No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 03-26-02 \;, ~ ..." March 26, 2002 9:00 AM BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING AGENDA WELCOME GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: CONSENT AGENDA- These items are considered routine and are enacted bv one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS- Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items which the Commission will discuss individually usually in the order listed on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS- These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesdays at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 A.M., then public hearings ~\ill be heard at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and asks anyone wishing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments \\ill be limited to five minutes. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman will ask for public comment, (4) 'further discussion and action by the Board. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION- Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have backup material, please ha~-e eight copies ready for distribution. NON-AGENDA ITEMS- These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBLIC COMMENT- Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting for general public comment. Please limit comments to five minutes. DECORUM- Please be respectful of others opinion. MEETINGS- All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 A.M" UIÙess otherwise advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. The Board schedules additional workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of these workshops. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. '-' , ..., www.stlucieco.gov John D. Bruhn Doug Coward Paula A. Lewis Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 ßOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA March 26, 2002 9:00 A.M. INVOCATION PLEDGE OF AlLEGL-lliCE ~ 1. MINUTES FWPro~W. Approve the minutes of the meeting held March 12, 2002. 2. PROCL:\...\L-\.TIONS / PRESENTATIONS A. Resolution No. 02-92 - Proclaiming April 20, 2002 as "Special Olymp!{s . , ,ð Florida Law Enforcement Torch Run Day" in St. Lucie County, Florida. ffJ0 )-z,¡/@ B. Presentation / Kathryn Basile, Executive Director of the Children's Services Council will present the St. Lucie County Needs Assessment. c. Presentation / Nan Griggs, President and CEO of the Workforce Development Board of the Treasure Coast will pro\ide an update on work force issues in St. Lucie County and ask the Board for input and suggestions. 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT 4. CONSEì\T AGENDA ~ CJt- -Appro\/' ~ NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Boara at these meetings will need a recoró of the proceedlDgs and for such purpose may neea to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the requesf of any party to the proceedings, individuals testif}ing during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted toe opportunity to cross-examine any indivIdual testifying during a hearingupon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior fo the meeting. '-' ....,/ REGULAR AGENDA MARCH 26, 2002 PAGE TWO 11ftr"" IlL "\f PUBLIC HEARINGS COIVIMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SA. SB. 5C. 5D. Ordinance No. 02-010 / Petition for Amendment / Westchester Community Development District No. 1 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the ordinance authorizing an amendment to the boundaries of the community development district. Location: northwest CQrner of the intersection of Interstate Lt,. ~ 95 and the proposed extension of Gatlin Boulevard. Appco~-ed l}-o {tftÁ:ruIUtSq . ßJ~~ Ordinance No. 02-011 / Petition for Amendment / Westchester Community Development District No. 2 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the ordinance authorizing an amendment to the boundaries of the community development district. Location: northwest corner of the intersection of Interstate 95 and the proposed extension of Gatlin Boulevard. Ordinance No. 02-012 / Petition for Amendment / Westchester Community Development District No.3 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the ordinance authorizing an amendment to the boundaries of the community development district. Location: northwest corner of the intersection of Interstate 95 and the proposed extension of Gatlin Boulevard. I ¡ f Ordinance No. 02-013 / Petition for Þ.mendment / Westchester Community Develqpment District No.4 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the ./.. t ordinance authorizing an amendment to the boundaries of the community ! development district. Location: northwest corner of the intersection of Interstat~ I j 95 and the proposed extension of Gatlin Boulevard. ~ End of Public Hearings I 3,. J"(i, ".A~~. 1 1 ,.¡JH ~, 6. PARKS AND RECREATION Discussion - The Board will discuss possible improvements at loth Street Park. Þn>p r wJ -to IJ..,~ pµ¿ iApoÆ fèe.-o I J V ~r IlVIproflU¡1JJL{S \w ....,., REGULAR AGENDA MARCH 26, 2002 PAGE THREE ï. COUNTY ATTORNEY 8. Resolution No. 02-87 - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the resolution establishing a permit fee for special review and siting criteria to be paid by the applicant for the construction of :r~ electric gener,torApl<y1-t in St. Lucie County, Florida. f1¡pß~~ -rr::> lJ--nWzo:«.! 7ZJ¡;ÇtSe;_t/Cl q2XJ ADMINISTRATION _~ _LJ. clif~~Iit~s&~ tJf ~/ fzó71 riv 'WSr iSff 6> c¿l7f. t A. St. Lucie County Airport Annexation / Florida Governmental Conflict Resolution - Staff requests auth.orizatton t~ork ~.th the Treasure Coast R~~~ng ~=s PJ;~m'.JrteJuLh(/)0 B. Bi-weekly Committee Reports - The Board \'\Till give updates on the various committees and advisory boards that they serve on.. 9. PUBLIC WORKS / ENGINEERING Indian River Estates Stormwater Attenuation Facility - Consider staff recommendation to authorize the Public Works Department to submit a request for IncluSion Application to Florida Department of Environmental Protection - State Revolving Fund Loan Program for $2.5 million to assist in construction. 4-pp(ò~ l tf.-O) \.,- ....I CONSENT AGENDA March 26. 2002 1. WARRANTS LIST Approve warrants list No. 24 and No. 25 2. PUBLIC WORKS A. Engineering / River Branch Estates MSBU / Potable Water Improvements (PSL) - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Consultant's Agreement with Culpepper & Terpening, to provide construction management services for the project in the amount of 57,000, and authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement. B. Engineering / RFP No. 02-033 / Continuing Contracts for Professional Surveying Services - Consider staff recommendation to approve the short list: 1) GCY, Inc., 2) Culpepper & Terpening, Inc., 3) LBFH, Inc., grant permission to negotiate with all three firms, and authorize the Chairman to sign the contracts as prepared by the County Attorney. C. 10% Discount at Oxbow Gift Store - Consider staff recommendation to approve the 10% discount offer. D. Engineering / Smallwood Avenue MSBU / Potable Water FPUA - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Interlocal Agreement with Fort Pierce Utilities Authority and the City of Fort Pierce, and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement. E. Environmental Resources / Equipment Request No. 02-208 and No. 02-209- Consider staff recommendation to approve the equipment requests for the purchase of a 6' x 12' equipment trailer in the amount of $1,200, and a 4- wheeler in the amount of $5,000 using funds remaining from a previous trailer purchase that cost less than anticipated. F. . Engineering/ Burger King and Merritt Ditch Emergency Culvert Replacement Project - Consider staff recommendation to approve the project, waive the formal bidding process, and authorize the Chairman to sign the construction contract V\ith Shenandoah General Construction in the amount of $182,460. G. Engineering / Grey Twig Lane MSBU - Consider staff recommendation to approve Amendment No.1 to Work Authorization No.9 to the Agreement for Continuing Engineering Services, dated March 14,2000 with LBFH, Ine. to provide the final design, permitting and bidding services in the amount of $15,050, and authorize the Chairman to execute the Work Authorization. H. Taylor Creek/C25 Dredging and Restoration Project - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to submit the grant application to Florida Seaport Transportation and Economic Development (FSTED) Council, in the amount of $1,750,000, and authorize execution ofthe application by the County Administrator. '-' CONSENT AGENDA MARCH 26, 2002 PAGE TWO ....I 2. PUBLIC WORKS (CONTINUED) I. Taylor CreekjC25 Dredging and Restoration Project - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to submit the grant application to Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND), in the amount of $800,000, approve Resolution No. 02-90, and authorize execution of the application by the County Administrator. ]. Budget Amendment No. 02-129/Equipment Request No. 02-210 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the budget amendment and equipment request for the purchase of a four-barrel recycling center for the Oxbow Eco-Center in the amount of 51,500, and acceptance of Plastic Lumber as a sole source for this item. K. Budget Amendment No. 02-128 jEqui:¡:Jment Request No. 02-211 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the budget amendment and equipment request for the purchase of three all-terrain, fat-tire wheelchairs for the Oxbow Eco-Center in the total amount of $6,000, and accept Deming Design as a sole source for this item. 3. MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET A. Supervisor of Elections Voting Equipment Upgrade j Equipment Request No. 02-204 and No. 02-205 / Budget Amendment No. 02-125 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the equipment requests and budget amendment for the purchase of voting equipment, with the understanding that the cost will not exceed 5312,800, and declare Diebold Election Systems the sole source vendor for the equipment. B. . Change Fund - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to establish a change fund account in the amount of 5100 for the Oxbow Eco- Center. 4. COMMUNITY SERVICES Certificate of participation for the Drug Control and System Improvement Program (Edward Byrne) Grant for 2002/03 from the Florida Department of Law Enforcement - Consider staff recommendation to authorize the Chairman to sign the Certificate of Participation. 5. PARKS AND RECREATION Community Parks System Master Plan j LaWllwood Recreation Complex Master Plan Update (parks Referendum) - A copy of the update as been forwarded to the Board for review. '-' CONSENT AGENDA MARCH 26, 2002 PAGE THREE wi 6. UTILITIES A. North Hutchinson Island Waste Water Treatment Plant Master Lift Station Rehabilitation- Consider staff recommendation to approve the purchase order with Severn Trent Avatar Utility Services, LLC in the amount of $39,608. B. Equipment Request No. 02-206 and No. 02-20ï j Budget Amendment No. 02-126 - Consider staff recommendation to declare Ellis K. Phelps a sole source for Flyght Pumps and approve the equipment requests and budget amendment for the purchase of two replacement pumps in the amount of $3,802. C. Extension of Reuse Water Main on North Hutchinson Island - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Work Authorization with LBF&H in the amount of $29,800 for design, permitting and services during construction. D. Contract Approval- Consider staff recommendation to approve the contract with Ocean Gate Builders in the amount of $19,200 for the up sizing of a new water line on North Hutchinson Island from eight inch to twelve inch in diameter, and authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement as approved by the County Attorney. ï. COUNTY ATTORNEY A Resolution No. 02-85 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution requesting the St. Lucie County Clerk of Circuit Court place one hundred thousand and 00/100 ($100,000.00) Dollars in a separate special revenue fund \\ith only the interest being allocated for Bluefield Ranch improvement e.xpenditures. B. Resolution No. 02-88 Fee Simple Deed/ Jenkins Rd North of Orange Ave - Consider staff recommendation to accept the Fee Simple Deed from North St. .Lucie River Water Control District, authorize the Chairman to execute the resolution, and instruct staff to record the resolution and deed in the public records of St. Lucie County, Florida. C. Resolution No. 02-89 Quitclaim Deed/ Indian Pines Blvd - Consider staff recommendation to accept the Quitclaim Deed from General Electric Capital Corporation, authorize the Chairman to execute the resolution, and instruct staff to record the resolution and deed in the public records of St. Lucie County, Florida. D. Assignment of License Agreement to Lynette f\lacLeod - Consider staff recommendation to approve the proposed agreement, and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement. ....... CONSENT AGENDA MARCH 26,2002 P AGE FOUR ...; 8. HUMAN RESOURCES Third Year Adjustment to the Pay and Classification Plan - Consider staff recommendation to approve the adjustment. 9. MOSQUITO CONTROL FIND Grant Application and Resolution for Assistance Under the Florida Inland Navigation District Waterways Assistance Program Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to submit the grant for improvements at Vitolo Family (Middle Cove) Park, authorize the Chairman to sign the application and the Interlocal Agreement authorizing the District to administer the FIND grant. 10. PURCHASING A. Bid No. 02-034 - Consider staff recommendation to reject the proposal received for parking garage management. B. Bid No. 02-043 - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid for temporary and emergency supply and dispensing of gasoline and diesel fuel to the sole bidder, Holmes Oil Corp. Inc., and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. C. Bid No. 02-039 - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid for the purchase of one track excavator (long reach) to the low bidder, L.B. Smith, Inc., for a total price of $184,225. 11. INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE A. Request For Bids - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to . advertise for bids to qualified vendors, as approved by the Selection Committee, for the replacement of the security system at Rock Road Jail. B. Bid No. 02-044 - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid for construction of two tennis courts at LaWllwood Recreation Area to the low bidder, Fast Dry Courts in the amount of $85,717, and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. '-' -" St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners Announcements March 26, 2002 A. The Oxbow Eco-Center is holding the Second Annual Earth Day Festival on April 20, 2002 from 10:00 am to 4:00 pm, at the Oxbow Eco-Center, on St. James Drive in Port St. Lucie. . B. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Parks System Master Plan Update Workshop on April 23, 2002 at 1:30 pm in the Commission Chambers. NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action laken by the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted the opportunity to cross-examine any Individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the SI. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462- 1777 or TTD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior 10 Ihe meeting. --.. '\.- -' ST. LUCIE COUNTY EROSION DISTRICT BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS John D. Bruhn District I Doug Coward District 2 Paula A. Lewis District 3 Frannie Hutchinson District 4 Cliff Barnes District 5 AGENDA March 26, 2002 1. MINUTES Approve the minutes of the meeting held February 26, 2002. 2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT CONSENT AGENDA 1. WARRANTS LISTS Approve Warrants List No. 21 through No. 25 2. PUBLIC WORKS Engineering / Beach Inlet Monitoring -Consider staff recommendation to approve Amendment No.2 to Work Authorization NO.2 (C-00-12-181) with Taylor.Engineering, Inc. and authorize the Chairman to execute the amended work authorization. :\OllCE: All proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose mayneed to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted an opportunity to cross·examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Senices Manager at (561) 462- 1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting, '-'" ...", ST. LUCIE COUNTY MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS John D. Bruhn District 1 Doug Coward District 2 Paula A. Lewis District 3 Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District 4 District 5 AGENDA March 26, 2002 1. MINUTES Approve the minutes of the meeting held February 12, 2002. 2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT CONSENT AGENDA 1. WARRANTS LISTS Approve Warrants List No. 20 through No. 25. 2. MOSOUITO CONTROL A. Quality Industries, Inc. Agreement Amendment- Consider staff recommendation to approve the proposed First Amendment to the February 27,2001 Agreement, and authorize the Chairman to execute the amendment. B. Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND) Grant - Consider staff recommendation to approve and' sign the Interlocal Agreement with the Board of County Commissioners authorizing the Mosquito Control District to administer the grant at Vitolo Family / Middle Cove Park. NOTICE: All procecdings befo....e this Board are elf'clronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken b)' the Boud at tbese meetings will need a record orthe proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record oflhl' proceedings is made. tJpOIl the requestofany party to the proceedings, individuals testifying ùuring a hearing will be sworn in. Any P:Jrty to the proceedings will be granted an opportunHy to cross-examine any indi\;dual testifying during a hearing upon fe-CJuest. Anyone ",ith;l disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting shouh.l contact the St. Lucie Count)" Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 ur TUO (561) 462-J-1-28 .11 least for£)-·eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. ~. ..", BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ADDITIONS AGENDA March 26. 2002 Revised 3/25/02 REGULAR AGENDA COMMUNI1Y DEVELOPMENT R-A. 1 Westchester Community Development Districts One through Four / Interlocal Agreement - Consider staff recommendation to approve the draft Interlocal Agreement between St. Lucie County and The Westchester Community Development Districts One through Four for the purpose of addressing infrastructure improvements at T~e Westchester Development Site. ftpP)~W- ~/'O ~~) CONSENT AGENDA COMMUNI1Y SERVICES C-A.l Acceptance of Funds / Budget Resolution No. 02-94 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the budget resolution to accept the funds remaining from the Community Food and Nutrition (CFN) grant from FYOl in the amount of $10,000, and authorize the Chairman to sign the necessary documents. NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Arty person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings \101\1 need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings \VÌII be granted the opportunity to cross· examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the SL Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. y 'WI ST. LUCIE COUNTY MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS John D. Bruhn District 1 Doug Coward District 2 Paula A. Lewis District 3 Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District 4 District 5 AGENDA March 26, 2002 1. MINUTES Appro\"(' the minutes of the meeting held February 12, 2002. 2. GENER:-\L PUBLIC COM!\lENT CONSENT AGENDA 1. W ARRA:\TS LISTS Approve \\'arrants List No. 20 through NO.2 5. 2. MOSQUITO CONTROL A. Quality Industries, Inc. Agreement Amendment- Consider staff recommendation to approve the proposed First Amendment to the February 27, 2001 Agreement, and authorize the Chairman to execute the amendment. B. Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND) Grant - Consider staff recommendation to approve and' sign the lnterlocal Agreement with the Board of County Commissioners authorizing the Mosquito Control District to administer the grant at Vitolo Family j Middle Cove Park. NOTICE: All proceedings before this Board are electronicall)" recorded. Any person who decides to appeal ao,· action taken by the Board at these meetings ..,,'ill need a record of the proceedings and rarsuch purpose ma)' need to ensure that a verbatim record orthe proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individunls testiryin~ during 3 hearing \'dll be sworn in. ..\n~· parI)" to the proceedings will be granted an opportunir," to cross·examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon requt:''!ot. ..\n~-orll~ n ilh a disabilitr requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact tbe St. Lucie Counly Community Services Manager al (561) 462-1777 Of" TOD (561) -162-1-128 at least rorty·eight(4S) hours prior to the meeting. ,,/ ,.", ST. LUCIE COUNTY EROSION DISTRICT BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS John D. Bruhn District 1 Doug Coward District 2 Paula A. Lewis District 3 Frannie Hutchinson District 4 Cliff Barnes District 5 AGENDA March 26, 2002 1. MINUTES Approve the minutes of the meeting held February 26,2002. 2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT CONSENT AGENDA 1. WARRANTS LISTS Approve Warrants List No. 21 through No. 25 2. PUBLIC WORKS Engineering / Beach Inlet Monitoring - Consider staff recommendation to approve Amendment No.2 to \'"ork Authorization No.2 (C-00-12-181) with Taylor Engineering, Inc. and authorize the Chairman to execute the amended work authorization. NOTICE: All proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, indhiduals testifying during a hearing ...ill be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted an opportunity to cross-e.'\:amine any indMdual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting shouJd contact the 51. Lucie County Community Senices Manager at (561) 462- 1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. · ~ .."" March 26, 2002 9:00 AM BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING AGENDA vVELCOME GENERAL RULES Ai\JD PROCEDURES Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: CONSENT AGENDA- These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS- Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items which the Commission will discuss individually usually in the order listed on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS- These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesdays at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 AM., then public hearings \\ill be heard at 9:00 AM. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and asks anyone wishing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments ~\ill be limited to five minutes. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman will ask for public comment, (4) 'further discussion and action by the Board. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION- Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have backup material, please have eight copies ready for distribution. NON-AGENDA ITEMS- These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBLIC COMMENT- Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting for general public comment. Please limit comments to five minutes. DECORUM- Please be respectful of others opinion. MEETINGS- All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 A.M., UIÙess otherwise advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. The Board schedules additional workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of these workshops. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. '-" ....." www.stlucieco.gov John D. Bruhn Doug Coward Paula A. Lewis Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 ßOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA March 26, 2002 9:00 A.M. INVOCATION PLEDGE OF AUEGl-\J\fCE ~ 1. MINUTES Appro\'e the minutes of the meeting held March 12, 2002. 2. PROCL:\...\LUIONS j PRESENTATIONS A. Resolution No. 02-92 - Proclaiming April 20, 2002 as "Special Olympics Florida Law Enforcement Torch Run Day" in St. Lucie County, Florida. B. Presentation j Kathryn Basile, Executive Director of the Children's Services Council will present the St. Lucie County Needs Assessment. C. Presentation j Nan Griggs, President and CEO of the Workforce Denlopment Board of the Treasure Coast will provide an update on work force issues in St. Lucie County and ask the Board for input and suggestions. 3. GENERAL Pl'BLIC COMMENT 4. CONSENT AGENDA NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. An)' person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a recorò of the proceedmgs and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the requesf of any :party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any par1Y to the proceedings will be granted [he opportunity to cross-examine any indivIdual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior [0 the meeting. \r' "-' REGULAR AGENDA !\IARCH 26, 2002 PAGE TWO n:r!"r-rr 1I'!__~p'Ø~ "'IiI 1 PUBLIC HEARINGS COI\JMU:-JITY DEVELOPMEj\;T SA. Ordinance No. 02-010 / Petition for Amendment 1 Westchester Community Development District No.1 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the ordinance authorizing an amendment to the boundaries of the community development district. Location: northwest co.rner of the intersection of Interstate 95 and the proposed extension of Gatlin Boulevard. 5B. Ordinance No. 02-011 1 Petition for Amendment 1 Westchester Community Development District No. 2 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the ordinance authorizing an amendment to the boundaries.of the community development district. Location: northwest corner of the intersection of Interstate 95 and the proposed extension of Gatlin Boulevard. - 5C. Ordinance No. 02-012 / Petition for Amendment 1 Westchester Community Development District No. 3 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the ordinance authorizing an amendment to the boundaries of the community development district. Location: northwest corner of the intersection of Interstate 95 and the proposed extension of Gatlin Boulevard. 50. Ordinance No. 02-013 1 Petition for Amendment 1 Westchester Community Develqpment District NO.4 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the ordinance authorizing an amendment to the boundaries of the community development district. Location: northwest corner of the intersection of Interstate 95 and the proposed extension of Gatlin Boulevard. End of Public Hearings 1....f,;I'a.JI!I%~r._ rr _TV n .,... 6. PARKS AND RECREATION Discussion - The Board \-\'ill discuss possible improvements at loth Street Park. ~ ..." REGULAR AGENDA MARCH 26, 2002 P AGE THREE 7. COUNTY ATTOR~t:Y Resolution No. 02-8ï - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the resolution establishing a permit fee for special review and siting criteria to be paid by the applicant for the construction of an electric generator plant in St. Lucie County, Florida. 8. ADMINISTRATIOX A. St. Lucie County Airport Annexation / Florida Governmental Conflict Resolution - Staff requests authorizati9n to work with the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council in this process. B. Bi-weekly Committee Reports - The Board will give updates on the various committees and advisory boards that they serve on. 9. PUBLIC WORKS ! E'\GINEERING Indian River Estates Stormwater Attenuation Facility - Consider staff recommendation to authorize the Public Works Department to submit a request for Inclusion Application to Florida Department of Environmental Protection - State Revolving Fund Loan Program for $2.5 million to assist in construction. ~ ....,., CONSENT AGENDA March 26. 2002 1. WARRANTS LIST Approve warrants list No. 24 and No. 25 2. PUBLIC WORKS A Engineering 1 River Branch Estates MSBU 1 Potable Water Improvements (PSL) - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Consultant's Agreement with Culpepper & Terpening, to provide construction management services for the project in the amount of $7,000, and authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement. B. Engineering / RFP No. 02-033 / Continuing Contracts for Professional Surveying Services - Consider staff recommendation to approve the short list: 1) GCY, Inc., 2) Culpepper & Terpening, Inc., 3) LBFH, Inc., grant permission to negotiate with all three firms, and authorize the Chairman to sign the contracts as prepared by the ,County Attorney. C. 10% Discount at Oxbow Gift Store - Consider staff recommendation to approve the 10% discount offer. D. Engineering / Smallwood Avenue MSBU 1 Potable Water FPUA - Consider staff recommendation to appro\'e the Interlocal Agreement with Fort Pierce Utilities Authority and the City of Fort Pierce, and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement. E. Environmental Resources 1 Equipment Request No. 02-208 and No. 02-209- Consider staff recommendation to approve the equipment requests for the purchase of a 6' x 12' equipment trailer in the amount of $1,200, and a 4- wheeler in the amount of $5,000 using funds remaining from a previous trailer purchase that cost less than anticipated. F. . Engineeringl Burger King and .\Ierritt Ditch Emergency Culvert Replacement Project - Consider staff recommendation to approve the project, waive the formal bidding process, and authorize the Chairman to sign the construction contract with Shenandoah General Construction in the amount of $182,460. G. Engineering 1 Grey Twig Lane ~lSBU - Consider staff recommendation to approve Amendment No.1 to Work Authorization No.9 to the Agreement for Continuing Engineering Senices, dated March 14, 2000 "vith LBFH, Inc. to provide the final design, permitting and bidding services in the amount of $15,050, and authorize the Chairman to execute the Work Authorization. H. Taylor Creek/C25 Dredging and Restoration Project - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to submit the grant application to Florida Seaport Transportation and Economic Development (FSTED) Council, in the amount of $1,750,000, and authorize execution of the application by the County Administrator. '" CONSENT AGENDA MARCH 26, 2002 PAGE TWO ...., 2. PUBLIC WORKS (CONTINUED) 1. Taylor Creek/C25 Dredging and Restoration Project - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to submit the grant application to Florida Inland Na\igation District (FIND), in the amount of $800,000, approve Resolution :\'0. 02-90, and authorize execution of the application by the County Administrator. ]. Budget Amendment 010. 02-129/ Equipment Request No. 02-210 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the budget amendment and equipment request for the purchase of a four-barrel recycling center for the Oxbow Eco-Center in the amount of $1,500, and acceptance of Plastic Lumber as a sole source for this item. K. Budget Amendment :\'0. 02-128 /Equipment Request No. 02-211 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the budget amendment and equipment request for the purchase of three all-terrain, fat-tire wheelchairs for the Oxbow Eco-Center in the total amount of $6,000, and accept Deming Design as a sole source for this item. 3. MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET A. Supervisor of Elections Voting Equipment Upgrade / Equipment Request No. 02-204 and No. 02-205 j Budget Amendment No. 02-125 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the equipment requests and budget amendment for the purchase of voting equipment, with the understanding that the cost will not exceed $312,800, and declare Diebold Election Systems the sole source vendor for the equipment. B. . Change Fund - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to establish a change fund account in the amount of $100 for the Oxbow Eco- Center. 4. COMMUNITY SERVICES Certificate of participation for the Drug Control and System Improvement Program (Edward Byrne) Grant for 2002/03 from the Florida Department of Law Enforcement - Consider staff recommendation to authorize the Chairman to sign the Certificate of Participation. J. PARKS AND RECREATIOK Community Parks System ~raster Plan / LaWllwood Recreation Complex Master Plan Update (parks Referendum) - A copy of the update as been forwarded to the Board for review. ~ CONSENT AGENDA MARCH 26, 2002 PAGE THREE ......, 6. UTILITIES A. North Hutchinson Island Waste Water Treatment Plant Master Lift Station Rehabilitation- Consider staff recommendation to approve the purchase order with Severn Trent Avatar Utility Services, LLC in the amount of 539,608. B. Equipment Request No. 02-206 and No. 02-207 / Budget Amendment No. 02-126 - Consider staff recommendation to declare Ellis K. Phelps a sole source for Flyght Pumps and approve the equipment requests and budget amendment for the purchase of two replacement pumps in the amount of $3,802. C. Extension of Reuse Water Main on North Hutchinson Island - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Work Authorization ~\ith LBF&H in the amount of $29,800 for design, permitting and services during construction. D. Contract Approval- Consider staff recommendation to approve the contract with Ocean Gate Builders in the amount of $19,200 for the up sizing of a new water line on North Hutchinson Island from eight inch to twelve inch in diameter, and authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement as approved by the County Attorney. 7. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Resolution No. 02-85 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution requesting the St. Lucie County Clerk of Circuit Court place one hundred thousand and 00/100 ($100,000.00) Dollars in a separate special revenue fund with only the interest being allocated for BIuefield Ranch improvement expenditures. B. Resolution No. 02-88 Fee Simple Deed/ Jenkins Rd North of Orange Ave - Consider staff recommendation to accept the Fee Simple Deed from North St. .Lucie River Water Control District, authorize the Chairman to execute the resolution, and instruct staff to record the resolution and deed in the public records of St. Lucie County, Florida. C. Resolution No. 02-89 Quitclaim Deed/ Indian Pines Blvd - Consider staff recommendation to accept the Quitclaim Deed from General Electric Capital Corporation, authorize the Chairman to execute the resolution, and instruct staff to record the resolution and deed in the public records of St. Lucie County, Florida. D. Assignment of License Agreement to Lynette MacLeod - Consider staff recommendation to approve the proposed agreement, and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement. \.,.; CONSENT AGENDA MARCH 26, 2002 PAGE FOUR ...., 8. HUMAN RESOURCES Third Year Adjustment to the Pay and Classification Plan - Consider staff recommendation to approve the adjustment. 9. MOSQUITO CONTROL FIND Grant Application and Resolution for Assistance Under the Florida Inland Navigation District Waterways Assistance Program Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to submit the grant for improvements at Vitolo Family (Middle Cove) Park, authorize the Chairman to sign the application and the Interlocal Agreement authorizing the District to administer the FIND grant. 10. PURCHASING A. Bid No. 02-034 - Consider staff recommendation to reject the proposal received for parking garage management. B. Bid No. 02-043 - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid for temporary and emergency supply and dispensing of gasoline and diesel fuel to the sole bidder, Holmes Oil Corp. Inc., and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. C. Bid No. 02-039 - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid for the purchase of one track excavator (long reach) to the low bidder, L.B. Smith, Inc., for a total price of $184,225. 11. INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE A Request For Bids - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to . advertise for bids to qualified vendors, as approved by the Selection Committee, for the replacement of the security system at Rock Road Jail. B. Bid No. 02-044 . Consider staff recommendation to award the bid for construction of two tennis courts at LaWllwood Recreation Area to the low bidder, Fast Dry Courts in the amount of $85,ïl7, and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. '" ....,; St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners Announcements March 26, 2002 A. The Oxbow Eco-Center is holding the Second Annual Earth Day Festival on April 20, 2002 from 10:00 am to 4:00 pm, at the Oxbow Eco-Center, on St. James Drive in Port St. Lucie. . B. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Parks System Master Plan Update Workshop on April 23, 2002 at 1:30 pm in the Commission Chambers. NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a record ofthe proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals teslifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted the opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeling should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462- 1777 or TTO (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting. '"" -.",J ST. LUCIE COUNTY EROSION DISTRICT BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS John D. Bruhn District I Doug Coward District 2 Paula A. Lewis District 3 Frannie Hutchinson District 4 Cliff Barnes District 5 AGENDA March 26, 2002 1. MINUTES Approve the minutes of the meeting held February 26,2002. 2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT CONSENT AGENDA 1. WARRANTS LISTS Approve Warrants List No. 21 through No. 25 2. PUBLIC WORKS Engineering / Beach Inlet Monitoring - Consider staff recommendation to approve Amendment NO.2 to Work Authorization NO.2 (C-00-12-181) with Taylor, Engineering, Inc. and authorize the Chairman to execute the amended work authorization. NOTICE: All proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings wm need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted an opportunity to cross-e.xamine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone "ith a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meering should contact the 51. Lucie County Community Setvices ~Ianager at (561) 462- 1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty,eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. '-' ....; ST. LUCIE COUNTY MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS John D. Bruhn District 1 Doug Coward District 2 Paula A. Lewis District 3 Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District 4 District 5 AGENDA March 26, 2002 1. MINUTES Approve the minutes of the meeting held February 12, 2002. 2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT CONSENT AGENDA 1. WARRANTS LISTS Approve Warrants List No. 20 through 1\0.25. 2. MOSQUITO CONTROL A. Quality Industries, Inc. Agreement Amendment- Consider staff recommendation to approve the proposed First Amendment to the February 27,2001 Agreement, and authorize the Chairman to execute the amendment. B. Florida Inland Navigation District (FI0JD) Grant - Consider staff recommendation to approve and' sign the Interlocal Agreement with the Board of County Commissioners authorizing the i\Iosquito Control District to administer the grant at Vitolo Family / Middle Con Park. NOTICE: All proceedings bl'fore this Board are electronically recorded. Any persoD who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will Deed a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record ofthe proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceediDg~ individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any part)' to the proceedings "ill be grantrd an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testif)'ing during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend Ihis meeting should contacl ¡he St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDL> (561) 462-1428 at least forty·eight(48) hours prior {O the meeting. '-" '-' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ADDITIONS AGENDA March 26. 2002 Revised 3/25/02 REGULAR AGENDA COMMUNI1Y DEVELOPMENT R-A.l Westchester Community Development Districts One through Four / Interlocal Agreement - Consider staff recommendation to approve the draft Interlocal Agreement between St. Lucie County and The Westchester Community Development Districts One through Four for the purpose of addressing infrastructure improvements at "'Çhe Westchester Development Site. CONSENT AGENDA COMMUNI1Y SERVICES C-A.l Acceptance of Funds / Budget Resolution No. 02-94 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the budget resolution to accept the funds remaining from the Community Food and Nutrition (CFN) grant from FYOl in the amount of $10,000, and authorize the Chairman to sign the necessary documents. NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted the opportunity to cross- examine êny individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeling should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 orTDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eighl(48) hours prior to the meeting. ~ ... .' " I' ~ "'" BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING Date: March 12, 2002 Tape: 1-2 Convened: 9:00 a.m. Adjourned: 11 :30 a.m. Commissioners Present Doug Coward, Chairman, Cliff Barnes, Frannie Hutchinson, Paula A. Lewis, John D. Bruhn Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator, Robert Bradshaw, Asst. County Administrator, Dan McIntyre, County Attorney, Paul Phillips, Airport Director, Ray Wazny, Public Works Director, Jack Southard, 'Public Safety Director, Bill Blazak Utilities Director, David Rodriguez, Human Services Director, Gayla Barwick, Tourism Director, Sheriff Mascara, Deputy Murphy, A. Millie Delgado, Deputy Clerk 1. MINUTES (1-028) It was moved by Com. Bmhn, seconded by Com. Hutchinson, to approve the minutes of the meeting held March 5, 2002; and, the minutes for the Manatee Protection Plan public hearing; upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 2. PROCLAMA TIONSIPRESENT A TIONS A. Presentation/The Board presented a "Certificate of Appreciation" to Mr. Ed Croke or his 12 years of service on the Tourist Development Council. B. Presentation/Baling Facility- Alex Makled, Larry Adams, and Eric Grotke of CDM made a presentation to the Board on the Baling Facility. 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. Sid Vihlcn,Jr. representing Florida Recycling Services, Inc., presented the Board with a Service Record Report ror the year 2001. 4. CONSENT AGENDA It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Hutchinson, to approve the Consent Agenda; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 1. WARRANT LIST The Board approved Warrant List No. 23. 2. PURCHASING A. Bid No. 02-001/River Branch Estates MSBU Water Main Extension- The Board approved awarding the bid to the low bidder, Barton Underground Constmction, Inc., in the amount of $92,981.00 and authorized the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. B. Re-Use Bid No. 00-005/Equipment Request No. 02-199- The Board approved the re-use bid and equipment request for the purchase of a , 6X6 Roll Off Tmck Hoist in the amount of$105,948.25. 1 03/08/02 F7.ABWARR FUND 001 001117 001140 001143 . 001147 001249 001265 001266 001269 001271 001809 101 101002 101003 101006 102 102001 102104 105 107 107001 , "'002 003 115 118 140 140001 160 183 183001 183002 183004 183106 183210 183211 183214 184203 184804 185002 316 316001 382 396 401 418 421 4.11 449 451 458 461 '171 478 479 491 505 505001 61l 625 655 677 678 679 692 693 . . , '-' ..,J ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD WARRANT LIST #23- 02-MAR-2002 TO 08-MAR-2002 FUND SUMMARY TITLE General Fund FTA 49 USC Sec 5307 9B/99 Section 112/MPO/FHWA FY01/02 Health & Human Srvcs CSBG FY01/02 NOAA/FDCA Adopt-A-Beach Section 8 Grant FY 99/00 TDC Planning Grant FY01/02 CTO TRIP Grant FY01/02 FDEP-Urban Mobile Lab Grant 01/02 DHR-Historical Museum Grant-In-Aid SFWMD-Fioridian Aquifer Well 01/04 Transportation Trust Fund Transportation Trust/80% Constitut Transportation Trust/Local Option Transportation Trust/Impact Fees Unincorporated Services Fund Drainage Maintenance MSTU FOOT Bicycle/Pedestria~ Coordinator Library Special Grants Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund-Wireless Sur Fine & Forfeiture Fund-E911 Surchar Fine & Forfeiture Fund-BOO Mhz Oper Sheraton Plaza Fund Paradise Park Fund Port & Airport Fund Port Fund Plan Maintenance RAD Fund Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.-County Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.- Teen Court Domestic Relations Hearing FYOO-03 Courts Admin. Civil Traffic Infrac Civil Traffic Infraction officer st 01/02 OSCA Civil Traffice Infractio Ft. Pierce Beach Restoration FIND So. Causeway Shoreline Stabil. SHIP Housing Assistance FY 01/02 County Capital Transportation Capital Environmental Land Capital Fund Lennard Road 1 - Roadway Capital Sanitary Landfill Fund Golf Course Fund H.E.W. Utilities Fund North Hutchinson Island Utilities NHI Util-Renewal & Replacement Fund NHI Util - Capital Facilities Fund S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund SH Util-Renewal & Replacement Fund Sports Complex Fund No County Utility District-Operatin No Cty Util Dist-Renewal & Replace No Cty Util Dist-Capital Facilities Building Code Fund Health Insurance Fund Property/Casualty Insurance Fund Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund Law Library Insurance Agency Fund Lost Tree Estates Fund Anita Street MSBU Fund Timberlake Estates MSBU Ideal Holding Road MSBU Westglen MSBU GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 231,888.62 42,549.00 402.38 2,299.68 6,689.21 3,129.33 35.99 34,833.60 198.25 197.37 101.80 89,201.59 36,461. 97 1,750.00 3,530.00 10,029.73 714.19 105.01 809.11 3,025,546.21 3,235.45 1,772.23 2,010.97 450.06 723.87 12,013.76 5.33 2,787.93 1,515.55 383.68 175.00 400.04 6,312.48 72.48 13.10 2,014.42 10,344.70 4,779.44 4,419.04 3,855.98 6,997.00 500.00 7,001.10 236,684.04 19,443.03 8.28 53,768.18 66.41 101.22 22,938.01 91.48 31,362.34 772.01 40.06 25.00 2,883.05 21,078.12 392,351.29 414.87 79.18 55,762.09 775.46 1,033.94 4,168.09 2,957.90 4,683.32 4,413,744.02 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,056.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,056.41 '-' """" C. Bid No. 02-35/Purchase or Pre-Cast Concrete Structures- The Board approved awarding the bid to the sole bidder, Old Castle Pre-Cast East, Inc., and authorized the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. D. Bid Waiver Sole Source Purchase/Equipment Request No. 02-200- The Board approved the request for a bid waiver and sole source contract with Sierra International Machinery, Inc., and approved the equipment request for the purchase and installation of a MacPresse Conveyor, and authorized the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. E. Bid No. 02-37/Purchase and Installation of Video Production Equipment- The Board approved awarding the bid to MCSI, Inc., in the amount of $95,653 approved an additional $4,018 over the previously approved equipment requests and authorized the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. 3. PUBLIC WORKS A. Solid Waste/Glades Road Landfill Stormwater and Landfill Gas Systems Permit Modification- The Board approved the February 19, 2002 proposal from Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc., I the total amount of$149,OOO. B. Code Enforcement/Equipment Request No. 02-202- The Board approved the equipment request for the purchase of a projector from CDW-G in the amount of$3,277,14. C. Grey Twig Lane MSBU/Interlocal Agreement with the City of Port 81. Lucie to Provide Potable Water- The Board approved the interlocal agreement and authorized the Chairman to sign the agreement. D. Sunland Gardens MSBU/Potable Water Improvements - The Board approved accepting the petition and granted permission to advertise for the initial public hearing on April 19,2002. E. Florida Department of Community Affairs Hazard Mitigation Grant Program- The Board authorized the Chairman to sign the grant application and maintenance agreement, and authorized submission of the grant for funds to replace a failing culvert in Lakewood Park that will protect 225 homes from future flooding. 4. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A. Simple Success Marketing Invoices- The Board approved payment of the invoices in the amount of$15,079.70 for the month of February. B. Westmoreland Park Project- The Board approved the Florida Communities Trust Conceptual Agreement and authorized the Chairman to sign the agreement. 5. PARKS AND RECREATION Equipment Request NO. 02-203- The Board approved canceling Equipment Request No. 02-081 and approved Equipment Request No. 02-203 for a lane reel for the Port St. Lucie Pool in the amount of $1,628. 2 '- ...,J 6. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Fourth Addendum to Shopping Center Lease at Village Green- The Board approved the Fourth Addendum and authorized the Chairman to sign. B. Company Name Change- The Board approved the company name change from John Alden Life Insurance Co., to Lincoln Re. C. Company Name Change- The Board approved the company name change from McCreary to EM!. D. Local Option Gas Tax/Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement/Correction of Scrivener Errors - The Board authorized the Chairman to initi8aI the corrections and directed staff to record the corrected agreement. 7. INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE- A. Additional ProjectslReallocation of Funds- The Board approved the additional renovation to the PSL Library and reallocation of remaining funds for other projects as listed. B. Reallocation of Funds for Roof Replacement at Rock Road Jail- The Board approved the reallocation of $400,000 ftom the security system upgrade and use of these funds for the completion of the roof replacement at Rock Road Jail and allow staff to use any remaining funds for jail expansion. C. Walton Road Annex Building- The Board approved the use of services of REG Architects for the construction of the building in the amount of $335,000 and authorized the Chairman to sign the work authorization as prepared by the County Attorney. 8. PUBLIC SAFETY A. Amended Work Authorization No.4 (EOC Annex Building) - The Board approved the amended work authorization for $7,150 and authorized the Chairman to sign the authorization. B. Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity- The Board approved the renewal application for WeCare for a Class F Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. C. Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity- The Board approved the renewal application for Able American Jet for a Class E Air Ambulance Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. REGULAR AGENDA 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Resolution No. 02-033- Revised Master Plan for the Port of Ft. Pierce- Consider staff recommendation to approve the draft resolution and further recommends that the Board direct staff to initiate the Plan Amendment process to the County's Comprehensive Plan to provide for the incorporation of this document into the Local Comprehensive Plan and that a copy of this Master Plan be sent to the City of Ft. Pierce. 3 \w ..., Mr. Bob Benton, Ft. Pierce City Commissioner, addressed the Board regarding policy 1.2.1 where he felt it was too broad and it opens up the cargo operation of the Port. He felt that they agreed on something and that the wording has been changed and they should go back to what was agreed upon. Mr. Dennis Beach, City Manager for the City of Ft. Pierce stated for the record, that staff has responded to the plan amendments that were sent by the County Administrator and he alluded to a March 8th letter he sent to the County Administrator. This letter points out issues the city staff had with the plan as it is currently drafted. (letter attached). He stated he did not want the BCC to proceed with the idea that they are all in agreement with these Issues. Com. Coward commented on what he felt was some internal conflict on what was said at the joint workshop and what is written in the letter. Mr. Beach stated the outline of the Port Planning area created an interpretation from DCA that the City of Ft. Pierce no longer had to include this in their Comprehensive Plan. They do not agree with this interpretation that is the City Attorney's office does not agree with this interpretation and this information will be conveyed to the City Commission at the time they deal with this issue. What they do believe is that, the interpretation that the County had, has set the stage for not having this as part of the City'S- Comp Plan. What they are suggesting in this letter is, there are two way to deal with this, number one is to exclude those properties in the unincorporated county ITom the port planning, the other is they can add wording to the Comprehensive Plan that states it will require review and approval for this by the City of Ft. Pierce for amendments and the Comp Plan itself. Either of these will satisfy staff. The other issue is the issue of operations and ownership and he thought they had discussed at the last meeting that St. Lucie County is the authority over the Port, they do not understand the reasoning for having this in the Comp Plan because it is simply a statement of fact. Their concern with it being included in the Comp Plan is, that if any action is taken to change it in the future, it will be interpreted by everyone that it is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. These are the concerns staff will be discussing with the Commission. Public Comments John Arena, Ft. Pierce resident addressed the Board with his recommended changes. Mr. Gerald Ward, Marine Industry of the Treasure Coast, addressed the Board and stated he concurred with Mr. Benton. Mr. Ward suggested the term "eco-tourism" be change to reflect strictly "tourism" and also the term "retro-fitting" was too harsh a term to be utilized in the document. He suggested going back to the original language. Mr. Lloyd Bell, Port Property Owner, addressed the Board and stated his objection to the proposed plan by the Community Development Director and the manner in which it was produced. He stated he is in favor of using the MegaYachts as a base tenant at the Port and hc felt it would bring in a great deal of prestige and meaningful employment to the County. He is not in favor however, of the manner in which Lursen turned over the negotiations to Berger Yacht. Mr. Bell stated the Merley report was not prepared properly and he wanted this on record. Mr. Charles Grande, Hutchinson Island resident, addressed the Board and stated he was surprised with Mr. Bell's comments since he had attended all the meetings and did have an opportunity to comment on the process. Mr. Grande requested 1.2.2 be deleted since he felt it did not serve a purpose. Also, he requested the term" interested parties" be placed back into the document. 4 \wi ...., Mr. John Ferrick, North Fork Homeowners Association, addressed the Board regarding policy 1.2.1. Mr. Ferrick stated that as a member of the Port Charette, they had discussed North of Taylor Creek, however, in the final product as he remembers it, include this as part of the Port Charette. Mr. Bill Hearn, lndrio Road resident, addressed the Mega Yacht and air borne particles. He also expressed his concerns with Policy 1.2.1. and the term" limited cargo". He felt this was totally in conflict with the environmental portion of the plan. In his mind, the term "limited" is relative and is up to interpretation. He suggested eliminating this policy, since it is covered in 2.1.2. Mr. Dan Conroy, South Beach Homeowners Association, addressed the Board regarding 2.5.1. This is regarding port security. He stated this policy was narrow in scope. They suggested right after the sentence, "consistent with existing law" the language be added, " and the prevailing threat level". Mr. Scott Ryles, President of the Ft. Pierce Sport Fishing Club, addressed the Board and stated he does agree with the past speakers that they need to eliminate some of the language. He believed the tcrm "interested parties" should be re-inserted. He also I:onl:urs that policy 1.2.1 needs 10 he deleted. He asked the plan be modified according the previously made comments. Com. '- Coward stated that there was a 1 % endorsement to put in the language "justification of the existing cargo area" etc., policy 2.12. Ms. Jean Hearn stated she agreed that there needed to be some "tweeking" on 1.2.1 and in her opinion, leaving out the last five words, she believes it would make a better comfort zone for the enlarged area 01' Port operations, she does not believe the Board or the citizens have shown that they are for expanding cargo. Mr. David Tillman, Ft. Pierce commented on the fact that he felt there was language which will open a back door or worse open the front door for things that are not wanted in the community. He would like to see the language limited. Com. Barnes stated the document can be changed in the future and it is useless except to proceed with legal means required by the State. They need to pay more attention to who is managing the Port area. The main thing is what they do there not what they say they will do. Com. Hutchinson concurred with Com. Barnes. The bottom line is to accomplish the dreams and the issues and ifthey keep going back and forth, it will never happen. Com. Bruhn stated he was not interested in having another governmental entity controlling what the BCC does. It was the consensus of the Board to insert the language, "the Port of Ft,.Pierce will eonlinue 10 supporl limited cargo operations as described in policy 2.12. Com. Coward reviewed additional concerns and suggested changes. The County Attorney suggested the term "interested parties" be inserted where the term "private sector" appears on page 3. Com. Lewis suggested the term" ensure" be changed on page 6. policy 2.51 The County Attorney suggested it read "shaH use its best efforts ". The Board continued to direct changes to staff. 5 " \.w. 1~:09 5E14Sì32;c , , ...,; 03í08/2UJ¡ ""AYORCI T,\-':."'::"'Hl::;=':P F'A~::: -::: i CITY ~f ORï PIERC~ / !or¡Je? ... c .' -- ./ -. --.".....: , OFFICE oF THE CITY M.o\NAGER CITY HALL. 100 NORTH U.S. 1 ~ O. BOX 14$0 FOClT PIERCE. FLORIDA 34954.14!!O I I z"fuch 8, i2002 I· I ¡ I 1\.1r. Douglas M. Anderson Administrator , Saint Lucie County 2300 Virgwa Avenue Fort Pierc.e, FL 34982 ! TEL. (591) 45Q.22CoJ FAX (561) 467-92ò4 / "'l:.. ~ RE: Port M",ter Plan I . Dear ?-.1[. Ander$On: I The foUo~ving represents City staff's comments on the proposed Port Master Plan scheduled for cOl1!iidera;tíon during your March 12,2002 Cormnission meeting. ! . The conqras expr~ssed during OUT join1 wOTkshop on February '19, 2002 re1atiog to Goa11 do not appear to'have been addrcssed. The current wording ofGoa11 is a statement offact regardless of whether Ór not it is part of the Master Plan. Our conc¢m is if you include the lan,gusse as it is written, ky attempts made by the City to change responsibility for the Port would be determined to be inc9nsistent with the Comp Pl&.t\ thereby making tht proposal ineligible for State fundi.¡\E sources. ¡ i Our propps¢d lan~'1Jage fo~ Goall is "The management of the Port of Fort Pierce should be in th~ public int~rest". i I Objectivej 1,1 should read 'íhe Port of Fort Pierce should insure that the public interest I\Ild quality ofJife Î3 P,f0tected when exercising public control of Port property". ! ~ Policy 1. f 1 sbould read "All option!: for the management Md OPCfé!.tions of the Port of Fort Pierc~ shall be e.Wlored". These discussions sha.H take place prior to DeC<!D:!bu 2004 through oither Ð. ta.>k force or j?i(lt workshop of the elected officials." I , I -" . 83/\J8/2~'.." 1 ~: Ð9,",,5El~f,7'325:' I I ¡ " Mr. DO) as M. Anderson Mllfch 8,~002 Page 2 . . . J.".-::IT'i~"N!\GER ..., _ 82 = I Poli,y 1. f.5 ,howd b, ddctod in it> ,"","<y. Objectiv~ 1.2 should read "The Port of Fort Pime shall establish a genera.! Port Ple.nnlng Area boundary AIld a Port Operations Area boundary complet:lywi-thin the City limits effort Pierce". The ba]ance 6f objectiyc 1.2 should be eliminated. Our coJrn '....ith including pa.rts ofunincorporë.ted County as part of the deep wa!er port relatos to tho jnt~rc:-taûon of law indicating that tJ)¢ Master Plan ,will no longer require City efFort Pierc<, apprOya.]i We d¡¡:.agree with that interpretation, howC"{er,it ",-ill become a moot issue i:fthc County agrees to ít1clude languag~ within the Master pla,¡¡ ¿ocume-nt that the CityofFort Pierce must approve and adop~ the Plan. 1h~ Ci1y i5 willing to cOtlSider ~eeing to unincorpora.ted areas being inoluded 65 part 0lthe Port if the County \>1111 include thh !:u¡guagc in tbe .Master Plan. I The balarjcc ofthc Plan appears acceptable to Cit)' staff. Wrth these minor changc:s. we will bo able to avoi~ pot~tia1 challenges to the Plan wii:!:, in our j11dgment will compliCé..te oilier issues important to both Saint Lucie County I'J1d Fort P¡~ce. ¡ If I c8.'n p~ovide edditioncl inforrnation. ple.\S¢ d.'¡3:. I SinCerelY! ~td~ DelUJis "f. B~h City :Ma.nager I DWB~ I , I c¢: Mayor and Members of Cit)' COn:J1IÜssio:! rvbbers Of Saint Lucie Count\' Cotn.-rùi:oo I . I ! " ~_,._.i"_ ~/ 83!\)8/2!JJ'L 14 09 \...sE14Sï'32õC 1/AYORCI TY:....,ðN~S::::R ...." PAGE: ~: ~ I T Y ~F ~ R T PIER ~ ß ! foriJa I ~ ... c -- " -- ~, , , OFFICE oF THE CITY MANAGER CITY HALL, 100 NOATH U.S. 1 F;!O. BOX 14$0 FORT PIERCE. FLORIDA 34954-1480 I I z"w-ch 8.'2002 . I ¡ I Mr. Douglas M. Anderson Administrator I S3.Ínt Lucie County 2300 Virgwa Avenue Fort Pierc-e, FL 34982 ! , RE: Port Master Plan I . Dear Mr. Anderson: '. I , TI\e foUo}ving represents City staff's comments on t.ì:1e proposed Port Master Plan scheduled for consideralion during your March 12, 2002 Commission meeting. ! . The con~rns expn~ssed during OUf jO!rrt workshop on February' 19, 2002 re1atiug to Go811 do not appear to'have been addressed. The current wording ofGoaJ I is a statement off act regardless of whether Ór not it is part of the Master Plan. Our conc,~ is if you include the languAge as it is v,Titten, ky attempts made by the City to change responsibility for the Port wou1d be determined to be inc6nsistent with the Camp Plan, thereby mAking the píOposaJ ineligible for Stale fundi¡1£ sources. I i Our proppsed Inng1Jage fo:- Goall is "The management of the Port of Fort Pierce should be in the public in1trest". i Objective: 1.1 should read "The Port of Fort Pierce should insure that the public intere~ and quality of life Í3 proteéted when exercising public control of Port property". ¡ , Policy 1, (1 should read "All option!: for the management and operations ofthe Port ofF ort Pierce shall be e.Xp[ored". These dÎ5cussions shall take place prior to Decembu 2004 through either e. te.>k force or j?i(lt workshop of the elected officials." ! i TEL. (561) 46D·22CoJ FAX (561) 457-92~ . I " "p. / " , Ei3/08/2tl~.. 14: 0'3'-' 5El~E,792E,~ I i ,. Mr. DO) as M. Anderson March 8,~002 Page 2 .. _ :'J.:;,:ITY"t:;·~!.\GER '-' I ~. ~_ f.J2 ;:: I Poli", I.f.5 ,howd b, dol""" Ut it, "ÛRIy. Objectiv4 1.2 should read "Thl' Port of Fort Pi~::e s~ e-stablish a general Port Pl8DI1ing Ar~ boundary Md a Port Operations ArCA boundary comp1ct:lywithin the City limits ofFort Pierce". The balance df objective 1.2 should be eliminated. OUr' coJrn 'h;th including pal1S ofunincorpolë.ted County as part of the deep w~er port relates to the interyre-tation of law indicating that the r-..faster Phn Will no longer require crt)' of Fort Pierce ~ppro'itùi We disagree with that interpretation, ho"i'i~{c:r, h ....i.I1 become a moot isruc if the County a.grees to include languagë within the Master Pia:! è,ocument that tbe City ofFort Pierce must approve and adop~ the Plan. The City i5 williug to con.side-r ~eeing to unincorporated areas being inoluded ôs part 0ithe Port if the C.ountY'WIll indude this I~¿ge in the MEster Plan. I The bnIa.rjee of the Plan appears acceptab!e to City staff. Wrth these minor change:s, we win bo able to avoi~ pot~tiaI challenges to the Plan wblch. in our judgment will complic¿¡e oilier issues important to both Saint Lucie County end Fort P¡~':e. ¡ If! ~ ptovide additioI1El infOl1t'.ation., pleASe ai·.i,~. I SinCerely! ~f4!~ DelUlis ~. Beach City Manager I DWB~ I , cc: Mayor and Members of Cit)' Corrunissio;¡ ~bers of Saint Lucie Count'.' ~Oil I . I : '-' -...J The Board discussed 7.1.1 regarding the upland spoil site. At this time was has not been a consensus for a pennanent spoil site. The Board reviewed the City ofFt. Pierce letter trom the City Manager. The County Attorney stated that there was not a problem with what the City is suggesting on goal 1, the County still manages the Port by law. Com. Hutchinson suggested leaving it as written. Com. Lewis stated she did not have a problem with removing the statement. Com. Bruhn stated he would leave it as is. Com. Coward stated he concurred with leaving it as is. Com. Barnes stated he did not have a problem with removing it. Consensus 3 to 2 to leave the language as written. It was~moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve Resolution No. 02- 033 with noted changes; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. ú. ADMINISTRA nON (2-640) A. Request for Qualifications and Proposals- Consider staff recommendation to grant pennission to advertise for the development of the Port ofFt. Pierce. Mr. Lloyd Bell, Port property owner, advised the Board of his concurrence with what the County Administrator is recommending. It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. B. Bi-Weekly Committee Reports- The Board gave updates on the various committees and boards that they serve on. C. The City of Fort Pierce's Proposed Annexation ofthe St. Lucie County International Airport- Consider staff recommendation that the County send a response letter to the City of Fort Pierce's March 6, 2002 letter commcnting on the proposed Joint Planning Agreement betweén the City ofFt. Pierce and St. Lucie County, prepared by the County. Com. Bruhn stated the city needs to follow the annexation law and does not agree with how they are selecting areas. Com. Barnes stated he was not willing to go to court over this issue and does not want to hurt the county's relationship with the city especially since a prior Board had approved the annexation agreement. Com. Coward stated he was aware of the agreement signed by a previous Board in 1989, however, the city needs to work with the county and the annexation should be done according to state law. ú '-' .J Com. Lewis stated she was concerned with the "good faith issue" and the actions being taken does not coincide with the legal conflict resolution process being undertaken at this moment It was moved by Com. Hutchinson, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, the vote was as follows: Nay: Barnes; Aye's: Bruhn, Lewis, Hutchinson, Coward; motion carried by a vote of 4 to 1. RA-l COUNTY ATTORNEY (2-1757) City of Ft. Pierce Annex ati ons/ Ordinances K 129-137- Consider staff recommendation that the Board determine whether to authorize the County Attorney to file a Petition for Writ of Certiorari challenging the adoption of Ordinances K 129-134. It was moved by Com. Hutchinson, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve staff recommendation to authorize the County Attorney to file the Petition; and, upon roll call, the vote was as follows: Nay's: Barnes, Coward; Aye's: Lewis, Bruhn, Hutchinson; motion carried by a vote of 3 to 2. Com. Bruhn requested the Board ratify his appointment of Doug Skidmore to the Code Enforcement Board. It wa!s moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Lewis, to ratify Com. Bruhn's appointment; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. There being no further business to be brought before the Board, the meeting was adjourned. Chairman Clerk of Circuit Court 7 .... "WI From: To: Date: Subject: Sandra Bogan Diane Turner 3/13/02 1 :43PM Announcement on Board Agenda If I'd like to include an announcement about Earth Day on the board agenda, do i just send it to you, or is there an official form I need to fill out? Essentially, this is what it will be: The Oxbow Eco-Center is holding its Second Annual Earth Day Festival on April 20 from 10:00 a.m. till 4:00 p.m. ~ "" ,...., AGENDA REOUEST ITEM NO. ~ A DATE: March 26, 2002 REGULAR [X] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Resolution No. 02-92 - Proclaiming Saturday, April 20, 2002, as "Special Olympics Florida Law Enforcement Torch Run Day" in St. Lucie County, Florida. BACKGROUND: Kelly L. Monahan, Supervisor II, Special Olympics, through Pete Keogh, Director of Parks & Recreation, has requested that a resolution be drafted proclaiming Saturday, April 20, 2002 as Special Olympics Florida Law Enforcement Torch Run Day in St. Lucie County, Florida. The attached Resolution has been drafted for that purpose. PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDA TION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution No. 02-92 as drafted. COMMISSION ACTION: --' Pc] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: County Attorney: ~ Review and Approvals Management & Budget Purchasing Originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable)___ Eff. 5/96 '-' ...., , RESOLUTION NO. 02-92 A RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING SATURDAY, APRIL 20, 2002, AS "SPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA LAW ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN DAY" IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. The Florida Law Enforcement Torch Run is celebrating it's 25th Anniversary. The Torch Run is the premier event sponsored by the Law Enforcement community to raise awareness and generate funds for Special Olympics. 2. Each year over 3,000 officers join Special Olympics athletes to carry the "Flame of Hope" on a 2,000 mile relay through more than 60 counties in Florida. 3. The Torch will be passed onto St. Lucie County Law Enforcement officers by Martin County Law Enforcement Officers on Friday, April 19 , 2002. Before passing the Torch onto Indian River County, we will hold a benefit to help support all three Special Olympics County Programs. 4. On Saturday, April 20, 2002, there will be a Law Enforcement Paint Ball competition at Lawnwood Stadium. All Law Enforcement Agencies from the three Counties will be invited to compete and demonstrate their services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners ofSt. Lucie County, Florida: 1. This Board does hereby proclaim Saturday, April 20, 2002 as "SPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA LAW ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN DAY" in St. Lucie County, Florida. 2. This Board urges the citizens of St. Lucie County to participate in this worthwhile event. \r ..., Memo J t.~ .q\ \ }' fð ¡J iN' ~~F~ ,~ ~,n V I /1 " §pecialOlympics rJ u OV 1/(,; Florida rì ,,,/ V St. Lucie County \J I G //) 'i lP flY ,-,,' ,~/ /) (\./ \", ~-\ /\,1' /í To: Through: From: Date: Subject: Doug Anderson, County Administrator Pete Keogh, Director, Parks & Recreation Kelly L Monahan, Supervisor II, Special Olympics ~~\. 2/28/02 Proclamation "The Florida Law Enforcement Torch Run" is celebrating it's 25th anniversary. The Torch Run is the premier event sponsored by the Law Enforcement community to raise awareness and generate funds for Special Olympics. Each year over 3000 officers join Special Olympics athletes to carry the ·Flame of Hope· on a 2000 mile relay through more than 60 counties in Florida. The Torch will be passed onto St. Lucie County Law Enforcement officers by Martin County Law Enforcement Officers on Friday, April 19 ,2002. Before passing the Torch onto Indian River County, we will hold a benefit to help support all three Special Olympics County Programs. On Saturday, April 20, 2002, there will be a Law Enforcement Paint Ball competition at Lawnwood Stadium. All Law Enforcement Agencies from the three Counties will be invited to compete and demonstrate their services. I would like to request a proclamation declaring Saturday, April 20,2002 as ·Special Olympics Florida Law Enforcement Torch Run Day· If you need any further information, please do not hesitate to contact me at extension 1683. MAR 0 1 ¡nOl ~ co. ADMIN. OFFICE KATuL BASILE Executi~~ector 250 NW Country Club Drive Suite 240 Port 51. Lucie. FL 34986 Tel: 561.462.2143 Fax: 561.462.2134 website: www.cscslc,org e-mail: kbasile@tctg.com , , Council M~~bers · Five community . Five community positions residents appointed by the Governor · Kathryn Hensley, School Brd Rep. · Paula Lewis, BOCC · Vern Melvin, DCF Dist. Admin · Scott Kenney, Juvenile Judge · Dr. William Vogel, Superintendent of Schools · Corinne Behncke · Dr. Beth Gessner · Marilyn Lawless · R. Duke Nelson · Garry Wilson ~:LB - l1-V¡f~i07V Children's Services Council - St. Lucie · Independent taxing district · Plan, fund and coordinate new & expanded services for children & their families · Established by public referendum October 1990 Children's Services Mission & Vision , · Guided by our mission to improve the quality of life for all children in St Lucie County · Children's Services fundsr advocatesr and creates opportunities for results- oriented programs and initiatives for our children and community 1 "-' Children's Services 'i. Funding Priorities . T Pmmoti"9 h","y "m;I~·'" "'bl5 & toddlers by providing prenatal education and programs to provide for optimal brain functioning by age 3 · Promoting school readiness by providing enrichment opportunities for all children 3 to 5 years old · Promoting school success by providing programs that support and educate parents and encourage academic achievement for children · Promoting healthy lifestyles by providing programs to strengthen children's resiliency to meet the challenges of life through programs for both the physical and mental health of children , Program~_Budget · For FY 2001-02 CSC funds 31 programs for $1,994,500 · CSC provides $600,953 in Matching Funds to draw down even greater funding for Healthy Kids, Healthy Families, Youth Intervention, & School Readiness Coalition · Other Allocations for program support, enhancement and training amount to $315,301 · PROGRAM ALLOCATIONS FOR FY 2001-02 TOTAL $2,910,754 ...., Comprehensive Strategy . Children's Services as one of the 20 members of the Shared Services Network Executive Roundtable supports the comprehensive strategy ''St. Lucie Hand-In-Hand" . Priority Risk Factors addressed in this effort for community change · Low Neighborhood Attachment & Community Disorganization · Poor Family Management · Academic Failure Beginning in Elementary School · Early & Persistent Antisocial Behavior , Profile of Children and Families in St. Lucie County Executive Summary 2 ",-,. About the Report . To better plan for future services and programs within the county, the CSC contracted with MGT of America, Inc., and Sun belt Research Associates, Inc., To conduct a comprehensive community needs assessment. . Specifically, the CSC was interested in examining the status of the children and their families in terms of indicators of well-being, the location of current services for children, and whether gaps existed in services in terms of geographic location or age group. , Profile Topic Areas · Family Life · Health · Safety and Security · Education ....., Sources of Data Qualitative and Quantitative · Collected from 15 state and local agencies · Six focus groups including parents and providers · Telephone interviews with over 400 residents · Service provider surveys · Personal interviews with key stakeholders · 3 Peer Counties - Charlotte, Manatee, Polk Indicator , Background . Family Life · Income · Employment · Mobility · Divorce · Child Care · After school programs for younger children · After school programs for older children 3 '-' Indicator Background . Health · Prenatal Care · Newborn health · Mothers' education · Infant deaths · Child deaths · Preventive health · Teen pregnancy · Substance abuse Indicator , Background . Education · School readiness · School attendance · Discipline · Retention · Parents' rating of programs · Academic achievement · Graduation rate ,..., Indicator Background . Safety & Security · Child abuse and domestic violence · Neighborhood violence · Violence in school · Delinquency · Accidental deaths What Parents and the Community Tell Us Prevalent Issues . Family Life · Financial stress · Parenting Skills · Recreation Facilities/Programs · Child Care . Health · Access to quality health care · Availability and Cost · Prenatal Care 4 "" What Parents and the Community Tell Us . Safety · Safety during the day · Crime, drugs, &. violence . Education · School violence · Lack of discipline · Crowded classrooms · Busing Recommendation 1 Establish Performance Measures and Targets Based on Trend Data and Performance Against Community Benchmarks . Issue: There are numerous performance measures that are appropriate to examine as a profile of children and families. However, performance improvement,. to be effective within the context of limited time and resources, must target the most critical areas. . Recommendation: Establish performance measures and targets, for the next two to three years and beyond, that address the areas where county rates are trending in a negative direction and where the county presently compares unfavorably to the state rate and peer counties. ....., Recommendation Development . The recommendations represent an analysis and synthesis of: · Comparison of county performance to state and benchmark counties on indicators relating to quality of life as well as risk factors. · Findings from focus group discussions with community leaders and parents of children in each of the three age groups studied, · Findings from telephone surveys to a cross-section of community residents, representing all race/ethnic groups and geographic areas, · Interviews with key stakeholders in the community, · Findings from the provider survey. ST. LUCIE PERFORMANCE Favorably To Peer Counties Favorably To Florida Family Life · Student Population Stability Health · Very Low Birth Weight · Infant Mortality · Kindergarten Immunizations · Health Coverage (KidCare Enrollment) · Births to Teens 10-14 Safety and Security · Property Crimes · Crime and Violence Among High School Students Education · HS Graduation Rate · HS Dropout Rate 5 '-" ...., ST. LUCIE PERFORMANCE Unfavorably To Peer Counties Favorably To Florida Family Life · Dissolution of Marriage Health · Low Birth Weight · WIC Participation Safety and Security · Violent Crimes · Motor Vehicle-Related Deaths · Youth Transfers to Adult Court Education · FCA T - Fifth Grade Mathematics ST. LUCIE PERFORMANCE Favorably To Peer Counties Unfavorably To Florida Family Life · None Health · Late or No Prenatal Care · Mothers with Less Than Tenth Grade Education · Births to teens 15-1 9 Safety and Security · Child Abuse or Neglect (0-17) · Domestic Violence Education · None ST. LUCIE PERFORMANCE Unfavorably To Peer Counties Unfavorably To Florida Family Life · Per Capita Income · Children under 18 in poverty · Unemployment Rate · Median Household Income · Free/Reduced-Price Lunch Eligibility Health · Substance Exposed Infants · Mothers with Less Than High School Education · Child Deaths · Reported AIDS Cases · Alcohol use by Early and Older Adolescents · Marijuana use by Early and Older Adolescents · Illicit Drug use by Early and Older Adolescents ST. LUCIE PERFORMANCE Unfavorably To Peer Counties Unfavorably To Florida Safety and Security · Youth Referred to DJJ · Youth Committed to DJJ · Deaths from Unintentional Injuries Education · FCAT - Fourth Grade Reading · Absentee Rates for Elementary, Middle School and High School Students · FCAT - Eighth Grade Reading and Mathematics · FCAT - Tenth Grade Reading and Mathematics · HSCT - Mathematics and Communications · Disciplinary referrals and suspensions for elementary and middle school (based on trend) 6 '-'" ...., Recommendation 2: Emphasize Role of CSC for Advocacy . ssue: As the sanctioned advocate for hildren's issues in the county, the Council has a unique contribution to make in planning county services. . Recommendation: The Council should continue their efforts to take a high profile role in presenting the needs of children and their families to city and county commissioners and state administrators, and work with these officials to address the needs identified in this study. The Council also should work with its partners in the Alliance of Okeechobee and the Treasure Coast to respond to privatization initiatives by tailoring a plan that is responsive to the community's and region's specific needs. Recommendation 3: Address Population Growth In The Port St. Lucie Area . Issue: Given the population growth over the past decade, the number of children in Port St. Lucie is now about equal to the number in Ft. Pierce and the unincorporated areas combined. The majority of services, however, are located in Ft. Pierce. . Recommendation: In making decisions about expanding or relocating services, the large growth in the child and family population in the Port. St. Lucie area should be considered. CSC Serves the Entire County St. Lucie County Population , . The CSC is attempting to address the growing needs of PSL, while continuing to serve the entire County · Programs are necessary to selVe the 43,000 + children ages 0 -17 in St. Lucie County · Parents and neighborhoods are in need of programs and resources to help their children grow in a positive manner · Community resources need continued enhancement Ages PSL FtP Un- County Incorp. Total Areas All ages 88,769 37,516 66,410 192,695 Adults 67,184 27,313 54,615 149,112 (18 and over) Children 21,585 10,203 11,795 43,583 (17 & 24% 27% 17.8% 22.6% younger) 7 '-" St. Lucie County's " Families Households Port St. Ft. Pierce Total Lucie County Family 24,943 24,840 54,258 With children 10,008 9,606 20,218 under 18 Married Couples 7,393 5,714 13,562 Single Parent 2,615 3,892 6,656 Female 1,889 3,037 5,015 Male 726 855 1,641 Household data From 2000 Census Recommendation 4: Improve Communication ,. ::n~::::::::rn provider agencies within communities is a problem that was voiced by several providers. . Recommendation: The Council should help establish a better link between provider groups that will ultimately lead to improved use of services by families and children. '-' St. Lucie County Populations at Risk PSL FtP County Youth referred 67346.5% 753 52% 1,446 to DJJ 99-00 2M-4I"Zlp highest zip code codes Pop. at 100 % 15.86% 23.11% 17.9% Poverty 1998 1998% Under 43.51% 45.60% 43.38% 200% Poverty WIC Oto 5 1,632 3,064 4,671 Pregnant 289 541 830 Growth since 400+ April 2001 Data from DJJ And St. Lucie County Health Dept Recommendation 5: Expand Transportation , Services f . . . Issue: Lack 0 transportation IS a core issue for many of St. Lucie County's neediest residents. . Recommendation: The Council should join with the cities' and counties' leadership to actively support the efforts of the Metropolitan Planning Organization to generate creative strategies to address the current limitations in county transportation services. 8 ~ ....., Recommendation 6: Enhance Parenting Skills and Conflict Resolution Strategies. Recommendation 7: Expand Specific Health Care Services . Issue: A commonly held view among those interviewed is that more and more parents are ill equipped to raise children. Indicator data suggest that many families have significant handicaps as it relates to parenting, including the stress associated with low income and unemployment, and mothers with limited education. . Issue: Community stakeholders reported serious gaps in health services for the residents of St. Lucie County who cannot afford unsubsidized medical care and are not eligible for existing programs. Parents underscored the need for expanded health and dental services. . Recommendation: The Council should expand programs that reach out to parents to aid them in the raising of their children. . Recommendation: The County Health Department, with appropriate community partners, should initiate a countywide dialogue with medical professionals to identify the most appropriate solution to gaps in medical service. Recommendation 8: Expand Mental Health Services Recommendation 9: Expand Sports and Recreational Activities sue: In interviews, isolàtion and limited cial outlets were reported as issues for both young and older teens. For some teens, substance use and delinquency offenses are a means of alleviating boredom and stress. Rates for substance use as well as referrals for delinquency offenses are higher among st. Lucie County teens than for the state or peer counties. Expanded sports and recreational activities for middle and high school students may help to address these issues. Issue: A critical deficit in current services identified by residents and providers alike was limited availability of mental health services. . Recommendation: The Department of Children and Families and the Agency for Health Care Administration should work with community funders to expand access to and breadth of mental health services for the residents of St. Lucie County. . Recommendation: The Council should expand collaboration with county leaders to facilitate planning with school administrators, city and county recreation personnel, and administrators of community-based recreation and character building programs to identify character building activities that match teens' needs and interests and are available to all income levels. 9 . ~ Sports & Recreation Opportunities · CSC funds Boys & Girls Club, YMCA, and thirteen computer labs in Ft. Pierce and Port St. Lucie · CSC has funded six neighborhood improvement projects from Lakewood Park to Park Edge · CSC has partnered with the County for batting cages, soccer fields, Cultural Affairs, and the Smithsonian classroom Recommendation 11: Develop Improved Response to Excessive Absentee Rates and School Discipline Problems Issue: Achievement rates in St. Lucie County are below the state rate and the rates in peer counties for almost all levels. Success in school is related to consistent attendance and attention/cooperation in the classroom. Negative indicators are absentee rates and discipline problems. Absentee rates in St. Lucie County are improving but remain higher than the state rate and the rate in peer counties. Additionally, trend data document that disciplinary issues at the elementary and middle school level, especially involving fighting, are on the Increase. Among parents interviewed, safety and security in schools was expressed as a concern. '--' Recommendation 10: Expand Availability of High Quality Early Care and Education Pro rë:!ms Issue: Many three and four year old children in the county do not have access to high quality early care and education programs, including Prekindergarten programs, as evidenced by the fact that one-fourth of the entering Kindergarten students were assessed as not ready for school. Parents and community stakeholders echoed the need for affordable, high quality early care and ed ucation. . Recommendation: The School Readiness Coalition of St. Lucie County should work with community partners to identify funding enhancements for the present child care and Prekindergarten programs and continue efforts to expand Gold Seal- level child care. Recommendation 11: Develop Improved Response to Excessive Absentee Rates and School Discipline Problems Recommendation: The St. Lucie County School Board, in collaboration with the Council and the Shared Services Network, should establish a work group to further examine the extent and nature of attendance and school discipline problems. In addition, the workgroup should review and update policies and practices relating to attendance and disciplinary management in schools and communication efforts with the public regarding the actual state of the schools. The results of the review should be used to update policies and improve practices. 10 '-" , Community Needs, Community Response · There is no one priority need · There is no one primary reason for the problems · There is no one perfect answer · There is no one entity that can provide the answers · It will take the community, professionals, volunteers, & families, to provide the solutions , CSC Web page www.cscslc.org CSCSLC Home II ¡ if II ¡ =.. II ¡ =. II ¡ -II ¡ ="II ¡ 11: '" ~ ~ 1'11:""=_ ,....-..... .,,-':10. r..\IO"~"''' -- - - ~~=. -:,~:- ......-....... ...,,- . - ~"~ .. Cmt~ ~ ......... ...., What Can We Do? · Continue to collaborate · Address the Priority Risk Factors of the Comprehensive Strategy · Share our talents and pool our resources · Remember that by working together we can "improve the quality of life for all children in St. Lucie County". 11 l. From: To: Date: Subject: Sandra Butler <sbutler@tcjobs.org> "'douga@stlucieco.gov'" <douga@stlucieco.gov> 3/7/023:41PM Annual Presentation Hi, I have not seen a reply from my previous email request for your assistance in setting up a meeting per the attached email. Can you help us? Thank you for your help!! 3> \11 ( (, .......... /ì Ii:, Y f ¡,,>'" pt/> Sandi Butler Workforce Development Board of the Treasure Coast Region 20 561-335-3030 561-335-0677 mailto: Sbutler@tcjobs.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Sandra Butler > Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:20 PM > To: 'douga@stlucieco.gov' > Subject: Annual Presentation > > Dear Mr. Anderson, > > I am writing to set up our annual presentation to the BOCC by our > PresidenUCEO, Nan Griggs. Ms. Griggs gives a presentation on an annual > basis to the Commission on workforce issues in our county, and hears any > concerns, needs and/or suggestions from the Commissioners regarding this > topic. She would need approximately an hour for presentation and > question/answer time. > > We are hoping to schedule the presentation sometime early in March. Would > you be so kind as to check the Commissions calendar, and get back to me > with some possible times and dates? > > Your assistance with this meeting is greatly appreciated. > > > > Sandi Butler > Workforce Development Board of the Treasure Coast > (561) 335-3030 > (561) 335-0677 Fax > mailto:sbutler@tcjobs.org > / ~~ v ¡~~ r ;J"j .~. \~ \< ~ "-' AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO: Consent Additions C - f} I DATE: March 26, 2002 Regular [ ] Public Hearing [ Consent [ X ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIO~""ERS PRESENTED BY: Beth Ryder, Directo¢ SUBMITTED BY: Community Services SUBJECT: Acceptance of funds remaining from the Community Food and Nutrition (CFN) grant from FYOl in the amount of $10,000. BACKGROUND: On March 7, 2002 the Florida Association for Community Action, Inc. notified us that funds were remaining from the CFN grant and must be expended by March 22, 2002. Staff responded to the announcement with a proposal to provide food vouchers with the grant funds. The deadline for expending the funds was extended to March 29, 2002 because the agency was unable to award funds until 'larch 21, 2002. Staff proposal is to purchase food vouchers from a local supermarket which will meet the deadline criteria and then process requests from clients or contract with a non-profit organization. FUNDS AVAIL: See Budget Resolution Number 02-94. PREVIOUS ACTION: NONE RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of the CFN funds, approval of Budget Resolution Numberß2-94 and authorization for the Chair to sign any documents necessary. COMMISSION ACTION: tc I APPROVED [] DENIED [ I OTHER: Coordination/Signatures I!. Manag~t & BUdgete~~ h1 ~ Other: Purchasing: County Attorney: $- Originating Department: Other: Fmance: Check for copy only, if appJicable: i> ¡ \w -...I RESOLUTION NO. 02-94 WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners budget for St. Lucie County, certain funds not anticipated at the time of adoption ofthe budget have become available in the form a Community Food and Nutrition Grant from the Florida Association for Community Action, Inc. in the amount of$10,000. WHEREAS, Section 129.06 Cd), Florida Statutes, requires the Board of County Commissioners to adopt a resolution to appropriate and expend such funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, in meeting assembled this 26th day of March, 2002, pursuant to Section 129.06 Cd), Florida Statutes, such funds are hereby appropriated for the fiscal year 2001-2002, and the County's budget is hereby amended as follows: REVENUES 001277-6420-334693-600 APPROPRIA nONS 001277-6420-549605-600 Dept. of Community Affairs - Human Srvcs $10,000 Domestic Subsidy $ 10,000 After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows: Commissioner Doug Coward, Chairperson Commissioner Cliff Barnes, Vice Chairperson Commissioner John D. Bruhn Commissioner Paula A. Lewis Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson xxx XXX XXX XXX XXX PASSED AND DULY ADO PTED THIS 26th DAY 0 F MARCH, 2002. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO CORRECTNESS AND FORM: COUNTY ATTORNEY Deloris lob",.. Amount: Immed. J'..t Preside", AI§1Íc:uttural and Libor ProjT¡rn. Inl:, Winle' HaVC11 Grant Number: Board Membe~ Willi.mAtki118,DSW Grant Period: Miarrri-Da<le CM Mi.mi 03/21/22J02 Orflcers Opbc1i~ BrQwn-Lawson ?re1kieltt Mwni·D.dt CAA, Miami 1¢Im W. Edwards, I" Vj.c( Prcaide1Jt North...! florida CA-~. 1nc, J¡çks.onvU1e V.T}"C:;"'~ T rc.a.s uret Hern.ode-Sumter C.""t~ He.d st.ttt Brook,víU. Maty ¡¡,oWII-ManiJík SeCrctaTY Monro< Coumy Ikad Stm K'Y Wcst ^l1-j(lft')ler H; lIborough COlDliY COUU11wury Action Program Tampa L<Roy Ch>v:i, Po'}: ÇOutlty OpportUJ1¡ty CQuncj1 Bartcw J;aO')e$ Lowe we COlmty CM 5uJtig WiIliamFm"",,...J,· Pinell¡s Head Sbrt Pine1tl.s Park. Rc~... M. G"". M~·Dadc County CM Miami ¡an;'" Hobdy child C.... 11..50='. Inc, GainesvjUt carolyn Collin.! Hillsboroogh COUJ)I~ Commufrity Actic.n P oard Tampa Barbira Mz$.Ofi-Vardiner Miaml.Dade H<ad Start Mi&mj Executive Director Patty eal) 1"0""'. Ph.D. PACA T ~n,;¡,hüSft 00: 1 9 ..... 352378021 9 FACA PAGE 02 ...,; FACA Florida Association for Community Action, Inc. March 21,2002 Beth Ryder, Executive Director Treasure Coast Community Action Agency, Inc. 437 North 7fro Street Ft. Pierce, Florida 34950 Dear Ms. Ryder: On behalf of the Florida Association for Community Action, Inc., I am pleased to announce that your application for cm funds has been approved. I would like to extend my sincerest congratulations to you on your award for the following amount: $10,000 CFN 3-02 03-21-2002 through 03-29-2002 Due to unforeseen circumstances, the process was altered to al10w for aU funds to be spent by March 29, 2002. Please remember that this is a cash reimbursement grant, therefore all original receipts should be maintained and submitted to F ACA along with your report by April 1, 2002. We appreciate your patience in this process and ask that you plea5e adhere to the aforementioned. The terms of the use of funds were covered in the initial application. I wish you much success with the funds. If you have any questions, you may contact me at (850) 224-4774. Again, thank you for your commitment to serving those in less fortunate situations. Sincerely, fk;, 4~ Party Ball Thomas, Ph.D. Executive Director PBT/jkh cc: F ACA Board of Directors Hilda Frazier, Planning Manager, Department of Community Affairs 207 W. P k Avenue. Tallahassee FL 32 01· 850 224-4774 Fax: 850 224-5762 A FedmTion of Çommw"lity Action Agencies, Head Start prO!!fam& and ot~r sanctioned organizations ,ince 1980 "-"'-"~' -- .~. . _ .Pa,ge-1 Judy Mat:lera ·~remaiñdër~n ··jª~~pl:Ige orH~.d~c oman Opbeba Bromo PrcIIdcnI MiallÍ·Dode c......... ~ Iiaui lobo W. Ed\\'<lœ, lr, 'iœ PresideJJt Nortbeœt FlfJlida CA.-\. Ine. laDr.:m"ille h'OI)'Gm¡' Ttea'RIICI' Hermnio-Stø:nte£ Count)'. J-IcOOStart Broc:b'o'ille M"-)' Bro",..·~1Milik Seadat',. ~k""'..Cou"')" Head StEIl J:.eyWest Delotis JetInsou _ Pad Ptesidcnl .-\¡ria~1ufaI aaI LaIx< Pro¡:tæn.lDc. \Vi.nI:er HJ\-eø Board lIIembers Wtlbam .\II:ins. DS\V ~ü...-Dado c.....~ ~liaW ArtieFIYcr If>!Is1x:Ko<¢ Co""',- C'0Il1D1l1Ol.1)' Al:tìoo. Prcf:m11 T~""" teRm.' Clmis Polk éc..¡j,-Opportunl~' CO\ll1ciJ _ow JaDeS Lcm-e LabCe<""yCA.-\. Eustis Willi"" Fillmore. ]r, Pu..u", J-IcOO S... 1'ioo1l",Pad: Ro¡pœ ~L Gtace ~Iiaui-Dado COIJDIj' CA.-\. Mi"..; l<ÐÍ.œ &bdy CWda.. ~ Ioc Grines\"illc C'êrolm ColliDs ~¢CoUli)· C'OWIDurrity ."..dion Board T""I" -~~ Mi.ann-Dade IT.Jj start Miron Executive Dinctor Palty Ball '\1øoaI. Pb.D. FAi::.~ TaUabassce ..,¡1 FACA Florida Association for Community Action, Inc. March 7, 2002 Dear CSBG Eligible Entities: The Department of Community Affairs, along \\ith the Florida Association for Community Action (FACA), imites all CSBG eligible entities to submit a proposal applying for the remaining Community Food and Nutrition (CFN) funds from FY 01. A F ACA membership form is enclosed for renewals or initial memberships. In order to be considered for this grant award, payment must accompany membership form and proposal Award grants will range from $1,000 to $10.000. TIùs will be a cash reimbursement grant: therefore all original receipts must be maintained and submitted to FACA by March 29, 2002, for payment The funds will be awarded to agencies with an immediate need in the priority areás of food related actiYities such as food youchers, food stamps, and meals for the current operating budget A formal application form is attached. The proposal should include the following specific information: · A statement of need that details the s~ific way that the program you propose would improye the health and/or nutritional needs of low-income indi...iduals. · The priority area, if any, targeted by the proposed program. · Realistic and achie...-able goals, objectÍ\es and actÏ\·ities. · The estimated number of people that will benefit from the funds, considering the uniqueness of this opportunity and length of funds. · The geographic region of the state that the proposed program will serv·e considering population of that region. need for servi.ces and whether that region of the state isotherv....ise under serv·ed with respect to the services you offer. ' t· ( fì/ ~\ ., A realistiC and achie...-able work plan. time-line and budget summary showing how the program will achieye its goals and objectÏ\·es. Funds will onl)· be a...-ailable until March 22, 2002. Funds cannot be used for administrath·e costs, direct senices only. . JUdy' ~aÏtera-~renïäindef ~C~\...lsj)â.ge'tV"ö:~oë ~__,~.__u_ .._.._~ ._ -. ~age1j ..., March 7, 2002 Page Two . Accountability measures that will describe how the organization will evaluate its progress toward meeting its objectives and the manner in which the agency will report on how funds were used. . The name of the proposed Grantee organization. the proposed Grantee's federal taxpayer identification number. Proposals can be faxed (850) 224-5762 or mailed to Florida Association for c;ommunity Action's office, Attn: CFN Grant Award, 207 West Park Avenue, Tallahassee, Florida 32301. All proposals for funds must be received by March 12, 2002. Proposals will be reviewed and evaluated and all applicants will be notified of award recipients. If you have any questions, I may be reached at (850) 224-4774. We apologize for the short turnaround, but funds just became available last week and we would like to use them if at all possible. We strongly encourage your participation in this opportunity and wish your agency well in the development of your proposals. Sincerely, Patty Ball Thomas, Ph.D. Executive Director PBT/jkhlwkrn Enclosure cc: Hilda Frazier, Planning Manager, Department of Community Affuirs Ophelia Brown-Lawson. FACA President John Edwards, Jr., FACA Vice-President . , ~. .......... ---- AGENDA REOUEST ~ ITEi'i NO. 6A DATE: 03/26/02 CONSENT [ ] REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [xi Leg. [ X ] Quasi-Jud. PRESENTED BY: TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Community Development SUBJECT: Consider the petition of The Board of Supervisors of Westc .ester Community Development District No. 1 for an amendment of the community development district known as "Westchester Community Development District No.1" - Draft Ordinance 02-010. BACKGROUND: The Board of Supervisors of Westchester Community Development District No. 1 has filed a petition Idth St. Lucie County to amend the community development district known as "Westchester Community Development District No.1" . The Westchester Community Development District No. 1 is proposed to occupy 59.4~ acres instead of the 74.25 acres originally proposed. The subject property is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Interstate 95 and the proposed extension of Gatlin Boulevard. The attached Exhibit provides a general location map for the boundaries of Westchester Community Development District No.1. It should be emphasized that at this time there are no existing occupied residential properties in this Proposed Westchester Community Development District No.1. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: On August 21, 2001, The Board of County Commissioners granted approval to Ordinance 01-010, establishing the community development district known as Westchester CDD #1. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners .approve Draft Ordinance 02-010, authorizing an amendment to the boundaries of the community development district known as "Westchester Community Development District No.1". COMMISSION ACTION: [ ] DENIED (Hutchinson Absent) [ X] [ ] APPROVED OTHER: 4-0 .J Review and Approvals County Attorney: Originating Department: Management & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) ........ .." COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: March 26, 2002 Ordinance 02-010 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Community Development Director DATE: March 20, 2002 SUBJECT: Petition of The Board of Supervisors of Westchester Community Development District No.1, to amend the community development district known as "Westchester Community Development District NO.1" - Draft Ordinance 02-010 The Board of Supervisors for Westchester Community Development District No. 1 has filed a petition with St. Lucie County for an amendment to Westchester Community Development District NO.1. Westchester COD No. 1 was originally proposed to contain 74.25 acres, but will now contain 59.43 acres. The change in boundaries was in response to changes in the master plan for the Westchester project. On August 21,2001, the Board of County Commissioners approved the establishment of Westchester Community Development District No. 1 located at the corner of the intersection of Interstate 95 and the proposed extension of Gatlin Boulevard. The attached Exhibit provides a general location map for the boundaries of Westchester COD NO.1. It should be emphasized that at this time there are no existing occupied residential properties in this proposed Westchester COD No.1. Attached is a copy of Draft Ordinance 02-010 that provides for the amendment of Westchester COD NO.1. Staff recommends approval of Draft Ordinance 02-010. hf cc; Doug Anderson, County Admisistrator Daniel Mcintyre, County Attorney David P. Kelly, Planning Manager Noreen Dreyer. Esquire - Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster & Russell, P.A. «-ò p~ ..r G ò'?JC:J &'If- 'Ñes\. Blvd \ IJÒe S\.'-' Prima Vista Blvd ~ CD (\ rn e ~ "0 a: . Gatlin Blvd OJ c: ::J OJ 0> æ a: Westchester COO #1 "0 > ro (\ c: o ~ en ...,.... . . - ~- .... .',::"': ~".~;,. ", ....,:..': ,.,.....,- ,.-', -". . "'. - '., . -, ''''''.' ," ,-- . ", ..... ,~'1, , ,,:, ,. ' ";,, ,', ':,:,"', <"',' ""-",.. "~~ "'. " ". "'-~:~-'-"'-':'-" . . -' . , ->~;~.,,:¡ . .... ..... ..- . t - mop .... boon c:corØod to< ~ l>anr>ng _ """"""'" P<"IXJOOO rri{. I'IhIo fMI1.Y 011... has been modo 10 pt<Mdo ",. moot current and *"""81fI inIorm8tòOn poos;bIo. ~ is noIlntended to< use .. . iIgIIIIr binding _, 81. Lucie County Martin County GRAPHIC SCAl..E r- I ,. . .....0:. o O.~ 1 2 ;\ N , '-' ...., .J"'" 0. ~:51' ..!' a .-. ~~ ÇI~ -".-. ..... ~ ......"'-" ,....- Not Included nil C _..-"- -..- -....--- .,.- - - - - A ¿' , r- Þ ,l ]0 .~ : I- ~J ) ¡, ) cO l- . en ~ \ i- C-o ~) \ ( \ i - - - ~ ¡ - . - : . , - .> 0 ¡,.. ----.---.-.---.-.---.-.- \ " . d' - - f"- 10 ( þt Ir , I '\ I (-¡HI I' I" I' ~ I I Ì\ I'\: - 1\ G-5 .-, RU-5 . If\ .t\A'Xn. WESTCHESTER Existing Land Use 81. Lucie County, Florida COO: lAND USE CA TAGORY: TOTAL COO AREA: W A~5 I R~5 I MX~~~W I MX:~EO 59.43 --k~ Lucido &: Associates .ó v,,* ,.",.~~ ~ v &~~~~ ,~~ -..- 1m AG-S. ~ !0.2 c1JIacI ~ RU-5, AoIIdonIIoI Uben IS c1JIact 5OUACE: 51. lucio Ccxny ~ PIon NOTE: AI ..-- are ~t.. DIID IoIXO - I.øw InIendy MIxed IJIIe CeIIeIcpnonI (S c1JIacI ~ 1oIXO· MedkmInlen8lty MIxed ~ IJIIe 0eYeIcpmeI~ CS-9 du/acI 111111111111" Proposed Roed (200' R/'M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 "-' ..,J ORDINANCE 02-010 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 01-010 GRANTED ON AUGUST 21,2001, ESTABLISHING THE WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO.1, AMONG OTHER MATTERS AND AMENDING CHAPTER 1-6.5-81 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; IN ORDER TO CONTRACT THE EXTERNAL BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT AND ESTABLISH THE REVISED BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE; PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; AND SETTING FORTH THE VOTE ON ADOPTION. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including, but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. On August 21, 2001, St. Lucie County granted approval to Ordinance 01-010 amending Chapter 1-6.5 "Community Development" of the S1. Lucie County Code and Compiled Laws and establishing the Westchester Community Development District NO.1 as a community development district pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, and its boundaries, among other matters. The boundaries of Westchester COD No.1 contain 74.25 acres of land entirely within the jurisdictional boundaries of St. Lucie County. 2. The Board of Supervisors of Westchester Community Development District No.1, has filed with the Board a petition for an amendment of the community development district, which petition contains the information required by Section 190.046( 1 ), Florida Statutes. The Petitioner is requesting that the boundaries of Westchester COD NO.1 be contracted to 59.428 acres of land. 3. In accordance with Section 190.046(1)(b), Florida Statutes, the Board held a public hearing on March 26, -2002, after publishing notice of such hearing in the Ft. Pierce Tribune and the Port St. Lucie News on March 15, 2002. Double Underline is for addition Ðtrike Thl'O~g" is for deletion Ordinance 02-010 1st Draft Page 1 Print Date: 03120102 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 '-' """'" (a) The Board has considered the record of the public hearing and the factors set forth in Section 190.005 (I) (e), Florida Statutes, and has found that: (b) All statements contained within the petition are true and correct; (c) The land to be removed from the District does not exceed 50% of the acres initially located within the District and the Board of Supervisors of the District has not previously petitioned St. Lucie County for the expansion or contraction of the District;'s boundaries. (d) The amendment of this district is consistent with all applicable elements and portions of the state comprehensive plan and the effective local government comprehensive plan; (e) The area of land within the proposed district is of sufficient size, is sufficiently compact, and is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one functional interrelated community; (e) The district is the best alternative available for delivering the community development services and facilities to the area that will be served by the district; (f) The community development services and facilities for the district will be compatible with the capacity and uses of the existing local and regional community development services and facilities; and, (g) The area that will be served by the district following contraction is amenable to separate special district government. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: PART A. GRANT OF PETITION; AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 01-010 TO ESTABLISH NEW EXTERNAL BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT. Part A of Ordinance 01-010 is hereby amended to contract the external boundaries of the District by deleting Exhibit A to Ordinance 01-010 in its entirety and replacing it with Exhibit A attached hereto. Accordingly, Section f..6.5-81 of the Code of Compiled Laws establishing the boundaries of the District is hereby amended so that references therein to Exhibit "An shall mean Exhibit A attached hereto. Double Undertine is for addition ûtril(<'J Tl1lol:lgn is for deletion Ordinance 02-010 1st Draft Page 2 Print Date: 03/20/02 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 '-" ...", if! PART B. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, County ordinances, and County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict. PART C. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance. If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person, property, or circumstance, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person, property, or circumstance. PART D. APPLICABILITY OF ORDINANCE. This ordinance shall be applicable throughout St. Lucie County's jurisdiction. PART E. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE. The Clerk be and is hereby directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of Administrative Code and Laws, Department of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida 32304. PART F. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State. PART G. ADOPTION. After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows: Chairwoman Doug Coward XXX Vice-Chairman Cliff Barnes XXX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX Commissioner Paula A. Lewis XXX " Double Underline is for addition Ðtrilcð TI'IM~gl , IS for deletion Ordinance 02-010 1st Draft Page 3 Print Date: 03/20/02 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 '-' .."" Commissioner John D. Bruhn xxx PART H. CODIFICATION. Provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated in the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or other appropriate word, and the sections of this ordinance may be re-numbered or re- lettered to accomplish such intention; provided, however, that Parts B through H shall not be codified. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 26th Day of March 2002. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: Deputy Clerk County Attorney hf H:\WP\Petitions\BCC\Finished.2002\Westchester1.CDD\Westchester1 ORD Double Underline is for addition Ell'ilte Thl ð~!!" is for deletion Ordinance 02-010 1st Draft Page 4 Print Date: 03120102 '-" ...., COUNTY COMMISSION ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA IN RE: PETITION PURSUANT TO SECTION 190.046(1), FLORIDA STATUTES, TO CONTRACT THE BOUNDARIES OF WESTCHESTER NO.1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT / PETITION TO CONTRACT BOUNDARIES OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT The Board of Supervisors (the "Board") of the Westchester No. 1 Community Development District, an independent special district established pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida Statutes (the "District") by Ordinance No. 01-010 (the "Ordinance") of S1. Lucie County, Florida (the "County") enacted on August 21, 2001 hereby petitions the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA (the "Commission") in accordance with Section 190.046(1) of the Unifonn Community Development Act of 1980, Chapter 190, Florida Statutes (the "Act") to contract the boundaries of the District and in support thereof, hereby attests as follows: 1. District. That approximately 74.25 acres are currently within the external boundaries of the 2. That the Board desires to contract the boundaries of the District by deleting acres therefrom, so that thereafter the land area to be served by the District will comprise approximately 59.428 acres. Following such contraction of the District's boundaries, all lands in the District will continue to be located wholly within the jurisdictional boundaries of the County. 3. That the real property to be removed from the external boundaries of the District does not exceed 50% of the acres initially locaced within the boundaries of the District and the Board has not previously submitted to the Commission a petition seeking expansion or contraction of the District's boundaries. 4. That annexed hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof is a metes and bounds description of the external boundaries of the District following the proposed contraction of such boundaries. No real property within the external boundaries of the District as proposed is to be excluded therefrom. FTL:823420:3 '-" ...., 5. That the District is not currently providing any services and facilities to the real property proposed to be removed from within the District's external boundaries. 6. That annexed hereto as Exhibit B and made a part hereof is evidence of the written consent to the removal of its property from the boundaries of the District by the owner of one hundred percent (100%) of the real property to be removed from the District. 7. That annexed hereto as Exhibit C and made a part hereof is a designation of the future general distribution, location, and extent of public and private uses of land proposed for the area to be excluded from the District by the future land use plan element of the effective local government comprehensive plan. 8. estimated Statutes. That annexed hereto as Exhibit D and made a part hereof is a statement of regulatory costs in accordance with the requirements of Section 120.541, Florida 9. That following the proposed contraction of the District's boundaries, (i) the property within the District will not be inconsistent with any applicable element or portion of the state comprehensive plan or of the effective local government comprehensive plan; (ii) the property comprising the District will be of sufficient size, compactness, and contiguity to be developable as one functional interrelated community; (iii) the District will continue to present the best alternative available for delivering the community development facilities and services to the property that will be served by the District; (iv) the community development facilities and services of the District will not be incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and regional community development services and facilities; and (v) the property comprising the District will be amenable to separate special-purpose government. 10. That all statements contained within this Petition are true and correct. WHEREFORE, Petitioner, the Board of Supervisors of the Westchester No. 1 Community Development District, hereby respectfully requests the Commission to: A. Direct its staff to notice, as soon as practicable, a local public non-emergency hearing pursuant to the requirements of Section 190.046(1 )(b) of the Act to consider whether to grant the petition for the contraction of the District's boundaries and to amend the Ordinance establishing the District to reflect the new boundaries of the District. B. Grant the petition and enact an ordinance pursuant to applicable law amending the Ordinance establishing the District to reflect the new boundaries of the District. 2 FTl:823420:3 \w 'WI RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED thisl.3 7d';y of ~ ~ ". L...... , 2002. WESTCHESTER NO.1 COMMUNITY DF~ENT DISTRICT By: /ø~- Tit: ¿)-.. ,,-,/-._..:::.J STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE ) The foregoing instrument waì./. acknowledged before me this /..3 Th day of /JJA4c!f, , 2002, by V/!iJe" . I/-~.J , the C~#/;?'¡;4.J of the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF WESTCHESTER NO. 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, who is personally known to me [~ or produced as identification. Notary Public ~ b¿/, ¿.J~ Printed Name: //?rA'~/A ¿¿J~J/fAU-<::'~ 3 FTL:823420:3 FTL:823420:3 '-' ...." EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION/METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION ~AWSON, NOBLE &WEBB, INC. ...I LB# 6674 CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND PLANNERS, SURVEYORS 590 NW PEACOCK BLVD, SUITE 9, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA PHONE (561) 878-1700 -'. CDD-l A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTIONS 9 & ro, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTIl, RANGE 39 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE P ARTICULARL Y DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE INTERSECTION OF TIlE CENTERLINE OF GATLIN BOULEVARD (ALSO BEING THE NORTH LINE OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST) AND THE WESTERLY LIMITS OF GATLIN BOULEVARD RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THE WESTERLY LIMITS OF TIlOSE LANDS DESCRIBED IN AN ORDER OF TAKING DATED JULY 4, 1979 AND RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 311 , PAGES 2946 THROUGH 2952, INCLUSIVE PUBLIC RECORDS .oF SAID ST. LUCIE COUNTY AND AS SHOWN ON THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF --' TRANSPORTATION RIGHT"OF- WAY MAPS FOR STATE ROAD NO.9 (1-95), SECTION 94001 _ 2412, DATED 06/02/77, WITH LAST REVISION OF 09111/79 (THE ABOVE DESCRIBED WESTERLY LIMITS OF GATLIN BOULEVARD BEAR SOUTH 00°01'45" WEST AND ALL BEARINGS ARE RELATIVE THERETO); THENC'ij SOUTH 89°57'05" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 737.09 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°02'55" WEST, A DIStANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE SOUTH 89°57'05" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1,691.19 FEET, To THE POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, AND HAVING A . . RADIUS OF 175.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 54°37'24", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 166.84 FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, HA VING-A RADIUS OF 300.00 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAIl) CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 65°52'34", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 344.93 FEET, TO A POINT OF NON-RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A LINE (THE RADIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 11 °18'05" EAST FROM THIS POINT); THENCE NORTH 00°14'07" EAST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 833.93 FEET; THENCE NORTH 44°33'37" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 35.47 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°13'48" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 45°26'22" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 35.23 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°45'53" EAST, A DISTANCE OF. 120.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°14'07" WEST, A DISTÂNCE QF 20.18 FE HENCE S H 44°52'57" EAST, A DISTANGE OF 35.28 FEET; THENCE SOUT (j°00' EAST, A TANCEOF 85.88 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°00'00" EAST, A ARY R. 8 FORD, PSM .' PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER STATE OF FLORIDA REG. NO. 4981 DATE: I - 3 CI - b <- REVISIONS-UPDATES NOTE: THIS IS NOT A SKETCH OF SURVEY, BUT ON~ Y A GRAPHIC DEPICTION OF THE DESCRIPTION SHOWN' HEREON. THERE HAS BEEN NO FIELD WORK, VIEWING OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, OR MONUMENTS SET IN CONNECTION WITH THE PREPARATION OF THIS INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON. DATE BY CK'D NOTE: LANDS SHOWN HEREON WERE NOT ABSTRACTED FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY AND/OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD. JOB NO.: B589 BY: JDM CHECKED: GRB F.B.: N/A PG.: N/A SHEET 1 OF 3 'rAWSON, NOBLE &WEBB, INC. ..." LB# 6674 CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND PLANNERS, SURVEYORS 590 NW PEACOCK BLVD, SUITE 9, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA PHONE (561) 878-1700 DISTANCE OF 476.82 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 39°04'35" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 189.81 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75°49'33" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 472.34 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70°10'51" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 208.88 FEET; THENCE NORTH 19°29'57" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 295.52 FEET; THENCE NORTH 15°14'57" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 513.76 FEET, TO A POINT OF NON-RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 275.00 FEET (THE RÅbIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 12°15'49" EAST FROM TillS POINT); THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12°15'48", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 58.86 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE NORTH 89°59'59" EAST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 345.02 FEET; THENC.E NORTH 00°00'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 239.96 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 90°00'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1,253.56 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CORV ATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY)' AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 4.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID _. CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 76°57'13", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 5.37 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE SOUTH 13°02'47" EAST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 58.53 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURV A TIJRE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERL Y, AND HAVING A ID\DIUS OF 800.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°30.'32", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 481.83 FEET, TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CORV ATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, .. AND HA VmG A RADIUS OF 58.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID . CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 54°25'22", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 55.09 FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERL Y, HAVING A RADIUS OF 130.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE AR,C OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°41'07", ANARC DISTANCE OF 205.76 FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERL Y, HAVING A RADIUS OF 58.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERL Y, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49°41'44", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 50.31 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE SOUTH 34°53'43" WEST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 291.45 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 781.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°34'43", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 471.34 FEET,TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHwESTERL Y, HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89°38'04", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 39.11 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 59.43 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. . '. . ~ ~. JOB NO.: B589 BY: JDM CHECKED: GRBF.B.: N/A PG.: N/A SHEET 2 OF 3 ~ ~. to~ ~ I'I~ (I). It) L. ~g :f r<> . _0 . 0 0- o z o W l- I- <t: ...J a... z ;:) w F- - or<> . <7> :tr<i . r<> gO) z C/I ")J\~ ..~ g\a¡ ".0 -U! , Irñ WìW:È P.O.B. P.O.e. P.B. P.e. PR.C. P.T. R ð L N.R. OR.a. LN\\' . . . . . . . . . . . . .... Lawson, Noble & Webb, Inc. LB #6674 ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS 590 NW Peacock Boulevard, Suite 9, Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986 (56 ) 878-1700· fax: (561) 878-1802. emoil: Inw-psl@lnw-inc.com West Palm Beach· Port St. Lucie SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION -- --- DETAIL "- "- \ \ I ° <II I 0, / ~'l\ ~./ "'/ o o ~ II ./ / I S90000'00"E 1253.56' ( R=4.00' -..'3 ð=76°S7'13" L=S.37' . ~ UNPLA TTED I \ \ \ "- ....... W -1 « u (f) -- - ..- , f' SEE DETAIL /' \ . . . I ~ o . ON òll? 0'" ° r- Ov o III SoooW07"W 20.18' S44°S2'S7"E 3S.26' S90"OO'OO"E 6S.68' R=27S.00' £l=12°1S'48" L=S8.86' N6S"S9'S9"E 345.02' S9.0"OO'OO"E 1253.56' ILl O. 0'" - <7> o· 0<7> " r<> 0(\/ o z SI3"02'47"E 58.S3' ILÌ ILÌ ~I~ ILl .... '" ~ ~~ ~;; 0111 <ri0 ~r- r-~ u~.rou wa... . laJ "'Ï 12'" "'.'" ~ ~ g g. R=56.00' £1=54"25'2.2" L"SS.09' ~ ~"5~.~ " R=I30.00' ð-~9 41 ~4 7 '-ð=90"41'07" L-SO.31 '-- L=205. 76' . . UNPLATTED C.DDo-t S9.43 ACRES +/- UNPLA TTED R=300.00' r-ð.=6S"S2'34" I L=344.93' R=17S.00' rð=S4"3T24" L=166B4' III ~~ ~(\/ R=761.00' It)<r 0.. Ii') --ð=34°34'43" ~o .<7> L=471.34' o~ ;;; ': . o-·w o~ ::1". .:::~:ijt~ 737.09' ?l E . . Il) <r . 100.00' - > ;;:: NOO002'SS"W Ô ~~ § ~~ '" Zo W :Jffill'l ~ ~~'r ~ ~-- z S89°S7'05"W 1691.19' "--PROPOSED CENTERL[NE OF GATLI~ BLVD. LYING WEST OF [-9S -w W <7> 0'> r<> r<> ILl ILl '" '" !!!.~ ~!!! Ô iii. <ri- Ô ¡:: r- r- ¡:: U tf") tf"IU ~~. f!:¡~ ¡¡¡ ¡¡¡ Z 2: 3: 3: g g UNPLATTED POINT OF BEGINNING POINT OF COMMENCEMENT PLAT BOOK { POINT OF CURVATURE . POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE POINT OF TANGENCY DENOTES RADIUS DENOTES DELTA DENOTES ARC LENGTH œNOTES NON-RAOIAL DENOTES OFFICI¡\L RECORD BOOK JOB No. B589 SEE SHEET 1 &. 2 OF 3 FOR DESCRIPTION F.B. - 1'\OOta\500-599\B599\CAO\B599SkOI.dwg 01/29/2002 02,29'30 PH ¡;ST Sl£ET 3 OF 3 BY: JDM CHECKED: GRB PG. DATE: 01-14-02 \.f ...., EXHIBIT B EVIDENCE OF WRITTEN CONSENT OF OWNER TO REMOVAL OF PROPERTY FROM THE EXTERNAL BOUNDARIES OF WESTCHESTER NO.1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Westchester Development Company, LLC, a Florida limited liability company and successor by merger with Westchester Development Company ("Owner"), hereby certifies that it is the sole owner of approximately 14.82 acres of certain real property (the "Property"), located in S1. Lucie County, Florida proposed to be excluded from the boundaries of Westchester No.1 Community Development District (the "District"). By signing below, the Owner hereby gives its full consent to the contraction of the external boundaries of the District to remove the Property therefrom. " 37...... IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand thisL day of ~...;,,,", ,2002. WESTCHESTER DEVELOPMENT COMP ;Y, LLC STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /3TÆ day of /J14Leh ,2002, by~~ flJh.~'Sð¡</, the ¡/¡c~ &ev",jeA.fT of WESSTCHESTER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, who is personally known to meÍÀ or produced as identification. Notary Public Printed Name: ~ ¿.-/.¿J~ / ~.4, C! r"/I- W á/Aðle;/ FTL:823420:3 '-' EXHIBIT C ...., DESIGNATION OF THE FUTURE GENERAL DISTRIBUTION, LOCATION AND EXTENT OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE USES OF LAND PROPOSED FOR THE AREA TO BE REMOVED FROM THE DISTRICT FTL:823420:3 '-' -..I J/: (\~ , .,r C! -,......" ~1si _.....,ø-' " ~.- ,.-"- Not Included _nl I L ._--r- .--- ~ -....... .... ,-- - - - - - A ...., r ¡- .\.. :J" ,~ ! ï - ~ II>~ ) co en - , \ f- ( f-O II ) \ (f- \ f- ~ '- . - ! - ; . - ~ roO .... ----'---'_'___1_'___'--- i" .01: - 10 ( Dt . F ~ '" I~ " r--- lI- I , I ['\ - I~ G-~~ RU-5 Î-\ 1\ .t\AY n. WESTCHESTER Existing Land Use St. Lucie County, Florida COD: LAND USE CAT AGORY: TOTAL COD AREA:" EI A~5 I R~5 I MX~~~W I MX~~EO I 59.43 I %.. Lucido & Associates .ó VJ;:¿.. ~~~ 1Ç1 v .c,-:t:..-...:"..::r--=: ,....- --- EEEE AG-5, ~ 102 OJIad ~ RU-5. _ Urban 15 Wlae) SOURCE: Slluclo CcUIIy ~ Plan N01E: AI acreages ar8 approxfme!.. OIJI] MXD - low Intonslly Mbced Use D8YøIopmont (5 &lad ~ MXD· ModI.m lnIonsIIy MIxed ~ Use DoM>IopnonI (5-9 OJIae) 11111111111111 Pr~ Roed (200' A/W FTL:823420:3 '-' EXHIBIT D STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS ..., '-' ...", STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT #1 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Purpose and Scope This statement of estimated regulatory costs ("SERC") supports the petition to contract the boundaries of the Westchester Community Development District #1 ("District" or "District #1"). The District was established by Ordinance No. 01-010 of St. Lucie County on August 21, 2001. The District currently comprises approximately 74.25 acres of land located in St. Lucie County. The District proposes to contract its boundaries by -14.82 acres to a total of 59.428 acres. The limitations on the scope of this SERC are explicitly set out in Section 190.002(2)(d), F.S. (governing District formation or alteration) as follows: "That the process of establishing such a district pursuant to uniform general law shall be fair and based only on factors material to manaqinq and financinq the service delivery function of the district, so that any matter conceminq permittinq or pfanninq of the development is not material or relevant (emphasis added)." 1.2 Overview of the Westchester DRI and the Changes Requested in the Boundaries of the Four Community Development Districts Serving Westchester On August 21, 2001 the St. Lucie County Commission approved the formation of four Community Development· Districts to provide community facilities and services to the Westchester DR!. District #1 is designed to provide community infrastructure, services, and facilities along with their operations and maintenance, to a portion of the Westchester DRI located in St. Lucie County (the "development"). The development is a master planned, mixed-use, fully amenitized, community. The DRI includes 2,033 acres. The landowner has established community development districts on 1,677.74 of these acres. The land plan for the portion of the DRI planned for community development districts consists of up to: (a) 4,500 residential units, (b) 2,001,000 square feet of offices, (c) 575,000 square feet of retail space, and (d) 300 hotel units. Given the size and scope of the development, St. Lucie County agreed to establish four community development districts to serve the project. Four districts- are optimal for the development because this articulation allows foreach district to focus on the unique requirements of the land within its boundaries. District #1 serves an exclusively commercial area in the project that will be developed in the first phase of the development program. By contrast, the land in District #2 is planned exclusively as a corporate office park with a civic/school site. The land in District #3 is planned only for use as a residential community with no commercial, retail, or office uses. Finally, District #4 is projected for future development as a town center with retail uses at its core and surrounding Page 10f6 FebruaJY 25, 2002 '-' ...., residential uses. No offices are planned for the land in District #4. In light of these very different land uses, and the unique demands for community development district facilities and services, it is optimal to create four unique community development districts, one for each area. Table 1 displays the land use plan for the lands within each of the four proposed' community development districts planned for the Westchester DRI as envisioned in the petitions to form the Districts. Noted at the time the petitions to form the Districts were filed, was the fact that the land use plans were "subject to change as land planning activities continue". Table 1. Land Use Plan for the Area in Westchester Served by the Westchester Community Development Districts #1 through #4 Category CDD#1 CDD#2 CDD#3 CDD#4 Total Acres 74.25 257.45 463.60 882.44 1,677.74 Single Family 0 0 863 2,512 3,375 Multifamily 0 0 287 838 1,125 Retail 125,000 0 0 450,000 575,000 Office 78,500 1,922,500 ° ° 2,001,000 Hotel ° ° ° 300 300 Source: St. Lucie West Development Corporation As land use planning and engineering analysis has progressed at Westchester, a number of desired adjustments have come to light. No changes in the total volume of development are proposed. However, the distribution of the development across the four Districts is now somewhat different than originally expected. The rationale for forming four distinct districts was based on the unique land use mix that was originally anticipated for lands included in each District. Since the land use plans have changed somewhat, it is desirable to alter the boundaries of the various Districts to reflect these changes. Table 2 presents to proposed new land use plan for each District as well as the proposed new acreage totals for each District. Page 2 of 6 February 25, 2002 \w ....", Table 2. land Use Plan for the Proposed Areas in Westchester Served by the Westchester Community Development Districts #1 through #4 As Modified Category Acres Single family units Multifamily units Retail sqft Office sqft Hotel rooms CDD#1 59.43 o o 125,000 78,500 o CDD#2 234.33 o o o 1,922,500 o CDD#3 499.87 863 287 o o o CDD#4 884.12 2,512 838 450,000 o 300 Total 1,677.75 3,375 1,125 575,000 2,001,000 300 The changes proposed for the acreage and land uses in each District are provided in Table 3. It is important to note that no change in total development is proposed. Furthermore, the proposed volume and distribution of development in each District is the same as originally proposed. The changes involve redistributing the acreage among the Districts, so that the original land uses are' preserved. Table 3. Changes in the land Use Plans Proposed for Westchester C0"1munity Development Districts #1 through #4 As Modified Category Acres Single family units Multifamily units Retail sqft Office sqft Hotel rooms CDD#1 -14.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CDD#2 -23.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CDD#3 36.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CDD#4 1.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 The Westchester Community Development District #1 remains as a commercial area in the DR!. District #1 will provide community development district facilities and services to 59.43 acres in the District. In addition, District #1 will serve as the master community development district for the additional districts that are planned for the development. In that role the District will also provide community-serving infrastructure that provides benefits to all of the other 3 community development districts envisioned to serve the Westchester DR!. These master improvements include major entrance roads, entry statements, landscaping, master stormwater control, and master utilities. The District will provide these facilities for itself and for the other districts planned for Westchester. The debt service and operation/maintenance costs incurred by District #1 to provide the master community improvements will be funded through non ad valorem special assessments on all benefiting property in the development. District #1 may also operate and maintain localized infrastructure within any of the other three districts that is integrally related to the master Page 3 of 6 February 25. 2002 '-' ...."" community improvements, if a district desires to delegatå that function and District #1 desires to accept the same. It is anticipated that the four community development districts will enter into a series of inter local agreements providing for this sharing of master improvement, operating and maintenance costs. 1.3 Requirements for Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs Section 120.541 (2), F.S. (1997), defines the elements a statement of estimated regulatory costs must contain: "(a) A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be required to comply with the rule, together with a general description of the types of individuals likely to be affected by the rule. (b) A good faith estimate of the cost to the agency, and to any other state and local government entities, of implementing and enforcing the proposed rule, and any anticipated effect on state and local revenues. (c) A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by individuals and entities, including local governmental entities, required to comply with the requirements of the rule. As used in this paragraph, "transactional costs" are direçt costs that are readily ascertainable based upon standard business practices, and include filing fees, the costof obtaining a license, the cost of equipment required to be installed or used or procedures required to be employed in complying with the rule, additional operating costs incurred, and the cost of monitoring and reporting. (d) An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined by Section 288.703, F.S., and an analysis of the impact on small counties and small cities as defined by Section 120.52, F.S. St. Lucie County is not defined as a small County for purposes of this requirement. (e) Any additional information that the agency determines may be useful. 2.0 A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be required to comply with the ordinance, together with a general description of the types of individuals likely to be affected by the ordinance. There will be no individuals or entities affected by approval of the proposed contraction in the boundaries of District #1. District #1 is an already existing Community Development District. The petition to contract its boundaries by approximately -14.82 acres will have no impact on either the remaining 59.43 acres in the District or on the -14.82 acres contracted out of the District for the following reasons. First, as noted above, District #1 will provide Community level facilities and services for all areas in the four Community Development Districts. However, neither the costs nor the acres served will change if the proposed change to the Page 4 of 6 February 25, 2002 ~ ..., boundaries of the four Districts is approved. So, there is no' impact on the other three Districts from the proposed change in the boundaries of District #1. Second, neither the costs nor the volume of development planned for District #1 will change if the proposed boundary change is approved. So, there will be no impact on land in District #1. Finally, the contraction parcel will be included in the expansion of other Districts. Again, since neither the costs nor the volume of development will change in any other District, there is no impact on any individual or entity if the proposal is approved. 3.0 Good faith estimate of the cost to state and local government entities, of implementing and enforcing the proposed ordinance, and any anticipated effect on state and local revenues. 3.1 Costs to Governmental Agencies of Implementing and Enforcing Ordinance State Governmental Entities There will be no cost to any governmental agencies to implement or to enforce - the proposed ordinance. District #1 is an existing Community Development District in good standing. Altering its boundaries will not change the costs for any State governmental entity. , St. Lucie County St. Lucie County will incur no costs associated with this proposed Ordinance beyond reviewing the petition and its supporting exhibits. The petition itself provides much of the information needed for a staff review. St. Lucie County already possess the staff needed to conduct the review without the need for new staff. In addition, there is no capital required to review the petition. Finally, local governments routinely process similar petitions for land uses and zoning changes that are far more complex than is the petition to alter the boundaries of District #1. There is no annual cost to the County, because the District is an existing Community Development District in good standing. Approving a change in the District's boundaries does not impact annual costs to the County in any way. Page 5016 February 25. 2002 \.,<f ...., 3.2 Impact on State and Local Revenues Adoption of the proposed ordinance will have no negative impact on State or local revenues. The District is an existing Community Development District. As an independent unit of local government, the District is designed to be a self funding entity in terms of its obligations under Chapter 190, F.S. Altering its boundaries, as proposed here, has no impact on State or local revenues. 4.0 A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by individuals and entities required to comply with the requirements of the ordinance. There are no transactional costs associated with approving this alteration in the boundaries of the District. As noted above, the amount of development and the number of acres served by all the Districts will no change if the Ordinance is approved. Furthermo.re, the volume of development and the costs for providing _ District facilities and services is also unchanged. Exhibit B contains the estimated costs and the timetable for construction. 5.0 An analysis af the impact on small businesses as defined by Section 288.703, F.S., and an analysis of the impact on small counties and small cities as defined by Section 120.52, F.S. There will be no impact on small businesses because of the changes proposed in the District's boundaries. The District is an existing Community Development District. The costs to provide infrastructure and services has not changed nor has the volume of development planned for the District. St. Lucie County has an estimated population that is greater than 10,000 in the most current census (2000). Therefore, the County is not defined as a "small" county according to Section 120.52, F.S. 6.0 Any additional useful information. The analysis provided above is based on a straightforward application of economic theory, especially as it relates to tracking the incidence of regulatory costs and benefits. Inputs were received from the Developer's Engineer and other professionals associated with the Developer. Page 6 of 6 February 25. 2002 v - \tr"' AGENDA REOUEST ITÈ1ff NO. 58 DATE: 03/26/02 CONSENT REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING [X""] Leg. [ X ] Quasi-~ud. [ TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Communitv Development SUBJECT: Consider the petition of The Board of Supervisors of Westchester Community Development District No. 2 for an amendment of the community development district known as ·Westchester Community Development District No.2" - Draft Ordinance 02-011. BACKGROUND: The Board of Supervisors of Westchester Community Development District No. 2 has filed a petition with St. Lucie County to amend the community development district known as ·Westchester Community Development District No.2" . The Westchester Community Development District No. 2 is proposed to occupy 234.33 acres instead of the 257.45 acres originally proposed. The subject property is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Interstate 95 and the proposed extension of Gatlin Boulevard. The attached Exhibit provides a general location map for the boundaries of Westchester Community Development District No.2. It should be emphasized that at this time there are no existing occupied residential properties in this Proposed Westchester Community Development District No.2. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: On August 21, 2001, The Board of County Commissioners granted approval to Ordinance 01-011, establishing the community development district known as Westchester CDD #2. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve Dra.ft Ordinance 02-011, authorizing an amendment to the boundáries of the community development district known as "Westchester Community Development . District No.2". . [ X] [ ] APPROVED OTHER: 4-0 [ ] DENIED (Hutchinson Absent) " COMMISSION ACTION: M. Anderson Administrator Review and AODrovals Management & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: County Attorney: Originating Department: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) '-' 'wJI ,. COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: March 26, 2002 Ordinance 02-011 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Community Development Director DATE: March 20, 2002 SUBJECT: Petition of The Board of Supervisors of Westchester Community Development District No.2, to amend the community development district known as ·Westchester Community Development District NO.2" - Draft Ordinance 02-011 The Board of Supervisors for Westchester Community Development District No.2 has filed a petition with St. Lucie County for an amendment to Westchester Community Development District NO.2. Westchester CDD No.2 was originally proposed to contain 257.45 acres, but will now contain 234.33 acres. The change in boundaries was in response to changes in the master plan for the Westchester project. On August 21, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners approved the establishment of Westchester Community Development District No. 2 located at the corner of the intersection of Interstate 95 and the proposed extension of Gatlin Boulevard. The attached Exhibit provides a general location map for the boundaries of Westchester COD NO.2. It should be emphasized that at this time there are no existing occupied residential properties in this proposed Westchester COD NO.2. Attached is a copy of Draft Ordinance 02-011 that provides for the amendment of Westchester COD NO.2. Staff recommends approval of Draft Ordinance 02-011. hf cc: Doug Anderson, County Admisistrator Daniel Mcintyre, County Attorney David P. Kelly, Planning Manager Noreen Dreyer, Esquire - Ruden, McClosky. Smith, Schuster & Russell. P.A. .. . «-ò ,P~ ~ G 0":> ~ ø'li- 'l'I eS\ Blvd \ uÒß <;:,\.... Prima Vista . Blvd ': ~ co c¡ en o "- ~ -0 a: . Gatlin Blvd Q) c :.:J Q) 0) c c¡ a: Westchester COO #2 -0 > co ttI C o ~ (f) ...... (f) t o a.. m··'····:· iit....~~.~.;"':¿",,....·.··.·.·. ;'. u;··/.:.... " \. _T<.~'I'.· ...... . ';_," _,""',. . -' , .. -." ,," ," ':"...~.-..... t S1. Lucie County Martin County _ mop hoo boon ~ 1"<I onom/pIanning end -..... )IXpO&eS only. _ _ oIIort has boon ..- to pr<Mdo Iho __ ClJ1'OI end _. inIonn8IIon ~.;o not __ b'.... .. . IogeIy binding __ GRAPHIC SCALE ~ I I 1 . .... c. o 0.5 1 2 ~ N '-" ..., J/ ~ , .¡r c -""~ ÇI-:! . -~ ...... ~ -~- r"- Not Included nJ c ....,,-' .... .-~ r- ,..--- / / f- - i- A /' r- , ¡..; ,\.. ~. r,- T - CD U1 - , - - ! - ! - . - ! ?a ; - - - > r ~ --._1___._....----....--.-.- '\ ""r" -¡-..,. 1'\ J ,.. .... ~. .~ 10 ( pc F ~ "- I I ['\ '\: - G-5/,-, RU-5 '1\ 1'\ .~AYn. WESTCHESTER Existing Land Use 81. Lucie County, Florida COD: lAND USE CATAGOAY: TOTAL COD AREA: Ed A~ I A~5 I M~~W I MX~~EO 23423 I ~~ LucIdo 41: AssocIates .0 ~::v '-I~.,....,... "Ç{ V II.';I::..~--=--= .-.- -..- EEE8 101», ~ Ð2....od ~ RIJ.5, ~ Ubon (5 cb'od SOt.fICE: Sll.ucle ec.ny c..,,,ø.."__ Plan NOTE: /4J ~ ate 1I IpO>IImøte. [[]] ~ MXO - ..-on kII8noIIy t.Ixed Use 00veIq:wn<01I (5..9 ....od MXO . Low InIonoIIy t.Ixed Use oe..Icpmeo~ (5 ....od 11..1....1.... f'Iq>ooed Aoed /200' RIW) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 '-'" ..." ORDINANCE 02-011 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 01-011 GRANTED ON AUGUST 21,2001, ESTABLISHING THE WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO.2, AMONG OTHER MATTERS AND AMENDING CHAPTER 1-6.5-81 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; IN ORDER TO CONTRACT THE EXTERNAL BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT AND ESTABLISH THE REVISED BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE; PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; AND SETTING FORTH THE VOTE ON ADOPTION. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including, but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. On August 21, 2001, St. Lucie County granted approval to Ordinance 01-011 amending Chapter 1-6.5 "Community Development" of the St. Lucie County Code and Compiled Laws and establishing the Westchester Community Development District No.1 as a community development district pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, and its boundaries, among other matters. The boundaries of Westchester COD NO.2 contain 257.45 acres of land entirely within the jurisdictional boundaries of St. Lucie County. 2. The Board of Supervisors of Westchester Community Development District No.2, has filed with the Board a petition for an amendment of the community development district, which petition contains the information required by Section 190.046(1), Florida Statutes. The Petitioner is requesting that the boundaries of Westchester COD NO.2 be contracted to 234.33 acres of land. 3. In accordance with Section 190.046(1)(b), Florida Statutes, the Board held a' public hearing on March 26, 2002, after publishing notice of such hearing in the Ft. Pierce Tribune and the Port St. Lucie News on March 15,2002. " " Double Underline is for addition Strike TI'lI'O~>Jh IS for deletion Ordinance 02-011 1s1 Draft Page 1 Print Date: 03/20/02 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 '-' .~ (a) The Board has considered the record of the public hearing and the factors set forth in Section 190.005 (I) (e), Florida Statutes, and has found that: (b) All statements contained within the petition are true and correct; (c) The land to be removed from the District does not exceed 50% of the acres initially located within the District and the Board of Supervisors of the District has not previously petitioned St. Lucie County for the expansion or contraction of the District;'s boundaries. (d) The amendment of this district is consistent with all applicable elements and portions of the state comprehensive plan and the effective local government comprehensive plan; (e) The area of land within the proposed district is of sufficient size, is sufficiently compact, and is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one functional interrelated community; (e) The district is the best alternative available for delivering the community development services and facilities to the area that will be served by the district; (f) The community development services and facilities for the district will be compatible with the capacity and uses of the existing local and regional community development services and facilities; and, (g) The area that will be served by the district following contraction is amenable to separate special district government. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: PART A. GRANT OF PETITION; AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 01-011 TO ESTABLISH NEW EXTERNAL BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT. Part A of Ordinance 01-011 is hereby amended to contract the external boundaries. of the District by deleting Exhibit A to Ordinance 01-011 in its entirety and replacing it with Exhibit A attached hereto. Accordingly, Section 1-6.5-81 of the Code of Compiled Laws establishing the boundaries of the District is hereby amended so that references therein to Exhibit "An shall mean Exhibit A attached hereto. , . .. . Double Underline is for addition (;trike "Fhrotlgh IS for deletion Ordinance 02-011 1st Draft Page 2 Print Date: 03120/02 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 '-" """ PART B. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, County ordinances, and County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict. PART C. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance. If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person, property, or circumstance, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person, property, or circumstance. PART D. APPLICABILITY OF ORDINANCE. This ordinance shall be applicable throughout St. Lucie County's jurisdiction. PART E. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE. The Clerk be and is hereby directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of Administrative Code and Laws, Department of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida 32304. PART F. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State. PART G. ADOPTION. After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows: Chairwoman Doug Coward XXX Vice-Chairman Cliff Barnes XXX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX Commissioner Paula A. Lewis XXX " Double Underline is for addition Ctrikc Thl'Otljlh IS for deletion Ordinance 02-011 1st Draft Page 3 Print Date: 03120102 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 ....... ..., Commissioner John D. Bruhn xxx PART H. CODIFICATION. Provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated in the S1. Lucie County Land Development Code, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or other appropriate word, and the sections of this ordinance may be re-numbered or re- lettered to accomplish such intention; provided, however, that Parts B through H shall not be codified. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 26th Day of March 2002. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: Deputy Clerk County Attorney " hf H:\WP\Petitions\BCC\Finished.2002\Westchester2.CDD\Westchester20RD Double Underline is for addition Ðtril(e nil õ~al1ls for deletion Ordinance 02-011 1st Draft Page 4 Print Date: 03/20/02 ¥ -.I COUNTY COMMISSION ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA IN RE: PETITION PURSUANT TO SECTION 190.046(1), FLORIDA STATUTES, TO CONTRACT THE BOUNDARIES OF WESTCHESTER NO.2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT / PETITION TO CONTRACT BOUNDARIES OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT The Board of Supervisors (the "Board") of the Westchester No. 2 Community Development District, an independent special district established pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida Statutes (the "District") by Ordinance No. 01-011 (the "Ordinance") of St. Lucie County, Florida (the "County") enacted on August 21,2001 hereby petitions the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA (the "Commission") in accordance with Section 190.046(1) of the Uniform Community Development Act of 1980, Chapter 190, Florida Statutes (the "Act") to contract the boundaries of the District and in support thereof, hereby attests as follows: 1. That approximately 257.45 acres are currently within the external boundaries of the District. 2. That the Board desires to contract the boundaries of the District by deleting acres therefrom, so that thereafter the land area to be served by the District will comprise approximately 234.326 acres. Following such contraction of the District's boundaries, all lands in the District will continue to be located wholly within the jurisdictional boundaries of the County. 3. That the real property to be removed from the external boundaries of the District does not exceed 50% of the acres initially located within the boundaries of the District and the Board has not previously submitted to the Commission a petition seeking expansion or contraction of the District's boundaries. 4. That annexed hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof is a metes and bounds description of the external boundaries of the District following the proposed contraction of such boundaries. No real property within the external boundaries of the District as proposed is to be excluded therefrom. FTL:849260:2 "'" .."" 5. That the District is not currently providing any services and facilities to the real property proposed to be removed from within the District's external boundaries. 6. That annexed hereto as Exhibit B and made a part hereof is evidence of the written consent to the removal of its property from the boundaries of the District by the owner of one hundred percent (100%) of the real property to be removed from the District. 7. That annexed hereto as Exhibit C and made a part hereof is a designation of the future general distribution, location, and extent of public and private uses of land proposed for the area to be excluded from the District by the future land use plan element of the effective local government comprehensive plan. 8. That annexed hereto as Exhibit D and made a part hereof is a statement of estimated regulatory costs in accordance with the requirements of Section 120.541, Florida Statutes. 9. That following the proposed contraction of the District's boundaries, (i) the property within the District will not be inconsistent with any applicable element or portion of the state comprehensive plan or of the effective local government comprehensive plan; (ii) the property comprising the District will be of sufficient size, compactness, and contiguity to be developable as one functional interrelated community; (iii) the District will continue to present the best alternative available for delivering the community development facilities and services to the property that will be served by the District; (iv) the community development facilities and services of the District will not be incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and regional community development services and facilities; and (v) the property comprising the District will be amenable to separate special-purpose government. 10. That all statements contained within this Petition are true and correct. WHEREFORE, Petitioner, the Board of Supervisors of the Westchester No. 2 Community Development District, hereby respectfully requests the Commission to: A. Direct its staff to notice, as soon as practicable, a local public non-emergency hearing pursuant to the requirements of Section 190.046(l)(b) of the Act to consider whether to grant the petition for the contraction of the District's boundaries and to amend the Ordinance establishing the District to reflect the new boundaries of the District. B. Grant the petition and enact an ordinance pursuant to applicable law amending the Ordinance establishing the District to reflect the new boundaries of the District. FTl:849260:2 2 '-' ...I RESPECTFULL Y SUBMITTED this/3 7 d~ of r"/... , , '" , 2002. WESTCHESTER NO.2 COMMUNITY DEVEL MENT DISTRICT B./ /#~.. STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /.37'7t day of 11l4-1rJ¡ , 2002, by ::hfßJe!'<;; 114-~¿¡,.) , the ChAd¿nN.J of the BOARD OF SUPER ISORS OF WESTCHESTER NO. 2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, who is personally known to me ~ or produced. as identification. Notary Public LJf!//l-"I--/ 2<.J.~ Printed Name: '4.4",¿-/';' j¿/..¿JÆ/~e~ PATRICIA W. WARREN 1# CC791995 EXPIRES NOV 28. 2002 BONDED THROIIQH MNNlTAGE tfI:1INr( FTL :849 260: 2 3 FTL:849260:2 ~ ...",,; EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTIONIMETES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION 'rAWSON, NOBLE &WEBB, INC. ~ lB# 6674 CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND PLANNERS, SURVEYORS 590 NW PEACOCK BLVD, SUITE 9, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA PHONE (561) 878-1700 CDD-2 A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTIONS 9 & 10, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF GATLIN BOULEVARD (ALSO BEING THE NORTH LINE OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST) AND THE WESTERLY LIMITS OF GATLIN BOULEVARD RIGHT-OF- WAY AND THE WESTERLY LIMITS OF THOSE LANDS DESCRIBED IN AN ORDER OF TAKING DATED JULY 4, 1979 AND RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 311, PAGES 2946 THROUGH 2952,INCLUSIVE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID ST. LUCIE COUNTY AND AS SHOWN ON THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY MAPS FOR STATE ROAD NO.9 (1-95), SECTION 94001 - 2412, DATED 06/02/77, WITH LAST REVISION OF 09/11/79 (THE ABOVE DESCRIBED WESTERLY LIMITS OF GATLIN BOULEVARD BEAR SOUTH 00°01 '45" WEST AND ÂLL BEARINGS ARE RELATIVE THERETO); THENCE SOUTH 89°57'05" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 737.09 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°02'55" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL, AND A POINT OF RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF . 89°38'04", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 39.11 FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, HA VINO A RADIUS OF 781.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°34'43", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 471.34 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE NORTH 34°53'43" EAST, ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 291.45 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 58.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TIIROUGH A CENTRAL ANG . OF 49°41'44", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 50.31 FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE CT . A' WITH A E, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HA VINO A ARY R. URFORD, PSM PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER STATE OF FLORIDA REG. NO. 4981 DATE: - 30 - å>"l- NOTE: THIS IS NOTA SKETCH OF SURVEY, BUT ONLY.. A GRAPHIC DEPICTION OF THE DESCRIPTION SHOWrtJ HEREON. THERE HAS BEEN NO FIELD WORK,VIEWING OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, OR MONUMENTS SËT IN CONNECTION WITH THE PREPARATION OF THIS INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON. REVISIONS-UPDATES DATE BY CK'D NOTE: LANDS SHOWN HEREON WERE NOT ABSTRACTED FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY ANDIOR EASEMENTS OF RECORD. JOB NO.: B589 BY: JDM CHECKED: GRB F.B.: N/A PG.: N/A SHEET 1 OF 6 YAWSON,NOBlE &WEBB, INC. .J LB# 6674 CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND PLANNERS, SURVEYORS 590 NW PEACOCK BLVD, SUITE 9, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA PHONE (561) 878-1700 " . .. ..-.~.. ....... .. RADIUS OF 130.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°41'07", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 205.76 FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 58.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 54°25'22", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 55.09 FEET, TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 800.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°30'32", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 481.83 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE NORTH 13°02'47" WEST, ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 337.09 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,050.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERL Y, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAl: ANGLE OF 13°01'56", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 466.28 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE NORTH 00°00'52" WEST, ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 608.90 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 800.00 FEET; TIIENCE NORTIIERL Y, ALONG TIIE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10°58'48", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 153.31 FEET, TO A POINT OF 'COMPOUND CURVATURE WITII A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, AND HAVING ARADIUS OF 58.00 FEET; THENCE NORTIIWESTERL Y, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TIIROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53°54'58", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 54.58 . FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WITII A CURVE, CONCAVE. NORTHEASTERL Y, HAVING A RADIUS OF 130.00 FEET; THENCE NORTIIWESTERL Y, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52°24'42", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 118.92 FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WITII A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERL Y, HAVING A RADIUS OF 4.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 77°30'05", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 5.41 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" WEST, ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1,278.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°00'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 456.86 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 975.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 38°43'01 ", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 658.84 FEET, TO A POINT OF NON-RADIAL INTERSECTION WIm A LINE (THE RADIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS soum 51 °16'59" WEST-FROM THIS POINT); THENCE NORTH 52°45'09" EAST ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 395.15 FEET; THENCE NORTH 78°15'06" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 907.21 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERL Y,.AND HA VING A RADIUS OF 4.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUQH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 99°48'52", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 6.97 FEET, TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 602.61 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52°10'10", AN ARC DISTANCE OF JOB NO.: B589 BY: JDM CHECKED: GRB F.B.: N/A PG.: N/A SHEET 2 OF ·6 . , - '- .. '1:.AWSON, NOBLE &WEBB, INC. ""'" LBU 6674 CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND PLANNERS, SURVEYORS 590 NW PEACOCK BLVD, SUITE 9, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA PHONE (561) 878-1700 548.69 FEET, TO A POINT OF NON-RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A LINE (THE RADIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 16°16'04" WEST FROM THIS POINT); THENCE NORTH 16°16'02" EAST ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF I71.26 FEET; THENCE NORTH 60°47'35" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 146.85 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF PORT ST. LUCIE SECTION 35 AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK IS, PAGE 10 OF THE PUBLIC RECÒRDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 89°54'10" EAST ALONG SAID LJ1'.lE, A DISTANCE OF 1,793.84 FEET, TO A POINT OF NON-RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 5,983.58 FEET, SAID CURVE BEING A PORTION OF THE WEST LINE OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN ORDER OF TAKING, DATED JULY 24, 1979, IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 311 , PAGES 2946 THRU 2952, PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY (THE RADIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH . " 85°05'37" EAST FROM THIS POIN1); THENCE TRAVERSING THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN ORDER OF TAKING, BY THE FOLLOWING ELEVEN (II) COURSES: I. SOUTHERL Y, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 23'i'~1 '41 ", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 2,474.52 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; 2. SOUTH 18°47'19" EAST ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 714.03 FEET; 3. " SOUTH 14°47'19" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 510.88 FEET; " 4. SOUTH 07°32'07" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 374.37 FEET; 5. SOUTH 06°58'16" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 373.49 FEET; 6. SOUTH 15°33'28" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 491.49 FEET; 7. SOUTH 34°39'50" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 207.78 FEET; 8. SOUTH 70°02'50" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 289.50 FEET; 9. SOUTH 00°01'45" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 64.09 FEET; " 10. SOUTH 82°24'53" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 317.56 FEET; 11. NORTH 89°58'15" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 635.24 FEET; TIIENCE DEPARTING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, SOUTH 89°57'05" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 737.23 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ......-..--...-.. . CONTAINING 234.33 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. ". . . " c ", JOB NO.: B589 BY: JDM CHECKED: GRB F.B.: N/A PG.: N/A SHEET 3 OF 6 "-" ....J LN\\' . Lawson, . . Noble . . . . . & Webb, ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS 590 NW Peacock Boulevard, Suite 9, Part St. Lucie, Florida 34986 (561J 878-1700 . fax: (561J 878-1802 . emoil: Inw-psl@lnw-inc.com West Palm Beach' Port St. Lucie . . . . ..- Inc. LB #6674 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION W w en en '" "' w w '" '" z z <{ <! a::·o::o en. .- ztri uiz 01--.1--0 ~.,.., top va... a..u ~ÏIÏ~ '" t{) z z :;: :;: o 0 -- -- CONTINUED SHEET 5 MATCH LINE SI8'47'19"E .s: 714.03' (TOT AU R~20SO.00' ð.~13·OI'56" L~466.28· ¡TOT AU z ~ ~. ;-&~ ~~ ~ (/) o ",--I --I " -I'~ bJõ -!-! rñ lWLATTED R~800.00' ð.=34 ·30'32"-L.. L=481.~' . C.D.D.-2 234.33 ACRES +/- ~ i'oi;) :-". CD,.., ¡o.... <DI<) o '" R=58.00' ð.=54·25'22" L=55.09' ~ R~58.00' &49'41'44"1 '- R=130.00' L=50.3I' '-ð.=90·41'07" L=20S.76' S34"39'SO"W 207,78'~ ::;; :;:::> ~!;t '1'0 ~!i! b~ o<{ "'w CD --fr~ P.D.B. g_ .0 29 _0 (] O u:!- ::.Ë R=25.00' ð.=89·38'04" L=39.11' S89'57'OS"W 737.23' ~ S89'S7'OS"W 737.09' P.o.c. ~ - - N. LINE SECTION 15 --.... ~ N89'58'IS"W 635.24' OR.8. 311, PAGES 2946-2952 GATLIN BOúLEVARD INTERCHANGE WITH 1-95 - ò o ~ II . w -' « o if) o w - CD ~o uw (f -- _ ~~~ (f . O(!)mN Za;cilil j~dg¡ lLl-á) 0"-.....<0 wo~v zO::. ..(J) :JW".N ON", I-a::~w ~05~ ~~,a.. 0() en w I- <{ l- t{) '" W -- i'S -Z U'lPLA TTED P.O.8. P.O.C. P.B. P.C. P RC. P.T. R ð. L N.R. ORB. ---- POINT OF BEGlt-.MNG POINT OF COMIÆNCEMENT PLA T BOOK POINT OF cæVATURE POINT OF REVERSE cæv A TURE POINT OF TANGENCY DENOTES RADIUS DENOTES DELTA DENOTES ARC LENGTH DENOTES NON-RADIAL DENOTES OFFICIAL RECORD 800K SEE SHEET 1. 2 & 3 OF 6 FOR DESCRIPTION JOB No. B589 DATE: 01-14-02 ¡'\Dot.\SOO-S99\BS89\CAD\BS89SK02-l.d.g 01/29/è002 Cè"è,Oè PM (ST SHEET 4 OF 6 BY: JDM CHECKED: GRB F.B. - PG. ~ . LN\\' . . . . Lawson, Noble & ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS 590 NW Peacock Boulevord, Suite 9, Port Sf. Lucie, Florida 34986 (56 ) 878-1700 ° fax: (561) 878-1802 ° email: Inw-psl@/nw-inc.com West Palm Beach ° Port St. Lucie "W1fI . . . . . . . .... Webb, Inc. LB #6674 SECTION 4 TOWNSHIP 37 S. RANGE 39 E. -NR. N 16°16'02·E 171.26' SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION _ ~ORT ST. LUCIE SECTION 35 ~ (PlATBOOKI5,PAGEI01 N8g054·1O·E 1793.84' \...:.- NGO·47'35"E 146.85' SI6·'6'04"W RADIAl ~ I R=602.61' ~ ò=S2°10'lO" L=S48.69' l SEE DETAIL ·B· N78°1S'06"E 907.21' (TOT AU <0 t- w ~.~ o - w --' => J: z Ü - t- ~ « o ::;; ü W m '" w C> z « a::~ W m '" ~ z ~ m : crlz Z'" 0 Or- 1'--_ ¡::"'."'t- uð.. 2:;u ~¡¡¡ ¡¡¡¡, ~·z ;;: ;;: o 0 t- t- C.D.D. -2 234.33 ACRES +/- ----.... ,./"\ " /' \ ", / \ \ / R=602.61' \ \ I Ò=52'IO'I~,,--\ \ L=S48.69 \ I I "\. R-4.00- \ tI18°15~!.. ~Ò=99°48'52· I \- - 9<>11.\ L=6.97' \ / , / " DETAIL "8" /' ....... ,./ ""---~,.., R=5983.58' ò=23°41'41"- L-2474.52' \ SEE DETAIL ·A" R-I3000' . R=4.00' Ò-S2024'42" Ò=77°30'OS" :) L=118.92' L=S.41' /' --." N90000'OO·W / '-R=58.00' 1278.80' Ò4s3054'58. (TOTAU \ r ~=S4.S8' \ / R=SOO.OO" ,./ ò=100S8·4S· L=lS3.31· ~ P.O.a. P.O.C. P.a. P.C. P .RC. P.T. R ò L N.R OR.B. POINT OF BEGII\MNG UNPLA TTED POINT OF COMMENCEMENT PLAT BOOK POINT OF CURVATURE POINT OF REVERSE CURVATIJRE POINT OF TANGENCY DENOTES RADIUS DENOTES DELTA DENOTES ARC LENGTH DENOTES NON-RADIAl DENOTES OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK SEE SHEET I, 2 & 3 OF 6 FOR DESCRIPTION JOB No. 8589 BY: JDM z o ",0 gö iDâ ON . :i ,....------.......... ,./ DETAIL °A· /' / N9Q°OO'OO"W / r 1278.80' L__(' I R=4.00' R=I~.~O' . ð=77030'05. \ /",Ò=:2244,2 I L=S.41' \( L-lIS.92 \ " \ R=S8.00'......... Ò-53°54'S8· ~\ \ L-S4.58' \ \ R=800.00' "- ò= 100S8'48·.,) /' '- ....... L=IS3.31' ____..v ------ P.T. . R=20S0.00' ð=13·OI'S6· r L=466,28' ---J (TOTAU MA TCH LINE CONTINUED SHEET 4 !'\D...\SOO-S99\B5e9\CAD\B589SK02-2.dwg 01/29/2002 02'56')6 PM CST Sl-£ET 5 OF 6 CHECKED: GRB F.B. - PG. ~·~'37"E RADIAL - o o <;j" II " W ....J « U (f) -, -. WEST LINE OF LMOS DESCRIBED IN ORDER OF TAKING, DATED JJLY 24,1979; O.RB. 311, PAGES 2946 - 2952 " "- \ \ \ \ I I / / / DATE: 01-14-02 t/") m w t- « t- V) a:: w t- ¡:o .-. . LN\\'vI . . . . Lawson, Noble & ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS 590 NW Peacock Boulevard, Suite 9, Pori SI. Lucie, Florido 34986 (561) 878-1700 . fox: (561) 878-1802 . emoi/: Inw-ps @lnw-inc.com West Palm Beach, Port St. Lucie . . . . . . ...... Webb, Inc. LB #6674 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION SECTION 9 TOWNSHIP 37 S., RANGE 39 E. t...WLATTED ~ P.O.B. POINT OF BEGItMNG P.O.c. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT P.8. PLAT BOOK P.C. POINT OF CURVATURE P.R.C. POINT OF REVERSE CLRVATURE P.T. POINT OF TANGENCY R DENOTES RADIUS ð. DENOTES DELTA L DENOTES ARC LENGTH NR. DENOTES NON-RADIAL OM. DENOTES OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK SEE Sf-EET I, 2 &. 3 OF 6 FOR DESCRIPTION JOB No. B589 BY: JDM . . R~975.00' ,---- ð.~38·43'OI·~ L~658.B4' c..D.D.-2 234.33 ACRES +/- w b. OW - OJ o . OW . 10 o~ o z ~IË ..J ~ o·ß ~II -, ô o '<t" II N90·OO'OO·W 127B,BO' (TOTAL) - ~ W ...J « ü if) r,\Do'o\SOO-599\BS89\CAD\BS89SK02-3,dwg 01/2912002 03,18,SB PM EST SHEET 6 OF 6 CHECKED: GRB F.B. - PG. DATE: 01-14-02 '-' """" EXHIBIT B EVIDENCE OF WRITTEN CONSENT OF OWNER TO REMOVAL OF PROPERTY FROM THE EXTERNAL BOUNDARIES OF WESTCHESTER NO.2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Westchester Development Company, LLC, a Florida limited liability company and successor by merger with Westchester Development Company ("Owner"), hereby certifies that it is the sole owner of approximately 23.12 acres of certain real property (the "Property"), located in St. Lucie County, Florida proposed to be excluded from within the boundaries of Westchester No. 2 Community Development District (the "District"). By signing below, the Owner hereby gives its full consent to the contraction of the external boundaries of the District to remove the Property therefrom. 'f....... IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand this/3 day of ~,.,"......., 2002. WESTCHESTER DEVELOPMENT COMP , LLC STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE ) The foregoing instrumen~ /was acknowledged before me this /3T/[. day of m/f¡le/¡ , 2002, by (//("~ heç.c/ep¡, the //;'Cê h.~ç,-./Of!"ßÎ' of WESSTCHESTER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, who is personally known to me [~ or produced as identification. I ~ . / J /~.?</~~ Notary Public Þ-~CJ/f- ¿J ¿d.4.-R..A!.e_ Printed Name: PATRICIA W. WARRENS I CC79199 EXPIRES NOV 28. 2OQ2 f ONOa) 11i1tOUOH AOVANTAGi HOTAi'I' " FTL:849260:2 'w ..." EXHIBIT C DESIGNATION OF THE FUTURE GENERAL DISTRIBUTION, LOCATION AND EXTENT OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE USES OF LAND PROPOSED FOR THE AREA TO BE REMOVED FROM THE DISTRICT FTL:849260:2 '-' .., 1,,;" C. ~1T , C -....." ~~. -""""...- ~ "..... ,.....- Not Included nil r - .......- --- .....-- ::: . - 4 - - ^ ,. , r- r ~\.. ]- .~ ;b en - . - ( - C I - - f- ~ ~ - - - ~ 11 ,.... __1_1___1_1___1_1___'_1- .'\ \ "'"r" ,... .... ..... io ( þ( 'F ~ r-. 1"- J I\. r--.. I I " ~ - G-51.-1 RU-5 1\ '\ .f\A)( n WESTCHESTER Existing Land Use St. Lucie County, Florida COD: LAND USE CATAGORY: TOTAL COD AREA: Ed A~5 I R~5 I M~~~~W I M~~¡~ED I 234M ...~ Lucido & Associates VJ;:¿, t..I~~ V .:...~-=-=".:::r--= o ,...... --- B33J AG-5, ~ 10.2 dJlacI ~ AlJ.5, _ Uban (5 dJlacI SOURCE; St lucie C<uIIy ~ Plan NOTE: þJ ~ are appoxmole. [[]] ~ MXD . Medim bIensfty MIxed Use [)eveIqJmont (5-9 dulacI MXD . Low Intensily MIxed Use [)eveIqJmont (S dJlacI J 1111111111111 Proposed Roed I2OC1 RJW) FTL:849260:2 '-' .." EXHIBIT D STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS '- ..., STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT #2 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Purpose and Scope This statement of estimated regulatory costs ("SERC") supports the petition to contract the boundaries of the Westchester Community Development District #2 ("District" or "District #2"). The District was established by Ordinance No. 01-011 of St. Lucie County on August 21, 2001. The District currently comprises approximately 257.45 acres of land located in St. Lucie County. The District proposes to contract its boundaries by -23.12 acres to a total of 234.33 acres. The limitations on the scope of this SERC are explicitly set out in Section 190.002(2)(d), F.S. (governing District formation or alteration) as follows: "That the process of establishing such a district pursuant to uniform general law - shall be fair and based only on factors material to manaQinQ and financinq the service delivery function of the district, so that any matter concerninQ permittinQ or planninq of the development is not material or relevant (emphasis added)." 1.2 Overview of the Westchester DRI and the Changes Requested in the Boundaries of the Four Community Development Districts Serving Westchester On August 21, 2001 the S1. Lucie County Commission approved the formation of four Community Development Districts to provide community facilities and services to the Westchester DR!. District #2 is designed to provide community infrastructure, services, and facilities along with their operations and maintenance, to a portion of the Westchester DRI located in St. Lucie County (the "development"). The development is a master planned, mixed-use, fully amenitized, community. The DRI includes 2,033 acres. The landowner has established community development districts on 1,677.74 of these acres. The land plan for the portion of the DRI planned for community development districts consists of up to: (a) 4,500 residential units, (b) 2,001,000 square feet of offices, (c) 575,000 square feet of retail space, and (d) 300 hotel units. Given the size and scope of the development, St. Lucie County agreed to establish four community development districts to serve the project. Four districts are optimal for the development because this articulation allows for each district to focus on the unique requirements of the land within its boundaries. District #1 serves an exclusively commercial area in the project that will be developed in the first phase of the development program. By contrast, the land in District #2 is planned exclusively as a corporate office park with a civic/school site. The land in District #3 is planned only for use as a residential community with no commercial, retail, or office uses. Finally, District #4 is projected for future development as a town center with retail uses at its core and surrounding Page 1 of6 February 25, 2002 '- ..."", residential uses. No offices are planned for the land in District #4. In light of these very different land uses, and the unique demands for community development district facilities and services, it is optimal to create four unique community development districts, one for each area. Table 1 displays the land use plan for the lands within each of the four proposed community development districts planned for the Westchester DRI as envisioned in the petitions to form the Districts. Noted at the time the petitions to form the Districts were filed, was the fact that the land use plans were "subject to change as land planning activities continue". Table 1. land Use Plan for the Area in Westchester Served by the Westchester Community Development Districts #1 through #4 Category CDD#1 CDD#2 CDD#3 CDD#4 Total Acres 74.25 257.45 463.60 882.44 1,677.74 Single Family 0 0 863 2,512 3,375 Multifamily 0 0 287 838 1,125 Retail 125,000 0 0 450,000 575,000 Office 78,500 1,922,500 0 0 2,001,000 Hotel 0 0 0 300 300 Source: St. Lucie West Development Corporation As land use planning and engineering analysis has progressed at Westchester, a number of desired adjustments have come to light. No changes in the total volume of development are proposed. However, the distribution of the development across the four Districts is now somewhat different than originally expected. The rationale for forming four distinct districts was based on the unique land use mix that was originally anticipated for lands included in each District. Since the land use plans have changed somewhat, it is desirable to alter the boundaries of the various Districts to reflect these changes. Table 2 presents to proposed new land use plan for each District as well as the proposed new acreage totals for each District. Page 2 of 6 February 25. 2002 '- ..."" Table 2. Land Use Plan for the Proposed Areas in Westchester Served by the Westchester Community Development Districts #1 through #4 As Modified Category Acres Single family units Multifamily units Retail sqft Office sqft Hotel rooms CDD#1 59.43 ° o 125,000 78,500 ° CDD#2 234.33 ° ° o 1,922,500 o CDD#3 499.87 863 287 o ° ° CDD#4 884.12 2,512 838 450,000 ° 300 Total 1,677.75 3,375 1,125 575,000 2,001,000 300 The changes proposed for the acreage and land uses in each District are provided in Table 3. It is important to note that no change in total development is proposed. Furthermore, the proposed volume and distribution of development in each District is the same as originally proposed. The changes involve redistributing the acreage among the Districts, so that the original land uses are - preserved. Table 3. Changes in the Land Use Plans Proposed for Westchester Co"?munity Development Districts #1 through #4 As Modified Category Acres Single family units Multifamily units Retail sqft Office sqft Hotel rooms CDD#1 -14.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CDD#2 -23.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CDD#3 36.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CDD#4 1.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 The Westchester Community Development District #2 continues to be planned as an office park in the DR/. District #2 will provide community development district facilities and services to 234.33 acres in the District. In addition, District #1 will serve as the master community development district for the additional districts that are planned for the development. In that role the District will also provide community-serving infrastructure that provides benefits to all four of the community development districts envisioned to serve the Westchester DRI. These master improvements include major entrance roads, entry statements, landscaping, master stormwater control, and master utilities. The debt service and operation/maintenance costs incurred by District #1 to provide the master community improvements will be funded through non ad valorem special assessments on all benefiting property in the development. District #1 may also operate and maintain localized infrastructure within any of the other three districts that is integrally related to the master community improvements, if a district desires to delegate that function and District #1 Page 30f6 February 25. 2002 "-' ..." desires to accept the same. It is anticipated that the four community development districts will enter into a series of inter local agreements providing for this sharing of master improvement, operating and maintenance costs. 1.3 Requirements for Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs Section 120.541(2), F.S. (1997), defines the elements a statement of estimated regulatory costs must contain: "(a) A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be required to comply with the rule, together with a general description of the types of individuals likely to be affected by the rule. (b) A good faith estimate of the cost to the agency, and to any other state and local government entities, of implementing and enforcing the proposed rule, and any anticipated effect on state and local revenues. (c) A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by- individuals and entities, including local governmental entities, required to comply with the requirements of the rule. As used in this paragraph, "transactional costs" are direct costs that are readily ascertainable based upon standard business practices, and include filing fees, the cost of obtaining a license, the cost of equipment required to be installed or used or procedures required to be employed in complying with the rule, additional operating costs incurred, and the cost of monitoring and reporting. (d) An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined by Section 288.703, F.S., and an analysis of the impact on small counties and small cities as defined by Section 120.52, F.S. St. Lucie County is not defined as a small County for purposes of this requirement. (e) Any additional information that the agency determines may be useful. 2.0 A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be required to comply with the ordinance, together with a general description of the types of individuals likely to be affected by the ordinance. There will be no individuals or entities affected by approval of the proposed contraction in the boundaries of District #2. District #2 is an already existing Community Development District. The petition to contract its boundaries by approximately -23.12 acres will have no impact on either the remaining 234.33 acres in the District or on the -23.12 acres contracted out of the District for the following reasons. First, as noted above, neither the costs nor the volume of development planned for District #2 will change if the proposed boundary change is approved. So, there will be no impact on land in District #2. Second, the contraction parcel will be included in the expansion of other Districts. Again, since neither the costs nor Page 4 of 6 February 25. 2002 '-" -.,,¡I the volume of development will change in any other District, there is no impact on any individual or entity if the proposal is approved. 3.0 Good faith estimate of the cost to state and local government entities, of implementing and enforcing the proposed ordinance, and any anticipated effect on state and local revenues. 3.1 Costs to Governmental Agencies of Implementing and Enforcing Ordinance State Governmental Entities There will be no cost to any governmental agencies to implement or to enforce the proposed ordinance. District #2 is an existing Community Development District in good standing. Altering its boundaries will not change the costs for any State governmental entity. St. Lucie County St. Lucie County will incur no costs associated with this proposed Ordinance beyond reviewing the petition and its supporting exhibits. The petition itself provides much of the information needed for a staff review. St. Lucie County already possess the staff needed to conduct the review without the need for new staff. In addition, there is no capital required to review the petition. Finally, local governments routinely process similar petitions for land uses and zoning changes that are far more complex than is the petition to alter the boundaries of District #2. There is no annual cost to the County, because the District is an existing Community Development District in good standing. Approving a change in the District's boundaries does not impact annual costs to the County in any way. 3.2 Impact on State and Local Revenues Adoption of the proposed ordinance will have no negative impact on State or local revenues. The District is an existing Community Development District. As an independent unit of local government, the District is designed to be a self funding entity in terms of its obligations under Chapter 190, F.S. Altering its boundaries, as proposed here, has no impact on State or local revenues. 4.0 A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by individuals and entities required to comply with the requirements of the ordinance. " There are no transactional costs associated with approving this alteration in the boundaries of the District. As noted above, the amount of development and the number of acres served by all the Districts will no change if the Ordinance is approved. Furthermore, the volume of development and the costs for providing Page 5 of 6 February 25, 2002 ~ District facilities and services is also unchanged. estimated costs and the timetable for construction. ..." Exhibit 8 contains the 5.0 An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined by Section 288.703, F.S., and an analysis of the impact on small counties and small cities as defined by Section 120.52, F.S. There will be no impact on small businesses because of the changes proposed in the District's boundaries. The District is an existing Community Development District. The costs to provide infrastructure and services has not changed nor has the volume of development planned for the District. St. Lucie County has an estimated population that is greater than 10,000 in the most current census (2000). Therefore, the County is not defined as a "small" county according to Section 120.52, F.S. 6.0 Any additional useful information. The analysis provided above is based on a straightforward application of economic theory, especially as it relates to tracking the incidence of regulatory costs and ben~fits. Inputs were received from the Developer's Engineer and other professionals associated with the Developer. ¡ , Page 6 of 6 February 25, 2002 " .V' '-' AGENDA REOUEST .."", ITEM NO. DATE: 03/26/02 CONSENT [ REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [)<1 Leg. [ X ] Quasi-Jud. [ s¿ SUBJECT: Consider the petition of The Board of Superviso Development District No. 3 for an amendment of the community development district known as "Westchester Community Development District No.3" - Draft Ordinance 02-012. PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Communitv Development BACKGROUND: The Board of Supervisors of Westchester Community Development District No. 3 has filed a petition with St. Lucie County to amend the community development district known as "Westchester Community Development District No.3" . The Westchester Community Development District No. 3 is proposed to occupy 499.87 acres instead of the 463.06 acres originally proposed. The subject property is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Interstate 95 and the proposed extension of Gatlin Boulevard. The attached Exhibit provides a general location map for the boundaries of Westchester Community Development District No.3. It should be emphasized that at this time there are no existing occupied residential properties in this Proposed Westchester Community Development District No.3. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: On August 21, 2001, The Board of County Commissioners granted approval to Ordinance 01-012, establishing the community development district known as Westchester CDD #3. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve Draft Ordinance 02-012, authorizing an amendment to the boundaries of the. community development district known as "Westchester Community Developmeh~ District No.3". . [ X] [ ] APPROVED OTHER: 4-0 [ ] DENIED (Hutchinson Absent) ~ COMMISSION ACTION: County Attorney: Review ðnd AODrovals Management & Budget: Purchasing: Originating Department: Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) '-'" >.J COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: March 26, 2002 Ordinance 02-012 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Community Development Director DATE: March 20,2002 SUBJECT: Petition of The Board of Supervisors of Westchester Community Development District No.3, to amend the community development district known as "Westchester Community Development District No.3" - Draft Ordinance 02-012 The Board of Supervisors for Westchester Community Development District NO.3 has filed a petition with S1. Lucie County for an amendment to Westchester Community Development District NO.3. Westchester CDD No.3 was originally proposed to contain 463.06 acres, but will now contain 499.87 acres. The change in boundaries was in response to changes in the master plan for the Westchester project. On August 21, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners approved the establishment of Westchester Community Development District No. 3 located at the corner of the intersection of Interstate 95 and the proposed extension of Gatlin Boulevard. The attached Exhibit provides a general location map for the boundaries of Westchester COD No.3. It should be emphasized that at this time there are no existing occupied residential properties in this proposed Westchester CDD NO.3. Attached is a copy of Draft Ordinance 02-012 that provides for the amendment of Westchester CDD NO.3. Staff recommends approval of Draft Ordinance 02-012. hf cc: Doug Anderson, County Admisistrator Daniel Mcintyre, County Attorney David P. Kelly. Planning Manager Noreen Dreyer, Esquire - Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster & Russell, PA '\ 'te5\ Blvd \.Jüc\e 13\ Prima Vista ,Blvd ~ò p~ v~ òt;õ"" ø~ (') ¡I) ::;; o .... :J ¡D" rn < 0.. -0 a: Gatlin Blvd Q) c: :::J Q) OJ c: (I a: Westchester CDD #3 ~ ro (') ¡I) rn3- <3 o..CD .... CD (I (f¡ e <ë -0 > ro (I c: o fi3 en . '-'-' .-., , "..", /", '\ .: ',; ".> ~4Ø.~ Thõs mop ..... boon c:o<rØed let gonoooJ pIorring ond ..........,. purposes oriy. \'He -v .rran has been __ 10 pnMde Ihe moot """"'" end accureIe I_Ion ~... not ntended Iet.- .. . legally binding docurent. t GRAPHIC SCAL..E ~ I I \ . .....c. o O.~ 1 ~ j St. Lucie County Martin County N " ~ .., ~"., c~ , "iT a .-",'" ~1i _.....,..... " --- ,..,-- Not Included nil L ---- -,...... .,. -.-- ::: -. - - A ~ " ,. II- ~\. 1:1" r~ I õ - I) P <D c.n - , \ - 1-0 ) \ ( \ - ¡ - . I- Š W"~ i ~ I- : f- ,. .> II ¡..... l'\ ro. ,... ... (þ 'F~' , 1'\ , II 10 Ì" ,." Ì' 11-. I I I 1'\ I~ - '\ G-~~ RU-5 .t\A)(n. '1\ " WESTCHESTER Existing Land Use S1. Lucie County, Florida - TOTAl COO AREA: 499.87 ~~ Lucido & Associates ð v,,;:y ~~~ ~ v ~~ I"'~ -~ EEEE AB-S, AgIa.IIan (0.2 c1Ifad ~ RU-5. ReoIdonIIoI Ubon C5 c1Ifad [[ill t.IXO. ~ InIeno/tf IoIxed Uoe DewIopoY*II IS c1Ifad ~ uxo· Modbn..-y_ ~ Uoe o..oIcpmeo. ~9 c1Ifad 11111111111111 Propooed _ C2OO' RIWI SOURCE: S1. LucIII Co.nIy COO..."'..._ Plan NOT£: AlIICtUgII are I >pO>CknaIe. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 '-' ...I ORDINANCE 02-012 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 01-012 GRANTED ON AUGUST 21, 2001 , ESTABLISHING THE WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO.3, AMONG OTHER MATTERS AND AMENDING CHAPTER 1-6.5-81 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; IN ORDER TO EXPAND THE EXTERNAL BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT AND ESTABLISH THE REVISED BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE; PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; AND SETTING FORTH THE VOTE ON ADOPTION. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including, but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. On August 21, 2001, St. Lucie County granted approval to Ordinance 01-012 amending Chapter 1-6.5 "Community Development" of the St. Lucie County Code and Compiled Laws and establishing the Westchester Community Development District NO.3 as a community development district pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, and its boundaries, among other matters. The boundaries of Westchester COD No.3 contain 463.06 acres of land entirely within the jurisdictional boundaries of St. Lucie County. 2. The Board of Supervisors of Westchester Community Development District No.3, has filed with the Board a petition for an amendment of the community development district, which petition contains the information required by Section 190.046(1), Florida Statutes. The Petitioner is requesting that the boundaries of Westchester COD NO.3 be expanded to 499.87 acres of land. 3. In accordance with Section 190.046(1 )(b), Florida Statutes, the Board held à· public hearing on March 26, 2002, after publishing notice of such hearing in the Ft. Pierce Tribune and the Port St. Lucie News on March 15, 2002. " " Double Underline is for addition Ðtrilla "f o, I)I; ¡ M IS for deletion Ordinance 02-012 1st Draft Page 1 Print Date: 03/20/02 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 '-' ...I ~ (a) The Board has considered the record of the public hearing and the factors set forth in Section 190.005 (I) (e), Florida Statutes, and has found that: (b) All statements contained within the petition are true and correct; (c) The land to be removed from the District does not exceed 50% of the acres initially located within the District and the Board of Supervisors of the District has not previously petitioned St. Lucie County for the expansion or contraction of the District;'s boundaries. (d) The amendment of this district is consistent with all applicable elements and portions of the state comprehensive plan and the effective local government comprehensive plan; (e) The area of land within the proposed district is of sufficient size, is sufficiently compact, and is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one functional interrelated community; (e) The district is the best alternative available for delivering the community development services and facilities to the area that will be served by the district; (f) The community development services and facilities for the district will be compatible with the capacity and uses of the existing local and regional community development services and facilities; and, " (g) The area that will be served by the district following contraction is amenable to separate special district government. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: PART A. GRANT OF PETITION; AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 01-012 TO ESTABLISH NEW EXTERNAL BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT. Part A of Ordinance 01-012 is hereby amended to expand the external boundaries of the District by deleting Exhibit A to Ordinance 01-012 in its entirety and replacing it with Exhibit A attached hereto. Accordingly, Section 1-6.5-81 of the Code of Compiled Laws establishing the boundaries of the District is hereby amended so that references therein to Exhibit CIA" shall mean Exhibit A attached hereto. " Double Underline is for addition Glril(ð l't1rð~! " IS for deletion Ordinance 02-012 1st Draft Page 2 Print Date: 03120102 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 ~ .." "'. ~ PART B. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, County ordinances, and County resolutions. or parts thereof, in conflict with this ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict. PART C. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative. or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance. If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person, property, or circumstance, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person, property, or circumstance. PART D. APPLICABILITY OF ORDINANCE. This ordinance shall be applicable throughout St. Lucie County's jurisdiction. PART E. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE. The Clerk be and is hereby directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of Administrative Code and Laws. Department of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida 32304. PART F. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State. PART G. ADOPTION. After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows: Chairwoman Doug Coward XXX Vice-Chairman Cliff Barnes XXX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX Commissioner Paula A. Lewis XXX Double Underline is for addition Gtril\c Throtl!lh IS for deletion Ordinance 02-012 1st Draft Page 3 Print Date: 03/20/02 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 '-" ...,¡ 'i" ~~ Commissioner John D. Bruhn xxx PART H. CODIFICATION. Provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated in the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or other appropriate word, and the sections of this ordinance may be re-numbered or re- lettered to accomplish such intention; provided, however, that Parts B through H shall not be codified. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 26th Day of March 2002. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: Deputy Clerk County Attorney "' hf H:\WP\Petitions\BCC\Finished.2002\Westchester3.CDD\Westchester30RD Double Under1ine is for addition StNI!" Thro~!l1I is for deletion Ordinance 02-012 1st Draft Page 4 Print Date: 03/20/02 '-'" """" COUNTY COMMISSION ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA IN RE: PETITION PURSUANT TO SECTION 190.046(1), FLORIDA STATUTES, TO EXPAND THE BOUNDARIES OF WESTCHESTER NO.3 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT / PETITION TO EXPAND BOUNDARIES OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT The Board of Supervisors (the "Board") of the Westchester No. 3 Community Development District, an independent special district established pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida Statutes (the "District") by Ordinance No. 01-012 (the "Ordinance") of St. Lucie County, Florida (the "County") enacted on August 21, 2001 hereby petitions the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA (the "Commission") in accordance with Section 190.046(1) of the Uniform Community Development Act of 1980, Chapter 190, Florida Statutes (the "Act") to expand the boundaries of the District and in support thereof, hereby attests as follows: 1. That approximately 463.60 acres are currently within the external boundaries of the District. 