to the south of pour project.. ' ACCESS: The existing right-of-way width for South 25th Street is 80 feet. Based on the Prelimiriary PUD approval, the applicant will be dedicating the west 201 feet of the subject property for the expansion of South 25th Street and 25 feet of additional right-of-way for the expansion of West Midway Road. South 25th',Street is scheduled for expansion to a four- lane roadway. The intersection of South 25th Street and West Midway Road is undergoing improvement construction at this time. Proposed a 12' emergency is being provided at the cul-de-sac running south to Midway Road. RECREATION: The proposed development will include .27 acres of recreational amenities including a pool with cabana restroom facility and a tot lot. T:\CLIENT FILES\Rivcr Landing\Application Materials\Project Summary Rev. 2-16-OS.dac R¿ ¡,~¿ t-;4/I//J/ r¿,/c; ~ _... Kimley-Hom ~ _ r ,., and Associates, Inc. February 9, 2005 . 4431 EmbatcadeIa Drive West Palm BeacI1,FJorida 33407 Harold Jurist Gulfstream Acquisitions, LLC 1955 S.W. 7lhPlace Boca Raton. FL33486 RE: Traffic Equivalency Evaluation 25111 Street and Midway Road St. Lucie County, Florida Dear Mr. Jurist Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. has performed a traffic equivalency analysis for the above-refClØ1ced site, which is located in Sl Lucie County; Florida in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of 25th Street and Midway Road. In the previously submitted traffic impact analysis, the site was analyzed for 11 single-family homes. The currently propOsed site ' development plan has been modified to consist of a maximum of 99 townhome units. The trip generation potential of the proposed plan of development was compared to the previous tèaffic analysis. 'This letter summarizes the result of the equivalency evaluation. Trip Generøtion CompariSon Trip generation for the previous and proposed development plan was calculated using trip, generation data published in the Institute of TranSp(:u1ation Engineers' (ITb") Trip Generation, Séventh Edition. Based on the ITE data, the trip generation rates for townhome units are generally I~ Ulan single-family homes. Table I swnmarizes the approved and proposed devclopment tripgeneratlón. Based on this analysis, daily trip generation is eXpcctedto decrease by 123 trips, a.m. peak hour trip generation is expected to. decrease by8 trips, and the p.,ß1. peak hour trip generation is expected to decrease by 19 trips. Conclusion This analysiS deïno.i1Stratesthe proposed plan of development does not result in an increase in the daily, a.m. peak bour or p.m. ,peak bour trip generation potential o.ver the previous plan. If you or Sl LucieCQunty has any' questiaecelved By regarding this equivalency evaluation,please call me at 561 -845-0665. AU6 04 2006 Growth Management . 1EI..5I11450685 F~ ~1 e&3 8175 ~_n Kimley-Hom a..J _ r..~ and Associates, Inc. Sincerely, KIMLE¥-HORN' AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Florida RCgístration Number 56799 Engineering Business Number 696 JBMllm Attachments Mr. Harold Jurist. February 9, 200S,Pa¡e 2 TABLE 1 25tfllMIDWAY RESIDENTIAL TRIP GENERATION EaUNALENCY Land U.. Intensity o.¡l, AM Pe.k Hour PM Peak Hour Trias Total In Out Total In Out Previous SIIe Tramc SlngI.Family Residential 71 d.u. 759 59 15 44 79 50 29 IPro r Residential Condominium I Townhouse ~ d.u. 638 51 9 42 60 40 20 Net r,.",c ·12' .. .. ·2 ·1. ·10 .J Note: Trip generation was calculated using the foUowing data: Daily Traffic Generation Single Family (ITE 210) . Ln(T) '" 0.92 Ln(X) + 2.71 Residential Condominium I Townhouse (ITE 230) = Ln(T) = 0.85 Ln(X) + 2.55 AM Peek Hour Tralllc Generation Single Family (ITE 210) '" T = O.70(X) + 9.43; (25% In, 75% out) Residential Condominium I Townhouse pTE 230] = Ln(T) = 0.80 Ln{X) + 0.26; (17% in, 83% out) PM PttakHclUr Traffic Generation Single Family (lTE 210) '" Ln(T) = 0.90 In(X) + 0.53; (63% In, 37% out) Residential Condominium J Townhouse [ITE 230] '" Ln(T) = 0.82 Ln{X) + 0.32; (67% In, 33% out) p:l(Ut f\llOOOOV020805..œ"" QIIII r"".n KimIey.ffom ......UnAssaàaf8s.1nc. &\ 2003, KiNey-Hrm WId Aaoi:iiI/8I, Inc. ~ __ ,.. Kinley-Horn ...... ~ and Associates, Inc. July 9. 2005 1. Scott Herring, P.E. St. Lucie County Public Works Department 2300YITginia Avenue Fort Pierce. ¡"lorida 34982 Re: River Landing (f.k.a 251hlMidway Residential) ReSponse to Road & Bridge Commcnt$ 041100000 Dear Mr. Herring: Kimley-Hommd Associates, Inc. is in receipt of the comments dated July 5, .2005 for the River Landing Preliminary PUD. As you are aware. a traffic iinpact study was prLoparcd for the site in August 2004 evaluating 71 single-family Wlits, 1ñe cum:nt development plan ¡roposed 99 residential tówohomes, which represented a net decrease in,trips from the prior litUÙysis.Furthênnorc. the traffic volumes have been updated with information from the recently rclca.scd 2004 St Lucie C01D1fy.MPO traffic data. Our response to your comments is as follows: 1. How tløø 1M tlppUclUll pl'tlpo.'D detll wilhlM let,ft of SÐ-Pice DefICiency III MúJwtIy &44 & SelvilrJ Project impact at the Midwäy Røad & Sclvitz Rôüd intersection (over one mile from the ¡roposed development) will be insignificant as all roadway approach segm~tsarc:: expc:cted to ba~'e less than one perCent p'oj~ impact Nevertheless, we have provided m interSection analysis that indicates the intersCctiòn is able to operate at level or ServiCe D with background traffic and minîinal ¡toject traffic included in the futW'e intersCl::tion wltimC$. 2. Appfll'ellll du1w, 'WtIS tlltlÚttlke in tire MPO tabla, MuIK.", RoœJ betwøen 2S'* SIIWt tlnd. us. 1 ø .,..t.ne 1't1t14WtI. Ple~,rnœ tIr. trtI.IJic,lUq tlccønlinø· The attàched link tables havè béeri: úpdatcd rôr Midway Road to show the e(jsbng two-lai1c roadway. PurSt1i:u.1tto Section 5.03,OO(A)(3.) 0£8t. Lucie Comfy's AdequatePublic FacilitIes section. projects are determined not to create a ])¡:ficient Road Segment ¡fproject impact isles. than one percent within ~mile of the project and less tbon five percent beyond'~ milëof the ¡roject. All roadWay links on Midway Road havc project impact of less Ibm ooc percent therefore the project doe$ ,notcrcate a Def'iëieót Road.Segmcnt ' . ra 561 845 œøS FAX 561 8G3 8175 . 4431 ErnbercadIro Olive west Palm Bezll. Flaidll 33401 JII""" _ ..,. KinIey·Hom ..... _ , ~ and AssociateS, Inc. Mr. J. ,SCOIl Hcnins. JI1Iy 9, 2005, Page 2 J. DrÍYeWfl Permits lire required for both tlte Soldlt 25" Stred enl1'lIltCe ønd the emergency enlrtlnce fro'" Midway Road. ' The applicant intends to obtain driveWay permitting for both project drlvcways you indicated. Updated analysis tables DTcaltached. We would appreciate your prompt Jevicw aŠ Hank Flores has indicated our rCb'ponse should be addressed by Tuesday, July 12. If you have any questions regarding this analrsù, please don't hesitate to Call me at 772--418-2420. Sineere{)' , ASSOCIATES, INC. l-1orida Régistration Number 56799 Engineering B~inessNumbcr 696 JBMlgb Attachments TABLE 1 25thIMIDWAY RESIDENTIAL TRIP GENERATION ~nd Use Inteosity Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour TrlDs Total In Out Total In Out PrODOled Site Trame Resiclentilll Condominium J Townhouse 99 d.u. 63fS 51 8 42 eo 40 20 Net New E1ttWrMI T",1tIc 13' 51 , 42 '0 40 20 Nole: Trip generation was calc:ullted using the fol1owing da": 0II11y Trlftç G.ne..tïon Resldentilll Condorrinlum J Townhouse pTE 230) - Ln(1)- 0.85 Ln(X) + 2.55 AM Peak Hour Traffic GeneratÎl:!ll Re.idential CondOrrinlum J TownhoUH [lTE 230J . Ln(1) · 0.80 Ln(X) + 0.28; (17'16 in, 83'Ao out) PM Peak Hour Traffic Generation Resldentfal Condoninluml Townhouse (ITE 230J . Ln(1) · 0.82 Ln(X} + 0.32: (67'16 In, 33'Ao out) p:104' ,œoœ.¡o708Qblll]/lÎp (tIll 7AIo05 '4;~ ~=n·:~ As8aciIIIII. "' o ~ KinNy-HDm WId Auocie..... Inc. ... illl1! I' , ! J! I I ilii} 01 s....¡ >->- IS 11 II~~ § § ,~ I~ !!!!!~ ItE ~N"':d d d do dd ddoddd l/C- ."f §!~~ .. ¡ ~! Ii ~1li!¡~ ~ ! 'Šs'iri ~ ~.r ~~ fIi - -g -I. ~ ...~N i. . ~E ìij&ili :!.!! ~!I! IIf!B~ 2~j 0 0 I > ~ .. J i I ~~~f '~ ~ ¡U¡ ¡(C f~~~f! .. ...- _.....__....fI) - .I . ~~N! I! ~:Il a~ "'1"1 e¡... '" ~E ~ ~1R.Iii;Pi~.! ~3 ........r:::.... GO '" '". '" ~ ~~~~~ fIÎ øi ~o ~~ :'!:! Ñ ~ i ..... ... " " J II ~'ª'ª'ª 8 ~ e.~ ~§ ~.~~.~~~ :Ii:li:lill!" ;,¡: ~ ~oi ::I:;t "'fDIDClGCI '9""' ._ ,... .. .... .... 0 i JI ~o99 1'4 1"1 1"Ir: ~~ ~~":1'4~~ J~ ¡¡/.. z'8 ...I ... :S Ii i~Ø ! .'.." ~ ... ~ ~~ ..'" ::I ........ :ñrñ ... . iiI.........J ¡;¡ .... ~ ~.ct~ , QZ'" ri f"'4~ .,.:,.¡ "', .,....,.. =Ssi ~ >-,!!! I .. !oi ; Þ-i8;J if ~!!! ~ ~ II ~E ~~I~~G ....~ -..:~ 011: ;-ä øoi ... -. .. .. .Nwjfli.~G- -. ~I ~~~§ § § §i ~ª ~Hnt§§§ I~ "'tn"'t'J f<f fIi of 'ð'" ~~ '!it!;:!~.i J ..-~.. I II ~!J~~ ª ~ ~~ ~,~ ~~~g~!J ~..~ t=t øi ~ ,.. !filii a- tiS fIi. flf fli - .... ...- - .. !] Id~Ñ~ 1"1 ~ ~FI ~~ P;fiI~ÑI'iIl\i II rJd ! j II IP ft j f .. Ii I Iii ~ j.11 J I! J ",... I f~ AI II.) IIJJII~fJIJI ;!l!!I!I~ ¡o I ;111 'pi')'! ¡¡ ni'. II l! I I IIC .It il ~ II U I ! f ! î I ~ d Ii ... II Ii Ii t~ IiI, liihl Itlll Jitt) 1.1 1,.1- Illi! 111911 InHf. ---II ~t!.~. i il 191 II = 81 II II ! ; II : I: i!~~~! »» > » » I II satl~~ § § -~ -~ -~~~~~ '1fI ~PI .-1") 8:: Iì;..... .....- dd co co... "";C'\ÎNè ci ci od do,dddo if ili CDè!S~ ?J iã CDID iiii !53~~~ ~:-: ¡; ...... J I $' Ñ ~ fð 0 0 .... ... .... N <ØIDIOIOCI'" III .. II ,1! L :!~~~ ~ ~ i!_ ~if ~ .~ ~ ~, ~ if '¢ v- a NI") 1"1<0 _____C") . I¡ iªª~ ,~ iã '::~ a~ ~V'I~....s .-.:11- ~ ~ I> .... co.. Ñ""¡ _ __......N Ii 11 iiiii 88 J a ~ i~ ~'... ~ii~il1i -~...:..,: ,..; ... ÑÑ .1 ~ I~ ccoo ~ ¡q ¡;r: ~~ ~RRRt4t4 ¡ ;f;¡J;f~ ..J Z'¡. C F=~¥ 11 z ar !! .J ~,~ ~'~ æ! ~:t!~~~1ìI ·ì§~ :R 1"1 :;'j IH on ~ I!~ 10 ~i3Š .; t!: I~! I! §~~~ ~ ~ G' -:/I. if~if~#~ §! ... a.......jJ "C' i 0 N_ NN _In arid ai ,.¡ ...:.,¡ II:Í I'i on,"¡ "¡ui I II - fJ~~~ ~ ! !HI ........ ~......... '-'1 10'" §'" N"'; N 'OF f:::.~:.n II I.> riri 11 &Hii! 2 i i j!. ~~ iiiiii I ... I! ....J-'....I~ -' ~ '-:¡:;I 00 ~~~R~~ ,"".,.('IIt N' ... N ;¡Jr;J ,HI J j II If! ~ ì I J I· III! {!. i; IJ :il . . 111 II u,pltphltl!¡hl!i f J 111·jlllfJlf!i~IJl~~I! w I 11 II ~ II ¡J I i f ! ~ I I ~ ¡ f î . . ;: i! J ~ ! I ¡ ! II !Ii ; I ] t .- 1! {ll I!§ all ' - I :! 1 Jlil := it t hi fJIl1 " I a el tiHf JlliB - ... . f¡ilii f¡lil' IJlaJI i JJil Esg.l: ! I- W W :I: m...J m<c êii¡:: ~z ~~ z- <crß zo:: 0> ¡::c u<c ww ~o:: W I- ~ " co o a:: :I '> ~ 05 " co o a:: ftJ ~ :E ::::E "'ao.... ;C2!gN .CN II II II c ~ 4D 0 III '1..- 0::=>- ten III ,~-o ! 111=111 ... QI :::I' QI eJo..CO> ~ .M.... ~ ...,...,. "D C :::I :::I !tHO C .,. ~ C'I/ .8~ ~ .1- :&~~~O II) ., ~ !:i f;)~~ ~ I- ......... ... Æ .""11) II) ......... ..... "" "D C :::I :::I MMO)"'C f .. ... .c C'I/ r- It) C'I/ ._ It) :g I- 1t)1I)1I)r- I&J I- II)~Ø) CII ..J <0 <0 cø - C ~' I- .......<0 ~ Q. Æ MM..,. 0 ~~~ .. !:;' ë "D j > c: tI C ,:::I .8 :::I tI .. ...~Ø) CII ~ E ~ .c <0 .... [:;¡ ftJ :::I I- C'l/NN t. ~ JJ ;: c .g I- ....IØN.,.C... CO') 1:$ ..J ........ CD r-'- CI œ e s .5 ~ M('oI<O"'I::... ... ........- ... "D C j 2 10....2 i .c .c .... .... 1:: I- 0 z !:i O)~. ... <0 ..... ... ,- 10 § . ~œ cE _..2 ~ 0 u > IE C I! U ~i~1- ~ >II::J'tSCI- g» cZ ~.9!..0 11 :¡::~ CIIeß J J!II~Q.'!ë" ~cfÆ#õo.. Short Report Page I of I SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst KHA User Intersection Midway Road & Selvitz Road ~ency or Co. Kimley Hom & Associates Area Type All other areas Date Performed 07/0912005 Jurisdiction St. Lucie County 'ime Period PM Peak Hour Analysis Year 2007 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB 58 LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT \lum. of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 ~ne group ....TR LTR LTR LTR Wolume (vDh) 69 564 157 40 542 47 74 80 47 83 279 146 % Heavy veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 0.95 0.95 0,95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 lActuated(P/A) A A A A A A A A A A A A IStartuø lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1Ext. eff. areen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival tVDe 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 PedIBikeJRTOR Volume 0 10 0 .10 0 10 0 10 Loane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ParkinglGradeIParking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parkinglhr us stopslhr 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 °hasina EW Perm 02 03 04 N5 Perm 06 07 08 rt"iming G = 48.0 G= G= G= G = 30.0 G= G= G= y= 6 Y= y= Y= y= 6 Y= y= y= uratlon of AnalYsis (hrs =0.25 Cvcle Lenath C = 90.0 .ane Group Capaci Control Delav. and LOS Detennlnation EB we NB 58 Adj. flow rate 822 852 201 524 ane group cap. 866 906 343 540 vie ratio 0.95 0.72 0.59 0.97 reen ratio 0.53 0.53 0.33 0.33' Unif.delay d1 19.8 15.9 24.9 29.6 þelay factor k OA8 0.28 0.18 0.48 Increm. delay d2 19.4 2.8 , 2.6 31.2 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control d~Jay 39.2 18.7 27.4 60.7 ....ane group LOS D B C E Apprch. delay 39.2 18.7 27.4 60.7 Approach LOS D 8 C E Intersèè. delay 37.2 Intersection LOS D HèS2OÓOTJtf Cop)"IÌ¡IIt e 2QOOUniwnity cìfFlañ4a. AD .JtiaIIIi' Relcrvecl Vriiln4.1. .L!1_". II".\T'\_..._..:_:-_..._ð..il"lltl\_..... ..Jð.l·~^"':-¿¿:;_ ~-.;.\=____..... ~_.L-__'''' _ __I".I~^rt _~_ .__,~_ _u__' _"". I!'^ .___ ""'In '''''^I!!' /,,\''P'ì'", 'A~'~-- #Aò' , v/" -, .,-" /~/'\~\ ¡\~\\.~~i1~_ ~) '~'.".' ,',',/~/ .", ~_/ ~~/ .,.,~~// ZONING ADMINISTRATION DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING URBAN DESIGN HISTORIC PRESERVATION CUL ruRAL RESOURCES CITY OF FORT PIERCE 2005 Florida League of Cities "City of Excellence" Award Winner DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING "IMPROVING THE WA Y WE Do BUSINESS" To: THROUGH: GIL BACKENSTOSS, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR-GROWTH MANAGEMENT PETER BUCHWALD, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR FROM: Re: DATE: DAVID CARLIN, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PLANNER RIVER LANDING SEPTEMBER 21, 2006 The City of Fort Pierce Planning Department has reviewed the above-referenced project and provides the following comments: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) The Master Site Plan specifies open space calculations to be 16.67 acres, or 60.7 percent the total acreage. However, 60.7 percent of 27.88 acres would yield 16.92 acres of open space. Specify the correct acreage and verify all calculations to more accurately reflect land uses for the development. The Master Site Plan specifies that a 6 foot vinyl chain link fence will be constructed along the perimeter of the development. This type of fence is not aesthetically pleasing especially considering a residential community is located near the development. The Master Site Plan depicts the common area located next to South 25th Street. Relocating the common area away from South 25th Street to a more strategic location would be desirable so residents can enjoy the area for its intended purpose and not have to experience noise pollution from vehicles. The Master Site Plan depicts a retention area along South 25th Street. In the event that River Landing is annexed into the City, the development would be nonconforming since the City Code does not allow retention/detention areas to be located near public roadways. In addition, the City Code specifies that retention/detention areas shall be located at the rear of the property. The Master Site Plan depicts a 50 right-of-way for River Glen Road within the development. In the event that River Landing is annexed into the City, the development would be nonconforming since the City's minimum right-of-way width is 60 feet. P.O. Box 1480 0 FORT PIERCE, FL 34954-1480 0 772-460-2200 OCTOBER 18, 2006 PAGE 2 6) The Master Site Plan specifies that the lift station will be located beyond the property line of River Landing. Confirm the location of the lift station and whether any agreements have been reached with respect to the proposed location on adjacent properties. 7) The Master Site Plan specifies that River Glen Road is approximately 1,400 feet long. In the event that River Landing is annexed into the City, the development would be nonconforming since the maximum length for blocks in the City is 1,000 feet. 8) The Master Site Plan depicts on street parking located next to the pool cabana area. In the event that River Landing is annexed into the City, the development would be nonconforming since on street parking is not allowed within subdivisions. 9) The Master Site Plan specifies two different land use classifications for the development. The future land use classification of Residential Suburban (RS) specifies a maximum density of 2 dwelling units per acre. However, the gross density figure provided on the Master Site Plan specifies 3.55 dwelling units per acre. Provide justification for exceeding the gross density requirement for the RS zoning and determine whether a future land use amendment would be applicable in this circumstance. cc: Larry Szynkowski, Planner P.O. Box 1480 0 FORT PIERCE, FL 34954-1480 0 772-460-2200 ....... I""·... V ,'lfl F ro~; . u ~kJ1?~~n. "V ~~,Q.e~.1 /2 Date: 4/19/2006 10:38:50 AM I .," .. Of' 'V...."..........,... I.... U "Committed to Quality" FORT PIERCE UTILITIES AUTHORllY 113 N. Second Street (34950) Post Office Box 3191 Fort Pierce, Aorldo 34948-3191 Phone 772·466-1600 Fox 772-489-0396 April 13, 2006 Mr. Todd Stephens Division President Crees ide' Plaza, LLC 4227 Northlake Blvd. Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 RE: Midway and 25th Street Master lift Station Dear Mr. Stephens: The FPUA master wastewater plan ·for the aforementioned corridor indicates that one lift station be constructed to service the area bounded by Midway Road to the south, Devine Road to the north, the St. Lucie River to the east and Jorgensen ROß.d to the west. You r project and the- River' Lånding -projeCt located on the' parcel adjacent to yours to the north had both proposed to construct lift stations for the Individual projects. FPUA has' made diligent efforts to combine these two proposed stations into one. At the time of our original discussions, both projects had similar time frames that would facilitate this cooperation and both parties expressed interest in·this concept to reduce . the cost of each project. However, now the River Landing project has pushed ahead , '.. "wnfiôurã""fëšöiLitìön-bèîñifãgreed"·¡:ipõñ:" ...... ...... -..".... ....:.-.. -.--- ...... ... .-. .. .....-; ......--....... -"..-.., ... '. It Is FPUA's preference to have a master 11ft station constructed in a commercial area to enhance accessibility. Because of this preference and in an effort to provide ~ fair resolution to all parties, this office has suggested that the lift station be constructed on the commercial site by the developer of River Landing. Below are the proposed responsibilities for each party. ~µ ß\J\I..CINc.. ~hL. 6€.. ~w~ n:> ~rfrO Creekside Plaza. LLC ,(:".- PA1J~ ~ e.rV~ · . 35' X 35' easement for the lift station (to FPUA) ~~ · 20~ access easement for the required gravity main and force main (to FPUA) · Engineered lift station plans "'. ' . .' Obtain FDEP permits ., . . . ... P:ovjde·.Lift:statio~ ~~st és~im~t~ to .~nclude. u'psizi~~ to s·ervice. e.~tire s~ryjce~~rea River. Landing. . · Cost and Construction of the proposed lift station · Construction of a gravity main and manhole to the west side of 25th Street , Provide cost estimate for the gravity main and manhole acrosS 25th Street . . This fax was received by GFI FAXmaker fax server. For more information. visit: http://www.gfLcom '"'' 'v ~VVJ ,_~ 'VVJ ",,' F'0n.:':,u~~Jn.o~vn''''J ':~.!ìJe~?12 Date:4~1,~J.2~P!310~3.~:2~!\~JLv Mr. ToddStephens Apri/13, 2006 Page 2 FPUA , . Financial contribution to River Landing for the lift station upsizing, the gravity main, and manhoJè across 25th Street ' . In the event the proposed lift station is not åvailable for service within 1 (one) year from the date of submittal of all of the åforementioned items by Creekside Plaza, LLC, Creekside Plaza, LLC, its successors ànd assigns, shall have the option to construct the lift station as set fourth in said agreement. If YOll are in agreement with this arrangement, please sign this correspondence on the line provided below and return it to this office at your earliest convenience. Advise us of your,projected date of completion for the above referenced items. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 772.466.1600 x 3480. Sincerely, 80 Hutchinson Environmental Engineer . -.-.......... -. ..... ..... -- ...... ......,..~.... .... ..... ...-.. -- . .. ." ,.~... ..,. ..., ..... ,.. " ...' .. . ." - .... . '.. ,.. . ...,... .. . . ..... . . ", . . .... ." . ~ ,...., . ,..'."..... '........., ACCEPTANCE Lj /13 J OCo Date BH/fkm pc: William G. Thiess, P.E., FPUA David A. Mellert, FPUA Michael Buono P:\J>rOeetl\D~D~rLsndl"g\o.-1S-0611t Ið T SI.phlln~ ref LS th..;~ø·dDc: This fax was received by GFI FAXmaker fax server. For more information, visit: http://www.gfi.com L~'U~~~U~ ~¿ :J4 ~bl~Q/~jö~ H ,JURIST PAGE Dl tal 001/001 1l/lôIZ005 ',ur!:: O~:;J5 FAr FORT PIERCE UTILITIES AUTHORITY, ~Commltte(;¡ tQ Ql.IO~ty" 113 N. Second Shøt (34950) Pbst Office Box 319' ~ort Plarce. Florida ~48-~191 :'hone 772-4fÞ.1600 Fax 772-489-0396 ....--~.......-- ---.-... Via: US Mall & Fax 561-347-8389 November 15, 2005 Mr. Harold L. Jurist, Managing Member Gulfstream Developers. LLC 1955 SW 71M Place Boca Raton. FL 33486 Re: River landing Lift Station Dear Mr. Jurist: The purpose of this letter is to inform you as to FPUA's position on the proposed lift station in the vicinity of your River Landing project. At the time of our previous discussions, the commercial project to th'e south of your project appeared 10 have a more aggressive schedule than you. Therefore. FPUA elected to have them, the fì~t developer in this corridor, construct the master 11ft station of substantial enough size to accommodate your project and the other neighboring sites. This, concept ís still withstanding. If you are In fact the first developer in this area, tÞen your project will be required to upslze your originally proposed lift station to ac!;ommodate the entire service area. You will receive credits against your wastewater capital it1'lprovemetlt charges to cover the entire cost of upSi2'ing the statton and to Gover the cost of any addItional gravi1y sewer extensions that are deemed necessary. Pleaseacc2lpt this Jetter as confirmation that you are approved to proceed wtth you original design i(l concept. However. you are stili required to continue through the standard deve!opment process. We look forward to working with Gulfs1ream Developers on this endeavor. If you hø.ve any questions, feel free to contact me at 466-1600 ex 3480. Slncarely,----; ¿~,_... / ~ -' -7~/_ /a/ ~ 80 ~rüfhins~~C.Pj) Environmental Engineer B H/fkrn pc: David A. Mellett, Env./Capit.Q1 Projects Enginoer P:If'rV/1C..\Oç>dcpt,<A'....l.tI1ð1n\~ 1·;¡S;.¡¡S lit "' Citlmlrn ",11,1;.:1... (~. I~ L-.... "<-7 ,....,. , t'/". I ~ /fir /~Ì)~ ~1-~ tf"~/-G'-. Fax to: Dan McIntyre County Attorney 772-462-1440 or hand deliver. From: Patricia A Ferrick 772-461-3612 4802 South 25th Street Fort Pierce, Fla. 34981-5009 Date: April 20, 2006 Reason: Rivers Landing response not received. Received By Growth Management Dear Dan: The public hearing for Rivers Landing had several serious errors and omissions. 11/29/05 We brought this to the Planning and Zoning Board and Staff, including Commissioner Coward; in a timely manner. It was than copied to all the Commissioners and Administration and to legal. We included a transcript of the errors. The time frame for the board to correct the errors lapsed prior to a response. We were told that legal was researching and is looking into the matter. The time for any prevailing board member to bring it back up has lapsed. The time to file a court challenge also lapsed. Yet we never received a response, we are left with no choice but to bring this omission to the public during a meeting under the 5 minutes allowed to address the board on any issue in the near future. "Time", has not lapsed to file an injunction based on errors made during the preliminary hearing, and challenging the ordinance that allows only a 30 day window to file. This site plan was only a preliminary PUD so we can still challenge the validity of the Final PUD based on errors and omission of not only Chairman Doug Coward, but of the ERD staff because they did not present clear cut information showing that portions of the property were indeed in the old Ox Bow of the North Fork of the 5t. Lucie River and what is termed on older maps as the lagoon of the 51. Lucie River prior to Midway Road being constructed to the West. We were told in a meeting on 4/20 with ERD that they did not know it was. Even though it was presented to the BCC at all public hearings both original and continuation. Perhaps they did not know this information existed under the mistaken belief that this property was located in the Ten Mile Creek area as recent correspondence indicates from ERD. The property is located along the North Fork. We requested information on the original site plan tha~ was for single family units and until today 4/20/06 we were not given this information. The original site plan shows that the preservation area was indeed on the original site plan. Not as the commissioners were led to believe a trade off for town houses. Although the original site plan shows house in an area that couldn't be built in the rest of the plan was build able. ERD staff told the developers they would recommend denial based on homes in the area where they did not know the old Ox Bow existed which technically could not have been built on. They then applied for a PUD for townhouses which are located solely in the Flood Plain. Creating a dike or barrier which will ultimately increase the flooding potential for adjoining neighbors for which we have already put the county on notice. TO Date we have not had a response on correcting the incorrect information that was presented to the commissioners with which they made their decision on this issue. Even a straw vote would have been some response. We were told on several occasions that legal staff had to respond and it had been turned over to them. Unfortunately by our county regulations time ran out and still no response from legal staff, which we were told would respond. We did indeed meet with the commissioners on your recommendation, but Commissioner Coward talked at us for 15 minutes, we only had approximately 5 to present information we had with us. Yet he did not tell the audience how much time he spent with the petitioners as we requested. We again request that this information be now made part of any future hearings as allowed for under statute. That disclosure is made as to the time spent and the discussion. The Final PUD has just been submitted. The Final PUD has major changes and should possibly be reheard as an amended Preliminary PUD I the revisions appear to be a conservation easement considerably reduced, and town homes now located on the edge of the Preserve Area perhaps requiring a rehearing as changes to the preliminary site plan a saving grace for all and a way to correct errors and omissions. A written response is requested from your office within the next 7 business days. We also suggest changes to the regulations that limit timeframes, to the next meeting and to 30 days for a court challenge. This does not allow for enough time to research errors that occur. At the same time we recommend changes to the 250/0 rule for allowing native plant preservation and a conservation easement which is then allowing developers to clear cut the rest of the property. In areas ,such as rivers and streams this is an unwise practice. Sincerely Patricia A. Ferrick owner of adjacent property and Governmental Representative North Fork Property Owners. Enclosures transcript of errors. cc to Comm. Hutchinson Minutes Board of County Commission Meeting December 1,2005 Rivers Landing Commissioner Coward: I have actually had mixed feelings on this project throughout. I thought the residents brought up some legitimate. issues compatibility. And I think that's what the applicant had to struggle with the ¡ most building this project that does in fact takes in the culture heritage of White City. wHen I look at the existing zoning of Commercial Office I don't see it. What I see is a Cumberland Farms come in and a whole lot of that kind of development that's not the heritage I look at when I see various structures we all cherish White City. I see the applicant trying to balance property rights which allows them to do hundreds of thousands of square feet of commercial. I don't see White City's heritage as just structural but I also see it as environmental. When we talk about Midway Road, we note the significance of the huge Oak trees. Well that's what's on the Eastern 1/3 of this property huge Oak trees some probably the age of the state of Florida, humungous Oak trees and to belittle the importance of saving that, "I think that is a mistake". I think it's important for both of those issues to be considered. And how do you allow for a development to occur next to pretty intense commercial. Can we go back to the zoning maps for a second what's the comer the N.E. . $' ii' ñ! '" n ft s: jJ õ w s: :r 0 01 '" . X z ~ õ' '" ~ (") 8. ~ !! Æ" ;;' ~ ~ [ o .. Ë 3 Q.. ;¡; IV .0 ~ .. ~ m ~ õ' '" $' ii' ñ! '" @ ~ "'" ~~ :r'" 3' "T1 !3'8 ",a. '\m [ õ' '" 5' [ ~ :r '" ñ! » ñì r !E »" c '" ~ 3 t11 0) " ! ~ D c z o m <: m 6 "'0 m o n ~ II'> ~ r- !: :;IQ ~ 1'1'1 :;IQ II' NQ o ::t Z m m ;IQ )( > :;IQ ", ~ I N o Z m » o ~~gðl~51 "'''!!!.8.5.0 3ñ!0 5'a. :r e: ]. g- Q!. ~ ft0.,.'O "'0 .~!!~~~ ~ª.2.~2.. _.:J _ ::t ~; 0 8 -:: :J~Wa.o ::,Q] (þ' I'Ð w r~.~ ~[ ~-.g ~ g' '2 ~~~ ~~ g!l~ !l-<, a:~; ~ QJ œ ª. œ. 3 (ti Q,I :J ::t ~. ~ §""~~ P--2. I call' -<~ SO 0> .!cr- ","TI '" Z ~6 e: 0 0 '" ¡¡¡ ;!! 0 8:ç O::t ~ [g~ ['" :;IQ õ' ï 0 a~. > a. 0 :;IQ '" '" 1'1'1 íÕ;;' > 3 '" II' :r (; ~3 5' '" ?- NNN 000 ZZZ mmm »»» :tm ,,~!:¡ p ,8 .... i¡ iiI !l ~ II ¡; 38¡¡'i" :::II?f3~~ '" b~ !tiS' 0 3::Ii1'¡¡¡i 0 I» i~s'o )- lI_õ''''o n !!'. J ,,~ " ~t~~~ !!~ IIII ~;I 2f!~ z " ~~;6" Ii!! mz !! ð ii:,., (10' 0 >< ¡¡~p! "r- °SS :z ~ 11$ i= ¡e ì10 Co ~;i>~ ... ~ ~;:i~~ :z ~ ..§ en 8 "., »!f~:;I: ~ ¡;~ XCI ~~8 c 0 V'I .".... ~ 0 n "33-,¡¡ ¡;¡ ~~ õ~mØm ~ ¡¡ » 0 r- 8.Õi3[ n :0 :z en ~ " CO) c: "., ~~~~ ,., ... ii II z '=' c::: '" ~ !II: õ m ~ -~ "" .. z ~ 8'&r U c: - z ¡;; :z C/I ~.z ~ N :Þ ¡; ::D ~ -n - ." z ~ "., iig~~ - II 0 "., - ë 8 z ii ... "" .... -t '" ,!oØ ,., c: " ~ ~ ID 0 -... CD ] _,,_~c. ~ - -= z i!I: r-~" ~ - 00 II:D I~ ... :Do ~ '" . 5'i~8. ~ 00 ,., m .." !II: 0 - .... ¡op 3 0 ~ 8.åi~ ~i~61J [I:"i),. ..iils: '" §.. ~ n g OJ> '" !l õ' " ,.... 5' '" '" .. :ç fº!3'g' ~.f~ § ~~Y'g- ~- Q,I-< CJ on::J 0 8.~ a.º § :r[~~ g- ~g>§5' -< a. ~ g.OQ !3':!!-< W ~ ~o~, . m~:~ ï~:!! =-. QQ 8 g»a. ~~l ;:ô: ~ N :r .. 5' 2., a. ." 8 a. '" o I: ",. '" o Q. c: .. 5. -< .. -< !3' '" '" ~ ~ ." 8 a. m [ õ' '" ,.... 5' ~ m ~ õ' '" 5' ii' '" '1 o N o Z m C ~'R» ~ ~m 5' ~ :r ;;' :r "" 8 a. :r .. &1 f} .. ~ c: '" a. * 3 5' ~ a. '" íÕ 3 5' ft o ~ o c: ¡;r 5: '" '" o T' ~ ~ "" o o a. NQ 0::t ZI'I'I m ;IQ )( 'TI 5 o o > :;IQ 1'1'1 > II'> "TI 6 o ~ 2:¡ > :;IQ ~ II' N N N o 0 0 Z Z Z m m m < < » m CD CD ¡¡¡nõn¡¡¡5'~ :ç~¡¡¡~:ç8.~ 2~:ç~~~~ ~S¡5'S<2:¡¡¡¡¡¡ tÐ õ- 0 Õ. õ' Q Q. ii)~ Q.~ '" õ'g, ~::;.' tt) ;::::;: Vi:J_ "',:r ï:r ~~ a git_1!.íÕ:;:3 ~gõ'g33~ ~~. a~' 5' § ? ~:T~::r~Q.~ 2, ~ íÕ ~ ' ~ ~ "'ëi3ëi 8"" ~- 5'- a ~ i ~~ ~~ ã, ã, g'[ o 0 ... (þ g. ~ g~ 'Oa.~» g~, ~m p¡ .. .. '" ¡¡¡~ ~ 2. c.."'D3"'" ~m~ 8 ~ Q. 1 ~--"'~ ~ '0 .. ;:T~ ~..~8 a"'~a. 3 ~ -" _.c m ~ Oc:_DI 0" ¡r ~ ~ñ!",2. ~ª,::Q _.!1! 8 I õ.._~ 8.5.Q~ ..~"" ñ! _,s¡ e::r~ Z N o Z ", > 1'1'1 ro- rn C1 rn Z o z c: z o ~ m o '" ~ c~ 0 0 '------.J n ~ 0 l) .... C) 0 z ~ '" ~ ~ Z m r- 0 '" ~, CO 0 ~ CHRISTEN N ~ !!: t 0 0 ~ ~ ("- L~ ~ \\ 1\ -----./ ('-( L..../ J~ N 0 Z m X ¡~;Ii ~8~!: =*?I"~i:\ &~~U 2ii~-: ~ i g~~ '" [!H; tñ, ......fJVJ 0 m:þ ~ ~ :z 0 il""O'8 m:z i!; "!1Ha ;1:1'" 00 is » þr- " rn_liilg ." 2g~~ :z " H '!1. -.... Õ ZOO :Þ :!Jhö'¡¡ §2n .... 000 :z X t 3.11 . II m o td ... ~ oi3~ XQ en 8 ~::I.. "..., ~~n c: ~ II· i"tJ g... ;:ID 0 ;[zU :Þ C V> c: I'" ~5 :Þ z g ~ iti~ G') ..., iI: ¡¡¡- Ii tI1tJ@ :z c: ..., .... z n en !tl¡¡ì: ~ a :a- NI!! m tJ Z c: N r:!ì! "" .... ." r ... Z I~u& .... en ~ ~ :Þ .... :c ã :z z ;:ID :z ~ m ~_u¡¡ ~ I'" c: co .. Iii 0 æ; n m iii -I '" --I ~iG::I"J .... g .... iI: ~ ." "" ... h~1~ 00 = :D ;I> <CO 00 ... '" .~"" <CO !"!' I'" I~ z VJ B: Q 0 .... ~ ...... -I en 0 ~.. ..., m :Þ ... !:! ." :Þ ~ fJ ~ N 0 '- z !' 3^I~O m t' X 't N ~ 0 Z r m X ~ '-.../ 31:Jnl 'lS l!:lOd A1NnO:J D R AD D~ n J: ]I "' .... m Z "' m Z ] '- o 0 » z D "' :¡¡ ~ o ãî '" "' -I c: .... ]I Õ J: ~ n n q -~- ..r- r¡: II II II II II II II ]I o » o '" o ,. " '- o Z <J> :¡¡ Z @ ~ " o ãî "' 0 0 0 > 1)~;li .." ..., ..., §1r[F ~:: Z 'T1 .,~ 8 - ð :=g x 3~ ¡~ c:~ ('}5~ ~ I !!I m:z @ ., 3!t~ ~"" C 3: ~ 8.~i3.~ ~I!I »r- ~~e 3_ Ii" ~N ~.~ Z 0 v> ¡ ! ~~. g ~E ZOO en g n!!!.:T ,,~ ~¡¡! 00 c: m H~~; ~ ..... xC ~>(') :::a Z ."..,., :Þ !Hn ~ == ~~ >-3Z0 :z on E:~ m .- t"I1°e CO) m 0 ;0 "" -I m_(O,. n o Z ~t'~3 ,. II z :::a g II m .~ ;:; " 3 -- III .... ~ æ¡ K~i¡i 0 z "' " g.~ :Þ "" "'.... Z "" c: ~ 0 fUr C') :;¡ .... '"'2 I~ -I !!: !11~.3 i c: a N ." " ~ .... i. :J en :Þ 5fli[ .... :z Z .." .... c: ã c: I! ;;i i¡~¡' y:> "" !I: 0 "'Hi N i ~ gg m i §.ii~ .... "" <Ø ~ Pi:t'P <Ø ~ ..... ~ .... fc::~ ~ .- .~O' ~.' comer is CG that's the most intense commercial use allowed in our codes. That's where I'm not saying there is enough acreage there for a Wall Mart or a super Wall Mart actually they can do anything intense commercial activity there. The property were talking about totally is almost immediately adjacent to that and the vision that we heard ITom various people was that we should put single family homes next to all that. Well there has to be a transition area between very intense comer that not only have zoning there, but we have a 4 lane highways either in construction or being Iplanned for, and this comer is going to be a very intense commercial use. So your not going to have single family rural estate lots next to very intense uses your going to have some tapering or phasing down that's going to help blend in with the residents that are there now and, I think that the project where it provides a town house product does meet a middle of ground between the two extremes, they have low density single family on one hand and the most intensive commercial use on the other and it's a transitions. And I think that if the architectural standards can be put in place I think that this is the key issue that was not included in the conditions. I think that can go a long way towards building structures similar to what we saw referenced further to the north of there by the neighbors there. I've forgotten what the name is of the office complex, no not Shadow Oaks the office complex further to the north "that's and excellent project" but I think if we do a cracker style architecture, I think that will help. But I to believe considering all the factors here believe it's a good project and can be done ..1~. well. I am pleased with the fact the applicant exceed our code in many regards and 60% open space there and 88% environmental preservation is very significant to me. So, I too will be voting for this project. Patricia A. Ferrick 4802 South 25th Street Ft. Pierce, Fla. 34981-5009 Dear Commissioner Coward: Re: Rivers Landing Mistakes Enclosed please fmd a transcript I did from the Rivers Landing hearing. Sever misstatements were made by you in reference to what could be put on Commercial Office zoning which was what the Rivers Landing parcel had. In no way shape or form coµld a Cumberland Farms type of business been placed on this property under Commercial Office zoning. But, thanks to your filibustering it can be put in as a Conditional Use under Commercial Neighborhoods which is the only commercial recognizable under a PUD. 3% of 27 acres is 8 acres of possible Neighborhood Commercial now with the preliminary PUD. I See newspaper article attached; when Pat Murphy of Hoyt C. Murphy and myself joined together to have a designation of "Office Commercial" put in our land use regulations as a buffer between residential land uses and the more intense General Commercial development. (1988) It took many years for our homeowners association to have convenience stores and gas stations changed to a conditional use instead of a permitted use under Neighborhood Commercial. See our objections at the time of the Cumberland Farms coming into our area. (1987) I raised my hand to correct this error but you did not recognize me. Although you let the developers talk after closing the hearing. Secondly, no one belittled the saving of 88% hardwood forest. We were not happy with the omission that 22% hardwood forest would be lost, and approximately 90% of the Sabal Palm trees, which happens to be the state tree of Florida would be clear cut on over 15 acres. Your environmental division is presenting some facts and ignoring others especially when they favor a project. These facts were not mentioned at all; I reiterate we did not belittle saving 88% hardwood forest on approximately 7 acres "we did not". Clear cutting 15 acres of environmental sensitive land really bothers us. You are constantly making comments after you close the public hearing that cannot be challenged. What do you intend to correct your errors and environmental staff s omissions? 3/10/06 I Well the time frame has passed on your bringing up the Rivers Landing errors, you made no effort to even hold a straw vote by the sitting board to see if they wanted to do anything. We believe that the ordinance I limiting corrective measures is time fÌ'ame flawed, and that the 30 day option for taking it to court is too short a time frame especially when these problems are as stated being addressed and are never addressed. I brought this matter to the Planning and Zoning Board in a timely manner whereby errors could be corrected but were not. This matter was also brought to your attention too. Since not all Commissioners are familiar wìth the zoning code and you were not provided the information in a packet before you to make competent decisions I/W e, therefore challenge the validity of the existing policy's timeframe. No one had the courtesy to respond to the alleged infÌ'actions. Attachments, 2 newspaper articles, CN, CO, PUD, Minutes Sincerely, Patricia A. Ferrick BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS - ,',',,'" "-,: ";- -c, ,,~,-.'.':;.,,_:~,·,,;;>:'<_;6¡'.:"· '~,i',:.f!t!<~,;-··r, ~*i~::T~~ ~!èír"êjì¡Eò~~~~~c1"" , COUNTY , ~ FLORIDA GROWTH MANAGEMEN February 5, 2007 Joe Smith 1800 Anywhere DR Anywhere, FL 34982 USA In accordance with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, you are hereby advised that A W RIVER LANDING, UC has petitioned for a Change in Zoning on a 27.88 acre parcel of land located on the east side of South 25th Street, approximately 0.17 mile north of West Midway Road, ftom the RS - 2 (Residential, Single- Family - 2 dulac) and CO (Commercial, Office) Zoning Districts to the PUD (planned Unit Development - River Landing) Zoning District and Final Planned Development Site Plan Approval for the project to be known as River Landing, consisting of 99 townhouse units, for the following described property: Location: East side of South 2~ Street, approximately 0.17 mile north of West Midway Road. THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST The public heoring 0" the petitio" will be held III 6:00 P.M., 01' tIS SOO" tIIert!t1fter lIS possible, 0" Feb1"llll1'Y 20, 2007, County Commissioner's C1uImbers, St. Lucie County Admúdstrøtio" Buildin.g AlUla, 2300 Vuriniø Avelllle, Fort Pierce, FIorû/o. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard at that time. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. The County Planning Division should receive written comments to the Board of County Commissioners at least 3 days prior to a scheduled hearing. County policy strongly encourages your input and comment at the public hearing of this matter before the Planning and Zoning Commission and County Commission, rather than by contact outside of the scheduled public hearing(s). We encourage you to speak at these public hearings, or provide written comments for the record. The proceedings of the Board of County Commissioners are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proc~ing, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary, a public hearing may be continued to a date-certain. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Director at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (772) 462-1777 or T.D.D. (772) 462-1428. If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parcel, please forward this notice to the new owner. Please call (772) 462-2822 if you have any questions, and refer to: File Number: PUD 06-011/RZ 06-018. Sincerely, ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CHRIS CRAFT, Chairman JOSEPH E. SMITH, District No.1. DOUG COWARD, District No.2. PAULA A LEWIS, District No.3. CHARLES GRANDE, District No, 4 . CHRIS CRAFT, District No. 5 County Administrator - Douglas M. Anderson Website: www.co.st-lucie.fI.us 2300 Virginia Avenue - Fort Pierce, FL. 34982-5652 Administration: (772) 462-1590 Planning: (772) 462-2822 GISrrechnical Services: (772) 462-2822 FAX: (772) 462-1581 Economic Development: (772) 462-1550 FAX: (772) 462-1579 Tourist Development: (772) 462-1535 1 (800) 344- TGIF FAX: (772) 462-2132 ~~m~~œ N~OO~~ M ~ ~ ~~8~~~ MV~~~O 0 0 ~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~øø~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Õ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~g~~~ J!I S~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~O<~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Ü~>~ I'-CO CO'" vv "'''' "'''' ~~ ~~ '" '" c: c: Q) Q) ~ ~~ ~ ., .,., ~' Q)ÆQ)~~Q)Q)8 Q) ~ê ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~3~~~~~~~~ ~Æ~~ ~~~~ ~~~m~~~~~~~~-~-mm---~~~-~~~~~~~", ~ 1!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~g~g~j~~~~~~~~~~BgB~~~~~t~ o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~m~m~>~~~~~~~~~~~m~~~~ü>o~ c: .s ., ~ .... sqJ!l ðl'Q m":¡ o <D N 'II: d1 d1 g ~ .... ~ ~ V Q)Q)Q) ~~~~ C ~ Q)"C »> ~CO~~ >0 ~~~.... ~~~ ~~~~«<Q)Q)~.,3:'II:'II: ........~ ~~~IQ)~ o~o»~~~~~~~~~~"'ðð 00>_ __~I~~~~~~---~-~I~~~<~~~~~~~~I~¡~~~~o~~~~ _ ~~~I~~~~~~~~~~~~~!~~~~Q)Q)Q)~~IIÆ~Q)IIQ)....~~c:~ ~ ~~_,_,_,_~clø~~~_~co'-CO!.-~~~mmm».-oB~ søø~~ ~ ",~~~::¡¡x::¡¡c:~ ~~~~~~::¡¡~.,~ ~~»>ææ::¡¡o~~~~~~~Q)mQ) ~-- 3:3:3:-5---- -3:3:3:z~woo»> 3:3:w "~"O>X2 ~~~~O~N~O~~~~~~'" ",z~~~~~~~~~N~~~~;~~~æ~~ ~~~ocoocooo~oo"'m~"'~"'I'-NmNN"'''''''''''''<D<D",gol'-''''''co~O~ ~~~~~~~~~N~~~~~~~~~~N~~~~~~~~~N~~~~;~~~~ o ~ ~ Q) '11:- Q)~ :gS o ~ ~ Q) Q) E 8'E ~o ~o 01'- 00 Nm ~ ~ I'- q o <? .... o ~ e 1\1 c. e c. .. '" :J ...: q en ~ .... o Õ '" 1\1 ~ ~ .. c e .. ~ u ~ c .... 1\1 .... - q- cøe 0)( OS ::Ie ~ e :.2 ....!: q~ ~I\I :i!~ -~ CI.. C Q) :g .!!! C I! jc. ¡cÎ ,i!:~ ~!. ~e ..~ .2E ClO .: ~ i¡ õ't ~ð cu e '" 1\1 C ~~ ~ ~ < :; <;:! ., Q) ~ ::¡¡~ Q) c: cu '0 c::.:: E I~~ C '¡: ~eE ~ iií Q) ., ., 8~ ~ XOI- '" cu ê - E < .~ 1\1 88 '" ~ C 0 ..J ~ '" c: c: Q) c: ., <;:! is 'ãiJlJl 0 g¡ 51 E cu :::8.8. ., 0 C 'E iê.E ~ ~ '" I- Q) ~ ., ., ., Q) 0 ~ ~oo 0 ...., ...., '#. o g¡ c: ~ ~ ~ ., ::¡¡ ., :!2 ! ., m ~ '~ ., ~ fi l- i ~ cu E 1\1 .f m~ t: >-~...., cu~~>¡16ãí-~ C ...1 ~ c: ~ c: ~ c: ~ ¡¡¡ 1 ¡¡¡ ~ ,g :¡¡ 8 ~ o::¡¡::¡¡~::¡¡:.:~~ 3:3: w ~~w ~ccc: ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ C!) zzz3:3:~ t::~~~~cã)ª ..8..8..8-g-g~È~ ~~~c\!Jc\!J8~~ ~ ",::¡¡ ~'~ ~ 0 00 '" ï: ., 2! Õ c: ~ 50z ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ o ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ c: Oo.s 0 ., 00 ~~ '" ~ ~ $ 2! ~~ ~~ ~ ~~o cu ~ 5 c ~~ 2 ~ .5 1ií,~ð e -E ï: :: ,~ ii 'g'g Cia: g¡ ~~i ~ 885 Q) I ~ ~~c:c:c: ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ..J c: c:c:0 EE S ~ EgQ)Q)""" ........ "''''~~~ ~..~ t: _I _ 0 = .!!! ,!!! ,!!! .,., c: g¡ _ Q) .!!! :2:2 E E E ., ~ ~ c: c: 1ii I - ~ Q) ~ :..., CU~I~~~~~~o ssg¡5Ic.>c:~ I-~"''''œlœ~ ã)"'CI-- Q)Q)C:I~I-g¡~- c:11~Q)~8.8.3~g¡g¡iêc:I.5"~ ~111~1~~¡¡:::I.5~~§jßo~i· ~~§ ~~~~¡~",,_õ~~Q)i~~i~I§.,....~~~~33~.,~3:3:IJJ!lJ!I~-~lo3:~ o~~~~~oo~~oo....,....,m~~~o~zuo»>~~~m:.:«~~~::¡¡::¡¡~....,Z<...., ""'::¡¡::¡¡ã) ~ C:Q)Q)" ~ ~C:C:~'¡:¡¡¡ 5":¡":¡:iE.9::¡¡ Vl'-W~I'-N"'CO~WWVl'-"'mCONN~~"'<DWN~VOVow"'''''''m'''V'''I'-com ooooooooooo",oooooooõoooooooooooooooooooø ~~88~8088oo~g~8gg~~o~~~~~~~g~~88~~~gggg~ ~~~m~~~~õ~$$~~~~~$~~~~~~~ø~~=~~~~ø~~~~~~ 8ggggggo88~~g888õ~og88gggggg8gggg88go8gm_ e~~~B~S~~~õoo~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~~~~S~~ss~~~~mc 3~~~~~~~~N~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~œB- ~88888888;g;g;g;g~8888;g8~8888888888888888888m~:¡¡ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~m~~ F . TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 6, 2007 . SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS· 85 ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING AG,ENDÄ FEBRUARY 20, 2007 NOTICE OF ZONING CHANGE The St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners proposes to adopt the following bY Resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 07-003 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CHANGE IN ZONING ON A 27.88 ACRE PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SOUTH 25TH STREET, APPROXIMATELY 0.17 MILE NORTH OF WEST MIDWAY ROAD, FROM THE RS-2 (RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE- FAMILY - 2 DU/ACRE) AND CO (COMMERCIAL, OFFICE) ZONING DISTRICTS TO THE PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT - RIVER LANDING) ZONING DISTRICT AND FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS RIVER LANDING - PUD, AND CONSISTING OF 99 TOWNHOUSE UNITS. Applicant: A W River Landing, LLC PARCEL 1 : THE SOUTH 543 FEET OF LOTS 58 AND 59, WHITE CITY SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, AT PAGE 23, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; LESS THE WEST 40 FEET OF THE SOUTH 543 FEET OF LOT 58~ ALL LYING IN SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. . PARCEL 2: THE EAST 1/2 OF THE WEST 600 FEET OF LOT 60, SHEEN'S SURVEY OF WHITE CITY, SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH. RANGE 40 EAST, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1,AT PAGE 23, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; LESS AND EXCEPTING THAT PART THEREOFL YING SOUTH OF THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF MIDWAY ROAD (STATE ROAD NO. 712). Location: East side of South 25th Street, approximately .17 mile north of West Midway Road. The PUBLIC HEARING on this item will be held in the Commission Chambers, Roger Poitras Annex, 3rd Floor, 51. Lucie County Administration Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida on February 20, 2007, beginning at 6:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. Action can be taken at this meeting, or the item can be continued to a future date and time. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard. Written comments received, in 'advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Written comments to the Board of County Commissioners should be received by the Growth Management Department - Planning Division at least 3 days prior to the scheduled heating. The petition file is available for review at the Growth Management Department offices located at 2300 Virginia Avenue, 2nd Floor, Fort Pierce, Florida. Please call 772/462-2822 if you have any questions or require additional information. The 5t. Lucie· County Board of County Commissioners has the power to review and grant any applications within their area of responsibility. The proceedings of the Board of County Commissioners are electronically reCOrded. PURSUANT TO Section 286.C)1 05. F1o{lda Statutes. if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at a meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record' of the proceedings is made, which record includes the'testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross- examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary, a public hearing may be continued from time to time as may be necessary to a date~certain. ' Anyone with a disabiiity requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Director at least forty-eight (48)'hours prior to the meeting at 7721462-1777 or T.D.D. 7721 462-1428. . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /SI CHRIS CRAFT, CHAIRMAN PUBUSHDATE: FEBRUARY 6, 2007 r - 1 _ To: Submitted By: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: . COMMISSION ACTION: ~><I APPROVED CJ OTHER Agenda Request Item Number Date: 5D 03106/07 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ] [ ] [ ] [X ] Quasi-JD [ ] Presented By rrt-~ Growth Management Director Consider Draft Developers Agreement OVA 07-001, approving a Developers Agreement between Incom Properties 31, Inc., King's Center and St. Lucie County. Board of County Commissioners Growth Management D DENIED Incom Properties 31, Inc., King's Center has proposed through a Developers Agreement, funding improvements to the intersection expansion of Kings Highway and Orange Avenue. Incom Properties 31, Inc., King's Center fair shares for these improvements would be 7 percent of 5.4 million or $378,000.00. Incom Properties 31, Inc., King's Center has dedicated a 3.079 acre strip of land to the County for right-of-way use equaling a credit of $296,197. The balance due to St. Lucie County is $81,803.00. These improvements are necessary to mitigate traffic impacts of the proposed project. The Agreement allows Incom Properties 31, Inc. to contribute a fair share towards these improvements to meet traffic concurrency requirements for the project to be known as King's Center. N/A This is the first of two public hearings of King's Center Developers Agreement 07-001 no action is necessary at this time. County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: Approved 4-0 Comm. Smith Absent Motion to continue to March 20, 2007 at 6p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible as requested by applicant. iPf ¡ ~ Jv"'l-AÞ Coordinationl Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Environ. Res. Dept: Road & Bridge Division Purchasing: Other: Engineering: µvp í~· DV A# 07-001 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND INCOM PROPERTIES 31, INC., KING'S CENTER This Agreement is made and entered into this 20th day of March, 2007, by and between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (the "Board"), and INCOM PROPERTIES 31, INC. (the "Developer"). RECITALS WHEREAS, the Board and the Developer recognize the following: A. This Agreement is entered into in accordance with the Florida Local Government Development Agreement Act, 163.3220-163.3243, Florida Statues (Act), and Section 11.08.00 (Development Agreements) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code (LDC). B. Developer is the owner of certain real property (Property) located in St. Lucie County, Florida, as more particularly described in the attached Exhibit "A" (Property). C. The County has determined that improvements to the intersection of Kings Highway and Orange Avenue are needed in order to maintain concurrency management requirements for the warehouse industrial development proposed on the Property by the Developer, and that the cost of such improvements is in the vicinity of $5,350,000, which amount is excessive in relation to the size and cost ofthe development proposed on the Property. D. The County has determined that improvements to the intersection of Kings Highway and Orange A venue cannot be funded by the public at the present time, and that any funding that can be obtained to expedite the design and construction of intersection improvements would provide a benefit to the public health, safety, and welfare. E. The County has determined that a proportionate share of costs study, intersection design, and permitting would expedite the funding and construction of improvements to the intersection of Kings Highway and Orange A venue, and that funding of these items are sufficient mitigation potentially representing a fair share of the costs of improvements that should be borne by the Developer for the warehouse industrial development proposed on the Property. F. In order to foster comprehensive and sound capital facilities planning and financing, to ensure the provision of adequate public facilities for development concurrent with the impacts of development, and to afford certainty in the approval of development, the Board and Developer desire to establish by agreement the terms under which the Property may be developed. G. On March 6, 2007, the Board held the first public hearing on this Agreement, after publishing notice approximately seven days prior to the first hearing. Notice of intent to consider this Agreement was mailed by the Board at least 15 days prior to the first hearing to all property owners, as reflected on the current years tax roll, lying within 500 feet of the Property. DV A# 07-001 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND INCOM PROPERTIES 31, INC., KING'S CENTER H. On March 20, 2007, the Board held the second public hearing on this Agreement, after publishing notice approximately seven days prior to the second public hearing and after announcing at the first public hearing the day, time, and place of such public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants entered between the parties, and inconsideration of the benefits to accrue to each, it is agreed as follows: 1. Recitals. The above recitals are true and correct. 2. Mandatory Provisions. a. Legal Description and Owner. The land that is the subject of this Agreement is described in the attached Exhibit "A". The owner of legal and equitable title to the Property IS INCOM PROPERTIES 31, INC., a Florida Corporation. The Legal Description is as follows: Section 2, Township 35 South, Range 39 East, North Y2 of the Northeast Y4 of the Southeast Y4, Less East 39 feet for road and canal rights-of-way as recorded in Official Records Book 222, Page 1569, of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. b. Duration. This Agreement shall expire ten (10) years after the effective date provided in Section 13, unless earlier terminated as provided in Sections 9 and 10. c. Uses, Densities, Intensities. Height. and Architectural Standards The development uses permitted on the Property, including densities, intensities, and height, shall be as follows: Uses Allowed: Uses consistent with the proVIsIons of Section 3.01.02(T) of the St. Lucie County Land development Code Density Allowed: Not applicable to nonresidential development Intensity Allowed: Five buildings consisting of 220,596 square feet which includes a 13,000 square feet Mezzanine Maximum Building Height 35 feet, Located on 20.42 acres Page 2 of 19 DV A# 07-001 DEVELOPMENTAGREEMENTBET~ENBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND INCOM PROPERTIES 31, INC., KING'S CENTER Maximum Permitted Height of Buildings and Structures: 50 Feet Architectural Standards: Such architectural standards as may be imposed by the Board of County Commissioners on future Planned Developments and conditional uses permitted within the project shall be followed. No other architectural standards apply on the effective date of this agreement. However, should the County create future architectural standards that apply to development of any lot or lots within the property, buildings, and structures constructed after effective date of those architectural standards shall comply with the adopted County architectural standards in effect at the time of site plan approval. d. Future Land Use MaD Designation. The land use designation of the Property under the future land use element of the adopted St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan is Industrial. e. Zoning. The current zoning of the Property is IL, Industrial Light for the proj ect f. Site Plan. On xxx, 2007 the Developer submitted and obtained Board approval of a major site plan for the Property consistent with the provisions of Section 2c herein. g. Public Facility Adequacy. In order to permit Development of the Property the Developer agrees to pay fees as follows related to the impacts of the project on the intersection of King's Highway and Orange Avenue. The Proportionate Share payment/credit for Kings Center is calculated as follows: The cumulative number of trips ÍÌ"om the proposed development expected to reach roadways during peak hours from the complete build out of a stage or phase being approved, divided by the change in the peak hour maximum service volume (MSV) of roadways resulting ÍÌ"om construction of an improvement necessary to maintain the adopted LOS, multiplied by the construction cost, at the time of developer payment, of the improvement necessary to maintain the adopted LOS. Page 3 of 19 DV A# 07-001 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND INCOM PROPERTIES 31, INC., KING'S CENTER At present St. Lucie County has approved the commencement of design for the intersection expansion of Kings Highway and Orange Avenue. The design is expected to be complet~d in the next 18 months with construction in 2011, as stated in the Five-year Capital Improvement Plan of the Comprehensive Plan. The King's Center development impact to this intersection in its present configuration represents approximate 7 percent of the gross minimum LOS standard. The cost of the improvements submitted by St. Lucie County Engineering and verified by FDOT cost standards is estimated at $5.4 million dollars, for design and construction. Kings Center fair shares for these improvements would be 7 percent of $5.4 million dollars or $378.000.00. Credit for the dedication of the non-site related right-of-way shall be valued on the date of the dedication at 120 percent of the most recent assessed value by the County property appraiser (Chapter 5, D, 6 of the LDC). Incom Properties 31, Inc. shall dedicate a 3.079 acres (134,147 sq. ft) strip ofland to County for right-of-way use. The most recent assessed value for this property is $1.84 a square foot or $246,830 multiplied by 120 percent equaling a credit of $296,197. This amount, $296,197, is subtracted from King's Center fair share amount or $378,000 leaving King's Center, Incom Properties 31, Inc. a balance due to St. Lucie County of$81,803. h. Local Development Permits. The local development permits required for the development of the Property are: (1) Regulatory Permits - surface water management permits(s) from the South Florida Water Management District; Driveway permit(s) from the Florida Department of Transportation. The need for other regulatory agency permits shall be determined based upon final site construction plans. (2) Final development order - required prior to commencing construction. (3) Site plan approval- required prior to commencing construction. (4) Approval of constructible site engineering plans - required prior to commencing construction. (5) Tree removal permit - required prior to commencing construction. (6) Building permit - required prior to commencing construction. (7) NPDES Permit from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. 1. Responsibility for Local Development Permits. All local development permits shall be obtained at the sole cost of the Developer and in the event the site is not developed in accordance with the site plan as provided in Section 2c of this agreement and/or a building permit is/are not received, no other alternate development of the Property shall be allowed until such time as the Board has reviewed the matter and determined Page 4 of 19 DV A# 07-001 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND INCOM PROPERTIES 31, INC., KING'S CENTER whether or not to terminate this Agreement or to modify it in a manner consistent with the S1. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. J. Consistency with Comprehensive Plan. The Board finds that the development of the Property as provided in this Agreement is consistent with the S1. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. k. Consistency with the Land Development Code (LDC). Provided that the Developer submits and obtains Board approval of a site plan in accordance with Section 2c of this Agreement that complies with the County's Land Development Code ("LDC"), the Board finds that the development of the Property as provided in this Agreement is consistent with the LDC. 1. Compliance with Other Law. Failure of this Agreement to address a particular pennit, condition, tenn, or restriction shall not relieve the Developer of the necessity of complying with the law governing such pennitting requirement, condition, tenn, or restriction; and any matter or thing required to be done under existing ordinances of S1. Lucie County shall not be otherwise amended, modified, or waived unless such amendment, modification or waiver is expressly provided for in this Agreement with specific reference to the code provision so amended, modified, or waived. m. Necessary Conditions. The Board reserves the right to impose conditions and requirements on any development order as necessary to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public and the citizens ofS1. Lucie County. 3. Road Impact Fee and Impact Fee Credits. Impact fee credits for the contribution of right of way to apply to Kings Center Maj or Site Plan. Kings Center will receive a credit in the amount of $296,197 for right-of way dedication as described in Exhibit "B". Pursuant to state law, impact fees to be used in impact fee district where improvements are required of the developer are imbedded in the total cost of any required mitigation. Therefore, impact fee credits are applied against the total cost of mitigation, and not against the cost of mitigation plus impact fees. 4. Site Plan Submittal. On or before March 20,2007, the Developer agrees to provide a final site plan (the "Site Plan") to the Board in accordance with provision 2c of this Agreement showing the proposed development of the Property that is consistent with the approved major site plan approval as set out in Resolution No. 07-019. The Developer further agrees that the plan Page 5 of 19 DV A# 07-001 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND INCOM PROPERTIES 31, INC., KING'S CENTER for development of the Property as shown on the Site Plan will not be changed unless approved by the Board in its discretion by action of the Board separate and apart from any regulatory approvals required for the development of the Property by the Board or any other regulatory agency. 5. Road RÎizht-of- W ay Dedication. Within ninety (90) days from the date of this Agreement, the Developer agrees to dedicate and convey to the Board a 3.079 acre strip of land for right-of-way purposes as shown on Exhibit "B". The conveyance shall be by general warranty deed in recordable form and shall be free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the conveyance, the Developer, at the Developer's expense, shall deliver the following to the Board: a. Commitment for title insurance showing that the Owner has marketable title to the right-of-way parcel. Within forty-five (45) days after the closing, the Developer shall deliver a title policy to the County consistent with the commitment naming the County as the insured. b. Sealed survey certified to the Board showing no encroachments. 1. Phase I Environmental Audit certified to the Board showing no evidence of hazardous waste contamination on the right-of-way parcel. 11. Beneficial Interest Affidavit, if required. 6. Payment of Impact and Mitil!ation Fees. No building permit shall be issued for development of the Property unless and until any and all impact fees required under the applicable ordinances and mitigation fees required herein by this Agreement have been paid by the Developer or its successors or assigns and a warranty deed in recorded form has been delivered as provided in paragraph 5. 7. Adeauacy of Public Facilities: Continued Reservation ofCapacitv. The following items in regard to the adequacy of public facilities In this area are acknowledged: a. *Drainage: The property is not located within an identified 100-year flood zone. All construction activities must be in accordance with the applicable St. Lucie County and South Florida Water Management District permitting standards and regulations. b. *Potable Water: The project is required to extend or connect to the potable water system of Fort Pierce Utility Authority. c. *Sanitary Sewer: The project is required to extend or connect to the sanitary sewer system Fort Pierce Utility Authority. Page 6 of 19 DV A# 07-001 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND INCOM PROPERTIES 31, INC., KING'S CENTER d. *Solid Waste: Sufficient capacity exists in the St. Lucie County Landfill to service the anticipated demands of the proposed development of the Property. e. *Parks: Not applicable to this project. f. *Mass Transit; Not applicable to this project and Property. g. *Roads: Subject to dedication of right-of-way shown in Exhibit "B", and a Proportionate Share payment for intersection improvements to Kings Highway and Orange A venue to support the proposed development of the Property and its impact on this intersection. Based on the signing of this Agreement and its approval by the Board of County Commissioners a Certificate of Capacity shall be issued for the Project as a part of, or subsequent to, the site plan approval. Said Certificate of Capacity shall expire if the items identified in paragraphs 2, 3, and 4 above have not been completed within 180 days of the adoption date of King's Center Resolution 07-019. If the Certificate of Capacity expires, the Developer shall reapply for a Certificate of Capacity after completion of the items identified in paragraphs 2, 3, and 4 above, and additional contributions beyond the proportionate share in an amount equal to Road Impact Fees at the latest studied rate shall be due from the owner/developer to the County as a penalty for non-compliance. In this event, no building permit shall be issued until the penalty is paid. The proportionate share computations provided pursuant to item 4 shall be verified by the County and compared to the total amounts paid pursuant to items 2 and 3 above. If the total amount paid pursuant to items 2 and 3 above is less than the proportionate share computation, the Developer shall pay the difference prior to issuance of the first building permit for the project. If the total amount paid pursuant to items 2 and 3 above is greater than the proportionate share computation, the difference shall be returned to the Developer, first through impact fee credits, and then through payments from impact fees collected from other projects within the corridor. The C01,lIlty anticipates providing additional north/south roadway capacity either as an expanded Kings Highway or through the provision of an alternate route parallel to Kings Highway. The County further anticipates that such improvements shall be funded through developer payments with the corridor. The payments may be through a combination of Proportionate Share Contributions, Road Impact Fee payments, Municipal Services Benefit Units (MSBU), and/or Municipal Services Taxing Units (MSTU). 12. Amendment or Cancellation bv Mutual Consent. This Agreement may be amended or cancelled by mutual consent of the parties, and shall terminate upon the issuance of the last Certificate of Occupancy for last residential building as shown on the Site Plan. Prior to amending this Agreement, the Board shall hold two public hearings consistent with the requirements of Section 11.08.02 of the LDC. No further development permits that would result in the generation of any Page 7 of 19 DV A# 07-001 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND INCOM PROPERTIES 31, INC., KING'S CENTER additional required Level of Service impacts will be issued until a new Final Development Order has been issued. Any application for a new Final Development Order, except for a modification to an existing building, structure, or site facility that does not require a new concurrency review, will be subject to all applicable standards and regulations in effect at the time the application is filed. Any application for Final Development Order, for a modification to a building, structure, or site facility built or constructed in accord with the terms of this development agreement shall be subject to any applicable St. Lucie County construction standard or code in effect at the time the application is filed. 13. Involuntarv Revocation of Development Al!reement. The Board may revoke this Agreement if the Board determines through its annual review of this Agreement that the terms and conditions of this Agreement, including all amendments or extensions thereto, have not been complied with. Prior to any revocation of this Agreement, the Board shall hold two public hearings consistent with the requirements of Section 11.08.02 of the LDC. At the public hearing(s), the Developer will be given an opportunity to rebut the determination that the requirements of this Agreement, or any amendments thereto have not been complied with. If the Board determines that revocation of this Agreement is not necessary, the Board may amend the terms of this Agreement to provide for any reasonable condition necessary to assure compliance with the requirements of this Development Agreement, and any extensions or amendments thereto. Either party or any aggrieved or adversely affected person may file an action for injunctive relief in the Circuit Court for St. Lucie County to appeal the revocation or amendment of this Agreement. The provisions of Paragraph 4 requiring Board approval of any change in the Site Plan shall survive the revocation of the Agreement. 14. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be ten (10) years from the effective date. This Agreement may be extended by mutual consent of the Board and the Developer, subject to public hearing in accordance with Section 11.08.02 of the LDC. 15. Recordinl!: Submission to Florida Department of Communitv Affairs. Within 14 days after the Board enters this Agreement, the County Attorney to the Board shall record the Agreement in the Public Records of St. Lucie County. A copy of the recorded Agreement shall be submitted to the Department of Community Affairs within 14 days after the Agreement is recorded by the Growth Management Director. If this Agreement is amended, cancelled, modified, extended, or revoked, the County Attorney shall have notice of such action recorded in the public records and such recorded notice shall be submitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs. Page 8 of 19 DV A# 07-001 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND INCOM PROPERTIES 31, INC., KING'S CENTER 16. Effective Date. This Agreement shall be effective 30 days after its receipt by the Florida Department of Community Affairs. Notice of the effective date of this Agreement shall be provided by the Growth Management Director to all effected parties to the Agreement. 17. Annual Review. In accordance with Section 11.08.08 of the LDC, the Board shall review the development that is subject to this Agreement every 12 months, commencing 12 months after the effective date of this Agreement. The Board shall begin the review process by giving notice, a minimum of 30 days prior to the anniversary date for the effective date of this Agreement, to the Developer of its intention to undertake the annual review of this Agreement and of the necessity for the Developer to provide the following: a. An identification of any changes in the plan of development as contained in the Site Plan Materials, or in any phasing for the reporting year and for the next year. b. If the Site Plan materials provided for phasing, a summary compàrison of development activity proposed and actually conducted for the year. c. Identification of undeveloped tracts of land that have been sold to a separate entity or Developer. d. An assessment of the Developer's compliance with each condition of approval set forth in this Agreement. e. Identification of significant local, state and federal permits which have been obtained or which are pending by agency, type of permit, permit number and purpose of each. Any information required of the Developer during an annual review shall be limited to that necessary to determine the extent to which the Developer is proceeding in good faith to comply with the terms of this Agreement. For each annual review conducted during years 6 through 10 of this Agreement, the Board shall prepare a written report in accordance with rules promulgated by the state land planning agency. The report shall be submitted to the parties to the Agreement and the State land planning agency. If the County finds on the basis of substantial competent evidence that there has been a failure to comply with the terms of the Agreement, the County may revoke or modify the terms of this Agreement. 18. Effect of Contrary State or Federal Laws. In the event that any state or federal law is enacted after the execution of this Agreement that is applicable to and precludes the parties ITom complying with the terms of this Agreement, then this Agreement shall be modified or revoked as is necessary to comply Page 9 of 19 DV A# 07-001 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND INCOM PROPERTIES 31, INC., KING'S CENTER with the relevant state or federal law. Prior to modifying or revoking this Agreement, the Board shall hold two public hearings consistent with the requirements of Section 11.08.02 of the LDC. 19. Enforcement. Party, any aggrieved or adversely affected person, or the state land planning agency, may file an action for injunctive relief in the Circuit Court for St. Lucie County to enforce the terms of this Agreement or to challenge compliance of this Agreement with the provisions of the Act or Section 11.08.00 of the LDC. In the event the Board or the Developer is required to seek enforcement of the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party all costs of such action, including reasonable attorney's fees. 20. Headin2s. The headings contained in this Agreement are for convenience of reference only and do not limit or otherwise affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. 21. Pronouns In this Agreement, the use of any gender will be deemed to include all genders, and the use of the singular will include the plural, wherever it appears appropriate from the context. 22. Waivers The failure or delay of any party at any time to require performance by another party of any provision of this Agreement, even if know, will not affect the right of that party to require performance of that provision or to exercise any right, power or remedy, and any waiver by any Party of any breach of any provision of this Agreement should not be construed as waiver of any continuing or succeeding breach of provisions, a waiver of the provision itself, or a waiver of any right, power or remedy under this Agreement. No notice to or demand on any party in this case will, of itself, entitle a party to any other or further notice or demand in similar or other circumstances, unless otherwise specified in the Agreement. 23. Assi2nment This Agreement may be assigned by Developer to its legal representatives and successors-in-interest provided that impact fee credits are limited solely to the property described in Exhibit A. 24. Bindine Effect This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida, and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective legal representatives, successors and assigns; provided, however, Page 10 of 19 DV A# 07-001 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND INCOM PROPERTIES 31, INC., KING'S CENTER Developer shall have no obligations, duties, responsibilities, or liability under this Agreement if Developer's Project is not approved by County, or if the Project is approved, the Developer requests the County to rescind the resolution approving the Project and the County rescinds the resolution. Such rescission shall not be unreasonably withheld. 25. Counteroarts This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. 26. Construction This Agreement shall be construed as the joint and equal work product of the parties and shall not be construed more or less favorably on account of its preparation. 27. Entire A2reement This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements or understandings made in connection with the subject matter. The Development Orders, Development Permits, Certificate of Capacity and conditions thereon pertaining to the Property are lawful government actions, and shall not be construed as agreements. No modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties unless the same is in writing and signed by the party to be bound. 28. Notices. The parties designate the following persons as representatives to be contacted and to receive all notices regarding this Agreement: For the Board: County Administrator St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982-5652 with a copy to: County Attorney St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982-5652 For the Developer: Incom Properties 31, Inc. 855 South Kings Highway Fort Pierce, Fl. 34945 With a copy to: ********* Page 11 of 19 DV A# 07-001 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND INCOM PROPERTIES 31, INC., KING'S CENTER 30, Successors and Assi2ns. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties and their successors and assigns. In the event of assignment of this Agreement, the Developer shall provide notice to: County Administrator St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982-5652 County Attorney St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982-5652 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused the execution of this Agreement by their duly authorized officials as of the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: Incom Properties 31, Inc. a Florida Corporation By: Print Name: Witness Print Name: Witness ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: County Attorney Page 12 of 19 DV A# 07-001 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND INCOM PROPERTIES 31, INC., KING'S CENTER STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of , 2007, by , Incom Properties 31, Inc., a Florida Corporation, who is personally known to me, or who has produced as identification and who did! not take an oath. Notary Public, State of Florida Print Name: My Commission Notary Seal Expires: Page 13 of 19 DV A# 07-001 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND INCOM PROPERTIES 31, INC., KING'S CENTER Exhibit "A" The owner of legal and equitable title to the Property is INCOM PROPERTIES 31, INC., a Florida Corporation. The Legal Description is as follows: Section 2, Township 35 South, Range 39 East, North Y2 of the Northeast 'l4 of the Southeast'l4, Less East 39 feet for road and canal rights-of-way as recorded in Official Records Book 222, Page 1569, of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. Legal Description for Right-of-Way dedication See Attached legal Description Page 14 of 19 DV A# 07-001 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND INCOM PROPERTIES 31, INC., KING'S CENTER 'Exhibit "B" Total Acres Per Acre Sq. Feet Per Sq. Ft. $1,632,800.00 20.41 $80,000.00 889060 $1.84 ROW Dedication Value Location Kings Highway TOTALS I Assessed I Sq Ft Per Sq Ft. Value Acres Per Acre Value 120% 73317.0 $1.84 $134,903.28 1.683 $80,000.00 $134,640.000 120.00% $161,883.94 ROW Dedication Value Location East-West TOTALS I Assessed I Sq Ft Per Sq Ft. Value Acres Per Acre Value 120% 60830.0 $1.84 $111,927.20 1.396 $80,000.00 $111,680.000 120.00% $134,312.64 ROW Dedication Value TOTALS TOTALS I Assessed I Sq Ft Per Sq Ft. Value Acres Per Acre Value 120% 134147.0 $1.84 $246,830.48 3.079 $80,000,00 $246,320.000 120.00% I $296,196.58 The cumulative number of trips from the proposed development expected to reach roadways during peak hours from the complete build out of a stage or phase being approved, divided by the change in the peak hour maximum service volume (MSV) of roadways resulting from construction of an improvement necessary to maintain the adopted LOS, multiplied by the construction cost, at the time of developer payment, of the improvement necessary to maintain the adopted LOS (Chapter 5, D, 3 of the LDR). At present St. Lucie County has approved the commencement of design for the intersection expansion of Kings Highway and Orange A venue. The design is expected to be completed in the next 18 months with construction in 2011, as stated in the Five-year Capital Improvement Plan of the Comprehensive Plan. The King's Center development impact to this intersection in its present configuration represents approximate 7 percent of the gross minimum LOS standard. The cost of the improvements submitted by St. Lucie County Engineering and verified by FDOT cost standards is estimated at 5.4 million dollars, for design and construction. Kings Center fair shares for these improvements would be 7 percent of5.4 million or $378.000.00. St. Lucie County has accepted right-of-way dedication for the proportionate fair-share payment, credit for the dedication of the non-site related right-of-way shall be valued on the date of the dedication at 120 percent of the most recent assessed value by the County property appraiser (Chapter5, D, 6 of the LDC). Incom Properties 31, Inc. has dedicated a 3.078 acres (134,147sq. ft) strip of land to County for right-of-way use. The most recent assessed value for this property is $1.84 a square foot or $246,830 multiplied by 120 percent equaling a credit of $296,197. This amount, $296,197, is subtracted from King's Center fair share amount or $378,000 leaving King's Center, Incom Properties 31, a balance due to St. Lucie County of$81,803. Page 15 of 19 DV A# 07-001 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND INCOM PROPERTIES 31, INC., KING'S CENTER ~'- I i ! - .-- Hj ! i LEGAL DESCRIPTION l3eíng a parcel of land lying in SecHor. 2. Towrlship 35 South, Range 39 East, St. Lucie County. Florida, being more particularly described os foUows: Commence ot the Easí 1/4 corner of said Seciion 2; thence S89·51'.3S"W, along th(~ 1/4 Section ¡i,e, 0 distance of 39.00 feet to the Vt/cst right-of-wey line of the North St. Lucie River Water ControJ District Canal No. 32W end the POIN1 OF BEGINNING of the following I described parcel; i Thence continue S89'S1'35"W, along said 1 /4 Section line, a distance of 111.47 feet: thence SOO·3.3' 48"[ a distonce of 515.91 feet to the beginning of a cur.....e concave to the east having 0 rC1dius of 18,975.03 feet; thence southerly along the arc of soid curve a distance of 144.14 fee! through 0 central angle of 00'26'07" to the South line of lhe North 1/2 of the NE 1/4 or the SE 1/L of Section 2; thence N89·S1'16"E. olong said South I¡ne. 0 distonce of 110,69 feet to soid West right-of-way Jine; thence NOO'32'35"W, along soid West right....of..-way line. 0 distance of 659.75 feet; thence NOQ"33'09"W, continuing along said West right--of-woy line. a distance of 0.28 feet to the POINT OF BEG¡NNING. r ~ ~ ~ ~ IA I .. J . r _.;/..I___..~j~ _;p(.-;...:~..._-~:SJ-_.._.....-, ~ ~' ,<,~' "4./ {(;' J/ '4Z. i "-.¿~.....~ ..p'!" / ;1 þ~. I' 1,..{!L....,:;_3;.:> --. ¡ //"..>.:: ""~.../~ " ,~i':"~'-~-:-'.... _. f<:' ~ _, ~ Containing 1.687 acres, more or less. Sh04!t 1 of 2 -" ¡ I ~11ON i L..RIGH~~OF-WAY ACQUISl1l0N ,. .. F ,10: OS-106f141d:"r"2,J'tVC: .- COO5UL TIIIIG ENGINEERS Dat., 1-18-2007 J & :P-i~&;! " LAND SUR\Æ'/'ORS .. 2_ 5Di11H ,... 51RE£ r ....C ,QI!~ PIERŒ. FI CIIOIIA. '49&' (772) .~. -.5'7 Tech' ClM m"Ic..n: cr AV1HOllt1'1I1;tI """8£R: oaco ow.; - ------. .. - - Page 16 of 19 DV A# 07-001 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND INCOM PROPERTIES 31, INC., KING'S CENTER SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1HIS IS NOT A SURVEY f 1 1 ~ t ~ '. 5 ~ i SOU~OR~ 1% TIlE 11 Of mE HEll. ~ 01' TH( Sf '1« at J. 5t:CTlQII 2 J , SKETCH OF DESCRJPl1ON] i I RlGHT-OF-W.:v ACQU~110~ 0. NOO'33'09"W 0.28' ~ o <..3 VI ~. œ . 1"'1 !:!: c:J'I ~ ,.. ;0 !LÃ.!!. .. 'Iä ~~~ ... 0' ..,jO .~ N89'S1'16"E 110.69' !'II .. ~I ~ z e ~þ VI.. "'!., ~. 5 ~ , ¡ . i i ei I I \1 : 11 I; I !f ¡~ ' ¡I I :i 100 I ! G GRAPHIC SCALE '00 ø 50 ~......H I III I'ZI7 ) ltnm.~QltL 01 UI (D :.,,¡ UJ. ~ i i' ~ ' I 111 I f -< c: ~ ~t A .. DELT,r. R - ~ACtUS L - ARC LENCTH POll . P01llT OF IIEClN~IHC POC - POIIIT Of COMII1ENCEI.t£IH H.S.L,R.W.C.O. _ NC!tTH sr. WCIE W"TE" COIIIROL OIST!</CT IIfARING5 SHO'M'l HfRt:ON ARE "sSUIoIfO "NO REL,Io TI'vE TO THe: N()fIT!< UtòE rT stemm 2 HA\o1NG A BEARING Of NOO'32',}5""\'1, Sh6e' 2 of 2 ne:05- 1068&d-rw2. W(: --,' .. CONSU1..TINÇ O,¡OINEEQS Dote: 1-18-2oo7:p ð; _R L"IW Wf('vt.YOt!S - ~ 2P60 $OU1" 2b1ll $I!IE!:T 10f¢ rCRT P;Efia, rLOIIIO" ~tð1 Tech: OlM 1'12) 464-JU7 ! ._. ..._.....w_.. ..~mc.'1E CF Ia(,Iroi~%Artœt NI.W8t't GOGO.. ~ Page 17 of 19 DV A# 07-001 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND INCOM PROPERTIES 31, INC., KING'S CENTER --- -.---.--- -- .. ¡- i i LEGAL DESCRIPTION Being 0 parcel of ¡and iyjng in Section 2, Township 35 South, Range 39 East, St. Lucie County, FlQrida, being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the East 1/4 corner of said SecUon 2; thence S89'S1'35"W, 01009 tne 1/4 Section line, a distance of 150.48 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING ot the following described porcel; Thence continue S89'51' 35"W. along soid 1/4 Section line, a distance of 1,2.34. 7f) feet to the West line of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Sect¡on 2; thence $00'18"4"E, along said West lioe, a distance of 87.48 feet to the intersection with a non "tangent curve ccncave to the north, having a radius of 2,125.00 feet. the chord of which bears N84'15' 42"E; lhençe easter! y along the arc of said curve, 0 distance of 242,09 feet through 0 central angle of 06'31 '39" to the point of reverse curvature with (J curve concave lo the south, having 0 radilJs of 2,000.00 feet; thence eosterly along the orc of soid curve 0 dis':ance of j09.5') teet. through a central angle of 08'51'42"; thence N89'5f.35"E a distance of 685.89 feet; thence NOO'33'48"W a distance of 40.00 feel to said 1/4 Section line and the POINT or BEGINNING, i s I J. ~ i t i ~ , PÆ 7~)-:>·:; -~~~:-'-~ t /Øß;;../Í~A" ~ (f.ç'¿¡"'~~~.:-:- ---- Ir ~ . i if ¡ Containing 1.40 acres, more or less. I. I.P.__, ''::..:',. f .c ,:.¥:-: :.+--. 1- ÕESCRIPl10N I L~~T-OF-W; ACQUISITIONj Sheet 1 01 2 - ------ IFil~:0~-10i;'4-rW:-;¡¡9C:-- ,,-.- - CONSUlTNë EÑ~, S I Do1e: 1..16-2007 I 4: i I' tf&= ."'''10 !;IIRVf...rn~ I · ~_ ~,oo1H a!\O~ S1REET I j ENING."" rORT I'I(I\Ç[, F'. C4lill~ J<!/\IZ I' (HZ) 'B< "3",' I.ch: ,~Lt~_..__ _ ,_ ..l_~M1ttlCA1L Cf AilIHQIIZAr~ !C"Wf4l, ~ ._ Page 18 of 19 _. i ¡ í I ! 1 ¡ I I I ¡ DV A# 07-001 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND INCOM PROPERTIES 31, INC., KING'S CENTER SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION '!HIS IS NOT A SURVEY GHA?HlC SCALE 100 ,..¡ ~ ~~ C II PDI' ) ~ tnl1.b . 100 .. 100 I t tt S89'S1'3S"W 1234.75' 150,/.8' 589·51·35....... 1 ... z :::. § 4: :¡ NB9'51'35"E 665.89 NOO'33' 48"W 40.00' ;: ~ S89·S1'.35"W 1234.7S' VI °01 9:-J OI~ ":01 ~ . . T R04~'OO' lo-!!'SI' 42- L 9.3 N89'S1'35"E 685,89' UJ Z ~ < ::IE { i t ~ i i !.15 11':-1 ,,~c: ~~:j .....- ~~ A - Dt:1.1... R = f!^DlUS I = ARC .ENG1I1 1'00 - "OINT or ßEGINtl¡NC PQC - POINT Of Çt),l~HŒMENr & ! IŒARIN(;!; !;HO't,N HEREO~ ARE ASSUMEO AN[¡ !1ELÅTM: TO TIJ!:' NORTH LINE or SECTION 7 i L.._.... HA"'NV,.~.::k~~.O~ 1\11)0'32'3.')"1'1' ¡ SKETCH OF Öe:SCRIPTlON l ~ or j ~ RIG~T-~=W~~. ~:.~~.I~~~~. i Sheet 2 01 2 FiIIl:05- t06a1td-'rw.dw9 C:' . ." '.. CONSULTINC ENGINF:F~S Date: 1-18-2007 I & :PMR ac tAMD SUR'Æ'1'ORS - 2tBr.l SØJ'tI1 25U, smtT IoIC', rOfir I'!tll(;£. nDIIIOIo .)&GIiI?, (112) «O~-;).')'7 10\)111 GlM ttk1ll'1::"1F. CIf A111HDIIIZATIOIi NUlllOUI: 0000 42" ......._..__...._.... _..~M·__._·~_·~·····_ .___....... --... - ....... -. _.....,. Page 190f19 5)) DIVISION OF ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM 07 -062 FROM: DATE: Board of County Commissioners Mike Powley, County Engineer MVp March 6, 2007 ~\d ,1 TO: SUBJECT: King's Center Developer's Agreement and Kings Highway Traffic Impacts The Developer's Agreement for King's Center, to be presented in tonight's Board Meeting (Item 50), requires the developer (Incom Properties 31) to mitigate their project's traffic impacts. The construction value of this mitigation is based on the value of a four-lane intersection. At present the formal document guiding the widening of the roadway, as well as the resulting financial responsibility for these roadway improvements, remains the four-lane configuration as depicted in the approved 1994 Preliminary Design & Environment (PD&E) study. Further, the MPO's Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) still depicts a proposed four-lane section for the Kings Highway corridor. The Engineering Division is presently working with our consultant, Inwood Consulting Engineers, to develop construction plans to widen the Kings Highway and Orange Avenue intersection to six lanes, in conformance with FOOT's Preferred Alternative Reevaluation (PAR). This document, intended to update the existing PD&E, is still being reviewed. It has not been formally accepted by FHWA. However, the traffic analyses presented therein indicate that six lanes will fail by 2035. Until such time as the PAR is formally accepted by FHWA, and the MPO's LRTP is updated to a six-lane section, our only recourse in these evaluations is to utilize the accepted four-lane configuration. MVP:lb cc: Douglas Anderson, County Administrator Faye Outlaw, Assistant County Administrator Ray Wazny, Assistant County Administrator Don West, Public Works Director Robert Nix, Growth Management Director Glenn Kerns, Capital Improvement Planner Ron Harris, County Surveyor John Frank, Sr.project Engineer Natasha Taylor, Civil Engineer ~ r-©n'ªr,O:~~ZI~~,~:\ !tM~R_[l6~~ CO. ADMiN. OFFICE ", , Agenda Request Item Number Date: 5£ 03/06/07 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ] ] ] [ ] Quasi-JD [ Growth Management PreseQted By Gro~~tment Director Petition of St. Lucie Oaks Commercial, LLC, for a Change in Zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) and PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development - St. Lucie Oaks) Zoning Districts to the PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development - St. Lucie Oaks Commercial) Zoning District and Preliminary Planned Unit Development Site Plan approval, for the project to be known as St. Lucie Oaks Commercial - PNRD and consisting of a four-story, 88 room hotel and approximately 16,200 square feet of restaurant I office space. Draft Resolution No. 07-002. (File No.: PNRD I PUD 06-018) St. Lucie Oaks Commercial, LLC, has applied for a Change in Zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) and PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development - St. Lucie Oaks) Zoning Districts to the PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development - St. Lucie Oaks Commercial) Zoning District and Preliminary Planned Unit Development Site Plan approval, to be known as St. Lucie Oaks Commercial - PNRD. The petitioner is proposing an eighty-eight (88) room hotel consisting of 14,547 sq. ft., and restaurant/office space building consisting of 16,200 sq. ft. on 4.58 acres. The property is located on the west side of South U.S, Highway No.1, approximately 1,500 feet north of Riomar Drive, Port St. Lucie. To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A RECOMMENDATION: At the February 15, 2007, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 6 to 1 (Ms. Hammer) with two members (Mr. Trias and Mr. Culverhouse) absent, r~r1!'!I,~ded approval of the requested change in zoning and Preliminary PlannedL>evelopment Site Plan with conditions. Approve Draft Resolution No. 07-002,' granting a Change in Zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) and PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development - St. Lucie Oaks) Zoning Districts to the PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development - St. Lucie Oaks Commercial) Zoning District and Preliminary Planned Development Site Plan approval, subject to limiting conditions. PREVIOUS ACTION: ~ COMMISSION ACTION: L.J APPROVED CJ OTHER D DENIED Coordinationl Signatures Mgt. & Budget: *' ERD: Engineering: Purchasing: ~ /... County Surveyor: ~ County Attorney ~ Originating Dept: ~ Finance: Approved 3-1 Comm. Smith Absent Comm. Lewis Voting No. Motion to continue to June 5 2007 at 6p.m. or as soon ' thereafter as possible, I St. Lucie Oaks Commercial Transmittal Master Checklist Primanr Distribution Sent Received Environmental Resources Department, Amy Mott: y y Public Works Surveyor - Ron Harris: y y Road, Bridge, & Transportation - Don Pauley: y y Stormwater Management - Chris Lestrange: y y General Engineering - John Frank: y y Zoning Supervisor - Paula Bushby: NA Attorney Prop Acquisition - JoAnn Riley: y y Sheriff s Department - Major Monahan: y y St Lucie County Fire District - Captain Derek Foxx: Y y Ft Pierce Farms/North St Lucie Water Control District - Ray Garcia: NA Property Appraiser's Office - Joycelyn Boyce NA IF AS - Jeffrey Gellermann: y Y Residential Only School Board of St Lucie County - Marty Sanders: NA Community Services (Transit) - Sebastian Gomez y y Geoe:raphical Based St Lucie County Utility Department - Mike Bowers: NA Airport Authority - Diana Lewis: NA City of Ft Pierce - Beach/Recor: NA City of Port St Lucie - Cheryl Friend: Y y Ft Pierce Utilities Authority - David Mellert: NA Education and Research Authority - Jane Bachelor: NA '- Commission Review: March 6, 2007 GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division MEMORANDUM TO: THROUGH: Board of County Commissioners Growth Management Director, Bob Nix AICP Planning Manager, Hank Flores AICP FROM: Lisa Wargo, Sr. Planner DATE: February 27, 2007 SUBJECT: Petition of St. Lucie Oaks Commercial, LLC, for a Change in Zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) and PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development - St. Lucie Oaks) Zoning Districts to the PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development - St. Lucie Oaks Commercial) Zoning District and Preliminary Planned Development Site Plan approval, to be known as St. Lucie Oaks Commercial - PNRD The petitioner, St. Lucie Oaks Commercial, LLC, is proposing an eighty-eight (88) room hotel and restaurant/office space building consisting of 16, 200 sq. ft. on 4.58 acres. The property is located on the west side of South U.S. Highway No.1, approximately 1,500 feet north of Riomar Drive, Port St. Lucie. The entire Planning & Zoning agenda package is attached for consideration. This memorandum provides updates and revisions resulting from the Planning & Zoning Commission Public Hearing comments and discussions. At the February 15, 2007, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission by a vote of 6 to 1 (Ms. Hammer), with two members (Mr. Trias and Mr. Culverhouse) absent, recommended approval of the requested Change in Zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) and PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development - St. Lucie Oaks) Zoning Districts to the PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development - St. Lucie Oaks Commercial) Zoning District and Preliminary Planned Development Site Plan approval, to be known as St. Lucie Oaks Commercial - PNRD At the February 15, 2007, Planning and Zoning meeting, Ms. Hammer stated that she did not feel that the project provided enough parking and did not meet the County's Land Development Code because the number of parking spaces for the proposed restaurant building was distributed over the project to include spaces at the adjacent proposed office building and hotel. The current code requires that the applicant provide 188 parking spaces for the project, the applicant has provided 192 spaces. The applicant originally indicated that 0.9 spaces per room were required for the proposed hotel; This was determined by the applicant when referencing ratios set under an unapproved revision to Chapter 7 of the County's Land Development Code. February 27, 2007 Page 2 Subject: Resolution No. 07-002 File No.: St. Lucie Oaks Commercial Preliminary PNRD -06-018 The 192 spaces provided by the applicant meets the current 1.1 spaces per room requirement under the County's Land Development Code. Staff has taken into consideration that the adjacent building is proposed as an office building allowing for those spaces (in addition to the spaces provided for the restaurant) to be utilized after business hours. After further review, Staff has determined that the project has met the requirements of the Land Development Code for the required number of parking spaces for the development. Staff has determined that the proposed zoning designation and the Preliminary Planned Unit Development Site Plan are compatible with the existing and proposed uses in the area. This petition meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and polices of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve this petition, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of a St. Lucie County Vegetation Removal Permit, the applicant must provide ERD with a final wetland determination, delineation, and avoidance I minimization I mitigation measures approved by jurisdictional agencies. 2. Prior to issuance of a SLC Vegetation Removal Permit, the applicant must provide ERD with a copy of a draft Eastern indigo snake protection plan, adherent to FWS guidelines, for our review. The plan, once approved, must be adhered to during all vegetation removal and construction activities. 3. The applicant will be required to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act by providing a note on the site plan stating the developer will provide the crosswalks if FDOT does not, and installing handrails along the front sidewalk prior to final approval. 4. The applicant has requested capacity deferral and may be required to submit an updated Transportation Impact Report prior to Final Site Plan approval if the conditions surrounding the project significantly affect available capacity. Attached is a c~py of ~raft Resolution No. 07- 002, which, if approved, would grant the request for ~ C~ange In Zonrng from the CG (Commercial, General) and PNRD (Planned Non- Residential Development - St. Lucie Oaks) Zoning Districts to the PNRD (Planned Non- Re~idential Develop~ent - St. Lucie Oaks Commercial) Zoning District and Preliminary Planned Unrt Development Site Plan approval, to be known as St. Lucie Oaks Commercial - PNRD Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution No. 07-002. Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter. SUBMITTED: 'MrJ/f Bob Nix, AicP Growth Management Director 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 RESOLUTION NO. 07-002 FILE NO.: PUD 06-018 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CHANGE IN ZONING OF A 4.58 ACRE (MORE OR LESS) PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF SOUTH U.S. HIGHWAY NO.1, APPROXIMATELY 1,500 FEET NORTH OF RIOMAR DRIVE FROM THE CG (COMMERCIAL, GENERAL) AND PNRD (PLANNED NON- RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT - ST. LUCIE OAKS) ZONING DISTRICTS TO THE PNRD (PLANNED NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT - ST. LUCIE OAKS COMMERCIAL) ZONING DISTRICT AND PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS ST. LUCIE OAKS COMMERCIAL - PNRD, AND CONSISTING OF A FOUR - STORY, 88-ROOM HOTEL AND APPROXIMATELY 16,200 SQUARE FEET OF REST AURANT/OFFICE SPACE. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. St. Lucie Oaks Commercial, LLC, through agent Robert A. Burson, Esq., presented a petition for a Change in Zoning from the CG (Commercial General) and PNRD (Planned Non-Residential District - St. Lucie Oaks) Zoning Districts to the PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development - St. Lucie Oaks Commercial) Zoning District, and Preliminary Planned Development Site Plan approval for the project to be known as St. Lucie Oaks Commercial - PNRD, and consisting of a four-story, 88 room hotel and approximately 16,200 square feet of restaurant I office space. The proposed project is located on the west side of South U.S. Highway No.1, approximately 1,500 feet north of Riomar Drive in Port St. Lucie. 2. The Development Review Committee has found that the proposed project meets all technical requirements and is consistent with the future land use maps of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. 3. On February 15,2007, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing, of which due public notice was published and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the subject property at least 10 days prior to the hearing, and recommended to the Board of County Commissioners by a vote of 6 to 1 (Ms. Hammer), with two members (Mr. Trias and Mr. Culverhouse) absent, Preliminary Planned Non-Residential Development Site Plan approval for the project to be known as St. Lucie Oaks Commercial- PNRD, be granted. 4. On March 6, 2007, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing a notice of such hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property at least 10 days prior to the public hearing. File No.: PNRD - 06-018 March 6, 2007 Resolution No. 07-002 Page 1 1 5. The proposed project is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives and 2 standards of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the St. Lucie County 3 Comprehensive Plan, and the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County. 4 5 6. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent properties, the 6 character of the neighborhood, utility facilities or other matters affecting the public 7 health, safety, and general welfare. 8 9 7. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect on the proposed 10 project on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping and 11 screening. 12 13 8. The proposed project will be constructed, arranged and operated so as not to interfere 14 with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable 15 district regulations. 16 17 9. The proposed project lies within the Urban Service Boundary and will be served 18 through the Port St. Lucie Utility Systems. The applicant has received confirmation 19 from that agency that availability exists. 20 21 22 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie 23 County, Florida: 24 25 A. Pursuant to Section 11.02.04(A) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the 26 Preliminary Planned Non-Residential Development project to be known as St. Lucie Oaks 27 Commercial- PNRD, is hereby approved as depicted on the site plan drawings for the project 28 prepared by Thomas Lucido and Associates, last revised on October 26, 2006, and date 29 stamped received by the St. Lucie County Growth Management Director on November 8, 30 2006, subject to the following conditions: 31 32 1. Prior to issuance of a St. Lucie County Vegetation Removal Permit, the applicant 33 must provide ERD with a final wetland determination, delineation, and avoidance I 34 minimization I mitigation measures approved by jurisdictional agencies. 35 36 2. Prior to issuance of a SLC Vegetation Removal Permit, the applicant must provide 37 ERD with a copy of a draft Eastern indigo snake protection plan, adherent to FWS 38 guidelines, for our review. The plan, once approved, must be adhered to during all 39 vegetation removal and construction activities. 40 41 3. The applicant will be required to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act by 42 providing a note on the site plan stating the developer will provide the crosswalks if 43 FDOT does not, and installing handrails along the front sidewalk prior to final 44 approval. 45 46 4. The applicant has requested capacity deferral and shall be required to submit an 47 updated Transportation Impact Report prior to Final Site Plan approval if the 48 conditions surrounding the project significantly affect available capacity. 49 File No.: PNRD - 06-018 March 6, 2007 Resolution No. 07-002 Page 2 1 B. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 The property on which this site plan approval is being granted is described as follows: PARCEL 1: A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST Y4 OF THE NORTHWEST Y4 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST Y4 OF THE NORTHWEST Y4 OF SAID SECTION 22; THENCE NORTH 89E 49' 00" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST Y4 OF THE NORTHEAST Y4 OF THE NORTHWEST % A DISTANCE OF 589.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH ODE 07' 00" EAST PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST Y4 OF SECTION 22 A DISTANCE OF 1150 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH ODE 07' 00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 104.72 FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING THE BACK OF AN EXISTING 2 FOOT VALLEY CURB; THENCE NORTH 34E 09' 21" EAST ALONG THE EXISTING BACK OF CURB A DISTANCE OF 1.33 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 82.10 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 74.76 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 54E 10' 24" TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE SOUTH 89E 45' 49" EAST CONTINUING ALONG SAID BACK OF CURB A DISTANCE OF 36.54 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 100.18 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 44.56 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25E 29' 00" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTH, HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.15 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY 51.87 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 59E 15' 36" TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE NORTH 70E 26' 03" EAST CONTINUING ALONG SAID BACK OF CURB A DISTANCE OF 35.48 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH, HAVING A RADIUS OF 28.81 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 13.80 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 27E 26' 51" TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE NORTH 83E 3D' 00" EAST DEPARTING SAID BACK OF CURB A DISTANCE OF 79.78 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89E 57' 34" EAST ALONG THE EXISTING BACK OF CURB, A DISTANCE OF 66.39 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH, HAVING A RADIUS OF 104.67 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 39.71 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 21E 44' 12" TO THE BEGINNING OF A COMPOUND CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 273.01 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 59.42 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12E 28' 11" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 39.81 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22E 48' 30" TO THE END OF SAID CURVE, SAID POINT BEING THE END OF THE EXISTING 2 FOOT VALLEY CURB; THENCE SOUTH 89E 53' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 7.15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH ODE 07' 00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 105.74 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89E 49' 00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF File No.: PNRD - 06-018 March 6. 