2. That the Board desires to expand the boundaries of the District by adding acres, so that thereafter the land area to be served by the District will comprise approximately 499.873 acres. Following such expansion of the District's boundaries, all lands in the District will continue to be located wholly within the jurisdictional boundaries of the County. 3. That the real property to be included within the external boundaries of the District does not exceed 50% of the acres initially located within the boundaries of the District and the Board has not previously submitted to the Commission a petition seeking expansion or contraction of the District's boundaries. 4. That annexed hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof is a metes and bounds description of the external boundaries of the District following the proposed expansion of such boundaries. No real property within the external boundaries of the District as proposed is to be excluded therefrom. FTL:823447:3 '-" ...." 5. That annexed hereto as Exhibit B is the proposed timetable for construction of any Qistrict services to the area to be newly included the District and the estimated cost of contructing the proposed services. 6. That annexed hereto as Exhibit C and made a part hereof is evidence of the written consent to the inclusion of its property in the District by the owner of one hundred percent (100%) ofthe real property to be included within the District. 7. That annexed hereto as Exhibit D and made a part hereof is a designation of the future general distribution, location, and extent of public and private uses of land proposed for the area to be included from the District by the future land use plan element of the effective local government comprehensive plan, 8. That annexed hereto as Exhibit E and made a part hereof is a statement of estimated regulatory costs in accordance with the requirements of Section 120.541, Florida Statutes. 9. That following the proposed expansion of the District's boundaries, (i) the property within the District will not be inconsistent with any applicable element or portion of the state comprehensive plan or of the effective local government comprehensive plan; (ii) the property comprising the District will be of sufficient size, compactness, and contiguity to be developable as one functional interrelated community; (Hi) the District will continue to present the best alternative available for delivering the community development facilities and services to the property that will be served by the District; (iv) the community development facilities and services of the District will not be incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and regional community development services and facilities; and (v) the property comprising the District will be amenable to separate special-purpose government. 10. That all statements contained within this Petition are true and correct. WHEREFORE, Petitioner, the Board of Supervisors of the Westchester No. 3 Community Development District, hereby respectfully requests the Commission to: A. Direct its staff to notice, as soon as practicable, a local public non-emergency hearing pursuant to the requirements of Section 190.046(l)(b) of the Act to consider whether to grant the petition for the expansion of the District's boundaries and to amend the Ordinance establishing the District to reflect the new boundaries of the District. B. Grant the petition and enact an ordinance pursuant to applicable law amending the Ordinance establishing the District to reflect the new boundaries of the District. " FTL:823447:3 2 '-" ....I RESPECTFULLY SUBMITIED this/3 7 d;Y of ~... "', ........ ,2002. WESTCHESTER NO.3 COMMUNITY D>~ENT DISTRICT By: -;/#~ Tit e: ¿ A '. ,..- -----, .. --.::> . STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE ) The foregoing instmment was acknowl~ged before me this /371Í day of J1J¡l-Jtt'!1t , 2002, by ::¡;;,.~ ¡'//l.lJl<.¥sa,J , the ér.t'-t/.4-.J of the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF WESTCHESTER NO. 3 COMMUNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, who is personally known to me [(] or produced as identification. Notary Public ~þJ~~ Printed Name: -At/A" /è-',; A. W. ¿¿/4~c:-# PATRICIA W, WARREN MMISSION II CC79I99 5 EXPIRES NOV 28. 2002 &eNDeD tHROUGH ~AHTAGE HOTAR'f FTl:823447:3 3 FTl:823447:3 ...... ...." EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION/METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION YAWSON, NOBLE &WEBB, INC. ...,¡ LB# 6674 CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND PLANNERS, SURVEYORS 590 NW PEACOCK BLVD, SUITE 9/ PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA PHONE (561) 878-1700 CDD-3 AJlARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTIONS 8, 9,10,16 & 17, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: "" COMMENCE AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF GATLIN BOULEVARD o (ALSO BEING THE NORTH LINE OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAS}) AND THE WESTERLY LIMITS OF GA TLIN BOULEVARD RIGHT-OF- WAY AND THE WESTERLY LIMITS OF THOSE LANDS DESCRIBED IN AN ORDER OF TAKING DATED JULY 4, 1979 AND RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 311, PAGES 2946 THROUGH , 2952, lNCLUSIVE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID ST. LUCIE COUNTY AND AS SHOWN ON THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY MAPS FOR STATE ROAD NO.9 (1-95), SECTION 94001 - 2412, DATED 06/02/77, WITH LAST REVISION OF 09/l1179 (THE ABOVE DESCRI-\iJED WESTERLY LIMITS OF GATLIN BOULEVARD BEAR SOUTH 00°01'45" WEST AND ALL BEARINGS ARE RELATIVE THERETO); THENCE SOUTH ~9°57'05" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 737.09 FEET; THENCE NORTII 00°02'55" WEST, A DISTANCp.QF 100.00 FEET, TO A POINT OF RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTIIWESTERL Y, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHEAS1ERL Y, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 1HROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89°38'04", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 39.1 I FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE EAS1ERL Y,HA VING A RADIUS OF 781.00 FEET; THENCE NORTIlERL Y, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CEN1RAL ANGLE OF 34°34'43", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 471.34 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A tINE; THENCE NORTH 34°53'43" EAST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF291.45 FEET, TO THE POINT OF GURV ATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 58.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TIIROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49°41'44", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 50.31 FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURV oRE A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF J F~ ° ENCE NO EASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE ÄRY R. BURFORD, PSM PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER STATE OF FLORIDA REG. NO. 4981 DATE: / - :30 - 0"'2.- REvrSIONS-UPDA TES DATE BY CK'D NOTE: THIS IS NOT A SKETCH OF SURVEY, BUT ONL...,. A GRAPHIC DEPICTION OF THE DESCRIPTION SHOWN HEREON. THERE'HAS BEEN NO FIELD WORK, VIEWING OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, OR MONUMENTS SET IN CONNECTION WITH THE PREPARATION OF THIS INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON. NOTE: LANDS SHOWN HEREON WERE NOT ABSTRACTED FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY AND/OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD. JOB NO.: B589 BY: JDM CHECKED: GRB F.B.: N/A . PG.: N/A SHEET 1 OF 8 b\ WSON¡ NOBLE &WEBB, IN.c. ...I LS# 6674 CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND PLANNERS, SURVEYORS 590 NW PEACOCK BLVD, SUITE 9; PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA PHONE (561) 878-1700 THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°41'07", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 205.76 FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 58.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 54°25'22", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 55.09 . FEET, TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, AND HA VINa A RADIUS OF 800.00 FEET; TIlENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°30'32", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 481.83 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE NORTH 13°02'47" WEST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 58.53 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEm;:IN DESCRIBED PARCEL, AND TIlE POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 4.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 76°57'13", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 5.37 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" WEST, ALONG ~AID LINE A DISTANCE OF 1,253.56 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°00'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 239.96 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°59'59" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 345.02 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURV A TORE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 275.00 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12°15'48", AN ARC DISTANCE' OF 58.86 FEET, TO A POINT OF NON-RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A LINE (THE RADIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 12°15'49" EAST FROM THIS POIN1); THENCE SOUTH 15°14'57" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 513.76 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 19°29'57" WE~T, A DISTANCE OF 295.52 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70°10'5 I" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 208.88 FEET; THENCE NORTH 75°49'33" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 472.34 FEET; THENCE , NORTH 39°04'35" WEST; A DISTANCE OF 189.81 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 476.82 FEET; THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 85.88 FEET; THENCE NORTH 44°52'57" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 35.28 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00014'07" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 20.18 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°45'53" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 120.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45°26'22" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 35.23 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°13'48" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 44°33'37" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 35.47 FEET; THENCE sourn 00°14'07" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 833.93 FEET, TO A POINT OF NON-RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE, CONÇA VE SOUTHEASTERL Y, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 300.00 FEET (THE RADIUS POINT OF SAIp CURVE BEARS SOUTH I 1°18'05" EAST FROM THIS POINT); THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 78°44'50", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 412.32 FEET, TO A POINT OF RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A LINE; THENCE SOUTH 89°57'05" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 4,508.27 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°00'15" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2,492.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°59'45" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 24,7.81 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERL Y, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 178.00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC ÙF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22°45'14", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 70.69 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE SOUTH 67°15'01" EAST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 214.49 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A JOB NO.: B589 BY: JDM CHECKED: GRB F.B.: N/A PG.: N/A SHEET 2 OF 8 -, - . . ~AWSON, NOBLE &WEBB, IN,C. '.J LB# 6674 CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND PLANNERS, SURVEYORS 590 NW PEACOCK BLVD, SUITE 9, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA PHONE (561) 878-1700 CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,920.49 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05°06'57", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 171.48 FEET, TO A POINT OF NON-RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A LINE (THE RADIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 27°51'57" WEST FROM THIS POINT); TI-lENCE NORTH 28°35'46" EAST ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 126.07 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 57°54'11" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 487.55 FEET, TO THE POINT OFCURV ATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 960.00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 43°11'52", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 723.79 FEET, TO A POIN,T OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE NORTH 78°53'57" EAST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 122.41 FEET, TO A POINT OF NON-RADIAL INTERSECTION WITI-I A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1;864.29 FEET (mE RADIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 11 °33'47" EAST FROM THIS POINT); THENCE EASTERL Y, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10°42'24", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 348.37 FEET, TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE S0UTHERL Y, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,649.48 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01 °33'23", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 71.98 FEÈT, TO A POINT OF NON-RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A LINE (THE RADIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 00°42'00" WEST FROM THIS POINT); TI-lENCE NORTH 00°07'32" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 8.74 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, AND HA VING A RADIUS OF 120.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26°06'27", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 54.68 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE NORTH 25°58'55" WEST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 213.43 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 380.00 FEET; THENCE NORTIIERL Y, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TI-lROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53°12'15", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 352.86 FEET, TO A POINT OF NON-RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A LINE (THE RADIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 62°46'40" EAST FROM TIllS POINT); THENCE SOUTH 81°36'23" EAST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF-66.58 FEET; THENCE NORTH 74°33'46" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 84.83 FEET; THENCE NORTH 05°28'36" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 93.42 FEET; THENCE NORTH 13°36'12" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 148.52 FEET; THENCE NORTH 04°31'12" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 121.23 FEET; THENCE NORTH 56°31'08'" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 413.01 FEET, TO A POINT OF NON-RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 250.00 FEET (THE RADIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS NORTH 48°06'40" WEST FROM THIS POIN1); THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 37°00;29", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 161.48 FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 250.OÖ FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 40°07'09", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 175.05 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE NORTH 45°00'00" EAST, ALONG SAID LINE A .,. . JOB NO.: 8589 BY: JDM CHECKED: GRB F.B.: N/A PG.: N/A SHEET 3 OF 8 . -, > . - " ~AWSON, NOBLE &WEBB, INC. ...., lB# 6674 CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND PLANNERS, SURVEYORS 590 NW PEACOCK BLVD, SUITE 9, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA PHONE (561) 878-1700 DISTANCE OF 1,130.54 FEET; THENCE NORTH 45°00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 384.99 FEET; THENCE NORTH 45°00'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45°00'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 115.12 FEET; THENCE NORTH 7r28'34" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 85.31 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCA VB SOUTHERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 925.00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID'CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 32°13'29", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 520.24 FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 420.00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TIIROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 33°01'35", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 242.1 0 FEET, TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERL Y, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,766.70 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY, " ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10°04'04", AN ARC . DISTANCE OF 486.15 FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTIIERL Y, HAVING A RADIUS OF 346.92 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 62°00'28", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 375.45 FEET, TO'A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE SOUTH 51 °23'09" EAST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 430.16 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,025.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12°44'26", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 227.92 FEET, TO A POINT OF . NON-RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A LINE (THE RADIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 51 °21'17" WEST FROM TIllS POIN}); TIIENCE SOUTH 52°45'09" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 50.02 FEET, TO A POINT OF NON-RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH À CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 975.00 FEET (THE RADIUS POINT OF SAID . CURVE BEARS SOUTH 51°16'59" WEST FROM THIS POIN}); THENCE SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 38°43'01 ", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 658.84 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE SOUTH 00°00'00" EAST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 456.86 FEET; THENCE NORTII 90°00'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1,278.80 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCA VB SOUTIIWESTERL Y, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 4.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 77°30'05", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 5.41 FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 130.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERL Y, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52°24'42", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 118.92 FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 58.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTIIEASTERL Y, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53°54'~8", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 54.58 FEET, TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 800.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10°58'48", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 153.31 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; TIIENCE SOUTH 00°00'52" EAST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 608.90 JOB NO.: B589 BY: JDM CHECKED: GAB F.B.: N/A PG.: N/A SHEET 4 OF 8 > -- .' \w: .."" L'AWSON, NOBLE &WEBB, IN·C. lB# 6674 CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND PLANNERS, SURVEYORS 590 NW PEACOCK BLVD, SUITE 9, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA PHONE (561) 878-1700 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,050.00 FEET; TIIENCE SOUTHERL Y, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13°01'56", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 466.28 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE SOUTH 13°02'47" EAST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 278.56 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 499.87 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. "' .-.-.- - . . . .. .:. ., . JOB NO.: B589 BY: JDM CHECKED: GRB F.B.: N/A PG.: N/A SHEET 5 OF B \w-' LN\\' . Lawson, Noble ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS 590 NW Peocock Boulevord, Suite 9, Pori SI. Lucie, Florido 34986 (561) 878-1700 " fax: (561) 878-1802 " ernail: Inw-psl@lnw-inc.com West Palm Beach" Port St. Lucie . . . . & . . . . . . . .... Webb, Inc. LB #6674 ....,I SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION CONTINUED SHEET 7 t- MATCH LINE (f) ::tmO ooq uj uj -jOJO 0 Þw. ( ' '", ro'" 0 r<"> r<"> - -N .<;t W w nl /I ( ' ~'~2 z<[ «z : 0"':. ":0 UNPLATTED. ~ ¡::ui ui~ W u..... ,....u '- ~~ rr>m ...J C.D;D.-3 "- "- <I: ~ ~ U 499.87 ACRES +/- '" '" R-20SO.00' z z if) ~.~ 6=13"01'56" I- I- L=466.28' NI3"02'47"W -x 58.53' I "-SEE DETAIL R=800.00' I 6=34"30'32"-Ll L=481.83· I R=58.00' I 6=54"25'22" L=SS.09' Y R=S8.00' ð=49"41'44"-cI,,- R=130.00' L=SO.31' ~~ 6=90"41'07" I L=205.76' I. / '-N34"53'43"E R=781.00' I 291.4S' 6=34"34'43"Z L=471.34' I ! / I R=2S.00' ð=89"38'04" )S L=39.1I' _ _I rl 100.00' -.J C NOO'02'55"W I l"- I- w w ~ Z (f) :J o :>: w u ~ ~ 1-':::;: Z o u N90"OO'OO"W r 85.88' (TOT AU R=275.00' ð=12"IS'48", L=58.86' \ . ;: <D, O"! 8 en. r<>o NO 589"S9'S9"W 8 34S.02' '" N90"OO'OO"W 1253.56' UNPLATTED ;: 8<" _ IX) gc.ó " I"- 8V z ~ "'~ ~'" <I> ....... . - 0\ ~tD ~~~ .... ~ -;""-1(> '!,Ø\ ~ '-... '- SI9"29'57"W 295.52' ~ P.Oß. P.O.C. P.8. P.C. P.R.C. P.T. R 6 L N.R. O.R.B. POINT OF BEGINNING POINT OF COMMENCEMENT PLAT BOOK . POINT OF cæVATL.Æ: POINT OF REVERSE CURVATLÆ POINT OF TANGENCY DENOTES RADIUS DENOTES DElTA DENOTES ARC LENGTH DENOTES NON-RADIAL DENOTES OFFICIAL RECORD 800K UNPLATTED '=S89'5T05'W 737.09' SEE SHEETS I - 5 OF 8 FOR DESCRIPTION P.O.B. (\ In en N I <D v --'en -N r<'I", ~~ 0;<[ OlL 0:>: "'I- ;;~ ~.. ;:~ ~~ '5" . I- OZ t= 10« "';! u ::~ ~u w Oz ..JffilO (f) å¡r I-I-en w 0« t3~..!.. ~ lÆ~ ~P.~.¿ ~ JOB No. 8589 PG. (,\Ooto\SOO-599\B589\CAO\B589SK03-1'''wg 01/29/2002 03'35'14 PM EST SHEET 6 OF B DATE: 01-14-02 BY: JDM CHECKED: GRB F.B. - '-' LN\\' ...", . . . . . . . . . . . . ..- lawson, Noble & Webb, Inc. lB #6674 ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS 590 NW Peacock Boulevard, Suite 9, Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986 (561) 878-1700 " fax: (561) 878-1802 . email: Inw-p51@lnw-inc.com West Palm Beach" Port Sf. Lucie SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION I UNPLA TTED 545'00'00"( 115,12'7" R~42000' N4S"OO'OO"E N778;~~4"E 6~33"oi'35" 100.00'""\ ,.-. \ L~242.10' LR~925.00' \ 6~32"13'29" R~2766.70'~ L~520.24' 6~IO"04'04" L~4S6.15' UNPLA TTED R~346.92' 6~62"00'2S" L~375.45' N52'4S'09"E S0.02' R~975.00' 6=38"43'01" L~658.84' I ;;: b- OlD _ ID 8u:i " on 0,," o '" UNPLA TTED ~I~ !J! _ '" ...J o :r ¡.~ § > 1// I I I \ \ \ "- L' C.D.D"-3 499.87 ACRES +/- S90"OO'OO"E 1278.80' /' "- ~.~ / N90"00'OO"W \ ~ ~ , .. / r 1278.S0' \ :i:i 0 ~ \ (1)0:: 0::_ ~Ii I R-4.00' ( 6~;~:~4~~" \ t5~ ~.~ ... I 6=77"3Q'?5" /'" L=118.92' I t~ r<> U ~ I L=5.41 !J.js: ~!Ji u I ~.~ \ I ~ ~ \ R=58.00' I- . I- \ 6=53"54'5S" -V / \ L~54.5S' / R~800.00' / "- 6~10"58'48· /' J..E2EW¡ "L-153,31' . N90"OO'OO"W....... --- _ _ __ -- P.O.B, 85.88' P.O.c. \ / (TOTAU P.B. -'\ P.C. ~ ~ PR.C. :J¡¡., ¡... SEE DETAIL P.T. ¡;:"'! ¡:> "B" R o~ :;!: 6 t:oo å L ~ AA OR.B. .".------ DETAIL "8" -- -- --- .....TOi lll£ CCHTlN.£O SÆ£T 8 SEE SÆETS 1 - 5 OF 8 FOR DESCRIPTION o o to " - ~ ..::]- e::¡: o en \ SEE DETAIL "A" R=4.00' ~=I3Q.~' " 6=77"30'05" f.o.-~2"24 4,2 L=541' ,L-118.92 . / " R=S8.00' d-S3"S4'S8" \ /L-S4.5B' R=SOO.od" /' .o.=10"5ß'48" L=IS3:31' SOO"00'52"E 608.90' (TOTAU POINT OF BEGINNING POINT OF COMM:NCEMENT PLAT SOOK POINT OF cæVATtÆ POINT OF REVERSE CURVATtJ¡E POINT OF TANGENCY DENOTES RADIUS DENOTES DELTA DENOTES ARC LENGlH DENOTES NON--RADIAL DENOTES OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK JOB No. 8589 F.B. - PG. 1'\Dntn\SDO-599\B5B9\CAD\BS89SK03_2·."9 01/29/2002 03,38,34 PM EST Sl-£ET 7 OF 8 DATE: 01-14-02 BY: JDM CHECKED: GRB '" LN\\'" . . . . . . . . . . . ...- lawson, Noble & Webb, Inc. lB #6674 ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS 590 NW Peacock Boulevard, Suite 9, Part St. Lucie, Florida 34986 (56 ) 878-1700 ' fax: (56 ) 878-1802 ' emoa: Inw-psl@lnw-inc.com West Palm Beach, Port S1. Lucie SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION I I N4S'OO'OO"E 1130.54·--.." !TOTAL) \. UNPLA TTED R=178.00' 6=22'45'14" L=70.69' '] .,. <D Ñ en ..,. N _ R-120.00' ~6=26'06'27' ~ \d~ J L-54.68' \~ ß.,{ "- SEE ... 'ð. ~~ DETAIL ~\~ /8 \'" ., R=1864.29' R-2649.48' 6=10'42'24' 6-1'33'23" L-348.37' L-71.98' ,.- / / / I R=120.00' I \ i= \ R=2649.48'J ~ \ 6=1'33'23' g " L= 71.98' b " ~ '-...... I W'W en en '" '" W/W C) '" ;2 ;2 CX)~ ~en 2, .2 OC/) c/)o j:,... I'- ~ ut<) rt)u ~2:.. e;~ :I: :r: '" C/) 2 2 ;:.;: o 0 I- I- CDD,-3 499.81 ACRES +/- DETAIL SECTION 8 TOWNSHIP 37 S., RANGE 39 E. TOWNSHIP 31 S" RANGE 39 E, SECTION 17 SEE SHEETS 1- 5 OF 8 FOR DESCRIPTION o o <.D II ~ W -..I <t Ü (/) ..... WIt; 2 ~ :J '" :r: Q r= ~ <: - :::¡ ~ , 0 u ~ P.OB. P.O.c. PB. p.e. PRe. P.T. R 6 L N.R. ORA POINT OF BEGImING POINT OF COM.£NcEMENT PlAT BOOK POINT OF CLfNATURE POINT OF REVERSE cœv A TL.Æ POINT OF TANGENCY DENOTES RADIUS DENOTES DELTA DENOTES Me lENGTH DENOTES NON-RADIAL DENOTES OFFICIAl RECORD BOOK I L SOO' 4'orw 833.93' IMTCHLIN! (TOYAU OOHTIN£!> SI££T 1 R=300.00' 6=78'44'50' L=412.32: 7 RADIAl <--_ SI1'18'05"E S89'51'05'W 4508.21' UNPLA TTED SECTION 9 TOWNSHIP 37 5., RANGE 39 E, TOWNSHIP 31 5,. RANGE 39 E. SECTION 16 1,\~t~'SOO-S99\BS89\CAD\BS89SK03-3.d.g 01/29/2002 03,SO'41 PH (ST Sl-EET 8 OF 8 JOB No. B589 BY: JDM CHECKED: GRB F.B. - PG. DATE: 01-14-02 '" >wi EXHIBIT B CONSTRUCTION TIMET ABLE AND COST ESTIMATE FOR AREA TO BE INCLUDED WITHIN DISTRICT BOUNDARIES fTL:823447:3 FTL:823447:3 '- ...." WESTCHESTER CDD-3 DEVELOPMENT Proposed Construction Timetable & Estimated Costs DRI Common Development Infrastructure Unit Description Unit Price Quantity Total Earthwork LS $3,509,200 1 $3,509,200 Roadways & Storm Drainage Systems LS $9,134,900 1 $9,134,900 Water & Sewer Utilities Systems LS $2,063,700 1 $2,063,700 Other Infrastructure Costs LS $2,830,000 1 $2,830,000 Sub Total: I, $17,s3't,åöo Contingency: 10% " ' $(7'~3.1S0" , " T()täICost: , , $19,291,589 " DRI Common Development Cost Distribution by CDD Prorata Description Share 1 Community Development District # 1 $1,199,622 Community Development District # 2 $4,093,436 Community Development District # 3 $2,921,675 Community Development District t# 4 $11,076,847 , , '. ,',',.,' ", "'" ',." TQtãr Cqst: ,$19,?~'1,~øq , , CDD-3 Development Sub Total: Contingency: , "l,',~TofäJ;~º$l~ Unit LS LS LS LS Unit Price $3,572,200 $7,829,100 $3,036,900 $765,000 Quantity 1 1 1 1 Description Earthwork Roadwa s & Storm Drainage Systems Water & Sewer Utilities Systems Other Infrastructure Costs ;...; I," , 'ç[j )~,Gº()d ÞâIttl'S,§timåtÊJTQtªl: r ~19¡ß4~;~Qº Notes: 1 The DRI Common Development Infrastructure Costs are assigned to each District according to the Masler Improvement Costs Allocation methodology presented in the Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs Report for this District. 2 Additional funds will be added 10 each District's Good Faith Estimate Bond amount for inflation, bond closing costs, and bond reserves, as applicable. Master CDD-3 Development Timetable Project Construction Schedule % Complete ConstructIon Value Phase 1 (Years 0-5) 90% $17,680,680 Phase 2 (Years 5-10) 10% $1,964,520 Phase 3 (Years 10-15) 0% $0 Phase 4 (Years15-20) 0% $0 2/25/2002 Page 1 of 1 S:/Westchester/Oocuments Excel/CDD Infrastructure Budgets,xls '- """" EXHIBIT C EVIDENCE OF WRITTEN CONSENT OF OWNER TO INCLUSION OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE EXTERNAL BOUNDARIES OF WESTCHESTER NO.3 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Westchester Development Company, LLC, a Florida limited liability company and successor by merger with Westchester Development Company ("Owner"), hereby certifies that it is the sole owner of approximately 36.27 acres of certain real property (the "Property"), located in St. Lucie County, Florida. By signing below, the Owner hereby gives its full consent to the expansion of the external boundaries of the Westchester No.3 Community Development District to include the Property therein. '--3 '/ ~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand this ~ day of r/..,,'....... ,2002. WESTCHESTER DEVELOPMENT ~OMP NY,LLC #4~ Titie: þ';'....e. r...~ '~~r-- STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /~/¡ day of '--111M~A ,2002, by ::I~Þf1.-, J.l4'LJkL5ð~, the Ilc~ l!ee<:;,Jr/pA.JT of WESSTCHESTER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, who is personally known to me [Ø or produced as identification. NotaryPublic ~ z::'¿../-~ Printed Name: £ArA'/6A ¡¿J,úh?~~ PATRICIA W. WARREN . ON' CC79I995 EXPIRES NOV 28. 2002 8ONDEO THROUGH ADVANTAGE NOfAI!'( FTL:823447:3 '- ...., EXHIBIT D DESIGNATION OF THE FUTURE GENERAL DISTRIBUTION, LOCATION AND EXTENT OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE USES OF LAND PROPOSED FOR THE AREA TO BE INCLUDED WITHIN THE DISTRICT FTL:823447:3 \w -."J ~I"'" ~ ,. 'iT a _.-r' C$),,-, -~.... ~ -- ,......- Not Included nil L -- ---.- -- -- c::: f- - f- A ,. .... ,... ¡- If- .l J" ".. ï I) P co . ( ' - \ - ) '\ ( _0 - ! I- : l- S ¡ . i- f- ; f- .> ,.. ~ .." r-, io ( þ( F ~ -", 1'\ I " I I I" '\: - 1\ G-5¡,-, RU-5 ,f\Ayn. !Ì\ . WESTCHESTER Existing Land Use St. Lucie County, Florida CDD: TOTAL CDD ARËA:' 499.87 #~ Lucido de Associates ð. ..;;X/ 1M4~McNIcbn 1;d v :"":J:..~-.:r-= I....~ -~ EEEE AG-5. I\gicUIon (02 ô.JIocI ~ AU-5. ResIcIentIaIIkban (5 ô.JIac [[]]J MXD· low intensity Mlxod Use Dowlcpment 15 duIae) ~ UXO - ModI.m InIensIty Mlxod ~ Use Development (5-9 dIIocI SOURCE: Sl lLdø Cou1ty Coovohenslve Plan NOTE: .... acreaoes "8 8 J JI'OX....te. 1111111111111. Proposod Rood (200' AIW) FTL:823447:3 ",-,. EXHIBIT E STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS ...." " \w -."J STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT #3 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Purpose and Scope This statement of estimated regulatory costs ("SERC") supports the petition to expand the boundaries of the Westchester Community Development District #3 ("District" or "District #3"). The District was established by Ordinance No. 01-012 of St. Lucie County on August 21, 2001. The District currently comprises approximately 463.60 acres of land located in St. Lucie County. The District proposes to expand its boundaries by 36.27 acres to a total of 499.87 acres. The limitations on the scope of this SERC are explicitly set out in Section 190.002(2)(d), F.S. (goveming District formation or alteration) as follows: "That the process of establishing such a district pursuant to uniform general law - shall be fair and based only on factors material to manaQinQ and financinQ the service delivery function of the district, so that any matter concerninQ permittinq or planninq of the development is not material or relevant (emphasis added)." 1.2 Overview of the Westchester DRI and the Changes Requested in the Boundaries of the Four Community Development Districts Serving Westchester On August 21, 2001 the Sf. Lucie County Commission approved the formation of four CommunitY Development Districts to provide community facilities and services to the Westchester DR!. District #3 is designed to provide community infrastructure, services, and facilities along with their operations and maintenance, to a portion of the Westchester DRI located in Sf. Lucie County (the "development"). The development is a master planned, mixed-use, fully amenitized, community. The DRI includes 2,033 acres. The landowner has established community development districts on 1,677.74 of these acres. The land plan for the portion of the DRI planned for community development districts consists of up to: (a) 4,500 residential units, (b) 2,001,000 square feet of offices, (c) 575,000 square feet of retail space, and (d) 300 hotel units. Given the size and scope of the development, St. Lucie County agre~d to establish four community development districts to serve the project. Four districts are optimal for the development because this articulation allows for each district to focus on the unique requirements of the land within its boundaries. District #1 serves an exclusively commercial area in the project that will be developed in the first phase of the development program. By contrast, the land in District #2 is planned exclusively as a corporate office park with a civic/school site. The land in District #3 is planned only for use as a residential community with no commercial, retail, or office uses. Finally, District #4 is projected for future development as a town center with retail uses at its core and surrounding Page1of6 February 25. 2002 '-' -...J residential uses. No offices are planned for the land in District #4. In light of these very different land uses, and the unique demands for community development district facilities and services, it is optimal to create four unique community development districts, one for each area. Table 1 displays the land use plan for the lands within each of the four proposed community development districts planned for the Westchester DRI as envisioned in the petitions to form the Districts. Noted at the time the petitions to form the Districts were filed, was the fact that the land use plans were "subject to change as land planning activities continue". Table 1. Land Use Plan for the Area in Westchester Served by the Westchester Community Development Districts #1 through #4 Category CDD#1 CDD#2 CDD#3 CDD#4 Total Acres 74.25 257.45 463.60 882.44 1,677.74 Single Family 0 0 863 2,512 3,375 Multifamily 0 0 287 838 1,125 Retail 125,000 ° 0 450,000 575,000 Office 78,500 1,922,500 ° 0 2,001,000 Hotel 0 0 ° 300 300 Source: St. Lucie West Development Corporation As land use planning and engineering analysis has progressed at Westchester, a number of desired adjustments have come to light. No changes in the total volume of development are proposed. However, the distribution of the development across the four Districts is now somewhat different than originally expected. The rationale for forming four distinct districts was based on the unique land use mix that was originally anticipated for lands included in each District. Since the land use plans have changed somewhat, it is desirable to alter the boundaries of the various Districts to reflect these changes. Table 2 presents to proposed new land use plan for each District as well as the proposed new acreage totals for each District. " Page 2 of 6 February 25. 2002 ·'-' ....,¡ Table 2. land Use Plan for the Proposed Areas in Westchester Served by the Westchester Community Development Districts #1 through #4 As Modified Category Acres Single family units Multifamily units Retail sqft Office sqft Hotel rooms CDD#1 59.43 o o 125,000 78,500 o CDD#2 234.33 o o o 1,922,500 o CDD#3 499.87 863 287 o o o CDD#4 884.12 2,512 838 450,000 o 300 Total 1,677.75 3,375 1,125 575,000 2,001,000 300 The changes proposed for the acreage and land uses in each District are provided in Table 3. It is important to note that no change in total development is proposed. Furthermore, the proposed volume and distribution of development in each District is the same as originally proposed. The changes involve redistributing the acreage among the Districts, so that the original land uses are - preserved. Table 3. Changes in the land Use Plans Proposed for Westchester Community Development Districts #1 through #4 As Modified . Category Acres Single family units Multifamily units Retail sqft Office sqft Hotel rooms CDD#1 -14.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CDD#2 -23.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CDD#3 36.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CDD#4 1.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 The Westchester Community Development District #3 continues to be planned as a purely residential development in the DR!. District #3 will provide community development district facilities and services to 499.87 acres in the District. In addition, District #1 will serve as the master community development district for the additional districts that are planned for the development. In that roléthe District will also provide community-serving infrastructure that provides benefits to all four of the community development districts envisioned to serve the Westchester DR/. These master improvements include major entrance roads, entry statements, landscaping, master stormwater control, and master utilities. The debt service and operation/maintenance costs incurred by District #1 to provide the master community improvements will be funded through non ad valorem special assessments on all benefiting property in the development. District #1 may also operate and maintain localized infrastructure within any of the other three districts that is integrally related to the master community Page 3 of 6 February 25. 2002 \w """" improvements, if a district desires to delegate that function and District #1 desires to accept the same. It is anticipated that the four community development districts will enter into a series of inter local agreements providing for this sharing of master improvement, operating and maintenance costs. 1.3 Requirements for Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs Section 120.541(2), F.S. (1997), defines the elements a statement of estimated regulatory costs must contain: "(a) A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be required to comply with the rule, together with a general description of the types of individuals likely to be affected by the rule. (b) A good faith estimate of the cost to the agency, and to any other state and local government entities, of implementing and enforcing the proposed rule, and any anticipated effect on state and local revenues. (c) A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by individuals and entities, including local governmental entities, required to comply with the requirements of the rule. As used in this paragraph, "transactional costs· are direct costs that are readily ascertainable based upon standard business practiées, and include filing fees, the cost of obtaining a license, the cost of equipment required to be installed or used or procedures required to be employed in complying with the rule, additional operating costs incurred, and the cost of monitoring and reporting. (d) An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined by Section 288.703, F.S., and an analysis of the impact on small counties and small cities as defined by Section 120.52, F.S. St. Lucie County is not defined as a small County for purposes of this requirement. (e) Any additional infonnation that the agency detennines may be useful. 2.0 A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be required to comply with the ordinance, together with a general description of the types of individuals likely to be affected by the ordinance. There will be no individuals or entities affected by approval of the proposed expansion of the boundaries of District #3. District #3 is an already existing Community Development District. The petition to expand its boundaries by approximately 36.27 acres will have no impact on either the initial 463.60 acres in the District or on the 36.27 acres added to the District for the following reasons. First, as noted above, neither the costs nor the volume of development planned for District #3 will change if the proposed boundary change is approved. So, there will be no impact on land in District #3. Second, the expansion parcel will Page 4 of 6 February 25. 2002 '-' "wIIfÍ be taken from the contraction parcels of other Districts. Agàin, since neither the costs nor the volume of development will change in any other District, there is no impact on any individual or entity if the proposal is approved. 3.0 Good faith estimate of the cost to state and local government entities, of implementing and enforcing the proposed ordinance, and any anticipated effect on state and local revenues. 3.1 Costs to Governmental Agencies of Implementing and Enforcing Ordinance State Governmental Entities There will be no cost to any governmental agencies to implement or to enforce the proposed ordinance. District #3 is an existing Community Development District in good standing. Altering its boundaries will not change the costs for any State governmental entity. St. Lucie County St. Lucie County will incur no costs associated with this proposed Ordinance beyond reviewing the petition and its supporting exhibits. The petition itself provides much .of the information needed for a staff review. St. Lucie County already possess the staff needed to conduct the review without the need for new staff. In addition, there is no capital required to review the petition. Finally. local governments routinely process similar petitions for land uses and zoning changes that are far more complex than is the petition to alter the boundaries of District #3. There is no annual cost to the County, because the District is an existing Community Development District in good standing. Approving a change in the District's boundaries does not impact annual costs to the County in any way. 3.2 Impact on State and Local Revenues Adoption of the proposed ordinance will have no negative impact on State or local revenues. The District is an existing Community Development District. As an independent unit of local government, the District is designed to be a self funding entity in terms of its obligations under Chapter 190, F.S. Altering its boundaries, as proposed here, has no impact on State or local revenues. 4.0 A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by " individuals and entities required to comply with the requirements of the ordinance. There are no transactional costs associated with approving this alteration in the boundaries of the District. As noted above, the amount of development and the number of acres served by all the Districts will no change if the Ordinance is Page50f6 February 25. 2002 '-' ...., approved. Furthermore, the volume of development and the costs for providing District facilities and services is also unchanged. Exhibit B contains the estimated costs and the timetable for construction. 5.0 An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined by Section 288.703, F.S., and an analysis of the impact on small Counties and small cities as defined by Section 120.52, F.S. There will be no impact on small businesses because of the changes proposed in the District's boundaries. The District is an existing Community Development District. The costs to provide infrastructure and services has not changed nor has the volume of development planned for the District. St. Lucie County has an estimated population that is greater than 10,000 in the most current census (2000). Therefore, the County is not defined as a "small" county according to Section 120.52, F.S. 6.0 Any additional useful information. The analysis provided above is based on a straightforward application of economic theory, especially as it relates to tracking the incidence of regulatory costs and benefits. Inputs were received from the Developer's Engineer and other professionals associated with the Developer. Page 6 of 6 February 25, 2002 ~ - ~ \w AGENDA REOUEST ....; ITEM NO. 5D ~ DATE: 03/26/02 CONSENT [ J REGULAR [ J PUBLIC HEARING [V] Leg. [ X ] Quasi-Jtid. [ PRESENTED BY: TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: Consider the petition of The Board of Supervis Development District No. 4 for an amendment of the community district known as "Westchester Community Development District No. Ordinance 02-013. Conununity evelopment 4" - Draft SUBMITTED BY: Community Development BACKGROUND: The Board of Supervisors of Westchester Community Development District No. 4 has filed a petition with St. Lucie County to amend the community development district known as "Westchester Community Development District No.4" . The Westchester Community Development District No. 4 is proposed to occupy 884.122 acres instead of the 882.44 acres originally proposed. The subject property is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Interstate 95 and the proposed extension of Gatlin Boulevard. The attached Exhibit provides a general location map for the boundaries of Westchester Community Development District No.4. It should be emphasized that at this time there are no existing occupied residential properties in this Proposed Westchester Community Development District No.4. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: On August 21, 2001, The Board of County Commissioners granted approval to Ordinance 01-013, establishing the community development district known as Westchester CDD #4. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners .approve Draft Ordinance 02-013, authorizing an amendment to the boundaries of the. community development district known as "Westchester Community Development District No.4". . X] ] APPROVED OTHER: 4-0 [ ] DENIED (Hutchinson Absent) COMMISSION ACTION: Review and Accrovals County Attorney: Originating Department: Management & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only. if applicable) ~ "WI COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: March 26, 2002 Ordinance 02-013 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Community Development Director DATE: March 20, 2002 SUBJECT: Petition of The Board of Supervisors of Westchester Community Development District No.4, to amend the community development district known as "Westchester Community Development District NO.4" - Draft Ordinance 02-013 The Board of Supervisors for Westchester Community Development District No.4 has filed a petition with St. Lucie County for an amendment to Westchester Community Development District No.4. Westchester COD NO.4 was originally proposed to contain 882.44 acres, but will now contain 884.122 acres. The change in boundaries was in response to changes in the master plan for the Westchester project. On August 21, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners approved the establishment of Westchester Community Development District No. 4 located at the corner of the intersection of Interstate 95 and the proposed extension of Gatlin Boulevard. The attached Exhibit provides a general location map for the boundaries of Westchester COD No.4. It should be emphasized that at this time there are no existing occupied residential properties in this proposed Westchester COD NO.4. Attached is a copy of Draft Ordinance 02-013 that provides for the amendment of Westchester COD NO.4. Staff recommends approval of Draft Ordinance 02-013. hf cc: Doug Anderson, County Admisistrator Daniel Mcintyre, County Attorney David P. Kelly, Planning Manager Noreen Dreyer, Esquire - Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster & Russell, P.A. " ~ò .P~ ~ Cì Òe.":> &'8 ~e'5\ Blvd \ uc\e c;:,\ \.- Prima Vista Blvd ~ ëñ CIS (f) o ~ '0 a: Q) c ::J Westchester COD #4 Gatlin Blvd Q) 0) c CIS a: '0 > a:I CIS C o ~ en êi5 t o 0... ~~~<iI6'. ,~!í!I~. &.......... .................... . , , " ,~~ .", ' ' ;' ~ t ThIs map has been COo"1lJiIed for gonoœIpiaming and r...."""" purposes only. _ fNeIY 8Ifort has been .- to proWIe the moat """""I and arxuat6 information posaIbIo. 110 ""11.-<_ lor... .. 6 IogoIIy brdng doa.mont. 81. Lucie County Martin County GRAPI-IIC ~ I I o 0.5 1 SCALE 2 I .........c. 3 N "'" -.",tI Not Included ï co C11 --.-.---.-.---.-,---.-.- \ \ \. 10 ( G-51~ RU-5 WESTCHESTER Existing Land Use St. Lucie County, Florida .f\AYn. COD: lAND USE CATAGORY: TOTAL COD AREA:- ~I ~:81 ~~~1 I MX~~~W I MX~MEO 884.11 I ê .-.- -~ EEEE ~ MXD . low Intensity Iobod UM DewIopmeo. IS 6Jfacl ~5, ~ 10.2 6Jfacl [[[IJ ~ MXD . ModU1\ lnIensiIy Mbcod UM De\IeIopnøII15-9 6Jfacl 0< Lucido & Associates .::;:;-..."<. 'Ý*~~~ v =.."""'---=---=r--= flJ.5, -..... lkbon IS 6JfacI SOlfICE: $I. Luc1e Co<.nIy ~ Plan NOTE: ÞA ~ ore oppro¡cma... 1..11..11....1 Proposed Road (200' R/W) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 ~ .ti ORDINANCE 02-013 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 01-013 GRANTED ON AUGUST 21,2001, ESTABLISHING THE WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO.4, AMONG OTHER MATTERS AND AMENDING CHAPTER 1-6.5-81 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; IN ORDER TO EXPAND THE EXTERNAL BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT AND ESTABLISH THE REVISED BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE; PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; AND SETTING FORTH THE VOTE ON ADOPTION. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including, but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. On August 21, 2001, St. Lucie County granted approval to Ordinance 01-013 amending Chapter 1-6.5 "Community Development" of the St. Lucie County Code and Compiled Laws and establishing the Westchester Community Development District No.4 as a community development district pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, and its boundaries, among other matters. The boundaries of Westchester COD No.4 contain 882.44 acres of land entirely within the jurisdictional boundaries of St. Lucie County. 2. The Board of Supervisors of Westchester Community Development District No.4, has filed with the Board a petition for an amendment of the community development district, which petition contains the information required by Section 190.046(1), Florida Statutes. The Petitioner is requesting that the boundaries of Westchester COD NO.4 be expanded to 884.122 acres of land. 3. In accordance with Section 190.046(1)(b), Florida Statutes, the Board held a public hearing on March 26, 2002, after publishing notice of such hearing in the Ft. Pierce Tribune and the Port St. Lucie News on March 15, 2002. Double Underli~e is for addition Slnl(1I T¡'rð~¡ Is for deletion Ordinance 02-013 1st Draft Page 1 Print Date: 03120102 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 '-" 'wi (a) The Board has considered the record of the public hearing and the factors set forth in Section 190.005 (I) (e), Florida Statutes, and has found that: (b) All statements contained within the petition are true and correct; (c) The land to be removed from the District does not exceed 50% of the acres initially located within the District and the Board of Supervisors of the District has not previously petitioned St. Lucie County for the expansion or contraction of the District;'s boundaries. (d) The amendment of this district is consistent with all applicable elements and portions of the state comprehensive plan and the effective local government comprehensive plan; (e) The area of land within the proposed district is of sufficient size, is sufficiently compact, and is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one functional interrelated community; (e) The district is the best alternative available for delivering the community development services and facilities to the area that will be served by the district; (f) The community development services and facilities for the district will be compatible with the capacity and uses of the existing local and regional community development services and facilities; and, (g) The area that will be served by the district following contraction is amenable to separate special district government. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: PART A. GRANT OF PETITION; AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 01-013 TO ESTABLISH NEW EXTERNAL BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT. Part A of Ordinance 01-013 is hereby amended to expand the external boundaries of the District by deleting Exhibit A to Ordinance 01-013 in its entirety and replacing it with Exhibit A attached hereto. Accordiñgly, Section 1-6.5-81 of the Code of Compiled Laws establishing the boundaries of the District is hereby amended so that references therein to Exhibit "A" shall mean Exhibit A attached hereto. Double Underline is for addition 8tl ihe Thl'O~gh IS for deletion Ordinance 02-013 1st Draft Page 2 Print Date: 03120/02 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 "-' """" PART B. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, County ordinances, and County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict. PART C. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance. If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person, property, or circumstance, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person, property, or circumstance. PART D. APPLICABILITY OF ORDINANCE. This ordinance shall be applicable throughout St. Lucie County's jurisdiction. PART E. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE. The Clerk be and is hereby directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of Administrative Code and Laws, Department of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida 32304. PART F. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State. PART G. ADOPTION. After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows: Chairwoman Doug Coward xxx Vice-Chairman Cliff Barnes xxx Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson xxx Commissioner Paula A. Lewis xxx Double Underline is for addition Strike Thro~gn IS for deletion Ordinance 02-013 1st Draft Page 3 Print Date: 03/20/02 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 "'" ..." Commissioner John D. Bruhn xxx PART H. CODIFICATION. Provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated in the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or other appropriate word, and the sections of this ordinance may be re-numbered or re- lettered to accomplish such intention; provided, however, that Parts B through H shall not be codified. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 26th Day of March 2002. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: Deputy Clerk County Attorney " hf H:\WP\Petitions\BCC\Finished.2002\Westchester4.CDD\Westchester40RD Double Underline is for addition Glrill" Throtlgh IS for deletion Ordinance 02-013 1st Draft Page 4 Print Date: 03/20/02 "'" ..,¡ COUNTY COMMISSION ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA IN RE: PETITION PURSUANT TO SECTION 190.046(1), FLORIDA STATUTES, TO EXPAND THE BOUNDARIES OF WESTCHESTER NO.4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT / PETITION TO EXPAND BOUNDARIES OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT The Board of Supervisors (the "Board") of the Westchester No. 4 Community Development District, an independent special district established pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida Statutes (the "District") by Ordinance No. 01-013 (the "Ordinance") of S1. Lucie County, Florida (the "County") enacted on August 21,2001 hereby petitions the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA (the "Commission") in accordance with Section 190.046(1) of the Uniform Community Development Act of 1980, Chapter 190, Florida Statutes (the "Act") to expand the boundaries of the District and in support thereof, hereby attests as follows: 1. That approximately 882.44 acres are currently within the external boundaries of the District. 2. That the Board desires to expand the boundaries of the District by adding acres, so that thereafter the land area to be served by the District will comprise approximately 884.122 acres. Following such expansion of the District's boundaries, all lands in the District will continue to be located wholly within the jurisdictional boundaries of the County. 3. That the real property to be included within the external boundaries of the District does not exceed 50% of the acres initially loc¡¡ted within the boundaries of the District and the Board has not previously submitted to the Commission a petition seeking expansion or contraction of the District's boundaries. . 4. That annexed hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof is a metes and bounds description of the external boundaries of the District following the proposed expansion of such boundaries. No real property within the external boundaries of the District as proposed is to be excluded therefrom. FTL:849323:2 ~ ~ 5. That annexed hereto as Exhibit B is the proposed timetable for construction of any District services to the area to be newly included the District and the estimated cost of contructing the proposed services. 6. That annexed hereto as Exhibit C and made a part hereof is evidence of the written consent to the inclusion of its property in the District by the owner of one hundred percent (100%) of the real property to be included within the District. 7. That annexed hereto as Exhibit D and made a part hereof is a designation of the future general distribution, location, and extent of public and private uses of land proposed for the area to be included from the District by the future land use plan element of the effective local government comprehensive plan. 8. That annexed hereto as Exhibit E and made a part hereof is a statement of estimated regulatory costs in accordance with the requirements of Section 120.541, Florida Statutes. 9. That following the proposed expansion of the District's boundaries, (i) the property within the District will not be inconsistent with any applicable element or portion of the state comprehensive plan or of the effective local government comprehensive plan; (ii) the property comprising the District will be of sufficient size, compactness, and contiguity to be developable as one functional interrelated community; (iii) the District will continue to present the best alternative available for delivering the community development facilities and services to the property that will be served by the District; (iv) the community development facilities and services of the District will not be incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and regional community development services and facilities; and (v) the property comprising the District will be amenable to separate special-purpose government. 10. That all statements contained within this Petition are true and correct. WHEREFORE, Petitioner, the Board of Supervisors of the Westchester No. 4 Community Development District, hereby respectfully requests the Commission to: A. Direct its staff to notice, as soon as practicable, a local public non-emergency hearing pursuant to the requirements of Section 190.046(1)(b) ofthe Act to consider whether to grant the petition for the expansion of the District's boundaries and to amend the Ordinance establishing the District to reflect the new boundaries of the District. B. Grant the petition and enact an ordinance pursuant to applicable law amending the Ordinance establishing the District to reflect the new boundaries of-the District. FTL:849323:2 2 '-" ,.",¡ RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this /::3;/d;y of r-->.....-. ..... ,2002. WESTCHESTER NO.4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ) ~~~~-¿ ø ~~ e: L,),...., I' -----.. - ----' ST ATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /3ßkday of '--f/)fUJ¿Îf , 2002, by.:!;¡/J1eS H HA-kkLÇ;JAJ , the ChÆJlm,Q~ of the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF WESTCHESTER NO. 4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, who is personally known to me [~ or produced as identification. NOtaryPUbliC~~~-~./ Printed Name: ~A7A'I'C".r;4 ¡¿I dA~~e,J PATRICIA W. WARREN # CC79199S EXPIRES HOV 28. 2002 8ONOEO THIiOUOH ADVANTAGe NOTARY FTL:849323:2 3 FTL:849323:2 '- -J EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTlONIMETES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION ...I ~AWSON, NOBLE &WEBB, INC. LB# 6674 CONSULTING ENGINEERS, lAND PLANNERS, SURVEYORS 590 NW PEACOCK BLVD, SUITE 9, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA PHONE (561) 878-1700 CDD-4 A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTIONS 4, 5, 8, 9 & 10 TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST AND IN,SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 36 soum, RANGE 39 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF GATLIN BOULEVARD (ALSO BEING THE NORTH LINE OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST) AND THE WESTERLY LIMITS OF GATLIN BOULEVARD RIGHT-OF- wAy AND THE WESTERL Y LIMITS OF THOSE LANDS DESCRIBED IN AN ORDER OF TAKING DATED JUL Y 4, 1979 AND RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 311 , PAGES 2946 THROUGH 2952, INCLUSIVE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID ST. LUCIE COUNTY AND AS SHOWN ON THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF- WAY MAPS FOR STATE ROAD NO.9 (1-95), SECTION 94pOl - 2412, DATED 06/02/77, WITH LAST REVISION OF 09/11/79 (THE ABOVE DESCRIBED WESTERLY LIMITS OF GATLIN BOULEVARD BEAR SOUTH 00°01 '45" WEST AND ALL BEARINGS ARE RELATIVE 1HERETO); THENCE SOUTH 89°57'05" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 737.09 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°02'55" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET, TO A POINT OF RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE, CONCA VE NORTHWESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET; THENcE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF . 89°38'04", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 39.11 FEET, TOA POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 781.00 FEET; THENCE . NORTHERLY, ALONG 1HE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°34'43", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 471.34 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE NORm 34°53'43" EAST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 291.45 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE WIm A CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 58.QO FEET; THENCE NORTHERL Y¡ ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 4 1'44", AN ARC DI CE OF 50.31 FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE . A . WITH A CUR , ONCA VE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A ARY A. B .FORD, PSM PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER STATE OF FLORIDA REG. NO. 4981 DATE: /-3o-~O"2- REVISIONS-UPDATES DATE NOTE: THIS IS NOT A SKETCH OF SURVEY, BUT ONLY~ A GRAPHIC DEPICTION OF THE DESCRIPTION SHOWN HEREON. THERE HAS BEEN NO FIELD WORK, VIEWING OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, OR MONUMENTS SET IN CONNECTION WITH THE PREPARATION OF THIS INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON. BY CK'O NOTE: LANDS SHOWN HEREON WERE NOT ABSTRACTED FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY ANDIOR EASEMENTS OF RECORD. JOB NO.: B589 BY: JDM CHECKED: GRB F.B.: N/A PG.: NIA SHEET 1 OF 9 'rAWSON, NOBLE &WEBB, IN,C. ....J LB# 6674 CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND PLANNERS, SURVEYORS 590 NW PEACOCK BLVD, SUITE 9, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA PHONE (561) 878-1700 . . RADIUS OF 130.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°41'07", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 205.76 FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 58.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 54°25'22", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 55.09 FEET, TO A PÖINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 800.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°30'32", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 481.83 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE NORTH 13°02'47" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 337.09 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,050.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG '_ THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF IJoOl'56", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 466.28 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE NORTH 00°00'52" WEST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 608.90 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 800.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY, lo\LONG THE ARC OF SND CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10°58'48", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 153.31 FEET, TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 58.00 FEET'; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53°54'58", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 54.58 FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HA. VING A RADIUS OF 130.00 FEET; THENCE NORTIIWESTERL Y, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THR:OUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52°24'42", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 118.92 FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WITII A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, IlA VING A RADIUS OF 4.00 FEET; THENCE NORTIIWESTERL Y, ALONG 1HE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 77°30'05", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 5.41 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITII A LINE; THENCE NORTII 90°00'00" WEST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 1,278.80 FEET; THENCE NORTII 00°00'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 456.86 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURV ATIJRE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 975.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERL Y, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 38°43'01", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 658.84 FEET, TO A POINT OF NON-RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A LINE (THE RADIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 51 °16'59" WEST FROM TIIIS POINT);· THENCE NORTH 52°45'09" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 50.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF . BEGINNING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL, AND A POINT OF NON-RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,025.00 FEET (THE RADIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 51°21'17" WEST FROM THIS POINT); THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE . TIIROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12°44'26", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 227.92 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE NORTH 51 °23'09" WEST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 430.16 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE Wlm A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERL Y, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 346.92 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY, ALONG . - JOB NO.: B589 BY: JDM CHECKED: GRB f.B.: N/A PG.: N/A SHEET 2 Of 9 - , ~. , ...." 'rAWSON, NOBLE &WEBB,INC. LB# 6674 CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND PLANNERS, SURVEYORS 590 NW PEACOCK BLVD, SUITE 9, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA PHONE (561) 878-1700 THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 62°00'28", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 375.45 FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,766.70 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF IOo04'04", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 486.15 FEET, TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 420.00 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 33°01 '35", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 242.10 FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURV A TIJRE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 925.00 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAlD CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 32°13'29", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 520.24 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; TIIENCE SOUTH. 77°28'34" WEST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 85.31 FEET; THENCE NORTH 45000'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 115.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45°00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45°00'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 384.99 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45°00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1,130.54 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 250.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 40°07'09", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 175.05 FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 250.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 37°00'29", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 161..48 FEET, TO A POINT OF NON- RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A LINE (THE RADIUS POINT OFSAID CURVE BEARS NORTH 48°06'40" WEST FROM THIS POINT); THENCE SOUTH 56°31'08" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 413.01 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 04°31'12" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 121.23 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 13°36'12" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 148.52 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 05028'36" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 93.42 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74°33'46" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 84.83 FEET; THENCE NORTH 81 °36'23" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 66.58 FEET, TO A POINT OF NON-RAJ;)IAL INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 380.00 FEET (THE RADIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 62°46'40" EAST FROM THIS POINT); THENCE SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53°12'15", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 352.86 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE SOUTH 25°58'55" EAST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 213.43 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERL Y, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 120.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTIlERL Y, ALONG TIlE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26°06'27", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 54.68 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE SOUTH 00°07'32" WEST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 8.74 FEET, TO APOINT OF NON- , RADIAL INTERS-pcnON WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,649.48 FEET (THE RADIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 00042'00" WEST FROM THIS POINT); THENCE WESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01°33'23", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 71.98 FEET, TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, AND - . . " JOB NO.: B589 BY: JDM CHECKED: GRB F.B.: N/A PG.: N/A SHEET 3 OF 9 'rAWSON, NOBLE &WEBB, INC. ....J LB# 6674 CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND PLANNERS, SURVEYORS 590 NW PEACOCK BLVD, SUITE 9, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA PHONE (561) 878-1700 .. HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,864.29 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10°42'24", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 348.37 FEET, TO A POINT OF NON-RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A LINE (THE RADIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS soum 1 1°33'47" EAST FROM THIS POINT); THENCE SOUTH 78°53'57" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 122.41 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE WIm A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 960.00 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF-43°11'52", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 723.79 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; mENCE NORTH 57°54'11" WEST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 487.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28°35'46" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 126.07 FEET, TO A POINT OF NON-RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUmWESTERL Y, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,920.49 FEET (THE RADIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 27°51'57" WEST . FROM THIS POINT); THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05°06'57", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 171.48 FEET, TO A . POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE NORTH 67°15'01" WEST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 214.49 FEET, T,O THE POINT OF CURV A1URE WIm A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERL Y, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 178.00 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY, ALONG mE ARC OF SAID CURVE mROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22°45'14", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 70.69 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE SOUTH 89°59'45" WEST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 247.81 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°00'15" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 3,879.07 FEET; THENCE NORTH 74°07'42" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1,181.39 FEET; 1HENCE NORTH 02°40'30" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 853.63 FEET; THENCE NORTH 03°34'36" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 264.67 FEET; THENCE NORTH 11 °39'14" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 299.59 FEET; THENCE NORTH 05°52'55" EAST, A . DISTANCE OF 655.21 FEET; THENCE NORTH 13°31'07" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 474.82 FEET; THENCE NORTH 74°14'30" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 2,525.46 FEET; THENCE NORTH 76°04'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1,244.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 65°11'40"EAST, A DISTANCE OF 178.59 FEET; THENCE NORm 59°06'39" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 424.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 73°43'15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 14.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 50°55'52" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 7.43 FEET; THENCE NORTH 56°01'38" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 31.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 33°56'01" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 30.15 FEET; THENCE NORTH 54°34'18" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 298.73 FEET; THENCE NORTH 85°53'58" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 132.02 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70°54'26" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 143.67 FEET; THENCE NORTH 56°25'29" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 121.35 FEET; THENCE NORTH 66°21'07" EAST, A . DISTANCE OF 557.84 FEET TO A POINT IN THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 4; THENCE SOUTH 00°35'12" WEST, ALONG SAID EXTENSION AND ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 4, A DISTANCE OF 3,104.48 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 4, SOUTH 00°36'27" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2,651.97 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SECTION LINE, SOUTH 60°47'35" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 146.85 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 16°16'02" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 171.26 FEET, TO A POINT OF NON-RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 602.61 FEET (THE JOB NO.: 8589 BY: JDM CHECKED: GRB F.B.: N/A PG.: N/A SHEET 4 OF 9 - , ~ . '. .' " ...,¡ 'r'AWSON, NOBLE &WEBB, IN.C. LB# 6674 CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND PLANNERS, SURVEYORS 590 NW PEACOCK BLVD, SUITE 9, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA PHONE (561) 878-1700 " ..-...,..... RADIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 16°16'04" WEST FROM THIS POINT); THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TIIROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52°10'10", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 548.69 FEET, TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 4.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TIIROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 99°48'52", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 6.97 FEET, TOA POINT OF . TANGENCY WITH A LINE; TIIENCE SOUTH 78° 15'06" WEST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 907.21 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 52°45'09" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 345.13 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 884.12 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. - , , I , . . , - " 'JOB NO.: B589 BY: JDM CHECKED: GRB F.B.: N/A PG.: N/A SHEET 5 OF 9 IZ ~ 10 -i0\0 00' -i!3'10 þ\DQ cC! Ri ::;: t I \ R=20S0.00· y-A=13'OI'56" \ L=466.28' \ \ J~ '!'.a\~ bl,þ <1[\1 \ R-aoo.OO' \ A=34 '30'32"""1-1 L=481.B3' J I R=58.00' I A=54'25'22" L=SS.09' Y R=S8.00' ¡. A=49'4I'44'( "- R=130.00' L=50.31· :...J A=90'4I'07" I L=20S.76' I / '-N34'S3'43"E R=781.00' 291.4S· A=34'34'43"Z I L=471.34' I I I I R=2S.00' A=89'38'04" ,l-f L=39.II' - _I rl 100.00' ...J NOO'02'SS"W '-" LN\\' . Lawson, Noble & ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS 590 NW Peocock Boulevord, Suite 9, Port SI. Lucie, Florido 34986 (561) 878-1700. fox: (561) 878-1802. emoil: Inw-psl@lnw-inc.com West Palm Beach· Port St. Lucie . . . . . . . . . . . .... Webb, Inc. LB #6674 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION ò 0 <:t II ~ W ..J <:( U U) . . CONTIMJED SHEET 7 MATCH LINE w w ",'", ,..., '" ~.~ z Z <t « '" "'0 m. ~_ zvi Wz 01'- 1'-0 r: 'f') '()j:: U(L Q..u w- """w (/):1: ::r:(I) ~ ~ :;.:; o 0 -- -- UNPLATTED ~ P.O.B. P.O.c. P.B. P.C. P .R.c. P.T. R A L N.R. OR.B. POINT OF BEGINNING POINT OF COMÆNCE:MENT PLAT BOOK POINT OF ct,RV A TæE POINT OF REVERSE CURV A TU1E POINT OF TANGENcy DENOTES RADIUS DENOTES DElTA DENOTES ARC LENGTH DENOTES NON-RADIAL DENOTES OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK P.O.C. CS89'S7'OS"W 737.09' SEE SHEETS 1 - 5 OF 9 FOR DESCRIPTION . -' UNPLATTED C\/ 10 '" C\/ I '" V ":0\ -C\/ "'", a:j~ O:;<t 00.. ~ z .0 .. . f::-~ 0' W '" ~ :J z JOB No. B589 PG. 1'\D.,.\50D-599\B5B9\CAD\B5B9SKD~-I.áwg 01129/2002 OJ,5~,19 PH EST stEET 6 OF 9 DATE: 01-14-02 BY: JDM CHECKED: GRB F.B. - .-. LN\\' ...., . . . . . . . . . . . ...... lawson, Noble & Webb, Inc. lB #6674 ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS 590 NW Peacock Boulevard, Suite 9, Port Sf. Lucie, Florido 34986 (561) 878-1700 ' fox: (561) 878-1802 ' emoil: Inw-ps/@Inw-inc.com West Palm Beach, Port St. Lucie SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION I CONTINUED Sl-EET 9 MATCH LINE I..EQE& N45'OO'00"W 115.12' 7 7 . Ra420.OO' 545'001'"W 5 7'28 3;""W 6-33'01'35' 100.'" ~85.31 \ L=242.10' 1"''0 LR-92S.OO' ~ is'1!' ~. 6=32'13'29" ~ L-52024' R=2766.70· 6=10'04'04' .~ L-486.15· cÞd'. ,:. ~.y;> ----.. ~ '....0'" /' '\ _____ ",/ \ "" / \ \ / R=602.61· \ \ / L>=S2'10'10~ \ I L-S48.69· \ I I 2." \. R=4.00' J \ '-H~~i?'£ - ~L>=9:'48'?2' / ____ - - - __ 'r - L-6.97 /' DETAIL 'A' \ / ,/ " / / N9o'OO'OO'W " DETAIL "8' /',/ ( r 127B.80· ----- ____ L___ -- - - - / . /\ R=13O.00· POINT OF BEGINNING R=~.O~ ~ \ L>=S2'24'42' POINT OF COMIÆNCÐ.£NT J L>=77 30 os / L=118.92' PLAT BOOK I L=S.4I· \/ POINT OF CURVATURE " POINT OF REVERSE CU¡V A TURE \ " POINT OF TANGENCY R=SB.OO' ......... DENOTES RADIUS \ 6=53'54'58' ~ ...\ DENOTES DELTA \ L=54.58' \/ \ DENOTES ARC LENGTH '\ DENOTES NON-RAOIAL R=800.00' \ DENOTES OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK " ð=10'SB'4B'-y',/ " L=lS331' .v '---~----- R=34G.92· 60062'00'28' L-375.45· ... z o ¡: u w VI '-'- o w Z ::; W ~ . 1"-1"- "'m w...: 1"'" 0"' ON VI ( co' 1-' W w W Z ~ ::¡ o I W U ::> ,I- Z « ¡: ::E Õ u' C.D.D.-4 884.12 ACRES +/- PORT ST. LUCIE SECTION 35 (PLAT BOOK 15. PAGE 10> ., > SECTION 4 TOWNSHIP 37 S. RANGE 39 E. TOWNSHIP 37 S.. RANGE 39 E. : SECTION 9 P.OE. p.o.e. PE. P.C. PAC. P.T. R L> L N.R. I O.R.B. SEE SHEETS 1 - 5 R= 1025.00' ) t2~j~~?' 51S'15'()&'''''' ,crf} ....<;; <3 --"'" ""'!;.<tJ"". w w ~\T Š) P 0.8 ( \ ( \ 5"\"!.~-<'·;/~ \: ,. .., .., ~';:'---d.«f N.R. ~z . ~ ..-- ;/ A~' 2'45'09"E z ~ \ ~æ ( \~.~g UNPLATTED \.....- Rm975.00' zuf ufÕ ~·43·OI· Et- t- - \ L=G58.84' I- '" .., I- t3e:. e:.~ I "'iJj iJj.'" \ SEE DETAIL \&I ~ § "A" 8/'" 0 0 ?I; I- I- R=4.oo· l>~;~~2' §I"" 6=77'30'0~S" ~ L-1I892' N9Q'OO'OO'W L-S.4I'/ " R=~B.oo' L - - - - 1278.80'- - - -( .r-ð~S3'54'5B". \ " ¡-54.58· R..aoo.oo·......- ,/ 6=10·58'48·~-1 L-153.31· _ I¡¡¡ -i2!IC¡ ~P'g Þ "'IV> Cqf\) Ii MATCH LINE CONTINUËD SHEET 6 R=602.61' 6=52'10'10' L~548.G9' ò o U) II - ~ W ....J <1: u (f) UNPLATTED ........ "" " '\ \ \ \ I J I / / / OF 9 FOR DESCRIPTION II\Do. to. \SOO-S99\..BSS9\CA D\BSS9Sk04-è,dw9 Dl/29/2oo2 03'56'25 PH EST SHEET 7 OF 9 JOB No. B589 BY: JDM CHECKED: GRB F.B. - PG. DATE: 01-14-02 '-' . Lawson, ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS 590 NW Peacock Boulevard, Suite 9, Part SI. Lucie, Florida 34986 (561) 878-1700. fax: (561) 878-1802 . email: Inw-psl@ nw-inc.com West Palm Beach, Port St. Lucie . . . . Noble & LN\\' . . . Webb, . . . ...- Inc. LB #6674 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION I CONTINUED SHEET 9 MATCH LINE SECTION 5 SECTION 4 SECTION 8 SECTION 9 TOWNSHIP 37·S., RANGE 39 E. 0 0 ...... 1O /' / " /I / \ ~ I \ W ~ I \ --.J :Jt- ~ SOO'07'32"W I <[q :;- I « t-m 0 or- ? 8.74' I U t:~ 8 \ (f) z ~ I \ R=2649.48' J 0 \ Ò-I'33'23" '~!i / / L-71.98" "- Ibe: "- o ./ '- "'...-- ----- C.DD.-4 882.44 ACRES +/- I'- t- ..... ..... ~:x: ~ '" -J. a' ~... (5 ~ I- Z <f ¡:: :::¡ Z o u I WìEM}; P.O.B. P.O.C. P.B. P.c. P .R.c. P.T. R .ð. L N.R. M.B. POINT OF BEGINNING POINT OF COMMENCEMENT PlAT BOOK POINT OF CURVATæE POINT OF REVERSE cæVATLRE POINT OF TANGENCY DENOTES RADIUS DENOTES DELTA DENOTES ARC LENGTH DENOTES NON-RADIAL DENOTES OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK I 4: . R=250.00' . ""\9. '---- .ð.=40'07'09" ~~q.. L=17S.0S· '--R=.2Sa.Oo' .ð.=37·OO'.29" L=161.48' UNPLATTED DETAIL UNPLATTED SEE SHEETS 1 - S OF 9 FOR DESCRIPTION JOB No. B589 BY: JDM I"D.t4'500-~99'BSS9'CAD'B~B9SK04-J.d'9 01/29/2002 OJ.SM6 PH CST Sl-EET 8 OF 9 CHECKED: GRB F.B. - PG. DATE: 01-14-02 . Lawson, ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS 590 NW Peacock Boulevard, Suite 9, Port SI. Lucie, Florida 34986 (561) 878-1700" fox: (561) 878-1802" ernail: Inw-psl@lnw-inc.carn West Palm Beach" Port St. Lucie SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION N66"21'07"E 557.84' o o o II .. W ---1 <{ U (f) NW39'14"E 299.59' N03"34'36"E 264.67' U\PLATTED SEE SHEETS 1 - 5 OF 9 FOR DESCRIPTION JOB No. B589 BY: JDM : I z « a: '" . z vi . 0..... ~ í') . ua. w~ "j¡ 1'-' f-.-. PfiJ !"v' ,.,"- ~v- !U tö _ 10 - - C\ "'II'! r'tö 10 CD £ ~ LN\\' "wiÎ . . . . Noble & . . . . . . . ..- Webb, Inc. LB D6674 UNPLATTED SECTION 34 TOWNSHIP 36 S RANGE 39 E. W m I") W to Z « 0:: ·v uiz .....0 I")~ ~t; IW (/)(/) Z ;: o I-- N8S"S3'S8"E 132.02' l NS4"34'lg"E 298.73' N59"06-39:E __ .~. 424.13' \ / , N65"11'40"E\ v I . 178.59' Z" N70"54'26"E 6"04'(jJ-£' 143.67' U1 I'll 44.50' N56"25'28"E g 1Z SEE 121.35' <>1 DETAIL ".! ¡:;¡ :Ë SECTION 33 TOWNSHIP 36 S., RANGE 39 E. TOWNSHIP 37 S., RANGE 39 E. SECTION 4 UNPLATTED ------ ~~ (I v . z o ¡:: u W U1 u.. o w z :J \ \ \ \ I , , ... ........, I I I I / / / " " ~" -------- CDD.-4 882.44 ACRES +1- I 'i~ :J I-- I W U W I-- I « (/) MATCH LINE =< . Ii] -'---- :> O<WTWÆD Off" ~ MATCH LlI\E CONTINUED SHEET 7 .,. SECTION 4 TOWNSHIP 37 S.. RANGE 39 E. TOWNSHIP 37 S., RANGE 39 E. - SECTION 9 ~ P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING P.O.C. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT P.6. PLAT BOOK P.C. POINT OF CURVATURE P .RC. .POINT OF REVERSE CUW A TURE P.T. POINT OF TANGENCY R DENOTES RADIUS t::. DENOTES DEL TA L DENOTES ARC LENGTH N,R DENOTES NON-RADIAL O.RB. DENOTES OfFICIAL RECORD BOOK 1"OQtQ'SOO-S99\BSB9\CAO\BS89SKO<-<,dwg 01/29/2002 0<,0:5<32 PM EST SHEET 9 OF 9 CHECKED: GRB F.B. - PG. DATE: 01-14-02 ~ ...." EXHIBIT B CONSTRUCTION TIMETABLE AND COST ESTIMATE FOR AREA TO BE INCLUDED WITHIN DISTRICT BOUNDARIES FTL:849323:2 '--' ...,; WESTCHESTER CDD-4 DEVELOPMENT Proposed Construction Timetable & Estimated Costs DRI Common Development Infrastructure Unit Description Unit Price Quantity Total Earthwork LS $3,509,200 1 $3,509,200 Roadways & Storm Drainage Systems LS $9,134,900 1 $9.134,900 Water & Sewer Utilities Systems LS $2,063,700 1 $2,063,700 Other Infrastructure Costs LS $2,830,000 1 $2,830,000 Sub Total: $17,5~7,áð(). .. Contingency: 10% $1,[53;760 .. . T()taIGost: . . ... $19,291,5ªº .. .. . ... .. . DRI Common Development Cost Distribution by COD Prorata Share t $1,199,622 $4,093.436 $2,921,675 $11,076,847 TotalC ost:$l~¡~~1'~~~ø; CDD-4 Development Sub Total: Contingency: .1):)Jª ~o~h Unit LS LS LS LS Unit Price $7,571,400 $14,333,900 $5,838,000 $3,780,000 Quantity 1 1 1 1 Total $7.571,400 $14,333,900 $5,838,000 $3,780,000 Description C[)D-4Good Faith Es,fimate' Tòtal: .. $45; 752;400 Notes: 1 The DRI Common Developmenllnfrastructure Costs are assigned to each District according to the Master Improvement Costs Allocation methodology presented in the Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs Report for this District. 2 Additional funds will be added 10 each District's Good Faith Estimate Bond amount for inflation, bond closing costs, and bond reserves, as applicable. Master CDD-4 Development Timetable Project Construction Schedule % Complete Construction Value Phase 1 (Years 0-5) 0% $0 Phase 2 (Years 5-10) 45% $20,588,580 Phase 3 (Years 10-15) 40% $18,300,960 Phase 4 (Years15-20) 15% $6,862,860 2125/2002 Page 1 of 1 S:iWestchesterlDocumenls ExceUCDD Infrastructure Budgets.xls '-' ...., EXHIBIT C EVIDENCE OF WRITTEN CONSENT OF OWNER TO INCLUSION OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE EXTERNAL BOUNDARIES OF WESTCHESTER NO.4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Westchester Development Company, LLC, a Florida limited liability company and successor by merger with Westchester Development Company ("Owner"), hereby certifies that it is the sole owner of approximately 1.68 acres of certain real property (the "Property"), located in St. Lucie County, Florida. By signing below, the Owner hereby gives its full consent to the expansion of the external boundaries of the Westchester No.4 Community Development District to include the Property therein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand this /3 "day of rJ~,..-,"", ,2002. - WESTCHESTER DEVELOPMENT COMP Y, LLC W/- ~/ STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /37-7 day of '-J?'jAÆh , 2002, by ::J;¡~c II: A-AfleÆtP.P , the ¡/¡<~ ~6;c/e,vT of WESSTCHESTER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, who is personally known to me [(I or produced as identification. Notary Public Printed Name: ~2¿/?J~ ~41é' /A WiPALk'.d PATRICIA W. WARREN .4MISSION j CC791995 EXPIRES NOY 28. 2002 SOWDIÐ THROUGH NNAKfAGf. IfOI'AR'I' " FTl:849323:2 '-' "WI EXHIBIT D DESIGNATION OF THE FUTURE GENERAL DISTRIBUTION, LOCATION AND EXTENT OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE USES OF LAND PROPOSED FOR THE AREA TO BE INCLUDED WITHIN THE DISTRICT FTl:849323:2 '- Not Included G-51~ RU-5 WESTCHESTER Existing Land Use St. Lucie County, Florida .~AYn. tlEB AG-5, "o'fcUftn 10.2 ô.tIac) ~ RV-5, _1IaI1kban 15 ô.tIac) SOURCE: SL LucIe Cou1Iy ~ P1an NOTE: AI 1ICtBa\ Ol 018 approximate. [ll]] ~ 4~ Lucido & Associates .6 ~N' l.-f~~ 'Ç.f V :'--=-~.:r-= J"-'- -~ ..., \ \ \ ï (0 (J TOTAL CDD AREA: 884.11 t.lXD . lDw Intenslly MIxed Use DeveIo )rnont (S du/ac) 11111111111111 Propœod Roed (200' RIWI MXD . MedUn nlensIty Mixed Use DeIIe~ /5-9 ô.tIac) FTl:849323:2 '\w EXHIBIT E STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS ~ '--' ..." STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT #4 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Purpose and Scope This statement of estimated regulatory costs ("SERC") supports the petition to expand the boundaries of the Westchester Community Development District #4 ("District" or "District #4"). The District was established by Ordinance No. 01-013 of St. Lucie County on August 21, 2001. The District currently comprises approximately 882.44 acres of land located in S1. Lucie County. The District proposes to expand its boundaries by 1.68 acres to a total of 884.12 acres. The limitations on the scope of this SERC are explicitly set out in Section 190.002(2)( d), F.S. (governing District formation or alteration) as follows: "That the process of establishing such a district pursuant to uniform general law - shall be fair and based only on factors material to manaQinQ and financinq the service delivery function of the district, so that any matter concerninQ permittinq or planninq of the development is not material or relevant (emphasis added)." 1.2 Overview of the Westchester DRI and the - Changes Requested in the Boundaries of the Four Community Development Districts Serving Westchester On August 21, 2001 the St. Lucie County Commission approved the formation of four Community Development Districts to provide community facilities and services to the Westchester DR/. District #4 is designed to provide community infrastructure, services, and facilities along with their operations and maintenance, to a portion of the Westchester DRI located in St. Lucie County (the "development"). The development is a master planned, mixed-use, fully amenitized, community. The DRI includes 2,033 acres. The landowner has established community development districts on 1,677.74 of these acres. The land plan for the portion of the DRI planned for community development districts consists of up to: (a) 4,500 residential units, (b) 2,001,000 square feet of offices, (c) 575,000 square feet of retail space, and (d) 300 hotel units. Given the size and scope of the development, St. Lucie County agreed to establish four community development districts to serve the project. Four districts are optimal for the development because this articulation allows for each district to focus on the unique requirements of the land within its boundaries. District #1 serves an exclusively commercial area in the project that will be developed in the first phase of the development program. By contrast, the land in District #2 is planned exclusively as a corporate office park with a civic/school site. The land in District #3 is planned only for use as a residential community with no commercial, retaif, or office uses. Finally, District #4 is projected for future development as a town center with retail uses at its core and surrounding Page 1 of 6 February 25. 2002 \w ,.., residential uses. No offices are planned for the land in Dìstrict #4. In light of these very different land uses, and the unique demands for community development district facilities and services, it is optimal to create four unique community development districts, one for each area. Table 1 displays the land use plan for the lands within each of the four proposed community development districts planned for the Westchester DRI as envisioned in the petitions to form the Districts. Noted at the time the petitions to form the Districts were filed, was the fact that the land use plans were "subject to change as land planning activities continue", Table 1. Land Use Plan for the Area in Westchester Served by the Westchester Community Development Districts #1 through #4 Category CDD#1 CDD#2 CDD#3 CDD#4 Total Acres 74.25 257.45 463.60 882.44 1,677.74 Single Family 0 0 863 2,512 3,375 Multifamily 0 0 287 838 1,125 Retail 125,000 0 0 450,000 575,000 Office 78,500 1,922,500 ° ° 2,001,000 Hotel ° ° ° 300 300 Source: St. Lucie West Development Corporation As land use planning and engineering analysis has progressed at Westchester, a number of desired adjustments have come to light. No changes in the total volume of development are proposed. However, the distribution of the development across the four Districts is now somewhat different than originally expected. The rationale for forming four distinct districts was based on the unique land use mix that was originally anticipated for lands included in each District. Since the land use plans have changed somewhat, it is desirable to alter the boundaries of the various Districts to reflect these changes. Table 2 presents to proposed new land use plan for each District as well as the proposed new acreage totals for each District. Page 2 of 6 February 25. 2002 \rw ....., Table 2. land Use Plan for the Proposed Areas in Westchester Served by the Westchester Community Development Districts #1 through #4 As Modified Category Acres Single family units Multifamily units Retail sqft Office sqft Hotel rooms CDD#1 59.43 o o 125,000 78,500 o CDD#2 234.33 o o o 1,922,500 o CDD#3 499.87 863 287 o o o CDD#4 884.12 2,512 838 450,000 o 300 Total 1,677.75 3,375 1,125 575,000 2,001,000 300 The changes proposed for the acreage and land uses in each District are provided in Table 3. It is important to note that no change in total development is proposed. Furthermore, the proposed volume and distribution of development in each District is the same as originally proposed. The changes involve redistributing the acreage among the Districts, so that the original land uses are . preserved. Table 3. Changes in the land Use Plans Proposed for Westchester Community Development Districts #1 through #4 As Modified . Category Acres Single family units Multifamily units Retail sqft Office sqft Hotel rooms CDD#1 -14.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CDD#2 -23.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CD 0#3 36.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CDD#4 1.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 The Westchester Community Development District #4 continues to be planned as the town center for the DRI with a retail core, residential neighborhoods, and a hotel. No offices are planned for District #4. District #4 will provide community development district facilities and services to 884.12 acres in the District. In addition, District #1 will serve as the master community development district for the additional districts that are planned for the development. In that role the District will also provide community-serving infrastructure that provides benefits to all four of the community development districts envisioned to serve the Westchester DR!. These master improvements include major entrance roads, entry statements, landscaping, master stormwater control, and master utilities. The debt service and operation/maintenance costs incurred by District #1 to provide the master community improvements will be funded through non ad valorem special assessments on all benefiting property in the development. District #1 may also operate and maintain localized infrastructure within any of the other three districts that is integrally related to the master community Page 3 of 6 February 25. 2002 \w ""'" improvements, if a district desires to delegate that function and District #1 desires to accept the same. It is anticipated that the four community development districts will enter into a series of inter focal agreements providing for this sharing of master improvement, operating and maintenance costs. 1.3 Requirements for Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs Section 120.541 (2), F.S. (1997), defines the elements a statement of estimated regulatory costs must contain: "(a) A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be required to comply with the rule, together with a general description of the types of individuals likely to be affected by the rule. (b) A good faith estimate of the cost to the agency, and to any other state and local govemment entities, of implementing and enforcing the proposed rule, and any anticipated effect on state and local revenues. (c) A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by individuals and entities, including local governmental entities, required to comply with the requirements of the rule. As used in this paragraph, "transactional costs" are direct costs that are readily ascertainable based upon standard business practiées, and include filing fees, the cost of obtaining a license, the cost of equipment required to be installed or used or procedures required to be employed in complying with the rule, additional operating costs incurred, and the cost of monitoring and reporting. (d) An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined by Section 288.703, F.S., and an analysis of the impact on small counties and small cities as defined by Section 120.52, F.S. St. Lucie County is not defined as a small County for purposes of this requirement. (e) Any additional information that the agency determines may be useful. 2.0 A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be required to comply with the ordinance, together with a general description of the types of individuals likely to be affected by the ordinance. There will be no individuals or entities affected by approval of the proposed expansion of the boundaries of District #4. District #4 is an already existing Community Development District. The petition to expand its boundaries by approximately 1.68 acres will have no impact on either the initial 882.44 acres in the District or on the 1.68 acres added to the District for the following reasons. First, as noted above, neither the costs nor the volume of development planned for District #4 will change if the proposed boundary change is approved. So, there will be no impact on land in District #4. Second, the expansion parcel will be taken from the contraction parcels of other Districts. Again, since neither the Page 4 of 6 February 25. 2002 \w ....., costs nor the volume of development will change in any other District, there is no impact on any individual or entity if the proposal is approved. 3.0 Good faith estimate of the cost to state and local government entities, of implementing and enforcing the proposed ordinance, and any anticipated effect on state and local revenues. 3.1 Costs to Governmental Agencies of Implementing and Enforcing Ordinance State Governmental Entities There will be no cost to any governmental agencies to implement or to enforce the proposed ordinance. District #4 is an existing Community Development District in good standing. Altering its boundaries will not change the costs for any State governmental entity. St. Lucie County St. Lucie County will incur no costs associated with this proposed Ordinance beyond reviewing the petition and its supporting exhibits. The petition itself provides much of the information needed for a staff review. St. Lucie County already possess the staff needed to conduct the review without the need for new staff. In additión, there is no capital required to review the petition. Finally. local governments routinely process similar petitions for land uses and zoning changes that are far more complex than is the petition to alter the boundaries of District #4. There is no annual cost to the County, because the District is an existing Community Development District in good standing. Approving a change in the District's boundaries does not impact annual costs to the County in any way. 3.2 Impact on State and Local Revenues Adoption of the proposed ordinance will have no negative impact on State or local revenues. The District is an existing Community Development District. As an independent unit of local government, the District is designed to be a self funding entity in terms of its obligations under Chapter 190, F.S. Altering its boundaries, as proposed here, has no impact on State or local revenues. 