2007 Resolution No. 07-002 Page 3 1 523.45 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 2 ALL LYING AND SITUATE IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. 3 CONTAINING WITHIN SAID BOUNDS 67,627 SQUARE FEET OR 1.55 ACRES. 4 5 PARCEL 2: 6 7 A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST Y4 OF THE NORTHWEST Y4 OF SECTION 22, 8 TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST BEING MORE PARTICULARLY 9 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 10 11 COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST Y4 OF THE 12 NORTHWEST Y4 OF SAID SECTION 22; THENCE NORTH 89E 49' 00" WEST ALONG 13 THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST Y4 OF THE NORTHEAST Y4 OF THE 14 NORTHWEST Y4 A DISTANCE OF 589.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH OE 07' 00" EAST 15 PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST Y4 OF SECTION 22 A 16 DISTANCE OF 1000.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE 17 HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH OE 18 07' 00" EAST 150.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89E 49' 00" EAST 547.45 FEET TO 19 THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO.1; THENCE SOUTH 20 OE 07' 00" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET; 21 THENCE NORTH 89E 49' 00" WEST A DISTANCE OF 547.45 FEET TO THE POINT 22 OF BEGINNING. 23 24 PARCEL 3: 25 I 26 THE WEST 249.00 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL AS 27 FOLLOWS: 28 29 FOR A POINT OF REFERENCE COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 30 THE NORTHEAST Y4 OF THE NORTHWEST Y4 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 36 31 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST (ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF RIVER PARK, UNIT 1, 32 AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10, PAGE 69, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA); 33 THENCE GO NORTH 89E 49' 00" WEST ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID 34 NORTHEAST Y4 A DISTANCE OF 589.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH OOE 07' 00" EAST 35 PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST Y4 800 FEET TO THE 36 POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE CONTINUE NORTH OOE 07' 00" EAST, 200 FEET; 37 THENCE SOUTH 89E 49' 00" EAST 547.45 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT-Of- 38 WAY OF U.S. #1, THENCE SOUTH OOE 07' 00" WEST ALONG SAID WESTERLY 39 RIGHT-OF-WAY OF U.S. #1 95.51 fEET; THENCE SOUTH 01E 16' 48" EAST ALONG 40 SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-Of-WAY Of U.S. #1 104.52 fEET; THENCE NORTH 89E 41 49' 00" WEST, 550.00 fEET TO THE POINT Of BEGINNING. 42 ALL LYING AND SITUATE IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, fLORIDA. 43 CONTAINING 1.143 ACRES MORE OR LESS 44 45 Location: West side of South U.S. Highway No.1, approximately 1,500 feet north 46 of Riomar Drive in Port Sl Lucie. 47 48 File No.: PNRD - 06-018 March 6, 2007 Resolution No. 07-002 Page 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 C. This Preliminary Planned Non-Residential Development Site Plan approval shall expire on March 6, 2009, unless an extension is granted in accordance with Section 11.02.06(B)(3), St. Lucie County Land Development Code or Final Planned Development Site Plan Approval has been granted. D. The Preliminary Planned Non-Residential Development Site Plan approval granted under this Resolution is specifically conditioned to the requirement that the petitioner, St. Lucie Oaks Commercial, LLC, through agent Robert A. Burson, Esq., including any successors in interest, shall obtain all necessary development permits and construction authorizations from the appropriate State and Federal regulatory authorities, including but not limited to: the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and the South Florida Water Management District, prior to the issuance of any local building permits of authorizations to commence development activities on the property described in Part B. E. The conditions set forth in Part A are an integral non-severable part of the site plan approval granted by this Resolution. If any condition set forth in Part A is determined to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason and the developer declines to comply voluntarily with that condition, the site plan approval granted by this Resolution shall become null and void. F. A copy of this Resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described in Part A, which plan shall be placed on file with the St. Lucie County Growth Management Director. G. A copy of this Resolution shall be mailed, return receipt requested to the developer and agent of record as identified on the site plan applications. H. This resolution shall be recorded in the Public Records of St. Lucie County. The recording of this resolution does not authorize the commencement of anyon-site development activities without obtaining such further development permits as may be required. All applicable conditions of approval as set forth above, and all applicable code requirements must be met to satisfaction of the County before final site construction permits are issued. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Chris Craft XXX Vice-Chairman Joseph E. Smith XXX Commissioner Doug Coward XXX Commissioner Charles Grande XXX Commissioner Paula A. Lewis XXX File No.: PNRD - 06-018 March 6, 2007 Resolution No. 07-002 Page 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 6th day of March, 2007. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS Deputy Clerk County Attorney File No.: PNRD - 06-018 March 6, 2007 Resolution No. 07-002 Page 6 1 2 3 Exhibit A 4 5 6 Maps 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 File No.: PNRD - 06-018 March 6, 2007 Resolution No. 07-002 Page 7 U cn.-J .::J!.-J to .. om Q)"õ "- L.. o Q) :J E ~E .....0 CJ)ü t u I c: ! ex,) ~ o I <0 o C ~ z a.. z.ø ~ 11 d ~l ~ N tiå .8 E 8 ~ ~ !. e! a. a. 1\1 2 .. N co - f î ~ IÙO~ ] ~ 3 p¡¡-' __..f PW Yap:) eUII::I w:-o J I I I I J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ______________________________________ -----------------__--__--1 ¿"~..... /~ I ------~--------------------- lunoo HqOc¡:>N1tO A petition of S1. Lucie Oaks Commercial, LLC, for a Change in Zoning from the CG (Commercial General) and PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development) Zoning Di,strict,to the PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development-St. Lucie Oaks ~ommercial) Zoning District and Preliminary Planned Development Site Plan 8 3 8 ~ILLI~SBURG WAY 18 a: a: 15 Q 0 W 17 ~ ~ 11 12 C!) § ~ ð æ: 18 ~ 14 ~ W ::E: .... ::E: 18 ~ W Z 13 ~ 20 ::E: C!) 3: 12 C/) 10 ;:) C/) 21 7 .H.S:r 28 24 25 23 24 3 23 22 ~ 22 21 4 I- 20 5 ;:) 21 Z 18 6 § 20 18 7 18 a: Õ ~ ~ aI .... ~ ~ C!) 3: CI) ;:) CI) NSLRDD CANAL NO. 28 NSLRDD CANAL NO. 28 2 ~ c:: ~ ~ ~ ¡e " 7 17 8 18 16 8 17 15 10 16 14 11 15 13 12 1" 15 16 113 18 8 7 8 5 4 PNRD 06-018 Legend ~ Subject property Së:-~~~~ f1r-d.!ll-._~ Map prepared December 20, 2006 N A Zoning -----J ';!II 13' ~ ~~138 , ...1 ~- 14 i5 . 44 -.A r 139 ~ '-;-¡;j _3' L6 J J140 ~ ':Jill~,;;- Frfj02 ~ SANDBERG IN 1;; 101 161 I _ 4 5 6 -- 144 St. L ucie Oak . {(, CG s Commercial, LLC 2 9 RM-9 WilliAMSBURG WAY 160 ~,. 3 159 ,..... ~ RS-4158 ."'2 28 "~ -;,:;:; 1 10 9. 147 - 148 ~DICKINSON&TER~ ~ 155 'r~ -·~531152· ~51 1180 ì' 149 7 a--- 145 8 18 a: c 15 W 17 ~ æ 18 w 14 J: C(~ 19 """ 13 { 20 a: c ~ ~ J: ... ~ ~ (!) _:E ø :) ø 11 12 7 CG ~ ~ z 9 .4 \. 12 10 V11 1 2 345 617 89101112 10 21 I NSlRDD CANAL NO. 28 ~ ~ r0 13 \32 31 / 30 ~f/ .I~~ r<' g; ~~~ 22 23 ~~//'/// ~,. .. 21 1'- . 2 1 ~~ 2T -- . ~ II) 28 f- .- 23 2 24 PUD 22 3 23 ... ~ ~ J: (!) :E ø :) ø ( [ NSLRDD ~ NO. 28 \ ~ :;J. 'Vi 1 4 3 \ 4- RM-9 ) 5~ i )' 31 2 21 4 22Ra-4 20 5 21 19 46 ~f-¡¡- 18 5 I-;¡- 7 Z 17 8 8 18 16 9 8 17 CG 14 15 16 f.;s '18 1-Š 20 21 I ~ 24 23 ---~ 7 6 15 4 3 2 J;j22 'J~ 22 ............. 21 - -........ '- 13 ~ 16 IfM7 118 1 r- > 19 14:::::15 2 18 o . ~J:~4;' 17 '--- 4. ~ "'T16 ~~ ~ 9 '~12 5 r~15 10 !. . '14 4 1 3 \ ~ 4 ~ 2 ~ ~ 31 \ ~~30 \~ 29 S2 C 27 21 26 Pi23 I ~ ~ 21 22 2~ 12 ~--:- 21 3 \~ 13 11 ~~ 22 2 4 ~~ \ 14 10 1 3 19 5 '\ 15 9. r~ 1 4 18 26 '~ . 1~ ~ v .. 15 10 16 14 l' 15 13 '2 M'312 11 110 9 I 8/ 7 6 5 ," RS-4 { RM-5 1 2 1 '\ < 138 2 , 3 4 17 5, 1 16 15 14 7 ~ 13 3 8 ~ t r;#J 12 5 C"ð 11 6 , { \ 2 PNRD 06-018 Legend ~ Subject property ,Sì:;- ~~ ~~ ~d,--,-~ Map prepared December 20, 2006 "- N A 10 7 Land Use ~ ~131 ~ ~ 1387 321'~rl 4~5t~T '3õ- ~38n. ~ì lfM;-J ~40 7 6 ::J 39 ~ 2 37 29 r J 42, 141 .140 41 I ~ I 8 t ~ 7 ~~DBERGLN ~ 101 ~ 1 143 161 4 5 6 - 144 ~ 3FllJ7 I;;;" 8 158 t. - RU - r 2 2 8 .. ~46 158 ",_ ~ i 147 157 1 I 10 9 I - ~48 ~DICKINSON¡TER~'-- 158 '~~ -p531152' ~51 1150 ì 149 St. L ucie Oaks , (, C(~M ' Commercial, LLC 9 RM WILLIAMSBURG WAY ex: 16 ex: o 15 0 ~ 17 § æ 18 ~ ~ 14 ~ ~ COM 19 ~ 13 20 ( ~ _ :J: U) :) U) ;l 11 12 COM ð ~ z P/F 10 9 ~ l 12 10V11 I 2 3 45 6\7 8 9101112 21 NSLRDD CANAL NO. 28 ~ ~ ~~~I :) i~0 H%~ CD NSLRDD CANAL NO. 28 I I [ Þ 32 31 / 30 < I COM 22 23 I - 23 2 25 / 2 ~ 3 ~ ~ RM) . ~ .~" 7 28 2 I ,%7 ~AS.t!.§! a 24 RM , RU 4 ~ 2 ~ \ 5 4 1 138 S ~ , 765432;:)22 22 2 I ~30 32 .\\ I I 3 29 ' _ ~21 17 28 iD.LJ.j 13 þ~ 16 17 18 1 4 16 I %7 25124 ]23 1 ~ r- ~ 1- ~ 19 15 2 26 22 2 ~ 14 ::j 15 I 2 V; 18 7 ~ 14 ~ 12 ~ .- 21 3 ~ r;-:-6 13 9 ~ 5 14 10 ~ 1 3 19 II \ ~ III ~ II '~ ... 5 1 6 ~. 15 9 4 18 'H U 0 W I £- _ _ . 14 7'" ' _ . 19 5 17 22 3 D 21 4 ¡ 220. 20 5 ~ 4 "20 19 6e 18 7 19 - 17 8 18 16 9 ~ 17 ~ :::: ~:: 13 12 9 -;- 1S 12 11 110 9 I' 7 6 COM ~ 6 r-., I - / RU l '-- PNRD 06-018 Legend ~ Subject property Së:-~~~~ r;r-tÆ .111-.-' Dv-'~ "" N A Map prepared December 20, 2006 Planning and Zoning Commission Review: 2/15/07 GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Zoning Commission THROUGH: Growth Management Director - Bob Nix, AICP Planning Manager - Hank Flores, AIC~ FROM: Lisa Wargo, Sr. Planner IV DATE: February 15,2007 SUBJECT: Petition of St. Lucie Oaks Commercial, LLC, for a Change in Zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) and PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development - St. Lucie Oaks) Zoning Districts to the PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development - St. Lucie Oaks Commercial) Zoning District and Preliminary Planned Unit Development Site Plan, for the project to be known as St. Lucie Oaks Commercial - PNRD and consisting of a four-story, 88 room hotel and approximately 10,200 square feet of restaurant/office space. LOCATION: West side of South U.S. Highway No.1, approximately 1,500 feet north of Riomar Drive, Port St. Lucie. EXISTING ZONING: CG (Commercial General) and PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development - St. Lucie Oaks) PROPOSED ZONING: PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development - St. Lucie Oaks Commercial) COM (Commercial) FUTURE LAND USE: PARCEL SIZE: PROPOSED USE: 4.58 acres SURROUNDING ZONING: Hotel with 88 rooms and approximately 10,200 square feet of restaurant 1 office space. To the north, east, and south of the proposed project are CG zoning districts, and to the west of the proposed project is PUD - St Lucie Oaks Residential. SURROUNDING LAND USES: The proposed project is bordered to the west by a RM (Residential Medium 9 du/acre) land use, to the February 15, 2007 Page3of5 Subject: St. Lucie Oaks Commercial File: PUD 1 PNRD # 06-018 The proposed change in zoning and petition for Preliminary PNRD (Planned Non- Residential Development) is consistent with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. The proposed project consists of a 4-story, 88 room hotel and a restaurant I office building containing 10, 200 sq. ft. The site plan that is submitted as part of this rezoning to PNRD is consistent with the provisions of the Land Development Code Sections 6.00.00, 7.02.00, and 11.02.10. 2. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements of the St Lucie County Comprehensive Plan; The Future Land Use and the proposed St. Lucie Oaks Commercial - PNRD are consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives, and standards of this Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County. 3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed zoning is inconsistent with the existing and proposed land uses; The existing land use designation is compatible with the requested zoning change to PNRD and the proposed uses. The surrounding land uses consist of Commercial, Rural Urban, and Residential Medium Land Uses and are currently zoned as Commercial General and Planned Non-Residential Development Zoning Districts. The property also conforms to all St. Lucie County land development regulations for developments in these zones. 4. Whether there have been changed conditions that require an amendment; There have not been changes that would require an amendment. 5. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in demands on public facilities, and whether or to the extent to which the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities, including but not limited to transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage, schools, solid waste, mass transit, and emergency medical facilities; Transportation: Hwy US No. 1 is currently being upgraded from a four-lane to six-lane road at the proposed project site and the applicant is providing additional access to the site from US NO.1. Staff review of the submitted Transportation Impact Analysis has determined that sufficient capacity exists to support the project's traffic generation and recommends approval of the Preliminary PNRD Site Plan. Water I Wastewater: The PNRD is located within the urban service boundary and will utilize public sewer and water services. Soils/Drainage: The subject property consists of Lawnwood sand, Malabar fine sand, Susanna sand, Waveland fine sand, and Urban Lands. These soils are typically found in Pine flatwoods communities and exhibit water tables of less than 10' during the wet season. Drainage will be handled through a master drainage February 15, 2007 Page4of5 Subject: St. Lucie Oaks Commercial File: PUD I PNRD # 06-018 system which requires permits from the South Florida Water Management District (S.F.W.M.D.), St. Lucie County, and the North St. Lucie River Water Control District. Schools: Since the project proposes a hotel and restaurant/office space it is not anticipated to have an impact on surrounding schools. Fire/EMS: Emergency Medical Services (EMS) will be provided by the St. Lucie County Fire District within 3 miles of the project site. 6. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The applicant submitted an Environmental Impact Report, which has been reviewed by the County's Environmental Resource Department. The ERD consulted regularly with the applicant to ensure that the proposed PNRD will not adversely impact the environment. The applicant proposes the use of Best Management Practices related to soil and water protection, conservation and stabilization throughout the development process. Much of the site has been previously disturbed due to past development, but native, county-protected trees, including live oaks, cabbage palms, and pines do exist on-site. The applicant intends to re-Iocate cabbage palms on-site and mitigate for the oaks and pines by planting new trees on-site. The SFWMD informal pre-application wetland review indicated that the site contains several Mother surface water" areas, which may require permitting through the Environmental Resource Permit process. It will be a condition of approval that final wetland permitting is completed by jurisdictional agencies, and correspondence is provided to ERD. 7. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in an orderly and logical development pattern specifically identifying any negative affects of such patterns; The property fronts on South U.S. Highway No.1 and will have approximately 10,200 square feet of restaurant I office building space closest to the highway with the proposed hotel located in the rear of the property. The surrounding properties have been developed. The intended hotel I restaurant I office space uses are conditional uses permitted under the current CG zoning designation, however, the hotel I restaurant I office space buildings can be sited and developed more efficiently under the PNRD zoning designation being requested. 8. Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public Interest, and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this Code; The proposed amendment is not in conflict with the public interest and IS In harmony with the purpose and intent of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. The proposed project will provide employment for the surrounding community in addition to providing an additional eating establishment and hospitality lodging for the neighboring community. February 15, 2007 Page 5 of 5 Subject: St. Lucie Oaks Commercial File: PUD I PNRD # 06-018 COMMENTS The petitioner, St. Lucie Oaks Commercial, LLC, through agent Robert A. Burson, Esq., is proposing the development of an 88 room hotel and approximately 10,200 square feet of restaurant I office space buildings on 4.58 acres of land totaling 24,664 square feet, and located on the west side of South U.S. Highway NO.1 approximately 1500 feet north of Riomar Drive in Port St. Lucie. The project is to be known as St. Lucie Oaks Commercial - Preliminary PNRD. Section 7.02.03(h) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that 20% of the site must consist of common open space. The proposed planned development maintains 1.15 acres (25%) of the project area in total common open space. Staff has determined that the proposed PNRD Zoning District designation and Preliminary PNRD site plan are compatible with the existing, proposed, and surrounding land uses in the area. This petition meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and polices of the St. Luce County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of a St. Lucie County Vegetation Removal Permit, the applicant must provide ERD with a final wetland determination, delineation, and avoidance I minimization I mitigation measures approved by jurisdictional agencies. 2. Prior to issuance of a SLC Vegetation Removal Permit, the applicant must provide ERD with a copy of a draft Eastern indigo snake protection plan, adherent to FWS guidelines, for our review. The plan, once approved, must be adhered to during all vegetation removal and construction activities. 3. The applicant will relocate as many of the smaller oaks from the site to the adjacent residential site and work with the County ERD through the mitigation process. 4. The applicant will be required to construct an upland buffer around the detention pond (1 square feet of buffer per linear foot of shoreline) with bald cypress, red maple, cabbage palm, sand cordgrass, etc.... Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter. Cc: Brasilino Filipe Robert Burson File Suggested motion to recommend approval/denial of this requested change In zoning. MOTION TO APPROVE: AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBUC HEARING, INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GRANT APPROVAL TO ST. LUCIE OAKS COMMERCIAL, LLC THROUGH ROBERT A. BURSON, ESQ. FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM THE CG (COMMERCIAL GENERAL) ZONING DISTRICT TO THE PNRD (PLANNED NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT - ST. LUCIE OAKS COMMERCIAL) ZONING DISTRICT, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A FOUR-STORY, 88 ROOM HOTEL AND APPROXIMATELY 10,200 SQUARE FEET OF RESTAURANT / OFRCE SPACE BUILDING ON 4.58 ACRES TO BE KNOWN AS ST. LUCIE OAKS COMMERCIAL - PNRD, BECAUSE..... [CITE REASON WHY - PLEASE BE SPECIFIC] MOTION TO DENY: AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBUC HEARING, INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DENY THE APPUCATlON OF ST. LUCIE OAKS COMMERCIAL, LLC THROUGH ROBERT A. BURSON, ESQ. FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM THE CG (COMMERCIAL, GENERAL) ZONING DISTRICT TO THE PNRD (PLANNED NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT - ST. LUCIE OAKS COMMERCIAL) ZONING DISTRICT, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A FOUR-STORY, 88 ROOM HOTEL AND APPROXIMATELY 10,200 SQUARE FEET OF RESTAURANT / OFFICE SPACE BUILDING ON 4.58 ACRES TO BE KNOWN AS ST. LUCIE OAKS COMMERCIAL - PNRD BECAUSE..... [CITE REASON WHY - PLEASE BE SPECIFIC] Land Use St. L ~. 1315 '131' ~ 138 1 371 ~ J..... 37 ~ 4"'¡'J5 I ..J:II r ,-, "-L.. 139 ~-- 'E!J38' '43 m--316 f;- 6 ~ 39 2 37 ~' j 42 141 1r:JJ.N~40 41 r~ 1 8 ~ 7 3 ~GLN ~ 02 101 ~ 143 161 4 5 6 l _ 144 160 FI' I I-- 8 - 3 f~7 145 159 " _ RU -" 2 2 8 \ '--146 158 ,...-- -;;-:; 1 10 I 9 , 147 --- 1~ ~DICKINSON1TER~ 155 0~ -f~ 1152 ~51 1150 1149 NSLRDD CANAL NO. 28 13 32 31 / 30 J ~ 19 ---;e 17 8 ~ t---:-::- 16 9 õi( 17 I- t-=- 15 10 i! 16 14 11 §~ 13 12 (.) 14 13 12 I 22 23 2 1 ~ AS.t!.§.! 1 - 23 2 22 3 21 4 20 5 19 46i:: 18 7 \ ~ 4~ 2~\ 5 3 ~, , 4 1 138 ~~ , t} 1 3 1 2 ~ 31 ~CON "n : >" " , n a :~~D n ,~\r\ 7 ~ 3 ~12~~ ~21 3 ~ . ~(," ~t r;.... ..~d: n, ',n ,.' ~~ \\ 6 '~15 9 4 18 26 ro 1 7 ' ,,,' . r _ 19 5 17 ~7 28 - ,27 ,....-- ¥ - 25 - 24 RM ~ ~ ~ ~ 11 10 9 I I 7 14 15 16 r~I~8\. 19 20 21 I--- 22 II 76 54 32 J1 ~ ~ 16~'fÆ18 1 r.£I 19 14 ~1ft5' J 2 lq'f(; 18 I-- Z 14 3 ~ 17 15 I 4 v" 16 I;-- 13 9 ' J 5 15 1 ,~ 0 . 14 ucie Oaks . (, C<!>M ' Commercial, LLC 9 RM WILLIAMSBURG WAY a: o 15 W ~ ~ æ w 14 :I: 16 a: o § ~ .... Z ~ ~ 20 { ~ _ Z en :> en .æ 11 12 COM ð ~ w z P/F 10 17 18 coM 19 13 9 .4 12 \... - 10 ~V11 1 2 3 4 5 6 17 89101112 21 .... ~ ~~~ :> ~~0 ~~ III NSLRDD CANAL NO. 28 COM ( r 2 ~ RM ~ > 31 -I 4 ?! Ii COM 7 \. ~ r-- \ ". I / RU RU 6 ) \. ( Legend ~ Subject property 5l:-~~~~ ~tÆ",-.-r Dv-'/JII6Jú ~ N A PNRD 06-018 Map prepared December 20, 2006 ü' z.~ cø cn-l co 11 8 ~-I .. N or- ~ m ~ 0 o-a; . I .8 (0 Q)'õ 0 ~ E .- ... d ... ,I B o Q) Q c! .3E :I a::: 11 ·E z ~l !. -0 a. ! cnü CI. CI CI. ~ t o I c: I t ¡ I I I I I I I IIiiIij-~- ! I "II 'j'iûóò"'"'~ ] 3 3 Pij- ¡euo:) tZ-o J I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I ______________________________________ ------------------_____--1 Æunoo eeqocpNlfO ----------------------------- A petition of St. Lucie Oaks Commercial, LLC, for a Change in Zoning from the CG (Commercial General) and PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development) Zoning District to the PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Devetopment-St. Lucie Oaks ~ommercial) Zoning District and Preliminary Planned Development Site Plan 321 37 3 9 ~ILLI~SBURG WAY 15 16 a: 0 17 ~ ...J 11 12 8 < ð 16 ~ :I: .... 3: 19 ~ W z 3: 20 :I: C) :¡: en 10 ::) en 21 a: o w ~ ~ æ w :I: 14 6 13 12 26 a: ë3 ~ § CD .... ~ 3: :I: C) :¡: en ::) en NSLRDD CANAL NO. 28 NSLRDD CANAL NO. 28 2 ~ c::. ~ .". ~ F! 21 22 23 3 2 27 .H.S! 26 24 25 23 24 4 22 : ~22 21 I- 20 5 ~21 19 46 § 20 16 7 (.) 19 17 8 18 16 9 17 15 10 16 14 11 15 13 12 14 15 16 ff 18 8 7 6 5 4 PNRD 06-018 Legend ~ Subject property 5l:-~~~~ ~tÆ~D9fNF~ N A Map prepared December 20, 2006 16 15 14 7 ~ 13 3 8 ~ ., ^ 111, riJ 12 5 C!) 11 St. L Zoning --=J "36 131' ~ ~k38 1 ...1 ~--;- [:....1 ~ t ~1 ~ 38 :;-JIIffj" 6 '[40 7 6 ~ ~ 2 37 , ~ f~l¡-l~ 1 8 I~ 7 -- --... ..---' 3 {02 T ~ SANDBERG LN 1;3 ~ 161 4 I 5 I 6 1 ;;- 160 ¡.....-- -\1, 3 7 145 15 ,^ - RS-4 ~ r 2 2 8 ~ '1~ -;;;1 1 10 I 9 , 147 - 148 ~DICKINSON1TER~ '-- 155 '~~II53-II52 11151 1150 ì 149 NSLRDD CANAL NO. 28 13 32 31 / 30 ~ 22 23 l"l"I A ..._ "T 2 1 28 21 :"'" ~ - 23 2 26 25 24 PUD 22 3 23 22R.-4 20 5 21 19 46 ~~ 1-- 18 7 :::I 19 z_ 17 8 § 18 16 9 (.) 17 21 4 15 10 14 11 16 15 - 14 13 12 11 110 9 8 7 13 12 14 I 15 16 ?1' 1"1~ 19 20 21 J.~ 24 23 I -UJ I 22 :> 22 7 6 5 4 3 ,2 /'";-j~ ~}21 16 17 I 18 I ' A!D I 19 18 - 13 ~ C( r-~ 14 ...J 15 o - rJ: 14 15 ~rJ13 ! 12 ~ . 2 3 17 16 , 9 15 1 0 14 4, 5 ucie Oak , (, CG s Commercial, LLC 2 9 RM-9 WILLIAMSBURG WAY 8 a:: 16 C 15 W 17 (!) ¡! it: 18 W 14 J: cn 19 ..,j 13 { 20 CG ;¡! ð :;: w Z 11 12 a:: c :.:: Š ~ J: .... ~ ~ J: (!) :ï: -en :::I en 9 10 ~ ~ 12 101V11 1 2 345 617 89101112 21 I .... ~ I :f en :::I en "~1 1 ~ ,,~ ~ 3 Lr-- 31 5 7 ~ NSLRDD CANAL NO. 28 - 'l'//'. /' h7- ij'ffh )'//Y//h ~.~ ~~ en 2 4 CG "" r-- \ "'r! -- !'-. 1 \ \. . RS-4 :~ 2 .\ 5 41 138 2 ~ ¢.o~Q~ '- 3 1 ~~~31 \ 2 ~~ 30 ~ 17 1 28 29r.'r. II 32 :\ C 1 X1 28 B23 1 ~ ~ 26 22 2~ 2 13 12 1~"':~ ~-;- , · , . r.i> l 14 10 .... 1 3 19 5 \ ~ 18 ",15 . 9'T£..:. ~ . 19 4 5 17 26 "- N A - /' ~ )' RM-5 ~ < \ 2 3 4 5, '" 8 10 7 Legend ~ Subject property S¡;-~~~~ ~rÆJII-.-r ov-~ PNRD 06-018 Map prepared December 20, 2006 St. Lucie Oaks Commercial, LLC PNRD 06-018 Legend 52::- ..L'~':e &u~~~;.. fir·"...·t/i .N"""+7emn<.f :t)"part_ Ni A w...a Subject property Map prepared December 20. 2006 -.- _.. ..... OFFICE USE ONLY DATE FILED: REVIEW FEE: . . CONCURRENCY FEE: RECEIPT NO: RECEIPT NO: - SP NUMBER: RESOLUTION NO: CERT. CAPACITY NO: AMENDED ST. LUCIE COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPTARMENT 2300 VIRGINIA A VENUE FORT PIERCE, FL 34982-5652 772-462·282~ APPLICATION FOR CHANGE IN ZONING TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (pUD, PNRD, PMUD) and CERTIFICATE OF CAPACITY DIRECTIONS Please complete the requested information and submit all items to the St. Lucie County Growth Management Department, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce. FL 34982. The proper non-refundable application fee must accompany all applications. For assistance in submitting the application, please contact the St. Lucie County Growth Management Department, Planning Division. REVIEW FEES and THRESHOLDS PRELIMINARY PLAN FINAL PLAN Required Revie~ Fu Less than 20 acres $ 1500.00 $ 500.00 + $5.00 per acre over SO acres I 20 acres to 49 acres $ 1,800.00 SO + acres $ 2,000.00 + S S.OO per acre over SO acres Concurrency Fee $200.00 $ 2S0.00 Minimum Size PUD S contisuous acres ofland under common ownership or control PNRD In Residential Land Use 10,000 square feet minimum lot size (under common ownership or control) In Commercial Land Use 20,000 square feet minimum lot size (under common ownership or control) In Industrial Land Use 20,000 square feet minimum lot size (under common ownership or control) In Mixed Land Use 20.000 square feet minimum lot size (under common ownersbip or control) PMUD 1 acre ofland per proposed Jand use within a Planned Mixed Use DeveloDment under common ownersbin or control Plat Fee I (no improvements) N/A $2S0.00 I Planned Development Extension I $300.00 I Initial submission shall include the followinS: I) One (1) original of the completed site plan application. 2) Twenty (20) copies of the site plan graphics. (24 inches by ,36 inches sheets) 3) Twenty (20) copies of the landscape plan. 4) Twenty (20) copies of the required boun~ary and topographic survey. S) Five (5) copies of the Transportation Impact Report (if applicable). 6) Five (5) copies of the Environmental Impact Report (if applicable). 7) Five (5) copies of the Preliminary Drainage Data. 8) Two (2) copies of Aerial. 9) One (1) copy of the St. Lucie County Property Appraiser Tax Map (Scale 1:200) with property under petition highlighted EXlpBIT H to Response to Letter from DRC dated 1019106 ST. LUCIE OAKS COMMERCIAL NO. 06-Ø18 NOV 08 2006 All applications for a Planned Development must be completed and filed with the Department before 4:30 PM each business day to meet 'applicable filing deadlines. For an application submission to be determined complete, all required materials must be present at the time of submission. ~ PROJECT INFORMATION LOCATION/SITE ADDRESS U.S. Highway One, Port St. Lucie, FLorida PUDIPNRDIPMUD NAME St. Lucie Oaks Commercial, PNRD PROPERTY TAX ID NUMBERS Parcel 1 : 3422-211-0013-000-7 Parcels 2 & 3: 3422-211-0002-000-7 LEGAL DESC~ION (attach extra sheets if necessary) See attached Addendum "A" . I SECTION 122 TOWNSHIP 36 ~GE 40 PARCEL SIZE ACRES 14.58 acres SQUARE FOOTAGE 199,504.8 ¡ZONING DISTRICT CG & PNRD ...AND USE CLASSIFICATION MXD ~ESCRIPTION OF PRQJECT Construction of a hotel: 4 stories, not to exceed 88 rooms. ; Construction of a retail/office building: 2 stories, approximately 13,600 square feet. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION (Check ] RESIDENTIAL ER OF RESIDENTIAL all appropriate boxes) lJNITS/SUBDMDED LOTS [ yI ] COMMERCIAL "OTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE approximately 69,600 [ ] INDUSTRIAL rrOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE [ ] OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) NUMBER AND SIZE OF N/A QUTPARCELS (IF APPLICABLE) , DESCRIBE THE REASON FOR A portion of the property is zoned CG & a portion is zoned PNRD as part of the rrHE REQUESTED CHANGE IN adjacent St. Lucie Oaks residential. PNRD is required for the construction/operation 01 ~ONING ,"-'.L,' , IS THE PROPOSED REZONING IN CONFLICT WITH ANY PORTION OF THE ST. LUCIECOUNTV LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE OR THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN? _..,--_.._-_._.~ .,-.- -.-,,- ...---. ., . _.... _........,..~.~....-..-..~,...~.... .~-.._--~ ......._.....~....._~.... .'_._~~" "--.,. .....-.. .....--...---......... ,'-"-.,_..._. .....,.-..-.-. --.'.--...,...-.... -.-.-... .-... ..~..-- .........-........, .~....~-~-.."'_...... '.~.~ -." ¡No. - ... ~...-..."--.,,. ..... .. . . .....".,"...-....,.. ..-..... ,.-...""......---.-..... .....-,..._.. .... -,-~"'--_..~.' ..---._....~.-....-. .. ... ....~._..........~.._._._.. .·..._'..N_M___..._.._...______.....__..........~ . '''~'-''''.'- "'" _·_·_···._···................._h.. ".. ....~....._~__ _ . .... _'._.... _..Þ ...., The following information you provide is very important in determining the outcome of your Rezoning request It is required by tb,e St Lucie Land Development Code that appropriate findings be made to justify a Rezoning approvaL Please use additional pages, if necessary, to justify your request 1.) Describe the reason for the requested change in zoning: ..-._....._....~.....~~....-...'.....__..._........¥..._.>..¥._,- ,......... -·¥···-..··'_····,··,···_·._·..,·_______,_·_.v,_·....~._........_'..._.._....~. ..-_-··___...___·,_...·.._~....'_4....._............¡... ..,_.....~.,... _. '__." ...._..'..~ "''''....__..,.,~~.........._..'...4._ ...._....._... _..._ ........_........_.._._..., ;A portion of the property is currently zoned PNRD' as part of the adjoining St. Lucie Oaks residential apartment complex. ;The remaining portion is CG having previously been the site of a McDonald's restaurant and vacant land attached to :SunTrust. Applicant's intended use of the property as a hotel and a retail/office building can best be sited and developed ' :under a common PNRD zoning. ' .....n........__..... .... ..___h"._ -.'''--''- -.. ·.'·.n.·..·._·_· -". ···....··,·...·_·r_. .-, ..--......-.-...-.-.-._..__._..~.____ ··....·-···..,·_.·__.·~_.__._·..._.._.~_·_a_ _.____ ."_a._~.__""'_' ,...._.. "___'~~' ._._....._.._....~__.,__.__.~.~....__.._...__._ ~___ ." ...,.........A.,. .._.: 2.) Is the proposed rezoning in conflict with any portion of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code or the St. Luice County Comprehensive Plan? ~_.__.~.._........,-......_.-.-.-_.... ._-~._-................._-..--._.. _.._-... .._.-..........._.._...._-_.---...._._~~----....._--_._..._----_.._---.._,~..__.... _.-._~._..'....._..~-_.__........~_......~_....__.,. .~-'.,~-_........_. "-.-." No ~..... "'-"--'".-'.' ,. ...-...-.-..~.-.-.-..-.,..._-..-.-~-..-.. .-~..".-.. .._~. ........~.-.....~...,_.-~...~-........_.-..--.._.,,-._~-_.._--.-..----..---·--------_·..··_....._·.....___...._.__.'A_~..........~__~....'_..._'"........"......_._._,,_..-..__._ ._......__..~._ _ 3.) How is the proposed change in zoning compatible with the existing uses in the area? ._'_..._--......-...-_..~..~_.__~.. ...~..._______~... .__....~.~.. '. ._...w~.____.___,...~__...___.....___.._.....____~__._.~__.______.___............_~_ '.,~..,..... ........__......_...._._ __.._... _ ~.~.___~...__.._...__....__, ____~.._~.... .._......~.~. . iTo the West is St. Lucie Oaks Residential which is zoned PNRD and which is a multi building and multi storied rental ¡housing development. Across US 1 to the East is vacant land zoned CG. To the South is SunTrust and a shopping icenter zoned CG. Immediately to the North is a canal and to the North of it is vacant land zoned CG. ,.' -_._~. ..., .-.-...-.. ....... .'~'" "-"'~.~_...,." _...._..~_...._.._-- .__..þ.._-'_.._._-_....._...þ'._.._..---"'..._._~..._.._.----_....-.............. ...... ...-.-. .....'.-.....,....,...-,. .,'.".-....-.--.- . ~-... ,.....-,..--.....-.....--.-.. .,..... ........-~.. ,4:~~~W .~s~~.p~~.P.()s.e~_~.~~~. in, ~~~~,~~p~~ib~!_~~~._~e L~d Us~ d~i~tion _~_~~~ pro~?___.._______.,...._____, _.. _... ..... ._.. :The existing land use designation is Mixed Use Development (MXD) which allows the requested zoning designation and : intended, uses of the property. .. '".. - .,'" ...... .~,. ....... ....- .,,-.. ... .... .......~--.-.._.._._.,-......_---_.._--_........-,---_.__._.__.,--_·__··_.._··_..~.·_..···___··....,....r_. ___....~.. ,_ ..__.....~.~_....."._._'u .....,,__~..__......._.. ......____,......._....~__...__. ..'_...__. ~'~."."" -- .._...,..-.,~........-. ....,."..-.-. ,..-......."........ ,".-... ~.,.'..,.. .... .." ..-..... ,.~,.. ..,.,.............-.....-...-..-.... ._.,~....«.. -'.-.. -,._,..._~.._.....'.....".~...,..,.__..,...._.... ~......._--_.,--,_..--.... ~-.,......~....... -_.~".._..' ....-.~'"'.....__. .._,.--..........,_. ',.., '....'0...., '.'~...._..._.._. . .~..'..~.,....".... _ .. S.) What conditions have changed in the immediate area that wammts consideration of this change in zoning? ¡The former McDonald's restaurant has been removed from a portion of the property. The owner has acquired 3 parcels which are, together, of sufficient size to allow the intended development of the property. . ·'~""_"''''..n_.'.~.....," ,__....,...."....._.'" ....._._.. .'.._..~.....~.._~........"..._ ..........'. '. ...-~.._.....~.....' ~...,.- ....__.......__......,....,-. ._......_....._~.... ._._......_,... ..____._.._'...~,.~._..__..._ ..._..'. ~ ._... '~"~"''''''~'. .. .....,.._,..... ...~~. ~..',..,......._...~.. ".__.. .....".....,. __ ,. 6.) What are the anticipated impacts of the proposed rezoning on the existing and future public facilities in this area? ...._.._~.... ._~....... ....-, .-... .~. . --~-"- .- .,... .- ...~.."....-._" .~.._.~-. _.._~~ .,....._,-,..... ....-.........,-....-.-.---....-. -'---"~'---"-----..,--"--,,,,-,.....-.._--.-,-- .. -~.._-..-_.'"_..... _.~~.. ..-..~-_._...__..."^.-. -.... ..- ..- '."--'-þ .' '" ¡Any impacts will be minimal with the greatest impact being on water and sewer facilities. It is expected that there is ¡sufficient capacity within the Port St. Lucie System to support the intended project. ---...................--.......--.. '-'.'" ..-,._."-...~_..... ..._.___._. ..w·...'.._...._~._.. . __no ,. .... ._.__.__w~._ -------_._-_.,..._-~,_..~. .......-.--....----- _.__..~...-...__....._,.._---~._._-...,-_..._..._... 7.) What are the anticipated environmental impacts of the proposed rezoning? If no adverse impacts are anticipated, please expl~in why? .....-.._.y'._...~-_.. -.. - --"·---.____·_·____.______._._.._A._____.______._ ...~__.__....._........._~.._..._._...__.____..~_.........._...__...~~_.,._.~..,..._~.~.~.._.._"._~".. 'None - Most of the land is vacant and cleared (a portion was formerly a McDonald's restaurant). The remaining portion is, !vacant but has overgrowth and it is not expected that any of the growth is protected. There are no wet lands. -·-·~..··..·~_···__~..._~_......_..._..._..__..._w . ._....".,...~_. ..._.._._........._....._... ......_......__. ~.~.,....,,_....__.._. . '..___.._ __...~.__._.._.....~....... .. ._......_..._..~....,.,..., .., ..... "'.._~._,.., ... ,_ .'._........._.,.'..~'...-..._........,..~...- ..~.._.._. ',-' ...~.. - , ~J~~.I~.~~p.r~~~~E.~~~~~~..r_~~~I!_~~..~r.~~,~~.~~. !~~i~~~v_~~p.~~!.1!.Patt~.,?_~le~~~p.~~~: ".,.. ""_''',. ..."., ,.__. . ".', __ Yes - The Property fronts on US Highway 1 and will have the retail/ office building closest to the highway with the hotel in . .1e rear. The adjoining lands to the South are fully developed as various commercial enterprises as are those lands to ¡the North along US1 which are developed. The intended uses are permitted by CG but the hotel and retail/office building !can best be sited and developed under the PNRD zoning. .... .'_."...,~_....~......~ ..."........... .........~..... ....._..~..._~. ...__..._·_~·_......·..·.__.4.·.... ST. LUCIE COUNTY APPLICATION FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CHECKLIST H.we you shown or provided the following required infol"l113tion: BOUNDAR\' & TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION: (Refer to Section 11.02.09(A )(2). SI. Lucie C "limy LlI11d Development Codc") 'l'es No Aerial Photograph (subject propc11y highlig.hted)" X Ü)cation Sketch X Boundary/Topographic, Survey X Positive O\ltfall X Floodplain X . Drainage Basin Boundaries , X Preliminary. SFWMD Permit Data X SITE PLAN INFORMATtON: (Refer \0 Sec1ion 11.02.09(A)(3). SI. Lucie ~ounlY Land Development Code) Yes No Yes No Location. Dimension. and Setbacks for al\ Parking & Loading Areas buildings X X Idcntification of maximum buildable area under WaterlWastcw¡¡ter Facilities reVIew X X Identification of all easements Identification of all Drainage Facilities X X I dent ification of adjacent driveways Location of'al\ Streets X X Locatiol, of all open space!"> X Landscaping Plan X Lighting Plan y Phasing Plan X TranSpOl1!1tion Impact Repol1 v Environmenwllmpact Repol1 * X Vegwllion Removal Plan * Sea Tunle Prolection Plan X X ] f YOll answered po to any of the above qttestions. please explain in the space below: * See the "Veqetation and Listed Species Assessment" report. This is not a phased development. (However, construction on the 2 buildings will not start at tne same ~1me) Th;~ property is not located on or near the water. SPECIAL NOTICE (PLEASE READ BEFORE SIGNING ACKNOWLEDGMENTS BELOW) Submission of this application does not constitute the granting of approval. All appropriate requirements must be met prior to this Jroject being presented for approval to the appropriate authority. St. Lucie County reserves the right to request additional infonnation to ensure a complete review of this project. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Applicant Information (property Developer) Name: St. Lucie Oaks Commercial, LLC Address: 5035 SE Federal Highway Stuart, FL 34997 Agent Information Name: Robert A. Burson, Esq. Address: Post Office Box 1620 Stuart, FL 34995 Phone: 772-781-3260 Fax: 772-781-3188 Phone: 772-286-1616 Fax: 772-286-5257 Property Owner Information This application will not be considered complete without the notarized signature of all DrODertv owners of record, which shall serve as an acknowledgment of the su is application for site plan approval. The property owner's signature below shall also serve as authorization ti e above applicant or en to ac behalf of said property owner. roperty Owner Signature M . . dd 5035 SE Federal Highway alhng,!Å ress: Stuart, FL 34997 Phone: 772-781-3260 Brasilino Filipe, managing member Property Owner Name (please Print) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF M~rti n The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 1i'" ,Qmçt.ºs.~()~Y Projept Reviewer: day of No "'ember ,20..0.6--> by 2rasilino Filipe who is personally known to me o~ Àa¡ pr~ DRCRcWiew: ^PJ»'OVaI Date: Coninlents: ~~ ~¿f4-- Signature of Notary ROBERT A. BURSON Type or Print Name of Notary Notary Public Title ROBERT A. BURSoN COMMISSION' DO 377319 EXPIRES: JlnU8/)' 3', 2009 Bar1CIId 'IIwu NoIIry............. Commission Number {Seal) Page 1 of 5 LEGAL DESCRIPTION - ST. LUCIE OAKS COMMERCIAL PNRD General DescriDtions: Parcel 1 is a portion of the original adjoining roadway to St. Lucie Oaks Apartments and was previously identified in the deed to the owner as "PARCEL 4: (Commercial Area less entrance roadway ") Parcel 2 is the former McDonald's restaurant site. Parcel 3 is formerly a portion of the SunTrust Bank property. Parcell.D. Numbers: Parcel 1: Parcels 2 and 3: 3422-211-0013-000-7 3422-211-0002-000-7 land Sizes: Parcel 1: Parcel 2: Parcel 3: Total: 1.55 acres + /- 1.887 acres + /- 1 .143 acres + /- 4.58 acres + /- ADDENDUM "A" - LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF ST. LUCIE OAKS COMMERCIAL Page 2 of 5 Parcel 1 A portion of the Northeast ~ of the Northwest ~ of Section 22, Township 36 South, Range 40 East being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Southeast corner of the Northeast ~ of the Northwest ~ of said Section 22; . thence North 89° 49' 00" West along the South line of said Southeast ~ of the Northeast ~ of the Northwest ~ a distance of 589.64 feet; thence North 00° 07' 00" East parallel with the East line of said Northwest ~ of Section 22 a distanqe of 1150 feet to the Point of Beginning of the hereinafter described parcel of land; thence continue North 00° 07' 00" East, a distance of 104.72 feet to a point, said point being the back of an existing 2 foot valley curb; thence North 34° 09' 21" East ~Iong the existing back of curb a distance of 1 .33 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Southeast having a radius of 82.10 feet; thence Northeasterly 74.76 feet along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 54° 10' 24" to the end of said curve; thence South 89° 45' 49" East continuing along said back of curb a distance of 36.54 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Southwest, having a radius of 100.18 feet; thence Southeasterly 44.56 feet along the arc of said curve through a central a"ngle ,of 25 ° 29' 00" to the beginning of a reverse curve concave to the North, having a radius of 50.15 feet; thence Easterly 51 .87 feet along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 59° 15' 36" to the end of said curve; thence North 70° 26' 03" East continuing along said back of curb a distance of 35.48 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the South, having a radius of 28.81 feet; thence Northeasterly 13.80 feet along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 27° 26' 51" to the end of said curve; ADDENDUM "A" - LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF ST. LUCIE OAKS COMMERCIAL Page 3 of 5 thence North 83 ° 30' 00" East departing said back of curb a distance of 79.78 feet; thence South 89° 57' 34" East along the existing back of curb, a distance of 66.39 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the South, having a radius of 104.67 feet; thence Southeasterly 39.71 feet along the arc of said cu~ve through a central angle of 21 ° 44' 12" to the beginning of a compound curve concave to the Southwest having a radius of 273.01 feet; thence Southeasterly 59.42 feet along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 12° 28' 11" to the beginning of a reverse curve concave to the Northeast, having a radius of! 1 00.00 feet; thence Southeasterly 39.81 feet along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 22° 48' 30" to the end of said curve, said point being the end of the existing 2 foot valley curb; thence South 89 ° 53' 00" East a distanFe of 7.1 5 feet; thence South 00° 07' 00" West, a distance of 105.74 feet; thence North 89° 49' 00" West, a distance of 523.45 feet to the point of beginnìng. All lying and situate in St. Lucie County, Florida. Containing within said bounds 67,627 square feet or 1.55 acres. ADDENDUM" A" - LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF ST. LUCIE OAKS COMMERCIAL Page 4 of 5 Parcel 2: A portion of the Northeast y.. of the Northwest y.. of Section 22, Township 36 South, Range 40 East being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Southeast corner of the Northeast y.. of-the Northwest % of said Section 22; thence North 89° 49' 00" West along the South line of said Southeast y.. of the Northeast y.. of the Northwest y.. a distance of 589.64 feet; thence North 00 07' 00" East parallel with the East line of said Northwest y.. of Section 22 a distance of 1000.00 feet to the Point of Beginning of the hereinafter described parcel of land; thence continue North 0° 07' 00" East 150.00 feet; thence South 89° 49' 00" East 547.45 feet to the Westerly right of way line of U.S. Highway No.1; I thence South 0° 07' 00" West along said right of way line a distance of 150.00 feet; thence North 890 49' 00" West a distance of 547.45 feet to the Point of Beginning. ADDENDUM II A II - LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF ST. LUCIE OAKS COMMERCIAL Page 5 of 5 Parcel 3 The West 249.00 feet of the following described parcel as follows: For a point of reference commence at the Southeast corner of the Northeast * of the Northwest * of Section 22, Township 36 South, Range 40 East (according to the plat of River Park, Unit 1, as recorded in Plat Book 10, page 69, St. Lucie County, Florida); thence go North 89 ° 49' 00" West on the South line of said Northeast % a distance of 589.64 feet; thence North 00° 07' 00" East parallel with the East line of said Northwest *800 feet to the Point of Beginning, thence continue North 00° 07' 00" East, 200 feet; thence South 89° 49' 00" East 547.45 feet to the Westerly Right-of-Way of U.S. '1, I thence South 00° 07' 00" West along said Westerly Right-of-Way of U.S. #1 95.51 feet; thence South 01 ° 16' 48" East along said Westerly Right-of-Way of U.S. '1 104.52 feet; thence North 89° 49' 00" West, 550.00 feet to the point of beginning. All lying and situate in St. Lucie County, Florida. Containing 1.143 acres more or less F:\E\LAND USE\ST LUCIE OAKS\05-297\LEGAL DESCRIPTION-01 B REVISED 09/08/06 McDonalds ADDENDUM "AU - LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF ST. LUCIE OAKS COMMERCIAL 1 RESOLUTION NO. 07-002 2 FILE NO.: PUD 08-018 3 4 5 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CHANGE IN ZONING OF A 4.58 ACRE (MORE 6 OR LESS) PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF SOUTH U.S. 7 HIGHWAY NO.1, APPROXIMATELY 1,500 FEET NORTH OF RIOMAR DRIVE 8 FROM THE CG (COMMERCIAL, GENERAL) AND PNRD (PLANNED NON- 9 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT - ST. LUCIE OAKS) ZONING DISTRICTS TO THE 10 PNRD (PLANNED NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT - ST. LUCIE OAKS 11 COMMERCIAL) ZONING DISTRICT AND PRELIMINARY PLANNED 12 DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN 13 AS ST. LUCIE OAKS COMMERCIAL - PNRD, AND CONSISTING OF A FOUR - 14 STORY, 88-ROOM HOTEL AND APPROXIMATELY 10,200 SQUARE FEET OF 15 RESTAURANT/OFFICE SPACE. 16 17 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the 18 testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following 19 determinations: 20 21 1. St. Lucie Oaks Commercial, LLC, through agent Robert A. Burson, Esq., presented 22 a petition for a a Change in Zoning from the CG (Commercial General) and PNRD 23 (Planned Non-Residential District - St. Lucie Oaks) Zoning Districts to the PNRD 24 (Planned Non-Residential Development - St. Lucie Oaks Commercial) Zoning District, 25 and Preliminary Planned Development Site Plan approval for the project to be known 26 as St. Lucie Oaks Commercial- PNRD, and consisting of a four-story, 88 room hotel 27 and approximately 10,200 square feet of restaurant I office space. The proposed 28 project is located on the west side of US Highway 1, approximately 1500 feet north of 29 Riomar Drive in Port St. Lucie. 30 31 2. On February 15,2007, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a 32 public' hearing, of which due public notice was published and mailed to all property 33 owners within 500 feet of the subject property at least 10 days prior to the hearing, and 34 recommended to the Board of County Commissioners that Preliminary Planned Non- 35 Residential Development Site Plan approval for the project to be known as St. Lucie 36 Oaks Commercial- PNRD, be granted. 37 38 3. . On March 6, 2007, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing a 39 notice of such hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of 40 the subject property at least 10 days prior to the public hearing. 41 42 4. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent properties, the 43 character of the neighborhood, utility facilities or other matters affecting the public 44 health, safety, and general welfare. 45 46 5. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect on the proposed 47 project on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping and 48 screening. File No.: PNRD I PUD-06-018 March 6. 2007 Resolution No. 07-002 Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 6. The proposed project will be constructed, arranged and operated so as not to interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable district regulations. 7. The proposed project lies within the Urban Service Boundary and will be served through the Port St. Lucie Utility Systems, and the applicant has received conformation from that agency that availability exists. 8. The Development Review Committee has found that the proposed project meets all technical requirements and is consistent with the future land use maps of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. The proposed project is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. Pursuant to Section 11.02.04(A) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the Preliminary Planned Non-Residential Development project to be known as St. Lucie Oaks Commercial - PNRD, is hereby approved as depicted on the site plan drawings for the project 'prepared by Thomas Lucido and Associates., last revis$d on October 26, 2006, and date 'stamped received by the St. Lucie County Growth Management Director on November 8, 2006, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of a St. Lucie County Vegetation Removal Permit, the applicant must provide ERD with a final wetland determination, delineation, and avoidance I minimization I mitigation measures approved by jurisdictional agencies. 2. Prior to issuance of a SLC Vegetation Removal Permit, the applicant must provide ERD with a copy of a draft Eastern indigo snake protection plan, adherent to FWS guidelines, for our review. The plan, once approved, must be adhered to during all vegetation removal and construction activities. 3. The applicant will relocate as many of the smaller oaks from the site to the adjacent residential site and work with the County ERD through the mitigation process. t The applicant will be required to construct an upland buffer around the detention pond (1 square feet of buffer per linear foot of shoreline) with bald cypress, red maple, cabbage palm, sand cordgrass, etc.... 5. The applicant will provide a note on the site plan stating the developer will provide the crosswalks if FDOT does not prior to final approval. 6. Handrails are to be installed and noted on the final site plan along the front sidewalk prior to final approval. File No.: PNRD I PUD-06-018 March 6, 2007 Resolution No. 07-002 Page 2 1 7. 2 3 4 8. 5 6 7 8 B. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 Prior to the Final PUD approval, the developer, his successor or assign shall provide an updated Transportation Impact Report. The boundary lines of the survey shall be shown with a bold solid line, and the size of the foul'1d concrete monument at the southwest comer of the parcel must be indicated on the Final Site Plan prior to final approval. The property on which this site plan approval is being granted is described as follows: PARCEL 1:' A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST Y. OF THE NORTHWEST % OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST % OF THE NORTHWEST Y. OF SAID SECTION 22; THENCE NORTH 89E 49' 00" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST Y. OF THE NORTHEAST Y. OF THE NORTHWEST Y. A DISTANCE OF 589.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00E07' 00" EAST PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST % OF SECTION 22 A DISTANCE OF 1150 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH OOE 07' 00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 104.72 FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING THE BACK OF AN EXISTING 2 FOOT VALLEY CURB; THENCE NORTH 34E 09' 21" EAST ALONG THE EXISTING BACK OF CURB A DISTANCE OF 1.33 FEET TO tHE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 82.10 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 74.76 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 54E 10' 24" TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE SOUTH 89E 45' 49" EAST CONTINUING ALONG SAID BACK OF CURB A DISTANCE OF 36.54 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 100.18 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 44.56 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25E 29' 00" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTH, HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.15 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY 51.87 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 59E 15' 36" TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE NORTH 70B 26' 03" EAST CONTINUING ALONG SAID BACK OF CURB A DISTANCE OF 35.48 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH, HAVING A RADIUS OF 28.81 FEET; , THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 13.80 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 27B 26' 51" TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE NORTH 83E 30' 00" EAST DEPARTING SAID BACK OF CURB A DISTANCE OF 79.78 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89E 57' 34" EAST ALONG THE EXISTING BACK OF CURB, A DISTANCE OF 66.39 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH, HAVING A RADIUS OF 104.67 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 39.71 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE FUe No.: PNRD I PUD-06-018 March 6. 2007 Resolution No. 07-002 Page 3 1 THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 21 E 44' 12" TO THE BEGINNING OF A 2 COMPOUND CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 3 273.01 FEET; 4 THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 59.42 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 5 THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12E 28' 11" TO THE BEGINNING OF A 6 REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 100.00 7 FEET; 8 THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 39.81 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 9 THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22E 48' 30" TO THE END OF SAID CURVE, 10 SAID POINT BEING THE END OF THE EXISTING 2 FOOT VALLEY CURB; 11 THENCE SOUTH 89E 53' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 7.15 FEET; 12 THENCE SOUTH OOE 07' 00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 105.74 FEET; 13 THENCE NORTH 89E 49' 00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 523.45 FEET TO THE POINT 14 OF BEGINNING. 15 ALL LYING AND SITUATE IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. 16 CONTAINING WITHIN SAID BOUNDS 67,627 SQUARE FEET OR 1.55 ACRES. 17 18 PARCEL 2: 19 20 A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST Y4 OF THE NORTHWEST Y4 OF SECTION 22, 21 TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST BEING MORE PARTICULARLY 22 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 23 24 COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST Y4 OF THE 25 NORTHWEST Y4 OF SAID SECTION 22; 26 THENCE NORTH 89E 49' 00" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID 27 SOUTHEAST Y4 OF THE NORTHEAST Y4 OF THE NORTHWEST Y4 A DISTANCE OF 28 589.64 FEET; 29 THENCE NORTH OE 07' 00" EAST PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID 30 NORTHWEST Y4 OF SECTION 22 A DISTANCE OF 1000.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF 31 BEGINNING OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND; 32 THENCE CONTINUE NORTH OE 07' 00" EAST 150.00 FEET; 33 THENCE SOUTH 89E 49' 00" EAST 547.45 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF 34 WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO.1; 35 THENCE SOUTH OE 07' 00" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE 36 OF 150.00 FEET; 37 THENC~ NORTH 89E 49' 00" WEST A DISTANCE OF 547.45 FEET TO THE POINT 38 OF BEGINNING. 39 40 PARCEL 3: 41 42 THE WEST 249.00 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL AS 43 FOLLOWS: 44 45 FOR A POINT OF REFERENCE COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 46 THE NORTHEAST Y4 OF THE NORTHWEST Y4 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 36 47 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST (ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF RIVER PARK, UNIT 1, 48 AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10, PAGE 69, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA); File No.: PNRD I PUD-06-018 March 6. 2007 Resolution No. 07-002 Page 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 THENCE GO NORTH 89E 49' 00" WEST ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST % A DISTANCE OF 589.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH ODE 07' 00" EAST PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST % 800 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE CONTINUE NORTH ODE 07' 00" EAST, 200 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89E 49' 00" EAST 547.45 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT -oF- WAY OF U.S. #1, THENCE SOUTH ODE 07' 00" WEST ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF U.S. #1 95.51 FEET; THENCE SOUTH DiE 16' 48" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF U.S. #1 104.52 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89E 49' 00" WEST, 550.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALL LYING AND SITUATE IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 1.143 ACRES MORE OR LESS C. This Preliminary Planned Non-Residential Development Site Plan approval shall expire on March 6, 2009, unless an extension is granted in accordance with Section 11.02.06(8)(3), St. Lucie County Land Development Code or Final Planned Development Site Plan Approval has been granted. . D. The Preliminary Planned Non-Residential Development Site Plan approval granted under this Resolution is specifically conditioned to the requirement that the petitioner, St Lucie Oaks Commercial, LLC, through agent Robert A. Burson, Esq., including any successors in interest, shall obtain all necessary development permits and construction authorizations from the appropriate State and Federal regulatory authorities, including but not limited to: the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and the South Florida Water Management District, prior to the issuance of any local building permits of authorizations to commence development activities on the property described in Part 8. E. The conditions set forth in Part A are an integral non-severable part of the site plan approval granted by this Resolution. If any condition set forth in Part A is determined to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason and the developer declines to comply voluntarily with that condition, the site plan approval granted by this Resolution shall become null and void. F. A copy of this Resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described in Part A, which plan shall be placed on file with the St. Lucie County Growth Management Director. G. A copy of this Resolution shall be mailed, return receipt requested to the developer and agent of record as identified on the site plan applications. H. This Resolution shall be recorded in the Public Records of St. Lucie County. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: File No.: PNRD I PUD-06-018 March 6. 2007 Resolution No. 07-002 Page 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ' I 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 Chairman Chris Craft XXX Vice-Chairman Joseph E. Smith XXX Commissioner Doug Coward XXX Commissioner Charles Grandy XXX Commissioner Paula A. Lewis XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 6th day of March, 2007. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS Deputy Clerk County Attorney File No.: PNRD I PUD-06-018 March 6, 2007 Resolution No. 07-002 Page 6 2 3 Exhibit A 4 5 6 Maps 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 File No.: PNRD I PUD-06-018 March 6. 2007 Resolution No. 07-002 Page 7 s. CG COMMERCIAL GENERAL .... . .. 1,. Purpose The purpose of this district is to provide and protect an' environment suitable fora Wide variety of comrrletcialusesintended to "rve a population..over aJargemark"arell.vlhict)cIonotim~ undesii'ablènolSe. vibration. odor. dust. or offensive effeds on the sUrrOûhding are, together wiUJ '. such other uses as may be necessary to .¡¡nd compatible.wJtt1'~1 êommercialsurroúr1dings~;: The number in ·0· following each identified use cOrtespcmds·to ttleiSlC code í'eference descnbed in Section 3.01.02(8). The number 999 applies 10 a'use not defined under the SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this code. ' . . . " . 2. . ':Permitted Uses' a. ' b. ·c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k. I. mJ n. o. p. q. r. s. t. u. v. w. y. . z. aa. bb. cc. del. ee. ff. '.. . x. Adjustment/collection & Credit· reporting :setviçes (732)' Advértising (731) ." ¡. . .~. Amphit~aters (iii) . "': .' ".' .' :,.... '.:"'.' . Amuseinei'rtS·& recreation serviC8S'·- øxèe'pt stadiums~åreoas. race ttácks. amusement parks and bingo parlors '(71):. . . '.~ ;.. . . Apparel & accessory stores (51) ;. . Automobile dealers (15) . .;,.. .. '., 1 Automotive rental, repairs & servo (exœpl bòdÿ:tepaits) u5~;_1s4) Beauty and barber services (mI724)" . . .- . Building materials, hardware and garden supply CS2) , . Cleaning serviCes 7348)' ,. . Commercial printing (lilt , . . Communlcatiòns - except towers (41) '. Computer programming, data processing'& othet cOnìputer serv~"(737)' :.. Contract construction servo (office & interior stØrågB only) (15f1M7) . Cultural activities and nature exhibitions (Ø) Duplicating. mailing. commercial artlphoto. & stenòg.. serv..Þ33J " . Eating places (511) Educational services - except public schools (I2J Engineering. accounting, research. management & related services (17) 'Equipment rental and leasing servïces·(735) '" ....; Executive, legislative. and judiCial functions (9111M311M115111m) Farm labor and manageinent services (071) Anancial. insurance, and real estate .....~ Food stores (54) .... Funeral and crematory services-(72l)' Gasoline service stations (5511) General merchandise stores cu) Health services (10) Home fumiture and fumishings (S7) Landscape & horticultural serviœs (1171) . '.. Laundry, cleaning and garment services (721) Membership organizations - except for religious organizations as pròvided in Section 8.02.01 (H) of this code (81) Miscellaneous retan (see SIC Code Major Group 59): (1). . Drug stores CSI1) (2) USed'merchandise stores (ØI) . (3) Sporting goods (SIN1) ." .. VI: ..: . ., ..::::"" " ..' ',: . ~ . . . ".: ¡;. " " ... ..' :: \r!..· . . . . .' '. ~'. gg. .- ,," ." . ',' . ,:,': .'. ',- .: 3·29 . ". '. ...~. . ..$....:. t, . - RIMsed~œI1MM St. L.ude CounI1 ~ ~.... Coda ......__'.1990 s. CG COMMERCIAL. GENERAL " , 1.. Purpose The purpose of this district is to provide and proted an' environment suitable for a Wide variety of. còmmercialusesintendedto ,serve apopulationoyeralargen1ør1(_1irea,WhichdQnotimpose undesirable noise. vibration. odor. dust. or offensive 'effedSon'1hê'súrröuhdJng,are~ together with. such' other uses as may bfJnecessary .toandçompatibløWJtìt..gêtî8taI êorrim.rê1àlsuiTourKIIngs~ ' The number in ·0· following each identified use cOrtesponds'to theiSlC code í'eference described in Section 3.01.02(8). The number 999 applies to a use not defin'8d under the SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this code. ' " ' , '. ' .. " ." 2. ;Permitted Uses, ...... a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k. I. m. n. o. p. q. r. s.. t. u. v. w. x. y. 'z. aa. bb. cc. dd. ee. ff. gg. AdjustmeriVcollection & credit'reporting :seiViçes (732)' Advértising (731) ." " . .' Amphitt)~aters (iii) . "': " ".' ,', :..... '.."'.' , AmusementS' & recreation servìces- B;tœpt stadiums~ åreoas. race itåcks. aJÍ1usement parks and bingo parlors17f):' ' '.; ,,:' ' Apparel & accessory stores (51) Automobile dealers (15) . or' Automotive rental. repairs & servo (excëpl bódÿ'fepaÌts) pS'i¡_1s4) Beauty and barber services (723f7M)" , . ,- ' Building materials, hardware and garden supply (S2) " .', , .. Cleaning serviCes 7M)' ~ '. . Commercial printing (181) , . . ," .' Communicatlòns - except towèrs (41) " Computer programming. data proceSSing' & Othet cOmputer serv~(t37)' c. Contract construction serv. (office & interior storåg& only) (15f1&i17) . Cultural activities and nature exhibitions (118) Dupll~ting. mailing, commercial arVphoto. & stenog~ servo .(733) , . Eating places (511) Educational services - except public schools (12) " Engineering. accounting. research. management & relatèd services (a7) ,'Equipment rental ~nd leasing ~rvIC8$(735) '.., ',; executive. legislative. and Judicial functions "1~ Farm labor and managèment servJc8s (071) Financial. insurance. and real estate ~ Food stores (54) ,- ' Funeral and crematory services f12I)' Gasoline service stations (5IW1) General merchandise stores (U) Heahh services (lOt Home fumiture and furnishings (57) Landscape & horticultural serviCes tv7I) , '.. " ',., -' , . . .:-. Laundry. cleaning and garment services (721) . Membership organizations - except for religious organizations as provided in Section 8.02.01 (H) of this code (81) Miscellaneous retan (see SIC Code Major Group 59): (1), . Drug storøs C581) (2) USed=inerchandise stores ~ ' (3) Sporting goods (SIN1) ".: fl) ..: .. .!. .": : ',: .¡ . . . .,.: ~. ,. , " ..' , . '. .':",. ',' . ..... 'f ....: 3-29 . ". '. ',. #. . ..~... .: .:. . - fMiIed~05I1s.01 S1..... Cou1Ir LMd 1M.....1eI1I c-. AiIópIMI......'. ',. 5. Off-street Parking and Loading Require.ments ~f-street parking and loading requirements are subject to Section 7.06.00. oJ. landScaping Requirements Laridscapingrequirernents'are subject to Section 7.09.OQ. . .t. . . \ .,,' . 'Conditional Usd" 7~' a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k. k. I. 8. ....,. . ' ,.: Adult' éstabrlShments subject to requirements of Sec. 7.10.10. (988) Drinking places (alcoholic beverages) ": free-standing. (5113) Disinfecting & pest control services. (73ü Amusement parks. ~ Go-cart tracks. (7188) Hotels & 'motels; (701; HousehOld goods'warehousing aridstorage-rnini-warehouses (IIi) , , '. ". ': Marina - recreatlohal boats only. (4G3) , Matm vehicle repair services - body repair. (753) Sporting and recreational camps. (7032)' ' Retail tr-.de: " . (1) liquor stores. (512)' . Stadiums, arenas, and race tracks. (7N) '.: '¡,; . ,. . Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards o"S~ction 7.10.23 (8119) " ,.' . . {. . '." . '. . AcceSsory uSes Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of SectiorT8.00.00;·and·lnclude the following: . . '. a. Drinking pJaces (alcoholic beverages as an accessorY uSe to a restaurant and/or civic, social, and fraternal organizations). . b. One single-family dwelling unit contained within the commerciai building, or a detached single,:,famlly dwelling or mobile home,(for on-site security purposes). c. Retail trade: (1) . Undis~illed alcoholic beverages (accessory to retail sale of fOod). :.h ~ . ... .... '.. . . " .. . .. . . ~ . . .; .. :.. : .... .. . : ~ '. 'to .' " . , 3-31 ". .:.. . '.. .... .: ..: . . ~ . . ... ~ 'JhrOUIh D5I'I5/tÍiI SU.ui:JeCounty ......1*......II1II Code ·~AÜult1.1·890 , ''7.02.00 . pLANNED NON~RESIDEN:rïAL DEVElÒPMENT 7.02.01 PURPOSE The Planned Non-Residential Development (PNRD) District is i!')tended to achieve non-i'esidentiallørid development of superior quality through the encouragement of fl8xibility and creativity in design options that ~ .. .: , ' A. Permìt creative approaches to the develoPment of hon-residentialland reflecting changes in the technology of land development; , B; , Allow for the efficient use of Jand. which can result in smaller networks of utilities and streets and thereby lower develoPment costs; , C. ,Allow' ,design options that encourage an environment Qf ståbl~ character. compatible 'with surróuiKting land uses; and . . ' . D. Permit, the enhancement of. neighborhoods t,hrough the preservation of natu,~al features. the provision of underground utilitiØ!¡. and the provision 6f recreation areas and open space. , ' 7.02.02 PERMmED USES . ' The following Qeneral guidelines shall be used in determining the perm,itted use possibiiities in any Planned Nonresidential Zoning Development: A. For properties located in any Residential or Agricultural classified land use are~: Any permitted. çonåttional or accessory use. inclúd~ngany standards. conditions and requtrements for those' u~8s. as identified in the Commercial~ Neigh~ood (CN); Comme~cia1. Office (CO); Institutional (I) Zoning Districts. and in the Agricuhural land use classified areas only. any. non-residential permitted or accessory use identified in the Agr,culture-1 (AG-1). Agricultural-2.5 . (AG-2.5). or AgricUltur.al-5 (AG-5) zoning dIStricts of this cocie. Telecomm,unicaUon towers must comply with the requirements of Section 7.1023. ' The general s~...çorÌd~. a~~ requirements. as', found in this Code, that pertain to conditional anti . accesSory 'uses shall ~ used in th~ é:lø~èrmination of the' cOmpatibility of the proposed use(s) with the surrounding land uses in the, review, of ~ Planned Nonr~sidential Development. All applications for Planned Nonresidentlàl DevelopmentShall include a complete identification of all pI~ned uses and actMties. . B; . For properties located in any Commercial or Industrial classified land use area: . .... ... ' ,Any perm;tled. conditional or'accessorY use. including ahy:Standards. conditions arid reciuirements' for those uses. "as identif~ in ,the Commercial. ,Neighborhood (CN);Commercial. OffIC8' (CO); Commercial. General (CG)i ,Industrial Ught (IL); IndUstrial Heavy (IH). Util~ty (U)and (I) Institutional zoning districts. and any non-residential permlttècfofaccessoryuse identified in the Agricuhure-1' (AG-1). Ag~l1ural-2.5 (AG-2.5). or Agricultural-5 (AG-~) zoni~ ålStricts of this Code- Telecommup~tion towerS ~ust comply with ~e ~irem~tS ~f SectiOh 7.1 ~~3. The general standards. conditions and';¡'equirementš: d 'found'in' this 'Code. that pertain to St. LucIe CoI!ntr ~ Dwlllopmenl CGde Adope.d AuguIt t, 1980 7-13 . . ,. RI¥IIed'JhrOUlhœlt9Oòf conditional and accessory uses shall be Used..in tJ.:ìe determin~tfon of the compatibility ,of the proposed use(s) with the surrounding land uses ih the review ~of the, Planned Nonresidential Developmenl All applications for Planned Nonresidential Dev~I~ent shall include a complete identification of all planned uses and activities. ' 7.02.03 STANDÄAÒS AND REQUiREMENTS Standards and requirements for a Planned Non-Residen~1 D,velopment shall be as follows: A.' MINIMUM SIZE The ininm1um lot siZe requirements for a Plånn'eéJ Non-Rèàident~1 ~velopment ~all be as follows: . iI_....· .., . . 1. Any Planned Nori~Residential Development in a Residential Land Use classification shall comply with the minimum lot requirements in the Coimriercial' NeighbOrhÞod (CN) Zoning District. " 2. Any P~ed Non-Residential De~elopment in a'~merëial.lndustrlal or Mixed UselalÌd Use dassmcation Shall éomply with the minimum lot, Í'equlrernents in the, Commercial 'General (CG) Zoning District. ' 3. ' 'Atl PlanneØ Non-Residential Develo~en~.shaII be ~~ common ~rshlp or con~l. , ~ ." B. DIMENSIONAl REQUIREMENTS Minimum dimensional requirements ~I be in accordance with Table 7.10 in'Sëction 7.04.01, , pÎ'Ovided..however, tl:lat the ~ of COunty Commission~ inay condition approval of a 'Planned Non-R~~DevelOpne¡'t upò\'1"cxxnpllanéè with more-.sÞ:1ngeht or restrictive dimensional requJ~ii1tpnts ii'i order to ensure'~pabbllity withsurroundln9lancf u'ses.. to mitigate Impact on the eÍ1VitorVnent aod ha~ral t8$OUrces, tQ e~re public s8fety and tQ ensure èor11p1iance with the Sl Lucie Coúnty t:OmprehensiYe Plan; and;' ".. any ~çture,on NOrth or South Hutchins~ Island that has not.been occupied. constructed, or has not ~celVed it buiklng P.enn~ site pIai1 o"r0th8r ÇoUrity éf8vetØPment-approval as a peiTnitted use p'riôrto·~"-y.1 0, 1995. Uiej'8qúirem~nts'of ~ 4.01'.00. Hutchinson Island - Building Height . ~e,rlayZon~..shatrapply.... ' ,. ' ' C. PUBLIC FACIlITIES 1. The PiaDned Non-Residential DevelOpment Shå1I be designed and loCated so there will bé no net pu~ CQSt fOf~ provis~ ofwa~er Iitles, ~ Dnes, 'storm ~ surface drainage , system$, and oVÑ!l, Utility SyStems in ~r 10 ~risure '~patibility with sÜrrbUnding land uSes..tq ~ftigat8 fmpac:t on the ~ronmer1t and ~~t'~O enSunt public safety .. ~ to ensure cornpß~ with the Sl J-ucIe CounIy-COmpreheñifYe PIañ~ ' " .... . . . . - :.' :..... ,:. .' .". 2. 'the rñbJ,n.üm '~e o.f aD wåter màins' üsed~ or ït.tèndéd for .use, 'Ji\ tlrë' Prot~ adivities is sIX (61 1nc;:heS. ' ACtual water main"i'8Qurrements \vili be detenntnecfby"the St.. Lucie ~A. P¡e~~", ~~on ~U.. ,'. " 't.ludeCOUlly.....O'-.~...nIea. .......~ 1.,19110 7-14 .......TIIñRIgh ôsnSòe , ' 3. " The minimum Size of all water mains used, or- intended for use,' in fire protection activities, that are 'løcated on a' dead-end water main Is eight (8~) inches. Actual water main , requirements will be determined by the SlluCÎe'Coooty-Fl Pierce Fire Prevention Bureau. The maximum number of fire hydrants that maybe 'located on any dead end water main is one (1). ' , " 4. fire hydrants shallbe provided at a minimum spacing øfone every six hundred (600) feet unless otherwise ápproved by the ,Sl Lucie ~unty-Ft. Pierce Fire Prevention Bureau. 'D. T~FFIC AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION , "..- .... ~ , '5." , .~ , ; p......; ". 1. Every use permitted in a Planned Non-Residential Development shall have access to a public street either directly or through an approVed priVate road, vehicular accessway, a '! ~ pedestrian way, or other area dedicated to public or private use~ ' , , 2. Principal vehicular access poinDs shall be designed to perrnitsmooth traff~ flow, wiV1 , Controlled tuming movement and minimum hazards to vehicular or pedestrian traffic. Minor streetS within the Planned Non-Residential Development sh.1I not be connected to streets outside the development So as to encourage their US8 by through traffic. , The proposed Planned Non-Residential Development shall be designed 'so that it will not create traffic COI'igestion on the arterial and COllector roads surrounding the project, or such surrouiKlingcollector or arterial roads shall' be improved so that they will not be adversely affected. ' , I Streets in a Planned Non-Residential Development may,be dedicated ,t~ public use or retained under private ownership. Said streets and associated improvements shall comply with aD pertinent County regulations and ordinances, however, variations to the standard minimum right-of-way widths may be considered as part of the PJani1ed Non-Residential Deyelopfnent if it isshoWÌ1 to P1e satisfaction of the County Commission, that the requested vañation Is '~istent with the intent of the Countÿs roadway construction standards and necessa~ for the design 01 the PIamed 'Unit Deve~enl Anÿ pedesjr¡an cirêulation system and its related walkways shall be insulated from the vehicular: street syStem. ' . ,,:' - 3: 4. .t". .. -- 6. All roads and streets shall intersect at an approximate ~o angle of ninety degrees (f;K)0) " unless circumstances acceptable tb Sl Lucie County indicate a need for a lesser angle o' intersection. 7. Street jogs or centerline offsets between any local street or road with another local streèt or road, shall b8 no less than one hundred fifty feet (150). ' The intersection of anY two local roads or streets with a Major eoilector or Arterial Roadway shaH be separated by a minimum distance of six hundred sixty feet (660), as measured ' . 'rom centerline to centerline. ' 8. 9. ' Permanent dead-end streets shan not exceed one thousand feet (1000) in length. Sl.~CcuII)'LInd D."~c-. AdDI*dMgult 1. 1890 - ~~'D5bs.v. 7-15 ..... Cul-de-sacs shall be provided at the end of all,dead end ,roads ~ streets' greater than fIVe hondred and ~(501) feet In length. The .Iength of a dead-end strøetshilll be measured 'aIong the centerline of the street from the its point of perpendicular IntersecUon with the centerline ,of Intersecting street, to the end of the ,dead-end street or roadway. All cul-de-sacs sh~11 have a minimum right-of-w~y diameter of one hundr~ (100) fèel If the dead end roådwayls five hundfed (500) feet or less in lengtl:l, a -V- or "T" type of tum around may be approvad. ' ' If a de~d end street is iemporary in nature then a, temPòråry cUl-d.saè shan be required . until the roadway is connected to another street or road. In the':center ,of· the, cul-de-sac: an U1paVed bland, surrounded ,by a curb, improved with grass aod Iand$capIng that will not irt~ttrfere with Sight distance, ,~ay bØ provided. Center islands shall have a,·diameter of not less than ~vent~n (17) .feet, unleSs otherwise approved through the review of,1he Planned Unit Development.. 10. ' : All roadways,' exclusive 0; interior. pimdng and a~ 8Jslés areas. regard1êss of ownership, shall, be located a minimum of ten (1 0) feet f~øm any ext~rior building walls, except for-.security gate houses or similar security stru~res locatSd,)i1 a private stieet or road right-of-way. ' . . ". . . . 11:. .A~ points 00.811' ,coDector or.',ait,rialstreetS sé~g ·..~.ptânnØd NOn-Residential Development shall.be k?œted and ~ced so that traffic moving into. ~ out of the arterial streets does not cause traffic congestion. , . PARKING AND LOADING " . . , 1. . Genei'al'Provlsions '8. 'The number"type;~ Iocatio,Ùjf parking sPa~s Shañ.be·dø.terrnined at the time " of final Planned Nonresidential Development ~~P.PrOv.aI.., The determination of the number of spaces required shall-be based on SectIon 7.06.02 of this Code. The number of parking spaces required by this sécUonmay b8 reduce~ based on . . . substantial competent evidence that the red~ number,of spa,CBS is adequate for the proposed use or that parking may be shared by proximate. ~s that óperate at different times or on different dàys. " _. _ .' '., . . -,: ;. b. . , ;. . ßeserved .þarldng~sþaCes may be Provided, in lieu o~ .pav8d ,~ces, subject to Section 7.06.02(8)(4) of this Code. . 2. Off Street Parking·and Loading . Off-street parIdn{j ~ Ioadng rSquirements are governed by s8Ctions 7.06.02 æ.d 7.06.03 of·1hfs Cod&. and' the .following'standards: 8. Off-street parking and loading' 'areas shall bè ~~etd, to .provide travelways between adjacent uses while discouraging through traiIic. , , _ .0. ."'''. r ~ eo.IIy 1anI Dtru.....MII Cact. ......~ 1;1_ 7-18 ~~'rIMs.'iM ir: 3:' b. Off-street parking and loading areas shall be screened from 'adjacent roads and pedestrian walkways with hedges, dense planting, or changes in grades or walls. on Street P~rking " '" . , In Planned Non-Residential Developments.. Ori street parking may be·used so long as the " ' iòad on which the on-street parking is propOsed lies' entirely within 1he:limits of the defined " PJanned Nonresidential Development and such parking would not contravene any, other provision of this Code or the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances. Where such on street . parking ~d loading is used. it shall be consistent with the fÇ)llowing design standards: a. Thå minimum size of a parking stall shall be as follows: " ... ,," . , " parallêl angled handicapPed (parallel) 'handicapped (~ed)', , 8 feet X :23 feet 10 feet X 18 feet: 12 fèet X. 23 feet ¡ 12feet X 18 feet '. " ..?F.," . .. ." .'~ b. Handicapped parking spaces shall be appropriately marked. , " " c. Access for emergency fire vehicles shall be in acCordance with"NFPA standards. - . d. No more than fifteen (15) parki1g spaces shall be,permitted in a continuous row -without being interrupted by a minimum landséape areå'of,360 square feet. 'F. LIGHTING All lighting facilities shall be arranged in such a manner so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous 'Interference of 'any tdnd to adjolnl~ streets or properties. ' .' . .. . ' G; :', ::. LANDSCAPiNG,AND NATURAL FEATURES 1. Native trees and vêgetation and other naturaHeatures shall be preserved to the extent practicable. . "; . ..,:., . 2. All senslilve environmental ,vegetation; trees and areas shall' be preserved to the extent ~~~." .. 3. " L8ndsëaplng lor off-street parking and loading areás shall meet the roinimum requirements 01 Section 7.09.00. . . '" {:. H. OPEN SPACE STANDARDS 1. "',: 'For developrnènt'þroJeèts of less than ten (10) acres, a mloimum Öf ~enty (20) percent of : the gross area of land to be committed to a Planned -Non-Residential.Development must befbr use as common open space, which may incIuc:I8' parks. recreation areas, bicycle and pedestrian paths and facilities, mamas. swimming beaches, common open, space, '. -' commori lai1dscaping or planting 8I'8U, or ôther,areas of public purposes other than street or road rights-of-way, utility easements, excluding exduslve stormwater.tteatment facilities, N.: , Sf. L.a. ~...... Dfi........ eo. ' AdapIed'AugIIIt 1 ¡ 1910 7-17 ~~õiiiïMN·. ..~. ändparking areas. . , , For development projects of ten (1 Ô) acres or more, a minimum of thirty-five (35) percent of the gross area'of land to be committed to a Planned Non-Residential p~élopmeni must be for use as Common open ,space, which may i~ parks, recreation areas, bicyclå and 'pedestrian paths and facilities, marinas, swim!'Ding beactws" ~mon open space, common landscaping ,or planti.ng areaS, or other are~ of public p~rposes other than , street or ,road rights-of-way, utility easements, ,exd~g ~xcluslve ~onnwater treatment facilities, and parking areas. . " . ., . At the iequest of the deVeloper, and" subj~ to"the aPPrQVal: of the Board of County Commissioners, use'of recreational facilities may be offere~ to the general public. A minimum of 15 percent of any existing native upland hab!~ton the property, must bØ preserved in ·its, natural condition as part of the required ~ pefGSntcommon open space, For each acre of preserved native habitat ~e,thEt ~~ minimum 15 percent that is preserved in its original state. credit shaD be given at a-rate of 150,percent per acre towards the remaining common open spate'requirement , All areas to be ded~ted for common oPen space sh~ìr' ~ identified as part of the Preliminary Dev.lopment-Plan for,the·Planned Nonre~tialDevelopment Areas that are floodways. lakes, wetlands. andstormwater retention areas may be applied to satisfy thè total: common.openspace requirement subject to"e requirement "that 15% of any existing native habitat on the property, m~t,be i~'aspart of ~e req.uired 35% common open space. As part of the Final Planned Nonresidential Development submission process, the developer or petitioner for the Planned Nonresidential Development shalJ p,r~i~ for one . of the following: a. The'advance dedication of an common- open space,\~: a public,. o~ acceptable private, agency that will. upon acceptance. agree to maintain the CQmmon open space and any buildings. structures Or improvements th~'h~y.e,~ ,placed on ,i~ All such dedications or conveyances shall be completed prior to the issuance of any bUilding permits. including land, cI!.ri"g. for any,:po,uC?" of the Planned Nonresidential Development; or. ' b~, , . A phased convey.atlce. of the lancUo be ul¡Se.ct for common open..space to·a·publl~, or acceptable private agency that will. upon acceptance., aga;~e to maintain the common open space and anybuikllngs. structures or improvements that have been placed on ,it. The schedule fPl'the phased conveyance, 0# ~ such lands to' be used' for common open space shall be a specific conci¡UOI') of. approval for the Planned Nonresidential Development. 2. Areas provided òr reserved to meet any otherenvironme~tai prese~tioÍ1 Or Prot. reqUirement 01 this code or other ,lawfUl regulatory authoJiIY may be ~ towards the , overall common·open spactt requJrer:nent ,,provIded,thaUhe Comf!Ø' ~n space meets 'the requirements of this·Code. " .. " . :s ':'. ',. 3. " . .. ,... . . ." ..:- .. ,.' ..'1 . , AlI.land dedicated for cc¡mrnon open space shal~,be .physiø8I1y ~:.ofthe Planned Non-, Residential Development., , ',,:: .' . _'. ." o· ..... ~ ~ CeIIIIr UnII 0.."""-' Code .AIIDpIId /IIftIIfA 1. 1810·· 7-18 .. . . '10: ~ '~,-ñftuDi¡Pitn~ 1. PI1ASING 1. A Plann~ Non-Residential Development may be developed in more than one (1) stage or phase. 2. If a Final Development Plan approved by the Board of County Commissioners is to be developed in stages or phases, each successive phase shall be constructed and developed in a reasonably continuous fashion. The final stage or phase shall be completed within ten (10) years of the date of final development plan approval. Any extension of the above' requirement is subject to approval by the Board of County Commissioners unless otherwise amended by the Board of County Commissioners. . J. SIGNS 1. Signs Within any Planned Non-Residential Development located in a Residential or Agriculturally classified land use area shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 9 . applicable to the Commercial Neighborhood (CN) Zoning District; provided, however, that the Board of County, Commissioners may condition approval of a Planned Non-Residential Development upon compliance with more stringent sign regulations in ord,r to ensure design consistency throughoUt the proposed development, to ensu~ compatibility with surrounding land uses,"to ensure public safety and prevent public harm, and to ensure compliance with the Sl Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. 2. Signs within any Planned Non-Residential Development located in a commercially or industrially classified Land Use Area. shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 9 applicable in the Commercial General (CG), Zoning District; provided,. ftowever. that the ' " Board of County Commissioners may condition approval of a Planned Non-Residential Development upon compliance with more stringent sign regula~ions ill order tQ ensure design consistency throughout the proposed development, to ensùre compatibilitY with surrounding land uses, to ensure public safety and prevent pubflC harm, and to· ensurQ compliance with the St. Lucie" County ~prehenslve Plan. . ..... .' . . ~.... CatIItr lIInØ;O'V........ Coda AdøpIIcI August 1. 11i9o 7-19 \:. :,' .":. r ~ ..0 '. ~'ftnüah CI5/'IMM. BOARD OF COUNTY . COMMISSIONERS GROWTH MANAGEME January 31, 2007 Joe Smith 1800 Anywhere DR. Anywhere, FL 34982 USA ..-'\ In accordance with the S1. Lucie County Land Development Code, you are hereby advised that St. Lucie Oaks CommercÜlI, LLC has petitioned for a Change in Zoning of a 4.58 acre (more or less) parcel of land from the CG (Commercial, General) and PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development - S1. Lucie Oaks) Zoning Districts to the PNRD (planned Non-Residential Development - St. Lucie Oaks Commercial) Zoning District and Preliminary Planned Development Site Plan Approval for the project to be known as S1. Lucie Oaks Commercial - PNRD, and consisting of a four - story, 88 room hotel and approximately 10,200 square feet of restaurant/office, for the following described Property: Location: West side of South U.S. Highway No.1, approximately 1500 feet North of Riomar Drive in Port St. Lucie, Florida. THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST The fU"St public hearing on the petiJion wUl be held at 6:00 P.M., or lIS soon thereafter lIS possible, on February 15, 2007, County Commissioner's Chambers, St. Lucie County Admlnistrøtlon Building Annex, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard at that time. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. The County Planning Division should receive written comments to the Planning and Zoning Commission at least 3 days prior to a scheduled hearing. County policy strongly encourages your input and .comment at the public hearing of this matter before the Planning and Zoning Commission and County Commission, rather than by contact outside of the scheduled public hearing(s). We encourage you to speak at these public hearings, or provide written comments for the record. . The proceedings of the Planning and Zoning Commission are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Planning and Zoning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary, a public hearing may be continued to a date-certain. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the S1. Lucie County Community Services Director at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (772) 462-1777 or T.D.D. (772) 462-1428. If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-descn'bed parcel, please forward this notice to the new owner. Please call (772) 462-2822 if you have any questions, and refer to: File Number: PNRD 06-018. Sincerely, ST. LUCIE COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Bill Hearn, Chairman JOSEPH E. SMITH, District No. I . DOUG COWARD, District No.2. PAULA A. LEWIS, District No.3. CHARLES GRANDE, District No, 4 . CHRIS CRAFT, District No. 5 County Administrator - Douglas M. Anderson Website: www.co.st-Iucie.fl.us 2300 Virginia Avenue - Fort Pierce, FL, 34982-5652 Administration: (772) 462-1590 Planning: (772) 462-2822 GISfTechnical Services: (772) 462-2822 FAX: (772) 462-1581 Economic Development: (772) 462-1550 FAX: (772) 462-1579 Tourist Development: (772) 462-1535 1(800) 344-TGIF FAX: (772) 462-2132 !_!~~I!~~! iii ~~ ~ ,~,illlliillllillllllm§ll~ii Iii ~ææææææææææææææææææææææßæ æææ I~~I~ ~ ~!i~~~~~~ii~~~.~ ~ læi~illi~iJlii¡¡iij~iiæJi ¡jj ¡~ ! ~ ~~ - ~ ~i~~ J j I~ c<~~i ð ii! ~l=ÜÜ j ~= 1:~iljð~~'!i=I_~~~~~ijð~j~lt¡ð! ii~ N<~~' ~~.I ~~ ~ i ið ';d5-f~ ,SJIL_ ~ZU)U) ~~s!äU)flj~U) ê ê Iww~. _ U)~~ ~~I~¡~~~~I!!~!!sl!¡~¡¡~~~ ~~~ I ~ ¡i CII CII J:J: U) «! j I ¡ I~ ~ ~ i ~ i JS Ii I ~ ! I ~ Ii iH II. I .. '& . .1 ;1 QU II:! I.. ~I il )1 ~J Ri ~J ~I it io C 81 ·1 ~ if...g I :i uif " jj i ~ I ~ í ~ ILIL i ØljU) J ~ ~ c ¡ ð ~~ I ~~~ ~ J ~ I Ii; (J i 8 ~ !Ii iii g I i I~ I j j~l! ~ ¡ g!88 8 3~ ficj ~~fi~ ~ I ~J~~ ~ c~ íiJI~;~!li~i!tI5~JIM~i~~j~~ ;!¡ clllli~~~III~!I~~~I!III~III-1 ¡1~~~lli~i~ liiili~iiiii~~~ lit 19~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~JJ) I ii IIII ~ r-mm § ~ .. ~ ~I III I I~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~I~~~ 8iijii¡ii~¡¡i ~~ ~:JC') âi -t: ð J:'='=I~~¡! uUI~ C .. ð I~ .~I~ 1 ð I! l!ã~~IU~lid ~~~¡fi~~~~f3~~!ä ~Si!oSHi!::::::~iSi!~ pol5~55~"''''N'''(S'''-'' 'C' '::C_f- !5 jj..i.lJ_ .;i t ¡~!~ a::~ ~ l~U)~ I) ~ I I~ ~ ~ J J + !5 .15 f! ~ :I i :l1~ C J I :rhUh~~~ I ~ 18 cI ~ ¡ ~ I DS1i ð i~N~!ijr-~~ij~= , Ie uhnhud C')~~~~~~~~~~~ 1-' j ~~II - I Iliël~lil~~i**.li*=~~~~~ ~ "'Ii I ~¡~; I!J_ 1*I!J~iI!Q¡~),aa..1 , I' l ~ I ;!w I i- ~æm~I*§~ ! II ~ i I ' if ~a..*i ~h~l!J! "I!JIII* iiI ! " ' '~I I, ~r~llli~ );llc 101 ~I!J 2! ! ~ I r " I!J!! I!J I!J), cl I, * 1m! - ~ I - - ~ ~ ~* ¡~. w ~i5 . :c I 1 ~ ! -III ! I ,*llilsl!! cl~l! ~mic=1 , li!! II~ ~, ',,', !!I!J~* ~!!I!J II;I!J ;~~d~!I~ cl. ' ' * I!J~ § ¡c I!J II c~ i III , I IIBI ~ * .ïl!II.~cil!J..milll! i Ib~ , ,~ ,I;II,! l!J~tc=i~¡ill~il;I~1 S~~~!I~¡ I ' I III1 í! Ilil!lllli:ÎIJ;!illlll¡11 _, ...__ ·_.____.......... _.'_. n' _........_.._.._..___. ___.0.-._ .. __.... ..' .._. _., .__.. _'M_.., ........ _. ....."~..._.._ _.... - ..._.. '" _, _.. ··u. -..--......._.__.._. .__.. . .--. -....-. ....- illl!l~)ijliiil I!~I!~ t~i~l. .1- d,l III!I¡!~ ;1 ~~c I!B--~21 ~ ~ ~~ . ~III~~ oj ~~ -! ~f~jm~~1 I ~=I·lii '~Ii~-I~I! i· !11~lt! ,tl~tlii II. . I lajlll~ ill tll! · !lIwl-- -lie '1111&-1' :~~~~Ic i~ Itlltl ~ ~I.-i~ II ·I~ i I t II;!¡- ~ i-I 151M ~ !¡¡I;~d IR.il·I~I~iI t- . 111~i;~! t~ ;;~I¡I! . f If I i ¡fil J f I Þ III i I I f =¡II I . . i Ii ¡J1111 ! I J'! I ; I ! Ii " fIr I,) ~ '11 I al J ~ fl t ~ tJ j' oj Ii!! 8 ,.In i it!f! ¡I!I I li!1 ¡Iii;! ..~ 1'111'11 Iff-fJ I · ~ J a I, f· I ." Ii till t~11 f .)Jt i IJl t ! . !I f!JI~ II IdO h I! II " Ii If II 'i i r II flllf ~ ·1· JI J I I ar ~ ¡ill! fl fil1 f~ II II ¡fl II !!~Jt ,I ·1 ~ ~f· IiI jt f!f!1 if il~ ~J ~.IJ !J ~I~J. I; I~~ .__ ~..._ '4"_'_ "._____._. ". .. '."... - ~-- "..-."..-.. ... - .. ~- -. J:' : COUNTY'. FLORIDA h ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM ****************************************************************************** TO: Lisa Wargo, Development Review Planner FROM: Yvette Alger, Environmental Planning Coordinator DATE: December 20, 2006 RE: S1. Lucie Oaks Commercial PNRD - Final Report ****************************************************************************** This 4.58-acre site is located along the west side of US Highway 1, just north of Rio Mar Drive. Much of the site has been previously disturbed due to past development, but native, county- protected trees, including live oaks, cabbage palms, and pines do exist on-site. The applicant intends to re-Iocate cabbage palms on-site and mitigate for the oaks and pines by planting new trees on-site. The SFWMD informal pre-application wetland review indicated that the site contains several "other surface water" areas, which may require permitting through the Environmental Resource Permit process. It will be a condition of approval that final wetland permitting is completed by jurisdictional agencies, and correspondence is provided to ERD. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1) Prior to issuance of a S1. Lucie County Vegetation Removal Permit, the applicant must provide ERD with a final wetland determination, delineation, and avoidance/minimization/mitigation measures approved by jurisdictional agencies. 2) Prior to issuance ofa SLC Vegetation Removal Permit, the applicant must provide ERD with a copy of a draft Eastern indigo snake protection plan, adherent to FWS guidelines, for our review. The plan, once approved, must be adhered to during all vegetation removal and construction activities. 1 St. Lucie County 2 Planning and Zoning CommissionILocal Planning Agency 3 Commission Chambers, 3rd Floor, Roger Poitras Annex 4 February 15, 2007 Regular Meeting 5 6:00 P.M. 6 7 A compact disc recording of this meeting, in its entirety, has been placed in the file along with these minutes as part of the record. 8 9 AGENDA 10 11 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 12 13 CALL TO ORDER 14 Chairman Hearn called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. 15 16 ROLL CALL 17 18 William Hearn .................................. Chairman 19 Susan Caron ..................................... Vice Chairman 20 Brad Culverhouse ............................. Board Member 21 (Mr. Culverhouse arrived at approximately 7:50pm) 22 Pamela Hammer ...............................Board Member 23 John Knapp ......................................BoardMember 24 Barry Schrader .................................Board Member 25 Stephanie Morgan............................. ßoard Member 26 Craig Mundt.~...................................Board Member 27 Kathryn Hensley............................... Ex-Officio 28 29 Members Absent: 30 Ramon Trias;.................................... Vice Chairman 31 32 OTHERS PRESENT 33 34 Robert Nix........................................ Growth Management Department Director 35 Gilbert Backenstoss..........................Assist. Growth Management Depart. Director 36 Heather Young .................................Assistant County Attorney II 37 Hank Flores...................................... Planning Manager 38 39 ANNOUNCEMENTS 40 Mr. Flores announced that the representative of the applicant on agenda item 2 (S/St. 41 Lucie Properties Ltd. and Evans Properties, Inc.) has submitted a letter requesting that the 42 item be pulled &om tonight's agenda. The applicant's representative is requesting 43 additional time in which to work out several outstanding issues. The application will be 44 re-advertised and heard at a later date. 45 1 1 DISCLOSURES 2 Ms. Hammer disclosed that she had conversations with staff and Commissioner Coward 3 on the Shinn Lakes project on tonight's agenda. 4 5 Ms. Morgan disclosed that she had conversations with representatives of Shinn Lakes 6 also. 7 8 AGENDA ITEM 1: Minutes 9 The minutes :trom the January 18, 2007 regular meeting. 10 11 Mr. Mundt requested that on page 8, line 5 the word "of' be re,môved and on page 9, line 12 41 the word "the" be inserted. ' 13 14 Ms. Hammer motioned approval of the minutes with tþe corrections requested by Mr. 15 Mundt; Ms. Caron seconded. 16 17 The motion carried unanimously. 18 19 AGENDA ITEM 2: SISto Lucie Properties Ltd. and Evans Properties. Inc. _ 20 PUD 06-002/RZ 06-005 ' , 21 22 Petition of S/St. Lucie Properties, Ltd. an~ EY$,S,froperties, Inc. for a change in zoning 23 :trom the AG-5 (Agricultural- 5 du/ac) Zçmingqistricqo the,PUD (Planned Unit 24 Development - Shinn Roaq E;questrian Estate~)ZoningDistrict and Preliminary Planned 25 Unit Development Site Plan. / 26 27 A letter was received:trom the applicant's repreSentative pulling the item :trom tonight's 28 agenda as announced bYMr)::loresearli~r. 29 30 AGENDA ITEM 3: St. Lucie Oaks Commercial. LLC PNRD 06-018/RZ 06-025 31 Petition of St. Lucie OakS'Commercill~ LLC for a change in zoning :trom the CG 32 (Commercial, General and PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development) Zoning 33 District to the PNRD (PlanIled NOh-Residential Development - St. Lucie Oaks 34 Commercial)Zoning District and Preliminary Planned Development Site Plan. 35 36 This item was presented'by Hank Flores who explained that this proposed rezoning is 37 located on a 4.58-acreparcel ofland on the west side of US Highway 1 approximately 38 1,500 feet north of Rio Mar Drive in Pt. St. Lucie. The proposed project is to be known 39 as St. Lucie Oaks Commercial and will consist of a four-story, 88-room hotel with 40 approximately 10,200 square feet of restaurant/office space. 41 42 Mr. Flores stated that there was a question on parking that came up today. Staff has 43 concluded that the project, as designed, provides for 192 parking spaces, which includes 44 appropriate handicapped parking. 45 2 1 Staff is recommending that this Board forward this application to the Board of County 2 Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. 3 4 Ms. Hammer questioned the parking requirements and the number of spaces provided 5 with this application. Ms. Hammer voiced her concern with the number of parking 6 spaces provided around the area of the proposed restaurant. Mr. Flores explained that the 7 applicant has provided additional parking spaces around the hotel area of the project. 8 9 Bob Burson, Esq., applicant's representative, stated that he concurs with staff's 10 recommendation and noted that there are several professional rep.r:esentatives here tonight 11 to answer any questions the Board may have. . " 12 13 Ms. Hammer questioned the curb cut on US Highway 1 which seeD;ls to be very close to 14 the entrance to the bank within this area. Mr. Flores e:¡{plained thatthe applicant is using 15 the existing curb cut; it will be a right turn only enqaÍ1ceand exit. CalM()ntgomery, 16 engineer on the project, confIrmed. ' 17 18 Ms. Hammer also pointed out her concern with theiesolu!ion,that staffpreBared for the 19 BCC agenda packet. On page 2, line 42 remove the word "etc." She feels åll conditions 20 and/or requirements should be clearly spelled out. 21 22 Ms. Hammer questioned whether or notback-upgeneratorswi,llbCused at the hotel, 23 restaurant and office space. Mr. Burson confIrmed 'that the hotel will defmitely have a 24 back-up generator and the Il!echanical engineer'is workin¡røut the back-up generators at 25 the restaurant and office space area. / 26 27 Mr. Hearn opened the public hearing. No one from the public spoke and the public 28 hearing was closed. 29 30 Ms. Morgan motion~dto forward a recommendation of approval to the Board of County 31 Commissioners because the projecfis not in conflict with any St. Lucie County Codes; it 32 will work well in the area; and a hotel is needed in that area. The recommendation of 33 approval is subject to the conditions of approval as noted in the staff report. 34 35 Mr. Mundt seconded. 36 37 Ms. Caron questioned the conditions of approval. She pointed out that on the fIrst staff 38 report there were 8 noted conditions of approval. The current staff report shows 4. Mr. 39 Flores confIrmed that those conditions that have been met and/or did not apply, and have 40 been removed. 41 42 Ms. Hammer stated that she would be more comfortable with this project if the applicant 43 would be willing to set aside "ghost parking" in case the restaurant needs extra parking. 44 45 Ms. Morgan commented that the applicant has provided more parking spaces than is 46 required under St. Lucie County's Code. 3 1 2 The motion carried 6-1 with Ms. Hammer dissenting because of the issue of the number 3 of parking spaces near the area of the proposed restaurant. 4 5 AGENDA ITEM 4: Jim Coseo PUD 06-004/RZ 06-009 6 Petition of Jim Coseo for a change in zoning ftom the AG-5 (Agricultural 1 du/5 acre) 7 Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Shinn Lakes) Zoning District 8 and Preliminary PUD (Planned Unit Development) Site Plan. 9 10 Mr. Nix advised the Board that staff is now recommending that t~is item be continued to 11 next month's meeting. It does not appear that the project, as pre~ented~ meets the 12 requirements ofPUDs, such as clustering and staff would IQçethe additional time in order 13 to meet with the applicant, the County Attorney, and oth~rs: torèsolve issues that may 14 cause future problems. ' 15 16 Jim Coseo, applicant, spoke and expressed his ftµstration. He went on to explain that on 17 tonight's agenda it is stated that staff is reco~en<.iing appr~val of this application. One 18 hour before tonight's meeting he was advised thatstatfwQuld,be changing their 19 recommendation; and, the engineer working with Mr. Coseo is not in attendance because 20 he was told it would not be on tonight'~ agenda. 21 22 Mr. Coseo stated that he started this process èight~en months agoånd met with staff on 23 numerous occasions on how to go about developing this property; on how to cluster; on 24 how to divide the pro pert)', and on how to address other- issues. County staff advised him 25 and his engineers on clustering and other Code requirements. Mr. Coseo requested that 26 this Board deliberate on this item and move it forward to the Board of County 27 Commissioners with ståfI's original recommendation of approval. 28 29 Mr. Hearn acknowle<.iged Mr. Coseo's :fh1Stiation, but advised him that it was in his best 30 interest, although it doesn't seem so, to give staff the month they are requesting to ensure 31 that the project is in compliance with the County's code requirements. 32 33 Mr. Coseo briefly went over the cUrrent site plan for this application explaining that the 34 proposed project is for 76 single-family dwelling units on 382 acres located on the east 35 side of Shinn Road and on the east side of Shinn Lake. 36 37 Mr. Hearn opened the public hearing. 38 39 Mark Mathes (advised he has no relationship with the applicant), spoke with an interest 40 in agricultural development in St. Lucie County. Mr. Mathes expressed his feelings that 41 the issue of clustering is important to resolve. It is important to get objective guidance 42 ftom the County for this project as well as future projects. Mr. Mathes also expressed his 43 desire to see large lot agricultural development remain available in S1. Lucie County. 44 45 Michael Jacquin spoke and requested that Mr. Coseo be given clear direction on what is 46 required in order to ensure the project has met compliance. If this application is heard 4 1 again next month, whatever the outcome at that meeting, the application should be moved 2 forward to the Board of County Commissioners. Mr. Coseo should be given a clear 3 timeframe. 4 5 Mr. Hearn closed the public hearing. 6 7 There were discussions among Board members and staff regarding continuing this item 8 and whether or not the Board can accommodate the applicant by having a special 9 meeting. It was agreed that staff needs the full month in order to ensure the proposed 10 project meets the County's code requirements. 11 12 Mr. Mundt motioned to continue this item to the March 15,,2007 (at 6pm or as soon 13 thereafter as the item can be heard) Planning and ZoningJ:;ornmiSsion meeting; Mr. 14 Schrader seconded. ' 15 16 Roll Call 17 Ms. Morgan - yes 18 Mr. Knapp - yes 19 Ms. Hammer - yes 20 Vice Chairman Caron - yes 21 Mr. Schrader - yes 22 Mr. Mundt - yes 23 Chairman Hearn - yes 24 25 The motion carried u~inouSly. 26 27 OTHER BUSINESS 28 Mr. Nix advised the Board of çertaincbanges 011 procedures that will be implemented 29 within the Growthl\1:anagemêntDeparttÛêìiCThe advertising process will be re- 30 evaluated; staffwillbe~vingag~nda meetings in an effort to ensure accuracy and 31 completeness of boardpac~ets, age:I).das, and other transmittals. Staff reports will be 32 changed and will include ~ore tho1'()ugh information. 33 34 Ms. Morgan suggested packets be distributed more than one week prior to P&Z meetings. 35 36 Ms. Hammer complimented the Growth Management staff on the progress and the 37 improvements made. 38 39 It was noted that Mr. Culverhouse arrived. 40 41 There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:50 p.m. 42 5 BOARD OF COU.NTY COMMISSIONERS -'.'.'."."."".".."".."'