4.0 A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by individuals and entities required to comply with the requirements of the ordinance. There are no transactional costs associated with approving this alteration in the boundaries of the District. As noted above, the amount of development and the number of acres served by all the Districts will no change if the Ordinance is approved. Furthermore, the volume of development and the costs for providing Page 5 of 6 February 25, 2002 .... .." District facilities and services is also unchanged. estimated costs and the timetable for construction. Exhibit B contains the 5.0 An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined by Section 288.703, F.S., and an analysis of the impact on small counties and small cities as defined by Section 120.52, F.S. There will be no impact on small businesses because of the changes proposed in the District's boundaries. The District is an existing Community Development District. The costs to provide infrastructure and services has not changed nor has the volume of development planned for the District. St. Lucie County has an estimated population that is greater than 10,000 in the most current census (2000). Therefore, the County is not defined as a "small" county according to Section 120.52, F.S. 6.0 Any additional useful information. The analysis provided above is based on a straightforward application of economic theory, especially as it relates to tracking the incidence of regulatory costs and benefits. Inputs were received from the Developer's Engineer and other professionals associated with the Developer. Page 6 of 6 February 25, 2002 .......... .... Agenda Request ..", Item NumberK - A 1- Date: Mar 26, 2002 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ] [ ] [ x ] [ ] Quasi-JD [ To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners ~ .' '", ' Prxs~nte.,d By \' "!'~ ) ~ IJ ~ '~omA>evelopment gïrector I Consider Approving an Interlocal Agreement between St. Lucie Coun~y and The Westchester Community Development Districts One Through Four for the þurpose for addressing Infrastructure Improvements at The Westchester Development Site. Community Development Dept. SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: Attached is a copy of an Interlocal Agreement between St. Lucie County and the Westchester Community Development Districts Numbers One Through Four. The purpose of this agreement is to recognize that certain community'wide infrastructure improvements will be constructed by Westchester CDD #1. How this effects St. Lucie County is that certain of these "community infrastructure" improvements will take place outside of the boundaries of the Westchester CDD #1, and some may take place outside of the overall boundaries of the Westchester development project itself. In order to do so, the County must through specific Interlocal Agreement, agree that the District may undertake certain improvements outside of its boundaries, consistent with the general restrictions setout in the Districts enabling ordinances. Paragraph 2 (Grant Of Authority) of this Interlocal Agreement outlines the general powers being authorized through this agreement. To the extent that the Districts operate within the limitations of thier enabling ordinances, they are permitted to undertake certain infrastructure improvements outside of the District boundaries and to levy assessments within the Districts accordingly. In addition, the attached Interlocal Agreement addressees the relationship of the previously approved local Development Agreement (DV A-01-001) between St. Lucie County and the Westchester Development Company regarding infrastructure improvements to be made and how those improvements are credited to the County. FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the attached draft Interlocal Agreement between St. Lucie County and The Westchester Community Development Districts One Through Four for the purpose for addressing Infrastructure Improvements at The.'_ Westchester Development Site. " C MMISSION ACTION: IJ[J APPROVED DENIED D OTHER 4-0 (Hutchinson Ah!,:pnt-) CURRENCE: Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: aft] Coordination/ Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: (agend620a) ,,-,. ..., íJ ~!'J Commission Review: March 26, 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: Community Development Director DATE: March 25, 2002 SUBJECT: Consider Approving an Interlocal Agreement between SI. Lucie County and The Westchester Community Development Districts One Through four for the purpose for addressing Infrastructure Improvements at The Westchester Development Site. Attached is a copy of an Interlocal Agreement between SI. Lucie County and the Westchester Community Development Districts Numbers One Through Four. The purpose of this agreement is to recognize that certain community wide infrastructure improvements will be constructed by Westchester CDD #1. How this effects St. Lucie County is that certain of these "community infrastructure" improvements will take place outside of the boundaries of the Westchester CDD #1, and some may take place outside of the overall boundaries of the Westchester development project itself. In order to do so, the County must through specific Interlocal Agreement, agree that the District may undertake certain improvements outside of its boundaries, consistent with the general restrictions setout in the Districts enabling ordinances. Paragraph 2 (Grant Of Authority) of this Interlocal Agreement outlines the general powers being authorized through this agreement. To the extent that the Districts operate within the limitations of thier enabling ordinances, they are permitted to undertake certain infrastructure improvements outside of the District boundaries and to levy assessments within the Districts accordingly. In addition, the attached Interlocal Agreement addressees the relationship of the previously approved local Development Agreement (DVA-01-001) between SI. Lucie County and the Westchester Development Company regarding infrastructure improvements to be made and how those improvements are credited to the County. Staff recommends that the Board approve the attached draft Interlocal Agreement between St. Lucie County and The Westchester Community Development Districts One Through Four for the purpose for addressing Infrastructure Improvements at The Westchester Development Site. SUBMITTED: / '\, "'-.---.\ \ .' ~ actor i DJMI I WESTCHESTERCDDINTERLOACLAG\EEEMNT#1 MEM01 (H)) cc: County Administrator County Attorney Public Works Director Planning Manager Noreen Dreyer, Esquire - Ruden, McClosky. Smith, Schuster & Russell. P,A. ....... ..., AN INTERLOCAL LUCIE COUNTY AND THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT THROUGH FOUR AGREEMENT BETWEEN ST. WESTCHESTER DISTRICTS ONE THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreemenf') is entered into this _ day of , 2002, by and between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as "County" and WESTCHESTER NO. 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ("District No.1"), WESTCHESTER NO.2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ("District No.2"), WESTCHESTER NO. 3 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ("District No.3") and WESTCHESTER NO. 4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ("District NO.4" and, collectively with District No.1, District NO.2 and District No. 3, the "Districts"), each a community development district established pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida Statutes WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the County has previously established the Districts by ordinance pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida Statutes (the "Acf) and granted each of the Districts certain special powers by resolution; and WHEREAS, to facilitate the financing, construction, acquisition, operation and maintenance of community-wide infrastructure for the Westchester development located within and without the Districts and to better assure compliance with the development order pertaining to Westchester as it relates to such community infrastructure, the Districts have entered into a District Development Interlocal Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A (the "District Interlocal Agreemenf'); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the District Interlocal Agreement, the Districts have delegated to District No.1, among other matters, the power and authority to act on behalf of all the Districts to finance, acquire, construct, operate and maintain Community Infrastructure (as defined in the District Interlocal Agreement) serving all of the Districts, to operate and maintain certain District Infrastructure (as defined in the District Interlocal Agreement), and to levy, collect and enforce non-ad valorem assessments in connection with the foregoing, all as more fully set forth in said District Interlocal Agreement; and WHEREAS, each District will also finance, acquire, construct, operate and maintain its own District Infrastructure serving that District (subject to any delegation to District NO.1 pursuant to the Districtlnterlocal Agreement of the responsibility for operating and maintaining all or a portion of such District Infrastructure); and WHEREAS, Section 190.012(1) of the Act lists certain special powers that a community development district is permitted to undertake, including "any other project [as such term is defined in the Act] ...without the boundaries of the district...when the project is the subject of an agreement between the district and a governmental entity and is consistent with the local government comprehensive plan of the local government within which the project is to be located;" and Interlocal Agreement Westchester Community Development Districts March 26. 2002 Page 1 ~ ~ WHEREAS, in furtherance of the foregoing, the County and the Districts desire to enter into this Agreement to provide for the exercise by District No. 1 outside of its boundaries of the powers relating to Community Infrastructure and District Infrastructure projects delegated to it in the District Interlocal Agreement and to provide each of the Districts, respectively, the right to exercise the powers granted to each by the Act to undertake their own District Infrastructure projects outside their respective boundaries; and WHEREAS, pursuant to ordinance of the County and other applicable law, including Section 336.025, Florida Statutes, the County has levied a local option fuel tax on motor fuel and diesel fuel (the "Gas Tax") and, pursuant to an interlocal agreement among the County and the eligible municipalities in the County (the "Gas Tax Interlocal Agreemenf'), has established a distribution formula for dividing the entire proceeds of the Gas Tax among the County and the eligible municipalities in the County (the "Distribution Formula"); and WHEREAS, the Distribution Formula is based on certain "allowable Transportation Expenditures" (as defined in the Gas Tax Interlocal Agreement) made by the County and the eligible municipalities, respectively; and WHEREAS, the County has requested that the Districts acknowledge herein that, for purposes of the Gas Tax Interlocal Agreement, the County may include as part of its allowable Transportation Expenditures any amounts expended by the Districts in connection with the construction or improvement of County-owned roads or roads dedicated, or to be dedicated, to the County that qualify as allowable Transportation Expenditures under the Gas Tax Interlocal Agreement (the "District County Road Expenditures"); NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and other considerations contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Recitations. The recitations set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference. 2. Grant of Authoritv. The County hereby agrees that District No. 1 may exercise such rights and powers and take such actions outside its boundaries consistent with the provisions of Section 1-6.5-83, of the St. Lucie County Code and Compiled Laws, as may be necessary or appropriate to permit District NO.1 to accomplish the powers delegated to it pursuant to the District Interlocal Agreement with respect to Community Infrastructure projects and District Infrastructure projects, consistent with the local government comprehensive plan of the County. The County further agrees that consistent with the provisions of Sf. Lucie County Ordinances 01-010, 01-011, 01-012 and 01-013 each of District No.1, District No.2, District No.3, and District No. 4 may exercise the powers granted to each by the Act outside its boundaries with respect to their own District Infrastructure projects, consistent with the local government comprehensive plan of the County. < 3. Matters Relating to Distribution Formula. Each of the Districts acknowledges that, for purposes of the Distribution Formula set forth in the Gas Tax Interlocal Agreement, the County may include as part of its allowable Transportation Expenditures all or any portion of the District County Road Interlocal Agreement Westchester Community Development Districts March 26, 2002 Page 2 -..... ..,.¡I Expenditures, in the sole determination of the County. In furtherance thereof, each of the Districts hereby delegates to District No. 1 the authority, on behalf of all of the Districts, to execute and deliver to the County such additional confirmation of the foregoing as the County may reasonably request. In addition, each of the Districts, as to itself, hereby agrees that upon written request of the County, it will provide the County with information to enable the County to determine its District County Road Expenditures. Notwithstanding the foregoing, such information may instead be provided by District No.1, on behalf of itself and the other Districts. Nothing herein shall obligate the Districts to incur District County Road Expenditures. Each of the Districts hereby delegates to District 1 the authority, on behalf of all of the Districts, to enter into agreements with the County whereby the County would undertake District projects or portions of District projects that include District County Road Expenditures, and the Districts would provide funding to the County for such expenditures, provided, however, that any such agreement shall be consistent with (a) all District indentures governing available funds, and (b) Development Agreement DVA-01-001between the County and Westchester Development Company, dated September 11, 2001, recorded in Official Records Book 1437, Page 2741, of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. Should the County prefer that funding flow through the County, then the Districts agree to cooperate with the County to accomplish this objective. 4. Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which, taken together, shall be deemed an original hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have made and executed this Agreement on the respective dates under each signature, signing by and through their duly authorized representative. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTCOMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN DEPUTY CLERK DATE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: " COUNTY ATTORNEY ********************************** Inter10cal Agreement Westchester Community Development Districts March 26, 2002 Page 3 "--' 'fIttI(II ir Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: WESTCHESTER NO.1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, a local unit of special purpose government By: Name: Name: Title: Date: Name: ********************************** WESTCHESTER NO.2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, a local unit of special purpose government Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: By: Name: Name: Title: Date: Name: ********************************** WESTCHESTER NO.3 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, a local unit of special purpose government Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: By: Name: ,- < Name: Title: Date: Name: Interlocal Agreement Westchester Community Development Districts March 26, 2002 Page 4 ...,. ,..... ...., {i-- ********************************** Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: WESTCHESTER NO.4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, a local unit of special purpose government By: Name: Name: Title: Date: Name: " Interlocal Agreement Westchester Community Development Districts March 26, 2002 Page 5 '-' AGENDA REQUEST ITEM~. § DATE: March 26, 2002 REGULAR [X] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: Pete Keogh Director, Parks & Recreation SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Parks & Recreation SUBJECT: Discussion on 10th Street Park Improvements BACKGROUND: As a follow-up to the issue brought up by Ft. Pierce City Commissioner Duke Nelson at the February 1 st Strategic Planning meeting regarding the need of a place for our north county senior citizens to meet, Commissioner Bruhn has requested that staff agenda discussion on possible improvements at 10th Street Park utilizing Park Impact Fees. He is proposing that the County offer assistance to the City for these improvements in the form of matching dollars (dollar for dollar) not to exceed the amount $25,000. (Attached: Information provided by County staff and the City of Ft. Pierce). FUNDS AVAILABLE IN: 310002-7210-563000-700 (Park Impact Fees-Improvements Other Than Buildings) (Funds will be transferred to the appropriate account if the Board approves proposal) PREVIOUS ACTION: NIA RECOMMENDATION: NIA K] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: 4-0 (Hutchinson Absent) Approval to use park impact fees for improvement. Doug ~ County COMMISSION ACTION: Coordination/Siqnatures County Attorney: Originating Dept: p--? Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) Mgt. & Budget: Purchasing Mgr.: Other: Other: Eft. 1/97 H:\Agenda discussion 10th Street Park.wpd ~ '-" BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ...., PARKS & RECREATION MEMORANDUM To: From: Date; Subject: Commissioner Coward Linda Brown, Administrative Manager ß February 14,2002 City of Ft. Pierce Impact Fees- Bathroom/Pavilion Costs Per our discussion, I have obtained the following information for your consideration: 1. According to OMB, the Interlocal Agreement with the City of Ft. Pierce provides that "The City agrees to remit to the County 50% of all funds collected as impact fees, after the deduction of 4% of the funds collected which shall be kept by the City as a fee for administration for collecting and transmitting the funds." \ Last year, the city's share of Park Impact fees came to $ $10,099 which includes the 4% administration fee. A couple of years ago during the budget meetings when the city brought up the need for a skateboard park, they were asked what they were utilizing their share of the park impact fees for. Their response was that they used park impact fees for maintenance of their parks. 2. The current dollar amount available in Park "A" (Ft. Pierce)lmpact fee is $69,224. 3. Don McLam has provided the following for restrooms and pavilions. a. Restroom-block building with metal roof and stucco exterior. The inside has two toilets on the women's side and one toilet-one urinal on the men's side. This is the standard current restroom that the county is building and can be seen at Lakewood Park, Maravilla, and Frederick Douglas parks. Cost: $42-48,000 1 JOHN ° ßRUHN 015,,'cr No 1 . OOUG COWARO. O'srncr No.2' PAULA A LEWIS. O,s,rrcr No. J . mAN~J:E HUTCHINSON D,,,rrcr No d . CLIFF ßARNES O,srrrcr No S COIJ~1'Y Adrnuîlsrraror . Douglos M. Ande':;or' 2JOO Virginia Avenue . Phone (561) 462-1515 . TDD (561) 462-1428 '-. .. "'"" b. Pavilion-12'xI2' which will hold one table-cost 16'x20' which will hold four tables ,.., $1,872 $ 3,800 installed $ 4,160 $ 8,300 installed If we can provide you with any additional information, please let us know. cc: Pete Keogh, Director Doug Anderson, County Administrator Robert Bradshaw, Assistant County Administrator 2 02/14/02 09:16 FAX 5614622117 SLC m!B III 01 ~~ \..r '" .: ...., 8 m m CJ )o;gCJ ~ ð. II> !l~.I!: .." iiï S' -<. :I C (t -. ~ It ::J :I Ie N n -~~ '11 CD ", i ii 0 " ¡; (D :I Z 0 III cCÞta .: iii < ... .. III ~~3 !)J ~ õ ~ 2. .. j c 0 JI:' C ~"I; i III ~ ~ 0 en UI 8: 0 -< N CD 3' =N~ !1. [ -i C1 '£ I.... )Þ 110'" ~ ~ å1 g 0 ;g Co> ~ ::rCldl ~ :I en en ,- o N CD ¡e 0" .. C ð- CD ~ ¡ ? III ¡illIZI ... Q ñJ' IT II> ~... N 0 ;9!. g' e ::r [ ..., ~ Ulg ::I 0 - f (i 0 c 0 'Jl Itilll 0 CD !!t => '1fl'" CD ... N ~ Q. '" .. ~ .. ~ C1(J ;g~~;g~O(J z~(J ~m=~~)Þ~ III _C CD ~ 1/1 =fc.cn ~ îC~ IDC O.-O~O ~Oll>~=> o g I» .. ~ .: ~ Q iI CT I ::L œ s. 01 II: ::;" ¡;" Q. ~ n ... Q. ð~iCD~O.~~~ '1I"'å"'3c ~ ð~: IDCD::J ~l»ð~~~~C1~lIIm ~_~ !1.. ::r '" ~~ "om ~ ~_c ~ CJf ¡~O ::I~CD 0& ~::Ifo~ :I» --·0 ~ "'-~::I~<-nIZlC IZI Q. III II ..CÞ..... -n ~~~i~~~~!~i~~~~"'~~~ <:: ~ii'~ ~ ~en~3CJ"3"1; 1I~~:I~ ~m~ g ë5Q."I; ==: ....-iD ~~~t!i~j~~2~3~ g~~ . .. :I 3 ... )oBi ~ ~§ ¡::~~~~]i~ ~ ~~! [ !lª-_ C:=>c.> ~IC_ "'I» ~ID~C c '1I~ ~ !,I:> 0 ü!;~ {'i ¡¡;;1'-c3 '1102 ¡¡: m3~ ..- ~.. n t"C ~ M"C 0 ... '¡IDa ~ ~ - ... S :I !l .-:" ~ 3 ~ ~ tl.ñJ':I =('0'0 => ~ ~ c"'iD z: !~f1i c:a 0 !: -ª. :: ~ 1'1 .CD;>"> ..... .... ~ ~ ..... ~..... 1:1\<: IIIn:x(') ; ..... ~~~ ,þ, W N ~""'ClNcr> IØ :::~ ~f :ÞM .... 00 ø......... ..... <0 ....OQ>QII....O W ::r "'IDID.... ~ -""0"0 cè1t·,þ, C ~ "w-a,-....C·U1(:, ið c·.... 0"'"" ø -~IC "" 0 C::IOO 00.... 0 U1 "'''''''0U10 '"' -.10 0 ..... 0 ....00 ooe.> 0 N .....U10000 .. So .. ð t:!~cm Q "'eriim = i:!","" ::I o II! III = :Þ rt !"5'ã!:þ (II ~~ þ'< !:lC!; '"' .....~ IV ~'" C :I ...... Nc.> .... ~'" W.. o.ltZ '& "'01:....... '",~ . -.0 åJ '0\ - ~ã.n l1li 0101U1 t.>m (II <Ol>- 0 0 (01\)'" .0.... ... Nl>- ~ m::;m ã!!.cn 'C . U11D en ~ .. 01 ell ...(,:1 .... -I\) "" co cø lID.. 0.... .... (0 CD .......... ~~ a€ < .. .... ....0 001 .... 01 .. c,;,,,,, IV CI ~ :b b'Q è1t (:, (,:I èo -a,è1t ioi. rt -< ... ....g g8 8 ~ .... ØI ~~ U1 ::r ." ,. ..... 0 '" .. ...... II) ~ ~ ð Q 0 '11 (1)0 = II) ell ::I - .... _ 01 N i lIP ~ C::I 0 !» 10.)(0 .. rt Q Q, åJ ...... -IQ ~ ~ - '< . m $ ........ "I; .. - ~..... - ~ 'tI ~. å :e 0 ;l- II> ~ 0 "C ¡ õ: ~ ... ~ 1\1 il 10 'ª Ñ ä ~ .. (;) ts c. o (;) m -< Xi m < m z c '!J 3" "0 0> " 1- ." " " "' '1j 0> ;;. "' 1 ::r: §," ~ CT <.oJ o ~ .... o "0 m m~ro :3 )( ~ CD 9: "C<fC tÈ Q ~ :E Q ~ ~ º ~ ~ g ~. CJ':<CQ.~'< n £.:.;::: ~ c 5" O)~o-o;::::r~t"CVlgl.C Di" -.:J 3 - Co) CD n :Jg.~Q'"O~·b':J.ã' g:' nCD.,.,æ.ú')gc:tI'I~ ë; (tI~oQJïO~m_Vlr ::I ~~5. o-<~ëÐ~ £ iJo>(¡') 3:Or-¡:'" ctI = ~ "C CD C'Ð ::I t1' c.ÌÌì~ ë6"r.oO)a.~ ø g )( sa ê. VI C 3 £ ~~cÈ ~ ..., tIi E () ~U) ê"3- ~~ ""J"" g. Ë" 5" :¡:::; ì'i õï :;¡ ~\ .,., ,~I ",I ... o 1:'j1 ~I 0, :1 .~I =1 ... ... c:: <!J o o o 01 ... '" a> '" ;q¡q "" -<!J ""'0 -.....,¡ÎJ1 0- ~.:: ... 0:>, ... '" '" .. ~ ~"{à ~ ~.~ O(A(:: O) ,20lDm <D '" - .,.,~.. Vi -->.V"Þ......w œ......OA AOOU"1 00'0·0 -'-000 Ar9 8.3 .,., Vi .... <D _-., ~!J' L" w 0 0"'0 .s~~ "" .,., o .,., .... 00 ~ .... .... '" -<D "'.... "'0 ~ Vi '" 0:> ... .. '" C: " ...., ~ '" '", <D .s -........ .... '" '" -..... "0 '" w- "0) ê.n <.c O:><D'" 8°-' .... -.... "'.... "'''' ....... èo ... .... ..... 0 ........ "0 N ....0 "0 1...,:....r "'0 o:>w ........ N .;.. '" '" "O<D "CD -A '" ~ N .... ........ "''" "'<D wo we "'0 "''" ........ N'" .....'" .;..'" ·0:..... "'.... "'''' 'tI ~ ,.. "' m ,..., tn o c: r't ~ n o c: := r't '< '-' ~ <D <D '" '" '" '" <D '" ..... <D <!J '" <D '" <D N o o o ." ëñ () :Þ r "0-< Om ~:Þ ;0 N o o N m:oro )( ,," "0<<0 m"'ìJnr-:o::r:mmm:Þzr-~n~"~ c:~m~O)mO~~-:JO~~O ~~ 3~'~~~O""Vlc~o~=-.~~C5' 3~i3::1;ª~~~~~~~~VI~~ ~g~~I~~o~~~~~-3-~a ~ ~:;¡iJ" ~(;),..õï:¡::O" -0 ~ :J~m~ :J~m~-'~n~~~ ~ c.~*~~~~~>~~o~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~3m~~~~~ ctI ï.J (So ~ (þ t¡) "C £U CJ "C n " c:c 0 :J CJ'I Q,)o(nc..=ëÐ=CJ agCIJoOa.~ ~-õG>C/)(:r~ êSOQ~:JVI 5' "C~E)::tOcg :;3Q,)'T'~ ='Q.Q,)OCfl -- -"7'> ~ =: ë" VI n3 C':I '< ~ 9; t"C 0_ ~3~(Q" ;:':lJ.,,~u . Vi 0 Ci) "'0 Q, ::;i 1JVi 2.~ ~ ~ 5" Õ c "' ~ ¡;; m :;¡ a. :; <0 m 0> 0; :;¡ " " '" '" )I. s: :u 0; :;¡ ... o ... '" " ',þ. '" ~l -, '~I o .... :: o :..,. ..... <.oJ ... <1' o <D ." '"" «> .... '" N ...., '" '" '" ... '" 0:> '" '" o )I. Vi .. ~-;; "'''' Õ"J',::¡, ...., "'" ~~ ...., 0:> ~ .. .. ~ ~ ;;iA .A.. .r.:Þ.-;q.o CO....¡ (X:IWN N A.~(])t.tttl't~r.,::,C'lA{A"""¡ so~co°.8~So~ ... '" '" N " .... ~~ - - - --_~_~_tI't ÂOilt......tAA.oEf'!o- o OOO')OIJl-..¡A 0 oO·OOWln'A"cn OOOOQ')OAt.J .9.98£~..9~~ ViiÃ___ _ _ "" (A b'I WCONNN NOQ')<DA ·ao",þ..·'-Ië.n OO(])C)'IC.)'1 .s9.9~.8 .... ....... o 00 .. '" '" -"= '" '" N :..,. "'''' ,",,0 .... ...., ........ O:>W ON "U"lA "'" ..... ~ :::: .. 0:> '" <1' -"= .. " 01- . '" ~" ... .... 2~ ..- "'.... "... 0;:......., "'- ~.2 -........ ... N '" ~"'" ~ - '" "o".Þ.Ò'I .....00 ..sa~ ...,.; ........ N- O~ ..... " b.N <D.... -0 ........ '" '" N - ....0 ·œ'".....,¡ <D ..... "'" ........ "'" ':"0 0:>'" o,"r-v "'..... "'''' ........ N <1' '" N '" ..... "Nm O:><D ...'" iJ 0> ~ ,.. "' » ,..., Z o '1 r't ~ n o c: := r" '< ....., '" <D '" '" '" O"! <D '" ..... :Þ " - <='" OJ '" (i;"10) '" <D <D N o o o ." ëñ () :Þ r "0-< Om ~:Þ ÃJ N o o N :> "' g, )I. "0 ., o ~. "g~ :l>n :Or" ^(/) CII ~fO' "g:= :I> nn ....... "110 men m~ CIIen r" t- O> " C OJ -< ~ }1> N o o N "0 1"\ o >< fO· B fO· r" '< ::: H en >-! o ~ -< o "I: "0 > ~ ;0; r" o n fO· r't '< 1"\ ~ en fO· Q., ~ = r't (/) H X "0 > n >-! "'1 tf tf en en H Z ("') tf \D \D \II H Z n C: "0 >-! H o :z: \,or ..." ~ JE~~~¿/ N T E R MEMO 0 F F C E To: Dennis W. Beach City Manager From: R. Duke Nelson etN City Commissioner Subject: Fort Pierce Park Improvements Date: February 14,2002 The attached memorandum, subject as above, dated February 13, 2002 is forwarded for action as appropriate. Hopefully, the proposal by the County will facilitate expediting needed facilities at 10dt Street Park. If need be, please schedule tills action for the February 19, 2002 Commission meeting. Note that it will be discussed at the County Commission meeting on February 26,2002. RDN@ Attachment cc: Mayor and Members of City Commission "- ..., BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DOUG COWARD COMMI5510Nm FROM Doug AnderS(ln, Cl)unty Administrator Doug Cowart-County Commissioner, ~istrict 2 TO' DATE: February 13. 2002 SUB.ŒCT: FORT PIERCE PARK IMPROVEMENTS At our recent strategí~ planning session there was considerable discussion about the Community Parks Master Plan, including a specific recommendation ITom Ft. Pierce City Commissioner R. "Duke" Nelson who indicated." stror.£ demand for checkers and dominos in NW Fort Pierce. I spoke with Commissioner Net.C)n thiS morning and he indicated that the City's 1 o'~ Street park would be the most desirable location for such il facility. He is specifically interested in providing checkers and ~rmanent restroom faclIities. Because of the limit~d cost and scope of such a project and the availability of recreational impact fee dollars from the "North CoulÎty Zone," it would be most appropriate to contribut~ available impact fee dollars rather than merging this ;;oncept with the broader parks referendum. The County currently collects recreational impact feedol1:m from Fort Pierce, so it is certainly appropriate to re-invest a portion of these funds back into City projects. Ba.sed on information from the County's Parks and Recreation Department. there appears to be sufficient funds available in the "North Zone" for this specific project to proceed immediately. I would recommend the County partner with the City and contribute up to S25,000 for capital improvements to the 10'" Street Park, including permanent bathroom fëlcílities, in-ground checkers/dominos tables with chairs. and landscape eJ'lhancements to provide a shaded, people- friendly park The City w,Juld then continue on-going operation and maintenance responsibilities for the park. Please hav~ stafffinaJize this concept ~it~ the City of Fort Pierce and then bring the proposal befo';;\ the St. L:Jcle Board of Coumy COmm!55tonet's on February 26, 2002. ~ )<)HN 0 QI\!J -oN (1¡iINr""c 1 . þ:-)IJG ::O~'A"O C"'i:r·c~ N,= 2 . P.'..:\...a~. I.E·...15 D'Sf~I~P No. J . JI'\..a..NNIE "'UT(H·N:>(')N [)1:"riCf No .¡ . CLIH OAI\r~'S. DI~t'çr No 5 l:"vnIY .6t,cmll"\im~lol . OO\,IQI':)j, M. .A.nj"'\I,)n 2:'300 Vir;¡ír"1'Q Av~nue . FOrT Pie-rce. FL:l4Qe-2-5652 . (561) 46'2-1412 FAX(S61J462-21.J1 .700(61)462-1':26 ~ -¡t.O ~ d.. \ ,L\ \~ \,.- """'" CITY OF FORT PIERCE - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM :: -.-. .- . -....... ~' . c. '-'::.3- , .( /' . ,'';'= 2M-' -.,~-- TO: City Manager, Dennis W. Beach ¡-c,., 1 '; 'jnn~ r ,-0 "l,-li( FROM: SUBJECT: Director of Public Works, Gary M. Ferch ~~. ,,~~iTY CF E~ ¡;¡¿:;c¡: ... i'¡ ;\I~ ' At:E~'s n;:;:;;~'.: \ .... _1,' 'J... 10th Street Park DATE: February 13, 2002 Pursuant to your request concerning restroom facilities at the above park, it would be our recommendation to stay consistent to our policy in utilizing the same type of restrooms as in all of our parks. Last March we received a proposal (attached) for a new restroom for Rotary Park/Kids Crossing, located on S 23rd S1. This restroom was never constructed because of budgetary restraints. The total cost of a restroom installation is approximately $30,000.00. Please keep in mind that this is only a proposal and the actual facility would need to be placed out for bid. In reviewing the facilities at the N 10th St Park, compared to the existing parks, there are only two small shelters. Rotary Park, Jaycee Park, and Pinewood Park all have a large pavilion for special events such as Birthday Parties, etc. We have attached a copy of a large pavilion for reference. The cost for a larger pavilion is approximately 26,500.00. This figure would also include picnic tables and benches. In summary, all the above are considered capital items and would require funding from the general fund. GMF/mm Attachments cc: Deputy Director of Public Works ~.;tD ~. f\Je15>ö1\ ;t\\~\a;;f.. L::NGTJ-IS '/,J..RY (SE:: AVAILABLE SIZES) 8' COLUMN SPACiNG TYPICAL . , -' :ñ I i UJ :¡; .--' iñ <t W W ,-" CJ ',u I ;n ""', ~ « ii5 ;¡j ~ :;;. ;:: <;: <:: ~ :> 'JJ " « :D. '-' UJ - I- UJ ~ :!2. ;::. >- c c:: 'f) UJ « UJ~ i- ;;> ;:;;. ~ '" ;;:, U :>, ~ <t ;:: .... I' ~,¡ ¡ ;' / Popular Sizes (WxL) 12'xl.2· 12'x20' 16'x20' lô~x2St 20'x20' 20'x23' 20'~,36' 20'x44' 24 ':(23' 24'x36' 24'x4-4' 2S'x4-4' 2S'x52' 2S'x60' 30'x44' Widths: 12'. 1,L 1::', 1·3'.20'.22',24'.23',30',35',40',45',50',60',66' Lengths: 12'.20'.2:3'.36'.4-1,',52'.60'.68',76',84',92',100'. 10S·. 116·... ! I II I I 1 } 1// , I I I ! ; , ! ! j I 1/ I i.. \ i // I ! / ./ ,I ,/ I I I !, I It" l I VI I i I' I I /1 I 1/ í I !' I I I </ I I i i I , , I 2 RC? Shc:itC'rs. rn~. '31)t)-,3~~-;)2r)7 'Jr.s¡.) i·.2S2-'~f3U¡) ?,o. B():{ .25 Sttl~lrt. :.'!. ·~.~'jlj;:;-;}fr..;.) ?L"-: :3·5 t·:2;:'d-¡}~tJ7 30'x5:2' 30'x60' 30'x6S' 30'x76' 30'x84' 40'x60' 40'xS4' 40'xlOO' 50'Û6' 50';ÜOO' 50'x1l6' 50';d32' 60'xlOO' 66'xlOO' 66'xl,W' Z0'd "'" ....., R.C.D. Commercial Construction Corp. P.o. Box 7385 Pt. St. Lucie, FL 34985 PROPOSAL March 22Nt>. 200 I City of Fort Pierce P.O Box 1480 Fort Pierce, FL 34954-1480 Ann: Bob Rithaler Re: Kids Crossing Balhroom Addition R.C.D. Commercial Conslruction Corp. will furnish all labor. material, supervision and in!Ouranee to: construct t 10'x20' addition to the existing restroom located at the above mentioned 8.. metal roof similar to other city parks b. women - 2 toilets. 1 lavatory c. men - I toilet, 1 urinal. 1 lavatory d new fixlures and flush valves to match existing e. n~w construction to match existing 2. work on existing restroom located at the above mentioned t. remove wood shake roof b. install nt:w metal roof to match new construction c. remove toilet partition d. existing thtures to remain as is to serve as handicap stall (no door) e. remove and reinstall wood pilings f remove and reinstall water cooler and chase wall 3. owner to provide a. toilet paper ind piper towel bolders and instlillation b. water, electric and toilet facilities for construction 4 exclusions a. no plans b no permit , 2oc-' .....\.-,.r.. '("./.- - .. j '1 0¿Zt ¿££ t9Ç t ~o~ ~SNO~ '~I~~3WWO~ a~~ Wd ¿Þ:Z0 to-ZZ-~~W '~'" ~ ; ,. L______ , .¡~\, ~ atUCX ou.:CON$TRUCTIOH CO., 1Me. P.O. eo. 3507 Fort ~. F.t 3.e48 " '.'. '. ",,,",,,,. ·1.," (561) *-3114 fa (561) ~ I ~/5/"01 " çtty Of <to Pierce .,t:.,,¡>1erce rIA. 3495C !'HONE 460-2200 1Q. ~ . . . JOe _, UX.-noN 8athroom expansion at Rot~YHar~ :\. . I ¡. , I .' ,:,' ; 1 JOe NI..WEJII . , All labor.material and equiptment for the following items: 1. Sathroon expansion of 8 feet, with 1 new urinal and 1 toplet 1n mens room. Two toilets on the womens side.New sink on both mens and womens side. 2. Roof to be 5v crimp with new roof qoinq over existing roof. 3. Two new lights similar to the existing ones. 4. Bathroom not to have electronic sensors. S. All paint including exiaiting 6. All cleanup AIdIItIIct: ... ef ,... WE PROPOSE he,eoy 10 turn~h IMterlal and labor- compMte in accordance Wllh Ir\e aboW SpeclhcatiOfI$.1or 11111 ,um of: Twenty Nine Thousand Nine Hundred forty five and 00/100 Dollars Payment to be made liS follows: As work progresses dollal'll ($ 29,945.00 } 1.5..tntwut per..u. an en u~1d \111. :-. All ......"01 .. gua,.,,_ 10 De .. $¡leQfoed All _ 10 De compieled in . ptO!IøaneI memer ~ 10 WIn<IattI prat'iIcvs. Any ~ or c»ncon """' .... opecIIIc¡nIons """''"9 ...,. COlIS .... lie .-cutod only upon wn-. _. _ will became en ""'" -.q. "'* oM _". esImat. All "II _._.. oonIingonI..-. _. _IS '" ~ beyond "'" ocnIfol. 0wI'er 10 carry h. _. and _ _ry '-renee. Our ~..,..IuIy~by_.~ ............ IIoJ1honztld S¡gnalu~ Note" This proøosal mllY be WIthdrawn by us If nol accQ )ted with," 30 days. ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL - The oöo... P"cee. ap.crftcd.UOna and conditions .ar. ...h..foilctory .nd .r. hereby .ecep1ed. You ar. aull1O'ueo 10 ao ... ..ork.. specdòed Psymtnl woll be made .. ouUlned _. 50gnature Date of Aa:eptanœ: Signatur. "'"' ...., N T E R MEMO OFF C E To: Gary M. Ferch Director of Public Works ~~,"''''' .:: ,...._~-r._.:_~..-,.;.;.~~- G; 'r~'--:~ .., 1~ \,- r II \" '~ I'" .; i1 \ ::-,\~- __. ':7 'p _.:.-~,__,,_J ......:.' .,~--:::-.~ I ;ì I, " c· ; , 'I :¡ : I· t' ."" I ¡. ¡ \, 1,' ;: : JAN 2. 9.. ' : O¡ '. "'. . I ¡"'j .~ I ¡ -r' o-f'¡éc;':"püš~3c';iOF~:,5 CÚì \ . \'". ,...,\\.0'- i~';·.1~ ¡,:.. .",-,,-- From: Dennis W. Beach I'?/);J1f City Manager ~ Subject: 10th Street Park Date: January 28, 2002 I have received a request for restroom facilities at the 10th Street Park. Please evaluate what options exist to provide restroom facilities similar to other parks in the community. Please respond in writing. DWBlbtp cc: R. Duke Nelson, Conunissioner ....... .., AGENDA REQUEST TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney SUBJECT: ..." ITEM NO. 1 DATE: March 26, 2002 REGULAR [X] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] PRESENTED BY: Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney Resolution No. 02-87 - Establishing a Permit Fee for Special Review and Siting Criteria to be paid by the Applicant for the Construction of an Electric Generator Plant in St. Lucie County, Florida. BACKGROUND: Please see attached Memorandum No. CA-02-384. PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution No. 02-87 as drafted. COMMISSION ACTION: ~ ] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: 4-0 (Hutchinson Absent) Approved as amended to use $10,000 base and consultant can increase if additional cost is necessary. E: Review and Approvals County Attorney: ~/ ,...'.~.n:,. B~dget '/Other: " if applicableJ___ Originating Dept. Finance: (Check for Copy only, Purchasing Other: Eff. 5/96 ,.,. ,...", INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney C.A. NO: 02-384 DATE: March 14t 2002 SUBJECT: Resolution No. 02-87 BACKGROUND: Pursuant to Section 11.12.00 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Codet a schedule of fees may be established by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners in order to cover the costs of technical and administrative activities. This Board believes it is in the best interest of the healtht safety and public welfare of the citizens of St. Lucie County to establish a permit fee for special review and siting criteria to be paid by the applicant for the construction of an electric generator plant in St. Lucie County, Florida. The attached Resolution No. 02-87 has been drafted for that purpose. RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution No. 02-87 as drafted. DSM/cac Attachment \.; "wÌ RESOLUTION NO. 02-87 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A PERMIT FEE FOR SPECIAL REVIEW AND SITING CRITERIA TO BE PAID BY THE APPLICANT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ELECTRIC GENERATOR PLANT IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners ofSt. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. Pursuant to Section 11.12.00 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, a schedule of fees may be established by resolution ofthe Board of County Commissioners in order to cover the costs of technical and administrative activities. 2. This Board believes it is in the best interest of the health, safety and public welfare of the citizens ofSt. Lucie County to establish a permit fee for special review and siting criteria to be paid by the applicant for the construction of an electric generator plant in St. Lucie County, Florida. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners ofSt. Lucie County, Florida: ð IJ,of,b 1. This Board does hereby establish a permit fee ofTen Thousand and 0011 00 ($10,000.00) 1:- /J ---- Þd d.-I ------L-- '"'r / ~ ð ,)V Dollars for special review and siting criteria to be paid by the applicant for the construction of an ~ electric generator plant in St. Lucie County, Florida. 2. This resolution shall take effect upon adoption. After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Doug Coward XX Vice Chairman Cliff Barnes XX Commissioner Paula A. Lewis XX ~ "-' >...,I AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. 1A DATE: March 26. 2002 REGULAR: ( X ) PUBLIC HEARING: ( ) CON NT: ( ) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): ADMINISTRATION SUBJECT: St. Lucie County International Airport Annexation - Florida Governmental Conflic BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAilABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: See attached memorandum RECOMMENDATION: Staff is requesting authorization from the Board of County Commissioners to work with the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council in this process. COMMISSION ACTION: o APPROVED 0 DENIED ~ OTHER: Go ahead with mediation. !::J County Attorney: "a Review and Approvals !::J Management and Budget: !::J Purchasing: !::J Originating Dept: !::J Other: !::J Other: !::J Finance: Check for copy only, if applicable: Anyone with a disability requiring accommodations to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at 561-462-1777 or TTD 561-462-1428, at least 48 hours (48) prior to the meeting. H :\WI N\WP\AGE N DA \Airportannex2. w pd "-" "" COUNTY ADMINISTRATION MEMORANDUM 02-37 TO: Board of County Com ',",' ,..'1,\' FROM: Douglas M. Anderson,' DATE: March 20, 2002 RE: St. Lucie County International Airport Annexation - Florida Governmental Conflict Resolution Yesterday I attended a meeting with City of Fort Pierce representatives and Michael Busha and Terry Hess from the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, discussing assistance from the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council in the conflict resolution process. The conflict resolution process consists of three phases: conflict assessment, joint public meeting, and mediation. We have completed the conflict assessment. The City has requested that the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council be involved in the mediation phase at this point, followed by a joint public meeting if necessary. Staff is requesting authorization from the Board of County Commissioners to work with the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council in this process. DMA/ab c: Dan Mcintyre, County Attorney Dennis Murphy, Community Development Director Bill Blazak, Utilities Director Paul Phillips, Airport Director Attachment HIWINIWPIAGEN DAlAirportannex2.w pd '-' AGENDA REQUEST TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Administration SUBJECT: Bi-Weekly Committee Reports ITEM NO. .J1J!I DATE: March 26. 2002 REGULAR [X ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] PRESENTED BY: BOCC BACKGROUND: At the April 11, 2000 Board of County Commissioners Meeting it was decided by the Board to place an item on the agenda. on a bi-weekly basi6. to give the Board an opportunity to provide updates on the various Committees and Advisory Boards that they serve on, It ha6 been decided by the County Administrator that this item will be placed on the agenda on the 2nd and 4th Tuesday of each month. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: This meeting the Board will provide updates on the following Committee6 and Advisory Board6 that they 6erve on: Committee Blueway Advisory Committee Chamber of Commerce Board of Dir. Children's Services Council Cultural Affair6 Council Friends of SLC Library Property & Homeowners St. Lucie County Fire Di6trict Transportation DLCB Treasure Coa6t Regional Planning Council COMMISSION ACTION: [ ] APPROVED [] DENIED [~ OTHER: Reports given MeetinG;¡ Date Monthly Monthly 2nd Thursday 2nd Tuesday 2nd Thursday 2nd Wednesday 3rd Wednesday 2nd Wednesday 3rd Friday Commis6ioner Ba rne6 Coward Lewi6 Barnes Lewi6 Hutchin60n Bruhn/Coward Lewi6 Coward/Barnes ,. , '-' AGENDA REQUEST ....I ITEM NO. --9.- r:,-- ---------¡ - ·-1 MAR 1 9 2C02 \ ! DATE: March 26, 2002 CONSENT [ REGULAR [X] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] Leg. [ Quasi-JD. [ ,..J TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: Î Request for SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Public Works SUBJECT: .I\uthorize the Public Works Department Inclusion application to Florida Dep Protection - State Revolving Fund Loan Pr gram assist in construction of the Indian River Attenuation Facility. million to Stormwater Since Indian River Estates subdivision was developed in the late 1950' s ,before stormwater management systems were required, the proper storm"later drainage facilities were not put in place. During heavy rains, flooding occurs leading to health problems associated '.vi th wells and septic tanks. For this reason, the County and several state agencies have developed a drainage plan to improve flood protection for the subdivision and to improve the quality of the stormwater runoff which currently discharges into the Savannas State Reserve. On October 17, 2000 the BOCC approved authorizing the engineering firm to complete final design for the project and on June 26, 2001 the Board approved submitting an application for $600,000 for Section 319 grant funds. Although the 319 grant will be awarded a~d it is anticipated that the County will submit another 319 grant in July 2002, over $2.5 million is still needed to complete the project. BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAIL. : No match is required for the loan program. The State Revolving Fund Loan Program repayment periods for projects sponsored by a local government shall be limited to 20 years under the Act. Rates shall be based upon Thomson Publishing Corporation's "Bond Buyer" 20-Bond GO Index. The rate determinations shall be as set forth in Rules 62-503.430(3) (a)4. and 5., F.A.C.. The County proposes to pay back the loan from stormwater MSTU (Municipal Services Taxing Unit) Revenue. PREVIOUS ACTION: The Board authorized the submittal of a grant application to the 319 Nonpoint Source Management Program on June 26, 2001. RECOMMENDATION: Staff reco~mends that the Board authorize staff to submit a Request for Inclusion application to the State Revolving Fund Loan Program. ){County Attorney: ~ Originating DePt:~~. F~nance: CONC ~.;'!.':-' r -,', ; ~ I 1 COMMISSION ACTION: [X ] [ ] APPROVED OTHER: 4-0 [ ] DENIED (Hutchinson Absent) ./ 1 9 2002 Purchasing: Othe~,.,.,.~.~__ Request for Inclusion 1J~~ 4 ., ~ Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Facilities Funding Twin Towers Office Bldg. 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400 Project Number: (Filled in by DEP) 1. Applicant's Name and Address St. Lucie County Enaineerina DeDartment (project sponsor) 2300 Virainia Avenue. 2nd Floor Annex. Room 229 (street) Fort Pierce. (city) Sl Lucie (county) 34982-5652 (zip code) Contact Person Don West. County Enaineer 2300 Virainia Avenue. 2nd Floor Annex. Room 229 (mailing address) Fort Pierce. FL 34982-5652 Telephone 561-462-1709 FAX 561-462-2362 e-mail ~öN V @.. I . .' .'~ <:..c.Sf-·/'-'.<...L ' f/, ~S' 2. Name and Address of Applicant's Consultant (if any): Hazen and Sawver (firm) Msrdi Executive Center. 1905 South 25th Street. Fort Pierce FL 34947 (mailing address) . Contact Person Robert Tavlor. Jr.. Senior Associate Telephone 561-489-0066 FAX 561-489-0299 a-mail rbtavlor@hazenandsawver.com 3. Certification by Authorized Representative: I certify that this form and attachments have been completed by me or at my direction and that the information presented herein is, to the best of my knowledge, accurate. (signature) Don West (name, typed) (date) Countv Enaineer (title) Hearing -Draft Form 62-503.900(1) Page 1 of 6 Effective Date: · . '-'" ...., Request for Inclusion 4. Project Description (Please Attach) To be eligible for listing on the fundable part of the integrated priority list, the project component(s) must be specifically identified in a planning document. If the planning has been completed for this project, note the title and date, and reference the page numbers or other location at which the specific facilities are described. a. A project may encompass urban stormwater management facilities, such as detentionlretention facilities, treatment facilities, etc. sponsored by a local government (eligible under Section 212 of the amended Clean Water Act). b. A project may encompass wastewater management facilities, such as sewers, pump stations, treatment plants, reuse facilities, sludge facilities, etc. sponsored by a local government (eligible under Section 212 of the amended Clean Water Act). c. A project may encompass nonpoint source pollution control best management practices for agriculture, silvaculture, on-site treatment and disposal, wetlands, mining, marinas, or groundwater protection sponsored by any entity (eligible under Section 319 or 320 of the amended Clean Water Act). This project is located in the County's Stormwater Master Plan as well as the SJRWMD 5-year plan budget spread sheet and the Indian River Lagoon national Estuary Program Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan. 5. Estimated Cost for Projects Involving Construction Including Structural Best Management Practices (Clean Water Act Section 212, 319, and 320) ..........,.............. a. Construction Costs: i. Construction, Demolitionand Related Procurement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii. Eligible Land ................................................. iii. Other (explain) ................................................ iv. Contingency (10% of Items i. through iii.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v. Technical Services during Construction. . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vi. Sum of Items i. through v.. .....................................,. vii. Administrative Allowance [see Rule 62-503.420(2), FAC.]............................... viii. Engineering Work Allowance [see Rule 62-503.420(3), FAC.] . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix. Total (sum of Items vi. through viii)....... ...... ............ .................. ............ ......... x. Loan Repayment Reserve for Direct Loans Only [see Rules 62-503.430(3)(a)1. and 2., FAC.] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . Total (sum of Items ix. and x.) for Direct Loans Only............ .............. . . . . . . b. Preconstruction Costs for Local Government Project Sponsors [see Rule 62-503.350(1), FAC.]: i. Item vi.. under Item a. above ..................................... $ ii. Administrative Allowance [see Rule 62-503.420(2}, FAC.] .............. $ iii. Planning Allowance [see Rule 62-503.420(5), FA C.] ................. $ iv. Appropriate Engineering Work Allowance [see Rules 62-503.420(3) and (4), FAC.] $ v. Total (sum of Items ii. through iv). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ vi. Loan Repayment Reserve for Direct Loans Only [see Rules 62-503.430(3)(a)1. and 2., FAC.] . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Total (sum of Items v. and vi.) for Direct Loans Only. . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . $ ($1000's) $ 2.500 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2.500 }, $ $ .{ Page 2 of 6 Hearing Draft Form 62-503.900(1) Effective Date; ~ ...." Request for Inclusion 6. Estimated. Project <?ost for Other than .Construction Projects (Clean Water Act Sections 319 and 320) L$1000's) a. Technical Services (such as carrying out non-structural best management practices) $ b. Equipment and Materials. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . $ c. Other (explain) . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ d. Contingency (10% of Items a. through c.) ................................ $ e. Sum of Items a. through d.. ..... ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . $ f. Administrative Allowance [see Rule 62-503.420(2), FAC.] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ g. Subtotal (sum of Items e. and f.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ h. Loan Repayment Reserve [see Rules 62-503.430(3)(a)1. and 2., FAC.] . . . . . . . . . $ Total (sum of Items g. and h.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7. Prioritization a. Default Minimum Priority o Check here if applying for a default minimum priority score (30 points) and skip to Item 12. below b. Baseline Priority Category ßi- Check here if applying for a priority determination under Rule 62-503,650, FAC., and provide appropriate information. Identify the category score(s) for which the project qualifies and reference the location in the planning documentation where sUbstantiating information may be found or attach other such substantiating information. Note that when a project justifies different base scores, the highest base score is to be used. The total of the base scores is not to be used. A full description of the project categories may be found in Rule 62-503.650(2), FAC. Proiect Cateaorv {Base Score} Reference J.Reduce documented public health hazard (800 Points). o ~ No 2.Protect groundwater that is under the direct influence of surface water Yes (Page 7 Certification) when groundwater is used for public water supply (400 Points). ~ No o Yes 3.Reduce potential public health hazards (200 Points). o [if No Yes (Page 7 Certification) Hearing Draft Form 62-503.900(1) Page 3 of 6 Effective Date: \.,; .....,¡ , ~. 4.Eliminate failing on site treatment and disposal systems or those that &' are causing environmental damage (140 Points) . 0 No Yes . Eliminate direct discharge of untreated stormwater to Class F-1, G-1, or G-II groundwaters or Class lor II surface waters (130 points) 0 æ( No Yes 5.Promote reclaimed water reuse as an alternative to consumptive use of drinking water (120 points) g 0 No Yes Œi 0 . Reduce saltwater intrusion into groundwater (110 points) No Yes 6.Assist in the implementation of total maximum daily load limitations or 0 g' pollutant load reduction goals (100 Points). No Yes Hearing Draft Form 62-503,900(1) Page 4 of 6 Effective Date: \....' ...., Request for Inclusion 7.Contribute to compliance with laws requiring elimination of discharges to æt specific water bodies (90 Points). 0 No Yes 8.Enhance, create, preserve, or restore wetlands (80 Points). 0 g- No Yes 9.Contribute to compliance with other enforceable water quality related ri requirements or water quality standards (70 Points). 0 No Yes 10.Achieve other water pollution control objectives (30 Points) 0 &f No Yes 8. Restoration and Protection of Water Bodies In order to qualify for a base score multiplier (times the base score) of 1.2, iden1ify which of the water bodies listed below that the project will assist in restoring or protecting and reference the location in existing documentation where substantiating information may be found or attach other such substantiating information. Water Body Reference Document II.A priority water body identified in an adopted Surface Water Improvement rI 0 and Management (SWIM) Plan. No Yes 0 ri 12.A water body classified as Outstanding Florida Waters. No Yes 0 ri . A water body identified under the National Estuary Program. No Yes g 0 l3.A water body classifieâ as Wild and Scenic Rivers. No Yes 14,A water body located in a priority watershed established under the Unified Watershed Assessment Program o ri No Yes 9. Cost-to-benefit Index Project priority scores (base category scores adjusted for waterbody restoration and protection) are multiplied by an index as detailed below. Note that Bureau of Water Facilities Funding personnel are available to assist in the computation of the index. a. Total Project Cost (from Item 5. or 6. above) in units of $1,000 (e.g., $1,000,000 is 1,000) expressed to the nearest whole number is $2.500 LHighest base category score (from Item 7. above) multiplied by the waterbody restoration/protection factor Hearing Draft Form 62-503.900(1) Page 5 of 6 Effective Date: , . '.. \wi (from Item 8. above) is c. Cost-to-benefit ratio (Item a. divided by Item b.) expressed to nearest 0.01 is d. Natural logarithm of cost-to-benefit ratio (Item c.) expressed t the nearest 0.001 is e. Index computed as [1.20 - 0.021 x Natural logarithm] (from Item d.) and expressed to nearest 0.01 is. ....J 10. Intergovernmental Cost Sharing If another local, state, or federal government is sharing the cost of the project, identify the governmental entity and grant amount $600000 from FDEP 319. $1000.000 from SFWMD and $1.000 000 from 51. Lucie Issues Team. Ten points for such intergovernmental cost sharing will be added to the priority score after the appropriate multipliers under Items 8. and 9, above have been applied. Hearing Draft Form 62-503.900(1) Page 6 of 6 Effective Date: · '-' ....,¡ ~~~ ~:>~li ..r:...:i~: tï,;:i?~ ;~~~t~; If the project will serve a small community and the median household income (MHI) for that community is less ;\~\;;: than or equal to 80% of the statewide average, an economic hardship exists. The MHI is $ as V~f;:; of the latest decennial census for the community to be served. Five points will be added to the priority score in 2'~!:/ recognition the economic hardship after the appropriate multipliers under Items 8. and 9. have been applied, 0<:-'::: Note that this MHI information will be used to determine the financing rate for hardship loans under Rule,:>..., 62-503.430(3)(a)4., FAC. - Request for Inclusion 11. Economic Hardship '., 12. Project Schedule (month and year) 2.Comprete the planning documentation........................... .............................. ......... ......... ........ 3.Complete the design documents (if necessary)............ ... ... ......... .......................................... ... 4.0btain an intent to issue a permit (if necessary) for construction or other activity............... .......... 5,Obtain all required project sites... ... ...... ... ... ...... '" ... ... ... ... ...... . ........... ......... ...... ......... ...... ..... 6.Start activity (such as construction or non-structural best management practice) ............ ......... ... Complete Comerete Complete Complete Julv 2002 7.Complete activity (such as construction or non-structural best management practice) .... ......... ...... Julv 2004 13. Loan Application and Loan Execution Schedule (month and year) Completed loan Application and Executed loan Agreement Considerations In situations described in Rule 62-503.680(6), FAC., and Rule 62-503.430(3)(a)4., FAC., late submittals could have adverse consequences. The certification required, under Item 3 above, from the Authorized Representative as part of this form includes the project sponsor's commitment to meet the submittal requirements for the completed loan application and to meet the target date requirements for executing a loan agreement. Note the following activities associated with completing a loan application: a. Establish pledged revenues and designate an Authorized Representative. b. If requested, submit EPA Compliance Report (relating to service area demographics). c. Establish project schedule. d. Provide financial information for each source of pledged revenue as follows: Actual revenues and expenditures for the last two fiscal years, and forecast revenues and debt coverage demonstrating the availability of pledged revenues for loan repayment. e. Address the availability of pledged revenues for loan repayment, and the subordination of the pledge if pledged revenues are subject to a prior or parity lien. f. Provide information concerning liens on the pledged revenues that have prior or parity status.. Information is to be provided for each of the last two fiscal years and estimated throughout the loan repayment period. Describe each obligation, the amount, and repayment terms. Provide resolutions, ordinances, or other documentation recognizing the seniority or parity of unissued debt. 8.Submit complete loan application... .................. ...... ...... ......................................................... ..Feb. 2002 I.Target date (anticipated date that loan agreement will be delivered for the Department's execution) June 2002 14. Retum completed form to the Bureau of Water Facilities Funding, 2600 Blair Stone Road, MS #3505, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400, Information may also be sent by FAX at (850) 921-2769. Hearing Draft Form 62-503.900(1) Page 7 of 6 Effective Date: -. \w ....,J Request for Inclusion CERTIFICATIONTHATTHEPROJECTWlLLREDUCE APUBLlCHEAL TH HAZARD Check the box with the appropriate description of the severity of the problem: o o ;¡~(; , Documented health hazard. Potential health hazard. <.. .. Attach the following information noting that each item must be specifically addressed: (a) Description of existing conditions (b) Specific location of the hazard and proposed project, including a sketch or map. (c) Extent of the hazard (for example, area involved and severity of problem). (d) Frequency of occurrence (for example, the approximate number of days during the year that the hazard exists) (e) Identification of the toxies, pathogens, or other contaminants causing the health hazard. (f) Explanation of how the project will reduce the hazard. ~ I hereby certify that either a documented or potential public health hazard exists and that the information presented herein and attached hereto is accurate. (Certification is required by the Director of the County Health Department.) (date) ~ Col (signature) (title) (name, typed) (agency) (address) Telephone FAX e-mail Hearing Draft Form 62-503.900(1) Page 8 of 6 Effective Date: . . .-/ \.r ...."" Savannas/Indian River Estates PROJECTDESCRIPTlON The Savannas State Reserve (Reserve) is a 4,900-acre environmental area, managed by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Division of Parks, which extending 10 miles from Ft. Pierce to Jensen Beach in eastern St. Lucie and Martin counties. The Reserve contains the best remaining segment of Florida's East Coast savannas, including extensive freshwater marshes and wet prairie systems. It is a diverse ecosystem comprised of eight natural community types as well as more than 1,000 vascular plant, aquatic invertebrate, vertebrate and periphyton species, including 57 species classified as endangered, threatened, special concern or rare. The area is an area of special concern within the Indian River Lagoon, a state priority waterbody designated under the Surface Water Improvement & Management Program (SWIM), part of the state's Unified Watershed Assessment, and a ~estuary of national significance" as designated by EPA's NatiQnal Estuary Program. One of the major contributing drainage areas to the Reserve is a 1,200-acre subdivision known as Indian River Estates (IRE), which was developed in the late 1950s. Drainage is provided by roadside swales that discharge into six major east-west drainage ditches that gravity flow from west to east into the Reserve. Since the area was developed before current stormwater treatment criteria were . established, the system does not have any storm water treatment facilities other than . the grassed roadside swales, which do not have a high nutrient removal efficiency rate. The proposed project, will convert a series of abandoned mining pits in order to create a large wet detention facility within the Savannas recreation area just north of Midway Road and east of IRE. The mining pits include a 12.8-acre pond bordered by an old haul road/berm. In order to provide adequate storage and with consideration for safety and access, this berm will require additional fill and grading to bring the top of berm to elevation 18.5 ft, with a top width of 14 feet and 2: 1 sideslopes. The proposed berm will encompass the primary storage area. A schematic layout of the proposed facilities is available in the completed engineerings drawings. This . proposed project will capture stormwater runoff from the subdivision and route it to the storage facilities for treatment and protect homes against the continual flooding (see attachment, Complaints and Health Violations and Flood Photos). The longitude of the project site is 80"E 18' 59". Latitude of the project site is 27°N 21' 43". The site is located in Section 1, 2,11, and 12, Township 36 South, Range 40 East, and in Section 35 and 36, Township 35 South, Range 40 East, in eastern St. Lucie County adjacent to the Savannas wetland area. Indian River Estates is located east of US 1 and to the immediate south of Midway Road. 1 03/22/02 F'7:ABWARR FUND 001 001137 001139 001140 001143 001147 001217 001265 001266 001267 001268 001269 001270 001271 001809 101 101003 101006 102 102001 102104 - - 107001 107002 107003 113 114 116 117 119 123 127 136 138 140 140001 140121 140308 140309 140310 145815 160 183 183001 183002 J o~004 002 '-' .. ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD """"" PAGE 1 WARRANT LIST #25- 16-MAR-2002 TO 22-MAR-2002 FUND SUMMARY TITLE General Fund Zora Neala Hurston Dust Tracks Heri FF~ Transportation for 21st Century Section 112/MPO/FHWA FY01/02 Health & Human Srvcs CSBG FY01/02 KOAA/FDCA Adopt-A-Beach DEP-Regional Attenuation Facility TDC Planning Grant FY01/02 CTD TRIP Grant FY01/02 D!PA 01/02 Dept. of Community Affai 01/02 Haz Mat DCA Grant ?DEP-Urban Mobile Lab Grant 01/02 DJJ/SLC Mental Health Collaborative D~R-Historical Museum Grant-In-Aid S?~~D-Floridian Aquifer Well 01/04 ~ransportation Trust Fund ~ransportation Trust/Local Option Transportation Trust/Impact Fees ~~incorporated Services Fund Drainage Maintenance MSTU ?DOT Bicycle/Pedestrian Coordinator :ibrary Special Grants Fund ?ine & Forfeiture Fund ?~ne & Forfeiture Fund-Wireless Sur ?~ne & Forfeiture Fund-E911 Surchar ?~ne & Forfeiture Fund-800 Mhz Oper ~armony Heights 3 Fund ~armony Heights 4 Fund S~nland Gardens Fund S~nrise Park Fund ~oliday pines Fund Q~eens Cove Lighting Dist#13 Fund ?ine Hollow Street Lighting MSTU ~':onte Carlo Lighting MSTU#4 Fund ?alm Lake Gardens MSTU Fund ?ort & Airport Fund ?ort Fund ?_~ Taxiway A-3, Airfield Signage ?DOT Const. of Perimeter Fencing #4 =~stallation #236741-1-94-01 Airfield Signage #408784-1-94-01 S?v~D IRL 2001 License Plate Grant Plan Maintenance RAD Fund Cc Administrator-19th Judicial Cir C~ Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.-County Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.- Teen Court SHIP Housing Assistance FY 01/02 EXPENSES 695,102.47 38.73 26.59 1,920.11 8,437.23 2,400.00 1,000.00 228.59 17,416.80 856.00 297.29 677.86 30,563.09 573.33 264.50 99,713.27 39,813.71 780.00 35,934.00 5,805.45 272.89 4,264.80 170,672.18 349.49 10,733.93 3,645.30 203.45 447.41 496.68 123.93 726.67 253.66 327.91 1,305.84 106.43 21,619.06 2,472.18 148,746.53 4,000.00 5,242.82 11,206.10 1,615.00 4,322.03 3,235.72 262.23 100.00 1,977.65 1,392.54 PAYROLL 24,110.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03/22/02 F7.l\BWARR FUND 316 362 370 382 401 418 421 441 448 449 451 458 461 471 478 479 491 505 505001 611 625 '-' ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ...." WARRANT LIST #25- 16-MAR-2002 TO 22-MAR-2002 FUND SUMMARY TITLE County Capital Sports Complex Improv Fund MSBU Inhouse Financing Projects Fnd Environmental Land Capital Fund Sanitary Landfill Fund Golf Course Fund H.E.W. Utilities Fund North Hutchinson Island Utilities NHI Util-Renewal & Replacement Fund NHI Util - Capital Facilities Fund S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund SH Util-Renewal & Replacement Fund Sports Complex Fund No County Utility District-Operatin No Cty Util Dist-Renewal & Replace No Cty Util Dist-Capital Facilities Building Code Fund Health Insurance Fund Property/Casualty Insurance Fund Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund Law Library GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 186,082.38 13,598.60 13,023.83 19,250.00 125,459.38 39,168.06 1,551.33 25,351.97 17,289.29 2,161.42 52,116.67 428.68 27,231.83 16,176.08 8,054.83 143.03 15,172.55 257,583.29 419.66 22,377.57 10,011. 03 2,194,622.93 PAGE 2 PAYROLL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,056.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 31,166.41 'w.. ...", 03/22/02 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD F7.ABWARR VOID LIST# 25- 16-MAR-2002 TO 22-MAR-2002 J:. ul-.JD: 001 - General Fund CHECK TOTAL INVOICE VENDOR 00282086 12212916 Neal, Anita S 12212918 12212919 12212921 12212922 300.00 300.00 300.00 300.00 300.00 1,500.00 CHECK TOTAL: FUND TOTAL: 1,500.00 PAGE 1 '- ...., 03/22/02 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE 2 F'7.ABWARR VOID LIST# 25- 16-MAR-2002 TO 22-MAR-2002 ruJ.'JD: 001143- Health & Human Srvcs CSBG FY01/02 INVOICE VENDOR I2213172 Johnson, Ulysses CHECK 00282057 FUND TOTAL: TOTAL 550.00 550.00 '-' 'will 03/22/02 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE 3 F7.ABWARR VOID LIST# 25- 16-MAR-2002 TO 22-MAR-2002 l-'vl\1D: 107 - Fine & Forfeiture Fund CHECK INVOICE VEl\.TDOR TOTAL 00281447 I2210706 Zavickas, Peter J 97.76 FUND TOTAL: 97.76 '-' ..., 03/22/02 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD FZABWARR VOID LIST# 25- 16-MAR-2002 TO 22-MAR-2002 I:~..JD: 471 - No County Utility District-Operatin CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL 00282249 I2213733 Community Land Title Corp I2213735 150.00 150.00 300.00 CHECK TOTAL: FUND TOTAL: 300.00 PAGE 4 03/15/02 F7:ABWARR FUND 001 001001 001111 001115 001137 001139 001140 001143 001147 001265 001267 001269 001271 001272 001809 101 101001 101003 101006 i01104 102 , . "001 104 104 105 107 107001 107002 107003 107120 121 140 140800 160 183 183001 183004 184203 184204 185002 215 262 282 316 382 401 4'8 '-" ST. LUCIE COu~TY - BOARD WARRANT LIST #24- 09-MAR-2002 FUND SUMMARY TITLE EXPENSES General Fund Recreation Special Events FTA-001-49 USC Sec 5307 96/97 FTA-001-49 USC Section 5307 97/98 Zora Neala Hurston Dust Tracks Heri FHA Transportation for 21st Century Section 112/MPO/FHWA FY01/02 Health & Human Srvcs CSBG FY01/02 NOAA/FDCA Adopt-A-Beach TDC Planning Grant FY01/02 EMPA 01/02 Dept. of Community Affai FDEP-Urban Mobile Lab Grant 01/02 DHR-Historical Museum Grant-In-Aid FFWCC/Derelict Vessel Removal SFWMD-Floridian Aquifer Well 01/04 Transportation Trust Fund Transportation Trust Interlocals Transportation Trust/Local Optio~ Transportation Trust/Impact Fees FHWA/FDOT Hurricane Floyd reimburse Unincorporated Services Fund Drainage Maintenance MSTU FDOT Bicycle/Pedestrian Coordinator Grants & Donations Fund Library Special Grants Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund-Wireless S~r Fine & Forfeiture Fund-E911 Surc~ar Fine & Forfeiture Fund-800 ~~z OoQ~ DOJ-Local Law Enforcement FYOO Blakely Subdivision Fund Port & Airport Fund IRL Taylor Creek Restoration SFw~ Plan Maintenance RAD Fund Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Media~ Ct Admin.- Teen Court Ft. Pierce Beach Restoration South Co. Post Storm Study FDEP SHIP Housing Assistance FY 01/02 5-Yr Bldg Bond Anticipat.I&S Fund Tourism Dev 4th Cent I&S Fund Environmental Land I&S Fund County Capital Environmental Land Capital Fund Sanitary Landfill Fund Golf Course Fund H.E.W. Utilities Fund 383,103.69 47.50 3,871.00 54,548.00 38.73 5,062.27 696 . 86 3,083.54 975.00 530.32 5,882.00 173.56 129.13 2,000.00 174.98 84,189.69 70.20 908.88 188,953.43 1,708.64 26,056.46 9,740.06 180.48 69,006.25 3,316.32 227,633.07 115.01 20,557.51 357.24 210.48 68.94 30,345.39 4,594.05 1,563.20 1,048.20 289.29 485.24 735.92 23,435.00 11,766.90 937,620.00 46,087.97 250,305.00 8,508.60 400.23 103,419.80 20,110.28 81.57 'WI :?Þ_GE 1 PAYROLL \~,828.83 ,(b\ 0.00 0.00 d., 0.00 I 0.00 347.49 3,852.60 913 .51 0.00 917.01 0.00 1,188.80 1,364.80 0.00 1,188.80 104,107.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46,897.25 8,129.19 1,226.40 0.00 2,143.24 85,221.71 829.15 4/020.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,796.39 0.00 2,613.47 4,015.73 1,115.38 2,874.61 0.00 0.00 1,413.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 35,310.43 18,807.50 118.29 03/15/02 F7.ABWARR FUND 441 448 449 451 458 461 471 478 479 491 505 505001 611 625 676 '-' ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ....., PAGE :2 WARRANT LIST #24- 09-MAR-2002 TO 15-MAR-2002 FUND SUMMARY TITLE North Hutchinson Island Utilities NHI Uti I-Renewal & Replacement Fund NHI Util - Capital Facilities Fund S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund SH Uti I-Renewal & Replacement Fund Sports Complex Fund No County Utility District-Operatin No Cty Util Dist-Renewal & Replace No Cty Util Dist-Capital Facilities Building Code Fund Health Insurance Fund Property/Casualty Insurance Fund Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund Law Library King Orange MSBU Fund GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 244,768.89 0.00 0.00 801.96 0.00 14,400.47 146,308.30 0.00 0.00 9,042.56 366,355.00 0.00 1,011.69 10,340.00 4,312.50 3,331,527.25 PAYROLL 2,588.36 1,550.67 309.15 1,903.84 1,052.20 18,526.06 2,272.79 416.17 165.63 22,546.83 2,745.86 880.02 4,234.68 0.00 0.00 826,435.07 '-' ..", 03/15/02 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE FZABWARR VOID LIST# 24- 09-MAR-2002 TO 15-MAR-2002 l _.ill : 461 - Sports Complex Fund CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL 002811 70 12210761 Allied Building Maintenance 5,800.00 FUND TOTAL: 5,800.00 03/15/02 F7.ABWARR FUND TITLE \.- ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ~ WARRANT LIST #24- 09-MAR-2002 TO 15-MAR-2002 FUND SUMMARY- MOSQUITO 145 Mosquito Fund GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 15,896.99 15,896.99 PAGE: 1 PAYROLL 22,607.50 22,607.50 · ' 03/15/02 FZABWARR FUND 184 TITLE '-' ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD '-' WARRANT LIST #24- 09-~L~-2002 TO 15-MAR-2002 FUND S~~Y- EROSION Erosion Control Operating Fund GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 1,876.61 1,876.61 PAGE 1 PÞ-_YROLL 2,413.54 2,413.54 \...... AGENDA REQUEST ITE~O. c-2A DATE: March 26, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: (~:~t,~t- County Engineer SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DEPT SUBJECT: River Branch Estates MSBU - Potable Water Improvements (PSL) Approval of Consultant's Agreement with Culpepper & Terpening to Provide "Construction Management Services" during the construction of the potable water improvements. BACKGROUND: On April 11 ,2000, the Board approved an Agreement with Culpepper & Terpening to provide engineering design services for the Project. On January 15, 2002, the Board approved the Preliminary Assessment Roll and authorized the County Engineer to proceed with construction of the project. FUNDS AVAIL.: Per Attached Budget Resolution No. 02 -064 PREVIOUS ACTION: April 11 , 2000 - Board approved an Agreement with Culpepper & Terpening to provide engineering design services RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the attached Consultant's Agreement with Culpepper & Terpening, to provide construction management services for the River Branch Estates MSBU Project in the amount of $7,000.00; and authorize the Chairman of the Board to execute the Agreement. [2i APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: D uglas Anderson ounty Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: Coord ination/Sianatures [x]County Attorney (x]Public Works 'r [x ]Mgt. & Budget Ît20 WI fVIb; [x ]Co. Eng >f~' f ' [ ]Purchasing [x]MSBU Coor eF [X]Finance AGENDA REQUEST ITEM ,..." C-4À ~ :. 1'f ~ DATE: Feb. 12,2002 REGULAR [] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Management & Budget PRESENTED BY: Marie Gouin SUBJECT: Adopt Budget Resolution 02-64 to establish the budget for River Branch Estates MSBU project. BACKGROUND: The River Branch Estates MSBU project has progressed to the point where a budget for construction costs can be established. This project will fund the costs necessary in providing potable water improvements to properties within the River Branch Estates MSBU. The entire cost of the project will be funded through non ad valorem special assessments within the MSBU. Staff requests the Board's adoption of the MSBU budget to facilitate the project construction. FUNDS AVAILABLE: See attached Budget Resolution 02-64 PREVIOUS ACTION: May 5,1998 - Board accepted petition and granted permission to advertise the Initial Public Hearing. June 2, 1998 - Initial Public Hearing held; Board created MSBU and authorized the County Engineer to proceed with the project. March 14, 2000 - Board approved the Interlocal Agreemen with the City of Port St. Lucie. Jan 15. 2002 - Board adopted Resolution 02-023 to levy non ad valorem special assessments; approved the preliminary assessment roll and authorized staff to proceed with construction of the project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board adopt Budget Resolution 02-64 establishing the budget for the River Branch Estates MSBU project. Coordination/Sionatures County Attorney: t/. ~ Management & Budget: íJ.D rr\f'f'...0 Purchasing: Orig Dept: Central Services: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) pworks:fl. ß-í..J" Other: . " Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the 51. Lucie County Community 5ef"Jlces Manager at 561-462-1777 or TOO 561-4â2-1428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting. COMMISSION ACTION: [;.j APPROVED () DENIED [ ] OTHER: ....... ............ ...." RESOLUTION NO. 02-64 WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners budget for St. Lucie County, certain funds not anticipated at the time of adoption of the budget have become available in the form of contributions from property owners participating in the River Branch Estates Municipal Services Benefits Unit (MSBU) project. WHEREAS, Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, requires the Board of County Commissioners to adopt a resolution to appropriate and expend such funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, in meeting assembled this 12th day of February, 2002, pursuant to Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, that such funds are hereby appropriated for the fiscal year 2001-2002, and the County's budget is hereby amended as follows: REVENUES 395 -0000-384300-000 APPROPRIA TrONS 395-4115-534000-4512 395-4115-549114-4512 395-4115-563003-4512 395-4115-563005-4512 395-4115-563011-4512 395 -9910-599330-800 395 -9950-572100-800 395 -9950-573100-800 395 -9950-599330-800 Total Appropriations Proceeds-Contributions from Prop Owners $175,231 Other Contractual Services General and Administrative Charges-MSBU Improv olt Bldgs-Survey Improv olt Bldgs-Consulting Engineer Improv olt Bldgs-Permits/Applications $ 116,100 1,632 2,800 13,100 2,100 $ 3,631 6,428 10,258 19,182 175.231 Project Reserves Interest - Notes Additional Expenses - Bonds Reserves -Debt Service After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows: Commissioner Doug Coward, Chairperson Commissioner Cliff Barnes, Vice Chairperson Commissioner John D. Bruhn Commissioner Paula A Lewis Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE !{õJ Œ & Œ n Wi æ fñì ifl] MeR, 4 2002 æJ PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2002. ENGINEERING ta~,.\o.. . r: II Çl... 1.'" ,'¡'J;¡ ¡ J ,/ !.. .-{~. . ~o--"~"~"~.;.:""'''~ c.' >~}, '" (.. -. -... ,,\,., >. }. -. r:-:.o..,~' >y \::~, 9'·······1. ,-" . ~ \ \'~;:;~) .r: ~ / -\ ....., ~..-......-~"".",~ J ~ U \ . .I. . ~,.' ~. l . " -: . . "'. COe .....~ 1.~..., ~ ,1-<11 . ............. \'......._fI'!'" C/~ ca'jl~-r<· :oi:' " ",,", ~,:",.-,."",,»- APPROVED AS TO CORRECTNESS AND FORM: ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY -{J () (2. .~ ~MAN , \ '-" ....." CONSULTANT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of 2002, by and between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as the "County", and CULPEPPER & TERPENING, INC., hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the County desires to retain the professional services of the Consultant to provide construction management services during the construction of the River Branch Estates project; and, WHEREAS, the Consultant desires to provide the County with such services. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual promises made herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by each party, the parties intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows: 1. GENERAL SCOPE OF THIS AGREEMENT The relationship of the Consultant to the County will be solely that of a consultant. The Consultant is an independent contractor and is not an employee or agent of the County. Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted to establish any relationship other than that of an independent contractor, between the County and the Consultant, its employees, agents, subcontractors, or assigns, during or after the -1- '-' .."" performance of this Agreement. The Consultant will provide the professional and technical services required for the successful completion of this Agreement in accordance with practices generally acceptable within the industry and good ethical standards. 2. SCOPE OF WORK The scope of work to be performed by the Consultant under this Agreement is to provide professional engineering services related to the River Branch Estates Municipal Services Benefit Unit as further described in the Consultant's Scope of Services, attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A". 3. PROJECT MANAGER The Project Manager for the County is Rebecca Padrick at (772) 462-2824. The Project Manager for the Consultant is Butch Terpening at (772) 464-3537. The parties shall direct all matters arising in connection with the performance of this Agreement, other than invoices and notices, to the attention of the Project Managers for attempted resolution or action. The Project Managers shall be responsible for overall resolution or action. The Project Managers shall be responsible for overall coordination and oversight relating to the performance of this Agreement. 4. TERM The term of this Agreement shall be until all tasks are satisfactorily completed. 5. TIME OF PERFORMANCE The services to be provided by the Consultant shall be accomplished within sixty (60) days or until complete as set forth in Exhibit "C" (Time Performance). -2- '-' ..., 6. COMPENSATION The Consultant shall be compensated for all services rendered under this Agreement as follows: seven thousand and 00/100 dollars ($7,000.00) upon completion as set forth in Exhibit "B". Any invoice presented to the County for payment shall be on a Request for Payment form approved by the County. 7. DEFAULT; TERMINATION A. FOR CAUSE If either party fails to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement in a timely and proper manner, the other party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice of any deficiency and by allowing the party in default seven (7) calendar days to correct the deficiency. If the defaulting party fails to correct the deficiency within this time, this Agreement shall terminate at the expiration of the seven (7) calendar day time period. With regard to The Consultant, the following items shall be considered a default under this Agreement: (1) If the Consultant should be adjudged bankrupt, or if he, or it, should make a general assignment for the benefit of his, or its, creditors, or if a receiver should be appointed on account of his, or its, insolvency. (2) If the Consultant should persistently or repeatedly refuse or fail, except in cases for which an extension of time is provided, to provide the services contemplated by this Agreement. (3) If the Consultant disregards laws, ordinances, or the instructions of the Project Manager or otherwise is guilty of a substantial violation of the provisions of the Agreement. , -3- ~ .." In the event of termination, the Consultant shall only be entitled to receive payment for work satisfactorily completed prior to the termination date. B. WITHOUT CAUSE Either party may terminate the Agreement without cause at any time upon fifteen (15) calendar days prior written notice to the other party. In the event of termination, the County shall compensate the Consultant for all authorized work satisfactorily performed through the termination date. 8. FORCE MAJEURE Neither party shall be liable to the other for failure to perform its obligations hereunder if and to the extent that such failure to perform results from causes beyond its reasonable control (financial difficulty shall not be considered a cause beyond a party's control), all of which causes herein are called IIForce Majeurell, including, but without being limited to, strikes, lockouts, or other industrial disturbances; fires; unusual climatic conditions; acts of God; acts of a public enemy; or inability to obtain transportation or necessary materials in the open market. The party unable to perform as a result of force majeure promptly shall notify the other of the beginning and ending of each such period, and County shall compensate Consultant at the rates set forth herein, for the services performed by Consultant hereunder, up to the date of the beginning of such period. If any period of force majeure continues for thirty (30) days or more, either party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement upon ten (10) days prior written notice to the other party. 9. ASSIGNMENT The County and Consultant each binds itself and its successors, legal representatives, and assigns to the other party to this Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and permitted assigns of such other party, in respect to all covenants of this Agreement; and neither the County nor the Consultant will assign or transfer its rights and obligations in this Agreement without the written consent of the other. Nothing herein shall be construed as creating any personal liability on the part of any officer or agent of any public body which may be a party hereto. -4- ~ ...,,¡ The Consultant agrees that the persons named in the scope of work shall provide services as described therein. The services of the person(s) so named are a substantial inducement and material consideration for this Agreement. In the event such persons can no longer provide the services required by this Agreement, the Consultant shall immediately notify the County in writing and the County may elect to terminate this Agreement without any liability to the Consultant for unfinished work product. The County may elect to compensate the Consultant for unfinished work product, provided it is in a form that is sufficiently documented and organized to provide for subsequent utilization in completion of the work product. 10. SUBCONSUL T ANTS AND SUBCONTRACTORS In the event the Consultant requires the services of any subconsultant, subcontractor or professional associate in connection with the services to be provided under this Agreement, Consultant shall secure the written approval of County Project Manager before engaging such subconsultant, subcontractor or professional associate. 11. AUDIT The Consultant agrees that the County or any of its duly authorized representatives shall, until the expiration of three years after expenditure of funds under this Agreement, have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of the Consultant involving transactions related to this Agreement. The Consultant agrees that payment(s) made under this Agreement shall be subject to reduction for amounts charged thereto which are found on the basis of audit examination not to constitute allowable costs under this Agreement. The Consultant shall refund by check payable to the County the amount of such reduction of payments. All required records shall be maintained until an audit is completed and all questions arising therefrom are resolved, or three years after completion of the project and issuance of the final certificate, whichever is sooner. 12. PUBLIC RECORDS The Consultant shall allow public access to all documents, papers, letters, or other material subject to the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and made or received by the Consultant in conjunction with this Agreement. -5- '-' "'wIll 14. INDEMNIFICATION The Consultant covenants and agrees at all times to save, hold, and keep harmless the County, its Officials, Employees, and Agents, and indemnify the County, its Officials, Employees, and Agents, against any and all claims, demands, penalties, judgments, court costs, reasonable attorney's fees, and liability of every kind and nature whatsoever to the extent arising out of or in any way connected or arising out of the Consultant's performance of this Agreement. Only those matters which 'are determined by a final, non-appealable judgment to be the result of the negligence of the County or the negligence of a third party who is not an agent, employee, invitee, or subcontractor of the Consultant shall be excluded from the Consultant's duty to indemnify the County, but only to the extent of negligence of the County or such third party. The Consultant hereby acknowledges that the payments made under this Agreement include specific consideration for the indemnification herein provided. 15. PROHIBITION AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES The Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any persons, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award of making this Agreement. 16. ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS In the event of any dispute concerning the terms and conditions of this Agreement or in the event of any action by any party to this Agreement to judicially interpret or enforce this Agreement or any provision hereof, or in any dispute arising in any manner from this Agreement, subject to the provisions of section 768.28, Florida Statutes, and in no way altering the extent of the County's liability under section768.28, Florida Statutes, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable costs, fees and expenses, including but not limited to, witness fees, expert fees, consultant fees, attorney, paralegal and legal assistant fees, costs and expenses alJd other professional fees, costs and expenses, whether suit be , -7- \..- "'WI brought or not, and whether any settlement shall be entered in any declaratory action, at trial or on appeal. 17. NON DISCRIMINATION The Consultant covenants and agrees that the Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment to be employed in the performance of the Agreement with respect to hiring, tenure, terms, conditions or privileges of employment, or any matter directly or indirectly related to employment because of age, sex or physical handicaps (except where based on a bonafide occupational qualification); or because of marital status, race, color, religion, national origin or ancestry. 18. VERIFICATION OF EMPLOYMENT STATUS The Consultant agrees that it shall bear the responsibility for verifying the employment status, under the Immigration Reform and Control act of 1986, of all persons it employs in the performance of this Agreement. 19. NOTICE All notices, requests, consents, and other communications required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be (as elected by the person giving such notice) hand delivered by messenger or courier service, telecommunicated, or mailed by registered or certified mail (postage prepaid) return receipt requested, addressed to: As To County: St. Lucie County Administrator Administration Annex 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Pierce, FL 34982 With A Copy To: St. Lucie County Attorney Administration Annex 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Pierce, FL 34982 , -8- '-' ...., As To The Consultant: Culpepper and Terpening, Inc. 2980 South 25th Street P. O. Box 13360 Fort Pierce, Florida 34979-3360 or to such other address as any party may designate by notice complying with the terms of this Section. Each such notice shall be deemed delivered (a) on the date delivered if by personal delivery, (b) on the date upon which the return receipt is signed or delivery is refused or the notice is designated by the postal authorities as not deliverable, as the case may be, if mailed. 20. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS The Consultant, its employees, subcontractors or assigns, shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to the performance of this Agreement. The County undertakes no duty to ensure such compliance, but will attempt to advise Consultant, upon request, as to any such laws of which it has present knowledge. 21. TRUTH-IN-NEGOTIATION CERTIFICATE Execution of this Agreement by Consultant shall act as the execution of as truth-in-negotiation certificate stating that wage rates and other factual unit costs supporting the compensation of this Agreement are accurate, complete and current at the time of execution of the Agreement. The original Agreement rates and any additions thereto shall be adjusted to exclude any significant sums by which County determines the Agreement rate(s) was increased due to inaccurate, incomplete, or non-current wage rates and other factual unit costs. All such rate adjustments shall be made within one year following the end of this Agreement. 22. NON-WAIVER The rights of the parties under this Agreement shall be cumulative and the failure of either party to exercise properly any rights given hereunder shall not operate to forfeit any of the said rights. , -9- ..... ~ 23. CONFLICT OF INTEREST The Consultant represents that it presently has no interest and shall acquire no interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of services required hereunder, as provided for in Florida Statutes 112.311. The Consultant further represents that no person having any interest shall be employed for said performance. The Consultant shall promptly notify the County in writing by certified mail of all potential conflicts of interest prohibited by existing state law for any prospective business association, interest or other circumstance which may influence or appear to influence the Consultant's judgment or quality of services being provided hereunder. Such written notification shall identify the prospective business association, interest or circumstance, the nature of work that the Consultant may undertake and request an opinion of the County as to whether the association, interest or circumstance would, in the opinion of the County, constitute a conflict of interest if entered into by the Consultant. The County agrees to notify the Consultant of its opinion by certified mail within thirty (30) days of receipt of notification by the Consultant. If, in the opinion of the County, the prospective business association, interest or circumstance would not constitute a conflict of interest by the Consultant, the County shall so state in the notification and the Consultant shall, at his/her option, enter into said association, interest or circumstance and it shall be deemed not in conflict of interest with respect to services provided to the County by the Consultant under the terms of this Agreement 24. LITIGATION SERVICES It is understood and agreed that the Cor:sultant's services under this Agreement do not include any participation, whatsoever, in any litigation. Should such services be required, a supplemental agreement may be negotiated between the County and the Consultant describing the services desired and providing a basis for compensation to the Consultant. , -10- \w: ...., 25. DISPUTE RESOLUTION Any disputes relating to interpretation of the terms of this Contact or a question of fact or arising under this Contract shall be resolved through good faith efforts upon the part of the Contractor and the County or its Project Manager. At all times, the Contractor shall carry on the work and maintain its progress schedule in accordance with the requirements of the Contract and the determination of the County or its representatives, pending resolution of the dispute. Any dispute which is not resolved by mutual agreement shall be decided by the County Administrator who shall reduce the decision to writing. The decision of the County shall be final and conclusive unless determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be fraudulent, capricious, arbitrary, so grossly erroneous as to necessarily imply bad faith, or not be supported by substantial evidence. 26. MEDIATION Prior to initiating any litigation concerning this Contract, the parties agree to submit the disputed issue or issues to a mediator for non-binding mediation. The parties shall agree on a mediator chosen from a list of certified mediators available from the Clerk of Court for St. Lucie County. The fee of the mediator shall be shared equally by the parties. To the extent allowed by law, the mediation process shall be confidential and the results of the mediation or any testimony or argument introduced at the mediation shall not be admissible as evidence in any subsequent proceeding concerning the disputed issue. 27. INTERPRETATION: VENUE This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior verbal or written agreements between the parties with respect thereto. This Agreement may only be amended by written document, properly authorized, executed and delivered by both parties hereto. This Agreement shall be interpreted as a whole unit and section headings are for convenience only. All interpretations shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. In the event it is necessary for either party to initiate legal action regarding this Agreement, venue shall be in the Nineteenth Judicial circuit for , -11- ...... ..., St. Lucie County, Florida, for claims under state law and the Southern District of Florida for any claims which are justiciable in federal court. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have accepted, made and executed this Agreement in counterparts each of which shall be treated as an original upon the terms and conditions above stated. WITNESSES: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: By: COUNTY ATTORNEY WITNESSES: CULPEPPER & TERPENING, INC. / L-- ~/ ~~ BY: j Title: -vO ')....-.~".....~.......... \ Q r-~ ~l1. <. "" +- G:\ATTY\AGREEMNT\C&T River Branch.wpd -12- ~ '- ...., EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES - RIVER BRANCH ESTATES MSBU POTABLE WATER IMPROVEMENTS The Engineer shall provide the following services for the project: Phase 50-1: The Engineer will provide Construction Management and full-time inspections during water main construction. In addition, the following items are included in this task: I. Review shop drawings and material "submittals for conformance to the Contract Documents. 2. Review Contractor's periodic pay requests and provide recommendations of payment to the Client and review contractor's progress schedule and provide a written summary. 3. Provide construction observation on a part-time basis; provide schedule and field reports of inspections [20 hours per week for five (5) weeks] to ensure that construction is proceeding in accordance with the plans and specifications. 4. Provide in writing clarifications and interpretations as to the intent or meaning of the Contract Documents as may be required. 5. Conduct [mal inspection and provide a list of deficient items to the Contractor prior to final acceptance. Document "Final Acceptance" with letter. 6. Prepare a set of reproducible "Record Drawings" based on contractor-supplied information and provide the necessary final certifications to permitting agencies. The above services are predicated on the following: 1. Any easement preparation required is not included herein. 2. Construction stakeout is not included herein. 3. Record Drawings prepared based on contractor-supplied information. 4. No services not specifically set forth hereinabove are included. , P:\Proj-1990's\Proj·] 997\97-65 River Braßch\cont\9765-I.doc ..... ..., EXHffiIT "B" RIVER BRANCH ESTATES MSBU COMPENSA TION TO THE ENGINEER For the services set forth in Exhibit "A", Scope of services, the fee compensation to the Engineer shall be as set forth herein. The term "L.S." indicates a Lump Sum fee for the tasks specified and is intended to be a fixed fee, not subject to change without the agreement of both parties. The term "Hourly" indicates that the task specified will be performed on an hourly-rate basis in accordance with the attached fee schedule. Phase 50-1 Construction Management $ 7,000 L.S. Total $ 7,000 , P:\Proj·1990's\Proj·1997\97·65 River Branch\c:onI\9765-I.doc "-' .~ AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C2b DATE: March 26,2002 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 SUBJECT: RFP #02-033 - Continuing Contracts for Professional Surveying Services BACKGROUND: On February 12,2002 proposals were received. 1374 vendors were notified, 45 sets of RFP documents were distributed, and 15 responses were received. On March 8th the selection committee short listed the following firms: 1. GCY, Inc. 2. Culpepper & Terpening, Inc. 3. LBFH, Inc. FUNDS AVAIL.: n/a PREVIOUS ACTION: n/a RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Board approve the short list, permission to negotiate with all three firms, and authorize the chairman to sign the contracts as prepared by the County Attorney. COMMISSION ACTION: [x] APPROVED [ ] OTHER: [ ] DENIED E: .-/ [x]County Attorney [x]Originating Dept. Public Works surveyrfpaward.ag Coordinatlon/S Ignatu res [ ]Mgt. & Budget [x]Co. Eng ..Àf1)\· { [ ]co.surveYor~ []Other "- AGENDA REQUEST ..., ITEM NO. C-2t! DATE: March 26, 2002 CONSENT [X REGULAR [ PUBLIC HEARING [ ] Leg. [ ] Quasi-JD. TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: "-- ~t SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): PW/ERD/Oxbow Eco-Center SUBJECT: 10% off at Oxbow Gift Store BACKGROUND: The Oxbow Eco-Center is requesting to offer 10% off as a marketing tool to encourage patronage at the gift store. These discounts will be time limited offers either during special events or in coupon form, and would be offered to the general public. FUNDS AVAIL. : n/a PREVIOUS ACTION: n/a COMMISSION ACTION: [X] APPROVED [ ] OTHER: DENIED r- Anderson Administrator --> RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. County Attorney: Originating Dept: Finance: (copies rv,~"" only) : coordinatio~fi~~ Mgt & Budget: Other: . Purchasing : Other: ~ ~ AGENDA REQUEST ITE'tNO. (!.. J!. D DATE: March 26, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [XX ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: j\~~~~W~ (Donald B. W t, P.E. County Engineer SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION SUBJECT: Smallwood Avenue MSBU - (Potable Water - FPUA) Interlocal Agreement with Fort Pierce Utilities Authority and the City of Fort Pierce to Provide Potable Water. BACKGROUND: See Attached Memorandum FUNDS AVAIL. N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: February 5, 2002 - The Board created the Smallwood Avenue MSBU and authorized the County Engineer to proceed with Engineering and design of the project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Interlocal Agreement with Fort Pierce Utilities Authority and the City of Fort Pierce to provide potable water to properties within the Smallwood Avenue MSBU and authorize the Chairman to sign the Agreement. [ ::J APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: -' COMMISSION ACTION: Do glas M. Anderson ounty Administrator """'''' mom", r [X] Public Works Dir: ~ , [] Finance Dir: Coordination/Siqnatures []Mgmt & Budget: [X]Co Eng: ~\.t.\. [X]MSBU coor~at : ~-J:> [] Purchasing: '-' ..."", COMMISSION REVIEW: March 26, 2002 ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM NO. 02- 077 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Board of County Commissioners County Engineer March 12, 2002 Smallwood Avenue MSBU (Potable Water - FPUA) Interlocal Agreement with Fort Pierce Utilities Authority and the City of Fort Pierce to Provide Potable Water. BACKGROUND Attached is a copy of the Interlocal Agreement with Fort Pierce Utilities Authority (FPUA) and the City of Fort Pierce relative to the Smallwood Avenue MSBU. Under the Agreement, the County will create the Smallwood Avenue MSBU to levy a special non-ad valorem assessment to pay for the project to provide potable water service to Smallwood Avenue. FPUA will design and install the system necessary to provide the water service, and the County will pay FPUA for the cost of the design and installation of the system out of bonds issued to finance the project. These bonds will payoff the assessment levied by the Smallwood Avenue MSBU. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board approve the Interlocal Agreement with Fort Pierce Utilities Authority and the City of Fort Pierce to provide potable water to properties within the Smallwood Avenue MSBU and authorize the Chairman to sign the Agreement. BP Attachment (1) cc: Staff Concurring Property Appraiser Tax Collector g\wplmsbu\smallwood\aga-Int-fpua. wpd \w- ....", INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT SMALLWOOD AVENUE MSBU THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this day of , 20__, by and between St. Lucie County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (the "County"), the Fort Pierce Utilities Authority, an authority created and established by the City Commission of the City of Fort Pierce, Florida, ("FPUA") and the City of Fort Pierce, a municipality organized under the laws of the State of Florida (the "City"). WHEREAS, FPUA is the governing body authorized to enter into agreements relating to providing service from the potable water supply of the CitYi and, WHEREAS, the County intends to create the Smallwood Avenue municipal services benefit unit (the "Smallwood Avenue MSBU") to fund the cost of providing potable water to the Smallwood Avenue MSBU in unincorporated St. Lucie County. A description of the boundaries of the real property within the proposed MSBU is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A"i and, WHEREAS, the parties believe that it is in their mutual best interest to cooperate in providing potable water to the Smallwood Avenue MSBU. , -1- '-" ..,; NOW, THEREFORE, FPUA, the City, and the County hereby agree and covenant on the terms and conditions hereinafter stated: 1. GENERAL. This Agreement is entered into pursuant to Section 163.01, Florida Statutes, the Florida Interlocal Cooperation Act. This Agreement embodies the whole understanding of the parties. There are no promises, terms, conditions, or obligations other than those contained therein, and this Agreement shall supersede all previous telecommunications, representations, or agreements, either verbal or written, between the parties hereto. 2. FPUA RESPONSIBILITIES. this Agreement are as follows: FPUA I S responsibilities under A. FPUA shall design and install or cause to be designed and installed a system including all pipes, services, mains and appurtenances thereto (the "System") necessary to provide potable water to the Smallwood Avenue MSBU. The design and installation of the System shall be done in accordance with all applicable, standard FPUA policies and procedures. The County reserves the right to review and approve the utilities plans and bid documents before inclusion in the bid package. B. If easements are required, FPUA shall attempt to obtain all necessary easements for installation and maintenance of the System. FPUA shall not be required, however, to condemn any such easements or expend funds for acquisition of same. If appropriate easements satisfactory to FPUA are not obtained, FPUA shall have no further obligation under this Agreement. C. FPUA shall administer a project to install the System to include but not limited to awarding the contract for design, construction, inspection during construction, shop drawing approvals, change order approvals, project certification, and production of record drawings. D. Upon completion of the System and acceptance of ownership of the System by FPUA, FPUA shall be responsible for the operation and maintenance of the System. E. Prior to the second public hearing to be held by the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners pursuant to Section 1-13 .5-7 of the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinance to adopt a preliminary assessment roll for the Smallwood Avenue MSBU, FPUA -2- '-" ...., shall provide an itemized final estimated cost (the "Final Estimated Cost") for the installation of the System to the County. The Final Estimated Cost shall include the cost of testing / permits, surveying, legal, design, construction, contingencies allowance, construction administration, certification, record drawings, and acquisition of easements for the installation of the System and shall be subject to the approval of the County. Any unexpected costs incurred during the construction and installation of the System beyond the Final Estimated Cost shall be the responsibility of FPUA. F. If the County does not levy a special non-ad valorem assessment as described below, FPUA shall be responsible for the cost of all design or other work done by FPUA related to the System. The County shall use its best efforts to notify FPUA as soon as possible of any decision not to levy an assessment. 3. COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES. In the event the County determines at a public hearing to create a MSBU and to levy a non- ad valorem special assessment, the County's responsibilities under this Agreement are as follows: A. The Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida shall act as the governing body of the Smallwood Avenue MSBU and shall levy a non-ad valorem special assessment (the "Assessment") on the landowners within the limits of the MSBU to fund the cost of the installation of the System as required for connection to the FPUA water system. B. The County shall pay to FPUA an amount not to exceed the Final Estimated Cost for the installation of the System and the cost of the landowners capital improvement charge. All other applicable fees and charges for connection to the FPUA water system will be the responsibility of the landowners. The amount of the capital improvement charge shall be the current FPUA charge for capital improvements on the date of the submission of the Final Estimated Cost to the County. Payment by the County to FPUA shall be within 30 working days after the County has obtained funds from the issuance of bonds to finance the project and after the approval of the costs by the St. Lucie County Director of Engineering or his designee. C. Upon the request of FPUA, the County I s Property Acquisition Division shall provide staff assistance to FPUA for the acquisition of easements necessary for the installation and maintenance of the System. 4. TERMINATION. Unless terminated by the mutual written agreement of all parties, this agreement shall remain in full force and effect until all of its terms and conditions have been met. -3- '-" ~ 5. NOTICE OF CITY ANNEXATION REOUIREMENT. notice is required by the City and should not be way as an endorsement of the City's annexation County. The following construed in any policies by the As a condition precedent for connection to the FPUA water system, FPUA requires all users to sign an annexation agreement whereby the user consents to and requests that his or her property be annexed into the city limits of Fort Pierce whenever such annexation may legally occur and that the FPUA will refuse to allow connection to its water system unless and until the referenced annexation agreement is signed. This annexation agreement shall be in the form utilized by FPUA, shall be irrevocable and shall be binding on the heirs, successors and assigns of all such users. 6. CONSENT TO COUNTY MSBU UPON ANNEXATION. The par tie s acknowledge that if the Smallwood Avenue MSBU is annexed into the City this will result in the existence of a St. Lucie County Municipal Services Benefit Unit within the jurisdictional boundary of the City. Accordingly, the City agrees that if it intends to annex the Smallwood Avenue MSBU into the City, it will include within the appropriate annexation ordinance a statement that the City consents to the existence of the Smallwood Avenue Municipal Services Benefit Unit within the boundaries of the City pursuant to the provisions of Section 125.01 (q), Florida Statutes or other applicable law. 7. VALIDATION OF BOND AND ASSESSMENT ROLL. A condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement is the entry of a Final Judgment (and the expiration of the appropriate appeal period) by a court of competent jurisdiction validating the issuance of bonds to finance the System along with the assessment roll adopted by the Board (the "Bond Validation Proceeding"). In the event that either a Final Judgment validating the bonds and assessment roll is not entered or an appellate court reverses the Final Judgment, the Agreement shall automatically terminate and the parties shall have no further responsibilities under the Agreement including but not limited to any payments due to FPUA by the County. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if either a Final Judgment validating the bonds and assessment roll is not entered or an appellate court reverses the Final Judgment, the County reserves the right to be reimbursed by FPUA for all outside counsel legal fees and costs incurred by the County in the Bond Validation Proceeding as well as in any related appeal. The County agrees to consult with FPUA concerning the expenditure of money for outside bond counsel services related to the Bond Validation Proceeding and further agrees that such expenditure shall not exceed five thousand and nO/100 dollars ($5000.00) without the express written consent of FPUA. The County's right to reimbursement shall survive the termination of this Agreement as described in this paragraph. -4 - ~ THE FOLLOWING PAGE IS THE SIGNATURE PAGE -6- -..",; , ~\ \-- AGENDA REQUEST ..., ITEM NO. C-2E DATE: March 13, 2002 REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING CONSENT [x] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAIL. PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: COMMISSION ACTION: [X] APPROVED [ ] OTHER: ~ County Attorney: Originating Dept. \\-~ PRESENTED BY: Vanessa Bessey Public Works/Environmental Resources Staff requests the Board of County Commissioners authorize Equipment Request EQ02-208 6'x 12' equipment trailer ($1,200) and EQ02-209 4 wheeler ($5,000). The BOCC approved acquisition of a gooseneck trailer for the Environmental Lands program. The purchase price of the trailer was substantially less than the amount budgeted. We would like to purchase additional equipment with these funds: equipment trailer (6' x 12') and 4- wheeler to provide additional accessibility to the sites. Funds are available in the Equipment Account due to savings from previously approved and purchased equipment. Account number to be charged: 001-3920-564000-300. N/A Staff recommends the Board approve the spending of excess funds for the purchase of a 6' x 12' equipment trailer ($1200/ EQ02-208) and 4-wheeler ($5000/ EQ02-209) . DENIED 9 as M. Anderson, ty Administrator :,,: '=:,~'~ d- Purchasing: Other: Finance: (Check for copy only, if applicable) ~ \w ,." INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Vanessa Bessey, Environmental Resources Manager DATE: March 14, 2002 SUBJECT: BACKGROUND The BOCC approved acquisition of a gooseneck trailer for the Environmental Lands program. The purchase price of the trailer was substantially less than the amount budgeted. We would like to purchase additional equipment with these funds: equipment trailer (6' x 12')and 4-wheeler to provide additional accessibility to the sites. RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION Staff recommends the Board approve the spending of excess funds for the purchase of a 6' x 12' equipment trailer ($1200/ EQ02-208) and 4-wheeler ($5000/ EQ02-209). Vanessa Bessey Environmental Resources anager " m c c D <: m c: ~ =ij Cñ 3: Õ -t m z 3: z m -t z :;u :-:I m ~ rn ;-I rn 1J 0 Qj 0 ijj c ~ ~ I';J r- .... Õ N :§ ~ ::::: ~ ~ 0- (þ "'"'i ;0 c: ~ ~ II> :g, Õ ¡:::: :;r ~ ::;¡ tn ~ -I 0 m~ ;:¡, De: (þ 'ê So "0- "6' 3:m :3 ( ) mO ::;¡ zO .... Õ -Ie: (þ ;QZ Qj m:<! g. Dm 0 .... e:o s: m» ;:¡: ~;Q (þ ~ (þ :;u "'T1C ::;¡ m 00 0 II> 0 0 ã= 0 ;Q"'T1 c: II> 3: "'T10 Z Õ' 3: tnO -t 0 m oe: z Qj z c: (b c »Z 3: Q. m I"":<! III s: !=? ¡;io m a ?:I c: »0 '§. ;Q3: 0 S. "'3: o- s: otn (þ ~tn Q ,_ "'0 c c: ~ gz ::;¡ c ~ "'m .... , c: ;Q (,,) \0 -I tn N OJ '? -<: 01 0 01 .¡:", ~ c c c W c c · \..- m c c 0 <: m c Cii " " > 3C Õ ;U ~ m z 3C z ~ m z ;U :-:' m ~ IT! ;::;: :;! ~ \:J 0 ~ ~ <::> ëi;' $; I\) c: '" r- , a: 3 ~ Õ I\) 0 g tr DI CD ::::: ~ ~ c: 1" ~ '" ~ ::0 CD ~ ~ Cl. CD ~ Õ' CD "" (j) r- '" ¡;¡ ~ ãf"b 3 §. en en 0 e!. DI ~ -I ::J -< mr (þ C) De: ::J "b rn CD c: en Sn ::J -a 0 0 .,,- CD '" :s:m '" CD mn c: ëi;' g. Õ zO -Ie: DI "b :;uZ '" a ;ä' :s m~ DI g: DDJ 3" DI e:o CD 0 m» ::J @ ... ~:;u o '" ~ ..... '" ~ ;u ,,0 ~ Õ m 00 0 0 " 0 0 ... s: ;u 0 :;u" õ' c .'" CD ~ ;¡: "n z ::J 3C CñO ~ ~ Q m e- !=? m ne: z CD z c "" ª- c »z 3C 8 Q m r~ IX! ::J Ci3 !=? m ã Q ~n ~ 3" '" »0 3 æ: ::03: '" 0 ::E ~3: ::E 0- S· ~ oen so s: ~en ~- ~ CD 00 <::> (j) ~ ~ oZ <::> 3 DI ~m ..... '" , Q "" en c: :;u W ::J Q (0 Q -i en I\) cg 3 OJ <::> 0 , -<: C1I 3 c: ~ CD ::J 0 ... <::> ~ 0 ~ <::> ..... <::> êJ §. , W Cl."b <::> "b DI ~ <::> a 0 0 ..... :s 0 c:¡: S· s: CQ CD '" '" CD CD 0 ~ c: ::J. ;::;: ~ ~. DI ~ Ci3 rn DI $; ~ en g¡ \..or AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C2~ DATE: March 26,2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 SUBJECT: Award of Contract - Burger King and Merritt Ditch Emergency Culvert Replacement BACKGROUND: Severe erosion due to culvert failure at the entrance of Burger King Restaurant north of Midway Road necessitates immediate action to avoid complete failure of the roadway. Staff obtained three quotes from qualified contractors to replace the culvert. The lowest of three quotes was submitted by Shenandoah General Construction (see attached). The project budget will be established as follows: Construction Reserves Total Project Budget - $182,460 $ 5.905 $188,365 FUNDS AVAIL.: Funds will be made available in 316001-41131-563000-43031 Transportation Capital/Local Option- Culvert Replacements. PREVIOUS ACTION: n/a RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Board approve the emergency culvert replacement at Burger King and Merritt Ditch, waive the formal bidding process, and authorize the Chairman to sign the construction contract with Shenandoah General Construction in the amount of $182,460. COMMISSION ACTION: [X] APPROVED [ ] OTHER: [ ] DENIED - [x County Attorney [x]Originating Dept. Public Works /.¿:< /' burger King & merritt culvert.ag ,.[/ J:;r Coord ination/S i!lnatures [xJMgt. & Budget UtlJ 4'rJrnt,¡ [x Co. Eng Þ1>,~ [x]Revenue Coord.~t\ fx]Purchasing ~ ~ ,# ,.. ISHENA~R,~t~,~ I 1888 N.W. 22"'0 Street Pompano Bcach, FL 33069 (9$4) 975-0098 Fax: (954) 975-9718 ~ ~ I 34.0 UNIT PRICE SCHEDULE I DATE: Decembcr 21, 2001 SUBMITTED TO: SI. Lucie County Engineering Dept. STREET: 2300 Virginia A venuc CITY, STATE 8< ZIP: Fl. Pierce, FL. 34982 PHONE: 561-221-1433 FAX: 561-462·2362 JOB LOeA TION: Town Soutl1l'laza \4891 US t) ATTENTION: Mark Warner l } ...., rROrOSAL #3501 We propose to f1lJ11ísh ~ crew and aU necessary equipment to Slip line existing 60" CMP, between Town Soulb & Burger King at the above mentioned job IClcanon. This work win be perfonned at our following unit prices of: I r!c:m I: Slip line Existin~ 60" with 54" HDPE Pipe SDR 32.5 Price includes: I) re-rounding partially crusbed pipe. 2) Soft dig 20' of offset pipe. 3) Sod reelorQ(ion 4) Injection grout undcr coru:rete drive and annular pipe space. 5) Cleaning new 54" pipe. I , Item 2: Slip line Existing 60" with 54" HDPE Pipe SDR 32.5 (Drive r.TMoine heb;nd Burgcr Kinz) Price includes: I) re-rounding partially cru..hcd pipe. 2) Injection grout under concrete drive and annular pipe space. 3) Ck....Lng DeW 54" pipe. I $286.00 per ft. (EST. 54U') $638.00 per ft. (EST. 40') Tottlltcm 1: Total Item 2: Performance & Payment 1:$o!ld: TOTAL B I I Note: Permits. if necessary, not included in this proposaL Performance a plIss-d\tough item with a not to exceed cost of $ 2,500.00. This proposa] may be withdrawn if not accep!c:d within 90 days. Payment tcrrna net 30 days. I All material is guar.luccd to be as specified.. All work to bc completed in . workmanlike manner according to srandardpnctices. Price above is only an estimate of foreseen conditions. Unforeseen conditions can effect the WUu\1l3t oftimc to complete the work, therefore increasing or dl!'el't'asine e"r1ma!c:. All agreements contingent upon Strikes, accidents or dela)'!! beyond our control. . Owner to cany fire, tom~do and other necessuy insurance. 0 rs aTe fully covered by Workman's Compensation Insurance. I I SIGNA 11JRE: SHENA NT'JOAH GENERAL CONSTRUCTION TITLE Danny DiMura/Project Manager ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL I SIGN &. RETURN I DATE 12-21-01 The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are >lIthori7"d to do the work as specified. I SIGNATURE: COMPANY NAMb: REPRESENTATIVE: DATE: TI11..E: I 00500-21 I .~....- -" ~Mð1 '-tJ LUCAS MARINE CONSTRUCTION, INC. PO AOK BA07 . Hobe Sound. FL 33475· Telephono (.~61) 286-5094 FO ( (561) 266-1139 Fenru¡uy S, 2002 St. I.Ul·ic COllnty Engineering 2300 Virginia I\V<'., Rm 22(,) Ft. Pierce. F L 349a2·5652 Attn: Mark Warne! Rc: Merritt Ditch and E.K. Pipc (ienllcmcn: Lucas Mmillt: CQUstl'lIctiQn pmpuscs to flll'nish all1abor, cquipment and Illalnials necessary to install approximately 500 L.F. (II" 54" Oia. SDl02.5 pipe III {h..' exisring 60" CMP culvcrt for Ille lump sum of$224,725.0U. The following condition~ will apply I. The' cOllnty will ohtain pt::mlission to utilize an area approxilmllely 40' wide by 500' long along the south side of the canal \Ncst of the west Burger King drivcway. We will be rcsponsihle IIII' rcmoving and replacing rIll' existing fence I\nd sou amlnlulch I\I1Y disturbed areas 2. Th..~ pipe under Ih\:: ..,as! Uurger King driveway is crushed and Wlllll01 allow passage or Lhe 54"Uill. pipe. The driveway will have to be removed ,\lid n:placed. M.lÌntenallee of Irani" will be estahli~h<.:d for Uurger K 1I1µ (;LI~tomcrs to cnlCl' and eXÍL using Ihe west driveway. Wt: h<tvc inclllded the cost for this work 3. We havt' included all cosl to restore dislurbL'd areas helwt:<.:n Lhlr:.~el King ami Town South Plaz.a. 4. We have nol induded till' cost fc'\!' any testing, inspeuìon, profcs~i()nal or ¡¡<.:ILl enginecring services, eertifiec..l as-built drawings or permits. 5. We have nut included the cost for pa)'m<.:nt and performance bl1nd~ (1. We <.:an stal1the project imlllec..li¡¡tcly following yoU!' notice 10 pn>c('ed, A Lime exlcnsi<.1n 1()r our Cortel HII'd. J{ 2,)110 SL. Culvert J{ep!acclllcat will bt'rL't¡uired. Thank you for Ihe nPPollunily to s\lbmillhis quotation and if YOII need allY additional information. p ¡:~asc advise. Sincerdy. ------------- .~~-- '" David K. Lucas ----- -.- Pn:sidenl L AGENDA REQUEST I~MNO.~~ DATE: March 26, 2002 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [XX] PRESENTED BY: f!:!.:N;'~(DE5W County Engineer SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Engineering SUBJECT: Approval of Amendment NO.1 to Work Authorization NO.9 to the Agreement for Continuing Engineering Services with LBFH, Inc., to provide final engineering design, permitting and bidding services forthe Grey Twig Lane MSBU. BACKGROUND: On August 3,2000, the County received a Petition from property owners representing 78% in support of a MSBU, to provide potable water to residents on Grey Twig Lane. On October 10, 2000, the Board approved W.A. NO.9 with LBFH to prepare a conceptual design and preliminary cost estimate necessary to provide the residents with a rough cost estimate. On June 28, 2001, an informal meeting was held with the residents to discuss the design and project cost. On September 18, 2001, the Board created the Grey Twig Lane MSBU to provide potable water improvements. On March 12, 2002, the Board approved the Interlocal Agreement with the City of Port St. Lucie establishing each parties responsibilities toward the project. Staff is now ready to proceed with authorizing LBFH to provide the tinal design, permitting, and bidding services for the project in the amount of $15,050.00. FUNDS AVAIL.: Per Budget Resolution No. 01-259 PREVIOUS ACTION: September 18, 2001 - Board created the Grey Twig Lane MSBU October 10, 2000 - Board approved W.A. NO.9 with LBFH to prepare a conceptual design and cost estimate ~COMMENDATI~ ..A Staff recommends approval of the attached Amendment No. 1 to Work Authorization No. 9 to the Agreement for Continuing Engineering Services, dated March 14,2000 with LBFH, Inc. to provide the final design, permitting and bidding services for the Grey Twig Lane MSBU, in the amount of $15,050.00, and authorize the Chairman to execute the Work Authorization. COMMISSION ACTION: RENCE: [x] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: ouglas Anderson County Administrator [X]Cou nty Attorney IX]Public Works Dir CoordlnatlonISI!1nature~ [X ]Mgt. & BUdgetþt!) vlJ1(n& , [ ]UtiIDir: I ]Purchasing IX ]MSBU co~ IX ]Finance (j! '. ø 1if¡ . (rISðÚ v5. ~ '-' ~l RESOLUTION NO. 01- 259 ~ rö)E~ ~ lW ~'I¡ml ~J DEC I 7 2001 ~I ---:J ENGINEERING WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of the S1. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners budget for S1. Lucie County, certain funds not anticipated at the time of adoption of the budget have become available in the form of contributions from property owners participating in the Grey Twig Lane Municipal Services Benefits Unit. WHEREAS, Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, requires the Board of County Commissioners to adopt a resolution to appropriate and expend such funds. WHEREAS, Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, requires the Board of County Commissioners to adopt a resolution to appropriate and expend such funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, in meeting assembled this 23RD day of October, 2001, pursuant to Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, that such funds are hereby appropriated for the fiscal year 2001-2002, and the County's budget is hereby amended as follows: REVENUES 399-0000-384300-38005 APPROPRIATIONS 399 -4115-563030-38005 399 -4115-563003-38005 399 -4115-563005-38005 399 -4115-563008-38005 399 -4115-563011-38005 399 -4115-563028-38005 399 -4115-549114-38005 399 -9910-599330-800 399 -9950-572100-800 399 -9950-573100-800 Proceeds-Contributions from Prop Owners Improv oft Bldgs-Utility Improvements Improv oft Bldgs-Survey Improv oft Bldgs-Consulting Engineer Improv oft Bldgs-Advertising Improv oft Bldgs-Permits & Applications Improv oft Bldgs-Emiironmental General and Administrative Fees Project Reserves Interest - Notes Additional Bond Expense After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows: Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson, Chairperson AYE Commissioner Doug Coward, Vice Chairperson AYE Commissioner Paula A. Lewis AYE Commissioner Cliff Barnes AYE Commissioner John D. Bruhn AYE $152,000 $92,000 $ 3,500 $14,500 $ 350 $ 1 ,500 $ 1,500 $ 6,650 $15,000 $ 7,000 $10,000 \w- ~ , J ...", PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED THIS 23"d DAY OF OCTOBER, 2001. A TIEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA Ý ESS .. , . ...... ...",/ AMENDMENT NO. 1 WORK AUTHORIZATION NO.9 Potable Water MSBU For Grey Twig Lane Engineering Services Contract No. COO-03-234 Pursuant to that certain Agreement for Continuing Engineering Services (the "Agreement") between St. Lucie County (the "County") and LBFH, Inc. (the "Engineer") dated March 14,2000, and as Amendment No.1 to Work Authorization No.9 (COO-03-234), dated October 10, 2000, Engineer hereby agrees to provide professional Engineering Services under the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit' A", attached hereto and made a part of this Work Authorization. Except as amended herein, the remaining terms and conditions of Work Authorization No.9 shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESs WHEREOF, the County and the Engineer have executed this Work Authorization Amendment No.1, effective this_ day of , 2001. ATTEST: ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA By: DEPUTY CLERK COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY WITNESSES: Q\'f JÅÁfU1Á- (! ~~1\-lU()~' (It L1 j\. l~cj c.- LBFH, r¿-. -h~c://)j By: ~Yli ,?{~ ,Ff ; --- Print Name: 6r 0 T7 II . tiki g¿ Title: V/(£ ¡11E5¡OUll} g: \atty\agreemnt \ work.out \ Ibf hPW MS BUGìl.E 5 la.wpd ~ . ". . . ~ Ief be ...., EXHIBIT "A" POTABLE WATER MSBU FOR GRAY TWIG LANE SECTION 1 - SCOPE OF SERVICES Phase 10trask 100: Limited Topographic Survey · Obtain topographic information along intended water main route. Route intended to be along the Southern edge of roadway of Gray Twig Lane. Information obtained to include vegetation, property lines, surface improvements, drainage, etc. along the route. Phase 22trask 220: Constmction Drawings & Technical Specifications · Prepare base plan and profile sheets for the project in AutoCAD format. · Prepare design plan and detail sheets for utility extensions from the existing water main within the South 25th Street right-of-way (Hawley Road). · Detail water main design with horizontal and vertical control, fittings configuration, restraining length, valve locations, etc. · Work with existing utility owner along South 25th Street, as necessary, to 'determine;ànd detail the best procedures to facilitate new construction connection to existing water mains. · Prepare technical specifications, contract documents, and bid schedule per St. Lucie County Standards. · Determine specific utility design quantities and engineering estimate of probable construction costs. · Review design drawings with OWNER and utility, and incoqJorate revisions. Phase 43trask 430: FDEP Permit Application · Prepare and submit a FDEP General Permit application for water main extension. OWNER to pay all permit application fees. · Submit the design drawings with the FDEP permit application to the City of Port St. Lucie for review and approval. Make changes as required. It is intended that prior to PSL signing the FDEP permit forms, the design drawings must be acceptable to them. · Respond to all "Requests for Information (RFI)" from FDEP regarding the General Permit Application. \\PC\projc:.cu'lOO-0245\Gray Twig u.ne AFS.OOc Page 2 of 4 .' <'- ßæfI1 '--' Phase 46fTask 460: St. Lucie County Approval · Prepare and submit a SLC Utility Pennit application. · Respond to all "Requests for Infonnation (RFI)" from SLC regarding the Utility Pennit Application. Phase 61fTask 610: Bidding Services · Prepare Project Manual. · Prepare for and attend pre-bid meeting. · Respond to Bidders questions and prepare all addendum's. · Review bids and prepare summary tabulation. · Contact bidder references · Prepare letter for recommendation of award. Phase 53fTask 530: Public Meetings · Attend up to three (3) public meetings and prepare necessary exhibits as requested, to support the MSBU Coordinator, in order to obtain input from the residents along the project boundaries. · Assist SLC staff as needed for the MSBU project. SECTION 2 - DELIVERABLES · Two sets of preliminary drawings will be submitted to St. Lucie County for review. · Completed FDEP pennit applications (2 copies) and SLC pennit applications (2 copies) will be provided to SLC for signatures. · Up to twelve (12) sets of drawings and specifications will be provided for bidding purposes and review purposes or reproducibles. · Up to five (5) sets of drawings and specifications will be provided for contract documents. SECTION 3 - SCHEDULE · The final design shall be provided and ready to bid within 45 days of receipt of a Purchase Order from St. Lucie County. The actual bid date may be adjusted based on receipt of pennits from FDEP and SLC. \\PC\projeo;ts\OO-02~S\Gr.lY Twig Lane AFS.doc Page 3 of 4 - , ,..~. .. ~ IËfIl "wi SECTION 4 - METHOD AND AMOUNT OF COMPENSATION Compensation for this work will be in accordance with the fOllowing Phase breakdown: Payment Phase Method Amount 10: Topographic Survey LS $3,100 22: Construction Drawings LS $6,550 43: FDEP Permitting LS $1,100 46: SLC Permitting LS $600 53: MSBU Coordination T&E $1,500 61: Bidding Services LS $2.200 $15,050 '. \'Ifx:\pm~IS\OO-01~5\Gray Twig Lane AFS.doc Page 4 of 4 ·- \w- AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C~ DATE: March 26, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ~ Donald B. We t, P.E. County Engineer SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 SUBJECT: Grant Application Submittal to Florida Seaport Transportation and Economic Development (FSTED) Council for the Taylor Creek/C25 Dredging and Restoration Project. BACKGROUND: Currently, BCI Engineers and Scientists, Inc., is finalizing engineering design drawings and permit applications forthe Taylor Creek/C25 Dredging and Restoration Project. The grant application is requesting $1,750,000 from FSTED, which would represent approximately 50% of the anticipated cost to complete the Taylor Creek Project. A similar application for the Taylor Creek Project was previously submitted in August 2000 and August 2001. Since last August, BCI has finalized design details and researched the use of advanced technologies to separate the spoil disposal materials. Use of advanced technologies such as chemical flocculants and mechanical belt filter presses have been evaluated for the Taylor Creek Project. Based upon this research, the estimated cost of construction for the project is estimated at $3.5 million dollars. (See attached report from BCI.) FSTED has indicated that a revised Port Master Plan document consistent with the City of Ft. Pierce Land Development Regulations must be completed before the grant funding application could receive final approval from FSTED. At this point in time, funding for construction of the Taylor Creek Project is proposed to be established through the following agencies in the listed amounts: $300,000 $600,000 $50,000 $800,000 $1,750,000 $3,500,000 St. Lucie County State Funding through SFWMD SJRWMD/National Estuary Program FIND FSTED Total Project Budget FUNDS AVAIL.: Funds are available in the County Port Budget in the amount of $250,000 - Account No. 140001- 4315-563000-4657. Additional funds in the amount of $50,000 will be budgeted in fiscal year2003, for a total local match of $300,000. PREVIOUS ACTION: 3/9/99 - Approval of Work Authorization #11 with Williams, Hatfield & Stoner in the amount of $11,000 for preparation of FIND grant. 5/4/99 - Approval of Work Authorization #12 with Williams, Hatfield & Stoner in the amount of $25,220 for spoil site selection process. 2/15/00 - Approval of Work Authorization #13 with Williams, Hatfield & Stoner in the amount of $86,900 for sediment testing and analysis. ,,)J~/"" ^......................I.....t '^/........I.. A.....L..__:__...:__..LL..t A ...:.&.I- \^':II:__~_ I 1_.L.t~_I_1 n _.L_ _ _ _. ., . , .--- --- - '. ~ ....",. CreeklC25 Dredging and Restoration Project. 2/5/02 - Approval of Work Authorization NO.2 with BCI in the amount of $33,050 for Shoreline Stabilization and Improvements in Reach 2. 3/5/02 - Approval of Work Authorization NO.3 with BCI in the amount of $17,500 for cost analysis and grant application preparation and submittal to FIND and SJRWMD. RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests authorization for submittal of the grant application to FSTED in the amount of $1,750,000 for the Taylor Creek/C25 Dredging and Restoration Project and execution of the application by the County Administrator. [ X APPROVED [ ] OTHER: [ ] DENIED COMMISSION ACTION: [x]County Attorney Coordination/Si~natures [x]Mgt. & BUdget~ [x]Co. Eng ~Q, [ ]Purchasing [x]Originating Dept. Public Works taylorc25 FSTED grant #2.ag [ ]Budget Coord. ." ........ "'" ~ --- =. ENGINEERS & SCIENTISTS, INC. P.O. Box 5467 Lakeland. FL 33807-5467 (863) 667-2345 FAX: (863) 667-2662 September 19, 2001 BCI Project No. 19-10801.1 Mr. Donald B. West P.E. St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982-5652 DRAFT Re: Taylor Creek Restoration Dredging Project Sediment Removal Analysis DRAFT REPORT Dear Mr. West: BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc. (BCI) is pleased to submit this report for the Taylor Creek Dredging Project in Fort Pierce, Florida. This report includes a summary of the sediment characteristics, volume estimates, dredging alternatives and a cost evaluation of sediment removal and handling options as outlined in Phase I of our proposal. We appreciate the opportunity to be of continued service to St. Lucie County. If you have questions concerning the contents of this report, please do not hesitate to call us. Sincerely, BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc. ~~f!~ Michael P. Kelley, P.E. Geoteçhnical Project Manager 1/:/ '/ 'I rJi ' (II ~/ ~,~4 / cd /ûJ;4'I0j!/~ Shailesh K. Patel, M.Sc., CPSSc. Project Manager MPKlSKP:js Enclosures cc: BCI File T:IG1910801 10.1 lDewatering InfolTaylorDWrptdoc '-" ...., T ABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................1 2.0 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION .............................................................1 3.0 SEDIMENT CHARA.CTERISTICS ...................................................................2 4.0 SEDIMENT REMOVAL ALTERNATIVES.....................................................2 5.0 D REDGED MATERIAL PROCESSIN G...........................................................3 6.0 DISPOSAL OPTIONS AND COST EVALUATION ........................................4 7.0 CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................................................6 8.0 REFERENCES......................................................................................................7 TABLE Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Taylor Creek Sediments - Average Physical Characteristics Option 1 - Estimated Cost Range Option 2 - Estimated Cost Range Option 3 - Estimated Cost Range FIGURES Figure 1 Taylor Creek Restoration Dredging Project Area '-' Taylor Creek Restoration Project Sediment Removal Analysis Draft Report ':'J BCI Project No. 19-10801.1 September 2001 1.0 INTRODUCTION BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc., (BCl) was engaged by St. Lucie County to assess the removal of sediments from Taylor Creek, located adjacent to the Intracoastal Waterway (Indian River Lagoon) in Ft. Pierce, Florida. This report provides an evaluation of sediment removal and management alternatives as outlined in Phase I of our proposal. Information in this report is based on sediment studies completed by BCI and Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. in December 1998 and June 2000. 2.0 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION The Taylor Creek Restoration project area consists of the western right-of-way of the Intracoastal Waterway (ICW) to the east, and the South Florida Water Management District's (SFWMD) Canal No. 25 (C-25) spillway and the Fort Pierce Farms Water Control District Canal No.1 (F-l spillway) to the west (Figure 1). Approximately 200,000 cubic yards (CY) of sediments have been targeted for removal within Taylor Creek to improve navigational access and water quality. For sediment removal, Taylor Creek has been divided into two reaches and are defined as follows: · Reach No.1: The area between the Florida East Coast Railroad (FECRR) Bridge and the western right-of-way of the ICW · Reach No.2: The area between the FECRR bridge and the C-25 Canal spillway (S-50) and submerged weir at the F-I canal A third reach, which includes the canals located behind the weir structures, was initially planned for restoration. This reach has since been removed from consideration due to the lack of significant muck deposits within the canals and cost considerations. Approximately 90,000 CY of sediment will be removed from Reach No.1 to reestablish a navigational channel depth of -12.5 feet from Mean Sea Level (MSL). The average depth to the top of sediment in Reach No. 1 is six to seven feet. Approximately 30,000 CY of fine-grained, organic-bearing muck sediments outside of the navigation channel will also be removed as part of the environmental restoration. The total volume of sediment to be removed from Reach No.1 is approximately 120,000 CY. Reach No.2 will entail the removal of approximately 80,000 CY of sediment to reestablish the design· channel depth to -12.5 feet (MSL). Reach No.2 has isolated pockets of fine-grained muck and layers of sand from the eroded creek banks. 1 Taylor C~Restoration Project Sediment Removal Analysis Draft Report ..."", BCI Project No. 19-10801.1 September 2001 3.0 SEDIMENT CHARACTERISTICS Investigations were completed in 1998 and 2000 to determine the extent, volume and physical properties of the sediments in Taylor Creek. As determined by the previous investigations, the physical characteristics of the sediments varied greatly based on location and depth in the creek. The sediments in Reach No.1 are predominantly fine-grained (greater than 50% passing No. 200 mesh sieve). The sediments in Reach No.2 are predominantly sandy (less than 50% passing the No. 200 sieve) with isolated pockets of fine-grained material along the south side of the creek. The sandy surface sediments are likely from erosion of the steep creek banks. The combined average physical characteristics for both reaches of Taylor Creek is 54% solids content, 50% fines and a specific gravity of 2.60. A summary of physical characteristics is presented in Table 1. The organic content of the sediment samples is typically less than 10% with a few samples showing greater than 20%. These sediment properties yield an estimated 136,000 dry tons of solids to be removed and managed. Table 1 Taylor Creek Sediments Average Physical Characteristics Location Estimated Average Average Average Estimated Volume to be Solids Percent Passing Organic Dry Tons Removed Content No. 200 Sieve Content ..... (cllbicvårds) (%) (%) (%) Reach No. 1 120,000 56 48 6 81,500 Reach No.2 80,000 50 54 8 54,500 4.0 SEDIMENT REMOVAL ALTERNATIVES A previous study (BCI, 2000) determined that hydraulic dredging would be the most effective method to remove the Taylor Creek sediments. The sediments would be dredged and pumped in a slurry form via pipeline to a nearby (within five miles) disposal/material processing site. Mechanical dredging was evaluated, but was not cost effective as compared to hydraulic dredging. Based on experience from similar sized projects, hydraulic dredging of 200,000 CY (1,500 CY/day) can be completed in five to seven months. The dredging rate could vary depending on the size of the dredge and booster pumps, but the production will likely be controlled by the rate at which the slurry can be processed and disposed. Currently, dewatering techniques can effectively handle a direct flow of approximately 1,000 to 1,500 gpm. However, new technologies that can process higher direct flows have recently been developed. 2 '-' Taylor Creek Restoration Project Sediment Removal Analysis Draft Report BCI Pro'Jl!tNo. 19-10801.1 September 2001 5.0 DREDGED MATERIAL PROCESSING The hydraulic dredging process creates a slurry of sediment and water, that is pumped from the dredging area to an upland disposal site or material processing site. The dredged sediment slurry typically expands to eight to ten times the volume of the in-situ sediment. Therefore, 200,000 CY of in-situ sediment would be diluted to 1,000,000 to 2,000,000 CY of slurry. This volume will require a series of mechanical and/or chemical processes to reduce the slurry volume and permanently dispose of the sediments. The treatment and disposal methods are based on many factors including location and availability ofland, processing techniques and final disposallocation(s). The volume and types of material produced during dredging is dependent on the sediment characteristics, methods of treatment and final disposal option. Treatments may involve water clarification, separation of the sand and muck fractions, and the use of chemical (flocculents) and mechanical (belt filter press, centrifuge, etc.) dewatering equipment. Water Clarification Hydraulic dredging will utilize creek water to dilute the sediment to create a pumpable slurry. The creek water utilized to dilute the slurry must be returned to a near- by water body. This process water will have high turbidity (suspended solids), which must be clarified before released into the receiving water body. Water clarification techniques include the use of settling tanks or retention ponds in combination with chemical flocculants, which accelerates the settling process. Sand Processing If the coarse fraction of the dredge slurry is processed and separated from the fines, the processing will yield approximately 50,000 CY of fine sand at 70 to 80% solids content with less than 5% fines. This sand/shell material can be utilized as fill on public projects such as parks, golf courses and for erosion repair. However, geotechnical testing for specific use is recommended. Fines Processing During separation of the sand from the slurry, the fines (muck) are passed through a mechanical system and can be either deposited into an upland disposal area or further treated with mechanical or chemical processes. If pumped into an upland disposal area, the fmes will settle out to a final solids content of between 10 to 20%, and will occupy a volume of approximately 500,000 to 700,000 cubic yards. This volume would require a disposal site area between 20 and 30 acres in size with embankments 10 to 15 feet high. If the fines are mechanically processed (dewatered), the solids content can be increased to approximately 35 to 40% solids. This dewatered "muck cake" can be hauled to a final disposal site or stockpiled for future beneficial reuse. Testing for a specific reuse is recommended. 3 , , Taylor Cr~Restoration Project Sediment Removal Analysis Draft Report .."" BCI Project No. 19-10801.1 September 2001 6.0 DISPOSAL OPTIONS AND COST EVALUATION Three dredge and disposal options and estimated costs are presented below. These options represent the low to high end of estimated costs for the project. The costs primarily vary due to the amount of processing required for each option. Depending on the available disposal options and the required process, the cost will likely fall within the range of costs presented. Other factors such as upland site vegetation coverage, topography, and elevation also impact cost. Option 1: Dispose Dredged Sediments at a Permanent Upland Site · Construct a containment area with approximately 700,000 CY of storage capacity (30 acre pond with IS-foot high berms) · Hydraulically dredge 200,000 cubic yards (in-situ) of sediment and pump slurry into containment area · Clarify return water through chemical flocculants and natural settling · Allow material to dry naturally · Reclaim site or reuse material as needed Table 2 Option 1 Estimated Cost Range ACTIVITY RANGE Disposal Site Construction $500,000 to $750,000 Dredeine $1,000,000 to $1,300,000 Water Clarification $50,000 to $70,000 Site Reclamation $100,000 to $200,000 Estimated Cost $1,650,000 to $2,320,000 Option 2: Process Fine-Grained Dredged Sediments at Temporary Upland Site · Construct containment site with 300,000 CY of storage volume (15 acre pond with IS-foot high berms) · Hydraulically dredge 200,000 CY of sediment and pump slurry into containment site · Clarify return water through chemical flocculants and natural settling · Dredge fines from the containment area to a mechanical dewatering system during (and after) the creek dredging operation · Haul 200,000 to 225,000 CY of dewatered muck cake and sand to final disposal sites · Reclaim containment area 4 '- Taylor Creek Restoration Project Sediment Removal Analysis Draft Report '!WI BCI Project No. 19-10801.1 September 2001 Table 3 Option 2 Estimated Cost Range ACTIVITY RANGE Disposal Site Construction $300,000 to $500,000 Dredl!ine $1,000,000 to $1,300,000 Water Clarification $50,000 to $70,000 Mechanical Processing $1,500,000 to $2,500,000 Handling and Hauling $600,000 to $1,000,000 Site Reclamation $100,000 to $200,000 Estimated Cost $3,550,000 to $5,570,000 Option 3: Process All Sediments at Temporary Site · Prepare temporary processing site (one to three acres) with areas for processing equipment, material stockpiling and handling, and hauling roads · Setup material processing facility which would include a combination of hydro cyclones, settling tanks and belt filter presses · Dredge 200,000 CY of sediments and pump slurry to processing facility · Stockpile, load and haul 200,000 to 225,000 CY of dewatered sediments to fmal disposal sites during dredging operations · Reclaim processing site after completion of dredging Table 4 Option 3 Estimated Costs Range ACTIVITY . RANGE Processing Site Preparation & Reclamation $25,000 Dredl!inl! $1,000,000 to $1,300,000 Material Processine $2,400,000 to $3,000,000 Handline and Haulinl! $600,000 to $1,000,000 Estimated Cost $4,025,000 to $5,325,000 5 ~ Taylor Creek Restoration Project Sediment Removal Analysis Draft Report ...., BCI Project No. 19-10801.1 September 2001 7.0 CONCLUSIONS After evaluating the quantity and actual location of muck sediments and available funding, BCI recommends that only two (Reaches I and 2) out of the three reaches previously evaluated from Taylor Creek, be considered for removal of 200,000 CY of sediment. The overall physical characteristics of the sediment in both reaches are fairly similar with approximately 50% and sand/shell and 50% fine-grained fraction. However, each reach was found to contain distinct muck pockets. Previous reports (BCI, 2000) recommended hydraulic dredging as the most cost effective method for sediment removal. Option I, which includes disposing the material at a permanent containment site, is the least expensive option with estimated costs ranging from $1,700,000 to $2,300,000. The county has previously expressed that a permanent disposal site is not a desirable option. Options 2 and 3 include temporary disposal options, either pumping the dredged sediments into a temporary containment area and then processing for final disposal or processing the sediments directly from the dredge pipeline for final disposal. The estimated costs for Options 2 and 3 range from approximately $3,500,000 to $5,600,000. Option 2 is recommended if a suitable temporary disposal area is available and Option 3 is recommended if a suitable disposal area is not available. The increase in cost from a permanent disposal option to a temporary disposal option is primarily due to the increase in material processing and handling. The cost estimate for material removal and management presented in this report will be refined once the dredged material management site(s) and desired disposal option has been identified. The bid process would likely allow the contractors to provide their own material management methodology based on the available area. 6 Taylor C~: Restoration Project Sediment Removal Analysis Draft Report """"" BCI Project No. 19-10801.1 September 2001 8.0 REFERENCES I. BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc. "Taylor Creek Restoration, St. Lucie County, Sediment Characterization Report", 1998 2. BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc. and Williams Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. ''Taylor Creek Restoration Project, Data Collection and Sediment Removal Feasibility," 2000. 7 ~ ~ \.- ~ Reach 1 Reach 2 Reach 3 + --- -- - ENGINEERS & SCIENTISTS. NC. 2000 E. EDGEWOOD DRIVE, LAKELAND, FL 33883 PHONE: (863) 667-2345 lIEVJSED: ST LUCIE COUNTY FIGURE 1 TAYLOR CREEK RESTORATION DREDGING PROJECT AREA ,;¡ Ii! º DATE: 8-30-01 DRAWN BY: NAT SCALE: NOT TO SCALE PROJECT NO. 19-10801 1. '-' AGENDA REQUEST ....." ITEM NO. C-2i DATE: March 26, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 PRESENTED BY: ~~~~.6)~ ([)onald B. Wes P.E. County Engineer SUBJECT: Grant Application Submittal to Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND) for the Taylor Creek/C25 Dredging and Restoration Project and Attached Resolution No. 02-90 BACKGROUND: Currently, BCI Engineers and Scientists, Inc., is finalizing engineering design drawings and permit applications for the Taylor Creek/C25 Dredging and Restoration Project. The grant application is requesting $800,000 from FIND, which would represent approximately 23% of the anticipated cost to construct the Taylor Creek Project. A similar application for $100,000 was previously approved by FIND in August 1999 for design costs. Since last August, BCI has finalized design details and researched the use of advanced technologies to separate the spoil disposal materials. Use of advanced technologies such as chemical flocculants and mechanical belt filter presses have been evaluated for the Taylor Creek Project. Based upon this research, the estimated cost of construction for the project is estimated at $3.5 million dollars. (See attached report from BCI.) At this point in time, funding for construction of the Taylor Creek Project is proposed to be established through the following agencies in the listed amounts: $300,000 $600,000 $50,000 $800,000 $1.750,000 $3,500,000 St. Lucie County State Funding through SFWMD SJRWMD/National Estuary Program FIND FSTED Total Project Budget FUNDS AVAIL.: Funds are available in the County Port Budget in the amount of $250,000 - Account No. 140001- 4315-563000' -4657. Additional funds in the amount of $50,000 will be budgeted in fiscal year 2003 for a total local match of $300,000 PREVIOUS ACTION: 3/9/99 - Approval of Work Authorization #11 with Williams, Hatfield & Stoner in the amount of $11,000 for preparation of FIND grant. 5/4/99 - Approval of Work Authorization #12 with Williams, Hatfield & Stoner in the amount of $25,220 for spoil site selection process. 2/15/00 - Approval of Work Authorization #13 with Williams, Hatfield & Stoner in the amount of $86,900 for sediment testing and analysis. 3/7/00 - Approval of Work Authorization #14 with Williams, Hatfield & Stoner in the amount of $32,200 for a hydrogeologic study of the groundwater at the Seminole property. 5/1/01 -Approval of Work Authorization #1 with BCI in the amount of $137,000 for design and permitting of Taylor Creek Project. 8/14/01 - Approval of grant application submittal to FSTED in the amount of $700,000 for Taylor Creek/C25 Dredging and Restoration Project. 2/5/02 - Approval of Work Authorization #2 with BCI in the amount of $33,050 for the Taylor Creek Restoration Dredging Project Shoreline Stabilization and Improvements Reach 2. 3/5/02 -Approval of Work Authorization NO.3 with BCI Engineers, Inc., in the amount of $17,500 for cost analysis 'W" 'tr- \....- and grant application preparation and submittal to FIND and SJRWMD. ,.." RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests authorization for submittal of a grant application to FIND in the amount of $800,000 for the Taylor Creek/C25 Dredging and Restoration Project and Resolution No. 02-90, and execution by the County Administrator. COMMISSION ACTION: j [xl APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: [x]County Attorney ¡~ [x]Originating Dept. PU~liC Works ¡t~ taylorc25 FIND grant#2.ag Coord ination/S i!lnatures [x]Mgt. & Budget .JVf MlVl&¡ [X]Co.Eng~ [ ]Purchasing [x]Budget Coord. '-" RESOLUTION NO. 02-90 ATTACHMENT E-6 RESOLUTION FOR ASSISTANCE UNDER THE FLORIDA INLAND NAVIGATION DISTRICT WATERWAYS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM "WI WHEREAS, THE St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners is interested in carrying out the following described project for the enjoyment of the citizenry of St. Lucie County and the State of Florida: Project Title: Taylor Creek/C25 Dredging and Restoration Proiect Total Estimated Cost: $3.500,000 Brief Description of Project: Navigation and muck sediment removal in Taylor Creek to improve navigation and water quality, including shoreline stabilization. AND, Florida Inland Navigation District financial assistance is required for the program mentioned aboye, NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the St. Lucie County Board of Count v Commissioners that the project described above be authorized, AND, be it further resolved that said St. Lucie Countv Board of County Commissioners make application to the Florida Inland Navigation District in the amount of 23 % of the actual cost ofthe project in behalf of said St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners AND, be it further resolved by the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners that it certifies the following: 1. That it will accept the terms and conditions set forth in FIND Rule 66B-2 F.A.C. and which will be a part of the Project Agreement for any assistance awarded under the attached proposal. 2. That it is in complete accord with the attached proposal and that it will carry out the Program in the manner described in the proposal and any plans and specifications attached thereto unless prior approval for any change has been received from the District. 3. That it has the ability and intention to finance its share of the cost of the project and that the project will be operated and maintained at the expense of said St. Lucie Countv Board of County Commissioners for public use. 4. That it will not discriminate against any person on the basis of race, color, or national origin in the use of any property or facility acquired or developed pursuant to this proposal, and shall comply with the terms and intent of the Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, P.L. 88-352 (1964) and design and construct all facilities to comply fully with statutes relating to accessibility by handicapped persons as well as other federal, state and local laws, rules and requirements. 5. That it will maintain adequate financial records on the proposed project to substantiate claims for reimbursement. 1 · 6. Th\..,..- will make available to FIND if requested, a post-audit of e) "wises incurred on the project prior to, or m conjunction with, request for the final 10% of the funding agreed to by FIND. This is to certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly and legally adopted by the St. Lucie County Board of Countv Commissioners at a legal meeting held on this day of 2002. Attest Signature Title Title 2 .",!" \..,,- """" P.O. Box 5467 Lakeland, FL 33807-5467 ~-- =. ENGINEERS & SCIENTISTS, INC. (863) 667-2345 FAX: (863) 667-2662 September 19,2001 BCI Project No. 19-10801.1 Mr. Donald B. West P.E. St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982-5652 DRAFT Re: Taylor Creek Restoration Dredging Project Sediment Removal Analysis DRAFT REPORT Dear Mr. West: BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc. (BCl) is pleased to submit this report for the Taylor Creek Dredging Project in Fort Pierce, Florida. This report includes a summary of the sediment characteristics, volume estimates, dredging alternatives and a cost evaluation of sediment removal and handling options as outlined in Phase I of our proposal. We appreciate the opportunity to be of continued service to St. Lucie County. If you have questions concerning the contents of this report, please do not hesitate to call us. Sincerely, BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc. ~~/~ Michael P. Kelley, P.E. Ge0,t~;hnical projVJ;ect Manager f,: . / , dð{i,l,./k!Z/~ Shailesh K. Patel, M.Sc., CPSSc. Project Manager MPK/SKP:js Enclosures cc: BeT File T:\G 191 ORO] \0. ] \Dewatering Info\ TaylorDWrpt.doc '-' -...I TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................1 2.0 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION .............................................................1 3.0 SED lME NT CHARA CTERlSTI CS .. ......................... ............... ..................... ....2 4.0 SEDIMENT REMOVAL AL TERNATIVES.....................................................2 5.0 DREDGED MATERIAL PROCESSING...........................................................3 6.0 DISPOSAL OPTIONS AND COST EVALUATION ........................................4 7.0 CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................................................6 8.0 REFERENCES...................................................................................................... 7 TABLE Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Taylor Creek Sediments - Average Physical Characteristics Option 1 - Estimated Cost Range Option 2 - Estimated Cost Range Option 3 - Estimated Cost Range FIGURES Figure 1 Taylor Creek Restoration Dredging Project Area '-' Taylor Creek Restoration Project Sediment Removal Analysis Draft Report 'WfI BCI Project No. 19-10801.1 September 2001 1.0 INTRODUCTION BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc., (BCI) was engaged by St. Lucie County to assess the removal of sediments from Taylor Creek, located adjacent to the Intracoastal Waterway (Indian River Lagoon) in Ft. Pierce, Florida. This report provides an evaluation of sediment removal and management alternatives as outlined in Phase I of our proposal. Information in this report is based on sediment studies completed by BCI and Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. in December 1998 and June 2000. 2.0 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION The Taylor Creek Restoration project area consists of the western right-of-way of the Intracoastal Waterway (ICW) to the east, and the South Florida Water Management District's (SFWMD) Canal No. 25 (C-25) spillway and the Fort Pierce Farms Water Control District Canal No.1 (F-I spillway) to the west (Figure 1). Approximately 200,000 cubic yards (CY) of sediments have been targeted for removal within Taylor Creek to improve navigational access and water quality. For sediment removal, Taylor Creek has been divided into two reaches and are defined as follows: · Reach No.1: The area between the Florida East Coast Railroad (FECRR) Bridge and the western right-of-way of the ICW · Reach No.2: The area between the FECRR bridge and the C-25 Canal spillway (S-50) and submerged weir at the F-l canal A third reach, which includes the canals located behind the weir structures, was initially planned for restoration. This reach has since been removed from consideration due to the lack of significant muck deposits within the canals and cost considerations. Approximately 90,000 CY of sediment will be removed from Reach No.1 to reestablish a navigational channel depth of -12.5 feet from Mean Sea Level (MSL). The average depth to the top of sediment in Reach No. I is six to seven feet. Approximately 30,000 CY of fine-grained, organic-bearing muck sediments outside of the navigation channel will also be removed as part of the environmental restoration. The total volume of sediment to be removed from Reach No.1 is approximately 120,000 CY. Reach No.2 will entail the removal of approximately 80,000 CY of sediment to reestablish the design' channel depth to -12.5 feet (MSL). Reach No.2 has isolated pockets of fine-grained muck and layers of sand from the eroded creek banks. 1 Taylor cre.),restoration Project Sediment Removal Analysis Draft Report ....", BCI Project No. 19-10801.1 September 2001 3.0 SEDIMENT CHARACTERISTICS Investigations were completed in 1998 and 2000 to determine the extent, volume and physical properties of the sediments in Taylor Creek. As determined by the previous investigations, the physical characteristics of the sediments varied greatly based on location and depth in the creek. The sediments in Reach No. 1 are predominantly fine-grained (greater than 50% passing No. 200 mesh sieve). The sediments in Reach No.2 are predominantly sandy (less than 50% passing the No. 200 sieve) with isolated pockets of fine-grained material along the south side of the creek. The sandy surface sediments are likely from erosion of the steep creek banks. The combined average physical characteristics for both reaches of Taylor Creek is 54% solids content, 50% fines and a specific gravity of 2.60. A summary of physical characteristics is presented in Table 1. The organic content of the sediment samples is typically less than 10% with a few samples showing greater than 20%. These sediment properties yield an estimated 136,000 dry tons of solids to be removed and managed. Table 1 Taylor Creek Sediments Average Physical Characteristics Location 56 50 Average PercentPassing Nov200 Sieve % 48 54 Average Organic Content % 6 8 Estimated Dry Tons Reach No. 1 Reach No.2 81,500 54,500 4.0 SEDIMENT REMOVAL ALTERNATIVES A previous study (BCI, 2000) determined that hydraulic dredging would be the most effective method to remove the Taylor Creek sediments. The sediments would be dredged and pumped in a slurry form via pipeline to a nearby (within five miles) disposal/material processing site. Mechanical dredging was evaluated, but was not cost effective as compared to hydraulic dredging. Based on experience from similar sized projects, hydraulic dredging of 200,000 CY (1,500 CY/day) can be completed in five to seven months. The dredging rate could vary depending on the size of the dredge and booster pumps, but the production will likely be controlled by the rate at which the slurry can be processed and disposed. Currently, dewatering techniques can effectively handle a direct flow of approximately 1,000 to 1,500 gpm. However, new technologies thaI can process higher direct flows have recently been developed. . 2 Taylor Cre~estoration Project Sediment Removal Analysis Draft Report BCI pro~No. 19-10801.1 September 2001 5.0 DREDGED MATERIAL PROCESSING The hydraulic dredging process creates a slurry of sediment and water, that is pumped from the dredging area to an upland disposal site or material processing site. The dredged sediment slurry typically expands to eight to ten times the volume of the in-situ sediment. Therefore, 200,000 CY of in-situ sediment would be diluted to 1,000,000 to 2,000,000 CY of slurry. This volume will require a series of mechanical and/or chemical processes to reduce the slurry volume and permanently dispose of the sediments. The treatment and disposal methods are based on many factors including location and availability ofland, processing techniques and final disposallocation(s). The volume and types of material produced during dredging is dependent on the sediment characteristics, methods of treatment and final disposal option. Treatments may involve water clarification, separation of the sand and muck fractions, and the use of chemical (flocculents) and mechanical (belt filter press, centrifuge, etc.) dewatering equipment. Water Clarification Hydraulic dredging will utilize creek water to dilute the sediment to create a pumpable slurry. The creek water utilized to dilute the slurry must be returned to a near- by water body. This process water will have high turbidity (suspended solids), which must be clarified before released into the receiving water body. Water clarification techniques include the use of settling tanks or retention ponds in combination with chemical flocculants, which accelerates the settling process. Sand Processin~ If the coarse fraction of the dredge slurry is processed and separated from the fines, the processing will yield approximately 50,000 CY of fine sand at 70 to 80% solids content with less than 5% fines. This sand/shell material can be utilized as fill on public projects such as parks, golf courses and for erosion repair. However, geotechnical testing for specific use is recommended. 'Fines Processinl! During separation of the sand from the slurry, the fines (muck) are passed through a mechanical system and can be either deposited into an upland disposal area or further treated with mechanical or chemical processes. If pumped into an upland disposal area, the fines will settle out to a final solids content of between 10 to 20%, and will occupy a volume of approximately 500,000 to 700,000 cubic yards. This volume would require a disposal site area between 20 and 30 acres in size with embankments 10 to 15 feet high. If the fines are mechanically processed (dewatered), the solids content can be increased to approximately 35 to 40% solids. This dewatered "muck cake" can be hauled to a final disposal site or stockpiled for future beneficial reuse. Testing for a specific reuse is recommended. ' 3 Taylor ere~estoration Project Sediment Removal Analysis Draft Report 'w1I Bel Project No. 19-10801.1 September 2001 6.0 DISPOSAL OPTIONS AND COST EVALUATION Three dredge and disposal options and estimated costs are presented below. These options represent the low to high end of estimated costs for the project. The costs primarily vary due to the amount of processing required for each option. Depending on the available disposal options and the required process, the cost will likely fall within the range of costs presented. Other factors such as upland site vegetation coverage, topography, and elevation also impact cost. Option 1: Dispose Dredged Sediments at a Permanent Upland Site · Construct a containment area with approximately 700,000 CY of storage capacity (30 acre pond with IS-foot high berms) · Hydraulically dredge 200,000 cubic yards (in-situ) of sediment and pump slurry into containment area · Clarify return water through chemical flocculants and natural settling · Allow material to dry naturally · Reclaim site or reuse material as needed Table 2 Option 1 Estimated Cost Range ACTIVITY RANGE DisDosal Site Construction $500,000 to $750,000 Dred!!ine $1,000,000 to $1,300,000 Water Clarification $50,000 to $70,000 Site Reclamation $100,000 to $200,000 Estimated Cost $1,650,000 to $2,320,000 Option 2: Process Fine-Grained Dredged Sediments at Temporary Upland Site · Construct containment site with 300,000 CY of storage volume (IS acre pond with IS-foot high berms) · Hydraulically dredge 200,000 CY of sediment and pump slurry into containment site · Clarify return water through chemical flocculants and natural settling · Dredge fines from the containment area to a mechanical dewatering system during (and after) the creek dredging operation · Haul 200,000 to 225,000 CY of dewatered muck cake and sand to final disposal sites · Reclaim containment area 4 '. Taylor ere~estoration Project Sediment Removal Analysis Draft Report BCI PrOjèC1'No.19-10801.1 September 2001 Table 3 Option 2 Estimated Cost Range ACTIVITY .... ". ....... ~ºE Disposal Site Construction $300,000 to $500,000 Dredeine $1,000,000 to $1,300,000 Water Clarification $50,000 to $70,000 Mechanical Processing $1,500,000 to $2,500,000 Handling and Hauling $600,000 to $1,000,000 Site Reclamation $100,000 to $200,000 Estimated Cost $3,550,000 to $5,570,000 Option 3: Process All Sediments at Temporary Site · Prepare temporary processing site (one to three acres) with areas for processing equipment, material stockpiling and handling, and hauling roads · Setup material processing facility which would include a combination of hydro cyclones, settling tanks and belt filter presses . Dredge 200,000 CY of sediments and pump slurry to processing facility · Stockpile, load and haul 200,000 to 225,000 CY of dewatered sediments to final disposal sites during dredging operations . Reclaim processing site after completion of dredging Table 4 Option 3 Estimated Costs Range ACTIVITY ~GE Processine Site Preparation & Reclamation $25,000 Dredgine $1,000,000 to $1,300,000 Material Processing $2,400,000 to $3,000,000 Handling and Hauline $600,000 to $1,000,000 Estimated Cost $4,025,000 to $5,325,000 5 Taylor Cree~storation Project Sediment Removal Analysis Draft Report ....., BCI Project No. 19-10801.1 September 2001 7.0 CONCLUSIONS After evaluating the quantity and actual location of muck sediments and available funding, BCI recommends that only two (Reaches 1 and 2) out of the three reaches previously evaluated from Taylor Creek, be considered' for removal of 200,000 CY of sediment. The overall physical characteristics of the sediment in both reaches are fairly similar with approximately 50% and sand/shell and 50% fine-grained fraction. However, each reach was found to contain distinct muck pockets. Previous reports (BCI, 2000) recommended hydraulic dredging as the most cost effective method for sediment removal. Option 1, which includes disposing the material at a permanent containment site, is the least expensive option with estimated costs ranging from $1,700,000 to $2,300,000. The county has previously expressed that a permanent disposal site is not a desirable option. Options 2 and 3 include temporary disposal options, either pumping the dredged sediments into a temporary containment area and then processing for final disposal or processing the sediments directly from the dredge pipeline for final disposal. The estimated costs for Options 2 and 3 range from, approxÎri1ately $3,500,000 to $5,600,000. Option 2 is recommended if a suitable temporary disposal area is available and Option 3 is recommended if a suitable disposal area is not available. The increase in cost from a permanent disposal option to a temporary disposal option is primarily due to the increase in material processing and handling. The cost estimate for material removal and management presented in this report will be refmed once the dredged material management site(s) and desired disposal option has been identified. The bid process would likely allow the contractors to provide their own material management methodology based on the available area. 6 Taylor Cre~estoration Project Sediment Removal Analysis Draft Report BCI Proj~o. 19-10801.1 September 2001 8.0 REFERENCES 1. BCl Engineers & Scientists, Inc. ''Taylor Creek Restoration, St. Lucie County, Sediment Characterization Report", 1998 2. BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc. and Williams Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. ''Taylor Creek Restoration Project, Data Collection and Sediment Removal Feasibility," 2000. 7 ~ ~ '-' ~ Reach 1 Reach 2 Reach 3 + . $ C- -_ ENGINEERS & SCIENTISTS. NC. 2000 E. EDGEWOOD DRIVE, LAKELAND, FL 33803 PHONE: (863) 667-2345 REVISED: -- ST LUCIE COUNTY FIGURE 1 TAYLOR CREEK RESTORATION DREDGING PROJECT AREA ,;¡ g R DATE: 8-30-01 DRAWN BY: NAT SCALE: NOT TO SCALE PROJEcrNO~ '19-10801 y/ \... ...., AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-2i REVISED DATE: March 26, 2002 CONSENT [X] REGULAR ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] Leg. [ ] Quasi-JD. [ SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Public Works/ERD/Oxbow Eco-Center PRESENTED BY: ~~ TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: Budget Amendment BA02-129/ Equipment Re~..:est EQ02-210 BACKGROUND: The Oxbow Eco-Center requests purchasing a four-barrel recycling center to encourage good stewardship and 'green' practices at the Center. The recycling system will be purchased with Department of Environmental Protection FRDAP grant monies, which was recently extended to allow use of excess funds. The manufacturer of the recycling center, Plastic Lumber, is a sc:e source because of the compactness and clean look of the system, which will be placed on our front porch. The cost of the cer:ter is $1,300.00 plus approximately $200.00 in shipping costs. FUNDS AVAIL. : Funds are available in transfèrred via the Budget (Improvements O/T Bldg) . n. y.. 'J J 001243-7240-563000-7134 and will be Amendment to OCl243-7240-564000-7134. (Machinery & Equip) PREVIOUS ACTION: n/a COMMISSION ACTION: [X] APPROVED [ ] OTHER: Staff recorrunends approval of Budget Amend:: r:t BA02-129 and Equipment Request EQ02-210. Staff recommends ceptance of plastic lumber as a sole source for thO item. CONC CE: RECOMMENDATION: County Attorney: ~~ Originating Dept: Finance: (copies only : Coordination Mgt & Budget: Other: --' DENIED gl sAnderson y Admi.nistrator Pu-.""Chasing : other : {' \.- 'WI' m C- o 0 0 c: <: m c: CJI Cñ "tJ =ti -i :Þ :!: :;; Õ ~ m Õ z :!: z :Þ -i -i m Õ z ;;0 :-:' m z 0 ;II: IT! C/) ~ tr ~ b' 1) 0 0 ::,.(1) ..., S- O ~ õ' (ìJ ¡¡¡ ~ '}> OJ ::,. 0 '<: -, ?f N --::r"" C') S!?. ~ ..... g;D)Q~CD 0 (1)C/)(1)'O::J '<:~~O~ ~ OJ "tJ :-i (1) ~ C/) (ìJOJ::,'::J::,. ~ëL;(t)éDo- Cl:i.-.."'b"'"'rn g (1) OJ 50 5' 08~~'O o ()' -- ::J::Js.~~ ...."tJOJO (1) OJ .... t:: 0 ~, §- ~ Q: g. fi)CD~~- :J~CDQQj' '"-Cñ~~~ :Þ OJ Ò' ~ :S,.;¿: ;;0 ::J .... (1) C/) (") §,..., ::,. ~ Ò' m (") "tJ(1)OJ~"" (") 0 o ~ <: (Jj '0' 0 c: 5}~~õ(ìJ :!: Z :::Jo-=:7C/)C'O :!: -i --0 CD:::) m z "" (1) C/)"tJ ' Z OJC/)(1)QJ"tJ c: Q.(l):Jõ3è1 0 :!: o ::J êij' - 0 m OJ ~o.. \D....,. !=? m OJ (Q OJ 50 Õ' ;;0 ::':Q)"'(t)~ :to ë3- CE" ~'- (1) OJ (1)'0 50 ~ ~~':>CE:; (1) C/) 0' Q Ct 0 , (1) QJ X ();!~(QCt (1) (1) ::J (1) 0 ::J _ C/) ~ (DOOO ~g~-~ 5)550 s.tQ -- I (1).¡,.(ìJ() <:> ,." (1) <:> (Jj Ct~ ~ ~ ::,.OJC)(1) .... Q)=::èJ-' '1> <:£tCt~ i\! (1)....(õ0 -(1) t:: .... §, C'J :3 Q: '? ~ ~ Q) :::- '" ~ (1) -' QS:~@" <:> 0'0,[,- <:> <:> "tJ C'J êi;' 0 ~ ~~o"2 .... w 5"""'" Cl:J -:-, .... (Q~::Jg. C/) OJ C/) (1) '- ...., BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST FORM REQUESTING DEPARTMENT Public Works - ERD/Oxbow Eco-Center PREPARED DATE: 03/20/02 AGENDA DATE: 03/26/02 TO: 001243-7240-564000-7134 Machinery & Equipment $1,500 FROM: 001243-7240-563000-7134 Improvements OfT Buildings $1,500 REASON FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT: To purchase a Four-Barrel Recycling Center for the Oxbow Eco-Center. CONTING.ENCY BALANCE: THIS AMENDMENT: N/A REMAINING BALANCE: DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: OMB APPROVAL: BUDGET AMENDMENT #: 02-129 DOCUMENT # & INPUT BY: G:\BUDGEnQUA TTRO\GENERAL \FORMS\AMENDM02, wb3 ....... ....I AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-2i DATE: March 26, 2002 CONSENT [X] REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] Leg. [ I Quasi-JD. [ TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: ~~ SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Public Works/ERe/Oxbow Eco-Center SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAIL. : PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: COMMISSION ACTION: [ ] APPROVED [ ] OTHER: County Attorney: Ib...~ ' 't' t "IJ Or1g1na 1ng Dep : Finance: (copies only): Budget Amendment BA02-129/ Equipment Request EQ02-210 The Oxbow Eco-Center requests purchasing a four-barrel recycling center to encourage good stewardship and 'green' practices at the Center. The recycling system will be purchased with Department of Environmental Protection FRDAP grant monies, which was recently extended to allow use of excess funds. The manufacturer of the recycling center, Plastic Lumber, is a sole source because of the compactness and clean look of the system, which will be placed on our front porch. The cost of the center is $1,300.00 plus approximately $200.00 in shipping costs. Funds are available in transferred via the Budget (Improvements OfT Bldg) . .-.".., ' 001243-7240-563000-7134 and will be Amendment to 001243-7240-564000-7134. (Machinery & Equip) n/a Staff recommends approval of Budget Amendment BA02-129 and Equipment Request EQ02-210. Staff recommends acceptance of plastic lumber as a sole source for this item. CONCURRENCE: DENIED Douglas Anderson County Administrator Coordinatio Mgt & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: m 0 m c "tI =ij > 3: ~ m 3: z -t m z ::a :-:I m 0 :t!= 111 en::¡:t;rQ>() ~ () 0:::rCD""O ß s: õ" ~ en ::J t;r - Q> :::r C[) ~ !:2, õ' I .....:::r~ C) ~ en I\J ~ ..... :;:D:lQ§<Þ -I C) CD en CDCQ:::J m· '<;~!=tc)~ ~ en Or Q> 1:1 -I CD ;::;: CC èi3Q>::r-:::J:::r ,.,¡jJCDëi)t;r _0 ""C- Q> ..... 1:1 .... CD s:::m C) C[) Q> s: s' 88<:!:~CQ :þmg ê.g~~~ G)~C tDQ>....t::o m::oz ~. §- ~ õ: g. Zm::;! ...... cnQ)- ~~qrã=cr i!gœ ,.....¡¡;3::¡:Q. Q> ::::- ::omO 0' ~ $. ~ :::J .... tD en ::a men:Þ §. .... ;::;: 0' m 0-1::0 1:ItD¡¡rg.... (") o ~ -:: en CQ' 0 c."C C ~C)tDõ.., 3: moO Q>-C) C[) Z :::J~:::r~~ !: en::o." -t .....-0 m -1"'0 Z ""tDen1:l ' Z Q>entDQ>1:I Ceno c Q.Q>:::JQjQj C 3: ~ 2. èij' ëi) Q. m :ÞOC OJ c -I:þz m 9¡ (Q Q) s: &f mr::;! ::a .....Q> en CD en ~-< :::r a. CD :::;,' CDQ>tDCQS: ~ -mo IJ1 CQ ,;.;- Q> tD ~:ÞO C)tD a. (I) O' Q 0 õ::os::: ' CD Q> >< () ;J Q> CQ t;r NNS::: tD CD :::J CD 0 ~C)õg¡::¡: 0- oen :-og~s:~ .... I Q) S' Q> 0 N _.CQ ...... I 0 ~~;nQ 0 0 ëì! &~:::J N 0 ..... :::rQ>C)ëi) '" Q)~Q)"" ... '" -<;tDt;r::¡: ~ (1):;00 ... §'~3~ 0 0, ;::;: ~ OJ :::::- ~ CD ...... Q.S'CD¡§' 0 Q CQ ~. P:"to 0 '? 1:IC)êììo .... CDCDC)1:I ..... :::J:::J t:: ~ s" '- Q) ':'1 CQtD:::JC) .., :::r en Q> en CD '-" ...., BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST FORM REQUESTING DEPARTMENT Public Works - ERD/Oxbow Eco-Center PREPARED DATE: 03/20/02 AGENDA DATE: 03/26/02 TO: 001243-7240-564000-7134 Machinery & Equipment $1,500 FROM: 001243-7240-563000-7134 Improvements OfT Buildings $1,500 REASON FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT: To purchase a Four-Barrel Recycling Center for the Oxbow Eco-Center. CONTINGENCY BALANCE: THIS AMENDMENT: N/A REMAINING BALANCE: DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: OMB APPROVAL: BUDGET AMENDMENT #: 02-129 DOCUMENT # & INPUT BY: G:\BUDGET\QUA TTRO\GENERAL \FORMS\AMEN DM02,wb3 . . \.r ....." dU811flCATlON fOR SOU 8OlJIIO: PIIOCIJIIDIrNT Based upon the Purchasing Manual, the proposed pI'OCUÆment described below is being procured pursuant to the guidelines on Sole Source Procurement. A good faith review of availabl~ sources has been made and there is only one source for the required supply, services or COnstruction item. 1. We propose to procure the following: 4 - f::gYY-e\ ~d~~\.J..:J r!L~, 2. As a sole source procurement from: Name of Company: :PI Ac::rt-\ C I \1VY1 ß8t2- Contact name:j\YV1 \=\'nr.o"" Phone~3o -1 b'l- AC\f3'1 3. The basis for this sole source determination and the reason no other vendor is suitable is: ~E~;¡~~!~S:=i~~~:~t~. ""fur (16\ of 4-¥i\£. C ey¡-\c\( \Q ~ - L'-1U..1 L~~vëb\c.. -\-r¡ ~t'", [Ost ~ --i~ ~ [~ 'oNe. \.t!Cik.kd. ~D'J..- Date 'P-N Ir;rz.p J f)"J.WW ÚD~(~v I Department/Division ----. ~;ß-r Authorized nature Nde: 1. Enter de&...Î AÍbo I dl goods or services to be procured. 2. EnIer name of sde __COI.....~ 3. Enler1he deIo...,¡,....... and basis Jcrsde soun:e procun!I1IerIl 4. AIIach såe sooroe letter fnm wnda and døpørtmer¡l 5. AIIach pt'OpOII8 from WIIIdrJr 1IIh ~ . ~ \ l'\.\-t-nAeX'-\- Title Approved () Disapproved ( ) PURCHASING DIRECTOR D~TE r...... omooo ...... TO: AGENDA REQUEST """"" ITEM NO. C-2k DATE: March 26, 2002 CONSENT [X REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING [ ] Leg. [ 1 Quasi-JD. [ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Public Works/ERD/oxbow Eco-Center .:' .~.--'-) , ,C\\(((l C~ t-=:>G l\ <Á A- Superintendent\ ""."J SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAIL.: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: COMMISSION ACTION: [X] APPROVED [ ] OTHER: County Attorney: "'~G)~ Originating Dept: t!1í$.l:5 Finance: (copies only): Budget Amendment BA02-128 I Equipment Request EQ02-211 In an effort to enhance accessibility at the Oxbow Eco-Center, staff is requesting to purchase three all-terrain, fat-tire wheelchairs for use by volunteers and visitors. These items will be purchased using funds from a DEP Florida Recreational Development Assistance Program grant, which was recently extended to allow use of excess funds. Deming Designs is the sole source provider for the specially designed wheelchair that is used in many state and national parks because of its safety features and durability. The cost of the wheelchairs is $6,000 including delivery. Funds are available in transferred via the Budget (Improvements OfT Bldgs) 001243-7240-563000-7134 and will be Amendment to 001243-7240-564000-7134. (Machinery & Equip) n/a Staff recommends approval of Budget Amendment Request EQ02-211. Staff recommneds acce Design as a sole source for this i CONCURRE BA02-128 and Equipment ance of Deming DENIED Coordinatio Mgt .. BUdget: Other: Purchasing: Other: -...." """ m D c: -c s:: m z -I ;:c m ~ c c <: m Cñ~ Õ ;:c Z -I s:: m z ;:I rn "tJ ::::~s:c: g. ;p a :,- (D~ 0 <Q (1) 0::: -. :So 0- I\) .., (1) ¡¡j'o!::!. a 5= , Qjo;:¡,;><:::J I\) 3 ~ 0 O-<Q :;:) ~ C/J ...... 3 ~, ëiJ 0 3 3 -I ...... (1) <2' 6. õ ~ g :;:) ~ m" °s:°ëir ¡¡r C/j or- ~§(1)9Cf ~ CC -0 oQ.o(')cu .,,- o¡g,,><~¡¡¡ Cf 3:m 0 o· t:J- ~::::.: c: s.cuo~§. ç¡ »mg Q.:;:) :::: ¡¡j'- (1) ~ Q.' (1) Cf G)~C cu ~ (') èi! :5' , m:;oz ë§~~"êcu ~ Zm~ 0- CD "11 0- CD~:;:)Cf ::U 0 ~gm :;:)cu~§'D :::: ~ Q.- <Q )'. :;OmO flg:~õ"tJ » ;:c mC/J» Q.~ "tJ<Q -c m 0-1:;0 ""cu~c:ii1 "tI 0 C"'T10 ~~ë§g.~ ;:c 0 0 s:: moO z ....ocu < s:: C/J:;o"'T1 -I s: C/j :;:) Cf S· m m -I"'T10 (1) cu CD CD 0 !=? z g¡2.C§~èi! z 0-0 c: c »~C s:: O()- Q) m ~~c:õ1'Cf !=? -I»z ED 0,):::::::.:::J_C1> Q......, mr--I m ~. ~ ~ ~ Q) ~ . (1).., èi! g 3-<-< :;:) cu :::: CD ::::....~Cf -mo ::¡-.... Cf ~»O O~CDÕ' ~ ~ CD CD _, õ:;03: :::r (=):::-: cuO~':¿ en en NN3: 0::: >< cu ...... Q - CD 0- ";' 0 QC/J "tJ 0 C/j "tJ cu :::: ." CD ....C/J ;:¡'1J'l°O ,_ õ' 0 0-"tJ NO '6' 9 CD ëD gz cuoc::::: Nm q) <b c/) _. :;0 Q.~CDS: -.CD Q. :<: :;:) .., :5' 9, 0 0:::: Cf 0 c:::¡-ocu 0 --'o~~ ...... I\) :::: . >, r¡;' ~ æ: w ~..C/) , -....¡ I\) . >, '? 0'1 fg 0> . >, 0 :s 0 '? en -....¡ ~ ...... w . >, BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST FORM REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: PREPARED DATE: AGENDA DATE: Public Works - ERD/Oxbow Eco-Center 03/20/02 03/26/02 TO: 001243-7240-564000-7134 Machine & E uipment $6,000 FROM: 001243-7240-563000-7134 Improvements OfT Buildin s $6,000 REASON FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT: To purchase three (3) all-terrain wheelchairs for the Oxbow Eco-Center. CONTINGENCY BALANCE: THIS AMENDMENT: REMAINING BALANCE: N/A DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: OMB APPROVAL: BUDGET AMENDMENT #: DOCUMENT # & INPUT BY: 02-128 G:\BUDGEnaUA TTRO\GENERAL \FORMS\AMEN DM02, wb3 · . ~ ..", dusnnCATION rOR sou SOUIKr PROCURI:MI:NT Based upon the Purchasing Manual, the Proposed procurement described below is being procured pursuant to the guidelines on Sole Source Procurement. A good faith review of available sources has been made and there is only one source for the required supply, services or construction item. 1. We propose to procure the following: ALL-~~l~~~~~ ___________________________ ----- --- ------------ 2. As a sole source procurement from: Name of Company: ~\~L6c-N _______ Contact name:~~_º-'L~~ Phoneß-.2o ~ l.f.:!ß..-~Îbc;. o \Gh-\d..e.'m·\'t~5 ~~\. COI'Y) The basis for this sole source determination and the reason no other vendor is suitable is: ~ "'.1\- -kv~~t¡~ hW~ ~s VI-. 4k ~~L_ ~c., oV\~ ~ ~..kL-",,-c:..~"""-t ~.,jtvo^\IJ4... Ù'_~.!!J!..!-~_-bL ~~~\("\t\, ..,gñ.CI·l ~ ~cg,....:::Iho(, (ly'::h~~~~e..L___ :>~~Y\$..ib~ -D~~ a...\\ ~ u:>\...~ ~ ~~~. J.~ ó.wrü.l... ~\tslA...J ~ìa~ -\-to (..e..l. _ .Ji!iw--10~ tdÐ '~J'1-K.~____ u5epartmentlDivision "- ~~ Authoriz Signature 3. -4~------- Date Note: 1. Enter descriptioo of goods Of'services 10 be procured . 2. Enter name of sole source conbading. 3, Enter the determination and basis for sole source procurement. 4, Attach sole source letter from venda and department. 5, Attach proposal rrom wndor with pricing. ~~~I O~5:0-~ Title Approved (~' Disapproved ( ) i1:f¿~ ____VAJi7~J PURCHASING DIRECTOR reviøcd05/2000 · - ~ ~ ..., BC"Jg~n!. 561-785-5834 ~. 2 P3.ge 1 Jf 3 --~ .-~ V~:~[0 j (l,~ (~jCn--S y~;> .. Beach Whee Ichif':i;::¡>gM~~:&:;, .~t2~ ,', ,..~,...;.,;" ,."...',.~::'~.;;>;:.~::'::;i:~ll:';;~... ~~z~~~ ^~ ~ . #.#~~1·~..1.~J._~~:.. <;J" . '.. ~ .. '!~ >~ ';:c', ,'^,", ~ ~ ; l\-1~·..:·~... Get Sack to De B.each with De Bugl!!' ,.. . 7'"' ~__'S.ç: '.: _W-Á1(.( ,0 I: /' ¡"t ~t" r-...l0~ .\.< ....Jl(.y.~1 \...." IJ.,,¡ 11..~ - ) . ..- - -<I' ' u!x'j u -it /;.:/ S ~1 v~ c. . ^ \ .,j ,_, r ; ¡t.::\........v \ ..' ' ,",\ .~í~.:~,..."".I -\:-'\\'-"'1 =:..-v_)~ B~.:!çh Whedcha\r by DCll\Íl1¿j Dc5' ;c.> J .¿~ ..::- ..Hõp.uJ~?l¡r:.i\J ~ .;- ~- .- -., ~M ~'t-:a- ~ ~ Imagine the joy of (eturn;ng to nature and not feeling stranded! Whether your heart yearns for a fun-filled stroll 011 the 8ea~h, in the woods, or hy the river, "'Ie are excit€>d ¡;bQut providing you with a pr<)duct that wJlI change your life! Sinc~ 1994, we h:¡V2 r.elped hundreds of disabled pgQpte, W9 know ho~v to buiid a highti' functional, ç'ng-iastin; ~roduct that you can affGrd. You will find our products, many state and nalional pa~i<s, from Florida to C¡¡lifornia, Washington, Minnesota - you !13111a it! ¡fyou would m;e to order "r.e of ()ur fine chairs, simp!y çall. fax or amaH us. One.; we have your spl:cificatio'1s, YOu can be experiencing the free<lottl, t.m and digni or De-Bug w!tl1ìn a coupi" of weeks. We aro not just thl? designers and manufacturers of me chair -we are also U6Srs. As a chair user, I can p~or.:ise you that we do 2verything possible to test the c.omfc and durabiiity of our prod:..!::ts, We've listened carefully to cur customers over the years, and added feature5 ,Q mak:¡¡ the chair better and more functional. Even my pernona! chaIr, which is C'jH ~"e years old, w')rks as good as the day it \·ias built. We welcome you to cur Web Site, and hope you iind all the information you need here to make your dec:Îsic:1. But if you don't, we'd b¡; delighted to answer any question you may have. If you'd like to get b¡¡ck to nature ill a high,qua'ity, affordable, comfortable De- bug, all that you need to d::J is send us yúLJr order form willi payment, and a chair willi b¡:r:' /."JI"..".v. b~aç h ,.,v~e~kh.:ir.':: C:ï:' : i:j =:\.!: tl1 7!16,'2031 .- --- -------.. - ._- .------ -- ----- -.-._--- ----- .------ --- ----- -.---. !::[~P .i!'..\\ \\. i:cachwh~ddm ¡r.ço::~' ;'n::::lc ¡s _ 2.!1d ydc ~s J;tm 7116:2001 , AGENDA REOUEST ..." ITEM NO. C3A DATE: March 26, 2002 REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING [ TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CONSENT [ X ] SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: OMB PRESENTED BY: Marie Gouin Supervisor of Elections Voting Equipment Upgrade Last year, the State legislature approved disbursing funds to help counties pay for upgrades to aging voter equipment. The disbursements are to be in equal pa)'TIlents over a two-year period beginning last Fiscal Year. At the request of the Supervisor of Elections, the Board set aside a significant portion of the first pa)'TIlent ($107,452) in the Fiscal Year 2002 budget for the purpose of further upgrades intended to meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. The second pa)'TIlent of$146,250 should be received sometime in June or July of this year. After discussing the matter with the Supervisor of Elections, the Board added $53,750 to this amount (for a total of $200,000) and budgeted the additional amount in the Supervisor of Elections transfer account with the understanding that it would be used for additional voter equipment upgrades. The Supervisor of Elections is now ready to purchase the upgrades (see attached letter) and is asking the board to: I) Approve the purchase of73 Accu-Vote Touch Screens with Audio Ballot, 10 additional light Optical Scan Accu-Vote machines and a TDD unit. 2) Declare Diebold Election Systems as the sole-source vendor as theirs "...is the only Touch Screen that can interface with the Accu- Vote equipment presently used in our county." G:\B UDGETI WPIAGEN DA'SIAgenda0213 '2~ so E, wpd .......'.. The amount required to purchase the necessary equipment is:............. .............. ................ ....... ...... ... ... ... .......$312,800 .-....i ... , The amount allocated to voter equipment upgrades is: Set Aside in General Fund Contingency..............................$107,452 Set Aside in the Supervisor of Elections Account..............$200.000 Total $307,452 This leaves a shortfall of$5,348 which, with the Board's approval maybe taken from the General Fund Contingency account. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds will be made available in 001-1910-564000-100 General Fund - Supervisor of Elections - Machinery & Equipment See Budget Amendment 02-125 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve Equipment Requests 02-204 and 02-205 (with the understanding that the cost will not exceed the stated amount), declare Diebold Election Systems the sole source vender for the equipment and approve Budget Amendment 02-125. 4 attachments: SOE Letter Budget Amendment 02-125 Equipment Requests 02-204/205 [XJ APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: COMMISSION ACTION: Coordination/Signatures County Attorney: ~, " M'"'g='", & Budgot, xxlf,¡J (VL~"""i"g, Originating Dept: ~ Public Works: Other: SOE -" Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) XX xx k(Z' cc: Supervisor of Elections G:\BUDGET\WPIAGENDA'SlAgonda02\3'26 SOE,wpd '-" The amount required to purchase the necessary equipment is:......... ....... ................. ....... ........... ... ... ... ...... ... ...$312,800 -.J The aniount allocated to voter equipment upgrades is: Set Aside in General Fund Contingency..............................$107,452 Set Aside in the Supervisor of Elections Account..............$200.000 Total $307,452 This leaves a shortfall of$5,348 which, with the Board's approval may be taken from the General Fund Contingency account. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds will be made available in 001-1910-564000-100 General Fund - Supervisor of Elections - Machinery & Equipment See Budget Amendment 02-125 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve Equipment Requests 02-204 and 02-205 (with the understanding that the cost will not exceed the stated amount), declare Diebold Election Systems the sole source vender for the equipment and approve Budget Amendment 02-125. 4 attachments: SOE Letter Budget Amendment 02-125 Equipment Requests 02-204/205 COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: [ ] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Doug Anderson County Administrator Coordination/Signatures County Attorney: ~ Management & Budget: x.x...!:fI (rt~urchaSing: Originating Dept: .~ Public Works: Other: SOE / Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) XX XX k (Z- cc: Supervisor of Elections G:\BUDGET\WPIAGENDA'SlAgenda02\3'26 SOE,wpd '-' -..J BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST FORM REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: OMB for Supervisor of Elections PREPARED DATE: 03/08/02 AGENDA DATE: 03/12/02 ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME AMOUNT TO: 001-1910-564000-100 Machinery & Eauipment $312,800 FROM: 001-8191-599080-800 Supervisor of Elections $200,000 001-9910-599900-800 Continaencv $107,452 001-9910-599900-800 Conlinqencv $5,348 REASON FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT: To purchase uparaded votina machines. * Note: $107,452 was Dreviouslv set aside for voline machines and deducted from available contingencv balance. CONTINGENCY BALANCE: $740,417 THIS AMENDMENT: $5,348 * REMAINING BALANCE: $735,069 DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: OMB APPROVAL: BUDGET AMENDMENT #: 02-125 DOCUMENT # & INPUT BY: G:\BUDGET\QUA TTRO\GENERAL\FORMS\AMENDM02.wb3 \w- 'w1IÍ "'- vi :è ° ( ) .- ( ) .!:2 :t:::: CO 0 1:J:':::::::3 (,)0 0 (1)1.;;..0 "i::C .... ° (t (t .~ 0..10 , <::> (,) ° (I) (¡]LÒ <::> fa ( ) a:J 'i5 ( ) <::> .....10 "t :S ( ) .c:: :S ;:.:., ~C\ <I:) C/) ::..,:s~o:s It) S; 0 m "'0 .... '- .... lU ~I::CI)(I)Q (» Ct: ( ) (t 10;. I:: (I) .... "'0 ( ) ° .- , -..... '- ~ .... O>~ ~ê3"'O <::> <::> I:: :::3 ( ) '- "'0 .... 10;. ~ .s. ~ .!!1 (¡) 0 ( ) (I) I:: 1.;;. N .c:: E (I) .- 0.. "'-E(t .....E ° ° ° :ê '- ° 0 .....0....... It.... N I::(,)>,0,Q Q) . ;;:: ~~:S.81:: .~ 0 .... ° .S: (I) :Q >,.2 >';;0 ° I- 0..10 NN ~ ( )(t (t :t:;:..... ..... (\') '- .c:: .c:: 0..:':::: (t I:: 0::0 ....(I)(t 'O~ ;:) «Ui lU .c:: I:: (,) (t ._ wN Ü ....0( )0"1:: '§ ;;::; (t 0> >M <:( (,) :S (,) (t ...J0C/)C/) fu ~~.c::( )E «WlJJlJJ ;;::;iJ.J~:S( ) 01->-> Ct: (/)« I:: 'C ( ) ::c :::3 .... ~ -0 0..... I:: (t .S1 LL... (,) ~ ( ).c:: ~ o::(/) ( ) '~ E .... ~ Ow I- :s ( ) .9- g (I) LL::J o .. :::3 (t C\J -.II- .8 §- 0- a:J .c:: c¿ 1-0' -.lZ ( ) "'0 .... (/) W .. <:(W ~CI)( )~I:: 0 W WO::C a:I:5 :::::: al ::J«w ow I:: ( ) (I) (t C\J ::IE -0 .2~2~~ OJ ::) GO ~ .. §~ 0 Z wzwc "'0 .~.c::0> '6 I- a::w:5~ <:(D.. ( ) ..... :::3 ..... (t :::¡ "'0 I:: '- Z 1-C):50 iE~ ._ ( ) 0.. ~ :::3 « ::) ~ "'0(1)0> .s 0 z«oo:: ~~ eE-sl::âi W OD.. .~ U :E WD.. C/)W 0...9- ° ( ) - u c.. 0::« ;;::z (I) 5-.c:: ~ :;:: CI) « (t (I) (,) 0> c:: ::J ti1 .c:: ( ) >, CI) '- (b 0>.... ( ) 2: 0' Ct: ~c:I::.c::1:: u W ü ~:ggg2 C/) C/) .s::: :r: ~~(,)~..... u ü .!!1 O>~ ~ :::¡ ::) 0> I:: ( ) ~ e CD "- ......... ..... 0 -O>15°E (b ~ (t (t .c::> ~ ~ 0>.... :::, .S: §; C5,S: cti (,) "'0 , "<t :::¡ _"'010;.(,)(1) u 0 ::) LLl::i3«~ ('oj u . Ü ( )0>1::( )0.. « ('oj 0 üo ~o..o~E R a <:(~ :::3 (,) ._ w :it a w 0:: I- Z w ::IE D.. 5 a w \.. '-tII . . ::... ....'õ ° s::: C/J( )_ ......- (t C/J~ s::: o ... ° u( ):;::; ( ) c ( ) C/J '- .c:::J"O .1.) c i:2 ...... "0 ï::: ::...Q)(t Q.8 ¿, 1;;..... ¡¡¡ r--." c œ ° 0 c ~ ~E( ) .....1.1) "" ~ <0 "0 C/J C/J <l) Ci) OIC/J(t J, S s:::( ).c: .... C\ LU ._ I.) ~ ~ a::: .s.e::J .... ( )Q.Q. c .c: 01 ( ) c 'õ .S :S ..... Õ 01 s::: ::. s::: ( ) '- ffiN .....( )..... .S .c: .!!! ..... .- 0 ( ) ( ) C/J ( ) <: .c:.::c:C/J .!2 c 0 ..... ( ) 0 , ' .c: (t u ¡';;c N I- :!:::: E ( ) Q.r--. I ~ ,.... . .... ~ 0 s::: 2:1.1) 0 CI).....,~ ::) 0 NN LU ( ) 1::: I.) ü '- 0 s::: 0::0 ~ 1: ::t: .- «ëD ::J ( ) I.) Ci) C/J ° e: WN ~ ~ LU u à5 Q. >->-M a::: ( ).c:¡¡¡ _...10 :S 01 s::: ~«W ¡:.: o .S .2 c¿ )(.J !;¡: Z ......:::J:t::: )tI)C W C/JS:::"O w :¡¡ '- "0 ID )u:: c "01:(t 5~1- w w s::: 0 :¡¡ c ... U .2ü"O :J of3 z c ~ "0 ~ Z W Ci) I- :I LL =' :¡¡ w ~ a.. '. ( )....."O ::> CI) z '1-O :¡¡ 0 w ~§(t Q) :J ~ In W 0 J: I!::: ::. C/J ·s 0 I!::: ~ e E (t jWO:: 0 a.. Ü .' 13 0 ='« w a.. § w Q. .9- .c: ~ 0 )..°c ~ ~ .... ~ C/J ::J C/J ~ (t ~s::: W ~ .c:( )o .s: io::æ ~ t:n~ ~ 31-~ e: s::: I.) ::J '- ( ) , z« ::) .....õ[jJ :3 W Ü ~::=.."'--.-.; u u ~~ < ü .!:!1 01 0 s::: « <: 0 <t 0Is:::...( ) £:: ~5 <: < ( ) .- ° E ¡:: - 01 C/J (1) <t C5 < (t (t '~.9- u ::.0 T.' CI) g: Ci) :g~( )s. - W (1) ~ ~ -J 0i3Q.( ) u C5 c i - ::JOI .¡:; <: , c u.~CI)s::: 8- ~ ~ T'. ¡:: C 1'.: ( ) 01 CD :;::; a Cl LO ~ §-:S ~ <::> <t 0 0 ~ ..... ,,'.. '.,. " ",.'.... .: ',. o.n . 0 N < ..< N T .¡. 0 ,. a w ¡:.:,.,'.. :it . z a ¡:.: .'. ::I Z W Z ¡:.: 0 Q I!::: W :¡¡ l- I- :¡¡ < z <C "..,'.~ z w W I- Z :¡¡ l- I!::: 0 '.", w '.' - :¡¡ a.. II.. <C ëij 0 "..- a.. :5 c l- S a.. s: I If w ë r a :J :J a c w ID '") W §£7-t7-uk rtvaLk.::7- SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS ST. LUCIE COUNTY 2300 Virginia Avenue · Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982 · (561) 462-1500 . FAX (561) 462-1439 February 27, 2002 Honorable Douglas Coward, Chairman Board of County Commissioners 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FI 34982 Dear Commissioner Coward: I am requesting the Board to give final approval for the purchase of Touch Screen Voting Machines to meet Americans with Disabilities Act requirements as set forth in Senate Bill 1504. The County has already received $146,000.00 from the State of Florida, with a second and equal payment scheduled for receipt on July I, 2002. Therefore, I am requesting the Board to authorize the purchase of73 Accu-Vote Touch Screens with Audio Ballot, which meets ADA requirements, at a cost of $3,500.00 per unit totaling $255,500.00. I am also requesting that the Board make a unanimous declaration that there is a sole source for the procurement of this equipment from Diebold Election Systems. This is the only Touch Screen that can interface with the Accu- Vote equipment presently used in our county. Additionally, I would like to purchase 10 additional visible light Optical Scan Accu- Vote machines. The combined total cost for these machines is $ 57,000.00. Upon the Board's approval, a notification must be filed with the State of Florida outlining our intent. A sample memo has been attached for your convenience If there are any questions that require my attention prior to the meeting, please let me know. Thank you for your continued cooperation. Sincerely, Gertrude Walker GW/ac 250 N. W. Country Club Drive· Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986 . (561) 871-5410 . FAX (561) 871-5323 9340 S. Federal Highway· Port St. Lucie, Florida 34952 · (561) 337-5623 . FAX (561) 337-5626 E-Mail: gertrude@slcelections.com - 73 Accu-Vote Touch Screens $3,500.00 per unit totaling $255,500.00 Contingent upon certification of the ADA component. 10 Visible Light Optical Scan Accu-Vote machines $5700.00 per unit totaling $ 57,000.00 1 TDD Unit for ADA (Deaf) Compliance $300.00 Grand total of $312,800.00 xc: Doug Anderson, County Administrator , . ~j:B~r2e02 01::9 3354545115 ~ DIEBOLD ELECTION SYSTEMS AccuVote Voting System Proposal For 5t. Lucie County Florida Nurnbf,!r ofPrecinots: ITEM QTY 73 .. UNITPR1(¡;E I' AccuVote Units' 1 10 AccuVòt4il-OS PrecInct rabu/att)rs Includes; Viaibl~ Lìgh! Read Head Modem Printer Carrying Case Ballot BQx 73 AccuVote.TS 8ellot Stations 73 Audit) a.llo' KIt 146 SmðrtC.rd Encoder 365 SmartC~rd8 146 Man.geT Cards A"c;:iII~~ Sel'Vlçes ~ G~M$ Tffli1Ji"g E/~ction $taffr,..;nlng 73 Pol! Worker Tnlirling, 73 EquIpment Instlll1.tion " Acc8p~nçe Tøsting 73 ETfCtion Dax. Support (2 electio",,' 2 ~ 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 Sub-TQtfill l-e!ls: Special Allowance Vote CountIng System T9tal ~nv8&tmeot Shlpping'/Insurance $5,7bO:OO ' $3,150.00 $;350;00 $~OO,òO $3,$0 $4.00 '....., EXTENSION' "--- $57,000,00 $229,950,00 $25,550.00 $43,800.00 $1,277,50 $584.0'0 t $0.00 $5.000,00 $9.733.33 $3,650.(}0 $7,300;00 $383,844.83 $4P,001'.so $338.183.~3 TBD PAG::: 02 ~ ...~ ...........-- AGENDA REQUEST ...... ITEM NO. C-3B \..{ .. DATE: March 26, 2002 REGULAR [] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Management & Budget PRESENTED BY: Marie Gouin SUBJECT: Request to establish a $100 Change Fund for Oxbow Eco-Center Gift Store BACKGROUND: On March 18, 2002, the Oxbow Eco Center submitted a request to the OMB Director for the establishment of a ~hange Fund Account in the amount of $100. The OMB Director is requesting Board's approval of the above mentioned request. The Oxbow Eco-Center is requesting to maintain a $100 cash drawer to make change for patrons of the Oxbow Eco-Center Gift Store. Once approved by the Board of Commissioners and the Clerk of Courts, the Finance Department will make the initial disbursement to establish the Change Fund for the Oxbow Eco-Center. FUNDS AVAILABLE: 001-7912-531000-700 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners give permission to establish the Change Fund Account in the amount of $100 for the Oxbow Eco Center. [X] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: COMMISSION ACTION: Airport: Coord ination/Siq natu res Management & Budget: xxJt.S yr,lAfr Purchasing: Finance: XX County Attorney: XX i~ Orig Dept Other: G:\BUDGE1ì WPlAGENDA'SlAgenda02\3'260xbowChangeFund, wpd ~år"' 19 02 08: 54a'--' Bogans 561-785-....,1'" p.1 :MEMO Oxbow Eco-Center Environmental Resouroes Division To: From: Marie Gouin, Director OMB Sandra Bogan, Superintendent, Oxbow Eoo-Center ~ Re: Cash Drawer for Oxbow Gift Store 3/18/02 Per this memo, I am requesting to set-up and maintain a $100 cash drawer at the Oxbow Eco-Center. The oash drawer will be used to make change for gift store patrons. Funds are available in acoount #001-7912-531000-700. Thank you. -......---~ ,,f --......,_ "",/ '-' """"" AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C- t+ ' DATE: March 26, 2002 REGULAR [] PUBLIC HEARING [] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT) : Communi tv Services Beth Ryder, Director SUBJECT: Certificate of Participation for the Drug Control and System Improvement Program (Edward Byrne) Grant for 2002/03 from the Florida Department of Law Enforcement. BACKGROUND: Since 1991 St. Lucie County has served as the coordinating unit of government for allocation of funds from the Florida Department of Law Enforcement Program Edward Byrne Grant. This grant is distributed to the three law enforcement agencies, the Police Departments of Fort Pierce, Port St. Lucie and the Sheriff's Office. FUNDS AVAIL. N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: None for FY02/03 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board Certificate of Participation Enforcement Program. authorize for the the Chair.man to sign Florida Department of the Law D as M. Anderson ounty Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: [ X] [ I APPROVED OTHER: DENIED County Attorney'_X ~ ~ Purchasing: Originating Department Other, Finance: check for Copy only, if applicable t.~..¡a..ß.omiew¡~:::~:~~i.Cr..r~Ëd ·'ªl'fñë-Grã"nf="~=, ~-' ' I" r·"···-·~..n'·',· -,,-~_...., ' -=':" .._._"-~_.~=~=~ ....; E~g~JJ ',: J: ~ , ,I, From: To: Date: Subject: Maria Gorniewicz Beth Ryder; William Simon 3/19/029:58AM Next Year's Ed Byrne Grant ". I; ¡.:, Frannie Hutchinson has forwarded to OMB an original of a blank Certificate of Participation and related paperwork for next year's Ed Byrne Grant. I am sending the original to Beth Ryder and copies to Bill, Jennifer and Marie LaRosa. Have a great day! ******************......***** Maria "Mika" Gorniewicz Budget Analyst St. Lucie County BOCC Office of Management and Budget gorniewm@co.st-lucie.fI.us 561-462-1733 phone 561-462-2117 fax ********************* cc: Jennifer Hollnagel; Marie La Rosa , ~ , '- ,..,; o FltLE Florida Department of law Enforcement Office of Criminal Justice Grants Mailing Address: Office of Criminal Justice Grants Florida Department of law Enforcement 2331 Phillips Road Tallahassee, Florida 32308 (850) 410-8700 James T. "Tim" Moore Commissioner The Honorable Frannie Hutchinson Chairperson, St. Lucie County Board of Commissioners 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 I r .. "---~-~r-...-_ MAN G'''rr(;f: ÜF ' , r~~;~L~.B.U-º~i ~ ; ~ ;'1 I B 2002 ' L.."., ---.j st WCIS CõÙNJy FLORIDA March 11, 2002 RE: Federal Fiscal Year 2002 Byrne State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance Formula Grant -- Local Share Dear Chairperson Hutchinson: The Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) anticipates the Federal Fiscal Year 2002 (State Fiscal Year 2003) award from the United States Department of Justice to be $15,209,331 for Local Share Edward Byrne State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance Formula Grant funds. This is an increase over the current year funding; however, when the matrix was run taking into account population and crime statistics, some counties' allocation was reduced. As with last year's funding, FDLE plans to allocate residual funds to ensure that no county's reduction is more than 10% from the previous year. A total of $43,004 will be used for this purpose. In accordance with provisions of Chapter 9B-61, Florida Administrative Code, FDLE has set aside $213,112 of these funds for use by all units of government within St. Lucie County. The Federal Fiscal Year 2002 (State Fiscal Year 2003) Program Announcement is enclosed for your use atld provides guidance for submission of applications for these funds. These funds may be used by local units of government to implement projects that offer a high probability of improving the functioning of the criminal justice system, aggressively and effectively responding to violent crime, or reducing drug trafficking and abuse. Chapter 9B-61.008, Florida Administrative Code, requires that, as a condition of participation in this program, the units of government in each county reach consensus concerning the expenditure of these funds, including the projects to be implemented as well as the agency responsible for such implementation. Developing such consensus will require someone to exercise leadership and assume a coordinating role in the development of applications for these funds. FDLE recommends that the Board of Committed to Service' Integrity· Respect· Quality ; \...- FFY 2002 Local Share Byrne Page Two March 11, 2002 ...., County Commissioners assume this responsibility. In the event the county declines to serve in this capacity, the Department will request the governing body of each municipality in the county, in descending order of population, to serve as the coordinating unit of government. The enclosed Certification of Participation form requests the identification of an individual coordinator. We will send this individual an application kit that will provide the program details necessary for completion of the application. Please complete the enclosed Certificate of Participation and return it within 30 days from the date of this correspondence to: Office of Criminal Justice Grants Florida Department of Law Enforcement 2331 Phillips Road Tallahassee, Florida 32308 Attention: Beth Hamilton We look forward to working with you. If you have any questions or if we can provide you with any assistance regarding the Byrne Program, please contact me or Beth Hamilton, Planning Manager, at (850) 410-8700. Sincerely, C!J¿ ~~. ~ Cla~ H. Wilder Community Program Administrator CHW/BH/mg Enclosures 1. Program Announcement 2. Certification of Participation Form (Chairman of County Commission only) ,. cc: Mayors in St. Lucie County Law Enforcement Agencies in St. Lucie County Project Directors in St. Lucie County Committed to Service' Integrity' Respect· Quality '-- '....; PROGRAM ANNOUNCEMENT FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2002 Edward Byrne Memorial State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance Formula Grant Program The State of Florida, Department of Law Enforcen,1ent (FDLE), anticipates an award from the United States Department of Justice for $15,209,331 in Local Share Edward Byrne Memorial State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance Formula Grant funds. This announcement is to notify eligible applicants of program requirements. Eligible Applicants Units of local government are eligible to receive subgrants from FDLE. "Units of local government" means any city, county, town, township, borough, parish, village, or other general- purpose political subdivision of a State and includes Native American Tribes that perform law enforcement functions as determined by the Secretary of the Interior. Program StrateQY and Purposes Units of local government applying for these federal funds must use them to implement projects that offer a high probability of improving the functioning of the criminal justice system, aggressively and effectively responding to violent crime, or reducing drug trafficking and abuse. Projects must comply with the 28 federally authorized program areas and may provide personnel, equipment, direct services, training, technical assistance, and public information. They may include a range of activities including provision of prevention, intervention and enforcement initiatives. The Department strongly discourages local subgrant funding of projects of less than $25,000. Economies of scale often play an important role in whether a project can achieve its targeted objectives. ProQram Development Each county is allocated a sum of money for use by all local governments within the county. This amount is determined through a funding matrix established in administrative rule. .. Chapter 9B-61.008, Florida Administrative Code, requires that units of government in each county reach consensus concerning the expenditure of these funds, including the projects to be implemented and the agency responsible for such implementation. Maximum coordination is required to meet this program requirement and the Department requests the county board of commissioners to coordinate requests for all local governments within the county. The Chairman, Board of County Commissioners, in each county so notified is requested to return to the Department a statement of certification indicating the county's willingness to serve as the coordinating unit of government. The certification will also identify the individual that will serve as County Coordinator. This certification must be returned within 30 days from the date of receipt of notification. In the event the county declines to serve in this Enclosure 1 FFY 2002 Byrne Program Announcement Page 1 "-' ~ capacity, the Department will request the governing body of each municipality in the county, in descending order of population, to serve as the coordinating unit of government. To accomplish these tasks, the Department encourages each county to appoint a Substance Abuse Policy Advisory Board, the membership of which should include at a minimum the following persons or their authorized designee: Chief Circuit Judge, State Attorney, Public Defender, Sheriff, Chief of Police of each municipality within the county or a Chief of Police designated by those Chiefs of Police as their representative, Jail Administrator, Clerk of the Court, Superintendent of Education and a representative of local drug treatment programs. Each county is also encouraged to designate an Office of Substance Abuse Policy to assist with these tasks. Match Reauirements Applicants must supply no less than 25 percent of a project's cost in cash from non-federal funds; however, Indian Tribes are exempt from this matching requirement. These matching funds must be funds that would not have been available for reduction of drug trafficking and abuse and violent crime and criminal justice system improvement efforts iri the absence of federal funds; that is, they must represent an additional local effort in addressing these problems. Application Reauirements and Deadlines Chapter 9B-61 , Florida Administrative Code, governs program administration and funding. Local governments should thoroughly review rule provisions before applying for subgrant funds. Once the Certificate of Participation is returned to the Office of Criminal Justice Grants (OCJG), a copy of the application package will be provided to the identified County Coordinator. The Department must receive two (2) copies of each application for funding (both with original signatures) no later than 5:00 P.M., Tuesday. June 4.2002. A separate application must be submitted for each proposed project. Applications should be mailed or hand delivered to the following: Mr. Clayton H. Wilder Community Program Administrator Department of Law Enforcement Office of Criminal Justice Grants 2331 Phillips Road Tallahassee, Florida 32308 Applications must be accompanied by letterS of approval representing agreement among at least 51 percent of all units of local government representing at least 51 percent of the county population as to the allocation of dollars to each project in the county. Questions regarding this Program Announcement should be directed to Clayton Wilder, Florida Department of Law Enforcement, at (850) 410-8700. Enclosure 1 FFY 2002 Byrne Program Announcement Page 2 · . \w- ...,J CERTIFICATE OF PARTICIPATION Federal Fiscal Year 2002 Date: Mr. Clayton H. Wilder Community Program Administrator Office of Criminal Justice Grants Florida Department of Law Enforcement 2331 Phillips Road Tallahassee, Florida 32308 Dear Mr. Wilder: This is, to inform you that the Board of County Commissioners Accepts _ Declines _ the invitation to serve as the coordinating unit of government in the Florida Department of Law Enforcement's Edward Byrne Memorial State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance Formula Grant Program. For purposes of coordinating the preparation of our application(s) for grant funds with the Office of Criminal Justice Grants, we have designated the following person: Name: Title: E-mail address: Agency: Address: Telephone: Date: County: ~ , Sincerely, Chair, Board of County Commissioners Enclosure 2 Byme Grant Program Announcement , ~ AGENDA REQUEST I~ NO. C-5 DATE: March 26, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ x] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: Pete Keogh Director, Parks & Recreation SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Parks & Recreation SUBJECT: Community Parks System Master Plan /Lawnwood Recreation Complex Master Plan Update (Parks Referendum) BACKGROUND: As part of St. Lucie County's continuing effort to assess the parks/recreational needs and wants by its residents, the Board of County Commissioners agreed to secure professional services to assist in the development of a "Community Parks System Master Plan" and a "Lawnwood Recreation Complex Master Plan." At the September 18, 2001 BOCC meeting, the Board agreed to contract with Glatting Jackson to develop both master plans. At the Board's direction, a "Steering Committee" was also formed to help guide the process, provide input and work with staff by providing feedback. Since the February 26,2002 update, a meeting with Trust for Public Land was held to discuss technical assistance, the Recreation Bond Issue was discussed at the St. Lucie County BOCC/Pt. St. Lucie City Council Joint Meeting and a presentation on the Community Parks System Master Plan was given at the Citizen Budget Committee Meeting. (Attachments: Updated chronological listing of the Community Parks System Master Plan/Lawnwood Recreation Complex progress which includes a copy of the Trust for Public Land proposal.) FUNDS AVAILABLE IN: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: N/A ~] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: COMMISSION ACTION: Coordination/Siqnatures County Attorney: Originating Dept: ~ Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) Mgt. & Budget: Purchasing Mgr.: Other: Other: Eft. 1/97 H:\Agenda Parks Referendun.wpd ~ '. . '-' ....., BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PARKS & RECREATION J MEMORANDUM March 26, 2002 BOCC Meeting To: From: Through: Date: Subject: Board of County Commissioners æ.. Linda Brown, Admi~tive Manager f' - / Pete Keogh, Director\ II, March 26, 2002 Community Parks System Master Plan Update . The following is a chronological listing of the Community Parks System Master Plan/Lawnwood Recreation Com lex Master Plan progress to date: August 8, 2001- Proposed "Community Parks System Master Plan" presentation by staff to the SLC Property & Homeowners Association August 14, 2001- Proposed "Community Parks System Master Plan" presentation by staff to the Cultural Affairs Council September 18, 2001 - Contracts with Glatting Jackson approved. September 18,2001- Steering Committee invitations mailed. October 9, 2001- Executed copies of Glatting Jackson contracts received from County Attorneys office. October 9, 2001- Work Authorization forwarded to Glatting Jackson. October 12, 2001- Request to Community Development/GIS to prepare a Base Map as outlined in Part I Existing Conditions Analysis 2.4 (Please see attachment). 1 JOHN D D~UHN, Districr No, 1 . DOUG COWA~D, Disrrict No, 2 . PAULA A, LEWIS, Disrricr No,:) . mANNIE HUTCHINSON, District No, 4 . CLIFF DA~NES, Disrnct No,S Counry Adminisrraror - Douglas MAnderson 2300 Virginia Avenue · Phone(561)462-1515· TDD (561) 462-1428 · "".-/ " " '- ....J October 23, 2001- "Steering Committee" ratification request (Agenda # C-4). October 24, 2001- Kick Off Meeting scheduled with Glatting Jackson & staff (Staff has completed or is in the process of completing Part I Existing Conditions Analysis 2.3 -Review of Existing Documents/Client Responsibilities) (Please see attached status update) Kick Off Meeting with staff and Glatting Jackson was held to discuss plan. Information requested by Glatting Jackson was provided (Status Meeting Minutes Attached). November 2, 2001- A follow-up conference call was held with David Kutner and Victoria Zinser Johnson, project managers representing Glatting Jackson and staff to begin finalizing the Community Parks System Master Plan Schedule. November 5, 2001- Staff provided Glatting Jackson with the attached finalized schedule. (Updated schedule attached indicating the two additional Commission Workshop dates). November 9, 2001- Site visits to St. Lucie County's park and recreation areas were completed by staff and Glatting Jackson. November 28, 20ot-First "Steering Committee" meeting held. Meeting facilitated by David Kutner from Glatting Jackson. (Meeting Minutes & Hand- Outs Attached) December 10, 2001- A Lawnwood Recreation Complex Programming Workshop, facilitated by David Kutner from Glatting Jackson, was held. Representatives from various sports groups and organizations were invited to participate. (Meeting Minutes Attached) January 8, 9, 10, 2002- Five (5) Community Parks System Master Plan Public Workshops were facilitated by Glatting Jackson. (Meeting Minutes & Summary Attached) 2 í \.,.. ....".¡ - , January 9, 2002- Glatting Jackson held a planning workshop with representatives from several county departments. (Meeting Minutes Attached) January 16,2002- The "Steering Committee" met for the second time. (Meeting Minutes will be provided at a later date) January 17, 2002- Staff met with Trust For Public Lands representatives to discuss strategies for successfully getting a bond referendum approved. (Information on Passing a Successful Bond Measure Attached-Additional Information will be provided throughout the Master Planning process) February 1, 2002- Presentation on the Parks System Master Plan, facilitated by Glatting Jackson at the "Strategic Planning Session". February 12, 2002- Commission Meetine/W orkshop which included a first draft presentation of Lawnwood Recreation Complex Master Plan. February 18, 2002- Telephone survey began (Glatting Jackson). Results anticipated within four to six weeks. 3 " ., '-' ....., *** Please note that according to the project time line, we are on schedule. *** cc: Doug Anderson, County Administrator Robert Bradshaw, Assistant County Administrator Dan McIntyre, County Attorney Millie Delgado, Recording Secretary Chron File 4 -< '" ..."" .:..;f I H I' TRUST ~ (1 1\ PUBLIC LAND 1l1li March 6.2002 Ct)'H~ 't'¡'I~ Ln¡J f¡,~ l'ru Jh> ViA FACSIMfLTE TRANSMISSION ivlr. Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia A venue Ft. Pierce, foL 34982-5652 Re: Revi!i(!d Conservation finance Proposa1 for St Lucie County Parks and Open Space Funding Dear Doug: Thank for taking the lÌme lo meet with me at our ot1iccs during your rccent visit to Tall aha:;see , 1 appreciated the opportunity to lalk with yuu about the Trust for Public Land's (TPL) Conservation Finance program. Bascd on our discussion, 1 respectfully submit the following revised proposal to provide technical assistance to St. Lucie Cuunly to study the feasibility of a parks and recreation ballot measure. The lotal amount requested for these services is $17,500. OLlr proposal to St. Lucie County includes the two rumlamental aspect:; of any success!ulland cunservation funding meas\11'c: fcasibility research and u puhlic upinion survey. . Feasihility Research - TPL, with assistance I'rom 51. Lucie County staff, would complete a feasibility study of land conscrvation rLllltling options for St Lucie County. The feasibility study would include: o sllmmary of the current state of thc St. Lucie Counly -- its land. its people. and its economy. as well as the growth trcnds that have shaped it in recenl years~ o analysis ofpossib1e alternatives [or [undin¡; a conservatiQn lanù acquisition program, including clœtion and ballollanguage requirements; anù o election history of past finance and olher ballotlTleasures in St. Lucie County, including measures for park élnd open space funding. n(,fh.l:'\ O,Til, 0: 1,1ô N¡)rd\ M"III\"u: ~tn:~1 T.II:~,I.h\~·H;I.·1 rL j:!H;I·1 \~1 (,'1',)) "'-:l.-j'JI [ 1'0" ì,hll) //'1, '\ ¡;, L~::'J,:\I DI " ¡:;.11t (:':i~l1) 21!.~~~0~¡ rOOIZOO'd L9S2# a~., ~I,gn¿ ~Ol lsn~l SSLrÞZZOS6 9Z:Zt ZOOZ'LO'~V~ '-' ...., Mr. Douglas M. Anderson March 6, 2002 Page Two o dection history of past finance and other ballot measures in SI. Lucie County, including measures for park and open space funding. Cu.\·l fo/' Feasihility He,~ear('h: $2,500. aa . Public Opinion Survey - Afler wmpleling the feasibility study, TPL would contract with a qualified public opinion survey fimlto conduct a statistically valid public opinion poll, throug11 randomly selected telephone interviews of registered voters in St. Lucie County. The poll will he designed to test the following, including: o specific nallot language and the level orvotcr support [or a land conservation ti.lLldin~ measure; o allemative funding sources and amounts; o purposes for the lIse of funds that St. Lucie County voters IÏnd most compelling; o liming, i.e" when is the best time to bring a measure to SL Lucie Coullty voters; and o variuus accountability measures that may be incorporated into the measure. Cost jùr (I Public Opinioll Sllrv~y: $/5.000.00 ilased on IllC results of our feasibility stuùy and public opinion survey, TPL will be able to make specific recommendations to Sl. Lllcie County about how to craft a parks and recreation measurc with the vcry best cbance for ~uccess, A draH Cl>ntr.lcl for profe.5sional services will follow under separate cover for your review. If we can provide you with further illfonnation, please do not hesitate to call. We look forward to assisting your community with this important effort to improve lhe quality oflife in St. Lucic County, ~~ctfUIlY, 'OrJJJ ('U Wi 1l~~rg~~-hiO: '-"" A . D· , 550clate Iree r / Conservation Fina ~e Cc: Ms. Orenda Marshall, Director of Florida Pmgrams, Miami Office Ms. Amy Wolf, Project Manager. Miami üftlee roo/roo'" Jq~2# a~1 ~I~gnd ~Ol lsn~L SSLîtZZOsa 9Z:Z1 G002'LO'~'w '-"' '-" St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners ... About The Community Parks Master Plan What is the Community Parks Master Plan? It is the development of a vision and implementation strategy for a parks system in St. Lucie County. The plan will provide for the development of recreation and sports facilities, maintenance, manage- ment and use of the parks in St. Lucie County to insure enhancement of the quality of life of our residents. Do any other communities in Florida have parks master plans? Many com- munities use this method to meet the recreational needs of their citizens. How will St. Lucie County pay for the implementation of a county-wide park system? To fund a project of this size will require a voter referendum. Is there an opportunity for the public to get involved in the Community Parks System Master Plan? There have been five public workshops and one Commission Workshop where the public was given the opportunity to state the types of recreation they would like to see and where they would like for the parks to be constructed. Additional Commission workshops are scheduled for: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 Tuesday, June II, 2002 1:30pm-3:30pm 1:30pm-3:30pm St. Lucie County Commission Chambers St. Lucie County Commission Chambers St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 District I: District 2: District 3: District 4: District 5: John D. Bruhn Doug Coward Paula A. Lewis Frannie Hutchinson CI iff Barnes Phone: 561-462-1400 Fax: 561-462-2131 Website: www.co.st-lucie.fI.us - \.... '-" ,.,.,I AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-6-A DATE: March 26,2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT) : Utilities Department William R. Blazak SUBJECT: North Hutchinson Island WWTP Master Lift Station Rehabilitation Purchase Order approval in the amount of $ 39,608.00 with Severn-Trent Avatar Utility Services, LLC. FUNDS AVAIL: 478-3600-563000-300 PREVIOUS ACTION: BOCC approved operation and maintenance contract #C98-12-185. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the purchase order with Severn Trent Avatar Utility Services, LLC. In the amount of $ 39,608.00,consistent with contract # C-98-12-185, for the rehabilitation of the North Hutchinson Island WWTP master lift station. County Attorney:X derson Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: [ X ] [ ] APPROVED OTHER: DENIED Purchasing Other: if applicable)____ Other: Eff _ 5/96 '-" ...,..J BOARD OF COUNTY COWA~SSJON'ERS UT~UTiE5 DEPARTMENT WilLIAM GlAZA/" DIREGOP. MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners William Blazak, Utility Director Luttr FROM: DATE: March 26, 2002 RE: North Hutchinson Island 1 Lift Station Rehabilitation BACKGROUND: When the master lift station on North Hutchinson Island was constructed in 1995 fiberglass lining of the station was unable to be accomplished because of budget constraints. Currently, the lift station lining is beginning to fail in several areas and needs to be replaced. The utility department advertised the project last year for competitive bids, Bid # 01-073, and only one bidder responded. Funds were budgeted in the amount of $40,000.00 to complete the project and the competitive bid that was received was for $ 80,000.00. As a result of the minimal response from bidding and the high pricing of the proposed work, utilities requested that our operations and maintenance contractor provide a cost estimate to rehabilitate the station with in house labor, consistent with the existing contract pricing. Severn Trent Avatar currently utilizes specialty crews capable of performing lift station rehabilitation in other areas of the State and can perform the necessary rehabilitation of the North Hutchinson lift station. The qU(~tation from Severn Trent Avatar reflects current contract pricing schedules and the pricing for the fiberglass lining reflects Severn Trent Avatar's competitive pricing process. It is anticipated that the actual estimated cost will be less that the quotation due to competitive pricing of the fiberglass lining contractor, and instaIlation methods, once the project is underway with Severn Trent. Utilization of our available contract labor will result in a considerable savings to St. Lucie County Utilities. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of a purchase order with Severn Trent Avatar Utility Services in the amount of $ 39,608.00 for the rehabilitation of the master lift station at North Hutchinson Island WWTP.. JOHN D, ßRUHN. District No, 1 . DOUG COWARD, District No 2 . PAULA A. LEWIS, District No J . Ff\ANNIE HUTCHINSON, Disrrict No, 4 . CLIFF ßARNES, Disrrict No, 5 (ounry AdminisTroror - Douglas M. Anderson 2JOO Virginia Avenue Q Fort Pierce, Fl J4982 · Phone (561) 462-1150 Q FAX (561) 462-115J "'" ..,.J ,s'r~\/J-~j< 1~ ] -'.----....." -- -"'-'_-,--.~-~. -..:- ._-- --~(IIrrlhre-,--] ~_:~!:-Î~~~J March 6, 2002 ¡ : ~ \,.. , William Blazak, Director St. Lucie County Utilities P.O. Box 728 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL. 34954 ~,"" î ! . , .., i~' 3 :::-5 ~ .' J' ,.- ::)'1- L~_;·\_,·· ~ ,~_.)\j¡,j>·j·r·l 5-::. ~r:J. l:;:,:c .~\.,',.;::2_~ Re: Lift Station Liner Project 5=, iLC 185 13 B:2rt()',-~: 31--.;·:. Fort 0il/~rs. F1criÖ;:;. 3JS'¡ 12 Tel: 941-2ó7~7ì47 Fa:~: S41-2é7-.:.~gC() Dear Mr. Blazak, Attached is our proposal along with the outlined work schedule and estimated hours to complete the l~g project. Also attached are quotations for the liner system itself. As previously discussed, one of the liner systems will require the concrete top of the lift station to be removed, while the other (Poly-Triplex Liller System) will not. While the Poly-Triplex system is more expensive, labor and crane service will not be required, therefor the overall cost of the job may be less. Other considerations such as the top cracking, etc... need to be given thought. It may be best to arrange to meet at the site visit to discuss, what is best for the County, both economically and durability. Please let me know your thoughts. We want to insure your Utility is gets the best its dollar. .' '-" ...,I ~]~~~~~~ '~1___í< \ t('l '')' J -~. ._.~--._.... - "..--"... _:__.,,-,,~~._._-,. ---. ,-- ,--'- -" - - í., , , ), March 6, 2002 , ........- \..:-.::.. ..;. ,- ~. ~ ---- " -..; :_: =: William Blazak, Director St. Lucie County Utilities P.O. Box 728 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL. 34954 ::;-,'::¡-:'11;~:;;:t ~ "~r''''''" ~~-1 ....~-' , ;: ¡ c .s'2T-;:'~2S~ t1..~= 13.513 Bcl:-=()'--,-'~' 2>1:1. Fen ~s. ?lG¡-:::a 33~- ~-. ;:-':;1: 94l-2:j7-774"7 PROPOSAL Fu;(; 941-2ó7-48l~C We hereby propose to furnish necessary Labor and Tools to perform the below listed described services. Article I. INSTALLATION OF FffiERGLASS LINER FOR THE NORTH HUTCHINSON ISLAND WWTP LIFT STATION. CONTRACTOR shall complete all WORK as specified or indicated in this docwnent. The WORK is generally described as follows: 1.1 Furnish necessary labor, Utility vehicle and required hand tools to complete installation of fiberglass liner system. Below estimated price including cost of the Fiberglass liner and Vactor truck service (see attachment). * Estimate has been constructed on a time and material basis. ST-AUS will perform the services at the contract rate schedule attached. An itemized invoice will be furnished to the owner upon job completion. * * Expenses and time have been estimated on the attached work sheet. Article 2. OWNERS RESPONSffiILITIES 2.1 Access and Permission to perform work. 2.2 Owner to Furnish all materials, crane, backhoe needed to perform service. 2.3 Owner will monitor by-pass pumping. Article 3. PAYMENT PROVISIONS CONTRACTOR shall submit Applications for payment in accordance with Contract Terms: - 3.1 Above estimated work for the swn of .....................................$ 39,608.00 dollars To be paid in full thirty (30) days after completion of the contracted work. If any unforeseen problems should be discovered during the performance of the above referenced service, we will notifY you immediately of their nature and any additional cost that may be incurred. Unless otherwise specified, rock removal, dewatering, coverup, and haul off is not included. Severn Trent-Avatar Utility Services will not be responsible for unmarked underground lines. Any changes requested by the ownerlbuilder are not covered by this agreement, and must be added subsequently, at the cost agreed upon by both parties. I have read all of this agreement and understand each item and am fully aware of this contractual agreement and the terms set forth in this contract. '-' , ACC, e~t,eJ~Y:7~ , / ,/ L . ) ,/ d" f-\ ..;r1 .. .. ''iJ.j<,,-- ,¿~ j i (Q I 0 <- Kenneth D. Irvin, L l Date Severn Trent-Avatar Utility Services, LLC. ....,¡ William Blazak St Lucie County Utilities Date '-, Day 1 3 Men travel to Ì'iorth Hutchinson Island Cut/Remcve concrete ¡id bShveen ~,¡\¡eÞNe!1 a~d valve bcx Prep To remove líd from lift station ""'" C~ê\iV Hrs Hr:y Rata Total 1 3 $ 135,00 $ 405,00 1 5 $ 135,00 $ 675.00 1 3 $ 135 00 $ 405.00 Day2 Remove Lid from US Set up by-pass pumping system 1 1 Day 3 Removal of US piping, pumps and rail system Pressure wash and vactor lift station Vactor Truck and Operator for 1- 10/day 1 1 1 Day 4 Liner company on site installing fiberglass liner system Severn Trent- Avatar Crew 1 DayS Liner oompany on site installing fiberglass liner system Severn Trent- Avatar Cõew 1 DayS Liner company on site installing/finish up liner system Severn Trent- Avatar Crew Day 7 Re-install pumps and piping Day 8 Re-install US cover Pour Concrete between wetwell and valve box Day 9 Clean up, Travel to Ft. Myers 'Hourly Rate per contract 3 man crew skilled Labor @ $40fhrs x 2 = $80.00 Util truck and labor @ $55fhr =$55,00 Hourly 3 man crew rate = $135.00 Vactor truck Rate $125.00/hr Saint Lucie County Utilities will be responsible for cost of Crane, concrete and other associated cost outside scope of services outlined on Proposal. 5 $ 135.00 $ 675,00 5 $ 135,00 $ 675,00 10 $ 135,00 $ 1,350.00 10 $ 135,00 $ 1,350,00 10 $ 125.00 $ 1,250,00 $ 25,938,00 $ 25,938. 00 8 $ 135 00 $ 1,080,00 8 $ 135,00 $ 1,080,00 8 $ 135,00 $ 1,080,00 8 $ 135,00 $ 1,080,00 6 $ 135,00 $ 810,00 6 $ 135.00 $ 810.00 4 $ 135.00 $ 540,00 3 $ 135,00 $ 405,00 $ 39,608,00 10/05/2001 14:36 3523777591 I NruCON '-' ..."J INDUCON CORPORATION 2632 N. W. 43rd Street Suite F.8 Gainesvil1e, Florida 32606-7438 (352) 377-4148 Fax 377-7591 www.induconcom Mark E. BallIett, Vice I'Iuidcut Joe C. JenItinJ, m. PrtIi4eot CIIriaopIIer C. NeSmilb. S=dal:yltmuu= October 5, 2001 Fax copy only to: 941·267~4800 Ken Irvin 81 ENVIRONMENTAL Subject: RFQ, install fiberglass wet well liner Re: North Hutchinson Island Dear K.en, Thanks for giving us the opportunity to quote this VIIOrk. For a lump sum of $20,750.00, INÐUCON CORPORATION will provide and install one - 114" LD. x 20'·0" wet well liner (3/4" wall thickness) to include anrwlar space grouting. We are allowing three days to perfunn this work. Any delays in our schedule will be billed at a rate ofS125.00 per hour. Services provided by others: all by-pass pumping, removal of station cover, removal of all pumps and associated piping/hardware, removal ofbench, all cleaning and debris removal Û'Om the station, installation of new pipinglbardware and cover repositioning. If you have any questions or require additional informatÎDn please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ~~ Clint Jenkins., President INDUCON CORPORATION C: fileSTElOOSOl PAGE 01 10/31/2001 05:15 9417723045 SEUS '-" ..I StU\C~fnN~Utauy Serv~ October 31, 2001 p~ Severn Trent Services Attn: Mr. Kenneth Irvin 18513 Bartow Blvd. Fort Myers, Florida 339J2 Re: North Hutchinsoo Island Lift Station Dear Mr. Irvin: We are pleased to offer a rost proposal fur the Nmh Hutchinson Island lift station lining proj«t. Please look over the 00$t proposaJ fur the installation of the 6800 series Poly TriPlex Liner System. Bid Item Desc:riDtioD DIa DeDtJI COlt STS-I Plant Lift Station 9.5' 20' 521,900,00 Warranty: 10 years/material and labor plus additional 10 years pronlted Tenns: 25% upon signing. remamder d~ upon compJetion It is our understanding that the Utility will provide: access to structure, r~oving of pumps, pipes and hardware, by-pass pumping, ç]eæ¡ing and debris, provide a So)urce of water supply; location for garbage disposal; coordinate and control sewage flow as needed duting the critical hoors of the installation process. SunCoast will ~ovide the normal preparatory work and equipment necessary to install the liner system, which includes cleaning, cementicious and injection grouting, where necessary. Thank you fur the opportunity to assist your Utility in solving these environmental problems. Please give me a call to discuss and your plans to pl"oceed. . Please sign below and return one copy. Thank you. Severn Trait Senices SunCoast Envirmmll1taI Utility Services Licensed and Insured CUC057128 - Underground L'1i1ity & Excavation Contractor 252.5 S.l. 19" Piau< C"p&C~ FL 3J9D.f.: ~941) 574-2743 fø.tt.(94'J,.) 772-3045 WIIIW.þ~~COØtI PAGE 01 _2ì31120EJl 10/31/2001 04:43 g417723045 '-' SELS PAGE 03 ..,..J Chemical Resistan(e of Poly-Trlolex Liner Systems Base Liner Resin. Parts A& B f The ålemíc;u resistance of any pOlymer must be judged on more than just its perfonnance In laboratory immersion tesn. Percent weight gain, by itself is not necessarily indicative of a cured resin's chl!.mical resistanCe, Drying to conStant weight will determine if a sample absorbed ¡ chemical while at tile same time losing material by leaching, visual obseNatlon of color change and general appearance Is also Important indlcatJons. of a system's suitability for JJartI~ular exposure. Every application must be IndMdually evaluated. Exposure to a chemial to which a )Dlymer has relatIVely low reslstll1ce may be possible far a short period of time and intermittent eJ< )osure may ..lIow for recovery, The following selective list of chemicals and their effeÇt on carefully prepared samples Is only a guide to the resin/hardener system's strang and weak points. 5;¡mple Si:e For Immersion; ' X 3" X liS" Sample Si<:e For Strength Retlntion: '" X 4" X , /8" Immersion To!mperatura: 2S' Do!greas Celsius. 77 'Fahr@nheit Immersion Time; One (1) Week r"'. Chemical Weight Cain NaOH, \ 0" NaOH, 2S,," NaOH, 50% NH OH. 28% NH HC!.,10\16 H2S0., 20% HNO, 10% H po', 10% AI:ETiC ACID oLSC ACID xYLEN~ DiSTILLED HIO RT(I) 0.44 0.18 ·0.09 1.21 0.76 1.15 1.18 4.40 2.94 0.31 3,24 0.57 PlC(8) 0.38 O.:S ·0.10 0.34 0.1)3 0.96 1.08 1.74 1.')9 0.,)7 0.13 OA7 S tTcngth 94.1 95.3 100.0 33.0 96,1 92.0 92.8 87.2 73.9 100.0 57,0 92.0 Flexible Strength & Modulus lI,etantion RT(I) ~/C(S) Modulus Strength Modulus 88.1 815.4 92.1 93.3 93.0 94.9 99.6 96,4 98.9 72.2 75,S 81.7 92.0 a9.0 93.4 86,7 88,) 90.2 86.9 a7.S 90.0 75.0 155.3 85.1 60.3 83.0 83.8 95.5 95.4 98,3 78,9 93,0 96.<3 87.9 35.4 94.5 Visual Observation; All samples were Fre! from crackiru}. crazing. swelling or dIscoloration after immersion. (1) Cur@d 7 days a.t 25'C/77'F, (2) Cured overnigl1t at ZS'Ci77'F. I'Qst·cured 2 hours at t 21'C12S0'F , Test F'eriormed By: Reichhold Chemica!. Inc" Raleigh, NC f-" Polv-Triolex Liner Systems Chemical Resistance & Phvsical ProDerties ~edeved 02103/92. Date Completed 02/25/94. ChemIcal Resistance &, PhysiCaJ ~ropertleS on panel b.ut11 on 37-40/37-620 Fourteen DayS (2 weeks) Chemical Immersion at room temperature 25 "C. Solution: (A) 10% Sulfuric (B) 20% Sulfurh: (0 Dist. W..t., 100" 5pc. Flex.St Flex. Mod. F!e.x.St, Flex,Mod. FleJ<,$l Flex.Mod. PSI. psixlO^5 Psi. psix 10^5 PsI. pslxlO^5 aarcal 10-20 18-28 15030 1 25623 &.431 20414 7.175 25503 10.16 2 21627 7.474 25580 8.469 23471 U5 3 27108 9.023 23917 7.741 24265 7,52. Ave. 24786 3.310 Z3307 7.795 24413 !Ul StO.'I, 2315 53846 2154 51956 335 114410 %Ret. 89.53 37.7S 84.19 82.31 as.13 95.20 "Weight G.1.il1 ..1.762Z ..2.0202 1"0.6918 Average of 3 soecime:15.. Solution: (D) 10% Caustic (E) to% Nitric (F) 20" Nitric 9&reol U·31 10-18 10-20 25889 9.3 76 24305 7,492 26652 8.941 Z 27021 9.011 26229 g,587 27598 5.563 3 27347 9.077 24154 8,341 25396 5.411 Ave. 26753 9.157 24896 8,142 26549 8.640 St.O@'I, 625 15697 944 46966 902 22098 ~Ret. 96.63 96,59 89.!B 85.98 95.90 9UJ """t.Gilin ..o.!Ì907 ...1.4906 ...2.3095 .~- ObservatIon on speCImens after immersion; SpecImens in Solutfons A and B developed small blisters around tile ~ge5. and some \ '- ¡¡en~tratlon. The other specimens on solutions C. D, E. and F do not h4V'= any change in a ; pearance. TQOU p..rform..rl 5v: Reichhold Chemicals. lIT? Durham. NC <Msword.\ T,=sr:Oata> 1a/31/2801 04:43 9417ì23045 SELS PAGE 04 '--' '-" f/ f Poly-Triplex Liner System Technical Data ¡ !Test property r PT1..S- 6800 PTL.S- 5600 I PTLS- 4000 PTCG -116 , I I Schedule A Schedule a SChedule C Chimn$yGuard ! Pre-Saturatlld Fabric Weight :88 Ounces PSY 56 Ounc41S PSY \40 Ounces PSY 116 Ounce. PSY ; !Test Performed By: Relchhold Chemicõll5, Raleigh, NC, 1999 !ASTM-D-790 ì I I IFlexural StrenQtI'! I 22.858 psi I 24.853 psi 16,035 psi 29,316 psi I I :Std. Dev, i 2,493 1.962 2.268 I 2.380 , ¡Flexural Modulus i 10,13 mpsi 9,41 mpsi I 8,13 mpsi I 12.92 mpsi I 'Std. Dev. ì 0,70 i 0.70 i 08i i 0,56 , I I \ I , I I I 1\STM-D-695 i I ¡CompressIVe Streng"" ; 8.699 psi i 11,331 psi I 6,897 psi 13125 psi I :Std. Dev I 1.320 I 1,113 I 748 I 1,151 I I ¡Compressive Moèul:.;s I 9.13 m¡:¡si ! 1 1. 11 mosi ! 8,13 mpsi 1ù.83 mcsi , , I ,¡Srd. Dev. ~STM-D-Q38 104 ~ ,73 1.42 1.38 Tensile Strength ; 12.340 PSI 9.878 OSI 7,043 psi i 2'J.411 psi I , I . Std Dev, , 1079 I ô84 ! 471 1 .406 j ! , I Tensile Modulus 10,77 mpsi Ç',52 mpsi I 7,55 mpsi I 15.22 mpsi Std. Oev, 0,60 0,59 I 0.51 i 174 I Average ThicKness 0.20 Inches 0.16 Inches 0.16 Inches 0,25 Inches Barcol ! t~ -F ront 22·35 3146 30-35 20-43 "'-, iBacl< 37 -43 38-45 20-35 33-45 ~ -- Material Content Analysis I , i% Resin 59,51 % , 71,51 % ! 79.68 % I 59,52 % , , % Filler ; 4,71 % ô.i4~lo I 5.97% ; 5,55 % I 1% Fiberglass I 25,78 % I 22,25 % i 14.35% 34,83 % , Tests Performed By: Southwestern Laboratories, Dallas, TX ¡ ASTM-D-2240 ! L ! , ,Hardness 82 Shore D i I , I i ! I ; ¡ I , ASTM-D-â38 I ~ ! I i 1.57 % I 154 % ! 1.20 % 171 % ó% Elongation @ Max Load I , ! Stc; , Dev, , 0,19 I 019 , 0,10 I 0.14 , , :Ultimate Elongation : 6,00 % ! ; I :Test Performed By: Whitney & Associates. Peoria, II., i Butt to Butt ResIn Bonded i , I I i :Sonding Srrengtt1 I 7,130 Lbs. I ! ! 6" Di~.. 10.000 psi test C'/"~,( 8rs ¡Concrete F;ailtrol i I I Permeability : Impermeable Œpermeacle ¡ Impermeacle Impermeable I ; 1 Excavation Required? No ~ No , No I No ! , I I Life Exoec~anC" i 50~ Years I 50.,. Yesr3 ¡ 50 + Yeal'$ ¡ 50'" Years : I ¡ Warranty 10 Years I 5 Yaars I 5 Years , 5 Years I '-' '--' ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BID TABULATION SHEET BID #01-073 NORTH HUTCHINSON ISLAND WWTP MASTER LIFT STATION REHABILITATION UTILITIES DEPARTMENT OPENED: September 12,2001 @ 2:00 P.M. VENDOR BASE BID MURRAY LOGAN CONSTRUCTION, INC. $ 80,000.00 WEST PALM BEACH, FL NUMBER OF COMPANIES NOTIFIED": 1404 NUMBER OF BID DOCUMENTS DISTRIBUTED": 41 NUMBER OF BIDS RECEIVED: 1 "PER DEMANDSTAR.COM C:\MYI'ILESlBIDTAB,WPD / / ///(//tIC,./"f''''] ~O~''~ ~.J/~~." -, -,. r "'V..... '-' ST. LUCIE COUNTY ~ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BIDDER'S CHECK LIST BIDS lVL<\Y NOT BE CONSIDERED if the following documents and/or attachments are not completely filled out and submitted with your bid. Bef~ sending in your bid, please make sure you have completed all of the following: Gr' Enclose two (2) sets of the Bid form (one marked original and one copy), including all handwritten sections, and two (2) sets of any descriptive literature, brochures and/or supporting data. Please make and retain a separate copy of this bid package for your /records. ' Œt' Bid Form, must be complete and have a manual signature (original signature) preferably , ,': sign'ed in blue ink. NdT í2.~~(1.C:<1 ~/A Include 5% bid security in the form of a cashier's check, money order or bond (if required), No xerox copies accepted. Originals only, please, if Include proof of proper licensing as stated in bid documents, !\~",...~..., ~ \ I 'LPÇ\ ~ Every page that has anything hand written on it, must be imprinted with the company's name on the top right-hand comer of the page. ~ Return bid in an envelope with the bid number and name of bid printed on the front of the envelope, If Fed-Ex or UPS-please keep bid in a separate sealed envelope when placing it in their packaging. ¿ Acknowledge in the bid any and all addendums issued and manually sign each addendum sheet and submit it with your bid. It ~/,...r....IF ~ z- ~ Provide three (3) references, preferably Governmental. Include name, address and phone number for similar work done in past year. R7/?1c;t.;o'1£W-.r '*3 ~ Erasures or other d-escriptive literature, brochures and/or data must be initialed by the person 'µ{... signing the bid. ~ If you desire a copy of the bid tabulation, include a self-addressed, stamped envelope for ..J{II,., bid tabulation to be mailed back to you. ' ~ PLEASE INITIAL AND RETURN WITH BID FORM G,\COMM0N\8IDS\2001 BIDSRFPS\2001 ·073 BID,DOC.,.v. 11198 2 .-..----..:.........--... ~2~ 07 Jl OJ;31p GLC ¡:u;~C¡¡nSIhG 5Gl 4G2 ~2D4 ~..-- \w ...,., ~~r""=. -:..... _._'-''''3 :i;'¡;-; ~.ï A¡~ t~¡ds r)!I..:~i Gë . '.' , ;;UDf;1 ¡r.;;a P'-: 1',. ~ ~ea¡ed ~nve¡op~ addrçS5ed to the St Luc~a County Purchasir;c . ~ \a¡ith b~d nwmb~f. date ana iifÙ9 úf bin ~7p~n~ng. D¡re{;t~r, ?:300 \¡~rg~:::~ ..,Ó.ft-:/9f:WB, R~o~ 228) f"c.rt ~i~~c'S; F¡ü(hJ~ 349a2~ p~arnfy markeü Or! the QL.HS.iCh3 f5i~ 1.!~"':'! ~~~ -"'~ IT'tJ', -v, 'I.,)í NORTH HUTÇH~NSOr~ ~Sl 4.ND ~'!-~;-r? ~~~ASTEg L~?=T ST.~ -nQ~~ ~E!=L=A~e!L~T A T~C~4 S"T LUC!~ f::C¡~)N1-!' ~.}T!!..~T!ES f"'\=~f'''"~'"t"~A;::~!~ --.. -~,""~~,~,,,!'¡ b.!\\I'~ lo,-", \.\ f-~EPRESENTrr~G Mo, ll~'1 LOt..4/' ff.;o4~"Ûf~jn~n~~ tv ;;CH!1Pt~t~ the ~~.I'l·O(,~ c<? NSì:1'" '-þ..~ ~L . " Cor:~9an,! anrl.!~rG(Jrp-r:~r~t!~::, ~~:-~~ :~ ?c;-f~m1 a;; req~.Ûr~d ;r; th~ ~pçcITh;~tiüns fot ihe pri~::; iJf: -- ........... VI ;.-;,!!:-;:: 1 ~ Sii~c aid ~ SO, cr:r::t 1"1 ;¡~!~~;=~~~;: ~;-d ... A :r-;.:._ ~._. _. ~ _ ~.~ r-!PHig ~.gp~,3Cem~n! 1.B 1ôã $~ð:~~ & N~~~ t-!a~h CC\:-;:;s 1.C R.;;;h;lb~:~~~~iv~ 'Of Shufew¡iid~ LjiT 5t.a~~or! $ '" '!> ~- ~- "'\ 00;)- c... ß, c::co, - t ' kin ()bng~!~":):; it !5 !lndsrstCL~d t'ìat th!S g¡dds; i$ bound by ih~ biridinQ dC}(':'~:...!!~!ents and th.:1! !r-;[: h~~j be VijU¡~j!CV'¡ri QUdl1Q a De! iod ot tiU (i~y~ qft~t' h!~ 0p~~~~;, ~:":~'=..... ~.~~ --."-"¡ ,.--.. , ~:~ 8ü¿r-;J ui C~f;LTrt~{ CommiS5I;)nerSand rsserves the right ~o viaiva any ~rìfotm8;!~!~5- Q: minOf ÎrrsgUi8ritie~. r~J~ct :=r:y E::d 2!! bIdz \.\:h~:::h ~rG ;;1,:vmp;Gte. \:-ÜfJ~j;gon8L ~bscu;e¡ Of V¡fh~~h CCi1tél:f1 addittcns net a::c\.=¡ed fúf~ ac.~ept or rèje,-j 8ny b!d if1 'f!hc!s C~ ~!1 p2;~ "....'h -:... "iirt~:;...:t ':~:..:S~. .:::r;d 8t.Ci3Pf the bid vÚ'Úch b~s¡ ~~rv~~ ì·t~&?- C~C~~~!y. ¡"¡P'.~v1L vr SiDDEn. m\JttAA~ ,~~ ~-.STi\lc.h.....,. l.J... .,31~ ~~rrf "DtA;\ Ñ. ~.e& fl ------ .. . .. .. ~. ...... ¡ li..i~f\.cù0_ .......,.....,." --...-- -.- '2"7.Jpoz '.....ii i. ~i.q,¡i::. ¿ii"' ~ ~11~_a. ~ ¡-!iv¡-~i...., . ~/· ~-;rff) - 2-Y/? - h... j ;-- ., I,.. 1./ ~- -- -----y.urø ':--i.-....¡. .__ ......, ¡JiUi-~LU 0 T TiTLL \/14 p!!!JIOq..,1- 2~':=- :'""!."" .~ , ,~~ " -'""! ~ .- JtHiz¡ng C;Luiìrac:c'r snail ~lS't aj~ 1ß·" '" ! 1 ~ - , - .. ., ex:snng iTI~tenats. Reo!accment n Q t'Je~\! tops c , ana M r _I. ·f-£ _..- t"'\enao;;rrs!!on 01JO¡:-...J~~ ';' ~l~~ , ....... ,-....,.. '-' -. '"-- ~ = ~-.........=-." ,.. """"""'- .... . "'--~~~~ "! ~ If -;.~ î ã::.fCld~~! r Rii_1 . " m::,"',=,;,,:,""'"1~ :IIULwlrC!; c-.... .. ~ ... ~ ~ --, ~---. ,,; - ...",I h~nj¥~~re or pip~ng that \A'Hl be replaced Ii i ¡~eü Ui -""'- ..... . i "r .1. '~P8:rt1C :tem~ shad renêC, pnc;H·~~. W:;""".."i;-",~-:; ! ~~-"'!~ ~~ ¡ -,.,.. ~1atc.hes ¡:!'~.-;! it¡-¡¡;·; i.Rt,;;;-,.r, " ¡ r;"n..';¡ ,~;~ $8 - ,Q:X:) .$ &{çx:o - or Sh;.)r2V;j~nds ~ ;;~ ~~¡;. -~ -- ~t~tior1 t~8 - , CO:J tì'\Ù¡'2fl-",,""\ LO(,I~.) (,.QN::''''¡tv~.~ l...>' \.f ...., ALTERNATE BID Contractor shall list all material, hardware or piping that will be replaced in lieu of utilizing existing materials. Specific items shall reflect pricing, including labor. 1.A. Replacem~p.t Piping evil f7-1""?.t'4 æ,ÆA ~~/$J, C, /1 '90" Þh~¡é", /1";../';7/ &" FI¡J.N¿'þ;l r I'~..¡ £../I? µ",n, ¡;:hjt:.4nl:p- f??.c I/¡? 7'D $/UvÆS ¡'''''' 44:/.....£;£".,/ \{,."Io/(-;: V".JIT' b,~D v,{,..r w~lf. 1. B New tops and Hatches q~' ~ YS' ¡'/Z<J ~""',;.,( ¡j!..,..., ß,(<ß c.,,,-c¡( "',.j'" n c.""sf-¡...¡-jll-.c.c c....../v~ rut" ;"1""-1. G:\COMM0N\6IDS\20018IDSRFPS\2001-073 BID DOC~.v. 11198 -26- mVié/¿/I~1 ~6/Ji'V '--f.......-'.I./ /'~~' CLASSIFICATION GENERAL êONTRACT~ p~ \ ct7_ 1983-00484 "(2:3 '\} ':;':~\ l..:f~\ ';::S] ;.s.::\ .;/::;\;,;':::~,"'''., f~) ",~'1. MURRAY LOGAN cOI'gR 'I.NC L.;I L) :'¿i;];,~~B¡''LOCATED Ar.' fj ¡ I_Or'i,,,,1 ~'UI"RAY D "....,', ,-"~ 1 :<"'"7;, -::::;,:,j'\'.\ ,~..,I '. "',1 .'-11'1 n ~ i '1\ ~..- ¡ i 11 I ',J ~ 4 '" ! - '1 DAVID LOGAN ::'~7.':J./ \.,! j ,I ,:::.::",313 J 65TH ",TRAIL ,NORTH ,--.j j 313 65TH TRAIL NORTH WEST PALM BEACH FL 33413-1763 WEST PALM BEACH FL 33413-1763 C/WIDE $36(;.6(: IS HEREBY LICENSED AT ABOVE ADDRESS FOR THE PERIOD BEGINNING ON THE FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER AND ENDING ON THE THIRTIETH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TO ENGAGE IN THE BUSINESS, PROFESSION OR OCCUPATION OF: TnTr~1 <f:'~~,"' ,',( THIS IS NOT A BILL - DO NOT PAY I GENERAL CONTRACTOR JOHN K. CLARK, CFC TAX COLLECTOR, PALM BEACH COUNTY PAID. pac TAX COLLECTOR $369.60 OCC 03 002a4 08-08-2000 THIS LICENSE VALID ONLY WHEN RECEiPTED 8Y TAX COLLECTOR UCENSE MUST BE DISPLAYED CONSPICUOUSLY AT ESTABUSHMENT OR PLACE OF BUSINES~ . JII . .. . ..:t1 I . C:.ASSiF!CAï:CN C(Jì'!T 1~('ICTiJ R "1:- ; '1'" I "'''. ,,-, III' , '1- . I '. :L 982-246«,.5 MURRAY LOGAN Cri~iRINC . 0.'''1 I LOCir~N rjlJI~RAY D, D¡:'¡I')ID LOGr:'¡N 3:L3 65T!~ TRAIL '~01RtH WEST PALM BEACH FL 33413-,1763 ** LOCATED AT CNTY ~~ ·:~;'·4 " ~:; .. . 313 65TH TRAIL NORTH WEST Pi~U.j BEACH FL 33413-1n,;:-) IS HERESY UCENSED AT ABOVE ADDRESS FOR THE PERIOD BEGINNING ON THE FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER AND ENDING ON THE THIRTIETH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TO ENGAGE IN THE BUSINESS, PROFESSION OR OCCUPATION OF: TOTr~L $94.5' THIS IS NOT A BILL - DO NOT PAY GENERAL CONTRACTOR . RG0006912/U9298/CGC041939 JOHN K. CLARK, CFC TAX COLLECTOR, PALM BEACH COUNTY PAID. pse TAX COLLECTOR $94.50 ace 03 00283 08-08-2000 THIS LICENSE VAUD ONLY WHEN RECEIPTED BY TAX COLLECTOR LICENSE MUST BE DISPLAYED CONSPICUOUSLY AT ESïABLlSHMENT OR PLACE OF BUSINES. '::__-::~ . ,.~-=..7: -,.- :·:-~·'~",,:-:.::.~,~~:~--,·:~':-·~.:~.;:ì:;~ ;",!.:-. :J~_ "-:-.",:,,", .. :.F:-"~~: "':' ~,...'~. , ~ .~, -1 .- .;~~_'''- ", -. '.~" -. \. - .: -:... .. _._~~ : . . --, -- -.. - ~ -. . . - ..- ::'..R~~M BE~~JiÇOUNIY;ÇO~TRACTO~S :-.;':ì <':FEE ': ·'"tl~,q).o.,.:' ,',: '", ',i );;-~ ~CERTIFICATÈ'!oj:rcbMPÈTENCY ,:¥/;~'; .:, CERTIFIED ..~~,;",{:;',.:',,'i.",;.\ ': "'~,-,", :: "'.' ,,;.',,:~:, .:. ',' ..', . :'" ::"':~':..;' ~'~',.' " ' '"I:'~":) .: ',CONT~CTOR C·ÉNERÄ'r.·' :. " :,':, ,', ,'" " - ~.'j,~ ...EXPIRESSE"""""'ÆDER30..u... . ,;_ - -,,~.-.'I:r-:; .. :.¡.)..-.I:;.~.." .....'.. .,~. ...,;:.... '. J..,_h.~. ~ ,- - . .,,~" ",". '. . .. ~....y.~ :Kff ''200 l' ,\. '" X'.~..J! ,,' ,. -,'\:..~ 's' ..~ -. ";~ ,\,¡',:: ¡;:'.,. ). " .": . i·," " ,":, ". ,; ~.?~.:~~; . '". .... "¡-... . ,.~ .-. ..~. ;'1;": -;- '. ,:.:. ,.:.... '.. ~': ',.!' '1 .' .:', ..... ... -i:-'~ ~~~~ ~ :.~.: ': ~ . . .~·!:~~;:3.i;.~·::· ;-~'tn:...·<r;~.1"0~ ,.~... . '.. '" ". . -fi;'':; ~~~,,~ 2.. ':.:' ~t '.,!: - . . ;;,'.:.- "urin:' :"",:,''[- ~"",,.;>,:_..:...,,~. ';.........~......n,.;b· ~"... ¡¡¡ , ".:::",,~,'J J~ßQ~':8"Q ..' ~ ".,\:"." ",>:",',' .' : ..,."... '. :..' ~3. .~ .......,.,',~~;..~~-';,.J ..:: . 1I"'''''''''''''UI''''U~''~.·;.;!.___.'';'.·. .¡ \' ".. " ' ,.:,.' " ~. .'~ . --: -- '- t...', .,' . ,,',., C01'ol'TRtiL' ,.... ",' "",/, .. - ,c- ~,---- ...... ....,,,...,. '.' ¡"'t' Cì ," '~""''''y'··'·o'a/Z''l:~/,r.la ., ,cr".'. :,r,... 5:MI'! . , ~"'~""; '.. ...i1'~~':\;~~t.fi,",iA'·';;,·.¡;":·", :~.f:.~::.·Î~~i,~'f'I:~~~~..:, .t¡.¡·.\,:õ ':..~.' :·'.--:,:r,:'''d5:·', ,~. .._~D:J .~~. .?_...:.~.....:.:;..~:.~...~':.;',: . '~:'.~ .~ ,NUMBER...\-: A·~~C· ~sc..,,·7.. !~'''J.'l.h'''''·9,'''99 ....··H~1\;'t - ....~..:,. ....11'_.....!.s;..;.~.. \..' ." "1":;1.:(":" .~....' '... . ~.:.ú=-:~ " :- ',.~'" ,..II _..'~ ~.. ..I~..~..·~,.':!'~ ~p~·. /A. ...,~j¢: -: ·f..~.:.¡~;·.:-;.~.¿;.t::.;.~;~:L...2:..IÇ~,;-.,,:...;.:.::-~:~.....~?h.~:".;...;-".,.~¡,~~j;¡f,~.!" ~..~. ,...':.- :..... .' ~i~E;:~m}~~~~¡~t¡~~t~L'l ~;~i~~~~{.fif~-=> ,." ,... ,., , . . ATTEST. __~,___ " 3136 5TH TRAIL NOR! H : CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY UCENSING BOARD ,..,\JlO"c;T.,'PALM. U....A~~L 1;'1,. 't'l.A,11__ I OF PALM BEACH COUNTY ~ ~V~¡(A-¡ J!Y " c...,G;,,...( 4.../Jír&v<-':I?··:" , ,.. '-' ""Co. O,ït <:::I r.1. ~.::I zc 0:" ~= " ~ (/) -::I r ::- -< ::- (/) ::J m D C ::J m o c -< r ::- ~ .... "':0- m, n:> :;:::'1 1'71 -1= :>1'71 ;:::z O(~ 1'71 ;::I en o z .. -..- ........- ---". .. ....."':..~.. - /-.JC' . .... ~': .;. =- ....~ ,",_...t .:,:..':~. ,: -:.. ...~. mC::%-4 x'..W:cr- ~'.~.~-:. ~ == m ii :ö'I,,",co -. . ~,'Z ::;-¡¡'3 VJ UJ:= G1 ~ ~:::-~ ~~; ~ :. g,. "'Ift: -; ~:>,':'~.~ ëi=-~ :>% ~ ..'. = CD !!."!1 -;7Q\-(..;,':';..'J:....t: ~:; =z :Þ'\J! !~7~.~":';:.~~ ~ S! Er-r . - ...... .. CD - I''''' r-~r-o,:"-,,,,:. "E ;g ::=o:>.:...··~'~~ ....> c:-¡ <:. ",,? i.'" :> ¡¡¡ '-'i" ¡;;:¡....~...'.~'.....~ Ceil ...._-Q n:::::'zo.~.~~!.-: .;'1~n\'"r'·-Q. => ~c·" . ~o -a' ....n:> \'¡¡"'r:';¡:: 0 ïO~'_'¿~' . ¡-:'':''1-4' N' 4:~~ _!. ~ ... = I ~ N z:..'m;:,-'; , . ~> ~ o....z~:'; :,'- I'\,J.;:-~n· N ;;;:J -~ - ~: 0 m-4 . -;C :;-":;" . 0 ':jO =\1'~ ,~,':';' ~J, ;::I " ---t ','.' ~...~-:. . - r- ~ '-. -.¡.- , w ~ .::,;'.'~:~'; ..... 1".1 ~ ...~ ... u """". --. ..~-:- =~ ~ ''':''' ,~ ;: '..' - --. r,. >. _.ç:¡~ ~ :...-' -.--. ~ .- . " . . _. n 0( z :::! . . :~..- -'. :-~.. ..., . "" .- '''l:.'- þ ....) ..-. .. ·~~L~~. ·::·:t/::~' , . ," ,~- ....-01: . - .~.~ ";-?.:.. ..,~..~.:,.,~~ ., '.. .- ~í ~ n o ~ ,.. ..0 \,¡, .. ~. I'" I I , . ..' " . .,' ',: -'.:" :~t' .;... . ~: !.;.. ..:~·~r:_~ :~ .' ~ l:\~"ii~:~~ ~.~: ~ ",~.¡ tt-:~ t ~7~~~i:")¡" .::..: . ',..... t ~':=::..:_~..:: ~ ''!''\f'T~- ~ "'''1 . i':7;'~:~;¡V .;~~¡~:!v.: ...~~_...,.t' ~ 0_...._- . ~;;.! i.~..;.~,; ...... :... .¡";';,....:;.,....) ..".....':.'"", ~-~ ; :~- LJ " ", -",.,.- ~ -ø:''''''' "'.0.'. . '~7 m",! · ~~~:~-.. I ...~~.......;. ... ,,~-:;.~~ ! . . "" ' I Ãi~~·'Uo. ,¡,;:c.:.. J .._~,,;.~-:.~...-. I p-\.i z...:·~ n;.c&:""~·~ I m ·;n~;.~' L ;;:; QO' "'>;Z11~;~, q . ù1 .~~::;::~ M , . -1::1 J -,~......~ -."0 ~ ,.....·....c· c:= , :;- \n' , ~ ;; :-~:z - .~~ ~ 'oz" en c::m.' ~ '" (I ~ ,_-lCII , c';;:J ~" rn )0(:>' "·'·z·O r ':)::"" ....." . n,,;-:r ¡,/i',;::: 0 :zo ::D ~.;en~:ÎS ....r;:I..:Þ ZCII ~'~CII; :,' =-.~~.=- .. -c:=o·· - :.OZ·:·,' ~»:"".- '~:=r- .- "s:ï:7'~" ., :..-;= " 1'71 " . ., .....:.;(;'1; ..: '~~~';'. . -c~' .0-( , ... 0:· ~.~ .' _ z. ...;.,." ..~ ". :")...-: ::..~: ~"-!..." , ~ ., " " ' ~ , F ~ r i ~ r I , i I , I I I , ,,~. .....,:.4lt . '. J .:....::~;.::.~c· jQ .." - . --' - ~~~:4':; ~:; ~:7.{: , >, .., '." ~ , /i·:;~,··J . :.':, -:,';' .:...f~~;" i 0'- om <t::I 111 ;c::; ZC 01:1) :::JJ: c ëñ -c r :Þ 0( :Þ (/ ::tI m C c:= :Ii m c tD -< r :> :E ("¡ ~ :¿ ...... crJJ> trt ("¡::t> :;0' m -II >m ::DZ -<0 m :;0 to o Z ~T II /,}<-4T/'orr-r "'~~':"+ .'. :;::~:""= .......'....._'r·' ':'..... me:::.... .....U,J .. ,.....-:,.¡-)I(=t» =- m-co ::t!.:..::......3111 ~tJ:;:]IÛ.:.'~j..)-rtZ~ = ~ ~~; -. ::tJ>,,·.O°ëi~~ Q-J>Z ". ":::JH= CD!2J"!1' "Dr.n-<~...· ....~ iC........ 07 :> -i . :'.ö· ·:-r~:-;·;-; ~ a :Eñi ï:!:r~·:.oo~: :::J 3: OC ,~, ,:. c:: Q.J:J> -!ø:::J .~C1J>J> =::t>r t:o:::::::J>:::J orc"'U) ('¡J>ZJ> .:_2 r¡)~ ("¡ :::;:.... -< ,.~-;3: ~o r() ::::JCtJ5ìT1Z o:;: ,..:.J>t.')....;:.r;;-I ZZ . .·.~n-f.. S:!-t~ 0,,1 -I I:I)J> :::::-1 ,·,H3:!IJ~-;n -;::0" Zi710[I!r.!-I IC 0:. i710.J)::O 0 ("¡ -;-'¡rf::o .....¡ H >::I r...... z> , r J>r ..... z ~ -<r o :>n ::t:> r.ïï J> ~r .... w W !:. ~. >- u .... .". ñ ...",¡ " . n ~ i.;; .... Z v :::: i71 ~ .... C .... ::! ~ on z -; UJ o ,,-a ..... .... '-J '..... ... ...,' ..c -0 -0 -0 o o '-J .::. ~ tJ ::;:; r 0 ,.., n I ~ 0 0 L!) I~ .01 / ¡~ I:: ::::: I I i . ' '. -. ¡.:. ..'=".:.,.... ~ r'¡ ¿,.;r z.. .,' .. .0:,....":'" - ~~;~i~;"j ."Il:1o''7..» ;' ¡·.n .:..£:"",-.:..;~ ,~If~~ y"2 '." - r\.) ~ ~~~: :.SJ ...-:- t.....J. of. .~ ,1& ". . "':'!"~' c.v .-;: ö.~ ~·~1 .. - , .....'1'· ,. ~~.~;. ;'< :¡:'o . .-1 r '3: .. .'- .' '"~ . -, - '. ... :l,.-; :'.' 'n-' .. 00 z-:-;· .... WI ., -i~ c:: ~r.n :::::.... C::Z ,-- (j') tõ r.n -; -::"1 ::; ~~, 171 --..... '0 ~~. & ..... \I .....~ " n"'ï n-: :;c 0 ~S :ü ...~ 'I .!-':ï:. 0 Zti; > ØUJ , ..... 1::0 OZ::J >:>C ::;::r-;¡ t?_r .....~ t1'1D ø:> ~'-'C~ ~ rm' J> -¡ .... o z -,.. '.?- . '~ .;"- '- '. '. ~ f: : .... .. --:f- . . . :. ;'~7". ~~ ./ ....... \~ .; Sep 04 01 10:08a SLC PURCHASING 561 482 1294 /11t/,e'¡{'/}"7 <.."J...í 4;..v'f.οc:)~;"/ /-" '- 4~t,..,. #r oL '- ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT ADDENDUM 1 BID #01-073 NORTH HUTCHINSON ISLAND WWTP MASTER L1FT STATION REHABILITATION September 4, 2001 TO ALL PROSPECTIVE BIDDERS: The fonowing changes, additions, clarifications, and deletions amend the Bid Documents of the above captioned Project, and shall become an integral part of the Contract Documents. Please note the contents herein and affIX same to the documents you have on hand. Indicate on the Bid Form that this Addendum has been received. BID ALTERNATE 1-C . PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED SIX (6) PAGES. post-Ir Fax Nola 7671 Date FI'OIII 7 Phone . Fad ~/- (Pf (,.. If you have any questions, call (561) 462-1700. Please sign and return by mail or fax to (561) 462-1294. NAME OF FIRM: /!/Vlt'A'.' l.otHA/ aN.!;;, f,.¡c. SIGNATURE: ~~ ,. ~tIT IC.r'S~ DATE: r~1 u~,; -= ~ r..· .....,...,. T"""O'.,.." roo, .,......... T ...,.... .:::~:..... :- :U~:...:-::-l~.t :"'I~ ~~. -:1:0::' .~~ Ul UJ. .:.~.=::""'t" \w h1(/~'1 hG,.a..,.. Co-J/; IotA, --- .. "'--.,- . ... .- ¡¡"~,,::-,,,..¡;-. ..-.-.: ;;¡,:--:-...: ~\...i¥~~ j j ~_.~-~~_........._- ----- . ... .. ... ... . - ..... -........ ¡-UhV. j¡~.y!f~~ ~~¡¡;;;;,. - -----..- g,jçr~~r~ ~ ~¥1~f~ i . ~;¡,.. n_.-..,. f....._ _. , ""'O-~"n ~~x J'J.-:.;{? 7GT; fD~~ 4/~ I . ¡ ~ut ¡r,. ! ~.?./ /â.·~ ¡K!_¡:;-;?!s:'" _____L - ~ --, ! -.....-............ G:;. ~r~~Jur~ ~ jT'!i it,....__ ;/..:...._ . <---J. .- -- "l'1T~i."!~ ¡Ç(~/r::;;t" f"_' i-;:::---______...., 1.~X!J""a if 1_- r-3~ ~ ..\l'1 J-- l_ 91 .. -:;j/_ t- pU'j¡:¿ i"i"T~ i;;;,.r.-"':1 -<- ~[;"-I _ _ ..., J ~... ÔAŒ ... ¡"'~¡d í2 i} ;/A.r j V ~J ji-'f1Vnc ## . -- . -;' ..:.( '~~;-iJ¿:¡;'-¡..."" ¡ ¡r::r:;¡----·~ '..Y'"..- ......- õ , Jy_'v 1-'" ' I , ---' #01-0i3 ~ CH:NSON ISLAND \!~\j.~\iV~.f~.."· :_~_-~1..4.,S._: ..,.iJ ~ :~ .-. ~T A Th-i"¡ D ¡:'u l\ £;:¡i í? à Tir;.~i .. - - ~ -- iI _ii ~ __i¡ . .... ¡........ 01 ¡~¡i¡¡ .1;...... i.i""i.wi¡¡"'¡ ji:,n. iVPi 5;;:;~~;!;t=; '7, 2!:~~ Tn 1\ I i ð~r,¡.~~¡-J""A""'n I~ ~!~!""\!::!"'!.-co_ ;- .;-....v.;;;.¡;~ ¡ ;¡:;; ¡: ~'¡..1!'W'...n_...,. _. ... tt . i ne TOnO\~!nq cna[1C~S: ;1ï:i(lrrH..,n~ {~~~rif¡f"'~tir!f'!~ !J,.~r{ ~-1.öi.ð.Tir~!'\~ ~!"'!!"':'::::'~..-1 +h"",",, D~A - -.-.....--....--..-, -.....·--·......P... _t!!_,¡.....:; "'!~!;.;o :L..~~-...Ii Dn~f rmønf<:: t"tt tn~ ~ "'"': ,Q t"~~tt!'·H"I!o.rI D!"'J"'\.;~"+ <"'\r'\....... I'"....."'u k__......__ __ ~.....L..___I _ _.-.....4 __ . ...;........;..........:-- -~ ~:...... _O....Vv ~!,-,,\ " """'" ''''1''"''-''&, al...., .;~Î.nu 1o.'C"':t...._'~~!~ ~~~ !!~teW'!~! !J~~t !.J! .. - . .- 1ne L:ünifBL"""Ï UOCU[T1e[l!~ P!A;:¡~µ n!1tt1 th-ø t"'!\nto-!""!t~ ho!"'ol!"'\ -a~~ ~«~v ~_--._ 4_ -g.....-. .---- ~--- --....--....-- ..-........... -..- _...,,.... v..~~:t~ ~':J t.!::~ , . ~JOQufnen!$ you ha~~ en h~~(L ~nd~~te ~:: !h.; 8;:.1 Farm !h~t th~s .;:\dd~nd;.;;;~ '-. . ..-.- h..-..-.~ ~.......__-........;, 'J"'-_-1 ~"\;~" ,.................¡v';...õy. Pi ¡::iiO;¡¡;';; c;¡:;~ II-!~ AT1"J\r"lI:n T1JU.t"'Il~\ ....nO~!::.....T'....n ....... ~ ............. i"-,_ ....__ . ¡; e....... t""'t t : ~"'-Í'e r~&.# _ ...... ~Lf t....._.#!.."....~!.-t._...!!::!...:' ~!:..: !i\¡~-H(:~ H\Jf~i ~ ir!~;¡;; ~~n 11! Th'ºt..1!!Tb" .of r't ---..---~..------ ·~-·...."._.~D... ,-....... ~.l""Lt"'!I.24'"'1o '/fÆ': #~~:="õ:. ,. '=; .,..""'~.."..., .,. ¡¡Ai. ¡.-:¡,..:;,..... __.., _..___.___ _ ___ . _......_.. ,;.,,", ., ;;;ow..... n J'Vä ¡¡i~i'~ -¡;;ii.ž '4U~~i.jvii~!I! \..-dH ii:lu i j ¡¡¡,ç.,¿"" Ï iU\i", .------ i;~ã~~ ~~ljit -- -..... ~ ---. ºf!Y relufu UV ï1ï;;ïit Of T~I tn i ~jo¡, i 4.~7=i 7Q.â. ;. -.---- :: i NÅ¡~'iE OF ¡;¡RM: ~"',u."'I ì L oó~/.I 92- ~ C1 -'\J 1'-1" '-.,.,., ,.( ( Jy.., \ ----.. -. .-- ~!~f<tfA , UKt:: ---- UAii=: '11~lol \w Excellellce Sillce 1968 l-\1TÞ-d~Mi!"¡\ ~ ~ P", \.~ \ MURRAY LOGAN CONSTRUcÌJON, lNC ,..."., General Contractors a?1 313 65TH TRAIl. NORTH WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33413 . ~ TELEPHONE (561) 686·3948 FAX (561) 686·7465 Construction Projects within the last 5 years Owner: Contact Person: Phone: Name of Project: Engineer: Amount: Completed: Owner: Contact Person: Phone: Name of Project: Engineer: Amount: Completed: Owner: Contact Person: Phone: Name of Project: Engineer: Amount: Completed: Owner: Contact Person: Phone: Name of Project: Engineer: Amount: Completed: Owner: Contact Person: Phone: Name of Project: Engineer: Amount: Completed: City of Delray Beach Mr. Howard Wight 561-243-7304 Barrier Island Pump Station Hazen & Sawyer $1,100,000.00 December 1997 Lake Worth Drainage District Mr. Bill Winters 561-737-3335 E-3 Revetment Bridge Design $125,000.00 May 1997 Breakers Hotel Mr. Bob Ivy 561-683-3113, Ext.227 Breakers D-13 Pump Station Mock, Roos & Associates, Inc. $1,100,000.00 March 1998 Loxahatchee Environmental Control District Mr. Paul Brienza 561-747-5700 RAS Pump Station Hazen & Sawyer $270,000.00 January 1998 Northern Palm Beach County Improvement District Mr. Bob Ivy 561-683-3113, ext227 Abacoa Reuse Pump Station Mock, Roos & AssociatðS, Ine $550,000.00 March 1998 '" '-' ...." AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-6-B DATE: March 26, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT) : Utilities Department william R. Blazak SUBJECT: Purchase of two replacement submersible lift station pumps. Recommending replacement with original equipment supplier. Flyght Pumps were original supplier when project was completed. Staff requests that Ellis K. Phelps be declared the sole source and waive the standard bid process for purchase of the pumps. The cost of each pump is $1,901.00 for a total purchase of 3,802.00. Request approval of EQ #02-206, EQ #02-207 and Budget Amendment BA02-126. FUNDS AVAIL.:45/-3510-564000-300 PREVIOUS ACTION: When the South Hutchinson Island project was bid in 1995 the bid specifications were for Flyght Pumps. The specifications allowed for equal or better products to be submitted. The Flyght proposal was selected and it allowed for a credit on the bid item at that time. RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests that the Board declare Ellis K. Phelps a sole source for Flyght Pumps and approve the purchase of two replacement pumps in the amount of $3,802.00.Request approval of EQ #02-206, EQ #02-207 and Budget Amendment BA02-126. COMMISSION ACTION: [ X] APPROVED [ ] OTHER: DENIED County Attorney:X ,~~ " 'I! 'V II' ·,1' I I, " ~ AI, ._¡.-~ ,J Originating Dept: X \,: 1'PI ,¡ r~ .! ,I ~, - it Finance Director:(C eck for"opy only, Coordination/Siqnatures Mgt. & Budget: -'~,¡ r(Y)h\ð] Purchasing Other: if applicable) Other: Eft. 5/96 \w BOARD OF COUNTY COAN\AJSS!ON£RS ...." Î UT1UTiE5 DEPARTMENT WilLIAM GlAZAI':; DIREGOi1. MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners I I ....' ';Y-"'r "' \ '\',"', j'- I. "'.,' ,', \/"'I~ .f~ FROM: William Blazak, Utility Director DATE: March 26, 2002 RE: Submersible Pump Purchase 1 South Hutchinson Island System BACKGROUND: When the South Hutchinson System was constructed Flyght pumps were utilized as a result of the bidding process associated with the project. Bidders had the opportunity to supply equal or better than Flyght but Ellis K. Phelps pricing was the most competitive. The pumps that staff is requesting to purchase would be a replacement pumps for the lift stations in the system. The original pumps have provided service for over 6 years without failure and will be rebuilt to provide back up and maintenance flexibility for other stations. The replacement pumps wil1 allow for the original pumps to be rebuilt and provide emergency back up for other lift stations in the system. RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests that the Board declare Ellis K. Phelps as a sole source, waive the standard bid process, and approve the purchase of two replacement pumps in the amount of $ 3,802.00 Also Request approval ofEQ #02-206,EQ #02-207 and Budget Amendment BA02-126. JOHN D, ßRUHN, Dimicr NO.1' DOUG COWARD, District No.2' PAULA A LEWIS, District No. J . FRANNIE HUTCHINSON, Dimicr No, 4 . CLIFF GARNES, Districr No.5 Counry Adminisrrotor - Douglas M. Anderson 2300 Virginia Avenue .. Fort Pierce, Fl34982 · Phone (561) 462-1150 .. FAX (561) 462-1153 ¡ BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST FORM REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: PREPARED DATE: AGENDA DATE: Uti liti es 03/11/02 03/26/02 TO: 451-3510-564000-300 Machinery & Equipment $3,802 FROM: 451-9910-599300-800 Reserves $3,802 REASON FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT: Purchase two (2) pumps for the South Hutchinson Island Wastewater Treatment System CONTINGENCY BALANCE: THIS AMENDMENT: N/A REMAINING BALANCE: DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: OMB APPROVAL: BUDGET AMENDMENT #: DOCUMENT # & INPUT BY: 02-126 G:\BUDGETiQUA TTRO\GENERAL \FORMS\AMENDM02,wb3 ( ....., "tJ c:: C! §-~ ..::c: 'S to e .¿go. ~-g 'S; ~ e:::: 0.::> 0.Q -~ ~Q) g ::>.Q .Qo <"') ~- 6 Q) 0:> <:) ~ .Q~ <:) ::::: ::> ;g '3: 0. Il) W N "tJ- 6 zo c:: C! ,... 00 CTJ·5: Il) -~ C/) "tJ.~ <"') . tn.... ~ õo ,... eno ~ Q) Il) ~ -0 C! :S :::ãiNN ~.È :::ãio:::o O<Ùi <O~ OW~ ~:2 ó:: >->-M C! C! l-...J0 a:;;: w E s: m z<w :¡¡¡ ::Jol- ::> 0) ~~ :J oen< c z uü:C C! ::> w .S 0. I- LLo:::l- > '~ê: z ~ :J oofß o Q) 0 CLL::J D.. Q) E 0 D.. ¡:: ~ . 0 O:::l-O « .!!! E « <enw ü e o.~ oWO::: ~~~ m::J< ~ V,¡ Q) 0) >-Oc C/) 16 ¡:: Q) l-wZ cs Q) :S zO:::w :S<lÌC:: >- c:: '- ::Jl-C) ¡.... 'S .0 0) OZ< :::¡ CI,) .;:; t: c::.i!! .2 OW ¡:.:: 00:>.... w:::ãi ::J ~~.s ~ cc:.::: CI) _D.. -...11:: 0- CI,)(!):::: ::J::J :5 iI::.c:... ...JO "::::0(1) .w ~ Cb\",,::S ::5~o l- ~ ... ... en 0 ~ ~J2 C/) o.;:¡; 0. ~ E:9 ::> ::>'<..:.: ~ o..¡g ~ -Q).Q :) c:: to C/) :I: ~c::~ <0 l.U Q) C! c:: <:) ¡:.:: ~ to c:: Q) C'J co.æ~ ~ :::¡ ::J õ...S Q) <:) ¡:.:: 0 Q) C! E 0- :) C/) a::EQ) l.U :it a w 0:: I- Z W :¡¡¡ D.. 5 a w "0 t:: <a §-CI> :tJ -'<: S; ~ e .Qc.. ~-g 'S; <a e~ c..:J 0.Q - ~ C) "'" CD C) 'S .Q '" ~.2 0 C) '"' '" C) CD c.. "q- ;::E Ie It) ::::: :::J 0 s: c.. "0- ..... t:: <a It) <a .S '" , "O.g> ..... It) õ 0 "q- ~~ <a- CD ... ::...,e Ie 5: c¿ e~ w <a <a aI ~::: :& E s: :J :J '" Z ~~ I- <a :J Z .S c.. :J .g> 1: 0 0 o ( ) 0 ( ) E « ¢: ( ) '" ¡..... ..!!1 ~ ~ c...!!: ü ( ) !!! '" ~ 't5Q)~ ¡;;. ¢: C ) ~ CI> :S 0 :S ~.S ~ .S 0 tt) CI):'¡:;C: ::,! t:~~ ¡..... o '" <a ::J ~~~ ~ 't5::$; ...J $:~~ S --( ) ¡..: ~ Q)~=S UJ :Soo c:: ...""... 0 ,e ;è,e U) <::¡,:::: c.. ~ E Q :J :J ><-'<: ~ o...¡g 15 1: ( ).Q U)~ C ) (,) ::., E t:: '" ...... !:!:!;¡: ( ) <a t:: C) '" 16 ( ) '" !:::¡..... ..!!11:e> ~ ::,!::J 0..'- C ) C) ¡.....o C ) <a E 0 ::JU) Q:E( ) llJ :it a w II:: I- Z w ::E c.. :5 a w ~j!~~íLCÖL l~:ö~ ~o~c~o~~~~ t..K.r".I""':t:..L,.r-::;:. !,.I.,õr'.t) ï~Ç¡t.. OJ. ...,¡ ,,," :<,'<.".UO ~ ..",.~,~.;;p. )'L\i,"¡HTU"~I'> '¡YHH~"TlifE 0 WAY¡, A~~ WA>!¡ ,""un IHH"'!~T ¡'1U¡''<In¡ ; i i 'fY~$:::J.) P~Oi?O;SAl Tv; ,sj WiCJ:!t:OiJ}jji- 'f.!),YME ~ÀY~S' ?JJ¡]i't.~~,:ttœ I SJ.YSJ.E'Cl; HJ.ìj'CJ.H1lS0M ~;SU}j:D 1.~:13 REPLAC£lalNT PUiMP$ j . y ¡;~& COMPANY S1'EVE KISS \fla are plass& to off&i" the following e~uipment: , TWO (2) MP30851257 2hp lph 2601/ Flygt Giíinder Pumps I I ' PR!C£: $3,002.00 plus taxes,FOsl ctolY,wìlh freight allowable to jobsil. " nns P1fOfOSAl. mu. EXì'iR£ DiM t!RTY (30) DAYS UNLESS EX1114ÐED IN ~~1]~G 131 EU.JS X. PHELPS 1& COMPANY . NOTE; WE DO NOT SUPPLY PIPIN ,VALVES,GUIDE BARS,PRESSURE GUAGES OR SPARE PARTS EXCEPT AS INDICA ED ABOVE. TERMS: SUBJECT TO CREDIT APPR VAL NET 30 DAYS AFTER DATE OF INVOICE OR 100% PAYA8LE BEFORE STARr UP OF EQUIPMENT{WHJCHE'/D COMES fIRST.) A SERVICE CHARGE OF 1.5 0 PER MONTH' WILL 8£ ADDED TO ALL BALANCES UNPAJD 30 DAYS AFTER ItJVOICE DATE. FAilURE TO PAY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE. TERMS WILL VOID ALL WARRANTIES. CONDmONS :1) Price is firm ba~ on our receiving complata approval and ralease for production four ( ) weeks after drawings have been submitted by EJlis K. Phelps &. Compan 2) PARTIAL 8 LLlI'IG IJVILL BE MADE ON ANY PARTIAL SHIPMENT. We thank you for your interest in OU'f¡eqUiPment and look forward to being of seNica to you in the near future. A SIGNED FACSI. ~ LE COPY OF THIS PROPOSAL IS ACCEPTABLE AS A BINDiNG CONTRACT . I i ~ ~D 8yi2~ , , MP,ANY: . ,)'1 Lü c,o.<- a" I¡--b li;;-;Ø t;;", DATE: 1-5-1 :2- ~ vt~( l' j fI/'- 6t'lw- ,fJrt ~ 'Pv¿J¡j ;Z-J-f.JJ- 113Q 10" STREET WEST' AIVI¡RA aEAtH. flO~II)AnH' . Slil·S4Q,IHD . FA" 551·aU·1293 A~QP~A 0 FT, MY~RS 0 RIVIeRA a~AtH 0 S..VANNAiI '-' JU~ JltilCA.TION FOR !:'''T -¡:: ;:"O""P'CE' 1P"O~T1D~ "':i'\{IT ~........--. ~ u.;c\, .. J:'\.'-:;"-U~..~ ....,; (J 32..~ upon ti:.:e P1:xCT1~g :?Y.!a:¡¡rrm], me propaed procm~meI1.t descrl~d below is œ;;'g proc-.w>wd T;"~t to the ~d.:::Jm~ on So1e Sourœ Procmement. A geed farJ1!:View of a~n:::¡ble sow.~ 4 <::> n>=s "been made and mer¡;: jz OD.'y one sO!!r~ for the required supply, service, or CODStmction item. 1. Propose to procure '-:;''L .-: /:.>~..;_l -:?:~ ?'I-/~"/_:::? / ,5/ f~<.;';J ,-/-_f "'-) 1.---/ /:/4~ -,1,1/ (:~, ,~,_:t4/L /1.:t .'7' .J .1'" /" ./ ,. 2. .A3 a sole source procurement from: ; //>.- . ' , Requisition :# ,) / . j(: 1/7 .! 1>1./" . / ;\ 3. The oasis for this sole sourœ' de'tenDiDation and the reason no other vendor is suitable is: /, ;;, //-¡~. '. ;" ~. c'd / / ~1 // _:' /:/ ,'.' /, "..._;;~ //::;J - / t--'.l~;;-~ /~ -~ l.iL.';' ...-"'1 '- -/ ì· .J, r i -; ¡-I/o) 7 // ....-; __.~.,/, ..-.I -~ __ ./ /.,r:~ ?'~ I~ ) '._/J,'''£. ;(,- >,/1//__;-- --- r~;:,: ;',t- ~;I ,--:;J ,.;: /~,: ..... "."'-' '~ ,:-;:,,! /':':'f-'>,:: <1'"';/ >-;T' j/ [/ /·"i., .", "·r" ~ /:(/-.. "of".; ~ .-_... / ../ ", "J ;, ,'./ + ~~ ,;.;' J.- ,.//,1,/,,> .-t/; / .;/ () Date Department/Division Authorized Signature TItle . NOTE: L Enter description of gccds or scrvil::: to be proaJred. 2 Emer name of sole soorœ """'.....,.,..... 3. Enter the det=iætiœ aDd ~ fcf' sole = procu¡....ent. 4. Axtacb sole source letter fr.: m YeIIdoC' aDd depanment. 5. Proposal from veador with priåDg. ( )Approved ( )Disa.pproved c¡ Purchasing Director Da.te ·..... ~':: .." ~. - SOL E SOU R C E AUT H-O-R I Z A T ION - DATE: THIS IS TO tONFIRM THAT THE ATTACHED REQUISITION IS·SOl.E SOURCE . !-"OH THE FOLLOWING REASÖN: (CHEC~ APPROPRIATE SOX) ~~GINAL MANUFACTU~~S'RE?LACEMENT: [] TO COMPLETE JOB REQUIREMENTS. [tbNl. V KNOWN VENDOR. r=l.Ol~ER (EXPLAIN-IN DETAIL) , " TO THE ÐEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE I 4TrEST THIS IS A SOl.E SOURCE ITEM. - Oß,PARTMENT HEAD , .. · - -. -.. ...... ;':0,978 P.2/2 '-' ...J ,'?! :/'1"7 ?l7'!:>JL<n~'1?.j3'!~ '~"',\,,;,\';¡"''j i4.11 J:.3' d:JJ~.:t=.:1~~:t :J~~ ,..H"¡d?,~~" ~ 77'J;~'''''' ''"''''''''''''"':'.-:0= £4:¡' ~.-:7JIJ ~.rio1..-;.-~~~. Œð. 90 Hcr,z:;¡¡ þ;<ty¡¡ Srr.vQ7'~ C;W SQ02.:/. TfI!a~.oi1e: (7"7qJ 932-43J:3 F'Þ:: (770) 9324321 I'I.!.ar:h 21, 2001 '{. St. Lucie County Utilities '" ',\ S-å:jeœ: FIy~ Products.. Salœ & Service - -- ?1~ be advis...od that Em3 !(. PbeIps &: Company is the ocly ~ 'Wnder for 'llFlygt Products and SAS is the emy ~ sernca ~ am wammt'¡ ~"';~on in ~ State of Fkrida (East of1l'1: Apalachicola River). Their Staft'is properly t:ained to prov.Aa you the best service available, , -----" Thank ycu fur y~ ~ in Plygt Proctuc1s WI de net hesit= to cau me if' you lmViI ¡my ~ons ~~db1g ctistn"bt..'ÛC!l or any ether ~. Very WIy yours. m FLYGT COR?Ol\ATIDN ~ lohnD. ~ Scuiheaat R.egiœaJ M¡¡nager cc~ Dick Cole - E. K. Phelps Dc Co. 0" j. ~ 11F1ygt Products includß.~ pumps. mbœra, valves. and MuI~e probeia controls aœ '9Iicl1 WllSher. ' ," L \..- '....,¡ AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-6-C DATE: March 26, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT) : Utilities Department William R. Blazak SUBJECT: Work Authorization with LBF&H for the extension of a reuse water main on North Hutchinson Island. The amount of the Work Authorization is $ 29{800.00 and will cover the design{ permitting and services during construction. FUNDS AVAIL: 441802-3600-563005-300 North Hutchinson Island Water Main Grant. PREVIOUS ACTION: March 6{ 2001- BOCC approved resubmittal of a grant application to the South Florida Water Management District Alternative Water Source Funding program. November 6{2001- BOCC accepted the 50/50 Grant Award in the amount of $82{800.00 for the project. February 26{ 2002 BOCC approved budget resolution 02-70 for the matching funds for the Grant. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Work Authorization with LBF&H in the amount of $ 29{800.00 for the design{ permitting and services during construction for a reuse line extension on North Hutchinson Island. "J/ - 'I 'I~ County Attorney:X ,f / Originating Dept: X Finance Director:~ fo Copy only, coordination/~i~at~ Mgt. & Budget: !.' c'¡ fYI derson Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: [ X ] [ ] APPROVED OTHER: DENIED Purchasing Other: if applicablel____ Other: Eff. 5/96 ~ '..".1 BOARD OF COUNTY COJwY\JSSJ·ONfRS UTi UTi ES DEPARTMENT WilLIAM ßlAZAK DIREGOR MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners ~ør FROM: William Blazak, Utility Director DATE: March 26, 2002 RE: North Hutchinson Island -Reclaimed Water Main Extension LBF&H Work Authorization Approval BACKGROUND: This Work Authorization is for the design, permitting and services during construction of a reuse line that will extend to the west along A-I-A. Utilities was successful in obtaining a grant from the South Florida Water Management District through the Alternative Water Source Funding program in the amount of $ 82,800.00. The Utility District applied matching funds for the project and this work authorization will allow for the design, permitting, bidding and construction services to complete the project. The reuse main extension will provide reclaimed water to the western portion of our service on North Hutchinson Island. Reclaimed water will be available along A-I-A westerly to Harbor Cove Condominiums and to the proposed County Park to be located East of Little Jim Bridge. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Work Authorization with LBF&H in the amount of $ 29,800.00 for the design, permitting, bidding and services during construction, for the extension of a reuse line on North Hutchinson Island. JOHN 0, ßRUHN. District No, 1 . DOUG COWARD. Disrrict No, 2 . PAULA A LEWIS. Djsrrict No, :) . mANNIE HUTCHINSON, District No, 4 . CLIFF GARNES, District No, 5 Counry Adminisrroror - Douglas M. AnderSOfl 2JOO Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, Fl J4982 ' Phone (561) 462-1150 . FAX (561) 462-115J ~ .." WOR:< AUTHO~IZATIûN #16 J'j,crth Hut¡:};¡ì1~~ì'1 r~jar.d ~2da¡m2d Water Sy,;;t~;r¡ R~us~ ?J\oi¡¡ ExJ'~7:s¡Cì1 W~:st CCl1tl"f.lc·t No. CCO-03-234 Pursuant to that czrtaill Agreement for Continuing Engineering Services (the "Agreement") between St. Lucie County (the "County") and LBPH, Inc. (the "Engineer") dated March 14,2000, Engineer herzby agrees to pròvide professional enginezring services under the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit uN', attached hereto and made a part of this Work Authorization. " IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County and the Engineer have executed this Work Authorization, effective this_ day of ,2002. BOARD OF COUNT?' CO¡Ì¡\MISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNT'!, FLORIDA A TrEST: By: Chairman Deputy C ~r!< APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FOR.1A AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY WITNESSES: - 1· ~' ; , ; /¡'.,r;;, (i, -f7f ~ "~_A}'tj~~~,tI ( ".__ _-(-(~:~;-.'/~.·,../I:~¿;·'{¿/:xll·L~Cl.- - ~ U ~ ¡ . 'Í f\..J ~ r,_ i ' i ).~~.j~(\ /\1 t, C .... ;~u.;:..;.¿h (;: i.1j..~ ¡c 1. LBFH, INC. " , ~'-,I,lil' /" I' , ,;;:J.)~I r;-r- !vr By: /1.{'-C7,,\1 II/v" , Print Name: ~ i) -, -J ':=::"<."- ¡'¡?"J t-¡ /--,/ 'e r,~ /- c..--c........// !¡ I ~Gl -- ._....- Title: I ,[ . . <" V iC B /}.1-- ,1 ,-. rf¡ (' I ;-::"';', , TJ' , ".,.~,-,,,.~....... -:-1 G: \atty \agreemnt\work.aut\LBFH- W A#1 Ó 11£j"" }c'l c~ ''=\ ',S',j . , ,·.....·:.':,.':..c,..··: 'L··" .~.~:,\"--'. '-' EXBIBJT A TD thz Agrt:zme:nt B€tWEi:ll St. Lucie CDUllty, Florida anrl LBF:;:C3:, ÌTIe. NOT!~1 HTItchi:nSüTI Island Re1:hdmerl Watzr System Reus.e Main Extension West SECTION 1- SCOPE OF SERVICES ENGINEER will provide the following services in accordance with applicable sections of the AGREEMENT: Design, permitting, bidding services, and construction administration for approximately 6,500 linear feet of reclaimed water main. The main will commence at the existing reclaimed water main along A-l-A and travel south and west along A-l-A towards the planned SLC park at "Little Jim Bridge" and Harbor Point condominiums. Phas~ 20 - Desj~ 1. Design of a southern 1 western pipeline extension to provide reclaimed water to the western side of North Hutchinson Island. The pipeline will consist of approximately 3,650 linear feet of 8-inch and 2,950 linear feet of 6-inch reclaimed water main west of AlA. 2. Prepare base plan and profile sheets for the project in AutoCAD fonnat. These drawing sheets will be derived from the highway construction plans prepared by FDOT, from survey infonnation, and from black and white aerial photography from the City of Fort Pierce. 3. Prepare key sheet for locating each plan and profile sheet in the project corridor. 4. Prepare design and detail sheets for utility adjustments and for new utilities to be located within the FDOT right-of-way. 5. Detail reclaimed water main design with horizontal and vertical control, fittings configuration, restraining length, valve locations, etc. will be provided. 6. Work with OWNER, as necessary, to determine and detail the best procedures to facilitate new construction connection to existing reclaimed water mains. 7. Determine specific utility design quantities and engineering estimate of probable construction costs. 8. Review design drawings with OWNER and incorporate revisions. P:\99-009O\Proposa1\ars finw version-doc Page 2 of 8 ~~c '..."J PhBse 12 - Snney 1. Prepare a design 1 route survey of the corridor frcm the north side of the Noru'1 Cause'Nay Bridge to û'1e westerly side of State Road AlA. The route is approximately 6,250 feet long. Corridor limits are from edge of pavemen¡ to t'1e apparent right of way. The design 1 route survey will include: ~ Location of the existing Potable Water and Sanitary Sewer as marked by others. Location and elevation on manholes (storm and samt3J.-Y) and water valve boxes, fIre hyd11mts, etc. will be collected. Baseline of survey will be established raiìdomly and referenced at each end. Setting of benchmarks (iron rods) at approximately 1500-foot intervals. Integrate aerial photography ,into the base survey drawings to better define existing topography. It is not intended to survey the right-of-way line. Design and construction are anticipated to be based on roadway dimensions and offsets from the existing roadway. ,~ ~ . . Phase 35 - Cûntract Documents 1. LBFH will prepare the contract manual, including coordination with the OWNER to update the "front end" contract documents, prepare the bid forms and bid item descriptions, prepare the technical specifications. The specifications will be completed using Word '97, and in the fonowing sequence so that the OWNER'S input and guidance can be incorporated into the documents. 2. Contract Documents - The contract manual, including "front end" contract documents and technical specifIcations will be completed for the OWNER'S review and comments. Upon approval of the contract manual, LBFH will coordinate with the OWNER'S purchasing department to obtain a bid number, advertising date, pre-construction meeting date, and bid opening date. .,. Permittin1i! Phase 43 - FDEP Reclaimed Water Permit / Notmcation 1. Prepare and submit a FDEP General Permit application for the reclaimed water main extension west. 2. Respond up to one "Requests for Information (RFI)" from FDEP regarding the submitted application. P:\99-0090\Propusal\afs fmaJ. veMioc..doc Page 3 of8 ~Ì2 ...., FhBse 45 - ¥DOT Utilit:y P'e:rmÜ 1. Pr~pare and submit a FDOT Utility Penrit appJication for the recìaimed water main extension west. 2. Respond to up to one &"1 from FDOT application. -lOVarr1~~j a .....0 '-o..J."o the subrrIitted Phas,e 41- SFWNID S{;berlule and OmuterlY Re'jJor1s 1. Prepare a detailed construction 1 project schedule and submit to SF'iV1VID per the requirements of the Contract between SLC and SFv'lJYID. Specifically the schedule will be in accordance with Article 4.4 of this contract. \ \ 2. Prepare quarterly reports to SFWlVID documenting the activity of the project for the previous quarter; These reports shall be as required in Article 4.4 of the contract between SLC and SFWlVID. Phase 62 - BiddinŒ Senkes 1. Prepare Contract Documents based on SLC standards 2. Prepare for, attend, and facilitate one pre-bid meeting. 3. Respond to Bidders questions and prepare necessary addendum. 4. Review bids and prepare summary tabulation. 5. Prepare letter for recommendation of award. Construction Administration I Services Durin!! Construction Phase &4 - OfficelField Engineering Services During Construction: Pre-Construction Meeting: LBFH shall conduct one pre-construction meeting with SLCU, the contractor, and other applicable agencies and public utilities prior to the commencement of construction. LBFH shall issue plans for construction to the contractor at this time, and meeting minutes following the meeting. Design Clarifications: LBFH shall provide the contractor with clarifications conèerning questions about the contract documents and/or the construction plans. Shop Drawings: LBFH shall review shop drawings for the improvements as indicated in the approved Plans and Specification. The shop drawings shall be forwarded to SLCU for their review and approval. Review Contractor's Pay Requests: LBFH shall review pay requests as submitted by the contractor. LBFH shall verify the quantities as P:\99~009O\Proposa.l\afs tinul vernion.Joc Page 4 of 8 ]~fb~ ~l,~ ~ represented on the pay request fuld ma.1çe a recoillmendaLion te SLCU to proceed with the payment as requested, or as modified based en LBffi's review. The contractor may submit pay requests up to one time per month. R~yiew ChaJJ.g~ Order RE1luesís: LBFH shall review change orders proposed by the contractor and shall provide recoJ11.JL.endations to the SLCU for approval or denial. Phas;e 66 . Site Yisits/Progress mspectiûJJ.5 LBFH shall provide construction observation services, and shall make site visits to observe the construction of improvements such that an engineering certification can be made regarding the construction of the proposed improvements and to answer requests for clarification by\the Contractor, or St. Lucie County. Tills estimate assumes that LBFH shall provide limited project representation by being present at the"site at intervals appropriate to the various stages of construction averaging: 3 to 4 hours per week for the construction duration of 4 months. The purpose of the project representation is to provide periodic consL.~ction observation, in conjunction field observations by SLCU and the contract operator, of the progress and quality of the construction work, and to determine, in general, if the construction is proceeding in accordance with the contract documents. The services provided are not intended to relieve the Contractors from their complete responsibility for the means, methods, sequence of construction and construction site safety. LBFH shall notify the County of observed permanent work which does not appear to substantially conform to the contract documents, prepare a written report describing any apparent non-conforming permanent work and make recommendations to the County for its correction. Should construction observation be required beyond the twenty week duration, these services will be considered Additional Services and compensated as such. The Contractor shall notify LBFH of all tests and installations which would require the presence of LBFH for engineering certifications as required by the various regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over the project (i.e. pressure tests, lift station start-up, etc.) LBFH shall coordinate when a County inspector is required. Phase 70 - Certification an.d Final Inspe~tion Final Inspections: LBFH shall conduct a construction observation visit to determine if the project is substantially complete, and a final construction observation visit to determine if the project has been completed in accordance with the approved Plans and Specifications and in a manner P:\99-0090\Proposal\afs fu¡aj v~sion.doc Page 5 of 8 C~'~}1J~ ''''''. .~, ..- . J¡;:..,- \.r-' '...." satisfactory to provide the necessary certifications. All remaining c1ea.ll:p and completion items will be noted for the contractor's completion. Ce:rmkatioD3; LBFH shall sl:bmit certification applications to the necessary regulatory agencIes, including the required supporting documentation. RE'\:Drd Drawings: LBFH shall review the record information submitted by the Contractor. Record information will be based on field measurements and survey information provided by the Contractor. Record drawings shall identify changes made during construction and indicat~ record infonnation required by the regulatory agencies. Based on this review LBFH will prepare record drawings of the project" :Reimibursab1es I Dind Expens~s 1. Any direct, non-salary expense, including, but not limited to, photocopies, blueprints, out-of-office reproduction or photographic services, long distance telephone calls, special mailing or delivery services, contract services authorized by the OWNER, processing fees, legal advertisements and notices, title search services, special materials, and survey markers. 2. Estimated sets of drawings and contract documents to be supplied: a) Owner review - 3 sets, b) Bidding - 12 sets, and c) Construction - 6 sets. SECTION 2 - DELIVERABLES ENGINEER will provide the following Deliverables to OWN'"ER: 1. Completed applications for the following permits: a) FDEP general permit for pipeline construction, b) FDOT Utility Permit, 2. Ninety percent complete design plans, specifications, and cost estimates (3 sets) . 3. One Hundred,percent complete design plans, specifications, cost estimate, and contract documents. 4. Bid tabulation and recommendation of award. P:\99..o090\?r0posaI\ufs fUlal. version.doc Page 6 of 8 ~Ì)flJ _-,r~~ >"".,.,"-,.,,,., ]6~~ """'" SECTION 3 . TDlIE OF PKRFORl'vlANCE Execution of this authorization and receipt of a purchase order shall ccnstitute Notice' to Proceed. ENGINF.FR. and ÜWNER agree to the following schedule: Phase 64 - Filed 1 Office Construction Engineering Start Compl€tioì1 Day* Day* 15 45 , ,. .!\ 1 15 30 60 60 100 120 240 120 240 240 270 Phase 20 - Design Phase 12 - Survey Phase 40 - Permitting Phase 62 - Bidding Services Phase 66 - Site Visits! Construction Observation Phase 70 - FDEP Certification. * From Notice to Proceed P:\99-C090\Propo~l\:Jf5 fmal version.doc Page 7 of 8 ~~~}J ,'"""'·',c, ·~'C -- . .,. j¡~, ,.."" SECTION 4 - IvIETII0D OF COlYIPENSATI0N OY~'ER will compensate ENGINEER for services III accordance with the following payment schedule: " Comvensation $10,500 Phase 20 - Design Phase 12 - Survey $4,300 \ ^, Phase 40 - Permitting FDEP FDOT $900 $1,300 $1,100 Phase 35 - Contract Documents Compensation Method LS LS LS LS LS Phase 41- SFWl'vID Schedule and Quarterly Reports $ 1,100 LS Phase 62 - Bidding Services $1,900 LS Phase 64 - Filed 1 Office Construction Engineering $3,000 LS Phase 66 - Site Visits 1 Construction Observation $4,000 LS Phase 70 - FDEP Certification. $1,100 LS Reimbursable $600 LS Total Design, Permit, and Services During Construction P:\99-0090\Pr0posal\afs final 'ferSion.doc Page 8 of 8 $29,800 ~ ...,; J ~ c:--- ......... .. , J .. ¡ ,:UU ¡U = ~! ~ HH ... .. ... ~5~ ... .. ... §:w;" I ::! CJ I: ~ ~., ~ ~S d ~- ,,;Jl ) !l§ jli i: .Jji· iiI ~I .r~J k 1'1 " ~lii II-Ii....,."..,. I ~..,..,., ~ '. . tI n i! Iii ;!I~ 111: r~ "- .. E: a ::! = w !I en Q "õI i . a . I Flf -'= ';:C I~ ii I . I I .. ,!~ n ~~ n dEW 1:IO!lE;)O'j <1I1!S pafo.Id - Z ,un~¥jJ I. ! i' ' AGE:NDA REQUEST If "-' ITEM NO. ë - i(,q DATE: March 6, 2001 CONSE:NT [X] REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] Leg. [ ] Quasi-JD. [ ] 4 :RESENTED BY: 1;AJ! bï~ ' Bi~l BlåzaJc, Director \J . ". \ resubmittal of a grant application to the South Management District Alternative Water SupplY,Funding TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Uti~ities Department SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAIL: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: . - COMMISSION ACTION: [ X] [ ] APPROVED OTHER: , Authorize th-e Florida Water Program. In 1996, St. Lucie County re¿eived $350,200.00 from South Florida Water Management District Alternative Water Supply Program to fund reuse water lines on South Hutchinson Island. Although the Utilities Department applied for funds last year for the North Hutchinson Island Reclaimed Water Main Extension West project, it ranked just below the funding line. For that reason, staff requests approval to resubmit this project to SFWMD for funding. The grant reque~t will be for $82,800 to construct an 8" reuse water main on North Hutchinson Island westward along AlA which will terminate as a 6" reuse water main at the new county park across from Little Jim's Boat Ramp. The total project cost is $165,000.00 and requires a 50% match. In March 2000, the Board approved submitting the grant application and earmarked the County match of $82,800 from account number 441- 9910-599300-800. , The Board approved submitting an application to SFWMD Alternative Water Supply Program in March 2000. Staff recommends that the Board authorize the submittal of a grant application to the South Florida Water Management District and authorize the County Administrator to sign all docume~ts associated with the submittal of the grant ap lication. [ ] DENIED o Coordination/Signature Mgt , Budge~: Pw:c:hasi:nq: ,_'" "'=-Y' ~ Originating DePt:.uf~ : V J'inanc:e: (copias onl.y): AgeaJ.th2obcc. ~ci Public Works: other : AGENDA REQTÆST I-JYl NO. C-3 DATE: February 26, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X ] TO: ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: OMB PRESENTED BY: Mar\è M. Gouin SUBJECT: Budget Resolution 02-70 for the North Hutchinson Island Water Main Extension grant awarded by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). BACKGROUND: N/A Fill'1l)S WILL BE AVAILABLE: 441802-3600-337310-300 SFWMD N Hutchinson Water Main Grant PREVIOUS ACTION: On November 6,2001 the St. Lucie BOCC accepted the grant award and authorized the Chair to sign the Grant Agreement. RECOMlVIENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve Budget Resolution # 02-70 to appropriate and expend funds :from the SFWMD N Hutchinson Water Main Grant in the amount of $82,800. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: [ ] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: -' Doug Anderson County Administrator Coordination/Signatures County Attorney: XX ~ f- 0J1"' Management & Budget: ~~urchasing: Originating Dept: Public Works: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) XX G:\BUDGE1ì ViP\AGENDA'S\Agenda0212'26SFWMDNHI.,.grant.wpd \... "WfI AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-6-D DATE: March 26, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT) : Utilities Department William R. Blazak SUBJECT: Approval of a contract with Ocean Gate Builders in the amount of $ 19,200.00 for the up sizing of a new water line on North Hutchinson Island from eight inch to twelve inch diameter. FUNDS AVAIL:449-3600-563000-300 PREVIOUS ACTION: none RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the contract with ocean Gate Builders in the amount of $19,200.00 for the up sizing of a new water line on North Hutchinson Island from eight inch diameter to twelve inch diameter. Staff further requests that the Board authorize the Chairman to execute the Agreement as approved to form and correctness by the County Attorney. [ X] [ ] APPROVED OTHER: DENIED E: COMMISSION ACTION: ·C nderson y Administrator Coordination/Siqnatures County Attorney:X:" ,";: h: . Mgt. & Budget: . \Pí1k'k~1 . Originating Dept:X \ ! h.~'(>¡;;,·'rV Other: Finance Director: (Chèck for cþpy only, if applicable)____ , Purchasing Other: Eff. 5/96 ~ ....I BOARD OF COUNTY CDì-MAJ5SJONER5 UTIUT~E5 ,& RECYCLHlG DEPARJj\¡\ENT WilLIAM ßLA.LÄi'\ DIP,EGOR MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners /1 \¡ L..,.¡' William Blazak, Utility Director \jJ;¿ 1{) FROM: DATE: March 26, 2002 RE: Ocean Gate Builders - Water Line Contract BACKGROUND: In September of2001 St. Lucie County Utilities entered into a Developer's Agreement for utility services with the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) for Avalon State Park on North Hutchinson Island. The terms of that Agreement require the DEP to extend water, wastewater and reclaimed water lines from our existing terminus point to the new State Park which is approximately 1500 feet north along S.R. A-I-A. The hydraulic requirements ofthe water line design dictated the line to be eight inches in diameter to support fire hydrants and the needs of the new Park to be constructed. DEP has competitively bid the required work necessary to complete the construction of the Park facilities as well as the necessary infrastructure with regards ti utilities. In an effort to provide reliability to the North Hutchinson Island water system the Utility Department contacted the DEP to determine if the new line construction could be up sized to a twelve inch line which would handle the necessary water flow for an emergency interconnect to, the North, with the City ofVero Beach. Up sizing of this portion of the line will minimize the cost to the Utility,District for this section allow for eventual completion of the interconnect with the proper line size in place. DEP indicated that the County could communicate directly with the contractor responsible for the installation ofthe new line and enter into and Agreement to pay them directly. ,<". The attached correspondence confirms the DEP support of the project, the cost confirmation of the up sizing and the County's Engineer of record for North Hutchinson concurrence with the cost proposal. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Contract with ocean Gate Builders in the amount of $ 19,200.00. Staff further requests that the Board authorize the Chairman to execute the Agreement as approved to form and correctness by the County Attorney JOHN D, C·RUlm, District No, 1 . DOUG COWARD, District No, 2 . PAULA A, LEWiS, District No,:) . mANNIE HUTCHINSON, Dlstricr No.4' CLIFF GARNES. Districr No, 5 Counry Administrator - Douglas M. Anderson 2300 Virginia Avenue " Forr Pierce, Fl34982 · Phone (561) 462-1150 · FAX (561) 462-1153 .'j ]', .~ '"' .,:j":"'~,',. ,·,2,,·.·',.',n . :JJ,.,.r.¡ '" " j..-l ., ", 'l ",' ",:" ¡ ."--,, c~ _.~~_ -------- . ~-. ~ - . - ¡ ',-,' '~-;: ".' ;~ , ~ . ;-~¡n:~2(S Îur .~'-2~..i:~S \'2j~e ~J\/ De~i:;:-:/ . ';.! I , \.~, '. ~ I _ -; ..2:<>: 3~;3 ,-d:: i>.~: . .. , ".' . '~. ,...I! , ...,,¡ March 5, 2002 '- --;-' " ..~~..... ¡;/ ~':- '.~ ,-,i'~; . . -... . _~....I NIr. William Blazak, Director St. Lucie County Utilities P.O. Box 728 2300 Virginia Avenue, Suite 227 Ft. Pierce, FL 34954 ~T ,..' -- ," ',~ '.>~-~_; ¡\J ~ '( Re: North Hutchinson Island Avalon State Park Water Main LBFH# 97-0364 \ \ Dear Bill, We have reviewed the information received from the contractor who is constructing the water main extension to Avalon State Park. Based on this information, our conversation and my conversation with the contractor, it would appear that the $19,200 increase in cost to upsize the water main from 8" PVC to 12" HDPE is competitive. Additionally having a 12" water main available for future interconnect possibilities for improved reliability of the North Hutchinson Island water system is sound engineering practice. Please call with any questions regarding this issue or if I can be of additional service. Thank you, 1 LBFH~e. çjJ // . ~;' t( L.---- ... L-¡'ðfl (J v 1'1 ~~kler, P.E. CUent Service Manager SAE/da .. \\pc\J'rojects\97 -0364\A valon \\1M Extension Letter.doc f~~:R-l1 -¿t.::co::: ¿¿ ~!:!¿ CL~;-iN t.:H! t. =.c':"23::;:~-,::G ,..; . 82·<02 r-., . ! /.~¡j, 1 -~. ìlj\ 'I J I' ·,l, -. I ¡1 \ ",.-..' ,-'~~J -'>\ ~ ;;. I \,..rC 2&1 0Ete "Q~T~: d e~~ 1: nr DLLL _ ..lD) .d.L"", "-" :¿Bô'¡ 3.::, FedsTcl Hlgh'NcV ' Sh1art. ~!crìco ;¡.qç'i6 > (cò 1) 2iJ3-6744 > Fc:.:: {¿61) :¿BJ-1òJ3 " - MÀ~C"iIi 2.,ZCÙ2 Mì'ì. BiLL Bl...>I.ZAX UT:l..iTIE:S ÛiRE~ T 0R ST. LUCIE COUJ'.ìT'f UTIL'TJ:ES DE?AR1"ME:l>IT P.O. Box 728 rOm" P¡;E¡¡¡CE. FL 349ð.4 R~: AV-"'LðN ~T:: P;l'F/j't; \IVX'ŒF¡M~ll'i1 tJPG~D~ "P:;¡O!PCSAL" DEAR MR. 8LAZAX. THIS ?ñDPCs;I,L ìS FOR'7H~ UPGRADE OF TJ.¡E WAT:ERUNE FROM 8-" 1'0 1- 2" *T TI-JiE AV ALaN STATE PA."IX PROJECT. TH~ PROPOSAL. AMOUNT 15 $19,200 TO HAVE: THE 12" '."iA ¡ ~.;":UNE ¡¡\i-j':'UCE. THIS ~RIClî INCLUDES.ALL F!?E. ATrJNGS, Ai...."P INS'TAL1...A.TjON. PA"fM~'j"TO:S~ MACE UPON COMFL.ETJON OF !:N5TALl..AT]ON OF MAT""d<IALS, Aj\JD NOY SE J3ASED UFON ~Ï1NG OR A?PFiO'lAi..5. As P!E1'! THE !.EirE-"=¡ F~OM THE FLOF/IOA DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAl. PRO"T'ECTiON, WE HA.vE A?F¡;¡OVAI.AND AWAIT,\i\JAGREEMENT FBOM ST. LUC¡ECOUNTY UTILmES. 'ì1F. THANK YOU Ai"iD LOO;': FORWARO TO COMPI..EnNG THIS WORK FOR YOU AS W::u. .AS FUTURE ENDEA'iORS. ~ FEELrRe TO CAU. ME WITH Â."l'f QUESí'10NS 01"( CONCERN5TI1ATYOU MAY HAVE. SINCZR£LY, ---~ ~--.... :~."-- TODD POR"t"Ð( PROJ£CT MANAGER ~. '. Cc: JIM Ross TOTAL P.02 · ,,,A r ,,,",;.\, non. I ... ~~,\, ø ~~ ~ ~ ~ § FLOR. Departm~:nt of ! -" --- - Errvironm entåJ-·Ptote tti on """"" Jeb Bush Governor ~D2 ¡?J.JiJ _,Q ,? '~___ Marjory Stoneman Dougl'às Bailding.! :: 'j 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Tallahassee::l'lorjda J.23~9-3000 ~;:, Ll...)t_~~t: (~;C,=.ii.jt'.¡T/. David 8. Struhs Secretary -;;._._-'--~'_..__:'_._-' March 6, 2002 Ñ1r. William Blazak, Utilities Director St. Lucie County Utilities Department P.O. Box 728 Fort Pierce, Florida 34954 Re: Avalon State Park DEP Project Number 60150 Off site Watermain Extension Dear Mr. Blazak: This letter is to acknowledge your recent request to upgrade the proposed eight-inch diameter off site watermain to a twelve-inch diameter watermain at the referenced project. This office supports your efforts to upgrade the system. It is our understanding that your office wishes to negotiate with the State's contractor to peIform the work. That approach to completing the construction is acceptable to this office. Currently, the estimated cost to complete the additional work is $19,200. Your office will make payment directly to the contractor. No change orders or contract amendments will be made to the existing State contract. Thank you for adopting this method. It certainly lessens the level of paperwork and coordination associated with contract amendments and formal agreements. If you require further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact Jim Ross, our project manager, or Chick Savering, our design section supervisor at (850) 488-5372. 7e~~~~f I~VL/V1~~ ('1\ ( VY III. Edward BOW11'lan;cP.E. Bureau Chief Bureau of Design and Recreation Services cc Jim Ross Pete Scalco Hugh O'Dare "//IQ;';: Pratectien, Less ?roc=ss" Printed on recycled paper, - \- .r: .r-,.' / -, ,.....) i--;:2" _Li i - L. '"'¡....,) ¡.;---" 'wt1' ' -, - - ~ ST. LUCIE COUNTY UTILITY' SERVICES DE? A RTjì¡\2NT NORTH HUTCHINSON ISLAND DIS-rnICT '- ~ DEVELOPER WATEJ< AND WASTEWATER SERVIce AGREE¡~\ËNT .- .- ,-'''; ¡ ~-; I THIS AGREEJ1\ENT is made and entered into this /(¡Þ) day of ,¿j,~/',i¡"'-¿.,i.A.4 2001, by and between DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, an agency of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as "Developer", and ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as "Utility". '- ;-..... =~~ -.., ...- '-' .~--'- -- :---!:-;....; ::::...~ s-; ""-'-: ,- - .....".... :~ ~ WHEREAS, Developer owns or controls lands located in St. Lucie County, Florida (the ,. ,;::t "Property"), as more fuHy described by legal description in Exhibit "A" and as shown on Exhibit : ';;,0 ª "B", attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fuHy set out in this Agreement; and, ..:::::::. L- '--' c:; è~ u;3-':= WHEREAS, the Developer acknowledges and agrees to abide by the St. Lucie County ,';:' ,-; ~ UtiJities North Hutchinson Island District Uniform Water and Wastewater Service Policy and ~~ :;:: Reclaimed Water Protocol (the "Uniform Service Policy"), the St. Lucie County Utilities North :=:ª.~ Hutchinson Island District Water and Wastewater Utility Unif¡orm Extension Policy (the ,~ .~ ~ "Uniform Extension Policy"), and Rates, Fees and Charges, as amended from time to time; and, é;:¡b ; - '~,'ª WHEJ<EAS, the Developer acknowledges and agrees that this contract for service in no way entitles the Developer to land densities which are greater than those allowed under the density provisions of the Comprehensive Plan of St. Lucie County, or to development rights as may otherwise be regulated by the Board of County Commissioners. NOW, THEJ<EFORE, for and in consideration of these premises, Developer hereby covenants and agrees as follows: 1. Definitions. The definitions and references used in the Uniform Service Policy and Uniform Exte~!?n Policy shall be used for the purpose of interpreting the terms as used in this agreement and apply unless the context indicates a different meaning. ·c, 2. Payment:,'Upon execution of this Agreement, Developer shall be responsible for the payment of guaranteed revenue fees in accordance with the Uniform Extension Policy. In addition, Developer shall pay, in full, connection charges for all capacity reserved hereunder on the date of execution of this Agreement as provided in the Uniform Extension Policy. The (1 payment schedule for Developer is set forth on Exhibit ·C" to this Agreement. , . , Prt1 fJ.,L--,l/ Ctv'c~~rt:::tcw, '~'.." i" ,þl, 8 .".,',b,~Ltt2Ì-Îj1)Î ,~ j db '..'2:J ,j g:\atty\agreemn1'\devagmt -1- 'J) 1i1, L,,"i' -rï'J' y... XH../ I¡../v ! '-' . q_I' Á..-¡{, c./ c:. é'tLL.4"·:·:I-~¡1 l1-ft I r f Ú",¿J J- 2> uò .f ,. í2SU\.1 Ct Yh:z. FI.. Pi -C( C:¿. rt- ] '-/1 r?L , '-' ...., AGENDA REOUEST ITEM NO. ~ 711- DA TE: March 26, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Resolution No. 02-85 - Requesting the S1. Lucie County Clerk of Circuit Court Place One Hundred Thousand and 00/1 00 ($100,000.00) Dollars in a Separate Special Revenue Fund With Only the Interest Being Allocated for Bluefield Ranch Improvement Expenditures. BACKGROUND: Please see attached Memorandum No. CA-02-375. PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution No. 02-85 as drafted. COMMISSION ACTION: u sAnderson County Administrator [2J APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: County Attorney: Ý5 Review and Approvals Originating Dept. Management & Budget R1~ Other: Purchasing : Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if apPlicabl~ Eft, 5/96 '-" ...., INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney C.A. NO: 02-375 DATE: March 14, 2002 SUBJECT: Resolution No. 02-85 BACKGROUND: On September 18, 2001, the Board approved the Bluefield Ranch Mitigation Agreement with Cresent Resources, LLC. On March 5, 2002, the Board considered what course of action they wanted to take in order to use the monies allocated for Bluefield Ranch Improvement Expenditures. A motion and second was made, and the Board unanimously approved to move the trust arrangement. Staff has considered the most appropriate way to handle the trust arrangement and has determined that rather than entering into a trust agreement it would be in the best interest of the citizens of St. Lucie County, and the County, to place the One Hundred Thousand and 00/100 ($100,000.00) Dollars in a separate special revenue fund with only the interest being allocated for Bluefield Ranch Improvement Expenditures. The attached Resolution No. 02-85 has been drafted for that purpose. ........ ....." RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution No. 02-85 as drafted. ReS~llY submitted, Daniel S. McI t County Attor ey DSM/cac Attachment ......' ...." RESOLUTION NO. 02-85 A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT PLACE ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND AND 00/100 ($100,000.00) DOLLARS IN A SEPARATE SPECIAL REVENUE FUND WITH ONLY THE INTEREST BEING ALLOCATED FOR BLUEFIELD RANCH IMPROVEMENT EXPENDITURES WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners ofSt. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. Crescent Resources, LLC, a developer based in Georgia, owns and controls property within St. Lucie County that will require wetland mitigation in order to obtain Federal and State permits to proceed with commercial development. 2. Representatives of the developer have agreed to perform certain services on Bluefield Ranch, an Environmentally Sensitive Land owned by St. Lucie County, which is in need of wetland restoration. 3. Additionally, the Developer has remitted One Hundred Thousand and 001100 ($100,000.00) Dollars to the County to be used to manage the County's Ranch Property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners ofSt. Lucie County, Florida: I. This Board does hereby request that the St. Lucie County Clerk of Circuit Court place One Hundred Thousand and 001100 ($100,000.00) Dollars in a separate special revenue fund with only the interest being allocated for Bluefield Ranch Improvement Expenditures. 2. The County Administrator is hereby directed to forward a copy of this resolution to the St. Lucie County Finance Director. \-" '-' AGENDA REQUEST TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY (DEPT.): County Attorney SUBJECT: Jenkins Road - North of Orange Avenue North St. Lucie River Water Control District Resolution No. 02-88 - Fee Simple Deed BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAIL.: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/ A ...." ITEM NO. C-7B DATE: March 26,2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [XX] PRESENTED BY: Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board accept the Fee Simple Deed from North St. Lucie River Water Control District, authorize the Chairman to execute Resolution No. 02-88 and instruct staff to record the Resolution and Fee Simple Deed in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. COMMISSION ACTION: [ ~ APPROVED [ ] OTHER: [ ] DENIED 3r Review and Approvals XX Public Works: IN xx Road & Bridge~ ~ XX County Attorney: Originating Dept,: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) G: \ACQ\ WP\J oAnn \ROA D 5 \J enkins\Agendo,wpd XX County Enginee~ Other: Eff 5/96 '-' ...., INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney DATE: March 26, 2002 SUBJECT: Jenkins Road - North of Orange Avenue North St. Lucie River Water Control District Resolution No. 02-88 - Fee Simple Deed The Florida Department of Transportation is preparing to begin their project that will widen Orange Avenue (State Road 68) from just east of I-95 to Angle Road. This widening will replace the existing rural cross-section consisting of open swale drainage with an urban cross-section. The project will also include four travel lanes, a landscaped median and a closed stormwater drainage system consisting of catch basins and underground pipes. Jenkins Road north of Orange Avenue is a County-owned and maintained roadway with open drainage swales that flow into the North St. Lucie River Water Control District Canal No. 30. The Florida Department of Transportation design includes piping portions of Canal No. 30 lying immediately north of Orange Avenue, The North St. Lucie River Water Control District is not prepared to maintain this type of improvement and would like to transfer these sections to the County. RECOMMENDA TION: Staff recommends that the Board accept the Fee Simple Deed from North St. Lucie River Water Control District, authorize the Chairman to execute Resolution No. 02-88 and instruct staff to record the Resolution and Fee Simple Deed in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. Daniel S. McIntyr County Attorne)! G:\ACQ\ WP\J oAnn \ROADS\J enkins\Agenda Memo.wpd " lEI ,....: d!: 0[" .-¡" '''Jr", oJ I~ '^ ~ 1 . ~, ~: . UŠ ,,- ~¡ . id I ~§~ " . I~ ~n b ! . i ~ ~ ~§~ . ~~ ~~: § ~§;; ~ o , ~ N " ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~!. I ~ I I I - -IN -of. ( I: " ,- kl ;; ,.'.¡ ~ " ; I <I, ".': ':'¡\ , . . ~- L ~~ I ~ ~ ---.---.---.-. -rt'"...._~~------ --"::''¡jd'T.¡J ----- I~ I~ ~ .' ~g§~ .~~: r9S§~ ",' " '" ~..'\f. ",... I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ¡. Ir- II II II II II II ¡e. Ч: ì~ I~ . I~ ª '/''''''101_ ....J..." W,,,. WI r____________~~u~ Itt¡. ,r II ~ No I ~ j.j ~ w,_ In... . -------¡ Nurft U3I-4S )3S ::I .. . . 00'" ~~=a @- =z 1m: ~ 015;; .""",ø - "'\.oJ ß&B~~ _V>I-Ct: >, IF- !Eo ;;g I.. "ª' .~! © ~ï !Q) ~ ã~ I!!YJ :!iI ~~~ ;;¡''I'!Œ .dJ ~i'" -:;;~--!. 1Þ=r,: ~.:~ i~¥- ¡¡:i ~ i ~ ~¡ i :l)! " N ~ ~ " " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ...,¡ RESOLUTION NO. 02 - 88 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A FEE SIMPLE DEED ON BEHALF OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, that: The foregoing Fee Simple Deed is duly accepted on behalf of St. Lucie County this 26th day of March, 2002. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Chairman ATTEST: Deputy Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: By: County Attorney North St, Lucie River Water Control District G:\ACQ\ WP\J oAnn\ROADS \J enkins\Resolution 02-88,wpd '-' ~ This Instrument Prepared by: Frank H. Fee, III, Esquire Fee, Koblegard & DeRoss 401 South Indian River Drive Fort Pierce, Florida 34950 Return to: FEE SIMP~ DEED THIS FEE SIMPLE DEED, executed this ~ day of ~ ,2002, by NORTH ST. LUCIE RIVER WATER CONTROL DISTRICT, a quasi-public corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida hereinafter called the Grantor, to ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida hereinafter called the Grantee: whose address is: 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 (WhefØ\o'srused herein, the terms -Grantor" and "Grantee" shalf ¡neiuas singular and plural. heirs, 199al reprøsenlativ8s. and BSsiQns of indMduals. and the successors and assigns 01 corporarions. wh'Hever rhe context so admits or requires. . WITNESSETH, That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00 in hand paid by the Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the Grantee forever, all that certain land situate, lying and being in the County of SI. Lucie, State of Florida, to-wit: THE REAL PROPERTY MORE FULLY DELINEATED AND DESCRIBED UPON COMPOSITE EXHIBIT "A" APPENDED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE. SAVING AND RESERVING to Grantor an easement for drainage, flowage, and water management within any facility constructed by Grantee for such purposes located within the herein described real property. TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever. \w EXHIBIT "A" ... ... '" '" ~ ~ ~ ". '..'C>. ". "lJ "'%\" '''''', i.:~{·~D'7 ,:.~C'~..., "'.... ," ·:,:R::": ': '3.1'.. ..' -',:. ·:V"î,u.c.(t '<s~Pf~J2' ::'~':~~.'~~ , ¡¡, N . . "" TIJrYNSHIP 34 SOUTH TIJrYNSHIP 35 SOUTH LOCA nON MAP N.T.S. PARCEL LOCA nON ¡. BEARINGS ARE REFERENCED TO FLORIOA STATE PLANE EAST lONE. NAD /983/90 ADJUSTMENT. 2. THIS SKETCH EXIST SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF ILLUSTRATING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION TO WHICH IT IS ATTACHED. 3. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE CALCULATED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. f'////////1 HATCHED AREA TO BE DONATED TO ST. LUCIE COUNTY. LEGEND: 4 DEL T A AC . ACRE Ii! BASEL I NE FND.· FOUND EXIST.· EXISTING HA HECTARE L . LENGTH (LT) . LEFT N. T. S.· NOT TO SCALE PG. . PAGE P.O.B.· POINT OF BEGINNING P.O. C., P01NT OF COMMENCEMENT R RADiuS ( R TJ . R J GH T R /W . R J GH T OF WA Y RGE.· RANGE SEC.· SECT/ON S.R.· STATE ROAD S T A.· S T A T/ ON TWP.· TOWNSH 1 P O.R.B.· OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 4 RIGHT OF WAY MAPPING 3400 WEST COMMERCIAL BLVD. FT. LAUDERDALE. FL. 33309 (954J 777-4550 NOT A SURVEY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY MAPPING RIGHT OF WAY PARCEL SKETCH --- STATE ROAD NO. 68 ST. LUCIE COUNTY PR(L 1M COMPOSITE EXHIBIT "A" (Page 1 of 3) fiNAL CHECKED ------------ W~P:!. I'I1LPIt.¡¡[Ð DY P'h:lU bOIl NO,'S ---~----- -- F.O.D.T. I)I~rnICr ., "" ---~-- ~._--- W.P. . NO. 4119208/2301081 SCALE, N/^ --- ------ 'llVI51C)fII .n D.ð.1E SECTION 94070-2505 SHEET I OF 3 P.O.C. WEST Y4 CORNER SEC. 7 P./.5TA.295+49.364 ð . 00%'11" (RT) E.14 COR.sEC.12 FND. BOA T SPIKE N 345,142.018 E 261,024.927 5ECTION CORNE~ FND. p.r.. 8, DISC N 345,960.880 E 261,025.324 295+38.058 334.851 (L TJ UJ C> ~ D b C> <: 0) "" "" ¡¿ IU ..: ~ ... "" --J qj 3: a: "- a:: 0 ~" <: ,:::: V1 ;.; UJ +27.380 16.149 (U) ,24.449 15.850 (LT) I I I I L_____ ð = 13" 42' 31" (LT) L = 2.93r, (9.G9') R = 12..544 (40.50') N 89° 3// 58/1 £ sTA.295+40.ooo (Iil SURVEY s.R. 68) = STA.20+oo.000 rlil SURVEY JENKINS RD.) r'msl r';/fhIQpplng/ ,"9208/ rw~ r6B.t19n METRIC 295+f55.720 334.673 (LT) UJV1 ~~ .~ t5l'> 0:::0::: v; V; ",,,, ",,,,, 'Q ~~ ~~ Ùù UJ UJN V) V) ACREAGE UJ <: :::¡ 3: "- CC l'> ~ I- '(1 >< UJ AREA = 0.9/34 HA (2.257 AC) UJ "" ..., D 8 <: +68.391 15.850 (IT) EXIST. RIW LINE P,O.B. 295 +f53.9/0 15.876 (LT) 296 N 89° 42/ 09" E ª SURVEY S.R.68 (ORANGE & 1J4 SECTION LINE AVE. ) NOT A SURVEY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY MAPPING RIGHT OF WAY PARCEL SKETCH « f- V) CI3J STATE ROAD NO. 68 ST. LUCIE COUNTY " PATE ~ WALKER 10-29-01 F I NAiL ROBERSON 11'15-DI _ CHECKEO ABEl 12-04.01 ~""PSPq[P.AECBY ~====__~~ r.[J.O.T. OI'5fHICT ~ W.P. . NO. 4119208/2301081 R[VISIUN SECTION SHEET 2 OF J " DAT( '-", " i COMPOSITE EXHIBIT "A" (Page 2 of 3) '-' EXH]B1T "A" Item/Segment No. 2301081 ISectlon No. 94070-25051 State Rood No.68 St. Lucie County Description A port I on of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Sect I on 7, Township 35 South, Range 40 East; and 0 portion of the Southeos1 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 12, TownShip 35 South, Range 39 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, being more por'~iculorly described os fol lows: Commence at a found boat spike marking the West 1/4 Corner of sold Section 7, said point being on the Baseline of Survey for State Rood 68 10ronge Avenue! os shown on the Florida Deportment of Transportation Right of Way Mop for Section 94070-2505: thence North 89"42'09- East along sold Basel ine of Survey and the South line of the Northwest 1/4 of sold Section 7. 0 distance of 14.545 meters, 147.72 feet'); thence North 00'17'51" West at 0 right angle to the lost described course. 0 distance of 15.875 meters 152.09 feet) to the POINT OF BEGINNING: thence North 89"58'16" West, 0 distance of 28.653 meters (94.01 feet I; thence North 00'01'40" Eosl, 0 distonce of 318,782 meters 11.045.87 feet!; thence North 89'59' 19- Eost, a distance of 28.553 meters 19-1,01 feet); Ihence South 00'01 '40- West, 0 distance of 318.802 meters 11,045.94 feet) to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 0.9134 hectares 12.257 acres). more or less. I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge ond belief the attached legal descrlpt"lon os shown on the Right of Way Parcel Sketch for Stote Road No. 58( Orange Avenue). I tem/Segmen'l No. 2301081, Section No. 94070·2505 is true, occurat"e and was prepared under my direction. I further certify Ihat sold legal description Is In compliance with the MlnirTUrn Technical Standards os set forth by the Florida Boord of Professional Surveyors 8 Mappers pursuant to Section 472.027 Florida Statues. Jeffrey Florida Date: Florida ~~) .~ '/ firú,' ',ìÓ:d! o. m l' / J Sur yar on ~apper No. ~805 , /2- hi/ ' Deportment a Transportation r~ 0 T t\ SUR 'j E Y . FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION R I GflT OF V/I.Y M/.I'P i r<G RIGHT OF WAY PARCEL SKETCH -_.._---------~-~----- STATE ROAD NO. 58 ST. LUCIE COUNTY ~--f--~------~--- ---~__....~,M'~()'.'LI)Ur ,.--.) UW, PR(LI~_ ~~~~~~~~_ (\ / 1,' ~ 'I '7' ( F_',N~___" ~~O(f<5_"N~'.:..'~~ - J li, ~-Wd \.d / 'ßftIL OI[ÇK(D ^UI:.L JZ'O~-Ol I 7J:·t.{rcl Ij~I.1 or '11'.,,1' ~UIIVl'lrJ,1 =__-=-_ _~~~~-.- -=~.I :==-_-=1=== ~~'. ::~~~~~ ~-:::-- ¡-r-I[~~-,~IÚU;:~iU.;-~ --~----_...-._---------- -..~------~- -=~-=-=_, _~--=='_-===-=I~ . _W.P~ . ~~!t_2(,iJI2J~~~--~I-',I/^ '____"__'m .'---- -- SEl T J ON 9·jQ70-2J05 l SHEET 3 OF 3 I fit "I ~,llm III IJ^fI ....., " COHl'OSIT::: EXllIßIT "A" Cl'abe J of 3) 'r \w ....¡ AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-7C DATE: March 26, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT.): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Indian Pines Boulevard General Electric Capital Corporation Resolution No. 02-89 - QUITCLAIM DEED BACKGROUND: The Property Acquisition Division received a letter from General Electric Capital Corporation regarding the conveyance of Indian Pines Boulevard to St. Lucie County. The Utilities Director has requested the County accept this donation as it provides accesS to the Holiday Pines Wastewater Treatment Plant. FUNDS AVAIL.: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board accept the QUITCLAIM DEED from General Electric Capital Corporation, authorize the Chairman to execute Resolution No. 02-89 and instruct staff to record the Resolution and QUITCLAIM DEED in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. [xJ APPROVED [ ] OTHER: [ ] DENIED COMMISSION ACTION: XX County Attorney: ~ Originating Dept,: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Review and Approvals XX Public Works:~ XX Road & Bridge:~ XX County E~' , ~. XX UtilitieJ¡X' -- E . 5/96 G: \ACQ\ WP\JoAnn\ROADS\Indion Pines Boulevard\Agenda.wpd ...L ,/ ¡ ; ;; \0..-"- ,..., " \ , ! ',. ~ ,- ----' , i.. , , .I i . ~ j .!L '. , ./ -, ~ ---------------------------~ ..------- . . I!!!I !!!!I to 0 I'ì ... I!: II!: i f I 07.23 Ac) ,-----... I " mo-oOOI-fJOI}L5J ¡ LAND - "'40~5' Ac', SWAMP - 2~,'9 Ac i TOT AI.. - 162".l_~ç , , / "" ",.:.,.~\ , ' sr:U1CIE COÚNTY " (JL , ...L ...:L ..L _.....J~~____________ 15.ð Ac D 100 ,---- 'DO z ,... o .... .. - W W I VI W W VI 64 (l JOD 'DD , ð ~¥. ~~~~~ ~@M~¥W g ~~©~~[Q)~ SHEE T NUt.6ER , EPARED rœ i ~! '>I~ ASSESSMENT MAP SECTION ~ ~/ ~ @If ~~ TH1á ...,. H'S 8'~ PII[PARED FOR ~ SI. LUC!E ~Tr I'ROP£RfT ~~ S. APP .¡SER'S PU SES 00. .NO D S t()T NE SSAR LT R[Fšf~T TOWNSHIP us S, I'UTIWI ~~cH~f .¡~:J:lT id~s ié il \V~lf~arJls.rg;[S¡;I S~~I 3@ ~. ~~~ I IfTJ PfIJØITT APPRA.I SER CONTAINED HERrON. RANGE '- ..,J .' RESOLUTION NO. 02-89 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A QUITCLAIM DEED ON BEHALF OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St, Lucie County, Florida, that: The foregoing QUITCLAIM DEED is duly accepted on behalf of St. Lucie County this 26th day of March, 2002. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Chairman ATTEST: Deputy Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: By: County Attorney General Electric Credit Corporation G:\ACQ\ WP\JoAnn\ROAD5\!ndian Pines Boulevard\Resolution 02-B9,wpd ; '- ...." PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO: PATRICIA KIMBALL FLETCHER. PA DUANE MORRIS LLP 200 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 3400 Miami, Florida 33131 Grantee's Tax Identification No.: Property's Folio Numbers: 1312-144-0001-000/1 1407-233-0019-000/4 QUITCLAIM DEED THIS QUITCLAIM DEED, is made as of this , 200 2 between GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION (f/k/a General Electric Credit C oration). a Delaware corporation (the "Grantor") and ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (the "Grantee"). NOW, THEREFORE, Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and No/lOO Dollars ($10.00), the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has remised, released and quitclaimed, and by these presents does hereby remise, release and quitclaim unto Grantee and Grantee's successors and assigns forever, all the right, title. interest, claim and demand that Grantor has in and to the following described parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the County of St. Lucie, State of Florida (the "Propertv"), to wit: SEE EXHIBIT A ATTACHED HERETO This conveyance is subject to the following: (a) any and all unpaid real estate taxes; (b) matters reflected in the plat(s) of the Property; and (b) all restrictions, easements, covenants and other matters of record. TO HA VE AND TO HOLD the same, together with all and singular the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anyway appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest and claim whatsoever of Grantor, " \w ..., either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behalf of Grantee and Grantee's succl:Ssors and assigns forever, and "as is" without any representations or warranties, express or implied, in fact or by law, as to the condition or fitness of the property conveyed hereto and improvements thereon. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has hereto set its hand and seal the day and year first above wriuen. WITNESSES: GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORA TION, a Delaware corporation ~: Fri~~- ^' . --- ~) ~= ''f{~ {SEAL } (' '-""'~~c-1.Yr STATE OF MI- IIJÃ. COUNTY OF h:.....-ç-,; ~ ) ) 55.: ) ') The foregoing jns~ment was acknowledged befor~ me ~ \ ~ day of \0. "Î\.)o. ,,-1 . 200~ by \-<'ð'n",r->,- c...)::r.Q~.r as \)'l~ ~ ð\" "".....~ of GI!NERAL ElECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION. f/kJa General Electric Credit Corporation, a Delaware cotporation, who is personally known to me or 'wl.v 1.......111'-.4 AJ ;¿"llllfi..aliulI, V!J behalf of the corporation. My colDIl1Í5siOD expires: PriDl Dame: valerIe Benedetto Notar'y ~ublic, State of Connecticut CommiSSIOn Expires: March 31, 2003 MIA\77745,l 2 " AGENDA REQUEST ITEM ~ fJ.d DATE: March 26, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. Mcintyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Approval of Assignment of License Agreement to Lynette Macleod BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the BOCC approve the proposed Assignment of License Agreement to Lynette Macleod and authorize the Chairman to sign it. COMMISSION ACTION: [XJ APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: D. u sM. Anderson County Administrator [X] County AttorMY: a- Review and Approvals [ JM~n~g.ment & Budget: [ JPurçha6ing: [ ] Information T .çh,: [ 1 Publiç Work6 Direçtor [ J Solid W~6te Mgr [JFinanç.:(çh.ä for çoPy only. if appliçabl.) [ 1 Publiç S~fety Dir.çtor Eff.çtlv.5/96 . '- ...., . INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. lUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Daniel S. Mclnt.yre, County Attorney C.A. NO: 02-391 DATE: March 18, 2002 SUBJECT: Assignment of License Agreement to lynet.te Macleod BACKGROUND: On Tuesday, August 209, 1999, the Board of County Commissioners approved the assignment of the Revocable License Agreement to Richard S. love and Barbara J. love. The Love's have sold their property to Lynette MacLeod. They are closing on April 8, 2002 and wish to have the license agreement assigned to the new owner at that time. RECOM MENDA TION/CONClUSION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the Assignment of the License Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement. FROM,: PMI LTD ~ PHONE NO. : 8667643295 ~. 15 2002 08:41RM Pi , ~.... .. ....~ .~. _.....".._" ,,_. .........."_.,. .....M _ ...._...... : ßð~ f {(),'~I'y~_C~~~:l~~~--·· I' ./ __ "~~~--,.~~'Y~Njß.- 4 v t ,. ._._.__.___._...... ..__~_DJ ~ { rtr\ A ~~N..___A "It' -e.,( __m_. ._,.m " [ F:v::J. p( ~ F (.. 3 ~ fÝ2 -:)6.)7- ' ii v. ~.__ E~--;;~- -I t¡~~ (' S"" .e~/_~·~ ~_¡;;3~__~-·--.. -------11 ;qf:.. JJ A~) S. 111 C I. III ~t;.-{.1! ~ A-#v-I.w''' - -=---.Jß"';.- Au 1"'''' e J f ¡l..m c,Jj~ La ~.L or ".1- "'0'''' ...i-~~ ! i 7 ~ ') - .(~ _.L'¡'..~d'~ /L ¡(,; 'ßo\, ~ (; t': :! _~..._.......I.¡..,....... _...______-ý;!.r f Z",,&£'..r J:t- ;or tf!.-!:!. . '---'--..--.--'w··T¡··..~..,..,.., .'.... ... .........-f:--(dl) A"iI-J-r.J) :! ; ":-, , ;, .v'::t~ f l ¡If : :i ii W-r. 4,A.v ~ of all 0 ~ ~~,_.¡p_ :1 fi 4/1"'~IfT;. PtAéLr!;¡)cI p...,J 111/;/1 J"(' c,_Û£.(.:-::t.,...,,__,_..,_ !¡ ()-h ~r....;J R' 'I ;L<'f)Z. -~..~ .--._----".,'-~f--_.-- WI ç, Id ~ ~ í /wt'~ :' /l/f-A.. f ft,,) ¡t..('.(;ftlt.M ~ :' i ~ ¡4./a~'f',M pJ~(j ,/,vJ(: 4¡aç,(~/. i. ---..-.fÁ ·"'/:!./"'-;¡!~-Jl.7-t"'"d~__.. ~ /~ ~_.. ,Ç- . .", ',' ,..~___.___ m~ ~ ~~J_:~.z._t.)~ S'7S",j--- i r ¡ <r ~ S'" I - 71'>- '?7..r!,'· --...--.'".-..-. . ....~_.~_..._---- =----=--__-J <1~h--;Þ:-~- ~~-- ~t~ sls h.2- ..H_......'" .. . ..._,_.._..~_.,.- ..~ ".. ...-.-....---.--.--. 0..._- .....-.-.-..--.............."................................,........... i i " I, ¡, , L !: - _._00._____-- II --..-"., '."- ___.___ _._ _H. '" ;1 ..'_____H ~ FROM: PMI L TD \w FROM : MIRET TËRM ~:. ~UL1~ ...w. PHONE NO. : 8557543295 ~. 15 2002 0S:41RM P2 Hlll'I\.,.:.¡ r . ,F'F:>-: NO. ; 56:3;;;7,3315 d),.J.,.1l"W.l,L" h.l/.l:'" IIU:j ,J.... J..' "~I.!l·_ æ l~S.~ :2:39PM PO:; BOA~D OF COUNTY COMMISSION€R.S COUNTY ATTORNEY 0anIeI 5, Mclmyrø IWCI~r YO;J/'\<¡¡ OI"!'1f1S'tI.~l\'r.Jr. !<n.n8l1N!' ~:IQ..$.m'~ ,6.>SI5TANT COUNTY AlÎO!1.NE1 M5I$'1'ANi'COU~ ATTO~m ASSISTANT CQ J,\IN A'lTORNEi AuglJ!! 20, 1611i19 Mr, Paul Mirl' 767 Hidekln RlIII' Drive Po" It, Lucie, florlcla 34H3·2798 RS: AtIIgnment 01 Revol:llble llc.n$!! A¡r.emem D..' Mr. Mir't: On T\IIS$d8V, A\¡9U$'t 20, 1¡"Ii!, tho ê08l'd of County Cðrnmiaior'utrs of St. I.IICÍ& Count'!'. F/Qrlda, tøproved the assignment of 1hl Plevocable LlCI!In1l8 A¡¡Ililimen1 tQ ¡¡¡¡onard S. lo~ ane Barber. J. Love. ÅS a follow 1.11) tQ mv ..,I¡.r letter tð you. pl.us lit m. ~"ø,^, if yOu oesire I formal ....mel'!t for recotding purp~a, D6M/¢at () "~, IIIWN, ~No;,' . OCUl.!eg'>',rJ.." =._.... ~ . ~AW "'.U'~~.Þøni<:'NQ, ~ . _'EHi/!O'III'ðON, ~"I~ ~ ~ . c~"f ~..r¡~ ¡;>""'" NO ~ ~"'i,.. ,,;trn¡,oo, ØIð"t!1 P~Q.I M. .",,,,tiOII 2X1OV:r;I '\IQÁvenu. . ;;;fdf)o(lf,Mjrnir1.ÀMt'~ . FCll'TP~, I'l04\Jeo; ·ió:i:/ · Phon. (~1)462-1<.15 FAA (,:)6') 402-1440 . 'II)C (!!i6~) 4t;.2-1A?:^ FROM PM I L TD '-' PHONE NO. 8667643295 ST. LUCIE CO. ATTORNEY Fa,x;561-462-1440 Jul ;"1.'_"' - ··.·.'..·.a';.~,·JC ._~. :':;'le'·· ............. ,--,. 15 2002 08:42AM P3 2 '01 -J~:,2~ P.02 .. a!,;V<)(;IO,,,I,,", UCE1ISt r.ckJ!D!£N'I' FOR tNS~ALLA~1g~ Oy DRIVEWAY ~~VEftT 't'H18 a.GJlBþ.... 1116ðe ..."t1 <'It1".:-ed i...to 1:1ù. _.L~ èey <''I' ~"",.,~ U';î:J , 1990. 1;>)' ane 1-"-0 ~~"E;;'ø,," $"" d1'Vis~o.., of ~.,... $~at::. be"...._n In'. l.UCIJl cQ1J)rry. ¡o ot ~loride. here~n.t~~~ ~a: ~éd ·'Coln.'!')'· eOO .\'&UJ:. ,)()UPII JQ;~I:, , UI1) I(AJIM KIÚIU: t'I:t1tE'f _ ,!\':> Kt.dd,¡on "1ve;r P:;;j,vCiI, :Part St. 1,.\lCJ.II, 11e>t'.1da 3'!l8S. bilX'$lt.after called "'~n4U:'e" ; IIØI.~II. th. o_c. ar.. COM't:ruc::tuag . h<Joie C>'" property C~.C'l'~Ð.~ 1115 J:.o~ ~~. a~øc~ l. Hld~en Rtv.~ ~~.tes IOnd ~_ to"" OWno¡!". hav" requ....f1.," perlll.1.sion fT'Ø'll -:"_1:i' 'tQ 'r."'I."::':>' " ~.t~"''':V ....'I......rt ,tJ>.'ttL1n CO'l!\i:ÿ'1Ii. d:-.''''''96 9al;....._1I "10 .i.( ,~nt.Lu.~ .i.n IIttae¡"ed 8xbJt:H. wit· in ordar to gain _=11:5$ !;:C> ~e~ø ~~Q~~; anð WK£RE&S, ~h. ~~~ he~ a~~~ to .~thori~. ~~. ~n~t~1~&t1on !It '\:l1è 'IX';(v_ey C\l.lvoé,.t: w!.'\:h~1'\ th. ð~a~l'\ag-è ""Ba"'",,,,'" ......j.ct "to ..". o:...;z-m.. and <:<>nð:l.t.i..... ...1: f....t:h '''I. ~l'Ii. _C..ble 1..1<>,0>""" ~~;..mC'''~... ~Ow, TKEft*roaE. in OQn$~~è~~tinn of ~. ~t~.~ DOVen~$ set: lor~~ ~~"e.ir.. ~~~ ~.~i.a agr.. 8E fo~loWB~ . . . Th'!' Cou"ty ."re... 1:0 !iI e'a",t '1:1'10 0-_.. .. ........."..d roVQCabl~ ~icen.e tor the pu~". D~ l~tallin~ and m41~~ei~~ft~ .. "";'9_~)" e"lv.;-t, .,~tÞ.\.r. 1:1'1" 1OI>Ov,,-J1...cr.it...d Ih'ainag* .....~...t ....C!. rot -th~ PUi!'POiI. of .1'0.,1"11 th. .,,-....1: to sra,.. ,,~~... t" Own.X'~· property. :2 _ '1'hh: Hoen.. _1" nC".: b. ....dgnod. b~ Cho7\enl 1o·1ttv.:.ut tbIC , s>r...cr ..., ¡;>t....... oo_.n'C o£COW\~. ~. '""~ ce,.....~ >01;>"U ba.....' th. rS\Jht 'to" te:l!'..i.natf" t:I'>~. Avr._oon"l: ..,0:1 r...."1.... ,...."val ot '1:1'1. cul"Na..t .t owro.r*' eçètlSe I.-.an ni_ty (90) d..:v" v:r~:t:'\:'en ""''\:L~ ~o 0Wne". .i.E, ~1'1 1:h1t ao-1. d~,,'::t'.\;;¡on ancl j..ðoaent of 'the OOI1"'~Y ~U_If'. t~. CI....l.;;~~:;; ':nst!.o.11a;'J.o.. .........,..*..,...... ......t;h ~þ~ œaJ.n.g" requtre_rlu ..* Ih.d.!;.." 1thf'U' I:s"."." ...b4J."~.'>'cm. 1'hAÞ Cc>"...~ IÞ'>EI~~'" ""Y. ..,., 1...-. 0:: ~<i'_.Lna.'I:~...... reQ".,.,.e 'lt1'16~ ~. Ovn..,. pe..'O~ _~.L.... .¡'t.r.~n 07: ~.Lh~.~.n~. ~ct~v~~~.£ wt;,h!n ~~. draina~. .a$øm~t. Mow~~.r: if -1- FRCM PM! LTD \., PHONE NO. 8667643295 ~. 15 2002 08:43AM P4 Jul 2 '01 13:29 P.03 -'.lop. I.~ .. _',,"_ .."......~. , ST. LUCIE CO. ATTORNEY Fax:561-462-14~O ........_.; ; "'J'. ,.,:..:-...\~ .....,. ¡;ì~.¡-·· r-""L)r~ '''....., ......,. tI....<:Ì'. a.Ç'tiV''ti",~ 11.".. n':>t !¡)<!'r~ormeoð 1:0 O::M¡ s::peocH'i<;/l.t';'<'I"I< at 't,,~ :ounty 8n9~n~J. CQ~nty shall be 6nt1tled to e.e~~~R ~ts riQh~ to ~.~~.n~'t~ thi~ A~r.6M~nt. 4. The dr1v_.]' culvert llhAll boa coostt'uctèd an~ ltla~'ta'¡'n&d 1>01.1y at. thé _p..n.... of 0........ lH'ISe~ '1:.... .lIIp.""".jtj.on r;>.I: O"".....rf<· eMtl'l.U ....6 1n t..:u ..~U,.nç. 'W:L';n .111 .:>.,t:,i,~ 1e.t 10m; of COU!'l~ .." d t~.",i"'i! by 'l:M C:>1JJ'I~ ~t>$l..,..;r "nd u dop;l.ctlld 0."1 ottt:4iCh.ð 1>xhið11: 'I". ~ :uxn.oeictl. ðt '1:1'.01. c...lv.,rl "'!I:~ut\ Th. ..II..."lþIIt ,:,"" sl,\Þjeçt 1;c '1:11.. approval I)f ton.. CO;l.f!ty ~¡¡j,n..:'. I!>. '.!'be Owners B"-l1 ind_MlIy .:&nc:! ho.Ld ~ ¢o..n'r:¡( harml.... t~ ~~d against ell elai... ~1.Ð111~y. ðè.~q*. ða~&9.~. e"p~( $. "..~. f~s. panal'ti..~.sut.t:... pro.".cL1ngG, , "''''t:';'cm.. L~~ coo~. of ."\~cnB. jn~'~'~~ r.a&Oftabl. a~~~~~~ ~..E o~ ~y ;c."nd ~'t .,.tv~. =l"'¡l)g Q~ in. ."'y 1otaY' .~W4 ...~Ù> 'tl:\. ....... o:::c...p.~i=, ".Mg"8:lt:. or aonuol of ")of! ._. pr-ö¡)....'t:y ~ "'::h. o=..~ Or ita "'9_nt:it. o..rv.nts, _1"10,..... p.~. 0.. Urv1t..s. O~ T..U~~¡n9 .l.n 1ft jury ~O pe't8Oft. ~ ~eþ..~y. 0" lQ9c of ~i~. Or pJ:'t>p~ 1:1: MY ~~ 0:- na1::unl whatsoever. s.....'l:u_d ~\,jr:i,h9 0.....:101'$· u&_ e>f ~'ty ¡properly. tlO W1'l'tt£e.e ~__. ;.r.. D.~~~"'. bav.. e_eo:>,.i:.o.ð t;b.l.s "'9're.....,,'I; ð<" '-M It.y ....4 Y4l-..:' .~_. 1i..:r..t .r- / " --:> :....!þ_..~., . I~;N;¡¡-:-(.L.e ..._~- , ' . . I ,r"'-', ~ ~~;;I. .} l '-..,/. S'l'A TC OF I"L QlUDa CDUllTi 01' S~. LV<:JB _ for. _ p-.r.,..,..,1.1:r .'P.-"'. "'iIWfo .:rw1lPlf "'~1RC MtCJ ~JCI'I MARIE H1J1E'1' ~ _ _11 ~ IUIO! au- ~o _ _ be ~ per-.o.... c!ese:rLbed ~n _d ",,",0 _...... .. r~l Ji.. ....._"'. -.4 .~)...... ~ __ 'B"_ _ to_of: .aut. oJQSlMI 1ti; Itft - -..:If _%11: M%1IIft .._,,__ ..ilt £...~..-.1; 'till: '11M ~Ø..iO ü_c:l.v ~~Bseð. -2- \ : PMI L TD "-' ST. LUCIE CO. RTTORNE)' Fax:561-462-1440 ''''''-L' . t""~~I( ,...~.- bT~'1:I" ~~. . PHONE NO. : 8667643295 JuJ ~. 15 2002 08:43AM P5 13:29 P.04 ~.,rI. ~7". J.:¡IiI('~.Ir" 1"'""1 FROM 7)_W~~t.ss 1..../ (+ ,.y hu.ð _and JIL.~.. 11l~. My c:o..L..,. bpi=--_ ~ U1'81': '2 '01 .....9· -- oft,Lc.l...l ,.-/ ~Ä..s ~ ~y of\:. ....1 . ~ '. ~l . iiëilary 'rUe ~? su~. of' Plor.ida v ". ~ , ~. ~ .~ .~. ~ ,'.. .". " .~. £,~~.. ~~ :r=1"~ fI._-' . .e1'. .... '..1, .....~......-~ W~ (" ~~ ~i?1 ~s) IT. weu COU1ft'\' ~ OP CDÚ:JIW ..........H2;OMIIõR!I .~ " trY, J~. ~ ~ "-:-::-:. ~'I'" ....". ~ :~-~~ ' - -' ~. -:~~:.,~"'~ , øPl\OVanw-'1'O --ro. ai4a, ': ~ ·ooaIIIi:Cftlaa& , ". ' . . .' 'w ... - '3" " " ... \., ,...", AGENDA REQUEST ,ITEM NO. ~ , , , DATE: March 26, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [XXX] TO: BOARD OP COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT PRESENTED BY: David Rodriguez Human Resources Director SUBJECT: Third year adjustment to the pay and classification plán. BACKGROUND: The Board of County Commissioners approved the Pay and Classification Study on April 4, 2000, and the second, third and fourth year phase of the study on April 24, 2001. PUNDS AVAIL.: Various Punds 9910-599310-800 PREVIOUS ACTION: The Board of County Commissioners approved the Pay and Classification Study on April 4, 2000, and the second, third and fourth year phase of the study on April 24, 2001. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the attached adjustment to the pay and classification study. COMMISSION ACTION: [ X] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: D u as Anderson County Administrator O~iginating Dept. Review and Approvals Management . aud9.~ Pu~cha8ing I Othe~, Othe~, County Attorney: Pinanc.: (Check for Copy only, if applicabl.l___ 8ff. 5/96 .......... .....,I , , .' AGENDA TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROM: David Rodriguez, Human Resources Director DATE: March 18, 2002 SUBJECT: Adjustment to the pay and classification plan BACKGROUND: The Board of County Commissioners approved the Pay and Classification Study on April 4, 2000, and the second, third and fourth year phase of the study on April 24, 2001. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the attached adjustment to the pay and classification study. Respectfully submitted, ~~~' David Rodriguez ~~ Human Resources Director DR/mp Attachments ........ ,.." :RECA~FOR APRIL 2002 , , , Agriculture $ 4,936 Building & Zoning $ 14,119 Central Services $ 6,811 Community Development $ 4,567 Information Technology $ 3,579 Mosquito Control $ 4,355 Public Safety $ 1,755 Solid Waste $ 10,385 Utilities $ 7,765 Veterans $ 3,758 Parks & Recreation Aquatics Civic Center Community Center Golf Course Lincoln Park Museum Parks Sports Complex $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Total (full year) $ 2,531 2,180 2,727 2,912 1,360 1,413 17,325 4A32 96,910 April 1 to Sept. 30 (half year) $ 48,455 ~ ' ~ '...,; , UTILITIÈS , Utility Customer Services Specialist II Pay Grade 8, Job Code 736 to Utility Customer Service Specialist III Pay Grade 11, Job Code 939 Cost $3,478 Utility Customer Service Specialist III Pay Grade 11, Job Code 939 to Utility Billing Supervisor Pay Grade 14, Job Code New Cost $41287 Total Cost $7,765 AGRICUL TURE Program Assistant Pay Grade 10, Job Code 702 to Program Specialist /4H Pay Grade 12, Job Code 699 Cost $1,310 Horticulture Specialist Pay Grade 16, Job Code 619 to Commercial Horticulture Agent Pay Grade 18, Job Code 702 Cost $3,626 Total C-ost $4,936 N o o N I .... (1)0 0:0 WN zO: 0< _W (1)- ~...J ::E< ::E(.) O~ (.)LL. ~~ ZLL. ~I- 0(1) (.)W LL.~ 00 OW 0:0: <Z 00 m¡::: ~t3 Z- ~!!: 0(1) (.)(1) w:5 -(.) (.)w 30: ·z t;o I- (I) o c. ë w o z w :æ :æ ° u w a:: ß Ci) S; LIJ a:: o ~ Ci) ~ ë w > o 0:: Q. Q. < Ci) LIJ ¡:: ::ï ¡:: :::> .=.: z w :æ I- 0:: < Q. W o ž o (i) :> ë , LIJ U S; fE CI) ::: '" fE I- CO) ~~OI ~ ~~~~~ Ci) U "t :::> ~ c U Ci) .... )0- I- ::ï ¡:: :::> LIJ U S; fE Ci) :::: §tï> c::: ::¡ (0 ~ð~co ~~ UCi) )0- I- ::ï ¡:: :::> ¡jj ..J I- ¡= Z o ¡:: (i) o Q. :g ~ ~ 01 It') "t ~ t.') ::i .... c ,.. .... r-.. co co c co N" co)" In" N .... C") t.')t.')t.') It') .... ~ .... I "t .... 0) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~" ~. 01 ..... C") 01" t.') ... ..... t.') ¡jj ¡jj ¡jj 0 t!) en O<Z~I- O!!::<o::Ü: ~>::~:5~ o«<w ., Q. Q. (/) m ž o ¡:: ,< ~ u ~ I i ...." .... :::J ~~CI) ~ ~ ~ -5 ~ CI) .S '" E o oS ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -,# .~ en ~ ~ 15 .!¿ .g I:: ~ ~ ~ Ë CD"'( )1=: .!£ :g ::; ~ ~ Q) .1:: Q Ci)è5..~ ... E 'i ~ CD 0 e ~ g ~ t)):::> .... I:: 't:I CD ~C\ Q)::; U :g ~ .S ca ~ '- ....~c:o:g o '_ ('Q CI) .S U ë;¡ I:: 't:I _ .S2 I:: -0 Õ 13 C\ oS I;::: I:: CI) Q) C5 .;:~~- .Q 0 E C\ .2., 5} 8 ~ Q)"C I::C: ::; -'C Q) '- t)) I:: Q) Q) I:: C\ .Q ~ ;::: ~ CI) -:: ~~~-9 .2 CI) I:: CI) .~Q..Q! ::: .~ ~ ii ~~2.~ .S! ~ .'=2 ',>; (,) CI) ~ ¡;;, Q) C\ .... Q) Q. (,) .... CI) Ci) :.... 0 ... Q) "" I:: Q) (,) -§ .2 E 't::; "- <ä ..s ~o.g~ '- t)).Ü) (J CD .S CI) "C E (,) .!!! CD .9-ª~~ CI) C\ '" ~ :::J .Q Q) (,) U 0 ~ I:: ...... - ...... '- I:: 't:I 5 .S ~ Q) "" 5 ~ t)) 't:I (,,) .§ .S ~ Q) :: .S: ~ ¡5:g~e ... 8 C") ..... , .... "- "t ~ C") .... I .... C\ "t c" C CO) ... I .... It) "t c" C CO) ... , .... "t "t it I- Z ::I o U u < It) C\ C I 2 Ci) U it a w a:: (/) (/) :3 u w a:: C\ 10 " cc c cc fa 10 r-... C\ (0)' t"7 "'t- CI) t"7 ... s: c llJ c a:: (0) .... 'tJ I .... I ) ~ r-... ê "'t 'tJ E c' I ) .g .E c CI) I ) <II I ) CI) (0) :5 ~ 1:1. ::3 .... (,) I ... (,) ~ .... N .2 I ) C\ 0 0 .S e:: .!Q "'t 0, ::3 0' 0 <: ·S 0 c: ~ ·S 'tJ 8 I ) c .S (0) ~ <II §- .... ..... .ê - I mO ::3 e:: CI) .... 0:::0 ::::: CI) ~ .E 10 q; ~ "'t UJN ..: CI) 0- ~ c- zO::: ~ c 0 <II "" (0) 0< .!Q .1:: ~ .Q .... CI) c: CI) <II I _UJ ~ E .S I ) .... m)- I ) :5 "'t !Q..J §-oS! e:: "'t ::!E< c r-... ..... CI) ~ ~ ~ 10 C\ " 0, CI) (,) 0 ::!Eo .... r-... cc ;§ CI) .g .1:: 0!Q a:: co' (0)- 0) ::3 CI) 0 C\ .... t") ãš .g ~ CI) OLL C/) t"7 t"7 .... :>., <II I ) <II ~~ s: ~ ~ ¡:: .1:: ~ Q) Q) ffi ~ :5 -.; } ZLL e:: =>.... % cc <II ·s I ) 0> ..... ~ ~ Om CI) ~ to 0 ~ OUJ .... CI) <II I ) (!) "'t e:: LL:J ~ .... I ~ e ð} .!Q ~ cc ~ 00 0> 0, C :5 -.J (,) cUJ 0 -.J ---= e:: 'tJ ò'g w ã5 .... 02 I ) ::3 ::: (1J 0:::0::: 0 >- .Q § - i:: :it z Ö .'2, ;:) <Z w l- e:: <II I- 00 :i w :J Q) 0 CD (,) > ¡::: :5 ü :5 $: z mi= :i 0 ·s e:: ::I 0 a: ;:) o,~ .~ 0 ~~ ·s I ) :t:: U a.. :::: - ~ CI) u w a.. ~ ~ .!Q u z- a: < 02 1:1. CI) c: < :J!:!: CI) E I ) ::: .Q Om c C\ c .- 0 ~ - ~ c C\ 0> - (,) ~ om c In - 0 0 to ~ e:: <II 1:1. UJ:3 llJ co (0)- In- I ) (ij '(3 Q) Ü 10 .... t") .!.!! Q) E Q) .1:: -0 C\ . t"7 ... .Q 1:1.- OUJ s: (,) CI) oS! C/) :>., C\ I ) 30::: ffi t"7 ~ <II .S Q) .Q .1:: Q) .(,) 'tJ CI) - e:: :5 ~ .~ 'z - Q) - ..... ~ t)o ffi I- C") .g ... Q) ::3 CI) lei I ) II) .E CI) 0- .... ~ - 0> .... I C/) 0 II) ... ~ -.J .... 1:1. I ) e ::!; C") I ... ~ E CI) m 0> .... 10 I ) .!Q <II 0 CI) Ü "'t E :5 ::3 .E ~ 11'. 'tJ CI) CI) c.. ~ c:i It, .E ..... Q) ::3 0, Ü .... " CI) 0 .2 Ü .S CI) ::3 e:: ::::: >- ü ~ c: i:: .Q I- .... Q) æ 'tJ fß :J e:: <II CI) æ ~ ... '" e:: 10 ¡:: Q) ::3 10 C\ ¡:: '" (,) c ~ ::3 CI) E I ) , :J (,) CI) .E I ) .2 B Q) 10 :5 c: ¡::: .5¿ CI) CI) ~ ¡:: ~ ::3 £ I ) ü (,) CI) Ž :it .:: 0 0 z ü.i ü.i ¡:: w w 0 C) en a: :i < C/) I- Z ~ Z ~ I- U C/) a: 0 ~ u:: u:: S < Cii C) < w ¡:: a.. :; >- >- .J Z C/) U w 15 < < < W ::I W 0 a.. a.. C/) m ., a: '....; ~ '....I AGRICULTURE MEMORANDUM -~T.-ÚJCIE :. - COUNTY -. f , -¡ J -\ ...~ --. - ~--- - - -- - ~-- TO: Doug Anderson, County Administrator FROM: Anita Neal. Interim County Extension Director DATE: January 11, 2002 RE: Position Reclassification - Program Assistant to Program Specialist It has come to our attention that one of our staff members. Debbie McManus, the 4-H Program Assistant, has taken on responsibilities in her position that fall outside the realm of her current job description. Doing so, as you would expect, has been a gradual process and her supervisor, Susan Munyan, 4-H/ Agriculture Agent, has come to rely on and appreciate the assistance that Mrs. McManus provides in performing these tasks. As described in the attached job description for an Extension Program Assistant, the major function of that position is to conduct educational programs under the direction of the Extension Agent with whom they work. The major function listed on the job description for a Program Specialist/4-H is to work in assisting in planning, developing, and implementing an effective educational4-H program. As Debbie currently creates and develops program materials. secures guest speakers for events, coordinates 4-H events and contests with school groups and 4-H clubs. assists with program and event promotions, and assists the 4-H Agent in interpreting Extension and 4-H policies and procedures to county 4-H volunteer leaders and to the public, it seems that the 4-H Program Specialist's job description more accurately describes her role in this office. Mrs. McManus does meet the minimum educational requirements of a Program Specialist as well. She earned her Associate Degree in Early Childhood Eduèation in 1977 at the Indian River Community College. Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners reclassifY Debbie McManus as a Program Specialist based on the justification provided herein. Your consideration in this matter is greatly appreciated. ASN/ca ' œŒ@UWŒ[~ JAN 1 il 2002 i ~ , \ Attachments Pat Clute, Employee and Labor Relations Manager ~ cc: HUMX\ RESOURCES ST. LUCIE CCUNTY. FLORIDA '-" Job Code Pay Grade ~ 699 ~ Iz- PROGRAM SPECIALIST/4-H MAJOR FUNCTION , Professional work in assisting in planning, developing and implementing an effective educational 4-H program. ILLUSTRATIVE DUTIES Assists in planning, developing and implementing effective educational programs in all 4-H areas. _!Recruits adult volunteers to be 4-H leaders. :¡identifies key citizens and agencies who might support or work with Programs and communicates needs of local people to 4-H Youth Agent. identify the needs, interest and problems of youth in the county. vlInterprets 4-H Youth Program and extension policies and procedures to county 4-H volunteer leaders and to the public. Maintains good working relations with other youth groups by helping keep channels of communication open. Assists the 4-H Youth Coordinator in project or activity promotion and publicity. Organizes special interest groups and clubs to meet particular needs and interests of youth. Visits local 4-H volunteer leaders to assist them with local problems. Conducts ,county 4-H Youth events and activities as assigned. ~ Keeps record of activities and prepares reports. Assists with and/or makes simple charts and other visual aids and educational materials for demonstration purposes. 4-H Youth Helps ,¡Performs related work a~ required. KNOWLEDGE, ABILITIES AND SKILLS Ability to organize youth groups, establish programs. and conduct educational classes. Ability to deal effectively with the general public and' co-workers. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS Associate Degree in Agriculture. Home Economics or Behavioral Sciences. Some experience in 4-H or similar youth groups preferred. A comparable amount of training or experience may be substituted for the mini- mum qualifications. lJ ...-.. ,- ¡, , j. f J '-' c. c. t-'-~ r: ~ ~ GENERAL POSITION DESCRIPTION FOR 4-H PROGRAM SPECIALIST I Major Responsibilities of 4-H Program Specialist The major responsibility of this position is the inter- pretation and delivery of relevant educational information to the 4-H members of the county, with specific emphasis being placed on an effort to insure the application of this knowledge. The Program Specialist is responsible to his/her County Extension Director for all programmatic and administrative matters. The Program Specialist will work cooperatively in order to integrate his/her program efforts into the total County Extension program. The amount of time which Program Specialist spends on specific programs components will be determined in concert with the County Extension Director. II Functions and Tasks of the Program Specialist This section deals with the primary functions and tasks- of Program Specialist's responsibility which is the interpre-. tation and delivery of educational programs. Function-l Conducts educational programs in his/her designated areas of responsibility to help people more effectively inter- pret and use findings of science and technology. a. Assume responsibility for developing and executing a plan of work. b. Involves the appropriate program advisory committee (s) in the development and implementation of programs in designated program area. ~ ....,¡ c. Involves resources of the University of Florida and the community to effectively implement county programs. , d. Identifies, recruits, and develops volunteer leader- ship necessary to carry out the program work of the county. e. Assumes responsibility to the 4-H program within his/her area of competency and/or subject matter. f. Develops and uses appropriate systems for reporting program accomplishments. g. At all times functions as a professional teacher/ educator. Function 2 Follow a sound process in developing educational programs in his/her designated area of responsibility. a. Works with program advisory committee in analyzing county situation and in identifying priority problems. b. Clearly establishes objectives, subject matter content, and learning experiences to reach these objectives. c. Designs and implements a variety of program delivery methods to reach target clientele. d. Evaluates results and accounts appropriate publics for program accomplishments. Function 3 Develops an understanding of the county, the needs of its youth and Extension's role in meeting those needs. a. Seeks to understand the county situation in terms of social and economic factors. b. Seeks to understand the role of County Extension Service in effecting changes in the county situation. c. Continuously examines own role as a change Program Specialist. Function 4 Understands philosophy of Extension and utilizes effective methodology in program delivery and evaluation. a. Seeks to understand and convey the philosophy, objectives and policies of the Florida Cooperative Extension Service. b. Assists in determining and obtaining resources needed to implement the plan of work. ~ ~ , c. Plans and provides the training needed to equip volunteer leaders to carry out the program. , d. Develops and maintains two way communications with volunteer leaders. e. Establishes and maintains rapport with personnel of mass media and arranges for appropriate releases in the assigned program area. f. Assesses the effectiveness of the program and plans for needed modifications. g. Utilizes results of program evaluation to initiate changes in implementating or in re-directing the program. h. Understands and implements the provisions of the Affirmative Action Plan. C"') o o N I N C/)O It: 0 WN Zit: oct -W C/)- ~..J ~ct ~U o~ Uu. ~~ Zu. ::II-- OC/) UW u.::I 00 OW It: It: ctz 00 m~ ~t3 Z- ::I!:!: ou) uu) w:3 -u Uw 3 It: t-=z C/)O I-- CiS o c. ~ S IJ.J It Il') Q .... .... C\ C" ~ ....~ ~ o ~ ~ o >- OJ I- ::::J ~ CI) ~ ö w o z w :E :E o o W It: ~ ~ ~ 0) .... Q C\ - C")- ~~ C\ .... C" ~ ~ ~ l- V) ::ï ~ u ~ V) :E ~ o a: :t: , "'" o W I- U) W :;) a w It: .... IX:) I'-. ~f C\ C\ ~ 12 .... IX:) C\ Il') ....- C\ ~ o w ~ It: D.. D.. <C ~ ~ IX:) IX:) ....- C\ ' C\ .... ~ ~ I- ~ ¡:!: V) ëi) V) <:( :E ~ (!) o a: :t: . "'" IJ.J U [ o ~ o ~ 8 ç ~ o u I'-. IX:) "'" 0)- C\ C\ c~ 12 .... Il') &5 0)' .... ~ ¡:.: z w :E I- It: ~ W o ž o ii5 :> õ f¡¡ ~ ~ ~ ~ !U o 's; !;; If '5 õ :t: \1 § ..¡. .c I:'! :s ", \1 0 "" ~ :>., Q" \1 :t: .!:2 ~ ..¡. ~ =@ tn '" u ·s '" ~13Cb ~-6:S ì 8 ·ê ~'tJ~ :;:, t: :::: o (! S! o tn ... (! c: "- Cb :;:: ~ Iõ;, fa ......... ~ :§ ~ ~ <:: c: "_ 0 1 1ñ 8 (I) :S I:'!- E Cb Cb ~ c: m Ö! o o<;¡ e .e ~ Q" .S ~ g...: I:'! tnïS.~ ¡g .S Q .~ :>.,.S ~ CD Cb.ê~t% :S'tJ ~ 16 ~ ~ OtntnÖ! 'tJ ·s .S e <I>:1::ic:a:: ::. :;:¡ c: õt¡(! :t: ii';~Q."¡' ~ .!:2 .S ~ .ê c: 1:: ::: c:,g&O .2 .¡¡; <:( ~ :t::: 0 c: ~ Q,,:J¡: <I> Q" .~ "'t E .....:SCb~ ~c::S'5 ~ .~ .f2 g- ::¡ 0 .!:2 \;. <:(I:'!~C: <I> ~ .2 E Q" 'tJ (¡ ~ Cb c: 0 0)~(! -6 o . Cb ð:: .....:; ~ Q,) ~ c: -!:: :J¡: ~ ~ .... "'t 'õ Cb ~ Cb<l>'tJ<I> ~t%~E c c C") C c c C\ .... Il') o.b .... I'-. C") I .... C C :it I- Z :;) o u u <C ~ C") ¡:: fu Q :it a w It: U) U) :3 o W It: Received: 31 8/02 9:48AM; Fax M CI CI ~ N IIJCI o::CI WN zO:: 0« -W IIJ> !:!L.J :¡E« :¡E() o~ ()LL. >0:: 1-0 zLL. ::JI- 01lJ ()W LL.::J 0° OW 0::0:: «z 00 ca¡::: >« I-() z- ::J!:!: 01lJ ()IIJ « W...J -() ()w 3 a:: 'Z ~o ¡::: ëñ o Q. _> ST LUCIE CO HUMAN Hc~OURCES; Page 2 ", 3/~2 9:28 AM FROM: Fax St. Lucie County Extension TO: 2361 CD ~ o >- CD .... :;, ~ ä w c z w :¡¡: :¡¡: o o W II:: llJ Ü tE o <: o Ùj <: ~ GJ >- .... <: :;, o Ü a llJ C/) s: llJ C( o <: C/) ~ c W to- (/) W :::I a w II:: .... <: llJ <.'J <t llJ a:: 2 :5 Ü ¡.:: C( o :t -I <:( õ ffi ~ ~ o Ü ë w > o II:: 0.. 0.. < ~ to- Z W 0:: 0:: :::I o .:; z w :¡¡: ~ ~ w c ž o iñ :> ë "t- CO) (\ a;j 'I' ~~: 10 o o' CO) ~ .... C/) :J ~ Ü ~ CI) llJ a:: :;, .... ....J :;, Ü ¡.:: C( o :t "t- co r-.. 0' 'I' 0) ~ ~ ~ 't- 0;) ~ cD ~ ~ ~ ~ o 10 IQ CO)' ~ C<'Ì ~ ~ ...... 'I' .... ~ ~ :g (\ . ~ ...: ~~:t r-.. co 'It 10 0) 10 10 CO) 01 0)' '1" C<'Ì ~~:t ûi w ~ ~ û) ~~~It ~~$ffi 0.. 0.. y. en , :§~~ ~Q) !¿ - c:: Q) ~ 0 ,> E~õ ~ ð &¡ c:: .!:: ü~~{J..c:_Q) (1 I/) 0 '¡ I/) E '-I/) ,S; ~ I/) CD ~ 0> ~ :S ,g> C1)ee.s;'5J ,CI Q. Q. J!! ìii ~g>s·S;:G ~'t:~~~ ~'O Q. :>., '- c: .Q .§ ]!~-"@I/) ~ '0 ~ ,5; ~ o ~ .... ::s '0 ~g>~~~ ~ '- !II I/) 98-.Qiij·S; E:Qj'O_ I/) c: Q»~~Eo §~.2-~~ .Q 55 ~ ~ ~ '~ ,S; <I) <;¡ llJ Q. CD .....Q Q)Ü CD'1J g¡:G iij'"-~.Q :>....c:..c:!!:S.Q, <;¡c::.Q'§o>'~ co.Q-§ç'S;..c: Q..=-= ~ 52 q.... CD~I/):",,g~ :SQ.E~~ .... I/) ~ ::s CD .§ ~£O>'O'1Jg¡ o eCD:.-__ ¡.~':¡CDQ) ~CD~::s.,¡:S o.Q<;¡:§§'O ~~-65:t:~ I/) E ,S; () ~ CD ~it:!II:;Q..Q c:: J!! § .Q '!::CD CD 01/)-'0 c: :¡:;Q>'"5-£& ï¡;~:2~.... II) o ....0.....E co Q.c::t'¡¡¡ ..c: ~.Q';;:;:S"@I/) <tJ ~ .~ C; .!::: :.:::: '_ I/) !¿ '- ::s (1 ~2.~~ª,'~ C/) - "'C1) I/) Q. 55 "'_CDCI) ~o>o~l/)~ :!<tÜOC::.2 'š !IJ J! ~ .~ -::s !.2""-'O- 't:.2-CD'Q:2 o '5 co I/) ... :t,Q¡g¡~~ CD 1:: E ¡:; 't: f= ~ '- 0c: (1 .! r-....(Q._>..... z o ~ o iL ~ :::I PAGE: DO' 002 ....., o o CO) C o o (\ "t- IC) .}¡ ,... "- '1 "t- o o ü; to- Z :::I o o o < ~ cI¡ /2 Q ~ ð w 0:: (/) (/) :) fd 0:: ..... ....; , BUILDING & ZONING Building Code Supervisor Pay Grade 19, Job Code 620 to Building Code Supervisor Pay Grade 21, Job Code 620 Cost $ 7,853 Currently, the Building Code Supervisor makes less than one of the Building Inspectors, this is more than the standard increase to bring this 14 year employee in line. 1 position of Building & Zoning Clerk Pay Grade 6, Job Code 612 to Building & Zoning Technician' Pay Grade 11, Job Code 735 Cost~6,266 Change in Policy Currently, InspectorsfPlans Examiners receive 10% for each State License/Certification they receive as an incentive to pass the State exam. It is recommended we reduce and limit the incentive increases according to the list below: . Total Cost $14,119 Page 1 of 2 , ~ . ~< " " " ~ - ~ ~~ æ .f.". @ It) CI:I :J. , (£) -' ""...ï; CI:) ~ ~ ~~. s: ~: :; lU ~~ a: <. :~:" ~. I- , :..;. () ~ ~~ < a.. " ~ .. :E ,!(¡ ~ -:..:: .*- l- e: '6 M w .2 "" 8 0 a .. Co:) .~ c5 0 ~ " c ; & ~ C'\I ~ ::J n Q) I CD ... ..s ~ C'\I ". 0 ê¡j en 0 a .. ,!(¡ ., a: 0 :>- ~ ..s - C'\I It) W CI:I Q) ... LO a: g. Q) z .... "';" t~_ .c:: ~ - 0 <C :;) CI:) ]: (J) .\21 ~ W 0... .!(¡ .c:: C1I Cñ ~ '~ ~ . >- ~ ~~ ~ 't:J ~ - en >i Q) ~ ..J -= Q! Ìij "Ot :E <C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - (J ti It) , .è- :E It) It) Q' oS Q) en '," a: è' o;j oj ~ § 0 u ü: , a ~ - IO~ Q (3 () ~ """ ~~ ~ 0 CI) u >- a: s: 10 " .s .!(¡ Q) ~ 0 ~ - , ..s ~ ~ 01 I:: Z U. C ; ,S; .0 ..s ::> ~ w ~ ~ .~ è' '- 8- 0 en ., I- CI) ~ c5 I:: (f) 10 () W lU c - ~ Q ::I w a ~ C\ ~ Q) Q) Q) U. ::J , ..s ..s .0 0 0 , 0 a C\ CI) c c\ . I: "- - w w U 0 C1I C1I 0 a: w a: ~ ~ Q) ..s .c:: C '. CD a: z Ö CIJ' ; 5 ~ Q <C Z w ~ a ~ .. .s C1I § - 0 0 :E w CI) > .. S ~ ~ ~ I- m ~ :E 0 z 0 CI:I u ::J >- a:1 " CI) Q Q) ~ (J u a... " CI) e: 'E 0 w a.. ~ e u z u: a: < ," 1 ..2 ê u ::I Cñ ^ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ .... .0:' ~ U en C1I (.) .. 0) ':; E Q) Q <C ~}' ..s ~ w ..J .. a: to)' ..... - 5 .!(¡ ë3 (.) a ~ - 10 f, .!(¡ ~ CI) ~ ~:'. ~ ~ ::I W s: ~ ~. Q) ..J a: ffi .~ g. c:: .S; '" .2 E ...= z .. >- to) (J) .!!2 C1I en 0 ,. ...J ê5 It) ). ~ ::.: ~ ~ -, I- CI:) ~ ~ is ", z Co ~. 01 <II g Cñ ~ ~ w l.!.J ~ 0) .S; e: a: a - r..:. { 01 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ a: a "Ot .1:: '5 Cl ~ c.. ~ :::: ::J u ~ !.' ì5 CI:I Q) U ~~ =s ..s 'It a: -J '1, (!) 10 ¡: CI:I Cb 't:J c: ~ ,'- ~ ~ ..s .2 ~ .. .,. I:: '., ~ CD .!!2 a " ..s oS C1I a S .;.. ~ .~ u u ,~ è - a '[ I:: 0 ~ ~ lU .; CI:I e: -ê õ § a ., f!! .~ ~ :§ a , ::; 0... U T:; U .s 'S CI:I . W " Ž ~ ...J - Z I- W W 0 0 w ¡:: W ~ w :E Ž z c CJ en .. a: I- 0 C < Z :,; I- j' () (f) a: 0 ¡:: 0 a: < a: ü: .:¡ ü: (f) < Cñ u CJ a: < w « ¡:: < a.. s: Cñ CD ~ >- ...J Z I- ; ...J (f) U w 0 0 « « w 0' ::J C ë a.. .., a.. a. (/) CD ~ " w "") IX: N o o N I ~ mO 0::0 wN zO:: 0« _w m>- ~...J :!E« :!EO o~ uu. ~~ zu. :::11- 0m OW u.:::I 00 CW 0::0::: «z 00 co¡::: ~(3 z- :::I~ o(/) urn wS -0 Uw :30::: ·z tño ¡::: Cñ o c. o w o z w ~ ~ o u w e:: CI) ~ It ~ Ü :::¡ CD :::> Cl .:.: z w ~ l- e:: « Q.. w o @ CI) S ~ o <: CI) ~ J: Ü ~ (!) <: ~ o N ...... C') <cì Lt') ....- -,-. ~,..~ "<l- e ,.. o w > o e:: Q.. Q.. « llJ Ü <: S ~ o Ü llJ Q o Ü ffi ....J Ü (!) <: ~ o N C\ .... CQ CQ :ž o ëñ :> õ û.i ..J I- ¡:: Z o ¡:: ëñ o Q.. û.i û.i û.i 0 CJ o«z>=~ o ~ ë2 e:: ii: ,:j ~>->-:5~t: o«««wo "") Q.. Q.. (I) aJ I- \I') e 10 C') C') 10 C\ e C\ \1')" ,..' iii ~ ~ ... ,.. e .... ,.. ...... CIQ CIQ e CIQ c\ ' C')' It'Ì ~ ~ ~ "<I- "<I- c\i ,.. e e 10 ~ ;g ~ ...... C\ - 0). \I') ,.. C\ r-: ~ ~ .... ~ "<l- e a:) f ~ t l 1 ... Q) .s ..... o - t:: Q) ~ tt! ~ Q) .s .!; 0) .t:: .S ,¡g 0) 0) e (.) .8 0) .~ ~ "E tt! o .Q .c: B '§: 0) .s '§: 0) t:: .8 tt! 0) ~ .~ Q.. ~ ~ Q) ·s . :J ~ e ~ ~ ~ 0) 0) -ê .!; t:: -ð 2 .!; 'C t:: t:: ~ ~ '(;) ,c:: o .::: ~~ .!!J ê ¡:: 8. z o ¡:: « u ii: ¡:: (I) ;:) "") ~ , ~ o e c C\ .... II') I ..... "<I- C\ I .... 0) "<I- :it I- Z ;:) o o o « ..... c c , C\ c c:: .2 .0) :;; is 0) .!; ;!2 'S CD , :it o w e:: If) If) « ..J u w e:: , "" ...¡ Inspector/Plans Examiner % , Increase Starting salary must qualify for a State Provisional Building Inspector License End of Probation period must have Provisional 5 License to continue employment Pass Exam and obtained Standard 1&2 Dwelling 10 Inspector State License pre-approved by the Building Official Pass Exam and obtained Standard 1&2 Family up to 10 Plans Examiner State License pre-approved by the Building Official Pass Exam and obtained Standard State License up to 10 pre-approved by the Building Official Pass Exam and obtained Standard State License up to 5 pre-approved by the Building Official Pass Exam and obtained CBO from ICe pre- up to 5 approved by the Building Official Any additional License pre-approved by the up to 2 Building Official Page 2 of 2 , ~ ....,,¡ , , , CENTRAL SERVICES Automotive Mechanic Pay Grade 10, Job Code 833 to Heavy Equipment Mechanic Pay Grade 14, Job Code 827 Cost $5,357 One position of Maintenance Tech V Pay Grade 9, Job Code 872 to Maintenance Specialist Pay Grade 12, Job Code (New) Cost $1,454 Total Cost $6,811 Change Division name from General Maintenance to General Construction \ ~ Q) .æ (t :oS (t ..... t:: .:; 0 0 :§ ~ E (t .92 Q) N (,) 3:! <::I 00 <::I 0 Q) e ::. ... ° .::c ~ ¿, N .s Q. <::I I .E (t .!Q <::I .... .!Q ~ C\ C/)O .!!1 ... c::O 00 ~ It) I WN (t Q) È ... Q) :oS ~ zc:: 00 ~ .!!1 0<C 00 ... 0 "0 e I _W .!!1 t:: ... C/)- (t Q. <::I 111 <::I ~...J .E t:: Ìij :i<C <::I "- "-~ "0 Q) .S:! 10 C\ t'-r.. ¿~ E t:: :iU ... "- :. ¡ t:: (t Ü <0" CO)" 111 .9- ~ O~ 'ë: ::. (,) ~ C\ .... ~~ tr Q) Uu. fo<) fo<) Q) Q) E ~gj ~ ;!J: E .E !It .9- Q) ü ¡ 5-~ :oS zu. ~ ..... 0 a:¡ ~ Q) Q) 0 ;:)1- w I- C\ i!. ;..,-2 ~ OC/) I- cò \it :> t:: (f) a1 .... I 111 (t (t UW "- (,) ,w C\ "'t' ~¥' ~ E u.;:) :J ~ a:¡ .... a:¡ Q) Q¡ .::c 00 ·0 0> " Q) .s ë S .,..: .\J :oS -2 cW w ~, w a:: C1 .... Q¡ Q) .E c::c:: c llJ -2 :oS .S:! :it <CZ z ë >- , "0 S: t:: W " (t I- 00 ~ w :::. t:: 0 13 z > LìS (t t:: m¡::: ~ 0 :' 3:! .!Q Q) :J ~t3 0 a:: ::t Q) ~ E 0 0 c.. I;:: .... 0 w c.. Q) CI) t:: 0 z- a:: <C :oS '« Q) c:c ;:)~ .:; ...: E oC/) <::I <0 Q t:: .9- uC/) <::I "'t' N '5 Q) ::. ~ a:¡ In E tr w:3 I- C\ " ..; 0 .9- Q) Iii <0 .... C")' 0 ::. ~ -U Ü ....- fo<) ... 0) tr Uw 111 Ii ~ C\ .E Q) II) 3c:: fo<) .!!1 ~~ I- ~ 00 (t 111 ·z ::t >- (t Q) .... ~O ø ü 0> ~ ::. ..J ~ C\ Q) 0 ::¡ I- 00 Q) ¡::: Z "<i :oS '1:) I ~ CO) <::I .... .E t:: ëij CI) w CO) Q) llJ llJ a:: a:¡ .... I t:: t:: CI) ø ¡::: "- (t 0 0 Ü '« 0::: "'t' .§ CI) ~ c.. s: ø :J 0 oi E 111 ai ffi 0 ::E II) .92 ~ :§ a:: -2 '« ~ 00 ~ CI) ø Q) e ~ ....J ~ ::> :oS Q..... ... ~ '« '1:) _ t:: .g 8 (t Q) Q) .:; E ¡...: s: Q) ..... I ~ .s- i: 8 ili ffi t:: (,) ~ Q) g.Q CI) ü CI) E Q) (t ü W ~~ Ž :it ¡:.: ..J I 0 0 Z I- W W w w ¡::: W ¡::: a:: \ 0 C> ci) . <C ~ Z Z 0 ~ z ~ I- 0 (f) I- 0 (f) 0::: 0 0 ~ ¡¡: ,:j ¡¡: :s c:c Cñ ¡::: 0 CI :s w C:C. ¡::: c.. :> Cñ /Xl >- >- Z l- (/) 0 w 0 0 c:c c:c c:c w 0 :J W 0 i5 c.. "",) c.. c.. (/) /Xl I- "",) a:: <0 ..... "- "- a:¡ In "'t' a:¡ C") fo<) IÒ ~ fo<) '....., 10 0) ;,¡ ..- C") ß C\ C\ ~ , ..-- ~ ~ CI) ~ ..,. ::;; ~ Q) :S .... tn 0 ~ ~ ·s ~ <\I Q.~ N ~ .ß! 0 0 0 ~'tJ 0 ..- 0 ~ U c: C N .~ CO 0 I .8 g- O .... C\ cnO 0 ~ ..- ,,0 ..'!! 10 Q) , WN <\I CI) ,.. zO:: 't:: 'tJ C\ ~ c: 0) 0< <\I ..- CI) , _W ~ S CI) ..- cn>- tn 0 ~...J c: ~ 0 Q) :¡æ< 0) ..- 0 e. Q) 0 0 ..- Q) :¡æ0 10 <0 .... <\I E lO- r-) 0)" : U O~ 'tJ c: I- C\ ,.. ~ .2 OLL ~ ~ c: CI) <\I CI) ~~ - t)) .~ -.J ~ ·s E ZLL U .Q E ~ 10 E 0 :J.... 0 ~U Of/) CI) Il'i Q. Q) OW UJ ..- (3' S c I LL:J u ..- "t::: L. ~ ..- 'õ~ 00 0 ë ~ c::i .2! Q. OW W ..- Q) ::3 ,," 0 ~ .\,1 ~ - Z CI) Q) <Z w 0 ~ <\I CI) I- 00 :æ w ~ .Q 0 > .g z £O¡:: :æ 0 ..'!! ~ 0 0:: .8 <\I 0 ~ê3 c: u Q", ·52 ~ u w Q", u Z- 0:: « ~ CI) « :J!:!: .c: 0 Of/) c C\ co u Q. Of/) c <0 It) ~ .52 ~ C") co ~ w:3 I- 0) C")- ....- ~ ~ C\ ,.. ~ ~ -0 ~ ~- ~ c: Ow ~ C\ <\I ~ 3" :t: ~ c: ~ Q) (!) u .s CD ·z ~ ~ .S 1.1 :§ ~o .... c: Q Q:) ~ ~ Q) UJ Q) ¡:: -.J M E S u R:! ,.. I tn.æ Ci) ~ ~ 0) I c: .S :::::: co ~ Q:) '- co co 0 <: 0) ;g E ... ..- .e a. S 0 ~ ai c5'tJ IE ¡::: .....æ 0 ~ ~ o <\I ~ II) ~ § è '::; -.J 'tJ 10 ~ CI) :e ~ c:: C\ ~ CI) .c: <II 0 ¡...: o .... I Q. 0 ·2 <") ¡¡j Q) 'tJ '1:j 0 ~ c: ::3 II) U '« <II <II U ù.i - ¡:.: ..J 0 Z I- ù.i ò,. w ¡:: w 0:: w ù.i 0 C) ci) :æ Z z 0 ~ z ~ I- en I- 0 en 0:: 0 0 ~ u: « « Cñ ¡::: u C) « w ..J Q", :> ëi5 CD >- >- ..J Z U w 0 0 « « « w w 0 Õ c.. ., Q", c.. en CD 0:: -..I \.r ....,.¡ COMMUIIY DEVELOPMENT , , , Marketing Services Coordinator to Business Retention Specialist Title Change Only - Vacant position Title Change Only One position of G.I.S. Analyst III Pay Grade 19, Job Code 738 to G.I.S. Specialist Pay Grade 20, Job Code New Cost $4,567 Total Cost $4,567 " M o o N I N enO 0::0 WN zO:: o<c _W en> ~..J :æ<c :æCJ O~ ULL. ~~ ZLL. =»t- Oen uw 1.1..;:) 00 OW 0::0:: <CZ 00 m¡:: ~ë3 Z- ;:)!:!: Oen CJen w:3 -CJ Uw 30:: ",:z enO ¡:: ü5 o c. ë w c z w ::E ::E o (J w a:: .... ~ ~ o -J ~ lU Q ç ~ ~ u ¡:.: z w ::E "I ~ ~" c:( ëñ, Q. :>' w _, c c' , !III"" ~.: Q':" lUf CI) ~,' s: :,~~~ lU ~: Ct:: :f: '<: ~ I Q. ~ I- W o C) ~ C :J a:I CI) ~ 1 ë w > o a:: Q. Q. c:( " 1 Ii > ....I l- I Z W a:: a:: :J (J ., ~ (!) , .. ,~ c W l- V) W :J a w a:: w .~ I- ¡:: Z o ¡:: ëñ o Q. .... CI) ::¡ 5 ~ CI) CI) (!i C") "t c:) C'I ~ 10 ~1::)f.9 ~ C'I c.; I::) 0) "t 0) (() ~ == 0) (() r-.: C") 10 ~ ~ 0) I ...... .... 1'0. "t C\j C'I (() "t i4 .... ~ -J ~ '« CI) (!i ~ gj ~b ~ co 0) ì.~ ~ f.9 :;; (() (() I") ~ Ñ ~ t:x:J- (()- IÒ C") .... It) f.9f.9.... C'I It) 1'0. f.::! 0) ,.. .... C") C) ..,: It)- 0'" i4~~ w w wcC) c~z>~ 8C)~a::ffi .:,j a:I»:3z~ QQ':Q':~~g " I' . . 1 I,,' " ~1¡~ ~.QQlco '1::: ffi :s Q) ~""".Q;S OJ~q;.f!2 .Qt::,g~ .9~~~ Õ co Q) ~ ~ :S it: .~ ! Q) tJ) Q. ;S.S 3:: Q) .... s: OJ :S ~ g t::'õ (1).2 co t:: ~ Q) .9 .0 ~ ¡:; .S: ~ - ...... ~ ::::: .~ Q) .... t:: .Q <I) '- E ~.§ ::: ê ì5 t:: '«~~ ~ t:: oS! co '- (!) .... ~ tJ).c:: ~ t:: .~ 0 :.¡:: ~ ..0 ·21 Q) co )( > Q) Q) 0 ,c:: Q) Q) ¡.;: :5;:; ..... o t:: .Q Õ E e Q. Q) ;S cD <I) co !!! (,,) .5; ~ co t:: o :e co c:: .Q ,g e (is Q. 0 oð Q. .... ~ 53 ·5 CIÌ 16 ..\,) ~ê.§§ _ ::: <I) (,,) '- 0 .¡;, .5 .S! <I) '0 ~, co !!! co .ë: !!! oS! ~;:: tJ) co oS! 0 co "t) co ...tJ)~<I)iJ .£2 .S ~ 16 :so Q) E ~ ~ :t1:::,~~ 5;:(1)0:::.... e<l)Q)-oS! cotJ)(,,)!2 Q. Q) '- .5 v, .9.QQ)~C: ;::: ;; c:: $I> ·21 .~ 0 co - t:: ~ U) S ,0 Õ t:: U) (,,) ~ :;:: ~ ..s! t::o (,,) 'r;¡ CI) (,,) ~o-!!!Q. .~ Q. (!) t:: -§ ~ .U) tJ).0 Q) ~ ,.., c::: .¡:: CI) (,,) ~ .- 'r;¡ co Q) .!:: 0 .Q ~...;'§Q.~ .S! ~ U) .!!2 (,) :g .!!! Õ .c:: ~ ::J ~ ~ ~ .$ t:rc%COÕâ) ~~ï~~ ¡t:: ,,, - E :;, r- 'W '\I "- """1 ž o ¡:: c:( (J u::: ¡:: V) :J ""') """ .... (,,) co Q. .§ .... Q) ~ ::: .Q I co '<i. It)~ t:: ¡:¡ co oS!.... (,,) 16 !!! .§ :S U) '~ .::J U) ;:¡, is'' co c:: co E ~ ~:;;¡ - co c:: 'r;¡ c:: .c:: o ,52 (,,) ~2 J!! e ~ Q. t:: '*- ~ It) ::J (,,) <I) co .§ .~ '5 ;S .~ c:: ~ .~ Q. :t:: J!! U) .... c:: ~ ::J (,,) .. (() 1'0. .... .... 10 t:x:J !!'> It) H""¡ f.9f.9.... C'I !::: ~ ~ ~ ~. .....t:x:JCIQ C'I- (()- oò :! .... It) ""f.9'" (() (() C'I t:x:J0)t:x:J ,.. 0 C'I t:x:J- CJ:i "t~ I") .... It) f.9f.9... I::) I::) .... 8 o C\ .... 10 C ~ .... ~ .... it I- Z :J o (J (J ~ .... I::) I::) ~ CI) (!i ~ lU ~ o u ð w a:: V) V) :3 (J w a:: \w , INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Analyst Pay Grade 20, Job Code 547 to Analyst Supervisor Pay Grade 21, Job Code 550 \ ...., , Cost $ 3,579 . . N o o N . ..... enC D::C WN ZD:: o<c -W en>- en...J :¡¡:<c :¡¡:(J 05!2 (JLL ~~ ZLL :JI- Oen (JW LL:J 0° OW D::D:: <cZ 00 m¡:: >-<c I-(J Z- :JLL Oen (Jen <c W...J (J(J :JW ...JD:: ·Z &:>0 I- en o c.. , ...... :: I: i a ~, ~ ,'4 :s: 1\ lJ.J ;~-c a:: ,i; ~, M, I- JiU ;¡;;<C 1';. c. ,ª .1- W o (!) <: 0 ::J CD , " CI). ~:. ö w o Z w :¡¡: :¡¡: o (,,) w ~ o .. W I- U) , w ::J " " w 0:: ö w > o. 0::: c. ' c., <C :r ~ ¡f'. .;r 7. CI) ~ S> ffi CI) ~ ¡:: ~ ¡..;: CI) ~ ~ a <:( >- i ø i o ,', >- -.J ,,. ..J o I- <: , Z G:r ~ ~ ~ <:" (,,) 01'.', ¡:: I'; ~k ~I -12 .:.: Z W :¡¡: I- ~ <C c. w o ; I I ž1 0, ëi) I . $' Õ ";:;. ê5 CI) S> ffi §¡ CI) ...... ~ -J ~ <:( co ~ oi 0) C") fcS' o ,.... ~ :2 C\ .;, C\ C\j "t C\ a:f C") ~ ...... ~ -J ~ <:( ~ 0 I Ii) C\ 8 oi "t 0) co' C") ~ W ..J I- ¡:: Z o ¡:: ëi) o c. t },t < 00) O)~; 0) co ......- 0) ~ IO..I~ ~ ~~ ~ ì ~ .ft' :.,;..- :4¡; co ...... C") o co 0) C\ co c C\j' co' 0>" "t ~ It) ~ ~ ~,' ~ co 0) "'t i C\ 0) ,.. LC) C\ It). ~ co' IÒ C\ .... It) «' 0)- ~ ~!7 ~ ~ 1; c:) C\ C") ...... Ii) ~ W W WOe! en o<cz).:1- o~<Co::Ü: ~>~5~ o<c<c<cw "") c. c. U) CD Ž o ¡:: <C (,,) .:,j' ü: ¡5 > ~ g: ~ ~. ~ .~ :6~Q) (I) (I) 1;5 ...: Q) ;"'Q)~ C6 0, t:: ~ ;:.:. 'c:( ra ~ 'O~~ !:l. Q) 0 :::J :s :g e 0 t:: 0,.... 0 ... ;.., 0 Q) :;:: en t:: 0 (I) I:: e 11:1 11:1 :;:; .Q ..: CQ '-' oS ..... Q)'t:::{g;:: .c: ~ ;§ - Q).!::: U) ~ ~ Q) I:: Q)~:S0 !/)t::,,!i} - ...... c:: Cb ~ ~ 11:1 I;; o :::J (I) '0 Q) 0 I:: (I) I:: 0 .Q 11:1 o -I:: ~ e . :: .\,2 11:1 ~l28:-e ~ tII Q) .~ "==' ..c: è: 11:1 - .... Q) t:: ä3 0 ~ <:( ::: -I:: :::J ... :::J 0 CI) CD 0 11:1 - £ "tJ en (I) 0 t:: ~o ~... 11:1 11:1:::J CD I::-E~QI <:( CD '-' o e t:: ~ :0. 11:1 0 ~ ..: -0 (I) e 0, I:: tII Q) .5; ~ -I:: ~ .5; E - 11:1:::J ~ 1:: E E !1 Q) .- 1:: ~ ct.5; 11:1 - ~ E ct tII Q) -I:: Q) I:: E ~ " <:( 0 :: ~- Q) 0 (I) I:: :Sg.~~ g.e~o oo,°~ I;; (I) Q) (! è 'b 1: UJ QJ Q) '- E '¡¡j :g § Q) CI) Q) ~ ~ .\,2 :S .§ CI) :g :S ·E5; oS Q .~ 11:1 Q) C6 ~ a :S Q) 11:1 Q) I/) " -I:: :SQ)I/)~ .5; ~ i ~ :S~C6E .~ 0 t:: :::J ;.., ... <:( 0 :::: Q)'õ~ t:::S I/) ~og.~ :::J CD e ê ü :S 0, <:( ,0 ,t .~" ~" .. .. " I " L , . ,'-. , I." " " e E' 11:1 Q) '5j:S 'ês~ Cþ :::J ~ .Q .Q~ à;,!!! 0, s: t:: Cþ e .5; ¡;¡" tII t:: Cþ 11:1 .Q g. ;::: e .~ 0, e êã Cþ :S :S~ (I)_ 0 .... ~ ~ Cþ -.Q ê E <:( Q) ~ E o ... g..:g e õ o,Cþ .!:2 :5 :S ... Cþ-E ~ g. ~ ti o jg .e 11:1 t:: CD ~ E .- 0 :g 0 ct~ ... - o :;: .!2 ~ ~ à; g.~ CI) Cþ .... E ~-I:: C6 ~ t:: CD <:(-1:: :6 .\,2 -I:: .e s: û) ·s ~EÊ ê ~ ¡g <:( (I) .... CD~1: t:: 11:1 .91 o 0 0, " :t: .§ :6 CD 'Q5 Q) e V) .g> 0 ~ CD E e ~ 11:1 o 0 .Ç;-I::':::: ~..::c .:::: ...., , , o o .... 6 o o C\ ,.... Ii) :g 0) .... I ,.... o o ,¡¡; I- Z ::J o (,,) (,,) ~ ,.... o o ¿ U It ,¡¡; " w 0:: U) U) <C ..J () w 0:: · ~ ...., , , , MOSQUITO CONTROL 5 temporary MEO I positions Pay Grade 6, Job Code 819 to be changed to 5 part time with limited benefits Pay Grade 6, Job Code 821 Total Cost $4,355 \\ , N o o N I .... mO od~ Wo::: z< Qw m>- m.J ~< ~o o~ 01.1. ~~ zu. :JI- om OW u.:J 0° w co::: 0::: <z 00 m~ ~ë3 Zii: :J- Om om w:3 -0 Ow :Jo::: .J ·z 1-0 m_ I- Cñ o Do , , . ,"' ~ o >- II! -.. :::> ~ ", " Ii] Cf.) S ~ ( .f I- u It: ~ I: ~ I- o q~ <=g ,. a:I " I:, .' Cf.) ,~ ~ I ë w o z w ::¡¡: :E o u w Il:: o W I- en w -:J o w Il:: I o w >, o Il:: Q.' Q.' < ,; í ~ "1" ~- t 1 , ~ ~ I- ...J ...J:i Z o 0,' W g: g:1: ~ <= <=I';:J o O,~ u ü ü, e e· :s :S' g gl~~ ~ ~I'~ I . . I· I,. Z " ~I· >1 õl ,:.: Z W ::¡¡: l- ll:: < Q. W o - o ~ ~ . ûi -I I- ¡:: Z o ¡:: U) o Q. ~ ~ OJ I,<) ..,. ..,. OJ ~ ~ ~ ;' -i -- 1lJ- I,<) I,<) I,<) - C\ IlJ OJ ..,. ..,. I'\Ì _I, ;g a:i ..,. 0) CO) .,' ~ ~ ~!; ..,.- I,<) 11)" I,<) I,<) ..,. ..,. I'\Ì - ..,. c a:i ûi ûi ûi 0 C> en o ~ Z ;;.: I- 8 C> ~ Il:: ffi a:I >- >- :s Z Q ~ ~ :i ~ .:.ï I ~ g II) 0) ~, . ", , " . .. , \ , -0 .91 ~ Q CI) .!§ 1J-s ~ CI) Q) .s .Q c: .E 0 -0 E ~ ~ ':; ~ 0' u ~ æ .!2 c: c: 8 ·9 .~ ~ UJ o c: I:t III ."> s :5 ~ CI) 0 .2 E ~-t: 1: ~ Q) 0 E .... ::"'-0 ...Q.S! I:t III E ,9- Q) .S:! è1: III III (5 .~ ~ 5 Q) .... -;; 'Vi 'I> 0 ::..,I:t o .~ ì5.¡:: ~ ..... .,¡ o ~ :: Q) 'I> c: ':;; ~ -.: ~-OQ) ... Q) ~ Q :-- -, i:~.e Q) .c: III E ~ :( .~ _ t: 5- 0 ~ ~ ~ ¡ ~ Q) Q LL .S .S Q) ~ ~ S~J:2 ... Q. Q) æ.E.s c C IlJ ¿, C C C") - II) ¿, C") C\ 10 ,¿ ..,. - :it I- Z :J o U u ~ II) c c ri-> c o ~ - I ) o1§ ~~O) Ë - 10 ~,gOJ ~~ ž o ¡:: < u u:: ¡:: en ~ :it o W Il:: fI) fI) :s u w Il:: , . II I , ,. ;':' ., ~ ; ~, " ~. 0 10 In~ @ (, J ~ a~ ': ' (, J CI) ') ;. :s ~ ; "'^. ¡;;,i- I- "'"~, 1J () cr' ~ « ~ a.. - '0; t:: ~ -- I/) ,'~ ~ '1:: --,;: -5 I- ù "'" !!! 0 N W I/) 0 0 0 C) ,0 (I) :S 10 0 =2 ': 0 - .Q t:: ¿ N ;:) .!2 0 I ~ T m " E 0 .... 1J C") 0 .~ ~ ..... f/) 0 0 '- 10 0:: . :;) - C N >- . :;) UJ -- b- (.) ~ 0:: IX) !!! Q) Z l- .' I/) 10 0 <C :::> } - .~ t:: Ih UJ CI) 0 ëñ ~ t:: (.) ..,. >- ~ " .. .Q ..... f/) ...J - .!S '- II) == " I/) <C ..,. ..,. CO 0 t:: C'I 10 CO CI. IV == 0 co C'I 0 . f/) ..,.- .....- If:>- .~ :S 0 ü: (, J (, J ~ :S ~ U I/) 0 >- 0:: :;) E 1ií .- 0 Ci) ~ Z u.. 0 - ~ ::J .- - ..,. t:: W ..,. Q) .!2 0 f/) I- a C'\Î ~ u UJ CJ) ~ ..... ..... 1J ::J w ~ 10 , .J2 Q) u.. a ;:) ~ ..,. ~ 1ií 0 ë 0 0 .9- UJ w cC Q) ~ C 0:: w 0:: ~ t:: :it 0:: 0 ~ IV <C Z z ë .~ I- W 0 Z 0 0 :¡: w ~ t:: > ;:) m ¡::: :¡: 0 .0 0 .J!! :e ~ <C 0 0:: Q) I/) () 0 () a.. 0 () w a.. ;" ~ Q.. ~ Z u.. 0:: < " .~ ::J f/) 1;, 0) fI) '5.:, ~ ~ 0 ..,. f/) ,t;> C'I 10 0) it: 0 :3 ~, co C") ....~ Q) uj :,t,~ ..,." (, J añ:f .... UJ , 0 œ: (, J .. '. ~ Q) õ 0 ç t:: UJ ~. ,(I) Q) ::J .., s: .Q 0:: .. !!! L.: ...J > 1J Q) .. ... Q) ~ ¡..: z ::¡ - I/) ..,. oS! :!:: f/) 0 : 0 'S: ..,. - :§ oS! ¡::: I- ~ IV C'\Î t:: IV -.J ð z a 0) ..... (I) .c: I/) a w ..... 10 E '§ f/) 0:: ~ (I) co , IV g: g: ~ ..,. .~ t:: 0 0:: 0 - 0 C. =2 =2 ;:) ~ cC :;) 0 I/) , b- 0 a () e! ~ IV Ü Ü Q) CI) I/) 10 ~ ~' " fE CD ~ 8 :§ t:: :s :s i '.. '8: :3 j CD 't: 0 0 :S IU oS! 0 CI) CI) ... Q.. CD ~ 0 ~I;¡: , ¡f ~ .E :S I' I" :it I,' W Ž " 0 ¡:.: ..J 0 W Z I- W W ,j ¡:: 0:: w ¡:: W 0 C) I_ci) (3 rn :¡: Ž z 0 ~ z ~ I- .. T' CJ) t:: , 0 0 ~ ii: ii: :3 0 ,,' ¡:: () C) ..J I': « § .' , :5 w ~k ¡:: () a.. ëñ m >- >- z CJ) w w > 0 Q < < « w el ;:) 0:: 0 ë a.. a.. a.. CJ) m .., N o o N I ~ ClJO o::~ Wo:: Z< Qw CIJ~ CIJ.... -< :EO :ECIJ 0- oIL. ~~ ZIL. ::::11- 0m OW IL.::::I 0° W Co:: 0:: <Z 00 mi= ~< 1-0 Z- ::::I~ oCIJ om w:S -0 Ow ::::10:: .... 'Z 1-0 CIJ_ I- ëñ o D.. I" W 1 I I" I ~ :s ~ ~ o >- Ct) I- ::::> ~ In I~ I- 01:' ~ <=1, g m , I I' CI) I ~ UJ I, >-1 I I ö w o z w ::!: ::!: o u w a:: ö, w > o a:: Il. Il. c( ~;: ,f.~ ~ ~ ,¡i' F<::~ l~ ~ I- -J -J Z o 0 w g: g: !2 <= <= ::> o 0 u ü ü.. ~ ~" ::; ::;i c c'~ ~ ~:' ~ ~,~ ; ! '; ¡:.: Z w ::!: ~ c( Il. W o ž' 0' iñ -I' >1 01 , o W I- Cf W ::> CJ w a:: - o ~ ~ "" "" (\j .... .... ~ <0 , "" o Q:j c: <0 o ~ :; UJ Ü (\j ~~~<o"" ~ C1) 00 ' < q, ;g I:! ~ Q:j <5 } û.i ..J I- ¡:: Z o ¡:: iñ o Il. o "" ~C\ 0'1 ~ o I.C) It) ~ g ~I ",,- ....- Iþ' ~ ~ ~I I 1 1 I I, ~ It 011' ~I;, I, I,; I:, I' I;: it 1 o ~ ~ i: ~ C") C")" 'If!t-- ~ &n"~ ~ ~~" û.i o o u m Q û.i û.i o C) ci) ~ Z > I- C)~a::it.:..¡ »:5z;: C(C(~WO Il. Il. UJ ID I- I' I, "t:I q, ï.¡:: b) .~ .¡§ ~-6 f!! C1) q, :5 .Q § oS E "t:I q, .f!! .~ 5 '5 0- (.) f!! q, 0) .!(! § c: (.) .9 >< ~ 'èi) o c: Q. <0 .~ :5 :5 !!! C1) 0 ~ E ;;¡'è: 1: ~ q, 0 §,b .9~ Q. <0 E .9- CD .(.) ~1§ E!! <0 o .!!1 ~ § (þ ~ --; '(;) CD 0 ::..,Q. ~ .!2 ~~ CD CI) 'õœ: 1: :g .q, Q) :; .Q L.: !!! "t:I CD .... .æ g: ~ :è J2 I:: .:::: CD .c: <0 ~ '§ ¡(¡ '" I:: .~ Õ ~ !!! ~ m CI) q, 01 Cl::u. E .S; '- 01 CD :t: 01 S co Q .... Q. Q) tfoS:5 I' I I I I I, ',.,-. "-,. I, I' 1 I I', I- I L' I" ž o ¡:: c( u ¡:¡: ¡:: Cf ~ \ o o <0 ¿, o o C") .... I.C) ¿, C") C\ <0 ,;., "" .... :ä; I- Z ::> o u u ~ r-. o o , C") o C ~ " :ä; CJ w a:: Cf Cf :5 u w a:: N o o N I .... enO Qd~ Wo:: z< Ow en> en.., :E< :EO osa OLL ~~ ZLL ::;)1- oen OW LL::;) 0° W co:: 0:: <Z 00 aJi::: ~ë3 Z- ::;)~ Oen oen w::S -0 Ow ::;)0:: ...I 'Z 1-0 en_ t: en o D.. , , ,!IF , , 1- fð CJ) S lu 0:: ~ o >- CD ..... ::> ~ I- o < a.. ~ I- W o '_ C> ~ '~ C I :;) ':' III I I 1-· ~, CJ) ~ ö w c z w :E :E o o w a:: c W l- I/) W I, :;) o w a:: I Ö w' >' 0- a:: I, a..: a.. , < . +' Jr '!I'!- r: .. ¥ :~ 't "" ....J o g: 8 ~ :s 0' CJ) ~ f ,. ~ I- <51 ffi Q: I a:: 1'1 a:: ~ I: :;) 01. 0 Ül, ~I'· :s I: O' '. Cl)t ~F; ,:.: z w :E ~ < a.. w c .." ~I' -I ~I; >..,. C - o ~ ~ õ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ill oJ I- ¡:: , z o :¡:: iñ o a.. .... N ~ co 0) .... <0 co ill ill ill c c> c ë2 z :>: 8 c> ë2 a:: III>->-::) Q ~ ~ ~ : - I; o It) It) ~ ~ g:, ~ ~ :' :: ;: . '<t "':t- Q): N ~ co co N 0 ;:; ~ ~' ..,. ..,. N .... ..,. o c:xj ..,. 0) C" :f ~ ~ ~ ~ ...- 6ø9, &n"~:' ~ "'1 .1 "':t- "':t- N .... I "':t- O c:xj I, I I I: , ¡~ I I/) I ' I- 1 ' ii: .. I w ~I Z 1-1: ~ gl ; , : . ;: , , " I- I , I \ '0 .!!,! ~ 0> Ii) c: Ii) 't: -tJ.g ~ Ii) Q) :5 .Q c: ~ ~ '0 CD ~ .~ "S "5 I::r 0 .~ ~ c: 8 ~ .~ Ii) Ii) o c: Q. III .~ :S :5 Ii) .2 III ìií o :5 è o o CV) .... 10 C CV) N ~ oJ.. '<t .... ~ E ~ o 1: ~ Q) 0 E "- :"''0 .Q II> Q.(;¡ E .9- Q) ,0 ~"€ !II III å ,~ ~ g Q) :::: -; ri3 Q) 0 :..,Q. ~ .!!2 ~¡:: Q) ~!i o I;:: ~ ¡g ,Q) Q) ~ .Q ..: ~'oQ) ... ~ ~ ~~~ Q) .c: III E'§::i .!g - § g. 0 Ii) ~ ~ a; fQQ)~ l.I.. .§·t CD "- ~. 1:: 01 :Scn~ ... Q. Q) ¡f~:5 :it I- Z :;) o o o ~ co o o . CV) o 0' ~ Z o ¡:: < o ii: ¡:: I/) ~ :it o w a:: I/) I/) :5 o w a:: . N o o N I .... tn° D::~ WD:: z< Qw tn>- tn..J :ë< ::eO 0!!2 ou.. ~gs Zu.. ::JI-- Otn OW u..::J 0° w CD:: D:: <Z 00 m¡:: ~ê3 zu: ::J- otn otn w:S -0 Ow ::JD:: ..J ·Z 1--0 tn_ I-- Ci) o c. , ~ o >- CQ I- ::> ~ 1"'" I, , 1 I", ~I; ::;1" ~I, I I, ~ I ~ 1 ~ 01,' ~ <=1 g III 1 1 1 CI) ~I I 1 I ö w o z w :æ :æ o o w a:: o W I, ~ en w :J a w a:: ë w > o a:: c.. c.., < , -, 'T::i: .~- '. > ..J ~ -J -J Z o 0 w g: g: ~ <= <= :J o 0 0 ü ü ~ ~ S SI' g g.... ~ 01 <: ~ ¡:.: Z w :æ ~ < c.. w o ž o iñ :> õ - o ~ ~ ..... C\ <0 co - E o 0 ~ æ 0> Il.CI)~<O ~~ ;; ~ ::. 0:) -, W ..J ~ ¡:: Z o ¡:: iñ o c.. . : , .' ~ ~ ~ ; "-, " ' ~ ~, , , ; '.. ~ " " c ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~. ...... Iñ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ('.,j ..... I ~ C 0:) , ~ g ~~, ~ ~ ~; ~ ~ ('.,j ..... I w w WOC) Ii) O~Z~~ 8 C) ~ a:: ffi III > > ~ Z Q ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 .. I ' ~I ~ o ~ ; -' -, m : , Ž I 0 ¡:: < o ü: ¡:: en ~ " .!!;! ~ t)) ¡;¡ .¡§ ~-5 ~ It) Cb :5 .Q :5 .s E " Cb .~ .~ ::. :; b' (J ~ Cb It) .~ :5 ~ .~ It) It) o t: Q.t1 .~ S :5 e !3 0 ã; E ~j II) 0 §,:; ..QJ! Q. 111 E .s. II) .l.I ~"€ ~ 111 o .~ ~ t: Q) ~ ; .~ ~Q. ..9 .~ ~¡:: II) ....0 .f! Iò::: :t ~ .Cb II) s; .Q ..: ~ " II) ~ ~ g: 1::§oE II) 111 E :5 It) .~ ! ~ 6- 0 g ~ ~ :¡¡ 12 Cb ~ u.. .§ .S; Cb - S2! .c: 1:: õ' - 111 "'" ... Q. Cb rf.s:5 \ g <0 C C C I') ..... 10 6 I') ~ Ii> ~ ..... :it ~ Z ::I o o o ~ 0> C c 8 c ~ , :it a w a:: en en ~ o w a:: ~ .. ...." , , PUBLIC SAFETY Marine Safety Coordinator Pay Grade 15, Job Code 763 Marine Safety Coordinator Pay Grade 17, Job Code 763 Cost $1,754.59 One position of Communications Officer I, part-time Pay Grade 13, Job Code 727 to Data Entry Clerk Pay Grade 13, Job Code New, part-time Cost -0- One position of Communications Officer I, part-time to Evidence Technician Pay Grade 13, Job Code New Cost -0- 03/20/2002 139:44 ~ -- -=I.[=,-, 551-452-1598 EMERG MGT 2 '-' PAGE En -.J , . ..II ail... '. ~as ~ ... IoI"Q , >.Olt-l ,..¡ ...as a:I : 0 ~ I;) :I 0 , Q,. a; ~41 00'" ...Q,I IDOIII Q Q,I'ri Ù"g1W1W ~'¡"¡IW Q. Q: ~ = 0 Q ().~ = CII4I111 Q i4l~ rtI~.~ '¡"¡w IW CQ .cCCUQ '\WClCI Q a; Q :;IGlr-4 CliO "cW:>Ù!IQ .a .,. .,. '¡"¡8,"cn cJCl4I...,¡,,¡ o CI :f''' "O.c I II .¡,,¡ iii cJ :II ... .§ ,¡,,¡ .¡,,¡ r,I ~ i a:I 0 ø·,. W''' ()"Q >.;..."d IIIW ~ CI Ù .a 'Q '" ø....c GlII : II'C-; ... .a Q "C.~ Ø\ .a N "0 a:I >. þo Q ~ Q cn~ .... "'W«Im'¡"¡r-4"ØÙ ::I 1/1 Q III 1oI:; III = ;~ OGlIt-I~"'IIIOllla:l'" ..c'~ 1\1 ø·~ "Q ,..¡ ~ 11/ ... 11/ III ~.CIO Q CII 0 .ri "'!."oIIIOIiI.c 0 1;1 ~r-I 41 cJ 112 101 ,¡,,¡ .... ,¡,,¡ N Q .~"dCUOolllO ,¡,,¡ :a.c'¡"¡l-if""'l g)llll I ø.. I :II .~ ·~CU Jr-I'Q.lI! 8 §~ ~ ù ,/I) .a "0 ~ 'tI >. r-I Q.I '1"4 ,¡,,¡ : o II ~ ="'''0 N ...c OIW"Q'tI ..,¡"IllW Q ""' z: ÞSø. c : >.. 11"1 ~~ ~ III CI III 101 ,¡"I a:I ,.., GI J ~ :I GI'C OQ'" ,eQ f2 a.I ... 0 GlIW 0 m_ III ,¡,,¡ .c 0 N ê § 101 ...c... I-i C . ... ,¡,,¡ 0\ 8m "0 ail" «IGI,"",OUOCl N ~. «Ir-I..-I cJ.¡,,¡m .aJ:l I ~ ..0 )....=.0101 4I"'¡:S'" .-4 E 0 CII=e"'¡ClII tlll'''¡ 8 1.1.= ~ . .~ 101 00 ØI:> 1%1" :II o~ ("') ...'tIQ.lOQ"'¡ ØI!.co ~ N O~ .aIW8.....111 1100 ..... ccO\"" ,¡,,¡ CIOCI="''' Is ~ NI"'I-Þ a:I "0 0 00 CI fa =.... ~ .. . . Q ø...Clg,a ~ ... ~ NCOO '~'a:I .a.,. ù.co III !2 :z; ..0 '-4' I' N "0'" >. "QIlOO '01I ~ -<t Ø\NN I-i 0 ,¡,,¡ 0 :I .! :s ,-41::1 "0 ð ~ ,.,,.., . .. .. .. O"'CI"'¡III..-I Oaslll ~t~ I ..o.,.¡ -4' co..o'" 811 ~..-Ir-4U .a Q U ~ I' .-4 N.-4-<t Q :I"'¡ II C CI ..:. oo·,.¡ .~ - ~_..... .,. .a,Q .,. ,C"O Q.I C 5US >'''0 II GO ,¡,,¡ r-4 1oI...c.... "1-4,1:1 ...... O"l:lCa:I ~Š ~ Q.lOÙCl III"I:IÙ~o,. Q 1W8a:1.cIlCl" 1110 III "g,¡,,¡=.... II. ......c VI .¡,,¡ Q ,¡,,¡co ~&1 IiC III. ail '1"4 10 . . co ~ Q cJlIQ~ .r-I......cll..." 3a: ~ c...." 1III·"¡..-I_ .a"'¡1.Io4 .,.¡...ù ~UII ::1110 tJ~ ¡ ...«II-iQ 1II) aiI,C'" ~::I O=..-IIW"O c:: 8:'" ø. ~IW ø. 101 0 C '¡a:I'''¡~III>' E ... ,¡,,¡ Q .Q ,8,¡,,1Q CI'" E a::: -4' a:lGI ÙO...·......II ~ a::: Ø\ 'c.c~"'¡''' 1I '8§a:lþo a ~ .-4 ...,¡,,¡ ~"'r-4" : ~ - CIOOClO .0 0 Q,I III 0 1iO''' 0 ~ (I) OQQ GIlD s.ClloIiù "1:1111 en . . . l>a:I. 'Q '¡"'¡ Þr.: -4'N..o CI ... ,..¡..... . ~ ~ Q II ~ lie ""' ..00..0 .,.¡ .. CI CI 3 .' .a CI'¡:¡ 0 ~ I-i ..0 "'Ø\-<t ....Q ,¡,,¡,C ... ,C·,. ÙCIQ ~ ~ ~ ,.,"" .. .. .. Q "CI III .....,. II ,¡,,¡ .. III o,. ~ ..0.-4 ,..,1/1("') .0 III CI "Z II:IIHI III "0 CI Ia3 I' N"'¡"" .a...'W 0,8Q g,QQ ~ III ..... HooooO:Z:1,) :I 111= I-i .. a .. :ž I ~ ~ 0' j .. § n .. ~ .~ ª ~ ~ ä ~~~ffi ;: ., R; I m It) u º ~ I/J .. ... .... '" - '-' >.,J 0 0 0 ¡:: ~ ~ "" Q) Q) ,0 (f. (\ ..c: Q) . ..c: Q) " (f. C() '. ¡:: .¡,J (\ (\ ,.¡ ..c: M 0 .¡,J >, 0 ~ (\ 0 ¡:: 0.. N 0 . .,.¡ .¡,J N .¡,J ¡:: UJO c.,) Q) 0::0 ¡:: ,.¡ WN ;: ,.¡ zel: ~;: 0< CI) c.,) ,0 -W ~ o Q) cn)- ."..c: 5!2-1 .¡,J :!:< 0 0 Q) ,..... CO CO ..c: ¡:: :!:O \0 Ie) 05!2 VJ 0;) CO' .¡,J .,.¡ ~ ~ .. Ou. VJ ,.¡ Q) f::0:: VJ oc() ~ ~¡:: z~ ~ (\ ~ 0 0 ¡::..c: ~I- UJ 0 o u Ocn ~ ~< .,.¡ en ~ .¡,J 0 OW UJ ~H (\ ¡:: u.~ ::> ....~ c.,) 00 Ö cr U~ .,.¡"t; OW UJ ~ ~ ¡:: ~ UJ a:: ><H .,.¡ (\ 0::0:: c ~VJ (f. Z Ö H (f. "t; :it <Cz UJ Z~ (\ Q) 00 :::E UJ ~~ H"t; ~ CJ- :::E > H c.,) Q) Z ~< 0 <VJ Q).' ::> 0 a:: 0 () 0. ~~ ,.¡ ¡:: tJ z~ UJ 0. Q) '() a:: c:( o '-" 0...¡,J ~!:!: o ¡:: c:( ocn 0 0 ,.¡ Q) oUJ CO CO 0..8 \0 Ie) Q) w5 ~ CO- co' Q) c.,) ~ .. ..c:~ -0 ~ .¡,JH OW ~ 0.. 30:: u ¡:: Q) H .,.¡ ,.¡ ·Z ¡:,.., t;o ¡:,.., Q) ;, ¡::: 0 r'I") Q) Q) tf. -:t >,¡:: ëñ z VJ r--. 0 E 0 z ~ HO 0 H 0 * o..z D. ~ H 8 ¡:,.., H Q) < U < . tf. H U -:t C()C() Z H -:t ¡:: ¡:: U 0 Z . .,.¡.,.¡ H ~ 0 ~ ,.¡H .... ~ r'I")~ Q)"t; CQ 0 ~ ~* .¡,J ¡:: 0 U 0 ¡:: ~ :I., u ~..c: ~ ~ Ž :it " ~ 0'\ 0 cr z W W ¡:: UJ W C 0 c:( a:: :::E II) en ~ z :>: I- () l- ii: .J ii: en a:: o~a:: 5 c:( >->-5 w c:( ¡:: - 33- D. z ~ II) () w c:( c:( c:( w 0 ::> UJ c 0. 0. II) ID ~ ., a:: \...- '..".¡/ I:) I:) C) I: a ~ ~ ~ UJ C1J (/) C1J S ..c UJ ~ Q:; t\I ..c: . C1J C1J ..c: èO I: .0.1 t\I t\I ¡,.¡ ..c: M 0 .0.1>, 0 <: t\I ° I:~ N 0 I .,.¡ .0.1 N .0.11: (/)0 Ù C1J 0::0 I: ¡,.¡ UJN ;:¡ ¡,.¡ zO:: \, .. ;:¡ 0< ù (/) ..c -UJ ~ o C1J 00>- '~..c: ~..J .0.1 :æ< C) C) C1J ~ co ..c:1: :æO It) Ie .µ.,.¡ o~ ~- co- Ou. ~ ~ ¡,.¡ C1J ~o:: OèO \, .. I: z~ '"-1 t\I I:..c: ~ ~I- U o ù Z .,.¡ o(/) '"-1 .0.1 0 OUJ Q t\I I: u.~ H Ù 00 > '''¡''C:! 0 '"-1 \, .. I: cUJ UJ Z .,.¡ t\I c::0:: 0 '"-1< tI) Z Ö :EH ~"C:! :it «z UJ HU t\I Q) 00 :E UJ HH ,..¡"C:! ~ m- :E > IZ Ù C1J Z ~~ 0 H:I: Q) :::J 0 c:: Q::;U ¡,.¡ 1:' 0 0 D. <'"-1 Q) ,~ z~ UJ D. c:: < p,.,H ~.µ ~!:!:: o I: < o(/) C) ¡,.¡ C1J O(/) ~ ~8 It) Q) UJS ..... ~- C1J Ù -0 Q::; ~ ..c:t\I OUJ .µ"'¡ w ~ 30:: U I: C1J H .,.¡ ¡,.¡ ·z r.:.. tJo r.:.. C1J ) I- 0 C"1 C1J C1J tn tn ~ >,1: 00 Z Z I' 0 >< 0 ..... ,..¡o 0 H H 0 4IIt- ~z D.. '"-1 ~ H 8 r.:.. H Q) < U < . tn H U ~ èOèO Z H ~ I: I: U ::J Z . .,.¡ ..-1 H :E ::J ..... ¡,.¡,..¡ ,..:¡ :E :E C"1"'" Q)"C:! ~ 0 :E .,..,4IIt- .0.1 I: ::J U 0 I: t\I p,., U '"-1..c: .,.., .,.., Ž :it ¡:.: 0'\ , 0 a z Ui Ui ¡:: UJ UJ c:: :E Ž 0 C) < U) ~ ~z).: 0 U) c:: 0 CI ~ c:: ¡¡: :5 < U) :5 ¡:: - 33- D.. > ~ ~ < U) 0 UJ ::> UJ 0 0 D. D.. "") a: '- , SOLID WASTE Solid Waste Superintendent Pay Grade 20, Job Code 573 to Assistant Solid Waste Manager Pay Grade 22, Job Code 573 ....I Cost $ 4,552 Compliance Technician Pay Grade 14, Job Code 769 to Pay Grade 16, Job Code 631 Foreman III Cost $ 1,769 2 positions Heavy Equipment Operator II Pay Grade 11, Job Code 826 to Heavy Equipment Operator III Pay Grade 13, Job Code New Cost $ 4,064 Total Cost $10,385 '....,¡ .£ e <II ~ Q N 1~ .... ~ , 5J " COO) 14 ~ C/J ~ C' æ e . .~ i 0:: ,: ~ :1 ~ ..' :I! .. .~ - ~-2 N t¡¡ ¡;~~ C 0 g c 0 i ~ i C"') 0 ~, § ~ :::;¡ ,~ ,.. t/)g ~ ~ ~ C\ .... Ir) D::N C We:: r~ - 2~ ~ CO .... C/)' "';1 ~' (1 ~ - ~ }:I c ~-J .... :i< ffi (\ ~ C\ :iU ~ o~ ~ ~- r:J:)' 1 ! a ~ .... uu. ~ 14 ~~ ~ h~ ¡... ~ 'õ .!2 Q ~ =>.,. w ~ <¿:) ~ ~.8 Ot/) ~ c" uw (/) C/) It) <D Q::¡ W ~ (\ i' e: 0 u.::I 8 It) C\ ..:. <II - C/) N '- ~ ~ 00 c '( .... e: ~ ~ OW w ~ c" LU a:: 2; t! C ~: 0 It) '" ~ 15 z C/) II) :6 -= LU Q ~ I- 00 ~ ~ j~~ z C:II= :I! 0 0 ;:) ~j 0 a:: Ö C/) <tI 8 u ~ '" ~ ~ z- w C/) ~ ::J!!:: IX ~ c: oU) r:J:) c ~, ~ ~ ;§ ~~ ..- .... ~ ~ It) .... ., e: ~ 15 æ ~ r-." f' 11)' u .... 'I & ~ -u 0 ~ ~ " Uw ~ .. :~ 30:: :::0 ~ .:: 'z >- ~ .... C/) _ ~ ~~ It) <b ¡g , ~ 0:: <¿:) ", § It)' " 't; ~ <II :z ~ ~ It) ~ ~ i t/) w ;:: ~ C/) Ir) ~ ~ r:J:) ~ e ~ ::¡ It)' ~ ~ ~ ~ I' U C/) '" êj ;§ 'ì3 ~ ~ CI) ,: ~ :« " :1 ~ c: 3:: ,. 0 <.J ;! Ö ," . <II Q) :5 ~ 0 ~ I ~ ~. C/) :::;¡ " Q.. C/) ,,- \ ~.J ~ .< ~ ð I LU W ~ ~ , ~ :I >= ~ ¡ § ~ ~ ü: Q. ~ ~ ~ ~ u w 0 ~ LU £0"d ¿869<::9tot9S 3~S~MalìOS0~3I~nì~S Wd tot=£0 <::0-8Ø-èl~W \...I co .... ~ E3 ~ g¡ t ...... ... VJ ~ æ· Q:: ·s c t ~ « ,0. ~ ':I . - ':. I¡j J!! N 0' 8 ! 8 ~ .: C"\I ::] .g . ~ .... ~ mO ~c ~ wN " ~~ I 'Y. ~ en ;. ~ ~ ~~ I i 8 ; ~ \I) ~C.J ë :J:U) "f"-" "",," otr ~ 0- ¡¡~ ~ (,)LI. 3! ~~ ~ ZLI. Q - æ ::: - âi ~.... ~ - Oen ~ (")' E (,)W Ii] ~ ..... <.0 ~ ~ ::i LI.~ ::] ~ ~ .... ~ - oCS ffi CJ ..... Q c: OW ~ co" :s ë a: N ~~ Q .2& :It z Ö' oêi ~ ~ i ~ ~ :I tD¡:: 8 0 ::) ~~ ~' ~ ~ 0 u ~ ; ~ u z- « ~!::: aU) ... <") .... ~ .~ C.JU) ~ It') ~ It') ..... w:) ~ ~:! & P -(,) .., .., C.Jw q: : ~ 3~ G ~ 'z >- :t: 01 <;: e Iño ...I Ü ..... :~ .2 c:> E !ž i:! ~ a:f . <;: .!2 ~ "I- (") ¡:: ~ ,¡~ en ~ ..... ~ 0 ~ ¡";:'!:j c. ~ ::] ~" ~ ~ ~ (,J ~ CI) ~ .Iii ~ ~ ~ OJ (J u 8 '5 ~ c (.) ãr ~ ~t 0 0.. CI) ð ~ ~ u ~ t>e-d ¿869Z9..t9S 3~S~Malìose~3I~nì~S Wd !;;I:s;e Ze-8e-èJ~W "WIll :'4 ..." '~f: ~-'''; ',0 ~:~ idi ,::J: "'".; ..... C'I ,., ~ <") <0 01 ß C'J C'I 10 ;". ~?>'. , .....' It') .,.... :;,~ CI) It') ~ J~~ S :~~ LlJ ~,-,_. ç~~ C( ~i¡¡; i~"J: ,~ ~';¡J ~- ~® ~ ::¡ a f~ ~ ~~~ c:: Q) a ¡~ g. ~ C N .... C 0 0 1{ Q) 0 <") C¡j , 0 <: -;~ ..... N .<:¡ IJ.J c I CO .:x '" :r: c ..... ~ '~:; co ø C'I (fJ 0 0 " :E ..... 0 ..~ Q) I!') D:: >- "~.~ ..... 0 N ¡~ <;:: a W CO ,~ 12 ..... c:: ø "t- Z f-- Q) c:: <") « :rt- u 0 ::::¡ 0 , CI) ~ ..... W ~ ~ ø c (fJ >- a '" "I" ~ ø (fJ -J .... :æ¡ « 10 C'I " Q) ~ 10 co ,., g. :æ¡ U 01 C 0 ø (fJ r< "1"- ~' 'E Ìii 0 C'I ..... ~ Q) U u.. ~ ~ 1.: ~ ì: D:: f-- .9- .... 0 ~ ::J 0 - 0- Q)' Z u.. c - Q) ~ - C'I :§ :J I- w Q C( 01 ~ 0 (fJ ~ S ~ $ <ri a 15 en ..... 1.: U W ~ w 0 LlJ <") I '¡¡¡ :J :::I ~ ..... a u.. .¡ IJ.J <: "t- ¿ ",- 0 a ;,.' 0 >- LlJ ~ c:: W C ~ w ::::. Q ..... Q) 0 c w c::: 0 ..... :::. '- c:: .- ù5 - c ;~ co co :it c:: Z .t:: u « z w c ~ :r: -2 <tI ~ W :::. Z 0 0 :!: 7t-! ~ > :~;j -2 :::I CD I- :!: 0 ,,",' co Q) 0 0 c::: ;.;<"{ '" (.) ì: « '~ '" ::J U (.) a.. ,,~ Q) " (.) w a.. ì u " <I: Z u.. c::: < Q) ~ :J c:: '5 (fJ "t- C "I" ,~ 0 C'I C'I "I" 0- (I) ;~ - ~ U <0 co "I" '- « <0- <")- 0' -- W -J l! C'I ..... "I" co .!:2 c:: U ,~ It') It') ~ ~ '" U 4., ~ :J W lffi f-- ~ -J c:: ~ ~ Q) ~ --ff{: :::: g. ...: ¡...: Z >- ~ " 0 (I) 0 ...J Q C( <") ~ LlJ .E ~ 0 <ri !5 I- z S f-- <0 ..... ~ :r: w 0 ffi C'I ..... I ~ -2 a (I) c::: co ..... I!') ,~ 0 c::: LlJ "I" ::::: 1.: >- c) u CD :::I Q ~ ø :;. a.. CI) ::::. ..... :E co ~ ¡:: (.) ù5 0 t:n .t:: C( ~ è ~ ~ CI) ;~ :r: co '" ~ .<:¡ '" Ìii <tI 0 Q) è3 :E :::ï Q :E ~ $1 CO :::ï :E " ::::¡ 0 ~ c:: .t:: Q CI) <tI '" 'It W Z 0 ¡:..: ...J 0 W Z I- Iii ¡::: c::: ¡::: w w Iii c e" <I: en :!: z en en c ~ z > I- (.) I- 0 0 ~ ü: .:.¡ ü: <I: c::: ¡::: (.) e" c::: ...J < < w ¡:: ¡::: (.) a.. Cñ m >- >- ...J Z en w w 0 0 <I: <I: < w 0 :::I c::: c a.. "") a.. a.. en m I- "") \....t ,,~ ....; :~ ;~ i~ "" <0 ~~ <0 a ..... '~ a a "" ""-~ LlJ c\ ' ~ ~I CI) ~ S; .\1 LlJ ~~ a:: í I- ~ U ¥,,~ . ~' ~ " <C I .E 0.. ~ ~ c:: ~ ( ) Q I- t5. g. ~ W ~ a N C) .... a 0 0 ~ ( ) 0 C') 0 ~ C -¡¡:¡ , ~ ~ .Q LlJ ~ N a I en IJJ 'i '" ::t a ..... ¿ I cu ( ) C\ 0 .... en 0 l:J :S It) a::: 0 >- i!i ( ) .... 6 N ~ Q W en ~ 1:: .... Z a::: i-- ( ) ( ) "" < 0 c:: C') 0 :J Q , CI) ~ .... W Q ~ ( ) a en >- ~ Q '" "" ~ q¡ en .J .... :!!i < a It) ( ) ( ) a <0 g. ~ :!!i u co C\ ( ) en C')' C')' .... q¡ 0 c:: C\ .... ( ) ~ ~ -c:: U u. E: 3: >- a::: i-- ,9- .... ~ 0 a¡ ::J Q - t:r ( )' Z u. - C\ ( ) ¿ - .E: ::J ~ Q a:: 0'> ~ .;:;, 0 en :5 2 S: <ri Q -'C ..... E: U W C') ,>2 0 ffi LlJ .... '" u. ::J LlJ ~ "" ~ ",' 0 0 >- "" c ...: c:: W ~ Q ( ) ,£1 C w 0 ..... ::. a::: c L5 cu (¡¡ :it a::: z -c:: 0 < Z c ::t .E cu I- W W ~ Z 0 0 :æ > è .E ::> CD ~ :æ 0 cu ( ) 0 0 a:: '" >- < '" ::J U U 0.. ( ) l:J () ~ U W 0.. 0 l:J <C Z " <C ( ) ~ u. c:: ::J en <0 co "" ,!<1 '5 0 en C') It) 0'> .... D- U r-- co It) '- ~ < ....' C\ ' ~ -' W .J C\ ..... ("') cu .!<1 c:: U ~ ~ ~ 2 .!<1 U ::J W i-- ~ ¡:: ...J a::: a¡ ( ) - - g. 0..: ¡....: Z ¿ - r-- 0 en 0 Q a:: C') ~ LlJ -E ~ S 0 <ri .2 ::t ::; i-- <0 .... ..... Q 0 ffi C\ .... , ~ .E en LlJ co It) .!<1 "" "'" E: 0 >- ci 0 ( ) Q ~ ( ) ~ a. U) ~ ..... :S cu ::.::: L5 0 0> -c:: a:: ,!; s- ( ) ~ ::t -¡¡:¡ '" 3: .Q '" q¡ cu Ü ( ) <3 :S ::¡ :S ~ '" en -c:: l:J ~ :J ~ c:: -c:: Q cu '" ü.i :it z 0 ~ ...J 0 W Z I- ¡:: a:: ¡:: w w w ü.i C C) <C en :æ en z c ~ z :>: !:: u en I- 0 0 ~ .:..¡ ü: <C a:: E a:: u.. ...J <C U C) <C w <C ¡:: () 0.. (J) IJJ >- >- ...J Z I- en w w 0 0 <C oct oct w 0 ::> a:: 0 0.. .., 0.. 0.. en IJJ I- .., M o o N I N C/JO a:~ Wa: Z« OW C/J~ 5Q...J :¡:« :¡:U 05Q ULL ~~ ZLL ::JI- OC/J UW LL::J 0° OW a: a: «Z 00 IJJI- ~ë3 Z- ::JLL 0C/J uC/J « W...J -U Uw 3a: 'Z ~o I- C/J o a. "..' : 8 U) s ) lJ.J .,.... 0::> ..: l- ) ~ I c.. 1 " :!E I; I- W ø c :::¡ III 01 <:, . I U) I,j ~ I c W C Z W :!E :!E Q U W e::: c , W I- en " ~ ;0 W ,e::: c W >,.', Q. e::: c.. ", c.. « I U) lJ.J Ü S 0:: lJ.J U) <: ~ ~ ~ >- ...J l- I ffi e::: 1 e::: I :::¡ I U I I , , , .. ..' Z. 21 en :;:1 C ¡:.: Z W :!E l- e::: « c.. W c ~ - - ffi ü [ o U) lJ.J Ü s ffi U) <: ê ~ <x:> C\ Q:j ~ ~ lJ.J -.:- , <: ..... cc c;, ..... ..... "'J. ffi ü [ o U) lJ.J Ü s ffi U) <: ~ ~ ~ LO a l(j ..... <x:> a "'J. ~ ~ .:- a o ..... "'J. W ...J I- ¡:: Z o E en o c.. a <x:> Q) "I" ..... I( . ..... <0 "" C'). "'J. C')- "'J. "J. I I ~ ~ ~I'; ~- ~ ~I'· "'J. "J. "I" ..... I( a <0 <0 C') ..... -.:- .,.:: <0" ....: C') "'J. CO) "'J. "J. üi W ,; üi C CJ ci:i c~z>1- gCJ~~fu ~' III)-)-...JZI- Q«««WO "'") c.. c.. en III I- . I (l) :S ... c: .E S . '~ E ~ ~ :S ::) 8's:2 a. ~ CD o..~£ ~ Q .S ~~~ .... :::s u o 't:: <tI - 0 ::. ~o.CD u2"E c: (l) 0 o ~ u U ::::: Q) (l) (l) .Q .c:: ~ c: ~ '5: ~ ~ e CJ) :;: 0. 0 OJ c: 0. ,E; ,2 ,!!1 0. :t:: .c: (l) '" - (l) 0 "I:J ~ o.;:¡ c: ,'" 0 - - .c:: :S '" c:: ~ ~ -Š ~ '(jj 0 (õ o :;: ~ 0. ::., ~ Õ)t:æ ::. 0 u ~ Õ ~ è <: (l) _ u c: ~ c: (l) ", ,S1 c: ~ 10....; <tI c: ~ ,!!1 ~ ~ <tI ô' :;: ~ (I) ,~ 0 è.c:E ~ 0 13 ~ ~ J~ Ii:: ¡g '¡¡¡ o 0. Qj :::: .£ u 0 ~ '~ (I) c: (l) :::. :::s U) <tI <3 c: .... ~ 0 CD c: :S ~ :2 :;: ~ .s 0 rn c:: ~ Õ ~ :s! c: ~ ð o 0. :;: ~ ,S '5 o (l) .Q o..c:: t: -. c:" (l) ",' (l) t: Q) ~ :::s CD .e C,,) <- co (l) 0. ~ to ~ ¡:: Q5 -5 Z o ¡:: « U u: ¡:: en :::¡ "'") .8 c: ,,_2 ...: .£ a:J 'ëij \..) :5 8- ,~ c:" <tI ã ~ ,S (l) ~ (l) :S"I:J.Q ::., <tI :s! .Q c: :::s :S - 0 '~ 0 :;: -. CD ::::: Cìi ~ 0 (l) u ~ ~ (l) .... ~ ~ <tI ~ £ CI) ~ ,E; <tI (l) ... ~ 0> 0 ::> ~ t5 CI) <tI ,~ <tI '" ã .... E .8 ,_ CD u co .c:: ~ Q~~ .c::Q.... u 0. C ) ~ :::s ¡:: ui 'ð 0, E ~ c: ~ co .~ .c:: ~ ~ ~ 'S ,~ ~ e ~ 0. ,!!1 '-"I:J ~ è ;:¡ '2: ~ ~ ~ ,~ :::: E: (l) 0 0 U (I) U e :::. c: 0. 0 ~ "'O-~ c: 0 (l) <tI (I) ::. ø :::. (l) CI) cc :S c: .... 0 25 0 - U c: .8 2 o 'õ) U) 0 :::. 0. ê: ~ ~ .E 3 "> U (l) C ) '" c: 't: a <tI ... "tJ Q ~ c: c: ,0 <J.) ~ :S~ (l)' '¡;¡ ,s ~ - õ ~ ~ <tI ~ ~ '5 0- ~ (l) ,"> -e (l) ~ .... '" 0 c: ø :£ ~ .E ..92 c: CD (l) .c:: '" - ~ ~ ~ 'S ~ e (]) 0. ~ "tJ .Q ~ ~ '" o 0. E :::s ... e Q 0> ~ .8 c: ~ <tI co E (l) ~ ~ . ....,I a a LO ¿ o o C\ ..... LO ¿ ..... C') LO , ..... o o :it; I- Z :::¡ o U U ~ ..... o o . C\ o (I) :::. :it; o w e::: en en « ...J U W c::: ~~(nn'll~ U MAR - 8 2002 FOR PURPOSES OF BUDGET REOUEST o""Ly VETERANS SERVICE OFFICER IT , HU¡v'''''·: RESOURCES .~T. L~C: ::S~'JTY, FLORIDA MAJOR FUNCTION: Specialized administration work advising, counseling, and assisting veterans in matters pertaining to their rights and benefits under various federal and state statutes. KNOWLEDGE, ABILITIES Ai'ffi SKILLS NEEDED TO PERFORiv! THE ESSENTW, JOB FUNCTIONS OF THE POSITION: Knowledge: Knowledge of the law, rules, and regulations governing veteran's benefits under federal and state statutes. Abilities/Skills: Ability to exercise good judgment in counseling and assisting in the solution of veterans' problems. Ability to enlist and retain the respect, confidence, and cooperation of veterans and veteran's agencies. Ability to interpret and enforce various federal and state statutes dealing with veteran's affairs. Ability to establish and maintain effective working relatioasmps with superiors, coworkers, veterans, their dependents, civic groups, and the general public. Ability to express oneself clearly and concisely, orally and in \VTiting. Basic typing skills required. Ability to counsel and assist individuals with discretion. Ability to work in coniuction with professional, medical and lee:al persons~ posses public relations and speakine: ability. Ability to take a teamwork approach to the iob bv cooperatine: with others. offerine: to help others when needed. and considerine: lare:er department or team e:oals rather than individual concerns. Includes the ability to build a constructive team spirit where team members are committed to the e:oals and obiectives of the team. Must be self-directed and work under a minimum if supervision. ESSENTIAL JOB FUNCTION: J1¡laintains communications with the veteran's community and all veterans' organizations, as well as the civic and business community. Acts as back up to Department Director in order to assist claimants with the more involved claims requiring a higher level of e;r:perience, Participates in and attends conferences and conventions relating to the field of veterans affairs so as to be current and knowledgeable on all matters affecting veterans benefits. Must attend the Florida Department of Veteran Affairs annual re-certification training program. Advises and assists veterans or their dependents in presenting claims for disability compensation, pension, medical care, insurance, burial, vocational rehabilitation, loans, job counseling, and other claims for benefits which they may be entitled to under federal and state statutes. Prepares claim forms and briefs and assembles necessary information to establish the validity of the claim. Reviews claim information, briefs available records and evidence, and prepares reswnes as needed. Contacts doctors and other individuals relative to furnishina official affidavits and evidence for individual claimants. ~ . Page 1 of 2 \.t ...., VETERANS SERVICE OFFICER II ESSENTIAL JOB FUNCTION (CO~lL.'WED) Inputs information on assistance µrovided into computer Dro~ram on a dailv basis. Mav partici{Jate in development of outlines for in-house traininO' sessions as necessarv to inform staff of new or chanO'in~ laws re2:ardin2: veteran benefits. Represents veterans before various officials as necessary to establish veterans claim. Prepares and presents talks to civic groups on matters perta,Íning to veterans affairs. Contacts employers relative to employment opportunities for disabled veterans. Individuals mav perform other duties as assi!?ned. inc1udin!? workin!? in other funtional areas to cover absences or relief. to equalize peak work periods. or otherwise to balance workload. ESSENTIAL PHYSICAL SKILLS: Use of both hands and fingers with dexterity. Good hand/eye coordination. Very frequent use of good near vision, good hearing. Occasional walking and frequent standing. Ability to occasionally lift 30 lbs. ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION REQUIRE~1ENTS: Constant work inside the office in a sedentary posture. Off site work when counseling claimants residing in Assisted Living Facilities and/or Nursing Homes. WORK HAZARDS: None, SAFETY EQUIPlVlENT USED OR NEEDED: None EDUCATIOl'i": Two-year degree from an accredited university or college. EXPERlENCE: Two years responsible administration experience and minimum of one vear experience as a Veteran Service Officer. A comparable amount of training or experience may be substituted for the minimum education qualifications. LICENSE, CERTIFICATION OR REGISTRATION: Must be an Honorably Discharged Veteran. ~fust have current accreditation from a Veteran Service Officer course. Valid Florida driver's license and a good driving record. Page2 of '2 . ,~ :~. ...., ~ "" ~ ~; :;;¡ ~ ~. .:;::s' ",. ;;;: í ~ St' a '; - '; - .~ Q) J1} ~ "'"' '"' ,->' c:: co co -,. c:: ~~ ... eu a ~t ~ ~ 9= 0 lU ~ [;1. U) ~ (¡) :1~ .!1: eu s: ~. ,,"' $ ~ lU ~ 'i:¡ Q) ~ ~ .£2 ( ) 0::: "5 0 Q. ! f- i "b 0 0 t) ( ) Q. Q) ¥ ~ , æ~ ..t:: $ .æ. c.. ~ ü ( ) ~ ::¡: I U) ..t:: .....- !il ..... ..... ..... Q) <0 iI I f- eu .2 :::. e ..' UJ I~ :s Q) ..... I r-.. N 0 C) ;;!i D>"b $ 6 0 a .~ e: Q) 0 0 <: ",. ::J ~, ..... J: a N ';)~ ':,'11'- ..... a c:¡ ~ Ct! 0 uj C') I £' :::: ,... ..- - ~ Ct! uj :S It) en 0 ~ Q) , 0 0 U) c:: <0 a:: ~ $ Q) 0 ..... N r..- i1.l Ct! :::.,. N W a:: ~ .at :::... $ ~ E r-.. Z ':It ~ ( ) ..... ..... , ct a... ..... a C/J (¡) 1.X Ii§. :S c:: E Q) e W ~ lUl~ ....... Q) E e en >- :it Q) E Q) >- '" E en -l ~ <0 <0 .... & U) 1::: è ct 0) r-.. ..... 1Ci :::¡ Ct! :::¡ ~ "" Ct! ~ U) ;: ~ co l() "I' :£ Q. ~ Ü - c- Ü :I:- 0:) ,... i ( ) 0 ( ) a en ;>" ¡¡ ~ ~ '"' ( ) "b a.....t:: .ç ~ .Q E- u... ~~ lU Ü s; <: Q !f! U) .~ ( ) DJ a:: N .' a ~..c:.......r.:: >- -,!:: lU 7;. 0 £; <Ó ( ) ~ Q) '§ I- a - ,. CD ~ Z u... N ~ a a It) ;;- C::( )E"b - - <0 ::> I- '<t '" UJ - UJ ('0')" 'j~ ( ) :::.,..- i f- Ü l- ii:';' ~o"ï~ a en ,... ,." :s:-1:::Q) U) ¡::: ~ ~ - ü w w UJ r-.. ;I! Q.eu J't § :J , ( ) E a...:S u... ::> ~ ~ ::J C ¢.:. E ( ) ( ) 0 0 0 .. a 0 ~ a ~ 0 a ff UJ C\i .~ '- "- 0 w w ~ c:: <:C 0) ~; '"ì" ( ) Q) $ 0 c:: ct 0 =:' lU co -, 1::: '§'$_ ~ c::: 0 z i' ~ co' !!t eu..........."b I- ct Z Z w 0 '" ¡::: ~ ~ a...::::: 'ëti c:: <: a a ::¡: UJ ~ I- ~ 0.2-Ct! ::J w > 0::: ..... U) 0 CJ ~ ø ::¡: a ~ "" U)~"",.::c: a c:: .to (f ~ c:: c:: ( ) Q) ü >- ct t) a.. ! ~ o o..t:: ( ) ü I- Ü w a.. '- ....... $. <:( z u... c:: ~ ~Q)O ::> U)..t::_Ct! <0 N '" 0-- a en 0) <0 It) a... 0)- <:( ~ en co r-.. (0 Ü ~ 0:) ~ ",- C:-O) >...: Ct! w ~ ~ ¡uO)o"b ..... ~~-c:: Ü ü I ¡ o c:: ê Q) w e a...._._ :::. ::> c::: Q. e ª E~"E( ) -l ",. <Ó 'i ~; ~ l() ( )-oU) I- Z <: Ü);l >- - ~ <0 '" ..... a... 0 ..... ". .....I - """ ( )U)Oo a 0 C'). " en ü ~, f- Ü ,... ~ E";:;- :::.,..).( I- ¡::: ¡::: ã¡' z ¡::: lU ~ ~ § UJ § ~ r-.. , t ~~.......êi) en .. c:: ¡::: e $:: -t: Ct! ~ "b- a 0::: 0 ijI, c:: a l- e -~ Ct! C/) Ct! c:: D- Ü ~ I ::J <:C 0::: N ;, a... ( ) C/) :::¡ lU () 0> "" 0::: <: (f co i%. C'J .S "b e a 0 ~ co' ?$' è~ c:: ~ ~ :µ Ct! 0) <: ¡::: "I. .- :¿ eu ~ '4" U) Ü N ~ ~ c <:C ù3 -~ U) '- , .... c:: - C/J ~ m Ct! N ~ 0::: :t~ 13 ( ) :::¡ 0 c 0::: 0 ~ "" ( ) ~ D- o z~ 0 0::: (f lU p.r. a.::: <:( 0::: W ~: Q. "'" :ü; ~ "'. új .. 1ì t7 z , 0 , ¡:..: i .....I a UJ ~] f- a.. c:: z ~ ¡::: új w UJ .. ª ~ UJ 0 C) (/) en ::¡: .. z 0 ~ "" () en z :Ï: Z >- f- .~ ~ f- a r;' a a <t c:: ü: .....I -:.~ ü: ...J c:: ¡¡: E () <:J c:: ~ w <t ;; ¡::: L) <t (/) .. (/) c:¡ ~ ~ .....I Z f- U) UJ c.. :; ~ a a ~ w a . :::¡ c:: UJ '- 0 0 a.. ..., a.. a.. U) c:¡ f- ", ..., N o o N I ..... C/)O ~~ W~ Z~ OW C/)>- C/)..J ~~ ~(.) 0C/) (.)LI- >-~~ f-O- ZLI-£:! ::Jf--:t OC/) (.)WW LI-::J~ O~Q Q~~ ~ZQ oorE ca¡:::e> >-~~ f-(.) ZLI- ::JC/) OC/) (.)~ W..J (.)(.) ::JW ..J~ f-Z C/)O f- C/) o [l. [2 >- ~ O~ :<:~ 1ii, ~ '~ ~: ~ CI) UJ :~ >- ;.;:~ ""'" "- ~ ~. ~. ~ ;.. "', 1?CI " w ~t;; ~1f. UJ ;:¡ ~O ;çW j¡,o:: ~ '.t'i. CI .:K W- > ¡"<c O~ 0:: c.. c.. ~ CI W CI Z W :2E :2E o ü W 0:: :<: o ¡::; US Q::: Ü UJ Q::: a z <:( CI) ~ Q::: ~ ~ ., 'Ei ~ û)~, >-....J ü~1- ¡:::~z :3~~ o a; C!: <C~ ;:¡ '-'-;:::ü Z '"", o~ ¡::;f <:('" l.LjS Q:::~ o~ UJ :" Q::: ;!!' J~ 'R ~~ ~~ ;;: 'I: z~ 0;,. en~ ~ ¡. o 'J: I- Z W :2E I- 0:: <t c.. W o - - ~ u: UJ Z a UJ a CO tó a ~ ~ ~. ~ "- t.<> :J ~ UJ :¿ ¡::; I- Q::: <:( Q ü ¡::; :3 o <:( :::: a a ~ ~ UJ co I- C'i UJ .... ~ "- t.<> ¡:: I- Q::: ~ ü ¡::; :3 o <:( W ....J I- ¡:: Z o t: en o c.. ~ .~ -Jf¡ ~ ~ i a ""'" ~ ~ b9-~ "r-~ _ IX) '~,¡, t.<> ~:~ -;;t.. "~: '~ ~ - ... ~, ~- .;s ~ ~ ~~ 0::>- ....- o' l! bC) f:.9. "-'-'I*! ~~, .,.: -ji ~ ~ '3'., ~ '3 ¥; 'j.':' - ~ ;~ 1> ~. ''6 i , a a c..¡ 0) 0::> 0::>- t.<> Ie N 0) Ie 0::> "- cr;¡' ~ t.<> a a c..¡ 0) 0::> 0::>- t.<> w W W CI C) cij CI ~ Z .. I- 8g~~ü: a:: ~ W ~~~~@ ..., c.. c.. en [!) ., .... .:..i'i ~:t ~ .~~ 0"" I- ~ jII' If· ~ .¡; § :r ~ '" ~: c: Q) C\] § (/) C\]~ ~ ~ q) C/) Q) -S-o.. 't:J g 0 ~ 0.. Q) "t5 Q) ~ C/) ..s:: ...... ..... - Q) !2 è3 ::. :;¡-';:;;Q) D) 't:J ~ ~ ~ 0 C\]õ:I: ~~¡¡)~ Q)- ~~Q)C: ~~5'E Q)-o."", ~~EQ) Q)EQ)E ~ 1::: è- ~ C\] C\] 0.. ~ C/) <..JQ)oQ) Q) 't:J o....s:: ..Q r:- - ~ .C/) ~ D) \.::::S-c: Q) Q) Q) .§ c: Q) E 't:J Q) ~.- s: o"'ì' t2 ~-1:::Q) 0..C\]..s:: Q) E 0..- ._s Q) Q) 0 Q) ..... 0 1 ~ Q) ~ 1::: .::;: ~ _ C\]-............. Q. :::: '-.:; \.j ""' C\] c: .8~.....rc C/) ~ C/)..::c c:t:~~ 2°~~ .¡¡¡ Q) 0 o..s:::::::C\] 0.. -_ <:C ~ è- g; 0...: C\] roO).2't:J C5 .,... q:¡ c: o...S.S ~ E:o:::"EQ) Q) - 0 C/) - 0.. 0 I.... E ~ü ~ :;:: CJ.) ~"- I~"""CI) 1::: C\] ~ - (tjÚ')C\]'t:J Q.Q)Ú')§ C"') c: 't:J 0 ï::: t: ~ ~ C\] ~..;. .- """ 'u C\] ~ <: .S:: Q) q:¡ c: - ~ __ Q.) (tJ_ ~s=g.g a: ~ <:( 0.. -t¡O' ~- ~ *. .,;.~ ~l '" Z ~, 0 " ~ ~ u... ¡:: en ;:¡ ..., J co a .... "- ¿, a a (") .... '0 tb .... N "- , .,... a a :i:t I- Z :::> o ü ü <:( "- N a , N a ü Q::: 'I:t: o w a:: en en ~ ....J ü W 0:: N o o N I '<"" enO c:::0 UlN zC::: O~ en>- en...J ~<t ~ü Oen üLL. >-C:::N I-og ZLL.~ ::JI-'<:t Oen üUlUl LL.::J~ OßO Oc:::<t ~zO ooæi IJ)I-l':> >-<t<t I-ü ZLL. ::Jen °en ü<t Ul...J Üü ::JUl ...Je:::: 'z t;o !:: en o c.. ".t 'h 'iC i dE 3:' :s:: a~ ll.J::'< Cl)jJ $I ll.Jre a::i '" I- .¡ ü ;;;;q: 'ga- .>P.:: ~ i I- '10' W ~I~ ~ ". £i ~ w. :t' C/) ~. lJ.J~ ~ ,~: .: ~ ~ ,",' ~~ :T' #; .~ :1 ~ c ~ w :i tï; ;:¡ W ¡~ ~a ~' W ~a: D~ W;f.. >~ ~~ a- n. q: CI) ~ D W D Z W :: :: o ü W e:: :2: o ¡:: ì¡j a:: ü lJ.J a:: a :2: "t CI) :0:: a:: ~ Ð: ... ¡j)1~ ü .1- ¡::s:z "t"!'w ::J~e::: 0,1) e::: ~::J ~¡t) :2: _. O!i' ¡::~ "tJl> lJ.J:;¡ a::~ ü ,I;. ~f ::; 0: ~- i ¡,:. !'\t ¡¡: Z" o~ ëñ¡;: ;;1; -:r; o .. I- Z W :: I- a: q: a. W o ,., .¡, .~ '. ~ p- i,j, <")~ C ,t' 0I';i ~;,; ~ I ::;: i ~ ¡¡j. ¡ I .!,1 "" ! $' <.à;, ~ 4 ~' :~ ~ ~ ~ ;:;: ~ :::::!it co f',.. c.o ~ 0')....- - ~ ~ ~ ~'i:! ~$. ~¡ ;¡¡¡. ~ $01. ~ ¡ ~; ~ ~ ;:; '?;' 'Š: ~ ::;¡ £ '" ~, !i' ....; ~ ji ':I:' c ..... t-. tll ". ;¡¡¡¡ ,,", ~ ~ ~ '~ i:' -~~ J;\ i '1 ! 3:: ~ ~- ffi~ ~: ',;r' ~ Z '" Q WWW ~ ~ DC> II) :::,-..... g~Z>=I-..~ ~ üCJ<te:::Ü:...J~u.. ro >-;::5 ~ ;::~ t; Q~~~~8r,~ - ~ iI: lJ.J :2: 0 lJ.J 0 .en C\.Ì a ~ ~ ~- .... s:¡ 0') ~ ::J ~ :::;: 0 :::.. 0 lJ.J 0:. ¿ 0:. ¡:: Zi I- a:: ~ ü ¡:: ~ o "t - - o o Q C\.Ì ¿ r--. ~ ~ ll.J .... ¿O')~ ~ ~ I- 2S a:: 0:. ~ 0:. 0, ~ ü ¡:: ~ o <:( W ...J I- ¡= Z o !::: II) o a. o (T) ~ 0 0') ~ , , , ;:;: ~ 0:. 0:. 0')' ~ ~ ;. e: (!) ro e: ° CI) (!) <15~"§ "SCI)(!) "tJ - 0.. (!) 0 0 .¡: 0 u 0.. (!) CI) (!) ~ ~ :S ..: - '- (!) &-2 ~ e"tJs ro ~ ° ~Q:r: -.;::::: . (Jj OroCl)'¡: S: CI) (!) C ~~~g .¡: Q~ -.1: Q~ (!) (!) E: E ~ E: (!) E: ro 1:::: è ::J U ro "" (!) 0.. ~ CI) ..Q Q,) 0 Q,) CI) "tJ o..:s ¡;:: .!:2 E: Q'¡ (!)'¡:~e: t:: - .- Q,) Q,) Q,) S ..Q(!)E:"tJ :,..,'- "tJo"ï~ ~Q.1::::Q,) 'ê E: i1:s ;.:::: Q,) Q,) 0 ~ Q,) '- 0 r::- Q,) S Q,) .S:: ~ - E:::::::::"tJ &- - t:: ~~.8CQ 1:::: CI) ro~,-~ 0.. e: (!) Q,) o°'¡:(!) _(!)QS: CI)'¡::::::ctI § -'o::c ~ :;:;~....:ctI ~Q)o"tJ Q.....tiJe: o...S .S ~ E ~"E Q,) Q,)-oCl) -Q. '- ¡g ~8 ° .S:: Q; :::....~ ~~......CI) 1:::: ctI ~ "tJ- ctI C/) ctI e: 9-Q,)C/) ::J C"') .S"tJ e ~(á~~ ëìj ::¿ u t1J CI) '- Q,) ro e: - :,.., _Q,)t1J_ ~s: §.g ct~o::c Q. "wi to o ..... r--. , a o a C') ..... Lt') ~ .... C\ r--. , .... o a :i:I: I- :2: ::J o Ü Ü "t 0:. C\ o , C\ a Ü a:: , :it; a w e:: II) (/) q: ...J ü W e::: " N o o N I ...... (/)0 e:::0 WN Ze::: 0< _W (/)>- ~-I ~< ~ü o~ ÜL1. >-e:::N t-og ZL1.£;:!. :Jt-~ o (/) .. UWUJ L1.:J~ OßO Oe:::< ~ZO oo~ rct-~ >-« t-ü Z- :JL1. o(/) U(/) < W-I -ü Uw 3e::: 'z ~o t: (/J o a.. . a lLJ " U) s: lLJ ct: o <: U) ~ o w o z w :E :E o t.) w e:: ä~ w > o e:: a. a.' -< <: o ¡::: US ct: Ü lLJ ct: a <: «; ~ ct: ìf: ~ ~ <: lLJ ü Ü S; Ü '- <: o ¡:: US ct: Ü lLJ.. ct:f JP' J z o en ~ o I- Z w :E l- e:: -< a. w o l- t.) -< a. :E I- W t? o :J a) ~ Lï:: L!.I ::: <: f- L!.I <: CI:I "1" ~a t:; C/) ¡:: ",' ~ ~ ~ OJ'" «;-.JI'-.. OJ L!.I ~ ~ ü ..¡ G: W .... lL. ~ o ¡:: f- ct: 0: >- -J I- Z W e:: e:: :J t.) ~ _ ffi - <: J:: lJJ Ü CI:I ~ a ~ lJ.J ¡:: ~- ~~~<D'7 ~-.JOJ ~ "'- ~ '0 ~ ",- 3; ~ ..... ~ ¡:: f- Q: 0: LU -J t: I- Z o t: en o Cl. 't' <D (;) 't' C") CQ I'-.. -.:- ..... I>'? ...... ~- I>'? "'" <D I'-.. ~ 0) LO LO 0) <D <0 -.:-' ".j ¡....- ..... '-9- ..... I>'? ~ ~ ~ ~ C\ Ç\ ~ ~- .....- 1<')- ..... '-9- ..... I>'? "'" Lù w Lù 0 t? (/J g~~:>:t: t.) t? c:: e:: u. -< w m>->--Jz 0-<-< -< w ., a. a. en m z o ¡:: -< ü ~ i § o i ~ 1-, -, '~ ::!! W "'" ~ '- ~ ~ -2 ~ "5 c: ~ 0--0 Q c: 0>-0 Q.) ~ o e co .~ ~ Q) ~o...Q.!:::coQ.. Q '-:::;: 0>1::-- .2 CD C3'S.~ ~ '- E: 5; ~ .:2 .~ Q¡::: -~Q) - ..... Q.) "- """- CQ::J.!:::~Q(.) ·s C/) "- co c:: Q) "2-0 "'--o.!::: Q ,... CD CD ._ - ... '" c: "- '" Q co co c: C1J C1J Ü....CDQ~ '- ~ 23 t2 (.) .~ Q.) I:: I:: Q.) CD _ ¡: CD '- Q. C( ::J CD Ü .:2 ~ CD -0 Ü :::.....!::: I~.:.!::: Q) (.)~f-,: ~- E: 'S § Q.S C1J '- ¡::- .2 Q..c: '" ü¡;:;CDE:-::::Q) .....¡:- -- Q<:: _CD~.!::: 0","-5;- §ü¡:-g",~ :.:::: -1:: CD CQ .~ .!::: "ëì) co E: CI) ;:: 1...... Q 0... :::.... Q.'- Q) Q. co¡::-:8¡: .E:Q.~"'Q) Q) Q-- ctJ C:" :S(.)ct1(.) 0'-' I:: ....Q.(.)::::: -0-'- D> CD '" '- Q) -J ,S E: Q) .~ ¡: NQ.)"'¡:::I.::.ÜC1J ¡:::S~::¡5Q)V5 ~ -0 (.) '" .c: :S 'ë;; '-c:e.... -(I) octJQ.-2O>CQ'::<: ~ '- -0 CD'S c: Q) ",~1::"tJ$0(.) C1J c: ctJ ctJ 0 ~ :::: $(3~E:i3Q)O - C3D>-Q.c: c: :::.... ~ I:: ..... -- C1J Q.) :- '_ co C1J - ,... (.) E: c: Q.) CD -- ._ 0 1::::JQ...o(.)~~ ctJ E: ctJ Q.) ctJ U C1J Q. E: Q. ~ .:2 Q) .::2 aQ) 0:::: '" -0 .t:: Q ÜctJC:CD-.t:: §Q.)~~"f3Cti$ .- t: '- ctJ ctJ .t:: Q) ""- 0 \..:. ""- U C1J.~-o C1J:::::-o' ~ 0... ..... Q. '::<: Q) :;:: (.) OQ) -0 Q.)1::~'-'bQCI) a:~",Q.Q.)C:(.) ccC:Ý')Q.):;:: -oQ.)"-Q.)ctJ..oQ) ~.!:::CD.!:::.c:-o;¡; "-.!::: $ t:--....... CI)'-"- :::¡:::¡..... ~-2CD<-Q.Q"tJ ~'E:ct1 .!:::c: ,,-C' ._ CI) CI) '" ......""" ;.::: CtJ U Q) ........ "V '- (.) Q.) '- -- (I) Q.),Q,,- Q..Q. 1:::: :Së;;¡C1JCI)Q.'bo c::§:SCD::JQ)Q.. CD Q..!::: _. CI) c: CI) ,t:: '" .~ :õ -0 .2J Q) :s:~sctJ~~:S (;) C") (;) , C\ (;) ü ct: (Q C) .... I'-.. 6 C) C) C") ..... '0 , <D ..... ~ , ..... C) C) :i:t: I- <: ~ o ü ü «; ¡ i j[ i i ~ ï, i: ?" :it a w e:: en en -< -J t.) I.IJ e:: \w PARKS 3 positions of Maintenance Technician I Pay Grade 4, Job Code 814 to Spray Technician Pay Grade 9, Job Code New RECREATION "'" Cost $17,325.04 Lincoln Park Community Center 2 positions of Maintenance Tech I - Temporary Pay Grade 4, Job Code 814 to Maintenance Tech I - part time with limited benefits Pay Grade 4, Job Code 814 Sports Complex 2 positions of Maintenance Tech I Pay Grade 4, Job Code 814 to Maintenance Tech II Pay Grade 6, Job Code 816 Page 3 of 3 Cost $1,360 Cost $4,432 ~ o o N I N enO ~O UJN z~ O~ _w en>- ~...J :E~ :EU O~ uu. >-~ ~O Zu. :J~ Oen UUJ u.:J Oa oUJ ~~ ~z 00 c:c~ >-~ ~U z- :J!:!: Oen uen ~ UJ...J -U Uw 3~ ¡...:z enO ¡:: en o c. a llJ' C/) :.;, llJ a:: o w o z w ~ ~ o u w a:: t- U ~ a.. ~ t- ~18 ...::J ~aJ "" 'it ¥ ! (/)1 lU >-~ ~ ~ ;;<' ~ ~, ;is. '" iê ""rJ) ':1 W ::J o w a:: <= o ¡:: ~ a:: ~ a:: <>ð ~ a:: Cf: ¡:.: z w ~ t- a:: ~ Cl. W o >- ...J t- Z W a:: a:: ::J u <= «: Õ ~ J:: ü ~ >- «: 0::: Q C/) 0> C\ <c ~ 80)'7 ..... r-- '<:" 0; ..... <= ~ ü ~ J:: Ü ~ Lu Ü <= ~ ~ <= ~ r-- r-- '<:" c:i ..... -.:- ..... co J:¡ ..... r--: W. ...J t: t- Z o E rJ) o a.. ~ g ~ co 0> t-. '<:"- ~ It') ~ ~ co r-- 0> Ll') <c '<I" 0>- c-.; ..... ...... ~ ~ c r-- c c ~ Ll') r-- ..,.: co ..... '<:"- ~ ..... ~ Uj w Uj 0 C) (/) §ffi~~ffi ~ ~ ~ ~ ffi ..., 0.. Cl. rJ) aJ -..I ( ) ::; - o c: en o ">. ::::; =a Q) co ~ c: "§ ~ E a. Q) « (¡; U - -a a) c: ª ~ ~ "~ ,g B~~ C) to ~§ .!: ::J ë;; "E E ~ o en '- r.J 0> Q) r.J c: 0- ~ :§ e ".; "5 0- .... .c Q) .£ c: £: co Q) :5 .!:! E '3 õ.E a. Q) Q) co > en ( ) 0 ~ 'C 0> r.J -g ~ .- ::J ,- U; 0 ..c: ~ ro "3 co ~ c: C ·~.9 Q) ~ ~ E a. 0 t: en a. .... Q) en ( J [/) .- > 0 ..r:: o :5 t- O> .... 0 o e '- -' ro t: '- c: 0 Q) o U g- tóu;- _.!:!Q)ea5 Cl. ë :c t'Co~ a>t:u"¡ij U ro - > 'C >. :ß ro ~ ga.g. E 0 -g .>:: :JE:=g .9 1: aJ :g c: Q) .....wu.!!! N -0 ~ = a::> ::J .c ..r:: ~ æ-g~ ::s :s en '" -:;; CD "2: :¡ èi5 c: Q) g "_2 §- 0 {Jro"'u .¡: -=; Q) Q) OJ.c u ~ ~ (5 ~ ...... c c <'1 c ~ Q ~ I ~ .;~ '"" ... ~ o o t-- o o o N ..... It') o ..... N "';- ..... o o :i:¡; t- Z ::J o U U -=: z o ¡:: ~ ü ü: ¡:: rJ) ::J ..., :i:¡; o w a:: rJ) (/) -=: ...J ü w a:: M o o N I N enO ~O WN Zet: O~ en)- en..J :E~ :E() Oen ()u. >-et: 1-0 Zu. ::>1- Oen ()W u.::> 0° OW et:~ ~Z 00 r:a¡::: >-~ I-() Zu. ::>en °en ()~ W..J ()l> ::>W ..Jet: ·Z ~O I- en o a. c w c z w ::¡: ::¡: o u w a:: a t.U!!t- CJ)' >~ t.Uœ O:::~ "" ä!il- i~ I~ ~t:i O~' C) <:~c ~ª ~. ~~ 7~ ~ ;;:¡ "" CJ)j; ~~ <t ..:t ~. ~ -1f to ~}: ~. C ~~ w ;........ ""U') ~w :t ::¡ oS C ¡¡; ~ if c~ g;~ o~ a:: ~. a.~ a. ,""' «~ ¡: ~ ~ ;;t 2; "" ,~ ~ ~~ 111- ,g Z .=W ;)ï; IX: ,'II a:: iG i .... ~ ~' 0:::' ":t a..~ ~ ',~ ~, :::!I "" ... ž~ º U') ~ c <: o ¡::: ùS 0::: Ü t.U 0::: ..¿s CJ) :x: 0::: ct ¡:..: z w ::¡: ~ « a. w c <: ~ ü :2: :r: ü ~ ).. <:<:: 0::: Q. CJ) -- <: '<t Ü :2: :r: ü ~ LU Ü <: ~ ~ <: ~ û.i -I I- ¡::: Z o E U') o a. 0'> C'o r.o ~ ~ ~ ~ 'q' 0; t-- t-- ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0:> L() -- r-.: r.o a C'o L() co 0) '<i~ ~ 0:> t-- 0'> L() r.o '<t 0)- C'o - ..- ..- ~ ~ a t-- a a c'\Ì L() t-- ...: 0:> ..- '<i~ ..- ~ Q) t-- I"') cri N ~. UJ UJ U ~ ~ ~ ~~~«ffi .., a. a. (/) m ...I C :5 - o c '" o ;;;¡ -¡p- ~ :-_~ E ::: '- .9 a. Q) « ; '-' - '0 Q) C ~ ~ .... E Q) ~¡=,g .8 ~ ~ :2 ü) Q) 0. ~ ~ i I C)ü) c ~ 'E E o en o CD a5 '-' C 0. « ':§ 0 u) 'S 0. .... .c Q) .8 C :5 <Q Q) E .!: E '~ õ. E "' a. Q) ~ ra > :g Q) g, E :::: '0 u c: ~ êð ð :ë ~ rn '~ C') c: ~.~ ~ Q) ro en E 5. 0 c: en 0. '- Q) '" ~ ~ ~ o E I- C) o "ê ~ C .2 <3 êii û) ~ ~ t: '0 c C U to 1J >- ~ g> 'Ë 0 .- E -I 0 It') - It') c: ......w ~ I- Z ::¡ o u u « o o t- o o o N ...... It( o ...... N t- o ...... o o ...: o "iiJ '- Q) c. o e ci "ED o to '-' ro ü) > Q) ro o.c. 1J ~ Q) t5 ;.;:: co 1: cc Q) '-' en N Õ ~ £ ~ ::1 .c E .! m -g .~ :J ::1 en '" _-:; CD .~ :s Q) '-' U)cc.c cu .2 ~ 0 1J"iiJ"'u "¡: -S CD (1) oC').c'-' ü:e:o:g C'o o a ,,:., a ~ a.. 'Z o ~ u ü: ¡:: U') ::¡ .., :it C w IX: U') en ~ u w a:: ...., co Q N lO a a::> 0') IJ.J SI. ~ ~ C ) CI) ~ ~ J:: ::; ~ .... J - IJ.J 0 a:: ~':'t c: (/ ~. .S! ->- !\'{ ¡- i::J ( ) "" ü ~ ~ c: ""-' <I: ãi <: ... ~ c.. :e ..9 ... ;¿ s¡; ~ c. ( ) ; ... u ¡- C ) cD :!!! ë " ;¡¡; LI.J ª (/ C"") ~ c: 0 0 :f. ... ,~ ( ) 0 :::: w Ci :J g ~ ... ;:) "" 0 - CJ "" .£ ( ) ( ) N -. ~ .c 1:J en 0 ~, CI ü; ;g 0 ~ c: ex: "" :J (/ N iI" ,"ê " E ( ) w ex: .;(; ;¡¡¡ ... c. Z "" 0 II) ... <C ;;: u CI ( ) 0 CI) ~ u c: c. W ~ Š <I: :2 0 en >- .. - 'S ìï en 'þo ui ..J ;;t .c ( ) - ... ~ <C ':;:' a::> "- 0 :S -!: 0') 10 ~ c: ~ t) );( co -.:- ( ) :S en !'t 0')" C'\ " u E ';:: 0 0 ~ .... - ã. c 0 t) u. ... ~ ~ ... t- ~: C. ( ) ( ) ô ex: rtI > (/ >- :2: 0 0 0 0 - Q) CI :S 0 I- " ~ ., 3:! N Z U. ~. Ci 0 U -0 ~ .... ~ c: 'I( :J I- LI.J ~ 0') :;:; :J 1: 0 -£ ¡- N fI 0 0 en ~ en :::t <0 '<t Q) ... '~ .... t) w 0 c. C'iJ N -';.i. LI.J N 0') .... .~ t- :J :¡. ~ Q CI U. ;:) r-:. :;&; rtI c: c: . - a .~ 0 :; ë '>, ,g .... 0 ~ >- -.:- 0 W Ci LI.J oi ~ Q) C'iJ .¡¡; 0 c ex: LI.J Q: '« E ìï 0 a:: ~..... ex: Ci ;ç "" c: II) c. z 0.. ,. :it it ~ ... CD ,'!1 <C Z LI.J Ci x;,' CI) C ) II) ..c: 0 0 ~ LI.J ~ i > 0 r- ¡- > 0 :S z c::a ~ ~ 0 ~~ !Ii CI ;:) ..: >- <C 0 c:: :; ... 0 0 0 ü c.. .;!í 0 ... ro ü l- t) ... - ë: LI.J c.. ,¡¡, c: ... Ü Z c:: <I: ~ 0 CD U. .~ c. <I: :J ... u 0 en &' ~ 0 "" Q "- ü; 0 cD en Þo Q Q u 0) t) .... 10 ;;: ... :c <C "" ¡::! a.. ë: ",", .... ...: t ~ W ..J :.to 1:J 0 ,< a::> - t) ~ :2: ~ C ) c: u ct:I t) -.:-- U ct:I > :J W ¡ ~ .... >- II) ro ex: 0 ~ 1:J CI ( ) c. ...J ~ ~ :ê 0 C. :J 0 1:J ->:: ~ Z ., >- :::t E E 0) u en 0 ;z .J 0 "- :::¡ <: C'iJ <)¡ ¡- "- 0 :e CD I- :::: ~ z ~ C I(') ë ( ) 0 -.:- ~ LI.J - -.:- - I(') UJ u ,'!1 en ¡:: ~ \.1J , .... c::: co 10 N - C'iJ :S 0 ùS 0 0 ~ c::: :2: - co >- c.. ;:) r-.: '<I' :J .c :S a:: 5f. ü ~ C'iJ -0 ';:: 0 ... Q) ( ) ( ) i :¡ ... \.1J ~ :J II) II) :§ CD .~ ... a:: Æ :J I :2: c- O) u C") Oð ~ IJ) c. C Q ~ CI) rtI .Q :J 0 Q ro II) u , ::x: 'or. 1:J C") a:: a:: i! .¡: :5 ( ) CD Q .c u ~ ~ ~ ~~ 0 CI ~ ~ ü: 0) ... ... 0 0 0.. ~.: .A. ::. :t LI.J Z :it ¡:.: ~ .J , 0 ¡- 0 , z ~ ¡:: W LI.J ¡:: LI.J LI.J W c::: ~ ,., z ~ " C/) <I: z Ci ~ >= t- Ü C/) t- o 0 0 ü: ü: IJ) ~ ëi5 E u " ~ LI.J ¡:: :) c.. :> (/) CJ ~ ~ z IJ) u UJ .". 0 0 <I: w ::> w Ci Õ a. , a. a. en CD , c::: , ,.... Q) '-' CI)":':: Q) Q) :>...:S ~ ~ D) ." CU c:: I., . C) C) C)" c:: :.::: Q) CI) .', ~ co ¡g " o U o.."b <.0 '-::J c:: fij ~ ~ "b"'=="b12 C:"bc::::J~ C/J/ ~~0.gQ) 3 Q) U Q) lLJ . Q) .CI)Q;)~ a::: ',',', ~ c:: Q) '.... c:: E I- "b .~ CD.... 0 U ...... :>... 0 , c:: CU 0 CD CI) ex: CU U - c:: [, 0- I, ......0E-D)::J } :E I' .J:::- CUI., .9'J CI) CD ã3 CI) "ò" " - C) ".., tü c:: :ï:: CD :::. Q) '"" " '-.......J:::cuE r-.. N 0 .","," t:) 6 0 o---c::':..;:: <: I Cl ~c¡¡....c¡¡<I.1 C) 0 ~ "b CI) 0 E C) N I IIJ cry . CD <1.1 <1.1 :::.:.- 0 - '<"" ~ §;., E as CI) Ll) C/) 0 cD e::: 0 <I.1Q~~"b '"" N . c:: 0.. c:: C\, we::: I" I· CI) E c¡¡ c¡¡ r-.. lá I' , z« .- cu CI) - - C/) C/J I, <1.1 <1.1 "-I :>...:::.:. C) Ow ~ lLJ ~. ,.¡ D1Q)ttlC"as C) C/)>- ).: ..' ~ .S a: ~ ~ C/)....J ,~:~ <.0 co "I' :2:« ;,~.~ cry ..... It') ~ ...... c:: '- c¡¡ ~, "ò" cry. "'. ". ~oCl) ~ ~ o :J ...... c:: CI) :2:U r-: ..... ~, U"""ttI :>... O~ Ii ffi ~ ~ c:-~Q)ttI '. <1.1(") Q) o.."b uu.. I.'· - C) I·, ---.J::: 0 >-e:::N , :¡: æ C) ~ Q) C/) .~ ~ I-O~ Ü c:¡ C\Ï I.' Q) Q) '- ~ cry CI) ~ I., "'" zu..£:::! Cl a C\, I <I.1:S:S~ ::;:, ~I--.:t ., UJ lLJ ¡:: ,..... , -:>......... c:: cu o C/) .. I- ..... .g-ttlCD"b ;~ (/) ü ~ "ò" ~ <1.1 ð"bü I., U ww '0 w <: '"" "ò" , ,', u..~1- ~ ~ ~ co C) .c: Q):>...<I.1 00« " 0 C) ue:~",==o.. Cl UJ ~ $ <ó ,. CI) cu :::. c:: CI) wO UJ 'a:: lLJ cry , I., O::J ~ :i:t oe:::« Cl , <: :¿ "ò" c¡¡ e: ~'E ::J ~zO ~ "," ""5 <1.1 o..E 0 I- z Cl .. ¡:: ~ D1.J::: CI) .J::: <: OO~ UJ UJ ,,', " '- 0 :::> ::E l- e: r-: E ü .~ > a::: 0 ::E 0 '.." a11-~ ; a:: D1>":~<I.1"b ü >-«« 0 a:: .S ~ D)-C: <1.1 Ü U 0- q; I-U UJ 0- 0 ~c::er-:~ z- a:: ex: ., ;'; o <1.1 ~ ~; ~!:: " <.0 r-.. ~~ ~uo..uj<l.1 0C/) .. ~ cry cry c:: ~ -ê ·ê g. uC/) "ò" <.0 C ,,> -.:- r-.." ~ 0:; ,," <1.1 c:: 0 ro CI) « Ü ~ ~ <1.1 ::J 0.. ~ ._ W....J .Q E CI) 0 c:: -U E.. - -¡:- " ~Eg>E-.2 Uw E .; J:: ::J " ~e::: o . Q 0 ttI 0 '- Q) ~ ....J Ü Ü -c:: .J::: U c:: ...... Q) ->:: " >- ~ :¿ ... CI) Q) Q) .J::: 'z <: ~ .e: ~O ... ...J CI) '- :::. E C/) 0 cc lLJ <I.1.c:Q) Q I- Q):::~:;:;Q) ¡:: z Ü l1J r-.. I- .E;: :¿ "ò" r-.. 2C¡¡C::1:::S L¡j UJ <: ..... "ò" C/) 8 '. a:: ~ ¡:: co c:i - CI) cu c¡¡ a::: a:: ..... , 0.. - _ 0.. cc 0 ü ,S " ~ ~ I- ~ E cu 0 c.. .....J . a::: , ., Q)::;oe:E lLJ '-- :: U a::: ~ Ii <: a:: Ll) èQ)"5tt1c¡¡ ..... " a ~ to-: I ~ CI) CI) ~ r-.. <: ¡::I ~ cu CI) E D1 cry .. è5.S!2 ã3 [2 C) q; L¡j, o.."'==i:t:::: ~ 0.. ~ C/J a:::: " E ,~ ttI D) Q) C) ::x:: ü a::: ~I" ~t5c::[2¢: a::: a:: a::: c¡¡ ttI 0.. I' I' =Þ: ': UJ , Z 0 ¡:.: ...J 0 UJ t: úi ¡::: a:: z 1 UJ W t- UJ Cl t:) (/) ex: (/) (/) :E z Cl ex: z >= I- U ex: I- z 0 0 a:: ex: u: u: º a:: ...J ...J a:: E u t:> c:: ex: UJ ex: ¡::: u ex: (/) (/) IIJ >- >- ...J z 1-1 en UJ 0- :> 0 0 ex: ex: ex: UJ g, ~ c:: UJ a. 0- en IIJ -, 0 0 0- ..., N o o N , ..- c/)0 e:::~ We::: Z« OW C/)>- C/)-I ~« ~(.) O~ (.)LL >-O:::N I-oe ZLL~ ::>I-o::t o C/) .. (.)L1JW LL::>I- OC« wO 00:::« ~zO OOZ _w CJI-~ >-«« 1-(.) Z- ::>!::: 0C/) (.)~ W-I -(.) (.)L1J ::>0::: -I ·Z ~O I- en o a. . " I a LU CI) s: LU 0:::1 , l- t) - <t I' 0.. i" ~ I- W t:) o ::J ,cc o ~ CI) ~ CI) -: ~ )~' :;:/ ~ . ., o W l- I' ~ L ::J I a W c:: o W o Z W ~ ~ o t) W c:: ,. - 01 We >, 01 c::" 0..1 0..' <t ,_, .' .' ~ o ¡::: lfj 0::: ü LU 0::: a ~ <:( CI) ~ 0::: èî: ~~ Ü E E o ü " -t: C\) Q >- ...J l- e: ' Z o . W u c:: :§ ,'. ~ --- t) ~ o ¡::: ~ 0::: ü LU 0::: , .:-: Z W ~ Z ~ 0 <t If) c.. :> W o 0 r:: G:: _ LU :J: ~ ü LU co ¡:: a LU ¡:: ~ ~ ;: '< " ~ ~ D:) ¡:: s: ~ LU ~ ~ I- 0:: èî: -;::- :J:Q Õ ~:¿ :: ~~ .3. üLU'< " I'- ~:¿,..~I'- ~ ¡::: D:) ~ LU I- "" I- 0:: ~ èî: ~ - W ...J I- ¡:: Z o E If) o c.. <::> <::> <::> "" D:) D:) c.o <0 "" ~ c.o Ct) ~ '~. C") ,.. 1<)'" ~ 2 a~ <::> <::> ('.j C") C'. ,.. , ,.. "" <::> <::> <ó C") ~ 1'-' "" c.o I'- C"),' C") C") 1'-_ ~ c.o <:)" 1'-' "" 0::; '" "" ~ ~ I, I I I 1.0 ,.. r--: "" ù.i ù.i W 0 t:) If) o <t Z :>: I- 8ffi~~ffi ~ cc>->-...JZ I- o<t<t<tw 0 , a. c.. If) cc I- I I I ; , : . ',' I I I I , , Q) U)~ Q) Q) :2;~ (1J t:: I... §t5~{j '- ::J 'b~'b[:2t:: t:: 'b t:: ::J Q) Q)'baa~ ~-q:u,cæ Q) CI) co 3:; 3:; t:: Q) I'-.. t:: ...... ,!2 Q) .... a c: ..... ~ a (1J~-§.Q)~ ..... 0 0) ¡:::¡ ,c-E<tJ- .~.~ Q) Q; CI) c: ,c Q) ;:" Q) I........,c(1JE ~Cë~c::.:: 'b CI) a (1J E Q) Q) Q)~' a -g~EæCl) Q) .S2 (~ 3:; 'b t:: Q. VJ t:: ,~ E cci ~ (1J, Q) Q) N ~~ 0) Q) ~ Ct;¡ æ ¡::.E Q 'b :>. - ><:>. ~..... t:: '- Ct;¡ :::: Q CI) o ::J "- .... CI) u -..:;; ctJ ... ~ ~ c;) Q; ~.g; ""'-,c 0 ~ æ C/) ,~ ~ CI) '- Q) I... :.;:; Q):S:S~ :::.:. :g~"'iõåi.g; Q)a'bOl... ,c Q) ~ Q) ~~~~Q. I... Ct;¡ 5 § ~ ~~I...E::J ::J Q) Q. ~ 0 tn CI)~..c: Q) ¡:: '- a >< I... E ° '- 0) CI) t::"":¡::Q)"Q '- ~ O),c Q) ~t::[2f-,:"'iõ a Q) ¡.;; 3:;uQ.vjQ) ~CI)Q)Q. t:: ~ 1:::'i::: a Q) t:: a Ct;¡ Q) ::J Q. ¡.;; .~ ~§~~§ ;:" <;: t:: <;: ..... Ct;¡ a '- Q) ~ ,cut::"-Q) CI) Q) Q) ,c CI) '_ ;:" ~ ", Q) ,c Q) ,_=== VJ Q):::'b Q) 6'(1Jt::1::::S õ.CI)(1J(1J..... Eètiõ Q.(1J ( )c:a~E ~ Q) ,c Ct;¡ Ct;¡ !;....~ ~ CI) '- ¡::CI) I...E 8' a .~ Q) <tJ I... Q. =s; it:: '- Q. E '_ (1J 0) Q) lQ) 13 t:: [2 F r-Ct;¡(1JQ.r- Z o ¡:: <t t) u.. ¡:: If) ::J , ....., ~ <::> ..... I'- , <::> <::> <::> C") ,... 1.0 <b ,... C'. I'- , ,... <::> <::> :it I- ~ :::J o Ü ü <:( (Q CO) <::> N <::> Ü 0:: , :j ; a w c:: If) If) <t ...J t) W c:: , . '" ri I,; .., , , ,'" : ,,'. "" .7,.;; 1'··. .... ';to <0 ~~ ~: \l"J <0 .... a co C") C\ .(¥, ,.~ ..... io9o C\ ' Lu :~, U) '. io9o "'" ~ ~.~~.~ '~~~ Lu ~ 0:: ,- ii~ ~E ..... I- ;?;' ~,;.... 0 ~. *1 ~ ;:Jt ~;~,~ ~~ c.. ~~-' :2 ~, ;¡¡:. ....., .- :1~ .... ~ I- ~. Q) Q .......;. LU !"{ :5 Q ("') ~, <:J ti: t-.. 0 0 ~. 0 , <: 0 i Q 0 =:J .2 Q N QJ tn Q , {f; ~ c-.. N ~ tf:: "" .... en 0 0 1t <.J Il') , ~ 0 >- :&f ~ .2 .... N .~ ~~ Q W QJ ~ Q) c-.. .... Z ~ f-. ~~' 0 Il') « ::) :~. ~ t-.. 0 C/) Z! ~ J:: , W Q ?; .... ~ ~ & <0 ~ " ~ en >- ~ ',ö , , '" ';to en z:L :I~ Q) ..J i C") ~ \l"J Q) ::2: « ~ C\ 0)' >- ::2: t) ~ t-.. co 1l"J..~.2 en ~ <0' ...: CQ ", c- O "þ .... .... C\ ;;'1 E t) u.. ~? ~ "'" ~ ~ Q) - c::: ~it - .;;:: .... >- ''';'; :r: .~ .E I- 0 ~ 0 .;¡:, ¥: ~ "C Z u.. ~. 0 ~ ~ ~ I- w .... :J ~ I- 1L1 .... "i. 0 0 en t"'t en 0 <0 c..¡ .... t) UJ -'~ OJ ~ LU <: .... <0 .... :.~. u.. ~ .~: =:J ~ co ..;. ~ OJ a ¡i.~ 0 Q ~ 0 0 '" cO ;.,,,: UJ ~~~ w ~ t: W e::: ~$1\. 0 c::: ...... "" 0 ~ ~ ?~ Z ~ Z ~.1.~ :ït; « z LU 0 ~ :§ ,.~ Q) w ...., :5 I- 0 0 :2 > ~J '0 tñ z CJ :2: 0 12: Q) Q) =:J I- ~ .~ .0 OJ 0 >- « 0 e::: <.::: t~.... rn Ü c.. 4. ~ .2 .:.:. Ü l- t) w C- u Ü z e::: ~ '" rn ~ u.. Q) c. ~ :;:¡ 0 en c-.. t-.. 0) :§ Q¡ en t-.. Q t-.. t) co Il') C") t: c: « ..... ..... <0' 0 Q) UJ ..J - .c <: .... .... C\ <.J t) ..'¡.. ~ io9o '4 ~ c: '-' ~ :::; ~ e UJ ~ ~ ~ ~: 0 ",.. ..J ~ ~ <.J <J1 "" c: ¡....: Z >- :r: - Q) <: ~~-;; ...J Ü t-.. ~ D- en 0 0 .~- I- ~ t-.. i:. E ¡:: ¡..;;~. '" I- ~~' z .... c:i ~ .... e L5 .... u w Lu .... .... ... .... en e::: co .0 ~, Q) Q) 0 > <J1 0 0:: :i,i-¡' e::: <: ..... yf~ 0 ctJ Ü ~ r-.: ~ Co. =:J ~ ,'.,~ t: Q) Lu ~~. '- >< :=t, Ü .... u Q: :;N n.;; B Q) .:.... .!: c-.. ì5. ~¡¡. ~ ~,('.; Q a ~ ~":" J:: '- Q <: E: <: ;<j', OJ .2 , '« 0 ~ ~:~.... C") Ü ~f~ J:: <J1 ~ U) Q) ~ CI) . .8 'ü Q: 1:: Q) c: C/) 0 Q) Cf. ~ ~~.~ :;:¡ OJ ~ '., 0 Q " rn ~;: .... .. :it; w ., z ¡:..: ...J 0 0 ~...~ I- .. LU Z - ¡:: w w .. " ¡:: e::: w .. :2: z w 0 (.:J en ~~. ~ en z 0 ~ z != , 5:2 l- I" 0 >- , en e::: 0 E: 0 e::: ~ e::: LL. ...J LL. ~ <t I Ü (.:J e::: <t w <t -, ¡:: ...J V) ," c.. ~ en tn >- >- ...J Z l- V) Ü W 0 0 <t <t ~ w 0 -, =:J W Q 0 c.. -, c.. c.. en tn I- -, e::: , ~ ~ " -....I " , " ". 'S .. ~<:'i. .,.. "I' <0 '::i'. l() <0 .,.. a '.,òC Q) '" '" LU !~!~: .,.. ~ ",' U) J:,~ ~ "'" 3: ~ LU CI::: I- ~ U ¡,¡;:., <.: -,'0' ......- 0.. ¡ ~ ... I- a> <::> ;;;; UJ :: <::> C"? c::> r-- 0 0 ;~ 0 6 < ~.i 0 0 ;::¡ .2 <::> N <::> . CQ [ ) a> "" N ~ :r..:i:" - .,.. '" l() C/') 0 0 u , ~ 0 >- ~:::; .2 .,.. N <::> UJ CI} .~ a> "" ... z ~ f- ::~:;¡. I~~ l() « ::;¡ "," r-- a U) , W Q .,.. ~ 5: <0 C/') ~ ~ ~2 .' "I' , C/') ~ .1 a> ...J ~ '" "" LO' a:> ::E « £ C\ r-- 0'1 >. ::E t) r-- Q) LO 0 -, to' Q)'" c.. C/') ..., .,.. ~~ a ";.40- .,.. .,.. '" .JÖi. E f..E. ~ ~ "'" :.:?Ço t) u.. ~..:;L, a> ì - -#';- ~ - ~f ... ~ :r:: 0 I- a () ~. .... ~~ "C Z u.. 0 I:: ,~. c:: ::J I- ;;'t~ UJ "I' !;:; ::¡ I- LU "I' ~: 0 a C/') ~~ en () to c\Ì ~..'. ... t) UJ ,;.;'-? UJ < "<- <0 .,.. i;;: OJ ::J Q) .... ,~ OJ u.. ;::¡ ~ Œ a 0 <::> 1'.:'~ c:: a .. w 0 ~ UJ I:: cò t£' c:: 0 ~ UJ c::: ª '" 0 ~ ~ .= ~ z ~ « z w 0 Ifi:'" ~ ~~ a> UJ ~:.;, :~ .t: I- a a ~ > ;:¡ ~;: - en z OJ ~ 0 ~: ;::~ a> CIJ ;::¡ I- 0 ::€' ~' ..c 0> 0 ~ « c::: :co ~. co U ~I~ .2 -'" u l- t) w u U Z c:: <II co ~ u.. a:> a. ::J II ::¡ a C/') ~ i'-. ~[I~ ~ C/') <::> t) Q) l() <") c:: c:: « "" "1'- .,..- <0- 0 CIJ UJ ...J "" - .c ~ < "<- .,.. ~:~ ~ t) to'> to'> c:: t) "" S .52 W ~. s~ ::J ~ .... ~ () * ro ...J ~ -~ u '" >:::. '" c: ¡....: Z >- :r:: t~: .... CIJ < ..J Ü r--. ~ c. C/') a 0 .~~. l- I:: r--. -, E l- i=: ~~:, z c::i r:;: '" 0 "I' .... U US UJ LU "<- ~ "<- ~ .... C/') c::: Q) J, Q> Q) "0'·' () > '" a CI::: ';õ'"-' c::: < .,.. $ 0 CtI a.. () ;::¡ ~ r-..: .!tf c: Q) LU .. u ~' ... '- x u CI::: ~ iþ I:: ;::..... .2 .~ '" a 0- *~ ..c: '- Q <::> < E ~ ~ ::C: .~ .2 ~ ":( 0 f () ~ .t: '" ~ ~ CIJ '" ~' ~ .2 'ü CI::: 1:: ',"" a> c: U) 0 ':-Ä Q) CE 0- ~. ::¡ 0> õ: <2~ 0 CtI ...' ~~ " , :it UJ .. Z ¡:.: ..J 0 l- " 0 z ~.r" w ¡= w UJ ¡= c::: w w 0 (? .. ~~ ~ en <.: z z 0 <! z :>: !:: u en I- i:- 0 0 c:: <.: '. en c:: 0 c::: Ll. ..J , Ll. <.: <! en !:: u (? c::: <! UJ <! .. ¡= ..J .- 0.. ~ en [ ) >- >- ..J Z I- en u w I. 0 0 <! <! <.: UJ 0 .. ;::¡ UJ 0 0 0.. -, 0.. 0.. en CD I- -, c:: \w ......, FORT PIERCE COMMUNITY CENTER , 1 position of Recreation Supervisor I Pay Grade 9, Job Code 652 to Recreation Supervisor II Pay Grade 10, Job Code 653 Cost $1,704 1 position of Maintenance Tech I - Temporary Pay Grade 4, Job Code 814 to Maintenance Tech I with benefits Pay Grade 4, Job Code 814 Cost $1,023 GOLF COURSE Office Assistant I Pay Grade 6, Job Code 1031 to Office Assistant III Pay Grade 10, Job Code 1031 Cost $ 2,912 MUSEUM Two positions of Maintenance Tech - Temporary Pay Grade 1, Job Code 802 to Maintenance Tech Part time with limited benefits Pay Grade 1, Job Code 802 Cost $1,413 Page 2 of 3 N o o N . .... cnO 0:::0 UJN zO::: o~ _W cn>- ~..J ~~ ~ü o~ ÜLL. >-O:::N r-Og ZLL.£::! ::Jr-~ o CIJ .. üWW LL.::J~ oge eo:::~ ~Ze oo~ CCr-<!:I >-~~ r-Ü Z- ::J!:!:: ocn ücn ~ W..J -Ü Üw 30::: 'z t;o r- CIJ o c.. Ci) ~ Ci) ~ c w c z w ::iE ::iE o u w e:: c w > o e:: a. a. ~ ~ o ¡::: i1i a:: ü LU a:: Q ~ <;( Ci) ~ a:: Ci: -¡:- Õ E E o >- <.J ....J CD I- f2 Z W CD '0:: ã:: 0:: ~ ::J Ü ~ o ¡::: i1i a:: ü LU a:: ¡:.: z w ::iE l- e:: ~ a. w o I ~i ~i ~~ o ~; I- U ~ a. ~ I- W ~ C ::J c:J 0) "'" - 0 (') t-.. ~ ..: ..... a:: o Ci) s: a:: LU §S Ci) ~ o ¡::: i1i a:: <.J LU a:: ¡e C\Ï co C\ ,- (') (') 0 ~ -- ,..... t-.. c:) (') co 0' C\ ~ a:: o Ci) s: a:: LU Q :::J Ci) ~ o ¡::: i1i a:: ü LU a:: o co co _ co 0) t-.. (') 0 r-.: 0' co' C\ _ C'o' ~ ~ ..... If) t-.. .,¡. ..... r--.. 0)' '" ~ C\ LO 0) CD C") C") R CD 0)- - ~ W ...J !:: I- Z o E (/) o a. w ù.i w c ~ (/) C <1: Z I- o e:: <1: ~ ü: u ~ e:: <1: w ~ ~ ~ :;t if¡ ...., a. a. U) III IE ~ I~ I- , 0, I- I !i Q ~ ü ü: ¡:: U) ::J -, ....., ~1::: ~tl: ..... C) CD ui .... .s::: C) Q)-~ 4::âj~ ~-,Q L.... ~ ëi5 C) 0 c:: ì:: .f/) 0 Q)~o.. Ü Q) ~ :::...,0...... ~::J..Q c: CI) .0 ::JQ)..:::' E: F ~ E:r-:;:: o . c: ü"tJQ) ..:.::c:J;2 ~ ¡g CD '" ¡;;; ::. Q. E: C!J c:o.s::: aU..:.:: U .- .... c: .::: (1J :.::Jc:Q Q) 0 c: --~o ~ Q) Ü tt; o...s ....."tJ-J (1Jc:..... ..s::: 0 (1J .....u_ Cl)Q)-;: (1J CI) 0 CD cu CI) .s::: '- E: ..... è (1J CI) cu CI) (1J 0.. Q):::::-65 :S (1J cu.....cu .Qo:S "tJ ..s"tJ :¡_c: o :: (1J .s::: 0 .... CI) CI) cu c: .~ ì:: .2 Q) ,o.¿ ..... 0.. '-' ~ 65 ~ Q "ë;: CI) c: ::J ~2E ..... (1J E tt;~o O)uü c: cu cu ~a::~ (1J (1J Q) ù5 .:2 èt o o r--.. 6 o o C\ - If) .0 - C\ r--.. , .... o o :i:I: I- ~ :::J o Ü ü <;( If) C") o , C\ o ü a:: , ~ a w c:: U) U) ~ ...J U W e:: . N o o N I ..... enO o::~ UJo:: Z<2: OUJ en>- en..J :¡:<2: :¡:U O~ uu.. >-O::N I-oe zu..~ :JI-"<t oen UUJUJ u..:J1- oß~ 00::<2: ~zo ooZ _LU [DI-e" >-<2:<2: I-U Zu.. :Jen Of/) U<2: UJ..J uU :JUJ ..JCt:: 'z ~o I- en o c. " . 1'1 ',. J:- c i ,..,¡{ "-IE IJ.J., C/J ~. ~!f IJ.J ,. 0::[ ~ i~ ~ a. ~ ~ ~ ~. t¡j ... 0'\ o !;;,~.': v ~.IV Cl ~ ª ~" v; ~ " ~ ~ V;$; IJ.J " :>-:~ " J:" ~, t " '" ; ;> ~ ~ 'i 'if Cl .~ ~ (/) UJ ::) - 0 , UJ .. "" ~. ..... o T ~ I ~? Cl.!.' ~! ~~ -~ ü~ .?;o" "ë: ;:. ::J :? E 1: E ~ 8·f 6 >- 8f, ...J ~ t ~ i5.:1:UJ '1::::'OC ~í~ --~ü ::2:j, Q ~ I-!r l5 ~' 0:: ~. üt l.U~ 0::':: i .. o UJ o z UJ ~ ~ o u w oc ::2: o ¡:: lfj 0:: Ü IJ.J 0:: a ::2: "::( v; ::.:: 0:: Ci: ~ z w ~ I- oc < Cl. W o ~l z' 0:' (j)' ~ 0' f:2 _ ffi :!:: ~ Ü CD ~ a l.U ~ .....- o .- ..... ::2:~~"t~ ~ ~ <:::> ~ Š ~ l.U ~~ I- 0:: Ci: -.:: 5 a. 5 ~ ~ -: IJ.J~ ~ ü IJ.J "I" r-.. ::2: ~ ..... "t r-.. ~¡::<o C ~ b: ~ ::2:Ci: ~ - Lù ...J I- ¡::: Z o E (/) o Cl. Ü,j Ü,j w 0 ø o ë2 Z 8 ø ë2 tX) >- >- 0« ...., a. Cl. Q '" ~ C'\ Q Q Q c-.i '" C'\ ¡; ;¡ l ~ ~ 0) .,.... C ~ r-.. <0 co;' """'" 0') ...... ff1 oy--- ~ ('1')' i- z;~ Z;! ~ .. ~ ~ · Q Q (Ò '" "I" r-..- i.'¡. R! ~ ..... Q) ..... ~ ..... i.'¡. ·õ.:: ~ ~ ~: Q!¡ "r- ~~ ~ ~~; ~. ~ f~ :'1;' ~ ~~; ;; l ~ ~ ~~ ? :r .~ ~. · ~~ ft, ....~ co, .. .....~ s N" :-: ~~ ;»; ~. .. t: " ~; , t ~"- :c ý, ¡ .. J. Ž: '" ~.. !: ~ ': ~. ;, ;¡ ~: t. 't f. . .,., ~ ~ ~- a= ü: .:.¡¡ .A W < ,. :ïZI-~ < w 9 i (/) OJ ....,' 10 ..... ,...; i.'¡. , ,", :~. "", en c:: ¡~ E ~-o -0 en c:: c:: 2 c¡¡ ~ Q.- Q) Q) .... Q) -c:: ~ ~ -;.~ -0 CI) Q) ~c¡¡§- .....~CI) ..c:: (,,) .Q3.t:: '::::::.-- c::;-- .... ..... .... ..2::::~ -0 ~.~ Q) CI) Q) -OQ)Q. Q) - ;:¡ Q).QCI) c:: c¡¡ CI) c:: Cö ~- Q) '- Q) 0 r:::: en~ 0 ~cc:=:; a> -0 c¡¡ :::.- (,,) o ;:¡ 0 (,,)0- r:::: ~ .S:2 a>r:::::S ..c::0..... ~ f2 co CI) Q) CI) Q) Q. Q) -S-Q) -oco:::"" Q)c.Q ..c::.Q Q. (,,):::: E CI) -0 a> ....-0 co co a> - E ;:¡ .S:2 ._ en,.r:::: ..... ~¡....:::::: .2 en..:C"') .S a> ~c:~ o Q) r:::: ~ (,,) 0 r::::~~ a>'- co Q) c:: .Q ;:¡ ~ Q) E Q) :::.E¡-r:::: c¡¡0r- ..c::(,,) CI) .CI) cri ~ {; ê :::......... a> o co :::. õ.. -S:2 ~ E co a>c:~ 0-;::- ~ ¡u .... ...." E .~ ~ CI) en-O o .~ C 0 /"""I -"_ ~ ....'- en ~, E'~ r:::: ;:¡ a> 't3 ï:: C,,) ¡"::'CO.QCö " .' :~ ). n ~ ~ ~ · .. Z o , ¡::: < ~ LL ¡:: (/) ::) ...., ....", Q ¡:;: , Q Q Q '" ..... 10 , 10 - ~ , - Q Q it I- ::2: ::;) o o ü "::( <0 '" Q N Q Ü 0:: , :j ; o w oc en en < ...J U W oc . N o o N I ..... enO c::r:~ Wc::r: z« Qw en>- ~-I :E« :E(.) O~ ()u.. >-c::r: 1-0 Zu.. :JI- oen ()W u..:J 0° OW c::r:c::r: «Z 00 tal- >-« 1-(.) Zu.. :J- Oen ()~ W-I -() (.)W 3c::r: 'z t;o I- en o a. . ..... , I I a lJ.J (¡J S; lJ.J 0:: ~ a': lJ.J " ~, >, ~ .' " I- ,:',"Ü ,<I: / ~ I., i: tü 01 C> ~I § IX) o ~ I I (¡J ~ (¡J ~ .j- .'" ; , ë w o z w :¡: :¡: o Ü w a:: '0 W I- ,(/) ,~ w '. Õ .: w a:: ë.. w > o " a:: a.. ~, a. <;; ~ $" '9' ~ o ¡:: US 0:: () lJ.J 0:: a ~ ~ (¡J ~ 0:: ö: UJ ,. ü _ ~, ~: ~ ~!. ~ ~I'··,', ~ ~'a:: <: 1< ::I UJ Ü (¡J- 0::, 51 Ü ," l.L -J o (!) , , ~ z w :¡: I- a:: q: a. w o .. z o (/) ~ o - - - I- ~ ~ (¡J ëì) (¡J ~ UJ ü G:: l.L o ~ C\ "- e) >- .,... -J CO') <:> 0:: <:> .,... :::J .... 0 ::r: - I- ~ ~ (¡J ëìj CI) ~ UJ ü G:: l.L o ~ .... co r-.: >- .... -J CO') ~ 0:: <:> :::J .,... 0 :t 'w ...J I- ¡::: Z o t: (/) o a. '<t co C'o , "- CO') ..... '<t '<t 0') C\ " ~ C'o ' ~ ~ .: .' . :: I: I;' I 1 , I ,', , ~ . <0 0') It) f. ~ ~ ;:!:. ..... ...... C\ - (0)' ". ~ ..... ~ ..... ~ ~ io' ." ..... I: , I- ~ ~ o ~ .,... .,... "- CO') ..: <0 co <:> .,...- <:>C\ ~ C'\Ì cr)' ..... ~ I- ~ ~ o ~ ü.i w ü.i 0 C> (/) o q: Z >= I- o a:: <I: a:: ü: ü c> a:: q: w CD >- >- ...J Z o <I: q: <I: W ..., a. a. (/) CD ~~ " .'ò: :i; N~ ~~Q~ ~ i~ .,.. il " Z o ':, ¡::: .', <I: ! Ü .:..¡ '." ü: q:, ¡::: I- (/) o ::I I- ..., '... i I I' , I I· . . ~ o E: J::: l> ;:¡ E: <J) ~ 'E ( ) c:: g .¡;; o ~ ( ) £ (ïj £ <J) ;:¡ o ':;: .Q o CI) .!,2 .9.:1 - '5 '- "0 ( )- - f:2 ;:¡ ~ o 0 ;; O¡ o .c:: (!) ê ~ .g c:: ( ) ::s ~ e .!,2 e>- 'Cõ ~ l.L 0 êt3 1: c:: ~ o .... '- ::s .¡;; l> o ( ) ~¡:: ,!,2 J::: . ;:: c:: o .0 ~1 :ã ~ .¡;; "0 c:: .Q o .~ ~- ~ 1: (\ ( ) (¡j :S "ë.; O¡ <J) .c:: ~ .t: ( ) ¡¿ l> (\ ¡¡:: ~ 0 ~ :5 .... c:: ..ê (\ ~ £ -'~ , " : ': I'· :': , , .. ~ Q) <:> :S ..... ..... m -E c:: ~~ :Q 8. .¡;; c:: - o - ~ ~ 2: ~ "0 '" c:: '" (\ ~ '" Q) ,9.:1 .g - = .g 0 O¡ c:: c:: (\ :.;:;; 0 <J) - ')( "0 ( ) .¡g £5 .~ (\ J::: 15 .~ ~ ( ) ( ) ·s .Q :§ t:: Q) ,2 -g .¡;; ..... 0 O¡~ ~ .!,2 ~:S ~ 15 <1J :S c:: O¡ ·2 'S 15 (¡) l> Q) t;:: ::s .¡;; c- ~ ~ ~ .~ c:: Q) .2 f:2 - ::s .9- 0 Q) t5ü"O tI) ....... ~ ~ õ ~ .Q (!) <1J o ( ) ~ ...... J::: ( ) ( ) - £ J::: .....- - cc a æ~E: ..>::: (\ 0 .2 ~ ~ 1:: t;:: .Q ¡g ~!5 Q) 'E c:: 0 ~ <1J l> 0 .s §-.g .. ""'" <:> <:> "- , <:> <:> <:> CO') .,... It) 6 LO C\ "- , co .... "t' :i:t: I- Z ::I o Ü ü ~ 0) CO') c\, <:> ü 0:: :i:t: o w a:: (/) (/) q: ...J Ü W a:: . IN o o IN I ...... mO a:::~ wa::: z~ Ow en>- m...J :E~ :Eu Om uu. >-a:::~ 1-0- zu.~ :JI-'<t om uww u.:J1- OCJ~ wO oa:::~ ~zo OO~ ccl-~ >-~~ I-U Zu. :Jen Om u~ w...J uU :Jw ...Ja::: ·z ~o I- en o a.. . , - I '~ ~' [¡J Ij: CI) _ 5;' UJ 0:: I- ~ ~ ::: I- UJ o ~ ~,', g CIJ ~ .:' ',' '. CI) ~ CI) :~ UJ1: >-£ M ;~. ~;, ~ "' o UJ o z UJ ::: ::: o u UJ a: o 'UJ I- ,,' en UJ :J k,O I> ~ o UJ > o a: a. " a., <1:' - .... ~ ~ o ¡:: ù5 0:: Ü UJ 0:: a ~ « CI) ::x: 0:: ~ :¿' ::J ,>. UJ~ CI) ::J :¿ ¡:.: z UJ ::: I- a: <I: a. UJ o z o en :> o ~ u: UJ J:: ~ Ü UJ ¡:: ~ t3¡:: <:~~... ~ ~ co ¡::$ <: UJ ~ ~ I- 0:: ~ ,,' -¡: J:: ::> Ü Q 0 ¡:: :¿ :: UJ ¡:: .3 ü UJ C\, '<:t <::¿o....C\, ~ ¡:: co 0) UJI- ~ I- 0:: .,;. <:~ 0) ~ ~ , >- ..J I- Z t LlJ a: " a: ¡: ::J ~, Ü .' ü.i ...J I- ¡:: Z o t: en o a.. " o co ~ "I- co ~ <0 C\, <0 "I- C\, <0 0')" "'<:'-.. ~ ~ -¡: ::> o ..c:: ... '.3 '<:t C\ 0) ~ '<:t 0) IÒ ~ c.o ~ ,.-.; ~ ~ ~:: 0)' ~ 0-:' ~ .....:, ~L .' ü.i w ü.i C C) en g~~~æ ü C) a: <I: W CIJ >- >- ...J z o <I: <I: <I: UJ ..., a.. a.. en CIJ J' cot "I- ,; co '. Wt).''';; c G: co.. c... ~~ 0" ;€ ~t : " c:' :2 'b "t:J Q) (tJ E c::';::; ~2 ~ 0 :J ~ 0_ -;~ :::. c: '61 0 "t:J ~ c: (tJ (tJ Q) ~ C3 Ji¡:: ~ -OJ J¿ ,S .~ E - :J CI) CI) (tJ c: Q) 0 ~ u Q) ~ E Q:;:: -è -e Q) (tJ :::. ~ .~ .2..t::: u Q) '- E~ o u c:- Q) 0 ::::..:=: (tJ U ..c~ ~õ Q) U Q) _CI) è: E :J :J - Q) o CI) :::. :J C3~ ~ Q) ~:SE tièª (tJ 0 CI) Q)-:J ~á3:¿ (ij :::. Q) I.;. c: .... Q) "- ::::: :::. 0_ Q) - (tJ CI) CI) CI) - Q) c: CJ) :J 0 (tJ c: ._ -"- - Q) è: 'ëï¡ ..t::: 0 0 - u Q. Q3:::::::: :::. (tJ (tJ O"¿;j"¿;j .- ~ '", .' " ::, ': .' I:. (- ..; ~ - , , " ,: .. .. i: >' ;~ .' ~, , I - ';.~ .. :t , , I I' z o ¡:: <I: ~ u. ¡:: (f) :J ..., : .:.ï <I: I- o I- , o o "- , o o o ("') ... I() 6 ... 0) "- . ... o o :ii I- ~ ::J o Ü ü « C\, ("') o , C\, o Ü 0:: , :j¡; o W a: en (f) <I: ...J Ü UJ a: ~ '-' AGENDA REQUEST TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Mosquito Control District SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAIL. : PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: COMMISSION ACTION: [ X] [ ] APPROVED OTHER: . C.9""ty Attorney: '-óriginating Dept: Finance: .."" ITEM NO. C-g DATE: March 26, 2002 CONSENT [X] REGULAR [ PUBLIC HEARING [ ] Leg. [ 1 Quasi-JD. PRESENTED BY: Jim David Director Authorize the Board of County Commissioners to approve the sub~itt~l of a grant application to Florida Inland Navigation District a"d approve Resolution 02-91 for Assistance Under the Florid~ Inla"d Navigation District ¡'laterwa:ys Assistance Program. In addition, authorize the Chair to sign the grant application and the Interloc~l Agreement authorizing the Mosquito Control District to aQ"inister the Florida Inland Navigation District Grant. The Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND) funds projects from shoreline stabilization to environmental education programs ê.nd facilities. The proposed grant application is for $50,000 to assist with the construction of an observation tower I outdoor classroom and fishing pier at Vitolo Family (Middle Cove) Park - Riverside, located approximately 4.5 miles south of the Ft. Pierce Inlet on South Hutchinson Island. Purchased with Florida Communities Trust and St. Lucie County Environmentally Sensitive Lands Bond funàs, this 107-acre park also provides hiking trails along the Indi~n River Lagoon for school groups and visitors. The proposed projec~ also fulfills educational and access commitments made from t~,e County to the Department of Community Affairs in a Florid~ Communities Trust application and agreement (Project # 95-0ó5-P5Eì. Matching funds will come from Florida Department of Co:¡mmnity Affairs Coastal Management Program (CMP). Ranked third in the state, the CMP application for Vitolo Family (Middle Cove) Park will receive funding and grant contracts should be signed in May. Indi~n River Lagoon License Plate funding of $16,816 will also be a ~atch. The Board approved submitting the grant application for access improvement for Middle Cove Park on September 25, 2001. Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve -,"= submittal of a grant application to FIND and approve Resolution 02- 91 for Assistance Under the Florida Inland ,Navigation District Waterways Assistance Program. In addition, authorize the Chair ~o sign the grant application and the Interlocal Agreement authoriziDg the District to administer the FIND grant. gl sAnderson u y Administrator coordination/Si~ures Mgt & BUdget:.c}W!i ~ &] Purchasing: Public Works: Other: DENIED '-' ....,¡ ATTACHMENT E-6 RESOLUTION FOR ASSISTANCE #02-91 UNDER THE FLORIDA INLAND NAVIGATION DISTRICT WATERWAYS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM WHEREAS, THE St. Lucie County BOCC is interested in carrying out the (Name of Agency) following described project for the enjoyment of the citizenry of St. Lucie Co un ty and the State of Florida: Project Title Vitolo Family Park at Middle Cove - Public/ADA Access Total Estimated Cost $ 113, 716. 0 0 Enhancement Brief Description of Project: Construction of an Outdoor Environmental Meeting Area / 2-Story Observation Tower, Two Observation Platforms, a Fishing pier and Purchase and Installation of a Web Carn. AND, Florida Inland Navigation District financial assistance is required for the program mentioned above, NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the St. Lucie County Board of County ~ameofAgenry) Commissioners that the project described above be authorized, AND, be it further resolved that said St. Lucie County BOCC ~ame of Agency) make application to the Florida Inland Navigation District in the amount of 44 % of the actual cost of the project in behalf of said St. Lucie County BOCC ~ame of Agenry) AND,beitfurtherresolvedbythe St. Lucie County BOCC ~ame of Agenry) that it certifies to the following: 1. That it will accept the tenns and conditions set forth in FIND Rule 66B-2 F.A.C. and which will be a part of the Project Agreement for any assistance awarded under the attached proposal. 2. That it is in complete accord with the attached proposal and that it will carry out the Program in the manner described in the proposal and any plans and specifications attached thereto unless prior approval for any change has been received from the District. FonnNo.90-11 (Rev. 10-14-92) (1) '-' ~ 3. That it has the ability and intention to fmance its share of the cost of the project and that the project will be operated and maintained at the expense of said St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners (Name of Agency) for public use. 4. That it will not discriminate against any person on the basis of race, color or national origin in the use of any property or facility acquired or developed pursuant to this proposal, and shall comply with the terms and intent ofthe Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, P. 1. 88-352 (1964) and design and construct an facilities to comply fully with statutes relating to accessibility by handicapped persons as wen as other federal, state and local laws, rules and requirements. 5. That it will maintain adequate financial records on the proposed project to substantiate claims for reimbursement. 6. That it will make available to FIND if requested, a post-audit of expenses incurred on the project prior to, or in conjunction with, request for the final 10% of the funding agreed to by FIND. This is to certify that the foregòing is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly and legally adopted by the St. Lucie County BOCC at a legal meeting held on this 26th day of March 2002. Attest Signature Title Title Form No. 90-11 (Rev. 10-14-92) (2) '-' ~ ATTACHMENT E-3 PROJECT INFORMATION Total Proj ect Cost: $ 113 , 716 FIND Assistance Requested: $ 50, 000 Assistance % oftotal cost 44% Amount and Source of Applicants Matching Funds:·" Indian River Lagoon License Plate FY 02 - $16,816; Florida Coastal Management Program - $34,900; St. Lucie County Mosquito Control District-$12jOOO (upfront permitting / design cost) Other Assistance applied for (name of program and amount) n/ a Ownership of Project Site (check one): Own X Leased Other Ifleased, please describe lessor term and conditions: " Project type (check one, or more of the following proj eet elements that are part of your proj ect). . - Public navigation channel dredging Public navigation aids and markers Public boat ramps and launching facilities Public boat docking and mooring facilities Public shoreline stabilization Inlet management Waterway signs and t>:uoys for safety, regulation or infonnation Public spoil 'disposal site development Waterways related environmental education programs and facilities Public fishing and viewing piers Public waterfront boardwalks Waterways boating safety programs and equipment Beach renourishment Other waterway related projects X Permits Required: A~encY Yes No N/A Date Applied For Date Received WMD DEP ACOE COUNTY/CITY Other Yes Minor structure vp.~ Minor Structure Form No. 90-22a (New 10-14-92, Rev.OS-OO.) '-" ...,./ ATTACHMENT E-l WATERWAYS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM PROJECT APPLICATION APPLICANT INFORMATION - PROJECT SUMMARY Applicant: St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners Project TitIe: vitolo Family Park at Middle Cove - Public/ADA Access Enhancement Liaison Agent: Contact Person: Jim David. st. Lucie Mosquito Control District Title: Director of st. Lucie County Mosquito Control District Address: 2300 Virginia Ave. Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982 ZIp Code: 34982 Telephone: 561/462-1686 FAX: 561/462-1565 , I hereby certify that the information provided in this application is true and accurate. Signature: Date: PROJECT SUMMARY NARRATIVE (please summarize the project in 2 paragraphs or less.) Middle Cove Park is a 107-acre marsh area surrounded on the western side by an earthen perimeter spoil berm approximatelv 30 feet in width. The berm has been stabilized with a hikinq and bicycle path. The marsh is part of a series of contiguous mangrove 'swamps located on the east shore of a back barrier island on the Indian River Laqoon. The ecosystem includes hiqh salt-marsh species. manqrove swamp. and AlA frin<;¡inç¡ tropical hanunock uplands. Dolphin, manatee, -jumpinq mullet. and over eighteen wadinq bird species. ospreys. and shore birds can be observed from the site. The purpose of this project is to provide improved environmental educational facilities and access to the Park. If funded, FIND grant monies will:be matched with dollars from the Florida Department of Community Affairs Coastal Management Proqram, Indian River Lagoon License Plate FY02 Proqram, and st. Lucie Countv Mosquito Control District to construct a two-storv observation tower. the first story platform of which will additionally be used as an outdoor classroom or meeting area. Funds will also be used to construct two observation platforms and an observation/fishing pier. A WebCam will also be purchased and installed for ADA access and educational purposes. Form No. 90-22 New 10/14/92, Rev.8/24/00. \r .., Scale: 1 II - 750' Middle Cove River Legend · Picnic area m.,.~J'Ä Bike rack · Trash can = Dike walkover  Sign 11 Aerator station · Fishing platform Gate II Rest area I- Fishing dock Indian Lagoon ~ ~ .!f). Dual pump & aerator station (existing) Dual pump & aerator station (proposed) Combination dike walkover picnic area educational site Mosquito impoundment bcundary Indian Atlantic River Ocean Lagoon N + 5Þ~,A;~ ._, '~ ~~2'-:;-~'7?~ roximate. '-' ....I STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" JEB BUSH Governor STEVEN M. SEIBERT Secretary January 16, 2002 Ms. Jody Rosier Bonet, Grants Writer St. Lucie County 2300Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 RE: Florida Coastal Management Program - Coasta'l Partnerships Initiative FY 2002-2003 Project Applications Dear Ms. Bonet: Enclosed for your information is a copy of the "Notice of Application Evaluation Scoring and Intent to Award" for Fiscal Year 2002-2003 applications submitted to the Florida Coastal Management . Program's Coastal Partnerships Initiative. As required by Rule 9M-l, Florida Administrative Code, an evaluation committee consisting of five members reviewed all the applications and evaluated and scored them according to the criteria established in the rule. The enclosed notice identifies all applications within each initiative category, the score received by each application, and the ranking of the applications within each initiative category based upon the scores. Rule 9M -1 requires that the scores and rankings of applications be published in the Florida Administrative Weekly. Any person whose substantial interests are affected may request a hearing pursuant to Sectjon 120.57, Florida Statutes, within 21 days of publication of the notice. Failure to request a hearing within the applicable time period shall constitute a waiver of the right to a hearing. The Notice of Application Evaluation Scoring and Intent to Award has been submitted to the Florida Administrative Weekly for publication on Friday, February 1,2002. If you have any questions, please contact me at the Florida Coastal Management Program, Department of Community Affairs, 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100, telephone (850) 414-6562, Sincerely, ~~ L. Christine McCay, ~tal Administrator Florida Coastal Management Program cc: I ¡.~: 1 R is r-; .,"~" n ." F2 D, -,,; ~!nl J1AN ,'/'I{ r¡ 2 5 ~-~-'fi! i .:~ '0.... ! : L' ; ; - "~ J' 2555 S HUM A R D 0 A K B 0 U LEV A RD· TAL LA HAS SEE. F L 0 ·RTtJA-3-2.3~ - 21 00- ¡ Phon e: (850) 488-846 61S U ncom 278-8466 FAX: (850) 921-07 81/Su'l)corn 29,1-..P.T81---! I Internet address: http:{{www.dca.state.fl.us---~ '. ',.J-,c:;,~= : --- " . HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOI'.MENT ..~~= ~"'''~~r~ '-"_1.. ~_,I~~.....I -. fcm Don McLan, Central Services Project Manager Enclosure CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIELO OFFICE CO~~UNrTY P!-A"i!HN.G ~~~~GENCy' ,!~~~~!",~~ "" .."., NOTICE OF APPLICATION EVALUATION SCORING AND INTENT TO AWARD FLORIDA COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FY 2002-2003: COASTAL PARTNERSHIPS INITIATIVE APPLICATIONS All eligible applications were evaluated by the Evaluation Committee using only the information included in each application and according to the evaluation criteria listed in Rule 9M-1, Florida Administrative Code. Each application was evaluated within the initiative category in which it was submitted. WITHIN EACH INITlA TIVE CATEGORY, the listing shows the total number of points awarded to each application (which is the sum of all five individual evaluators' scores) and the ranking of each project. At the time of this notice and posting of scores, the amount of funding available for application awards is unknown. The Florida Coastal Management Program is usually notified of the total amount of its coastal management funding in March by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The actual total amount of money available and the amount of funding determined to be appropriate for each project will affect the specific number of proposals that can be funded. However, no projects scoring less than 2~0 points will be awarded funding. This is based on a minimum of 50 points awarded by an individual evaluator multiplied by five evaluators. As specified in Rule 9M -1, F .A.C., 25% of available funding (when the amount is known) will initially be directed to each initiative category. Projects will be funded in order of score and rank, based upon availability of funding, and subject to final approval by the National . Oceanic and Atmospheric Administ~ation. Coastal Partnerships Initiative FY 2002-2003 Proposal Identification Numbers Numberin2: Key Remarkable Coastal Places - Community Stewardship - 100s 200s Access to Coastal Resources -300s Working Waterfronts - 400s Proiect Number and Title Submitted Bv I Total Pts. Rank 101: Indian River LagQon Scenic St. Lucie County 308 2 Highway Designation 102: River to Sea Preserve at Flagler County 1344 1 Marineland 201: Resource Ranger Club West Florida RPC/Escambia County 313 2 202: Wetlands Model Demonstration, a Bay Area Resource 286 3 Middle School Outreach Program Council/Escambia County , 203: Florida Keys GreenS\veep Nature Conservancy/Monroe County 336 1 2002/2003 204: Sea Turtle Educational Materials Palm Beach County 1271 4 30 I: Shoreside Park Parking and Town of Palm Shores 327 2 Handicapped Accessibility and Repairs 302: Inlet Park Recreational Town of Palm Beach Shores 218 below Enhancement Planning minimum "'"', "" --' 303: Venice South Beach Pier/Parking/ City of Venice 296 tie 6/7 Beach Access 304: Island City Park Preserve Public City of Wilton Manors 269 12 Access Improvements 305: Town Center Boardwalk Planning City ofFort Orange 270 11 306: South Causeway Island Picnic St. Lucie County 275 9 Pavilions 307: Middle Cove Park Fishing/ St. Lucie County 314 3 *~ *: Observation Pier 308: Olde Eau Gallie Riverfront Pier City of Melbourne 265 13 Enhancement 309: Pleasant Oceanside Beach City of Deerfield Beach 297 5 Renovations , 310: Chapman Field Park General Plan Miami-Dade Countÿ, 299 4 311: Smokehouse Bay Bridge Pedestrian City of Marco Island 256 15 Underpass 312: Ais Lagoon House Shoreline City of Palm Bay 342 1 Stabilization - 313: Cónstruct Up to Three Public Okaloosa County 285 8 ' Access Structures over Dunes on Okaloosa Island 314: Public Beach Access Improvement Town of North Redington Beach 272 10 Program 315: One Mile Wonder Walks City of Mexico Beach 296 tie 6/7 316: Riverwalk Boan~walk Expansion City of Port St. Lucie 257 14 Program 317: Proposed Analysis of Maule Lake's City of North Miami Beach 244 below Shoreline and Public RÏI!ht-of-Wavs minimum 40 I: Manatee Pocket Walk - Phase I Martin County 332 2 Construction ' 402: Panacea Visitors Center Project Wakulla County 369 1 , 403: Eau Gallie Riverfront Areas Master City of Melbourne 307 4 Plan 404: Dinner Key Restrooms Renovation City of Miami 215 below minimum 405: Daytona Beach Working Daytona Beach Partnership 311 3 Waterfronts Initiative ~ :...:.~ '...,¡ 2002-2003 SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEi\fEi'iT DISTRICT FUNDING APPLICA TION FORlyI 1~Y£S,211 AppI1cation No: IRL - 02 (District to provide) The undersigned Applicant, has read all of the tenns and conditions of the Indian River Laaoon License Plate Funding Program Guidelines And Application, and certifies that aU ot the information contained within this Application and subsequent Attachments and Exhibits is true and correct to the best of its knowledge. Applicant's Legal Name (Organization Name): Saint Lucie County Mosquito Control District Contact Person: James R. David , Applicant's Address: 3150 Will Fee Rd., Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982 Telephone Number: ( 561 ) 462 - 1686 Pax. Number: ( 551) 426 - 1565 Type of O!:.[anization: Date of Incorporation: , @overnmerít~ Not-far-profit State of Incorporation: FEID Number: 59-6000835 Project Location (county): &.lucie) Martin and/or hIm Beach - Project Title: Mosquito Impoundment Restoration, Public Access! Awareness . Brief Project Description: Improve Water Quality to 500 acres of mangrove swamp habitat and increase public access to the Indian River Lagoon Attachments:- Please attach information to address each of the items listed below: 1) Describe the project goal(s) and how the goal(s) will be accomplished, Include appropriate drawings. Submittals for habitat restoration and storrnwater retrofit projects must include p!~ view and cross section(s) drawings. If planting is part of the project, a planting plan must also be submitted. 2) Provide a project location description and attach a location map. If more than one COWlty will benefit from your project, explain the multiple county benefits, If your project is located in the watershed, please clearly explain the benefits to the receiving water body. 3) Explain the expected habitat restoration, water quality, and/or environmental education benefits of the proposed project. 4) Provide a project schedule and justification for being able to meet the project schedule. All projects must be completed within one year of execution of the funding program Agreement. Funding Requested Per County: St. Lucie $56,816 Martin $ Palm Beach S Total $ 56,816 Page 1 of 2 ~S241 14 "'-' ~----' ~ *C Cost Breakdown and Schedule Task Descriptisn License Plate Cost-share Cost-Share Expected Funding Funding Source Completion Amount Amount Date Pump Station/New Pump¡s 20,000 73,273 I noaa/slcmcd I 05/15/03 New Convert Pump Sta/Pumf 20,000 3,000 slemed 05/15/03 , Outlook/Fishing Pier 10,500 30,000 I deal slcmed 05/15/03 Web Cam 6,316 2,000 slemed 05/15/03 I - I Regulatory Approvals: Are any regulatory approvals needed for the proposed project? ~ No If yes, please fill in the table below: - Approval Agency Type of Received? Expiration Comments Approval Date Yes No FDEP/ ACOE I Std Gen Permit X 11/15/06 I Pump Stations FDEP/ ACOE Minor Structure X I Outlook/Fish Pier I I I I I I I Authorized Person's Name: James R. David s¡gn,O%:!þ:: ~ jþ:/ Title: ])redo-r- PrintN . Jõ.ttttt5 ¡2 f)Æ-Ut!J Print Title: /)/ ,-..e..c--h-r Remember to complete and attach Exhibit "An Page20f2 ~$~2~ 15 -- ..."" INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this _ day of ,2002, by and between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as "County", and ST. LUCIE COUNTY MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT, a special taxing district, hereinafter referred to as "District". WHEREAS, the County intends to apply for a 2002-03 Waterways Assistance Program Grant (the "Grant") from the Florida Inland Navigation District ("FIND"); and, WHEREAS, the grant application will be entitled "Vitolo Family Park at Middle Cove _ Public /ADA Access Enhancement" and seeks grant funds for the construction of various site improvements required under the County's Grant A ward Agreement with the Florida Communities Trust for Middle Cove (the "Project"); and, WHEREAS, the Project will benefit the District's land management program; and, WHEREAS, in light of the benefits to the District's land management program, the District is willing to assist the County in the financial and administrative responsibilities under the FIND grant should it be awarded. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. GENERAL. This Agreement is entered into pursuant to Section 163.01, Florida Statutes, Florida Interlocal Cooperation Act. 2. COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES. The County shall submit a 2002-03 Waterways Assistance Program grant application to FIND for the Project. In the event the County is awarded 1- AGENDA REQUEST ..,¡ ITEM NO.C-10-A DATE: March 26,2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY; SUBMITTED BY; Purchasinq Department Michael Rath, Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Rejection of RFP No. 02-034, Parking Garage Management BACKGROUND: On February 27,2002 proposals were opened for the Management of the' Downtown Parking Garage including a component to build-out two additional floors. Fifteen hundred ninety-seven (1597) vendors were notified, twenty (20) proposal documents were distributed and one (1) proposal was received from Paul Jacquin & Sons, Inc. The sole proposal received did not provide for the required management component, only proposing to build the additional two stories. Therefore, this proposal was considered non-responsive. FUNDS AVAIL.; N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends rejection of the proposal received in response to RFP No.02- 034, Parking Garage Management. COMMISSION ACTION: ~] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: CE: ------., D u nderson o ty Administrator County Attorney:(X) 921/ Mgt. & Budget Originating Dept: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) Other: Purchasing Mgr. :(X) Other: ;vµ!- Eft. 1/97 ,""_ ·"~·'_'·_'_W"".""·~_~"'~'"_'" _~.,' ., AGENDA REQUEST ...J ITEM NO. C-10-B DATE: March 26, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ J CONSENT [XJ TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Purchasinq Department Michael Rath, Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Award of Bid No. 02-043, Temporary and Emergency Supply and Dispensing of Gasoline and Diesel Fuel BACKGROUND: On March 6, 2002 bids were opened for Temporary and Emergency Supply and Dispensing of Gasoline and Diesel Fuel for the Central Services Department. A temporary fueling facility is required during the tank removal at the Central Services Garage. Additionally, the resulting contract will provide emergency fueling operations in the event of an emergency or disaster, which may render the County's facility inoperable. Six hundred sixty-four (664) vendors were notified, forty-six (46) bid documents were distributed and one (1) bid was received. The Central Services Department has reviewed the bid received and recommends that the bid be awarded to the sole bidder, Holmes Oil Corp. Inc., at a discount of $.02 from the daily pump price for both Gasoline and Diesel Fuel. Recommendation and tabulation attached. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds are available in the Service Garage, Gas, Oil and Grease Account No. 001-1920-552500-100. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends award of Bid No. 02-043, Temporary and Emergency Supply and Dispensing of Gasoline and Diesel Fuel to the sole bidder, Holmes Oil Corp. Inc., and authorization for the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. COMMISSION ACTION: [X] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: County Attomey:(X) '1 C;_() {/!.J Mgt. & Budget (X) Purchasing Mgr.:(X) ,/") .t.iL-- I\- , Originating Dept:: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) Other: Other: Eft. 1/97 "" ~ ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TABULATION SHEET - BID 02-043 TEMPORARY AND EMERGENCY SUPPLY AND DISPENSING OF GASOLINE AND DIESEL FUEL OPENED: MARCH 6, 2002 @ 3:30 PM BID INFORMATION HOLMES OIL CO., INC. FT. PIERCE, FL DISCOUNT FROM DAIL Y PUMP PRICE $ .02 - PER GALLON UNLEADED (87 OCTANE) PUMP PRICE AS OF MARCH 1, 2002, $ 1.199 - PER GALLON INCLUDING ALL TAXES DISCOUNT FROM DAILY PUMP PRICE, $ .02 - PER GALLON DIESEL NO.2 UNDYED PUMP PRICE AS OF MARCH 1 2002, $ 1.229 - PER GALLON INCLUDING ALL TAXES NUMBER OF COMPANIES NOTIFIED*: NUMBER OF BID DOCUMENTS DISTRIBUTED*: 635 Plus 29 local vendors 17 Plus 29 local vendors NUMBER OF BIDS RECEIVED: 1 *per demandstar.com ~ AGENDA REQUEST ...,,¡ ITEM NO. C-10-C DATE: March 26, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: PurchasinQ Department Michael Rath. Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Award of Bid No. 02-039, Purchase of One (1) Track Excavator (Long Reach) BACKGROUND: On February 27, 2002 bids were opened for Purchase of One (1) Track Excavator (Long Reach) for the Road and Bridge Division. Six hundred fifty-eight (658) vendors were notified, twenty (20) bid documents were distributed and two (2) bids were received. The Road and Bridge Division has reviewed the bids received and recommends that the bid be awarded to the low bidder, L. B. Smith, Inc., with the extended warranty, for a total price of $184,225. Recommendation and tabulation attached. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds are available in the Transportation Trust Fund, Road & Bridge, Drainage, Machinery & Equipment Account No. 001-1920-552500-100. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends award of Bid No. 02-039, Purchase of One (1) Track Excavator (Long Reach) to the low bidder, L. B. Smith, Inc., for a total price of $184,225. COMMISSION ACTION: E: [x] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: County Attomey:(X) !~ '( ( "I Coordination/Siqnatures Mgt. & Budget (X) Á.l fPlfVC1 Other: /1 ~ Purchasing Mgr.:(X) ,¿ Originating Dept:: Finance: (Check fbr Copy only, if Applicable) Other: Eft. 1/97 '" '..ø' t PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ROAD & BRIDGE DIVISION MEMORANDUM TO: Michael Rath, Purchasing Director Scott Herring, Road and Bridge ManagerÇ1;Ø-- Ray Murankus, Drainage Operations Supervisor f(J1 March 12, 2002 VIA: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Bid 02-039 After reviewing the bid packages submitted for Bid number 02-039 (Long Reach Track Excavator), we recommend that the low bidder, L. B. Smith Inc. be awarded the bid. L. B. Smith, Inc. submitted a bid of $181,200.00 for a Volvo EC240BLCR with an extended warranty available at $3,025.00. Nortrax Equipment Co. submitted a bid of $203,250.00 for a John Deere 230CLC with an extended warranty available at $3,500.00. The purchase of the Volvo EC240BLCR should include the extended warranty available at $3,025.00 bringing the package total to $184,225.00. Please contact me at extension 2511 should you have any questions regarding this matter. RTM/sb cc: Don Pauley, Fleet Manager Dewey Hudman, Project Manager .. .... .. z z z (1) c: c: c: .. 3: 3: 3: 0- c:J c:J c:J ( ) m m m 3 ~ ~ ~ DI 0 0 0 :::J 0- "11 "11 "11 (II !!! c:J 0 - DI ë 0 .. 0 3: n en 0 0 ~ 0 "tJ 3 þ m 0 z 0 c: m m 3: <: m en m z z !:::' -t 0 en -t 0 =ñ (j) m -t 0 22 . ~ c:J c: -t m ~ I\) I\) 0 Ø) UI 00 :Ez o. mo þ' en::c :5m -t-l m' -CIJ ~~ ~š: =i c:Jm :J: ~D - 0c: z x- 0 -"'0 . ~š: < m m z z -I 0 0 0 0 ::c CIJ ~ ~ N ..¡, 0 C» W ..¡, ~ Ìt.J Ìt.J U1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c.. m š: 0 0< :þ NJ: " Wz ~O m 0 - 00 o. š: .m DJ< 0 ·0 om 0 0 ::c ::c m m . ~ ~ =em :þ>< W ~w ;:a-l ÜI 0 ;:am 0 N :þz 0 U1 (:) (:) ZO 0 0 ~~ "Wi' 0 "'0" "'0 :EC: m -::c z ;:a 0 m OJ: 0 »:þ OCIJ "T1 QOm m DJO DJ ::c"T1 ::c -0 c: °z :þ C)m ::c m - -< ..¡, - N -I ~..... $! N 0 0 0 " N @ m >< 0 DJ W ~ -10 C »:þ C ~ DJ::C "'0 cO š: 0 ·0 ::c ~"T1CIJ - . -0:-' 0 00. z zc:c: C) ClJzo ::c :J:-I¡;; m -< » moo 0 ~OO :J: .š:c - DJŠ:z Oëñ~ oCIJ N- .0 Cz wm <Ø::c CIJ \.-- \.; AGENDA REQUEST 'wi ITEM NO. c-11L DATE: March 26,2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: Paul Julin Project Manager SUBMITTED BY(DEPT):INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE(Central Services) SUBJECT: Approval to issue Request for Bids upon selection of qualified firms. BACKGROUND: Through Board approval Central Services contracted Sims Wilkerson Engineering to evaluate security needs at the Rock Road Jail. It was determined that the security system needed complete replacement. Once this evaluation was completed we then went out for RFQ to qualify prospective vendors. A Board approved selection committee has been appointed. This Committee has reviewed and selected qualified vendors (please see attached). Staff would , like to issue a Request for Bids to these qualified vendors. FUNDS AVAIL: 316-1940-546200-1527 (maintenance Improvement project) PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners allow staff to issue Requestfor BIds to qualified vendors as approved by the selection committee for the replacement of the security system at Rock Road Jail. MISSION ACTION: PC] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: ~nderson nty Administrator Coordination/Sianatur.. County AttorneY~ DJ"ft. Originating Dep . Finance: (Check for Copy only. If Applicable) Mgl & Budget Purchasing Mgr.: Jß- Other: Other: Eft". 1/97 H:\A~end..-J..il RFQ.wpd. '-'" ""'" THE FOLLOWING VENDORS RESPONDED TO THE RFQ: 1. ALARM PAR~NERS - FT. PIERCE 2. DELMARVA SYSTEMS CORPORATION - WILMINGTON, DE 3. ENERGY ERECTORS, INC. - LEESBURG, FL 4. ESITECH SECURITY GROUP, INC. - RICHMOND, VA 5. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. - ORLANDO, FL 6. INTEGRA TED SYSTEMS INC. - SAN ANTONIO, TX 7. NORMENT SECURITY GROUP - MONTGOMERY, AL 8. SEMCO INTEGRATED SYSTEMS - JACKSONVILLE, FL 9. - SIEMENS BUILDING TECHNOLOGIE.S, INC. - MIRAMAR, FL I PM"":" 01098 st Lucie Cou~ Jail$Ystems RFQ.dòC-"·' '::~ , =~:~~': .~.~ . ..,~ .,- , :.:':'~=_ Page 1~ I Irro. -- , '....J EVALUATION OF QUALDICATIONS Part IV 4-1 EVALUATION METHOD AND CRITERIA A. General The County shall be the lOIe judge of its own belt interests, the propaeaI, and the resulting acceptance R8 j otilltell agr18m8Rl The County reserves the rfglrt to investigate the financial capability. reputøtion. integri4'. &kill, busin.. experience and quality of perforrnlll1ce under similar opendions of each Propœer, includng stockholders and principals before maJclng an 8W11'd. Awards, if any. will be based on both an objective and Slbjective comparison of Qualifications 8nd Proposers. The County's decisions will be final. The County's evalullllion criteria will include, but shall not be limited to, consideration of the following: 1, Years of experience MAX, POINTS (1 year = 5 points) 25 2, Si~;!2r Or"jects s. PLC System b. CCTV System c. Shaker Fence Detection System d, Touch Screen Control Interface System e. Intercom System Reference Questionnaire 25 3 4, Company Staff a, SSI Superintendent b, Security control systems PLC programmer c. Factory trained personnel (Notifier) 5, Local Vendor Partnership 6, Warranty Service a. Within 200 miles travel distance b, Service calls within 4 hours max. (5 points) (5 points) (5 points) (5 points) (5 points) (Average of responses) 15 15 (5 points) (5 points) (5 points) 10 10 (5 points) (5 points) TOTAL 100 B. Selection The Board of Coun4' Commissioners may conduct the selection process or at the option of the Board, it may be referred to the Competitive Selection Committee (the "Committee"). Either the Board or the Committee will review all Qualifications received and establish a list of Proposers deemed to be qualified. The minimum score to qualify based on the criteria set forth above shall be 85 points out of a total of 100. P.lterRati'lely, tl1e iaan; FRay lIirest the CaFRFRittee tø establish a "GRaft list" af na fe"'er than three Pra",asers withawt e&tal¡líshiRg a pRarity ar~er. The "shaft list" ¡¡hall be &wl¡r:Rilted ta the Baard aRd the BBar~ may raRk the PrapBseFS in Brller af prefereRse, Tile CaFRmittee ar the [¡Bard may rel west aral pre68ntatieR tram the Pfepasers 'MleA establishiRg the "'Rarity list. If three ar fewer Ql.JalifisatiaAE are reGeived, all Pre",aGer& &11311 I¡e iRslwded iR the selestÎ9R praseæ aE dessR ¡e~ ~ If the list af 1 1Ialifielil PrBpsserE Ehalll¡e &l l¡mitted te t ::¡e ¡¡aard fer appre"aL At the efiltiaA gf the [¡Bard, either the BaarEl ar t ::¡e CBmmittee &hall attempt t9 Regetiate a sSRtlrast with the mast fair, campetitive aRd reasaRal¡le, If the CaFRFRittee ar the [¡aarEl iE wRable ta Regatiate a satisfastar:y SeRV'ast wit ::¡ tl1e fjFSt Pra",sser, RegBtiatiaRs 'Nith tl1at Prepa6er &hall I¡e teFmiRated aREI the Cammittee er tile Bearlil mall attempt tø negaliste a saRtraGt "<itll tile Re~t FRast I walilied swsGe&&fu1 ¡jdller Prapaser. If these RegatiatiaRs are Rat 6WSG86sfwl, Re!laliatiaR6 sllalll¡e tørl'Rinated \'<ith tl1e E8GaRd EWGGe&dwl ¡idller RFQ . 02-XXX ~ 12 ··,·,'··....._.·".·'_·,.;..·~,'...·...ft,_", k ....",._..._~.._"-<- .,'-...__......, _ ,,___,_..,~._'_,,_.,," ,._"._. . __......,___., - ~ . '.~'-~'.~., -- CI .. ~ '-'" ..., II 0 Naaco N~~OO ~~N.O mNooc ~i - -~- ----- - :II ! I ~i )1 · ..... ..... ..... ..... i~ !!- ¡ : ~ ~ II ill t Lj1 J~ dI ! e! ~~J~ §J I I I,I,I ~J~II II~I, i III ¡ f !J~ } j I i Ji ~ il) . -- I c !! I! . Œ . .s :; .., :; . ~ '" CI . Q. .........' ~j ~·~oo ~~ooo. ~~~~o ~~ooo ~ --- -,~ ------ to- - of: I il "'·...'00 ",~ClOCl i 1ÐU)lI)aoQ 11)11)000 IE ..... ..... ..... ..... , - I ! . . = . i ~. II: f ~ I j If 'I ~ t I I jl~11 JBIII IJlfl iilll ~ ,,; , i d II f ,II' 1)11 I I Jilf I' 18 I J,I, l'Efti JfIJI~ JJjJif J~IJlj . .s :; ., :; . Q. ...., - '-' ....., - - o 0 ..; ~ CII o CO E ro -g c:g c ~ ~ Æ ;@ :§ .!;; 1ü :]..... ~ Q)....CII U 0 0 0 ~ 0 .Q:6 'UC C OC: c æ E:2 "0 \) ·ê ~ 1:: .5 0 cis.!;; CII "" co ...... . ...... c, ....C,co-õ) - 0>< CII>-C.Cllc: CII CCII c:C>-~C § CII,C [~[~~ ~ ~! õSgc.c. ~ ~ê C ~ \) "* ã! ã! .~ 6 ~.Q~õ..~ C B.~ui .-.-_E_ ~ J!!Q.t) "O°õ8.... .... \)>.0) .~ ECII 0) CII> ~......~ ..; ~ ..; .!J:!, æ 'õ' - _ E ._ 0 CII ~ CII 0 c,.... ..'" c:oc:;o..û) B=:g~z1äz1äCII:::~ äi .!!! û) L- ]j a. û) Co (.) 0 :rš 'C .-...... - >.::: >. c c: co ClIo o......c......c!_..... c. ~ õ coco 0 co 0) .~ ro S :2 c :2 ~ EC, c EC, '4i C c :.:. 0 C :2 c· is 8 :2 0 a::: ui ,g WWZ,CI CUI.!!!\) -, I -...... CII I- I Ü I l!)=- -1-= t:: OD..CJ)wCJ)~N!:QNmuo z«cww::J:Õ(I)õCJ)J!!\) i- c j o U 0) :5 E e - "0 0) > ëii \) 2! ...... o c: £! "3 /I) 2! 2! ëi'i c: c: .Q 1ií 0) j a 0) \) c: 2! oS! 0) a::: - "i .., b c: 8 .I 3 ., I ... ~'-- I- 0 0 0 0 0 ID 0 0 0 0 LO LO <0 m 0 .... N CJ) (I) LO LO LO LO LO LO N LO LO 0 0 LO LO N ã5 N .... .... C» l!) LO 0 It) CJ) LO It) It) LO LO LO on It) It) It) .... It) It) ci Z N C» ¡Q LO co 0 LO LO ~, It) It) LO It) It) CIÒ LO It) It) .... ('I) N C» ; V -¡ It) LO It) It) LO LO '<t LO LO 0 0 0 0 &Ö ::J: N on <0 l!) co 0 co LO LO LO LO LOLO LO It) It) LO LO cw) (I) N CIÒ .... C» W W '<t 0 V LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO cw) W N CIÒ .... C» ~ '<t 0 '<t, LO It) LO LO LO LO LO LO It) LO It) ,..; C N N .... co D.. 0 OIt)OOLO 0 0 0 0 0 It) It) 0 « N - l è .-.. i E ;, ~ LO i t .... íñ'Cñ - It) .-.. LO ëL~ 0 --- ! IØ .-.. ... N >< J9 CD It) i CD t LOLO E --- - --- --- co c. ... 0 -- ~ __sEE :E LO E CD .... ! It) ~ --- It) i! i --- --- j .. --- I!. J9c.SS ~ ...... c. C 0 :ë LO C ~ >- C. LO /I) /I) ¡¡¡ CD Z --- ¡ I ..... >- >- "0 ¡ J ~Ë(I)(I)s c ¡ c c D.. issr 0 S 0 c é ~ JI :¡:s C ~ ·i ~ /I) 'C -' 1'1 ! ~u. E CD ~ ~ D.. D.. j J J ~ I! OGií~ a ::J B UJ UJ I 15 I~U¡§>-:~ c ~ ëñ I ~ en .oU"OCD oS! I'd .d U ] Ii .d - '. CD a::: ..- N ('I) v It) CD K 'C - 1'1 :IE c o i» Ii C UJ 1'1 ..a. ., E ~ 0 !!(.) f a. CD "0 t! If ~ l1li I ~ CJ) II Ò C en - ,n - /I) v en .~ en- en II. 01 Z /1)'0 W II E-õ ßc.QlC c:~..~ -e~~ rñ C> UJ I- Eb"OCI CD 1:: S c: 1ií::JI!!'6 ~ ~ i'S "oUJ......m Q).......Ern ~ ~ 8 :¡j :¡PEEE ë 0 CD.~ _ZUJUJ a en W II Ò -c w- W - II C. .::J 0. g e -< -C) ÍIi~~i~l illwM¡ i~~li~ '-' AGENDA REQUEST ...J ITEM NO..k..11B DATE: March 26, 2002 -::e:nv~~~.(i.. ThL..::hd-urL.> REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Purchasinq Department Michael Rath. Purchasina Director SUBJECT: Award of Bid No. 02-044, Construction of Two (2) Tennis Courts at Lawnwood recreation Area BACKGROUND: On March 13,2002 bids were opened for-the construction of Two (2) Tennis Courts at Lawnwood Recreation Area for the Central Services Department. Six hundred sixty-two (662) vendors were notified, eleven (11) bid documents were distributed and two (2) bids were received. The Central Services Department has reviewed the bids received and recommends that the bid be awarded to the low bidder, Fast Dry Courts in the total amount of $85,717. Recommendation and tabulation attached. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds are available in Lawnwood Recreation Area Maintenance Improvements Account No. 316-1930-563000-75009. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends award of Bid No. 02-044, Construction of Two (2) Tennis Courts at Lawnwood Recreation Area to the low bidder, Fast Dry Courts, and authorization for the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the CountY Attorney. COMMISSION ACTION: pq APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: County Attorney.(X) ,J( Coordination/Signatures Mgl & BUdgetP9~ other. Originating Dept:: FInance: (Check iJr Copy only, if Applicable) o -;L- Purchasing Mgr.:(X) ¡\,~ Other. Eft. 1/97 . t .. z z CD c: c: ., 3: 3: 3: Q. I:D I:D I:D CD m m m 3 :;rJ :;rJ :;rJ III ::I 0 0 0 Q. 'TI 'TI 'TI 1/1 ~ I:D n - III a 0 ., c 0 en c 3: 0 :;rJ "tI 3 0 :I> m n z n c: m 3: m <: m en m z z !=? -I ~ en c 'TI ëñ ¡:;; -I C :;rJ .~ æ c: -I m c .~ N .... .... en en N "tI"'O "tI"11 :1>)> 0» r"'O 3: en 3:_ "tI~ nO :I> -0 zo ~O 0:::a I:D-( ~O ~O < z en nO m ~c: Z ~ c :::a 'TI:::a 0 c: r~ 0 en :::a ::! en 0 z - z 0 . 0 -f0 D:J ~ mZ :Þ ~ zen en co ...,¡ z-f m JJ) cø -:::0 ~ ëø enc Con 00 C 0 ..,¡, p ...,¡ 0:::1 . 0 Q cO ::¡ 0 0 :::OZ m -f0 s: en." ..¡, N - Z » en ~ r ~ m ~ -Eß r :::a .!" ,þ. rr z ëø -to.) ~ en Q» Con 0 0 0 ::::to m . Q ~2 0 . 0 0' ~ :::¡ - 0 m z s:: » I\) r » "11 r m ~ z m ~ ~ Q :::a en cø Z 0 0 Z ~ P 0 Q Q - m 0 "'0 0 0 0 , en ~ ~ m en s:: (..) 0 ...., 0 "'0 m 0 m z z z ~ en m ~ ~ 0 :::a .. r- c: s:: en 0 m ~ » ~ Õ :::a 0 z ::::t 0 0 m ..,¡, en "11 ~(..) ~ to.) 0 0 0 to.) - to.) - @ ~ to.) m .. z 0 z 0 - tc "'0 en 0 s:: 0 ~:Þ 0 tc;:C c: c:O ~ ro ~"11en ~ -O~ 00r- ~ Zc:c: enZO ::::t~ñi Z moO :IE ~OO 0 ,s::c: 0 tcs::z 0 6ëñ~ "'0 oen ~ 1\)- ,0 " Oz ,þ.m ,þ.;:c en , . r,MiE~eì ~~th '~Lawll:'-:"0v6b,i~Ço~rts :Twp ~Ne:~ "W~ .. " "" "'''' P?ge 1 I From: To: Date: SUbject: Don McLam Michael Rath Monday, March 18, 2002 2:24PM Lawnwood Tennis Courts - Two New Central Srevices Is recommending the combined low bid of FAST DRY COURTS for the work to be done under BID # 02-044, Please prepare this item for BOCC approval. CC: Linda Brown; Patti Raffensberger; Roger A Shinn 03/22/02 F7.ABWARR FUND 145 TITLE '-' ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ..."", PAGE 1 WARRANT LIST #25- 16-MAR-2002 TO 22-MAR-2002 FUND SUMMARY- MOSQUITO Mosquito Fund GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES PAYROLL 30/125.76 0.00 30/125.76 0.00 '-' ...." ST. LUCIE COUNTY MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS John D. Bruhn District 1 Doug Coward District 2 Paula A. Lewis District 3 Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District 4 District 5 AGENDA March 26, 2002 1. l\'IINUTES Approve the minutes of the meeting held February 12, 2002. 2. GENER--\L PUBLIC COMMENT CONSENT AGENDA 1. WARR-\:.'TS LISTS Approve Warrants List No. 20 through No. 25. 2. MOSQlJlTO CONTROL A. Quality Industries, Inc. Agreement Amendment- Consider staff recommendation to approve the proposed First Amendment to the February 27, 2001 Agreement, and authorize the Chairman to execute the amendment. B. Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND) Grant - Consider staff recommendation to approve and sign the Interlocal Agreement with the Board of County Commissioners authorizing the Mosquito Control District to administer the grant at Vitolo Family / Middle Cove Park. NOTICE: All proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceetlings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record ofthe proceedings is made. Upon the requestofanyparty to the proceedings, individu:Jls testifying dudng a hearing will be sworn in. Any polrt)' to the proceedings will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon requt'st Anyone ,\ iCh a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462.1777 or TOIJ (561) 462-1" '!S at Ic::¡sr forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. '-'" '''wtI MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT ST. LUCIE COUNty, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETtNG Date: February 12,2002 Tape: 1 Convened: 9:47 a.m. Adjourned: 9:47 a.m. Commissioners Present: Chairman, John D. Bruhn, Paula A. Lewis, Frannie Hutchinson, Cliff Barnes, Doug Coward Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator, Robert Bradshaw, Asst. County Administrator, Heather Young, Asst. County Attorney, Ray Wazny, Public Works Director, Jim David, Mosquito Control Director, Don West, County Engineer; A. Millie Delgado, Deputy Clerk 1. MINTUES It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded 'by Com. Barnes, to approve the minutes of the meeting held February 5, 2002; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS None 3. CONSENT AGENDA It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Hutchinson, to approve the Consent Agenda; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 1. WARRANT LIST The District approved Warrant List No. 19 2. MOSQUITO CONTROL A. Declaration of Surplus Property- The District approved to surplus equipment identified to interested Mosquito Control Districts at the values estimated for those items, consider "Best Offers" and approved to publicly auction the surplus equipment that is not successfully bid upon by another District. B. Indian River Lagoon License Plate Program FY 2002/Grant Application- The District approved the application in the amount of $56,816. C. Equipment Request No. 02-191- The District approved the equipment request for the purchase of a replacement computer desk in the amount of$2,205. There being no further business to be brought before the District, the meeting was 02/15/02 F7.A.BWARR , FUND TITLE '-' ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ...., WARRANT LIST #20- 09-FEB-2002 TO 15-FEB-2002 FUND SUMMARY-MOSQUITO 145 Mosquito Fund GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 10,051. 40 10,051.40 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 23,272.49 23,272.49 02/22/02 F7.ABWARR FUND TITLE '-' ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD "" WARRANT LIST #21- 16-FEB-2002 TO 22-FEB-2002 FUND SUMMARY- MOSQUITO 145 Mosquito Fund GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 9,069.98 9,069.98 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 0.00 0.00 03/01/02 F'7.i!\BWARR FUND TITLE '-' ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ...", WARRANT LIST #22- 23-FEB-2002 TO 01-MAR-2002 FUND SUMMARY- MOSQUITO 145 Mosquito Fund GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 23,204.23 23,204.23 PAGE 1 PAYROLL' 21,885.06 21,885.06 03/08/02 F7.ABWARR FUND 145 TITLE '- ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ...." WARRANT LIST #23- 02-MAR-2002 TO 08-MAR-2002 FUND SUMMARY- MOSQUITO Mosquito Fund GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 10,674.28 10,674.28 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 0.00 0.00 03/15/02 F'7.ABWARR FUND 145 TITLE '- ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ....., WARRANT LIST #24- 09-MAR-2002 TO 15-MAR-2002 FUND SUMMARY- MOSQUITO Mosquito Fund GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 15,896.99 15,896.99 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 22,607.50 22,607.50 \,., ....." "' AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C- l.A' DATE: March 26, 2002 TO: MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT[X] PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Mosquito Control James R. David SUBJECT: Quality Industries, Inc. - First Amendment to February 27,2001 Agreement BACKGROUND: Attached is a copy of a proposed First Amendment to the February 27, 2001 Agreement between the Mosquito Control District and Quality Industries, Inc., for the manufacture and maintenance of mosquito control lift pumps, ref. Contract no. C01-02-345. The amendment will clarify the agreement such that the payment of new pumps and repairs shall be based upon the unit prices bid by the contractor in Bid Solicitation No, 01-024. FU N DS A V AI L.: 145-6230-546000-600 Equipment Maintenance; 145112-6230-564000-6950 Machinery & Equipment - NOAA CIP Bear Point Integration and other Grant accounts as they become available PREVIOUS ACTION: Original Contract Executed February 27,2001 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the proposed First Amendment to the February 27,2001 Agreement between the Mosquito Control District and Quality Industries, Inc., and authorize the chairman to execute the Amendment. ~nty Attorney: Originating Dept. fJ¿ . Review and A r ~agement & Budget i') I '" Other: jt: COMMISSION ACTION: [x] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicableL Eft. 5/96 · .. .- MEMORANDUM TO: MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD FROM: JAMES R DAVID, MOSQUITO CONTROL DIRECTOR DATE: March 8, 2002 SUBJECT: Quality Industries, Inc. - First Amendment to February 27,2001 Agreement BACKGROUND: Attached is a copy of a proposed First Amendment to the February 27, 2001 Agreement between the Mosquito Control District and Quality Industries, Inc,. for the manufacture and maintenance of mosquito control lift pumps, ref. Contract no, C01-02- 345. The amendment will clarify the agreement such that the payment of new pumps and repairs shall be based upon the unit prices bid by the contractor in Bid Solicitation No, 01- 024. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the proposed First Amendment to the February 27,2001 Agreement between the Mosquito Control District and Quality Industries, Inc., and authorize the chairman to execute the Amendment. - /- AGENDA REQUEST """ ITEM NO. C-2B DATE: March 26, 2002 CONSENT [Xl REGULAR ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] Leg. [ Quasi-JD. TO: MOSQUTIO CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Mosquito Control District SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAIL. : PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: COMMISSION ACTION: [X] [ ] APPROVED OTHER: County Attorney: ~ginating Dept: Finance: ):. ~ AgeMQCdistrictFIND PRESENTED BY: Jim David Director Authorize the Mosquito Control District Board to sign the Interlocal Agreement with the Board of County Commissioners authorizing the Mosquito Control District to administer the Florida Inland Navigation District Grant to construct the educational facilities (observation tower/outdoor classroom and fishing pier) and implement the educational programming at Vitolo Family / Middle Cove Park. The Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND) funds projects from shoreline stabilization to environmental education programs and facilities. The proposed project is an observation tower / outdoor classroom and fishing pier at Vitolo Family / Middle Cove Park - Riverside, located approximately 4.5 miles south of the Ft. Pierce Inlet on South Hutchinson Island. Purchased with Florida Communities Trust and St. Lucie County Environmentally Sensitive Lands Bond funds, this 107-acre park also provides hiking trails along the Indian River Lagoon for school groups and visitors. The proposed project also fulfills the access and educational commitments made from the County to the Department of Community Affairs in a Florida Communities Trust application and agreement (Project # 95-065-P56). Matching funds will come Affairs Coastal Management License Plate program. from Florida Program and Department the Indian of Community Ri ver Lagoon The District Board approved submitting an application to the Indian River Lagoon License Plate program for a portion of this project on February 12, 2002. Staff recommends that the District approve and sign the Interlocal Agreement with the Board of County Commissioners authorizing the Mosquito Control District to administer the Florida Inland Navigation District Grant at Vitolo Family / Middle Cove Park. DENIED '-- .J Anderson Administrator Mgt & Budget: Public Works: Purchasing: Other: '-' "wi ATTACHi\IENT E-l WATERWAYS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM PROJECT APPLICATION APPLICANT INFORt\1ATION - PROJECT SUMMARY Applicant: st. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners Project TitIe: vitolo Family Park at Middle Cove - Public/ADA Access Enhancement Liaison Agent: Contact Person: Jim David, st. Lucie Hosqui to Control District Title: Director of st. Lucie County Mosquito Control District Address: 2300 Virginia Ave. Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982 Zip Code: 34982 Te1ephone: 561/462-1686 FAX: 561/462-1565 I her~by certify that the information provided in this application is true and accurate. Signature: Date: PROJECT SUMMARY NARRATIVE (please summarize the project in 2 paragraphs or less.) Hiddle Cove Park is a lOT-acre marsh area surrounded on the western side bv an earthen perimeter sDoil berm aDDroximatelv 30 feet in wi rH-n 'Pn", berm has been stabilized with a hikinq and bicycle path. The marsh is part of a series of contiguous mangrove 'swamps located on the east shore of a back barrier island on the Indian River Laqoon. The ecosystem includes hiqh salt marsh species, manqrove swamp. and AlA fringing tropical hammock uplands. Dolphin, manatee, lumpinq mullet, and over eiqhteen wadinq bird species. OSDreVS, and shore birds can be observerì from the site. The purpose of this project is to provide improved environmental educational facilities and access to the Park. If funded, FIND grant monies will:be matched with dollars from the Florida Department of Community Affairs Coastal Manaqement Proqram, Indian River Lagoon License Plate FY02 Proqram, and St. Lucie County Mosquito Control District to construct a two-storv observation row"'.... rnA first story platform of which will additionally be used as an outdoor classroom or meeting area. Funds will also be used to construct two observation platforms and an observation/fishing pier.' A WebCam will also be purchased and installed for ADA access and educational purposes. Form No. 90-22 New 10/14/92, Rev.8/24/00. '-' 'wi ATTACHMENT E-3 PROJECT INFORMATION Total Project Cost: $ 113,716 FIND Assistance Requested: $ 5 ° , ° ° ° Assistance % oftotal cost 44% Amount and Source of Applicants Matching Funds:, Indian River Lagoon License Plate FY 02 - $16,816; Florida Coastal Management Program - $34,900; St. Lucie County Mosquito Control District-$12,OOO (upfront permitting / design cost) Other Assistance applied for (name of program and amount) n / a Ownership of Project Site (check one): Own X Leased Other If leased, please describe lessor term and conditions: Project type (check one, or more of the following project elements that are part of your project). Public navigation channel dredging Public navigation aids and markers Public boat ramps and launching facilities Public boat docking and mooring facilities Public shoreline stabilization Inlet management Waterway signs and b_uoys for safety, regulation or information Public spoil disposal site development Waterways related environmental education programs and facilities Public fishing and viewing piers Public waterfront boardwalks Waterways boating safety programs and equipment Beach renourishment Other waterway related projects X Permits Required: Agency Yes No N/A Date Applied For Date Received WMD DEP ACOE COUNTY/CITY Other Yes Minor Structure VPR Minor Structure Form No. 9D-22a (New 10-14-92, Rev.OS-DD.) Indian River Lagoon Indian River Lagoon N + Scale: 1" - 750' ~""'../',,-,'- ~~ ~~,-.,~ ,'~ ._, '~- ~~.: .'..,.. ",' , Middle Cove Legend · Picnic area ~ Bike rack · Trash can = Dike walkover  Sign tÒ. Aerator station · Fishing platform Gate · Rest area .... Fishing dock Ð Ð ~ Dual pump & aerator station (existing) Dual pump & aerator station (proposed) Combination dike walkover picnic area educational site Mosquito impoundment boundary Atlantic Ocean roximate. '-' ...., STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" JEB BUSH Governor STEVEN M. SEIBERT Secretary January 16,2002 Ms. lody Rosier Bonet, Grants Writer St. Lucie County 2300Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 RE: Florida Coastal Management Program - Coastal Partnerships Initiative FY 2002-2003 Project Applications Dear Ms. Bonet: Enclosed for your information is a copy of the "Notice of Application Evaluation Scoring and Intent to Award" for Fiscal Year 2002-2003 applications submitted to the Florida Coastal Management Program's Coastal Partnerships Initiative. As required by Rule 9M-l, Florida Administrative Code, an evaluation committee consisting of five members reviewed all the applications and evaluated and scored them according to the criteria established in the rule. The enclosed notice identifies all applications within each initiative category, the score received by each application, and the ranking of the applications within each initiative category based upon the scores. Rule 9M -1 requires that the scores and rankings of applications be published in the Florida Administrative Weekly. Any person whose substantial interests are affected may request a bearing pursuant to Section 120.57, Florida Statutes, within 21 days of publication of the notice. Failure to request a hearing within the applicable time period shall constitute a wai\'er of the right to a hearing. The Notice of Application Evaluation Scoring and Intent to Award has been submitted to the Florida Administrative Weekly for publication on Friday, February 1,2002. If you have any questions, please contact me at the Florida Coastal Management Program, Department of Community Affairs, 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100, telephone (850) 414-6562. Sincerely, ~~ L. Christine McCay, ~tal Administrator Florida Coastal Management Program /cm , , ., n ~ cc: Don McLan, Central Services Project Manager :, ;~7 [I , ,f;ì, . ~!!if· Enclosure ' JAN 2 5 .- - ,.' ! ¡ i : ....~ ~-~ ,: i L: j i 2 5 5 5 S HUM A R D 0 A K B 0 U LEV A RD· TAL L A HAS SEE, F L 0 'RTt)-A-~.2.3.i. 9 - 2 1 0 0 -' Ph 0 n e: (850) 488-84 66/Su ncorn 278·8466 FAX: (850) 921-078 1/Su'ncom 291·ÕT8'1--! j Internet address: http://www.dca.state.fLus--.-,-': '. 'J=,",~= I .'---- '-- CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE COMMUNITY PLANNING EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOP.MENT 2796 Overseas Highway. Suite 212 2555 Shumard Oa~ Bculevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak. Boulevard - Lb~t¡"'nn 1=1 ~nnr;n_"'7 Tallahassee. FL 323;-9-2100 Tallahassee, Fl32399-2100 Ta:lahassee. FL 32399-2100 ~ '..."I NOTICE OF APPLICATION EVALUATION SCORING AND INTENT TO AWARD FLORIDA COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FY 2002-2003: COASTAL PARTNERSHIPS INITIATIVE APPLICATIONS All eligible applications were evaluated by the Evaluation Committee using only the information included in each application and according to the evaluation criteria listed in Rule 9M-l, Florida Administrative Code. Each application was evaluated within the initiative category in which it was submitted. WITHIN EACH mITIA TIVE CATEGORY, the listing shows the total number of points awarded to each application (which is the sum of all five individual evaluators' scores) and the ranking of each project. At the time of this notice and posting of scores, the amount of funding available for application awards is unknown. The Florida Coastal Management Program is usually notified of the total amount of its coastal management funding in March by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The actual total amount of money available and the amount of funding detel111ined to be appropriate for each project will affect the specific number of proposals that can be funded. However, no projects scoring less than 2~0 points \vill be awarded funding. This is based on a minimum of 50 points awarded by an individual evaluator multiplied by five evaluators. As specified in Rule 9M-l, F.A.C., 25% of available funding (when the amount is known) will initially be directed to each initiative category. Projects will be funded in order of score and rank, based upon availability of funding, and subject to final approval by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administ~ation. Coastal Partnerships Initiative FY 2002-2003 Proposal Identification Numbers Numbering Kev Remarkable Coastal Places - Community Stewardship- 100s 200s Access to Coastal Resources -300s Working Waterfronts - 400s Proiect Number and Title Submitted Bv Total Pts. Rank 101: Indian River Lag90n Scenic St. Lucie County 308 2 Highway Designation 102: River to Sea Preserve at Flagler County 344 I Marineland 201: Resource Ranger Club West Florida RPClEscambia County 313 2 202: Wetlands Model Demonstration, a Bay Area Resource 286 3 Middle School Outreach Program CounciVEscambia County 203: Florida Keys GreenSweep Nature Conservancy/Monroe County 336 1 2002/2003 204: Sea Turtle Educational Materials Palm Beach County 271 4 301: Shoreside Park Parking and Town of Palm Shores 327 2 Handicapped Accessibility and Repairs 302: Inlet Park Recreational Town of Palm Beach Shores 218 below Enhancement Planning minimum ~ ...,J --' 303: Venice South Beach PierIParkingl City of Venice 296 tie 6/7 Beach Access , 304: Island City Park Preserve Public City of Wilton Manors 269 12 Access Improvements 305: Town Center Boardwalk Planning City of Port Orange 270 11 306: South Causeway Island Picnic St. Lucie County 275 9 Pavilions 307: Middle Cove Park Fishing/ St. Lucie County 314 3 *~ * Observation Pier 308: Olde Eau Gallie Riverfront Pier City ofMelboume 265 13 Enhancement 309: Pleasant Oceanside Beach City of Deerfield Beach 297 5 Renovations 310: Chapman Field Park General Plan Miami-Dade CountY. 299 4 311: Smokehouse Bay Bridge Pedestrian City of Marco Island 256 15 Underpass 312: Ais Lagoon House Shoreline City of Palm Bay 342 1 Stabilization 313: Cónstruct Up to Three Public Okaloosa County 285 8 Access Structures over Dunes on Okaloosa Island 314: Public Beach Access Improvement Town of North Redington Beach 272 10 Program 315: One Mile Wonder Walks City of Mexico Beach 296 tie 6/7 316: Riverwalk Board_walk Expansion City of Port St. Lucie 257 14 Program 317: Proposed Analysis of Maule Lake's City of North Miami Beach 244 below Shoreline and Public RiQ:ht-of-Wavs mInImum 40 I: Manatee Pocket Walk - Phase I Martin County 332 2 Construction 402: Panacea Visitors Center Project Wakulla County 369 I 403: Eau Gallie Riverfront Areas Master City of Melbourne 307 4 Plan 404: Dinner Key Restrooms Renovation City of Miami 215 below ffilnImUm 405: Daytona Beach Working Daytona Beach Partnership 311 3 Waterfronts Initiative ~ ~ ....." 2002-2003 SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMEì\'T DISTRICT FUNDING APPLICA TION FOllivI 1iill:$2~1 AppIlcation No: IRL - 02 (District to provide) The undersigned Applicant, has read all of the terms and conditions of the Indian River Lagoon License Plate Funding Program Guidelines And Application, and certifies that all of the information contained within this Application and subsequent Attachments and Exhibits is true and correct to the best of its knowledge. Applicant's Legal Name (Organization Name): Saint Lucie County Mosquito Control District Contact Person: James R. David - Applicant's Address: 3150 Will Fee Rd., Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982 Telephone Number: ( 561 ) 462 - 1686 Fax. Number: ( 561) 426 - 1565 Type of Organization: Date of Incorporation: ( GovemmerÍtàD Not-for-profit State of IncorporaÜon: FEID Number: 59-6000835 Project Location (county): 6t. I ucie Martin and/or Palm Beach Project Title: Mosquito Impoundment Restoration, Public Access! Awareness . Brief Project Description: Improve Water Quality to 500 acres of mangrove swamp habitat and increase public access to the Indian River Lagoon Attachments:- Please attach informaÜon to address each of the items listed below: 1) Describe the project goal(s) and how the goal(s) will be accomplished. Include appropriate drawings. Submittals for habitat restoration and stormwater retrofit projects must include plan view and cross section(s) drawings. If planting is part of the project, a planting plan must also be sub!IÙtted. 2) Provide a project location description and attach a location map. If more than one county will benefit from your project, explain the multiple county benefits. If your project is located in the watershed, please clearly explain the benefits to the receiving water bcx:ly. 3) Explain the expected habitat restoration, water quality, and/or environmental education benefits of the proposed project. 4) Provide a project schedule and justification for being able to meet the project schedule. All projects must be completed within one year of execution of the funding program Agreement. Funding Requested Per County: St. Lucie .$ 56,816 Martin .$ Palm Beach S Total .$ 56,816 Page 1 of 2 ~IT~:2ÆI 14 '-" ---...:..~ ..,I *C Cost Breakdown and Schedule Task Descripti,on License Plate Cost-share Cost-Share Expected Funding Funding Source Completion Amount Amount Date Pump Station 1 N ew Pump¡s 20,000 73,273 noaa/ skmed 05/15/03 New I Convert Pump Sta/PumF 20,000 3,000 sf cmcd 05/15/03 Outlookl Fish ing Pier 10,500 30,000 dca/ slcmed 05/15/03 Web Cam 6,316 2,000 slcmcd 05/15/03 . Regulatory Approvals: Are any regulatory approvals needed for the proposed project? ~ No If yes, please fill in the table below: Approval Agency Type of Received? Expiration Comments Approval Date Yes No FDEPI ACOE Std Gen Permit X 11/15/06 Pump Stations FDEPI ACOE Minor Structure I X I Outlook/Fish Pier I Authorized Person's Name: James R. David s¡gna:fh:: ~ ~ Title: ])~ PrintN . Jã.(¡rt(5 ¡¿ f)A-tJ(!J Print Title: 7)1 {~-!cs-r-- Remember to complete and attach Exhibit "An Page 2 of2 ~$:2~1 15 '-' ..., INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this _ day of , 2002, by and between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as "County", and ST. LUCIE COUNTY MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT, a special taxing district, hereinafter referred to as "District". WHEREAS, the County intends to apply for a 2002-03 Waterways Assistance Program Grant (the "Grant") from the Florida Inland Navigation District ("FIND"); and, WHEREAS, the grant application will be entitled "Vitolo Family Park at Middle Cove - Public / ADA Access Enhancement" and seeks grant funds for the construction of various site improvements required under the County's Grant A ward Agreement with the Florida Communities Trust for Middle Cove (the "Project"); and, WHEREAS, the Project will benefit the District's land management program; and, WHEREAS, in light of the benefits to the District's land management program, the District is willing to assist the County in the financial and administrative responsibilities under the FIND grant should it be awarded. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. GENERAL. This Agreement is entered into pursuant to Section 163.01, Florida Statutes, Florida Interlocal Cooperation Act. 2. COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES. The County shall submit a 2002-03 Waterways Assistance Program grant application to FIND for the Project. In the event the County is awarded 1- '-' '...".¡ the FIND Grant, the parties shall coordinate Project activities in accordance with the terms of the FIND Grant. 3. DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES. In the event the County is awarded the FIND Grant, the District shall provide oversight for the Project on behalf of the County. The parties shall coordinate Project activities in accordance with the terms of the FIND Grant. 4. AMENDMENT. The Agreement may only be amended by a written document signed by all parties and filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of St. Lucie County, Florida. 5. TERMINA TION. Either party may terminate this Agreement upon one hundred eighty (180) days prior written notice to the other party. 6. NOTICES. All notices, requests, consents, and other communications required or permitted under this Agreement shall in writing (including telex and telegraphic communication) and shall be (as elected by the person giving such notice) hand delivered by messenger or courier service, telecommunicated, or mailed by registered or certified mail (postage prepaid), return receipt requested, and addressed to: As to District: With a COPy to: St. Lucie County Mosquito Control Director 2300 Virginia Avenue, Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 St. Lucie County Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue Administration Building Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 As to County With a copy to: County Administrator 2300 Virginia Avenue Administration Building Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 St. Lucie County Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue Administration Building Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 or to such other address as any party may designate by notice complying with the terms of this 2- '-' """ section. Each such notice shall be deemed delivered: (a) on the date delivered if by personal delivery, (b) on the date telecommunicated if by telegraph, (c) on the date of transmission with confirmed answer back if by telex, and (d) on the date upon which the return receipt is signed or delivery is refused or the notice is designated by the postal authorities as not deliverable, as the case may be, if mailed. 7. AUDIT. The County agrees that District or any of its duly authorized representatives shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after expenditure of funds under this Agreement, have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of the County involving transactions related to this Agreement. The District agrees that the County or any of its duly authorized representatives shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after expenditure offunds under this Agreement, have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of the District involving transactions related to this Agreement. 8. PUBLIC RECORDS. The County and the District shall allow public access to all documents, papers, letters, or other material subject to the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and made or received by them in conjunction with this Agreement. 9. ASSIGNMENT. No party shall assign this Agreement to any other persons or firm without first obtaining the other parties' approval. 10. FILING. This Agreement shall be filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of S1. Lucie County, Florida, prior to its effectiveness. 11. GENERAL. This Agreement embodies the whole understanding of the parties. There are no promi~es, terms, conditions, or obligations other than those contained therein, and this 3- '-' ..",,¡ Agreement shall supersede all previous telecommunications, representations, or agreements, either verbal or written, between the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused the execution by their duly authorized officials as of the dates below stated. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN DATE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY ATTEST: ST. LUCIE COUNTY MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN DATE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS COUNTY ATTORNEY g: \atty\agreemnt\inter loc\mcd- find, wpd 4- 03/22/02 FZABWARR FUND 184 '-"" ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ...., PAGE 1 WARRANT LIST #25- 16-MAR-2002 TO 22-MAR-2002 FUND SUMMARY- EROSION TITLE Erosion Control Operating Fund GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES PAYROLL 1,689.13 0.00 1,689.13 0.00 '-' ST. LUCIE COUNTY EROSION DISTRICT .....i BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS John D. Bruhn District 1 Doug Coward District 2 Paula A. Lewis District 3 Frannie Hutchinson District 4 Cliff Barnes District 5 AGENDA March 26, 2002 1. MINUTES Approve the minutes of the meeting held February 26,2002. 2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT CONSENT AGENDA 1. W ARRA...NTS LISTS Approve Warrants List No. 21 through No. 25 2. PUBLIC WORKS Engineering / Beach Inlet Monitoring· Consider staff recommendation to approve Amendment No.2 to Work Authorization No.2 (C-00-12-181) with Taylo.r Engineering, Inc. and authorize the Chairman to execute the amended work authorization. NOTICE: All proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceeclings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceeclings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifling during a hearing "ill be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462- 1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. '-' AGENDA REQUEST -..I ITEM NO. C-2 DATE: March 26, 2002 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] PRESENTED BY: TO: ST. LUCIE COUNTY EROSION DISTRICT SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 J SUBJECT: Beach & Inlet Monitoring: Amendment NO.2 to Work Authorizatio No.2 (C-OO 12-181) with Taylor Engineering, Inc. to increase the amount of compensation by $32,585.00 for additional services. BACKGROUND: Work Authorization NO.2 was approved by the Board on February 21, 2001 for Taylor Engineering, Inc. to continue with the County's comprehensive beach and inlet monitoring program for the 3rd and 41h years. On May 8, 2001 the Board approved Amendment No.1 decreasing the amount of compensation to be paid to Taylor Engineering, Inc. $169,850.00 to $157,410.50. This request is to amend the existing work authorization to include additional services ($32,585.00) related to sea turtle monitoring for the 2002 nesting season, resulting in an increase to the total contract amount from $157,410.50 to 189,995.50. Sea turtle monitoring was required for three consecutive years as part of the FDEP permit for the 1999 beach nourishment project and was not anticipated beyond that point. However, in order to access the beach and repair and maintain the geotubes, FDEP is requiring sea turtle monitoring as a permit condition. Also, the sea turtle monitoring information gathered this nesting season should be helpful in the future permitting process of long term shoreline stabilization solutions for this area. FUNDS AVAIL.: Funds for the additional engineering services will be made available in the following accounts: Erosion District: 184-3710-563005-3712 ($16,292.50); Erosion Control-Conservation FDEP (98SL 1): 184203-3710-563005-3712 ($16,292.50); Fort Pierce Beach Restoration Grant. PREVIOUS ACTION: November 10, 1998: Board approved grant agreements with FDEP for beach & inlet activities. April 27, 1999: Board approved work authorization with Taylor Eng. for 1st and 2nd year monitoring. December 12, 2000: Board approved master consultant's agreement with Taylor Engineering, Inc. February 21, 2001: Board approved work authorization with Taylor Eng. for 3rd and 41h year monitoring. May 8,2001: Amendment NO.1 approved decreasing the contract amount from $169,850 to $157,410.50. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Erosion District Board approval of Amendment No.2 to Work Authorization No.2 (C-00-12-181) with Taylor Engineering, Inc. and execution of said amended work authorization by the Chairperson. COMMISSION ACTION: [~ APPROVED [ ] OTHER: [ ] DENIED "'coo", AlWm" ,3i ~ [x]Originating Dept. Public Works t u [x]Mgt. & Budget [x)Co. Eng 1t.1\e> / I [xJBudget & Revenue Coordinator ~f'I \"\ [x]Finance Department (Grants)~ , \w -.i.00-12-181 (W A #2, Amend #2) SECOND AMENDMENT TO WORK AUTHORIZATION NO.2 Engineering Services Related to Beach & Inlet Monitoring Work Authorization No.2 between St. Lucie County Erosion District (the "District") and Taylor Engineering, Inc. (the "Consultant"), for Beach & Inlet Monitoring Services, dated February 13,2001 (the "Agreement") and the first amendment to said work authorization dated May 8,2001, is hereby amended to increase the amount of the compensation to be paid to the Consultant to a total not to exceed One Hundred Eighty-Nine Thousand, Nine Hundred Ninety-Five Dollars, and Fifty Cents ($189,995.50). The Consultant's "Scope of Services", "Work Compensation Sheet", and "Project Schedule" have also been amended and attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibits "A", "B", and "C", respectively. All other terms and conditions of Work Authorization No.2 (C-OO- 12-181) shall be the same and remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Second Amendment to Work Authorization No.2 (C-00-12-181) to be executed and delivered on the dates below. WITNESSES: ST. LUCIE COUNTY EROSION DISTRICT BY: CHAIRPERSON Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY WITNESSES: TAYLOR ENGINEERING, INC. BY: Print Name: Title: R/WP/MISOTA YWRWAAMD2 Date: "ar-2D-D2 D9:51am FrDm-TAYLOR ENGINEERING INC 9D41319841 T-891 PD2/D2 F-145 .. '-' ...", Exbibit A Scope of Work Fon Pierce MarÍDe Ttlrde Monitoring :z002 Taylor Engineering, Inc. will engage the locallD8line turtle permit bolder, Ecological Associates, lnc" to penonn marine tunle nest m01\itorin¡¡ of the Fort Pierce beach nourishment project area. Nest monitoring sha1I be performed in accordance with the procedures of Specific Condition II.d of FDEP permit No, OI26215-00l·JC. Daily surveys will be conducted nom March 1,2002 through September 15,2002 and periodically thereafter until October 31,2002 or until all marked nesrs have hatched, whichever is later. A representative sample of nests shaU be marked to monitor nest fate and derennine reproductive success during the 2002 nesting season. On completion of the 2002 monitoring we will prepare and sublDlt to St. Lucie County a tetter repon of the daily nest monitoring activiries and reproductive success. \\,«vcr2I1'ROPOSAlII'2002.Q23 ~\I. J.uci.Cuunty 2oo21'unk MOllltonl1 !\p2002.023 SOW,doc Mar-13-02 0~:~5~m FrDm-TAYLOR ENGINEERING INC 9047319847 T-865 P 04/05 F-655 ; '- Exhibit B Work Compensation Schedule TAYLOR ENGINEERING. INC. Fort Pierce Matine Turtle Monitoring 2002 ..." TASK 1: Marine Turtle Monitoring Labor Days Cost Task Totals Vice President 1.000 960,00 Administrative 1,000 400,00 Total Man-Days 2,000 Labor Cost 1,360.00 Non-Labor Units Cost rurtle Monitor Subcontract (Ecological As60c,) 1,0 31.225.00 Total Non-labor Cost 31,22500 Total Task 1 32,58500 Project Total S 32,585.00 P2002-02~ St. Lucie Co, Turtle Monitor Add On,xls ~r-13-D2 04:45pm Frcm-TAYLOR ENGINEERING INC 9D41319841 T-885 P 05/05 F-855 1<·'I,'II'·i1' I I 'i;,," 111 , '¡,: II! ¡;. !!'. i'II" :a ;. ~ E! .= E n. ! E ~ "ii ~ ... E ~ i ~ I ... co .. ... GO c ...'C ~o uO e= Ole ~o .. U oS ~ 't:.!! 11 .. *I ·C ~ .!! .0 D.~ .. :.ï " ... "" ;¡: ...... ~ ~ ... ... co >C o. ::;) :;) n. w .c ë ... ... "" :;'C E .. .!! .. !~ Õ i ~ 'is 0:: u" 1I')t! .. it ~ 0 ... . CI c: 'C .2 'j;; a :: Q) i: ::J I- m c: II "L': i~ 1: Z >- 0 oK:= ~ .. 111 Q1 r.o a: Ii ~ !! -tI 1J,-:~ ~ tIJ rr. :i N .. i £ II) "'N ~~ ~~ '<1.- " § "CIJ -~.; n.D '- ..." EROSION DISTRICT ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING Date: February 26, 2002 Tape: I Convened: 9:54 a.m. Adjourned: 9:54 a.m. Commissioners Present: Chairman, Frannie Hutchinson, Doug Coward, Cliff Barnes, John D. Bruhn, absent, Paula A. Lewis, absent Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator, Robert Bradshaw, Asst. County Administrator, Dan McIntyre, County Attorney, Ray Wazny, Public Works Director, Don West, County Engineer, A. Millie Delgado, Deputy Clerk I. MINTUES It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve the minutes of the meeting held January 8, 2002; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS None.. 3. CONSENT AGENDA It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve the Consent Agenda; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. I. The District approved Warranl List Nos. 15 through 20. 2. Public Works- The District approved waiving the bidding process and awarded contracts to 1) Underwater Engineering Services, Inc., not to exceed $43,100 for the maintenance and repair ofthe geotubes and 2) Stewart Mining Industries, Inc., not to exceed $10,000 for beach compatible fill to be delivered to South Jetty Park and execution of said contracts by the Chairperson contingent on review and approval of said contracts by the County Attorney. There being no further business to be brought before the District, the meeting was adjourned. Chairman Clerk of Circuit Court '"' 03/01/02 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD F7.ABWARR ...., WARRANT LIST #22- 23-FEB-2002 TO 01-MAR-2002 FUND SUMMARY- EROSION FUND TITLE 184 Erosion Control Operating Fund GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 1,512.27 1,512.27 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 2,413.54 2,413.54 '- 03/08/02 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD F7.ABWARR ..."", WARRANT LIST #23- 02-MAR-2002 TO 08-MAR-2002 FUND SUMMARY- EROSION FUND TITLE 184 Erosion Control Operating Fund GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 5/815.27 5,815.27 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 0.00 0.00 \.¡' 03/15/02 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD FZABWARR ...., WARRANT LIST #24- 09-MAR-2002 TO 15-MAR-2002 FUND SUMMARY- EROSION FUND TITLE 184 Erosion Control Operating Fund GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 1,876.61 1,876.61 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 2,413.54 2,413.54