..'",...,.,..,",.".....,","",...,',',',.',.,",.,"',..,""',.,', ......... . ...".,..,.,. '...':. ","":'-' ,":"", . .. .. ., GROWTH MANAGEMENT February 22,2007 Nancy Davis, Nancy J Davis 10811 SW Tradition Square Port St Lucie, FL 34987 In accordance with the St Lucie County Land Development Code, you are hereby advised that SL Lucie Oaks Commercial, LLC has petitioned St Lucie County for a Change in Zoning nom the CG (Commercial, General) and PNRD (planned Non-Residential District - St Lucie Oaks) Zoning Districts to the PNRD (planned Non-Residential Development - St Lucie Oaks Commercial) Zoning District and Preliminary Planned Development Site Plan approval for the project to be known as St Lucie Oaks Commercial - PNRD, and consisting of a four-story, 88- room hotel and restaurant/office space, for the following described property: Location: West side of South U.S. ffighway No.1, approximately 1,500 feet North of Riomar Drive in Port St. Lucie THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST The public hearing on the petition will be held at 6:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible, on Tuesday, March 6, 2007, County Commissioner's Chambers, St. Lucie County Administration Building Anna, 2300 V'wginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard at that time. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. The County Planning Division should receive written comments to the Board of County Commissioners at least 3 days prior to a scheduled hearing. County policy strongly encourages your input and comment at the public hearing of this matter before the Planning and Zoning Commission and County Commission, rather than by contact outside of the scheduled public hearing(s). We encourage you to speak at these public hearings, or provide written comments for the record. The proceedings of the Board of County Commissioners are electronically recorded. Ifa person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request If it becomes necessary, a public hearing may be continued to a date-certain. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St Lucie County Community Services Director at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (772) 462-1777 or T.D.D. (772) 462-1428. If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parce~ please forward this notice to the new owner. Please call (772) 462-2822 if you have any questions, and refer to: File Number: PNRD 06-018. Sincerely, ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Chris Craft, Chairman JOSEPH E. SMITH, District No. I . DOUG COWARD, District No.2. PAULA A. LEWIS, District No.3. CHARLES GRANDE, District No.4 · CHRIS CRAFT, District No.5 County Administrator - Douglas M. Anderson Website: www.co.st-lucie.fI.us 2300 Virginia Avenue - Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 Administration: (772) 462-1590 Planning: (772) 462-2822 GISlTechnical Services: (772) 462-2822 FAX: (772) 462-1581 Economic Development: (772) 462-1550 FAX: (772) 462-1579 Tourist Development: (772) 462-1535 1 (800) 344-TGIF FAX: (772) 462-2132 S1: LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBUC HEARING AGENDA MARCH 6, 2007 N011ŒOFCHANGE INZONNJNÐPFELfMI\IARy PIAtotEDNONÆSIOENTw..~ SITE PLANAPPAovAL The 81. L.ucft Cotny BoIrd rlQ)unIv CcIrMiIIIoIiIII'I pqJœea 10 âpC IhII fcIIao.Mng by nI8CIIuIIon: IU!IŒIJ'I1ON NO. 07..., A JœSQI.UI"JoN (II 'I'&! IIQgJ) oP COONJ:'Y ~ OF IT. wcm ~ ~ CIb1mNO A aIANOB IN ZOJ.IaNG OP A ..,. ACIB ØIDU OR LI!SI) PAI.œL Œ LAND LOCATID ON 'IIII!........ OF IOU1'B u.s. ....AY HO. I, AlftœŒM'Dl.Y.fC ~~~~~~W~~1O" .... ~ ............m.u. ~ - IT. OAD ~ ZOIGNG DB'I'IUCr ANÞrJBUMItCMYlI..Al'IaID ~ ID'BRÄN MftOVALRJa 'DIBftOIICI'm_KNØWNItSST. r..uc:.OAD ~-.-o.ANÞ~I""OI' AfOUa-SI'ORX Il-llCJClYIDI'ILANÞ...JQUMI!....ØI~WAaL 1...-..,.-..,,,... APPLICANT: St. JaleOlbC 44 u.c,...... .....A. ___.... U!OAI.DIIIIaIPI'Iœf: lAIIŒLl . It. POIDICH Œ'IHB NOKIBIAS'.r 114 OF1BB ~ U. QP ~\nrNIIV H IOIIJ1Ø. MNaB.BAIT.......~~'-Y.AI ~ Kt'lBl! ~ ~ OF'l'HB JIOKI.-ASI' 1M Œ'I'IIJI HOkaø"aI. 114 œrMID ~I...a "I'BI!IIŒ1IDmB. ..-.,......... AIØIO 1æIOUlJlLINI QP lAID SOU1BBAST 1I4OP"--.nEAJI'l,. Œ'" JilClKID"". IMADII'rANCIIOF__ JIIIm .1IIInUI NœI'II. ..,.- .,. ... MSI' WI'III 'ID Ql'l'LDI! OF MID iiiÎñ'.nw... 114 CIP ...~... ZZADII'Ð\IOI OF IUD 10... ftØ'l'OF -... ,. ~APIJ!It nISf'.....,. MItCIIL ŒLA!!!i...:= CCIIUDRJI JIIOaB.~ ",. WIIAS'f. A -..rANCB OF 11M. '12 JIEJ' '1'0 A ~ JaN'I' -.0 1IIB IIACK OF AN ~unu 2 IIOØI' VAU.BY ~ JIIIORI'R JI .. 21- BAST ALOMG 'JBB JCI)¡¡J.II'IO MŒ OF CUD A OF I.D 10 ... __ 01' A ØJRVB aK:ØB1O...IDI1I'JIIIAft&t\VJllDA..... ØI 1~1DIInUS NCJ-'~'Y 74." JIIBI' ALQI!fO TBBAIIC OF lAID aJaY8 'IaØIDI A1W.JLB OP Sot .,..._ 18'... m....1Im ar SAID ~ IOUIB. 45' "IIASTCCJIII'INUINO AlØG SAID BACK ar œø A GP H.54 'IV 'l'lll1IIUIOaMt1 OP A aJDE ~W 'IOn. 1OI1I1IWBft·IlAYINO A UP ....~ 1DUI'IIIIAI'IaL"", Mr ALONØ'l'BlAIC CP lAID 'IIIItOIJOIIA OF 25 ..-....,.'1'0 'I'IIB........ Œ A aavBCDlCAVB 10.......... IIA'VJNG A MDmI Øl5a.15 ~~ ~! ß1 PIBI' ALOMJ'lBBAIC CHlIA1Ø CUR\'B 'I'IIIOUOØ It. CIN'DAL OP ,,____ 1 .. m DB JIG) qr MID CUKV.I; I~ Nœ1'111O ~ :II" CD" J!.V1' A10IG lAID MŒ .. am. A DBI'ANaIoPJ5A1 ....10............ aP A œNCA'YB TOmBlØQØJ. BA'VINO =:a~-sk~~'2W.:r::~~~~u::.~«yf ..~ 2"«JJrJØ ., J'W('q!-1.. ..,.BAlTP111!Ø1'D113 SAID IIACX OF aJD A IJIITAJICB aI "~sl~ 1DUI1J.. --...,.,. WIAIT AJ4IIØ'llmBIII...u Mat CJlTÇUD, A ~~ OP .." JIBIT 10..... ~ OP It. CU&VB œNc.\VI! 10 TIIB SOU1II: BA~AItADJUSOP l0U7J111B1\ l_a~".71 RIEl' AIØIO'laAICOP lAID aJa\fI! 'I'IIaOIDI A Cllll'l'lALANOLB (III 21 ...... .....12" 10 'IBI......... OP A ~=VB '1'0 'ilia _IØ".... BAYING A MDIUI OIl 21J.DI ~ UIIIm,;B ",a RIBJ' ALOINO TIE Ale OP IAI:Þ_ CUIMI DIGIX'IR A CIIND.\L ANGU! OF 12 ---- 2r U- 10 'I1IB IaIJIIINIWG OP A DYBID CIaYB ~='==~~cIFliu.m:Il~ 41' 3r 'lOtS.., œr lAID aJJML lAID Jij IIIINO 'lID! IIRD OP"'-IIX......, 2 JOOI' VAU.BYaJIUI: UIIK'W..Z IOU'I'II..... SJ"'" Mft A DIII"ANœ OP1.J! JI.Er. 'IHIINL"a ~:.~=a~~~&I&c¡:~,az=:: II'n1A'I1! IN ST. UJaB ~ FLaIJD.A. COfIITAJNINØ WI'I'IØN lAID 80IJNbS mIlD SQUAIœ FIII'I" oa 1.55 ACItBS. PAaCllLZ: A ~I" (III 'IRB MImD!AS'I' J/4 OP 1BB NDa'J.WBS1' w OF B;1.&rATOw......" IOI1IØ.ItANGB..BAS'I'IIDIO....~y.........,Aa . ~ATrBB ~ ~ œr,. N'Caa...ur u. 0JI'1RB ~..... .,. CJIr MID ~ 22; .....us NCIKIII. 18" .... WII'I' ALOIWI'IIII! IIOIJ'IB Iaœ OP ~ SOl) IIIIII\S'I' 114 CHI,. NtJIrIBIIAIT W op 'lID! ~.... WADIITANC:I! OP.... JIØI': 1JBd NœnIIID ..-- fir ... BAIT ~ W11'111BB BAIT L1NB OP lAID iiSidawDli 114 OP Ia,;IIUIC 22A ~ OP 1_. PBBI' '10 TIIB JIODrI' œt........ L~..~.,~~__~~.aw= 'l'BKWDilIIIIIIoYDJIITOPWAY UNA aPu.s. IIIœIWA'YNO..J¡ ~&ØU'IB.I--- fir lID" WI!ST AUJN] MID..... OJ WAY LlœA DISTAMC:8 VI' I!UD ~~~....,. .. DIInRJ!BS .'ww:øn- A DlSTAJiICB OP Jf7A5F1111'1OTRBPOIIIfJ'OP..........u. ur -.W .....1Vr'I _; llUII'ft,.D nulUJlIW UD\--... UIt WIDI ALoUI'IIU . am MAI.ø LII'II:o ur MID SOV'I'IIBAST 114 OPTIIB Nœ1HI!AST 114 Œ"IIIB huaunw.aìl. 114 ADISTANCB OF _.61 =:=ZIl4~~~~t~~..rMr~ (11, 'DIE IIIIIINAPIB œsauBl!D PAltCIIL OF LAJIID: 'IHBNCI CONI'INUB NOaH 00 ....... rrr or BAST 15D.OO~ 11BICBSOU'I1II9~'" Ø1' EAST sr1AS JIIIEf'IV ....WBS"I'BILY1tIGHI'OPWAYUNE œr U.S. .II1GRWAYJIIO:J¡ 'l'llBNCB1OU'IR ..~ ft1' .. WI!ST AI..CJN[J SA1D 1UGRT OF WAY UNl!ADIITAIICB ur ..00 ~ JItKIH ., œ--....'WEST A DIS'f.A.'NCB OP 5ÇlA5 JIBBI"'IV'IIE JOINT aI JIOCEL3 'lBBwør.JIO,.-r OF'DIBRJUDMNG DIIICIUa1!D MJICILM JIIOLt.OWI: IœAJIOIIn' OP ~ COMMIINCBJa.1D SOU'I1aAft œaNa OF'I1EMm'IIIAn' 114 OF 1HB NœI'BWIIS1' 114 OF B:IICJIt 22. 'I'OMaIIIP . SOUI1L UNGB .. lAST ~ TO 'ra lIAr OFIUYBIMB. tJNI'I' I.AlI'K.'OtHD IN ftA'I' BOOJ[ I&. MOB ~-=~·:~~.=.=or==r~JØlHn: aA!O--.",. ØO"' MSl'PAItALLBL wrrB'JIIB IAS'l'LDm CllIAID 1IOIO.nw_. J& Il1O Plllß'1O 'IBB JOJN1' OF IIBOIIMl'tG. 'I'JB(CB C'ONI1NUB NœIH.. ___ fir or 1L\I1'. _ ~ 'l'lJl!ltlQl1UUI"B ., ..-- .... BASI' snAS JIDI' 10 ~ 1r..-.IIICIX.....-QlLWAY OF U.$..... .~SOIJ'III __---17" ....... ALCJtICJIA1D W_I--.YaJGII1!.OILWAYOP U.s.... '5051 JIIBI\ .~ SOU'IH01 ~-.I"" BAST AIØIG SAID w.-oALY.....- ÐILWAY CJF U.s.,. 10U211Dn I~ NœI1I. DBOJ" .. ... ...,.. _.. JIIBI' TO 'I1IB JIOIN'I' œr ............ AU. LYING AND smJATa IN ft waB CØON1'Y, JIIØtIbA.. CDN'fAIIIDIIO 1.I43AaœS....œ L1SS. ......: 'WeIC lido.,..... U.s....., ...... I........ I . -; ... filii NcIIth.,...... DJiw .. PM It. .... "I'M PlaIC HEAFING on this 111m wi be held in the Co...Won a-rw.. Alger PallrMArnIc, 3rd ~ SI. LucIe CounIv Þå1iMl6... BuIIdhg, 2300 V..-.... Fort "-w. FkIñdI on liaårt. MMIh e, 'll1J1. ~~ II 8:áO P.M. or. eaan Ihei8IfIIr _ jioIIIIM. ActIon CIn be lIMn III.. rneeI!ng, or hi iIem œn beConlrØdb. f\Uedlde Md line. AlltUtall18d PI'IOfII wi be gIVen ., cœorI.dv to be~. WdIIn oammenII naMId in 8IMInce of .. pIbIc heIrInà wlllIIo be canIIdIred. WrIIIn áJ1...._ to the Bo8Id of CCU1ty Can roIIIIonIrIlhcUd be ~ bv fie 0r0wI1 ........,... DIf*tnM . ~DttAlian 1& .... 3 _ ~ 1D"1INcUId ~. Thf PIIb:I- iI....1or rMIw II.. GRMtI CIIpM'nInI..... II 2300 VllainliA....... 2I'Id Floor, FðIt PIIrœ, RaIIdI. Pr-e 0IIII 2&?2 .~ NM ." ~ or NqUint ac6IIonaI WoImdøri. 1hI Sll.ucit Ccuty BoIfå of COunIy CommiIIiaI.. ~ the power to I8IIIew .. gmnt "'" ~. wti1 ttIIir.. d ......= __BDaId ~~_electranlc:8tf1lCD'dld. ~ - - f. perIOt1 cIIcIdI8 to IIppI8I My dïciIIon må ~ IhIiJlöliRrGrcai.IiIY. ....-ct to any mIIIIr oorlllldlnd . . rrIIIIIná or IwInI. hi or :r.: wi need . r.xII'd (I ..~ ForllØtJ'UlpOle, htorlhe~ needlDenIkd.... ~ I8COIå allheplaClld~ iI ma, which Í'ICOId incUfIIbleslmorrt end èWfIncI ~ which .. .... Is to be bued. Uøari the I8qU8II d q Ø8ItY 10" PfQCIIIdnø, ~ ::;r".1img. hMñna WI be IMIm In. ~ ~ 10 the ~ WI Þe-p1IId" ~ 10 CRIll ~ tncMüI ~ GIfr1a . I1e8IIng ~ ~ . tI8OOrIW.....ry.. P'A*: hearing may be conIIrúd frðm lime to tint. may be ..~! 111"y to a 0IiIfIIIII. ~ wIIh a cIIIIIÞiIY ~~M.ocl.n b aIIInd thI8 ~ Ihcdd oone.ct.. St. Wale CounIv ~ EkIMoIe I:hceår. ~ (48) houIs prtorlo" rñíeIIV lit ~1m OITDD. 771J 482-1428. BOAADOF 00lJNTY caNSSIONEF!S :>"- -.¡:j I B h _-='1==-"'- =_-=..;;=-_J §'~ VJf'l ;~~t§~ ~ç;:t>\Jv) ,......"-J:s~ " <: 1> <: <: ~ C'¡ C'¡ C'¡ ~ ~ ª' o ~ " c " e. ;2 U1 ¡... '" i::, Þ :z: c '" ~ ~§~ @o..ê; ?. &:t.6 ~~~ " " .. S· '!=! ~ ~h <:: c z'"S' C)~~ co. i". ~g ~~ 2.0~_ ~~ m~ z> ~r ~ "" ~.~ ""3 ::g~ ~~g "r-", co C '< ~5-~ ?. c:~ '" ~~~ ~ ~ :;' '!=! in n i ~:t ~¡: C [~ a..... å1 1; ~ ~ ~ ;::¡ ....tnt.:l,þ.~ ~g~~~~~ r..~¡?.~~~~ ¡~¡t~F¡¡: ~ _ Q S' - 8. ". Co !} 5" . (Q c J. >--------".+/- '" .. ~~~ ~ " ,--, ! : ~: ~ L -' í f --------- U.S. HIGH VA Y ,< ~5 !~~ ~~~ .:....~t:I ~. ~. NUMB£R ON£ ~ .. ~ ~ '" ~ ,,~ ~ ~t qg !'! ~ > ~ J'1r" i Î~[I ~ ! t L ~ ;g ~Q ~~ 8 ~ ~ ~g G'2M~~ 8t:1 ::t1Z:~~l/) ~~ ~~tic:tj ~!Q ::jAJ :::!~:-r1 ~o Q aDö gi ~ ;;: ~ ~~ ~~~ 959.4' H.r.RIOIWtDRM" ~ .. ~ US 1 Existing Zoning; Land Use: Current Use: CG Commercial Shapping Plaza --------------- ------ - 'T1 "'n ø OJ f" .;i C,,) HI Hhlp!IIPp~ ~~H r~ ¥l '"'OnCl) C_""',) 111 n JI Ji JI ii en ~8 ~ õ r- --' ~ In R " H õ ~O~ CD C "'It It ~ c: lid! I I I i c h~ 31 n f~'JP (' ~r a ... z III ã: ëD" F" Q) - . il} II g Q ¡¡ ~12¡ 11_ I I'I I Ii!" ~!5 g- o S"a c :;1 0 0 JP~" p~~~~: c: Q) n 1111 1 1 1 <~~ ::J f i i" .( JI- go . ~ ( ~ -? -< CD _. J~ !;;" õl u>~CD fll ...... t ~ ~ ~ ¡IUIt ~ 5- :Þ ~ õ lai n 1-! t , ~ ~¡'O '" III ~¿ c. !!I ~ ~ If¡ Itli SI2 &1 III OJ 1 11 "I ~I $& '"'0 -II» II HJ~ 0 ...a. ~ f - ~ ~ hI 1 11L III hhŒ!! IhIli'J p2 ~ n ~ i ~ en -~$ g. -. 0 II ~~ .'Ii ¡;~"f~ dl&·;,i II i'il"",DI -III ¡i - - HJ ~ ;- ¡¡¡IS N . ~~ ~~~~~¡n) ~ ~~ IU ~ III i -RADIUS == 660.0' . = __ œ -.. - - - - -~~,~-- 11 w D RADIUS == 660.0' CJ m I I J' I 1111 .-,- ~ II! ~ ." . II ~ I ~l.¡- , I; 111I1 Iii 'I" IPIIII.. I ~i ~~II ~II'I ~ ~i.";I.1 ;! ~ Ii I'~ Ui¡iUHU1iH I;!! ItJ :~lihl~I~[!if~ I ~~i Ii ì §.-, n it~gU i!lì ~i h ;JIHJF~i!iih ~i ~t 9o:i~i P J Ii'Il . j ii it 90 ~~ti~.i! ~. §~ ¡¡; : uP~it9o! ~~ .~ ,. Ui li~ilfJ~ n ~~ 15.¡~ §IJiud t Ii n !iu! ¡Cf ~I~ h Iii hi~ ~ I( 4 ~ ¡! U i ~ ¡H i! i: i i' ~ r;;-J II . \ ;1 II w' ," -I ø Pfi ~n ~ "UnCI) ~U!;i'~li~ s~~;~;I~'im'~li~ is!e~§r~8111~~~ M ~8 ¡¡ r ... ~H ~ ft ~!õ ª-o="" 2 I ~I ~8 l~r';1 0 k 2 &2i >mo ~ C r ~'~I U· ~,~ ~ª:J ~~dl' ~,~ ~ª:~ilª~·IJ.~ ~ fi~ ]1 n ... - .[ <:: tP.R' " 3' a ... a: - . (j, sh~, II; 'I~I~ §§¡¡ II; '::I~¡¡~ I~~&~'¡¡ s rP g () ~. :> 0 0 :5'3C :;! >'¡¡§:~'i I bm~ I~I 'i I I~~ms ~'i ~~hl' ~ ~p.g' ~B~ ~~¡ <:: Q) n jis~§',~! i!ª ~ 'i~'~! ¡¡-i¡~§hpn ~ " go <~~ :> ~~ - .' - ~ -? ~ m_. RI~,U5;&- ~ dl!hR~&- ~. ~ U~!1' II J r . g! . " cnc:lm ~ ~R111§~ ~5,~ ~IRII§~ ~1~R<~s~~:s, ~~ ~ :Þ r õ ~ ::I. æ: ¡;. 0 I'I~ I~ ~I~ 'I h 3i§IIª;~~~;~~i IJ> en a. M- ª~ii!1 ~¡ ~ t:ii§1 i:ii¡I*~~!i' &1 en '" -0-1» HiJ-g 0 Ni f - ~ ~ h'~I~'~H h ª~i~~ ;~R~~~I !;S~ ~ HI§: ~. i § en 0 i~II~I:I<i ~ii~ liti ~mUrï~IÞh . ......., II) -It i I ~ ~- 8'1 ~ $ i ~ I ~§I~ ~ § i~, H~!i iD N ., i I >~~. - ~ iii' iiI~ ~- ~ . ~ ." ~ ~'il" ; UP en ... I'I~ ~ a Ii!. ~ ~ ?A J L _...J L -:::';l=----=-7~=--=.t;=--JH------:J~--~ '>.",¥þ/ // D ~ ~_____________ _ íi0' ~ ~ ~ ________ woo i=::¡¡.-{ \ .----------------- -=[xlsllng Zonmg PUD år """00'; ~~ 1 ,! ~ _ ~ _ ~NOO'07'00;r.-w5;¡72' --et:: - ____~5Q"!':..___n__~J~. ' 1 ,:;;~ ,I .i5~ I . _ oc), ~~:wfTìf 11 (O~~ 1 rlTl~ - 2~~0;;~~~~ ~ ~. ~- ~~ 1t ~~~~~~~~~ " CJ III~ ~ ~ -=<~~~~~~ ~ ~?¡ I~ I i:~! i¥ I I 1'1 J--<I W,I J) !~, ~~¡ I' I!' ¡ ¡ ¡~¡ : ~ ,i:~ ~ = ".; ;: -ç 1 '" T ~ ~J. II ~~2 i - ~~ I' ! Î~ ~ == : I ~"1,!U ~";I' ~ ,_ '" äf ~ I ~f (¡~; ~i ;-¡ ~ ,i¡ii~ ~CL ~ t-l ~ I ~ _=!~,,~~__.-4: . "< ~r ~ o I' 'r.O ~ ~ líìl~~ !ij~ :I 258"/: kJJi ~ . 1 - -I)H P\ ~,'~ I'i 7\ II ~~,,:=:: 1. t =! t( : ,r ~~; ; ~! ~~\ ~~/'I \1> >t _~~~ ~911¡1!~ ,,!--"~ .r(':, i ~ M (~~Glr'J~~ I : I I, - r: III m.~ ¡~o ~~~ :. ~ SOO'0700Y 20000 fœ¡ ~ ~~' ~:? '-. .~H [ 11 ~~) ì\ M'\' \ :~¡-i.! !~"¡ ~i: :; "'- ~h 'jn' ~~~ ~ð~¡g r:~! =..- n~¡ ,- , ~~. G) '12" .,.,'\ ; "" ~"'~ èt~l. ~~~ '--~;g l.::'1 =- i'~~' -+ ~>-to:!:. C/) ~'~=.:;! -{o ~ V> \ g ~ I .g " ~ ;¡¡ I ..~ M V Ii f¡:>i (:0\ ~ ~ ~: i: ~ !: I t ~:::o ::,,'1 :; ~ t -, . ,----, .- " JT 1 ( < I I I · Q l ~ g i ~; 3' ": ~ c = '_'0 G ~ "~- ~ "l 1 ~~ ¡'8 è ,~ ~ I I ¡<i''1 'Ii T I¡~~ = ~i~'1 ~j ;~'~'J! ~ ~ 8 ~I ,.,~ I ~ ; ~ ::' ~ ¡,- ~ / "v¡V¡, ~IN:,:J I __,2,0' I", I '" ::==~i;<, 5":21 ~;i I ~.' : ~ t - µI ~~~!~'~ i Oi -II L~~ -I~,r~'-r~!: :", ~~ ~ I -''-U~I ~ ,~t - ì~~1!J ~ III pac: 1 Iv ~.~t~::' .;5 '" ~ ~ p = 11 ~~~rn [Ì, I' I ~~~~ -,R) ~~q~l! ~ . I --,I - 1 " 1 - I 1 .' "''' " , - \ ti U ,-" -j ~ U .,..--,. I 1;, 3 'I"', 111111~~ð.II,'I,11!nW",<,<. J, ",~f""m¡/J H8 e>" - = I'll'!' Alii" \1 ðJf1 \ ¡~~b t" ; ~ ,~.I~ =[~:;~:. ~~!~~ ~~! ) I \;J I...... '\ T 17 ~'\'~ 181.0' . ¡ :r ( III \'I I C) \I)'" rI?' !2" I, ~ >~" >....~ <:I' a~ jI: !. ~~~ ~ ~å~~ g g~ '2~ ~~ ~2~ ~ ~ a ~ -I ~ '3 æ:g ~ ;1J -8 ~ ¡s ~ 8 ::; (~;gD rtrf ~~.: j!=a = ~ ~ 2f;;tI, a ~ ~ ~ g 2: ~ v tt: ~ ~ n 0 In"'2~èS25 ...... ij ~tJ V1 c ,.,. Ç) -., ~ 2: û) ~ If) ¡:§~ . ~ 0~tJ g ~. ~2 c ~~~~RR}rg '-'-~ NUMB£R ~ON£ i g [[ ~ n ~ '" ~ ~ § '< '<!~ .;s" ~ ~-, e ------ -~ / ( L -\¡¡. ; ~ ; :I ~ e- :;;- n 1i DI " " ~ CD 31 Z g¡ 0 §. ~ ~ CD ~ ~ ¡¡ '0 W ¡¡ "- CT '< W '" JJ if iõ ~ -T\ g3 ? -" ......, ,,; c:= -.. o .þ. W i'J g1;~ 3" ~. ~'~ ~ g3[ g §.~~ ~ g.~~ (b :::::I~CfI "C ~~~ ~ :f.o = [ ~~.~ ~ S' ~!!. QI ~~~ 0 æ:3~ if ~i~. ~ ~ ~ ~ @ a œ ! ~~ QI ; ~ i i [ ! ~ i ø ~~p n[ ~ -oncn 'Ì( ] ['" r CPO" -0 .2' t: 3'3;- !~i.? " oj' ~ - 0 g- o S' :I C :;! i~~~~~~ è: Q) n ;: ~ -< CI) _. . g 2 . õl r(;CI) ~ Q ~ ë: Q) -. 0 QI 6-.!.a. ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ UI 0 CD .... ii -0 N ·0 Q) m~ ::J I (l~ .., ----------- <== U,S, HIGH'WA Y [xistlng Zonmg: Ui Land Use: Commercial Current Use: Shopping Plazo ---------------------- ~ /' '\ ~~~ II ) c- ~ "l Hi ~I ~ .".. ; ~§ . ;;;+ HH~~ ~ H ~ IUP c ~ [ I¡WI! " ~ I ., I PH ~ ~... -I ~ !::;c:;c: . '. . Ii; ~ ~H J ¡¡g ~~" ~ f H ~i~ ~ ~~ J J J ~ ~ ~~~ I I ¡ ~¡~ alill i ~i~H!1 ~ i; " AJ -; " r " ~l~"~ª-u~ '(i ",œ DI Î~;;¡ - . _~ ~ I! ~ J!ª ~ šª ~3.~ ~~. ª- ~..g :ï ~..g .g s.œ. ::iI ~i~H I ~llfI ª'h¡f ~ f ~ ~g)! ~[~~[ [ ¡;: ~ 1:1. "-!D en 0 ~.:..r~~a.:..~ .;~ n ~~~! - I ~ I ~~_ :; ~~3'~~§.~~ :0 III ~ii 1 m '" ::;<¡¡¡ " ª i ~ ~ ~ ' SJ _t:",,¡¡ ,,- it ~9.i!iª-~!i~ 2 CD -; ·ï~ ~1;,~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 !D 0 ... . .. ~ ~ ~~ m ~~ ~~~m 5' DI 12 œ ~ I ill !!¡ ~ ~8;! r ... ~ :: ~~~~ ." ~ q¡ ~ I ~U 0 ic œ C m~ ~ ~~ ¡¡¡ ,... w' œ ~ i!. m ::J 0.....- h~ :Q n qq qq Q g, ftCIIWS, g, " ~ ~~ :;:; " a: ,,- œ F" QI 0 " § .~U. i!. (0 CfI §. <0 0 5' -; œ '" œ fJ ;: œ ¡; ro '" iõ I . '" " m ~ '" ~ go 4Þ '" ~ ~p ;:: ~ ~ ic '" .... H~ ~ '" þ ,... S "" x 0 ¡;, '" en ô " 0 £ en " ~ " EiðJ ,.. '" ~ 0 -; '" " ~ -; I ~~ n '" ¡¡ b m - " ii '" ~ :T 0 ¡¡ i~ 0 PI' ,... ~ J!l CD I I è: ëi1 en ~ Vi ;-:I ~~ ~ ~s ;>-s ~~ ~~ ~ ;>- ~~ !" ~i ;>-€ 'c g ;>-~ !" ~¡; ~~;>-~ >~ ~ i ;~i1 r'r' W~ Ii WH 111H Uti~1~ !m W~ i ! i!ii iJ~li Í~n ~1 i:1U fha !fi:jU ';t~ ~it' § h~1 i}h[ in: Kt ¡t~ìl ~~m :l~!H~ ;~!~ hi I ~ ~"j, pn~ !.,~ ~, u.[, ih. <'liH t,· '-I ih~ ,t~!~ ¡[~ ~~ ~d i~ ~;., mc~ ;:U ¡Ii HI~ ~{¡"l ;ff 11 'I'~! ~111 ¡j'oh d ï;, n!~t ~§'rjø !~l fó" ~&,j§:i i~~· i[rräj ~~i: ~~i '.'J '[1'- glf 'J ¡~f¡f ¡.~, 'rï!,., 'I. '~1 'iì~ îrt.l'f 0j~,~, ú~· ~¡;¡¡¡ "p '1. Jh' '¡H1 Iii t~ ¡~!! ~?H i~~it~, h! (I;, , ! ll:~ -H I, ,~.'=. I'. }<.., ¡_ .îj í~~ l~~!f hi h I~H! il~~ ;HtH f,~ l~~ h 'f'Uq'l ~!hL!! '! ..{,"'¡, ~¡ -- ¡H 'w Hi . "j'¡:' ,In ì[<"¡ F H ~fI :II;~ :h 1 ~I-l!! Ii ..¡ -r:HI [I ¡ ~ 'f" -f:; ;,~ ~ Ii!. ~,r. ~f.:, H !! I 5. 'Ii' .f5.0 S' -< Ii ...¡. ,....ì~¡.3 ;-!" -t ~, Ò' ~(¡ H " fj¡ t'[ ~~!;? ~1 ;, Ii ì i ~~ <. i1. :!-:~ i~ ;¡ i [i! t,.. h '.. H ii . 'X ~ ¡ ã' g, .f<> š:&. i ' ~ iì ~¡' i~ iHj' l{; ¡HH~ iÎ~~ ~ ['~ 'Hi m'~ .""c'1~ H H .~~:! ~!¡; bH~ iJi~ ~ .l~ ¡¡'! jn~ ¡h Of ¡, ~~f~ä ~Jli [il=l! i!.~ H~ ~,\ f .~~ Iw~Ij~ !,~! .hi I·t- ht!" ,~, ~. ,d. ,¡,I:;;. ~ilfh¡,~ "g"¡ "0" ~ [ ... l' "~ , ~"I ,! ,~ ÎI-'¡~I~ F [, !i~; ~¡~. iÎfm i~! U .I~' ~¡,¡i~ d[m~ .,:' ..., ¡ " '."C~. jOo ° o!. .!~ :'.(¡-o .~ 11 .~~!i .n; ~~[;o. .H ; !og ~'. 9~;i.¡i 1- . ,"" '"i' -' -d "-' ',' 'I' "!'·I'! ~: h ~h1 ~~i~ i~;;~i i'I'~ ~ ·:a ~ ~ nì:9J1! ,.. § õø~-' ...1l" ~ ..u:~~ì 1 . !!, ï~~- r I' j¡¡!lU~i !¡ · ¡'~i " ! :IH~. IO¡ 1 ~~¡' .~¡ ,'¡."., ~~ I !W¡ '.¡¡ h~![f- ¡~ · h-[ ~,I H.·hE h · .u~,;. ~.,~~ i~ ,~~H _cO :]iJ(F .i . ~:.! íq. .'~! If ,}~ a~ '&¡h',l 10 , ~''.! .',ì .,~-~" ¡ ;¡ '., .~. !¡-":¡.. ;[ . ~¡~~ gl'~ IN,,! "i i ~H r8~ it Ii:' ~i i ~~U ¡~!: "Hi: ~t · ~~r I~i /1 ¡'ill , - ',,' -g. ¡-I-!' \, -.J fi' .,' i ~ f~:; iil ~il;~ ¡' ! ij ';i ,:.j. ; '~~~- ¡P ¡:~i it' ~; ¡¡~~ · .m. ;¡[ 'i~, i ¡ ri;:¡ " !'~~ [1: ¡Ie I Is. ~ ¡ i"i J!'Lf ~ ~ ~ . H !H~ i Hi Wit' HfH UlitHitm t~ml iH¡11 f~ ,h · fIt þ~ 1 H~' n t '¡Nt !}ï~,3 0 it ~tt ~ r,! ~u H ~Hii !~l"¡;,i:;i~il ~h~~ ~,HI! -' f~ ~ H', r ¡H" 'H í -~ ~fH ~i l" U ~~ ~ ~q, ~~ in,) HH~~!H~j :,ti ~{h~" U H - H.j i ~i¡ï ~.H,t:~[;~ !,., '<p~ ~" 'i t I' ~t i~¡l ..[t'"[IH :HJ ~.~. ~~ h ; .1 I~ [ I,;. ~~,I}lt11·ï f~lf ~ìtl i; ~~ ! H i': ~,Ê~~! Ulh"d~~l tl·~" f]~~ ~. .. . .~. , 'I!ì L¡. ¡-. h "}'f ~I II , ~i ¡ , ; ~[:i~¡·!:!;:~' .1.': [.lo o a.R = ~ ~g. t~¡.o3 !",:t! -.f~ ~Jl '8. ~J ,;: l ~j ~,'f 1 ~Ht H'~}i;äl¡,· ~H [,il~ :-, ¡,~ I .~~! ,...f ,h 'nH'· !,l !o'1 [ U ' ä~ . i ii'! ~·ïi"t.í~ in IlL [[,' ~" 1 ~-!i'K 'Hit!. 8'J 1~ "I! ~.' .' 'i H~'~ :¡it i' ¡o" ~~! " ~~"! ~~:¡kHt! H} 'F' ! 'i. r I ~;¡, ~.. f· h \ ,~. ,[; l' , ~.: t .f .:¡ l'h r .'. , "., [i , , ;>-!-' r 1" ~ ~ !" !" !II >'" " fII ~!" S ~"""1 tI> ;>-.... .!i' ¡¡ n . '" ~ä ;>-~ ;>-!'> !=' !"!" ;>-r-> a ~ '" " ~,',! !.¡fj Hi f!, i !ìi ~ Hi :¡¡¡u m HI H 1; Ii Wi HI [¡,mm Ii If~ ,~~~[ i!. i" -.. · h· !m'] !f.~' ;,!~. ~... ~~ ~~..I!¡ 2 ~i. 1~ h i"!i. 3~~ - f fJ~ 1 H~ ~~[~Ü .t ,ji I' !, i .Ht' H ~,gl~~ h h " 'i ¡h ., ~,[: u' .~"",,: :\ ~" [;"1 'l,J ~=¡¡h ',¡= ';¡ .. II" -. ". . ~-, ¡~..;,. .{ !'o . I I "'1 . ,..~ ,.' ~,';: . ~ i' ,~. i. i.i. ,~~I¡ [. n· I~ i~ ~ ~~ ~ . ï1[1. . H o~ ~i ~~~ ~ ~ n' S' :\!. ~~.~~~! ~i {!'i -~ 15' 1" a··s. ! ~i l~ ¡ a' ó! of ~... '1. ~~, W· ~~::::." l.i"h " ". - 'i;' ' ,i~'1 i.~ H H Iir ~ ~ t~ ì Ii; ~~~~~~ ;~ ~}' H n ~ ¡í~! HII! ~ ~I - ,; of ,ì :1. hI ¡H'ht I; .li ¡¡' .. ~ '~I' .!,1· i .' ~i " .-. - r"" !'.. ~" 1 [ !" {~ h' -. , l' H H ~i~ ! ¡ ~i i c!! ~'H ¡! m ~j ~f t fn~ Hli! I ~I f.i ~~ !ti ;! !n ~H !¡ ~I Hi !i i tHi i ¡~lH n,; " ,- If: . f ~~;, '" ;~', H ., !~~, ¡ ~!.. j' ¡¡ !i Ii} ¡ ~n 1H I; in~ ¡ mi ~ HH~ 'Ii ii 11 ~~ ~ ii ì ;} i J! i: - ~~h ~!Hi c ~: ~! fo ¡ j' ~!' i'~! u' ~i~i " . I - ~~. to' - "F! I!!i n ~:~ân :jH h~! ii'~ q. ,I.HU hi '!,~ ~,p [' H~H [~~~ h~r 11i j "1 ";"'j "~, ["h -Ht ò; ¡!h l'l ì " þ::.[ i~ IiI ¡ ~i1 ,""- :~{ p ,[1 ,-, , J t}11 hi¡ ¡~ lfl~ i= i ~i. ;.;~ ~'¡!l h í i ~ ~I Hi W ti ~!I~ h f 'i. .~~ ¡ hh H [ 1 p" i ·,v i. d "i~i j; i {Hi H ì· 0& I!ih 8.1:", fi' ifa ,:1 '-!n ¡ !i~f H t [i ~~;. ~¡~t ~, ! 'j ;1' oj!' ii !l I~ tI~ ï i~ ,i!1. i .~ 'Ii ~hï 'oil; N ~.. 5" 0P' ¡; , H f' I'lf!~ !1.!J." ~- 31'1 ¡' '1 ~ f'~ Ii? fl' l ¡i~~~ 'HP"~ · 0:1, hI H '. n" "11[. "'~"~ . ¡ ~[H' -, h .' ~ "',!€ '" t'ª .... .. ¡, ~ ~ '!i.n h.'z ,Kl."z iiji if ~i i It ;ii m i iill~ ~~,.~I,~ '~'i " h l.~ t~· ~. i ¡"1~ ~ii;'iï~ :¡¡ F 11 ~ {' 'Ii ~; t :H~~ Hi~~' "h "I L · i[ HI ~~; a':~ H~~if g" h!< I c' ì ,- ~ hi" ....~ ï; " ~. , ':, ,! ~ 'ji~ h,i¡>1 , ,j . ~ ~ .'0 0' ¡..o ;-ihi '. '[ 'I " 1'- î!' ~ "J" ¡¡'~"I n i ¡ 1 t ~i! H ~!W i!;H H · [; 1 ,~ U t I;~j m~; ~. ,~.I~..' ~ !h~ ..0'. ª' ~ , . i ..-,1 0'[0 H ~'I -. 1 ~~. [ ¡~¡~- " ~ î; - .¡!.~ '~jl h' ~ ~~ ~. ~.!ì ~th' :~. ~ 1f g,~ ~ij 8:~~ }Ji;jl .~ ~¡ ~¡ U' 1,:j' §~ "., ,j ;:'¡ :! .", '. ii;H: \I ~i i~~&. '" ~~; ; ~~ g'"~~ ~ ~~ I ~~~ ~ ~ "I.~ § ~a ~ ~¡I ¡ ~i ~i;i~ ~ ¡i i m ¡m iti 1m iH I; iH ¡I ~~~ i ~, ;~~~~ ~ .~ ~ '![ l"'J '-. ;.. hf J ,~1 ,J hi i ~; ~!~u : ði~~ ~ 1¡- i I iii, ~H, jl;~ h U ti ~,~ M~ ."~ 0 o-;~ ~ ~. <, 1" "~ .,>. ì¡ H '. f ~Q~ ~ ~~ I§i~~ ~ ~ ~ 1111; r! Hl~ -í~; P Ii P:~ ï :1 i~W; ! h i i,'~ hl·n ~~Ii i~ I;, ,; h ~ M '~ â~!::¡ 8 ã· i '," ,~. .". Ii [ ," " h ï ~. :;d~ ¡¡ ~ ~ L ~'1 I:¡~ .¡.~ ,-' f~ !! I:, ~~ ~ ~E ~~:g~ .~!~. In I' ,I ~. ~ e~ .-;~~~ ~ ~ h ,!1 II 1.1 I'! 01 .c F 8 8J~.o· ~ i~' . 'I.' ¡ [ .! · ![ , ~~ ~ :' i§~~ ;l [h i"~ !;. 11 .. ¡,~ , i~ ~ ~ .~~ .~ hg "~ "1 h I h ¡ ~; ~ ~ "~ p '"~ p i1¡ /, ~~ i g" a ~ if ih '~I~~ :' ~ iì . ~ ;. hi ~"~~ ;1 :, Ii I ~! ~!~ ~I ~!J d ¡ ì~ i 'I " - ~~ !' - .. h ~~ -~. II ~ i:¡ I .~ if~ !' p ~~ , " - . ¡. "* :;H ,[- . . ;>-~ !'> ;>-~ ,.. !3 !"!" ;>-i;:!"!'II ;>-~ r"'!3 '" ;>-~ ~!" P !" . ¡J: ~ ;"I umt Wi ! ~; Hi J¡'I 1; H~ ~ "¡ off iN ~i 1 ¡'~ f i íH~ If J1í~~, .It. i ~l n! if ,1'1 I ~ ~ if !Ii nl~ h f n ~ ~ U! ;~ ~l. Hl' 'i ~Il i' ,,1 0: 1 ,\ ~,c~ U ,H l' ,.1 ':¡ ¡Iii !o. · ~-, ~.i i ,'1; [ ~., r~~! ¡ U ~! cO, .J lil 't' ! ,[ J~f:. I~, i' < ~[~ ,U'J ,~ 1 ~ ~, !¡ ;¡; H i ~~ :il¡ h! q ¡¡Ii ~Ii h ; I¡ H U Ü fi¡~ ~~, i ¡H, ~n ~t I : j~ ïiI Ii i ~;, ~ 1 ~¡ ~1 I't _1 § '8 ~4 ~f ~ 1 ~ .f (I ° f n . Ii ,. ì' h .111 L' f: If II· f - ~ · -j ~n.~ [ " t,~~' ". j g i [í ° .' "I Ii ". '! ..~ ~ Î' -. a~1 h t ~ .~ n \" ~ ~ i . 1. '~p~ ~ H ~ ~I ~¡ ..~¡¡ II ~ ~ h ¥ II '1:¡ - 1·..· . '1 !. n 'l 1 I' f i I, ~f ¡! 3' ! H .{. '1 1 ¡ ~ ~ i~ ~ mt it, i !~!i l~ n i,! Hi ~ ~~. ~ i~ ~ < fa t r' i II'3 '!. f I ~ !! H~ I :1 '!~ = ;,1,~! ~;_~';: ~ ~ .~ ~JI' ~1 II i¡" !' ~ - ,., ~.. !; ¡. !_, -.,.~ : , "':1' J ì H , Hi;" . ~. j · l .1 1 ,~ :¡'~ ." ,¡~, ;~ ~, ~i :: , !" !H~ ¡j :4 i; H S'; . ~. J! oj ft Iq¡ e[ ~: .: !~ U ;; ~~ Ii ~ 5! ... aB ,~ . !~ 1 I~ _ ¡ ø! I! I i,I¡¡lii ~ ! MI! ! ¡!Iii ø Ii " ¡¡I!I ¡.Ii! 1I,.e: !:!8 9 ï .- g~P IH f'2 -untn ~n ~ c It '- ~ ir ª-Or" ~ ~ oF r 1i~3! n c: ~~~J1 (") 3' 3 I"" I ~j ~ ã: .. . (i, ¡¡ii \ ~ () . . :J 0 g S" 3 c l iP.g· 0 '" ~~l; ~¡;:= c: 00 n ¡ ReI 4Þ :J II ~ I- -=< -< CD _. ~~ ¡; .~ "Tl r~CD ~ H 5- :Þ g r 00 -. 0 m II> III ä: ð..D)D» £ III Q) ]jaJ (J)- 3 0 N~ ~ (') ~ I ~ ~ £!. ~ 00 UI ~;r. DI 0 -0 , (1) :§ " CÐ .. .... i 11!l ~ -u I I ~ III N ; ã) :::J AGENDA REOUEST ITEM NO. ~ DATE: March 6, 2007 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING Leg. [ ] Quasi-JD [X] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: r SUBMITTED BY (DEPT.): County Attorney JoAnn Riley Property Acquisition Manager SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Public Hearing Petition for Abandonment of a portion of Rock Road North of 1-95 to Angle Road Resolution 07-022 See attached Memorandum N/A December 12, 2006 - Permission to Advertise Public Hearing January 16,2007 - Public Hearing continued to February 6, 2007 February 6, 2007 - Public Hearing continued to March 6, 2007 Staff recommends the Board continue this Public Hearing to May I, 2007 at 6:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. COMMISSION ACTION: '[)4 APPROVED [ ] OTHER Approved 4-0 Comm. Smith Absent Motion to continue to May 1, 2007 at 6p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. [x] County Attomey~.., [x] Originating Dept: JIVJ· [ ] DENIED E: o lás M. Anderson County Administrator Review and Approvals [ ] Public Works: [ ] Road and Bridge: [x] Engineering: MVP [ ] Purchasing: PROPERTY ACQUISITION DIVISION MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: JoAnn Riley, Property Acquisition Manager DATE: March 6, 2007 SUBJECT: Public Hearing Petition for Abandonment of a portion of Rock Road North of I-95 to Angle Road Resolution 07-022 BACKGROUND: On February 6,2007, the Board continued the Public Hearing for the abandonment of Rock Road to March 6, 2007. Staff and the applicant have determined they need additional time to reconfigure the needed roadway network in this area. These roadway connections will serve the long term transportation needs of the County. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board continue the Public Hearing to May 1, 2007 at 6:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. Respectfully submitted, Î -uA DVM--~ Ann Ri ley Property Acquisition Manager Rock .¡ ~ 03/02/07 FZABWARR FUND 001 001001 001124 001164 001167 001172 001174 001177 001179 001180 001182 001278 001404 001412 001415 001423 101 101001 101002 101003 101004 101006 101213 101214 .001 105 107 107001 107002 107006 123 126 130 140 140001 140128 140131 140322 140327 140334 140335 140337 150 160 183 183004 183006 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD WARRANT LIST #22- 24-FEB-2007 TO 02-MAR-2007 FUND SUMMARY TITLE General Fund Recreation Special Events FTA USC Section 5307 FY 99/00 USDOJ Violence Against Women Grant FTA Section 5303 Grant FY 05 CDBG Grant FY 05 FHFC Disaster Relief Grant Section 112/MPO/FHWA/Planning 2006 CSBG FY 06 US Dept Housing HUD Shelter Plus Gr CSBG Grant FY07 St. Lucie County Mental Health ColI 05 CDBG Sup Disaster Recovery CTD Medicaid Non-Emrg Grant FY 07 TDC Planning Grant FY 07 DCA-Construction Mitigation Transportation Trust Fund Transportation Trust Interlocals Transportation Trust/8011s Constitut Transportation Trust/Local Option Transportation Trust/County Fuel Tx Transportation Trust/Impact Fees FDOT 25th St. Widening FDOT US1 & Indrio Road Construction Unincorporated Services Fund Drainage Maintenance MSTU Library Special Grants Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund-Wireless Sur Fine & Forfeiture Fund-E911 Surchar F&F Fund-Court Related Technology Queens Cove Lighting Dist#13 Fund Southern Oak Estates Lighting SLC Public Transit MSTU Port & Airport Fund Port Fund Industrial Park West-EDA Design Parallel Runway 9L/27R Industrial Park West Development FDOT Access Roads Ph.2 A/P IPW Const. Apron & Environmental Mitiga Parallel Runway Design-9L/27R Install Perimeter Fencing #412400 Impact Fee Collections Plan Maintenance RAD Fund Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir Ct Admin.- Teen Court Guardian Ad Litem Fund EXPENSES 2,884,605.29 150.00 16,910.00 16,148.97 205.56 2,336.95 10,360.00 2,060.46 394.27 56.43 932.79 437.60 16,249.96 54,570.25 275.10 343.76 30,408.88 50.00 61,484.11 64,927.13 24,439.37 19,264.15 443,527.07 103,572.00 56,543.25 79,589.78 53.48 3,527,351.95 370.87 1,128.44 16,399.14 350.69 119.89 2,997.08 54,134.80 5,386.54 194,116.95 151,828.36 3,062.07 226,822.15 4,325.00 7,990.97 3,799.84 2,348.29 1,448.77 1,080.77 3,219.95 31,500.00 PAGE PAYROLL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 .. # 03/02/07 FZABWARR FUND 184211 185006 185007 185008 216 310002 315 316 317 401 418 451 458 461 471 478 479 491 505 505001 611 615 625 655 j 679 692 693 801 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD WARRANT LIST #22- 24-FEB-2007 TO 02-MAR-2007 FUND SUMMARY TITLE FDEP South SLC Beach Restoration FHFA SHIP FY05/06 FHFA SHIP FY06/07 FHFA Hurricane Housing Recovery County Capital I&S Impact Fees-Parks County Building Fund County Capital County Capita1-St Revenue Share Bnd Sanitary Landfill Fund Golf Course Fund S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund SH Util-Renewal & Replacement Fund Sports Complex Fund No County Utility District-Operatin No Cty Util Dist-Renewa1 & Replace No Cty Util Dist-Capita1 Facilities Building Code Fund Health Insurance Fund Property/Casualty Insurance Fund Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund Impact Fees Fund Law Library Insurance Agency Fund Lost Tree Estates Fund Anita Street MSBU Fund Timberlake Estates MSBU Ideal Holding Road MSBU Westg1en MSBU Bank Fund GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 260,393.34 10,360.00 803.28 1,902.59 14,424.00 400.00 3,864.61 17,742.05 750.00 97,397.95 24,818.07 1,861.33 455.1.4 37,964.80 15,753.63 724.87 14,634.78 48,428.04 169,558.14 1,113,892.32 6,043.18 1,110.59 665.00 166,443.68 348.95 347.77 1,855.31 897.44 719.26 56,934.79 10,201,174.04 PAGE PAYROLL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 .. AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. c2fl DATE: March 6, 2007 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ x ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY{DEPT): County Attorney Heather Sperrazza Lueke Assistant County Attorney SUBJECT: Extension of Declaration of State of Local Emergency - Indian River Drive BACKGROUND: See CA No. 07-0304 FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Declaration and authorize the Public Safety Director to sign the Declaration. 1)<] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: Approved 4-0 Comm. Smith Absent JJ [X] County Attorney: ~ ~ Review and Approvals [ ]Management & Budget: [ ]Purchasing: [ ] Road & Bridge.: [ ) Parks & Recreation Director [ ] Solid Waste Mgr Effective 5/96 [ ]Finance:(check for copy only, if applicable) \, ';:,) , 1\ \ : I,>, r i' FEB 2 2 2007 CG AN ORDER OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY DIRECTOR OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY EXTENDING THE STATE OF LOCAL EMERGENCY ( Indian River Drive) WHEREAS, the St. Lucie County Public Safety Director has made the following determinations: 1. The Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County has adopted Resolution No. 00-277 authorizing the County Administrator and the Public Safety Director to exercise certain emergency powers and authority during a local emergency, 2. The Public Safety Director declared a state of emergency on November 21, 2006, at 9:00 am on Indian River Drive. 3. Based on the recommendation of the County Engineer and the advice of local law enforcement officials, there is a clear and present threat to life and public health and safety as well as a threat of significant damage to improved public and private property as a result of the failure of the several property owners to repair their embankments, causing severe erosion to the embankment and undermining Indian River Drive in several locations. 4. The presence of this severe erosion and undermining of Indian River Drive has placed St. Lucie County in a state of emergency, exposing the citizens thereof to danger to life and property. 5. In order to respond to such emergency, upon this declaration, the County Administrator or his designee is authorized to initiate and take such actions authorized by Resolution 00-277 for and on behalf of the Board of County Commissioners during the term of such local state of emergency. 6. Such declaration is extended for seven (7) days until March 13, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. unless sooner rescinded by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County or the County Administrator. 7. This Extension of the Declaration of Emergency shall become effective March 6, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. Jack T. Southard Public Safety Director INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM COUNTY ATTORNEYS OFFICE ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Heather Sperrazza Lueke, Assistant County Attorney C.A. NO: 07-0304 DATE: March 6, 2007 SUBJECT: Extension of Declaration of State of Local Emergency - Indian River Drive BACKGROUND: Based on the recommendation of the County Engineer and the advice of local law enforcement officials, there is a clear and present threat to life and public health and safety as well as a threat of significant damage to improved public and private property as a result of the failure of several property owners to repair their embankments causing severe erosion to the embankment and undermining Indian River Drive in several locations. Resolution No. 00-277 authorizes the County Administrator and the Public Safety Director to exercise certain emergency powers and authority during a local emergency. On November 21, 2006, the Board approved a Declaration of Emergency on Indian River Drive. Since November 21, 2006, the Board has approved extensions of the State of Emergency. It is necessary to extend that state of emergency again. Attached is an extension of the Declaration of Local Emergency for Indian River Drive. RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends the that Board approve the Declaration and authorize the Public Safety Director to sign the Declaration. Respectfully submitted, /'/ /1 l' >C>. '/l /\/'/~ (-,-Z,c / / ../ '-..,' / 'v - ../ Heather Sperrazza Lueke Assistant County Attorney 1..) ~ , " / /' HL/ , AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. c-~.6 DATE: March 6, 2007 REGULAR [] PUBLIC HEARING [] CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre SUBJECT: Resolution No. 07-082 - Extending State of Local Emergency - Ban on Open Air Burning in St. Lucie County BACKGROUND: Due to the drought in St. Lucie County, the Fire Chief has requested that the County extend the ban on open air burning in St. Lucie County. FUNDS A V AILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDA TION: Staff recommends that the Board approve Resolution No. 07- 082 and authorize the Chairman to sign the Resolution. COMMISSION ACTION: ouglas Anderson County Administrator '.!.M APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 4-0 Comm. Smith Absent County Attorney: Ie¡ Review and Approvals Management & Budget Purchasing: Originating Dept. Public Works Dir: County Eng.: Finance: (Check for copy only. if applicable) Eft. 5/96 .. RESOLUTION NO. 07-082 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY EXTENDING THE STATE OF LOCAL EMERGENCY (OPEN AIR BURNING) WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has made the following determinations: 1. The Board has adopted Resolution No. 00-277 authorizing the County Administrator and the Public Safety Director to exercise certain emergency powers and authority during a local emergency. 2. The County Administrator declared a state of emergency on February 14, 2007, at 5:00 p.m. due drought conditions. 3. The drought conditions have placed St. Lucie County in a state of emergency, exposing the citizens thereof to danger to life and property. 4. In order to respond to such emergency, upon this extension, the County Administrator or his designee is authorized to initiate and take such actions authorized by Resolution 00-277 for and on behalf of the Board of County Commissioners during the term of such local state of emergency. 5. Such declaration is extended for seven (7) days until March 7, 2007 at 5:00 p.m. unless sooner rescinded by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County or the County Administrator. 6. This Extension of the Declaration of Emergency shall become effective February 28, 2007 at 5:00 p.m. After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Chris Craft Vice Chairman Joseph E. Smith Commissioner Paula A. Lewis Commissioner Doug Coward Commissioner Charles Grande xxx XXX XXX XXX XXX - . PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this _ day of March, 2007. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY ~ AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-2.C Date: March 6, 2007 Regular [ ] Public Hearing [ ] Consent [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Heather Young Assistant County Attorney SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 07-010 (Animal Registration) - Permission to Advertise for Public Hearing BACKGROUND: See C.A. No. 07-0336 FUNDS A V AIL.(State type & No. of transaction or N/ A): N/ A RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests permission to advertise proposed Ordinance No. 07-010 (Animal Registration) for public hearing on April 3,2007 at 6:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as may be heard. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: /1- ¿Y -, Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator t' \ l~1i< APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approvea 4-0 Comm. Smith Absent Finance (Check for Coordination/Signatures County Attorney: Mgt. & Budget: Purchasing: Originating Dept.: Other: Other: INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Heather Young, Assistant County Attorney C.A. NO: 07-0336 DATE: February 27, 2007 SUBJECT: Animal Registration Ordinance - Permission to Advertise Proposed Ordinance No. 07-010 for Public Hearing BACKGROUND: Attached to this memorandum is a copy of proposed Ordinance No. 07-010 which would require the registration of dogs and cats over the age of four months as well registration of dog and cat breeders in the unincorporated areas of the County. A "breeder" would be defined as any person whose cats or dogs produce a total of two or more litter within a twelve month period. The ordinance provides for the Board to establish a fee schedule by resolution. Staff intends to propose a differential fee schedule based upon the sterilization status of the registered animal. Funds generated from the issuance of registration tags and breeder registration certificates would be used to fund spay and neuter programs in the County. If adopted, the ordinance would take effect October 1, 2007. RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff requests permission to advertise proposed Ordinance No. 07-010 for public on April 3,2007, at 6:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as may be heard. Respectfully submitted, 'k--~~~~ Heather Young Assistant County Attorney Attachment HY/ Copies to: County Administrator Public Safety Director Management and Budget Director Animal Control Coordinator Deputy Clerk Press/Public ORDINANCE NO. 07-010 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 1-4 "ANIMALS AND FOWL" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING SECTION 1- 14-16 (DEFINITIONS) TO ADD A DEFINITION OF "BREEDER"; CREATING ARTICLE III, "REGISTRATION" TO REQUIRE REGISTRATION OF DOGS AND CATS; CREATING SECTION 1-4-29 (REGISTRATION REQUIRED; EFFECT ON DOGS OR CATS IN EXISTENCE ON THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE ORDINANCE); CREATING SECTION 1-4-30 (ISSUANCE OF ANIMAL REGISTRATION/IDENTIFICATION TAGS); CREATING SECTION 1-4-31 (BREEDER REGISTRATION REQUIRED); CREATING SECTION 1-4-32 (ISSUANCE OF BREEDER REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE); CREATING SECTION 1- 4-33 (ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTIES); PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING ADOPTION; AND PROVIDING CODIFICATION. WHEREAS, Section 125.01, Florida Statutes, authorized the Board of County Commissioners to establish programs providing for the health, safety, and general welfare of the residents of St. Lucie County; and, WHEREAS, Chapter 1-4 (Animals and Fowl) of the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances and Compiled Laws (the "Animal Control Ordinance") provides for the regulation and control of animals in the unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County; and, WHEREAS, on this _ day of ,2007, at a duly advertised public hearing, the Board determined that it is necessary and in the public interest to amend the Animal Control Ordinance to establish a differential registration/identification tag program for dogs and cats as an appropriate means of (a) promoting public health and safety, (b) facilitating the identification and return of stray and last dogs and cats, and (c) encouraging spaying and neutering to reduce the pet overpopulation in St. Lucie County in order to effectively enforce the provisions of Chapter 1-4. Stf'1:Id< thf'eugh passages are deleted. Underlined passages are added. -1- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: PART B. AMENDMENT OF CHAPTER 1-4 (ANIMALS AND FOWL) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES AND COMPILED LAWS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, BY AMENDING SECTION 1-4-16 (DEFINITIONS). Section 1-4-16 (Definitions) of Chapter 1-4 of the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances and Compiled Laws is hereby amended to add a definition of "breeder" as follows: Section 1-4-16. Definitions. ************************************* Breeder. Any person who owns. keeps. harbors. maintains. or has custody of any dog or cat which produce a total of two or more litters during a twelve (12) month period. ************************************* PART C. AMENDMENT OF CHAPTER 1-4 (ANIMALS AND FOWL) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES AND COMPILED LAWS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, TO CREATE ARTICLE III, (REGISTRATION). Article III (Registration) of Chapter 1-4 of the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances and Compiled Laws is hereby created to read as follows: ARTICLE III. REGISTRATION Section 1-4-29. Registration reQuired; effect on dogs or cats in existence on the effective date of the ordinance. Except as otherwise provided herein. it shall be unlawful for any person to own, keep. harbor. maintain. or have custody of any dog or cat four (4) months or older. unless such dOQ or cat has been currently registered in accordance with the provisions of this ordinance. Any dog or cat four (4) months or older on the effective date of this ordinance and which has a current valid rabies vaccination as of the effective date shall be reQistered in accordance with the provisions of this ordinance. StrucI( threu§R passages are deleted. Underlined passages are added. -2- Section 1-4-30. Issuance of animal registration/identification tags. (g) All owners or custodians of d09s and cats in the unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County shall obtain a St. Lucie County re9istration/identification taQ for each dOQ and cat by the age of four (4) months that they own. keep. harbor. maintain. or have in custody as follows: ill Within thirty (30) days of aCQuirinQ the dog or cat; or (2) Within thirty (30) days after the owner or custodian takes residence in the unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County. whichever occurs later. (Q) Except as provided herein. reQistration/identification ta9s should be securely fastened about the animal's neck by a collar or other device so as to be clearly visible at all times. Dogs and cats not so registered/identified may be considered stray and in violation of Section 1-4-22 and may be impounded as therein provided. A vaccination certificate and if applicable. a sterilization certificate. issued by a veterinarian must accompany all applications for a St. Lucie County reQistration/identification taQ. f£) The registration/identification tag shall be valid for one (1) year from the date of issuance or date of the rabies vaccination. whichever is earlier for unsterilized animals and for the lifespan of sterilized animals. íQ} Animal owners or custodians shall purchase a reQistration/identification taQ directly from (1) any participatinQ veterinarians' office displaying the St. Lucie County Animal Control Division Seal. and (2) the Humane Society of St. Lucie County. Inc.. 100 Savannah Road. Fort Pierce. Florida 34982. Such request shall include proof of current vaccination affidavit as set forth above in Section 1-4-30(b) and a sterilization certificate duplicate copy. if applicable. ParticipatinQ veterinarians shall provide the Humane Society of St. Lucie County. Inc.. with a list of all licenses issued which shall maintain a database of such information. The fees for re9istration/identification taQS shall be established by resolution of the Board. The County shall pay participating veterinarians and the Humane Society of St. Lucie County. Inc.. respectively. the sums to be determined by resolution of the Board for each registration/identification tag sold. W No reQistration/identification tag shall be transferable from one animal to another nor from one owner to another. Upon transfer of a previously registered animal to a new owner or custodian. the owner or custodian shall have a period of thirty (30) days .struE:l< tkr8u§k passages are deleted. Underlined passages are added. -3- within which to comply with the requirements of this ordinance. ill Net proceeds accruing to the County from the sale of cat or dog registration/identification taQs shall be turned over to the Clerk of the Circuit Court to be placed in a fund desiQnate as the "Animal Registration Fund." The proceeds shall be used for spay/neuter proQrams in St. Lucie County operated by the St. Lucie County Humane Society. fg) The reQistration provisions of this article shall not apply to: ill Any owner or custodian who is a nonresident or temporary resident. as defined herein. provided that the owner's animal has been vaccinated for rabies. which vaccination remains valid under the laws of St. Lucie County for the duration of the anticipated stay within the unincorporated areas of the County. A "temporary resident" as used herein shall be defined to mean a person who intends to reside in the unincorporated areas of the County for a total period of less than six months during any twelve-month period. All other reQuirements include restraint obligations shall apply; or, ill The ownership. care. custody or maintenance, in the ordinary course of business. of any animal by a research or veterinary medical facility. government operated or authorized animal shelter. humane society facility, boarding facility, or commercial pet shop. provided that said shelter, facility, or shop is operatinQ in accordance with all applicable occupational licensinQ and zoninQ ordinances. ill Dogs and cats kept on property zoned AG-l, AG-2.5. AG-4, or PUD where livestock is permitted. Section 1-4-31 Breeder reQistration reQuired It shall be unlawful for any person to operate as a cat or dog breeder unless such person has been currently registered as a breeder in accordance with the provisions of this ordinance. Any breeder shall be registered in accordance with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 1-4-32. Issuance of breeder reQistration certificate. ill All breeders of cats and/or dOQS in the unincorporated areas of St. Lucie Strueh thrßugh passages are deleted. Underlined passages are added, -4- County shall obtain an annual St. Lucie County breeder reQistration certificate on or before October 1st of each year. ill The breeder reQistration number shall be included in all advertisements for sale of any animals offered for sale or breeding by the breeder. ill Breeders shall obtain a reQistration certificate directly from (1) any participatinQ veterinarians' office displayinQ the St. Lucie County Animal Control Division Seal. and (2) the Humane Society of St. Lucie County. Inc.. 100 Savannah Road. Fort Pierce. Florida 34982. Such request shall include proof of current vaccination affidavit as set forth above in Section 1-4-30(b) and a sterilization certificate duplicate copy. if applicable. ParticipatinQ veterinarians shall provide the Humane Society of St. Lucie County. Incoo with a list of all licenses issued which shall maintain a database of such information. The fees for breeder reQistration shall be established by resolution of the Board. The County shall pay participatinQ veterinarians and the Humane Society of St. Lucie County. Incoo respectively. the sums to be determined by resolution of the Board for each registration certificate issued. W The breeder registration certificate shall be non-transferable. ill Net proceeds accruinQ to the County from the sale of breeder registration certificates shall be turned over to the Clerk of the Circuit Court to be placed in a fund designate as the" Animal Registration Fund." The proceeds shall be used for spay/neuter programs in St. Lucie County operated by the St. Lucie County Humane Society. Section 1-4-33 Enforcement and penalties This article shall be enforced in accordance with the enforcement and penalty provisions set forth in Section 1-4-26. PART C. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, and adopted prior to January 1, 1969, St. Lucie County ordinances and St. Lucie County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict. Strl:lel( threl:lgA passages are deleted. Underlined passages are added. -5- PART D. SEVERABILITY AND APPLICABILITY. If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance. If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person, property, or circumstance, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any person, property, or circumstance. PART D. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE. The Clerk is hereby directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of Administrative Code and Laws, Department of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida 32304. PART F. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect October 1,2007. PART G. ADOPTION. After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows: Chairman Chris Craft Vice Chairman Joseph E. Smith Commissioner Paula A. Lewis Commissioner Charles Grande Commissioner Doug Coward xxx XXX XXX XXX XXX PART G. CODIFICATION. Provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated in the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County, Florida, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or other appropriate word, and the sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intention; provided, however, that Parts B through F shall not be codified. StrucI< tRrBu§A passages are deleted. Underlined passages are added. -6- PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this day of ,2007. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: County Attorney g: \atty\ordnance \2007\07 -OlO.doc Strucl( tRPeu~R passages are deleted. Underlined passages are added. -7- AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C2d DATE: March 6. 2007 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING Leg. [ ] Quasi -JD [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT.): County Attorney JoAnn Riley Property Acquisition Manager SUBJECT: Contract for Sale and Purchase Paradise Park Stormwater Improvement Peter Zecca Tax ID 1433-801-0047-000/3, 1433-801-0024-000/6, 1433-801-0071-000/0 and 1433-801-0001-000/9 BACKGROUND: Please see attached Memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds will be made available in: Paradise Park SLC Stormwater Imp. - Stormwater Management Account No. 102803-3725-561007-42511 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve the Contract for Sale and Purchase from Peter Zecca for the purchase price of $116,000.00, authorize the Chairman to sign the Contract and direct staff to proceed with the closing and record the Warranty Deed in the Public Records ofSt. Lucie County. [ )MPPROVED [ ] OTHER Approved 4-0 Comm. Smith Absent [ ] DENIED C:CjJE: Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: -.--' .j¡r [x] County Attorney: f [x] Originating Dept: 5rAf- Review and Approvals [x] Engineering:: MVf Ix] Public workS~ PROPERTY ACQUISITION DIVISION MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: JoAnn Riley, Property Acquisition Manager DATE: March 6, 2007 SUBJECT: Contract for Sale and Purchase Paradise Park Stormwater Improvement Peter Zecca Tax ID 1433-801-0047-000/3,1433-801-0024-000/6, 1433-801-0071-000/0 and 1433-801-0001-000/9 BACKGROUND: St. Lucie County is planning to construct stormwater improvements to the Paradise Park neighborhood. Peter Zecca's property is one of the properties needed for part of a dry retention pond. A contract was sent to Mr. Zecca in the amount of $116,000.00 which is 100'Yo of the appraised value of the property according to East Coast Appraisers & Consultants the County's independent appraiser. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve the Contract for Sale and Purchase from Peter Zecca for the purchase price of $116,000.00, authorize the Chairman to sign the Contract and direct staff to proceed with the closing and record the Warranty Deed in the Public Records of St. Lucie County. Respectfully submitted, /'ì ,'--' . f¡ .....- V~\V\·- ,-L.tt_,-, ( ~,. :Ann Riley Property Acquisition Manager ,-,,,,~ '~ " .................."......,.... imm' '" LI LAC TER " , ACORN WAY \'\" " "" SILVERSTREAMCIR .". ~ 'i' ; m \\ .". \ ,'_.m." c:. I '. IJI 1 \.> \\,\ '--. ". ..·....T....··...· .................._~._-- " "". "-.., . "-....., '~ "'" J' ...'...'...."'.--.." " " _.m.......m_~ " I' I"', ''''''''' \ ! ' OOO~"" "', !i ,I 4Cllibt) '" \,' \ SAN MARCOS AVE . 11'" "" .,'" ) I17 '[Jr[~t:~~JI"'i" '. '.. ...." i ~ ' TI·-I-~~'--~m, " ""'/ / i ¡ I I I I lJJ -~i" '. '" ,,_~_____,; l I 111NDAA~Ei '-ri ri ---1- ì'l"ì" '-':~'-'\~' ¡ ! ¡: .!, j \,~>~~ __dO'..... ,..... ..... . ]]]]r[r-'T--_[IIJ ..\ - -. ì C:lrrNr-~~==<=~rri- -----'- ~I I 1 [~nll 1 !! LL_~ \1___~~ r'mrI[] ,~·tlj ~__L_L~ \J]] T 1TJ IrT-rlTrTl IIrrrAVE- -IT=n ~~-IT--\ ~ \ 1---- ._.~..._-_........ l(wrttro~~I~I' ... ~~.~1-1 i r-t--T-r\ \, ITIJ I fT-TT' ····1 Î I]; [rl] [DJ ¡ · -I·! I TIT T- 'f' \\\ ,UilLt'-'ll r-L,.--LL - -I" III" - - ' '-I! T ~¡=" -- ----It\ \ m" Rb~kRITA~A~E"''':'-'''' ,..",.."", .m,,,,,,',m....,_' i~~::i,~c.,..'._"_-"--""~'_'''''''''':C::':~:~'''''''' ! \ \ ", \ ...._m·········._...._..........._...~M.....M... C 'Tj"'-·""". _....m~I' "'" II' 'I r "AVENUES"" I·m[~ [~::::.:r'" ....h.....\ ' .......................-.-......., i' PROJECT NAME: Paradise Park Stormwater Improvement Project PARCEL: Peter Zecca Parcell.D. 1433-801-0047-000/3 and 1433-801-0024-000/6,1433-801-0071-000/0 and 1433-801-0001-000/9 CONTRACT FOR SALE AND PURCHASE FOR REAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION THIS AGREEMENT made this _ day of , 2007, between Peter Zecca. whose mailing address 8955 Via Tuscany Drive. Boynton Beach. FL 33437. hereinafter referred to as SELLER and, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose mailing address is 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida, 34982 hereinafter referred to as PURCHASER, upon the terms and conditions set forth herein, SELLER agrees to sell and PURCHASER agrees to purchase a certain parcel or parcels of real property located in the County of St. Lucie, Florida, being more fully described as: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" together with all improvements and personal property located thereon as may hereinafter be specifically described. 1. PURCHASE PRICE AND METHOD OF PAYMENT. The full purchase price is One Hundred Sixteen Thousand and 00/100 Dollars, ($116.000.00) determined to be the total of the following: Real Property (Land) and Buildings Parcell.D. 1433-801-0071-000/0 Parcell.D. 1433-801-0047-000/3 Parcell.D. 1433-801-0024-000/6 Parcell.D. 1433-801-0001-000/9 $28.000.00 $25.000.00 $25.000.00 $38.000.00 Other Improvements upon the Land (described, if any) $ N/A payable in Cash or Cashier's check at the time of closing; plus or minus credits, adjustments and prorations as of the date of closing. 1 This contract is contingent on the County purchasing the abutting property to the subject parcels. 2. EXPENSES. PURCHASER shall pay for documentary stamps and recording fees on the Deed conveying the subject real property to PURCHASER. Processing fees, if any, for obtaining a release, partial release or subordination agreement upon any existing mortgage shall be borne by PURCHASER. 3. TITLE. PURCHASER shall obtain, at the PURCHASER'S expense, a commitment for title insurance from a title company of PURCHASER'S choice, certified to a date not earlier that the date hereof, showing good and marketable title thereto to be vested in the SELLER, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances except those herein expressly set forth and those which shall be discharged by SELLER at or before closing. Should PURCHASER find on examination of said title commitment that SELLER'S title is not good and marketable, PURCHASER shall notify SELLER or his attorney in writing specifying the defects and SELLER agrees to use reasonable diligence to make same good and marketable and shall have a reasonable time therefor, but not to exceed 45 days from the date of said notification. If title shall not be made good and marketable within said time, all monies paid hereunder shall forthwith be repaid to PURCHASER and thereupon this contract shall become null and void and the parties hereto released and relieved of all further rights, duties or obligations hereunder; or, at PURCHASER'S option and PURCHASER'S request, SELLER shall deliver the title in its existing condition upon compliance by PURCHASER with the terms of the contract, and in such event SELLER shall be released and relieved from any duty and obligations to make such title good and marketable. 4. CONVEYANCE. SELLER agrees to convey title to PURCHASER by a good and sufficient statutory Warranty Deed, all real property to be free and clear of all liens and encumbrances except, taxes for the current year, and zoning ordinances. 5. LIENS. All certified liens or assessments and any pending liens for which work has 2 been completed prior to the date of this contract, shall be paid by SELLER. SELLER shall make and deliverto PURCHASER a Mechanic's No-Lien Affidavit as to realty. 6. PRORATIONS. Taxes, rents, interest and other expenses or revenue of said property shall be prorated from the cash to close as ofthe date of closing. Credits and charges for the day of closing shall belong to and be borne by the SELLER. 7. RISK OF LOSS. SELLER assumes risk of any and all loss or damage prior to closing and the property shall be conveyed in the same condition as on the date of this contract, ordinary wear and tear excepted. 8. POSSESSION. SELLER shall deliver possession to PURCHASER at the closing. 9. CLOSING. The closing shall be on or before March 23. 2007 at which time all monies due to be paid hereunder and all instruments due to be made, executed, and delivered by the respective parties, each to the other, as herein provided, shall be paid and delivered, and the abstract shall become the property of the PURCHASER, subject to possessory rights and mortgagees of record. 10. PLACE OF CLOSING. Closing shall be held at the offices of a place chosen by PURCHASER and PURCHASER shall notify SELLER in writing of same at least seven (7) days prior to closing. 11. ATTORNEY'S FEES. Either pa'rty failing to comply with the terms hereof will pay all expenses, including a reasonable attorney's fee, incurred by the other party because of that failure. 12. MISCELLANEOUS. Written provisions shall control all printed provisions in conflict therewith. This Contract embodies the entire agreement of the parties and may not be 3 altered or modified except by an instrument in writing signed by the party against whom the enforcement of any alterations or modifications is sought. 13. DEFAULT. If SELLER fails to perform hereunder without fault of the PURCHASER, all monies paid hereunder shall be returned to the PURCHASER upon demand but PURCHASER shall not thereby waive any right or remedy he may have because of such default of SELLER. If PURCHASER fails to perform hereunderwithout fault of SELLER, all monies paid hereunder may be retained by SELLER as liquidated damages which shall be in lieu of all other remedies allowed by law and this contract shall there upon terminate. 14. DEED RESTRICTIONS. SELLER warrants that there are no deed restrictions which are coupled with a reverter or re-entry clause and that title is not based upon a tax deed, or if based upon a tax deed, that the title has been duly quieted by suit. 15. ASSIGNMENT. This contract is freely assignable by the PURCHASER, but no such assignment is binding upon SELLER until an executed copy thereof is delivered to the SELLER. Upon such delivery, the assignor shall be relieved of all liabilities under th is contract. 16. ESCROW CLOSING. The cash proceeds of sale shall be held in escrow by the escrow agent for a period 0 f n 0 longer that five ( 5) business days to a lIow the deed tot he PURCHASER to be recorded and the abstract oftitle continued, at the expense ofthe PURCHASER, to show title in the PURCHASER, without any intervening encumbrances or change from the date of last continuation. If there should be any change, the parties shall have the same rights as provided elsewhere herein, when SELLER is unable to make title good and marketable. 17. RECISSION. PURCHASER may rescind this contract if at the time of closing the SELLER is the subject of any insolvency, receivership or bankruptcy proceedings, or is deceased. 4 18. EXISTING MORTGAGES. SELLER hereby warrants that existing mortgages are in good standing and SELLER further agrees to keep them in good standing and to make all payments due thereunder; he shall either satisfy the mortgage or obtain a release of the subject property from the mortgage at or before closing. 19. REFUSAL OF SPOUSE. Failure or refusal of the wife or husband of the SELLER to execute the deed or any other required document, shall be deemed default of the SELLER. 20. OFFER TO SELL. SELLER and PURCHASER recognize and agree that bysigningthis agreement first, the SELLER i s 0 ffering to s ell the property described above tot he PURCHASER in accordance with the terms and conditions of this agreement. If PURCHASER shall fail to approve this agreement within sixty (60) days after SELLER signs this agreement, this offer shall be null and void. 21. SELLER'S REPRESENTATIONS. (a) SELLER warrants and represents that there are no leases, occupancies, or tenancies; and none will be agreed to prior to closing without PURCHASER'S consent. (b) SELLER has not entered into any contracts, subcontracts, licenses, concessions, easements, or other agreements, service arrangements, either recorded or unrecorded, written or oral, affecting the property. (c) SELLER agrees with PURCHASER that from and after the date hereof and prior to closing, SELLER will not enter into any lease or agreement or any modification of any existing lease or agreement pertaining to the subject property without the written consent of PURCHASER. (d) Neither the whole nor any part of the subject property is now, and at the closing will be, in violation of any code, ordinance, statute, or regulation pertaining thereof; and SELLER has received no notice of any such violation. SELLER shall deliver to PURCHASER any such notice received prior to or after closing. (e) There are no encroachments thereof. (f) All of SELLER'S representations and warranties set forth in this Contract shall be true as of and surviving the closing, and all obligations of SELLER involving action or performance by SELLER prior to closing shall have been fully complied with. In the event that a 5 lien, claim or cause of action should arise, resulting from the activities upon the property prior to closing or from any misrepresentations concerning the property contained herein, SELLER shall at its sole cost and expense defend against such claim or cause of action, and hold PURCHASER harmless therefrom, which shall include, but not be limited to, SELLER'S retaining such attorneys or other persons as may be required to fulfill this indemnification. If any of the representations of SELLER contained in this paragraph are inaccurate at the present time or as of the date of closing, PURCHASER may elect not to close this transaction in which event all parties shall be relieved from all obligations and liabilities hereunder; provided however, that nothing contained herein shall preclude PURCHASER from seeking specific pèrformance of SELLER'S obligations hereunder so as to rectify any misrepresentation made by SELLER herein. 22. COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS. As of and subsequent to the date of this Contract of Sale, the SELLER warrants and represents to the PURCHASER, its successors and assigns, that to the best of the SELLER'S knowledge and belief that there is no violation of Federal, State, and/or local environmental laws and/or regulations on the property. PURCHASER, at PURCHASER'S expense, shall have the right to have said items inspected, and if upon inspection such items do not meet the above representations, PURCHASER shall have the option of canceling this Agreement or PURCHASER may elect to proceed with the transaction. 23. CONFLICT OF LAWS. The parties hereto hereby agree that all legal rights, duties, obligations and defenses shall be determined pursuant to the Laws of the State of Florida. The covenants herein shall bind and the benefits and advantages shall inure to the respective heirs, executors, administrators and successors or the parties hereto. Whenever used, the singular shall include the plural, and the plural the singular and the use of any gender shall include all genders. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto affixed their hands and seals. 6 EXECU-ry¡ by SELLER this ~~~ Þ¡ WiaL~ 72J .~ Witness , 2007. STATE OF ) COUNTY OF ) , ''I"'--L The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ';}.. ~.-, day of ~ \ ,2007, by Peter Zecca, who is personally known to me or who has produced a drivers license issued within the last five years as identification. ,,'''''''''' NANCY R, FENGFISH ......"'þoP<y PUff', f~o. .'0\ Notary Public - Slate of Florida ~. : : . ~My Commission Expires Apr 1 , 2008 ;~: ~o~f Commission # DO 3062 ¡ 5 "'f.,W,:.'¡,"" Bonded By Notional Notary Assn ~~.~ Notary Public G t\G..~ ~ 6 f \~ (Printed, Typ d or Stampe Name of Notary Public) My Commission Expires EXECUTED by PURCHASER this day of , 2007 ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS County Attorney 7 EXHIBIT "A" Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, PARADISE PARK ADDITION, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 8, at Page 36, of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. And Lot 24, Block 1, PARADISE PARK ADDITION, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 8, at Page 36, of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida AND Lot 24, Block 2, PARADISE PARK ADDITION, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 8, at Page 36, of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. And Lot 24, Block 3, PARADISE PARK ADDITION, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 8, at Page 36, of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida 8 EXHIBIT "B" SCHEDULE OF LEASES, TENANCIES AND OCCUPANCIES ~/ft 9 EXHIBIT "C" CONTRACTS1 LICENSES AND AGREEMENTS f\ 0 10 EXHIBIT "D" OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS \\ q 11 EXHIBIT "E" POLICIES OF INSURANCE ~ ~ 12 ITEM NO. C3 A.- DATE: March 6, 2007 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT.): ENGINEERING DIVISION (4115) , P.E. SUBJECT: Work Authorization NO.9 (C05-04-190) for Professional Surveying Services with LBFH, Inc., for Orange Avenue and NSLRWCD Canal No. 54. BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds will be made available in 316001-41131-563003-xxxxx. Transportaiton Capital - Local Option Culvert Replacement. PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Board approve Work Authorization NO.9 (C05-04-190) for Professional Surveying Services with LBFH, Inc., for Orange Avenue and NSLRWCD Canal No. 54 in the amount of $8,400, and authorization for the Chairman to sign. COMMISSION ACTION: r>1 APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER E: i~' [x] County Attorney r [x]Orig. Dept. Public Works Pulitzer Rd. Orange Ave. su Coordina i [x] Mgt. & Budget Ix] County Surveyor Approved 4-0 Comm. Smith Absent DIVISION OF ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Mike Powley, County Engineer DATE: March 6, 2007 SUBJECT: Work Authorization NO.9 (C05-04-190) for Professional Surveying Services with LBFH, Inc., for Orange Avenue and NSLRWCD Canal No. 54. BACKGROUND The culvert crossing at Orange Avenue over North St. Lucie River Water Control District's Canal No. 54 had previou$ly been identified as in need of repair, but is became critical before it could be included in our CIP budget. This work authorization will provide the necessary survey work for us to develop the construction plans in-house. LBFH, Inc. shall prepare a topographic survey meeting the Minimum Technical Standards. Attached is Work Authorization NO.9 (C05-04-190) for Professional Surveying Services with LBFH, Inc., for Orange Avenue and NSLRWCD Canal No. 54 in the amount of $8,400. WORK AUTHORIZATION NO.9 St. Lucie County Pulitzer Road and Orange A venue Topographic Survey Agreement for Surveying and Mapping Services Contract No. C05-04-190 Pursuant to that certain Agreementfor Professional Surveying Services (the "Agreement") between S1. Lucie County (the "County") and LBFH, Inc. (the "Surveyor") dated April 5, 2005, Surveyor hereby agrees to provide professional surveying services under the Scope of Services set forth in Exhibit "A"; under the Tenns and General Conditions to Agreement set forth in Exhibit "B"; and under the Time and Expense Rates Schedule set forth in Exhibit "C"; all of which are attached hereto and made a part of this Work Authorization. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County and the Surveyor have executed this Work Authorization, effective this_ day of , 2007. WITNESSES: ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY WITNESSES: ~::FH' mc. (JI it U1 Print Name: C L .¡...)'T 0 W ~ £~S I,¿N oß L.CX.,..I--I Title: GL.& Æ-N Î 5~r'LV IC-.z ~~~IL g:\atty\agreemnt\work.aut\lbfh-Pulitzer&Orange#9. wpd A 9c¥e EnglnCIring Comp,ny CO".UL TINB CIVIL '''II/UER. ~1I"Yno". & M""F.A$ Exhibit A Scope of Services SCOPE: LBFH Inc. shall prepare a topographic su.rvey meeting the Mi1Jimum Technical Standards Chapter 61g17, FJorida Administrative Code. The survey is located at the intersection of North .51. Lucie Water Management District Canal No. 54 and State Road 68 (Orange Avenue). The survey shall be conducted 200-feet North and South of the intersection and 300-feet East and West of the intersection and shalJ include the folJowing: 1) The survey shaII establish a survey base1jne with fO\lr set horizontal control points. The horizontal contro) points wilI be based on the Florida State Plane coordinate system, Transverse Mercator Projection, East Zone, North American Datum of 1983/1990 adjustroeTJt> and shall be based on St. Lucie County published GPS control. 2) The survey shaH estabHsh four benchmarks "11 the horizontal controt points set in item I with a .closed conventional bench loop. The: vertical datum win be based on the North AIJIerican Datum of 1988 (NA VD 88) and wi1I be based on published St. Lucie County ven.ical controJ. 3) The survey shaJJ locate aU above. ground improvements and subsurface utilities as flagged by othcn (see special provisions). 4) The survey shall cal1ect cross-sections of the site on a ~O-foot CTQS$- section inteTval from right-of-way to right-of-way for both the canal and Orange A venue. 5) The survey sbaD establish approÄimate right-of-way lines (to 0.5 foot of accuracy) based on found JoeaJ control. Should the local control not support the stated accuracy, the expected accuracy wiU be noted on the drawing. 6) The topographic survey wiu be overlaid oot" current St. Lucie County aerial imagery. P:17002\Propœ.I\$IIIV,y\S08 51. Luçic çounty Puli=r Rmd and Onmgc Avc:nll~Ope- Tu!O- Survey- SOI.doc: PaF2 A ~~ Enll"tlrinl CClmøøl!)t CONI III Tille; CIVIL ENO.NF.!ft$ H'RVEYoII. A NArrna -------- --. .. -..- ...- -...... DELIVERABLE: 1) LBFH Inc. wiIJ provide six (6) signed and sealed copies of the topogTaphic survey 00 regular bond paper. 2) LBFH Inc. will provide one (1) copy ofthe survey on mylar. 3) LBFH Inc. will provide one (1) digital copy of the field notes and the survey drawing on compact disc. SCHEDULE: The topographjc survey shaH be comp1eted approximately three (3) weeks from notice to proceed. fE.E.¡ The surveying and mapping service wiIJ be provided for Lump Sum Fee: $8,400 SPECIAL PROVISIONS: The Services shalJ be subject to the fonowing special conditio.ns: 1) This scope does not include the location of any wetland jurisdictional areas. 2) This survey does not inetude tree locations. 3) This scope does not include the coordination or flagging of underground utiJities. It is the client's responsib.ility to have all subsurface locates complete at the time of tbe field survey. 4) LBFH Inc. shall not enter into any under.ground drainage or sanitary structures, should inverts be recessed fTOm the structure opening, covered with water or debris, onJy the centerline bottom elevation of the stn1ctu~ shaH be obtained. 5) The schedule is based on times of faiT weather, should there be extended times of inclement weather, the project schedu1e could be delayed. If a delay occurs the client wi11 be notified. P:\7«Kn\Pmpos.,I\SuIVcy\SnR $~. Lucie Cou"ly P\llilJlw RIlleS 'lid OnInac AvClluc\Scopc.. Tope!- Sllney- SOS.doc '-JC3 - ---. ..-------- __. .. ..0_ I _......_ _W~ Wt Exhibit B Terms and General Conditions to Agreement SERVIC.ES AND FEES: The attached Exhibit A, Scope of Services and Fee5. ("SERVICES"), describes specific work to be performed by LBFH and fees to be paid LBFli by CLIENT. PERFORMANCE: LBFH: s.hall perform the work in an expeditious and dilige"c manner. The standard of care for an professicmaJ engineering and related services performed or furnished by LBFH under this Agreement will be the care and skill ordinarily used by members of LBFH'S profession practicing under similar conditions at the same time aod in the same locality. The parties to this Agreement agree that LBFH has no control over ce.nain aspects of the wor.k, including but not linùted to. the timely s~bmittal of data or infarmatjon to be furnished by others for LBFH's use, the review and approval process of governmental, jurisWf;tjOf)aJ. or utility agencies and entities. LBFH asserts no guarantees regarding pennit application processing times and issuance of a permit. and incurs no liability for Siarne. LBFR's opinions of probable PROJECT' costs are made on tbe basis of LBFH's jud¡rnent and experience for the given time and cconOllÚc conditions. LBFH does not guarantee that proposals. bids or actual PROmCI' cost wiD nor vary from LBPH's opinions of probab1e cost. COMPENSAnON FEES: Lump Sum fees are fixed amountS to be paid for the services indicated. Time & Expense fees shan be based on the attached Exhibit C, . Time &: Expense Rates. All Time &; Eltpense fees quoted in advance of the work being performed are ONI. Y ESTIMATES. BET AINER: Upon acceptance of this Agreement by aJENT, but prior to initiatiou of work by LBFH. CLIENT shan deposit with LBFH a retainer in the amount of 5000.00. Upon completion of work by I;BFH. the amount of deposit shall be credited to aJENT and calcUlated in the final sum due LBFH. In the case of payment default in excess of 60 days. the retainer shan be applied towards' theoutstandin¡ invoices, work shall be stopped and not continue until the acçount is current and additional retainer deposit is received. INVOICES: Invoices shall be sent' to CLIENT by LBFH covering periods of not less than a month. Invoices sbatl be prepared in LBFH's style and fonnat. If CLIENT requests a dif.ferent sty.le or format that requires additional preparatioß time by LBFH, then CLIENT shari compensate LBFH for that additional effort at the pr~vailing ratc for personnel peñormin, the work. Lump Sum fees owed LBFH for an invoi<:e period shall be caJcula~ by LBFH based upon LBFH's percentage estimate of the amount of work accomplished fot' the period. Time" E~pense fees owed LBFH for an invoice period SihalI be based on the amount of time expended by LBFH in perfonmng the services, calculated porta.l-to·portal, mulùplied by the prevailing rate for the personnel penonDÎng the, work. A min;,num of one hour of time will be charged for: attendance at any public hearing, commission. or board ru.eeùng, or at Iny Jegal or adJ1'Ú11istrative proceeding, CLIENT will reimburse LBFH for all direct nOD-salary ex.pensc. including but not limited to those items shown on Exhibit C. Time and Expensc Rates. INVOICE REVIEW: Within 21 days of receipt of LBFH's invoice, a..IENT shall examine invoice in detail as to accuracy/compleleness and sball raise any question/objection in writing re¡ard.jng invoice within these 21 days. AfteT 21 days from receipt of LBFlfs invoice, CLIENT waives any qUC$tionlobjection to the invoice 110t earlier raised. PAYMENT OF FEES: All fees arc Clue and payable upon receipt of aD invoice. Payment shan be in United States currency. If CLIENT fails to make 3.1'Iy payment due LBFH within 30 days from the date of LBFH's in'Voice, the amounts due LBFH shan include a charge at the rare of 1.5'1> per month (18fJJ per annum), or as otherwise provided by law. LBfH reserves the sole right to suspend al1 services to Q.IENT if any invoice remains unpaid 60 daY$ after datc of invoice. (f services· are suspended, they may not resume until all unpaid il1Volces are paid in full. ADDITIONAL SERVICES: Service5 authorized by tbe Q.IENT. other than those specificaJly set forth in the "Scope of Sarvices". shan be considered additional SeMCCS for which a.JEN1' shall compensate LBFH on a "Time It Expen~" basis or as otherwise agreed by the parties. Additional services include revisions to work previously performed tbat are required because of a chanp jl1 the data. criteria. or information furnished to LBFH, a change in the Scope or concept of the project initiated by the CLIENT, and/or services that an: required by change!! in the requirements of public agencies. after work under this Agreement has commeoced.. A "Change of Scope Memorandum" will be executed by CLIENT before such work is started. RATE AND FEE ADJUSTMENT: The attached scbedule of hourly billing rates is subject to change at the cod of each calendar year, and shall be reflected ÜI this Agreemcur. Lump sum fees are also subject to change at tbe end of each calendu year ba.~ upon the Consumer Price Inde~ for An Urban Consumers (CPI- ~ ~~4 OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS: An documents, including dOl.wings. specifications. field notes, and eJectronicaUy generated information and data prepared by LBFH pursuant to the terms of thi$ Agreement, are the property of LBFH. Copies of LBFH's non- proprietary doc:ument$ wi11 be made available to CLIENT at the ''Time de Etpense" cost for reproducing szùd documents. These documents are not intended Of represcnted. to be suitab1e fot' reuse for extensions of this or 111)' other project, and CLIENT OT others are prohibited from making or incOtpOJ"ating an)' adju.'Jtments, changes or amendments to them without specific written approval from LBFH. ENFORCEMENT: In any action to enforce or to intetpœt this A¡reement. the prevailing party shaJJ be entitled to recover all costs and expenses incumd, including reasoo.ble anorney's fees. For the purpose of this Agreement "action" shall be interpreted to include negotiations and investigation prior to the , institution of proceedings at the trial leveJ as well as costs and fees incurred through any appeals. In the event CLIENT has or asSC11s some claim or demand againn LBFH based. upon this A¡reetnent Ot any services deliveTCd under this Agreement. including any exten$;ons or modifications thereof. a.1ENT. as wen as all persons or firms claiming 'through. under. or against CLIENT. must initiate suit a¡ainsl the LBFH within óne year from the date upon wbkh the services wen: delivered or c:Jaim shaH be forever barred.. LBFHs JiabiJity is linùted to the fees paid by CLIENT under the tenns and conditions of this Agreement. LBFH agrees to waive this Jimitation upon rec:eiving CLIENT'S written request and additional payment of four percent of LBFlfs fee. or five hundred doUars ($500.00), whichever is greater. within ~ days of the S+-' date of this Agreement. Venue for any disputes shall ~ County Florida, unless otherwise required í--I.tCA by Florida Jaw. AGREEMENT MODIFICATION: This Agreement may be modified by the parties ilt any lime, but no such modification shall be effcctive unJe$s reduced to writing and signed by both parties. PRIVITY OF AGREEMENT; This Agreement is A copy of the document. showing clients interest in not to be construed to provide any obligation from the the property being anached he~o. P:\7002\Propos.,l\Survcy\S08 51. l..ucic ec..lnly Pulil7.l:r 'toad .nd Oritn..c A venuC\E.bibit I.doc P 5 .. ..age GENERAL CONDITIONS DATA PROVIDED BY OTHERS: CLIENT is responsible for supplying LBFH with information and data required for LBFH's \lse io acc:ompHshing the work. LBFH $baI) not be responsible or liable for any i"accuratc: or. incomplete infonnation provided by others, or for its good faith use of inaccurate or incomplete infor.mation provided by others. LBFH to any third parties. including. but not limited to. any contractors (general or sub), banks, lending institutiotls or to any successors in title to the CLIENT. The rights undet this Agreenœnt only inure to the parties hereto. ASSIGNABILITY: This Agreement is expressly unclemood to be nontransfctabJe and non-assignable by either party without tht e.Jtpress written consent of the other party. ACCEPTANCE: The fees, teTms and. conditions offered in this Agreernel1t shalI be valid and open for acceptance by ClJENT for a period of sixty (60) days afiet tbe date the Agreement is !liped by LBFH. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Agreement shall become cffec:tive on the date that it is signed by CLIENT and returned to LBt=H with the required retainer. TERMINATION: This Agreement may be terminated by either party . upon giving 7 days writCen notice. and CLIENT shall be responsible only· for those fees and eltpcnses incur.red through the date of receipt of said Dotice. Notice shan be delivered to above stated addresses. SEVERABILITY: In the evenr a çourt of competent jurisdiction determines that any tenn or provisioD of this c:ontJ:act is unèoforc:eable for any reason, the balance of the term¡ and conditions shall nonetheless remain in fuIJ foroe and etfec:t and soch unenforceable provisions shall be deemed to have been exc;sed and deleted from this Asreement as though it bad never been a part hereof. SPECIAL PROVISIONS: Special provisions shaJJ be as set forth in Exhibit A. Where special provisions conflict with the terms and cODditio.ns, the special conditions sbaII prevail. To Be Completed by CLIENT: The reconi tirle ownct of the rea) propeny which is the su~ect ofth;$ Agreement is: A copy of the deed vesting title in client being attached hereto. If the owner of the property is not the CLIENT, the CLIENI"S interest in the propeny is: ST. LUCIE COUNTY EXHIBIT C TIME AND EXPENSE RATES- The rates and charges shown below are used to calculate invoice amounts for services rendered 0" a Time and Expense basis. . A. Personnel Hourly Billing Rates: Project Director....... ....... ....... ..... ........ ............ ...... ........ ......... ............. ....... $170.00 Sr. Client Service Manager ... ................................ .... ...............,................ $140.00 Client Sef'\'Ìce Manager.............. ........ ...., ....... ....... ...................... .............. $130.00 Sr. Project Engineer ......... ..... .............. .......... .......... ................ ........ .......... $120.00 Project.Engineer V........... ............... .... ............................ .......... ............... $ 115.00 Project Engineer IV .. ..... ........ ......... .................... ....... ...... ......................... $ 105.00 Project Engineer 111............... ........... ............ .................. ............................. $ 95.00 Project Engineer II.......... ............. ........ ............ ....... .........:................... ....... $ 80.00 Project Engineer I.. ...................... ........ ........................... ............... ............. $ 75.00 Sr. Designer ........... ................... ............ ....... ............................ .................. $ 95.00 Designer. ..........-. ............ .... ................. ................... ..... ............... ................ $ 85.00 Survey and Mapping Director... ........... .... ............... .... .... ..................... ...... $120.00 Survey Client Service Manager....... ......................................................... $ 100.00 Sr. Professional Surveyor & Mapper.......................................................... $ 95.00 Professional Surveyor & Mapper ............................................................... $ 90.00 GIS Client Service Manager...............................................:....................... $ 95.00 G IS Specialist If............. .,............. ..................,............... ................... ......... $ 80.00 GIS Specialist f..... ......... ............. .......... .............. ..... ........ ............... ............ $ 70.00 En~ineering & Survey Technician II........................................................... S 80.00 . Engineering & Survey Technician I............................................................ S 70.00 Sr. Field Representative..... .............. ...........:.... ....... ................ ............. ...... $ 90.00 Field R,presentative /I............................................................................... $ 75.00 Field Representative I .................... ..:................................................... ...... S 60.00 Survey Crew.. ................................. ....... ...................... .............................. $120.00 GPS Survey Crew ... .... .........:........ ........ :......................... ...... .................... $140.00 GPS Equipment .... .............. ........ .......... .............. ........ ............................... S 35.00 Administrative Support... ........:. ·..........n...... ........ .........:... .............. ............ $ 40.00 e. Outside contractual seNÏCQs secureo by ENGINEER on CLIENT'S behalf, tra"el costs by commercial carrier, direct non·salary expenses Including, but not limited to, meals, lodging, special mailing or delivery services. legal advertisements and notices, title search service and special survey materials shall be reimbursed at 110 percent of ENGINEER'S cost. C. A 1;5-percent charge will be added to all invoices to cover ENGINEER'S expense items such as occasional photocopies, telephone charges, fax, local travel, and regular postage. D. Contract prinJing and blueprinting shall be charged at no percent of ENGINEER'S cost. Internally- produced blueprints shan be charged at S 0.25 per square foot or fraction thereof, and photocopies snan be charged at S 0.1 5 per sheet. ~ SI.C: Q7·Dft·øs IkMdIor. fØ.Dec-1U R'wllllrllln: Qa.JrIn.Ø5 P:l1C6 AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-3b DATE: March 6, 2007 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 SUBJECT: Solida Drive Culvert Replacement Project - Award contract to low bidder, Johnson-Davis, in the amount of $119,298.00. Bid #07-024 BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum. FUNDS AVAIL. Funds will be made available in 316001-41131-563000-1902 Trans Capital/Local Option/Culvert Replacement and will be transferred from the Selvitz Road and NSLRWCD Canal 102 Project. PREVIOUS ACTION: n/a RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Board approve awarding of Solida Driv~ Culvert Replacement Project to low bidder, Johnson-Davis, Inc. in the amount of $119,298.00, establish project budget, and authorization for the Chairman to sign. COMMISSION ACTION: 2E: Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator [ ~APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 4-0 Comm. Smith Absent ,-7, " J<t' [x]County Attorney {'- [x]Originating Dept. Public Works~ [ ¡Finance Solida Dr. Culvert Bid Award to JD.ag.doc ~~ 1>MgI&"+¡(:; '-'(J. [xProj Mgr, [x]Exec. Asst. 6l, PI- t1 [X¡PUrchasin& DIVISION OF ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Mike Powley, County Engineer DATE: March 6, 2007 SUBJECT: Solida Drive Culvert Replacement Project - Award contract to low bidder, Johnson- Davis, in the amount of $119,298.00. Bid #07-024 BACKGROUND The Solida Drive Culvert Replacement Project provides for the replacement of a failed culvert pipe from Hurricane Jeanne. On February 6, 2007 bids were received. The low bidder is Johnson-Davis, Inc. in the amount of $119,298.00. In order to fund the total project budget amount, staff is requesting that funds be transferred from the Selvitz Road and NSlRWCD Canal 102 Project. The Selvitz Road and NSlRWCD Canal 102 repair was addressed satisfactorily by PCl as part of their bridge fabrication and hauling for the Lyons Bridge Project in Martin County. The project budget will be established as follows: Construction Contract: Testing: Reserves: $120,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 12.000.00 $137,000.00 DIVISION OF ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM 07-047 TO: Neal Appel- Purchasing Director VIA: Michael Powley, P.E. - County Engineer VIA: Barbara Meinhardt - Fiscal Coordinator FROM: John Frank, A.LC.P., P.E. - Senior Project Engineer DATE: February 19,2007 SUBJECT: Award of Solid a Drive Culvert Replacement (BID # 07-024) Bids for Bid #07-024 were opened on February 6,2007. We have reviewed the bids and we recommend that the project be awarded to Johnson-Davis, Inc. in the amount of$119,298.00. Funds will be made available in 316001-41131-563000-1902 Trans Capital/Local Option/Culvert Replacement. The following budget is established for the project: Construction: Testing: Reserves: TOTAL: $120,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 12.000.00 $137,000.00 ITEM NO. C- "3 ~ DATE: March 6, 2007 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY (DEPT.): ENGINEERING DIVISION (4115) SUBJECT: First Amendment to Work Authorization No.1 to the Contract for Professional Engineering Services related to Stormwater Management with Inwood Consulting Engineers for additional survey and geotechnical services for Harmony Heights Stormwater Improvements Phase I in the amount of $ 19,494.00. BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds will be made available in 102804-3725-563005-42507 and 102804-3725-563021-42507 SFWMD Harmony Heights Stormwater Phase I. PREVIOUS ACTION: 1I15/20(}2 - Board approved Work Authorization No.3 with BCI in the amount of $67,099.84 for preparation of the Harmony Heights Stormwater Master Plan. 6/16/2002 - Board approved Work Authorization No.4 with BCI in the amount of $75,784.80 for the Harmony Heights Drainage Improvements Design and Permitting Phase I. 1119/2004 - Board approved the 1st Amendment to Work Authorization No.4 with BCI in the amount of $1,737.26 for the Harmony Heights Stormwater Improvements Project Phase II. 5/10/2005 - Board approved the Funding from the South Florida Water Management District in the amount of $336,780.00 for Harmony Heights Stormwater Improvement Project Phase I. 7/26/2005 - Board approved the Resolution to accept Funding from South Florida Water Management District in the amount of $336,780.00 for Harmony Heights Stormwater Improvement Project Phase I. 9/19/2006 - Board approved of extension of the contract with South Florida Water Management to May 30, 2008 for Harmony Heights Phase I. 9/26/06 - Board approved Work Authorization No. I to the Contract for Professional Engineering Services related to Stormwater Management with Inwood Consulting Engineers for redesign of Harmony Heights Stormwater Improvements Phase I in the amount of $152,757.50. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve the First Amendment to Work Authorization No.1 to the Contract for Professional Engineering Services related to Stormwater Management with Inwood Consulting Engineers for additional survey and geotechnical services for Harmony Heights Stormwater Improvements Phase I in the amount of $19,494.00, and authorization for the Chairman to sign. COMMISSION ACTION: CON E: 'M APPROVED [ ] OTHER [ ] DENIED 51 ~~. .; strator [x] county Attorney j' .ir:' [x] Mgt. & Budget [x] Proj. Man. [x] Originating Dept Public Works (xl Exec, Assis. ~A "'\ f I Finance (Check for copy only, if applicable) arman Heights Inwood WA 1 Amend1.ag -- Mil Approved 4-0 Camm. Smith Absent DIVISION OF ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM TO: Michael Powley, County Engineer FROM: Michael Harvey, Engineer Intern DATE: March 6, 2007 SUBJECT: Harmony Heights Stonnwater Improvements Phase I Harmony Heights is located on North 41"\ 4200, and west to 53rd Streets between two drainage canals: South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) Canal 25 and Ft. Pierce Farms Water Control District (FPFWCD) Canal I. The subdivision was developed before State water quality regulations were developed and therefore has poor storm water conveyances and lack of storm water treatment areas. During rain events, the stonn water outfalls directly into the two canals, both of which discharge into the Indian River Lagoon by means of Taylor Creek, which is approximately one-quarter mile ftom this site. Water quality of the runoff ftom this area is poor and contains debris, sediment and contaminants, such as oil, grease, fertilizers and pesticides. These deposits into 5t Lucie County's natural surface water bodies, mostnotablythe Indian River Lagoon, which is already undergoing major dredging to remove all of the above contaminants and silt deposits. These pollutants have been determined to be very detrimental to the health of the area's natural resources in addition to the Lagoon. The primary purpose of the project is stormwater discharge attenuation to reduce ftesh water and stormwater pollutants outfall to the Indian River Lagoon. The project will reduce stormwater runoff ftom Harmony Heights subdivision into the SFWMD Canal 25 and FPFWCD Canall. Detention ponds and swales are to be constructed within the Harmony Heights subdivision to additionally treat the outfall. On January 15,2002 the Board approved Work Authorization No.3 with BCI Engineers to prepare the Harmony Heights Stonnwater Master Plan. The Master Plan is now completed and was permitted earlier this year through both the SFWMD and the FPFWCD. On July 16, 2002 the Board approved Work: Authorization No.4 with BCI Engineers for the design and permitting of the Harmony Heights Stonnwater Improvements Phase I. Due to the amount of time between the beginning of the design and the present date, as well as the recent growth in the neighborhood and it was determined that the plans need to be updated. However, the continuing services contract with BCI has expired and was· not renewed Therefore, it was determined that a new consultant should begin evaluating and possibly redesigning the plans. On September 26, 2006, the Board approved Work Authorization No. I with Inwood Consulting Engineers for redesign. The attached First Amendment to Work Authorization No. I to the Contract for Professional Engineering Services related to Stonnwater Management with Inwood Consulting Engineers is for additional survey and geotechnical services for Harmony Heights Stonnwater Improvements Phase I in the amoWlt of$19,494.00. FIRST AMENDMENT TO WORK AUTHORIZATION NO.1 Engineering Services Stormwater Management C06-04-239 Harmony Heights Phase I Pursuant to that certain Agreement Between County and Engineer for Engineering Services (the "Agreement") between S1. Lucie County (the "County") and Inwood Consulting Engineers (the "Engineer") dated April 4, 2006, is hereby amended to provide additional survey and geotechnical services in the amount of $19,494.00. The Engineers additional Scope of Services described in Exhibit" A", Compensation described in Exhibit "B", and Schedule described in Exhibit "c" are attached hereto and made a part hereof All other terms and conditions of Work Authorization NO.1 (C-06-04-239) shall be the same and remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County has hereunto subscribed and the Engineer has affixed his, its, or their names, or name, on the dates below. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY WITNESSES: ENGINEER BY: Print Name: Inwood Consulting Engineers Date: Change Order for Harmony Heights Phase I Design Revisions St Lude County, Florida Contract No. C06-04-239 Exhibit A - Page 1 of 1 December 15, 2006 EXHIBIT A - SUPPLEMENTAL SCOPE OF WORK Harmony Heights Phase I Design Revisions Supplemental Scope St. Lucie County has requested supplemental work be conducted to support the design of roadway and drainage improvements in the Harmony Heights Phase I project area. The supplemental work is in addition to the scope of services provided in the September 1, 2006 proposal submitted to and approved by the County (Purchase Order P2613454). The supplemental services are summarized below: 1. Collect additional survey by Southeastern Surveying & Mapping Corporation (SSMC) along the County right-of-way parallel to Grady Avenue from 41st Street to 43rd Street to support the construction of a new roadway segment. 2. Collection of additional survey by SSMC along 43rd Street to support roadway and drainage design along that roadway. 3. Collection of surveyed finished floor elevations by SSMC from all habitable structures within the limits of Phase I. 4. Collect pavement cores by Dunkelburger Engineering & Testing, Inc. (DET) along Juanita Avenue and San Diego Avenue to determine existing pavement characteristics. This data will be used to specify the most appropriate mill & resurface recommendations for these roads. This data will be compiled in a report with the other geotechnical data collected to date by DET. 5. Include additional Inwood man-hours to process and apply the above data. 6. Include additional Inwood man-hours in the project for preparation of 30% design plans (current authorization includes only 60%,90%, 100%, and final plans). 7. Include additional Inwood man-hours in the project for preparation of construction cost estimates at the 30% and 60% design intervals (current authorization includes cost estimates only at 90%, 100%, and final plans). 8. Include additional Inwood man-hours in the project for preparation of a NPDES NOI. 9. Include additional man-hours to accommodate meeting with SFWMD and FPFWCD to discuss any supplemental permitting issue associated with the project. 10. Include additional Inwood man-hours to participate in a pre-construction conference. A fee estimate for the supplemental services is included as Exhibit B. ~ Ù .E f! a: c:: ï3, c:: W ID ~ 8 :2 N ~ iii 5o::-e tJ"'~.!E ~aEüJ ~üf!"É .Ev.:~~ iÞ "; ¡p ~ fi~~~ ~i i §'5 W _ '" Ii: 5 5tJ tJ :::¡ ~ z w :I w ..J a. a. ::) ~ I- Z ~ ..J ::) I/) z o u w :I æ a. l- I/) o u c z 01( I- iii: o I&. I&. W :.: iii: ~ I&. o W I- 01( :I ~ I/) w 3: .. .c:: Q. '" E '" ãi :r ~.~ ê.3 ....: xcnoo 'Ìi " '[ ci Q. Z Õ ~ ~ Ë§ž'E ca 0 a.. 0 ztJu.tJ .. ~ ! : i 18m ~ ~ I : !i~i~¡!~! '" '" : : : : : : : : : ~ ~ : : : : : : : : : : : : .. .. iff:~S~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i ~ uc-----. -- ¡¡¡ ~~¡:;::~ c( ! r ~ OJ II ~ ~ tl. p' ~::Ii OJ .... '" ~ 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i goo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 ! g - ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 0>0° 8 'æ~ ciooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooog .z.i! ., :! >'1i .fit OJ goo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ g .. ~ .. ~¡~ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo! ~ ~ :¡¡ .. OJ ~ 01 ~ i ~ 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ! " ~ .. ~ '3.Ë ~ i -! ~~ ü C .n !! ~ ø· <;) si ~ ~~ ìi E 8 ~i ~ w 'U ~ 0 .! 0 ê"ãt ~ ~ 1I..fi ~ 0 .2 I ~ !r 0 w v; J f ~ A. i ø 8 ~ 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N ~ .. 8 00. 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 000 0 0 . I N .. o 0 eON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 G ~ ~ - coo 0 0 000 0 0 0 _ _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ¡ .. .. . N N NON 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o - - - - 0 _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 COO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ .. ~ o ¡ u Ii . .. .!! u ~ OJ ~ .... .. ...."M 'M ]fjf i < D.. < e"....& ~ ! ! i!; l&&~! (") ...: iii cD ,..: ~ c o Z .. .!! ~ .!! & ~ 6 ~ "cu-:., .= ¡¡¡~b;~[~ ~!.UI!~UI!!, oUlE".:I!¡: C>. 1:: .2 'Ii E .. 'iii !~I~ILI1 i! iH i! i!! i ß ß ß ß ß ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ¡¡; ¡¡; ...: ~ (") ~ ~ ~ ~ f . i ê ~ :. :.i 2j ~ ;¡¡ '" .. E ~ 'S; ., W .; ~ i fi ~ ~ ~ .0 0> _ .. t ~ î ~.¡; :fl! of· ! ! 0 i < ~ ~ .. 1 1 ~ B!!':d·,¡.. .....8~ i ~ I ~ ~ 1 . ~ ~ ~ . ::IE::IEo,g"j< l~ 'fi !!oðoð~~~¡¡:8.8.ï.." ï! ß ,~.~'i '1i ~~!! ~ ~{j ~~~~~~~~~j~f~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t:3 ~ ~ ~ ~ =ë ~ ~ 'E ; 11 ~ 0 ß 8- %1: Jtl~ ~ ~ - f ! '"' ! ~ 1 ~ ~ .! < z N '" '" o .. ..; : ~8888~ ~cicicici¡ ,.:......,.: .. .. 8 8 ¡¡ ,.:"': .... " ~ .J: U <£ ~ ~ ~ 00 0 ~ 0°60 ~ Ii ::IE (!! ~ UI 8 ž~ (; : ê ~u :5 ::IE,! wëC)¡=·· a: i1i ~ HJ Sæ~~ffi ..JWWUD.. ~~&~¡;¡ 'E 1! ¡¡ j :> UI ~ .§'! :28 æ ~ f: .i!~ g '0 :!! .J: " .a i;' . E J! ~ ! E! {!'E ~~ I! .. e" ., zl .. .. ~-= ~ :> 35 S ..J - ~ :!1! ~ ¡¡ äj u :> ~ .. .., ~ II. .. A'j -= .. :> .. 1:'::: s~ j; .. ~ .. ., H~ ~"':N 8 ~ ~ o. ;0 8 ~:B ~ .. ~ I ~ .. ., ¡ ~ oð .. ., .~ : ., '5o W .fi w ~ . ~ c !!' c ~ u f ~ ! i ~ ! w 1: e W ... 1! 1! ... :! ¡¡ ¡¡ :! ; j j ; :') ~ ~ :') UJ 0 0 Cf) o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 ~ ~ ¡ ~ ¡ oiN~·~ to') e/)... . l ;! ;.; I § Iii ~ C !! c( ::Ii ~ .. W .~ ~ ~ 12 '1i C ., Z ,g ~ 8'" 'õ ~ of! õ i' 'ii 'Ii l ~,.~ Q,Q, >' , tjij ::IE'" $'" ~Æ \DO\ OM ON N' ",'9 ....\D ...0 .8u E"" cuts ~~ o u C '" N :as Lit ...... ................................................ ......... ··,·····~,·~ÆJ.· ........,.....,.... -."'.....................,.. .......".~. .~~.. :~: .~,~........ N .. .. ':':'::' .--................--.--............................... .... ................................ .. z: ... :....,.. c» GO ...... .,...... N N ~................................... iJI·..·......··....· ........... .... (::r .. ::-:;:: ...... ..... -....... ";::\ ....................................",..........,.,............ -.. ~ '::'::j' ... ,",'. .~..~. .::::.:.................................................................... ~ Ò" S ~:..j èr H.4;;-Þ'a --:, [.:::' ::: Cl ~.. :·"L ..,:.r......................, -...'.........."'........."'.........,..........., :!: '" :!: :!: :!: :!: :!: I:; " 0 '0 E¡" ;;r :§ ~ ~ .. ìì¡ :t;¡ ª -5i ¡;;- ~ ~ ~ ::r ::r ::t '¡: ~ ¡¡: 1: '::I ~ ~ ~ u. if ~ ~ ::I ~ ~ :!: ~ 8 :!: :g :!: I I:; ~ t;¡ ~ ~ ìì¡ § ~ N ~ ::r ~ ¡;;- ¡;;- ¡;;- ~ ~ :~ if i 'C 15 ~ ,¡¡ U. ::I if :I: ~ ~ i ! ! i ! ~ i ! i :! 'C .. 0 0 .., .. N 0 ,II> ::I N ... .. ... ,N .. 0 III Z 0 ... ~ Z ~I:I ..,.... >111 !I!! j w'" -'IU 5~ë§ w:Z:Q1 ~ J:A.o &!~it J ~ .. ~l:Ig i ..,... ~IU;:) c..:Z:o ~ B .5 uotE~ ~ i 1¡í t:;::¡OtJ iIí F æ2:E3 {!! z J: 0 ~ . e .. ~B::z:1:ñ i '" I:; I:; " I:; I:; " ~ " I:; ~ I:; ¡;; ~ 0 0 :~ :ãr ~ ::t ::r ~ ,èr ~ ,ãr ~ S N ;;r '~ ìì¡ :~ N N ::t t;¡ t;¡ ::I .. .. if :ìì¡ ,ìì¡ ìì¡ ìì¡ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ::I ::I :if 1: i~ ,~ :~ ~ ~ ~ ,Y. I:; " " ~ ¡;; ~ I:; " '" " ¡..... ¡;; ,I:; I:; 0 ~ '0 0 ,~ '0 .. ,ìì¡ ::t :¡:r :ë3" '~ :.. ìì¡ ,t;¡ ¡;;- N N 'N t;¡ ;;r ;;r :N ìì¡ ~ ~ N N ::t ::t ,::t .. :;¡:. .. :- ìì¡ :~ ::I 'if ~ II> ~ '::I '~ ~ ,if if ~ '~ '!! !! ! '~ I- ,I- ! ! ! ! ! it i ! l 1 ,! t l ! 'II> II> 0 0 II> S II> ',,", '1I't ... N N ... I I :1 ~ ~ -tf w III '~ I- ~ i - ~ ~ ~ .. .... '5 .... cu '" I t!. ~ .. ,I ::E [ ~ III E ~ (/ 11 'ë' <L [ ~ III E E ::I (/ I :: e ~ <L I '''' ~¡ ~ìt,.~t, 81 :II .5/ f LINE-TO-LINE TRANSFER REQUEST DEPARTMENT: ENGINEERING 07-57 DATE: 2/23/07 TO: 102804-3725-563005-42507 $7,464.00 $0 102804-3725-563021-42507 -Infrastructure Reimb $12,030.00 $0 $19,494.00 FROM 102804-3725-563000-42507 Harmon Hei hts Drain - Infrastructure $19,494.00 $673,560 REASON FOR TRANSFER: Establishin scheduled for Board a roval on 3/6/07. $19,494.00 for a a work authorization CONTACT PERSON: DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL: OMB APPROVAL: ADMINISTRATION APPROVAL: B"t:f"hardl / ~ PHONE #: 1708 OMB NOTES: $38,988 INPUT DATE: LlNE-TO-LlNE TRANSFER #: INPUT BY: DOCUMENT #: , . AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-4; DATE: March 6,2007 REGULAR [] PUBLIC HEARING CONSENT [xx] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: Debbie Brisson/Parks & Recreation Director SUBMITTED BY: Parks & Recreation/Recreation SUBJECT: Disposal of Capital Equipment BACKGROUND: Several pieces of capital equipment that appear on the Civic Center's capital inventory have been stored in the concourse until a decision was made about their future use. Most of it is staging that staff has determined cannot be used at the Fairgrounds or new Special Needs Shelter. Now that efforts are under way to renovate the concourse for office areas, etc., this equipment needs to be disposed of and removed from the Board's capital inventory list. The staging is expected to be offered for sale and the floor-cleaning machine is old and should be considered junk. The property record numbers are 402887,405989,5171,7345,7833,401673 and 405113. FUNDS AVAILABLE: No funds are involved. RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests the Board approve removal of the above listed capital equipment items from the County's Fixed Asset Inventory. '¡X [ ] APPROVED OTHER: DENIED COMMISSION ACTION: Approved 4-0 Comm. Smith Absent ~"l,l , Review and Approvals ~ Management & Budget / ' Other: Other: purChaSing:~ County Attorney: Originating Dept. =- .. .. .-., Parks and Recreation Department Memorandum To: Board of County Commissioners From: Linda Barton, Assistant Director u-/ Subject: Approval of Agenda Item #C-4A Date: 2/22/2007 Several pieces of capital equipment that appear on the Civic Center's capital inventory have been stored in the concourse until a decision was made about their future use. Most of it is staging that staff has determined cannot be used at the Fairgrounds or new Special Needs Shelter. Now that efforts are under way to renovate the concourse for office areas, etc., this equipment needs to be disposed of and removed from the Board's capital inventory list. The staging is expected to be offered for sale and the floor-cleaning machine is old and should be considered junk. The property record numbers are 02887,405989,5171,7345,7833,401673 and 405113. LB: em Attachment cc: D. Anderson, County Administrator R. Wazny, Assistant County Administrator Chron Fi Ie - ~- _ J:: ~ ITEM NO. C-5A DATE: 3/6/07 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR ( ) PUBLIC HEARING ( ) CONSENT (X) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: PURCHASING DEPARTMENT PRESENTED BY: Neil Appel. Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Award of Invitation to Bid #07-029, Street Resurfacing Annual Contract to the lowest responsible, responsive bidder, Ranger Construction Industries, Inc. BACKGROUND: Please see attached memorandum. FUNDS AVAilABLE: Account #316001-41132-546200-42003 - Transportation Capital Unincorporated Area Resurfacing PREVIOUS ACTION: See the attached memorandum. RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests Board approval to award Invitation to Bid #07-029, Street Resurfacing annual Contract to the lowest responsible, responsive bidder, Ranger Construction Industries, Inc., for a not to exceed amount of $1 ,054,186.80, and authorization for the Chairman to sign the Amendment as prepared by the County Attorney. (~ APPROVED ( ) OTHER Approved 4-0 Comm. Smith Absent ( ) DENIED COMMISSION ACTION: Dou las M. Anderson County Administrator (VI / lAY County Attorney (X) (Á~ Road and Bridge (X) ~ Coordination'S ignatures Mgt. & Budget (X) ,z-Jf) ~(¥\9 Purchasing (X) /~ Other ( ) Other ( ) Finance: (check for copy, only if applicable)_ PURCHASING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM _ _R_'~' _"_._~.._._".__".___._.~________.. ..._..~._._. ".", .-- "......_' ~ - .... "'_>'·_·'M-' ~- - . '-'.-~' ~.- ... .,-~-_. .-.,_._-,~_._-~'-.,~-- ..-. ~.,.,_...___.__~._.__,~___.,___,..,ø__~_______~__ ^-~_..,.... .-.----.,.- _". ,_, __....__~__.__... ._____.". _.__~,.___ "~_....·"M' ,_,~. ,'_.." _ ... '_'.. .~,.__ .._.."...... ,- . TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Neil Appel, C.P.M., Purchasing Director DATE: February 28, 2006 RE: Award of Invitation to Bid #07-029, Street Resurfacing Annual Contract to the lowest responsible, responsive bidder, Ranger Construction Industries, Inc. Backaround: The annual street resurfacing contract (Bid #07-029) was issued on behalf of the Road and Bridge Division of Public Works on January 7,2007. The bids were opened on February 7, 2007. Five hundred twenty-four (524) vendors were notified, fifteen (15) sets of bid documents were distributed and three (3) bids were received. Recommendation: Staff requests Board approval to award Invitation to Bid #07-029, Street Resurfacing annual Contract to the lowest responsible, responsive bidder, Ranger Construction Industries, Inc., for a not to exceed amount of $1 ,054,186.80, and authorization for the Chairman to sign the Amendment as prepared by the County Attorney. '1 {'sl/- BID #07-029 STREET RESURFACING BID SPECIFICATIONS <, 1.0 SCOPE ¡ The Specifications consist of preparation and resurfacing various county roads, traffic striping and pavement messages, final cleanup, associated appurtenances, and other related work. At his or its expense, the Contractor is required to video all roadways before work is started and after all work is complete. The roads to be resurfaced under this contract may include, but not be limited to: Resurfacing List Resurfacina onlv: \'f Tax Map Road Name From To LenQth 42/01 X Glades Cut-Off Rd Rangeline Rd Carlton Rd 4.10 23/13S Graham Rd Jenkins Rd Kings Hwy 1.00 13/12N Sebastian Rd E Seminole Rd Eastwood Dr 0.93 13/01 S Winter Garden Pkwy Feeder Rd Pandora Ave 0.10 6.13 The following roads will have additional striping added: Tax Map Road Name From To LenQth 34/17N Old St. James Dr Manville Dr Church Property 0.10 13/02N Green Dolphin St North Blvd Deland Ave 0.75 13/02S Green Dolphin St Santa Barbara Dr Palomar St 0.35 13/02S Green Dolphin St Donlon Rd Eden Rd 0.75 1.95 Total Miles 8.08 At any time during the contract road and/or indicated length of the above road may be added or deleted. 1.1 WORK SCHEDULES AND OVERTIME A. No work shall be done between the hours of 4:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M., nor on Saturday, Sunday, or legal holidays observed by St. Lucie County, in any case without the written approval or permission of the Project Manager. B. The normal work shift for County Inspectors shall begin at 7:00 A.M. and end at 4:00 P.M. Monday through Friday. Any work performed before or after the normal work shift, or on Saturday, Sunday, or legal holidays shall be considered overtime and shall be paid for by the Contractor. If permission is obtained from the County's Project Manager to work between 4:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M., the Contractor shall bear all expenses for Inspection. Such overtime inspection expenses will be recovered by deductions from periodic partial payments. SID #07-029 STREET RESURFACING 11 ~ (!) Z (,) ~ ~ a. 0:::1-0 ::JWO enWN W:::I: o:::en~ I-Z" wOO W-- o:::~t::: I-...JN en::J.. O')caC N<W °l-Z r-:. W o a. =It 0 C ca OI.!)NNOOOOOOOO ~~,"":r--OO"'-OOO~~ r--N...-NcO"¡'cOL()ool.!)l.!) I.!)I.!)0NC'?"<t0)1.!)r--"<tNC'? CDOONC'?"<tCDr--OOOfJ7...-...-NN Ñ....:fJ7fJ7a5"":fJ7"":ri fJ7fJ7fJ7fJ7 ...-C'? Nr-- fJ7fJ7 fJ7 fJ7 fJ7 fJ7 NNOI.!)NNOOI.!)OOOOO C'?C'?r--C'?r--r--001.!)0~00~ 00 0""": ooN"¡'L() L()00L() I.!) fJ7fJ7fJ7fJ7fJ7fJ7fJ7fJ7fJ7l.!)r--"<tNC'? fJ7...-...-NN fJ7 fJ7 fJ7 fJ7 OOCDC'?CDCDOOOOOOI.!)OO C"!1.!)...-"":r--0~'"":C"!Lr.!r--0...- C'?CDr--OOCD"<tCDC'?CDc:ONM 1.!)"<t"<t"<tI'-C'?"<tO)I.!)CDC'?NC'? OOONC'?OO"<tr--OOOfJ7...-...-NN ....:~fJ7fJ7aicifJ7....:ri fJ7fJ7fJ7fJ7 ...-N C'?O fJ7fJ7 fJ7 fJ7 fJ7 ...- fJ7 0001.!)00 C"!1.!)r--~...- C'?CDc:ONM I.!)CDC'?NC'? fJ7...-...-NN fJ7 fJ7 fJ7 fJ7 OOC'?OO ~~~"": 01.!)"<t0 ...-C'?C'?O) ...- fJ7 r-- I.!) fJ7 "":00 I.!) CD ...-0 fJ7"": fJ7 00 ~~ o I.!) ...-C'? ...- fJ7 fJ7 1.!)01.!)C'? I'-:C'?~N OOM"<t...- OC'?C'?I.!) ...-fJ7"<tr-- fJ7 cD· oot:: ~~ fJ7 ~ 00 I'-: 00 0 0 I.!) 0 0 0 I.!) 0 I.!) 00 0 0 0 o I.!) 0 ~ ~ "": ~ ~ C"! C"!~ ~ 00 ~ ~ ~ "<t"<t ~ N CD 00 00 0) ...- 0)...- CD r-.:r-.: CD 00 CD L()r-.: CD "<t r-- r-- ...- "<t 0) O"<t 1.!)r--"<tC'?"<t ...-C'?I.!) 00 OOOONC'?"<t"<tr--...-...-fJ7...-"'- NN ...- fJ7 N "":aifJ7fJ7....:...¡fJ7"":"'¡ fJ7 fJ7 fJ7 fJ7 fJ7 I.!) "<t ...-N "<to fJ7 fJ7 0) I.!) fJ7 fJ7 fJ7 ...- ...- 0 fJ7 fJ7 . ...- fJ7 I.!) I.!) I.!) 0 I.!) 0 0 0 0 0 ~'"": C"!~~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 00 O...-...-...-N "<tl.!) CD r-- r-- CD 00 CD fJ7fJ7fJ7fJ7fJ7fJ7fJ7fJ7fJ7l.!)r--"<tC'?"<t fJ7...-...-NN fJ7 fJ7 fJ7 fJ7 "0 -3= -CD _ 0 c: 00)->.= 0 ~ t:o:;CO::-Ö ~~9~~ is Ñ ~ ¡ß -I/) -I/) -I/) I/) I/) I/) ~~CD«'(o"'-N O)~~~~~ ~ ~ E E .§- I I I ro ro ro ro ro ro 3= ro ~OOOOOOCD~~CD ~I/)I/)I/)I/)I/)Ol/) æ(oÑ~~E~g ~¡ß¡ß¡ß¡ß¡ß5¡ß NæOOæ~ 0:::::2::2::2::2::2:......:2: "But) OOCl) ~+-'......,......,+-'.......c:+-' ~EEE~EE~ EEEEEE~E ~rororo~roro~ ~~~~~~ro~ ro I- s.... L.. co '- L.. ro ~I-I-I-~I-I-~ ~~~~~~c: g~~~g~~g:2:~~~~~~~CD ~OOO~OO~~~~~~~~O~ OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO::OOOOOOOOOOOOüOO CD CD ...- "<t r-- 00 ...- N CD "<t. "<t. CD CD 0 ...- ...- ...- ...- ...- N 0) 0) C'? N r-- C'? 0) ., c: t: <Ii <Ii <Ii <Ii <Ii <Ii <Ii <Ii <Ii <Ii <Ii tc-~ 0 0 LL LL LL ,~, l- I- ~ ~ ~ W W W W W W W W W W W ã) _ U-c: ro Ci5 CD 't:>E ð5.3CD --> __ro roro~ ..c:..c: - ~ ~ro I/)I/)..c: ««~ ('I')C'?I/) I I « 00 00 0) CD CD c: ~ ~= >. >. ,- 1-1-:2: "<tl.!) N C'? I.!) ~ "0 CD - :J .0 -tc E a¡ .!Q !EO õ~"O ZCCD I/) (]) > .~ E 'CD c: :J U ro U CD ~Oo:: EOI/) o:Q:Q üCCCC C'? o I/) I/) ~ ~ ...... ...... ...... 000 '- '- '- (]) CD CD .0 .0 .0 E E E :J :J :J zzz ffi û5 "0 t: ro E Q) o :ï¡ 0.. . ITEM NO. C-5-B DATE: 03/06/07 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR ( ) PUBLIC HEARING ( ) CONSENT (X) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: PURCHASING DEPARTMENT PRESENTED BY: Neil Appel. Purchasing Director SUBJECT: Fixed Asset Inventory-Property Record Removal BACKGROUND: Please see the attached Property Disposition forms from various S1. Lucie County Departments with regard to removal of inventory items. These items are being disposed of as surplus. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board authorize Staff to remove the attached records from the fixed asset inventory of the Board of County Commissioners. COMMISSION ACTION: Approved 4-0 Comm. Smith Absent ,r~ APPROVED [] DENIED L J OTHER: County Attorney: ( X) Originating Dept: jY Coord i nation/SiQnatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing Dir.: (X) M' Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PURCHASING DEPARTMENT NEIL APPEL, DIRECTOR MEMORANDUM To: Board of County Commissioners From: Neil Appel, Purchasing Director Date: MARCH 6, 2007 Re: Fixed Asset Inventory-Property Record Removal ******************************************************************************************************** Per Section 18.4 of the Purchasing Manual, Staff is requesting permission to remove the fixed assets as listed on the attached Property Disposition Forms from various St. Lucie County Departments. These items will be disposed of as surplus. ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT REPORT OF ACQUISITIONIDISPOSITION OR TRANSFER OF PROPERTY TODAY'S DATE 2/21/07 1. INVOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE) 2, ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE) 3. GOVERNMENT NAME, Center Auditorium BUILDING AND ROOM # 4. LOCATION CODE 5. PROPERTY RECORD # TRANSFERRING TO OTHER DEPARTMENT? YES 0 NO 0 IF YES, DEPARTMENT NAME 6. DISPOSING OF YES 0 NO 0 7. ~~~F3 .~.ºg~lF3.§ºj!~!_~~~_~.~ER_R_~l?!.~.?!J~:rEDf!RADE~~~~L._._._._,__._____ ._..____._____.__ : !~.~.~"',. ......·'......o...n.......__....'.,....,..,..,_.___...._..____,..----.__.___'.._.______........_.._..__.______._.__,._._,.._-.---,--.._,._.....__1 8. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY c.'~) Rider Operated Floor Scrubber ~. ,...--.-.....-.,.---.,..... . '_._,.~._~...,.._-,........_~,."......' ,_.. 9. MAKE 'Tennant .' - '..,. ~."..,.". ......",,'^^' .. .m~ ...... ............-.q .....-....,-.- ....._~,,_.~".'h_,"._...~._,_...... ...'......._.____.._..........^...._.. ,,_..~__ ".._..~'".... ...,........,... n...... m" ^_^_..'",...__u...,._.,....~._._....,.. _,.,__.,...._.....~..N"..._.."_,, 10. MODEL NUMBER 11. SERIAL NUMBER 12. METHOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSING OF: JUNK, SURPLUS, SOLD, TRADED, ETC.) r"'" .,., ,.""""." ."" ·'···'M..... ..,.."....... ,..,..,.."", ,..., ,'.., ,.." .'.... ",'.. ...',.. ,.., ',..--,-,....., .......-.,.......,..,.,.,.., ....,.....,......,..... .......'...-..'............,.... .', ..,'...,. ....... ,'.. """ """1 !Junk :..,..... '" .....'..........'.....-.-.".....,......--..,..-..........,...-.-..-,-.-.....·_,...._,..,......,---·....,,----'--00_'..'..,...... ..__.._...',.'.._._'.._._....._______._..,_..._......._..............__..___....,.., _,..,....._,. ....." ,..". ¡ P.~.,,~ ;¡ -;}H1 DEPARTMENTOOEAD 0 AUTHORIZED PERSON DATE THIS FORM IS TO BE USED FOR ALL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPARTMENT TO ANOTHER. A. WHEN PURCHASING AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORM OUT, ATTACH TO THE. .INVOICE AND RECEIVING COpy OF P.O. AND SUBMIT TO FINANCE FOR PAYMENT, FINANCE WILL SEND TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED, YOU WILL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR). THIS INFORMATION IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDS. B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING AN ITEM, FILL OUT FORM AND SEND TO PURCHASING. INTRANET:PURCHASING FORMS:PROPERTY DISPOSITION ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT REPORT OF ACQUISITIONIDISPOSITION OR TRANSFER OF PROPERTY TODAY'S DATE 2/21/07 1. INVOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE) 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE) 3. GOVERNMENT NAME, DIVISION, BUILDING AND ROOM # r~'-------'------·__M-------______.____.___._ ~~-_'_'_'__'___~_,..__w__._,..__._.._.___,.__.<______,__~_,__" ¡Civic Center Auditorium I ¡ ! '....,__..u_~._~.__...V"..__~._.._._....,..'u,_".__~. '-'-~-~_.'-"'~"".","' ....,_,_".._.'''.·._.~_.._..__m_~_'__.'_~.~......_"___._,..~..--_·_-_··_-_·_~·,--_..._·,-,,"_.__.._,.____.._._._.w_...,-_._-~--.-,_.._..-.._,--~._,~_.____u_.._",.J 4. LOCATION CODE 5. PROPERTY RECORD # TRANSFERRING TO OTHER DEPARTMENT? YES 0 NO @ IF YES, DEPARTMENT NAME 6. DISPOSING OF YES @ NO 0 7. '!_~~!3~º_~~§_Q_~!~.T_~~_t:i~FE~REDIDO~A TED/TRA~~D, ETC.) ¡ -----------'1 ,2002 i i.'-_'_'_T_'_-'__~'_'__""_~__".'_V'__'_"'___^'_~___'~_'___..._____.__.___.__.....______.__."..__..._,__._______,_,._____._~__,_._..,_.____.__..¡ 8. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY ..U·.._._...'....A....... Winch & Control Box 9. MAKE L____,?tage Equipment 10, MODEL NUMBER 11. SERIAL NUMBER 12., ry1 ETH 0 D 0 FºI§F'º§f\~{I~[?l§¡:>C??I~º,º~:.~l:'~~,_,§l:''3¡:>_~~?!,.§º~.[?,.I_'3I.':[?_~[?!,~_Tº) .',_" __ ___'_____] ¡Junk ¡ DE:AR~=-~~T~~::~~~::::-~----~~~~-i----- THIS FORM IS TO BE USED FOR ALL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPARTMENT TO ANOTHER. A. WHEN PURCHASING AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORM OUT, ATTACH TOTHE. .INVOICE AND RECEIVING COPY OF P.O. AND SUBMIT TO FINANCE FOR PAYMENT, FINANCE WILL SEND TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED, YOU WILL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR). THIS INFORMATION IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDS. B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING AN ITEM, FILL OUT FORM AND SEND TO PURCHASING. INTRANET:PURCHASING FORMS:PROPERTY DISPOSITION ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT REPORT OF ACQUISITION/DISPOSITION OR TRANSFER OF PROPERTY TODAY'S DATE 2/21/07 1. INVOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE) 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE) 3. GOVERNMENT NAM BUILDING AND ROOM # Center Auditorium 4. LOCATION CODE 5. PROPERTY RECORD # 71 TRANSFERRING TO OTHER DEPARTMENT? YES 0 NO 0 IF YES, DEPARTMENT NAME 6. DISPOSING OF YES 0 NO 0 7. YEAR ACQUIRED (IF TRANSFERRED/DONATED/TRADED, ETC.) ,...--.........'.....---.-... '..','..'.. ..'.'.."..'-..--..-.-.....-......---...--..-......-...--.-,----..----·--·---------------l 11977 :"".....,.........-...,.,-,.-..-..--..,...--.-,.-...-..--.......--......-.........---..--.......-'----..-...-...-----.--.-........-......,---..--....,._.._._.._.,.,..._J 8. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY .w ,-,.--,. W.....', "·_~'·'_'·~.m._ "'..__... .^.__,. ....,····~··._..'_.'.'m__ .__"~·..~.·..·,._._....._.._~_,M...'..'^_._...~,____... "..."'____ ~....__..~,...___ ,,_,~.."..._'"_..".. ._._.,___~..__.__.."... ''''''_'''''_. ..._._..~.^'.. ,~._ ~.~._.._..__., _..... n..._' ...,._......__... 9. MAKE iT;~~'C'" ~._~,._ .~_. .,. .,_.._ _M_ _...-.., ~ 10.MODEL NUMBER 11. SERIAL NUMBER 12 ',I\A~I Ijº ººfP'ª f:'º~~hJI,=,,[)I.?~º?If\J ~,º~:~t¿f\J~'.~t¿R~.~t¿~!,~-º.~I?,~I!3.......!?_E::I?,_~IÇ:>_ '~~ DE'PARTMENT!~ O~ER~ON - '. ".-.. ..,~--,. ,--_.~.._.~"_....,,-_....,._....,'^_.,~....~......._._^_..---,'- ..._.-.^..._~_.__.......~,..__.. . ....... _.....~,..,...__...__...._.__..._.... .....*" . j I u j .. . ......,..,,_.......,..,-...~..-........"'-, ,..~..,.-,. :J. ~ ;¡.-I-o 1 DATE THIS FORM IS TO BE USED FOR ALL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPARTMENT TO ANOTHER. A. WHEN PURCHASING AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORM OUT, ATTACH TOTHE. .INVOICE AND RECEIVING COPY OF P.O. AND SUBMIT TO FINANCE FOR PAYMENT, FINANCE WILL SEND TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED, YOU WILL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR). THIS INFORMATION IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDS. B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING AN ITEM, FILL OUT FORM AND SEND TO PURCHASING. INTRANET:PURCHASING FORMS:PROPERTY DISPOSITION ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT REPORT OF ACQUISITION/DISPOSITION OR TRANSFER OF PROPERTY TODAY'S DATE 2/21/07 1. INVOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE) 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE) 3. GOVERNMENT NAME, DIVISION, BUILDING AND ROOM # , -...-.--.-..-----.--- ! 'Civic Center Auditorium I [,...,..--."...-----.----.-------.----.---.--.---,---..-'--..---.--'......-----'--.-.-------,--.--,-...--.--.--.--____.J 4. LOCATION CODE 5, PROPERTY RECORD # TRANSFERRING TO OTHER DEPARTMENT? YES 0 NO ® IF YES, DEPARTMENT NAME 6. DISPOSING OF YES @ NO 0 7. ~~!.'B_.~º.9.~iB_§.º-Q.~IBAN_SFERR~!.~O.NA TED/TRADED, ETC.L_.___ ,1982 '-.....~...~_.._.._.._,...,-._----_.~---_._.._.,-~------_._._._....~......._-_._---_._~_......._,..__.._------_. ., . ...-.-.---____._,.J 8. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY 9. MAKE ,~Iamps --,,--.__.»--~---..-..... ..-......- .-.. 'on" ...._._..,........... ._._.,."^,.,..,.___.__'_h._~....... ..~,~.,........_.",_.~~".._, ..~..,_..._..^,.._"_.~.~_."._.__~.~.~,.._.". . .,.. -.,...... ...,.,~,.'-'" _..."'.,.____u,_.,__._~.~._.~......,..,.._".____"_.,_._ _M_._.__..~._.._.___.__ 10.MODEL NUMBER 11. SERIAL NUMBER 12 .,.M ETH 0 q,ºEºI§eº§~~,(I~.12I~~º~I.t-.I~gE:~~t¿f\J~,~t¿~F'~t¿§.~~º~12,I~~'?§g,~TÇ,.t.. '..."" ",.,"',""'....,... "". ¡Surplus ,," "."'._""",, ""·""'·"'·,·"'····"'···~·-~~~ß·~-~.."..,··-·".'--.....-.."'....-....-,....-..,..,-.""'.-....--.-.-..··"..·"""·,··....··a..=-.;,·=~'~l"·""'·"···..·"·..·..,·· DEPARTMENT HEAD OR 'AI!J.ffiõ~PERSON DATE i .", '.' ",1 THIS FORM IS TO BE USED FOR ALL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPARTMENT TO ANOTHER. A. WHEN PURCHASING AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORM OUT, ATTACH TO THE, .INVOICE AND RECEIVING COPY OF P.O. AND SUBMIT TO FINANCE FOR PAYMENT, FINANCE WILL SEND TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED, YOU WILL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR). THIS INFORMATION IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDS. B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING AN ITEM, FILL OUT FORM AND SEND TO PURCHASING. INTRANET:PURCHASING FORMS:PROPERTY DISPOSITION ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT REPORT OF ACQUISITIONIDISPOSITION OR TRANSFER OF PROPERTY TODAY'S DATE 2/21/07 1. INVOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE) 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE) 3, GOVERNMENT NAME, DIVISION, BUILDING AND ROOM # -'~-'-""-""""-"'--'--"----'-'--"-'''''-'-'--------------.---.-".'..---..-..'....'-..'-'..'--'.-.-- '--'...--'-..-........,--,..---..-..,-...,....--.....--.....-..,.··'ì Civic Center Auditorium I ! ..', '" ..'.'..."--."'.--...."-........,---..,-,..."...- ...-.-- -......-.....'-'.'...'.......,-.'.-.,...-....-.--.,.....----........,---........-....--.------.-......"..----..,_..........J ~--""",," _n_,._.__.., '~_._.._,.,..~_".._. ,~..~...._,". ._.,......._,_..... ...~'_' _'W"~ 4. LOCATION CODE 5. PROPERTY RECORD # TRANSFERRING TO OTHER DEPARTMENT? YES 0 NO 0 IF YES, DEPARTMENT NAME 6. DISPOSING OF YES 0 NO 0 7. ~~I~,R A.Ç_Ql!.'.~5DJ1F TRANSFERRED/DC?,NATE'2./TRJ\DED, ET~.:L_ .._. i 1984 J \...-,..~. .'·'.~"'·~·..v.._._·_.....~".,.."'_"',._,,._,_.,_..._.,--·'·,....~_·,·,~·,_·~~-_·_~y---"--~·,,·_·____..~N__.V.___------.-..--"--"~.._'-.M___.__h._.....__..__~_____H._._W~._.....w._._.__''''''.,..__.__.__~_,_...,._._.____..,. 8. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY :Showmaster Stage _~ "··,.·.._M·,',··-_·,..~'..M ._...., ,__,~..~._.- ^·'^o""h_..___..^,__n. 9. MAKE ,...- "_.".^o"'..._._._.'...~~.._.....~~,~._.,.,,_._.'"___,__..., ·····~·_-...-~...-·~___~·_~_...._~._..~Ü_m'__~._.__.,__..__~_....,,__.~....~..'^....~__"'_.......___^..__._.^..._._..~.~._.....~~..._ ._"..",......,.,... _...._....,,,...._,..,...__..,,...... ~......^...._.r......_.. . ._'"~..~ 10.MODEL NUMBER 11. SERIAL NUMBER 12., M ET HOD OF DI S pº~~~mJ F D!~'.P0SI NG.9F: J Y-~~,.-§l!'3~-~..Y_§,§Q~.ºL_I'3~º~º,_§'Iº:) ,',' __" ._.""""""". ". ,_.., """,'.. "'_, ¡Surplus i . "', , ,. .", "."." "··'P6lt:L'.."l¿JI::~·:-·_·_·,-'-,··.........."- -..."'...."".....'.---,.--........----,-"'.."...--..,.-......---..·--·ã-:-,;ï'=-~-1-·"'·_- ,...,.",.,........."__..."",,.1 DEPARTMENT HEA~~D PERSON DATE THIS FORM IS TO BE USED FOR ALL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPARTMENT TO ANOTHER. A. WHEN PURCHASING AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORM OUT, ATTACH TO THE. .INVOICE AND RECEIVING COPY OF P.O. AND SUBMIT TO FINANCE FOR PAYMENT, FINANCE WILL SEND TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED, YOU WILL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR). THIS INFORMATION IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDS. B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING AN ITEM, FILL OUT FORM AND SEND TO PURCHASING. INTRANET:PURCHASING FORMS:PROPERTY DISPOSITION ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT REPORT OF ACQUISITIONIDISPOSITION OR TRANSFER OF PROPERTY TODAY'S DATE 2/21/07 1. INVOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE) 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE) 3. GOVERNMENT NAME, DIVISION, BUILDING AND ROOM # ¡-.-:-:--.----.---.---:--.------ .--'---------.--.--...-.--,---,--...,-.---,---------.--..----..----1 CIVIC Center Auditorium I L______._._..._......,.....,.,...._..__________._____..___.__.--------.,-----.------------------,-.-------.__--...J 4. LOCATION CODE 5. PROPERTY RECORD # 673 TRANSFERRING TO OTHER DEPARTMENT? YES 0 NO 0 IF YES, DEPARTMENT NAME 6. DISPOSING OF YES 0 NO 0 7. YEAR ACQUIRED (IF TRANSFERRED/DONATED/TRADED, ETC.) r:~,~~2~~~·~~_~:~.~~~~=_·=~_==~.=_==~===~=-------~_~===--====_~=~=_~==_=_~~~~] 8. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY 9. MAKE 10.MODEL NUMBER 11. SERIAL NUMBER 12.METHOD OF DIS~º§!\~.(JF DISPO,~f\J~ Of:~l}.f\J!S.'.~lJf3~~l}~,~g~I?!.II3,f.\qJ::/:),J::.Iº:L_ ",. '" m. ~~--~--~-----------------~ Pa.kL. _ ~ ~.. a./--ð 1 DEPARTMENT HEAD OR TH~D PERSON DATE THIS FORM IS TO BE USED FOR ALL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPARTMENT TO ANOTHER. A. WHEN PURCHASING AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORM OUT, ATTACH TO THE. .INVOICE AND RECEIVING COpy OF P.O, AND SUBMIT TO FINANCE FOR PAYMENT, FINANCE WILL SEND TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED, YOU WILL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR). THIS INFORMATION IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDS. B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING AN ITEM, FILL OUT FORM AND SEND TO PURCHASING. INTRANET:PURCHASING FORMS:PROPERTY DISPOSITION ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT REPORT OF ACQUISITIONIDISPOSITION OR TRANSFER OF PROPERTY TODAY'S DATE 2/21/07 1. I NVOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE) 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE) 3. GOVERNMENT NAME, DIVISION, BUILDING AND ROOM # r----------------'-'--.----_____________.___'_____~._____ _ Civic Center Auditorium i..,_,.......______.."_....___.......___.____,.._,_____..___,_.._._____.___..'__._____...._____________.._.__._ 4. LOCATION CODE -" .,..."--"--.- -.^.-..-~..-"_.-,.-..... ..,.--..,-^".....,.-.-._...,.....~__.~,~ ... .__~..M.."..._.~....^._..._,.__._"_"__.~...___..~.,__..,._____....__.._ 5. PROPERTY RECORD # 13 TRANSFERRING TO OTHER DEPARTMENT? YES 0 NO 0 IF YES, DEPARTMENT NAME 6. DISPOSING OF YES @ NO 0 7. ~(~AR..~Cg~!~§_º. (IF !RAN~FERR.~D/D_<2.~ATED/TRADED, ETC.) 12001 -.-----.......---.-,.....----J ..___"-.__.u__~__,..__~___¥__.,..__.__¥_.______,_..___.__.______ 8. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Stage, Cart ~ ,,'^_....,~......~-,,_._. '..'·_h"·__W...._.O>_.~.__ --...~.,-". 4....__......._._... ",. ...--.^' ______"__n___..._.' """-"'.', ....,..._.".-.~.._~_" ".._.,.._.~..,.._..._., _.~___,.._~..._ .~._..... _',.,.._._._~.._"..'_ n"_.._~_._.....".__.__.,,__ ,~.'~ "_.._~_..~ .._,....,__" .."n,...".'__"__n.^_.h.M.. __....~ 9. MAKE Corp. 10. MODEL NUMBER, 11. SERIAL NUMBER 12 ·,~~TIjº-º-.ºr:-º!~eº§~~_(IEºI~~()~1 ~g()~:~':J,~~,-§-L¿~.~~~_~,',~()~º,.I~~g_§º~.§IÇ:t...,"""_.."", ~U"'IU"-_O-;····_-_-------_-_--···-··---- ._._. __._____ :=:.::.:.:.] nw:L ~~ .;t -;;./-0 ] DEPARTMENT HEAD OR THORIZ D PERSON DATE THIS FORM IS TO BE USED FOR ALL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPARTMENT TO ANOTHER. A. WHEN PURCHASING AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORM OUT, ATTACH TO THE. .INVOICE AND RECEIVING COPY OF P.O. AND SUBMIT TO FINANCE FOR PAYMENT, FINANCE WILL SEND TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED, YOU WILL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR). THIS INFORMATION IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDS. B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING AN ITEM, FILL OUT FORM AND SEND TO PURCHASING. INTRANET: PURCHASING FORMS:PROPERTY DISPOSITION ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT REPORT OF ACQUISITION/DISPOSITION OR TRANSFER OF PROPERTY TODA Y'S DATE 1/25/07 1. INVOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE) 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE) 3. GOVERNMENT NAME, DIVISION, BUILDING AND ROOM # ,service garage / central services i ct, 1 d ? A ~IM '¡J..11 4. LOCATION CODE rr ' ¡'Jl' 9.1'"', ' jI'" 5. PROPERTY RECORD # 90-0002, 90-0003, 90-0053 ~ 9 ODOr) / TRANSFERRING TO OTHER DEPARTMENT? YES 0 NO IF YES, DEPARTMENT NAME 6. DISPOSING OF YES 0 NO o o 7. YEAR ACQUIRED (IF TRANSFERREDIDONATEDITRADED, ETC.) c/) :-/ 8. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY t-..,.) vehicle lifts '1'", 9. MAKE ,,-~,--" ~.. U1 10. MODEL NUMBER 11. SERIAL NUMBER 12. METHOD OF DIS OSAL (IF DISPOSING OF: JUNK, SURPLUS,SOLD,TRADED,ETC:) sur s - damaged '~ ~ DEPARTMENT HEAD QR. A~TI¡!ORIZED PERSON (! V1A ¡vtE:( ¡VA-Ù/Lt~ Tlil6 FORM IS TO BE USED FOR ALL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPARTMENT TO ANOTHER. 1/25/07 DATE A. WHEN PURCHASING AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORMOUT,ATTACHTOTHE .INVOICE AND RECEIVING COPY OF P.O. AND SUBMIT TO FINANCE FOR PAYMENT, FINANCE WILL SEND TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED, YOU WILL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR). THIS INFORMATION IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDS. B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING AN ITEM, FILL OUT FORM AND SEND TO PURCHASING. INTRANET:PURCHASING FORMS:PROPERTY DISPOSITION Page 1 of 1 Desiree Cimino - disposal of damaged lifts From: To: Date: Subject: cc: Charles Padrick Cimino, Desiree 12/7/20068:25 AM disposal of damaged lifts Shinn, Roger A Good morning I wish to dispose of the three vehicle lifts that were removed from the Mosquito Control building that was damaged by the two hurricanes. All are damaged by the hurricanes. I found the FR# on two but can't find the other. (1) 9_00002 (2) 9~0053 are the numbers I could locate. 0 oùOO I V ~) ci.C~c)PfÇ) .::., cf { ryð.,,? Jt,~ c C1 ¡,pJ ¡J / fì1r;J 117 . file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Desiree\Loca1%20Settings\ Temp\GW} 0000 1.H... 12/12/2006 ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT REPORT OF ACQUISITION/DISPOSITION OR TRANSFER OF PROPERTY TODAY'S DATE 10/18/06 1. INVOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE) 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE) 3. GOVERNMENT NAME, ,., '~"·"'··_·'__'·'m..,',.~_'",",..._,._.__."..=~,~,,~,'.w_w_-...,..,.._....'..m~_.'c.".__.__,...ww.'...w..=.~"_.,_.__.,__..___~~.~_. ,,'_"" . BUILDING AND ROOM # 4. LOCATION CODE 5. PROPERTY RECORD # TRANSFERRING TO OTHER DEPARTMENT? YES 0 NO 0 IF YES, DEPARTMENT NAME 6, DISPOSING OF YES ® NO 0 7, YEAR ACQUIRED TRANSFERRED/DONATEDfTRADED, 1990's 8. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY electronic ISDN outdated equipment. 9, MAKE 10. MODEL NUMBER j~ ofJ. ;¡:. ¡) ,............"...."....,.. "''''''~'''''''''' "",,,,_,, ,'.'.."..,.... '.... "'...w.....,',....~"...,"',.w'w,',..'w....... ,....,...."."....,..,..",.. " ..,,'..... ,,'...... 11 ~RíK NUMBER t. "LºL~.1C2I...lº,Ll!l~.wlQl,r:w:1¿I"_l~L~:JJf.w,l~lJ:"Sw~I"...,, .. 12. METHOD OF DISPOSAL DISPOSING OF: ¡JUNK ,- If M fA. '^ t<- THORIZED PERSO e r I'-:)-o/, DATE THIS FORM IS TO BE USED FOR ALL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPARTMENT TO ANOTHER. A WHEN PURCHASING AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORM OUT, ATTACH TOTHE, .INVOICE AND RECEIVING COPY OF P.O. AND SUBMIT TO FINANCE FOR PAYMENT, FINANCE WILL SEND TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED, YOU WILL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR). THIS INFORMATION IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDS. B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING AN ITEM, FILL OUT FORM AND SEND TO PURCHASING. INTRANET:PURCHASING FORMS:PROPERTY DISPOSITION Page 1 of 1 Sandi Morando - Prop. #5 From: To: Date: Subject: Wayne Hartwick Sandi Morando 10/17/2006 11:33 AM Prop. #s Sandi: These are some old, old numbers and if they are not off inventory they should be. 101830, 101834, 101831, 101832, 101839 Thanks Wayne file://C:\Documents and Settings\Adrninistrator\Local Settings\Temp\XPGroWise\4534B... 10/17/200ó ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT REPORT OF ACQUISITION/DISPOSITION OR TRANSFER OF PROPERTY TODA Y'S DATE c2.--9"-07 1. INVOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE) 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW 3. GOVERNMENT NAME, DIVISION, BUILDING AND ROOM # ¡:~':;~~W' liL 4. LOCATION CODE [__ 5. PROPERTY RECORD # L_012.k£ç¡ ~ TRANSFERRING TO OTHER DEPARTMENT? YES Ø" NO IF YES, DEPARTMENT NAME --~'''''''._-'''---~ I I _J ----·l ..-----__...J ¡ I o r;-;:-¡. - f'o S; 1 £.!d.JºJl.k..~ ,<::.l1JÍ_! 6. DISPOSING OF YES 0 NO ® 7. YEAR ACQUIRED (IF TRANSFERRED/DONATEOrrRADEO, ETC.) L 8. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY I Lr1~~\\JÃtð(L 9. MAKE L__.._...~_.(3J'=.,.._~ ';:'.{1'l.11.:~ Q._ß.. ,,- ,.''1 ,''''".' ''-'--~-.: ! -:0:' -1 ...····"1 --~J ---¡ .... I . , .--------..,..."..-.".,;..."..-.,",-'--...-,.-..."..,_,_..J 10. MODEL NUMBER 11.SERIAL NUMBER 12. METHOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSING OF: JUNK, SURPLUS, SOLD, TRADED, ETC.) I - ÕE~~~~~!'~b PERSON '~-l ¡~q'o7 -------------------- DATE THIS FORM IS TO BE USED FOR ALL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPARTMENT TO ANOTHER. A. WHEN PURCHASING AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORM OUT, ATTACH TO THE. .INVOICE AND RECEIVING COpy OF P.O. AND SUBMIT TO FINANCE FOR PAYMENT, FINANCE WILL SEND TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED, YOU WILL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR). THIS INFORMATION IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDS. 8. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING AN ITEM, FILL OUT FORM AND SEND TO PURCHASING. INTRANET:PURCHASING FORMS:PROPERTY DISPOSITION ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT REPORT OF ACQUISITION/DISPOSITION OR TRANSFER OF PROPERTY TODAY'S DATE 1/26/07 1. INVOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE) 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE) r " 3. GOVERNMENT NAME, DIVISION, BUILDING AND ROOM # St. Lucie County Road & Bridge Division, BOCC. --'._--".'-~ -~ I _..~-~-~~_.~--'" 4. LOCATION CODE ŒW Road 5. PROPERTY RECORD # TRANSFERRING TO OTHER DEPARTMENT? YES 0 NO @ IF YES, DEPARTMENT NAME 6. DISPOSING OF YES @ NO 0 7. YEAR ACQUIRED (IF TRANSFERRED/DONATED/TRADED, ETC.) 19-30-2000 8. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY IMobile (hand held) radio 9. MAKE IMotorola 10. MODEL NUMBER MTS 2000 I/3W 11. SERIAL NUMBER 466AAY0069 ~J ;--¡ ~~~ !""'-';"") CJ r-'-"'- I I '1 I I I.J'; ... .. ~ :~::-.j --~ ¡.) ....<.J 12.METHOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSING OF: JUNK, SURPLUS, SOLD, TRADED, ETC.) ¿ , jO"~~" ~ Q. ' DEPARTMENT HEAD OR AU.:rRðRTZED PERSON )-30--07 DATE THIS FORM IS TO BE USED FOR ALL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPARTMENT TO ANOTHER. A. WHENPURCHASINGANITEM,FILL THIS FORMOUT,ATTACHTOTHE, .INVOICE AND RECEIVING COPY OF P.O. AND SUBMIT TO FINANCE FOR PAYMENT, FINANCE WILL SEND TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED, YOU WILL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR). THIS INFORMATION IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDS. B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING AN ITEM, FILL OUT FORM AND SEND TO PURCHASING. INTRANET:PURCHASING FORMS:PROPERTY DISPOSITION Ann Amandro Traffic Operations Supervisor ACCIDENTIINCIDENT OR LOSS REPORT ST. LUCIE COUNTY RISK MANAGEMENT/SAFETY DEPARTMENT ( /i'- ,"-/, ( \<~{.~ .... Check one or more: Accident!{'ïtç,'i::f~ijt \<,.;."".,::---<__.,.1 ..,-_.,·..~.<~i [l] Loss (Items damaged or stolen) [l] EMPLOYEE [{J Damage to County Property NON-EMPLOYEE D Damage to Personal Property 0 Vehicle D First Aid Only Reporting Only 1./ I Sent to Doctor D Sent to Hospital D MUST BE SUBMITTED TO RISK MANAGEMENT/SAFETY WITHIN 24 HOURS OR NEXT BUSINESS DA Y Date of occurrence (MM/DDIYYVY) Time: Department/Division: 10/19/2006 Unknown DAM DPM Road & Bridge Division / Traffic Name: Traffic Operations Department Address (FOR NON-EMPLOYEES/CITIZENS ONLY) Street/Apartment: City: State: Zip code: Telephone number: Location of accident/incident or loss: Unknown. Either from the Traffic office or lost on Angle Road or Orange Avenue. Description of accident/incident or loss: A Motorola hand held radio was lost or stolen. PR# 40-4737. Description of Injury (part of body, nature of Injury, etc.) None. Explain any conditions or factors you feel contributed to this accident/Incident or loss: None. Witness #1 name: Address: Telephone number: Witness #2 name: Address: Telephone number: Accident/Incident or loss reported to: (Person In Risk Management) Marcie Wallace Title: Risk Management Tech Accident/Incident or loss reported to: (Person In originating department) Title: Name of Supervisor: Ann Amandro Title: Traffic Operations Supervisor Report prepared by: Sandra Murray Title: Senior Staff Assistant What actions have been or will be take to prevent recurrence of this or any similar accident/incident or loss? A radio check-out I check-in log was created and will be used to track radio's. PART 1- SUPERVISOR SECTION Complete each section as applicable. Forward any other additional reports and statements (police, sheriff, fire, incident employee, witness, etc.) to Risk Management/Safety WITHIN 24 HOURS OR NEXT BUSINESS DAY. Provide all photographs showing the date and time taken. GO TO PAGE 2 .. EMPLOYEE SECTION ACCIDENTIINCIDENT OR LOSS REPORT ST. LUCIE COUNTY RISK MANAGEMENT/SAFETY DEPARTMENT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO RISK MANAGEMENT/SAFETY WITHIN 24 HOURS OR NEXT BUSINESS DA Y PART 11- EMPLOYEE SECTION What were you doing just before the accident/incident or loss happened? N/A Exact location where accident/Incident or loss took place (Inside, outside, building name, room, vehicle, etc.) Unknown. Either from the office or somewhere along Angle Road or Orange Avenue. Describe in detail what happened. Use additional sheets If necessary. The hand-held radio was used from Monday - Thursday with no incident. On Friday 10-19-06, the radio was not used and discovered missing on Monday 10-22-06. II Explain any conditions or factors you feel contributed to this accident/incident or loss. The hand-held radio was not signed out or signed in mainly because the radio was used by the same person everyday. II COUNTY EMPLOYEE MEDICAL RELEASE ONLY I , do not wish to seek medical attention at this time. Should I need medical attention at a later date concerning this accident or incident, I will notify the Risk Management/Safety Department as well as my own department. Department Signature of employee Witness Date , 7J(4-di-ð 1/3-&h7 Supervis Signature Dale I ~~>~~ R&B Mgr. Don Pauley J:&:J-07 Date ROUTED TO: RISK MANAGEMENT OFFICE USE ONLY D Wayne Teegardin , D John Lenfesty o Pat Clute SENT TO EMI: o Kathy Weaver o Dale Holland or Danielle Wymer PAGE20F2 ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT REPORT OF ACQUISITION/DISPOSITION OR TRANSFER OF PROPERTY TODAY'S DATE 1/26/07 1. INVOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE) 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE) 3. GOVERNMENT NAME, DIVISION, BUILDING AND ROOM # ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT 4. LOCATION CODE 5. PROPERTY RECORD #40-2909 TRANSFERRING TO OTHER DEPARTMENT? YES 0 NO ® IF YES, DEPARTMENT NAME 6. DISPOSING OF YES (!) NO 0 7. YEAR ACQUIRED (IF TRANSFERREDIDONATEDITRADED, ETC.) 2006 8. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY ICE MACHINE 9. MAKE 10. MODEL NUMBER 11. SERIAL NUMBER .t_ _, 12. M~Tt19DOF DISPOSAL(IF DISPOSING OF: JUNK, SURPLUS, SOLD, TRADED, ETC.) ,JUNK ¡ 'iIJ· Ai f) /lro. f_ 1/27/07 .. """,U/VLVr )lJ\-- DEPARTMENT HEAD OR AUTHORIZ D PERSON DATE ,."._, "-.,"', "--'::) THIS FORM IS TO BE USED FOR ALL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPARTMENT TO ANOTHER. A. WHEN PURCHASING AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORM OUT, ATTACH TO THE. .INVOICE AND RECEIVING COpy OF P.O. AND SUBMIT TO FINANCE FOR PAYMENT, FINANCE WILL SEND TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED, YOU WILL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR). THIS INFORMATION IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDS. B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING AN ITEM, FILL OUT FORM AND SEND TO PURCHASING. INTRANET:PURCHASING FORMS:PROPERTY DISPOSITION ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT REPORT OF ACQUISITIONIDISPOSITION OR TRANSFER OF PROPERTY TODAY'S DATE November 17. 2006 1. INVOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE) 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE) 3. GOVERNMENT NAME, DIVISION, BUILDING AND ROOM # Public Safety/Radiological Division 4. LOCATION CODE 000046 5. PROPERTY RECORD # AND DEPT. TRANSFERRING TO (IF TRANSFERRING TO (IF 6. TRANSFERRING 7. OR DISPOSING OF) 11404583 8. YEAR ACQUIRED (IF TRANSFERREDIDONATEDITRADED, ETC.) 2000 9. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Laptop (bad Harddrive ~ [:3 ~-', C/) ;--1 r- (= ~~¿~ 10. MAKE Dell ~=. ..- N c:) 11. Lattitude r"'¡ .. MODEL NUMBER 12. (0:": c.._.. ;~ SERIAL NUMBER ......~ "",:--¡ -.""¡ -< ~"Y ~" 13. 'METHOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSING OF: JUNK, SURPLUS, SOLD, TRADED, ETC. VI Junk (not worth fixing) T HEAD OR AUTHORIZED PERSON) THIS FORM IS TO BE USED FOR ALL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPARTMENT TO ANOmER. A. WHEN PURCHASING AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORM OUT, A IT ACH TO THE "INVOICE" AND "RECEIVING" COpy OF P.O. AND SUBMIT TO FINANCE FOR PAYMENT, FINANCE WILL SEND TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED, YOU WILL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR). THIS INFORMA nON IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDS. B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING AN ITEM, FILL OUT FORM AND SEND TO PURCHASING. INTRANET:PURCHASING FORMS:PROPERTI DISPOSITION ( REPORT OF ACQUISITION OR DISPOSmON OF PROPERTY ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: BOARD OF COVNTY COMMISSIONERS FROM: Public Safè1ry Date Aug 8 Number PR:lf404'i81 XX 2000 19_ Offieft' 01' ÐepunDeac Gentlemen: The following changes have occured in the property in my CUltody. Thil information should be entered Oft your Property Record. IDENTIFICATION DATA Name of Irwm Locaåoft Mak. Laptop PSEMMN Dell MocIeJ Y.r Mfp. Idmcificaåoa. Num&.r Lattitude OTHER DESCRIPTION: 2000 ( Q ACQUISITION OR DISPOSmON DATA PUROiASED DISPOSED OF From Automated Services To Reference P2013877 Transferred 0 Sold 0 Purchase Price , . $ 2,913.00 Traded 0 ] unked 0 Freight . Reason for Disposal Innallation $ , $ $ Amount Realized .. . $ Gross Cœt Leu T r,ade Remitted to Net COlt .' . . 2,913.00 . Date 19 Remade. VOUCHU FUND Signed Tide PROPERTY ACQUISmON OR DISPOSAL FORM ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT REPORT OF ACQUISITION/DISPOSITION OR TRANSFER OF PROPERTY TODAY'S DATE 12/4/06 1. INVOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE) I 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE) I 3. GOVERNMENT NAME, DIVISION, BUILDING AND ROOM # Public Safety - Central Communications 911 4. LOCATION CODE PSCTCM 5. PROPERTY RECORD # /40-5217 TRANSFERRING TO OTHER DEPARTMENT? YES 0 NO IF YES, DEPARTMENT NAME 6. DISPOSING OF YES @ NO @/ o I I , UJ 7. YEAR ACQUIRED (IF TRANSFERRED/DONATED/TRADED, ETC.) /2001 8. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY ITape Machine and Recorders 9. MAKE Dictaphone Corp. 10.MODEL NUMBER 101GAOOO-OW 11. SERIAL NUMBER /N/A 12. METHOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSING OF: JUNK, SURPLUS, SOLD, TRADED, ETC.) Junked :"---, __,....h_.~ ··':·a .. .'/' I .,,,-'~ --"".-~ r...",.~ .. :"...._! "'."-'" /2-Ý--~ DATE THIS FORM IS TO BE USED FOR ALL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPARTMENT TO ANOTHER. A. WHEN PURCHASING AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORM OUT, ATTACH TO THE .INVOICE AND RECEIVING COpy OF P.O. AND SUBMIT TO FINANCE FOR PAYMENT, FINANCE WILL SEND TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED, YOU WILL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR). THIS INFORMATION IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDS. B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING AN ITEM, FILL OUT FORM AND SEND TO PURCHASING. INTRANET:PURCHASING FORMS:PROPERTY DISPOSITION PROP. OF ST. LUCIE CO. 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111 485217 ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT REPORT OF ACQUISITION/DISPOSITION OR TRANSFER OF PROPERTY TO DAY'S DATE 1/25/07 1. INVOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE) L 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE) 3. GOVERNMENT NAME, DIVISION, BUILDING AND ROOM # Public Safety - 911 4. LOCATION CODE PSCTCM I 5. PROPERTY RECORD # 140-5729 I TRANSFERRING TO OTHER DEPARTMENT? YES 0 NO @/ I IF YES, DEPARTMENT NAME 6. DISPOSING OF YES @ NO 0 7. YEAR ACQUIRED (IF TRANSFERRED/DONATED/TRADED, ETC.) 102/26/2002 8. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY [Portable AED defibrillator 9. MAKE Survivalink c:/") ':-"';¡ ; ::~;~:) - , "~ 0".' ;,) 10. MODEL NUMBER 19200D-X01 11. SERIAL NUMBER 802300 - ~;~~~ .1 c 12. METHOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSING OF: JUNK, SURPLUS, SOLD, TRADED, ETC.) Ju~ked, battery died, paddles expired and cannot re order. Unit is obsolete I, / . , ( l / / bEat~E~ HEAci-¿;~~THORIZED PERSON I /;;S / Ö 7 DATE THIS FORM IS TO BE USED FOR ALL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPARTMENT TO ANOTHER. A. WHEN PURCHASING AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORM OUT, ATTACH TO THE .INVOICE AND RECEIVING COPY OF P.O. AND SUBMITTO FINANCE FOR PAYMENT, FINANCE WILL SEND TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED, YOU WILL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR). THIS INFORMATION IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDS. B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING AN ITEM, FILL OUT FORM AND SEND TO PURCHASING. INTRANET:PURCHASING FORMS:PROPERTY DISPOSITION ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT REPORT OF ACQUISITION/DISPOSITION OR TRANSFER OF PROPERTY TODAY'S DATE 3/10/06 1. INVOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE) 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE) 3. GOVERNMENT NAME, DIVISION, BUILDING AND ROOM # Civic Center Auditorium 4. LOCATION CODE LSCIVC 5. PROPERTY RECORD # TRANSFERRING TO OTHER DEPARTMENT? YES 0 NO IF YES, DEPARTMENT NAME 6. DISPOSING OF YES (!) NO 0(., o 7. YEf,\R ACQUIRED (IF TRANSFERRED/DONATEDITRAD~[), ETC) .1989 8. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY ¡Dimmer Packs (f) :--1 ,r-: C ,0 ·""""·""m·,,,·, w t',..) S 0, -0 C :$:;; "J) Š:; ~2::0 ~-,n'l ~ ....~~ 9. MAKE ,Leprechon 10. MODEL NUMBER 11. SERIAL NUMBER 12., rv1ETHOD OF DISPOSAL (IF: DISPOSING OF: JUNK, SURPLUS,?OL[),TRADE[), ETc:) Junk "".""""""''0.'...'...''.''''''''''''''''''''''''.".",.."""",'..,...""""""""""" rCL-ti'L ~ìl£)tu.,t"~A DEPARTMENT HEAD ' AUTHO IZED PERSON 3-10-0(" DATE THIS FORM IS TO BE USED FOR ALL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPARTMENT TO ANOTHER. A. WHEN PURCHASING AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORM OUT, ATTACH TOTHE. .INVOICE AND RECEIVING COpy OF P.O. AND SUBMIT TO FINANCE FOR PAYMENT, FINANCE WILL SEND TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED, YOU WILL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR). THIS INFORMATION IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDS. B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING AN ITEM, FILL OUT FORM AND SEND TO PURCHASING. INTRANET:PURCHASING FORMS:PROPERTY DISPOSITION ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT REPORT OF ACQUISITIONIDISPOSITION OR TRANSFER OF PROPERTY TODAY' S DATE 3/10/06 1. INVOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE) 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE) 3. GOVERNMENT NAME, DIVISION, BUILDING AND ROOM # ._".._'''''- ··~~··_~,···,·='__.___w~·.,,'"_,· ·~·~'w.··,,_·,.,_.'_·^·,.,·.,.',.._.,~.._.........."~__.·_·~--~·····"_···__···_"'_·'·_"~·_'_^~""__'_V..._·,~.._'~_._'~'._~ ~~~"~___~~_"",_,'~_'~ '__"·N'_~_-H.__.W"'~_'.'__'~^'.'~'_'~M_.~_._,vw..",,_..._".Nm"__""__~'~""_"'__'_'_'_~"~"~""~"'Y"_"'" .' .,_. "~.'''''''w ..." ._.......,,_, :Civic Center Auditorium 4. LOCATION CODE ¡Lscïvc-----"-n~..-,-------------'-..-- .,n,_.v""__"",."",",_,_,_',__.",,,_,, ·.·.~·.-._~"_-~.·~.".'~·~3",_··_.·_··,~·_·."_'"·,..~w~"_-"'-~'·"._-.m'-'__'·"'Y~-·····~·_____~__"_"~_.__'w_m...'~_"'¥_'_"_"'~'~_~'""''^'''~'_.'.._.- _O"~""~'_"'A~"'."."'~_' .~,. ""''''''.''~'.~'k'N".W~''._'''_'~_w._._.~_,..w,_.__,._'_..''"'"__y.w,.~.,.,_.,_.-,,ww 5. PROPERTY RECORD # '405990 c.....'" TRANSFERRING TO OTHER DEPARTMENT? YES IF YES, DEPARTMENT NAME o NO o o 6. DISPOSING OF YES o NO 7. YEAR ACQUIRED TRANSFERRED/DONATED/TRAi::)§i::),_~T~)_ 2002 8. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY rows sag bars 9. MAKE ,United Stage Equipment 10. MODEL NUMBER 11.SERIAL NUMBER 12'I'v1I::THOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSING OF: JUNK, SURPLU~, SOLi::),TRADE[),ETC) Surplus ~ DEPARTMENT HEAD â-ID-tJ~ DATE THIS FORM IS TO BE USED FOR ALL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPARTMENT TO ANOTHER. A. WHEN PURCHASING AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORM OUT, ATTACH TOT HE. .INVOICE AND RECEIVING COpy OF P.O. AND SUBMIT TO FINANCE FOR PAYMENT, FINANCE WILL SEND TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED, YOU WILL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR). THIS INFORMATION IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDS. B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING AN ITEM, FILL OUT FORM AND SEND TO PURCHASING. INTRANET:PURCHASING FORMS: PROPERTY DISPOSITION ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT REPORT OF ACQUISITIONIDISPOSITION OR TRANSFER OF PROPERTY TODAY'S DATE 3/10/06 1. INVOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE) 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE) 3. GOVERNMENT NAME, DIVISION, BUILDING AND ROOM # ., v_,_·,~~·, ,.........." ~...'M___^ Center Auditorium 4. LOCATION CODE 'LSCIVC 5. PROPERTY RECORD #6339 TRANSFERRING TO OTHER DEPARTMENT? YES 0 NO 0 IF YES, DEPARTMENT NAME 6. DISPOSING OF YES @ NO 0 7. ~,~~.'3~~-º~~!'3_~ºJ~E~~~~~.~_~~~~lP.~~~!'§P!:!:~~_~§'~~!~L.....__.._._...~._.....,..............,.... ......,.,....,.,,','_.."".. :1979 t ....." .'..,. ,..... .......... ....' .....-....'...,..... ,... ..--,..-....,.....-..........., ....,...,.....' .......'.. '-..........,-..-.........._,.... ....,.... , . ...... '" .... ....-'...........'...C7).'... .', ~.,........., ..J -J = 8. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY ~ 0... C ~ Light Batten Rigging .0, ;:;0 i'Tï 11. SERIAL NUMBER 9. MAKE 10. MODEL NUMBER 12. METHOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSING OF: JUNK, SURPLUS, SOLD, TRADED, ETC.) Surplus " , ,." "," """"""""""'fZJ·m. "'. "" DEPARTME~EA~~~~EDPERSON ·.3-IO-ofø DATE THIS FORM IS TO BE USED FOR ALL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPARTMENT TO ANOTHER. A. WHEN PURCHASING AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORM OUT, ATTACH TO THE. .INVOICE AND RECEIVING COpy OF P.O. AND SUBMIT TO FINANCE FOR PAYMENT, FINANCE WILL SEND TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED, YOU WILL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR). THIS INFORMATION IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDS. B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING AN ITEM, FILL OUT FORM AND SEND TO PURCHASING. INTRANET:PURCHASING FORMS:PROPERTY DISPOSITION 1. INVOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE) If -dO. c¡q 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE) ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT REPORT OF ACQUlSITIONIDISPOSITJON OR TRANSFER OF PROPERTY TODA Y'S DATE & - /,3 ·Oý., 3. GOVERNMENT NAME, DIVISION, BUILDING AND ROOM # n~ r I¿ .{- 'Í7{~ c.. 4. LOCATION CODE '7 d. 10 5. PROPERTY RECORD # L-f 0 t/ 0 c¡ 0 TRANSFERRING TO OTHER DEPARTMENT? YES 0 NO 0, IF YES, DEPARTMENT NAME 6. DISPOSING OF YES 0' NO 0," , ' 7. YEAR ACQUIRED (IF TRANSFERRED/DONATED/TRADED, ETC.) 8. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY ti I ell n.r¡ (Y) Owe./"" g, MAKE Ie cub orCJ.... 10.MODEL NUMBER ~/;;;::- 3000 11.SERIAL NUMBER <...~Qa '-I 12. METHOD OF DISPOSAL {IF DISPOSING OF; JUNK, SURPLUS, SOLD, TRADED, ETC.) Q 10Y¡ LI<S+ . f ¡j'" b/1cJ¡(}Þ DEPA TMENT HEAD OR AUTHORIZED PERSON / DATE ,. .'<' :,,1,1' .:"~.~ ..,>.... THIS FORM IS TO BE USED FOR ALL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPARTMENT TO ANOTHER. A WHEN PURCHASING AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORM OUT, A IT ACH TO THE INVOICE AND RECEIVING COpy OF P. O. AND SUBMIT TO FINANCE FOR PAYMENT, FINANCE WILL SEND TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED, YOU WILL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR), THIS INFORMATION IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDS, B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING AN ITEM, Fill OUT FORM AND SEND TO PURCHASING. ¡l\'TRAN8T:PLJ¡~CJ'¡AS¡J\'G F'ORrvJs:PT~OPERT'Y D1SPOSIT/01\ ITEM NO. C-S-C DATE: 03/06/07 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR ( ) PUBLIC HEARING ( ) CONSENT (X) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: PURCHASING DEPARTMENT PRESENTED BY: Neil Appel. Purchasing Director SUBJECT: Fixed Asset Inventory-Property Record Removal BACKGROUND: Please see the attached Property Disposition forms from the St. Lucie County Clerk of Courts with regard to removal of inventory items. These items will be disposed of as surplus. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board authorize Staff to remove the attached records from the fixed asset inventory of the Board of County Commissioners. COMMISSION ACTION: [>1 APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 4-0 Comm. Smith Absent Dou nderson County Administrator County Attorney: ( X) Jl Coordination/Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Purchasing Dir.: (X)"~- - Originating Dept: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) Other: Other: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PURCHASING DEPARTMENT Neil Appel, Director MEMORANDUM To: Board of County Commissioners From: Neil Appel, Purchasing Director Date: March 06, 2007 Re: Fixed Asset Inventory-Property Record Removal ******************************************************************************************************** Per Section 18.4 of the Purchasing Manual, Staff is requesting permission to remove the fixed assets as listed on the attached Property Disposition Forms from the St. Lucie County Clerk of Courts. The items will be disposed of as surplus. ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT REPORT OF ACOUISITION/DISPOSITION OF TRANSFER PROPERTY TO DAY'S DATE: 01/04/07 1. INVOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE): 2. ACCOUNT # USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE): 3. GOVERNMENT NAME, DIVISION, BUILDING, AND ROOM #: St Lucie County Clerk of Court 4. LOCATION CODE: CC0103 5. PROPERTY RECORD # AND DEPT. TRANSFERRING TO (IF TRANSFERRING OR DISPOSING OF): #402054 6. YEAR ACQUIRED (IF TRANSFERREDjDONATED/TRADED, ETC.) 1991 7. DESCRIPTION OF PROPER1Y: Work Station Desk 8. MAKE: 9. MODEL NUMBER: 10. SERIAL NUMBER: 11. METHOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSING OF: JUNK, SURPLUS, SOLD, TRADED, ETC.): ~'2 t:~' ~:;3 ....-, JUNK \-=-.:::: ". C:.. i ; AUTHORIZED PERŠQN) ,;-: --<~ V1 __"'.n' j ....J THIS FORM IS TO BE USED FOR ALL CAPTIAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR TRANSFERRED FORM ONE DEPT. ANOTHER. A. WHEN PURCHASED AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORM OUT, ATTACH TO THE "INVOICE" AND "RECEIVING" COPY OF P.O. AND SUBMITTO FINANCE FOR PAYMENT, FINANCE WILL SEND TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED, YOU WILL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR.) THIS INFORMATION IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDS. B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING AN ITEM, FILL OUT FORM AND SEND TO PURCHASING. PROP. OF ST.LUCIE CO. II~~II~I~I\~~II 482854 7. ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT !lJi:I)Qll',LQFAc.QJJISITIQlUDlsrosrrION QR TRAl'LQ,E'J1;R OFJ.~ROrEB,-TY TODA Y'S DATE zj,:)-f; ¿~ ¡; 1. INVOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE) ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE) , GOVERNMENT NAMl~, DIVISION, BUILDING AND ROOM # LOCA TION CODE ¿; C{J c?- ¿J3 2. 3. 4. 5. PROPERTY RECORD # AND DEPT. TRANSFERRING TO (IF TRANSFERRING TO (IF 6. TRANSFERRING OR DISPOSING OF) ~{)&1t/P 8. YEAR ACQUIRED (IF TRANSÞEIUŒD/DONATED/TRADED, ETC.) 9. DE$CRlPTJON OF PROPERTY 10, MAIœ' 11. MODEL NUMBER 12. SERIAL NUMBER '7 oj 6/1/1J 6c1r 13. MEtHOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DLSPOSING 01': JUNK, '~YLUS, SOLD, TRADED, ETC. . dA _ (,-yo-¡:,. /2.-<-w ~ "j //1" 4' ~P/Á , /4---z-- , ~ . . - ....-=~-~..._-..,.......--....... -, .. -. ..-. (DEP ARTMENT HEAD G,R AUTHORIZED PERSON) THIS FORM IS TO ßE USED FOR ALL CAPrrAL EQUIrl\1ENT PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR TRANSFERHED FROM ONE DEI> ARTl\1ENT TO ANOTHER. A, WHEN PURCHASING AN ITEM,FILL THIS FO~ OUT, ATTACH TO 'fIlE "INVOICE" AND "RECEIVING" COpy OF P.O. AND SUBMIT TO FINANCE FOR PAYMENT, FINANCE V\lILL SEND TO PURCHASING, (IF YOU ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED, YOU WILL NEED TO CALL niE VENDOR). rl1-IIS INFORtvfATION IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDS. B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSPERRlNG AN ITEM, FILL OUT FORM AND SEND TO PURCHASING. INTRANET:PURCHASING FORMS:PROPERTY DISPOSITION ..../,,/' c/~ ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT REPORT OF ACOUISITION/DISPOSITION OF TRANSFER PROPERTY ¡ TO DAY'S DATE: . 02/12/07 1. INVOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE): 2. ACCOUNT # USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE): 3. GOVERNMENT NAME, DIVISION, BUILDING, AND ROOM #: St Lucie County Clerk of Court 218 S. 2nd Street Felony Court Clerks 4. LOCATION CODE: CC0304 5. PROPERlY RECORD # AND DEPT. TRANSFERRING TO (IF TRANSFERRING OR DISPOSING OF): #404450 6. YEAR ACQUIRED (IF TRANSFERREDjDONATEDjTRADED/ ETC.) 2000 7. DESCRIPTION OF PROPER1Y: Fax Machine 8. MAKE: Ricoh ,-,n ;3?i -~..:~:~:~ 9. MODEL NUMBER: 2000L 10. SERIAL NUMBER: M90981002222 11. METHOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSING OF: JUNK, SURPLUS/ SOLD, TRADED, ETC.): JUNK ~ (DEPARTMENT HEAD OR AUTHORIZED PERSON) THIS FORM IS TO BE USED FOR ALL CAPTIAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR TRANSFERRED FORM ONE DEPT. ANOTHER. A. WHEN PURCHASED AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORM OUT, ATTACH TO THE "INVOICE" AND "RECEIVING" COPY OF P.O. AND SUBMITTO FlNANCE FOR PAYMENT, FINANCE WILL SEND TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED, YOU WILL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR.) THIS INFORMATION IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDS. B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING AN ITEM, FILL OUT FORM AND SEND TO PURCHASING. PROP. OF ST. LUCIE CO. '""111"11""'""'11111111111111"11 404450 ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT PROPERTY AOUISITION /DISPOSITI01V /TRANSFER FORM. '>"YODÂrSDATE: 11/17/06; 1. INVOICEDATE(IFNEWPURCHASE}: 2 ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE): 3. GO VERNMENT NAME, DIVISION, BUILDIf{G Aì\7J ROOM #: 4: LOCATIOl\CODE: CCFINA v;{'" PROPERTY RECORD # AND DEPT. JRANSFERRING TO (IF TRANSFERRING OR DISPOSING OF): 405280 6. YEAR A CQUIRED (IF TRANSFERREDIDONATF.nITRADED, ETC.): 7. COMfrfODITY CODE USED ON PURCHASE ORDER (IF NEW PURCHAsE): .; vf" DESCRIPnON OF COJrflyfODlTY : Computer v9:'- JrfAKE: Howard 10. MODEL NUMBER: 'vç;' SERIAL NUMBER: 22.163 12 METHOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSING OF:J[]!VK, SURPLUS, SOLD, TRADED, Erc.): Surplus . ...., ~ fftlJ. ."'::?~- ,2v , 1 /( t. it. .1"'~ ; ffII"ø J ...j-. ,.. <i .~~./ (DEPARTMENT HEAlJ OR A. driIoJuzib PE. ." " 'N 0ffÍJ . THIS FÇJRM IS TO BE USED FOR ALL CAPITOL EQUlP~ff£\T PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR . T~.NSFERRED FROM ONE DEPT. TO ANOTHER.. A.. WHEN PURCHASING AN ITEM. FILL THIS FORM OUT, .A..1TACH TO THE "INVOICE" .AND I'rRECEIYING'" COpy OF P.O..AND SUBMIT TO FJNrl..1'lCE FOR PAYMENT; FINANCE WILL SEND ON TO PURCHA.SING. (IF YOU.ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED, YOU'LL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR. (THIS INFOR..lr.£A.nON IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDS.) B. IF DISPOSING OF DR TRANSFERRING AN ITEM, FILL OUT FORM .AND SEND TO XATRINA. IN PURCHASDlG. ' ! ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING JJEPARTMENT PROPERTY AOUISITION /DISPOSITI~J.¡-:r n:RANSFER FORM. ""'/TODAyrSDATE: 11/17/06. 1. lNVOICEDATE(IFNEWPURCHASE): , 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE): 3. GO VERNMENT NAME, DIVISION, BUILDING A.1\7J ROOM #: ~ LOCArrOl\CODE: \,4:" vf" ,.....--' v9. J.O. . /' viI. GGFINA 6. PROPERTY RECORD # AND DEFT. TRANSFERRINÇì. TO (IF TRANSFERRING OR DISPOSING OF): ..â¡;g:~~z.:V"- Z4J-!:<rf /;!Ä- (r2_~~/, #-) -' 'r-' ~'~ ~ YEAR ACQUIRED (IF TRANSFERRÉD/lJONAl ;' h/IRADED) ETC): 7. COMMODITY CODE USED ON PURCHASE ORDER (IF NEW PURCHASE): ¡ DESCRIPTION OF CŒMMDDITY : Computer MAKE: Howard MODEL NUMBER: SERIAL NUMBER: 22164 , 12. METHOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSING OF:JIT,NK, SURPLUS, SOLD, TRADED, ErC): Surplus ' f- ill) ,. f~ l; I' ,,/ !/¿e' 7 - lv..r 0-) :1........ ·'·~·;J,,!':A:?"'¿;",i"1l\ ,¡~!YIAc,~:A.<'~= (DEPARTMENT HEAD OR A UTHORlZED PERSON (;'1..Y) THIS FlJRM IS TO BE USED FOR .ALL CAPITOL EQUIP}r:fEl'rT PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR , TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPT. TO ANOTHER. .A.. WHEN PURCHASING AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORM O~ A.TTACH TO THE "INVOICE" AND "RECEIVING" COpy OF P.O..A.N1J SUBMIT TO FIW..NCE FOR PAYMENT, FINANCE WILL SEND ON TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED" YOU'LL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR. (THIS INFORMATION IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FlXED.A.SSET RECORDSJ B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRA..NSFERRING.A..N ITEM, FILL our FORM.AND SEND TO XATRIN.A. IN PURCHASING. . t ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING lJEPARTMENT PROPERTY AOUISITION /DISPOSITI01V /FRANSFER FORM: ~>TODÅ.Y'S])ATE: 11/17/06 ' 1. DfYOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE): , 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHAsE): 3. GO VERNMENT N~ DIVISION, BUILDING All,7J ROOM#: ~ LOC4TIOACODE: CCFINA \.4" PROPERIY RECORD # AND DEFT. TRANSFERRING TO (IF TRANSFERRING OR DISPOSING OF): 405282 6. YEAR ACQUIREJJ (IF TRANSFERREDIDONATFTJITRADED, ETC): 7. COMMODITY CODE USED ON PURCHASE ORDER (IF NEW PURCHASE): ¡ vf" v9:' DESCRIPnON OF COMJrfODITY : Computer MAKE: Howard 10. ~;:' MODEL NUMBER· SERIAL NUMBER: 221.65 12. METHOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSING OF:J[]!'lX, SURPLUS, SOLD, TRADED, ETe): Sur Ius . II, ~'!"',., ",:1 ¡~/!ø'kßr(2.4.'J~') ¡. iflj!L:-U¿/~-' ",,.,. .., " /f (DEPARTMENT HEAD OR A. UTHORJZED PERSON O(1-YJ THIS FÇJRM IS TO BE USED FOR .ALL CAPITOL EQUlPld£.\T PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR. . TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPT. TO ANOTHER. .A. WHEN PURCHASING.AN ITEM; FILL THIS FORM OUT, .A.ITA..CH TO THE "INYOICE" AND "RECEIVING" COpy OF P.O. A..NJ) SUBMIT TO FfMI_NCE FOR PA~ F.1NA...NCE WILL SEND ON TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU.ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PA..RT OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTEDþ YOU'LL NEED TO CALL THE YENDOR. (THIS INFORMA.nON IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDS.) B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING AN ITEM. FILL OUT FORM AND SEND TO XATRINA.. IN PURCHASING. ' '! ST. LUCIE COUNTY FURCHASING DEPARTMENT PROPERTY AOUISITION /DISPOSITI01V /TRANSFER FORlrf. . .....~ .. "/TODAY'SDAIE: 11/17/06. 1. INVOICE DA TE (IF NEW PURCHASE): , 2 ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE): 3. GOVERNMENT NAME~ DIVISION, BUILDING AND ROOMU: 4 LOCATIOl\CODE: CCFINA \./.5. PROPERIY RECORD # AND DEFT. TRANSFERRING TO (IF TRANSFERRING OR DISPOSING OF): 405284 6. YEAR ACQUIRED (IF 7RANSFERRED/lJONATFn/TRADElJ, ETC): 7. COMMODITY CODE USED ON PURCHASE ORDER (IF NEW PURCHAsE): ¡ vf" DESCRIPTION OF COM7-r.fODITY : Computer /.... v9. JyfAKE: Howard 10. . "",,,,,., vJ1. MODEL NUMBER: SERIAL NUMBER: '??170 , 12. METHOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSING OF:J[J7\~ SURPLUS, SOLD, TRADED, EYC): Surplus . B. lfl .;II I (.' ., ,.It' , ,J) ._'- ,,,/ n " J , - . ", .. /_:·I·(J-,·¡lJ""_Ll~ l~t~11f~··· .'.I/I~_ (DEPARTMENT HEAJ) OR A urHVRÍzijTÞE.kšb'Ñ òf.iÌ¡.fj Ii THIS FÇJRM IS TO BE USED FOR. ALL CAPITOL EQUIP.ld~\T PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR . TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPT. TO ANOTHER. .A... WHEN PURCHASING AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORM OUT, AITACH TO THE "INVOICE" AND "RECEIVING" COpy OF .P.O. AND SUBMIT TO FJ.M.I.fi·cr FOR PAYMENT, FINANCE WILL SEND ON TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SllRE OF ANY PA..RT OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED.. YOU'LL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR. (THIS INFORMA.110N IS EXTREMELY IMPORTA..NT FOR THE FIXED.A.SSET RECORDS.) IF DISPOSING OF OR TRÆNSFERRlNG.AN ITEM. FILL OUT FORM A..ND SEND TO .L{TRIN.A. IN PURCHASING. . ! ST.. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING IJEPAR1MENT PROPERTY AOUISITION /DISPOSITIOl'! /IRANSFER FORM. . . ">TODÂ'TSDATE: 11/17/06 ' 1. INVOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE): , 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE): 3. GO VERNMENT NAME~ DIVISION, BUILDING A..l\7J ROOM #: ~ LOCATIOACODE: CCFINA \/5." PROPERTY RECORD # AND DEPT. JRANSFERRING TO (IF TRANSFERRING OR DISPOSING OF): 405285 . , 6. YEAR A CQUIRED (IF TRANSFERREDIDONAl r TJ/TRADED, EYC): 7. COll'iMODITY CODE USED ON PURCHASE ORDER (IF NEW PURCHASE): i vf" DESCRIPTION OF COJ;£?ðODITY : Computer ../ v9. lrfAKE: Howard 10. MODEL NUMBER.. . ,/',. ví~. SERIAL NUMBER' 22.171 . , 12. MEIHOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSING OF.-JU?..,rx, SURPLUS, SOLD, TRADED, ErC): Sur Ius . (DEPARTMENT HEA.D OR A UTHORIZED PERSON 0 THIS F9RM IS TO BE USED FOR.ALL CAPITOL EQUlP...'d£."-tT PURCHASED. DISPOSED OF OR . TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPT. TO ANOTHER. A... WHEN PURCHASING AN ITEM. FILL THIS FORM OUT, AITACH TO THE "INVOlCE" AND "RECEIVING" COpy OF P.O. AND SUBMIT TO FJN.A.NCE FOR PA.YMENT, F.DlA.NCE WILL SEND ON TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED.. YOU'LL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR. (THIS INFORMATION IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED A.SSET RECORDS.) B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING.AN ITEM, FILL OUT FORM AND SEND TO XA.TRINA. IN PURCHASING. . ! ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING JJEPAR1MENT PROPERTY AOUISITION /DISPOSITI01V /TRANSFER FORM ">-YODÄrSDATE: 11/17/06 1. INVOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE): , 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE): 3. GOVERNMENT NAME, DIVISION, BUILDING AND ROOM#: 4: LOCATIOACODE: CCFINA 0' PROPERTY RECORD # AND lJEPT. TRANSFERRiNG TO (IF TRANSFERRING OR DISPOSING OF): 405286 6. YEAR ACQUIRED (IF TRANSFERREDmONAl t- TVIRADED, ErC): 7. COMl-rfODITY CODE USED ON PURCHASE ORDER (IF NEW PURCHASE): ,j vf" DESCRIPTION OF COJríMODITY ~. Computer ",/ 1/9. l-rfAKE: Howard 10. ~" MODEL NUMBER: SERIAL NUMBER: ? 71 7? , , 12. METHOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSING OF:JIll'r'X, SURPLUS, SOLD) TRADED} ETC): Sur Ius ," ' . , / <) ~ ~;; 1 . / .j}." "".' ;.:~. ' v-'·.I'ij.,.,.¡'i/',¡"",r.J<~/" 1,{íJJ'L,,,-,....bt..., /1 (DEPARTMENT HEAD OR A UTHORIZED PERSON o,,&7.J) THIS FÇJRM IS TO BE USED FOR ALL CA..PITOL EQUJP}Y££.\T PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR . TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPT. TO ANOTHER. A.. WHEN PURCHASING.AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORM Our, ATTACH TO THE "INVOICE'" AND fTRECEIYlNG'" COpy OF P.O. AND SUBMIT TO FIW_NCE FOR PAYMENT, FINANCE WILL SEND ON TO PURCHA.SING. (IF YOU.ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED, YOU'LL NEED TO CALL THE VENlJOR. (THIS INFORMA.nON IS EXTREMELY IMPORTA..NT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDSJ B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRllVG AN ITEM, FILL OUT FORM AND SEND TO XÄ TRDYA IN PURCHASD/G. . 1 ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING lJEPARTMENT PROPERTY AOUISITION /DISPOSITI01Y /TRANSFER FORM. ':'/ÝO])ÄPSDATE: 11/17/06' 1. iNVOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE): , 2 ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE): 3. GO VERNMENT NAME, DIVISION, BUILDING .Al\7J ROOM #: 4: LOCATIOACODE: CCFINA W:'" PROPERTY RECORD # AND DEPT. TRANSFERRING TO (IF TRANSFERRING OR DISPOSING OF): 405288 6. YEAR ACQUIRED (IF TRANSFERREDmONA:L ¡- D/IRADED, ETC): 7. COMMODITY CODE USED ON PURCHASE ORDER (IF NEW PURCHAsE): i vf'" DESCRIPTION OF COJr£.MO])!TY .- Computer v1:" lYfAKE: Howard 10. ~,. MODEL NUJr£BER: SERIAL NUMBER: 221.74 . t 12 METHOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOS G OF:JIT!\:K, SURPLUS, SOLD, TRADED, EYe): Sur Ius . (DEPARTMENT HEA.D OR A UTHORJZED PERSON. 'mY) THIS FÇJRM IS TO BE USED FOR ALL CAPITOL EQUJPlY£EJ.....Y PURCHASED¡ DISPOSED OF OR . TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPT. TO ANOTHER. A.. WHEN PURCHASING AN iTEM, FILL THIS FORM OUT, A.TTACH TO THE "mYOICE" .AND "RECEIVING" COpy OF P.O...A.N1J SUBMIT TO FJMI..NCE FOR PAYMENT, FINANCE WILL SENJJ ON TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED, YOU'LL NEED TO CALL THE YENlJOR. (THIS INFORMAnON IS EXTREMELY IMPORTA..NT FOR THE FlXED.A.SSET RECORDS) B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING.AN ITEM. FILL OUT FORM .AND SEND TO XATRINA. IN PURCHASING. ' :l ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPAR1MENT PROPERTY AOUISITION /DISPOSITIO.1V /TRANSFER FORM - ~ ..:"'·YODÁY'SDA1E: 11/17/06. 1. INVOICE DAIE (IF NEW PURCHASE): , 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHAsE): 3. GO VERNME.NT NAME, DIVISION, BUILDING AND ROOM #: ~ LOCArrOACODE: CCFINA W:" PROPERIY RECORD # AND DEFT. JRANSFERRrNG TO (IF TRANSFERRING OR DISPOSING OF): 405289 6. YEAR ACQUIRED (IF TRANSFERRED/lJONAl r T)/IRADE1JJ ETC): 7. COMMODITY CODE USE]) ON PURCHASE ORDER (IF NEW PURCHAsE): J vf" DESCRIP170N OF COM?r£ODlTY : ""'.... ¡/9. frfAKE: Howard Computer 10. MODEL NUMBER: . ,/'.., ~. SERIAL NUMBER: 22175 . , 12. METHOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSING OF:JT.li'lK, SURPLUS, SOLD, TRADElJ, :::T::::~ORAUT~:~~ THIS FÇJRM IS TO BE USED FOR ALL CAPITOL EQUIPld.EltT PURCHASED, .DISPOSE.D OF OR, . TR-J...NSFERRE.D FROM ONE DEPT. TO ANOTHER. .A... WHEN PURCHASING AN ITEM. FILL THIS FORM OUT, .A.7TACH TO THE "INVOICE" A.ND "RECEIVING" COpy OF P.O. AND SUBMIT TO F.Jl'o&I...NCE FOR PAYMENT, FDlANCE WILL SEND ON TO PURCHA.SING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED" YOU'LL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR. (THIS INFORMAnON IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDSJ B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING AN ITEM. FILL our FORM AND SEND TO XATRINA IN PURCHA.SING. ' ! ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING lJEPAR1MENT PROPERTY AOUISITION /DISPOSITI~.1Y n:RANSFER FOR},{ v/YODArSDATE: 11/17/06, 1. INVOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE): , 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE IIEM (IF NEW PURCHASE): 3. GO VERNMENT NAME, DIVISIO~ BUILDING Al\7J ROOM #: 4: LOCA1TOl\CODE: CCFINA \/5." PROPERTY RECORD # AND DEPT. TRANSFERRING TO (IF TRANSFERRING OR DISPOSING OF): 405290 6. YEAR ACQUIRED (IF TRANSFERREDIDONATFl)/TRADE1J, ETC): 7. CQMMODITY CODE USED ON PURCHASE ORDER (IF NEW PURCHASE): ¡ vf" DESCRIPTION OF C01rflr:fODITY: Computer vi:' MAKE: Howard 10. . /' ~- MODEL NUMBER: SERIAL NUMBER- 22177 , , 12. MEIHOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSING OF.~J[]?\~ SURPLUS, SOLD, TRADE1J, EYe.): Surplus . J ¡7:, ..-.'- ,M j q /1 1 ¡ ~!;, ·")"::',</:,:·¡.,,?·A¡~(¡t.h.,.c,i'!1,,ç·· (DEPARTMENT HEA..D oitA UTHORJZED PERSQ,W Oi'lLJ) (J THIS FÇJRM .IS TO BE USED FOR ALL CAPITOL EQUlP1d£...Y PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR , TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPT. TO ANOTHER. A- WHEN PURCHASING AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORM OUT,A.1TACH TO THE nINVOICEn A..ND "RECEIVINGn COpy OF P.O..AND SUBMIT TO FillA.NCE FOR PAYMENT, FIN.A.NCE WILL SEND ON TO PURCHA.SING. (IF YOU.ARE NOT SURE OF ANY P.A.RT OF THE INFOR.M.A.TION REQUESTED, YOU'LL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR. (THIS INFORMATION IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDS.) B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING AN ITEM, FILL OUT FORM ÅND SEND TO X/{TRlNA IN PURCHASING. . 1 ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING lJEPAR1MENT PROPERTY AOUISITION /DISPOSITIOl'¡ /TRANSFER FORM: ;'/YODAY1SDATE: 11/17/06, 1. INVOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE): , 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE IIEM (IF NEW PURCHAsE): 3. GO VERNMENT NAME, DIVISION, BUILDING .A1VD ROOM #: ~ LOCAITOl\CODE: \..r.1."" PROPERTY RECORD # AND DEFT. TRANSFERRING TO (IF TRANSFERRING OR DISPOSING OF): 405291 . CCFINA 6. YEAR ACQUIRED (IF TRANSFERRED/DONATF.7)/TRADED, ETC): 7. COMMODITY CODE USED ON PURCHASE ORDER (IF NEW PURCHASE): ,j V[.' DESCRlPTION OF C01r£MODITY : Computer ¡/g:" lYfAKE: Howard 10. MODEL NUMBER: . /0. ~. SERIAL NUMBER: 22179 12. METHOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSIN: OF:JU!VK, SURPLUS, SOLD, TRADED, ErC): Sur Ius . (DEPARTMENT HE.AJJ OR A UTHORIZED PERSON THIS FÇJRM IS TO BE USED FOR ALL CA...PITOL EQUlP}r.f£.\T PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR . TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPT. TO ANOTHER. .A.. WHEN PURCHASING AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORM OUT, A.ITACH TO THE "INVOICE" AND "RECEIVING'" COpy OF P.O. A..N1J SUBMIT TO FJM.I....NCE FOR PAYMENT; FINANCE WILL SEND ON TO PURCHA.SING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED" YOU'LL NEED TO CA..LL THE VENDOR. (THIS INFORMA.nON IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDS.) B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING AN ITEM, FILL OUT FORM AND SEND TO XATRINA. IN PURCHASING. . 1 ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT PROPERTY AOUISfl70N IDISPOSITI01V /TRANSFER FORA{ ~>-'TODÂyrSDATE: 11/17/06. 1. INYålCE DAlE (IF NEW PURCHASE): 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHAsE): 3. GO VERNMENT NAME, DIVISION, BUILDING A1'r7J ROOM#: 4: LOC4rrOl\CODE: CCFINA \.4'" PROPERIY RECORD # AND DEFT. TRANSFERRING TO (IF TRANSFERRING OR DlSPOSllIG OF): 405292 6. YEAR ACQUIRED (IF TRANSFERREDIDONAl r D/IRADElJ, ETC): 7. COlJMODITY CODE USED ON PURCHASE ORDER (IF NEW PURCHAsE): ¡ Vi" DESCRIP110N OF COJrfMODlTY : Computer /~..,. ¡/9. lYfAKE: Howard 10. ~~. MODEL NUMBER: SERIAL NUMBER: 22181 , ! 12. JrJETHOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSING OF:JT.l?Yr:K, SURPLUS, SOLD, TRADED, ErC): Surplus " J . (;./)~ __r~ ,g, .(11 . .. ',J., \-.1 /n., . '- ~J- Ii}"" f·}.._",/,,:. _./j.j",j4.~./""'¡,4,,,j'=j "š"'" \>- > ~...,:,(,. , (DEPARTMENT HEA.D OR.A UTHOR/ZED PERSON tJILY) THIS FÇJRM IS TO BE USED FOR .ALL CAJ'ITOL EQUIPld£.\T PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR. . TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPT. TO ANOTHER. . A.. WHEN PURCHASING AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORM OUT, A.TTACH TO THE "INVOICE'" AND "RECEIVlNG/"r COpy OF P.O. A.N1J SUBMIT TO FJN..!JVCE FOR PAYMENT, FINANCE WILL SEND ON TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU.ARE NOT SURE OF.ANY PART OF THE INFORlr.£A.T10N REQUESTED, YOU"LL NEED TO CALL THE VENlJOR. (THIS INFORMAnON IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDS.) B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING.AN ITEM, FILL OUT FORM' .AND SEND TO XATRINA IN PURCHASING. . t SY. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING lJEPARTMENT PROPERTY AOUISITION IDISPOSITIOJV /TRANSFER FORM '>-'TODÅY'SDATE: 11/17/Ô6' 1. INVOICEDATE(IFNEWPURCHASE): , 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE IIEM (IF NEW PURCHASE): 3. GOVERNME.NT NAME, DIVISION, BUILDING A1VlJ ROOM#: 4: LOCA.170ACODE: CCFINA vs.: PROPERTY RECORD # AND DEFT. TRANSFERRING TO (IF TRANSFERRING OR DISPOSING OF): 405293 . , 6. YEARACQUIRED (IF TRANSFERRED/DONATF..D/IRADED, ETC): 7. COMMODITY CODE USED ON PURCHASE ORDER (IF NEW PURCHASE): ; /' vB. DESCRIPTION OF COkLMODlTY : vf{ Computer lrfAKE: Howard 10. ~' MODEL NUMBER: SERIAL NUMBER: 22182 . , 12. METHOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSING OF:J7IJ.YK, SURPLUS, SOLD, TRADED, EYe): Surplus " 7 iI· (;f~!.) --<l~ !, <>{l f ,1 ~ f/~, ~ ~ /, ", '",' .-..; __.' " . .<," . ", ,;-",' f ,. c. .,¡' ,'/r~ ' 11, d' "-'~"f' ~."...",=-/r'''' .f ¡r". c.._._.>.-=, '.,../ --" 1~.. ~~.V.....~W ,/\. :1W~ ¡(¡ (DEPARTMENT H.E.A..1J OR A UTHORlZED PERSON ONL ,; THIS FÇJRM JS TO BE USED FOR ALL CAPITOL EQUJPld£.\T PURCH.ASED, DISPOSED OF OR . TlV..NSFERRED FROM ONE DEPT. TO ANOTHER. Á- WHEN PURCH.ASING AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORM OUT, .A.1T.ACH TO THE "INVOICE" .AND "'RECEIVING'" COpy OF P.O. AND SUBMIT TO FJNrlflCE FOR P.AYMENT, FINANCE WILL SEND ON TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED, YOU'LL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR. (THIS INFORMATION IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED .ASSET RECORDS.) B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING AN ITEM, FILL OUT FORM A.ND SEND TO .lA TRIN.A IN P URCHA-SING. . ! ST. LUCIE COUNTY .PURCHASING IJEPARTMENT PROPERTY AOUISITION /DISPOSITI01V /TRANSFER FORM ~:""TODÅyrSDATE: 11/17/06, 1. iNVOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE): 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE IIEM (IF NEW PURCHAsE): 3. GOVERNMENT NAME, DIVISION; BUILDING AND ROOM#: ~ LOCATIOACODE: \/5:/ PROPERTY RECORD # A.NJ) JJE.PT. TRANSFERRING TO (IF TRANSFERRING OR DISPOSING OF): 405294 . , CCFINA 6. YEAR ACQUIRED (IF TRANSFERREDIJJONATF.nnRADED} ETC): 7. COMMODITY CODE USED ON PURCHASE ORDER (IF NEW PURCHAsE): ¡ v(" DESCRIPTION OF COJr£MODITY : /r" :/9. MAKE.. Howard Computer 10. MODEL NUMBER: . /' ~. SERIAL NUMBER: 22.183 . t 12. ME7HOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSING OF:JI.l7'r'X, SURPLUS, SOLD} TRADED, ETCJ: Sur Ius . (DEPARTMENT HEA..D OR' UTHORlZED PERSO THIS FtJRM IS TO BE USED FOR ALL CAPITOL EQUJP}r:f£.\T PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR . TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPT. TO ANOTHER. Á- WHEN PURCHASING.AN ITEM. FILL THIS FORM OUT, A..ITACH TO THE "'INVOICE'" AND "RECEIVING'" COpy OF P.O. AND SUBMIT TO F.17'-V..NCE FOR PAYMENT, FDlANCE WILL SEND ON TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU.ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFOR.M.A..TION REQrÆSTED, YOU'LL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR. (THIS INFORM.A.nON IS EXTREMELY IMPORT.A...NT FOR THE FlXED.A.SSET RECORDS.) B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING.AN ITEM, FILL OUT FORM .A..ND SEND TO K.A..TRlNA IN PURCHASING. . t ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING IJEPAR1MENT PROPERTY AOlJISITION /DISPOSITIf?lf n:RANSFER FORM. ~/TODAY'SDA1E: 11/17/06, 1. INVOICEDATE(IFNEWPURCHASE): , 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE): 3. GOVERNMENT NAME:t DIVISIO~ BUILDING AI\"'D ROOM#: ~ LOCATIOACODE: CCFINA \/5." PROPERTY RECORD # AND DEPT. JRANSFERRING TO (IF TRANSFERRING OR DISPOSING OF): 405295 . 6. YEAR ACQUIRED (IF TRANSFERREDIDONATFn/TRADED, ETC): 7. COMMODITY CODE USED ON PURCHASE ORDER (IF NEW PURCHASE): r/i" DESCRrPnON OF C01rflr.£ODITY .- Computer /' ¡/9. MAKE: Howard 10. ~;~. MODEL NUMBER: SERIAL NUMBER: '22184 I 12. fr:fETHOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSING OF.-JU!YK, SURPLUS, SOLD, TRADED, Ere): Surplus . , ") ~ /1 !I' ...-'- ¡Ü!"1 " "/' ' , ," ,.,,, ,", "....i\ ,bi'A: ,'..1.,,1...... (DEPARTMENT HEAJ) O.*--:{ ufHORizED' PERS0tj DrolLY) (, THIS F9RM JS TO BE USED FOR ALL CAPITOL EQ'ulPidE./,'YY PURCH.A.SED, DISPOSED OF OR . TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPT. TO ANOTHER. .A... WHEN PURCH.A.SING.AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORM OUT, .A..TTACH TO THE "INVOICE" AND "RECElVING" COpy OF P.O. AND SUBMIT TO FINÆ.NCE FOR PAYMENT, FINANCE WILL SEND ON TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED,þ YOU'LL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR. (THIS INFORMAnON IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDS.) B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRDlG AN ITEM, FILL our FORM .AND SEND TO KATRUlA. IN PURCHA.SING. . t ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING JJEPARTMENT PROPERTY AOUISITION /DISPOSITI01V /TRANSFER FORM. ;""TODÄyrSDATE: 11/17/06" 1. INVOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHAsE): , 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE IIEM (IF NEW PURCHAsE): 3. GOVERNMENT NAME, DIVISION, BUILDING A.1\7J ROOM#: 4: LOCAITOACODE: \./;Í" PROPE.RIY RECORD # AND DEFT. TRANSFERRING TO (IF TRANSFERRING OR DISPOSING OF): 405296 , CCFINA 6. YEAR ACQllIRED (IF TRANSFERRED/DONATF.T>/TRADEDJ EYC): 7. COMMODITY CODE USED ON PURCHASE ORDER (IF NEW PURCHASE): ¡ vi" DESCRIP110N OF C01rflðODITY.- Computer v!{' frfAKE: Howard 10. MODEL NUMBER: ~. SERIAL NUMBER: .22185 , t 12. ME7HOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSm OF:JU!'-t~ SURPLUS, SOLD, TRADED, EYC): Sur Ius . , .....-~<; ........ ~i ¡" '. .J~.)~þ1~.A:~Z¡;~j~-:r)\ it.{QJ·\.¡,~ ,~:_J~.Y.t~·?~ '-'" / / (DEPARTMENT HEAJ) OR AUTHORJZED PERSON OÞw'LY) THIS F9RM IS TO BE USED FOR .ALL CAPITOL EQUJP}r.f.£,\Y PlfRCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR . TRrl..NSFERRED FROM ONE DEPT. TO ANOTHER. A.. WHEN PlfRCHASING.AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORM Om-, A.ITACH TO THE "INVOICE" AND "RECEIVING'" COPY OF P.O..A.N1J SUBMIT TO FINANCE FOR PAYMENT, FIN.ANCE WILL SEND ON TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU.ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED,þ YOU'LL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR. (THIS INFORMATION IS EXTREMELY IMPORT.A...NT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDS.) B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TR.ANSFERRINGAN ITEM. FILL OUT FORM.AND SEND TO XA. TRlNA.. IN PURCHASING. . 1 ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING lJEPAR1MENT ' . PROPERTY AOUISITION IDISPOSITIOJ.V /TRANSFER FORM . . ">ÝODÂY'SDATE: 11/17/06 1. INYÔICEDATE(IFNEWPURCHASE): , 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE): 3. GOVERNMENT NAME, D1VISIO~ BUILDIN'G AND ROOM#: 4.' LOCAITOACODE: CCFINA \/5." PROPERTY RECORD # AND DEPT. TRANSFERRING TO (IF TRANSFERRING OR DISPOSING OF): 405297 . , 6. YEAR A CQUIRED (IF TRANSFERRED/DONAl ¡-- D/],RAlJED, ETC): 7. COMMODITY CODE USED ON PURCHASE ORDER (IF NEW PURCHAsE): .; vf" DESCR1P110N OF CO.M:MODITY : Computer v1:'- lYfAKE: Howard 10. MODEL NUMBER: v;;~ SERIAL NUMBER: 22188 , I 12. METHOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSING OF:JTJ1.YK, SURPLUS, SOLD, TRAlJED, ErC).- . Surplus . t . 0.L :J"} ~'- '~ ~ ·1 , -.(/: ~ .;,d;, '" ,1\7 1,- ..v·.......:.' J .J , ./",.,..".,;","",.,,,'4.;1",,) , I~' \:,.'C"'k'~V' (DEPARTMENT HEAD OR.A. UTHORIZED PERSON fAJJ OJ' THIS FflRM .IS TO BE USED FOR ALL CA.PITOL EQUlP~~\T PURCH.A.SED, DISPOSED OF OR , T~..NSFERRED FROM ONE DEPT. TO ANOTHER. .A... WHEN PURCH.A.SING AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORM OUT, .A.TT.A.CH TO THE "'INVOICE'" A.N1J ITRECEIVING" COpy OF P.O. AND SUBMIT TO FIW....NCE FOR P.A.YMENT, FDlANCE WILL SEND ON TO PURCHA.SING. (IF YOU.ARE NOT SURE OF.A.NY PART OF THE INFORMA.TION REQUESTED~ YOU'LL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR. (THIS INFOR1r.lA.nON IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED .A.SSET RECORDS.) B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING AN ITEM. FILL OUT FORM AND SEND TO .K:A TRINA. IN PURCHASING. ' 1 ST., LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT PROPERTY AOUISITION IlJISPOSITI01V /TRANSFER FORM. '>"TODÅ'Y'SDATE: 11/17/06. 1. INVOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE): , 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE): 3. GO VERNMENT NAME, DIVISION; BUILDIN"G A]'{n ROOM #: 4: LOCATI01\CODE: vS:'" PROPERTY RECORD # AND DEPT. TRANSFERRING TO (IF TRANSFERRING OR DISPOSING OF): 405298 CCFINA 6. YEAR ACQUIRED (IF TRANSFERRED/DONAl r n/TRADED, ETC): 7. COMMODITY CODE USED ON PURCHASE ORDER (IF NEW PURCHAsE): ; Vi" DESCRIPTION OF COMlY.fODITY : Computer ¡/9:" lYfAKE: Howard 10. MODEL NUMBER: , ./ V11. SERIAL NUMBER: 22189 t 12. METHOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSING OF:Jú".iYK# SURPLUS, SOLD# TRADED# . 6' ErC): Surplus ,) ~ i¡ {:2_,¿~~~~/6~~.",,:}'!lp, ;( (DEPARTMENT HEAJ) OR A. UTHORJZED PERSON 0^i~YJ THIS F9RM IS TO BE USED FOR .ALL CAPITOL EQUlP}d£.\T PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR . T~.NSFERRED FROM ONE DEPT. TO ANOTHER. Á- WHEN PURCHA.SlNGAN ITE~ FILL THIS FORM OUT,.A.7TACH TO THE "INVOICE" AND "RECEIVING" COpy OF P.O. AND SUBMIT TO F.lNA.J.'\fCE FOR PA.~ FlNANCE WILL SEND ON TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE mFORMATION REQUESTED., YOU'LL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR. (THIS INFORMAnON IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FlXED.A.SSET RECORDS.) B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING.AN ITEM; FILL OUT FORM AND SEND TO XATRINA. IN PlIRCHASmG. . ! ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT PROPERTY AOUISITION /DISPOSITIO.iV /TRANSFER FORM ->YODÁrSDATE: 11/17/06' 1. INVOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE): 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE): 3. GOVERNJrfENT NAME, DIVISION, BWLDING A1\7J ROOM#: ../:[ LOCATIOl\CODE: CCFINA ~" PROPERTY RECORD # AND IJEPT. TRANSFERRING TO (IF TRANSFERRING OR DISPOSING OF): 405299 vf" v£' 10. . ,/',. v1~. 12. 6. YEARACQUIRED (IF TRANSFERREDIDONATFD/IRADED, ETC): 7. COMMODITY CODE USED ON PURCHASE ORDER (IF NEW PURCHASE): i DESCRIPnON OF CO},£MODITY .- Computer 2rfAKE: Howard MODEL NUMBER: SERIAL NUlrfBER: 22191 METHOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSING OF.-JU!VK, SURPLUS, SOLD, TRADED, ErC): Surplus -(j .~. . 7. 6iJi t1 . " " ,.-\), [,l(\I\ -4~ (DEPARTMENT HEAD OR AUTHORIZED PER1IØN ONLY) THIS FÇJRM IS TO BE USED FOR .ALL CAPITOL EQUIP.J~\T PURCHA.SED, DISPOSED OF OR, .. TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPT. TO ANOTHER.. . A.. WEEN PURCHASING AN ITEM. FILL THIS FORM OUT, ATTACH TO THE "INVOICE" AND "RECEIVING'" COpy OF .P.O. AND SUBMIT TO F.JM.I.J'lCE FOR PAYMENT, FDUNCE WILL SEND ON TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED, YOU'LL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR. (THIS INFORMATION IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FiXED ASSET RECORDSJ B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING AN ITEM. FILL OUT FORM A.ND SEND TO XATRINA IN PURCHASING. . 1 SI: LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT PROPERTY AOUISITION IDISPOSITIO.1V /fRANSFER FORM. >-"YODÂY'SDATE: 11/17/06· 1. lNVÔICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE): , 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE): 3. GOVERNMENT N~ DIVISION; BUlLDIlŸG A1\7J ROOM#: 4: LOCA1TOæODE: CCFINA \/;5." PROPERTY RECORD # AND JJEPT. TRANSFERRING TO (IF TRANSFERRING OR DISPOSING OF): 405300 6. YEAR ACQUIRED (IF TRANSFERRED/lJONAl ;- TJflRAJ)ED, ETC): 7. COMMODITY CODE USED ON PURCHASE ORDER (IF NEW PURCHASE): vf" DESCRIPTION OF COJr£MODITY : Computer // v9. blAKE.. Howard 10. ~~' MODEL NUMBER: SERIAL NUMBER: 22193 , , 12. ME7HOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSING OF:Jú?lK, SURPLUS, SOLD, TRADED, ETC): Surplus . . I [,1 d j. f 'I ,1 ,) ~,~ l/..~f frk' II t v',.¡;. ~" / . ( '/~ jið ,_ . ;A¿ f~,,,...p,., -,¡..,ç;,<,'1'~<r4~ ... " 1'[ . " ¡'~")¡V"'" (DEPARTMENT HE.A.1J OR A UTHORJZED PERSON Ol\6/Y; THIS FÇJRM JS TO BE USED FOR .ALL CA..PITOL EQUlP}d£.\T PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR . TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPT. TO ANOTHER. A- WHEN PURCHASING AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORM Or.;-r, ATTACH TO THE "INVOICE" AND nRECEIVlNG" COpy OF P.O. A.N1J SUBMIT TO FJN...I....1\lCE FOR PAYMENT, FINANCE WILL SEND ON TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE DlFORMA.T10N REQUESTED.. YOU'LL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR. (THIS INFORMA.nON IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDSJ B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING.AN ITEM. FILL our FORM.A..ND SEND TO .xA TRINA. 1N PURCHASING. . 1 ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT PROPERTY AOUISITION /DISPOSITI01V /TRANSFER FORM. >'"TODAY'SDATE: 11/17/06' 1. INVOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE): , 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE): 3. GOVERNMENT NAME, DIVISION, BUILDING AA7J ROOM#: ~ LOCA1TON::ODE: CCFINA vS:' PROPERTY RECORD # AND DEFT. 1RANSFERRlNG TO (IF TRANSFERRING OR DISPOSING OF): 405301 " 6. YEAR ACQUIRED (IF TRANSFERREDIDONATF])/IRADED) ETC): 7. COMÚODITY CODE USED ON PURCHASE ORDER (IF NEW PURCHASE): ~/ DESCRIPTION OF COMJðODITY : Computer // :/9. MAKE: Howard 10. MODEL NUMBER: ~' SERIAL NUMBER: 22194 " t 12. METHOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSING OF:JUl'rrr;, SURPLUS, SOLD, TRADED, ErC): Surplus . I " " 1~/:*-¡;:¿~~J'-ÍJd/flÂ>'/;~'/¿~ (DEPARTMENT HEA..D OR A UTHORIZED PERSON O~ THIS FÇJRM JS TO BE USED FOR. .ALL CAPITOL EQUJPld£"YT PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR" . TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPT. TO ANOTHER. " A- WHEN PURCHASING AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORM OUT,.A.1T.A.CH TO THE "INVOICE" AND "'RECEIVING" COpy OF P.O..AND SUBMIT TO FEV_NCE FOR PAYMENT, FDlANCE WILL SEND ON TO PURCHA.SING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SlIRE OF ANY P.A.RT OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED.. YOU'LL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR. (THIS INFORMATION IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR. THE FlXEDASSET RECORDS.) B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRA.NSFERRING.A.N ITEM. FILL OUT FORM.AND SEND TO ...r:.1TRINA IN PURCHASING. . ! ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT PROPERTY AOUISITION IDISPOSITI01V /TRANSFER FORM. >-YODArSDATE: 11/17/06' 1. INVÒICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE): , 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE): 3. GOVERNMENT NAME, DIVISION, BUILDING A]\lD ROOM#: ~ LOCATIO!..cODE: CCFINA v-s:' PROPERTY RECORD # AND DEPT. TRANSFERRING TO (IF TRANSFERRING OR DISPOSING OF): 405302 - 6. YEAR ACQUIRED (IF TRANSFERRED/DONAl ;- lJ/IRADED, ETC): 7. COMlYIODITY CODE USE}) ON PURCHASE ORDER (IF NEW PURCHASE): ¡ Vi" DESCRIPIION OF COJrfldODITY ~~ Computer v9:' lYfAKE: Howard 10. MODEL NUMBER: , /' vi~. SERIAL NUMBER: 22195 , I 12. ME7HOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSING OF:JI.Il'r:K, SURPLUS, SOLD, TRADED, ErC): Sur Ius . (DEPARTMENT HE.AJJ OR A UTE' THIS FÇJRM JS TO BE USED FOR ALL CAPITOL EQUJP~ 'T PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR , TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPT. TO ANOTHER. A- WHEN PURCHASING .AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORM Our, ATTACH TO THE "INVOICE" .AND "RECEIVING" COpy OF .P.O..A.N1J SUBMIT TO FlW_l'lCE FOR PAYMENT, F.DlANCE WILL SEND ON TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU.ARE NOT SlJRE OF A..NY PART OF THE INFORMA.TION REQUESTEDþ YOU'LL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR. (THIS INFORMATION IS EXTREMELY IMPORTA.NT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDS.) B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING AN ITEM, FILL OUT FORM.AND SEND TO XA. TRINA. IN PURCHASING. . 1 ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPAR1MENT PROPERTY AOUISITION /DISPOSITIO.1V /IRANSFER FORM. >'<ÍODÅY'SDATE: 11/17/06' 1. INVOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE): 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE): 3. GO VERNMENT NAME, DIVISION, BUlLDIN'G AI\7J ROOM#: 4 LOCATTOl\CODE: CCFINA vs:" PROPERTY RECORD # AND DEFT. 1RANSFERRING TO (IF TRANSFERRING OR DISPOSING OF): 405307 . 6. YEAR ACQUIRED (IF 7RANSFERRED/DONATF..nnRADED, EYC): 7. COMMODITY CODE USED ON PURCHASE ORDER (IF NEW PURCHASE): ¡ vi" DESCRlPTJON OF COM:MODITY : Computer /" v9. MAKE: Howard 10. ~;' MODEL NUMBER: SERIAL NUMBER: 22.166 , , 12. METHOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSING OF:JIf!\r~ SURPLUS, SOLD, TRADED, ETC): Sur Ius . , 'iL. :::;J!;,. ~l ,l n..,;~ ," - ~~",,!,/;r.~j-':d , A/rJ.AL"J4f'", (DEPARTMENT H.EA.D OR A UTHORIZED PERSON orJ-Y) THIS FÇJRM IS TO BE USED FOR .ALL CAPITOL EQUlP}r.f£.....T PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR , TRß..NSFERRED FROM ONE DEPT. TO ANOTHER. .A... WHEN PURCHASING.AN ITEM. FILL THIS FORM OUT, AITACH TO THE "INVOICE" AND "RECEIVING" COpy OF P.O..AND SUBMIT TO FJMI..NCE FOR PAYMENT, FINANCE WILL SEND ON TO PURCHA.SING. (IF YOU..ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED, YOU'LL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR. (fHIS INFORM.A.nON IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDS.) B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING.A.N ITEM. FILL OUT FORM .AND SEND TO XATRINA IN PURCHASING. . ! ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING JJEPARTMENT PROPERTY AOUISITION /DISPOSITI01V /TRANSFER FO~ ">TODÂrSDATE: 11/17/06. 1. .INVOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE): , 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHAsE): 3. GOVERNMENT NAME, DIVISION; BUlLDJlýG AND ROOM#: 4 LOCA.1TOACODE: CCFINA \.,/5:'" PROPER:rY RECORD # AND IJEPT. TRANSFERRING TO (IF TRANSFERRING OR DISPOSING OF): 405308 6. YEAR ACQUIRED (IF TRANSFERREDIDONATF])/TRAJJED, EYC): 7. COl·r.fMODITY CODE USED ON PURCHASE ORDER (IF NEW PURCHASE): i vf .' DESCRIPTION OF COM?Y.fODITY : Computer /0" 1/9. MAKE: Howard 10. MODEL NUMBER: . / r./Í~. SERIAL NUMBER: 22176 . , 12. Jr:fETHOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSING OF:JIINK, SURPLUS, SOLD, TRADElJ, Ere): Surplus . '1' ~ ~1J ~'- ",.J (r;JI')~4<"^' -t.u (DEPARTMENT HEAlJ OR A UTHORIZED PERSON' 'NLJ') THIS FÇJRM IS TO BE USED FOR. ALL CAPITOL EQUJPldÐrT PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR . T.R.J...NSFERRE.D FROM ONE DEPT. TO ANOTHER. A.. WHEN PURCHASING AN ITEM. FILL THIS FORM OUT, A'ITACH TO THE "INVOICE" .AND "RECEIVING'"' COpy OF P.O..A..NlJ SUBMJT TO F.JM.I...NCE FOR PA.YMENT, FDlANCE WILL SEND ON TO PURCHA.S.DIG. (IF YOU ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED, YOU'LL NEED TO CALL THE VENJJOR. (THIS INFORMAnON IS EXTREMELY IMPORT.A...NT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDS.) B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING AN ITEM. FILL OUT FORM .A..ND SEND TO XÄTRINA. IN PURCHA.SING. . 1 ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT PROPERTY AOUISITION IDISPOSITI01Y /TRANSFER FORM ><rO.DÄ "YfSDA 1E: 11/17/06. 1. INVOICE DATE (IF NEW PURCHASE): 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHAsE): 3. GOVER.NMENT NAME~ DIVISION, BUILDING AND ROOM#: ~ LOCA1TOACODE: CCFINA vs:" PROPERTY RECORD # AND DEPT. 'IRANSFERRING TO (IF TRANSFERRING OR DISPOSING OF): 405309 6. YEAR ACQ UIRED (IF TRANSFERRED/DONAl r n/TRADED, ETC): 7. COMMODITY CODE USED ON PURCHASE ORDER (IF NEW PURCHAsE): ¡ vi" DESCRIPnON OF CO.Mi'Y.£ODITY: Computer ",/ v9. lYfAKE: Howard 10. MODEL NUMBER: . /' Vi~. SERIAL NUMBER: 22178 , t 12. kŒTHOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSING OF:JU!V~};' SURPLUS, SOLD, TRADED, EYC): Surplus . ,;,.' Ufo . . ' (Î' _t~ ,)l ¡, ,d " ," 1;' , .. ¡"'''''~ ,-j\l~)'(,f"J'ì:/"U.Æ,''/' ",øI" ~"!!--".'~'l""''','N.~,;, ~ ',/ (DEPARTMENT HEAD OR A. UTHORlZED PERSON J) . t~' THIS FfJRM IS TO BE USED FOR ALL CAPITOL EQUIPldEl''tT PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR , TRANSFERRE.D FROM ONE DEPT. TO ANOTHER. A.. WHEN PURCHASING.AN ITEM. FILL THIS FORM O~ ATTACH TO THE "INVOICE" AND "RECEIVING'" COpy OF P.O. AND SUBMIT TO FIW...NCE FOR PAYMENT, FDlA.NCE WILL SEND ON TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQlÆSTED, YOU'LL NEED TO CALL THE VENlJOR. (THIS INFORMATION IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDS.) B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRlNGAN nEM, FILL OUT FORM AND SEN.D TO XATRlNA IN PURCHA.SING. . t ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING IJEPAR1MENT PROPERTY AOUISITION IDISPOSITI,?!Y n:RANSFER FORM: v/TODAY'SDATE: 11/17/06. 1. INYOICE DAm (IF NEW PURCHASE): , 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE): 3. GOVERNMENT NAME, DIVISION, BUILDING AN]) ROOM#: 4: LOCA110ACODE: CCFINA ~,. PROPERTY RECORD # AND DEPT. TRANSFERRING TO (IF TRANSFERRING OR DISPOSING OF): 405310 6. YEAR ACQUIRED (IF TRANSFERREDIDONATE.DnRADED) ETC): 7. COMMODITY CODE USED ON PURCHASE ORDER (IF NEW PURCHAsE]: ¡ v&" DESCRIPTION OF COJr£MODlTY : Computer v!f,e MAKE: Howard 10. MODEL NUMBER: . ~.. ~. SERIAL NUM'BER: 22.180 12. METHOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSING OF:Jr.llVli, SURPLUS, SOLD) TRADED, ETC): Sur Ius . (DEPARTMENT HEA.D OR A UTHORIZED PERSON 0 THIS FÇJRM IS TO BE USED FOR ALL CAPITOL EQUJPlr££\T PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR . TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPT. TO ANOTHER. A- WHEN PURCHASING AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORM OUT, .A..ITACH TO THE "INVOICE" AND "RECEIVING" COpy OF P.O. AND SUBMIT TO F.fNrl-lVCE FOR PAYMENT, FINANCE WILL SEND ON TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU.ARE NOT S&"RE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED, YOU'LL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR. (THIS INFORMA.170N IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDS.) B. IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING AN ITEM. FILL OUT FORM .AND SEND TO KA.TRINA. IN PURCHASING. . 1 ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT . , PROPERTY AOUISITION /DISPOSITI01V /TRANSFER FORA{ ;....··YODÅY'SDATE.- 11/17/06 ' 1. INVOICE DAlE (IF NEW PURCHASE): , 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE lTEJrf (IF NEW PURCHAsE): 3. GO VERNMENT NAME, DIVISION, BUILDIN'G A1.\7J ROOM #: 4: LOCATIO¡.;cODE: CCFINA \.,/5." PROPERTY RECORD # AND lJEPT. 1RANSFERRlNG TO (IF TRANSFERRING OR DISPOSING OF): 405311 6. YEARACQUIRED (IF TRANSFERREDIJJONATF..l)/TRADED) ETC): 7. COMMODITY CODE USED ON PURCHASE ORDER (IF NEW PURCHAsE): ¡ vf" DESCRlPTJON OF COJrflyfODlTY .- Computer v{' MAKE: Howard 10. MODEL NUMBER: ~' SERIAL NUMBER: 22.187 . t 12. METHOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSING OF:JU^~ SURPLUS, SOLD, TRADED) ETC): Sur Ius . .. THIS FÇJRM JS TO BE USED FOR .ALL CAPITOL EQUIP.ld£.....T PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR, . TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPT. TO ANOTHER. .A.... WHEN P URCH.A.SING AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORM 0 UT, .A.ITACH TO THE "INVOICE" .A..ND "RECEIVING" COpy OF P.O. AND SUBMIT TO F.JM.I..NCE FOR PAYMENT, F.IN.A..NCE WILL SEND ON TO PURCHA.SING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SllRE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED~ YOU'LL NEED TO CA..LL THE VENDOR.. (THIS INFORMA.nON IS EXTREMELY IMPORT.A...NT FOR THE FIXED ASSET RECORDS) .& IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING AN ITEM, FJLL our FORM .A.ND SEND TO KATRINA. IN PURCHA.SING. . ~l ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT PROPERTY AOUISITION /lJISPOSITI01V /TRANSFER FORA{ ·-'-"·TODÁPSDATE: 11/17/06, 1. INVOICE DA7E (IF NEW PURCHASE): , 2. ACCOUNT NUMBER USED TO PURCHASE ITEM (IF NEW PURCHASE): 3. GO VERNMENT NAME, DIVISION, BUlLDIN'G A.1vn ROOM #: 4.' LOCATIO¡..;cODE: \/~{' PROPERTY RECORD # AND DEPT. 1RANSFERRING TO (IF TRANSFERRlNG OR DISPOSING OF): 405312 , , eeFINA 6. YEAR A CQVIRED (IF TRANSFERREDIIJONATF:T>/TRAJ)EJ), ETC): 7. COMMODITY CODE USED ON PURCHASE ORDER (IF NEW PURCHAsE): , vf" DESCRIPTION OF COJrflr.£ODITY: Computer 1/1:' MAKE: Howard 10. ~;" MODEL NUMBER' SERIAL NUMBER.· 22192 , , 12.. METHOD OF DISPOSAL (IF DISPOSING OF:.Tú?\~ SURPLUS, SOLD, TRADED, ErC): Sur Ius . B. ¡~ ,(:1 ~:~ j I ~ ,'I f~~;$.,;:'..:.J"--)\ J~iJJt.LC!-.t1.-" (DEPARTMENT HEA.D OR A UTHORJZED PERSON o¿j'ÌJ) THIS F9RM IS TO BE USED FOR .ALL CAPITOL EQUlP}r.f£.\T PURCHASED, DISPOSED OF OR , TRANSFERRED FROM ONE DEPT. TO ANOTHER. A.. WHEN PURCHASING AN ITEM, FILL THIS FORM OUT, .A.17A.CH TO THE "INVOICE" AND "'RECElVDIG" COpy OF P.O. AND SUBMIT TO F1NA.NCE FOR PAYMENT, F.INA..NCE WILL SEND ON TO PURCHASING. (IF YOU ARE NOT SURE OF ANY PART OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED'þ YOU'LL NEED TO CALL THE VENDOR. (THIS INFORMA.nON IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR THE FIXEDA.SSET RECORDS.) IF DISPOSING OF OR TRANSFERRING AN ITEM, FILL OUT FORM AND SEND TO .KÄ TRINA. IN PURCHASmG. . ! \ IlEM NO. C6A DATE: March 6. 2007 AGENDA REQUEST TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REGULAR: ( ) PUBLIC HEARING: ( ) CONSENT (X) PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Public Safety Jack T Southard Public Safety Director SUBJECT: Request to approve the purchase of a desktop computer with standard specifications in the amount of $1,160.00. BACKGROUND: See Attached Memo FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds will be available through 107001-2120-564000-21101 - E911 Wireless Funds From 107001-2120-599300-21101 - Reserves PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the purchase of a desktop computer with standard specifications in the amount of $1,160.00 Also approve and sign Budget Amendment # BA07-044. Equipment Request #07-312. ~lasAnderson -- CounW Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: )(APPROVED DENIED OTHER: Approved 4-0 Comm, Smith Absent Purchasing: Finance: Che r copy only, if applicable: :'" (,': 'f' [1 (',n r? rn ":_: ,- l:: d \t,' ! r~ -....-,',..-..' _..._~ n] ,~ ¡ ~ ¡ . ¡ ~ ~ ¡ Inter-Office Memorandum Department of Public Safety Division of 911 Communications TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Jack T Southard, Director SUBJECT: Computer for Recording System DATE: March 6, 2007 ***************************************************************** On November 14, 2006, the Board of County Commissioners approved the purchase of a new recording system for the 911 Center. After it has been installed, the current computer is over five (5) years old and does not have enough memory capacity for the archived records. Public Safety is requesting the purchase of a replacement computer with more memory in the amount of $1,160.00. BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST FORM REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: Public Safety PREPARED DATE: 2/2312007 AGENDA DATE: 3/6/2007 -'~~~i:~1~~L2J_E:J'2~ÜZ:ii:~CÇ"º,µ,NI~N UMI:H:ß,~"~'sSiEŒ2I,SIiJT>','AÇ,Ç9µNTi~'-'ME:1J0UK.1¥~;70~12:L:_;;i:ÄNl~PNJ-!F\I TO: 107001-2120-564000-21101 Machinery & Equipment $1,160 FROM: 107001-2120-599300-21101 Reserves $1 , 160 REASON FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT: CONTINGENCY BALANCE: THIS AMENDMENT: REMAINING BALANCE: N/A N/A ... N/A C\ A.~.~~, '" n / r I A~~) tJJ¿~ ( ) ~'¿;' BA07-~ 4 DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: OMB APPROVAL: BUDGET AMENDMENT #: DOCUMENT # & INPUT BY: ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS EQUIPMENT REQUEST FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007 DEPARTMENT: Public Safet RECOMMENDED: X YES NO REVISED JUSTIFICATION: On November 14, 2006, the Board of County Commissioners approved the purchase of a new recording system for the 911 Center. After it has been installed, the current computer is over five (5) years old and does not have enough memory capacity for the archived records. Public Safety is requesting the purchase of a replacement computer with more memory in the amount of $1,160.00. EQUIPMENT REQ#: EQ07-312 ACCOUNT#: 107001-2120-564000-21101 ~.L~#- ~~~ In~.tl,(m Techno/Q9Y." ~ ~-~ Phone: (772) 462-1681 Fax: (772) 462-1443 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE 2300 VIRGINIA AVENUE FORT PIERCE, FL. 34982 Name/Address PUBLIC SAFETY IT Quote Date Quote # 2/16/2007 1441 QUOTE VALID UNTIL W,O.# REQUESTOR 3/1612007 86727 Janusz Description Qty Rate Total FY07 DESKTOP COMPUTER, W/STANDARD 1 1,158.14 1,158.14 SPECS INCLUDING MONITOR, KEYBOARD, MOUSE AND EXTRA MEMORY VENDOR INFORMATION: Dell Computers One Dellway, RR2E Box 4 Round Rock, TX 78682 The goods and/or services as quoted hereon have been requested in the Total quantity and quality stated. Quotes are valid for 30 days unless otherwise $1,158.14 stated. AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE AGENDA REOUEST ITEM NO. C6b rIM! : "", ~'::: i-~; '": :' ,."'0, : -'-_ ~-~-, ", - --,,",~~ -'~:_~ ", "- DATE: March 6, 2007 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMmED BY(DEPT): PUBLIC SAFETY JACK T. SOUTHARD PUBLIC SAFETY DIRECTOR SUBJECT: Request to accept Modification #1 to Agreement #07-DS-3W-l0-66-01-248, State Homeland Security Grant, time extension. BACKGROUND: The Board of County Commissioners approved the State Homeland Security Grant Agreement on October 10, 2007. The purpose for the Agreement is for local planning, exercise, and training for Homeland Security. This Agreement was to expire on February 28, 2007. Modification #1 to this Agreement is extending the expiration date to February 28, 2008. FUNDS WILL BE AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: On October 10, 2006, the St. Lucie Board of County Commissioners accepted the State Homeland Security Grant Agreement for local planning, exercise and training for Homeland Security. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve Modification #1 to Agreement#07-DS-3W-l0-66-01-248, State Homeland Security Grant Agreement. COMMISSION ACTION: [w APPROVED [ ] DENIED r] OTHER: uglas Anderson County Administrator Approved 4-0 Comm. Smith Absent Originating Dep Review and Purchasing: \7''1'' County Attorney: Other: Other: .- ~~~-:--~=-~-~ St. Lucie County Department of Pub~ic Safety Division of Emergency Management MEMORANDUM FROM: Board of County Commissioners Jack T. Southard, Public Safety Directo~ February 23, 2007 TO: DATE: REF: Modification #1 to Agreement state Homeland Security Grant The Board of Cm.m.ty Commissioners approved the State Homeland Security Grant on October 10, 2006. The purpose for this agreement is for local planning, exercise, and training for Homeland Security. This agreement was to expire on February 23,2007. Modification #1 to this Agreement is extending the expiration date to February 28,2008. Therefore, Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve Modification #1 to Agreement#07-DS-3W-1O-66-01-248, State Homeland Security Grant Agreement. JTs/mgp FEB 2 6 · ---~_.-----~-_.- ----_.- ----------'-.---.-.-- . ....-----.-.--------.-... --- - - - _..,---.- ---~--- _.----~.._------_._._---_..._-----------_.-._------ ----.----.--. -- -- ..-----------.- -- .---- - --... ._-_..--_.~.__.._-.- Contract Number: CFDA Number: 07 -DS-3W-1 0-66-01-248 97.067 MODIFICATION #1 TO GRANT AGREEMENT This Modification is made and entered into by and between the State of Florida, Department of Community Affairs, ("the Department"), and the Saint Lucie County ("the Recipient@) to reinstate and to modify the Department's Contract Number 06-DS-3W-10-66-01-248, dated November 5,2006, ("the agreement"), WHEREAS, the Department and the Recipient have entered into the Agreement, pursuant to which the Department has provided a sub grant of $46,633 to Recipient; and WHEREAS, the Agreement expired on February 28, 2007; and WHEREAS, the Department and the Recipient desire to reinstate the Agreement and to modify the Agreement by extending it. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises of the parties contained herein, the parties agree as follows: ' 1, The Agreement is hereby rein~tated as though it had not expired" 2., Paragraph 3, Period of AgreE?ment, is hereby amended to have an expiration date for the Agreement of February 28, 2008'. Final requests for reimbursement should be submitted no later than thirty (30) days after the termination date of the contract. Any requests received' after March 31, 2008 may, in the discretion of the Department, not be reimbursed from this Agreement. 3. All provisions not in conflict with this Modification remain in full force and effect, and are to be pèrformed at the level specified in the Agreement. 4. All provisions of the Agreement being modified and any attachments thereto in conflict with this Modification shall be and are hereby changed to conform with this Modification, effective as of the date of the last execution of this Modification by both parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this document as of the dates set out herein. RECIPIENT: Saint Lucie County BY: NAME & TITLE: DATE: STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS BY: NAME & TITLE: W. Craiq Fuqate, Director of the Division of Emerqencv Manaqement DATE: