Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 03-26-02
\;,
~
..."
March 26, 2002
9:00 AM
BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS MEETING AGENDA
WELCOME
GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES
Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board
meeting:
CONSENT AGENDA- These items are considered routine and are enacted bv one motion. There
will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS- Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department
requests are items which the Commission will discuss individually usually in the order listed on
the agenda.
PUBLIC HEARINGS- These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesdays at 7:00 P.M. or
as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second
or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 A.M., then public hearings ~\ill be heard at 9:00 A.M. or
as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will
not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and asks
anyone wishing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments \\ill be limited to five
minutes.
As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request
or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board
item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman will ask for public
comment, (4) 'further discussion and action by the Board.
ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION- Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the
microphone. If you have backup material, please ha~-e eight copies ready for distribution.
NON-AGENDA ITEMS- These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as
necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda.
PUBLIC COMMENT- Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting for general public comment.
Please limit comments to five minutes.
DECORUM- Please be respectful of others opinion.
MEETINGS- All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays
of each month at 7:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 A.M" UIÙess otherwise
advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras
Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. The Board schedules additional
workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is
provided of these workshops. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this
meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or
TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting.
'-'
, ...,
www.stlucieco.gov
John D. Bruhn
Doug Coward
Paula A. Lewis
Frannie Hutchinson
Cliff Barnes
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
ßOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA
March 26, 2002
9:00 A.M.
INVOCATION
PLEDGE OF AlLEGL-lliCE
~ 1.
MINUTES
FWPro~W.
Approve the minutes of the meeting held March 12, 2002.
2. PROCL:\...\L-\.TIONS / PRESENTATIONS
A.
Resolution No. 02-92 - Proclaiming April 20, 2002 as "Special Olymp!{s . , ,ð
Florida Law Enforcement Torch Run Day" in St. Lucie County, Florida. ffJ0)-z,¡/@
B.
Presentation / Kathryn Basile, Executive Director of the Children's Services
Council will present the St. Lucie County Needs Assessment.
c.
Presentation / Nan Griggs, President and CEO of the Workforce
Development Board of the Treasure Coast will pro\ide an update on work
force issues in St. Lucie County and ask the Board for input and
suggestions.
3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT
4.
CONSEì\T AGENDA ~ CJt-
-Appro\/' ~
NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any
action taken by the Boara at these meetings will need a recoró of the proceedlDgs and for such purpose may neea
to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the requesf of any party to the proceedings,
individuals testif}ing during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted toe
opportunity to cross-examine any indivIdual testifying during a hearingupon request. Anyone with a disability
requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services
Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior fo the meeting.
'-'
....,/
REGULAR AGENDA
MARCH 26, 2002
PAGE TWO
11ftr"" IlL "\f
PUBLIC HEARINGS
COIVIMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SA.
SB.
5C.
5D.
Ordinance No. 02-010 / Petition for Amendment / Westchester Community
Development District No. 1 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the
ordinance authorizing an amendment to the boundaries of the community
development district. Location: northwest CQrner of the intersection of Interstate Lt,. ~
95 and the proposed extension of Gatlin Boulevard. Appco~-ed l}-o {tftÁ:ruIUtSq
. ßJ~~
Ordinance No. 02-011 / Petition for Amendment / Westchester Community
Development District No. 2 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the
ordinance authorizing an amendment to the boundaries of the community
development district. Location: northwest corner of the intersection of Interstate
95 and the proposed extension of Gatlin Boulevard.
Ordinance No. 02-012 / Petition for Amendment / Westchester Community
Development District No.3 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the
ordinance authorizing an amendment to the boundaries of the community
development district. Location: northwest corner of the intersection of Interstate
95 and the proposed extension of Gatlin Boulevard.
I
¡
f
Ordinance No. 02-013 / Petition for Þ.mendment / Westchester Community
Develqpment District No.4 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the ./.. t
ordinance authorizing an amendment to the boundaries of the community !
development district. Location: northwest corner of the intersection of Interstat~ I j
95 and the proposed extension of Gatlin Boulevard. ~
End of Public Hearings
I 3,.J"(i, ".A~~. 1 1 ,.¡JH ~,
6. PARKS AND RECREATION
Discussion - The Board will discuss possible improvements at loth Street Park.
Þn>p r wJ -to IJ..,~ pµ¿ iApoÆ fèe.-o
I J V ~r IlVIproflU¡1JJL{S
\w
....,.,
REGULAR AGENDA
MARCH 26, 2002
PAGE THREE
ï.
COUNTY ATTORNEY
8.
Resolution No. 02-87 - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the resolution
establishing a permit fee for special review and siting criteria to be paid by the
applicant for the construction of :r~ electric gener,torApl<y1-t in St. Lucie County,
Florida. f1¡pß~~ -rr::> lJ--nWzo:«.! 7ZJ¡;ÇtSe;_t/Cl q2XJ
ADMINISTRATION _~ _LJ. clif~~Iit~s&~ tJf
~/ fzó71 riv 'WSr iSff 6> c¿l7f. t
A. St. Lucie County Airport Annexation / Florida Governmental Conflict
Resolution - Staff requests auth.orizatton t~ork ~.th the Treasure Coast
R~~~ng ~=s PJ;~m'.JrteJuLh(/)0
B. Bi-weekly Committee Reports - The Board \'\Till give updates on the various
committees and advisory boards that they serve on..
9.
PUBLIC WORKS / ENGINEERING
Indian River Estates Stormwater Attenuation Facility - Consider staff
recommendation to authorize the Public Works Department to submit a request
for IncluSion Application to Florida Department of Environmental Protection - State
Revolving Fund Loan Program for $2.5 million to assist in construction.
4-pp(ò~ l tf.-O)
\.,-
....I
CONSENT AGENDA
March 26. 2002
1. WARRANTS LIST
Approve warrants list No. 24 and No. 25
2. PUBLIC WORKS
A. Engineering / River Branch Estates MSBU / Potable Water Improvements
(PSL) - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Consultant's
Agreement with Culpepper & Terpening, to provide construction
management services for the project in the amount of 57,000, and
authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement.
B. Engineering / RFP No. 02-033 / Continuing Contracts for Professional
Surveying Services - Consider staff recommendation to approve the short
list: 1) GCY, Inc., 2) Culpepper & Terpening, Inc., 3) LBFH, Inc., grant
permission to negotiate with all three firms, and authorize the Chairman to
sign the contracts as prepared by the County Attorney.
C. 10% Discount at Oxbow Gift Store - Consider staff recommendation to
approve the 10% discount offer.
D. Engineering / Smallwood Avenue MSBU / Potable Water FPUA - Consider
staff recommendation to approve the Interlocal Agreement with Fort Pierce
Utilities Authority and the City of Fort Pierce, and authorize the Chairman
to sign the agreement.
E. Environmental Resources / Equipment Request No. 02-208 and No. 02-209-
Consider staff recommendation to approve the equipment requests for the
purchase of a 6' x 12' equipment trailer in the amount of $1,200, and a 4-
wheeler in the amount of $5,000 using funds remaining from a previous
trailer purchase that cost less than anticipated.
F. . Engineering/ Burger King and Merritt Ditch Emergency Culvert Replacement
Project - Consider staff recommendation to approve the project, waive the
formal bidding process, and authorize the Chairman to sign the
construction contract V\ith Shenandoah General Construction in the amount
of $182,460.
G. Engineering / Grey Twig Lane MSBU - Consider staff recommendation to
approve Amendment No.1 to Work Authorization No.9 to the Agreement
for Continuing Engineering Services, dated March 14,2000 with LBFH, Ine.
to provide the final design, permitting and bidding services in the amount
of $15,050, and authorize the Chairman to execute the Work Authorization.
H. Taylor Creek/C25 Dredging and Restoration Project - Consider staff
recommendation to grant permission to submit the grant application to
Florida Seaport Transportation and Economic Development (FSTED) Council,
in the amount of $1,750,000, and authorize execution ofthe application by
the County Administrator.
'-'
CONSENT AGENDA
MARCH 26, 2002
PAGE TWO
....I
2. PUBLIC WORKS (CONTINUED)
I. Taylor CreekjC25 Dredging and Restoration Project - Consider staff
recommendation to grant permission to submit the grant application to
Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND), in the amount of $800,000,
approve Resolution No. 02-90, and authorize execution of the application
by the County Administrator.
]. Budget Amendment No. 02-129/Equipment Request No. 02-210 - Consider
staff recommendation to approve the budget amendment and equipment
request for the purchase of a four-barrel recycling center for the Oxbow
Eco-Center in the amount of 51,500, and acceptance of Plastic Lumber as a
sole source for this item.
K. Budget Amendment No. 02-128 jEqui:¡:Jment Request No. 02-211 - Consider
staff recommendation to approve the budget amendment and equipment
request for the purchase of three all-terrain, fat-tire wheelchairs for the
Oxbow Eco-Center in the total amount of $6,000, and accept Deming Design
as a sole source for this item.
3. MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
A. Supervisor of Elections Voting Equipment Upgrade j Equipment Request No.
02-204 and No. 02-205 / Budget Amendment No. 02-125 - Consider staff
recommendation to approve the equipment requests and budget
amendment for the purchase of voting equipment, with the understanding
that the cost will not exceed 5312,800, and declare Diebold Election
Systems the sole source vendor for the equipment.
B. . Change Fund - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to
establish a change fund account in the amount of 5100 for the Oxbow Eco-
Center.
4. COMMUNITY SERVICES
Certificate of participation for the Drug Control and System Improvement Program
(Edward Byrne) Grant for 2002/03 from the Florida Department of Law
Enforcement - Consider staff recommendation to authorize the Chairman to sign
the Certificate of Participation.
5. PARKS AND RECREATION
Community Parks System Master Plan j LaWllwood Recreation Complex Master
Plan Update (parks Referendum) - A copy of the update as been forwarded to the
Board for review.
'-'
CONSENT AGENDA
MARCH 26, 2002
PAGE THREE
wi
6. UTILITIES
A. North Hutchinson Island Waste Water Treatment Plant Master Lift Station
Rehabilitation- Consider staff recommendation to approve the purchase
order with Severn Trent Avatar Utility Services, LLC in the amount of
$39,608.
B. Equipment Request No. 02-206 and No. 02-20ï j Budget Amendment No.
02-126 - Consider staff recommendation to declare Ellis K. Phelps a sole
source for Flyght Pumps and approve the equipment requests and budget
amendment for the purchase of two replacement pumps in the amount of
$3,802.
C. Extension of Reuse Water Main on North Hutchinson Island - Consider staff
recommendation to approve the Work Authorization with LBF&H in the
amount of $29,800 for design, permitting and services during construction.
D. Contract Approval- Consider staff recommendation to approve the contract
with Ocean Gate Builders in the amount of $19,200 for the up sizing of a
new water line on North Hutchinson Island from eight inch to twelve inch
in diameter, and authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement as
approved by the County Attorney.
ï. COUNTY ATTORNEY
A Resolution No. 02-85 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the
resolution requesting the St. Lucie County Clerk of Circuit Court place one
hundred thousand and 00/100 ($100,000.00) Dollars in a separate special
revenue fund \\ith only the interest being allocated for Bluefield Ranch
improvement e.xpenditures.
B. Resolution No. 02-88 Fee Simple Deed/ Jenkins Rd North of Orange Ave -
Consider staff recommendation to accept the Fee Simple Deed from North
St. .Lucie River Water Control District, authorize the Chairman to execute
the resolution, and instruct staff to record the resolution and deed in the
public records of St. Lucie County, Florida.
C. Resolution No. 02-89 Quitclaim Deed/ Indian Pines Blvd - Consider staff
recommendation to accept the Quitclaim Deed from General Electric Capital
Corporation, authorize the Chairman to execute the resolution, and instruct
staff to record the resolution and deed in the public records of St. Lucie
County, Florida.
D. Assignment of License Agreement to Lynette f\lacLeod - Consider staff
recommendation to approve the proposed agreement, and authorize the
Chairman to sign the agreement.
.......
CONSENT AGENDA
MARCH 26,2002
P AGE FOUR
...;
8. HUMAN RESOURCES
Third Year Adjustment to the Pay and Classification Plan - Consider staff
recommendation to approve the adjustment.
9. MOSQUITO CONTROL
FIND Grant Application and Resolution for Assistance Under the Florida Inland
Navigation District Waterways Assistance Program Consider staff
recommendation to grant permission to submit the grant for improvements at
Vitolo Family (Middle Cove) Park, authorize the Chairman to sign the application
and the Interlocal Agreement authorizing the District to administer the FIND grant.
10. PURCHASING
A. Bid No. 02-034 - Consider staff recommendation to reject the proposal
received for parking garage management.
B. Bid No. 02-043 - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid for
temporary and emergency supply and dispensing of gasoline and diesel fuel
to the sole bidder, Holmes Oil Corp. Inc., and authorize the Chairman to
sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney.
C. Bid No. 02-039 - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid for the
purchase of one track excavator (long reach) to the low bidder, L.B. Smith,
Inc., for a total price of $184,225.
11. INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE
A. Request For Bids - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to
. advertise for bids to qualified vendors, as approved by the Selection
Committee, for the replacement of the security system at Rock Road Jail.
B. Bid No. 02-044 - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid for
construction of two tennis courts at LaWllwood Recreation Area to the low
bidder, Fast Dry Courts in the amount of $85,717, and authorize the
Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney.
'-'
-"
St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners
Announcements
March 26, 2002
A. The Oxbow Eco-Center is holding the Second Annual Earth Day Festival
on April 20, 2002 from 10:00 am to 4:00 pm, at the Oxbow Eco-Center,
on St. James Drive in Port St. Lucie. .
B. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Parks System Master
Plan Update Workshop on April 23, 2002 at 1:30 pm in the Commission
Chambers.
NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action laken by the Board at
these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is
made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the
proceedings will be granted the opportunity to cross-examine any Individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a
disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the SI. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-
1777 or TTD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior 10 Ihe meeting.
--..
'\.-
-'
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
EROSION DISTRICT
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
John D. Bruhn
District I
Doug Coward
District 2
Paula A. Lewis
District 3
Frannie Hutchinson
District 4
Cliff Barnes
District 5
AGENDA
March 26, 2002
1. MINUTES
Approve the minutes of the meeting held February 26, 2002.
2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT
CONSENT AGENDA
1. WARRANTS LISTS
Approve Warrants List No. 21 through No. 25
2. PUBLIC WORKS
Engineering / Beach Inlet Monitoring -Consider staff recommendation to
approve Amendment No.2 to Work Authorization NO.2 (C-00-12-181) with
Taylor.Engineering, Inc. and authorize the Chairman to execute the amended
work authorization.
:\OllCE: All proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board
at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose mayneed to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings
is made, Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the
proceedings will be granted an opportunity to cross·examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a
disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Senices Manager at (561) 462-
1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting,
'-'"
...",
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
John D. Bruhn
District 1
Doug Coward
District 2
Paula A. Lewis
District 3
Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes
District 4 District 5
AGENDA
March 26, 2002
1. MINUTES
Approve the minutes of the meeting held February 12, 2002.
2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT
CONSENT AGENDA
1. WARRANTS LISTS
Approve Warrants List No. 20 through No. 25.
2. MOSOUITO CONTROL
A. Quality Industries, Inc. Agreement Amendment- Consider staff recommendation
to approve the proposed First Amendment to the February 27,2001 Agreement,
and authorize the Chairman to execute the amendment.
B. Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND) Grant - Consider staff recommendation
to approve and' sign the Interlocal Agreement with the Board of County
Commissioners authorizing the Mosquito Control District to administer the
grant at Vitolo Family / Middle Cove Park.
NOTICE: All procecdings befo....e this Board are elf'clronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken b)' the Boud at tbese meetings will need
a record orthe proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record oflhl' proceedings is made. tJpOIl the requestofany party to the proceedings,
individuals testifying ùuring a hearing will be sworn in. Any P:Jrty to the proceedings will be granted an opportunHy to cross-examine any indi\;dual testifying during
a hearing upon fe-CJuest. Anyone ",ith;l disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting shouh.l contact the St. Lucie Count)" Community Services Manager
at (561) 462-1777 ur TUO (561) 462-J-1-28 .11 least for£)-·eight(48) hours prior to the meeting.
~.
..",
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ADDITIONS AGENDA
March 26. 2002
Revised 3/25/02
REGULAR AGENDA
COMMUNI1Y DEVELOPMENT
R-A. 1
Westchester Community Development Districts One through Four / Interlocal
Agreement - Consider staff recommendation to approve the draft Interlocal
Agreement between St. Lucie County and The Westchester Community
Development Districts One through Four for the purpose of addressing
infrastructure improvements at T~e Westchester Development Site.
ftpP)~W- ~/'O
~~)
CONSENT AGENDA
COMMUNI1Y SERVICES
C-A.l Acceptance of Funds / Budget Resolution No. 02-94 - Consider staff
recommendation to approve the budget resolution to accept the funds
remaining from the Community Food and Nutrition (CFN) grant from FYOl in
the amount of $10,000, and authorize the Chairman to sign the necessary
documents.
NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Arty person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings
\101\1 need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of
any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings \VÌII be granted the opportunity to cross·
examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact
the SL Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting.
y
'WI
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
John D. Bruhn
District 1
Doug Coward
District 2
Paula A. Lewis
District 3
Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes
District 4 District 5
AGENDA
March 26, 2002
1. MINUTES
Appro\"(' the minutes of the meeting held February 12, 2002.
2. GENER:-\L PUBLIC COM!\lENT
CONSENT AGENDA
1. W ARRA:\TS LISTS
Approve \\'arrants List No. 20 through NO.2 5.
2. MOSQUITO CONTROL
A. Quality Industries, Inc. Agreement Amendment- Consider staff recommendation
to approve the proposed First Amendment to the February 27, 2001 Agreement,
and authorize the Chairman to execute the amendment.
B. Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND) Grant - Consider staff recommendation
to approve and' sign the lnterlocal Agreement with the Board of County
Commissioners authorizing the Mosquito Control District to administer the
grant at Vitolo Family j Middle Cove Park.
NOTICE: All proceedings before this Board are electronicall)" recorded. Any person who decides to appeal ao,· action taken by the Board at these meetings ..,,'ill need
a record of the proceedings and rarsuch purpose ma)' need to ensure that a verbatim record orthe proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings,
individunls testiryin~ during 3 hearing \'dll be sworn in. ..\n~· parI)" to the proceedings will be granted an opportunir," to cross·examine any individual testifying during
a hearing upon requt:''!ot. ..\n~-orll~ n ilh a disabilitr requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact tbe St. Lucie Counly Community Services Manager
al (561) 462-1777 Of" TOD (561) -162-1-128 at least rorty·eight(4S) hours prior to the meeting.
,,/
,.",
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
EROSION DISTRICT
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
John D. Bruhn
District 1
Doug Coward
District 2
Paula A. Lewis
District 3
Frannie Hutchinson
District 4
Cliff Barnes
District 5
AGENDA
March 26, 2002
1. MINUTES
Approve the minutes of the meeting held February 26,2002.
2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT
CONSENT AGENDA
1. WARRANTS LISTS
Approve Warrants List No. 21 through No. 25
2. PUBLIC WORKS
Engineering / Beach Inlet Monitoring - Consider staff recommendation to
approve Amendment No.2 to \'"ork Authorization No.2 (C-00-12-181) with
Taylor Engineering, Inc. and authorize the Chairman to execute the amended
work authorization.
NOTICE: All proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board
at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings
is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, indhiduals testifying during a hearing ...ill be sworn in. Any party to the
proceedings will be granted an opportunity to cross-e.'\:amine any indMdual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a
disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting shouJd contact the 51. Lucie County Community Senices Manager at (561) 462-
1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting.
·
~
..""
March 26, 2002
9:00 AM
BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS MEETING AGENDA
vVELCOME
GENERAL RULES Ai\JD PROCEDURES
Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board
meeting:
CONSENT AGENDA- These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There
will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS- Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department
requests are items which the Commission will discuss individually usually in the order listed on
the agenda.
PUBLIC HEARINGS- These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesdays at 7:00 P.M. or
as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second
or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 AM., then public hearings \\ill be heard at 9:00 AM. or
as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will
not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and asks
anyone wishing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments ~\ill be limited to five
minutes.
As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request
or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board
item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman will ask for public
comment, (4) 'further discussion and action by the Board.
ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION- Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the
microphone. If you have backup material, please have eight copies ready for distribution.
NON-AGENDA ITEMS- These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as
necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda.
PUBLIC COMMENT- Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting for general public comment.
Please limit comments to five minutes.
DECORUM- Please be respectful of others opinion.
MEETINGS- All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays
of each month at 7:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 A.M., UIÙess otherwise
advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras
Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. The Board schedules additional
workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is
provided of these workshops. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this
meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or
TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting.
'-"
....."
www.stlucieco.gov
John D. Bruhn
Doug Coward
Paula A. Lewis
Frannie Hutchinson
Cliff Barnes
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
ßOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA
March 26, 2002
9:00 A.M.
INVOCATION
PLEDGE OF AUEGl-\J\fCE
~ 1. MINUTES
Appro\'e the minutes of the meeting held March 12, 2002.
2. PROCL:\...\LUIONS j PRESENTATIONS
A. Resolution No. 02-92 - Proclaiming April 20, 2002 as "Special Olympics
Florida Law Enforcement Torch Run Day" in St. Lucie County, Florida.
B. Presentation j Kathryn Basile, Executive Director of the Children's Services
Council will present the St. Lucie County Needs Assessment.
C. Presentation j Nan Griggs, President and CEO of the Workforce
Denlopment Board of the Treasure Coast will provide an update on work
force issues in St. Lucie County and ask the Board for input and
suggestions.
3. GENERAL Pl'BLIC COMMENT
4. CONSENT AGENDA
NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. An)' person who decides to appeal any
action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a recorò of the proceedmgs and for such purpose may need
to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the requesf of any :party to the proceedings,
individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any par1Y to the proceedings will be granted [he
opportunity to cross-examine any indivIdual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability
requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services
Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior [0 the meeting.
\r'
"-'
REGULAR AGENDA
!\IARCH 26, 2002
PAGE TWO
n:r!"r-rr 1I'!__~p'Ø~ "'IiI 1
PUBLIC HEARINGS
COI\JMU:-JITY DEVELOPMEj\;T
SA. Ordinance No. 02-010 / Petition for Amendment 1 Westchester Community
Development District No.1 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the
ordinance authorizing an amendment to the boundaries of the community
development district. Location: northwest co.rner of the intersection of Interstate
95 and the proposed extension of Gatlin Boulevard.
5B. Ordinance No. 02-011 1 Petition for Amendment 1 Westchester Community
Development District No. 2 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the
ordinance authorizing an amendment to the boundaries.of the community
development district. Location: northwest corner of the intersection of Interstate
95 and the proposed extension of Gatlin Boulevard. -
5C. Ordinance No. 02-012 / Petition for Amendment 1 Westchester Community
Development District No. 3 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the
ordinance authorizing an amendment to the boundaries of the community
development district. Location: northwest corner of the intersection of Interstate
95 and the proposed extension of Gatlin Boulevard.
50. Ordinance No. 02-013 1 Petition for Amendment 1 Westchester Community
Develqpment District NO.4 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the
ordinance authorizing an amendment to the boundaries of the community
development district. Location: northwest corner of the intersection of Interstate
95 and the proposed extension of Gatlin Boulevard.
End of Public Hearings
1....f,;I'a.JI!I%~r._ rr _TV n
.,...
6. PARKS AND RECREATION
Discussion - The Board \-\'ill discuss possible improvements at loth Street Park.
~
..."
REGULAR AGENDA
MARCH 26, 2002
P AGE THREE
7. COUNTY ATTOR~t:Y
Resolution No. 02-8ï - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the resolution
establishing a permit fee for special review and siting criteria to be paid by the
applicant for the construction of an electric generator plant in St. Lucie County,
Florida.
8. ADMINISTRATIOX
A. St. Lucie County Airport Annexation / Florida Governmental Conflict
Resolution - Staff requests authorizati9n to work with the Treasure Coast
Regional Planning Council in this process.
B. Bi-weekly Committee Reports - The Board will give updates on the various
committees and advisory boards that they serve on.
9. PUBLIC WORKS ! E'\GINEERING
Indian River Estates Stormwater Attenuation Facility - Consider staff
recommendation to authorize the Public Works Department to submit a request
for Inclusion Application to Florida Department of Environmental Protection - State
Revolving Fund Loan Program for $2.5 million to assist in construction.
~
....,.,
CONSENT AGENDA
March 26. 2002
1. WARRANTS LIST
Approve warrants list No. 24 and No. 25
2. PUBLIC WORKS
A Engineering 1 River Branch Estates MSBU 1 Potable Water Improvements
(PSL) - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Consultant's
Agreement with Culpepper & Terpening, to provide construction
management services for the project in the amount of $7,000, and
authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement.
B. Engineering / RFP No. 02-033 / Continuing Contracts for Professional
Surveying Services - Consider staff recommendation to approve the short
list: 1) GCY, Inc., 2) Culpepper & Terpening, Inc., 3) LBFH, Inc., grant
permission to negotiate with all three firms, and authorize the Chairman to
sign the contracts as prepared by the ,County Attorney.
C. 10% Discount at Oxbow Gift Store - Consider staff recommendation to
approve the 10% discount offer.
D. Engineering / Smallwood Avenue MSBU 1 Potable Water FPUA - Consider
staff recommendation to appro\'e the Interlocal Agreement with Fort Pierce
Utilities Authority and the City of Fort Pierce, and authorize the Chairman
to sign the agreement.
E. Environmental Resources 1 Equipment Request No. 02-208 and No. 02-209-
Consider staff recommendation to approve the equipment requests for the
purchase of a 6' x 12' equipment trailer in the amount of $1,200, and a 4-
wheeler in the amount of $5,000 using funds remaining from a previous
trailer purchase that cost less than anticipated.
F. . Engineeringl Burger King and .\Ierritt Ditch Emergency Culvert Replacement
Project - Consider staff recommendation to approve the project, waive the
formal bidding process, and authorize the Chairman to sign the
construction contract with Shenandoah General Construction in the amount
of $182,460.
G. Engineering 1 Grey Twig Lane ~lSBU - Consider staff recommendation to
approve Amendment No.1 to Work Authorization No.9 to the Agreement
for Continuing Engineering Senices, dated March 14, 2000 "vith LBFH, Inc.
to provide the final design, permitting and bidding services in the amount
of $15,050, and authorize the Chairman to execute the Work Authorization.
H. Taylor Creek/C25 Dredging and Restoration Project - Consider staff
recommendation to grant permission to submit the grant application to
Florida Seaport Transportation and Economic Development (FSTED) Council,
in the amount of $1,750,000, and authorize execution of the application by
the County Administrator.
'"
CONSENT AGENDA
MARCH 26, 2002
PAGE TWO
....,
2. PUBLIC WORKS (CONTINUED)
1. Taylor Creek/C25 Dredging and Restoration Project - Consider staff
recommendation to grant permission to submit the grant application to
Florida Inland Na\igation District (FIND), in the amount of $800,000,
approve Resolution :\'0. 02-90, and authorize execution of the application
by the County Administrator.
]. Budget Amendment 010. 02-129/ Equipment Request No. 02-210 - Consider
staff recommendation to approve the budget amendment and equipment
request for the purchase of a four-barrel recycling center for the Oxbow
Eco-Center in the amount of $1,500, and acceptance of Plastic Lumber as a
sole source for this item.
K. Budget Amendment :\'0. 02-128 /Equipment Request No. 02-211 - Consider
staff recommendation to approve the budget amendment and equipment
request for the purchase of three all-terrain, fat-tire wheelchairs for the
Oxbow Eco-Center in the total amount of $6,000, and accept Deming Design
as a sole source for this item.
3. MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
A. Supervisor of Elections Voting Equipment Upgrade / Equipment Request No.
02-204 and No. 02-205 j Budget Amendment No. 02-125 - Consider staff
recommendation to approve the equipment requests and budget
amendment for the purchase of voting equipment, with the understanding
that the cost will not exceed $312,800, and declare Diebold Election
Systems the sole source vendor for the equipment.
B. . Change Fund - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to
establish a change fund account in the amount of $100 for the Oxbow Eco-
Center.
4. COMMUNITY SERVICES
Certificate of participation for the Drug Control and System Improvement Program
(Edward Byrne) Grant for 2002/03 from the Florida Department of Law
Enforcement - Consider staff recommendation to authorize the Chairman to sign
the Certificate of Participation.
J. PARKS AND RECREATIOK
Community Parks System ~raster Plan / LaWllwood Recreation Complex Master
Plan Update (parks Referendum) - A copy of the update as been forwarded to the
Board for review.
~
CONSENT AGENDA
MARCH 26, 2002
PAGE THREE
......,
6. UTILITIES
A. North Hutchinson Island Waste Water Treatment Plant Master Lift Station
Rehabilitation- Consider staff recommendation to approve the purchase
order with Severn Trent Avatar Utility Services, LLC in the amount of
539,608.
B. Equipment Request No. 02-206 and No. 02-207 / Budget Amendment No.
02-126 - Consider staff recommendation to declare Ellis K. Phelps a sole
source for Flyght Pumps and approve the equipment requests and budget
amendment for the purchase of two replacement pumps in the amount of
$3,802.
C. Extension of Reuse Water Main on North Hutchinson Island - Consider staff
recommendation to approve the Work Authorization ~\ith LBF&H in the
amount of $29,800 for design, permitting and services during construction.
D. Contract Approval- Consider staff recommendation to approve the contract
with Ocean Gate Builders in the amount of $19,200 for the up sizing of a
new water line on North Hutchinson Island from eight inch to twelve inch
in diameter, and authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement as
approved by the County Attorney.
7. COUNTY ATTORNEY
A. Resolution No. 02-85 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the
resolution requesting the St. Lucie County Clerk of Circuit Court place one
hundred thousand and 00/100 ($100,000.00) Dollars in a separate special
revenue fund with only the interest being allocated for BIuefield Ranch
improvement expenditures.
B. Resolution No. 02-88 Fee Simple Deed/ Jenkins Rd North of Orange Ave -
Consider staff recommendation to accept the Fee Simple Deed from North
St. .Lucie River Water Control District, authorize the Chairman to execute
the resolution, and instruct staff to record the resolution and deed in the
public records of St. Lucie County, Florida.
C. Resolution No. 02-89 Quitclaim Deed/ Indian Pines Blvd - Consider staff
recommendation to accept the Quitclaim Deed from General Electric Capital
Corporation, authorize the Chairman to execute the resolution, and instruct
staff to record the resolution and deed in the public records of St. Lucie
County, Florida.
D. Assignment of License Agreement to Lynette MacLeod - Consider staff
recommendation to approve the proposed agreement, and authorize the
Chairman to sign the agreement.
\.,.;
CONSENT AGENDA
MARCH 26, 2002
PAGE FOUR
....,
8. HUMAN RESOURCES
Third Year Adjustment to the Pay and Classification Plan - Consider staff
recommendation to approve the adjustment.
9. MOSQUITO CONTROL
FIND Grant Application and Resolution for Assistance Under the Florida Inland
Navigation District Waterways Assistance Program Consider staff
recommendation to grant permission to submit the grant for improvements at
Vitolo Family (Middle Cove) Park, authorize the Chairman to sign the application
and the Interlocal Agreement authorizing the District to administer the FIND grant.
10. PURCHASING
A. Bid No. 02-034 - Consider staff recommendation to reject the proposal
received for parking garage management.
B. Bid No. 02-043 - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid for
temporary and emergency supply and dispensing of gasoline and diesel fuel
to the sole bidder, Holmes Oil Corp. Inc., and authorize the Chairman to
sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney.
C. Bid No. 02-039 - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid for the
purchase of one track excavator (long reach) to the low bidder, L.B. Smith,
Inc., for a total price of $184,225.
11. INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE
A Request For Bids - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to
. advertise for bids to qualified vendors, as approved by the Selection
Committee, for the replacement of the security system at Rock Road Jail.
B. Bid No. 02-044 . Consider staff recommendation to award the bid for
construction of two tennis courts at LaWllwood Recreation Area to the low
bidder, Fast Dry Courts in the amount of $85,ïl7, and authorize the
Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney.
'"
....,;
St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners
Announcements
March 26, 2002
A. The Oxbow Eco-Center is holding the Second Annual Earth Day Festival
on April 20, 2002 from 10:00 am to 4:00 pm, at the Oxbow Eco-Center,
on St. James Drive in Port St. Lucie. .
B. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Parks System Master
Plan Update Workshop on April 23, 2002 at 1:30 pm in the Commission
Chambers.
NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at
these meetings will need a record ofthe proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is
made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals teslifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the
proceedings will be granted the opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request Anyone with a
disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeling should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-
1777 or TTO (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting.
'""
-.",J
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
EROSION DISTRICT
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
John D. Bruhn
District I
Doug Coward
District 2
Paula A. Lewis
District 3
Frannie Hutchinson
District 4
Cliff Barnes
District 5
AGENDA
March 26, 2002
1. MINUTES
Approve the minutes of the meeting held February 26,2002.
2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT
CONSENT AGENDA
1. WARRANTS LISTS
Approve Warrants List No. 21 through No. 25
2. PUBLIC WORKS
Engineering / Beach Inlet Monitoring - Consider staff recommendation to
approve Amendment NO.2 to Work Authorization NO.2 (C-00-12-181) with
Taylor, Engineering, Inc. and authorize the Chairman to execute the amended
work authorization.
NOTICE: All proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board
at these meetings wm need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings
is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the
proceedings will be granted an opportunity to cross-e.xamine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone "ith a
disability requiring accommodation to attend this meering should contact the 51. Lucie County Community Setvices ~Ianager at (561) 462-
1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty,eight(48) hours prior to the meeting.
'-'
....;
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
John D. Bruhn
District 1
Doug Coward
District 2
Paula A. Lewis
District 3
Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes
District 4 District 5
AGENDA
March 26, 2002
1. MINUTES
Approve the minutes of the meeting held February 12, 2002.
2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT
CONSENT AGENDA
1. WARRANTS LISTS
Approve Warrants List No. 20 through 1\0.25.
2. MOSQUITO CONTROL
A. Quality Industries, Inc. Agreement Amendment- Consider staff recommendation
to approve the proposed First Amendment to the February 27,2001 Agreement,
and authorize the Chairman to execute the amendment.
B. Florida Inland Navigation District (FI0JD) Grant - Consider staff recommendation
to approve and' sign the Interlocal Agreement with the Board of County
Commissioners authorizing the i\Iosquito Control District to administer the
grant at Vitolo Family / Middle Con Park.
NOTICE: All proceedings bl'fore this Board are electronically recorded. Any persoD who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will Deed
a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record ofthe proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceediDg~
individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any part)' to the proceedings "ill be grantrd an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testif)'ing during
a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend Ihis meeting should contacl ¡he St. Lucie County Community Services Manager
at (561) 462-1777 or TDL> (561) 462-1428 at least forty·eight(48) hours prior {O the meeting.
'-"
'-'
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ADDITIONS AGENDA
March 26. 2002
Revised 3/25/02
REGULAR AGENDA
COMMUNI1Y DEVELOPMENT
R-A.l Westchester Community Development Districts One through Four / Interlocal
Agreement - Consider staff recommendation to approve the draft Interlocal
Agreement between St. Lucie County and The Westchester Community
Development Districts One through Four for the purpose of addressing
infrastructure improvements at "'Çhe Westchester Development Site.
CONSENT AGENDA
COMMUNI1Y SERVICES
C-A.l Acceptance of Funds / Budget Resolution No. 02-94 - Consider staff
recommendation to approve the budget resolution to accept the funds
remaining from the Community Food and Nutrition (CFN) grant from FYOl in
the amount of $10,000, and authorize the Chairman to sign the necessary
documents.
NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings
will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of
any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted the opportunity to cross-
examine êny individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeling should contact
the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 orTDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eighl(48) hours prior to the meeting.
~
...
.'
"
I'
~
"'"
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
REGULAR MEETING
Date: March 12, 2002
Tape: 1-2
Convened: 9:00 a.m.
Adjourned: 11 :30 a.m.
Commissioners Present Doug Coward, Chairman, Cliff Barnes, Frannie Hutchinson,
Paula A. Lewis, John D. Bruhn
Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator, Robert Bradshaw, Asst. County
Administrator, Dan McIntyre, County Attorney, Paul Phillips, Airport Director, Ray
Wazny, Public Works Director, Jack Southard, 'Public Safety Director, Bill Blazak
Utilities Director, David Rodriguez, Human Services Director, Gayla Barwick, Tourism
Director, Sheriff Mascara, Deputy Murphy, A. Millie Delgado, Deputy Clerk
1. MINUTES (1-028)
It was moved by Com. Bmhn, seconded by Com. Hutchinson, to approve the minutes of
the meeting held March 5, 2002; and, the minutes for the Manatee Protection Plan public
hearing; upon roll call, motion carried unanimously.
2. PROCLAMA TIONSIPRESENT A TIONS
A. Presentation/The Board presented a "Certificate of Appreciation" to
Mr. Ed Croke or his 12 years of service on the Tourist Development
Council.
B. Presentation/Baling Facility- Alex Makled, Larry Adams, and Eric
Grotke of CDM made a presentation to the Board on the Baling
Facility.
3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS
Mr. Sid Vihlcn,Jr. representing Florida Recycling Services, Inc., presented the Board
with a Service Record Report ror the year 2001.
4. CONSENT AGENDA
It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Hutchinson, to approve the Consent
Agenda; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously.
1. WARRANT LIST
The Board approved Warrant List No. 23.
2. PURCHASING
A. Bid No. 02-001/River Branch Estates MSBU Water Main Extension-
The Board approved awarding the bid to the low bidder, Barton
Underground Constmction, Inc., in the amount of $92,981.00 and
authorized the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the
County Attorney.
B. Re-Use Bid No. 00-005/Equipment Request No. 02-199- The Board
approved the re-use bid and equipment request for the purchase of a ,
6X6 Roll Off Tmck Hoist in the amount of$105,948.25.
1
03/08/02
F7.ABWARR
FUND
001
001117
001140
001143 .
001147
001249
001265
001266
001269
001271
001809
101
101002
101003
101006
102
102001
102104
105
107
107001
, "'002
003
115
118
140
140001
160
183
183001
183002
183004
183106
183210
183211
183214
184203
184804
185002
316
316001
382
396
401
418
421
4.11
449
451
458
461
'171
478
479
491
505
505001
61l
625
655
677
678
679
692
693
. .
,
'-'
..,J
ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD
WARRANT LIST #23- 02-MAR-2002 TO 08-MAR-2002
FUND SUMMARY
TITLE
General Fund
FTA 49 USC Sec 5307 9B/99
Section 112/MPO/FHWA FY01/02
Health & Human Srvcs CSBG FY01/02
NOAA/FDCA Adopt-A-Beach
Section 8 Grant FY 99/00
TDC Planning Grant FY01/02
CTO TRIP Grant FY01/02
FDEP-Urban Mobile Lab Grant 01/02
DHR-Historical Museum Grant-In-Aid
SFWMD-Fioridian Aquifer Well 01/04
Transportation Trust Fund
Transportation Trust/80% Constitut
Transportation Trust/Local Option
Transportation Trust/Impact Fees
Unincorporated Services Fund
Drainage Maintenance MSTU
FOOT Bicycle/Pedestria~ Coordinator
Library Special Grants Fund
Fine & Forfeiture Fund
Fine & Forfeiture Fund-Wireless Sur
Fine & Forfeiture Fund-E911 Surchar
Fine & Forfeiture Fund-BOO Mhz Oper
Sheraton Plaza Fund
Paradise Park Fund
Port & Airport Fund
Port Fund
Plan Maintenance RAD Fund
Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir
Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat
Ct Admin.-County Arbitration/Mediat
Ct Admin.- Teen Court
Domestic Relations Hearing FYOO-03
Courts Admin. Civil Traffic Infrac
Civil Traffic Infraction officer st
01/02 OSCA Civil Traffice Infractio
Ft. Pierce Beach Restoration
FIND So. Causeway Shoreline Stabil.
SHIP Housing Assistance FY 01/02
County Capital
Transportation Capital
Environmental Land Capital Fund
Lennard Road 1 - Roadway Capital
Sanitary Landfill Fund
Golf Course Fund
H.E.W. Utilities Fund
North Hutchinson Island Utilities
NHI Util-Renewal & Replacement Fund
NHI Util - Capital Facilities Fund
S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund
SH Util-Renewal & Replacement Fund
Sports Complex Fund
No County Utility District-Operatin
No Cty Util Dist-Renewal & Replace
No Cty Util Dist-Capital Facilities
Building Code Fund
Health Insurance Fund
Property/Casualty Insurance Fund
Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund
Law Library
Insurance Agency Fund
Lost Tree Estates Fund
Anita Street MSBU Fund
Timberlake Estates MSBU
Ideal Holding Road MSBU
Westglen MSBU
GRAND TOTAL:
EXPENSES
231,888.62
42,549.00
402.38
2,299.68
6,689.21
3,129.33
35.99
34,833.60
198.25
197.37
101.80
89,201.59
36,461. 97
1,750.00
3,530.00
10,029.73
714.19
105.01
809.11
3,025,546.21
3,235.45
1,772.23
2,010.97
450.06
723.87
12,013.76
5.33
2,787.93
1,515.55
383.68
175.00
400.04
6,312.48
72.48
13.10
2,014.42
10,344.70
4,779.44
4,419.04
3,855.98
6,997.00
500.00
7,001.10
236,684.04
19,443.03
8.28
53,768.18
66.41
101.22
22,938.01
91.48
31,362.34
772.01
40.06
25.00
2,883.05
21,078.12
392,351.29
414.87
79.18
55,762.09
775.46
1,033.94
4,168.09
2,957.90
4,683.32
4,413,744.02
PAGE
1
PAYROLL
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7,056.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7,056.41
'-'
""""
C.
Bid No. 02-35/Purchase or Pre-Cast Concrete Structures- The Board
approved awarding the bid to the sole bidder, Old Castle Pre-Cast
East, Inc., and authorized the Chairman to sign the contract as
prepared by the County Attorney.
D.
Bid Waiver Sole Source Purchase/Equipment Request No. 02-200-
The Board approved the request for a bid waiver and sole source
contract with Sierra International Machinery, Inc., and approved the
equipment request for the purchase and installation of a MacPresse
Conveyor, and authorized the Chairman to sign the contract as
prepared by the County Attorney.
E.
Bid No. 02-37/Purchase and Installation of Video Production
Equipment- The Board approved awarding the bid to MCSI, Inc., in
the amount of $95,653 approved an additional $4,018 over the
previously approved equipment requests and authorized the Chairman
to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney.
3. PUBLIC WORKS
A. Solid Waste/Glades Road Landfill Stormwater and Landfill Gas
Systems Permit Modification- The Board approved the February 19,
2002 proposal from Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc., I the total amount
of$149,OOO.
B. Code Enforcement/Equipment Request No. 02-202- The Board
approved the equipment request for the purchase of a projector from
CDW-G in the amount of$3,277,14.
C. Grey Twig Lane MSBU/Interlocal Agreement with the City of Port 81.
Lucie to Provide Potable Water- The Board approved the interlocal
agreement and authorized the Chairman to sign the agreement.
D. Sunland Gardens MSBU/Potable Water Improvements - The Board
approved accepting the petition and granted permission to advertise for
the initial public hearing on April 19,2002.
E. Florida Department of Community Affairs Hazard Mitigation Grant
Program- The Board authorized the Chairman to sign the grant
application and maintenance agreement, and authorized submission of
the grant for funds to replace a failing culvert in Lakewood Park that
will protect 225 homes from future flooding.
4. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
A. Simple Success Marketing Invoices- The Board approved payment of
the invoices in the amount of$15,079.70 for the month of February.
B. Westmoreland Park Project- The Board approved the Florida
Communities Trust Conceptual Agreement and authorized the
Chairman to sign the agreement.
5. PARKS AND RECREATION
Equipment Request NO. 02-203- The Board approved canceling Equipment Request
No. 02-081 and approved Equipment Request No. 02-203 for a lane reel for the Port
St. Lucie Pool in the amount of $1,628.
2
'-
...,J
6. COUNTY ATTORNEY
A. Fourth Addendum to Shopping Center Lease at Village Green- The
Board approved the Fourth Addendum and authorized the Chairman to
sign.
B. Company Name Change- The Board approved the company name
change from John Alden Life Insurance Co., to Lincoln Re.
C. Company Name Change- The Board approved the company name
change from McCreary to EM!.
D. Local Option Gas Tax/Amended and Restated Interlocal
Agreement/Correction of Scrivener Errors - The Board authorized the
Chairman to initi8aI the corrections and directed staff to record the
corrected agreement.
7. INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE-
A. Additional ProjectslReallocation of Funds- The Board approved the
additional renovation to the PSL Library and reallocation of remaining
funds for other projects as listed.
B. Reallocation of Funds for Roof Replacement at Rock Road Jail- The
Board approved the reallocation of $400,000 ftom the security system
upgrade and use of these funds for the completion of the roof
replacement at Rock Road Jail and allow staff to use any remaining
funds for jail expansion.
C. Walton Road Annex Building- The Board approved the use of
services of REG Architects for the construction of the building in the
amount of $335,000 and authorized the Chairman to sign the work
authorization as prepared by the County Attorney.
8. PUBLIC SAFETY
A. Amended Work Authorization No.4 (EOC Annex Building) - The
Board approved the amended work authorization for $7,150 and
authorized the Chairman to sign the authorization.
B. Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity- The Board
approved the renewal application for WeCare for a Class F Certificate
of Public Convenience and Necessity.
C. Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity- The Board approved
the renewal application for Able American Jet for a Class E Air
Ambulance Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity.
REGULAR AGENDA
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Resolution No. 02-033- Revised Master Plan for the Port of Ft.
Pierce- Consider staff recommendation to approve the draft resolution
and further recommends that the Board direct staff to initiate the Plan
Amendment process to the County's Comprehensive Plan to provide
for the incorporation of this document into the Local Comprehensive
Plan and that a copy of this Master Plan be sent to the City of Ft.
Pierce.
3
\w
...,
Mr. Bob Benton, Ft. Pierce City Commissioner, addressed the Board regarding policy
1.2.1 where he felt it was too broad and it opens up the cargo operation of the Port.
He felt that they agreed on something and that the wording has been changed and they
should go back to what was agreed upon.
Mr. Dennis Beach, City Manager for the City of Ft. Pierce stated for the record, that staff
has responded to the plan amendments that were sent by the County Administrator and he
alluded to a March 8th letter he sent to the County Administrator. This letter points out
issues the city staff had with the plan as it is currently drafted. (letter attached). He stated
he did not want the BCC to proceed with the idea that they are all in agreement with these
Issues.
Com. Coward commented on what he felt was some internal conflict on what was said at
the joint workshop and what is written in the letter.
Mr. Beach stated the outline of the Port Planning area created an interpretation from
DCA that the City of Ft. Pierce no longer had to include this in their Comprehensive
Plan. They do not agree with this interpretation that is the City Attorney's office does not
agree with this interpretation and this information will be conveyed to the City
Commission at the time they deal with this issue. What they do believe is that, the
interpretation that the County had, has set the stage for not having this as part of the
City'S- Comp Plan. What they are suggesting in this letter is, there are two way to deal
with this, number one is to exclude those properties in the unincorporated county ITom
the port planning, the other is they can add wording to the Comprehensive Plan that states
it will require review and approval for this by the City of Ft. Pierce for amendments and
the Comp Plan itself. Either of these will satisfy staff.
The other issue is the issue of operations and ownership and he thought they had
discussed at the last meeting that St. Lucie County is the authority over the Port, they do
not understand the reasoning for having this in the Comp Plan because it is simply a
statement of fact. Their concern with it being included in the Comp Plan is, that if any
action is taken to change it in the future, it will be interpreted by everyone that it is
inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. These are the concerns staff will be
discussing with the Commission.
Public Comments
John Arena, Ft. Pierce resident addressed the Board with his recommended changes.
Mr. Gerald Ward, Marine Industry of the Treasure Coast, addressed the Board and stated
he concurred with Mr. Benton. Mr. Ward suggested the term "eco-tourism" be change to
reflect strictly "tourism" and also the term "retro-fitting" was too harsh a term to be
utilized in the document. He suggested going back to the original language.
Mr. Lloyd Bell, Port Property Owner, addressed the Board and stated his objection to the
proposed plan by the Community Development Director and the manner in which it was
produced. He stated he is in favor of using the MegaYachts as a base tenant at the Port
and hc felt it would bring in a great deal of prestige and meaningful employment to the
County. He is not in favor however, of the manner in which Lursen turned over the
negotiations to Berger Yacht.
Mr. Bell stated the Merley report was not prepared properly and he wanted this on record.
Mr. Charles Grande, Hutchinson Island resident, addressed the Board and stated he was
surprised with Mr. Bell's comments since he had attended all the meetings and did have
an opportunity to comment on the process.
Mr. Grande requested 1.2.2 be deleted since he felt it did not serve a purpose. Also, he
requested the term" interested parties" be placed back into the document.
4
\wi
....,
Mr. John Ferrick, North Fork Homeowners Association, addressed the Board regarding
policy 1.2.1. Mr. Ferrick stated that as a member of the Port Charette, they had
discussed North of Taylor Creek, however, in the final product as he remembers it,
include this as part of the Port Charette.
Mr. Bill Hearn, lndrio Road resident, addressed the Mega Yacht and air borne particles.
He also expressed his concerns with Policy 1.2.1. and the term" limited cargo". He felt
this was totally in conflict with the environmental portion of the plan. In his mind, the
term "limited" is relative and is up to interpretation. He suggested eliminating this
policy, since it is covered in 2.1.2.
Mr. Dan Conroy, South Beach Homeowners Association, addressed the Board regarding
2.5.1. This is regarding port security. He stated this policy was narrow in scope. They
suggested right after the sentence, "consistent with existing law" the language be added, "
and the prevailing threat level".
Mr. Scott Ryles, President of the Ft. Pierce Sport Fishing Club, addressed the Board and
stated he does agree with the past speakers that they need to eliminate some of the
language. He believed the tcrm "interested parties" should be re-inserted. He also
I:onl:urs that policy 1.2.1 needs 10 he deleted.
He asked the plan be modified according the previously made comments.
Com. '- Coward stated that there was a 1 % endorsement to put in the language
"justification of the existing cargo area" etc., policy 2.12.
Ms. Jean Hearn stated she agreed that there needed to be some "tweeking" on 1.2.1 and
in her opinion, leaving out the last five words, she believes it would make a better
comfort zone for the enlarged area 01' Port operations, she does not believe the Board or
the citizens have shown that they are for expanding cargo.
Mr. David Tillman, Ft. Pierce commented on the fact that he felt there was language
which will open a back door or worse open the front door for things that are not wanted
in the community. He would like to see the language limited.
Com. Barnes stated the document can be changed in the future and it is useless except to
proceed with legal means required by the State. They need to pay more attention to who
is managing the Port area. The main thing is what they do there not what they say they
will do.
Com. Hutchinson concurred with Com. Barnes. The bottom line is to accomplish the
dreams and the issues and ifthey keep going back and forth, it will never happen.
Com. Bruhn stated he was not interested in having another governmental entity
controlling what the BCC does.
It was the consensus of the Board to insert the language, "the Port of Ft,.Pierce will
eonlinue 10 supporl limited cargo operations as described in policy 2.12.
Com. Coward reviewed additional concerns and suggested changes.
The County Attorney suggested the term "interested parties" be inserted where the term
"private sector" appears on page 3.
Com. Lewis suggested the term" ensure" be changed on page 6. policy 2.51
The County Attorney suggested it read "shaH use its best efforts ".
The Board continued to direct changes to staff.
5
"
\.w.
1~:09 5E14Sì32;c
,
,
...,;
03í08/2UJ¡
""AYORCI T,\-':."'::"'Hl::;=':P
F'A~::: -:::
i
CITY ~f ORï PIERC~
/ !or¡Je?
...
c
.'
--
./ -.
--.".....: ,
OFFICE oF THE CITY M.o\NAGER
CITY HALL. 100 NORTH U.S. 1
~ O. BOX 14$0
FOClT PIERCE. FLORIDA 34954.14!!O
I
I
z"fuch 8, i2002
I·
I
¡
I
1\.1r. Douglas M. Anderson
Administrator
,
Saint Lucie County
2300 Virgwa Avenue
Fort Pierc.e, FL 34982
!
TEL. (591) 45Q.22CoJ
FAX (561) 467-92ò4
/
"'l:.. ~
RE: Port M",ter Plan
I .
Dear ?-.1[.Ander$On:
I
The foUo~ving represents City staff's comments on the proposed Port Master Plan scheduled for
cOl1!iidera;tíon during your March 12,2002 Cormnission meeting.
! .
The conqras expr~ssed during OUT join1 wOTkshop on February '19, 2002 re1atiog to Goa11 do not
appear to'have been addrcssed. The current wording ofGoa11 is a statement offact regardless of
whether Ór not it is part of the Master Plan. Our conc¢m is if you include the lan,gusse as it is
written, ky attempts made by the City to change responsibility for the Port would be determined
to be inc9nsistent with the Comp Pl&.t\ thereby making tht proposal ineligible for State fundi.¡\E
sources. ¡
i
Our propps¢d lan~'1Jage fo~ Goall is "The management of the Port of Fort Pierce should be in th~
public int~rest".
i
I
Objectivej 1,1 should read 'íhe Port of Fort Pierce should insure that the public interest I\Ild quality
ofJife Î3 P,f0tected when exercising public control of Port property".
! ~
Policy 1. f 1 sbould read "All option!: for the management Md OPCfé!.tions of the Port of Fort Pierc~
shall be e.Wlored". These discussions sha.H take place prior to DeC<!D:!bu 2004 through oither Ð. ta.>k
force or j?i(lt workshop of the elected officials."
I
,
I
-"
.
83/\J8/2~'.." 1 ~: Ð9,",,5El~f,7'325:'
I
I
¡
" Mr. DO) as M. Anderson
Mllfch 8,~002
Page 2
. . . J.".-::IT'i~"N!\GER
...,
_ 82
=
I
Poli,y 1. f.5 ,howd b, ddctod in it> ,"","<y.
Objectiv~ 1.2 should read "The Port of Fort Pime shall establish a genera.! Port Ple.nnlng Area
boundary AIld a Port Operations Area boundary complet:lywi-thin the City limits effort Pierce". The
ba]ance 6f objectiyc 1.2 should be eliminated.
Our coJrn '....ith including pa.rts ofunincorporë.ted County as part of the deep wa!er port relatos to
tho jnt~rc:-taûon of law indicating that tJ)¢ Master Plan ,will no longer require City efFort Pierc<,
apprOya.]i We d¡¡:.agree with that interpretation, howC"{er,it ",-ill become a moot issue i:fthc County
agrees to ít1clude languag~ within the Master pla,¡¡ ¿ocume-nt that the CityofFort Pierce must approve
and adop~ the Plan. 1h~ Ci1y i5 willing to cOtlSider ~eeing to unincorpora.ted areas being inoluded
65 part 0lthe Port if the County \>1111 include thh !:u¡guagc in tbe .Master Plan.
I
The balarjcc ofthc Plan appears acceptable to Cit)' staff. Wrth these minor changc:s. we will bo able
to avoi~ pot~tia1 challenges to the Plan wii:!:, in our j11dgment will compliCé..te oilier issues
important to both Saint Lucie County I'J1d Fort P¡~ce.
¡
If I c8.'n p~ovide edditioncl inforrnation. ple.\S¢ d.'¡3:.
I
SinCerelY!
~td~
DelUJis "f. B~h
City :Ma.nager
I
DWB~
I
,
I
c¢: Mayor and Members of Cit)' COn:J1IÜssio:!
rvbbers Of Saint Lucie Count\' Cotn.-rùi:oo
I .
I
!
"
~_,._.i"_
~/
83!\)8/2!JJ'L 14 09 \...sE14Sï'32õC
1/AYORCI TY:....,ðN~S::::R
...."
PAGE: ~:
~ I T Y ~F ~ R T PIER ~ ß
! foriJa
I
~ ...
c
--
" --
~,
,
,
OFFICE oF THE CITY MANAGER
CITY HALL, 100 NOATH U.S. 1
F;!O. BOX 14$0
FORT PIERCE. FLORIDA 34954-1480
I
I
z"w-ch 8.'2002
.
I
¡
I
Mr. Douglas M. Anderson
Administrator
I
S3.Ínt Lucie County
2300 Virgwa Avenue
Fort Pierc-e, FL 34982
!
,
RE: Port Master Plan
I .
Dear Mr.Anderson:
'. I
,
TI\e foUo}ving represents City staff's comments on t.ì:1e proposed Port Master Plan scheduled for
consideralion during your March 12, 2002 Commission meeting.
! .
The con~rns expn~ssed during OUf jO!rrt workshop on February' 19, 2002 re1atiug to Go811 do not
appear to'have been addressed. The current wording ofGoaJ I is a statement off act regardless of
whether Ór not it is part of the Master Plan. Our conc,~ is if you include the languAge as it is
v,Titten, ky attempts made by the City to change responsibility for the Port wou1d be determined
to be inc6nsistent with the Camp Plan, thereby mAking the píOposaJ ineligible for Stale fundi¡1£
sources. I
i
Our proppsed Inng1Jage fo:- Goall is "The management of the Port of Fort Pierce should be in the
public in1trest".
i
Objective: 1.1 should read "The Port of Fort Pierce should insure that the public intere~ and quality
of life Í3 proteéted when exercising public control of Port property".
¡ ,
Policy 1, (1 should read "All option!: for the management and operations ofthe Port ofF ort Pierce
shall be e.Xp[ored". These dÎ5cussions shall take place prior to Decembu 2004 through either e. te.>k
force or j?i(lt workshop of the elected officials."
!
i
TEL. (561) 46D·22CoJ
FAX (561) 457-92~
. I
"
"p. /
"
,
Ei3/08/2tl~.. 14: 0'3'-' 5El~E,792E,~
I
i
,. Mr. DO) as M. Anderson
March 8,~002
Page 2
.. _ :'J.:;,:ITY"t:;·~!.\GER
'-'
I ~. ~_ f.J2
;::
I
Poli", I.f.5 ,howd b, dol""" Ut it, "ÛRIy.
Objectiv4 1.2 should read "Thl' Port of Fort Pi~::e s~ e-stablish a general Port Pl8DI1ing Ar~
boundary Md a Port Operations ArCA boundary comp1ct:lywithin the City limits ofFort Pierce". The
balance df objective 1.2 should be eliminated.
OUr' coJrn 'h;th including pal1S ofunincorpolë.ted County as part of the deep w~er port relates to
the interyre-tation of law indicating that the r-..faster Phn Will no longer require crt)' of Fort Pierce
~ppro'itùi We disagree with that interpretation, ho"i'i~{c:r, h ....i.I1 become a moot isruc if the County
a.grees to include languagë within the Master Pia:! è,ocument that tbe City ofFort Pierce must approve
and adop~ the Plan. The City i5 williug to con.side-r ~eeing to unincorporated areas being inoluded
ôs part 0ithe Port if the C.ountY'WIll indude this I~¿ge in the MEster Plan.
I
The bnIa.rjee of the Plan appears acceptab!e to City staff. Wrth these minor change:s, we win bo able
to avoi~ pot~tiaI challenges to the Plan wblch. in our judgment will complic¿¡e oilier issues
important to both Saint Lucie County end Fort P¡~':e.
¡
If! ~ ptovide additioI1El infOl1t'.ation., pleASe ai·.i,~.
I
SinCerely!
~f4!~
DelUlis ~. Beach
City Manager
I
DWB~
I
,
cc: Mayor and Members of Cit)' Corrunissio;¡
~bers of Saint Lucie Count'.' ~Oil
I .
I
:
'-'
-...J
The Board discussed 7.1.1 regarding the upland spoil site. At this time was has not been
a consensus for a pennanent spoil site.
The Board reviewed the City ofFt. Pierce letter trom the City Manager.
The County Attorney stated that there was not a problem with what the City is suggesting
on goal 1, the County still manages the Port by law.
Com. Hutchinson suggested leaving it as written.
Com. Lewis stated she did not have a problem with removing the statement.
Com. Bruhn stated he would leave it as is.
Com. Coward stated he concurred with leaving it as is.
Com. Barnes stated he did not have a problem with removing it.
Consensus 3 to 2 to leave the language as written.
It was~moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve Resolution No. 02-
033 with noted changes; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously.
ú. ADMINISTRA nON (2-640)
A. Request for Qualifications and Proposals- Consider staff
recommendation to grant pennission to advertise for the development
of the Port ofFt. Pierce.
Mr. Lloyd Bell, Port property owner, advised the Board of his concurrence with what the
County Administrator is recommending.
It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve staff
recommendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously.
B. Bi-Weekly Committee Reports- The Board gave updates on the
various committees and boards that they serve on.
C. The City of Fort Pierce's Proposed Annexation ofthe St. Lucie County
International Airport- Consider staff recommendation that the County
send a response letter to the City of Fort Pierce's March 6, 2002 letter
commcnting on the proposed Joint Planning Agreement betweén the
City ofFt. Pierce and St. Lucie County, prepared by the County.
Com. Bruhn stated the city needs to follow the annexation law and does not agree with
how they are selecting areas.
Com. Barnes stated he was not willing to go to court over this issue and does not want to
hurt the county's relationship with the city especially since a prior Board had approved
the annexation agreement.
Com. Coward stated he was aware of the agreement signed by a previous Board in 1989,
however, the city needs to work with the county and the annexation should be done
according to state law.
ú
'-'
.J
Com. Lewis stated she was concerned with the "good faith issue" and the actions being
taken does not coincide with the legal conflict resolution process being undertaken at this
moment
It was moved by Com. Hutchinson, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve staff
recommendation; and, upon roll call, the vote was as follows: Nay: Barnes; Aye's:
Bruhn, Lewis, Hutchinson, Coward; motion carried by a vote of 4 to 1.
RA-l COUNTY ATTORNEY (2-1757)
City of Ft. Pierce Annex ati ons/ Ordinances K 129-137- Consider staff
recommendation that the Board determine whether to authorize the County Attorney to
file a Petition for Writ of Certiorari challenging the adoption of Ordinances K 129-134.
It was moved by Com. Hutchinson, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve staff
recommendation to authorize the County Attorney to file the Petition; and, upon roll call,
the vote was as follows: Nay's: Barnes, Coward; Aye's: Lewis, Bruhn, Hutchinson;
motion carried by a vote of 3 to 2.
Com. Bruhn requested the Board ratify his appointment of Doug Skidmore to the Code
Enforcement Board.
It wa!s moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Lewis, to ratify Com. Bruhn's
appointment; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously.
There being no further business to be brought before the Board, the meeting was
adjourned.
Chairman
Clerk of Circuit Court
7
....
"WI
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Sandra Bogan
Diane Turner
3/13/02 1 :43PM
Announcement on Board Agenda
If I'd like to include an announcement about Earth Day on the board agenda, do i just send it to you, or is
there an official form I need to fill out? Essentially, this is what it will be:
The Oxbow Eco-Center is holding its Second Annual Earth Day Festival on April 20 from 10:00 a.m. till
4:00 p.m.
~
""
,....,
AGENDA REOUEST
ITEM NO. ~ A
DATE: March 26, 2002
REGULAR [X]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [ ]
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY:
SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney
Daniel S. McIntyre
County Attorney
SUBJECT:
Resolution No. 02-92 - Proclaiming Saturday, April 20, 2002, as "Special Olympics Florida Law Enforcement
Torch Run Day" in St. Lucie County, Florida.
BACKGROUND:
Kelly L. Monahan, Supervisor II, Special Olympics, through Pete Keogh, Director of Parks & Recreation, has
requested that a resolution be drafted proclaiming Saturday, April 20, 2002 as Special Olympics Florida Law
Enforcement Torch Run Day in St. Lucie County, Florida. The attached Resolution has been drafted for that
purpose.
PREVIOUS ACTION:
RECOMMENDA TION:
Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution No. 02-92 as drafted.
COMMISSION ACTION:
--'
Pc] APPROVED [] DENIED
[ ] OTHER:
County Attorney:
~
Review and Approvals
Management & Budget
Purchasing
Originating Dept.
Other:
Other:
Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable)___
Eff. 5/96
'-'
....,
,
RESOLUTION NO. 02-92
A RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING SATURDAY,
APRIL 20, 2002, AS "SPECIAL OLYMPICS
FLORIDA LAW ENFORCEMENT TORCH
RUN DAY" IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY,
FLORIDA
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made
the following determinations:
1. The Florida Law Enforcement Torch Run is celebrating it's 25th Anniversary. The Torch
Run is the premier event sponsored by the Law Enforcement community to raise awareness and
generate funds for Special Olympics.
2. Each year over 3,000 officers join Special Olympics athletes to carry the "Flame of Hope"
on a 2,000 mile relay through more than 60 counties in Florida.
3. The Torch will be passed onto St. Lucie County Law Enforcement officers by Martin
County Law Enforcement Officers on Friday, April 19 , 2002. Before passing the Torch onto Indian
River County, we will hold a benefit to help support all three Special Olympics County Programs.
4. On Saturday, April 20, 2002, there will be a Law Enforcement Paint Ball competition at
Lawnwood Stadium. All Law Enforcement Agencies from the three Counties will be invited to
compete and demonstrate their services.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners ofSt.
Lucie County, Florida:
1. This Board does hereby proclaim Saturday, April 20, 2002 as "SPECIAL OLYMPICS
FLORIDA LAW ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN DAY" in St. Lucie County, Florida.
2. This Board urges the citizens of St. Lucie County to participate in this worthwhile event.
\r
...,
Memo J
t.~ .q\ \ }' fð ¡J iN'
~~F~ ,~ ~,n V I /1 "
§pecialOlympics rJ u OV 1/(,;
Florida rì ,,,/ V
St. Lucie County \J I G
//) 'i lP
flY
,-,,' ,~/ /) (\./
\", ~-\
/\,1'
/í
To:
Through:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Doug Anderson, County Administrator
Pete Keogh, Director, Parks & Recreation
Kelly L Monahan, Supervisor II, Special Olympics ~~\.
2/28/02
Proclamation
"The Florida Law Enforcement Torch Run" is celebrating it's 25th anniversary. The
Torch Run is the premier event sponsored by the Law Enforcement community to raise
awareness and generate funds for Special Olympics. Each year over 3000 officers join
Special Olympics athletes to carry the ·Flame of Hope· on a 2000 mile relay through
more than 60 counties in Florida.
The Torch will be passed onto St. Lucie County Law Enforcement officers by Martin
County Law Enforcement Officers on Friday, April 19 ,2002. Before passing the Torch
onto Indian River County, we will hold a benefit to help support all three Special
Olympics County Programs.
On Saturday, April 20, 2002, there will be a Law Enforcement Paint Ball competition
at Lawnwood Stadium. All Law Enforcement Agencies from the three Counties will be
invited to compete and demonstrate their services.
I would like to request a proclamation declaring Saturday, April 20,2002 as ·Special
Olympics Florida Law Enforcement Torch Run Day·
If you need any further information, please do not hesitate to contact me at
extension 1683.
MAR 0 1 ¡nOl ~
co. ADMIN. OFFICE
KATuL BASILE
Executi~~ector
250 NW Country Club Drive
Suite 240
Port 51. Lucie. FL 34986
Tel: 561.462.2143 Fax: 561.462.2134
website: www.cscslc,org
e-mail: kbasile@tctg.com
,
, Council M~~bers
· Five community . Five community
positions residents appointed
by the Governor
· Kathryn Hensley,
School Brd Rep.
· Paula Lewis,
BOCC
· Vern Melvin,
DCF Dist. Admin
· Scott Kenney,
Juvenile Judge
· Dr. William Vogel,
Superintendent of
Schools
· Corinne Behncke
· Dr. Beth Gessner
· Marilyn Lawless
· R. Duke Nelson
· Garry Wilson
~:LB - l1-V¡f~i07V
Children's Services
Council - St. Lucie
· Independent taxing district
· Plan, fund and coordinate
new & expanded services for
children & their families
· Established by public
referendum October 1990
Children's Services
Mission & Vision
,
· Guided by our mission to
improve the quality of life for
all children in St Lucie
County
· Children's Services fundsr
advocatesr and creates
opportunities for results-
oriented programs and
initiatives for our children
and community
1
"-'
Children's Services
'i. Funding Priorities
. T Pmmoti"9 h","y "m;I~·'" "'bl5 &
toddlers by providing prenatal education
and programs to provide for optimal
brain functioning by age 3
· Promoting school readiness by providing
enrichment opportunities for all children
3 to 5 years old
· Promoting school success by providing
programs that support and educate
parents and encourage academic
achievement for children
· Promoting healthy lifestyles by providing
programs to strengthen children's
resiliency to meet the challenges of life
through programs for both the physical
and mental health of children
, Program~_Budget
· For FY 2001-02 CSC funds 31
programs for $1,994,500
· CSC provides $600,953 in Matching
Funds to draw down even greater
funding for Healthy Kids, Healthy
Families, Youth Intervention, &
School Readiness Coalition
· Other Allocations for program
support, enhancement and training
amount to $315,301
· PROGRAM ALLOCATIONS
FOR FY 2001-02
TOTAL $2,910,754
....,
Comprehensive
Strategy
. Children's Services as one of the
20 members of the Shared
Services Network Executive
Roundtable supports the
comprehensive strategy ''St.
Lucie Hand-In-Hand"
. Priority Risk Factors addressed in
this effort for community change
· Low Neighborhood Attachment &
Community Disorganization
· Poor Family Management
· Academic Failure Beginning in
Elementary School
· Early & Persistent Antisocial
Behavior
,
Profile of
Children and
Families in St.
Lucie County
Executive Summary
2
",-,.
About the Report
. To better plan for future services
and programs within the county,
the CSC contracted with MGT of
America, Inc., and Sun belt
Research Associates, Inc., To
conduct a comprehensive
community needs assessment.
. Specifically, the CSC was
interested in examining the status
of the children and their families in
terms of indicators of well-being,
the location of current services for
children, and whether gaps existed
in services in terms of geographic
location or age group.
,
Profile
Topic Areas
· Family Life
· Health
· Safety and Security
· Education
.....,
Sources of Data
Qualitative and
Quantitative
· Collected from 15 state
and local agencies
· Six focus groups including
parents and providers
· Telephone interviews with
over 400 residents
· Service provider surveys
· Personal interviews with
key stakeholders
· 3 Peer Counties -
Charlotte, Manatee, Polk
Indicator
, Background
. Family Life
· Income
· Employment
· Mobility
· Divorce
· Child Care
· After school programs for
younger children
· After school programs for
older children
3
'-'
Indicator
Background
. Health
· Prenatal Care
· Newborn health
· Mothers' education
· Infant deaths
· Child deaths
· Preventive health
· Teen pregnancy
· Substance abuse
Indicator
, Background
. Education
· School readiness
· School attendance
· Discipline
· Retention
· Parents' rating of programs
· Academic achievement
· Graduation rate
,...,
Indicator
Background
. Safety & Security
· Child abuse and domestic
violence
· Neighborhood violence
· Violence in school
· Delinquency
· Accidental deaths
What Parents and the
Community Tell Us
Prevalent Issues
. Family Life
· Financial stress
· Parenting Skills
· Recreation
Facilities/Programs
· Child Care
. Health
· Access to quality health
care
· Availability and Cost
· Prenatal Care
4
""
What Parents and the
Community Tell Us
. Safety
· Safety during the day
· Crime, drugs, &.
violence
. Education
· School violence
· Lack of discipline
· Crowded classrooms
· Busing
Recommendation 1
Establish Performance Measures and
Targets Based on Trend Data and
Performance Against Community
Benchmarks
. Issue: There are numerous performance
measures that are appropriate to examine as
a profile of children and families. However,
performance improvement,. to be effective
within the context of limited time and
resources, must target the most critical areas.
. Recommendation: Establish
performance measures and targets, for the
next two to three years and beyond, that
address the areas where county rates are
trending in a negative direction and where the
county presently compares unfavorably to the
state rate and peer counties.
.....,
Recommendation
Development
. The recommendations represent
an analysis and synthesis of:
· Comparison of county performance to
state and benchmark counties on
indicators relating to quality of life as
well as risk factors.
· Findings from focus group discussions
with community leaders and parents
of children in each of the three age
groups studied,
· Findings from telephone surveys to a
cross-section of community residents,
representing all race/ethnic groups
and geographic areas,
· Interviews with key stakeholders in
the community,
· Findings from the provider survey.
ST. LUCIE PERFORMANCE
Favorably To Peer Counties
Favorably To Florida
Family Life
· Student Population Stability
Health
· Very Low Birth Weight
· Infant Mortality
· Kindergarten Immunizations
· Health Coverage (KidCare Enrollment)
· Births to Teens 10-14
Safety and Security
· Property Crimes
· Crime and Violence Among High
School Students
Education
· HS Graduation Rate
· HS Dropout Rate
5
'-"
....,
ST. LUCIE PERFORMANCE
Unfavorably To Peer Counties
Favorably To Florida
Family Life
· Dissolution of Marriage
Health
· Low Birth Weight
· WIC Participation
Safety and Security
· Violent Crimes
· Motor Vehicle-Related Deaths
· Youth Transfers to Adult Court
Education
· FCA T - Fifth Grade Mathematics
ST. LUCIE PERFORMANCE
Favorably To Peer Counties
Unfavorably To Florida
Family Life
· None
Health
· Late or No Prenatal Care
· Mothers with Less Than Tenth
Grade Education
· Births to teens 15-1 9
Safety and Security
· Child Abuse or Neglect (0-17)
· Domestic Violence
Education
· None
ST. LUCIE PERFORMANCE
Unfavorably To Peer Counties
Unfavorably To Florida
Family Life
· Per Capita Income
· Children under 18 in poverty
· Unemployment Rate
· Median Household Income
· Free/Reduced-Price Lunch Eligibility
Health
· Substance Exposed Infants
· Mothers with Less Than High School
Education
· Child Deaths
· Reported AIDS Cases
· Alcohol use by Early and Older
Adolescents
· Marijuana use by Early and Older
Adolescents
· Illicit Drug use by Early and Older
Adolescents
ST. LUCIE PERFORMANCE
Unfavorably To Peer Counties
Unfavorably To Florida
Safety and Security
· Youth Referred to DJJ
· Youth Committed to DJJ
· Deaths from Unintentional Injuries
Education
· FCAT - Fourth Grade Reading
· Absentee Rates for Elementary,
Middle School and High School
Students
· FCAT - Eighth Grade Reading and
Mathematics
· FCAT - Tenth Grade Reading and
Mathematics
· HSCT - Mathematics and
Communications
· Disciplinary referrals and suspensions
for elementary and middle school
(based on trend)
6
'-'"
....,
Recommendation 2:
Emphasize Role of CSC
for Advocacy
. ssue: As the sanctioned advocate for
hildren's issues in the county, the
Council has a unique contribution to
make in planning county services.
. Recommendation: The Council should
continue their efforts to take a high
profile role in presenting the needs of
children and their families to city and
county commissioners and state
administrators, and work with these
officials to address the needs identified
in this study. The Council also should
work with its partners in the Alliance of
Okeechobee and the Treasure Coast to
respond to privatization initiatives by
tailoring a plan that is responsive to the
community's and region's specific
needs.
Recommendation 3:
Address Population Growth
In The Port St. Lucie Area
. Issue: Given the population growth
over the past decade, the number
of children in Port St. Lucie is now
about equal to the number in Ft.
Pierce and the unincorporated
areas combined. The majority of
services, however, are located in
Ft. Pierce.
. Recommendation: In making
decisions about expanding or
relocating services, the large
growth in the child and family
population in the Port. St. Lucie
area should be considered.
CSC Serves the
Entire County
St. Lucie County
Population
,
. The CSC is attempting to
address the growing needs of
PSL, while continuing to serve
the entire County
· Programs are necessary to selVe
the 43,000 + children ages 0 -17
in St. Lucie County
· Parents and neighborhoods are in
need of programs and resources
to help their children grow in a
positive manner
· Community resources need
continued enhancement
Ages PSL FtP Un- County
Incorp. Total
Areas
All ages 88,769 37,516 66,410 192,695
Adults 67,184 27,313 54,615 149,112
(18 and
over)
Children 21,585 10,203 11,795 43,583
(17 & 24% 27% 17.8% 22.6%
younger)
7
'-"
St. Lucie County's
" Families
Households Port St. Ft. Pierce Total
Lucie County
Family 24,943 24,840 54,258
With children 10,008 9,606 20,218
under 18
Married Couples 7,393 5,714 13,562
Single Parent 2,615 3,892 6,656
Female 1,889 3,037 5,015
Male 726 855 1,641
Household data From 2000 Census
Recommendation 4:
Improve Communication
,. ::n~::::::::rn
provider agencies within
communities is a problem that was
voiced by several providers.
. Recommendation: The Council
should help establish a better link
between provider groups that will
ultimately lead to improved use of
services by families and children.
'-'
St. Lucie County
Populations at Risk
PSL FtP County
Youth referred 67346.5% 753 52% 1,446
to DJJ 99-00 2M-4I"Zlp highest zip code
codes
Pop. at 100 % 15.86% 23.11% 17.9%
Poverty 1998
1998% Under 43.51% 45.60% 43.38%
200% Poverty
WIC Oto 5 1,632 3,064 4,671
Pregnant 289 541 830
Growth since 400+
April 2001
Data from DJJ And St. Lucie County Health Dept
Recommendation 5:
Expand Transportation
, Services f . .
. Issue: Lack 0 transportation IS a
core issue for many of St. Lucie
County's neediest residents.
. Recommendation: The Council
should join with the cities' and
counties' leadership to actively
support the efforts of the
Metropolitan Planning Organization
to generate creative strategies to
address the current limitations in
county transportation services.
8
~
.....,
Recommendation 6:
Enhance Parenting Skills and
Conflict Resolution Strategies.
Recommendation 7:
Expand Specific Health
Care Services
. Issue: A commonly held view
among those interviewed is that
more and more parents are ill
equipped to raise children.
Indicator data suggest that many
families have significant handicaps
as it relates to parenting, including
the stress associated with low
income and unemployment, and
mothers with limited education.
. Issue: Community stakeholders
reported serious gaps in health services
for the residents of St. Lucie County
who cannot afford unsubsidized medical
care and are not eligible for existing
programs. Parents underscored the
need for expanded health and dental
services.
. Recommendation: The Council
should expand programs that reach
out to parents to aid them in the
raising of their children.
. Recommendation: The County Health
Department, with appropriate
community partners, should initiate a
countywide dialogue with medical
professionals to identify the most
appropriate solution to gaps in medical
service.
Recommendation 8:
Expand Mental Health
Services
Recommendation 9:
Expand Sports and
Recreational Activities
sue: In interviews, isolàtion and limited
cial outlets were reported as issues for both
young and older teens. For some teens,
substance use and delinquency offenses are a
means of alleviating boredom and stress.
Rates for substance use as well as referrals for
delinquency offenses are higher among st.
Lucie County teens than for the state or peer
counties. Expanded sports and recreational
activities for middle and high school students
may help to address these issues.
Issue: A critical deficit in current
services identified by residents and
providers alike was limited
availability of mental health
services.
. Recommendation: The Department
of Children and Families and the
Agency for Health Care
Administration should work with
community funders to expand
access to and breadth of mental
health services for the residents of
St. Lucie County.
. Recommendation: The Council should expand
collaboration with county leaders to facilitate
planning with school administrators, city and
county recreation personnel, and
administrators of community-based recreation
and character building programs to identify
character building activities that match teens'
needs and interests and are available to all
income levels.
9
.
~
Sports & Recreation
Opportunities
· CSC funds Boys & Girls Club,
YMCA, and thirteen computer
labs in Ft. Pierce and Port St.
Lucie
· CSC has funded six neighborhood
improvement projects from
Lakewood Park to Park Edge
· CSC has partnered with the
County for batting cages, soccer
fields, Cultural Affairs, and the
Smithsonian classroom
Recommendation 11: Develop
Improved Response to
Excessive Absentee Rates and
School Discipline Problems
Issue: Achievement rates in St. Lucie
County are below the state rate and the
rates in peer counties for almost all levels.
Success in school is related to consistent
attendance and attention/cooperation in
the classroom. Negative indicators are
absentee rates and discipline problems.
Absentee rates in St. Lucie County are
improving but remain higher than the state
rate and the rate in peer counties.
Additionally, trend data document that
disciplinary issues at the elementary and
middle school level, especially involving
fighting, are on the Increase. Among
parents interviewed, safety and security in
schools was expressed as a concern.
'--'
Recommendation 10:
Expand Availability of High
Quality Early Care and
Education Pro rë:!ms
Issue: Many three and four year old
children in the county do not have access
to high quality early care and education
programs, including Prekindergarten
programs, as evidenced by the fact that
one-fourth of the entering Kindergarten
students were assessed as not ready for
school. Parents and community
stakeholders echoed the need for
affordable, high quality early care and
ed ucation.
. Recommendation: The School Readiness
Coalition of St. Lucie County should work
with community partners to identify
funding enhancements for the present
child care and Prekindergarten programs
and continue efforts to expand Gold Seal-
level child care.
Recommendation 11: Develop
Improved Response to
Excessive Absentee Rates and
School Discipline Problems
Recommendation: The St. Lucie
County School Board, in
collaboration with the Council and
the Shared Services Network,
should establish a work group to
further examine the extent and
nature of attendance and school
discipline problems. In addition, the
workgroup should review and
update policies and practices
relating to attendance and
disciplinary management in schools
and communication efforts with the
public regarding the actual state of
the schools. The results of the
review should be used to update
policies and improve practices.
10
'-"
,
Community Needs,
Community Response
· There is no one priority need
· There is no one primary
reason for the problems
· There is no one perfect
answer
· There is no one entity that
can provide the answers
· It will take the community,
professionals, volunteers, &
families, to provide the
solutions
,
CSC Web page
www.cscslc.org
CSCSLC Home
II¡ if II¡ =.. II¡ =. II¡ -II¡ ="II¡ 11:
'"
~
~
1'11:""=_
,....-.....
.,,-':10.
r..\IO"~"'''
--
-
-
~~=.
-:,~:-
......-.......
...,,-
.
-
~"~
..
Cmt~
~
.........
....,
What Can We Do?
· Continue to collaborate
· Address the Priority Risk
Factors of the
Comprehensive Strategy
· Share our talents and pool
our resources
· Remember that by working
together we can "improve
the quality of life for all
children in St. Lucie
County".
11
l.
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Sandra Butler <sbutler@tcjobs.org>
"'douga@stlucieco.gov'" <douga@stlucieco.gov>
3/7/023:41PM
Annual Presentation
Hi, I have not seen a reply from my previous email request for your
assistance in setting up a meeting per the attached email. Can you help us?
Thank you for your help!! 3> \11 ( (, ..........
/ì Ii:,
Y f ¡,,>'" pt/>
Sandi Butler
Workforce Development Board of the Treasure Coast
Region 20
561-335-3030
561-335-0677
mailto: Sbutler@tcjobs.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sandra Butler
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:20 PM
> To: 'douga@stlucieco.gov'
> Subject: Annual Presentation
>
> Dear Mr. Anderson,
>
> I am writing to set up our annual presentation to the BOCC by our
> PresidenUCEO, Nan Griggs. Ms. Griggs gives a presentation on an annual
> basis to the Commission on workforce issues in our county, and hears any
> concerns, needs and/or suggestions from the Commissioners regarding this
> topic. She would need approximately an hour for presentation and
> question/answer time.
>
> We are hoping to schedule the presentation sometime early in March. Would
> you be so kind as to check the Commissions calendar, and get back to me
> with some possible times and dates?
>
> Your assistance with this meeting is greatly appreciated.
>
>
>
> Sandi Butler
> Workforce Development Board of the Treasure Coast
> (561) 335-3030
> (561) 335-0677 Fax
> mailto:sbutler@tcjobs.org
>
/
~~
v
¡~~
r
;J"j
.~.
\~
\<
~
"-'
AGENDA REQUEST
ITEM NO: Consent Additions C - f} I
DATE:
March 26, 2002
Regular [ ]
Public Hearing [
Consent [ X ]
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIO~""ERS
PRESENTED BY: Beth Ryder, Directo¢
SUBMITTED BY: Community Services
SUBJECT: Acceptance of funds remaining from the Community Food and Nutrition (CFN) grant from
FYOl in the amount of $10,000.
BACKGROUND: On March 7, 2002 the Florida Association for Community Action, Inc. notified us that
funds were remaining from the CFN grant and must be expended by March 22, 2002. Staff responded to
the announcement with a proposal to provide food vouchers with the grant funds. The deadline for
expending the funds was extended to March 29, 2002 because the agency was unable to award funds until
'larch 21, 2002. Staff proposal is to purchase food vouchers from a local supermarket which will meet
the deadline criteria and then process requests from clients or contract with a non-profit organization.
FUNDS AVAIL: See Budget Resolution Number 02-94.
PREVIOUS ACTION: NONE
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of the CFN funds, approval of Budget
Resolution Numberß2-94 and authorization for the Chair to sign any documents necessary.
COMMISSION ACTION:
tc I APPROVED [] DENIED
[ I OTHER:
Coordination/Signatures I!.
Manag~t & BUdgete~~ h1 ~
Other:
Purchasing:
County Attorney: $-
Originating Department:
Other:
Fmance: Check for copy only, if appJicable:
i>
¡
\w
-...I
RESOLUTION NO. 02-94
WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners budget
for St. Lucie County, certain funds not anticipated at the time of adoption ofthe budget have become
available in the form a Community Food and Nutrition Grant from the Florida Association for
Community Action, Inc. in the amount of$10,000.
WHEREAS, Section 129.06 Cd), Florida Statutes, requires the Board of County Commissioners to adopt
a resolution to appropriate and expend such funds.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie
County, Florida, in meeting assembled this 26th day of March, 2002, pursuant to Section 129.06 Cd),
Florida Statutes, such funds are hereby appropriated for the fiscal year 2001-2002, and the County's
budget is hereby amended as follows:
REVENUES
001277-6420-334693-600
APPROPRIA nONS
001277-6420-549605-600
Dept. of Community Affairs - Human Srvcs
$10,000
Domestic Subsidy
$ 10,000
After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows:
Commissioner Doug Coward, Chairperson
Commissioner Cliff Barnes, Vice Chairperson
Commissioner John D. Bruhn
Commissioner Paula A. Lewis
Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson
xxx
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
PASSED AND DULY ADO PTED THIS 26th DAY 0 F MARCH, 2002.
ATTEST:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
CHAIRMAN
APPROVED AS TO CORRECTNESS
AND FORM:
COUNTY ATTORNEY
Deloris lob",.. Amount:
Immed. J'..t Preside",
AI§1Íc:uttural and Libor ProjT¡rn. Inl:,
Winle' HaVC11 Grant Number:
Board Membe~
Willi.mAtki118,DSW Grant Period:
Miarrri-Da<le CM
Mi.mi
03/21/22J02
Orflcers
Opbc1i~ BrQwn-Lawson
?re1kieltt
Mwni·D.dt CAA,
Miami
1¢Im W. Edwards, I"
Vj.c( Prcaide1Jt
North...! florida CA-~. 1nc,
J¡çks.onvU1e
V.T}"C:;"'~
T rc.a.s uret
Hern.ode-Sumter C.""t~
He.d st.ttt
Brook,víU.
Maty ¡¡,oWII-ManiJík
SeCrctaTY
Monro< Coumy Ikad Stm
K'Y Wcst
^l1-j(lft')ler
H;lIborough COlDliY
COUU11wury Action Program
Tampa
L<Roy Ch>v:i,
Po'}: ÇOutlty OpportUJ1¡ty CQuncj1
Bartcw
J;aO')e$ Lowe
we COlmty CM
5uJtig
WiIliamFm"",,...J,·
Pinell¡s Head Sbrt
Pine1tl.s Park.
Rc~... M. G"".
M~·Dadc County CM
Miami
¡an;'" Hobdy
child C.... 11..50='. Inc,
GainesvjUt
carolyn Collin.!
Hillsboroogh COUJ)I~
Commufrity Actic.n P oard
Tampa
Barbira Mz$.Ofi-Vardiner
Miaml.Dade H<ad Start
Mi&mj
Executive Director
Patty eal) 1"0""'. Ph.D.
PACA
T ~n,;¡,hüSft
00: 1 9 ..... 352378021 9
FACA
PAGE
02
...,;
FACA
Florida Association for Community Action, Inc.
March 21,2002
Beth Ryder, Executive Director
Treasure Coast Community Action Agency, Inc.
437 North 7fro Street
Ft. Pierce, Florida 34950
Dear Ms. Ryder:
On behalf of the Florida Association for Community Action, Inc., I am pleased to
announce that your application for cm funds has been approved. I would like to
extend my sincerest congratulations to you on your award for the following amount:
$10,000
CFN 3-02
03-21-2002 through 03-29-2002
Due to unforeseen circumstances, the process was altered to al10w for aU funds to be
spent by March 29, 2002. Please remember that this is a cash reimbursement grant,
therefore all original receipts should be maintained and submitted to F ACA along
with your report by April 1, 2002. We appreciate your patience in this process and ask
that you plea5e adhere to the aforementioned. The terms of the use of funds were
covered in the initial application.
I wish you much success with the funds. If you have any questions, you may contact
me at (850) 224-4774. Again, thank you for your commitment to serving those in less
fortunate situations.
Sincerely,
fk;, 4~
Party Ball Thomas, Ph.D.
Executive Director
PBT/jkh
cc: F ACA Board of Directors
Hilda Frazier, Planning Manager, Department of Community Affairs
207 W. P k Avenue. Tallahassee FL 32 01· 850 224-4774 Fax: 850 224-5762
A FedmTion of Çommw"lity Action Agencies, Head Start prO!!fam& and ot~r sanctioned organizations ,ince 1980
"-"'-"~' -- .~. .
_ .Pa,ge-1
Judy Mat:lera ·~remaiñdër~n ··jª~~pl:Ige orH~.d~c
oman
Opbeba Bromo
PrcIIdcnI
MiallÍ·Dode c.........
~ Iiaui
lobo W. Ed\\'<lœ, lr,
'iœ PresideJJt
Nortbeœt FlfJlida CA.-\. Ine.
laDr.:m"ille
h'OI)'Gm¡'
Ttea'RIICI'
Hermnio-Stø:nte£ Count)'.
J-IcOOStart
Broc:b'o'ille
M"-)' Bro",..·~1Milik
Seadat',.
~k""'..Cou"')" Head StEIl
J:.eyWest
Delotis JetInsou
_ Pad Ptesidcnl
.-\¡ria~1ufaI aaI LaIx< Pro¡:tæn.lDc.
\Vi.nI:er HJ\-eø
Board lIIembers
Wtlbam .\II:ins. DS\V
~ü...-Dado c.....~
~liaW
ArtieFIYcr
If>!Is1x:Ko<¢ Co""',-
C'0Il1D1l1Ol.1)' Al:tìoo. Prcf:m11
T~"""
teRm.' Clmis
Polk éc..¡j,-Opportunl~' CO\ll1ciJ
_ow
JaDeS Lcm-e
LabCe<""yCA.-\.
Eustis
Willi"" Fillmore. ]r,
Pu..u", J-IcOO S...
1'ioo1l",Pad:
Ro¡pœ ~L Gtace
~Iiaui-Dado COIJDIj' CA.-\.
Mi"..;
l<ÐÍ.œ &bdy
CWda.. ~ Ioc
Grines\"illc
C'êrolm ColliDs
~¢CoUli)·
C'OWIDurrity ."..dion Board
T""I"
-~~
Mi.ann-Dade IT.Jj start
Miron
Executive Dinctor
Palty Ball '\1øoaI. Pb.D.
FAi::.~
TaUabassce
..,¡1
FACA
Florida Association for Community Action, Inc.
March 7, 2002
Dear CSBG Eligible Entities:
The Department of Community Affairs, along \\ith the Florida Association for
Community Action (FACA), imites all CSBG eligible entities to submit a proposal
applying for the remaining Community Food and Nutrition (CFN) funds from FY 01.
A F ACA membership form is enclosed for renewals or initial memberships. In order to
be considered for this grant award, payment must accompany membership form and
proposal
Award grants will range from $1,000 to $10.000. TIùs will be a cash reimbursement
grant: therefore all original receipts must be maintained and submitted to FACA by
March 29, 2002, for payment The funds will be awarded to agencies with an
immediate need in the priority areás of food related actiYities such as food youchers,
food stamps, and meals for the current operating budget A formal application form is
attached. The proposal should include the following specific information:
· A statement of need that details the s~ific way that the program you propose
would improye the health and/or nutritional needs of low-income indi...iduals.
·
The priority area, if any, targeted by the proposed program.
·
Realistic and achie...-able goals, objectÍ\es and actÏ\·ities.
·
The estimated number of people that will benefit from the funds, considering the
uniqueness of this opportunity and length of funds.
·
The geographic region of the state that the proposed program will serv·e
considering population of that region. need for servi.ces and whether that
region of the state isotherv....ise under serv·ed with respect to the services you
offer. '
t·
( fì/
~\
.,
A realistiC and achie...-able work plan. time-line and budget summary showing how
the program will achieye its goals and objectÏ\·es.
Funds will onl)· be a...-ailable until March 22, 2002. Funds cannot be used for
administrath·e costs, direct senices only.
.
JUdy' ~aÏtera-~renïäindef ~C~\...lsj)â.ge'tV"ö:~oë
~__,~.__u_ .._.._~ ._ -.
~age1j
...,
March 7, 2002
Page Two
. Accountability measures that will describe how the organization will evaluate its
progress toward meeting its objectives and the manner in which the agency will
report on how funds were used.
. The name of the proposed Grantee organization. the proposed Grantee's federal
taxpayer identification number.
Proposals can be faxed (850) 224-5762 or mailed to Florida Association for c;ommunity
Action's office, Attn: CFN Grant Award, 207 West Park Avenue, Tallahassee, Florida
32301. All proposals for funds must be received by March 12, 2002. Proposals will be
reviewed and evaluated and all applicants will be notified of award recipients. If you have
any questions, I may be reached at (850) 224-4774.
We apologize for the short turnaround, but funds just became available last week and we
would like to use them if at all possible. We strongly encourage your participation in this
opportunity and wish your agency well in the development of your proposals.
Sincerely,
Patty Ball Thomas, Ph.D.
Executive Director
PBT/jkhlwkrn
Enclosure
cc: Hilda Frazier, Planning Manager, Department of Community Affuirs
Ophelia Brown-Lawson. FACA President
John Edwards, Jr., FACA Vice-President
.
,
~.
..........
----
AGENDA REOUEST
~
ITEi'i NO.
6A
DATE: 03/26/02
CONSENT [ ]
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [xi
Leg. [ X ] Quasi-Jud.
PRESENTED BY:
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SUBMITTED BY:
Community Development
SUBJECT:
Consider the petition of The Board of Supervisors of Westc .ester Community
Development District No. 1 for an amendment of the community development
district known as "Westchester Community Development District No.1" - Draft
Ordinance 02-010.
BACKGROUND:
The Board of Supervisors of Westchester Community Development District No.
1 has filed a petition Idth St. Lucie County to amend the community
development district known as "Westchester Community Development District
No.1" .
The Westchester Community Development District No. 1 is proposed to occupy
59.4~ acres instead of the 74.25 acres originally proposed. The subject
property is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of
Interstate 95 and the proposed extension of Gatlin Boulevard. The attached
Exhibit provides a general location map for the boundaries of Westchester
Community Development District No.1. It should be emphasized that at this
time there are no existing occupied residential properties in this Proposed
Westchester Community Development District No.1.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
N/A
PREVIOUS ACTION:
On August 21, 2001, The Board of County Commissioners granted approval to
Ordinance 01-010, establishing the community development district known as
Westchester CDD #1.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners .approve Draft
Ordinance 02-010, authorizing an amendment to the boundaries of the
community development district known as "Westchester Community Development
District No.1".
COMMISSION ACTION:
[ ] DENIED
(Hutchinson Absent)
[ X]
[ ]
APPROVED
OTHER: 4-0
.J
Review and Approvals
County Attorney:
Originating Department:
Management & Budget:
Other:
Purchasing:
Other:
Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable)
........
.."
COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: March 26, 2002
Ordinance 02-010
MEMORANDUM
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Community Development Director
DATE: March 20, 2002
SUBJECT: Petition of The Board of Supervisors of Westchester Community
Development District No.1, to amend the community development district
known as "Westchester Community Development District NO.1" - Draft
Ordinance 02-010
The Board of Supervisors for Westchester Community Development District No. 1 has filed
a petition with St. Lucie County for an amendment to Westchester Community
Development District NO.1. Westchester COD No. 1 was originally proposed to contain
74.25 acres, but will now contain 59.43 acres. The change in boundaries was in response
to changes in the master plan for the Westchester project.
On August 21,2001, the Board of County Commissioners approved the establishment of
Westchester Community Development District No. 1 located at the corner of the
intersection of Interstate 95 and the proposed extension of Gatlin Boulevard. The attached
Exhibit provides a general location map for the boundaries of Westchester COD NO.1. It
should be emphasized that at this time there are no existing occupied residential properties
in this proposed Westchester COD No.1.
Attached is a copy of Draft Ordinance 02-010 that provides for the amendment of
Westchester COD NO.1. Staff recommends approval of Draft Ordinance 02-010.
hf
cc; Doug Anderson, County Admisistrator
Daniel Mcintyre, County Attorney
David P. Kelly, Planning Manager
Noreen Dreyer. Esquire - Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster & Russell, P.A.
«-ò
p~
..r
G
ò'?JC:J
&'If-
'Ñes\. Blvd
\ IJÒe
S\.'-'
Prima Vista Blvd
~
CD
(\
rn
e
~
"0
a:
.
Gatlin Blvd
OJ
c:
::J
OJ
0>
æ
a:
Westchester COO #1
"0
>
ro
(\
c:
o
~
en
...,....
. . - ~- ....
.',::"':
~".~;,. ", ....,:..':
,.,.....,- ,.-', -". . "'. - '., . -, ''''''.'
," ,-- . ", .....
,~'1, , ,,:, ,. ' ";,, ,', ':,:,"',
<"',' ""-",.. "~~ "'. " ".
"'-~:~-'-"'-':'-"
. . -'
. ,
->~;~.,,:¡ . .... ..... ..- .
t
- mop .... boon c:corØod to< ~ l>anr>ng _ """"""'" P<"IXJOOO rri{.
I'IhIo fMI1.Y 011... has been modo 10 pt<Mdo ",. moot current and *"""81fI
inIorm8tòOn poos;bIo. ~ is noIlntended to< use .. . iIgIIIIr binding _,
81. Lucie County
Martin County
GRAPHIC SCAl..E
r- I ,. . .....0:.
o O.~ 1 2 ;\
N
,
'-'
....,
.J"'" 0.
~:51'
..!' a
.-. ~~ ÇI~
-".-. ..... ~
......"'-"
,....-
Not
Included
nil C
_..-"-
-..-
-....---
.,.-
-
- -
- A ¿' , r-
Þ ,l ]0 .~ :
I- ~J ) ¡, ) cO
l- . en
~ \
i- C-o ~) \
( \
i
- -
- ~
¡
- .
- : .
,
-
.> 0
¡,..
----.---.-.---.-.---.-.-
\ " . d' - - f"-
10 ( þt Ir , I
'\ I (-¡HI I' I"
I'
~ I I Ì\
I'\: -
1\ G-5.-, RU-5 . If\
.t\A'Xn.
WESTCHESTER
Existing Land Use
81. Lucie County, Florida
COO: lAND USE CA TAGORY: TOTAL COO AREA:
W A~5 I R~5 I MX~~~W I MX:~EO 59.43
--k~ Lucido &: Associates .ó
v,,* ,.",.~~ ~
v &~~~~ ,~~
-..-
1m AG-S. ~ !0.2 c1JIacI
~ RU-5, AoIIdonIIoI Uben IS c1JIact
5OUACE: 51. lucio Ccxny ~ PIon
NOTE: AI ..-- are ~t..
DIID IoIXO - I.øw InIendy MIxed
IJIIe CeIIeIcpnonI (S c1JIacI
~ 1oIXO· MedkmInlen8lty MIxed
~ IJIIe 0eYeIcpmeI~ CS-9 du/acI
111111111111" Proposed Roed (200' R/'M
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
"-'
..,J
ORDINANCE 02-010
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 01-010 GRANTED ON
AUGUST 21,2001, ESTABLISHING THE WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO.1, AMONG OTHER MATTERS AND
AMENDING CHAPTER 1-6.5-81 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF ST.
LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; IN ORDER TO CONTRACT THE EXTERNAL
BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT AND ESTABLISH THE REVISED
BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING
PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR
APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF
STATE; PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR
CODIFICATION; AND SETTING FORTH THE VOTE ON ADOPTION.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on
the testimony and evidence, including, but not limited to the staff report, has made the
following determinations:
1. On August 21, 2001, St. Lucie County granted approval to Ordinance 01-010
amending Chapter 1-6.5 "Community Development" of the S1. Lucie County Code
and Compiled Laws and establishing the Westchester Community Development
District NO.1 as a community development district pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida
Statutes, and its boundaries, among other matters. The boundaries of Westchester
COD No.1 contain 74.25 acres of land entirely within the jurisdictional boundaries
of St. Lucie County.
2. The Board of Supervisors of Westchester Community Development District No.1,
has filed with the Board a petition for an amendment of the community development
district, which petition contains the information required by Section 190.046( 1 ),
Florida Statutes. The Petitioner is requesting that the boundaries of Westchester
COD NO.1 be contracted to 59.428 acres of land.
3. In accordance with Section 190.046(1)(b), Florida Statutes, the Board held a public
hearing on March 26, -2002, after publishing notice of such hearing in the Ft. Pierce
Tribune and the Port St. Lucie News on March 15, 2002.
Double Underline is for addition
Ðtrike Thl'O~g" is for deletion
Ordinance 02-010
1st Draft
Page 1
Print Date: 03120102
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
'-'
"""'"
(a) The Board has considered the record of the public hearing and the factors
set forth in Section 190.005 (I) (e), Florida Statutes, and has found that:
(b) All statements contained within the petition are true and correct;
(c) The land to be removed from the District does not exceed 50% of the acres
initially located within the District and the Board of Supervisors of the District
has not previously petitioned St. Lucie County for the expansion or
contraction of the District;'s boundaries.
(d) The amendment of this district is consistent with all applicable elements and
portions of the state comprehensive plan and the effective local government
comprehensive plan;
(e) The area of land within the proposed district is of sufficient size, is sufficiently
compact, and is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one functional
interrelated community;
(e) The district is the best alternative available for delivering the community
development services and facilities to the area that will be served by the
district;
(f) The community development services and facilities for the district will be
compatible with the capacity and uses of the existing local and regional
community development services and facilities; and,
(g) The area that will be served by the district following contraction is amenable
to separate special district government.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of St.
Lucie County, Florida:
PART A.
GRANT OF PETITION; AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 01-010 TO
ESTABLISH NEW EXTERNAL BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT.
Part A of Ordinance 01-010 is hereby amended to contract the external boundaries of the
District by deleting Exhibit A to Ordinance 01-010 in its entirety and replacing it with Exhibit
A attached hereto. Accordingly, Section f..6.5-81 of the Code of Compiled Laws
establishing the boundaries of the District is hereby amended so that references therein to
Exhibit "An shall mean Exhibit A attached hereto.
Double Undertine is for addition
ûtril(<'J Tl1lol:lgn is for deletion
Ordinance 02-010
1st Draft
Page 2
Print Date: 03/20/02
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
'-"
...",
if!
PART B.
CONFLICTING PROVISIONS.
Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie
County, County ordinances, and County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this
ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict.
PART C.
SEVERABILITY.
If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional,
inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance.
If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person,
property, or circumstance, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person,
property, or circumstance.
PART D.
APPLICABILITY OF ORDINANCE.
This ordinance shall be applicable throughout St. Lucie County's jurisdiction.
PART E.
FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE.
The Clerk be and is hereby directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to
the Bureau of Administrative Code and Laws, Department of State, The Capitol,
Tallahassee, Florida 32304.
PART F.
EFFECTIVE DATE.
This ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State.
PART G.
ADOPTION.
After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows:
Chairwoman Doug Coward XXX
Vice-Chairman Cliff Barnes XXX
Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX
Commissioner Paula A. Lewis XXX "
Double Underline is for addition
Ðtrilcð TI'IM~gl , IS for deletion
Ordinance 02-010
1st Draft
Page 3
Print Date: 03/20/02
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
'-'
..""
Commissioner John D. Bruhn
xxx
PART H.
CODIFICATION.
Provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated in the St. Lucie County Land
Development Code, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or
other appropriate word, and the sections of this ordinance may be re-numbered or re-
lettered to accomplish such intention; provided, however, that Parts B through H shall not
be codified.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 26th Day of March 2002.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY
Chairman
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM
AND CORRECTNESS:
Deputy Clerk
County Attorney
hf
H:\WP\Petitions\BCC\Finished.2002\Westchester1.CDD\Westchester1 ORD
Double Underline is for addition
Ell'ilte Thl ð~!!" is for deletion
Ordinance 02-010
1st Draft
Page 4
Print Date: 03120102
'-"
....,
COUNTY COMMISSION
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN RE: PETITION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 190.046(1), FLORIDA STATUTES,
TO CONTRACT THE BOUNDARIES OF
WESTCHESTER NO.1 COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
/
PETITION TO CONTRACT BOUNDARIES OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
The Board of Supervisors (the "Board") of the Westchester No. 1 Community
Development District, an independent special district established pursuant to Chapter 190,
Florida Statutes (the "District") by Ordinance No. 01-010 (the "Ordinance") of S1. Lucie County,
Florida (the "County") enacted on August 21, 2001 hereby petitions the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA (the "Commission") in
accordance with Section 190.046(1) of the Unifonn Community Development Act of 1980,
Chapter 190, Florida Statutes (the "Act") to contract the boundaries of the District and in support
thereof, hereby attests as follows:
1.
District.
That approximately 74.25 acres are currently within the external boundaries of the
2. That the Board desires to contract the boundaries of the District by deleting acres
therefrom, so that thereafter the land area to be served by the District will comprise
approximately 59.428 acres. Following such contraction of the District's boundaries, all lands in
the District will continue to be located wholly within the jurisdictional boundaries of the County.
3. That the real property to be removed from the external boundaries of the District
does not exceed 50% of the acres initially locaced within the boundaries of the District and the
Board has not previously submitted to the Commission a petition seeking expansion or
contraction of the District's boundaries.
4. That annexed hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof is a metes and bounds
description of the external boundaries of the District following the proposed contraction of such
boundaries. No real property within the external boundaries of the District as proposed is to be
excluded therefrom.
FTL:823420:3
'-"
....,
5. That the District is not currently providing any services and facilities to the real
property proposed to be removed from within the District's external boundaries.
6. That annexed hereto as Exhibit B and made a part hereof is evidence of the
written consent to the removal of its property from the boundaries of the District by the owner of
one hundred percent (100%) of the real property to be removed from the District.
7. That annexed hereto as Exhibit C and made a part hereof is a designation of the
future general distribution, location, and extent of public and private uses of land proposed for
the area to be excluded from the District by the future land use plan element of the effective local
government comprehensive plan.
8.
estimated
Statutes.
That annexed hereto as Exhibit D and made a part hereof is a statement of
regulatory costs in accordance with the requirements of Section 120.541, Florida
9. That following the proposed contraction of the District's boundaries, (i) the
property within the District will not be inconsistent with any applicable element or portion of the
state comprehensive plan or of the effective local government comprehensive plan; (ii) the
property comprising the District will be of sufficient size, compactness, and contiguity to be
developable as one functional interrelated community; (iii) the District will continue to present
the best alternative available for delivering the community development facilities and services to
the property that will be served by the District; (iv) the community development facilities and
services of the District will not be incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and
regional community development services and facilities; and (v) the property comprising the
District will be amenable to separate special-purpose government.
10. That all statements contained within this Petition are true and correct.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner, the Board of Supervisors of the Westchester No. 1
Community Development District, hereby respectfully requests the Commission to:
A. Direct its staff to notice, as soon as practicable, a local public non-emergency
hearing pursuant to the requirements of Section 190.046(1 )(b) of the Act to consider whether to
grant the petition for the contraction of the District's boundaries and to amend the Ordinance
establishing the District to reflect the new boundaries of the District.
B. Grant the petition and enact an ordinance pursuant to applicable law amending the
Ordinance establishing the District to reflect the new boundaries of the District.
2
FTl:823420:3
\w
'WI
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED thisl.3 7d';y of ~ ~ ". L...... , 2002.
WESTCHESTER NO.1 COMMUNITY
DF~ENT DISTRICT
By: /ø~-
Tit: ¿)-.. ,,-,/-._..:::.J
STATE OF FLORIDA )
COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE )
The foregoing instrument waì./. acknowledged before me this /..3 Th day of
/JJA4c!f, , 2002, by V/!iJe" . I/-~.J , the C~#/;?'¡;4.J of the BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF WESTCHESTER NO. 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT,
who is personally known to me [~ or produced as identification.
Notary Public ~ b¿/, ¿.J~
Printed Name: //?rA'~/A ¿¿J~J/fAU-<::'~
3
FTL:823420:3
FTL:823420:3
'-'
...."
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION/METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION
~AWSON, NOBLE &WEBB, INC. ...I
LB# 6674
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND PLANNERS, SURVEYORS
590 NW PEACOCK BLVD, SUITE 9, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA
PHONE (561) 878-1700
-'.
CDD-l
A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTIONS 9 & ro, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTIl, RANGE 39 EAST,
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE P ARTICULARL Y DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCE AT THE INTERSECTION OF TIlE CENTERLINE OF GATLIN BOULEVARD (ALSO
BEING THE NORTH LINE OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST) AND THE
WESTERLY LIMITS OF GATLIN BOULEVARD RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THE WESTERLY LIMITS OF
TIlOSE LANDS DESCRIBED IN AN ORDER OF TAKING DATED JULY 4, 1979 AND RECORDED IN
OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 311 , PAGES 2946 THROUGH 2952, INCLUSIVE PUBLIC RECORDS .oF
SAID ST. LUCIE COUNTY AND AS SHOWN ON THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF --'
TRANSPORTATION RIGHT"OF- WAY MAPS FOR STATE ROAD NO.9 (1-95), SECTION 94001 _ 2412,
DATED 06/02/77, WITH LAST REVISION OF 09111/79 (THE ABOVE DESCRIBED WESTERLY
LIMITS OF GATLIN BOULEVARD BEAR SOUTH 00°01'45" WEST AND ALL BEARINGS ARE
RELATIVE THERETO); THENC'ij SOUTH 89°57'05" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 737.09 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 00°02'55" WEST, A DIStANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE
HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE SOUTH 89°57'05" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1,691.19 FEET,
To THE POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, AND HAVING A . .
RADIUS OF 175.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 54°37'24", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 166.84 FEET, TO A POINT OF
REVERSE CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, HA VING-A RADIUS OF 300.00
FEET; THENCE WESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAIl) CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE
OF 65°52'34", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 344.93 FEET, TO A POINT OF NON-RADIAL INTERSECTION
WITH A LINE (THE RADIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 11 °18'05" EAST FROM THIS
POINT); THENCE NORTH 00°14'07" EAST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 833.93 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 44°33'37" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 35.47 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°13'48" EAST, A
DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 45°26'22" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 35.23 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89°45'53" EAST, A DISTANCE OF. 120.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°14'07" WEST,
A DISTÂNCE QF 20.18 FE HENCE S H 44°52'57" EAST, A DISTANGE OF 35.28 FEET;
THENCE SOUT (j°00' EAST, A TANCEOF 85.88 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°00'00" EAST, A
ARY R. 8 FORD, PSM .'
PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
STATE OF FLORIDA REG. NO. 4981
DATE: I - 3 CI - b <-
REVISIONS-UPDATES
NOTE: THIS IS NOT A SKETCH OF SURVEY, BUT ON~ Y
A GRAPHIC DEPICTION OF THE DESCRIPTION SHOWN'
HEREON. THERE HAS BEEN NO FIELD WORK, VIEWING
OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, OR MONUMENTS SET IN
CONNECTION WITH THE PREPARATION OF THIS
INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON.
DATE
BY
CK'D
NOTE: LANDS SHOWN HEREON WERE NOT
ABSTRACTED FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY AND/OR
EASEMENTS OF RECORD.
JOB NO.:
B589 BY: JDM CHECKED: GRB F.B.: N/A PG.: N/A SHEET 1 OF 3
'rAWSON, NOBLE &WEBB, INC. ..."
LB# 6674
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND PLANNERS, SURVEYORS
590 NW PEACOCK BLVD, SUITE 9, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA
PHONE (561) 878-1700
DISTANCE OF 476.82 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 39°04'35" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 189.81 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 75°49'33" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 472.34 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70°10'51" EAST,
A DISTANCE OF 208.88 FEET; THENCE NORTH 19°29'57" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 295.52 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 15°14'57" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 513.76 FEET, TO A POINT OF NON-RADIAL
INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 275.00
FEET (THE RÅbIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 12°15'49" EAST FROM TillS POINT);
THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
12°15'48", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 58.86 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE
NORTH 89°59'59" EAST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 345.02 FEET; THENC.E NORTH
00°00'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 239.96 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 90°00'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF
1,253.56 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CORV ATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY)'
AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 4.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID _.
CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 76°57'13", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 5.37 FEET, TO A
POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE SOUTH 13°02'47" EAST, ALONG SAID LINE A
DISTANCE OF 58.53 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURV A TIJRE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE
WESTERL Y, AND HAVING A ID\DIUS OF 800.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC
OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°30.'32", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 481.83
FEET, TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CORV ATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, ..
AND HA VmG A RADIUS OF 58.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID
. CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 54°25'22", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 55.09 FEET, TO A
POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERL Y, HAVING A
RADIUS OF 130.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE AR,C OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°41'07", ANARC DISTANCE OF 205.76 FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE
CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERL Y, HAVING A RADIUS OF 58.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHERL Y, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
49°41'44", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 50.31 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE
SOUTH 34°53'43" WEST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 291.45 FEET, TO THE POINT OF
CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 781.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
34°34'43", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 471.34 FEET,TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WITH A
CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHwESTERL Y, HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET; THENCE
SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
89°38'04", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 39.11 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 59.43 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
.
'.
.
~
~.
JOB NO.:
B589 BY: JDM CHECKED: GRBF.B.: N/A PG.: N/A SHEET 2 OF 3
~
~.
to~
~ I'I~
(I). It) L.
~g :f
r<> .
_0
. 0
0-
o
z
o
W
l-
I-
<t:
...J
a...
z
;:)
w
F- -
or<>
. <7>
:tr<i
. r<>
gO)
z
C/I
")J\~
..~
g\a¡
".0
-U!
, Irñ
WìW:È
P.O.B.
P.O.e.
P.B.
P.e.
PR.C.
P.T.
R
ð
L
N.R.
OR.a.
LN\\'
. . . . . . . . . . . . ....
Lawson, Noble & Webb, Inc. LB #6674
ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS
590 NW Peacock Boulevard, Suite 9, Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986
(56) 878-1700· fax: (561) 878-1802. emoil: Inw-psl@lnw-inc.com
West Palm Beach· Port St. Lucie
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION
--
---
DETAIL "-
"-
\
\
I
° <II I
0, /
~'l\
~./
"'/
o
o
~
II
./
/
I
S90000'00"E
1253.56' (
R=4.00' -..'3
ð=76°S7'13"
L=S.37'
.
~
UNPLA TTED
I
\
\
\
"-
.......
W
-1
«
u
(f)
-- - ..-
, f' SEE DETAIL
/'
\ .
. .
I
~
o .
ON
òll?
0'"
° r-
Ov
o
III
SoooW07"W
20.18'
S44°S2'S7"E
3S.26'
S90"OO'OO"E
6S.68'
R=27S.00'
£l=12°1S'48"
L=S8.86'
N6S"S9'S9"E
345.02'
S9.0"OO'OO"E
1253.56'
ILl
O.
0'"
- <7>
o·
0<7>
" r<>
0(\/
o
z
SI3"02'47"E
58.S3'
ILÌ ILÌ
~I~
ILl ....
'" ~
~~ ~;;
0111 <ri0
~r- r-~
u~.rou
wa... . laJ
"'Ï 12'"
"'.'"
~ ~
g g.
R=56.00'
£1=54"25'2.2"
L"SS.09' ~
~"5~.~ " R=I30.00'
ð-~9 41 ~4 7 '-ð=90"41'07"
L-SO.31 '-- L=205. 76'
.
.
UNPLATTED
C.DDo-t
S9.43 ACRES +/-
UNPLA TTED
R=300.00'
r-ð.=6S"S2'34"
I L=344.93'
R=17S.00'
rð=S4"3T24"
L=166B4'
III
~~ ~(\/
R=761.00' It)<r 0.. Ii')
--ð=34°34'43" ~o .<7>
L=471.34' o~ ;;; ':
. o-·w
o~ ::1".
.:::~:ijt~
737.09' ?l E . .
Il) <r .
100.00' - > ;;::
NOO002'SS"W Ô ~~
§ ~~
'" Zo
W :Jffill'l
~ ~~'r
~ ~--
z
S89°S7'05"W
1691.19'
"--PROPOSED CENTERL[NE OF GATLI~
BLVD. LYING WEST OF [-9S
-w W
<7> 0'>
r<> r<>
ILl ILl
'" '"
!!!.~ ~!!!
Ô iii. <ri- Ô
¡:: r- r- ¡::
U tf") tf"IU
~~. f!:¡~
¡¡¡ ¡¡¡
Z 2:
3: 3:
g g
UNPLATTED
POINT OF BEGINNING
POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
PLAT BOOK {
POINT OF CURVATURE
. POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE
POINT OF TANGENCY
DENOTES RADIUS
DENOTES DELTA
DENOTES ARC LENGTH
œNOTES NON-RAOIAL
DENOTES OFFICI¡\L RECORD BOOK
JOB No. B589
SEE SHEET 1 &. 2 OF 3 FOR DESCRIPTION
F.B. -
1'\OOta\500-599\B599\CAO\B599SkOI.dwg 01/29/2002 02,29'30 PH ¡;ST Sl£ET 3 OF 3
BY: JDM
CHECKED: GRB
PG.
DATE: 01-14-02
\.f
....,
EXHIBIT B
EVIDENCE OF WRITTEN CONSENT OF OWNER
TO REMOVAL OF PROPERTY FROM THE EXTERNAL BOUNDARIES OF
WESTCHESTER NO.1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
Westchester Development Company, LLC, a Florida limited liability company and
successor by merger with Westchester Development Company ("Owner"), hereby certifies that it
is the sole owner of approximately 14.82 acres of certain real property (the "Property"), located
in S1. Lucie County, Florida proposed to be excluded from the boundaries of Westchester No.1
Community Development District (the "District"). By signing below, the Owner hereby gives its
full consent to the contraction of the external boundaries of the District to remove the Property
therefrom. "
37......
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand thisL day of
~...;,,,", ,2002.
WESTCHESTER DEVELOPMENT
COMP ;Y, LLC
STATE OF FLORIDA )
COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /3TÆ day of
/J14Leh ,2002, by~~ flJh.~'Sð¡</, the ¡/¡c~ &ev",jeA.fT of
WESSTCHESTER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, who is personally known to meÍÀ or
produced as identification.
Notary Public
Printed Name:
~ ¿.-/.¿J~
/ ~.4, C! r"/I- W á/Aðle;/
FTL:823420:3
'-'
EXHIBIT C
....,
DESIGNATION OF THE FUTURE GENERAL DISTRIBUTION, LOCATION AND
EXTENT OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE USES OF LAND PROPOSED FOR THE AREA
TO BE REMOVED FROM THE DISTRICT
FTL:823420:3
'-'
-..I
J/: (\~
, .,r
C!
-,......" ~1si
_.....,ø-' "
~.-
,.-"-
Not
Included
_nl I L
._--r-
.--- ~
-....... ....
,--
- -
- -
- A ...., r
¡- .\.. :J" ,~ !
ï
- ~ II>~ ) co
en
- , \
f- ( f-O II ) \
(f- \
f- ~
'- .
- !
- ; .
-
~ roO
....
----'---'_'___1_'___'---
i" .01: - 10 ( Dt . F ~ '"
I~ "
r---
lI- I , I ['\
-
I~ G-~~ RU-5 Î-\
1\ .t\AY n.
WESTCHESTER
Existing Land Use
St. Lucie County, Florida
COD: LAND USE CAT AGORY: TOTAL COD AREA:"
EI A~5 I R~5 I MX~~~W I MX~~EO I 59.43 I
%.. Lucido & Associates .ó
VJ;:¿.. ~~~ 1Ç1
v .c,-:t:..-...:"..::r--=: ,....-
---
EEEE AG-5, ~ 102 OJIad
~ RU-5. _ Urban 15 Wlae)
SOURCE: Slluclo CcUIIy ~ Plan
N01E: AI acreages ar8 approxfme!..
OIJI] MXD - low Intonslly Mbced
Use D8YøIopmont (5 &lad
~ MXD· ModI.m lnIonsIIy MIxed
~ Use DoM>IopnonI (5-9 OJIae)
11111111111111 Pr~ Roed (200' A/W
FTL:823420:3
'-'
EXHIBIT D
STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS
...,
'-'
...",
STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS
WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT #1
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Purpose and Scope
This statement of estimated regulatory costs ("SERC") supports the petition to
contract the boundaries of the Westchester Community Development District #1
("District" or "District #1"). The District was established by Ordinance No. 01-010
of St. Lucie County on August 21, 2001. The District currently comprises
approximately 74.25 acres of land located in St. Lucie County. The District
proposes to contract its boundaries by -14.82 acres to a total of 59.428 acres.
The limitations on the scope of this SERC are explicitly set out in Section
190.002(2)(d), F.S. (governing District formation or alteration) as follows:
"That the process of establishing such a district pursuant to uniform general law
shall be fair and based only on factors material to manaqinq and financinq the
service delivery function of the district, so that any matter conceminq permittinq
or pfanninq of the development is not material or relevant (emphasis added)."
1.2 Overview of the Westchester DRI and the Changes Requested in the
Boundaries of the Four Community Development Districts Serving Westchester
On August 21, 2001 the St. Lucie County Commission approved the formation of
four Community Development· Districts to provide community facilities and
services to the Westchester DR!. District #1 is designed to provide community
infrastructure, services, and facilities along with their operations and
maintenance, to a portion of the Westchester DRI located in St. Lucie County
(the "development"). The development is a master planned, mixed-use, fully
amenitized, community. The DRI includes 2,033 acres. The landowner has
established community development districts on 1,677.74 of these acres. The
land plan for the portion of the DRI planned for community development districts
consists of up to: (a) 4,500 residential units, (b) 2,001,000 square feet of offices,
(c) 575,000 square feet of retail space, and (d) 300 hotel units.
Given the size and scope of the development, St. Lucie County agreed to
establish four community development districts to serve the project. Four
districts- are optimal for the development because this articulation allows foreach
district to focus on the unique requirements of the land within its boundaries.
District #1 serves an exclusively commercial area in the project that will be
developed in the first phase of the development program. By contrast, the land
in District #2 is planned exclusively as a corporate office park with a civic/school
site. The land in District #3 is planned only for use as a residential community
with no commercial, retail, or office uses. Finally, District #4 is projected for
future development as a town center with retail uses at its core and surrounding
Page 10f6
FebruaJY 25, 2002
'-'
....,
residential uses. No offices are planned for the land in District #4. In light of
these very different land uses, and the unique demands for community
development district facilities and services, it is optimal to create four unique
community development districts, one for each area.
Table 1 displays the land use plan for the lands within each of the four proposed'
community development districts planned for the Westchester DRI as envisioned
in the petitions to form the Districts. Noted at the time the petitions to form the
Districts were filed, was the fact that the land use plans were "subject to change
as land planning activities continue".
Table 1. Land Use Plan for the Area in Westchester Served by the
Westchester Community Development Districts #1 through #4
Category CDD#1 CDD#2 CDD#3 CDD#4 Total
Acres 74.25 257.45 463.60 882.44 1,677.74
Single Family 0 0 863 2,512 3,375
Multifamily 0 0 287 838 1,125
Retail 125,000 0 0 450,000 575,000
Office 78,500 1,922,500 ° ° 2,001,000
Hotel ° ° ° 300 300
Source: St. Lucie West Development Corporation
As land use planning and engineering analysis has progressed at Westchester,
a number of desired adjustments have come to light. No changes in the total
volume of development are proposed. However, the distribution of the
development across the four Districts is now somewhat different than originally
expected. The rationale for forming four distinct districts was based on the
unique land use mix that was originally anticipated for lands included in each
District. Since the land use plans have changed somewhat, it is desirable to
alter the boundaries of the various Districts to reflect these changes. Table 2
presents to proposed new land use plan for each District as well as the proposed
new acreage totals for each District.
Page 2 of 6
February 25, 2002
\w
....",
Table 2. land Use Plan for the Proposed Areas in Westchester Served by the
Westchester Community Development Districts #1 through #4 As Modified
Category
Acres
Single family units
Multifamily units
Retail sqft
Office sqft
Hotel rooms
CDD#1
59.43
o
o
125,000
78,500
o
CDD#2
234.33
o
o
o
1,922,500
o
CDD#3
499.87
863
287
o
o
o
CDD#4
884.12
2,512
838
450,000
o
300
Total
1,677.75
3,375
1,125
575,000
2,001,000
300
The changes proposed for the acreage and land uses in each District are
provided in Table 3. It is important to note that no change in total development is
proposed. Furthermore, the proposed volume and distribution of development in
each District is the same as originally proposed. The changes involve
redistributing the acreage among the Districts, so that the original land uses are'
preserved.
Table 3. Changes in the land Use Plans Proposed for
Westchester C0"1munity Development Districts #1 through #4 As Modified
Category
Acres
Single family units
Multifamily units
Retail sqft
Office sqft
Hotel rooms
CDD#1
-14.82
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
CDD#2
-23.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
CDD#3
36.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
CDD#4
1.68
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
The Westchester Community Development District #1 remains as a commercial
area in the DR!. District #1 will provide community development district facilities
and services to 59.43 acres in the District.
In addition, District #1 will serve as the master community development district
for the additional districts that are planned for the development. In that role the
District will also provide community-serving infrastructure that provides benefits
to all of the other 3 community development districts envisioned to serve the
Westchester DR!. These master improvements include major entrance roads,
entry statements, landscaping, master stormwater control, and master utilities.
The District will provide these facilities for itself and for the other districts planned
for Westchester. The debt service and operation/maintenance costs incurred by
District #1 to provide the master community improvements will be funded through
non ad valorem special assessments on all benefiting property in the
development. District #1 may also operate and maintain localized infrastructure
within any of the other three districts that is integrally related to the master
Page 3 of 6
February 25. 2002
'-'
....""
community improvements, if a district desires to delegatå that function and
District #1 desires to accept the same. It is anticipated that the four community
development districts will enter into a series of inter local agreements providing
for this sharing of master improvement, operating and maintenance costs.
1.3 Requirements for Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs
Section 120.541 (2), F.S. (1997), defines the elements a statement of estimated
regulatory costs must contain:
"(a) A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be
required to comply with the rule, together with a general description of the types
of individuals likely to be affected by the rule.
(b) A good faith estimate of the cost to the agency, and to any other state and
local government entities, of implementing and enforcing the proposed rule, and
any anticipated effect on state and local revenues.
(c) A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by
individuals and entities, including local governmental entities, required to comply
with the requirements of the rule. As used in this paragraph, "transactional
costs" are direçt costs that are readily ascertainable based upon standard
business practices, and include filing fees, the costof obtaining a license, the
cost of equipment required to be installed or used or procedures required to be
employed in complying with the rule, additional operating costs incurred, and the
cost of monitoring and reporting.
(d) An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined by Section
288.703, F.S., and an analysis of the impact on small counties and small cities
as defined by Section 120.52, F.S. St. Lucie County is not defined as a small
County for purposes of this requirement.
(e) Any additional information that the agency determines may be useful.
2.0 A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be
required to comply with the ordinance, together with a general description
of the types of individuals likely to be affected by the ordinance.
There will be no individuals or entities affected by approval of the proposed
contraction in the boundaries of District #1. District #1 is an already existing
Community Development District. The petition to contract its boundaries by
approximately -14.82 acres will have no impact on either the remaining 59.43
acres in the District or on the -14.82 acres contracted out of the District for the
following reasons.
First, as noted above, District #1 will provide Community level facilities and
services for all areas in the four Community Development Districts. However,
neither the costs nor the acres served will change if the proposed change to the
Page 4 of 6 February 25, 2002
~
...,
boundaries of the four Districts is approved. So, there is no' impact on the other
three Districts from the proposed change in the boundaries of District #1.
Second, neither the costs nor the volume of development planned for District #1
will change if the proposed boundary change is approved. So, there will be no
impact on land in District #1. Finally, the contraction parcel will be included in
the expansion of other Districts. Again, since neither the costs nor the volume of
development will change in any other District, there is no impact on any
individual or entity if the proposal is approved.
3.0 Good faith estimate of the cost to state and local government entities, of
implementing and enforcing the proposed ordinance, and any anticipated
effect on state and local revenues.
3.1 Costs to Governmental Agencies of Implementing and Enforcing Ordinance
State Governmental Entities
There will be no cost to any governmental agencies to implement or to enforce -
the proposed ordinance. District #1 is an existing Community Development
District in good standing. Altering its boundaries will not change the costs for any
State governmental entity.
,
St. Lucie County
St. Lucie County will incur no costs associated with this proposed Ordinance
beyond reviewing the petition and its supporting exhibits. The petition itself
provides much of the information needed for a staff review. St. Lucie County
already possess the staff needed to conduct the review without the need for new
staff. In addition, there is no capital required to review the petition. Finally, local
governments routinely process similar petitions for land uses and zoning
changes that are far more complex than is the petition to alter the boundaries of
District #1.
There is no annual cost to the County, because the District is an existing
Community Development District in good standing. Approving a change in the
District's boundaries does not impact annual costs to the County in any way.
Page 5016
February 25. 2002
\.,<f
....,
3.2 Impact on State and Local Revenues
Adoption of the proposed ordinance will have no negative impact on State or
local revenues. The District is an existing Community Development District. As
an independent unit of local government, the District is designed to be a self
funding entity in terms of its obligations under Chapter 190, F.S. Altering its
boundaries, as proposed here, has no impact on State or local revenues.
4.0 A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by
individuals and entities required to comply with the requirements of the
ordinance.
There are no transactional costs associated with approving this alteration in the
boundaries of the District. As noted above, the amount of development and the
number of acres served by all the Districts will no change if the Ordinance is
approved. Furthermo.re, the volume of development and the costs for providing _
District facilities and services is also unchanged. Exhibit B contains the
estimated costs and the timetable for construction.
5.0 An analysis af the impact on small businesses as defined by Section
288.703, F.S., and an analysis of the impact on small counties and small
cities as defined by Section 120.52, F.S.
There will be no impact on small businesses because of the changes proposed
in the District's boundaries. The District is an existing Community Development
District. The costs to provide infrastructure and services has not changed nor
has the volume of development planned for the District.
St. Lucie County has an estimated population that is greater than 10,000 in the
most current census (2000). Therefore, the County is not defined as a "small"
county according to Section 120.52, F.S.
6.0 Any additional useful information.
The analysis provided above is based on a straightforward application of
economic theory, especially as it relates to tracking the incidence of regulatory
costs and benefits. Inputs were received from the Developer's Engineer and
other professionals associated with the Developer.
Page 6 of 6
February 25. 2002
v
-
\tr"'
AGENDA REOUEST
ITÈ1ff NO.
58
DATE: 03/26/02
CONSENT
REGULAR
PUBLIC HEARING [X""]
Leg. [ X ] Quasi-~ud. [
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SUBMITTED BY:
Communitv Development
SUBJECT:
Consider the petition of The Board of Supervisors of Westchester Community
Development District No. 2 for an amendment of the community development
district known as ·Westchester Community Development District No.2" - Draft
Ordinance 02-011.
BACKGROUND:
The Board of Supervisors of Westchester Community Development District No.
2 has filed a petition with St. Lucie County to amend the community
development district known as ·Westchester Community Development District
No.2" .
The Westchester Community Development District No. 2 is proposed to occupy
234.33 acres instead of the 257.45 acres originally proposed. The subject
property is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of
Interstate 95 and the proposed extension of Gatlin Boulevard. The attached
Exhibit provides a general location map for the boundaries of Westchester
Community Development District No.2. It should be emphasized that at this
time there are no existing occupied residential properties in this Proposed
Westchester Community Development District No.2.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
N/A
PREVIOUS ACTION:
On August 21, 2001, The Board of County Commissioners granted approval to
Ordinance 01-011, establishing the community development district known as
Westchester CDD #2.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve Dra.ft
Ordinance 02-011, authorizing an amendment to the boundáries of the
community development district known as "Westchester Community Development .
District No.2". .
[ X]
[ ]
APPROVED
OTHER: 4-0
[ ] DENIED
(Hutchinson Absent)
"
COMMISSION ACTION:
M. Anderson
Administrator
Review and AODrovals
Management & Budget:
Other:
Purchasing:
Other:
County Attorney:
Originating Department:
Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable)
'-'
'wJI
,.
COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: March 26, 2002
Ordinance 02-011
MEMORANDUM
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Community Development Director
DATE: March 20, 2002
SUBJECT: Petition of The Board of Supervisors of Westchester Community
Development District No.2, to amend the community development district
known as ·Westchester Community Development District NO.2" - Draft
Ordinance 02-011
The Board of Supervisors for Westchester Community Development District No.2 has filed
a petition with St. Lucie County for an amendment to Westchester Community
Development District NO.2. Westchester CDD No.2 was originally proposed to contain
257.45 acres, but will now contain 234.33 acres. The change in boundaries was in
response to changes in the master plan for the Westchester project.
On August 21, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners approved the establishment of
Westchester Community Development District No. 2 located at the corner of the
intersection of Interstate 95 and the proposed extension of Gatlin Boulevard. The attached
Exhibit provides a general location map for the boundaries of Westchester COD NO.2. It
should be emphasized that at this time there are no existing occupied residential properties
in this proposed Westchester COD NO.2.
Attached is a copy of Draft Ordinance 02-011 that provides for the amendment of
Westchester COD NO.2. Staff recommends approval of Draft Ordinance 02-011.
hf
cc: Doug Anderson, County Admisistrator
Daniel Mcintyre, County Attorney
David P. Kelly, Planning Manager
Noreen Dreyer, Esquire - Ruden, McClosky. Smith, Schuster & Russell. P.A.
.. .
«-ò
,P~
~
G
0":>
~
ø'li-
'l'I eS\ Blvd
\ uÒß
<;:,\....
Prima Vista . Blvd ':
~
co
c¡
en
o
"-
~
-0
a:
.
Gatlin Blvd
Q)
c
:.:J
Q)
0)
c
c¡
a:
Westchester COO #2
-0
>
co
ttI
C
o
~
(f)
......
(f)
t
o
a..
m··'····:·
iit....~~.~.;"':¿",,....·.··.·.·. ;'. u;··/.:....
" \. _T<.~'I'.· ...... . ';_," _,""',.
. -' , .. -." ,," ,"
':"...~.-.....
t
S1. Lucie County
Martin County
_ mop hoo boon ~ 1"<Ionom/pIanning end -..... )IXpO&eS only.
_ _ oIIort has boon ..- to pr<Mdo Iho __ ClJ1'OI end _.
inIonn8IIon ~.;o not __ b'.... .. . IogeIy binding __
GRAPHIC SCALE
~ I I 1 . ....c.
o 0.5 1 2 ~
N
'-"
...,
J/ ~
, .¡r
c
-""~ ÇI-:! .
-~ ...... ~
-~-
r"-
Not
Included
nJ c
....,,-' ....
.-~ r-
,..---
/ /
f- -
i- A /' r-
,
¡..; ,\.. ~. r,-
T
- CD
U1
- ,
-
-
!
- !
- .
- ! ?a
;
-
-
-
>
r
~
--._1___._....----....--.-.-
'\ ""r" -¡-..,.
1'\ J ,.. .... ~. .~ 10 ( pc F ~
"-
I I ['\
'\: -
G-5/,-, RU-5 '1\
1'\ .~AYn.
WESTCHESTER
Existing Land Use
81. Lucie County, Florida
COD: lAND USE CATAGOAY: TOTAL COD AREA:
Ed A~ I A~5 I M~~W I MX~~EO 23423 I
~~ LucIdo 41: AssocIates .0
~::v '-I~.,....,... "Ç{
V II.';I::..~--=--= .-.-
-..-
EEE8 101», ~ Ð2....od
~ RIJ.5, ~ Ubon (5 cb'od
SOt.fICE: Sll.ucle ec.ny c..,,,ø.."__ Plan
NOTE: /4J ~ ate 1IIpO>IImøte.
[[]]
~
MXO - ..-on kII8noIIy t.Ixed
Use 00veIq:wn<01I (5..9 ....od
MXO . Low InIonoIIy t.Ixed
Use oe..Icpmeo~ (5 ....od
11..1....1.... f'Iq>ooed Aoed /200' RIW)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
'-'"
..."
ORDINANCE 02-011
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 01-011 GRANTED ON
AUGUST 21,2001, ESTABLISHING THE WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO.2, AMONG OTHER MATTERS AND
AMENDING CHAPTER 1-6.5-81 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF ST.
LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; IN ORDER TO CONTRACT THE EXTERNAL
BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT AND ESTABLISH THE REVISED
BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING
PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR
APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF
STATE; PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR
CODIFICATION; AND SETTING FORTH THE VOTE ON ADOPTION.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on
the testimony and evidence, including, but not limited to the staff report, has made the
following determinations:
1. On August 21, 2001, St. Lucie County granted approval to Ordinance 01-011
amending Chapter 1-6.5 "Community Development" of the St. Lucie County Code
and Compiled Laws and establishing the Westchester Community Development
District No.1 as a community development district pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida
Statutes, and its boundaries, among other matters. The boundaries of Westchester
COD NO.2 contain 257.45 acres of land entirely within the jurisdictional boundaries
of St. Lucie County.
2. The Board of Supervisors of Westchester Community Development District No.2,
has filed with the Board a petition for an amendment of the community development
district, which petition contains the information required by Section 190.046(1),
Florida Statutes. The Petitioner is requesting that the boundaries of Westchester
COD NO.2 be contracted to 234.33 acres of land.
3. In accordance with Section 190.046(1)(b), Florida Statutes, the Board held a' public
hearing on March 26, 2002, after publishing notice of such hearing in the Ft. Pierce
Tribune and the Port St. Lucie News on March 15,2002.
"
"
Double Underline is for addition
Strike TI'lI'O~>Jh IS for deletion
Ordinance 02-011
1s1 Draft
Page 1
Print Date: 03/20/02
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
'-'
.~
(a) The Board has considered the record of the public hearing and the factors
set forth in Section 190.005 (I) (e), Florida Statutes, and has found that:
(b) All statements contained within the petition are true and correct;
(c) The land to be removed from the District does not exceed 50% of the acres
initially located within the District and the Board of Supervisors of the District
has not previously petitioned St. Lucie County for the expansion or
contraction of the District;'s boundaries.
(d) The amendment of this district is consistent with all applicable elements and
portions of the state comprehensive plan and the effective local government
comprehensive plan;
(e) The area of land within the proposed district is of sufficient size, is sufficiently
compact, and is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one functional
interrelated community;
(e) The district is the best alternative available for delivering the community
development services and facilities to the area that will be served by the
district;
(f) The community development services and facilities for the district will be
compatible with the capacity and uses of the existing local and regional
community development services and facilities; and,
(g) The area that will be served by the district following contraction is amenable
to separate special district government.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of St.
Lucie County, Florida:
PART A.
GRANT OF PETITION; AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 01-011 TO
ESTABLISH NEW EXTERNAL BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT.
Part A of Ordinance 01-011 is hereby amended to contract the external boundaries. of the
District by deleting Exhibit A to Ordinance 01-011 in its entirety and replacing it with Exhibit
A attached hereto. Accordingly, Section 1-6.5-81 of the Code of Compiled Laws
establishing the boundaries of the District is hereby amended so that references therein to
Exhibit "An shall mean Exhibit A attached hereto.
, .
.. .
Double Underline is for addition
(;trike "Fhrotlgh IS for deletion
Ordinance 02-011
1st Draft
Page 2
Print Date: 03120/02
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
'-"
"""
PART B.
CONFLICTING PROVISIONS.
Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie
County, County ordinances, and County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this
ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict.
PART C.
SEVERABILITY.
If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional,
inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance.
If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person,
property, or circumstance, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person,
property, or circumstance.
PART D.
APPLICABILITY OF ORDINANCE.
This ordinance shall be applicable throughout St. Lucie County's jurisdiction.
PART E.
FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE.
The Clerk be and is hereby directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to
the Bureau of Administrative Code and Laws, Department of State, The Capitol,
Tallahassee, Florida 32304.
PART F.
EFFECTIVE DATE.
This ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State.
PART G.
ADOPTION.
After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows:
Chairwoman Doug Coward XXX
Vice-Chairman Cliff Barnes XXX
Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX
Commissioner Paula A. Lewis XXX "
Double Underline is for addition
Ctrikc Thl'Otljlh IS for deletion
Ordinance 02-011
1st Draft
Page 3
Print Date: 03120102
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
.......
...,
Commissioner John D. Bruhn
xxx
PART H.
CODIFICATION.
Provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated in the S1. Lucie County Land
Development Code, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or
other appropriate word, and the sections of this ordinance may be re-numbered or re-
lettered to accomplish such intention; provided, however, that Parts B through H shall not
be codified.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 26th Day of March 2002.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY
Chairman
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM
AND CORRECTNESS:
Deputy Clerk
County Attorney
"
hf
H:\WP\Petitions\BCC\Finished.2002\Westchester2.CDD\Westchester20RD
Double Underline is for addition
Ðtril(e nil õ~al1ls for deletion
Ordinance 02-011
1st Draft
Page 4
Print Date: 03/20/02
¥
-.I
COUNTY COMMISSION
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN RE: PETITION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 190.046(1), FLORIDA STATUTES,
TO CONTRACT THE BOUNDARIES OF
WESTCHESTER NO.2 COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
/
PETITION TO CONTRACT BOUNDARIES OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
The Board of Supervisors (the "Board") of the Westchester No. 2 Community
Development District, an independent special district established pursuant to Chapter 190,
Florida Statutes (the "District") by Ordinance No. 01-011 (the "Ordinance") of St. Lucie County,
Florida (the "County") enacted on August 21,2001 hereby petitions the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA (the "Commission") in
accordance with Section 190.046(1) of the Uniform Community Development Act of 1980,
Chapter 190, Florida Statutes (the "Act") to contract the boundaries of the District and in support
thereof, hereby attests as follows:
1. That approximately 257.45 acres are currently within the external boundaries of
the District.
2. That the Board desires to contract the boundaries of the District by deleting acres
therefrom, so that thereafter the land area to be served by the District will comprise
approximately 234.326 acres. Following such contraction of the District's boundaries, all lands
in the District will continue to be located wholly within the jurisdictional boundaries of the
County.
3. That the real property to be removed from the external boundaries of the District
does not exceed 50% of the acres initially located within the boundaries of the District and the
Board has not previously submitted to the Commission a petition seeking expansion or
contraction of the District's boundaries.
4. That annexed hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof is a metes and bounds
description of the external boundaries of the District following the proposed contraction of such
boundaries. No real property within the external boundaries of the District as proposed is to be
excluded therefrom.
FTL:849260:2
"'"
..""
5. That the District is not currently providing any services and facilities to the real
property proposed to be removed from within the District's external boundaries.
6. That annexed hereto as Exhibit B and made a part hereof is evidence of the
written consent to the removal of its property from the boundaries of the District by the owner of
one hundred percent (100%) of the real property to be removed from the District.
7. That annexed hereto as Exhibit C and made a part hereof is a designation of the
future general distribution, location, and extent of public and private uses of land proposed for
the area to be excluded from the District by the future land use plan element of the effective local
government comprehensive plan.
8. That annexed hereto as Exhibit D and made a part hereof is a statement of
estimated regulatory costs in accordance with the requirements of Section 120.541, Florida
Statutes.
9. That following the proposed contraction of the District's boundaries, (i) the
property within the District will not be inconsistent with any applicable element or portion of the
state comprehensive plan or of the effective local government comprehensive plan; (ii) the
property comprising the District will be of sufficient size, compactness, and contiguity to be
developable as one functional interrelated community; (iii) the District will continue to present
the best alternative available for delivering the community development facilities and services to
the property that will be served by the District; (iv) the community development facilities and
services of the District will not be incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and
regional community development services and facilities; and (v) the property comprising the
District will be amenable to separate special-purpose government.
10. That all statements contained within this Petition are true and correct.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner, the Board of Supervisors of the Westchester No. 2
Community Development District, hereby respectfully requests the Commission to:
A. Direct its staff to notice, as soon as practicable, a local public non-emergency
hearing pursuant to the requirements of Section 190.046(l)(b) of the Act to consider whether to
grant the petition for the contraction of the District's boundaries and to amend the Ordinance
establishing the District to reflect the new boundaries of the District.
B. Grant the petition and enact an ordinance pursuant to applicable law amending the
Ordinance establishing the District to reflect the new boundaries of the District.
FTl:849260:2
2
'-'
...I
RESPECTFULL Y SUBMITTED this/3 7 d~ of r"/... , , '"
, 2002.
WESTCHESTER NO.2 COMMUNITY
DEVEL MENT DISTRICT
B./ /#~..
STATE OF FLORIDA )
COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /.37'7t day of
11l4-1rJ¡ , 2002, by ::hfßJe!'<;; 114-~¿¡,.) , the ChAd¿nN.J of the BOARD OF
SUPER ISORS OF WESTCHESTER NO. 2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT,
who is personally known to me ~ or produced. as identification.
Notary Public LJf!//l-"I--/ 2<.J.~
Printed Name: '4.4",¿-/';' j¿/..¿JÆ/~e~
PATRICIA W. WARREN
1# CC791995
EXPIRES NOV 28. 2002
BONDED THROIIQH
MNNlTAGE tfI:1INr(
FTL :849 260: 2
3
FTL:849260:2
~
...",,;
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONIMETES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION
'rAWSON, NOBLE &WEBB, INC. ~
lB# 6674
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND PLANNERS, SURVEYORS
590 NW PEACOCK BLVD, SUITE 9, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA
PHONE (561) 878-1700
CDD-2
A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTIONS 9 & 10, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST,
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCE AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF GATLIN BOULEVARD
(ALSO BEING THE NORTH LINE OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST)
AND THE WESTERLY LIMITS OF GATLIN BOULEVARD RIGHT-OF- WAY AND THE
WESTERLY LIMITS OF THOSE LANDS DESCRIBED IN AN ORDER OF TAKING DATED
JULY 4, 1979 AND RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 311, PAGES 2946 THROUGH
2952,INCLUSIVE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID ST. LUCIE COUNTY AND AS SHOWN ON
THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY MAPS FOR STATE
ROAD NO.9 (1-95), SECTION 94001 - 2412, DATED 06/02/77, WITH LAST REVISION OF
09/11/79 (THE ABOVE DESCRIBED WESTERLY LIMITS OF GATLIN BOULEVARD BEAR
SOUTH 00°01 '45" WEST AND ÂLL BEARINGS ARE RELATIVE THERETO);
THENCE SOUTH 89°57'05" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 737.09 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°02'55"
WEST, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREIN
DESCRIBED PARCEL, AND A POINT OF RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE,
CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET; THENCE
NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
. 89°38'04", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 39.11 FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE
WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, HA VINO A RADIUS OF 781.00 FEET; THENCE
NORTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
34°34'43", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 471.34 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE;
THENCE NORTH 34°53'43" EAST, ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 291.45 FEET, TO THE
POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS
OF 58.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TIIROUGH A
CENTRAL ANG . OF 49°41'44", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 50.31 FEET, TO A POINT OF
REVERSE CT . A' WITH A E, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HA VINO A
ARY R. URFORD, PSM
PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
STATE OF FLORIDA REG. NO. 4981
DATE: - 30 - å>"l-
NOTE: THIS IS NOTA SKETCH OF SURVEY, BUT ONLY..
A GRAPHIC DEPICTION OF THE DESCRIPTION SHOWrtJ
HEREON. THERE HAS BEEN NO FIELD WORK,VIEWING
OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, OR MONUMENTS SËT IN
CONNECTION WITH THE PREPARATION OF THIS
INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON.
REVISIONS-UPDATES
DATE
BY
CK'D
NOTE: LANDS SHOWN HEREON WERE NOT
ABSTRACTED FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY ANDIOR
EASEMENTS OF RECORD.
JOB NO.:
B589 BY: JDM CHECKED: GRB F.B.: N/A PG.: N/A SHEET 1 OF 6
YAWSON,NOBlE &WEBB, INC. .J
LB# 6674
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND PLANNERS, SURVEYORS
590 NW PEACOCK BLVD, SUITE 9, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA
PHONE (561) 878-1700
"
. .. ..-.~.. ....... ..
RADIUS OF 130.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°41'07", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 205.76 FEET, TO A
POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY,
HAVING A RADIUS OF 58.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF
SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 54°25'22", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 55.09
FEET, TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY,
AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 800.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF
SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°30'32", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 481.83
FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE NORTH 13°02'47" WEST,
ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 337.09 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A
CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,050.00 FEET; THENCE
NORTHERL Y, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAl: ANGLE OF
13°01'56", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 466.28 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE;
THENCE NORTH 00°00'52" WEST, ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 608.90 FEET, TO
THE POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, AND HAVING A
RADIUS OF 800.00 FEET; TIIENCE NORTIIERL Y, ALONG TIIE ARC OF SAID CURVE
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10°58'48", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 153.31 FEET, TO A
POINT OF 'COMPOUND CURVATURE WITII A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, AND
HAVING ARADIUS OF 58.00 FEET; THENCE NORTIIWESTERL Y, ALONG THE ARC OF
SAID CURVE TIIROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53°54'58", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 54.58 .
FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WITII A CURVE, CONCAVE.
NORTHEASTERL Y, HAVING A RADIUS OF 130.00 FEET; THENCE NORTIIWESTERL Y,
ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52°24'42", AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 118.92 FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WITII A CURVE,
CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERL Y, HAVING A RADIUS OF 4.00 FEET; THENCE
NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
77°30'05", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 5.41 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE;
THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" WEST, ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1,278.80 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00°00'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 456.86 FEET, TO THE POINT OF
CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 975.00
FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 38°43'01 ", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 658.84 FEET, TO A POINT OF NON-RADIAL
INTERSECTION WIm A LINE (THE RADIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS soum
51 °16'59" WEST-FROM THIS POINT); THENCE NORTH 52°45'09" EAST ALONG SAID LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 395.15 FEET; THENCE NORTH 78°15'06" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 907.21 FEET,
TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERL Y,.AND
HA VING A RADIUS OF 4.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID
CURVE THROUQH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 99°48'52", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 6.97 FEET, TO
A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY,
AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 602.61 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC
OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52°10'10", AN ARC DISTANCE OF
JOB NO.:
B589 BY: JDM CHECKED: GRB F.B.: N/A PG.: N/A SHEET 2 OF ·6
. ,
-
'-
..
'1:.AWSON, NOBLE &WEBB, INC. ""'"
LBU 6674
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND PLANNERS, SURVEYORS
590 NW PEACOCK BLVD, SUITE 9, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA
PHONE (561) 878-1700
548.69 FEET, TO A POINT OF NON-RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A LINE (THE RADIUS
POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 16°16'04" WEST FROM THIS POINT); THENCE
NORTH 16°16'02" EAST ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF I71.26 FEET; THENCE NORTH
60°47'35" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 146.85 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF PORT ST. LUCIE
SECTION 35 AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK IS, PAGE 10 OF THE
PUBLIC RECÒRDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 89°54'10" EAST ALONG SAID LJ1'.lE,
A DISTANCE OF 1,793.84 FEET, TO A POINT OF NON-RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A
CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 5,983.58 FEET, SAID CURVE
BEING A PORTION OF THE WEST LINE OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN ORDER OF TAKING,
DATED JULY 24, 1979, IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 311 , PAGES 2946 THRU 2952, PUBLIC
RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY (THE RADIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH . "
85°05'37" EAST FROM THIS POIN1); THENCE TRAVERSING THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID
LANDS DESCRIBED IN ORDER OF TAKING, BY THE FOLLOWING ELEVEN (II) COURSES:
I. SOUTHERL Y, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 23'i'~1 '41 ", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 2,474.52 FEET, TO A POINT OF
TANGENCY WITH A LINE;
2. SOUTH 18°47'19" EAST ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 714.03 FEET;
3. " SOUTH 14°47'19" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 510.88 FEET;
" 4. SOUTH 07°32'07" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 374.37 FEET;
5. SOUTH 06°58'16" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 373.49 FEET;
6. SOUTH 15°33'28" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 491.49 FEET;
7. SOUTH 34°39'50" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 207.78 FEET;
8. SOUTH 70°02'50" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 289.50 FEET;
9. SOUTH 00°01'45" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 64.09 FEET;
" 10. SOUTH 82°24'53" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 317.56 FEET;
11. NORTH 89°58'15" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 635.24 FEET;
TIIENCE DEPARTING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, SOUTH 89°57'05" WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 737.23 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
......-..--...-..
.
CONTAINING 234.33 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
".
.
. "
c
",
JOB NO.:
B589 BY: JDM CHECKED: GRB F.B.: N/A PG.: N/A SHEET 3 OF 6
"-"
....J
LN\\'
.
Lawson,
. .
Noble
. . . . .
& Webb,
ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS
590 NW Peacock Boulevard, Suite 9, Part St. Lucie, Florida 34986
(561J 878-1700 . fax: (561J 878-1802 . emoil: Inw-psl@lnw-inc.com
West Palm Beach' Port St. Lucie
. . . . ..-
Inc. LB #6674
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION
Ww
en en
'" "'
w w
'" '"
z z
<{ <!
a::·o::o
en. .-
ztri uiz
01--.1--0
~.,.., top
va... a..u
~ÏIÏ~
'" t{)
z z
:;: :;:
o 0
-- --
CONTINUED SHEET 5
MATCH LINE
SI8'47'19"E .s:
714.03'
(TOT AU
R~20SO.00'
ð.~13·OI'56"
L~466.28·
¡TOT AU
z
~
~.
;-&~
~~
~
(/)
o
",--I
--I "
-I'~
bJõ
-!-!
rñ
lWLATTED
R~800.00'
ð.=34 ·30'32"-L..
L=481.~'
.
C.D.D.-2
234.33 ACRES +/-
~
i'oi;)
:-".
CD,..,
¡o....
<DI<)
o
'"
R=58.00'
ð.=54·25'22"
L=55.09' ~
R~58.00'
&49'41'44"1 '- R=130.00'
L=50.3I' '-ð.=90·41'07"
L=20S.76'
S34"39'SO"W
207,78'~
::;;
:;:::>
~!;t
'1'0
~!i!
b~
o<{
"'w
CD
--fr~
P.D.B. g_
.0
29
_0
(]O
u:!-
::.Ë
R=25.00'
ð.=89·38'04"
L=39.11'
S89'57'OS"W
737.23'
~ S89'S7'OS"W
737.09'
P.o.c. ~ - -
N. LINE SECTION 15
--....
~
N89'58'IS"W
635.24'
OR.8. 311, PAGES
2946-2952
GATLIN BOúLEVARD
INTERCHANGE WITH
1-95
-
ò
o
~
II
.
w
-'
«
o
if)
o
w -
CD
~o
uw
(f-- _
~~~
(f.
O(!)mN
Za;cilil
j~dg¡
lLl-á)
0"-.....<0
wo~v
zO::. ..(J)
:JW".N
ON",
I-a::~w
~05~
~~,a..
0()
en
w
I-
<{
l-
t{)
'"
W
--
i'S
-Z
U'lPLA TTED
P.O.8.
P.O.C.
P.B.
P.C.
P RC.
P.T.
R
ð.
L
N.R.
ORB.
----
POINT OF BEGlt-.MNG
POINT OF COMIÆNCEMENT
PLA T BOOK
POINT OF cæVATURE
POINT OF REVERSE cæv A TURE
POINT OF TANGENCY
DENOTES RADIUS
DENOTES DELTA
DENOTES ARC LENGTH
DENOTES NON-RADIAL
DENOTES OFFICIAL RECORD 800K
SEE SHEET 1. 2 & 3 OF 6 FOR DESCRIPTION
JOB No. B589
DATE: 01-14-02
¡'\Dot.\SOO-S99\BS89\CAD\BS89SK02-l.d.g 01/29/è002 Cè"è,Oè PM (ST SHEET 4 OF 6
BY: JDM
CHECKED: GRB
F.B. -
PG.
~
.
LN\\'
. . . .
Lawson, Noble &
ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS
590 NW Peacock Boulevord, Suite 9, Port Sf. Lucie, Florida 34986
(56) 878-1700 ° fax: (561) 878-1802 ° email: Inw-psl@/nw-inc.com
West Palm Beach ° Port St. Lucie
"W1fI
. . . . . . . ....
Webb, Inc. LB #6674
SECTION 4
TOWNSHIP 37 S.
RANGE 39 E.
-NR.
N 16°16'02·E
171.26'
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION
_ ~ORT ST. LUCIE SECTION 35
~ (PlATBOOKI5,PAGEI01
N8g054·1O·E 1793.84'
\...:.- NGO·47'35"E
146.85'
SI6·'6'04"W
RADIAl ~
I
R=602.61'
~ ò=S2°10'lO"
L=S48.69'
l SEE DETAIL
·B·
N78°1S'06"E
907.21'
(TOT AU
<0
t-
w
~.~
o -
w --'
=> J:
z Ü
- t-
~ «
o ::;;
ü
W
m
'"
w
C>
z
«
a::~
W
m
'"
~
z
~
m : crlz
Z'" 0
Or- 1'--_
¡::"'."'t-
uð.. 2:;u
~¡¡¡ ¡¡¡¡,
~·z
;;: ;;:
o 0
t- t-
C.D.D. -2
234.33 ACRES +/-
----....
,./"\ "
/' \ ",
/ \ \
/ R=602.61' \ \
I Ò=52'IO'I~,,--\ \
L=S48.69 \ I
I "\. R-4.00-
\ tI18°15~!.. ~Ò=99°48'52· I
\- - 9<>11.\ L=6.97'
\ /
, /
" DETAIL "8" /'
....... ,./
""---~,..,
R=5983.58'
ò=23°41'41"-
L-2474.52'
\ SEE DETAIL
·A"
R-I3000'
. R=4.00' Ò-S2024'42"
Ò=77°30'OS" :) L=118.92'
L=S.41' /' --."
N90000'OO·W / '-R=58.00'
1278.80' Ò4s3054'58.
(TOTAU \ r ~=S4.S8'
\ /
R=SOO.OO" ,./
ò=100S8·4S·
L=lS3.31·
~
P.O.a.
P.O.C.
P.a.
P.C.
P .RC.
P.T.
R
ò
L
N.R
OR.B.
POINT OF BEGII\MNG UNPLA TTED
POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
PLAT BOOK
POINT OF CURVATURE
POINT OF REVERSE CURVATIJRE
POINT OF TANGENCY
DENOTES RADIUS
DENOTES DELTA
DENOTES ARC LENGTH
DENOTES NON-RADIAl
DENOTES OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK
SEE SHEET I, 2 & 3 OF 6 FOR DESCRIPTION
JOB No. 8589
BY: JDM
z
o
",0
gö
iDâ
ON
. :i
,....------..........
,./ DETAIL °A·
/'
/
N9Q°OO'OO"W
/ r 1278.80'
L__('
I R=4.00' R=I~.~O' .
ð=77030'05. \ /",Ò=:2244,2
I L=S.41' \( L-lIS.92
\ "
\ R=S8.00'.........
Ò-53°54'S8· ~\
\ L-S4.58' \
\ R=800.00'
"- ò= 100S8'48·.,) /'
'- ....... L=IS3.31' ____..v
------
P.T.
. R=20S0.00'
ð=13·OI'S6·
r L=466,28'
---J (TOTAU
MA TCH LINE
CONTINUED SHEET 4
!'\D...\SOO-S99\B5e9\CAD\B589SK02-2.dwg 01/29/2002 02'56')6 PM CST Sl-£ET 5 OF 6
CHECKED: GRB
F.B. - PG.
~·~'37"E
RADIAL -
o
o
<;j"
II
"
W
....J
«
U
(f)
-,
-.
WEST LINE OF LMOS DESCRIBED
IN ORDER OF TAKING, DATED
JJLY 24,1979; O.RB. 311,
PAGES 2946 - 2952
"
"-
\
\
\
\
I
I
/
/
/
DATE: 01-14-02
t/")
m
w
t-
«
t-
V)
a::
w
t-
¡:o
.-.
.
LN\\'vI
. . . .
Lawson, Noble &
ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS
590 NW Peacock Boulevard, Suite 9, Pori SI. Lucie, Florido 34986
(561) 878-1700 . fox: (561) 878-1802 . emoi/: Inw-ps@lnw-inc.com
West Palm Beach, Port St. Lucie
. . . . . . ......
Webb, Inc. LB #6674
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION
SECTION 9
TOWNSHIP 37 S., RANGE 39 E.
t...WLATTED
~
P.O.B. POINT OF BEGItMNG
P.O.c. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
P.8. PLAT BOOK
P.C. POINT OF CURVATURE
P.R.C. POINT OF REVERSE CLRVATURE
P.T. POINT OF TANGENCY
R DENOTES RADIUS
ð. DENOTES DELTA
L DENOTES ARC LENGTH
NR. DENOTES NON-RADIAL
OM. DENOTES OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK
SEE Sf-EET I, 2 &. 3 OF 6 FOR DESCRIPTION
JOB No. B589
BY: JDM
.
.
R~975.00' ,----
ð.~38·43'OI·~
L~658.B4'
c..D.D.-2
234.33 ACRES +/-
w
b.
OW
- OJ
o .
OW
. 10
o~
o
z
~IË
..J ~
o·ß
~II
-,
ô
o
'<t"
II
N90·OO'OO·W
127B,BO'
(TOTAL)
-
~
W
...J
«
ü
if)
r,\Do'o\SOO-599\BS89\CAD\BS89SK02-3,dwg 01/2912002 03,18,SB PM EST SHEET 6 OF 6
CHECKED: GRB
F.B. - PG.
DATE: 01-14-02
'-'
""""
EXHIBIT B
EVIDENCE OF WRITTEN CONSENT OF OWNER
TO REMOVAL OF PROPERTY FROM THE EXTERNAL BOUNDARIES OF
WESTCHESTER NO.2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
Westchester Development Company, LLC, a Florida limited liability company and
successor by merger with Westchester Development Company ("Owner"), hereby certifies that it
is the sole owner of approximately 23.12 acres of certain real property (the "Property"), located
in St. Lucie County, Florida proposed to be excluded from within the boundaries of Westchester
No. 2 Community Development District (the "District"). By signing below, the Owner hereby
gives its full consent to the contraction of the external boundaries of the District to remove the
Property therefrom.
'f.......
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand this/3 day of
~,.,"......., 2002.
WESTCHESTER DEVELOPMENT
COMP , LLC
STATE OF FLORIDA )
COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE )
The foregoing instrumen~ /was acknowledged before me this /3T/[. day of
m/f¡le/¡ , 2002, by (//("~ heç.c/ep¡, the //;'Cê h.~ç,-./Of!"ßÎ' of
WESSTCHESTER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, who is personally known to me [~ or
produced as identification. I ~ . / J
/~.?</~~
Notary Public Þ-~CJ/f- ¿J ¿d.4.-R..A!.e_
Printed Name:
PATRICIA W. WARRENS
I CC79199
EXPIRES NOV 28. 2OQ2
fONOa) 11i1tOUOH
AOVANTAGi HOTAi'I'
"
FTL:849260:2
'w
..."
EXHIBIT C
DESIGNATION OF THE FUTURE GENERAL DISTRIBUTION, LOCATION AND
EXTENT OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE USES OF LAND PROPOSED FOR THE AREA
TO BE REMOVED FROM THE DISTRICT
FTL:849260:2
'-'
..,
1,,;" C.
~1T
, C
-....." ~~.
-""""...- ~
".....
,.....-
Not
Included
nil r
- .......-
---
.....--
::: .
- 4 -
- ^ ,. , r-
r ~\.. ]- .~
;b
en
- .
-
(
- C I
- -
f- ~ ~
-
-
-
~
11
,....
__1_1___1_1___1_1___'_1-
.'\ \ "'"r"
,... .... ..... io ( þ( 'F ~ r-.
1"- J
I\. r--..
I I "
~ -
G-51.-1 RU-5 1\
'\ .f\A)( n
WESTCHESTER
Existing Land Use
St. Lucie County, Florida
COD: LAND USE CATAGORY: TOTAL COD AREA:
Ed A~5 I R~5 I M~~~~W I M~~¡~ED I 234M
...~ Lucido & Associates
VJ;:¿, t..I~~
V .:...~-=-=".:::r--=
o
,......
---
B33J AG-5, ~ 10.2 dJlacI
~ AlJ.5, _ Uban (5 dJlacI
SOURCE; St lucie C<uIIy ~ Plan
NOTE: þJ ~ are appoxmole.
[[]]
~
MXD . Medim bIensfty MIxed
Use [)eveIqJmont (5-9 dulacI
MXD . Low Intensily MIxed
Use [)eveIqJmont (S dJlacI
J 1111111111111 Proposed Roed I2OC1 RJW)
FTL:849260:2
'-'
.."
EXHIBIT D
STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS
'- ...,
STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS
WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT #2
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Purpose and Scope
This statement of estimated regulatory costs ("SERC") supports the petition to
contract the boundaries of the Westchester Community Development District #2
("District" or "District #2"). The District was established by Ordinance No. 01-011
of St. Lucie County on August 21, 2001. The District currently comprises
approximately 257.45 acres of land located in St. Lucie County. The District
proposes to contract its boundaries by -23.12 acres to a total of 234.33 acres.
The limitations on the scope of this SERC are explicitly set out in Section
190.002(2)(d), F.S. (governing District formation or alteration) as follows:
"That the process of establishing such a district pursuant to uniform general law -
shall be fair and based only on factors material to manaQinQ and financinq the
service delivery function of the district, so that any matter concerninQ permittinQ
or planninq of the development is not material or relevant (emphasis added)."
1.2 Overview of the Westchester DRI and the Changes Requested in the
Boundaries of the Four Community Development Districts Serving Westchester
On August 21, 2001 the S1. Lucie County Commission approved the formation of
four Community Development Districts to provide community facilities and
services to the Westchester DR!. District #2 is designed to provide community
infrastructure, services, and facilities along with their operations and
maintenance, to a portion of the Westchester DRI located in St. Lucie County
(the "development"). The development is a master planned, mixed-use, fully
amenitized, community. The DRI includes 2,033 acres. The landowner has
established community development districts on 1,677.74 of these acres. The
land plan for the portion of the DRI planned for community development districts
consists of up to: (a) 4,500 residential units, (b) 2,001,000 square feet of offices,
(c) 575,000 square feet of retail space, and (d) 300 hotel units.
Given the size and scope of the development, St. Lucie County agreed to
establish four community development districts to serve the project. Four
districts are optimal for the development because this articulation allows for each
district to focus on the unique requirements of the land within its boundaries.
District #1 serves an exclusively commercial area in the project that will be
developed in the first phase of the development program. By contrast, the land
in District #2 is planned exclusively as a corporate office park with a civic/school
site. The land in District #3 is planned only for use as a residential community
with no commercial, retail, or office uses. Finally, District #4 is projected for
future development as a town center with retail uses at its core and surrounding
Page 1 of6
February 25, 2002
'- ..."",
residential uses. No offices are planned for the land in District #4. In light of
these very different land uses, and the unique demands for community
development district facilities and services, it is optimal to create four unique
community development districts, one for each area.
Table 1 displays the land use plan for the lands within each of the four proposed
community development districts planned for the Westchester DRI as envisioned
in the petitions to form the Districts. Noted at the time the petitions to form the
Districts were filed, was the fact that the land use plans were "subject to change
as land planning activities continue".
Table 1. land Use Plan for the Area in Westchester Served by the
Westchester Community Development Districts #1 through #4
Category CDD#1 CDD#2 CDD#3 CDD#4 Total
Acres 74.25 257.45 463.60 882.44 1,677.74
Single Family 0 0 863 2,512 3,375
Multifamily 0 0 287 838 1,125
Retail 125,000 0 0 450,000 575,000
Office 78,500 1,922,500 0 0 2,001,000
Hotel 0 0 0 300 300
Source: St. Lucie West Development Corporation
As land use planning and engineering analysis has progressed at Westchester,
a number of desired adjustments have come to light. No changes in the total
volume of development are proposed. However, the distribution of the
development across the four Districts is now somewhat different than originally
expected. The rationale for forming four distinct districts was based on the
unique land use mix that was originally anticipated for lands included in each
District. Since the land use plans have changed somewhat, it is desirable to
alter the boundaries of the various Districts to reflect these changes. Table 2
presents to proposed new land use plan for each District as well as the proposed
new acreage totals for each District.
Page 2 of 6
February 25. 2002
'-
...""
Table 2. Land Use Plan for the Proposed Areas in Westchester Served by the
Westchester Community Development Districts #1 through #4 As Modified
Category
Acres
Single family units
Multifamily units
Retail sqft
Office sqft
Hotel rooms
CDD#1
59.43
°
o
125,000
78,500
°
CDD#2
234.33
°
°
o
1,922,500
o
CDD#3
499.87
863
287
o
°
°
CDD#4
884.12
2,512
838
450,000
°
300
Total
1,677.75
3,375
1,125
575,000
2,001,000
300
The changes proposed for the acreage and land uses in each District are
provided in Table 3. It is important to note that no change in total development is
proposed. Furthermore, the proposed volume and distribution of development in
each District is the same as originally proposed. The changes involve
redistributing the acreage among the Districts, so that the original land uses are -
preserved.
Table 3. Changes in the Land Use Plans Proposed for
Westchester Co"?munity Development Districts #1 through #4 As Modified
Category
Acres
Single family units
Multifamily units
Retail sqft
Office sqft
Hotel rooms
CDD#1
-14.82
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
CDD#2
-23.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
CDD#3
36.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
CDD#4
1.68
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
The Westchester Community Development District #2 continues to be planned
as an office park in the DR/. District #2 will provide community development
district facilities and services to 234.33 acres in the District.
In addition, District #1 will serve as the master community development district
for the additional districts that are planned for the development. In that role the
District will also provide community-serving infrastructure that provides benefits
to all four of the community development districts envisioned to serve the
Westchester DRI. These master improvements include major entrance roads,
entry statements, landscaping, master stormwater control, and master utilities.
The debt service and operation/maintenance costs incurred by District #1 to
provide the master community improvements will be funded through non ad
valorem special assessments on all benefiting property in the development.
District #1 may also operate and maintain localized infrastructure within any of
the other three districts that is integrally related to the master community
improvements, if a district desires to delegate that function and District #1
Page 30f6
February 25. 2002
"-'
..."
desires to accept the same. It is anticipated that the four community
development districts will enter into a series of inter local agreements providing
for this sharing of master improvement, operating and maintenance costs.
1.3 Requirements for Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs
Section 120.541(2), F.S. (1997), defines the elements a statement of estimated
regulatory costs must contain:
"(a) A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be
required to comply with the rule, together with a general description of the types
of individuals likely to be affected by the rule.
(b) A good faith estimate of the cost to the agency, and to any other state and
local government entities, of implementing and enforcing the proposed rule, and
any anticipated effect on state and local revenues.
(c) A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by-
individuals and entities, including local governmental entities, required to comply
with the requirements of the rule. As used in this paragraph, "transactional
costs" are direct costs that are readily ascertainable based upon standard
business practices, and include filing fees, the cost of obtaining a license, the
cost of equipment required to be installed or used or procedures required to be
employed in complying with the rule, additional operating costs incurred, and the
cost of monitoring and reporting.
(d) An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined by Section
288.703, F.S., and an analysis of the impact on small counties and small cities
as defined by Section 120.52, F.S. St. Lucie County is not defined as a small
County for purposes of this requirement.
(e) Any additional information that the agency determines may be useful.
2.0 A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be
required to comply with the ordinance, together with a general description
of the types of individuals likely to be affected by the ordinance.
There will be no individuals or entities affected by approval of the proposed
contraction in the boundaries of District #2. District #2 is an already existing
Community Development District. The petition to contract its boundaries by
approximately -23.12 acres will have no impact on either the remaining 234.33
acres in the District or on the -23.12 acres contracted out of the District for the
following reasons.
First, as noted above, neither the costs nor the volume of development planned
for District #2 will change if the proposed boundary change is approved. So,
there will be no impact on land in District #2. Second, the contraction parcel will
be included in the expansion of other Districts. Again, since neither the costs nor
Page 4 of 6 February 25. 2002
'-" -.,,¡I
the volume of development will change in any other District, there is no impact
on any individual or entity if the proposal is approved.
3.0 Good faith estimate of the cost to state and local government entities, of
implementing and enforcing the proposed ordinance, and any anticipated
effect on state and local revenues.
3.1 Costs to Governmental Agencies of Implementing and Enforcing Ordinance
State Governmental Entities
There will be no cost to any governmental agencies to implement or to enforce
the proposed ordinance. District #2 is an existing Community Development
District in good standing. Altering its boundaries will not change the costs for any
State governmental entity.
St. Lucie County
St. Lucie County will incur no costs associated with this proposed Ordinance
beyond reviewing the petition and its supporting exhibits. The petition itself
provides much of the information needed for a staff review. St. Lucie County
already possess the staff needed to conduct the review without the need for new
staff. In addition, there is no capital required to review the petition. Finally, local
governments routinely process similar petitions for land uses and zoning
changes that are far more complex than is the petition to alter the boundaries of
District #2.
There is no annual cost to the County, because the District is an existing
Community Development District in good standing. Approving a change in the
District's boundaries does not impact annual costs to the County in any way.
3.2 Impact on State and Local Revenues
Adoption of the proposed ordinance will have no negative impact on State or
local revenues. The District is an existing Community Development District. As
an independent unit of local government, the District is designed to be a self
funding entity in terms of its obligations under Chapter 190, F.S. Altering its
boundaries, as proposed here, has no impact on State or local revenues.
4.0 A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by
individuals and entities required to comply with the requirements of the
ordinance.
"
There are no transactional costs associated with approving this alteration in the
boundaries of the District. As noted above, the amount of development and the
number of acres served by all the Districts will no change if the Ordinance is
approved. Furthermore, the volume of development and the costs for providing
Page 5 of 6
February 25, 2002
~
District facilities and services is also unchanged.
estimated costs and the timetable for construction.
..."
Exhibit 8 contains the
5.0 An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined by Section
288.703, F.S., and an analysis of the impact on small counties and small
cities as defined by Section 120.52, F.S.
There will be no impact on small businesses because of the changes proposed
in the District's boundaries. The District is an existing Community Development
District. The costs to provide infrastructure and services has not changed nor
has the volume of development planned for the District.
St. Lucie County has an estimated population that is greater than 10,000 in the
most current census (2000). Therefore, the County is not defined as a "small"
county according to Section 120.52, F.S.
6.0 Any additional useful information.
The analysis provided above is based on a straightforward application of
economic theory, especially as it relates to tracking the incidence of regulatory
costs and ben~fits. Inputs were received from the Developer's Engineer and
other professionals associated with the Developer.
¡
,
Page 6 of 6
February 25, 2002
"
.V'
'-'
AGENDA REOUEST
.."",
ITEM NO.
DATE: 03/26/02
CONSENT [
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [)<1
Leg. [ X ] Quasi-Jud. [
s¿
SUBJECT:
Consider the petition of The Board of Superviso
Development District No. 3 for an amendment of the community development
district known as "Westchester Community Development District No.3" - Draft
Ordinance 02-012.
PRESENTED BY:
SUBMITTED BY:
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Communitv Development
BACKGROUND:
The Board of Supervisors of Westchester Community Development District No.
3 has filed a petition with St. Lucie County to amend the community
development district known as "Westchester Community Development District
No.3" .
The Westchester Community Development District No. 3 is proposed to occupy
499.87 acres instead of the 463.06 acres originally proposed. The subject
property is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of
Interstate 95 and the proposed extension of Gatlin Boulevard. The attached
Exhibit provides a general location map for the boundaries of Westchester
Community Development District No.3. It should be emphasized that at this
time there are no existing occupied residential properties in this Proposed
Westchester Community Development District No.3.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
N/A
PREVIOUS ACTION:
On August 21, 2001, The Board of County Commissioners granted approval to
Ordinance 01-012, establishing the community development district known as
Westchester CDD #3.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve Draft
Ordinance 02-012, authorizing an amendment to the boundaries of the.
community development district known as "Westchester Community Developmeh~
District No.3". .
[ X]
[ ]
APPROVED
OTHER: 4-0
[ ] DENIED
(Hutchinson Absent)
~
COMMISSION ACTION:
County Attorney:
Review ðnd AODrovals
Management & Budget:
Purchasing:
Originating Department:
Other:
Other:
Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable)
'-'"
>.J
COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: March 26, 2002
Ordinance 02-012
MEMORANDUM
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Community Development Director
DATE: March 20,2002
SUBJECT: Petition of The Board of Supervisors of Westchester Community
Development District No.3, to amend the community development district
known as "Westchester Community Development District No.3" - Draft
Ordinance 02-012
The Board of Supervisors for Westchester Community Development District NO.3 has filed
a petition with S1. Lucie County for an amendment to Westchester Community
Development District NO.3. Westchester CDD No.3 was originally proposed to contain
463.06 acres, but will now contain 499.87 acres. The change in boundaries was in
response to changes in the master plan for the Westchester project.
On August 21, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners approved the establishment of
Westchester Community Development District No. 3 located at the corner of the
intersection of Interstate 95 and the proposed extension of Gatlin Boulevard. The attached
Exhibit provides a general location map for the boundaries of Westchester COD No.3. It
should be emphasized that at this time there are no existing occupied residential properties
in this proposed Westchester CDD NO.3.
Attached is a copy of Draft Ordinance 02-012 that provides for the amendment of
Westchester CDD NO.3. Staff recommends approval of Draft Ordinance 02-012.
hf
cc: Doug Anderson, County Admisistrator
Daniel Mcintyre, County Attorney
David P. Kelly. Planning Manager
Noreen Dreyer, Esquire - Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster & Russell, PA
'\'te5\ Blvd
\.Jüc\e
13\
Prima Vista ,Blvd
~ò
p~
v~
òt;õ""
ø~
(')
¡I)
::;;
o
....
:J
¡D"
rn
<
0..
-0
a:
Gatlin Blvd
Q)
c:
:::J
Q)
OJ
c:
(I
a:
Westchester CDD #3
~
ro
(')
¡I)
rn3-
<3
o..CD
....
CD
(I
(f¡
e
<ë
-0
>
ro
(I
c:
o
fi3
en
. '-'-' .-.,
, "..", /", '\ .: ',; ".>
~4Ø.~
Thõs mop ..... boon c:o<rØed let gonoooJ pIorring ond ..........,. purposes oriy.
\'He -v .rran has been __ 10 pnMde Ihe moot """"'" end accureIe
I_Ion ~... not ntended Iet.- .. . legally binding docurent.
t
GRAPHIC SCAL..E
~ I I \ . .....c.
o O.~ 1 ~ j
St. Lucie County
Martin County
N
"
~
..,
~"., c~
, "iT
a
.-",'" ~1i
_.....,..... "
---
,..,--
Not
Included
nil L
----
-,...... .,.
-.--
:::
-. -
- A ~ " ,.
II- ~\. 1:1" r~
I õ
- I) P <D
c.n
- , \
- 1-0 ) \
( \
- ¡
- .
I- Š W"~
i
~
I- :
f- ,.
.>
II
¡.....
l'\ ro. ,... ... (þ 'F~'
, 1'\ , II 10 Ì"
,." Ì'
11-. I I I 1'\
I~ -
'\ G-~~ RU-5 .t\A)(n. '1\
"
WESTCHESTER
Existing Land Use
S1. Lucie County, Florida
-
TOTAl COO AREA:
499.87
~~ Lucido & Associates ð
v,,;:y ~~~ ~
v ~~ I"'~
-~
EEEE AB-S, AgIa.IIan (0.2 c1Ifad
~ RU-5. ReoIdonIIoI Ubon C5 c1Ifad
[[ill t.IXO. ~ InIeno/tf IoIxed
Uoe DewIopoY*II IS c1Ifad
~ uxo· Modbn..-y_
~ Uoe o..oIcpmeo. ~9 c1Ifad
11111111111111 Propooed _ C2OO' RIWI
SOURCE: S1. LucIII Co.nIy COO..."'..._ Plan
NOT£: AlIICtUgII are I>pO>CknaIe.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
'-'
...I
ORDINANCE 02-012
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 01-012 GRANTED ON
AUGUST 21, 2001 , ESTABLISHING THE WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO.3, AMONG OTHER MATTERS AND
AMENDING CHAPTER 1-6.5-81 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF ST.
LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; IN ORDER TO EXPAND THE EXTERNAL
BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT AND ESTABLISH THE REVISED
BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING
PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR
APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF
STATE; PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR
CODIFICATION; AND SETTING FORTH THE VOTE ON ADOPTION.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on
the testimony and evidence, including, but not limited to the staff report, has made the
following determinations:
1. On August 21, 2001, St. Lucie County granted approval to Ordinance 01-012
amending Chapter 1-6.5 "Community Development" of the St. Lucie County Code
and Compiled Laws and establishing the Westchester Community Development
District NO.3 as a community development district pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida
Statutes, and its boundaries, among other matters. The boundaries of Westchester
COD No.3 contain 463.06 acres of land entirely within the jurisdictional boundaries
of St. Lucie County.
2. The Board of Supervisors of Westchester Community Development District No.3,
has filed with the Board a petition for an amendment of the community development
district, which petition contains the information required by Section 190.046(1),
Florida Statutes. The Petitioner is requesting that the boundaries of Westchester
COD NO.3 be expanded to 499.87 acres of land.
3. In accordance with Section 190.046(1 )(b), Florida Statutes, the Board held à· public
hearing on March 26, 2002, after publishing notice of such hearing in the Ft. Pierce
Tribune and the Port St. Lucie News on March 15, 2002.
"
"
Double Underline is for addition
Ðtrilla "fo,I)I;¡M IS for deletion
Ordinance 02-012
1st Draft
Page 1
Print Date: 03/20/02
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
'-'
...I
~
(a) The Board has considered the record of the public hearing and the factors
set forth in Section 190.005 (I) (e), Florida Statutes, and has found that:
(b) All statements contained within the petition are true and correct;
(c) The land to be removed from the District does not exceed 50% of the acres
initially located within the District and the Board of Supervisors of the District
has not previously petitioned St. Lucie County for the expansion or
contraction of the District;'s boundaries.
(d) The amendment of this district is consistent with all applicable elements and
portions of the state comprehensive plan and the effective local government
comprehensive plan;
(e) The area of land within the proposed district is of sufficient size, is sufficiently
compact, and is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one functional
interrelated community;
(e) The district is the best alternative available for delivering the community
development services and facilities to the area that will be served by the
district;
(f) The community development services and facilities for the district will be
compatible with the capacity and uses of the existing local and regional
community development services and facilities; and,
"
(g) The area that will be served by the district following contraction is amenable
to separate special district government.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of St.
Lucie County, Florida:
PART A.
GRANT OF PETITION; AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 01-012 TO
ESTABLISH NEW EXTERNAL BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT.
Part A of Ordinance 01-012 is hereby amended to expand the external boundaries of the
District by deleting Exhibit A to Ordinance 01-012 in its entirety and replacing it with Exhibit
A attached hereto. Accordingly, Section 1-6.5-81 of the Code of Compiled Laws
establishing the boundaries of the District is hereby amended so that references therein to
Exhibit CIA" shall mean Exhibit A attached hereto.
"
Double Underline is for addition
Glril(ð l't1rð~!" IS for deletion
Ordinance 02-012
1st Draft
Page 2
Print Date: 03120102
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
~
.."
"'.
~
PART B.
CONFLICTING PROVISIONS.
Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie
County, County ordinances, and County resolutions. or parts thereof, in conflict with this
ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict.
PART C.
SEVERABILITY.
If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional,
inoperative. or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance.
If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person,
property, or circumstance, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person,
property, or circumstance.
PART D.
APPLICABILITY OF ORDINANCE.
This ordinance shall be applicable throughout St. Lucie County's jurisdiction.
PART E.
FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE.
The Clerk be and is hereby directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to
the Bureau of Administrative Code and Laws. Department of State, The Capitol,
Tallahassee, Florida 32304.
PART F.
EFFECTIVE DATE.
This ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State.
PART G.
ADOPTION.
After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows:
Chairwoman Doug Coward XXX
Vice-Chairman Cliff Barnes XXX
Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX
Commissioner Paula A. Lewis XXX
Double Underline is for addition
Gtril\c Throtl!lh IS for deletion
Ordinance 02-012
1st Draft
Page 3
Print Date: 03/20/02
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
'-"
...,¡
'i"
~~
Commissioner John D. Bruhn
xxx
PART H.
CODIFICATION.
Provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated in the St. Lucie County Land
Development Code, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or
other appropriate word, and the sections of this ordinance may be re-numbered or re-
lettered to accomplish such intention; provided, however, that Parts B through H shall not
be codified.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 26th Day of March 2002.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY
Chairman
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM
AND CORRECTNESS:
Deputy Clerk
County Attorney
"'
hf
H:\WP\Petitions\BCC\Finished.2002\Westchester3.CDD\Westchester30RD
Double Under1ine is for addition
StNI!" Thro~!l1I is for deletion
Ordinance 02-012
1st Draft
Page 4
Print Date: 03/20/02
'-'"
""""
COUNTY COMMISSION
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN RE: PETITION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 190.046(1), FLORIDA STATUTES,
TO EXPAND THE BOUNDARIES OF
WESTCHESTER NO.3 COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
/
PETITION TO EXPAND BOUNDARIES OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
The Board of Supervisors (the "Board") of the Westchester No. 3 Community
Development District, an independent special district established pursuant to Chapter 190,
Florida Statutes (the "District") by Ordinance No. 01-012 (the "Ordinance") of St. Lucie County,
Florida (the "County") enacted on August 21, 2001 hereby petitions the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA (the "Commission") in
accordance with Section 190.046(1) of the Uniform Community Development Act of 1980,
Chapter 190, Florida Statutes (the "Act") to expand the boundaries of the District and in support
thereof, hereby attests as follows:
1. That approximately 463.60 acres are currently within the external boundaries of
the District.
2. That the Board desires to expand the boundaries of the District by adding acres,
so that thereafter the land area to be served by the District will comprise approximately 499.873
acres. Following such expansion of the District's boundaries, all lands in the District will
continue to be located wholly within the jurisdictional boundaries of the County.
3. That the real property to be included within the external boundaries of the District
does not exceed 50% of the acres initially located within the boundaries of the District and the
Board has not previously submitted to the Commission a petition seeking expansion or
contraction of the District's boundaries.
4. That annexed hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof is a metes and bounds
description of the external boundaries of the District following the proposed expansion of such
boundaries. No real property within the external boundaries of the District as proposed is to be
excluded therefrom.
FTL:823447:3
'-"
...."
5. That annexed hereto as Exhibit B is the proposed timetable for construction of
any Qistrict services to the area to be newly included the District and the estimated cost of
contructing the proposed services.
6. That annexed hereto as Exhibit C and made a part hereof is evidence of the
written consent to the inclusion of its property in the District by the owner of one hundred
percent (100%) ofthe real property to be included within the District.
7. That annexed hereto as Exhibit D and made a part hereof is a designation of the
future general distribution, location, and extent of public and private uses of land proposed for
the area to be included from the District by the future land use plan element of the effective local
government comprehensive plan,
8. That annexed hereto as Exhibit E and made a part hereof is a statement of
estimated regulatory costs in accordance with the requirements of Section 120.541, Florida
Statutes.
9. That following the proposed expansion of the District's boundaries, (i) the
property within the District will not be inconsistent with any applicable element or portion of the
state comprehensive plan or of the effective local government comprehensive plan; (ii) the
property comprising the District will be of sufficient size, compactness, and contiguity to be
developable as one functional interrelated community; (Hi) the District will continue to present
the best alternative available for delivering the community development facilities and services to
the property that will be served by the District; (iv) the community development facilities and
services of the District will not be incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and
regional community development services and facilities; and (v) the property comprising the
District will be amenable to separate special-purpose government.
10. That all statements contained within this Petition are true and correct.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner, the Board of Supervisors of the Westchester No. 3
Community Development District, hereby respectfully requests the Commission to:
A. Direct its staff to notice, as soon as practicable, a local public non-emergency
hearing pursuant to the requirements of Section 190.046(l)(b) of the Act to consider whether to
grant the petition for the expansion of the District's boundaries and to amend the Ordinance
establishing the District to reflect the new boundaries of the District.
B. Grant the petition and enact an ordinance pursuant to applicable law amending the
Ordinance establishing the District to reflect the new boundaries of the District.
"
FTL:823447:3
2
'-" ....I
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITIED this/3 7 d;Y of ~... "', ........ ,2002.
WESTCHESTER NO.3 COMMUNITY
D>~ENT DISTRICT
By: -;/#~
Tit e: ¿ A '. ,..- -----, .. --.::> .
STATE OF FLORIDA )
COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE )
The foregoing instmment was acknowl~ged before me this /371Í day of
J1J¡l-Jtt'!1t , 2002, by ::¡;;,.~ ¡'//l.lJl<.¥sa,J , the ér.t'-t/.4-.J of the BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF WESTCHESTER NO. 3 COMMUNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT,
who is personally known to me [(] or produced as identification.
Notary Public ~þJ~~
Printed Name: -At/A" /è-',; A. W. ¿¿/4~c:-#
PATRICIA W, WARREN
MMISSION II CC79I99 5
EXPIRES NOV 28. 2002
&eNDeD tHROUGH
~AHTAGE HOTAR'f
FTl:823447:3
3
FTl:823447:3
......
...."
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION/METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION
YAWSON, NOBLE &WEBB, INC. ...,¡
LB# 6674
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND PLANNERS, SURVEYORS
590 NW PEACOCK BLVD, SUITE 9/ PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA
PHONE (561) 878-1700
CDD-3
AJlARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTIONS 8, 9,10,16 & 17, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE
39 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS: ""
COMMENCE AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF GATLIN BOULEVARD
o (ALSO BEING THE NORTH LINE OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAS})
AND THE WESTERLY LIMITS OF GA TLIN BOULEVARD RIGHT-OF- WAY AND THE
WESTERLY LIMITS OF THOSE LANDS DESCRIBED IN AN ORDER OF TAKING DATED
JULY 4, 1979 AND RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 311, PAGES 2946 THROUGH ,
2952, lNCLUSIVE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID ST. LUCIE COUNTY AND AS SHOWN ON
THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY MAPS FOR STATE
ROAD NO.9 (1-95), SECTION 94001 - 2412, DATED 06/02/77, WITH LAST REVISION OF
09/l1179 (THE ABOVE DESCRI-\iJED WESTERLY LIMITS OF GATLIN BOULEVARD BEAR
SOUTH 00°01'45" WEST AND ALL BEARINGS ARE RELATIVE THERETO); THENCE SOUTH
~9°57'05" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 737.09 FEET; THENCE NORTII 00°02'55" WEST, A
DISTANCp.QF 100.00 FEET, TO A POINT OF RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE,
CONCAVE NORTIIWESTERL Y, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET; THENCE
NORTHEAS1ERL Y, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 1HROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
89°38'04", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 39.1 I FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE
WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE EAS1ERL Y,HA VING A RADIUS OF 781.00 FEET; THENCE
NORTIlERL Y, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CEN1RAL ANGLE OF
34°34'43", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 471.34 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A tINE;
THENCE NORTH 34°53'43" EAST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF291.45 FEET, TO THE
POINT OF GURV ATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS
OF 58.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TIIROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49°41'44", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 50.31 FEET, TO A POINT OF
REVERSE CURV oRE A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A
RADIUS OF J F~ ° ENCE NO EASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE
ÄRY R. BURFORD, PSM
PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
STATE OF FLORIDA REG. NO. 4981
DATE: / - :30 - 0"'2.-
REvrSIONS-UPDA TES
DATE
BY
CK'D
NOTE: THIS IS NOT A SKETCH OF SURVEY, BUT ONL...,.
A GRAPHIC DEPICTION OF THE DESCRIPTION SHOWN
HEREON. THERE'HAS BEEN NO FIELD WORK, VIEWING
OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, OR MONUMENTS SET IN
CONNECTION WITH THE PREPARATION OF THIS
INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON.
NOTE: LANDS SHOWN HEREON WERE NOT
ABSTRACTED FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY AND/OR
EASEMENTS OF RECORD.
JOB NO.:
B589 BY: JDM CHECKED: GRB F.B.: N/A . PG.: N/A SHEET 1 OF 8
b\ WSON¡ NOBLE &WEBB, IN.c. ...I
LS# 6674
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND PLANNERS, SURVEYORS
590 NW PEACOCK BLVD, SUITE 9; PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA
PHONE (561) 878-1700
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°41'07", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 205.76 FEET, TO A
POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY,
HAVING A RADIUS OF 58.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF
SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 54°25'22", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 55.09 .
FEET, TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY,
AND HA VINa A RADIUS OF 800.00 FEET; TIlENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF
SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°30'32", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 481.83
FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE NORTH 13°02'47" WEST,
ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 58.53 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE
HEm;:IN DESCRIBED PARCEL, AND TIlE POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A CURVE,
CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 4.00 FEET; THENCE
NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
76°57'13", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 5.37 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE;
THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" WEST, ALONG ~AID LINE A DISTANCE OF 1,253.56 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00°00'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 239.96 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°59'59"
WEST, A DISTANCE OF 345.02 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURV A TORE WITH A CURVE,
CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 275.00 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY,
ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12°15'48", AN ARC
DISTANCE' OF 58.86 FEET, TO A POINT OF NON-RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A LINE
(THE RADIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 12°15'49" EAST FROM THIS POIN1);
THENCE SOUTH 15°14'57" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 513.76 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 19°29'57"
WE~T, A DISTANCE OF 295.52 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70°10'5 I" WEST, A DISTANCE OF
208.88 FEET; THENCE NORTH 75°49'33" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 472.34 FEET; THENCE
, NORTH 39°04'35" WEST; A DISTANCE OF 189.81 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°00'00" WEST, A
DISTANCE OF 476.82 FEET; THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 85.88 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 44°52'57" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 35.28 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00014'07"
EAST, A DISTANCE OF 20.18 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°45'53" WEST, A DISTANCE OF
120.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45°26'22" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 35.23 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH 00°13'48" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 44°33'37" EAST, A
DISTANCE OF 35.47 FEET; THENCE sourn 00°14'07" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 833.93 FEET,
TO A POINT OF NON-RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE, CONÇA VE
SOUTHEASTERL Y, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 300.00 FEET (THE RADIUS POINT OF SAIp
CURVE BEARS SOUTH I 1°18'05" EAST FROM THIS POINT); THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY,
ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 78°44'50", AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 412.32 FEET, TO A POINT OF RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A LINE;
THENCE SOUTH 89°57'05" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 4,508.27 FEET; THENCE NORTH
00°00'15" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2,492.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°59'45" EAST, A
DISTANCE OF 24,7.81 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE
SOUTHERL Y, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 178.00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG THE
ARC ÙF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22°45'14", AN ARC DISTANCE OF
70.69 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE SOUTH 67°15'01" EAST,
ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 214.49 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A
JOB NO.:
B589 BY: JDM CHECKED: GRB F.B.: N/A PG.: N/A SHEET 2 OF 8
-,
-
.
.
~AWSON, NOBLE &WEBB, IN,C. '.J
LB# 6674
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND PLANNERS, SURVEYORS
590 NW PEACOCK BLVD, SUITE 9, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA
PHONE (561) 878-1700
CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,920.49 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 05°06'57", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 171.48 FEET, TO A POINT OF NON-RADIAL
INTERSECTION WITH A LINE (THE RADIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH
27°51'57" WEST FROM THIS POINT); TI-lENCE NORTH 28°35'46" EAST ALONG SAID LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 126.07 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 57°54'11" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 487.55 FEET,
TO THE POINT OFCURV ATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY, AND HAVING
A RADIUS OF 960.00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 43°11'52", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 723.79 FEET, TO A
POIN,T OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE NORTH 78°53'57" EAST, ALONG SAID LINE
A DISTANCE OF 122.41 FEET, TO A POINT OF NON-RADIAL INTERSECTION WITI-I A
CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1;864.29 FEET (mE RADIUS
POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 11 °33'47" EAST FROM THIS POINT); THENCE
EASTERL Y, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
10°42'24", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 348.37 FEET, TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE
WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE S0UTHERL Y, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,649.48 FEET;
THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE
OF 01 °33'23", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 71.98 FEÈT, TO A POINT OF NON-RADIAL
INTERSECTION WITH A LINE (THE RADIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH
00°42'00" WEST FROM THIS POINT); TI-lENCE NORTH 00°07'32" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 8.74
FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, AND
HA VING A RADIUS OF 120.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID
CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26°06'27", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 54.68 FEET,
TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE NORTH 25°58'55" WEST, ALONG SAID
LINE A DISTANCE OF 213.43 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A CURVE,
CONCAVE EASTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 380.00 FEET; THENCE NORTIIERL Y,
ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TI-lROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53°12'15", AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 352.86 FEET, TO A POINT OF NON-RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A LINE
(THE RADIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 62°46'40" EAST FROM TIllS POINT);
THENCE SOUTH 81°36'23" EAST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF-66.58 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 74°33'46" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 84.83 FEET; THENCE NORTH 05°28'36" EAST, A
DISTANCE OF 93.42 FEET; THENCE NORTH 13°36'12" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 148.52 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 04°31'12" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 121.23 FEET; THENCE NORTH 56°31'08'"
EAST, A DISTANCE OF 413.01 FEET, TO A POINT OF NON-RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A
CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 250.00 FEET (THE
RADIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS NORTH 48°06'40" WEST FROM THIS POIN1);
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 37°00;29", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 161.48 FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE
CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF
250.OÖ FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 40°07'09", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 175.05 FEET, TO A POINT OF
TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE NORTH 45°00'00" EAST, ALONG SAID LINE A
.,. .
JOB NO.:
8589 BY: JDM CHECKED: GRB F.B.: N/A PG.: N/A SHEET 3 OF 8
.
-,
>
.
-
"
~AWSON, NOBLE &WEBB, INC. ....,
lB# 6674
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND PLANNERS, SURVEYORS
590 NW PEACOCK BLVD, SUITE 9, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA
PHONE (561) 878-1700
DISTANCE OF 1,130.54 FEET; THENCE NORTH 45°00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 384.99
FEET; THENCE NORTH 45°00'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
45°00'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 115.12 FEET; THENCE NORTH 7r28'34" EAST, A
DISTANCE OF 85.31 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCA VB
SOUTHERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 925.00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG THE
ARC OF SAID'CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 32°13'29", AN ARC DISTANCE OF
520.24 FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE
NORTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 420.00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC
OF SAID CURVE TIIROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 33°01'35", AN ARC DISTANCE OF
242.1 0 FEET, TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE
NORTHWESTERL Y, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,766.70 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY, "
ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10°04'04", AN ARC
. DISTANCE OF 486.15 FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WITH A CURVE,
CONCAVE SOUTIIERL Y, HAVING A RADIUS OF 346.92 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY,
ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 62°00'28", AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 375.45 FEET, TO'A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE SOUTH
51 °23'09" EAST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 430.16 FEET, TO THE POINT OF
CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF
1,025.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH
A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12°44'26", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 227.92 FEET, TO A POINT OF
. NON-RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A LINE (THE RADIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS
SOUTH 51 °21'17" WEST FROM TIllS POIN}); TIIENCE SOUTH 52°45'09" WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 50.02 FEET, TO A POINT OF NON-RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH À CURVE, CONCAVE
WESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 975.00 FEET (THE RADIUS POINT OF SAID
. CURVE BEARS SOUTH 51°16'59" WEST FROM THIS POIN}); THENCE SOUTHERLY,
ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 38°43'01 ", AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 658.84 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE SOUTH
00°00'00" EAST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 456.86 FEET; THENCE NORTII
90°00'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1,278.80 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A
CURVE, CONCA VB SOUTIIWESTERL Y, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 4.00 FEET; THENCE
SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
77°30'05", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 5.41 FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WITH
A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 130.00 FEET; THENCE
SOUTHEASTERL Y, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
52°24'42", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 118.92 FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE
WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 58.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTIIEASTERL Y, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 53°54'~8", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 54.58 FEET, TO A POINT OF COMPOUND
CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 800.00
FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 10°58'48", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 153.31 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY
WITH A LINE; TIIENCE SOUTH 00°00'52" EAST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 608.90
JOB NO.:
B589 BY: JDM CHECKED: GAB F.B.: N/A PG.: N/A SHEET 4 OF 8
>
--
.'
\w: ..""
L'AWSON, NOBLE &WEBB, IN·C.
lB# 6674
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND PLANNERS, SURVEYORS
590 NW PEACOCK BLVD, SUITE 9, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA
PHONE (561) 878-1700
FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, AND
HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,050.00 FEET; TIIENCE SOUTHERL Y, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID
CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13°01'56", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 466.28 FEET,
TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE SOUTH 13°02'47" EAST, ALONG SAID
LINE A DISTANCE OF 278.56 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 499.87 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
"' .-.-.-
-
.
.
.
.. .:.
.,
.
JOB NO.:
B589 BY: JDM CHECKED: GRB F.B.: N/A PG.: N/A SHEET 5 OF B
\w-'
LN\\'
.
Lawson, Noble
ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS
590 NW Peocock Boulevord, Suite 9, Pori SI. Lucie, Florido 34986
(561) 878-1700 " fax: (561) 878-1802 " ernail: Inw-psl@lnw-inc.com
West Palm Beach" Port St. Lucie
.
.
. .
&
. . . . . . . ....
Webb, Inc. LB #6674
....,I
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION
CONTINUED SHEET 7 t-
MATCH LINE
(f)
::tmO
ooq
uj uj -jOJO
0 Þw.
(''", ro'"
0 r<"> r<"> - -N
.<;t W w nl
/I ('~'~2
z<[ «z
: 0"':. ":0 UNPLATTED.
~ ¡::ui ui~
W u..... ,....u '-
~~ rr>m
...J C.D;D.-3 "- "-
<I: ~ ~
U 499.87 ACRES +/- '" '" R-20SO.00'
z z
if) ~.~ 6=13"01'56"
I- I- L=466.28'
NI3"02'47"W -x
58.53' I "-SEE DETAIL
R=800.00' I
6=34"30'32"-Ll
L=481.83· I
R=58.00' I
6=54"25'22"
L=SS.09' Y
R=S8.00'
ð=49"41'44"-cI,,- R=130.00'
L=SO.31' ~~ 6=90"41'07"
I L=205.76'
I.
/ '-N34"53'43"E
R=781.00' I 291.4S'
6=34"34'43"Z
L=471.34' I
!
/
I R=2S.00'
ð=89"38'04"
)S L=39.1I'
_ _I rl
100.00' -.J C
NOO'02'55"W
I
l"-
I-
w w
~ Z
(f) :J
o :>:
w u
~ ~
1-':::;:
Z
o
u
N90"OO'OO"W
r 85.88'
(TOT AU
R=275.00'
ð=12"IS'48",
L=58.86' \
. ;:
<D,
O"! 8
en.
r<>o
NO
589"S9'S9"W 8
34S.02' '"
N90"OO'OO"W
1253.56'
UNPLATTED
;:
8<"
_ IX)
gc.ó
" I"-
8V
z
~
"'~
~'" <I>
....... . - 0\
~tD ~~~
.... ~ -;""-1(>
'!,Ø\
~
'-...
'-
SI9"29'57"W
295.52'
~
P.Oß.
P.O.C.
P.8.
P.C.
P.R.C.
P.T.
R
6
L
N.R.
O.R.B.
POINT OF BEGINNING
POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
PLAT BOOK .
POINT OF cæVATL.Æ:
POINT OF REVERSE CURVATLÆ
POINT OF TANGENCY
DENOTES RADIUS
DENOTES DElTA
DENOTES ARC LENGTH
DENOTES NON-RADIAL
DENOTES OFFICIAL RECORD 800K
UNPLATTED
'=S89'5T05'W
737.09'
SEE SHEETS I - 5 OF 8 FOR DESCRIPTION
P.O.B.
(\
In
en
N
I
<D
v
--'en
-N
r<'I",
~~
0;<[
OlL
0:>:
"'I-
;;~ ~..
;:~ ~~ '5"
. I- OZ t=
10« "';! u
::~ ~u w
Oz ..JffilO (f)
å¡r I-I-en w
0« t3~..!.. ~
lÆ~
~P.~.¿ ~
JOB No. 8589
PG.
(,\Ooto\SOO-599\B589\CAO\B589SK03-1'''wg 01/29/2002 03'35'14 PM EST SHEET 6 OF B
DATE: 01-14-02
BY: JDM
CHECKED: GRB
F.B. -
'-'
LN\\'
...",
. . . . . . . . . . . . ..-
lawson, Noble & Webb, Inc. lB #6674
ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS
590 NW Peacock Boulevard, Suite 9, Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986
(561) 878-1700 " fax: (561) 878-1802 . email: Inw-p51@lnw-inc.com
West Palm Beach" Port Sf. Lucie
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION
I
UNPLA TTED
545'00'00"(
115,12'7" R~42000'
N4S"OO'OO"E N778;~~4"E 6~33"oi'35"
100.00'""\ ,.-. \ L~242.10'
LR~925.00' \
6~32"13'29" R~2766.70'~
L~520.24' 6~IO"04'04"
L~4S6.15'
UNPLA TTED
R~346.92'
6~62"00'2S"
L~375.45'
N52'4S'09"E
S0.02'
R~975.00'
6=38"43'01"
L~658.84'
I
;;:
b-
OlD
_ ID
8u:i
" on
0,,"
o
'"
UNPLA TTED
~I~
!J! _
'" ...J
o :r
¡.~
§> 1//
I
I
I \
\
\
"-
L'
C.D.D"-3
499.87 ACRES +/-
S90"OO'OO"E
1278.80'
/' "- ~.~
/ N90"00'OO"W \ ~ ~
, .. / r 1278.S0' \ :i:i 0
~ \ (1)0:: 0::_
~Ii I R-4.00' ( 6~;~:~4~~" \ t5~ ~.~
... I 6=77"3Q'?5" /'" L=118.92' I t~ r<> U
~ I L=5.41 !J.js: ~!Ji
u I ~.~
\ I ~ ~
\ R=58.00' I- . I-
\ 6=53"54'5S" -V /
\ L~54.5S' /
R~800.00' /
"- 6~10"58'48· /' J..E2EW¡
"L-153,31' .
N90"OO'OO"W....... --- _ _ __ -- P.O.B,
85.88' P.O.c.
\ / (TOTAU P.B.
-'\ P.C.
~ ~ PR.C.
:J¡¡., ¡... SEE DETAIL P.T.
¡;:"'! ¡:> "B" R
o~ :;!: 6
t:oo å L
~ AA
OR.B.
.".------
DETAIL "8"
-- --
---
.....TOi lll£
CCHTlN.£O SÆ£T 8
SEE SÆETS 1 - 5 OF 8 FOR DESCRIPTION
o
o
to
"
-
~
..::]-
e::¡:
o
en
\ SEE DETAIL
"A"
R=4.00' ~=I3Q.~' "
6=77"30'05" f.o.-~2"24 4,2
L=541' ,L-118.92
. / " R=S8.00'
d-S3"S4'S8"
\ /L-S4.5B'
R=SOO.od" /'
.o.=10"5ß'48"
L=IS3:31'
SOO"00'52"E
608.90'
(TOTAU
POINT OF BEGINNING
POINT OF COMM:NCEMENT
PLAT SOOK
POINT OF cæVATtÆ
POINT OF REVERSE CURVATtJ¡E
POINT OF TANGENCY
DENOTES RADIUS
DENOTES DELTA
DENOTES ARC LENGlH
DENOTES NON--RADIAL
DENOTES OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK
JOB No. 8589
F.B. - PG.
1'\Dntn\SDO-599\B5B9\CAD\BS89SK03_2·."9 01/29/2002 03,38,34 PM EST Sl-£ET 7 OF 8
DATE: 01-14-02
BY: JDM
CHECKED: GRB
'"
LN\\'"
. . . . . . . . . . . ...-
lawson, Noble & Webb, Inc. lB #6674
ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS
590 NW Peacock Boulevard, Suite 9, Part St. Lucie, Florida 34986
(56) 878-1700 ' fax: (56 ) 878-1802 ' emoa: Inw-psl@lnw-inc.com
West Palm Beach, Port S1. Lucie
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION
I
I
N4S'OO'OO"E
1130.54·--.."
!TOTAL) \.
UNPLA TTED
R=178.00'
6=22'45'14"
L=70.69'
']
.,.
<D
Ñ
en
..,.
N
_ R-120.00'
~6=26'06'27'
~ \d~ J L-54.68'
\~ ß.,{ "- SEE
... 'ð. ~~ DETAIL
~\~ /8
\'" .,
R=1864.29' R-2649.48'
6=10'42'24' 6-1'33'23"
L-348.37' L-71.98'
,.-
/
/
/
I R=120.00'
I
\
i= \ R=2649.48'J
~ \ 6=1'33'23'
g " L= 71.98'
b "
~ '-......
I
W'W
en en
'" '"
W/W
C) '"
;2 ;2
CX)~ ~en
2, .2
OC/) c/)o
j:,... I'- ~
ut<) rt)u
~2:.. e;~
:I: :r:
'" C/)
2 2
;:.;:
o 0
I- I-
CDD,-3
499.81 ACRES +/-
DETAIL
SECTION 8
TOWNSHIP 37 S., RANGE 39 E.
TOWNSHIP 31 S" RANGE 39 E,
SECTION 17
SEE SHEETS 1- 5 OF 8 FOR DESCRIPTION
o
o
<.D
II
~
W
-..I
<t
Ü
(/)
.....
WIt;
2 ~
:J '"
:r: Q
r= ~
<: -
:::¡ ~
, 0
u
~
P.OB.
P.O.c.
PB.
p.e.
PRe.
P.T.
R
6
L
N.R.
ORA
POINT OF BEGImING
POINT OF COM.£NcEMENT
PlAT BOOK
POINT OF CLfNATURE
POINT OF REVERSE cœv A TL.Æ
POINT OF TANGENCY
DENOTES RADIUS
DENOTES DELTA
DENOTES Me lENGTH
DENOTES NON-RADIAL
DENOTES OFFICIAl RECORD BOOK
I
L
SOO'4'orw
833.93'
IMTCHLIN! (TOYAU
OOHTIN£!> SI££T 1
R=300.00'
6=78'44'50'
L=412.32: 7
RADIAl <--_
SI1'18'05"E
S89'51'05'W
4508.21'
UNPLA TTED
SECTION 9
TOWNSHIP 37 5., RANGE 39 E,
TOWNSHIP 31 5,. RANGE 39 E.
SECTION 16
1,\~t~'SOO-S99\BS89\CAD\BS89SK03-3.d.g 01/29/2002 03,SO'41 PH (ST Sl-EET 8 OF 8
JOB No. B589
BY: JDM
CHECKED: GRB
F.B. -
PG.
DATE: 01-14-02
'"
>wi
EXHIBIT B
CONSTRUCTION TIMET ABLE AND COST ESTIMATE FOR AREA TO BE
INCLUDED WITHIN DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
fTL:823447:3
FTL:823447:3
'-
...."
WESTCHESTER CDD-3 DEVELOPMENT
Proposed Construction Timetable & Estimated Costs
DRI Common Development Infrastructure
Unit
Description Unit Price Quantity Total
Earthwork LS $3,509,200 1 $3,509,200
Roadways & Storm Drainage Systems LS $9,134,900 1 $9,134,900
Water & Sewer Utilities Systems LS $2,063,700 1 $2,063,700
Other Infrastructure Costs LS $2,830,000 1 $2,830,000
Sub Total: I, $17,s3't,åöo
Contingency: 10% " ' $(7'~3.1S0"
, " T()täICost: , , $19,291,589
"
DRI Common Development Cost Distribution by CDD
Prorata
Description Share 1
Community Development District # 1 $1,199,622
Community Development District # 2 $4,093,436
Community Development District # 3 $2,921,675
Community Development District t# 4 $11,076,847
, , '. ,',',.,' ", "'" ',." TQtãr Cqst: ,$19,?~'1,~øq
, ,
CDD-3 Development
Sub Total:
Contingency:
, "l,',~TofäJ;~º$l~
Unit
LS
LS
LS
LS
Unit
Price
$3,572,200
$7,829,100
$3,036,900
$765,000
Quantity
1
1
1
1
Description
Earthwork
Roadwa s & Storm Drainage Systems
Water & Sewer Utilities Systems
Other Infrastructure Costs
;...;
I,"
, 'ç[j)~,Gº()d ÞâIttl'S,§timåtÊJTQtªl: r
~19¡ß4~;~Qº
Notes:
1 The DRI Common Development Infrastructure Costs are assigned to each District according to the Masler Improvement Costs
Allocation methodology presented in the Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs Report for this District.
2 Additional funds will be added 10 each District's Good Faith Estimate Bond amount for inflation, bond closing costs, and
bond reserves, as applicable.
Master CDD-3 Development Timetable
Project Construction Schedule % Complete ConstructIon Value
Phase 1 (Years 0-5) 90% $17,680,680
Phase 2 (Years 5-10) 10% $1,964,520
Phase 3 (Years 10-15) 0% $0
Phase 4 (Years15-20) 0% $0
2/25/2002
Page 1 of 1
S:/Westchester/Oocuments
Excel/CDD Infrastructure Budgets,xls
'-
""""
EXHIBIT C
EVIDENCE OF WRITTEN CONSENT OF OWNER
TO INCLUSION OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE EXTERNAL BOUNDARIES OF
WESTCHESTER NO.3 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
Westchester Development Company, LLC, a Florida limited liability company and
successor by merger with Westchester Development Company ("Owner"), hereby certifies that it
is the sole owner of approximately 36.27 acres of certain real property (the "Property"), located
in St. Lucie County, Florida. By signing below, the Owner hereby gives its full consent to the
expansion of the external boundaries of the Westchester No.3 Community Development District
to include the Property therein.
'--3 '/ ~
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand this ~ day of
r/..,,'....... ,2002.
WESTCHESTER DEVELOPMENT
~OMP NY,LLC
#4~
Titie: þ';'....e. r...~ '~~r--
STATE OF FLORIDA )
COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /~/¡ day of
'--111M~A ,2002, by ::I~Þf1.-, J.l4'LJkL5ð~, the Ilc~ l!ee<:;,Jr/pA.JT of
WESSTCHESTER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, who is personally known to me [Ø or
produced as identification.
NotaryPublic ~ z::'¿../-~
Printed Name: £ArA'/6A ¡¿J,úh?~~
PATRICIA W. WARREN .
ON' CC79I995
EXPIRES NOV 28. 2002
8ONDEO THROUGH
ADVANTAGE NOfAI!'(
FTL:823447:3
'-
....,
EXHIBIT D
DESIGNATION OF THE FUTURE GENERAL DISTRIBUTION, LOCATION AND
EXTENT OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE USES OF LAND PROPOSED FOR THE AREA
TO BE INCLUDED WITHIN THE DISTRICT
FTL:823447:3
\w
-."J
~I"'" ~
,. 'iT
a
_.-r' C$),,-,
-~.... ~
--
,......-
Not
Included
nil L
-- ---.-
--
--
c:::
f- -
f- A ,. .... ,...
¡- If- .l J"
"..
ï
I) P co
. ('
- \
- ) '\
( _0
- !
I- :
l- S
¡ .
i-
f- ;
f-
.>
,..
~ .." r-, io ( þ( F ~ -",
1'\ I
"
I I I"
'\: -
1\ G-5¡,-, RU-5 ,f\Ayn. !Ì\
.
WESTCHESTER
Existing Land Use
St. Lucie County, Florida
CDD:
TOTAL CDD ARËA:'
499.87
#~ Lucido de Associates ð.
..;;X/ 1M4~McNIcbn 1;d
v :"":J:..~-.:r-= I....~
-~
EEEE AG-5. I\gicUIon (02 ô.JIocI
~ AU-5. ResIcIentIaIIkban (5 ô.JIac
[[]]J MXD· low intensity Mlxod
Use Dowlcpment 15 duIae)
~ UXO - ModI.m InIensIty Mlxod
~ Use Development (5-9 dIIocI
SOURCE: Sl lLdø Cou1ty Coovohenslve Plan
NOTE: .... acreaoes "8 8JJI'OX....te.
1111111111111. Proposod Rood (200' AIW)
FTL:823447:3
",-,.
EXHIBIT E
STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS
...."
"
\w -."J
STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS
WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT #3
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Purpose and Scope
This statement of estimated regulatory costs ("SERC") supports the petition to
expand the boundaries of the Westchester Community Development District #3
("District" or "District #3"). The District was established by Ordinance No. 01-012
of St. Lucie County on August 21, 2001. The District currently comprises
approximately 463.60 acres of land located in St. Lucie County. The District
proposes to expand its boundaries by 36.27 acres to a total of 499.87 acres.
The limitations on the scope of this SERC are explicitly set out in Section
190.002(2)(d), F.S. (goveming District formation or alteration) as follows:
"That the process of establishing such a district pursuant to uniform general law -
shall be fair and based only on factors material to manaQinQ and financinQ the
service delivery function of the district, so that any matter concerninQ permittinq
or planninq of the development is not material or relevant (emphasis added)."
1.2 Overview of the Westchester DRI and the Changes Requested in the
Boundaries of the Four Community Development Districts Serving Westchester
On August 21, 2001 the Sf. Lucie County Commission approved the formation of
four CommunitY Development Districts to provide community facilities and
services to the Westchester DR!. District #3 is designed to provide community
infrastructure, services, and facilities along with their operations and
maintenance, to a portion of the Westchester DRI located in Sf. Lucie County
(the "development"). The development is a master planned, mixed-use, fully
amenitized, community. The DRI includes 2,033 acres. The landowner has
established community development districts on 1,677.74 of these acres. The
land plan for the portion of the DRI planned for community development districts
consists of up to: (a) 4,500 residential units, (b) 2,001,000 square feet of offices,
(c) 575,000 square feet of retail space, and (d) 300 hotel units.
Given the size and scope of the development, St. Lucie County agre~d to
establish four community development districts to serve the project. Four
districts are optimal for the development because this articulation allows for each
district to focus on the unique requirements of the land within its boundaries.
District #1 serves an exclusively commercial area in the project that will be
developed in the first phase of the development program. By contrast, the land
in District #2 is planned exclusively as a corporate office park with a civic/school
site. The land in District #3 is planned only for use as a residential community
with no commercial, retail, or office uses. Finally, District #4 is projected for
future development as a town center with retail uses at its core and surrounding
Page1of6
February 25. 2002
'-' -...J
residential uses. No offices are planned for the land in District #4. In light of
these very different land uses, and the unique demands for community
development district facilities and services, it is optimal to create four unique
community development districts, one for each area.
Table 1 displays the land use plan for the lands within each of the four proposed
community development districts planned for the Westchester DRI as envisioned
in the petitions to form the Districts. Noted at the time the petitions to form the
Districts were filed, was the fact that the land use plans were "subject to change
as land planning activities continue".
Table 1. Land Use Plan for the Area in Westchester Served by the
Westchester Community Development Districts #1 through #4
Category CDD#1 CDD#2 CDD#3 CDD#4 Total
Acres 74.25 257.45 463.60 882.44 1,677.74
Single Family 0 0 863 2,512 3,375
Multifamily 0 0 287 838 1,125
Retail 125,000 ° 0 450,000 575,000
Office 78,500 1,922,500 ° 0 2,001,000
Hotel 0 0 ° 300 300
Source: St. Lucie West Development Corporation
As land use planning and engineering analysis has progressed at Westchester,
a number of desired adjustments have come to light. No changes in the total
volume of development are proposed. However, the distribution of the
development across the four Districts is now somewhat different than originally
expected. The rationale for forming four distinct districts was based on the
unique land use mix that was originally anticipated for lands included in each
District. Since the land use plans have changed somewhat, it is desirable to
alter the boundaries of the various Districts to reflect these changes. Table 2
presents to proposed new land use plan for each District as well as the proposed
new acreage totals for each District.
"
Page 2 of 6
February 25. 2002
·'-'
....,¡
Table 2. land Use Plan for the Proposed Areas in Westchester Served by the
Westchester Community Development Districts #1 through #4 As Modified
Category
Acres
Single family units
Multifamily units
Retail sqft
Office sqft
Hotel rooms
CDD#1
59.43
o
o
125,000
78,500
o
CDD#2
234.33
o
o
o
1,922,500
o
CDD#3
499.87
863
287
o
o
o
CDD#4
884.12
2,512
838
450,000
o
300
Total
1,677.75
3,375
1,125
575,000
2,001,000
300
The changes proposed for the acreage and land uses in each District are
provided in Table 3. It is important to note that no change in total development is
proposed. Furthermore, the proposed volume and distribution of development in
each District is the same as originally proposed. The changes involve
redistributing the acreage among the Districts, so that the original land uses are -
preserved.
Table 3. Changes in the land Use Plans Proposed for
Westchester Community Development Districts #1 through #4 As Modified
.
Category
Acres
Single family units
Multifamily units
Retail sqft
Office sqft
Hotel rooms
CDD#1
-14.82
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
CDD#2
-23.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
CDD#3
36.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
CDD#4
1.68
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
The Westchester Community Development District #3 continues to be planned
as a purely residential development in the DR!. District #3 will provide
community development district facilities and services to 499.87 acres in the
District.
In addition, District #1 will serve as the master community development district
for the additional districts that are planned for the development. In that roléthe
District will also provide community-serving infrastructure that provides benefits
to all four of the community development districts envisioned to serve the
Westchester DR/. These master improvements include major entrance roads,
entry statements, landscaping, master stormwater control, and master utilities.
The debt service and operation/maintenance costs incurred by District #1 to
provide the master community improvements will be funded through non ad
valorem special assessments on all benefiting property in the development.
District #1 may also operate and maintain localized infrastructure within any of
the other three districts that is integrally related to the master community
Page 3 of 6
February 25. 2002
\w """"
improvements, if a district desires to delegate that function and District #1
desires to accept the same. It is anticipated that the four community
development districts will enter into a series of inter local agreements providing
for this sharing of master improvement, operating and maintenance costs.
1.3 Requirements for Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs
Section 120.541(2), F.S. (1997), defines the elements a statement of estimated
regulatory costs must contain:
"(a) A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be
required to comply with the rule, together with a general description of the types
of individuals likely to be affected by the rule.
(b) A good faith estimate of the cost to the agency, and to any other state and
local government entities, of implementing and enforcing the proposed rule, and
any anticipated effect on state and local revenues.
(c) A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by
individuals and entities, including local governmental entities, required to comply
with the requirements of the rule. As used in this paragraph, "transactional
costs· are direct costs that are readily ascertainable based upon standard
business practiées, and include filing fees, the cost of obtaining a license, the
cost of equipment required to be installed or used or procedures required to be
employed in complying with the rule, additional operating costs incurred, and the
cost of monitoring and reporting.
(d) An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined by Section
288.703, F.S., and an analysis of the impact on small counties and small cities
as defined by Section 120.52, F.S. St. Lucie County is not defined as a small
County for purposes of this requirement.
(e) Any additional infonnation that the agency detennines may be useful.
2.0 A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be
required to comply with the ordinance, together with a general description
of the types of individuals likely to be affected by the ordinance.
There will be no individuals or entities affected by approval of the proposed
expansion of the boundaries of District #3. District #3 is an already existing
Community Development District. The petition to expand its boundaries by
approximately 36.27 acres will have no impact on either the initial 463.60 acres
in the District or on the 36.27 acres added to the District for the following
reasons.
First, as noted above, neither the costs nor the volume of development planned
for District #3 will change if the proposed boundary change is approved. So,
there will be no impact on land in District #3. Second, the expansion parcel will
Page 4 of 6 February 25. 2002
'-' "wIIfÍ
be taken from the contraction parcels of other Districts. Agàin, since neither the
costs nor the volume of development will change in any other District, there is no
impact on any individual or entity if the proposal is approved.
3.0 Good faith estimate of the cost to state and local government entities, of
implementing and enforcing the proposed ordinance, and any anticipated
effect on state and local revenues.
3.1 Costs to Governmental Agencies of Implementing and Enforcing Ordinance
State Governmental Entities
There will be no cost to any governmental agencies to implement or to enforce
the proposed ordinance. District #3 is an existing Community Development
District in good standing. Altering its boundaries will not change the costs for any
State governmental entity.
St. Lucie County
St. Lucie County will incur no costs associated with this proposed Ordinance
beyond reviewing the petition and its supporting exhibits. The petition itself
provides much .of the information needed for a staff review. St. Lucie County
already possess the staff needed to conduct the review without the need for new
staff. In addition, there is no capital required to review the petition. Finally. local
governments routinely process similar petitions for land uses and zoning
changes that are far more complex than is the petition to alter the boundaries of
District #3.
There is no annual cost to the County, because the District is an existing
Community Development District in good standing. Approving a change in the
District's boundaries does not impact annual costs to the County in any way.
3.2 Impact on State and Local Revenues
Adoption of the proposed ordinance will have no negative impact on State or
local revenues. The District is an existing Community Development District. As
an independent unit of local government, the District is designed to be a self
funding entity in terms of its obligations under Chapter 190, F.S. Altering its
boundaries, as proposed here, has no impact on State or local revenues.
4.0 A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by "
individuals and entities required to comply with the requirements of the
ordinance.
There are no transactional costs associated with approving this alteration in the
boundaries of the District. As noted above, the amount of development and the
number of acres served by all the Districts will no change if the Ordinance is
Page50f6
February 25. 2002
'-' ....,
approved. Furthermore, the volume of development and the costs for providing
District facilities and services is also unchanged. Exhibit B contains the
estimated costs and the timetable for construction.
5.0 An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined by Section
288.703, F.S., and an analysis of the impact on small Counties and small
cities as defined by Section 120.52, F.S.
There will be no impact on small businesses because of the changes proposed
in the District's boundaries. The District is an existing Community Development
District. The costs to provide infrastructure and services has not changed nor
has the volume of development planned for the District.
St. Lucie County has an estimated population that is greater than 10,000 in the
most current census (2000). Therefore, the County is not defined as a "small"
county according to Section 120.52, F.S.
6.0 Any additional useful information.
The analysis provided above is based on a straightforward application of
economic theory, especially as it relates to tracking the incidence of regulatory
costs and benefits. Inputs were received from the Developer's Engineer and
other professionals associated with the Developer.
Page 6 of 6
February 25, 2002
~
-
~
\w
AGENDA REOUEST
....;
ITEM NO.
5D
~
DATE: 03/26/02
CONSENT [ J
REGULAR [ J
PUBLIC HEARING [V]
Leg. [ X ] Quasi-Jtid. [
PRESENTED BY:
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SUBJECT:
Consider the petition of The Board of Supervis
Development District No. 4 for an amendment of the community
district known as "Westchester Community Development District No.
Ordinance 02-013.
Conununity
evelopment
4" - Draft
SUBMITTED BY:
Community Development
BACKGROUND:
The Board of Supervisors of Westchester Community Development District No.
4 has filed a petition with St. Lucie County to amend the community
development district known as "Westchester Community Development District
No.4" .
The Westchester Community Development District No. 4 is proposed to occupy
884.122 acres instead of the 882.44 acres originally proposed. The subject
property is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of
Interstate 95 and the proposed extension of Gatlin Boulevard. The attached
Exhibit provides a general location map for the boundaries of Westchester
Community Development District No.4. It should be emphasized that at this
time there are no existing occupied residential properties in this Proposed
Westchester Community Development District No.4.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
N/A
PREVIOUS ACTION:
On August 21, 2001, The Board of County Commissioners granted approval to
Ordinance 01-013, establishing the community development district known as
Westchester CDD #4.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners .approve Draft
Ordinance 02-013, authorizing an amendment to the boundaries of the.
community development district known as "Westchester Community Development
District No.4". .
X]
]
APPROVED
OTHER: 4-0
[ ] DENIED
(Hutchinson Absent)
COMMISSION ACTION:
Review and Accrovals
County Attorney:
Originating Department:
Management & Budget:
Other:
Purchasing:
Other:
Finance: (Check for Copy only. if applicable)
~
"WI
COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: March 26, 2002
Ordinance 02-013
MEMORANDUM
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Community Development Director
DATE: March 20, 2002
SUBJECT: Petition of The Board of Supervisors of Westchester Community
Development District No.4, to amend the community development district
known as "Westchester Community Development District NO.4" - Draft
Ordinance 02-013
The Board of Supervisors for Westchester Community Development District No.4 has filed
a petition with St. Lucie County for an amendment to Westchester Community
Development District No.4. Westchester COD NO.4 was originally proposed to contain
882.44 acres, but will now contain 884.122 acres. The change in boundaries was in
response to changes in the master plan for the Westchester project.
On August 21, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners approved the establishment of
Westchester Community Development District No. 4 located at the corner of the
intersection of Interstate 95 and the proposed extension of Gatlin Boulevard. The attached
Exhibit provides a general location map for the boundaries of Westchester COD No.4. It
should be emphasized that at this time there are no existing occupied residential properties
in this proposed Westchester COD NO.4.
Attached is a copy of Draft Ordinance 02-013 that provides for the amendment of
Westchester COD NO.4. Staff recommends approval of Draft Ordinance 02-013.
hf
cc: Doug Anderson, County Admisistrator
Daniel Mcintyre, County Attorney
David P. Kelly, Planning Manager
Noreen Dreyer, Esquire - Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster & Russell, P.A.
"
~ò
.P~
~
Cì
Òe.":>
&'8
~e'5\ Blvd
\ uc\e
c;:,\ \.-
Prima Vista Blvd
~
ëñ
CIS
(f)
o
~
'0
a:
Q)
c
::J
Westchester COD #4
Gatlin Blvd
Q)
0)
c
CIS
a:
'0
>
a:I
CIS
C
o
~
en
êi5
t
o
0...
~~~<iI6'. ,~!í!I~. &.......... ....................
. , , " ,~~ .", ' '
;' ~
t
ThIs map has been COo"1lJiIed for gonoœIpiaming and r...."""" purposes only.
_ fNeIY 8Ifort has been .- to proWIe the moat """""I and arxuat6
information posaIbIo. 110 ""11.-<_ lor... .. 6 IogoIIy brdng doa.mont.
81. Lucie County
Martin County
GRAPI-IIC
~ I I
o 0.5 1
SCALE
2
I .........c.
3
N
"'"
-.",tI
Not
Included
ï
co
C11
--.-.---.-.---.-,---.-.-
\
\
\.
10 (
G-51~ RU-5
WESTCHESTER
Existing Land Use
St. Lucie County, Florida
.f\AYn.
COD: lAND USE CATAGORY: TOTAL COD AREA:-
~I ~:81 ~~~1 I MX~~~W I MX~MEO 884.11 I
ê
.-.-
-~
EEEE
~
MXD . low Intensity Iobod
UM DewIopmeo. IS 6Jfacl
~5, ~ 10.2 6Jfacl
[[[IJ
~
MXD . ModU1\ lnIensiIy Mbcod
UM De\IeIopnøII15-9 6Jfacl
0< Lucido & Associates
.::;:;-..."<.
'Ý*~~~
v =.."""'---=---=r--=
flJ.5, -..... lkbon IS 6JfacI
SOlfICE: $I. Luc1e Co<.nIy ~ Plan
NOTE: ÞA ~ ore oppro¡cma...
1..11..11....1 Proposed Road (200' R/W)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
~
.ti
ORDINANCE 02-013
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 01-013 GRANTED ON
AUGUST 21,2001, ESTABLISHING THE WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO.4, AMONG OTHER MATTERS AND
AMENDING CHAPTER 1-6.5-81 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF ST.
LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; IN ORDER TO EXPAND THE EXTERNAL
BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT AND ESTABLISH THE REVISED
BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING
PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR
APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF
STATE; PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR
CODIFICATION; AND SETTING FORTH THE VOTE ON ADOPTION.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on
the testimony and evidence, including, but not limited to the staff report, has made the
following determinations:
1. On August 21, 2001, St. Lucie County granted approval to Ordinance 01-013
amending Chapter 1-6.5 "Community Development" of the St. Lucie County Code
and Compiled Laws and establishing the Westchester Community Development
District No.4 as a community development district pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida
Statutes, and its boundaries, among other matters. The boundaries of Westchester
COD No.4 contain 882.44 acres of land entirely within the jurisdictional boundaries
of St. Lucie County.
2. The Board of Supervisors of Westchester Community Development District No.4,
has filed with the Board a petition for an amendment of the community development
district, which petition contains the information required by Section 190.046(1),
Florida Statutes. The Petitioner is requesting that the boundaries of Westchester
COD NO.4 be expanded to 884.122 acres of land.
3. In accordance with Section 190.046(1)(b), Florida Statutes, the Board held a public
hearing on March 26, 2002, after publishing notice of such hearing in the Ft. Pierce
Tribune and the Port St. Lucie News on March 15, 2002.
Double Underli~e is for addition
Slnl(1I T¡'rð~¡ Is for deletion
Ordinance 02-013
1st Draft
Page 1
Print Date: 03120102
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
'-"
'wi
(a) The Board has considered the record of the public hearing and the factors
set forth in Section 190.005 (I) (e), Florida Statutes, and has found that:
(b) All statements contained within the petition are true and correct;
(c) The land to be removed from the District does not exceed 50% of the acres
initially located within the District and the Board of Supervisors of the District
has not previously petitioned St. Lucie County for the expansion or
contraction of the District;'s boundaries.
(d) The amendment of this district is consistent with all applicable elements and
portions of the state comprehensive plan and the effective local government
comprehensive plan;
(e) The area of land within the proposed district is of sufficient size, is sufficiently
compact, and is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one functional
interrelated community;
(e) The district is the best alternative available for delivering the community
development services and facilities to the area that will be served by the
district;
(f) The community development services and facilities for the district will be
compatible with the capacity and uses of the existing local and regional
community development services and facilities; and,
(g) The area that will be served by the district following contraction is amenable
to separate special district government.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of St.
Lucie County, Florida:
PART A.
GRANT OF PETITION; AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 01-013 TO
ESTABLISH NEW EXTERNAL BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT.
Part A of Ordinance 01-013 is hereby amended to expand the external boundaries of the
District by deleting Exhibit A to Ordinance 01-013 in its entirety and replacing it with Exhibit
A attached hereto. Accordiñgly, Section 1-6.5-81 of the Code of Compiled Laws
establishing the boundaries of the District is hereby amended so that references therein to
Exhibit "A" shall mean Exhibit A attached hereto.
Double Underline is for addition
8tl ihe Thl'O~gh IS for deletion
Ordinance 02-013
1st Draft
Page 2
Print Date: 03120/02
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
"-'
""""
PART B.
CONFLICTING PROVISIONS.
Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie
County, County ordinances, and County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this
ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict.
PART C.
SEVERABILITY.
If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional,
inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance.
If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person,
property, or circumstance, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person,
property, or circumstance.
PART D.
APPLICABILITY OF ORDINANCE.
This ordinance shall be applicable throughout St. Lucie County's jurisdiction.
PART E.
FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE.
The Clerk be and is hereby directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to
the Bureau of Administrative Code and Laws, Department of State, The Capitol,
Tallahassee, Florida 32304.
PART F.
EFFECTIVE DATE.
This ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State.
PART G.
ADOPTION.
After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows:
Chairwoman Doug Coward
xxx
Vice-Chairman Cliff Barnes
xxx
Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson
xxx
Commissioner Paula A. Lewis
xxx
Double Underline is for addition
Strike Thro~gn IS for deletion
Ordinance 02-013
1st Draft
Page 3
Print Date: 03/20/02
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
"'"
..."
Commissioner John D. Bruhn
xxx
PART H.
CODIFICATION.
Provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated in the St. Lucie County Land
Development Code, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or
other appropriate word, and the sections of this ordinance may be re-numbered or re-
lettered to accomplish such intention; provided, however, that Parts B through H shall not
be codified.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 26th Day of March 2002.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY
Chairman
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM
AND CORRECTNESS:
Deputy Clerk
County Attorney
"
hf
H:\WP\Petitions\BCC\Finished.2002\Westchester4.CDD\Westchester40RD
Double Underline is for addition
Glrill" Throtlgh IS for deletion
Ordinance 02-013
1st Draft
Page 4
Print Date: 03/20/02
"'"
..,¡
COUNTY COMMISSION
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN RE: PETITION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 190.046(1), FLORIDA STATUTES,
TO EXPAND THE BOUNDARIES OF
WESTCHESTER NO.4 COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
/
PETITION TO EXPAND BOUNDARIES OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
The Board of Supervisors (the "Board") of the Westchester No. 4 Community
Development District, an independent special district established pursuant to Chapter 190,
Florida Statutes (the "District") by Ordinance No. 01-013 (the "Ordinance") of S1. Lucie County,
Florida (the "County") enacted on August 21,2001 hereby petitions the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA (the "Commission") in
accordance with Section 190.046(1) of the Uniform Community Development Act of 1980,
Chapter 190, Florida Statutes (the "Act") to expand the boundaries of the District and in support
thereof, hereby attests as follows:
1. That approximately 882.44 acres are currently within the external boundaries of
the District.
2. That the Board desires to expand the boundaries of the District by adding acres,
so that thereafter the land area to be served by the District will comprise approximately 884.122
acres. Following such expansion of the District's boundaries, all lands in the District will
continue to be located wholly within the jurisdictional boundaries of the County.
3. That the real property to be included within the external boundaries of the District
does not exceed 50% of the acres initially loc¡¡ted within the boundaries of the District and the
Board has not previously submitted to the Commission a petition seeking expansion or
contraction of the District's boundaries. .
4. That annexed hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof is a metes and bounds
description of the external boundaries of the District following the proposed expansion of such
boundaries. No real property within the external boundaries of the District as proposed is to be
excluded therefrom.
FTL:849323:2
~
~
5. That annexed hereto as Exhibit B is the proposed timetable for construction of
any District services to the area to be newly included the District and the estimated cost of
contructing the proposed services.
6. That annexed hereto as Exhibit C and made a part hereof is evidence of the
written consent to the inclusion of its property in the District by the owner of one hundred
percent (100%) of the real property to be included within the District.
7. That annexed hereto as Exhibit D and made a part hereof is a designation of the
future general distribution, location, and extent of public and private uses of land proposed for
the area to be included from the District by the future land use plan element of the effective local
government comprehensive plan.
8. That annexed hereto as Exhibit E and made a part hereof is a statement of
estimated regulatory costs in accordance with the requirements of Section 120.541, Florida
Statutes.
9. That following the proposed expansion of the District's boundaries, (i) the
property within the District will not be inconsistent with any applicable element or portion of the
state comprehensive plan or of the effective local government comprehensive plan; (ii) the
property comprising the District will be of sufficient size, compactness, and contiguity to be
developable as one functional interrelated community; (iii) the District will continue to present
the best alternative available for delivering the community development facilities and services to
the property that will be served by the District; (iv) the community development facilities and
services of the District will not be incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and
regional community development services and facilities; and (v) the property comprising the
District will be amenable to separate special-purpose government.
10. That all statements contained within this Petition are true and correct.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner, the Board of Supervisors of the Westchester No. 4
Community Development District, hereby respectfully requests the Commission to:
A. Direct its staff to notice, as soon as practicable, a local public non-emergency
hearing pursuant to the requirements of Section 190.046(1)(b) ofthe Act to consider whether to
grant the petition for the expansion of the District's boundaries and to amend the Ordinance
establishing the District to reflect the new boundaries of the District.
B. Grant the petition and enact an ordinance pursuant to applicable law amending the
Ordinance establishing the District to reflect the new boundaries of-the District.
FTL:849323:2
2
'-"
,.",¡
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this /::3;/d;y of r-->.....-. .....
,2002.
WESTCHESTER NO.4 COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
)
~~~~-¿ ø ~~
e: L,),...., I' -----.. - ----'
ST ATE OF FLORIDA )
COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /3ßkday of
'--f/)fUJ¿Îf , 2002, by.:!;¡/J1eS H HA-kkLÇ;JAJ , the ChÆJlm,Q~ of the BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF WESTCHESTER NO. 4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT,
who is personally known to me [~ or produced as identification.
NOtaryPUbliC~~~-~./
Printed Name: ~A7A'I'C".r;4 ¡¿I dA~~e,J
PATRICIA W. WARREN
# CC79199S
EXPIRES HOV 28. 2002
8ONOEO THIiOUOH
ADVANTAGe NOTARY
FTL:849323:2
3
FTL:849323:2
'-
-J
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTlONIMETES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION
...I
~AWSON, NOBLE &WEBB, INC.
LB# 6674
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, lAND PLANNERS, SURVEYORS
590 NW PEACOCK BLVD, SUITE 9, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA
PHONE (561) 878-1700
CDD-4
A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTIONS 4, 5, 8, 9 & 10 TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 39
EAST AND IN,SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 36 soum, RANGE 39 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY,
FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCE AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF GATLIN BOULEVARD
(ALSO BEING THE NORTH LINE OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST)
AND THE WESTERLY LIMITS OF GATLIN BOULEVARD RIGHT-OF- wAy AND THE
WESTERL Y LIMITS OF THOSE LANDS DESCRIBED IN AN ORDER OF TAKING DATED
JUL Y 4, 1979 AND RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 311 , PAGES 2946 THROUGH
2952, INCLUSIVE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID ST. LUCIE COUNTY AND AS SHOWN ON
THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF- WAY MAPS FOR STATE
ROAD NO.9 (1-95), SECTION 94pOl - 2412, DATED 06/02/77, WITH LAST REVISION OF
09/11/79 (THE ABOVE DESCRIBED WESTERLY LIMITS OF GATLIN BOULEVARD BEAR
SOUTH 00°01 '45" WEST AND ALL BEARINGS ARE RELATIVE 1HERETO); THENCE SOUTH
89°57'05" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 737.09 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°02'55" WEST, A
DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET, TO A POINT OF RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE,
CONCA VE NORTHWESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET; THENcE
NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
. 89°38'04", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 39.11 FEET, TOA POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE
WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 781.00 FEET; THENCE
. NORTHERLY, ALONG 1HE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
34°34'43", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 471.34 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE;
THENCE NORm 34°53'43" EAST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 291.45 FEET, TO THE
POINT OF CURVATURE WIm A CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS
OF 58.QO FEET; THENCE NORTHERL Y¡ ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 4 1'44", AN ARC DI CE OF 50.31 FEET, TO A POINT OF
REVERSE . A . WITH A CUR , ONCA VE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A
ARY A. B .FORD, PSM
PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
STATE OF FLORIDA REG. NO. 4981
DATE: /-3o-~O"2-
REVISIONS-UPDATES
DATE
NOTE: THIS IS NOT A SKETCH OF SURVEY, BUT ONLY~
A GRAPHIC DEPICTION OF THE DESCRIPTION SHOWN
HEREON. THERE HAS BEEN NO FIELD WORK, VIEWING
OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, OR MONUMENTS SET IN
CONNECTION WITH THE PREPARATION OF THIS
INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON.
BY
CK'O
NOTE: LANDS SHOWN HEREON WERE NOT
ABSTRACTED FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY ANDIOR
EASEMENTS OF RECORD.
JOB NO.:
B589 BY: JDM CHECKED: GRB F.B.: N/A PG.: NIA SHEET 1 OF 9
'rAWSON, NOBLE &WEBB, IN,C. ....J
LB# 6674
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND PLANNERS, SURVEYORS
590 NW PEACOCK BLVD, SUITE 9, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA
PHONE (561) 878-1700
. .
RADIUS OF 130.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°41'07", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 205.76 FEET, TO A
POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY,
HAVING A RADIUS OF 58.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF
SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 54°25'22", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 55.09
FEET, TO A PÖINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY,
AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 800.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF
SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°30'32", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 481.83
FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE NORTH 13°02'47" WEST, A
DISTANCE OF 337.09 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE
EASTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,050.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG '_
THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF IJoOl'56", AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 466.28 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE NORTH
00°00'52" WEST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 608.90 FEET, TO THE POINT OF
CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 800.00
FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY, lo\LONG THE ARC OF SND CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 10°58'48", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 153.31 FEET, TO A POINT OF COMPOUND
CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF
58.00 FEET'; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53°54'58", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 54.58 FEET, TO A POINT OF
REVERSE CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HA. VING A
RADIUS OF 130.00 FEET; THENCE NORTIIWESTERL Y, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE
THR:OUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52°24'42", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 118.92 FEET, TO A
POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WITII A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY,
IlA VING A RADIUS OF 4.00 FEET; THENCE NORTIIWESTERL Y, ALONG 1HE ARC OF
SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 77°30'05", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 5.41
FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITII A LINE; THENCE NORTII 90°00'00" WEST,
ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 1,278.80 FEET; THENCE NORTII 00°00'00" EAST, A
DISTANCE OF 456.86 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURV ATIJRE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE
WESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 975.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERL Y, ALONG
THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 38°43'01", AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 658.84 FEET, TO A POINT OF NON-RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A LINE
(THE RADIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 51 °16'59" WEST FROM TIIIS POINT);·
THENCE NORTH 52°45'09" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 50.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF .
BEGINNING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL, AND A POINT OF NON-RADIAL
INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS
OF 1,025.00 FEET (THE RADIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 51°21'17" WEST
FROM THIS POINT); THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE
. TIIROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12°44'26", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 227.92 FEET, TO A
POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE NORTH 51 °23'09" WEST, ALONG SAID LINE
A DISTANCE OF 430.16 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE Wlm A CURVE, CONCAVE
SOUTHERL Y, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 346.92 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY, ALONG
. -
JOB NO.:
B589 BY: JDM CHECKED: GRB f.B.: N/A PG.: N/A SHEET 2 Of 9
-
, ~.
,
...."
'rAWSON, NOBLE &WEBB,INC.
LB# 6674
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND PLANNERS, SURVEYORS
590 NW PEACOCK BLVD, SUITE 9, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA
PHONE (561) 878-1700
THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 62°00'28", AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 375.45 FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WITH A CURVE,
CONCAVE NORTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,766.70 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY,
ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF IOo04'04", AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 486.15 FEET, TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE,
CONCAVE NORTHERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 420.00 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY,
ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 33°01 '35", AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 242.10 FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURV A TIJRE WITH A CURVE,
CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 925.00 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY,
ALONG THE ARC OF SAlD CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 32°13'29", AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 520.24 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; TIIENCE SOUTH.
77°28'34" WEST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 85.31 FEET; THENCE NORTH 45000'00"
WEST, A DISTANCE OF 115.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45°00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF
100.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45°00'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 384.99 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH 45°00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1,130.54 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE
WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 250.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 40°07'09", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 175.05 FEET, TO A POINT OF REVERSE
CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF
250.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 37°00'29", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 161..48 FEET, TO A POINT OF NON-
RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A LINE (THE RADIUS POINT OFSAID CURVE BEARS
NORTH 48°06'40" WEST FROM THIS POINT); THENCE SOUTH 56°31'08" WEST, A
DISTANCE OF 413.01 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 04°31'12" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 121.23 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 13°36'12" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 148.52 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 05028'36"
WEST, A DISTANCE OF 93.42 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74°33'46" WEST, A DISTANCE OF
84.83 FEET; THENCE NORTH 81 °36'23" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 66.58 FEET, TO A POINT OF
NON-RAJ;)IAL INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, AND HAVING A
RADIUS OF 380.00 FEET (THE RADIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 62°46'40"
EAST FROM THIS POINT); THENCE SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53°12'15", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 352.86 FEET, TO A
POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE SOUTH 25°58'55" EAST, ALONG SAID LINE
A DISTANCE OF 213.43 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE
WESTERL Y, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 120.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTIlERL Y, ALONG
TIlE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26°06'27", AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 54.68 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE SOUTH
00°07'32" WEST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 8.74 FEET, TO APOINT OF NON-
, RADIAL INTERS-pcnON WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, AND HAVING A
RADIUS OF 2,649.48 FEET (THE RADIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 00042'00"
WEST FROM THIS POINT); THENCE WESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01°33'23", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 71.98 FEET, TO A
POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, AND
-
.
. "
JOB NO.:
B589 BY: JDM CHECKED: GRB F.B.: N/A PG.: N/A SHEET 3 OF 9
'rAWSON, NOBLE &WEBB, INC. ....J
LB# 6674
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND PLANNERS, SURVEYORS
590 NW PEACOCK BLVD, SUITE 9, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA
PHONE (561) 878-1700
..
HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,864.29 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID
CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10°42'24", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 348.37 FEET,
TO A POINT OF NON-RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A LINE (THE RADIUS POINT OF SAID
CURVE BEARS soum 1 1°33'47" EAST FROM THIS POINT); THENCE SOUTH 78°53'57"
WEST, A DISTANCE OF 122.41 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE WIm A CURVE,
CONCAVE NORTHERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 960.00 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY,
ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF-43°11'52", AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 723.79 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; mENCE NORTH
57°54'11" WEST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 487.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
28°35'46" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 126.07 FEET, TO A POINT OF NON-RADIAL
INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUmWESTERL Y, AND HAVING A RADIUS
OF 1,920.49 FEET (THE RADIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 27°51'57" WEST
. FROM THIS POINT); THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05°06'57", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 171.48 FEET, TO A
. POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE NORTH 67°15'01" WEST, ALONG SAID LINE
A DISTANCE OF 214.49 FEET, T,O THE POINT OF CURV A1URE WIm A CURVE, CONCAVE
SOUTHERL Y, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 178.00 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY, ALONG
mE ARC OF SAID CURVE mROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22°45'14", AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 70.69 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE SOUTH
89°59'45" WEST, ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 247.81 FEET; THENCE NORTH
00°00'15" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 3,879.07 FEET; THENCE NORTH 74°07'42" EAST, A
DISTANCE OF 1,181.39 FEET; 1HENCE NORTH 02°40'30" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 853.63
FEET; THENCE NORTH 03°34'36" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 264.67 FEET; THENCE NORTH
11 °39'14" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 299.59 FEET; THENCE NORTH 05°52'55" EAST, A
. DISTANCE OF 655.21 FEET; THENCE NORTH 13°31'07" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 474.82 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 74°14'30" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 2,525.46 FEET; THENCE NORTH 76°04'00"
EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1,244.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 65°11'40"EAST, A DISTANCE OF
178.59 FEET; THENCE NORm 59°06'39" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 424.13 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 73°43'15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 14.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 50°55'52" EAST, A
DISTANCE OF 7.43 FEET; THENCE NORTH 56°01'38" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 31.64 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 33°56'01" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 30.15 FEET; THENCE NORTH 54°34'18"
EAST, A DISTANCE OF 298.73 FEET; THENCE NORTH 85°53'58" EAST, A DISTANCE OF
132.02 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70°54'26" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 143.67 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 56°25'29" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 121.35 FEET; THENCE NORTH 66°21'07" EAST, A
. DISTANCE OF 557.84 FEET TO A POINT IN THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE
EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 4; THENCE SOUTH 00°35'12" WEST, ALONG SAID
EXTENSION AND ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 4, A DISTANCE OF 3,104.48
FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 4, SOUTH
00°36'27" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2,651.97 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SECTION
LINE, SOUTH 60°47'35" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 146.85 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 16°16'02"
WEST, A DISTANCE OF 171.26 FEET, TO A POINT OF NON-RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH
A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 602.61 FEET (THE
JOB NO.:
8589 BY: JDM CHECKED: GRB F.B.: N/A PG.: N/A SHEET 4 OF 9
- ,
~
.
'.
.' "
...,¡
'r'AWSON, NOBLE &WEBB, IN.C.
LB# 6674
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND PLANNERS, SURVEYORS
590 NW PEACOCK BLVD, SUITE 9, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA
PHONE (561) 878-1700
"
..-...,.....
RADIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 16°16'04" WEST FROM THIS POINT);
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TIIROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 52°10'10", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 548.69 FEET, TO A POINT OF COMPOUND
CURVATURE WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF
4.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TIIROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 99°48'52", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 6.97 FEET, TOA POINT OF .
TANGENCY WITH A LINE; TIIENCE SOUTH 78° 15'06" WEST, ALONG SAID LINE A
DISTANCE OF 907.21 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 52°45'09" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 345.13 FEET
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 884.12 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
- ,
,
I
,
.
.
, -
"
'JOB NO.:
B589 BY: JDM CHECKED: GRB F.B.: N/A PG.: N/A SHEET 5 OF 9
IZ
~ 10
-i0\0
00'
-i!3'10
þ\DQ
cC!Ri
::;:
t
I
\ R=20S0.00·
y-A=13'OI'56"
\ L=466.28'
\
\
J~
'!'.a\~
bl,þ
<1[\1
\
R-aoo.OO' \
A=34 '30'32"""1-1
L=481.B3' J
I
R=58.00' I
A=54'25'22"
L=SS.09' Y
R=S8.00' ¡.
A=49'4I'44'( "- R=130.00'
L=50.31· :...J A=90'4I'07"
I L=20S.76'
I
/ '-N34'S3'43"E
R=781.00' 291.4S·
A=34'34'43"Z I
L=471.34' I
I
I
I R=2S.00'
A=89'38'04"
,l-f L=39.II'
- _I rl
100.00' ...J
NOO'02'SS"W
'-"
LN\\'
.
Lawson, Noble &
ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS
590 NW Peocock Boulevord, Suite 9, Port SI. Lucie, Florido 34986
(561) 878-1700. fox: (561) 878-1802. emoil: Inw-psl@lnw-inc.com
West Palm Beach· Port St. Lucie
.
.
.
. . . . . . . . ....
Webb, Inc. LB #6674
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION
ò
0
<:t
II
~
W
..J
<:(
U
U)
. .
CONTIMJED SHEET 7
MATCH LINE
w w
",'",
,..., '"
~.~
z Z
<t «
'" "'0
m. ~_
zvi Wz
01'- 1'-0
r:'f') '()j::
U(L Q..u
w- """w
(/):1: ::r:(I)
~ ~
:;.:;
o 0
-- --
UNPLATTED
~
P.O.B.
P.O.c.
P.B.
P.C.
P .R.c.
P.T.
R
A
L
N.R.
OR.B.
POINT OF BEGINNING
POINT OF COMÆNCE:MENT
PLAT BOOK
POINT OF ct,RV A TæE
POINT OF REVERSE CURV A TU1E
POINT OF TANGENcy
DENOTES RADIUS
DENOTES DElTA
DENOTES ARC LENGTH
DENOTES NON-RADIAL
DENOTES OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK
P.O.C.
CS89'S7'OS"W
737.09'
SEE SHEETS 1 - 5 OF 9 FOR DESCRIPTION
.
-'
UNPLATTED
C\/
10
'"
C\/
I
'"
V
":0\
-C\/
"'",
a:j~
O:;<t
00..
~
z
.0
.. . f::-~
0'
W
'"
~
:J
z
JOB No. B589
PG.
1'\D.,.\50D-599\B5B9\CAD\B5B9SKD~-I.áwg 01129/2002 OJ,5~,19 PH EST stEET 6 OF 9
DATE: 01-14-02
BY: JDM
CHECKED: GRB
F.B. -
.-.
LN\\'
....,
. . . . . . . . . . . ......
lawson, Noble & Webb, Inc. lB #6674
ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS
590 NW Peacock Boulevard, Suite 9, Port Sf. Lucie, Florido 34986
(561) 878-1700 ' fox: (561) 878-1802 ' emoil: Inw-ps/@Inw-inc.com
West Palm Beach, Port St. Lucie
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION
I
CONTINUED Sl-EET 9
MATCH LINE
I..EQE&
N45'OO'00"W
115.12' 7 7 . Ra420.OO'
545'001'"W 5 7'28 3;""W 6-33'01'35'
100.'" ~85.31 \ L=242.10'
1"''0 LR-92S.OO' ~
is'1!' ~. 6=32'13'29"
~ L-52024' R=2766.70·
6=10'04'04'
.~ L-486.15·
cÞd'. ,:.
~.y;> ----..
~ '....0'" /' '\ _____
",/ \ ""
/ \ \
/ R=602.61· \ \
/ L>=S2'10'10~ \
I L-S48.69· \ I
I 2." \. R=4.00' J
\ '-H~~i?'£ - ~L>=9:'48'?2' / ____ - - - __
'r - L-6.97 /' DETAIL 'A'
\ / ,/
" / / N9o'OO'OO'W
" DETAIL "8' /',/ ( r 127B.80·
----- ____ L___
-- - - - / . /\ R=13O.00·
POINT OF BEGINNING R=~.O~ ~ \ L>=S2'24'42'
POINT OF COMIÆNCÐ.£NT J L>=77 30 os / L=118.92'
PLAT BOOK I L=S.4I· \/
POINT OF CURVATURE "
POINT OF REVERSE CU¡V A TURE \ "
POINT OF TANGENCY R=SB.OO' .........
DENOTES RADIUS \ 6=53'54'58' ~ ...\
DENOTES DELTA \ L=54.58' \/ \
DENOTES ARC LENGTH '\
DENOTES NON-RAOIAL R=800.00' \
DENOTES OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK " ð=10'SB'4B'-y',/
" L=lS331' .v
'---~-----
R=34G.92·
60062'00'28'
L-375.45·
...
z
o
¡:
u
w
VI
'-'-
o
w
Z
::;
W
~ .
1"-1"-
"'m
w...:
1"'"
0"'
ON
VI
(
co'
1-'
W w
W Z
~ ::¡
o I
W U
::> ,I-
Z «
¡: ::E
Õ
u'
C.D.D.-4
884.12 ACRES +/-
PORT ST. LUCIE
SECTION 35
(PLAT BOOK 15. PAGE 10>
.,
>
SECTION 4
TOWNSHIP 37 S. RANGE 39 E.
TOWNSHIP 37 S.. RANGE 39 E.
: SECTION 9
P.OE.
p.o.e.
PE.
P.C.
PAC.
P.T.
R
L>
L
N.R.
I O.R.B.
SEE SHEETS 1 - 5
R= 1025.00'
) t2~j~~?'
51S'15'()&''''''
,crf}
....<;; <3
--"'" ""'!;.<tJ"". w w
~\T Š) P 0.8 (\ (\
5"\"!.~-<'·;/~ \: ,. .., ..,
~';:'---d.«f N.R. ~z . ~
..-- ;/ A~' 2'45'09"E z
~ \ ~æ (\~.~g
UNPLATTED \.....- Rm975.00' zuf ufÕ
~·43·OI· Et- t- -
\ L=G58.84' I- '" .., I-
t3e:. e:.~
I "'iJj iJj.'" \ SEE DETAIL
\&I ~ § "A"
8/'" 0 0
?I; I- I- R=4.oo· l>~;~~2'
§I"" 6=77'30'0~S" ~ L-1I892'
N9Q'OO'OO'W L-S.4I'/ " R=~B.oo'
L - - - - 1278.80'- - - -( .r-ð~S3'54'5B".
\ " ¡-54.58·
R..aoo.oo·......- ,/
6=10·58'48·~-1
L-153.31·
_ I¡¡¡
-i2!IC¡
~P'g
Þ "'IV>
Cqf\)
Ii
MATCH LINE
CONTINUËD SHEET 6
R=602.61'
6=52'10'10'
L~548.G9'
ò
o
U)
II
-
~
W
....J
<1:
u
(f)
UNPLATTED
........
""
"
'\
\
\
\
I
J
I
/
/
/
OF 9 FOR DESCRIPTION
II\Do. to. \SOO-S99\..BSS9\CA D\BSS9Sk04-è,dw9
Dl/29/2oo2
03'56'25 PH EST SHEET 7 OF 9
JOB No. B589
BY: JDM
CHECKED: GRB
F.B. -
PG.
DATE: 01-14-02
'-'
.
Lawson,
ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS
590 NW Peacock Boulevard, Suite 9, Part SI. Lucie, Florida 34986
(561) 878-1700. fax: (561) 878-1802 . email: Inw-psl@nw-inc.com
West Palm Beach, Port St. Lucie
. . . .
Noble &
LN\\'
. . .
Webb,
. . . ...-
Inc. LB #6674
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION
I
CONTINUED SHEET 9
MATCH LINE
SECTION 5 SECTION 4
SECTION 8 SECTION 9
TOWNSHIP 37·S., RANGE 39 E.
0
0 ......
1O /'
/ "
/I / \
~ I \
W ~ I \
--.J :Jt- ~ SOO'07'32"W I
<[q :;- I
« t-m 0
or- ? 8.74' I
U t:~ 8 \
(f) z ~ I
\ R=2649.48' J 0
\ Ò-I'33'23" '~!i / /
L-71.98"
"- Ibe:
"- o ./
'- "'...--
-----
C.DD.-4
882.44 ACRES +/-
I'-
t-
.....
.....
~:x:
~ '"
-J. a' ~...
(5 ~
I- Z
<f ¡::
:::¡ Z
o
u
I
WìEM};
P.O.B.
P.O.C.
P.B.
P.c.
P .R.c.
P.T.
R
.ð.
L
N.R.
M.B.
POINT OF BEGINNING
POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
PlAT BOOK
POINT OF CURVATæE
POINT OF REVERSE cæVATLRE
POINT OF TANGENCY
DENOTES RADIUS
DENOTES DELTA
DENOTES ARC LENGTH
DENOTES NON-RADIAL
DENOTES OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK
I
4: . R=250.00' .
""\9. '---- .ð.=40'07'09"
~~q.. L=17S.0S·
'--R=.2Sa.Oo'
.ð.=37·OO'.29"
L=161.48'
UNPLATTED
DETAIL
UNPLATTED
SEE SHEETS 1 - S OF 9 FOR DESCRIPTION
JOB No. B589
BY: JDM
I"D.t4'500-~99'BSS9'CAD'B~B9SK04-J.d'9 01/29/2002 OJ.SM6 PH CST
Sl-EET 8 OF 9
CHECKED: GRB
F.B. -
PG.
DATE: 01-14-02
.
Lawson,
ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS
590 NW Peacock Boulevard, Suite 9, Port SI. Lucie, Florida 34986
(561) 878-1700" fox: (561) 878-1802" ernail: Inw-psl@lnw-inc.carn
West Palm Beach" Port St. Lucie
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION
N66"21'07"E
557.84'
o
o
o
II
..
W
---1
<{
U
(f)
NW39'14"E
299.59'
N03"34'36"E
264.67'
U\PLATTED
SEE SHEETS 1 - 5 OF 9 FOR DESCRIPTION
JOB No. B589
BY: JDM
: I
z
«
a:
'" .
z vi .
0.....
~í') .
ua.
w~
"j¡
1'-'
f-.-.
PfiJ
!"v'
,.,"-
~v-
!U
tö _
10 -
- C\
"'II'!
r'tö
10 CD
£
~
LN\\'
"wiÎ
. . . .
Noble &
. . . . . . . ..-
Webb, Inc. LB D6674
UNPLATTED
SECTION 34
TOWNSHIP 36 S
RANGE 39 E.
W
m
I")
W
to
Z
«
0::
·v
uiz
.....0
I")~
~t;
IW
(/)(/)
Z
;:
o
I--
N8S"S3'S8"E
132.02' l
NS4"34'lg"E
298.73'
N59"06-39:E __ .~.
424.13' \ / ,
N65"11'40"E\ v I .
178.59' Z"
N70"54'26"E
6"04'(jJ-£' 143.67' U1
I'll 44.50' N56"25'28"E g
1Z SEE 121.35' <>1
DETAIL ".!
¡:;¡
:Ë
SECTION 33
TOWNSHIP 36 S., RANGE 39 E.
TOWNSHIP 37 S., RANGE 39 E.
SECTION 4
UNPLATTED
------
~~
(I
v .
z
o
¡::
u
W
U1
u..
o
w
z
:J
\
\
\
\
I
,
,
...
........,
I
I
I
I
/
/
/
"
"
~"
--------
CDD.-4
882.44 ACRES +1-
I
'i~
:J I--
I W
U W
I-- I
« (/)
MATCH LINE =< . Ii]
-'---- :>
O<WTWÆD Off" ~
MATCH LlI\E
CONTINUED SHEET 7
.,.
SECTION 4
TOWNSHIP 37 S.. RANGE 39 E.
TOWNSHIP 37 S., RANGE 39 E.
- SECTION 9
~
P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
P.6. PLAT BOOK
P.C. POINT OF CURVATURE
P .RC. .POINT OF REVERSE CUW A TURE
P.T. POINT OF TANGENCY
R DENOTES RADIUS
t::. DENOTES DEL TA
L DENOTES ARC LENGTH
N,R DENOTES NON-RADIAL
O.RB. DENOTES OfFICIAL RECORD BOOK
1"OQtQ'SOO-S99\BSB9\CAO\BS89SKO<-<,dwg 01/29/2002 0<,0:5<32 PM EST SHEET 9 OF 9
CHECKED: GRB
F.B. -
PG.
DATE: 01-14-02
~
...."
EXHIBIT B
CONSTRUCTION TIMETABLE AND COST ESTIMATE FOR AREA TO BE
INCLUDED WITHIN DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
FTL:849323:2
'--'
...,;
WESTCHESTER CDD-4 DEVELOPMENT
Proposed Construction Timetable & Estimated Costs
DRI Common Development Infrastructure
Unit
Description Unit Price Quantity Total
Earthwork LS $3,509,200 1 $3,509,200
Roadways & Storm Drainage Systems LS $9,134,900 1 $9.134,900
Water & Sewer Utilities Systems LS $2,063,700 1 $2,063,700
Other Infrastructure Costs LS $2,830,000 1 $2,830,000
Sub Total: $17,5~7,áð(). ..
Contingency: 10% $1,[53;760 ..
. T()taIGost: . . ... $19,291,5ªº
.. .. . ... .. .
DRI Common Development Cost Distribution by COD
Prorata
Share t
$1,199,622
$4,093.436
$2,921,675
$11,076,847
TotalC ost:$l~¡~~1'~~~ø;
CDD-4 Development
Sub Total:
Contingency:
.1):)Jª~o~h
Unit
LS
LS
LS
LS
Unit
Price
$7,571,400
$14,333,900
$5,838,000
$3,780,000
Quantity
1
1
1
1
Total
$7.571,400
$14,333,900
$5,838,000
$3,780,000
Description
C[)D-4Good Faith Es,fimate' Tòtal:
.. $45; 752;400
Notes:
1 The DRI Common Developmenllnfrastructure Costs are assigned to each District according to the Master Improvement Costs
Allocation methodology presented in the Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs Report for this District.
2 Additional funds will be added 10 each District's Good Faith Estimate Bond amount for inflation, bond closing costs, and
bond reserves, as applicable.
Master CDD-4 Development Timetable
Project Construction Schedule % Complete Construction Value
Phase 1 (Years 0-5) 0% $0
Phase 2 (Years 5-10) 45% $20,588,580
Phase 3 (Years 10-15) 40% $18,300,960
Phase 4 (Years15-20) 15% $6,862,860
2125/2002
Page 1 of 1
S:iWestchesterlDocumenls
ExceUCDD Infrastructure Budgets.xls
'-'
....,
EXHIBIT C
EVIDENCE OF WRITTEN CONSENT OF OWNER
TO INCLUSION OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE EXTERNAL BOUNDARIES OF
WESTCHESTER NO.4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
Westchester Development Company, LLC, a Florida limited liability company and
successor by merger with Westchester Development Company ("Owner"), hereby certifies that it
is the sole owner of approximately 1.68 acres of certain real property (the "Property"), located in
St. Lucie County, Florida. By signing below, the Owner hereby gives its full consent to the
expansion of the external boundaries of the Westchester No.4 Community Development District
to include the Property therein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand this /3 "day of
rJ~,..-,"", ,2002. -
WESTCHESTER DEVELOPMENT
COMP Y, LLC
W/- ~/
STATE OF FLORIDA )
COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /37-7 day of
'-J?'jAÆh , 2002, by ::J;¡~c II: A-AfleÆtP.P , the ¡/¡<~ ~6;c/e,vT of
WESSTCHESTER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, who is personally known to me [(I or
produced as identification.
Notary Public
Printed Name:
~2¿/?J~
~41é' /A WiPALk'.d
PATRICIA W. WARREN
.4MISSION j CC791995
EXPIRES NOY 28. 2002
SOWDIÐ THROUGH
NNAKfAGf. IfOI'AR'I'
"
FTl:849323:2
'-'
"WI
EXHIBIT D
DESIGNATION OF THE FUTURE GENERAL DISTRIBUTION, LOCATION AND
EXTENT OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE USES OF LAND PROPOSED FOR THE AREA
TO BE INCLUDED WITHIN THE DISTRICT
FTl:849323:2
'-
Not
Included
G-51~ RU-5
WESTCHESTER
Existing Land Use
St. Lucie County, Florida
.~AYn.
tlEB AG-5, "o'fcUftn 10.2 ô.tIac)
~ RV-5, _1IaI1kban 15 ô.tIac)
SOURCE: SL LucIe Cou1Iy ~ P1an
NOTE: AI 1ICtBa\Ol 018 approximate.
[ll]]
~
4~ Lucido & Associates .6
~N' l.-f~~ 'Ç.f
V :'--=-~.:r-= J"-'-
-~
...,
\
\
\
ï
(0
(J
TOTAL CDD AREA:
884.11
t.lXD . lDw Intenslly MIxed
Use DeveIo)rnont (S du/ac)
11111111111111 Propœod Roed (200' RIWI
MXD . MedUn nlensIty Mixed
Use DeIIe~ /5-9 ô.tIac)
FTl:849323:2
'\w
EXHIBIT E
STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS
~
'--'
..."
STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS
WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT #4
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Purpose and Scope
This statement of estimated regulatory costs ("SERC") supports the petition to
expand the boundaries of the Westchester Community Development District #4
("District" or "District #4"). The District was established by Ordinance No. 01-013
of St. Lucie County on August 21, 2001. The District currently comprises
approximately 882.44 acres of land located in S1. Lucie County. The District
proposes to expand its boundaries by 1.68 acres to a total of 884.12 acres.
The limitations on the scope of this SERC are explicitly set out in Section
190.002(2)( d), F.S. (governing District formation or alteration) as follows:
"That the process of establishing such a district pursuant to uniform general law -
shall be fair and based only on factors material to manaQinQ and financinq the
service delivery function of the district, so that any matter concerninQ permittinq
or planninq of the development is not material or relevant (emphasis added)."
1.2 Overview of the Westchester DRI and the - Changes Requested in the
Boundaries of the Four Community Development Districts Serving Westchester
On August 21, 2001 the St. Lucie County Commission approved the formation of
four Community Development Districts to provide community facilities and
services to the Westchester DR/. District #4 is designed to provide community
infrastructure, services, and facilities along with their operations and
maintenance, to a portion of the Westchester DRI located in St. Lucie County
(the "development"). The development is a master planned, mixed-use, fully
amenitized, community. The DRI includes 2,033 acres. The landowner has
established community development districts on 1,677.74 of these acres. The
land plan for the portion of the DRI planned for community development districts
consists of up to: (a) 4,500 residential units, (b) 2,001,000 square feet of offices,
(c) 575,000 square feet of retail space, and (d) 300 hotel units.
Given the size and scope of the development, St. Lucie County agreed to
establish four community development districts to serve the project. Four
districts are optimal for the development because this articulation allows for each
district to focus on the unique requirements of the land within its boundaries.
District #1 serves an exclusively commercial area in the project that will be
developed in the first phase of the development program. By contrast, the land
in District #2 is planned exclusively as a corporate office park with a civic/school
site. The land in District #3 is planned only for use as a residential community
with no commercial, retaif, or office uses. Finally, District #4 is projected for
future development as a town center with retail uses at its core and surrounding
Page 1 of 6
February 25. 2002
\w
,..,
residential uses. No offices are planned for the land in Dìstrict #4. In light of
these very different land uses, and the unique demands for community
development district facilities and services, it is optimal to create four unique
community development districts, one for each area.
Table 1 displays the land use plan for the lands within each of the four proposed
community development districts planned for the Westchester DRI as envisioned
in the petitions to form the Districts. Noted at the time the petitions to form the
Districts were filed, was the fact that the land use plans were "subject to change
as land planning activities continue",
Table 1. Land Use Plan for the Area in Westchester Served by the
Westchester Community Development Districts #1 through #4
Category CDD#1 CDD#2 CDD#3 CDD#4 Total
Acres 74.25 257.45 463.60 882.44 1,677.74
Single Family 0 0 863 2,512 3,375
Multifamily 0 0 287 838 1,125
Retail 125,000 0 0 450,000 575,000
Office 78,500 1,922,500 ° ° 2,001,000
Hotel ° ° ° 300 300
Source: St. Lucie West Development Corporation
As land use planning and engineering analysis has progressed at Westchester,
a number of desired adjustments have come to light. No changes in the total
volume of development are proposed. However, the distribution of the
development across the four Districts is now somewhat different than originally
expected. The rationale for forming four distinct districts was based on the
unique land use mix that was originally anticipated for lands included in each
District. Since the land use plans have changed somewhat, it is desirable to
alter the boundaries of the various Districts to reflect these changes. Table 2
presents to proposed new land use plan for each District as well as the proposed
new acreage totals for each District.
Page 2 of 6
February 25. 2002
\rw
.....,
Table 2. land Use Plan for the Proposed Areas in Westchester Served by the
Westchester Community Development Districts #1 through #4 As Modified
Category
Acres
Single family units
Multifamily units
Retail sqft
Office sqft
Hotel rooms
CDD#1
59.43
o
o
125,000
78,500
o
CDD#2
234.33
o
o
o
1,922,500
o
CDD#3
499.87
863
287
o
o
o
CDD#4
884.12
2,512
838
450,000
o
300
Total
1,677.75
3,375
1,125
575,000
2,001,000
300
The changes proposed for the acreage and land uses in each District are
provided in Table 3. It is important to note that no change in total development is
proposed. Furthermore, the proposed volume and distribution of development in
each District is the same as originally proposed. The changes involve
redistributing the acreage among the Districts, so that the original land uses are .
preserved.
Table 3. Changes in the land Use Plans Proposed for
Westchester Community Development Districts #1 through #4 As Modified
.
Category
Acres
Single family units
Multifamily units
Retail sqft
Office sqft
Hotel rooms
CDD#1
-14.82
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
CDD#2
-23.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
CD 0#3
36.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
CDD#4
1.68
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
The Westchester Community Development District #4 continues to be planned
as the town center for the DRI with a retail core, residential neighborhoods, and
a hotel. No offices are planned for District #4. District #4 will provide community
development district facilities and services to 884.12 acres in the District.
In addition, District #1 will serve as the master community development district
for the additional districts that are planned for the development. In that role the
District will also provide community-serving infrastructure that provides benefits
to all four of the community development districts envisioned to serve the
Westchester DR!. These master improvements include major entrance roads,
entry statements, landscaping, master stormwater control, and master utilities.
The debt service and operation/maintenance costs incurred by District #1 to
provide the master community improvements will be funded through non ad
valorem special assessments on all benefiting property in the development.
District #1 may also operate and maintain localized infrastructure within any of
the other three districts that is integrally related to the master community
Page 3 of 6
February 25. 2002
\w
""'"
improvements, if a district desires to delegate that function and District #1
desires to accept the same. It is anticipated that the four community
development districts will enter into a series of inter focal agreements providing
for this sharing of master improvement, operating and maintenance costs.
1.3 Requirements for Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs
Section 120.541 (2), F.S. (1997), defines the elements a statement of estimated
regulatory costs must contain:
"(a) A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be
required to comply with the rule, together with a general description of the types
of individuals likely to be affected by the rule.
(b) A good faith estimate of the cost to the agency, and to any other state and
local govemment entities, of implementing and enforcing the proposed rule, and
any anticipated effect on state and local revenues.
(c) A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by
individuals and entities, including local governmental entities, required to comply
with the requirements of the rule. As used in this paragraph, "transactional
costs" are direct costs that are readily ascertainable based upon standard
business practiées, and include filing fees, the cost of obtaining a license, the
cost of equipment required to be installed or used or procedures required to be
employed in complying with the rule, additional operating costs incurred, and the
cost of monitoring and reporting.
(d) An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined by Section
288.703, F.S., and an analysis of the impact on small counties and small cities
as defined by Section 120.52, F.S. St. Lucie County is not defined as a small
County for purposes of this requirement.
(e) Any additional information that the agency determines may be useful.
2.0 A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be
required to comply with the ordinance, together with a general description
of the types of individuals likely to be affected by the ordinance.
There will be no individuals or entities affected by approval of the proposed
expansion of the boundaries of District #4. District #4 is an already existing
Community Development District. The petition to expand its boundaries by
approximately 1.68 acres will have no impact on either the initial 882.44 acres in
the District or on the 1.68 acres added to the District for the following reasons.
First, as noted above, neither the costs nor the volume of development planned
for District #4 will change if the proposed boundary change is approved. So,
there will be no impact on land in District #4. Second, the expansion parcel will
be taken from the contraction parcels of other Districts. Again, since neither the
Page 4 of 6 February 25. 2002
\w
.....,
costs nor the volume of development will change in any other District, there is no
impact on any individual or entity if the proposal is approved.
3.0 Good faith estimate of the cost to state and local government entities, of
implementing and enforcing the proposed ordinance, and any anticipated
effect on state and local revenues.
3.1 Costs to Governmental Agencies of Implementing and Enforcing Ordinance
State Governmental Entities
There will be no cost to any governmental agencies to implement or to enforce
the proposed ordinance. District #4 is an existing Community Development
District in good standing. Altering its boundaries will not change the costs for any
State governmental entity.
St. Lucie County
St. Lucie County will incur no costs associated with this proposed Ordinance
beyond reviewing the petition and its supporting exhibits. The petition itself
provides much of the information needed for a staff review. St. Lucie County
already possess the staff needed to conduct the review without the need for new
staff. In additión, there is no capital required to review the petition. Finally. local
governments routinely process similar petitions for land uses and zoning
changes that are far more complex than is the petition to alter the boundaries of
District #4.
There is no annual cost to the County, because the District is an existing
Community Development District in good standing. Approving a change in the
District's boundaries does not impact annual costs to the County in any way.
3.2 Impact on State and Local Revenues
Adoption of the proposed ordinance will have no negative impact on State or
local revenues. The District is an existing Community Development District. As
an independent unit of local government, the District is designed to be a self
funding entity in terms of its obligations under Chapter 190, F.S. Altering its
boundaries, as proposed here, has no impact on State or local revenues.
4.0 A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by
individuals and entities required to comply with the requirements of the
ordinance.
There are no transactional costs associated with approving this alteration in the
boundaries of the District. As noted above, the amount of development and the
number of acres served by all the Districts will no change if the Ordinance is
approved. Furthermore, the volume of development and the costs for providing
Page 5 of 6
February 25, 2002
....
.."
District facilities and services is also unchanged.
estimated costs and the timetable for construction.
Exhibit B contains the
5.0 An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined by Section
288.703, F.S., and an analysis of the impact on small counties and small
cities as defined by Section 120.52, F.S.
There will be no impact on small businesses because of the changes proposed
in the District's boundaries. The District is an existing Community Development
District. The costs to provide infrastructure and services has not changed nor
has the volume of development planned for the District.
St. Lucie County has an estimated population that is greater than 10,000 in the
most current census (2000). Therefore, the County is not defined as a "small"
county according to Section 120.52, F.S.
6.0 Any additional useful information.
The analysis provided above is based on a straightforward application of
economic theory, especially as it relates to tracking the incidence of regulatory
costs and benefits. Inputs were received from the Developer's Engineer and
other professionals associated with the Developer.
Page 6 of 6
February 25, 2002
..........
....
Agenda Request
..",
Item NumberK - A 1-
Date: Mar 26, 2002
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[ ]
[ x ]
[ ]
Quasi-JD [
To:
Submitted By:
Board of County Commissioners
~ .' '", ' Prxs~nte.,d By
\' "!'~
) ~ IJ ~
'~omA>evelopment gïrector
I
Consider Approving an Interlocal Agreement between St. Lucie Coun~y and The
Westchester Community Development Districts One Through Four for the þurpose for
addressing Infrastructure Improvements at The Westchester Development Site.
Community Development Dept.
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND:
Attached is a copy of an Interlocal Agreement between St. Lucie County and the
Westchester Community Development Districts Numbers One Through Four. The
purpose of this agreement is to recognize that certain community'wide infrastructure
improvements will be constructed by Westchester CDD #1. How this effects St. Lucie
County is that certain of these "community infrastructure" improvements will take place
outside of the boundaries of the Westchester CDD #1, and some may take place
outside of the overall boundaries of the Westchester development project itself. In
order to do so, the County must through specific Interlocal Agreement, agree that the
District may undertake certain improvements outside of its boundaries, consistent with
the general restrictions setout in the Districts enabling ordinances.
Paragraph 2 (Grant Of Authority) of this Interlocal Agreement outlines the general
powers being authorized through this agreement. To the extent that the Districts
operate within the limitations of thier enabling ordinances, they are permitted to
undertake certain infrastructure improvements outside of the District boundaries and
to levy assessments within the Districts accordingly.
In addition, the attached Interlocal Agreement addressees the relationship of the
previously approved local Development Agreement (DV A-01-001) between St. Lucie
County and the Westchester Development Company regarding infrastructure
improvements to be made and how those improvements are credited to the County.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
PREVIOUS ACTION:
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board approve the attached draft Interlocal Agreement
between St. Lucie County and The Westchester Community Development Districts
One Through Four for the purpose for addressing Infrastructure Improvements at The.'_
Westchester Development Site.
"
C MMISSION ACTION:
IJ[J APPROVED DENIED
D OTHER 4-0 (Hutchinson Ah!,:pnt-)
CURRENCE:
Douglas M. Anderson
County Administrator
County Attorney
Originating Dept.:
Finance:
aft]
Coordination/ Signatures
Mgt. & Budget:
Other:
Purchasing:
Other:
(agend620a)
,,-,.
...,
íJ
~!'J
Commission Review: March 26, 2002
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Planning Division
MEMORANDUM
TO:
County Commission
FROM:
Community Development Director
DATE:
March 25, 2002
SUBJECT:
Consider Approving an Interlocal Agreement between SI. Lucie County and The
Westchester Community Development Districts One Through four for the
purpose for addressing Infrastructure Improvements at The Westchester
Development Site.
Attached is a copy of an Interlocal Agreement between SI. Lucie County and the Westchester Community
Development Districts Numbers One Through Four. The purpose of this agreement is to recognize that
certain community wide infrastructure improvements will be constructed by Westchester CDD #1. How
this effects St. Lucie County is that certain of these "community infrastructure" improvements will take
place outside of the boundaries of the Westchester CDD #1, and some may take place outside of the
overall boundaries of the Westchester development project itself. In order to do so, the County must
through specific Interlocal Agreement, agree that the District may undertake certain improvements
outside of its boundaries, consistent with the general restrictions setout in the Districts enabling
ordinances.
Paragraph 2 (Grant Of Authority) of this Interlocal Agreement outlines the general powers being
authorized through this agreement. To the extent that the Districts operate within the limitations of thier
enabling ordinances, they are permitted to undertake certain infrastructure improvements outside of the
District boundaries and to levy assessments within the Districts accordingly.
In addition, the attached Interlocal Agreement addressees the relationship of the previously approved
local Development Agreement (DVA-01-001) between SI. Lucie County and the Westchester
Development Company regarding infrastructure improvements to be made and how those improvements
are credited to the County.
Staff recommends that the Board approve the attached draft Interlocal Agreement between St. Lucie
County and The Westchester Community Development Districts One Through Four for the purpose for
addressing Infrastructure Improvements at The Westchester Development Site.
SUBMITTED:
/ '\,
"'-.---.\
\
.'
~
actor
i
DJMI I
WESTCHESTERCDDINTERLOACLAG\EEEMNT#1 MEM01 (H))
cc: County Administrator
County Attorney
Public Works Director
Planning Manager
Noreen Dreyer, Esquire - Ruden, McClosky. Smith, Schuster & Russell. P,A.
.......
...,
AN INTERLOCAL
LUCIE COUNTY AND THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
THROUGH FOUR
AGREEMENT BETWEEN ST.
WESTCHESTER
DISTRICTS ONE
THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreemenf') is entered into this _ day of , 2002, by
and between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter
referred to as "County" and WESTCHESTER NO. 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT ("District No.1"), WESTCHESTER NO.2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT ("District No.2"), WESTCHESTER NO. 3 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT ("District No.3") and WESTCHESTER NO. 4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT ("District NO.4" and, collectively with District No.1, District NO.2 and District No.
3, the "Districts"), each a community development district established pursuant to Chapter
190, Florida Statutes
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the County has previously established the Districts by ordinance pursuant to
Chapter 190, Florida Statutes (the "Acf) and granted each of the Districts certain special
powers by resolution; and
WHEREAS, to facilitate the financing, construction, acquisition, operation and maintenance
of community-wide infrastructure for the Westchester development located within and without
the Districts and to better assure compliance with the development order pertaining to
Westchester as it relates to such community infrastructure, the Districts have entered into a
District Development Interlocal Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A (the "District
Interlocal Agreemenf'); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the District Interlocal Agreement, the Districts have delegated to
District No.1, among other matters, the power and authority to act on behalf of all the
Districts to finance, acquire, construct, operate and maintain Community Infrastructure (as
defined in the District Interlocal Agreement) serving all of the Districts, to operate and
maintain certain District Infrastructure (as defined in the District Interlocal Agreement), and to
levy, collect and enforce non-ad valorem assessments in connection with the foregoing, all
as more fully set forth in said District Interlocal Agreement; and
WHEREAS, each District will also finance, acquire, construct, operate and maintain its own
District Infrastructure serving that District (subject to any delegation to District NO.1 pursuant
to the Districtlnterlocal Agreement of the responsibility for operating and maintaining all or a
portion of such District Infrastructure); and
WHEREAS, Section 190.012(1) of the Act lists certain special powers that a community
development district is permitted to undertake, including "any other project [as such term is
defined in the Act] ...without the boundaries of the district...when the project is the subject of
an agreement between the district and a governmental entity and is consistent with the local
government comprehensive plan of the local government within which the project is to be
located;" and
Interlocal Agreement
Westchester Community Development Districts
March 26. 2002
Page 1
~
~
WHEREAS, in furtherance of the foregoing, the County and the Districts desire to enter into
this Agreement to provide for the exercise by District No. 1 outside of its boundaries of the
powers relating to Community Infrastructure and District Infrastructure projects delegated to
it in the District Interlocal Agreement and to provide each of the Districts, respectively, the
right to exercise the powers granted to each by the Act to undertake their own District
Infrastructure projects outside their respective boundaries; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to ordinance of the County and other applicable law, including Section
336.025, Florida Statutes, the County has levied a local option fuel tax on motor fuel and
diesel fuel (the "Gas Tax") and, pursuant to an interlocal agreement among the County and
the eligible municipalities in the County (the "Gas Tax Interlocal Agreemenf'), has
established a distribution formula for dividing the entire proceeds of the Gas Tax among the
County and the eligible municipalities in the County (the "Distribution Formula"); and
WHEREAS, the Distribution Formula is based on certain "allowable Transportation
Expenditures" (as defined in the Gas Tax Interlocal Agreement) made by the County and the
eligible municipalities, respectively; and
WHEREAS, the County has requested that the Districts acknowledge herein that, for
purposes of the Gas Tax Interlocal Agreement, the County may include as part of its
allowable Transportation Expenditures any amounts expended by the Districts in connection
with the construction or improvement of County-owned roads or roads dedicated, or to be
dedicated, to the County that qualify as allowable Transportation Expenditures under the
Gas Tax Interlocal Agreement (the "District County Road Expenditures");
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and other considerations
contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Recitations.
The recitations set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated herein by
reference.
2. Grant of Authoritv.
The County hereby agrees that District No. 1 may exercise such rights and powers
and take such actions outside its boundaries consistent with the provisions of Section
1-6.5-83, of the St. Lucie County Code and Compiled Laws, as may be necessary or
appropriate to permit District NO.1 to accomplish the powers delegated to it pursuant
to the District Interlocal Agreement with respect to Community Infrastructure projects
and District Infrastructure projects, consistent with the local government
comprehensive plan of the County. The County further agrees that consistent with
the provisions of Sf. Lucie County Ordinances 01-010, 01-011, 01-012 and 01-013
each of District No.1, District No.2, District No.3, and District No. 4 may exercise
the powers granted to each by the Act outside its boundaries with respect to their
own District Infrastructure projects, consistent with the local government
comprehensive plan of the County.
<
3. Matters Relating to Distribution Formula.
Each of the Districts acknowledges that, for purposes of the Distribution Formula set
forth in the Gas Tax Interlocal Agreement, the County may include as part of its
allowable Transportation Expenditures all or any portion of the District County Road
Interlocal Agreement
Westchester Community Development Districts
March 26, 2002
Page 2
-.....
..,.¡I
Expenditures, in the sole determination of the County. In furtherance thereof, each of
the Districts hereby delegates to District No. 1 the authority, on behalf of all of the
Districts, to execute and deliver to the County such additional confirmation of the
foregoing as the County may reasonably request. In addition, each of the Districts, as
to itself, hereby agrees that upon written request of the County, it will provide the
County with information to enable the County to determine its District County Road
Expenditures. Notwithstanding the foregoing, such information may instead be
provided by District No.1, on behalf of itself and the other Districts. Nothing herein
shall obligate the Districts to incur District County Road Expenditures.
Each of the Districts hereby delegates to District 1 the authority, on behalf of all of
the Districts, to enter into agreements with the County whereby the County would
undertake District projects or portions of District projects that include District County
Road Expenditures, and the Districts would provide funding to the County for such
expenditures, provided, however, that any such agreement shall be consistent with
(a) all District indentures governing available funds, and (b) Development Agreement
DVA-01-001between the County and Westchester Development Company, dated
September 11, 2001, recorded in Official Records Book 1437, Page 2741, of the
Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. Should the County prefer that funding
flow through the County, then the Districts agree to cooperate with the County to
accomplish this objective.
4. Counterparts.
This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which, taken together, shall
be deemed an original hereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have made and executed this Agreement on the
respective dates under each signature, signing by and through their duly authorized
representative.
ATTEST:
BOARD OF COUNTCOMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
CHAIRMAN
DEPUTY CLERK
DATE:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
CORRECTNESS:
"
COUNTY ATTORNEY
**********************************
Inter10cal Agreement
Westchester Community Development Districts
March 26, 2002
Page 3
"--'
'fIttI(II
ir
Signed, sealed and delivered in the
presence of:
WESTCHESTER NO.1 COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, a local
unit of special purpose government
By:
Name:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Name:
**********************************
WESTCHESTER NO.2 COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, a local
unit of special purpose government
Signed, sealed and delivered in the
presence of:
By:
Name:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Name:
**********************************
WESTCHESTER NO.3 COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, a local
unit of special purpose government
Signed, sealed and delivered in the
presence of:
By:
Name:
,-
<
Name:
Title:
Date:
Name:
Interlocal Agreement
Westchester Community Development Districts
March 26, 2002
Page 4
...,.
,.....
....,
{i--
**********************************
Signed, sealed and delivered in the
presence of:
WESTCHESTER NO.4 COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, a local
unit of special purpose government
By:
Name:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Name:
"
Interlocal Agreement
Westchester Community Development Districts
March 26, 2002
Page 5
'-'
AGENDA REQUEST
ITEM~. §
DATE: March 26, 2002
REGULAR [X]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [ ]
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY: Pete Keogh
Director, Parks & Recreation
SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Parks & Recreation
SUBJECT: Discussion on 10th Street Park Improvements
BACKGROUND: As a follow-up to the issue brought up by Ft. Pierce City Commissioner Duke
Nelson at the February 1 st Strategic Planning meeting regarding the need of a place for our north
county senior citizens to meet, Commissioner Bruhn has requested that staff agenda discussion
on possible improvements at 10th Street Park utilizing Park Impact Fees. He is proposing that the
County offer assistance to the City for these improvements in the form of matching dollars (dollar
for dollar) not to exceed the amount $25,000. (Attached: Information provided by County staff and
the City of Ft. Pierce).
FUNDS AVAILABLE IN: 310002-7210-563000-700 (Park Impact Fees-Improvements Other Than
Buildings) (Funds will be transferred to the appropriate account if the Board approves proposal)
PREVIOUS ACTION: NIA
RECOMMENDATION: NIA
K] APPROVED [] DENIED
[ ] OTHER: 4-0 (Hutchinson Absent)
Approval to use park impact fees for
improvement.
Doug ~
County
COMMISSION ACTION:
Coordination/Siqnatures
County Attorney:
Originating Dept: p--?
Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable)
Mgt. & Budget:
Purchasing Mgr.:
Other:
Other:
Eft. 1/97
H:\Agenda discussion 10th Street Park.wpd
~
'-"
BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
....,
PARKS &
RECREATION
MEMORANDUM
To:
From:
Date;
Subject:
Commissioner Coward
Linda Brown, Administrative Manager ß
February 14,2002
City of Ft. Pierce Impact Fees- Bathroom/Pavilion Costs
Per our discussion, I have obtained the following information for your
consideration:
1. According to OMB, the Interlocal Agreement with the City of Ft. Pierce
provides that "The City agrees to remit to the County 50% of all funds
collected as impact fees, after the deduction of 4% of the funds collected
which shall be kept by the City as a fee for administration for collecting and
transmitting the funds."
\
Last year, the city's share of Park Impact fees came to $ $10,099 which
includes the 4% administration fee. A couple of years ago during the budget
meetings when the city brought up the need for a skateboard park, they were
asked what they were utilizing their share of the park impact fees for. Their
response was that they used park impact fees for maintenance of their parks.
2. The current dollar amount available in Park "A" (Ft. Pierce)lmpact fee is
$69,224.
3. Don McLam has provided the following for restrooms and pavilions.
a. Restroom-block building with metal roof and stucco exterior. The
inside has two toilets on the women's side and one toilet-one urinal on the
men's side. This is the standard current restroom that the county is building
and can be seen at Lakewood Park, Maravilla, and Frederick Douglas parks.
Cost: $42-48,000
1
JOHN ° ßRUHN 015,,'cr No 1 . OOUG COWARO. O'srncr No.2' PAULA A LEWIS. O,s,rrcr No. J . mAN~J:E HUTCHINSON D,,,rrcr No d . CLIFF ßARNES O,srrrcr No S
COIJ~1'Y Adrnuîlsrraror . Douglos M. Ande':;or'
2JOO Virginia Avenue . Phone (561) 462-1515 . TDD (561) 462-1428
'-.
..
"'""
b. Pavilion-12'xI2' which will hold one table-cost
16'x20' which will hold four tables
,..,
$1,872
$ 3,800 installed
$ 4,160
$ 8,300 installed
If we can provide you with any additional information, please let us know.
cc: Pete Keogh, Director
Doug Anderson, County Administrator
Robert Bradshaw, Assistant County Administrator
2
02/14/02 09:16 FAX 5614622117 SLC m!B III 01
~~ \..r
'"
.: ....,
8
m m CJ )o;gCJ
~ ð. II> !l~.I!:
.." iiï
S' -<. :I C (t -.
~ It ::J :I
Ie N n -~~
'11 CD
", i ii 0 " ¡; (D :I
Z 0 III cCÞta
.: iii < ... .. III ~~3
!)J ~ õ ~ 2. ..
j c 0 JI:' C ~"I;
i III ~ ~ 0 en UI
8: 0 -< N CD 3' =N~
!1. [ -i C1 '£
I.... )Þ 110'"
~ ~ å1 g 0 ;g Co> ~ ::rCldl
~ :I en en ,- o N CD
¡e 0" .. C ð- CD ~ ¡ ? III ¡illIZI
... Q ñJ' IT II> ~... N 0 ;9!.
g' e ::r [ ..., ~ Ulg ::I 0 -
f (i 0 c 0 'Jl Itilll
0 CD !!t => '1fl'" CD ...
N ~ Q. '" .. ~ .. ~
C1(J;g~~;g~O(Jz~(J~m=~~)Þ~ III _CCD
~ 1/1 =fc.cn
~ îC~ IDCO.-O~O ~Oll>~=> o g I»
.. ~ .: ~ Q iI CT I ::L œ s. 01 II: ::;" ¡;" Q. ~ n
... Q. ð~iCD~O.~~~ '1I"'å"'3c ~ ð~:
IDCD::J ~l»ð~~~~C1~lIIm ~_~ !1.. ::r '"
~~ "om ~ ~_c ~
CJf ¡~O ::I~CD 0& ~::Ifo~ :I» --·0
~ "'-~::I~<-nIZlC IZI Q. III II ..CÞ.....
-n
~~~i~~~~!~i~~~~"'~~~ <:: ~ii'~
~ ~en~3CJ"3"1;1I~~:I~ ~m~ g ë5Q."I;
==: ....-iD
~~~t!i~j~~2~3~ g~~ . .. :I 3
... )oBi
~ ~§ ¡::~~~~]i~ ~ ~~! [ !lª-_
C:=>c.>
~IC_ "'I» ~ID~C c'1I~ ~ !,I:> 0
ü!;~ {'i ¡¡;;1'-c3 '1102 ¡¡: m3~
..- ~.. n t"C ~ M"C 0
... '¡IDa
~ ~ - ... S :I !l .-:"
~ 3 ~ ~ tl.ñJ':I
=('0'0
=> ~ ~ c"'iD
z: !~f1i
c:a 0 !: -ª. :: ~
1'1 .CD;>">
..... .... ~ ~ ..... ~..... 1:1\<: IIIn:x(')
; ..... ~~~ ,þ, W N ~""'ClNcr> IØ :::~ ~f :ÞM
.... 00 ø......... ..... <0 ....OQ>QII....O W ::r "'IDID....
~ -""0"0 cè1t·,þ, C ~ "w-a,-....C·U1(:, ið c·.... 0"'""
ø -~IC ""
0 C::IOO 00.... 0 U1 "'''''''0U10 '"' -.10 0
..... 0 ....00 ooe.> 0 N .....U10000 .. So .. ð t:!~cm
Q "'eriim
= i:!",""
::I o II! III =
:Þ rt !"5'ã!:þ
(II ~~ þ'< !:lC!;
'"' .....~ IV ~'" C :I
...... Nc.> .... ~'" W.. o.ltZ
'& "'01:....... '",~ . -.0 åJ '0\ - ~ã.n
l1li 0101U1 t.>m (II <Ol>- 0
0 (01\)'" .0.... ... Nl>- ~ m::;m
ã!!.cn
'C .
U11D en ~
.. 01 ell ...(,:1 .... -I\) ""
co cø lID.. 0.... .... (0 CD .......... ~~ a€ <
.. .... ....0 001 .... 01 .. c,;,,,,, IV
CI ~ :b b'Q è1t (:, (,:I èo -a,è1t ioi. rt -<
... ....g g8 8 ~ .... ØI ~~ U1 ::r ."
,. ..... 0 '" .. ...... II)
~ ~
ð Q
0 '11
(1)0 = II)
ell ::I
- .... _ 01 N i lIP ~
C::I 0 !» 10.)(0 .. rt Q
Q, åJ ...... -IQ ~ ~ - '<
. m $ ........ "I;
.. - ~..... - ~
'tI
~.
å
:e
0
;l-
II>
~
0
"C
¡
õ:
~
...
~
1\1
il
10
'ª Ñ
ä ~
..
(;)
ts
c.
o
(;)
m
-<
Xi
m
<
m
z
c
'!J
3"
"0
0>
"
1-
."
"
"
"'
'1j
0>
;;.
"'
1
::r:
§,"
~
CT
<.oJ
o
~
....
o
"0
m m~ro
:3 )( ~ CD
9: "C<fC
tÈ Q ~ :E Q ~ ~ º ~ ~ g ~.
CJ':<CQ.~'< n £.:.;::: ~ c 5"
O)~o-o;::::r~t"CVlgl.C
Di" -.:J 3 - Co) CD n
:Jg.~Q'"O~·b':J.ã' g:'
nCD.,.,æ.ú')gc:tI'I~ ë;
(tI~oQJïO~m_Vlr ::I
~~5. o-<~ëÐ~ £
iJo>(¡') 3:Or-¡:'"
ctI = ~ "C CD C'Ð ::I t1'
c.ÌÌì~ ë6"r.oO)a.~
ø g )( sa ê. VI C
3 £ ~~cÈ
~ ..., tIi E ()
~U) ê"3-
~~ ""J""
g. Ë" 5"
:¡:::;
ì'i
õï
:;¡
~\
.,.,
,~I
",I
...
o
1:'j1
~I
0,
:1
.~I
=1
...
...
c::
<!J
o
o
o
01
...
'"
a>
'"
;q¡q
""
-<!J
""'0
-.....,¡ÎJ1
0-
~.::
...
0:>,
...
'"
'"
..
~ ~"{Ã
~ ~.~
O(A(::O)
,20lDm
<D
'"
-
.,.,~.. Vi
-->.V"Þ......w
œ......OA
AOOU"1
00'0·0
-'-000
Ar9 8.3
.,., Vi
.... <D
_-.,~!J'
L" w 0
0"'0
.s~~
""
.,.,
o
.,., ....
00
~
....
....
'"
-<D
"'....
"'0
~
Vi
'"
0:>
...
..
'"
C:
"
....,
~
'"
'",
<D
.s
-........
.... '" '"
-..... "0
'" w-
"0) ê.n <.c
O:><D'"
8°-'
....
-....
"'....
"''''
....... èo
... ....
..... 0
........
"0 N
....0
"0
1...,:....r
"'0
o:>w
........
N .;..
'" '"
"O<D
"CD -A
'" ~
N ....
........
"''"
"'<D
wo
we
"'0
"''"
........
N'"
.....'"
.;..'"
·0:.....
"'....
"''''
'tI
~
,..
"'
m
,...,
tn
o
c:
r't
~
n
o
c:
:=
r't
'<
'-'
~
<D
<D
'"
'"
'"
'"
<D
'"
.....
<D
<!J
'"
<D
'"
<D
N
o
o
o
."
ëñ
()
:Þ
r
"0-<
Om
~:Þ
;0
N
o
o
N
m:oro
)( ,,"
"0<<0
m"'ìJnr-:o::r:mmm:Þzr-~n~"~
c:~m~O)mO~~-:JO~~O ~~
3~'~~~O""Vlc~o~=-.~~C5'
3~i3::1;ª~~~~~~~~VI~~
~g~~I~~o~~~~~-3-~a ~
~:;¡iJ" ~(;),..õï:¡::O" -0 ~
:J~m~ :J~m~-'~n~~~ ~
c.~*~~~~~>~~o~~~~ ~
~~~~~~~~~3m~~~~~ ctI
ï.J (So ~ (þ t¡) "C £U CJ "C n " c:c 0 :J CJ'I
Q,)o(nc..=ëÐ=CJ agCIJoOa.~
~-õG>C/)(:r~ êSOQ~:JVI
5' "C~E)::tOcg :;3Q,)'T'~
='Q.Q,)OCfl -- -"7'>
~ =: ë" VI n3 C':I '< ~ 9; t"C
0_ ~3~(Q" ;:':lJ.,,~u
. Vi 0 Ci) "'0 Q,
::;i 1JVi 2.~ ~
~ 5" Õ
c
"'
~
¡;;
m
:;¡
a.
:;
<0
m
0>
0;
:;¡
"
"
'"
'" )I.
s:
:u
0;
:;¡
...
o
...
'"
"
',þ.
'"
~l
-,
'~I
o
....
::
o
:..,.
.....
<.oJ
...
<1'
o
<D
."
'""
«>
....
'"
N
....,
'"
'"
'"
...
'"
0:>
'"
'"
o
)I.
Vi
..
~-;;
"''''
Õ"J',::¡,
...., "'"
~~
....,
0:>
~
..
..
~ ~ ;;iA
.A.. .r.:Þ.-;q.o
CO....¡ (X:IWN N
A.~(])t.tttl't~r.,::,C'lA{A"""¡
so~co°.8~So~
...
'"
'"
N
"
....
~~ - - -
--_~_~_tI't
ÂOilt......tAA.oEf'!o-
o OOO')OIJl-..¡A 0
oO·OOWln'A"cn
OOOOQ')OAt.J
.9.98£~..9~~
ViiÃ___
_ _ "" (A b'I
WCONNN
NOQ')<DA
·ao",þ..·'-Ië.n
OO(])C)'IC.)'1
.s9.9~.8
.... .......
o 00
..
'"
'"
-"=
'"
'"
N
:..,.
"''''
,",,0
....
....,
........
O:>W
ON
"U"lA
"'"
..... ~
::::
..
0:>
'"
<1'
-"=
..
"
01-
. '"
~"
... ....
2~
..-
"'....
"...
0;:.......,
"'-
~.2
-........
... N '"
~"'"
~ - '"
"o".Þ.Ò'I
.....00
..sa~
...,.;
........
N-
O~
..... "
b.N
<D....
-0
........
'" '"
N -
....0
·œ'".....,¡
<D .....
"'"
........
"'"
':"0
0:>'"
o,"r-v
"'.....
"''''
........
N <1'
'" N
'" .....
"Nm
O:><D
...'"
iJ
0>
~
,..
"'
»
,...,
Z
o
'1
r't
~
n
o
c:
:=
r"
'<
.....,
'"
<D
'"
'"
'"
O"!
<D
'"
.....
:Þ
" -
<='"
OJ '"
(i;"10)
'"
<D
<D
N
o
o
o
."
ëñ
()
:Þ
r
"0-<
Om
~:Þ
ÃJ
N
o
o
N
:>
"'
g,
)I.
"0
.,
o
~.
"g~
:l>n
:Or"
^(/)
CII
~fO'
"g:=
:I>
nn
.......
"110
men
m~
CIIen
r"
t-
O>
"
C
OJ
-<
~
}1>
N
o
o
N
"0
1"\
o
><
fO·
B
fO·
r"
'<
:::
H
en
>-!
o
~
-<
o
"I:
"0
>
~
;0;
r"
o
n
fO·
r't
'<
1"\
~
en
fO·
Q.,
~
=
r't
(/)
H
X
"0
>
n
>-!
"'1
tf
tf
en
en
H
Z
("')
tf
\D
\D
\II
H
Z
n
C:
"0
>-!
H
o
:z:
\,or ..."
~ JE~~~¿/
N T E R
MEMO
0 F F C E
To:
Dennis W. Beach
City Manager
From:
R. Duke Nelson etN
City Commissioner
Subject:
Fort Pierce Park Improvements
Date:
February 14,2002
The attached memorandum, subject as above, dated February 13, 2002 is forwarded for
action as appropriate. Hopefully, the proposal by the County will facilitate expediting
needed facilities at 10dt Street Park.
If need be, please schedule tills action for the February 19, 2002 Commission meeting.
Note that it will be discussed at the County Commission meeting on February 26,2002.
RDN@
Attachment
cc: Mayor and Members of City Commission
"-
...,
BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
DOUG COWARD
COMMI5510Nm
FROM
Doug AnderS(ln, Cl)unty Administrator
Doug Cowart-County Commissioner, ~istrict 2
TO'
DATE:
February 13. 2002
SUB.ŒCT:
FORT PIERCE PARK IMPROVEMENTS
At our recent strategí~ planning session there was considerable discussion about the Community
Parks Master Plan, including a specific recommendation ITom Ft. Pierce City Commissioner R.
"Duke" Nelson who indicated." stror.£ demand for checkers and dominos in NW Fort Pierce. I spoke
with Commissioner Net.C)n thiS morning and he indicated that the City's 1 o'~ Street park would be
the most desirable location for such il facility. He is specifically interested in providing checkers and
~rmanent restroom faclIities.
Because of the limit~d cost and scope of such a project and the availability of recreational impact fee
dollars from the "North CoulÎty Zone," it would be most appropriate to contribut~ available impact
fee dollars rather than merging this ;;oncept with the broader parks referendum. The County currently
collects recreational impact feedol1:m from Fort Pierce, so it is certainly appropriate to re-invest a
portion of these funds back into City projects. Ba.sed on information from the County's Parks and
Recreation Department. there appears to be sufficient funds available in the "North Zone" for this
specific project to proceed immediately.
I would recommend the County partner with the City and contribute up to S25,000 for capital
improvements to the 10'" Street Park, including permanent bathroom fëlcílities, in-ground
checkers/dominos tables with chairs. and landscape eJ'lhancements to provide a shaded, people-
friendly park The City w,Juld then continue on-going operation and maintenance responsibilities for
the park.
Please hav~ stafffinaJize this concept ~it~ the City of Fort Pierce and then bring the proposal befo';;\
the St. L:Jcle Board of Coumy COmm!55tonet's on February 26, 2002. ~
)<)HN 0 QI\!J-oN (1¡iINr""c 1 . þ:-)IJG ::O~'A"O C"'i:r·c~ N,= 2 . P.'..:\...a~. I.E·...15 D'Sf~I~P No. J . JI'\..a..NNIE "'UT(H·N:>(')N [)1:"riCf No .¡ . CLIH OAI\r~'S. DI~t'çr No 5
l:"vnIY .6t,cmll"\im~lol . OO\,IQI':)j, M. .A.nj"'\I,)n
2:'300 Vir;¡ír"1'Q Av~nue . FOrT Pie-rce. FL:l4Qe-2-5652 . (561) 46'2-1412
FAX(S61J462-21.J1 .700(61)462-1':26
~ -¡t.O ~ d.. \ ,L\ \~
\,.- """'"
CITY OF FORT PIERCE - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
:: -.-. .- . -.......
~' . c. '-'::.3- , .( /' .
,'';'= 2M-'
-.,~--
TO:
City Manager, Dennis W. Beach
¡-c,., 1 '; 'jnn~
r ,-0 "l,-li(
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Director of Public Works, Gary M. Ferch ~~. ,,~~iTY CF E~ ¡;¡¿:;c¡:
... i'¡ ;\I~'At:E~'s n;:;:;;~'.:
\ .... _1,' 'J...
10th Street Park
DATE:
February 13, 2002
Pursuant to your request concerning restroom facilities at the above park, it would be our
recommendation to stay consistent to our policy in utilizing the same type of restrooms as in
all of our parks.
Last March we received a proposal (attached) for a new restroom for Rotary Park/Kids
Crossing, located on S 23rd S1. This restroom was never constructed because of budgetary
restraints.
The total cost of a restroom installation is approximately $30,000.00. Please keep in mind
that this is only a proposal and the actual facility would need to be placed out for bid.
In reviewing the facilities at the N 10th St Park, compared to the existing parks, there are only
two small shelters. Rotary Park, Jaycee Park, and Pinewood Park all have a large pavilion
for special events such as Birthday Parties, etc. We have attached a copy of a large pavilion
for reference.
The cost for a larger pavilion is approximately 26,500.00. This figure would also include
picnic tables and benches.
In summary, all the above are considered capital items and would require funding from the
general fund.
GMF/mm
Attachments
cc: Deputy Director of Public Works
~.;tD ~. f\Je15>ö1\ ;t\\~\a;;f..
L::NGTJ-IS '/,J..RY (SE:: AVAILABLE SIZES)
8' COLUMN SPACiNG TYPICAL
.
, -'
:ñ I i
UJ :¡;
.--'
iñ <t
W
W ,-" CJ
',u I
;n ""', ~
« ii5 ;¡j
~ :;;. ;::
<;: <:: ~
:> 'JJ "
« :D. '-'
UJ - I-
UJ ~
:!2. ;::.
>- c
c:: 'f) UJ
« UJ~ i-
;;> ;:;;. ~
'" ;;:, U
:>, ~
<t
;:: ....
I'
~,¡
¡
;' /
Popular Sizes (WxL)
12'xl.2·
12'x20'
16'x20'
lô~x2St
20'x20'
20'x23'
20'~,36'
20'x44'
24 ':(23'
24'x36'
24'x4-4'
2S'x4-4'
2S'x52'
2S'x60'
30'x44'
Widths: 12'. 1,L 1::', 1·3'.20'.22',24'.23',30',35',40',45',50',60',66'
Lengths: 12'.20'.2:3'.36'.4-1,',52'.60'.68',76',84',92',100'. 10S·. 116·...
! I II I
I
1 } 1// , I
I I !
; ,
!
! j
I 1/ I
i.. \
i // I
! / ./
,I ,/ I I
I !, I
It" l I
VI I i
I' I I
/1 I
1/ í I
!' I I I
</ I
I i i I ,
, I
2
RC? Shc:itC'rs. rn~. '31)t)-,3~~-;)2r)7 'Jr.s¡.) i·.2S2-'~f3U¡)
?,o. B():{ .25 Sttl~lrt. :.'!. ·~.~'jlj;:;-;}fr..;.) ?L"-: :3·5 t·:2;:'d-¡}~tJ7
30'x5:2'
30'x60'
30'x6S'
30'x76'
30'x84'
40'x60'
40'xS4'
40'xlOO'
50'Û6'
50';ÜOO'
50'x1l6'
50';d32'
60'xlOO'
66'xlOO'
66'xl,W'
Z0'd
"'"
.....,
R.C.D. Commercial Construction Corp.
P.o. Box 7385 Pt. St. Lucie, FL 34985
PROPOSAL
March 22Nt>. 200 I
City of Fort Pierce
P.O Box 1480
Fort Pierce, FL 34954-1480
Ann: Bob Rithaler
Re: Kids Crossing Balhroom Addition
R.C.D. Commercial Conslruction Corp. will furnish all labor. material, supervision and
in!Ouranee to:
construct t 10'x20' addition to the existing restroom located at the above mentioned
8.. metal roof similar to other city parks
b. women - 2 toilets. 1 lavatory
c. men - I toilet, 1 urinal. 1 lavatory
d new fixlures and flush valves to match existing
e. n~w construction to match existing
2. work on existing restroom located at the above mentioned
t. remove wood shake roof
b. install nt:w metal roof to match new construction
c. remove toilet partition
d. existing thtures to remain as is to serve as handicap stall (no door)
e. remove and reinstall wood pilings
f remove and reinstall water cooler and chase wall
3. owner to provide
a. toilet paper ind piper towel bolders and instlillation
b. water, electric and toilet facilities for construction
4 exclusions
a. no plans
b no permit
,
2oc-' .....\.-,.r.. '("./.-
- ..
j
'1
0¿Zt ¿££ t9Ç t ~o~ ~SNO~ '~I~~3WWO~ a~~ Wd ¿Þ:Z0 to-ZZ-~~W
'~'" ~ ; ,. L______
, .¡~\, ~
atUCX ou.:CON$TRUCTIOH CO., 1Me.
P.O. eo. 3507
Fort ~. F.t 3.e48
"
'.'.
'.
",,,",,,,.
·1.,"
(561) *-3114
fa (561) ~
I ~/5/"01
"
çtty Of <to Pierce
.,t:.,,¡>1erce rIA. 3495C
!'HONE
460-2200
1Q.
~ . . .
JOe _, UX.-noN
8athroom expansion at Rot~YHar~
:\. .
I
¡. ,
I
.'
,:,'
; 1
JOe NI..WEJII
. ,
All labor.material and equiptment for the following items:
1. Sathroon expansion of 8 feet, with 1 new urinal and 1 toplet 1n mens room. Two toilets on
the womens side.New sink on both mens and womens side.
2. Roof to be 5v crimp with new roof qoinq over existing roof.
3. Two new lights similar to the existing ones.
4. Bathroom not to have electronic sensors.
S. All paint including exiaiting
6. All cleanup
AIdIItIIct:
... ef ,...
WE PROPOSE he,eoy 10 turn~h IMterlal and labor- compMte in accordance Wllh Ir\e aboW SpeclhcatiOfI$.1or 11111 ,um of:
Twenty Nine Thousand Nine Hundred forty five and 00/100 Dollars
Payment to be made liS follows:
As work progresses
dollal'll ($
29,945.00
}
1.5..tntwut per..u. an en u~1d \111. :-.
All ......"01 .. gua,.,,_ 10 De .. $¡leQfoed All _ 10 De compieled in . ptO!IøaneI
memer ~ 10 WIn<IattI prat'iIcvs. Any ~ or c»ncon """' .... opecIIIc¡nIons
"""''"9 ...,. COlIS .... lie .-cutod only upon wn-. _. _ will became en ""'"
-.q. "'* oM _". esImat. All "II _._.. oonIingonI..-. _. _IS '"
~ beyond "'" ocnIfol. 0wI'er 10 carry h. _. and _ _ry '-renee. Our
~..,..IuIy~by_.~ ............
IIoJ1honztld
S¡gnalu~
Note" This proøosal mllY be
WIthdrawn by us If nol accQ)ted with,"
30
days.
ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL - The oöo... P"cee.
ap.crftcd.UOna and conditions .ar. ...h..foilctory .nd .r. hereby .ecep1ed. You ar.
aull1O'ueo 10 ao ... ..ork.. specdòed Psymtnl woll be made .. ouUlned _.
50gnature
Date of Aa:eptanœ:
Signatur.
"'"'
....,
N
T
E
R
MEMO
OFF
C E
To:
Gary M. Ferch
Director of Public Works
~~,"''''' .:: ,...._~-r._.:_~..-,.;.;.~~- G; 'r~'--:~
.., 1~ \,- r II \" '~ I'"
.; i1 \ ::-,\~- __. ':7 'p _.:.-~,__,,_J ......:.' .,~--:::-.~ I ;ì I,
" c· ; , 'I :¡ : I·
t' ."" I ¡. ¡
\, 1,' ;: : JAN 2. 9.. ' : O¡
'. "'. . I
¡"'j .~ I
¡ -r' o-f'¡éc;':"püš~3c';iOF~:,5 CÚì \
. \'". ,...,\\.0'-
i~';·.1~
¡,:.. .",-,,--
From:
Dennis W. Beach I'?/);J1f
City Manager ~
Subject: 10th Street Park
Date: January 28, 2002
I have received a request for restroom facilities at the 10th Street Park. Please evaluate what options
exist to provide restroom facilities similar to other parks in the community. Please respond in writing.
DWBlbtp
cc: R. Duke Nelson, Conunissioner
.......
..,
AGENDA REQUEST
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney
SUBJECT:
..."
ITEM NO. 1
DATE: March 26, 2002
REGULAR [X]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [ ]
PRESENTED BY:
Daniel S. McIntyre
County Attorney
Resolution No. 02-87 - Establishing a Permit Fee for Special Review and Siting Criteria to be paid by the
Applicant for the Construction of an Electric Generator Plant in St. Lucie County, Florida.
BACKGROUND:
Please see attached Memorandum No. CA-02-384.
PREVIOUS ACTION:
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution No. 02-87 as drafted.
COMMISSION ACTION:
~ ] APPROVED [] DENIED
[ ] OTHER: 4-0 (Hutchinson Absent)
Approved as amended to use $10,000 base
and consultant can increase if additional
cost is necessary.
E:
Review and Approvals
County Attorney:
~/
,...'.~.n:,. B~dget
'/Other: "
if applicableJ___
Originating Dept.
Finance: (Check for Copy only,
Purchasing
Other:
Eff. 5/96
,.,.
,...",
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney
C.A. NO: 02-384
DATE: March 14t 2002
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 02-87
BACKGROUND:
Pursuant to Section 11.12.00 of the St. Lucie County Land
Development Codet a schedule of fees may be established by
resolution of the Board of County Commissioners in order to cover
the costs of technical and administrative activities.
This Board believes it is in the best interest of the healtht
safety and public welfare of the citizens of St. Lucie County to
establish a permit fee for special review and siting criteria to be
paid by the applicant for the construction of an electric generator
plant in St. Lucie County, Florida.
The attached Resolution No. 02-87 has been drafted for that
purpose.
RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION:
Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution
No. 02-87 as drafted.
DSM/cac
Attachment
\.;
"wÌ
RESOLUTION NO. 02-87
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A PERMIT FEE FOR
SPECIAL REVIEW AND SITING CRITERIA TO BE PAID
BY THE APPLICANT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF
AN ELECTRIC GENERATOR PLANT IN ST. LUCIE
COUNTY, FLORIDA
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners ofSt. Lucie County, Florida, has made
the following determinations:
1. Pursuant to Section 11.12.00 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, a schedule
of fees may be established by resolution ofthe Board of County Commissioners in order to cover
the costs of technical and administrative activities.
2. This Board believes it is in the best interest of the health, safety and public welfare of the
citizens ofSt. Lucie County to establish a permit fee for special review and siting criteria to be paid
by the applicant for the construction of an electric generator plant in St. Lucie County, Florida.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners ofSt.
Lucie County, Florida: ð
IJ,of,b
1. This Board does hereby establish a permit fee ofTen Thousand and 0011 00 ($10,000.00)
1:- /J ---- Þd d.-I ------L-- '"'r / ~ ð ,)V
Dollars for special review and siting criteria to be paid by the applicant for the construction of an
~
electric generator plant in St. Lucie County, Florida.
2. This resolution shall take effect upon adoption.
After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows:
Chairman Doug Coward XX
Vice Chairman Cliff Barnes XX
Commissioner Paula A. Lewis XX
~
"-'
>...,I
AGENDA REQUEST
ITEM NO. 1A
DATE: March 26. 2002
REGULAR: ( X )
PUBLIC HEARING: ( )
CON NT: ( )
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): ADMINISTRATION
SUBJECT:
St. Lucie County International Airport Annexation - Florida Governmental Conflic
BACKGROUND:
See attached memorandum
FUNDS AVAilABLE:
N/A
PREVIOUS ACTION:
See attached memorandum
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff is requesting authorization from the Board of County Commissioners to work with the Treasure
Coast Regional Planning Council in this process.
COMMISSION ACTION:
o APPROVED 0 DENIED
~ OTHER: Go ahead with mediation.
!::J County Attorney:
"a
Review and Approvals
!::J Management and Budget:
!::J Purchasing:
!::J Originating Dept:
!::J Other:
!::J Other:
!::J Finance: Check for copy only, if applicable:
Anyone with a disability requiring accommodations to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at 561-462-1777
or TTD 561-462-1428, at least 48 hours (48) prior to the meeting.
H :\WI N\WP\AGE N DA \Airportannex2. w pd
"-"
""
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
MEMORANDUM
02-37
TO:
Board of County Com
',",'
,..'1,\'
FROM:
Douglas M. Anderson,'
DATE:
March 20, 2002
RE: St. Lucie County International Airport Annexation - Florida Governmental
Conflict Resolution
Yesterday I attended a meeting with City of Fort Pierce representatives and Michael Busha
and Terry Hess from the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, discussing assistance
from the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council in the conflict resolution process. The
conflict resolution process consists of three phases: conflict assessment, joint public
meeting, and mediation.
We have completed the conflict assessment. The City has requested that the Treasure
Coast Regional Planning Council be involved in the mediation phase at this point, followed
by a joint public meeting if necessary.
Staff is requesting authorization from the Board of County Commissioners to work with the
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council in this process.
DMA/ab
c: Dan Mcintyre, County Attorney
Dennis Murphy, Community Development Director
Bill Blazak, Utilities Director
Paul Phillips, Airport Director
Attachment
HIWINIWPIAGEN DAlAirportannex2.w pd
'-'
AGENDA REQUEST
TO:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Administration
SUBJECT:
Bi-Weekly Committee Reports
ITEM NO. .J1J!I
DATE: March 26. 2002
REGULAR [X ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [ ]
PRESENTED BY:
BOCC
BACKGROUND: At the April 11, 2000 Board of County Commissioners Meeting it was decided by the
Board to place an item on the agenda. on a bi-weekly basi6. to give the Board an opportunity to provide
updates on the various Committees and Advisory Boards that they serve on, It ha6 been decided by the
County Administrator that this item will be placed on the agenda on the 2nd and 4th Tuesday of each month.
FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A
PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A
RECOMMENDATION: This meeting the Board will provide updates on the following Committee6 and Advisory
Board6 that they 6erve on:
Committee
Blueway Advisory Committee
Chamber of Commerce Board of Dir.
Children's Services Council
Cultural Affair6 Council
Friends of SLC Library
Property & Homeowners
St. Lucie County Fire Di6trict
Transportation DLCB
Treasure Coa6t Regional Planning Council
COMMISSION ACTION:
[ ] APPROVED [] DENIED
[~ OTHER: Reports given
MeetinG;¡ Date
Monthly
Monthly
2nd Thursday
2nd Tuesday
2nd Thursday
2nd Wednesday
3rd Wednesday
2nd Wednesday
3rd Friday
Commis6ioner
Ba rne6
Coward
Lewi6
Barnes
Lewi6
Hutchin60n
Bruhn/Coward
Lewi6
Coward/Barnes
,. ,
'-'
AGENDA REQUEST
....I
ITEM NO. --9.-
r:,--
---------¡
- ·-1
MAR 1 9 2C02 \
!
DATE: March 26, 2002
CONSENT [
REGULAR [X]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
Leg. [ Quasi-JD. [
,..J
TO:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY:
Î
Request for
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Public Works
SUBJECT:
.I\uthorize the Public Works Department
Inclusion application to Florida Dep
Protection - State Revolving Fund Loan Pr gram
assist in construction of the Indian River
Attenuation Facility.
million to
Stormwater
Since Indian River Estates subdivision was developed in the late
1950' s ,before stormwater management systems were required, the
proper storm"later drainage facilities were not put in place. During
heavy rains, flooding occurs leading to health problems associated
'.vi th wells and septic tanks. For this reason, the County and
several state agencies have developed a drainage plan to improve
flood protection for the subdivision and to improve the quality of
the stormwater runoff which currently discharges into the Savannas
State Reserve. On October 17, 2000 the BOCC approved authorizing
the engineering firm to complete final design for the project and on
June 26, 2001 the Board approved submitting an application for
$600,000 for Section 319 grant funds. Although the 319 grant will
be awarded a~d it is anticipated that the County will submit another
319 grant in July 2002, over $2.5 million is still needed to
complete the project.
BACKGROUND:
FUNDS AVAIL. :
No match is required for the loan program. The State Revolving Fund
Loan Program repayment periods for projects sponsored by a local
government shall be limited to 20 years under the Act. Rates shall
be based upon Thomson Publishing Corporation's "Bond Buyer" 20-Bond
GO Index. The rate determinations shall be as set forth in Rules
62-503.430(3) (a)4. and 5., F.A.C.. The County proposes to pay back
the loan from stormwater MSTU (Municipal Services Taxing Unit)
Revenue.
PREVIOUS ACTION:
The Board authorized the submittal of a grant application to the 319
Nonpoint Source Management Program on June 26, 2001.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff reco~mends that the Board authorize staff to submit a Request
for Inclusion application to the State Revolving Fund Loan Program.
){County Attorney: ~
Originating DePt:~~.
F~nance:
CONC
~.;'!.':-'
r -,', ; ~
I
1
COMMISSION ACTION:
[X ]
[ ]
APPROVED
OTHER: 4-0
[ ] DENIED
(Hutchinson Absent)
./
1 9 2002
Purchasing:
Othe~,.,.,.~.~__
Request for Inclusion
1J~~
4
.,
~
Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Water Facilities Funding
Twin Towers Office Bldg. 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400
Project Number:
(Filled in by DEP)
1. Applicant's Name and Address
St. Lucie County Enaineerina DeDartment
(project sponsor)
2300 Virainia Avenue. 2nd Floor Annex. Room 229
(street)
Fort Pierce.
(city)
Sl Lucie
(county)
34982-5652
(zip code)
Contact Person Don West. County Enaineer
2300 Virainia Avenue. 2nd Floor Annex. Room 229
(mailing address)
Fort Pierce. FL 34982-5652
Telephone
561-462-1709
FAX
561-462-2362
e-mail ~öN V @..
I
. .' .'~
<:..c.Sf-·/'-'.<...L '
f/, ~S'
2. Name and Address of Applicant's Consultant (if any):
Hazen and Sawver
(firm)
Msrdi Executive Center. 1905 South 25th Street. Fort Pierce FL 34947
(mailing address) .
Contact Person Robert Tavlor. Jr.. Senior Associate
Telephone 561-489-0066
FAX 561-489-0299
a-mail rbtavlor@hazenandsawver.com
3. Certification by Authorized Representative: I certify that this form and attachments have been completed
by me or at my direction and that the information presented herein is, to the best of my knowledge, accurate.
(signature)
Don West
(name, typed)
(date)
Countv Enaineer
(title)
Hearing -Draft Form 62-503.900(1)
Page 1 of 6
Effective Date:
· .
'-'"
....,
Request for Inclusion
4. Project Description (Please Attach)
To be eligible for listing on the fundable part of the integrated priority list, the project component(s) must be
specifically identified in a planning document. If the planning has been completed for this project, note the title
and date, and reference the page numbers or other location at which the specific facilities are described.
a. A project may encompass urban stormwater management facilities, such as detentionlretention facilities,
treatment facilities, etc. sponsored by a local government (eligible under Section 212 of the amended Clean
Water Act).
b. A project may encompass wastewater management facilities, such as sewers, pump stations, treatment
plants, reuse facilities, sludge facilities, etc. sponsored by a local government (eligible under Section 212 of
the amended Clean Water Act).
c. A project may encompass nonpoint source pollution control best management practices for agriculture,
silvaculture, on-site treatment and disposal, wetlands, mining, marinas, or groundwater protection sponsored by
any entity (eligible under Section 319 or 320 of the amended Clean Water Act). This project is located in the
County's Stormwater Master Plan as well as the SJRWMD 5-year plan budget spread sheet and the Indian River
Lagoon national Estuary Program Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan.
5. Estimated Cost for Projects Involving Construction Including Structural Best Management
Practices (Clean Water Act Section 212, 319, and 320) ..........,..............
a. Construction Costs:
i. Construction, Demolitionand Related Procurement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ii. Eligible Land .................................................
iii. Other (explain) ................................................
iv. Contingency (10% of Items i. through iii.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
v. Technical Services during Construction. . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
vi. Sum of Items i. through v.. .....................................,.
vii. Administrative Allowance [see Rule 62-503.420(2), FAC.]...............................
viii. Engineering Work Allowance [see Rule 62-503.420(3), FAC.] . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ix. Total (sum of Items vi. through viii)....... ...... ............ .................. ............ .........
x. Loan Repayment Reserve for Direct Loans Only
[see Rules 62-503.430(3)(a)1. and 2., FAC.] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , .
Total (sum of Items ix. and x.) for Direct Loans Only............ .............. . . . . . .
b. Preconstruction Costs for Local Government Project Sponsors [see Rule 62-503.350(1), FAC.]:
i. Item vi.. under Item a. above ..................................... $
ii. Administrative Allowance [see Rule 62-503.420(2}, FAC.] .............. $
iii. Planning Allowance [see Rule 62-503.420(5), FA C.] ................. $
iv. Appropriate Engineering Work Allowance [see Rules 62-503.420(3) and (4), FAC.] $
v. Total (sum of Items ii. through iv). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
vi. Loan Repayment Reserve for Direct Loans Only
[see Rules 62-503.430(3)(a)1. and 2., FAC.] . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Total (sum of Items v. and vi.) for Direct Loans Only. . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . $
($1000's)
$ 2.500
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$ 2.500
},
$
$
.{
Page 2 of 6
Hearing Draft Form 62-503.900(1)
Effective Date;
~
...."
Request for Inclusion
6. Estimated. Project <?ost for Other than .Construction Projects (Clean Water Act Sections 319 and 320) L$1000's)
a. Technical Services (such as carrying out non-structural best management practices) $
b. Equipment and Materials. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . $
c. Other (explain) . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
d. Contingency (10% of Items a. through c.) ................................ $
e. Sum of Items a. through d.. ..... ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . $
f. Administrative Allowance [see Rule 62-503.420(2), FAC.] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
g. Subtotal (sum of Items e. and f.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
h. Loan Repayment Reserve [see Rules 62-503.430(3)(a)1. and 2., FAC.] . . . . . . . . . $
Total (sum of Items g. and h.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
7. Prioritization
a. Default Minimum Priority
o Check here if applying for a default minimum priority score (30 points) and skip to Item 12. below
b. Baseline Priority Category
ßi- Check here if applying for a priority determination under Rule 62-503,650, FAC., and provide
appropriate information.
Identify the category score(s) for which the project qualifies and reference the location in the planning
documentation where sUbstantiating information may be found or attach other such substantiating information.
Note that when a project justifies different base scores, the highest base score is to be used. The total of the
base scores is not to be used. A full description of the project categories may be found in Rule 62-503.650(2),
FAC.
Proiect Cateaorv {Base Score}
Reference
J.Reduce documented public health hazard (800 Points).
o ~
No
2.Protect groundwater that is under the direct influence of surface water
Yes
(Page 7 Certification)
when groundwater is used for public water supply (400 Points).
~
No
o
Yes
3.Reduce potential public health hazards (200 Points).
o [if
No Yes
(Page 7 Certification)
Hearing Draft Form 62-503.900(1)
Page 3 of 6
Effective Date:
\.,; .....,¡
, ~.
4.Eliminate failing on site treatment and disposal systems or those that &'
are causing environmental damage (140 Points) . 0
No Yes
. Eliminate direct discharge of untreated stormwater to Class F-1, G-1, or
G-II groundwaters or Class lor II surface waters (130 points) 0 æ(
No Yes
5.Promote reclaimed water reuse as an alternative to consumptive use of
drinking water (120 points) g 0
No Yes
Œi 0
. Reduce saltwater intrusion into groundwater (110 points) No Yes
6.Assist in the implementation of total maximum daily load limitations or
0 g'
pollutant load reduction goals (100 Points). No Yes
Hearing Draft Form 62-503,900(1)
Page 4 of 6
Effective Date:
\....' ....,
Request for Inclusion
7.Contribute to compliance with laws requiring elimination of discharges to æt
specific water bodies (90 Points). 0
No Yes
8.Enhance, create, preserve, or restore wetlands (80 Points). 0 g-
No Yes
9.Contribute to compliance with other enforceable water quality related ri
requirements or water quality standards (70 Points). 0
No Yes
10.Achieve other water pollution control objectives (30 Points) 0 &f
No Yes
8. Restoration and Protection of Water Bodies
In order to qualify for a base score multiplier (times the base score) of 1.2, iden1ify which of the water bodies listed
below that the project will assist in restoring or protecting and reference the location in existing documentation
where substantiating information may be found or attach other such substantiating information.
Water Body Reference Document
II.A priority water body identified in an adopted Surface Water Improvement rI
0
and Management (SWIM) Plan. No Yes
0 ri
12.A water body classified as Outstanding Florida Waters. No Yes
0 ri
. A water body identified under the National Estuary Program. No Yes
g 0
l3.A water body classifieâ as Wild and Scenic Rivers. No Yes
14,A water body located in a priority watershed established under the
Unified Watershed Assessment Program
o ri
No
Yes
9. Cost-to-benefit Index
Project priority scores (base category scores adjusted for waterbody restoration and protection) are multiplied by an
index as detailed below. Note that Bureau of Water Facilities Funding personnel are available to assist in the
computation of the index.
a. Total Project Cost (from Item 5. or 6. above) in units of $1,000 (e.g., $1,000,000 is 1,000) expressed to the
nearest whole number is $2.500
LHighest base category score (from Item 7. above) multiplied by the waterbody restoration/protection factor
Hearing Draft Form 62-503.900(1)
Page 5 of 6
Effective Date:
, .
'..
\wi
(from Item 8. above) is
c. Cost-to-benefit ratio (Item a. divided by Item b.) expressed to nearest 0.01 is
d. Natural logarithm of cost-to-benefit ratio (Item c.) expressed t the nearest 0.001 is
e. Index computed as [1.20 - 0.021 x Natural logarithm] (from Item d.) and expressed to nearest 0.01
is.
....J
10. Intergovernmental Cost Sharing
If another local, state, or federal government is sharing the cost of the project, identify the governmental entity and
grant amount $600000 from FDEP 319. $1000.000 from SFWMD and $1.000 000 from 51. Lucie Issues
Team. Ten points for such intergovernmental cost sharing will be added to the priority score after the
appropriate multipliers under Items 8. and 9, above have been applied.
Hearing Draft Form 62-503.900(1)
Page 6 of 6
Effective Date:
·
'-'
....,¡
~~~
~:>~li
..r:...:i~:
tï,;:i?~
;~~~t~;
If the project will serve a small community and the median household income (MHI) for that community is less ;\~\;;:
than or equal to 80% of the statewide average, an economic hardship exists. The MHI is $ as V~f;:;
of the latest decennial census for the community to be served. Five points will be added to the priority score in 2'~!:/
recognition the economic hardship after the appropriate multipliers under Items 8. and 9. have been applied, 0<:-':::
Note that this MHI information will be used to determine the financing rate for hardship loans under Rule,:>...,
62-503.430(3)(a)4., FAC. -
Request for Inclusion
11. Economic Hardship
'.,
12. Project Schedule (month and year)
2.Comprete the planning documentation........................... .............................. ......... ......... ........
3.Complete the design documents (if necessary)............ ... ... ......... .......................................... ...
4.0btain an intent to issue a permit (if necessary) for construction or other activity............... ..........
5,Obtain all required project sites... ... ...... ... ... ...... '" ... ... ... ... ...... . ........... ......... ...... ......... ...... .....
6.Start activity (such as construction or non-structural best management practice) ............ ......... ...
Complete
Comerete
Complete
Complete
Julv 2002
7.Complete activity (such as construction or non-structural best management practice) .... ......... ...... Julv 2004
13. Loan Application and Loan Execution Schedule (month and year)
Completed loan Application and Executed loan Agreement Considerations
In situations described in Rule 62-503.680(6), FAC., and Rule 62-503.430(3)(a)4., FAC., late submittals
could have adverse consequences. The certification required, under Item 3 above, from the Authorized
Representative as part of this form includes the project sponsor's commitment to meet the submittal
requirements for the completed loan application and to meet the target date requirements for executing a
loan agreement.
Note the following activities associated with completing a loan application:
a. Establish pledged revenues and designate an Authorized Representative.
b. If requested, submit EPA Compliance Report (relating to service area demographics).
c. Establish project schedule.
d. Provide financial information for each source of pledged revenue as follows: Actual revenues and
expenditures for the last two fiscal years, and forecast revenues and debt coverage demonstrating the
availability of pledged revenues for loan repayment.
e. Address the availability of pledged revenues for loan repayment, and the subordination of the pledge if
pledged revenues are subject to a prior or parity lien.
f. Provide information concerning liens on the pledged revenues that have prior or parity status.. Information
is to be provided for each of the last two fiscal years and estimated throughout the loan repayment period.
Describe each obligation, the amount, and repayment terms. Provide resolutions, ordinances, or other
documentation recognizing the seniority or parity of unissued debt.
8.Submit complete loan application... .................. ...... ...... ......................................................... ..Feb. 2002
I.Target date (anticipated date that loan agreement will be delivered for the Department's execution) June 2002
14. Retum completed form to the Bureau of Water Facilities Funding, 2600 Blair Stone Road, MS #3505,
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400, Information may also be sent by FAX at (850) 921-2769.
Hearing Draft Form 62-503.900(1)
Page 7 of 6
Effective Date:
-.
\w
....,J
Request for Inclusion
CERTIFICATIONTHATTHEPROJECTWlLLREDUCE
APUBLlCHEAL TH HAZARD
Check the box with the appropriate description of the severity of the problem:
o
o
;¡~(;
,
Documented health hazard.
Potential health hazard.
<..
..
Attach the following information noting that each item must be specifically addressed:
(a) Description of existing conditions
(b) Specific location of the hazard and proposed project, including a sketch or map.
(c) Extent of the hazard (for example, area involved and severity of problem).
(d) Frequency of occurrence (for example, the approximate number of days during the year that the hazard exists)
(e) Identification of the toxies, pathogens, or other contaminants causing the health hazard.
(f) Explanation of how the project will reduce the hazard.
~
I hereby certify that either a documented or potential public health hazard exists and that the information
presented herein and attached hereto is accurate. (Certification is required by the Director of the County Health
Department.)
(date)
~
Col
(signature)
(title)
(name, typed)
(agency)
(address)
Telephone
FAX
e-mail
Hearing Draft Form 62-503.900(1)
Page 8 of 6
Effective Date:
. .
.-/
\.r
....""
Savannas/Indian River Estates
PROJECTDESCRIPTlON
The Savannas State Reserve (Reserve) is a 4,900-acre environmental area,
managed by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Division of
Parks, which extending 10 miles from Ft. Pierce to Jensen Beach in eastern St. Lucie
and Martin counties. The Reserve contains the best remaining segment of Florida's
East Coast savannas, including extensive freshwater marshes and wet prairie
systems. It is a diverse ecosystem comprised of eight natural community types as
well as more than 1,000 vascular plant, aquatic invertebrate, vertebrate and periphyton
species, including 57 species classified as endangered, threatened, special concern
or rare. The area is an area of special concern within the Indian River Lagoon, a state
priority waterbody designated under the Surface Water Improvement & Management
Program (SWIM), part of the state's Unified Watershed Assessment, and a ~estuary of
national significance" as designated by EPA's NatiQnal Estuary Program.
One of the major contributing drainage areas to the Reserve is a 1,200-acre
subdivision known as Indian River Estates (IRE), which was developed in the late
1950s. Drainage is provided by roadside swales that discharge into six major
east-west drainage ditches that gravity flow from west to east into the Reserve. Since
the area was developed before current stormwater treatment criteria were
. established, the system does not have any storm water treatment facilities other than
. the grassed roadside swales, which do not have a high nutrient removal efficiency
rate.
The proposed project, will convert a series of abandoned mining pits in order to
create a large wet detention facility within the Savannas recreation area just north of
Midway Road and east of IRE. The mining pits include a 12.8-acre pond bordered by
an old haul road/berm. In order to provide adequate storage and with consideration
for safety and access, this berm will require additional fill and grading to bring the top
of berm to elevation 18.5 ft, with a top width of 14 feet and 2: 1 sideslopes. The
proposed berm will encompass the primary storage area. A schematic layout of the
proposed facilities is available in the completed engineerings drawings. This
. proposed project will capture stormwater runoff from the subdivision and route it to
the storage facilities for treatment and protect homes against the continual flooding
(see attachment, Complaints and Health Violations and Flood Photos).
The longitude of the project site is 80"E 18' 59". Latitude of the project site is 27°N 21'
43". The site is located in Section 1, 2,11, and 12, Township 36 South, Range 40
East, and in Section 35 and 36, Township 35 South, Range 40 East, in eastern St.
Lucie County adjacent to the Savannas wetland area. Indian River Estates is located
east of US 1 and to the immediate south of Midway Road.
1
03/22/02
F'7:ABWARR
FUND
001
001137
001139
001140
001143
001147
001217
001265
001266
001267
001268
001269
001270
001271
001809
101
101003
101006
102
102001
102104
- -
107001
107002
107003
113
114
116
117
119
123
127
136
138
140
140001
140121
140308
140309
140310
145815
160
183
183001
183002
J o~004
002
'-'
..
ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD
"""""
PAGE
1
WARRANT LIST #25- 16-MAR-2002 TO 22-MAR-2002
FUND SUMMARY
TITLE
General Fund
Zora Neala Hurston Dust Tracks Heri
FF~ Transportation for 21st Century
Section 112/MPO/FHWA FY01/02
Health & Human Srvcs CSBG FY01/02
KOAA/FDCA Adopt-A-Beach
DEP-Regional Attenuation Facility
TDC Planning Grant FY01/02
CTD TRIP Grant FY01/02
D!PA 01/02 Dept. of Community Affai
01/02 Haz Mat DCA Grant
?DEP-Urban Mobile Lab Grant 01/02
DJJ/SLC Mental Health Collaborative
D~R-Historical Museum Grant-In-Aid
S?~~D-Floridian Aquifer Well 01/04
~ransportation Trust Fund
~ransportation Trust/Local Option
Transportation Trust/Impact Fees
~~incorporated Services Fund
Drainage Maintenance MSTU
?DOT Bicycle/Pedestrian Coordinator
:ibrary Special Grants Fund
?ine & Forfeiture Fund
?~ne & Forfeiture Fund-Wireless Sur
?~ne & Forfeiture Fund-E911 Surchar
?~ne & Forfeiture Fund-800 Mhz Oper
~armony Heights 3 Fund
~armony Heights 4 Fund
S~nland Gardens Fund
S~nrise Park Fund
~oliday pines Fund
Q~eens Cove Lighting Dist#13 Fund
?ine Hollow Street Lighting MSTU
~':onte Carlo Lighting MSTU#4 Fund
?alm Lake Gardens MSTU Fund
?ort & Airport Fund
?ort Fund
?_~ Taxiway A-3, Airfield Signage
?DOT Const. of Perimeter Fencing #4
=~stallation #236741-1-94-01
Airfield Signage #408784-1-94-01
S?v~D IRL 2001 License Plate Grant
Plan Maintenance RAD Fund
Cc Administrator-19th Judicial Cir
C~ Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat
Ct Admin.-County Arbitration/Mediat
Ct Admin.- Teen Court
SHIP Housing Assistance FY 01/02
EXPENSES
695,102.47
38.73
26.59
1,920.11
8,437.23
2,400.00
1,000.00
228.59
17,416.80
856.00
297.29
677.86
30,563.09
573.33
264.50
99,713.27
39,813.71
780.00
35,934.00
5,805.45
272.89
4,264.80
170,672.18
349.49
10,733.93
3,645.30
203.45
447.41
496.68
123.93
726.67
253.66
327.91
1,305.84
106.43
21,619.06
2,472.18
148,746.53
4,000.00
5,242.82
11,206.10
1,615.00
4,322.03
3,235.72
262.23
100.00
1,977.65
1,392.54
PAYROLL
24,110.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
03/22/02
F7.l\BWARR
FUND
316
362
370
382
401
418
421
441
448
449
451
458
461
471
478
479
491
505
505001
611
625
'-'
ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD
...."
WARRANT LIST #25- 16-MAR-2002 TO 22-MAR-2002
FUND SUMMARY
TITLE
County Capital
Sports Complex Improv Fund
MSBU Inhouse Financing Projects Fnd
Environmental Land Capital Fund
Sanitary Landfill Fund
Golf Course Fund
H.E.W. Utilities Fund
North Hutchinson Island Utilities
NHI Util-Renewal & Replacement Fund
NHI Util - Capital Facilities Fund
S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund
SH Util-Renewal & Replacement Fund
Sports Complex Fund
No County Utility District-Operatin
No Cty Util Dist-Renewal & Replace
No Cty Util Dist-Capital Facilities
Building Code Fund
Health Insurance Fund
Property/Casualty Insurance Fund
Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund
Law Library
GRAND TOTAL:
EXPENSES
186,082.38
13,598.60
13,023.83
19,250.00
125,459.38
39,168.06
1,551.33
25,351.97
17,289.29
2,161.42
52,116.67
428.68
27,231.83
16,176.08
8,054.83
143.03
15,172.55
257,583.29
419.66
22,377.57
10,011. 03
2,194,622.93
PAGE
2
PAYROLL
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7,056.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
31,166.41
'w..
...",
03/22/02
ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD
F7.ABWARR
VOID LIST# 25- 16-MAR-2002 TO 22-MAR-2002
J:. ul-.JD: 001
- General Fund
CHECK
TOTAL
INVOICE
VENDOR
00282086 12212916 Neal, Anita S
12212918
12212919
12212921
12212922
300.00
300.00
300.00
300.00
300.00
1,500.00
CHECK TOTAL:
FUND TOTAL:
1,500.00
PAGE
1
'- ....,
03/22/02 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE 2
F'7.ABWARR VOID LIST# 25- 16-MAR-2002 TO 22-MAR-2002
ruJ.'JD:
001143- Health & Human Srvcs CSBG FY01/02
INVOICE VENDOR
I2213172 Johnson, Ulysses
CHECK
00282057
FUND TOTAL:
TOTAL
550.00
550.00
'-' 'will
03/22/02 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE 3
F7.ABWARR VOID LIST# 25- 16-MAR-2002 TO 22-MAR-2002
l-'vl\1D: 107 - Fine & Forfeiture Fund
CHECK INVOICE VEl\.TDOR TOTAL
00281447 I2210706 Zavickas, Peter J 97.76
FUND TOTAL: 97.76
'-'
...,
03/22/02
ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD
FZABWARR
VOID LIST# 25- 16-MAR-2002 TO 22-MAR-2002
I:~..JD: 471
- No County Utility District-Operatin
CHECK INVOICE VENDOR
TOTAL
00282249 I2213733 Community Land Title Corp
I2213735
150.00
150.00
300.00
CHECK TOTAL:
FUND TOTAL:
300.00
PAGE
4
03/15/02
F7:ABWARR
FUND
001
001001
001111
001115
001137
001139
001140
001143
001147
001265
001267
001269
001271
001272
001809
101
101001
101003
101006
i01104
102
, . "001
104
104
105
107
107001
107002
107003
107120
121
140
140800
160
183
183001
183004
184203
184204
185002
215
262
282
316
382
401
4'8
'-"
ST. LUCIE COu~TY - BOARD
WARRANT LIST #24- 09-MAR-2002
FUND SUMMARY
TITLE
EXPENSES
General Fund
Recreation Special Events
FTA-001-49 USC Sec 5307 96/97
FTA-001-49 USC Section 5307 97/98
Zora Neala Hurston Dust Tracks Heri
FHA Transportation for 21st Century
Section 112/MPO/FHWA FY01/02
Health & Human Srvcs CSBG FY01/02
NOAA/FDCA Adopt-A-Beach
TDC Planning Grant FY01/02
EMPA 01/02 Dept. of Community Affai
FDEP-Urban Mobile Lab Grant 01/02
DHR-Historical Museum Grant-In-Aid
FFWCC/Derelict Vessel Removal
SFWMD-Floridian Aquifer Well 01/04
Transportation Trust Fund
Transportation Trust Interlocals
Transportation Trust/Local Optio~
Transportation Trust/Impact Fees
FHWA/FDOT Hurricane Floyd reimburse
Unincorporated Services Fund
Drainage Maintenance MSTU
FDOT Bicycle/Pedestrian Coordinator
Grants & Donations Fund
Library Special Grants Fund
Fine & Forfeiture Fund
Fine & Forfeiture Fund-Wireless S~r
Fine & Forfeiture Fund-E911 Surc~ar
Fine & Forfeiture Fund-800 ~~z OoQ~
DOJ-Local Law Enforcement FYOO
Blakely Subdivision Fund
Port & Airport Fund
IRL Taylor Creek Restoration SFw~
Plan Maintenance RAD Fund
Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir
Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Media~
Ct Admin.- Teen Court
Ft. Pierce Beach Restoration
South Co. Post Storm Study FDEP
SHIP Housing Assistance FY 01/02
5-Yr Bldg Bond Anticipat.I&S Fund
Tourism Dev 4th Cent I&S Fund
Environmental Land I&S Fund
County Capital
Environmental Land Capital Fund
Sanitary Landfill Fund
Golf Course Fund
H.E.W. Utilities Fund
383,103.69
47.50
3,871.00
54,548.00
38.73
5,062.27
696 . 86
3,083.54
975.00
530.32
5,882.00
173.56
129.13
2,000.00
174.98
84,189.69
70.20
908.88
188,953.43
1,708.64
26,056.46
9,740.06
180.48
69,006.25
3,316.32
227,633.07
115.01
20,557.51
357.24
210.48
68.94
30,345.39
4,594.05
1,563.20
1,048.20
289.29
485.24
735.92
23,435.00
11,766.90
937,620.00
46,087.97
250,305.00
8,508.60
400.23
103,419.80
20,110.28
81.57
'WI
:?Þ_GE
1
PAYROLL
\~,828.83
,(b\ 0.00
0.00
d., 0.00
I 0.00
347.49
3,852.60
913 .51
0.00
917.01
0.00
1,188.80
1,364.80
0.00
1,188.80
104,107.93
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
46,897.25
8,129.19
1,226.40
0.00
2,143.24
85,221.71
829.15
4/020.92
0.00
0.00
0.00
9,796.39
0.00
2,613.47
4,015.73
1,115.38
2,874.61
0.00
0.00
1,413.38
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
35,310.43
18,807.50
118.29
03/15/02
F7.ABWARR
FUND
441
448
449
451
458
461
471
478
479
491
505
505001
611
625
676
'-'
ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD
.....,
PAGE
:2
WARRANT LIST #24- 09-MAR-2002 TO 15-MAR-2002
FUND SUMMARY
TITLE
North Hutchinson Island Utilities
NHI Uti I-Renewal & Replacement Fund
NHI Util - Capital Facilities Fund
S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund
SH Uti I-Renewal & Replacement Fund
Sports Complex Fund
No County Utility District-Operatin
No Cty Util Dist-Renewal & Replace
No Cty Util Dist-Capital Facilities
Building Code Fund
Health Insurance Fund
Property/Casualty Insurance Fund
Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund
Law Library
King Orange MSBU Fund
GRAND TOTAL:
EXPENSES
244,768.89
0.00
0.00
801.96
0.00
14,400.47
146,308.30
0.00
0.00
9,042.56
366,355.00
0.00
1,011.69
10,340.00
4,312.50
3,331,527.25
PAYROLL
2,588.36
1,550.67
309.15
1,903.84
1,052.20
18,526.06
2,272.79
416.17
165.63
22,546.83
2,745.86
880.02
4,234.68
0.00
0.00
826,435.07
'-' ..",
03/15/02 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE
FZABWARR VOID LIST# 24- 09-MAR-2002 TO 15-MAR-2002
l _.ill : 461 - Sports Complex Fund
CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL
002811 70 12210761 Allied Building Maintenance 5,800.00
FUND TOTAL: 5,800.00
03/15/02
F7.ABWARR
FUND
TITLE
\.-
ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD
~
WARRANT LIST #24- 09-MAR-2002 TO 15-MAR-2002
FUND SUMMARY- MOSQUITO
145
Mosquito Fund
GRAND TOTAL:
EXPENSES
15,896.99
15,896.99
PAGE:
1
PAYROLL
22,607.50
22,607.50
· '
03/15/02
FZABWARR
FUND
184
TITLE
'-'
ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD
'-'
WARRANT LIST #24- 09-~L~-2002 TO 15-MAR-2002
FUND S~~Y- EROSION
Erosion Control Operating Fund
GRAND TOTAL:
EXPENSES
1,876.61
1,876.61
PAGE
1
PÞ-_YROLL
2,413.54
2,413.54
\......
AGENDA REQUEST
ITE~O. c-2A
DATE: March 26, 2002
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [XX]
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY:
(~:~t,~t-
County Engineer
SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DEPT
SUBJECT:
River Branch Estates MSBU - Potable Water Improvements (PSL)
Approval of Consultant's Agreement with Culpepper & Terpening to Provide "Construction Management
Services" during the construction of the potable water improvements.
BACKGROUND:
On April 11 ,2000, the Board approved an Agreement with Culpepper & Terpening to provide engineering
design services for the Project.
On January 15, 2002, the Board approved the Preliminary Assessment Roll and authorized the County
Engineer to proceed with construction of the project.
FUNDS AVAIL.:
Per Attached Budget Resolution No. 02 -064
PREVIOUS ACTION:
April 11 , 2000 - Board approved an Agreement with Culpepper & Terpening
to provide engineering design services
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the attached Consultant's Agreement with Culpepper & Terpening, to
provide construction management services for the River Branch Estates MSBU Project in the amount of
$7,000.00; and authorize the Chairman of the Board to execute the Agreement.
[2i APPROVED [] DENIED
[ ] OTHER:
D uglas Anderson
ounty Administrator
COMMISSION ACTION:
Coord ination/Sianatures
[x]County Attorney
(x]Public Works 'r
[x ]Mgt. & Budget Ît20 WI fVIb;
[x ]Co. Eng >f~'
f '
[ ]Purchasing
[x]MSBU Coor eF
[X]Finance
AGENDA REQUEST
ITEM ,..."
C-4À ~
:. 1'f
~
DATE:
Feb. 12,2002
REGULAR []
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT
[X ]
TO:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SUBMITTED BY:
Management & Budget
PRESENTED BY: Marie Gouin
SUBJECT: Adopt Budget Resolution 02-64 to establish the budget for River Branch Estates
MSBU project.
BACKGROUND: The River Branch Estates MSBU project has progressed to the point where a budget
for construction costs can be established. This project will fund the costs necessary
in providing potable water improvements to properties within the River Branch Estates
MSBU. The entire cost of the project will be funded through non ad valorem special
assessments within the MSBU. Staff requests the Board's adoption of the MSBU
budget to facilitate the project construction.
FUNDS AVAILABLE: See attached Budget Resolution 02-64
PREVIOUS ACTION: May 5,1998 - Board accepted petition and granted permission to advertise the Initial
Public Hearing.
June 2, 1998 - Initial Public Hearing held; Board created MSBU and authorized the
County Engineer to proceed with the project.
March 14, 2000 - Board approved the Interlocal Agreemen with the City of Port St.
Lucie.
Jan 15. 2002 - Board adopted Resolution 02-023 to levy non ad valorem special
assessments; approved the preliminary assessment roll and authorized staff to
proceed with construction of the project.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board adopt Budget Resolution 02-64 establishing the budget
for the River Branch Estates MSBU project.
Coordination/Sionatures
County Attorney: t/. ~ Management & Budget: íJ.D rr\f'f'...0 Purchasing:
Orig Dept: Central Services: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable)
pworks:fl. ß-í..J" Other: . "
Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the 51. Lucie County Community 5ef"Jlces
Manager at 561-462-1777 or TOO 561-4â2-1428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting.
COMMISSION ACTION:
[;.j APPROVED () DENIED
[ ] OTHER:
.......
............
...."
RESOLUTION NO. 02-64
WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners budget
for St. Lucie County, certain funds not anticipated at the time of adoption of the budget have become
available in the form of contributions from property owners participating in the River Branch Estates
Municipal Services Benefits Unit (MSBU) project.
WHEREAS, Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, requires the Board of County Commissioners to adopt a
resolution to appropriate and expend such funds.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County,
Florida, in meeting assembled this 12th day of February, 2002, pursuant to Section 129.06 (d), Florida
Statutes, that such funds are hereby appropriated for the fiscal year 2001-2002, and the County's budget
is hereby amended as follows:
REVENUES
395 -0000-384300-000
APPROPRIA TrONS
395-4115-534000-4512
395-4115-549114-4512
395-4115-563003-4512
395-4115-563005-4512
395-4115-563011-4512
395 -9910-599330-800
395 -9950-572100-800
395 -9950-573100-800
395 -9950-599330-800
Total Appropriations
Proceeds-Contributions from Prop Owners
$175,231
Other Contractual Services
General and Administrative Charges-MSBU
Improv olt Bldgs-Survey
Improv olt Bldgs-Consulting Engineer
Improv olt Bldgs-Permits/Applications
$ 116,100
1,632
2,800
13,100
2,100
$ 3,631
6,428
10,258
19,182
175.231
Project Reserves
Interest - Notes
Additional Expenses - Bonds
Reserves -Debt Service
After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows:
Commissioner Doug Coward, Chairperson
Commissioner Cliff Barnes, Vice Chairperson
Commissioner John D. Bruhn
Commissioner Paula A Lewis
Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson
AYE
AYE
AYE
AYE
AYE
!{õJ Œ & Œ n Wi æ fñì
ifl] MeR, 4 2002 æJ
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2002.
ENGINEERING
ta~,.\o..
. r: II Çl... 1.'"
,'¡'J;¡ ¡ J ,/ !.. .-{~.
. ~o--"~"~"~.;.:""'''~ c.' >~},
'" (.. -. -... ,,\,., >.
}. -. r:-:.o..,~' >y \::~,
9'·······1. ,-"
. ~ \ \'~;:;~) .r: ~
/ -\ ....., ~..-......-~"".",~ J
~ U \ . .I. . ~,.' ~.
l . " -: . . "'. COe .....~ 1.~..., ~ ,1-<11
. ............. \'......._fI'!'"
C/~ ca'jl~-r<· :oi:'
" ",,",
~,:",.-,."",,»-
APPROVED AS TO CORRECTNESS
AND FORM:
ATTEST:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY -{J () (2. .~
~MAN
, \
'-"
....."
CONSULTANT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this
day of
2002, by and between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of
Florida, hereinafter referred to as the "County", and CULPEPPER & TERPENING,
INC., hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the County desires to retain the professional services of the
Consultant to provide construction management services during the construction of
the River Branch Estates project; and,
WHEREAS, the Consultant desires to provide the County with such services.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual promises made herein,
and for other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged by each party, the parties intending to be legally bound, hereby agree
as follows:
1. GENERAL SCOPE OF THIS AGREEMENT
The relationship of the Consultant to the County will be solely that of a
consultant. The Consultant is an independent contractor and is not an employee or
agent of the County. Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted to establish any
relationship other than that of an independent contractor, between the County and
the Consultant, its employees, agents, subcontractors, or assigns, during or after the
-1-
'-'
..""
performance of this Agreement. The Consultant will provide the professional and
technical services required for the successful completion of this Agreement in
accordance with practices generally acceptable within the industry and good ethical
standards.
2. SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of work to be performed by the Consultant under this Agreement
is to provide professional engineering services related to the River Branch Estates
Municipal Services Benefit Unit as further described in the Consultant's Scope of
Services, attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A".
3. PROJECT MANAGER
The Project Manager for the County is Rebecca Padrick at (772) 462-2824.
The Project Manager for the Consultant is Butch Terpening at (772) 464-3537.
The parties shall direct all matters arising in connection with the performance
of this Agreement, other than invoices and notices, to the attention of the Project
Managers for attempted resolution or action. The Project Managers shall be
responsible for overall resolution or action. The Project Managers shall be
responsible for overall coordination and oversight relating to the performance of this
Agreement.
4. TERM
The term of this Agreement shall be until all tasks are satisfactorily
completed.
5. TIME OF PERFORMANCE
The services to be provided by the Consultant shall be accomplished within
sixty (60) days or until complete as set forth in Exhibit "C" (Time Performance).
-2-
'-'
...,
6. COMPENSATION
The Consultant shall be compensated for all services rendered under this
Agreement as follows: seven thousand and 00/100 dollars ($7,000.00) upon
completion as set forth in Exhibit "B".
Any invoice presented to the County for payment shall be on a Request for
Payment form approved by the County.
7. DEFAULT; TERMINATION
A. FOR CAUSE
If either party fails to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement in a
timely and proper manner, the other party shall have the right to terminate this
Agreement by giving written notice of any deficiency and by allowing the party in
default seven (7) calendar days to correct the deficiency. If the defaulting party
fails to correct the deficiency within this time, this Agreement shall terminate at the
expiration of the seven (7) calendar day time period.
With regard to The Consultant, the following items shall be considered
a default under this Agreement:
(1) If the Consultant should be adjudged bankrupt, or if he, or it,
should make a general assignment for the benefit of his, or its, creditors, or if a
receiver should be appointed on account of his, or its, insolvency.
(2) If the Consultant should persistently or repeatedly refuse or fail,
except in cases for which an extension of time is provided, to provide the services
contemplated by this Agreement.
(3) If the Consultant disregards laws, ordinances, or the instructions
of the Project Manager or otherwise is guilty of a substantial violation of the
provisions of the Agreement.
,
-3-
~
.."
In the event of termination, the Consultant shall only be entitled to
receive payment for work satisfactorily completed prior to the termination date.
B. WITHOUT CAUSE
Either party may terminate the Agreement without cause at any time
upon fifteen (15) calendar days prior written notice to the other party. In the event
of termination, the County shall compensate the Consultant for all authorized work
satisfactorily performed through the termination date.
8. FORCE MAJEURE
Neither party shall be liable to the other for failure to perform its obligations
hereunder if and to the extent that such failure to perform results from causes
beyond its reasonable control (financial difficulty shall not be considered a cause
beyond a party's control), all of which causes herein are called IIForce Majeurell,
including, but without being limited to, strikes, lockouts, or other industrial
disturbances; fires; unusual climatic conditions; acts of God; acts of a public enemy;
or inability to obtain transportation or necessary materials in the open market. The
party unable to perform as a result of force majeure promptly shall notify the other
of the beginning and ending of each such period, and County shall compensate
Consultant at the rates set forth herein, for the services performed by Consultant
hereunder, up to the date of the beginning of such period. If any period of force
majeure continues for thirty (30) days or more, either party shall have the right to
terminate this Agreement upon ten (10) days prior written notice to the other party.
9. ASSIGNMENT
The County and Consultant each binds itself and its successors, legal
representatives, and assigns to the other party to this Agreement and to the
partners, successors, legal representatives, and permitted assigns of such other
party, in respect to all covenants of this Agreement; and neither the County nor the
Consultant will assign or transfer its rights and obligations in this Agreement without
the written consent of the other. Nothing herein shall be construed as creating any
personal liability on the part of any officer or agent of any public body which may be
a party hereto.
-4-
~
...,,¡
The Consultant agrees that the persons named in the scope of work shall
provide services as described therein. The services of the person(s) so named are a
substantial inducement and material consideration for this Agreement. In the event
such persons can no longer provide the services required by this Agreement, the
Consultant shall immediately notify the County in writing and the County may elect to
terminate this Agreement without any liability to the Consultant for unfinished work
product. The County may elect to compensate the Consultant for unfinished work
product, provided it is in a form that is sufficiently documented and organized to
provide for subsequent utilization in completion of the work product.
10. SUBCONSUL T ANTS AND SUBCONTRACTORS
In the event the Consultant requires the services of any subconsultant,
subcontractor or professional associate in connection with the services to be provided
under this Agreement, Consultant shall secure the written approval of County Project
Manager before engaging such subconsultant, subcontractor or professional associate.
11. AUDIT
The Consultant agrees that the County or any of its duly authorized
representatives shall, until the expiration of three years after expenditure of funds
under this Agreement, have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent
books, documents, papers, and records of the Consultant involving transactions
related to this Agreement. The Consultant agrees that payment(s) made under this
Agreement shall be subject to reduction for amounts charged thereto which are
found on the basis of audit examination not to constitute allowable costs under this
Agreement. The Consultant shall refund by check payable to the County the amount
of such reduction of payments. All required records shall be maintained until an audit
is completed and all questions arising therefrom are resolved, or three years after
completion of the project and issuance of the final certificate, whichever is sooner.
12. PUBLIC RECORDS
The Consultant shall allow public access to all documents, papers, letters, or
other material subject to the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and made
or received by the Consultant in conjunction with this Agreement.
-5-
'-'
"'wIll
14. INDEMNIFICATION
The Consultant covenants and agrees at all times to save, hold, and keep
harmless the County, its Officials, Employees, and Agents, and indemnify the County,
its Officials, Employees, and Agents, against any and all claims, demands, penalties,
judgments, court costs, reasonable attorney's fees, and liability of every kind and
nature whatsoever to the extent arising out of or in any way connected or arising out
of the Consultant's performance of this Agreement. Only those matters which 'are
determined by a final, non-appealable judgment to be the result of the negligence of
the County or the negligence of a third party who is not an agent, employee, invitee,
or subcontractor of the Consultant shall be excluded from the Consultant's duty to
indemnify the County, but only to the extent of negligence of the County or such third
party. The Consultant hereby acknowledges that the payments made under this
Agreement include specific consideration for the indemnification herein provided.
15. PROHIBITION AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES
The Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or
person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the Consultant, to solicit
or secure this Agreement, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any persons,
company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bonafide employee working
solely for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift or any other
consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award of making this Agreement.
16. ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS
In the event of any dispute concerning the terms and conditions of this
Agreement or in the event of any action by any party to this Agreement to judicially
interpret or enforce this Agreement or any provision hereof, or in any dispute
arising in any manner from this Agreement, subject to the provisions of section
768.28, Florida Statutes, and in no way altering the extent of the County's liability
under section768.28, Florida Statutes, the prevailing party shall be entitled to
recover its reasonable costs, fees and expenses, including but not limited to, witness
fees, expert fees, consultant fees, attorney, paralegal and legal assistant fees,
costs and expenses alJd other professional fees, costs and expenses, whether suit be
,
-7-
\..-
"'WI
brought or not, and whether any settlement shall be entered in any declaratory action,
at trial or on appeal.
17. NON DISCRIMINATION
The Consultant covenants and agrees that the Consultant shall not discriminate
against any employee or applicant for employment to be employed in the performance
of the Agreement with respect to hiring, tenure, terms, conditions or privileges of
employment, or any matter directly or indirectly related to employment because of
age, sex or physical handicaps (except where based on a bonafide occupational
qualification); or because of marital status, race, color, religion, national origin or
ancestry.
18. VERIFICATION OF EMPLOYMENT STATUS
The Consultant agrees that it shall bear the responsibility for verifying the
employment status, under the Immigration Reform and Control act of 1986, of all
persons it employs in the performance of this Agreement.
19. NOTICE
All notices, requests, consents, and other communications required or permitted
under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be (as elected by the person giving
such notice) hand delivered by messenger or courier service, telecommunicated, or
mailed by registered or certified mail (postage prepaid) return receipt requested,
addressed to:
As To County:
St. Lucie County Administrator
Administration Annex
2300 Virginia Avenue
Fort Pierce, Pierce, FL 34982
With A Copy To:
St. Lucie County Attorney
Administration Annex
2300 Virginia Avenue
Fort Pierce, Pierce, FL 34982
,
-8-
'-'
....,
As To The Consultant:
Culpepper and Terpening, Inc.
2980 South 25th Street
P. O. Box 13360
Fort Pierce, Florida 34979-3360
or to such other address as any party may designate by notice complying with the
terms of this Section. Each such notice shall be deemed delivered (a) on the date
delivered if by personal delivery, (b) on the date upon which the return receipt is
signed or delivery is refused or the notice is designated by the postal authorities as
not deliverable, as the case may be, if mailed.
20. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS
The Consultant, its employees, subcontractors or assigns, shall comply with all
applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to the performance
of this Agreement. The County undertakes no duty to ensure such compliance, but will
attempt to advise Consultant, upon request, as to any such laws of which it has
present knowledge.
21. TRUTH-IN-NEGOTIATION CERTIFICATE
Execution of this Agreement by Consultant shall act as the execution of as
truth-in-negotiation certificate stating that wage rates and other factual unit costs
supporting the compensation of this Agreement are accurate, complete and current
at the time of execution of the Agreement. The original Agreement rates and any
additions thereto shall be adjusted to exclude any significant sums by which County
determines the Agreement rate(s) was increased due to inaccurate, incomplete, or
non-current wage rates and other factual unit costs. All such rate adjustments shall
be made within one year following the end of this Agreement.
22. NON-WAIVER
The rights of the parties under this Agreement shall be cumulative and the
failure of either party to exercise properly any rights given hereunder shall not
operate to forfeit any of the said rights.
,
-9-
.....
~
23. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The Consultant represents that it presently has no interest and shall acquire
no interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the
performance of services required hereunder, as provided for in Florida Statutes
112.311. The Consultant further represents that no person having any interest shall
be employed for said performance.
The Consultant shall promptly notify the County in writing by certified mail of
all potential conflicts of interest prohibited by existing state law for any prospective
business association, interest or other circumstance which may influence or appear
to influence the Consultant's judgment or quality of services being provided
hereunder. Such written notification shall identify the prospective business
association, interest or circumstance, the nature of work that the Consultant may
undertake and request an opinion of the County as to whether the association,
interest or circumstance would, in the opinion of the County, constitute a conflict of
interest if entered into by the Consultant. The County agrees to notify the
Consultant of its opinion by certified mail within thirty (30) days of receipt of
notification by the Consultant. If, in the opinion of the County, the prospective
business association, interest or circumstance would not constitute a conflict of
interest by the Consultant, the County shall so state in the notification and the
Consultant shall, at his/her option, enter into said association, interest or
circumstance and it shall be deemed not in conflict of interest with respect to
services provided to the County by the Consultant under the terms of this Agreement
24. LITIGATION SERVICES
It is understood and agreed that the Cor:sultant's services under this
Agreement do not include any participation, whatsoever, in any litigation. Should such
services be required, a supplemental agreement may be negotiated between the
County and the Consultant describing the services desired and providing a basis for
compensation to the Consultant.
,
-10-
\w:
....,
25. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Any disputes relating to interpretation of the terms of this Contact or a
question of fact or arising under this Contract shall be resolved through good faith
efforts upon the part of the Contractor and the County or its Project Manager. At
all times, the Contractor shall carry on the work and maintain its progress schedule
in accordance with the requirements of the Contract and the determination of the
County or its representatives, pending resolution of the dispute. Any dispute which
is not resolved by mutual agreement shall be decided by the County Administrator who
shall reduce the decision to writing. The decision of the County shall be final and
conclusive unless determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be fraudulent,
capricious, arbitrary, so grossly erroneous as to necessarily imply bad faith, or not be
supported by substantial evidence.
26. MEDIATION
Prior to initiating any litigation concerning this Contract, the parties agree to
submit the disputed issue or issues to a mediator for non-binding mediation. The
parties shall agree on a mediator chosen from a list of certified mediators available
from the Clerk of Court for St. Lucie County. The fee of the mediator shall be shared
equally by the parties. To the extent allowed by law, the mediation process shall be
confidential and the results of the mediation or any testimony or argument introduced
at the mediation shall not be admissible as evidence in any subsequent proceeding
concerning the disputed issue.
27. INTERPRETATION: VENUE
This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with
respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior verbal or written
agreements between the parties with respect thereto. This Agreement may only be
amended by written document, properly authorized, executed and delivered by both
parties hereto. This Agreement shall be interpreted as a whole unit and section
headings are for convenience only. All interpretations shall be governed by the laws
of the State of Florida. In the event it is necessary for either party to initiate legal
action regarding this Agreement, venue shall be in the Nineteenth Judicial circuit for
,
-11-
......
...,
St. Lucie County, Florida, for claims under state law and the Southern District of
Florida for any claims which are justiciable in federal court.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have accepted, made and
executed this Agreement in counterparts each of which shall be treated as an original
upon the terms and conditions above stated.
WITNESSES:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
CORRECTNESS:
By:
COUNTY ATTORNEY
WITNESSES:
CULPEPPER & TERPENING, INC.
/
L-- ~/
~~
BY:
j
Title:
-vO ')....-.~".....~..........
\
Q r-~ ~l1. <. "" +-
G:\ATTY\AGREEMNT\C&T River Branch.wpd
-12-
~
'-
....,
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES - RIVER BRANCH ESTATES MSBU
POTABLE WATER IMPROVEMENTS
The Engineer shall provide the following services for the project:
Phase 50-1: The Engineer will provide Construction Management and full-time inspections during
water main construction. In addition, the following items are included in this task:
I. Review shop drawings and material "submittals for conformance to the Contract Documents.
2. Review Contractor's periodic pay requests and provide recommendations of payment to the
Client and review contractor's progress schedule and provide a written summary.
3. Provide construction observation on a part-time basis; provide schedule and field reports of
inspections [20 hours per week for five (5) weeks] to ensure that construction is proceeding in
accordance with the plans and specifications.
4. Provide in writing clarifications and interpretations as to the intent or meaning of the Contract
Documents as may be required.
5. Conduct [mal inspection and provide a list of deficient items to the Contractor prior to final
acceptance. Document "Final Acceptance" with letter.
6. Prepare a set of reproducible "Record Drawings" based on contractor-supplied information and
provide the necessary final certifications to permitting agencies.
The above services are predicated on the following:
1. Any easement preparation required is not included herein.
2. Construction stakeout is not included herein.
3. Record Drawings prepared based on contractor-supplied information.
4. No services not specifically set forth hereinabove are included.
,
P:\Proj-1990's\Proj·] 997\97-65 River Braßch\cont\9765-I.doc
.....
...,
EXHffiIT "B"
RIVER BRANCH ESTATES MSBU
COMPENSA TION TO THE ENGINEER
For the services set forth in Exhibit "A", Scope of services, the fee compensation to the Engineer shall
be as set forth herein. The term "L.S." indicates a Lump Sum fee for the tasks specified and is
intended to be a fixed fee, not subject to change without the agreement of both parties. The term
"Hourly" indicates that the task specified will be performed on an hourly-rate basis in accordance with
the attached fee schedule.
Phase 50-1
Construction Management
$ 7,000 L.S.
Total
$ 7,000
,
P:\Proj·1990's\Proj·1997\97·65 River Branch\c:onI\9765-I.doc
"-'
.~
AGENDA REQUEST
ITEM NO. C2b
DATE: March 26,2002
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [x]
PRESENTED BY:
SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115
SUBJECT:
RFP #02-033 - Continuing Contracts for Professional Surveying Services
BACKGROUND:
On February 12,2002 proposals were received. 1374 vendors were notified, 45 sets of RFP documents
were distributed, and 15 responses were received. On March 8th the selection committee short listed
the following firms:
1. GCY, Inc.
2. Culpepper & Terpening, Inc.
3. LBFH, Inc.
FUNDS AVAIL.: n/a
PREVIOUS ACTION: n/a
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Board approve the short list, permission to negotiate with all three firms, and authorize
the chairman to sign the contracts as prepared by the County Attorney.
COMMISSION ACTION:
[x] APPROVED
[ ] OTHER:
[ ] DENIED
E:
.-/
[x]County Attorney
[x]Originating Dept. Public Works
surveyrfpaward.ag
Coordinatlon/S Ignatu res
[ ]Mgt. & Budget
[x]Co. Eng ..Àf1)\·
{
[ ]co.surveYor~
[]Other
"-
AGENDA REQUEST
...,
ITEM NO.
C-2t!
DATE: March 26, 2002
CONSENT [X
REGULAR [
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
Leg. [ ] Quasi-JD.
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY:
"-- ~t
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): PW/ERD/Oxbow Eco-Center
SUBJECT:
10% off at Oxbow Gift Store
BACKGROUND:
The Oxbow Eco-Center is requesting to offer 10% off as a marketing
tool to encourage patronage at the gift store. These discounts will
be time limited offers either during special events or in coupon
form, and would be offered to the general public.
FUNDS AVAIL. :
n/a
PREVIOUS ACTION:
n/a
COMMISSION ACTION:
[X] APPROVED
[ ] OTHER:
DENIED
r-
Anderson
Administrator
-->
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval.
County Attorney:
Originating Dept:
Finance: (copies
rv,~""
only) :
coordinatio~fi~~
Mgt & Budget:
Other: .
Purchasing :
Other:
~
~
AGENDA REQUEST
ITE'tNO. (!.. J!. D
DATE: March 26, 2002
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [XX ]
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY:
j\~~~~W~
(Donald B. W t, P.E.
County Engineer
SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION
SUBJECT: Smallwood Avenue MSBU - (Potable Water - FPUA)
Interlocal Agreement with Fort Pierce Utilities Authority and the City of
Fort Pierce to Provide Potable Water.
BACKGROUND: See Attached Memorandum
FUNDS AVAIL. N/A
PREVIOUS ACTION:
February 5, 2002 - The Board created the Smallwood Avenue MSBU and
authorized the County Engineer to proceed with Engineering and design of
the project.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board approve the Interlocal Agreement with Fort Pierce Utilities Authority and
the City of Fort Pierce to provide potable water to properties within the Smallwood Avenue MSBU and
authorize the Chairman to sign the Agreement.
[ ::J APPROVED [] DENIED
[ ] OTHER:
-'
COMMISSION ACTION:
Do glas M. Anderson
ounty Administrator
"""'''' mom", r
[X] Public Works Dir: ~
,
[] Finance Dir:
Coordination/Siqnatures
[]Mgmt & Budget:
[X]Co Eng: ~\.t.\.
[X]MSBU coor~at : ~-J:>
[] Purchasing:
'-'
..."",
COMMISSION REVIEW: March 26, 2002
ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM NO. 02- 077
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Board of County Commissioners
County Engineer
March 12, 2002
Smallwood Avenue MSBU (Potable Water - FPUA)
Interlocal Agreement with Fort Pierce Utilities Authority and the City of Fort
Pierce to Provide Potable Water.
BACKGROUND
Attached is a copy of the Interlocal Agreement with Fort Pierce Utilities Authority (FPUA)
and the City of Fort Pierce relative to the Smallwood Avenue MSBU. Under the
Agreement, the County will create the Smallwood Avenue MSBU to levy a special non-ad
valorem assessment to pay for the project to provide potable water service to Smallwood
Avenue. FPUA will design and install the system necessary to provide the water service,
and the County will pay FPUA for the cost of the design and installation of the system out
of bonds issued to finance the project. These bonds will payoff the assessment levied by
the Smallwood Avenue MSBU.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board approve the Interlocal Agreement with Fort Pierce Utilities
Authority and the City of Fort Pierce to provide potable water to properties within the
Smallwood Avenue MSBU and authorize the Chairman to sign the Agreement.
BP
Attachment (1)
cc: Staff Concurring
Property Appraiser
Tax Collector
g\wplmsbu\smallwood\aga-Int-fpua. wpd
\w-
....",
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
SMALLWOOD AVENUE MSBU
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this
day of
, 20__, by and between St. Lucie County, a political
subdivision of the State of Florida (the "County"), the Fort Pierce
Utilities Authority, an authority created and established by the
City Commission of the City of Fort Pierce, Florida, ("FPUA") and
the City of Fort Pierce, a municipality organized under the laws of
the State of Florida (the "City").
WHEREAS, FPUA is the governing body authorized to enter into
agreements relating to providing service from the potable water
supply of the CitYi and,
WHEREAS, the County intends to create the Smallwood Avenue
municipal services benefit unit (the "Smallwood Avenue MSBU") to
fund the cost of providing potable water to the Smallwood Avenue
MSBU in unincorporated St. Lucie County.
A description of the
boundaries of the real property within the proposed MSBU is
attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A"i and,
WHEREAS, the parties believe that it is in their mutual best
interest to cooperate in providing potable water to the Smallwood
Avenue MSBU.
,
-1-
'-"
..,;
NOW, THEREFORE, FPUA, the City, and the County hereby agree
and covenant on the terms and conditions hereinafter stated:
1. GENERAL. This Agreement is entered into pursuant to
Section 163.01, Florida Statutes, the Florida Interlocal
Cooperation Act. This Agreement embodies the whole understanding of
the parties. There are no promises, terms, conditions, or
obligations other than those contained therein, and this Agreement
shall supersede all previous telecommunications, representations,
or agreements, either verbal or written, between the parties
hereto.
2. FPUA RESPONSIBILITIES.
this Agreement are as follows:
FPUA I S responsibilities under
A. FPUA shall design and install or cause to be
designed and installed a system including all pipes, services,
mains and appurtenances thereto (the "System") necessary to provide
potable water to the Smallwood Avenue MSBU. The design and
installation of the System shall be done in accordance with all
applicable, standard FPUA policies and procedures. The County
reserves the right to review and approve the utilities plans and
bid documents before inclusion in the bid package.
B. If easements are required, FPUA shall attempt to
obtain all necessary easements for installation and maintenance of
the System. FPUA shall not be required, however, to condemn any
such easements or expend funds for acquisition of same. If
appropriate easements satisfactory to FPUA are not obtained, FPUA
shall have no further obligation under this Agreement.
C. FPUA shall administer a project to install the
System to include but not limited to awarding the contract for
design, construction, inspection during construction, shop drawing
approvals, change order approvals, project certification, and
production of record drawings.
D. Upon completion of the System and acceptance of
ownership of the System by FPUA, FPUA shall be responsible for the
operation and maintenance of the System.
E. Prior to the second public hearing to be held by the
St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners pursuant to Section
1-13 .5-7 of the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinance to adopt a
preliminary assessment roll for the Smallwood Avenue MSBU, FPUA
-2-
'-"
....,
shall provide an itemized final estimated cost (the "Final
Estimated Cost") for the installation of the System to the County.
The Final Estimated Cost shall include the cost of testing /
permits, surveying, legal, design, construction, contingencies
allowance, construction administration, certification, record
drawings, and acquisition of easements for the installation of the
System and shall be subject to the approval of the County. Any
unexpected costs incurred during the construction and installation
of the System beyond the Final Estimated Cost shall be the
responsibility of FPUA.
F. If the County does not levy a special non-ad
valorem assessment as described below, FPUA shall be responsible
for the cost of all design or other work done by FPUA related to
the System. The County shall use its best efforts to notify FPUA as
soon as possible of any decision not to levy an assessment.
3. COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES. In the event the County
determines at a public hearing to create a MSBU and to levy a non-
ad valorem special assessment, the County's responsibilities under
this Agreement are as follows:
A. The Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie
County, Florida shall act as the governing body of the Smallwood
Avenue MSBU and shall levy a non-ad valorem special assessment (the
"Assessment") on the landowners within the limits of the MSBU to
fund the cost of the installation of the System as required for
connection to the FPUA water system.
B. The County shall pay to FPUA an amount not to exceed
the Final Estimated Cost for the installation of the System and the
cost of the landowners capital improvement charge. All other
applicable fees and charges for connection to the FPUA water system
will be the responsibility of the landowners. The amount of the
capital improvement charge shall be the current FPUA charge for
capital improvements on the date of the submission of the Final
Estimated Cost to the County. Payment by the County to FPUA shall
be within 30 working days after the County has obtained funds from
the issuance of bonds to finance the project and after the approval
of the costs by the St. Lucie County Director of Engineering or his
designee.
C. Upon the request of FPUA, the County I s Property
Acquisition Division shall provide staff assistance to FPUA for the
acquisition of easements necessary for the installation and
maintenance of the System.
4. TERMINATION. Unless terminated by the mutual written
agreement of all parties, this agreement shall remain in full force
and effect until all of its terms and conditions have been met.
-3-
'-"
~
5. NOTICE OF CITY ANNEXATION REOUIREMENT.
notice is required by the City and should not be
way as an endorsement of the City's annexation
County.
The following
construed in any
policies by the
As a condition precedent for connection to the FPUA water
system, FPUA requires all users to sign an annexation agreement
whereby the user consents to and requests that his or her property
be annexed into the city limits of Fort Pierce whenever such
annexation may legally occur and that the FPUA will refuse to allow
connection to its water system unless and until the referenced
annexation agreement is signed. This annexation agreement shall be
in the form utilized by FPUA, shall be irrevocable and shall be
binding on the heirs, successors and assigns of all such users.
6. CONSENT TO COUNTY MSBU UPON ANNEXATION. The par tie s
acknowledge that if the Smallwood Avenue MSBU is annexed into the
City this will result in the existence of a St. Lucie County
Municipal Services Benefit Unit within the jurisdictional boundary
of the City. Accordingly, the City agrees that if it intends to
annex the Smallwood Avenue MSBU into the City, it will include
within the appropriate annexation ordinance a statement that the
City consents to the existence of the Smallwood Avenue Municipal
Services Benefit Unit within the boundaries of the City pursuant to
the provisions of Section 125.01 (q), Florida Statutes or other
applicable law.
7. VALIDATION OF BOND AND ASSESSMENT ROLL. A condition
precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement is the entry of a
Final Judgment (and the expiration of the appropriate appeal
period) by a court of competent jurisdiction validating the
issuance of bonds to finance the System along with the assessment
roll adopted by the Board (the "Bond Validation Proceeding"). In
the event that either a Final Judgment validating the bonds and
assessment roll is not entered or an appellate court reverses the
Final Judgment, the Agreement shall automatically terminate and the
parties shall have no further responsibilities under the Agreement
including but not limited to any payments due to FPUA by the
County. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if either a Final Judgment
validating the bonds and assessment roll is not entered or an
appellate court reverses the Final Judgment, the County reserves
the right to be reimbursed by FPUA for all outside counsel legal
fees and costs incurred by the County in the Bond Validation
Proceeding as well as in any related appeal. The County agrees to
consult with FPUA concerning the expenditure of money for outside
bond counsel services related to the Bond Validation Proceeding and
further agrees that such expenditure shall not exceed five thousand
and nO/100 dollars ($5000.00) without the express written consent
of FPUA. The County's right to reimbursement shall survive the
termination of this Agreement as described in this paragraph.
-4 -
~
THE FOLLOWING PAGE IS THE SIGNATURE PAGE
-6-
-..",;
,
~\
\--
AGENDA REQUEST
...,
ITEM NO. C-2E
DATE: March 13, 2002
REGULAR
PUBLIC HEARING
CONSENT
[x]
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SUBMITTED BY:
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND:
FUNDS AVAIL.
PREVIOUS ACTION:
RECOMMENDATION:
COMMISSION ACTION:
[X] APPROVED
[ ] OTHER:
~
County Attorney:
Originating Dept. \\-~
PRESENTED BY: Vanessa Bessey
Public Works/Environmental Resources
Staff requests the Board of County Commissioners
authorize Equipment Request EQ02-208 6'x 12' equipment
trailer ($1,200) and EQ02-209 4 wheeler ($5,000).
The BOCC approved acquisition of a gooseneck trailer for
the Environmental Lands program. The purchase price of
the trailer was substantially less than the amount
budgeted. We would like to purchase additional equipment
with these funds: equipment trailer (6' x 12') and 4-
wheeler to provide additional accessibility to the sites.
Funds are available in the Equipment Account due to
savings from previously approved and purchased equipment.
Account number to be charged: 001-3920-564000-300.
N/A
Staff recommends the Board approve the spending of excess
funds for the purchase of a 6' x 12' equipment trailer
($1200/ EQ02-208) and 4-wheeler ($5000/ EQ02-209) .
DENIED
9 as M. Anderson,
ty Administrator
:,,: '=:,~'~
d-
Purchasing:
Other:
Finance: (Check for copy only, if applicable)
~
\w
,."
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
TO:
Board of County Commissioners
FROM:
Vanessa Bessey, Environmental Resources Manager
DATE:
March 14, 2002
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND
The BOCC approved acquisition of a gooseneck trailer for the Environmental Lands
program. The purchase price of the trailer was substantially less than the amount
budgeted. We would like to purchase additional equipment with these funds: equipment
trailer (6' x 12')and 4-wheeler to provide additional accessibility to the sites.
RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION
Staff recommends the Board approve the spending of excess funds for the purchase of a
6' x 12' equipment trailer ($1200/ EQ02-208) and 4-wheeler ($5000/ EQ02-209).
Vanessa Bessey
Environmental Resources anager
"
m c c
D <: m
c: ~
=ij Cñ
3: Õ -t
m z 3:
z m
-t z
:;u :-:I
m
~
rn ;-I rn 1J
0 Qj 0 ijj
c ~ ~
I';J r-
.... Õ
N :§
~ ::::: ~ ~
0-
(þ "'"'i ;0
c: ~ ~
II>
:g,
Õ ¡::::
:;r ~
::;¡ tn
~ -I
0 m~
;:¡, De:
(þ
'ê So
"0-
"6' 3:m
:3
() mO
::;¡ zO
....
Õ -Ie:
(þ ;QZ
Qj m:<!
g. Dm
0
.... e:o
s: m»
;:¡: ~;Q
(þ
~ (þ :;u "'T1C
::;¡ m 00
0 II> 0
0 ã= 0 ;Q"'T1
c: II> 3: "'T10
Z Õ' 3: tnO
-t 0 m oe:
z Qj z
c: (b c »Z
3: Q. m I"":<!
III s: !=? ¡;io
m a
?:I c: »0
'§. ;Q3:
0
S. "'3:
o-
s: otn
(þ ~tn
Q ,_
"'0
c c: ~ gz
::;¡
c ~ "'m
....
, c: ;Q
(,,)
\0 -I tn
N OJ
'? -<:
01 0
01
.¡:", ~
c
c
c
W
c
c
· \..-
m c c
0 <: m
c Cii "
" >
3C Õ ;U
~
m z 3C
z
~ m
z
;U :-:'
m
~
IT! ;::;: :;! ~ \:J
0 ~ ~
<::> ëi;' $;
I\) c: '" r-
, a: 3 ~ Õ
I\) 0
g tr DI
CD ::::: ~ ~
c: 1" ~
'" ~ ::0
CD ~ ~
Cl. CD ~
Õ' CD
"" (j) r-
'" ¡;¡ ~
ãf"b
3 §. en en
0
e!. DI ~ -I
::J -< mr
(þ C) De:
::J "b rn
CD c: en Sn
::J -a
0 0 .,,-
CD '" :s:m
'" CD mn
c: ëi;'
g. Õ zO
-Ie:
DI "b :;uZ
'" a
;ä' :s m~
DI g: DDJ
3" DI e:o
CD 0 m»
::J @
... ~:;u
o '"
~ ..... '" ~ ;u ,,0
~ Õ m 00
0 0 " 0
0 ... s: ;u 0 :;u"
õ'
c .'" CD ~ ;¡: "n
z ::J 3C CñO
~ ~ Q m
e- !=? m ne:
z CD z
c "" ª- c »z
3C 8 Q m r~
IX! ::J Ci3 !=?
m ã Q ~n
~ 3" '" »0
3 æ: ::03:
'"
0 ::E ~3:
::E 0-
S· ~ oen
so s: ~en
~-
~ CD 00
<::> (j) ~ ~ oZ
<::> 3 DI ~m
..... '"
, Q "" en c: :;u
W ::J Q
(0 Q -i en
I\) cg 3 OJ
<::> 0
, -<:
C1I 3 c:
~ CD ::J 0
...
<::> ~ 0 ~
<::> .....
<::> êJ §.
,
W Cl."b
<::> "b DI ~
<::> a 0 0
.....
:s 0
c:¡:
S· s:
CQ CD
'" '"
CD CD
0 ~
c:
::J. ;::;:
~ ~.
DI ~
Ci3 rn
DI $;
~ en
g¡
\..or
AGENDA REQUEST
ITEM NO. C2~
DATE: March 26,2002
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [x]
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY:
SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115
SUBJECT:
Award of Contract - Burger King and Merritt Ditch Emergency Culvert Replacement
BACKGROUND:
Severe erosion due to culvert failure at the entrance of Burger King Restaurant north of Midway Road necessitates
immediate action to avoid complete failure of the roadway. Staff obtained three quotes from qualified contractors to
replace the culvert. The lowest of three quotes was submitted by Shenandoah General Construction (see attached). The
project budget will be established as follows:
Construction
Reserves
Total Project Budget -
$182,460
$ 5.905
$188,365
FUNDS AVAIL.: Funds will be made available in 316001-41131-563000-43031 Transportation Capital/Local Option-
Culvert Replacements.
PREVIOUS ACTION: n/a
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Board approve the emergency culvert replacement at Burger King and Merritt Ditch, waive the formal
bidding process, and authorize the Chairman to sign the construction contract with Shenandoah General Construction
in the amount of $182,460.
COMMISSION ACTION:
[X] APPROVED
[ ] OTHER:
[ ] DENIED
-
[xCounty Attorney
[x]Originating Dept. Public Works /.¿:< /'
burger King & merritt culvert.ag ,.[/
J:;r
Coord ination/S i!lnatures
[xJMgt. & Budget UtlJ 4'rJrnt,¡
[xCo. Eng Þ1>,~
[x]Revenue Coord.~t\
fx]Purchasing ~
~
,#
,..
ISHENA~R,~t~,~ I
1888 N.W. 22"'0 Street
Pompano Bcach, FL 33069
(9$4) 975-0098 Fax: (954) 975-9718
~
~
I
34.0 UNIT PRICE SCHEDULE
I
DATE: Decembcr 21, 2001
SUBMITTED TO: SI. Lucie County Engineering Dept.
STREET: 2300 Virginia A venuc
CITY, STATE 8< ZIP: Fl. Pierce, FL. 34982
PHONE: 561-221-1433
FAX: 561-462·2362
JOB LOeA TION: Town Soutl1l'laza \4891 US t)
ATTENTION: Mark Warner
l
}
....,
rROrOSAL #3501
We propose to f1lJ11ísh ~ crew and aU necessary equipment to Slip line existing 60" CMP, between
Town Soulb & Burger King at the above mentioned job IClcanon. This work win be perfonned at our
following unit prices of:
I
r!c:m I: Slip line Existin~ 60" with 54" HDPE Pipe SDR 32.5
Price includes: I) re-rounding partially crusbed pipe.
2) Soft dig 20' of offset pipe.
3) Sod reelorQ(ion
4) Injection grout undcr coru:rete drive and annular pipe space.
5) Cleaning new 54" pipe.
I
,
Item 2: Slip line Existing 60" with 54" HDPE Pipe SDR 32.5
(Drive r.TMoine heb;nd Burgcr Kinz)
Price includes: I) re-rounding partially cru..hcd pipe.
2) Injection grout under concrete drive and annular pipe space.
3) Ck....Lng DeW 54" pipe.
I
$286.00 per ft.
(EST. 54U')
$638.00 per ft.
(EST. 40')
Tottlltcm 1:
Total Item 2:
Performance & Payment 1:$o!ld:
TOTAL B
I
I
Note: Permits. if necessary, not included in this proposaL Performance a
plIss-d\tough item with a not to exceed cost of $ 2,500.00.
This proposa] may be withdrawn if not accep!c:d within 90 days. Payment tcrrna net 30 days.
I
All material is guar.luccd to be as specified.. All work to bc completed in . workmanlike manner
according to srandardpnctices. Price above is only an estimate of foreseen conditions. Unforeseen
conditions can effect the WUu\1l3t oftimc to complete the work, therefore increasing or dl!'el't'asine e"r1ma!c:.
All agreements contingent upon Strikes, accidents or dela)'!! beyond our control. . Owner to cany fire, tom~do
and other necessuy insurance. 0 rs aTe fully covered by Workman's Compensation Insurance.
I
I
SIGNA 11JRE:
SHENA NT'JOAH GENERAL CONSTRUCTION TITLE
Danny DiMura/Project Manager
ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL I SIGN &. RETURN
I
DATE
12-21-01
The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are
>lIthori7"d to do the work as specified.
I
SIGNATURE:
COMPANY NAMb:
REPRESENTATIVE:
DATE:
TI11..E:
I
00500-21
I
.~....- -"
~Mð1
'-tJ
LUCAS MARINE CONSTRUCTION, INC.
PO AOK BA07 . Hobe Sound. FL 33475· Telephono (.~61) 286-5094 FO( (561) 266-1139
Fenru¡uy S, 2002
St. I.Ul·ic COllnty Engineering
2300 Virginia I\V<'., Rm 22(,)
Ft. Pierce. F L 349a2·5652
Attn: Mark Warne!
Rc: Merritt Ditch and E.K. Pipc
(ienllcmcn:
Lucas Mmillt: CQUstl'lIctiQn pmpuscs to flll'nish all1abor, cquipment and Illalnials
necessary to install approximately 500 L.F. (II" 54" Oia. SDl02.5 pipe III {h..' exisring 60"
CMP culvcrt for Ille lump sum of$224,725.0U. The following condition~ will apply
I. The' cOllnty will ohtain pt::mlission to utilize an area approxilmllely 40' wide by
500' long along the south side of the canal \Ncst of the west Burger King
drivcway. We will be rcsponsihle IIII' rcmoving and replacing rIll' existing fence
I\nd sou amlnlulch I\I1Y disturbed areas
2. Th..~ pipe under Ih\:: ..,as! Uurger King driveway is crushed and Wlllll01 allow
passage or Lhe 54"Uill. pipe. The driveway will have to be removed ,\lid
n:placed. M.lÌntenallee of Irani" will be estahli~h<.:d for Uurger K 1I1µ (;LI~tomcrs to
cnlCl' and eXÍL using Ihe west driveway. Wt: h<tvc inclllded the cost for this work
3. We havt' included all cosl to restore dislurbL'd areas helwt:<.:n Lhlr:.~el King ami
Town South Plaz.a.
4. We have nol induded till' cost fc'\!' any testing, inspeuìon, profcs~i()nal or ¡¡<.:ILl
enginecring services, eertifiec..l as-built drawings or permits.
5. We have nut included the cost for pa)'m<.:nt and performance bl1nd~
(1. We <.:an stal1the project imlllec..li¡¡tcly following yoU!' notice 10 pn>c('ed, A Lime
exlcnsi<.1n 1()r our Cortel HII'd. J{ 2,)110 SL. Culvert J{ep!acclllcat will bt'rL't¡uired.
Thank you for Ihe nPPollunily to s\lbmillhis quotation and if YOII need allY additional
information. p¡:~asc advise.
Sincerdy.
-------------
.~~-- '"
David K. Lucas ----- -.-
Pn:sidenl
L
AGENDA REQUEST
I~MNO.~~
DATE: March 26, 2002
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [XX]
PRESENTED BY:
f!:!.:N;'~(DE5W
County Engineer
SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Engineering
SUBJECT:
Approval of Amendment NO.1 to Work Authorization NO.9 to the Agreement for Continuing Engineering
Services with LBFH, Inc., to provide final engineering design, permitting and bidding services forthe Grey
Twig Lane MSBU.
BACKGROUND:
On August 3,2000, the County received a Petition from property owners representing 78% in support
of a MSBU, to provide potable water to residents on Grey Twig Lane.
On October 10, 2000, the Board approved W.A. NO.9 with LBFH to prepare a conceptual design and
preliminary cost estimate necessary to provide the residents with a rough cost estimate.
On June 28, 2001, an informal meeting was held with the residents to discuss the design and project
cost.
On September 18, 2001, the Board created the Grey Twig Lane MSBU to provide potable water
improvements.
On March 12, 2002, the Board approved the Interlocal Agreement with the City of Port St. Lucie
establishing each parties responsibilities toward the project.
Staff is now ready to proceed with authorizing LBFH to provide the tinal design, permitting, and bidding
services for the project in the amount of $15,050.00.
FUNDS AVAIL.: Per Budget Resolution No. 01-259
PREVIOUS ACTION:
September 18, 2001 - Board created the Grey Twig Lane MSBU
October 10, 2000 - Board approved W.A. NO.9 with LBFH to prepare a
conceptual design and cost estimate
~COMMENDATI~ ..A
Staff recommends approval of the attached Amendment No. 1 to Work Authorization No. 9 to the
Agreement for Continuing Engineering Services, dated March 14,2000 with LBFH, Inc. to provide the
final design, permitting and bidding services for the Grey Twig Lane MSBU, in the amount of $15,050.00,
and authorize the Chairman to execute the Work Authorization.
COMMISSION ACTION:
RENCE:
[x] APPROVED [] DENIED
[ ] OTHER:
ouglas Anderson
County Administrator
[X]Cou nty Attorney
IX]Public Works Dir
CoordlnatlonISI!1nature~
[X ]Mgt. & BUdgetþt!) vlJ1(n&
,
[ ]UtiIDir:
I ]Purchasing
IX ]MSBU co~
IX ]Finance
(j! '. ø
1if¡
. (rISðÚ
v5.
~
'-'
~l
RESOLUTION NO. 01- 259
~
rö)E~ ~ lW ~'I¡ml
~J DEC I 7 2001 ~I
---:J
ENGINEERING
WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of the S1. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners
budget for S1. Lucie County, certain funds not anticipated at the time of adoption of the budget
have become available in the form of contributions from property owners participating in the Grey
Twig Lane Municipal Services Benefits Unit.
WHEREAS, Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, requires the Board of County Commissioners to
adopt a resolution to appropriate and expend such funds.
WHEREAS, Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, requires the Board of County Commissioners to
adopt a resolution to appropriate and expend such funds.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie
County, Florida, in meeting assembled this 23RD day of October, 2001, pursuant to Section 129.06
(d), Florida Statutes, that such funds are hereby appropriated for the fiscal year 2001-2002, and
the County's budget is hereby amended as follows:
REVENUES
399-0000-384300-38005
APPROPRIATIONS
399 -4115-563030-38005
399 -4115-563003-38005
399 -4115-563005-38005
399 -4115-563008-38005
399 -4115-563011-38005
399 -4115-563028-38005
399 -4115-549114-38005
399 -9910-599330-800
399 -9950-572100-800
399 -9950-573100-800
Proceeds-Contributions from Prop Owners
Improv oft Bldgs-Utility Improvements
Improv oft Bldgs-Survey
Improv oft Bldgs-Consulting Engineer
Improv oft Bldgs-Advertising
Improv oft Bldgs-Permits & Applications
Improv oft Bldgs-Emiironmental
General and Administrative Fees
Project Reserves
Interest - Notes
Additional Bond Expense
After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows:
Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson, Chairperson AYE
Commissioner Doug Coward, Vice Chairperson AYE
Commissioner Paula A. Lewis AYE
Commissioner Cliff Barnes AYE
Commissioner John D. Bruhn AYE
$152,000
$92,000
$ 3,500
$14,500
$ 350
$ 1 ,500
$ 1,500
$ 6,650
$15,000
$ 7,000
$10,000
\w-
~
,
J
...",
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED THIS 23"d DAY OF OCTOBER, 2001.
A TIEST:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
Ý
ESS
..
,
.
......
...",/
AMENDMENT NO. 1
WORK AUTHORIZATION NO.9
Potable Water MSBU For Grey Twig Lane
Engineering Services
Contract No. COO-03-234
Pursuant to that certain Agreement for Continuing Engineering Services (the
"Agreement") between St. Lucie County (the "County") and LBFH, Inc. (the "Engineer") dated
March 14,2000, and as Amendment No.1 to Work Authorization No.9 (COO-03-234), dated
October 10, 2000, Engineer hereby agrees to provide professional Engineering Services
under the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit' A", attached hereto and made a part of
this Work Authorization. Except as amended herein, the remaining terms and conditions of
Work Authorization No.9 shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESs WHEREOF, the County and the Engineer have executed this Work
Authorization Amendment No.1, effective this_ day of , 2001.
ATTEST:
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
DEPUTY CLERK
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND
CORRECTNESS:
COUNTY ATTORNEY
WITNESSES:
Q\'f JÅÁfU1Á- (! ~~1\-lU()~'
(It L1 j\. l~cj c.-
LBFH, r¿-. -h~c://)j
By: ~Yli ,?{~ ,Ff
; ---
Print Name: 6r 0 T7 II . tiki g¿
Title: V/(£ ¡11E5¡OUll}
g: \atty\agreemnt \ work.out \ Ibf hPW MS BUGìl.E 5 la.wpd
~ . ". .
. ~
Ief be
....,
EXHIBIT "A"
POTABLE WATER MSBU FOR GRAY TWIG LANE
SECTION 1 - SCOPE OF SERVICES
Phase 10trask 100: Limited Topographic Survey
· Obtain topographic information along intended water main route. Route
intended to be along the Southern edge of roadway of Gray Twig Lane.
Information obtained to include vegetation, property lines, surface
improvements, drainage, etc. along the route.
Phase 22trask 220: Constmction Drawings & Technical Specifications
· Prepare base plan and profile sheets for the project in AutoCAD format.
· Prepare design plan and detail sheets for utility extensions from the existing
water main within the South 25th Street right-of-way (Hawley Road).
· Detail water main design with horizontal and vertical control, fittings
configuration, restraining length, valve locations, etc.
· Work with existing utility owner along South 25th Street, as necessary, to
'determine;ànd detail the best procedures to facilitate new construction
connection to existing water mains.
· Prepare technical specifications, contract documents, and bid schedule per
St. Lucie County Standards.
· Determine specific utility design quantities and engineering estimate of
probable construction costs.
· Review design drawings with OWNER and utility, and incoqJorate
revisions.
Phase 43trask 430: FDEP Permit Application
· Prepare and submit a FDEP General Permit application for water main
extension. OWNER to pay all permit application fees.
· Submit the design drawings with the FDEP permit application to the City of
Port St. Lucie for review and approval. Make changes as required. It is
intended that prior to PSL signing the FDEP permit forms, the design
drawings must be acceptable to them.
· Respond to all "Requests for Information (RFI)" from FDEP
regarding the General Permit Application.
\\PC\projc:.cu'lOO-0245\Gray Twig u.ne AFS.OOc
Page 2 of 4
.' <'-
ßæfI1
'--'
Phase 46fTask 460: St. Lucie County Approval
· Prepare and submit a SLC Utility Pennit application.
· Respond to all "Requests for Infonnation (RFI)" from SLC
regarding the Utility Pennit Application.
Phase 61fTask 610: Bidding Services
· Prepare Project Manual.
· Prepare for and attend pre-bid meeting.
· Respond to Bidders questions and prepare all addendum's.
· Review bids and prepare summary tabulation.
· Contact bidder references
· Prepare letter for recommendation of award.
Phase 53fTask 530: Public Meetings
· Attend up to three (3) public meetings and prepare necessary exhibits as
requested, to support the MSBU Coordinator, in
order to obtain input from the residents along the project boundaries.
· Assist SLC staff as needed for the MSBU project.
SECTION 2 - DELIVERABLES
· Two sets of preliminary drawings will be submitted to St. Lucie County for
review.
· Completed FDEP pennit applications (2 copies) and SLC pennit
applications (2 copies) will be provided to SLC for signatures.
· Up to twelve (12) sets of drawings and specifications will be provided for
bidding purposes and review purposes or reproducibles.
· Up to five (5) sets of drawings and specifications will be provided for
contract documents.
SECTION 3 - SCHEDULE
· The final design shall be provided and ready to bid within 45 days of receipt
of a Purchase Order from St. Lucie County. The actual bid date may be
adjusted based on receipt of pennits from FDEP and SLC.
\\PC\projeo;ts\OO-02~S\Gr.lY Twig Lane AFS.doc
Page 3 of 4
- ,
,..~. ..
~
IËfIl
"wi
SECTION 4 - METHOD AND AMOUNT OF COMPENSATION
Compensation for this work will be in accordance with the fOllowing Phase
breakdown:
Payment
Phase Method Amount
10: Topographic Survey LS $3,100
22: Construction Drawings LS $6,550
43: FDEP Permitting LS $1,100
46: SLC Permitting LS $600
53: MSBU Coordination T&E $1,500
61: Bidding Services LS $2.200
$15,050
'.
\'Ifx:\pm~IS\OO-01~5\Gray Twig Lane AFS.doc
Page 4 of 4
·-
\w-
AGENDA REQUEST
ITEM NO. C~
DATE: March 26, 2002
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [X]
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
~
Donald B. We t, P.E.
County Engineer
SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115
SUBJECT:
Grant Application Submittal to Florida Seaport Transportation and Economic Development (FSTED) Council for
the Taylor Creek/C25 Dredging and Restoration Project.
BACKGROUND:
Currently, BCI Engineers and Scientists, Inc., is finalizing engineering design drawings and permit applications
forthe Taylor Creek/C25 Dredging and Restoration Project. The grant application is requesting $1,750,000 from
FSTED, which would represent approximately 50% of the anticipated cost to complete the Taylor Creek Project.
A similar application for the Taylor Creek Project was previously submitted in August 2000 and August 2001.
Since last August, BCI has finalized design details and researched the use of advanced technologies to separate
the spoil disposal materials. Use of advanced technologies such as chemical flocculants and mechanical belt filter
presses have been evaluated for the Taylor Creek Project. Based upon this research, the estimated cost of
construction for the project is estimated at $3.5 million dollars. (See attached report from BCI.)
FSTED has indicated that a revised Port Master Plan document consistent with the City of Ft. Pierce Land
Development Regulations must be completed before the grant funding application could receive final approval
from FSTED.
At this point in time, funding for construction of the Taylor Creek Project is proposed to be established through
the following agencies in the listed amounts:
$300,000
$600,000
$50,000
$800,000
$1,750,000
$3,500,000
St. Lucie County
State Funding through SFWMD
SJRWMD/National Estuary Program
FIND
FSTED
Total Project Budget
FUNDS AVAIL.: Funds are available in the County Port Budget in the amount of $250,000 - Account No. 140001-
4315-563000-4657. Additional funds in the amount of $50,000 will be budgeted in fiscal year2003, for a total local
match of $300,000.
PREVIOUS ACTION:
3/9/99 - Approval of Work Authorization #11 with Williams, Hatfield & Stoner in the amount of $11,000 for
preparation of FIND grant.
5/4/99 - Approval of Work Authorization #12 with Williams, Hatfield & Stoner in the amount of $25,220 for spoil
site selection process.
2/15/00 - Approval of Work Authorization #13 with Williams, Hatfield & Stoner in the amount of $86,900 for
sediment testing and analysis.
,,)J~/"" ^......................I.....t '^/........I.. A.....L..__:__...:__..LL..t A ...:.&.I- \^':II:__~_ I 1_.L.t~_I_1 n _.L_ _ _ _. .,
. , .--- --- -
'.
~ ....",.
CreeklC25 Dredging and Restoration Project.
2/5/02 - Approval of Work Authorization NO.2 with BCI in the amount of $33,050 for Shoreline Stabilization and
Improvements in Reach 2.
3/5/02 - Approval of Work Authorization NO.3 with BCI in the amount of $17,500 for cost analysis and grant
application preparation and submittal to FIND and SJRWMD.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff requests authorization for submittal of the grant application to FSTED in the amount of $1,750,000 for the
Taylor Creek/C25 Dredging and Restoration Project and execution of the application by the County Administrator.
[ X APPROVED
[ ] OTHER:
[ ] DENIED
COMMISSION ACTION:
[x]County Attorney
Coordination/Si~natures
[x]Mgt. & BUdget~
[x]Co. Eng ~Q,
[ ]Purchasing
[x]Originating Dept. Public Works
taylorc25 FSTED grant #2.ag
[ ]Budget Coord.
."
........
"'"
~ --- =.
ENGINEERS & SCIENTISTS, INC.
P.O. Box 5467
Lakeland. FL 33807-5467
(863) 667-2345
FAX: (863) 667-2662
September 19, 2001
BCI Project No. 19-10801.1
Mr. Donald B. West P.E.
St. Lucie County
2300 Virginia Avenue
Ft. Pierce, FL 34982-5652
DRAFT
Re: Taylor Creek Restoration Dredging Project
Sediment Removal Analysis DRAFT REPORT
Dear Mr. West:
BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc. (BCI) is pleased to submit this report for the
Taylor Creek Dredging Project in Fort Pierce, Florida. This report includes a summary of
the sediment characteristics, volume estimates, dredging alternatives and a cost
evaluation of sediment removal and handling options as outlined in Phase I of our
proposal.
We appreciate the opportunity to be of continued service to St. Lucie County. If
you have questions concerning the contents of this report, please do not hesitate to call
us.
Sincerely,
BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc.
~~f!~
Michael P. Kelley, P.E.
Geoteçhnical Project Manager
1/:/ '/ 'I rJi '
(II ~/ ~,~4 /
cd /ûJ;4'I0j!/~
Shailesh K. Patel, M.Sc., CPSSc.
Project Manager
MPKlSKP:js
Enclosures
cc: BCI File
T:IG1910801 10.1 lDewatering InfolTaylorDWrptdoc
'-"
....,
T ABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................1
2.0 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION .............................................................1
3.0 SEDIMENT CHARA.CTERISTICS ...................................................................2
4.0 SEDIMENT REMOVAL ALTERNATIVES.....................................................2
5.0 D REDGED MATERIAL PROCESSIN G...........................................................3
6.0 DISPOSAL OPTIONS AND COST EVALUATION ........................................4
7.0 CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................................................6
8.0 REFERENCES......................................................................................................7
TABLE
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Taylor Creek Sediments - Average Physical Characteristics
Option 1 - Estimated Cost Range
Option 2 - Estimated Cost Range
Option 3 - Estimated Cost Range
FIGURES
Figure 1
Taylor Creek Restoration Dredging Project Area
'-'
Taylor Creek Restoration Project
Sediment Removal Analysis Draft Report
':'J
BCI Project No. 19-10801.1
September 2001
1.0 INTRODUCTION
BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc., (BCl) was engaged by St. Lucie County to
assess the removal of sediments from Taylor Creek, located adjacent to the Intracoastal
Waterway (Indian River Lagoon) in Ft. Pierce, Florida. This report provides an
evaluation of sediment removal and management alternatives as outlined in Phase I of
our proposal. Information in this report is based on sediment studies completed by BCI
and Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. in December 1998 and June 2000.
2.0 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION
The Taylor Creek Restoration project area consists of the western right-of-way of
the Intracoastal Waterway (ICW) to the east, and the South Florida Water Management
District's (SFWMD) Canal No. 25 (C-25) spillway and the Fort Pierce Farms Water
Control District Canal No.1 (F-l spillway) to the west (Figure 1). Approximately
200,000 cubic yards (CY) of sediments have been targeted for removal within Taylor
Creek to improve navigational access and water quality. For sediment removal, Taylor
Creek has been divided into two reaches and are defined as follows:
· Reach No.1: The area between the Florida East Coast Railroad (FECRR)
Bridge and the western right-of-way of the ICW
· Reach No.2: The area between the FECRR bridge and the C-25 Canal
spillway (S-50) and submerged weir at the F-I canal
A third reach, which includes the canals located behind the weir structures, was
initially planned for restoration. This reach has since been removed from consideration
due to the lack of significant muck deposits within the canals and cost considerations.
Approximately 90,000 CY of sediment will be removed from Reach No.1 to
reestablish a navigational channel depth of -12.5 feet from Mean Sea Level (MSL). The
average depth to the top of sediment in Reach No. 1 is six to seven feet. Approximately
30,000 CY of fine-grained, organic-bearing muck sediments outside of the navigation
channel will also be removed as part of the environmental restoration. The total volume
of sediment to be removed from Reach No.1 is approximately 120,000 CY.
Reach No.2 will entail the removal of approximately 80,000 CY of sediment to
reestablish the design· channel depth to -12.5 feet (MSL). Reach No.2 has isolated
pockets of fine-grained muck and layers of sand from the eroded creek banks.
1
Taylor C~Restoration Project
Sediment Removal Analysis Draft Report
..."",
BCI Project No. 19-10801.1
September 2001
3.0 SEDIMENT CHARACTERISTICS
Investigations were completed in 1998 and 2000 to determine the extent, volume
and physical properties of the sediments in Taylor Creek. As determined by the previous
investigations, the physical characteristics of the sediments varied greatly based on
location and depth in the creek.
The sediments in Reach No.1 are predominantly fine-grained (greater than 50%
passing No. 200 mesh sieve). The sediments in Reach No.2 are predominantly sandy
(less than 50% passing the No. 200 sieve) with isolated pockets of fine-grained material
along the south side of the creek. The sandy surface sediments are likely from erosion of
the steep creek banks.
The combined average physical characteristics for both reaches of Taylor Creek is
54% solids content, 50% fines and a specific gravity of 2.60. A summary of physical
characteristics is presented in Table 1. The organic content of the sediment samples is
typically less than 10% with a few samples showing greater than 20%. These sediment
properties yield an estimated 136,000 dry tons of solids to be removed and managed.
Table 1
Taylor Creek Sediments
Average Physical Characteristics
Location Estimated Average Average Average Estimated
Volume to be Solids Percent Passing Organic Dry Tons
Removed Content No. 200 Sieve Content
..... (cllbicvårds) (%) (%) (%)
Reach No. 1 120,000 56 48 6 81,500
Reach No.2 80,000 50 54 8 54,500
4.0 SEDIMENT REMOVAL ALTERNATIVES
A previous study (BCI, 2000) determined that hydraulic dredging would be the
most effective method to remove the Taylor Creek sediments. The sediments would be
dredged and pumped in a slurry form via pipeline to a nearby (within five miles)
disposal/material processing site. Mechanical dredging was evaluated, but was not cost
effective as compared to hydraulic dredging.
Based on experience from similar sized projects, hydraulic dredging of 200,000
CY (1,500 CY/day) can be completed in five to seven months. The dredging rate could
vary depending on the size of the dredge and booster pumps, but the production will
likely be controlled by the rate at which the slurry can be processed and disposed.
Currently, dewatering techniques can effectively handle a direct flow of approximately
1,000 to 1,500 gpm. However, new technologies that can process higher direct flows
have recently been developed.
2
'-'
Taylor Creek Restoration Project
Sediment Removal Analysis Draft Report
BCI Pro'Jl!tNo. 19-10801.1
September 2001
5.0 DREDGED MATERIAL PROCESSING
The hydraulic dredging process creates a slurry of sediment and water, that is
pumped from the dredging area to an upland disposal site or material processing site. The
dredged sediment slurry typically expands to eight to ten times the volume of the in-situ
sediment. Therefore, 200,000 CY of in-situ sediment would be diluted to 1,000,000 to
2,000,000 CY of slurry. This volume will require a series of mechanical and/or chemical
processes to reduce the slurry volume and permanently dispose of the sediments. The
treatment and disposal methods are based on many factors including location and
availability ofland, processing techniques and final disposallocation(s).
The volume and types of material produced during dredging is dependent on the
sediment characteristics, methods of treatment and final disposal option. Treatments may
involve water clarification, separation of the sand and muck fractions, and the use of
chemical (flocculents) and mechanical (belt filter press, centrifuge, etc.) dewatering
equipment.
Water Clarification
Hydraulic dredging will utilize creek water to dilute the sediment to create a
pumpable slurry. The creek water utilized to dilute the slurry must be returned to a near-
by water body. This process water will have high turbidity (suspended solids), which
must be clarified before released into the receiving water body. Water clarification
techniques include the use of settling tanks or retention ponds in combination with
chemical flocculants, which accelerates the settling process.
Sand Processing
If the coarse fraction of the dredge slurry is processed and separated from the
fines, the processing will yield approximately 50,000 CY of fine sand at 70 to 80% solids
content with less than 5% fines. This sand/shell material can be utilized as fill on public
projects such as parks, golf courses and for erosion repair. However, geotechnical testing
for specific use is recommended.
Fines Processing
During separation of the sand from the slurry, the fines (muck) are passed through
a mechanical system and can be either deposited into an upland disposal area or further
treated with mechanical or chemical processes. If pumped into an upland disposal area,
the fmes will settle out to a final solids content of between 10 to 20%, and will occupy a
volume of approximately 500,000 to 700,000 cubic yards. This volume would require a
disposal site area between 20 and 30 acres in size with embankments 10 to 15 feet high.
If the fines are mechanically processed (dewatered), the solids content can be
increased to approximately 35 to 40% solids. This dewatered "muck cake" can be hauled
to a final disposal site or stockpiled for future beneficial reuse. Testing for a specific
reuse is recommended.
3
, ,
Taylor Cr~Restoration Project
Sediment Removal Analysis Draft Report
..""
BCI Project No. 19-10801.1
September 2001
6.0 DISPOSAL OPTIONS AND COST EVALUATION
Three dredge and disposal options and estimated costs are presented below.
These options represent the low to high end of estimated costs for the project. The costs
primarily vary due to the amount of processing required for each option. Depending on
the available disposal options and the required process, the cost will likely fall within the
range of costs presented. Other factors such as upland site vegetation coverage,
topography, and elevation also impact cost.
Option 1: Dispose Dredged Sediments at a Permanent Upland Site
· Construct a containment area with approximately 700,000 CY of
storage capacity (30 acre pond with IS-foot high berms)
· Hydraulically dredge 200,000 cubic yards (in-situ) of sediment and
pump slurry into containment area
· Clarify return water through chemical flocculants and natural settling
· Allow material to dry naturally
· Reclaim site or reuse material as needed
Table 2
Option 1 Estimated Cost Range
ACTIVITY RANGE
Disposal Site Construction $500,000 to $750,000
Dredeine $1,000,000 to $1,300,000
Water Clarification $50,000 to $70,000
Site Reclamation $100,000 to $200,000
Estimated Cost $1,650,000 to $2,320,000
Option 2: Process Fine-Grained Dredged Sediments at Temporary Upland
Site
· Construct containment site with 300,000 CY of storage volume (15
acre pond with IS-foot high berms)
· Hydraulically dredge 200,000 CY of sediment and pump slurry into
containment site
· Clarify return water through chemical flocculants and natural settling
· Dredge fines from the containment area to a mechanical dewatering
system during (and after) the creek dredging operation
· Haul 200,000 to 225,000 CY of dewatered muck cake and sand to final
disposal sites
· Reclaim containment area
4
'-
Taylor Creek Restoration Project
Sediment Removal Analysis Draft Report
'!WI
BCI Project No. 19-10801.1
September 2001
Table 3
Option 2 Estimated Cost Range
ACTIVITY RANGE
Disposal Site Construction $300,000 to $500,000
Dredl!ine $1,000,000 to $1,300,000
Water Clarification $50,000 to $70,000
Mechanical Processing $1,500,000 to $2,500,000
Handling and Hauling $600,000 to $1,000,000
Site Reclamation $100,000 to $200,000
Estimated Cost $3,550,000 to $5,570,000
Option 3: Process All Sediments at Temporary Site
· Prepare temporary processing site (one to three acres) with areas for
processing equipment, material stockpiling and handling, and hauling
roads
· Setup material processing facility which would include a combination
of hydro cyclones, settling tanks and belt filter presses
· Dredge 200,000 CY of sediments and pump slurry to processing
facility
· Stockpile, load and haul 200,000 to 225,000 CY of dewatered
sediments to fmal disposal sites during dredging operations
· Reclaim processing site after completion of dredging
Table 4
Option 3 Estimated Costs Range
ACTIVITY . RANGE
Processing Site Preparation & Reclamation $25,000
Dredl!inl! $1,000,000 to $1,300,000
Material Processine $2,400,000 to $3,000,000
Handline and Haulinl! $600,000 to $1,000,000
Estimated Cost $4,025,000 to $5,325,000
5
~
Taylor Creek Restoration Project
Sediment Removal Analysis Draft Report
....,
BCI Project No. 19-10801.1
September 2001
7.0 CONCLUSIONS
After evaluating the quantity and actual location of muck sediments and available
funding, BCI recommends that only two (Reaches I and 2) out of the three reaches
previously evaluated from Taylor Creek, be considered for removal of 200,000 CY of
sediment. The overall physical characteristics of the sediment in both reaches are fairly
similar with approximately 50% and sand/shell and 50% fine-grained fraction. However,
each reach was found to contain distinct muck pockets. Previous reports (BCI, 2000)
recommended hydraulic dredging as the most cost effective method for sediment
removal.
Option I, which includes disposing the material at a permanent containment site,
is the least expensive option with estimated costs ranging from $1,700,000 to $2,300,000.
The county has previously expressed that a permanent disposal site is not a desirable
option. Options 2 and 3 include temporary disposal options, either pumping the dredged
sediments into a temporary containment area and then processing for final disposal or
processing the sediments directly from the dredge pipeline for final disposal. The
estimated costs for Options 2 and 3 range from approximately $3,500,000 to $5,600,000.
Option 2 is recommended if a suitable temporary disposal area is available and Option 3
is recommended if a suitable disposal area is not available. The increase in cost from a
permanent disposal option to a temporary disposal option is primarily due to the increase
in material processing and handling.
The cost estimate for material removal and management presented in this report
will be refined once the dredged material management site(s) and desired disposal option
has been identified. The bid process would likely allow the contractors to provide their
own material management methodology based on the available area.
6
Taylor C~: Restoration Project
Sediment Removal Analysis Draft Report
"""""
BCI Project No. 19-10801.1
September 2001
8.0 REFERENCES
I. BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc. "Taylor Creek Restoration, St. Lucie County,
Sediment Characterization Report", 1998
2. BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc. and Williams Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. ''Taylor
Creek Restoration Project, Data Collection and Sediment Removal Feasibility,"
2000.
7
~
~
\.-
~ Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 3
+
--- -- -
ENGINEERS & SCIENTISTS. NC.
2000 E. EDGEWOOD DRIVE, LAKELAND, FL 33883
PHONE: (863) 667-2345
lIEVJSED:
ST LUCIE COUNTY
FIGURE 1
TAYLOR CREEK RESTORATION
DREDGING PROJECT AREA
,;¡
Ii!
º DATE: 8-30-01
DRAWN BY: NAT
SCALE:
NOT TO SCALE
PROJECT NO. 19-10801
1.
'-'
AGENDA REQUEST
....."
ITEM NO. C-2i
DATE: March 26, 2002
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [X]
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115
PRESENTED BY:
~~~~.6)~
([)onald B. Wes P.E.
County Engineer
SUBJECT:
Grant Application Submittal to Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND) for the Taylor Creek/C25 Dredging and
Restoration Project and Attached Resolution No. 02-90
BACKGROUND:
Currently, BCI Engineers and Scientists, Inc., is finalizing engineering design drawings and permit applications
for the Taylor Creek/C25 Dredging and Restoration Project. The grant application is requesting $800,000 from
FIND, which would represent approximately 23% of the anticipated cost to construct the Taylor Creek Project.
A similar application for $100,000 was previously approved by FIND in August 1999 for design costs.
Since last August, BCI has finalized design details and researched the use of advanced technologies to separate
the spoil disposal materials. Use of advanced technologies such as chemical flocculants and mechanical belt filter
presses have been evaluated for the Taylor Creek Project. Based upon this research, the estimated cost of
construction for the project is estimated at $3.5 million dollars. (See attached report from BCI.)
At this point in time, funding for construction of the Taylor Creek Project is proposed to be established through
the following agencies in the listed amounts:
$300,000
$600,000
$50,000
$800,000
$1.750,000
$3,500,000
St. Lucie County
State Funding through SFWMD
SJRWMD/National Estuary Program
FIND
FSTED
Total Project Budget
FUNDS AVAIL.: Funds are available in the County Port Budget in the amount of $250,000 - Account No. 140001-
4315-563000' -4657. Additional funds in the amount of $50,000 will be budgeted in fiscal year 2003 for a total local
match of $300,000
PREVIOUS ACTION:
3/9/99 - Approval of Work Authorization #11 with Williams, Hatfield & Stoner in the amount of $11,000 for
preparation of FIND grant.
5/4/99 - Approval of Work Authorization #12 with Williams, Hatfield & Stoner in the amount of $25,220 for spoil
site selection process.
2/15/00 - Approval of Work Authorization #13 with Williams, Hatfield & Stoner in the amount of $86,900 for
sediment testing and analysis.
3/7/00 - Approval of Work Authorization #14 with Williams, Hatfield & Stoner in the amount of $32,200 for a
hydrogeologic study of the groundwater at the Seminole property.
5/1/01 -Approval of Work Authorization #1 with BCI in the amount of $137,000 for design and permitting of Taylor
Creek Project.
8/14/01 - Approval of grant application submittal to FSTED in the amount of $700,000 for Taylor Creek/C25
Dredging and Restoration Project.
2/5/02 - Approval of Work Authorization #2 with BCI in the amount of $33,050 for the Taylor Creek Restoration
Dredging Project Shoreline Stabilization and Improvements Reach 2.
3/5/02 -Approval of Work Authorization NO.3 with BCI Engineers, Inc., in the amount of $17,500 for cost analysis
'W"
'tr-
\....-
and grant application preparation and submittal to FIND and SJRWMD.
,.."
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff requests authorization for submittal of a grant application to FIND in the amount of $800,000 for the Taylor
Creek/C25 Dredging and Restoration Project and Resolution No. 02-90, and execution by the County
Administrator.
COMMISSION ACTION:
j
[xl APPROVED [ ] DENIED
[ ] OTHER:
[x]County Attorney ¡~
[x]Originating Dept. PU~liC Works ¡t~
taylorc25 FIND grant#2.ag
Coord ination/S i!lnatures
[x]Mgt. & Budget .JVf MlVl&¡
[X]Co.Eng~
[ ]Purchasing
[x]Budget Coord.
'-"
RESOLUTION NO. 02-90
ATTACHMENT E-6
RESOLUTION FOR ASSISTANCE
UNDER THE FLORIDA INLAND NAVIGATION DISTRICT
WATERWAYS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
"WI
WHEREAS, THE St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners is interested in carrying out
the following described project for the enjoyment of the citizenry of St. Lucie County and the State of
Florida:
Project Title:
Taylor Creek/C25 Dredging and Restoration Proiect
Total Estimated Cost:
$3.500,000
Brief Description of Project: Navigation and muck sediment removal in Taylor Creek to improve
navigation and water quality, including shoreline stabilization.
AND, Florida Inland Navigation District financial assistance is required for the program mentioned
aboye,
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the St. Lucie County Board of Count v Commissioners that
the project described above be authorized,
AND, be it further resolved that said St. Lucie Countv Board of County Commissioners make
application to the Florida Inland Navigation District in the amount of 23 % of the actual cost ofthe project
in behalf of said St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners
AND, be it further resolved by the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners that it certifies
the following:
1. That it will accept the terms and conditions set forth in FIND Rule 66B-2 F.A.C. and which
will be a part of the Project Agreement for any assistance awarded under the attached proposal.
2. That it is in complete accord with the attached proposal and that it will carry out the Program
in the manner described in the proposal and any plans and specifications attached thereto unless prior
approval for any change has been received from the District.
3. That it has the ability and intention to finance its share of the cost of the project and that the
project will be operated and maintained at the expense of said St. Lucie Countv Board of County
Commissioners for public use.
4. That it will not discriminate against any person on the basis of race, color, or national origin
in the use of any property or facility acquired or developed pursuant to this proposal, and shall comply with
the terms and intent of the Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, P.L. 88-352 (1964) and design and
construct all facilities to comply fully with statutes relating to accessibility by handicapped persons as well
as other federal, state and local laws, rules and requirements.
5. That it will maintain adequate financial records on the proposed project to substantiate claims
for reimbursement.
1
· 6. Th\..,..- will make available to FIND if requested, a post-audit of e) "wises incurred on the
project prior to, or m conjunction with, request for the final 10% of the funding agreed to by FIND.
This is to certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly and legally adopted
by the St. Lucie County Board of Countv Commissioners at a legal meeting held on this day
of 2002.
Attest
Signature
Title
Title
2
.",!"
\..,,-
""""
P.O. Box 5467
Lakeland, FL 33807-5467
~-- =.
ENGINEERS & SCIENTISTS, INC.
(863) 667-2345
FAX: (863) 667-2662
September 19,2001
BCI Project No. 19-10801.1
Mr. Donald B. West P.E.
St. Lucie County
2300 Virginia Avenue
Ft. Pierce, FL 34982-5652
DRAFT
Re: Taylor Creek Restoration Dredging Project
Sediment Removal Analysis DRAFT REPORT
Dear Mr. West:
BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc. (BCl) is pleased to submit this report for the
Taylor Creek Dredging Project in Fort Pierce, Florida. This report includes a summary of
the sediment characteristics, volume estimates, dredging alternatives and a cost
evaluation of sediment removal and handling options as outlined in Phase I of our
proposal.
We appreciate the opportunity to be of continued service to St. Lucie County. If
you have questions concerning the contents of this report, please do not hesitate to call
us.
Sincerely,
BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc.
~~/~
Michael P. Kelley, P.E.
Ge0,t~;hnical projVJ;ect Manager
f,: . / ,
dð{i,l,./k!Z/~
Shailesh K. Patel, M.Sc., CPSSc.
Project Manager
MPK/SKP:js
Enclosures
cc: BeT File
T:\G 191 ORO] \0. ] \Dewatering Info\ TaylorDWrpt.doc
'-'
-...I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................1
2.0 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION .............................................................1
3.0 SED lME NT CHARA CTERlSTI CS .. ......................... ............... ..................... ....2
4.0 SEDIMENT REMOVAL AL TERNATIVES.....................................................2
5.0 DREDGED MATERIAL PROCESSING...........................................................3
6.0 DISPOSAL OPTIONS AND COST EVALUATION ........................................4
7.0 CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................................................6
8.0 REFERENCES...................................................................................................... 7
TABLE
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Taylor Creek Sediments - Average Physical Characteristics
Option 1 - Estimated Cost Range
Option 2 - Estimated Cost Range
Option 3 - Estimated Cost Range
FIGURES
Figure 1
Taylor Creek Restoration Dredging Project Area
'-'
Taylor Creek Restoration Project
Sediment Removal Analysis Draft Report
'WfI
BCI Project No. 19-10801.1
September 2001
1.0 INTRODUCTION
BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc., (BCI) was engaged by St. Lucie County to
assess the removal of sediments from Taylor Creek, located adjacent to the Intracoastal
Waterway (Indian River Lagoon) in Ft. Pierce, Florida. This report provides an
evaluation of sediment removal and management alternatives as outlined in Phase I of
our proposal. Information in this report is based on sediment studies completed by BCI
and Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. in December 1998 and June 2000.
2.0 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION
The Taylor Creek Restoration project area consists of the western right-of-way of
the Intracoastal Waterway (ICW) to the east, and the South Florida Water Management
District's (SFWMD) Canal No. 25 (C-25) spillway and the Fort Pierce Farms Water
Control District Canal No.1 (F-I spillway) to the west (Figure 1). Approximately
200,000 cubic yards (CY) of sediments have been targeted for removal within Taylor
Creek to improve navigational access and water quality. For sediment removal, Taylor
Creek has been divided into two reaches and are defined as follows:
· Reach No.1: The area between the Florida East Coast Railroad (FECRR)
Bridge and the western right-of-way of the ICW
· Reach No.2: The area between the FECRR bridge and the C-25 Canal
spillway (S-50) and submerged weir at the F-l canal
A third reach, which includes the canals located behind the weir structures, was
initially planned for restoration. This reach has since been removed from consideration
due to the lack of significant muck deposits within the canals and cost considerations.
Approximately 90,000 CY of sediment will be removed from Reach No.1 to
reestablish a navigational channel depth of -12.5 feet from Mean Sea Level (MSL). The
average depth to the top of sediment in Reach No. I is six to seven feet. Approximately
30,000 CY of fine-grained, organic-bearing muck sediments outside of the navigation
channel will also be removed as part of the environmental restoration. The total volume
of sediment to be removed from Reach No.1 is approximately 120,000 CY.
Reach No.2 will entail the removal of approximately 80,000 CY of sediment to
reestablish the design' channel depth to -12.5 feet (MSL). Reach No.2 has isolated
pockets of fine-grained muck and layers of sand from the eroded creek banks.
1
Taylor cre.),restoration Project
Sediment Removal Analysis Draft Report
....",
BCI Project No. 19-10801.1
September 2001
3.0 SEDIMENT CHARACTERISTICS
Investigations were completed in 1998 and 2000 to determine the extent, volume
and physical properties of the sediments in Taylor Creek. As determined by the previous
investigations, the physical characteristics of the sediments varied greatly based on
location and depth in the creek.
The sediments in Reach No. 1 are predominantly fine-grained (greater than 50%
passing No. 200 mesh sieve). The sediments in Reach No.2 are predominantly sandy
(less than 50% passing the No. 200 sieve) with isolated pockets of fine-grained material
along the south side of the creek. The sandy surface sediments are likely from erosion of
the steep creek banks.
The combined average physical characteristics for both reaches of Taylor Creek is
54% solids content, 50% fines and a specific gravity of 2.60. A summary of physical
characteristics is presented in Table 1. The organic content of the sediment samples is
typically less than 10% with a few samples showing greater than 20%. These sediment
properties yield an estimated 136,000 dry tons of solids to be removed and managed.
Table 1
Taylor Creek Sediments
Average Physical Characteristics
Location
56
50
Average
PercentPassing
Nov200 Sieve
%
48
54
Average
Organic
Content
%
6
8
Estimated
Dry Tons
Reach No. 1
Reach No.2
81,500
54,500
4.0 SEDIMENT REMOVAL ALTERNATIVES
A previous study (BCI, 2000) determined that hydraulic dredging would be the
most effective method to remove the Taylor Creek sediments. The sediments would be
dredged and pumped in a slurry form via pipeline to a nearby (within five miles)
disposal/material processing site. Mechanical dredging was evaluated, but was not cost
effective as compared to hydraulic dredging.
Based on experience from similar sized projects, hydraulic dredging of 200,000
CY (1,500 CY/day) can be completed in five to seven months. The dredging rate could
vary depending on the size of the dredge and booster pumps, but the production will
likely be controlled by the rate at which the slurry can be processed and disposed.
Currently, dewatering techniques can effectively handle a direct flow of approximately
1,000 to 1,500 gpm. However, new technologies thaI can process higher direct flows
have recently been developed. .
2
Taylor Cre~estoration Project
Sediment Removal Analysis Draft Report
BCI pro~No. 19-10801.1
September 2001
5.0 DREDGED MATERIAL PROCESSING
The hydraulic dredging process creates a slurry of sediment and water, that is
pumped from the dredging area to an upland disposal site or material processing site. The
dredged sediment slurry typically expands to eight to ten times the volume of the in-situ
sediment. Therefore, 200,000 CY of in-situ sediment would be diluted to 1,000,000 to
2,000,000 CY of slurry. This volume will require a series of mechanical and/or chemical
processes to reduce the slurry volume and permanently dispose of the sediments. The
treatment and disposal methods are based on many factors including location and
availability ofland, processing techniques and final disposallocation(s).
The volume and types of material produced during dredging is dependent on the
sediment characteristics, methods of treatment and final disposal option. Treatments may
involve water clarification, separation of the sand and muck fractions, and the use of
chemical (flocculents) and mechanical (belt filter press, centrifuge, etc.) dewatering
equipment.
Water Clarification
Hydraulic dredging will utilize creek water to dilute the sediment to create a
pumpable slurry. The creek water utilized to dilute the slurry must be returned to a near-
by water body. This process water will have high turbidity (suspended solids), which
must be clarified before released into the receiving water body. Water clarification
techniques include the use of settling tanks or retention ponds in combination with
chemical flocculants, which accelerates the settling process.
Sand Processin~
If the coarse fraction of the dredge slurry is processed and separated from the
fines, the processing will yield approximately 50,000 CY of fine sand at 70 to 80% solids
content with less than 5% fines. This sand/shell material can be utilized as fill on public
projects such as parks, golf courses and for erosion repair. However, geotechnical testing
for specific use is recommended.
'Fines Processinl!
During separation of the sand from the slurry, the fines (muck) are passed through
a mechanical system and can be either deposited into an upland disposal area or further
treated with mechanical or chemical processes. If pumped into an upland disposal area,
the fines will settle out to a final solids content of between 10 to 20%, and will occupy a
volume of approximately 500,000 to 700,000 cubic yards. This volume would require a
disposal site area between 20 and 30 acres in size with embankments 10 to 15 feet high.
If the fines are mechanically processed (dewatered), the solids content can be
increased to approximately 35 to 40% solids. This dewatered "muck cake" can be hauled
to a final disposal site or stockpiled for future beneficial reuse. Testing for a specific
reuse is recommended. '
3
Taylor ere~estoration Project
Sediment Removal Analysis Draft Report
'w1I
Bel Project No. 19-10801.1
September 2001
6.0 DISPOSAL OPTIONS AND COST EVALUATION
Three dredge and disposal options and estimated costs are presented below.
These options represent the low to high end of estimated costs for the project. The costs
primarily vary due to the amount of processing required for each option. Depending on
the available disposal options and the required process, the cost will likely fall within the
range of costs presented. Other factors such as upland site vegetation coverage,
topography, and elevation also impact cost.
Option 1: Dispose Dredged Sediments at a Permanent Upland Site
· Construct a containment area with approximately 700,000 CY of
storage capacity (30 acre pond with IS-foot high berms)
· Hydraulically dredge 200,000 cubic yards (in-situ) of sediment and
pump slurry into containment area
· Clarify return water through chemical flocculants and natural settling
· Allow material to dry naturally
· Reclaim site or reuse material as needed
Table 2
Option 1 Estimated Cost Range
ACTIVITY RANGE
DisDosal Site Construction $500,000 to $750,000
Dred!!ine $1,000,000 to $1,300,000
Water Clarification $50,000 to $70,000
Site Reclamation $100,000 to $200,000
Estimated Cost $1,650,000 to $2,320,000
Option 2: Process Fine-Grained Dredged Sediments at Temporary Upland
Site
· Construct containment site with 300,000 CY of storage volume (IS
acre pond with IS-foot high berms)
· Hydraulically dredge 200,000 CY of sediment and pump slurry into
containment site
· Clarify return water through chemical flocculants and natural settling
· Dredge fines from the containment area to a mechanical dewatering
system during (and after) the creek dredging operation
· Haul 200,000 to 225,000 CY of dewatered muck cake and sand to final
disposal sites
· Reclaim containment area
4
'.
Taylor ere~estoration Project
Sediment Removal Analysis Draft Report
BCI PrOjèC1'No.19-10801.1
September 2001
Table 3
Option 2 Estimated Cost Range
ACTIVITY .... ". ....... ~ºE
Disposal Site Construction $300,000 to $500,000
Dredeine $1,000,000 to $1,300,000
Water Clarification $50,000 to $70,000
Mechanical Processing $1,500,000 to $2,500,000
Handling and Hauling $600,000 to $1,000,000
Site Reclamation $100,000 to $200,000
Estimated Cost $3,550,000 to $5,570,000
Option 3: Process All Sediments at Temporary Site
· Prepare temporary processing site (one to three acres) with areas for
processing equipment, material stockpiling and handling, and hauling
roads
· Setup material processing facility which would include a combination
of hydro cyclones, settling tanks and belt filter presses
. Dredge 200,000 CY of sediments and pump slurry to processing
facility
· Stockpile, load and haul 200,000 to 225,000 CY of dewatered
sediments to final disposal sites during dredging operations
. Reclaim processing site after completion of dredging
Table 4
Option 3 Estimated Costs Range
ACTIVITY ~GE
Processine Site Preparation & Reclamation $25,000
Dredgine $1,000,000 to $1,300,000
Material Processing $2,400,000 to $3,000,000
Handling and Hauline $600,000 to $1,000,000
Estimated Cost $4,025,000 to $5,325,000
5
Taylor Cree~storation Project
Sediment Removal Analysis Draft Report
.....,
BCI Project No. 19-10801.1
September 2001
7.0 CONCLUSIONS
After evaluating the quantity and actual location of muck sediments and available
funding, BCI recommends that only two (Reaches 1 and 2) out of the three reaches
previously evaluated from Taylor Creek, be considered' for removal of 200,000 CY of
sediment. The overall physical characteristics of the sediment in both reaches are fairly
similar with approximately 50% and sand/shell and 50% fine-grained fraction. However,
each reach was found to contain distinct muck pockets. Previous reports (BCI, 2000)
recommended hydraulic dredging as the most cost effective method for sediment
removal.
Option 1, which includes disposing the material at a permanent containment site,
is the least expensive option with estimated costs ranging from $1,700,000 to $2,300,000.
The county has previously expressed that a permanent disposal site is not a desirable
option. Options 2 and 3 include temporary disposal options, either pumping the dredged
sediments into a temporary containment area and then processing for final disposal or
processing the sediments directly from the dredge pipeline for final disposal. The
estimated costs for Options 2 and 3 range from, approxÎri1ately $3,500,000 to $5,600,000.
Option 2 is recommended if a suitable temporary disposal area is available and Option 3
is recommended if a suitable disposal area is not available. The increase in cost from a
permanent disposal option to a temporary disposal option is primarily due to the increase
in material processing and handling.
The cost estimate for material removal and management presented in this report
will be refmed once the dredged material management site(s) and desired disposal option
has been identified. The bid process would likely allow the contractors to provide their
own material management methodology based on the available area.
6
Taylor Cre~estoration Project
Sediment Removal Analysis Draft Report
BCI Proj~o. 19-10801.1
September 2001
8.0 REFERENCES
1. BCl Engineers & Scientists, Inc. ''Taylor Creek Restoration, St. Lucie County,
Sediment Characterization Report", 1998
2. BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc. and Williams Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. ''Taylor
Creek Restoration Project, Data Collection and Sediment Removal Feasibility,"
2000.
7
~
~
'-'
~ Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 3
+
. $ C- -_
ENGINEERS & SCIENTISTS. NC.
2000 E. EDGEWOOD DRIVE, LAKELAND, FL 33803
PHONE: (863) 667-2345
REVISED:
--
ST LUCIE COUNTY
FIGURE 1
TAYLOR CREEK RESTORATION
DREDGING PROJECT AREA
,;¡
g
R DATE: 8-30-01
DRAWN BY: NAT
SCALE:
NOT TO SCALE
PROJEcrNO~ '19-10801
y/
\...
....,
AGENDA REQUEST
ITEM NO. C-2i
REVISED
DATE: March 26, 2002
CONSENT [X]
REGULAR ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
Leg. [ ] Quasi-JD. [
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Public Works/ERD/Oxbow Eco-Center
PRESENTED BY:
~~
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SUBJECT:
Budget Amendment BA02-129/ Equipment Re~..:est EQ02-210
BACKGROUND:
The Oxbow Eco-Center requests purchasing a four-barrel recycling
center to encourage good stewardship and 'green' practices at the
Center. The recycling system will be purchased with Department of
Environmental Protection FRDAP grant monies, which was recently
extended to allow use of excess funds. The manufacturer of the
recycling center, Plastic Lumber, is a sc:e source because of the
compactness and clean look of the system, which will be placed on
our front porch. The cost of the cer:ter is $1,300.00 plus
approximately $200.00 in shipping costs.
FUNDS AVAIL. :
Funds are available in
transfèrred via the Budget
(Improvements O/T Bldg)
. n. y.. 'J J
001243-7240-563000-7134 and will be
Amendment to OCl243-7240-564000-7134.
(Machinery & Equip)
PREVIOUS ACTION:
n/a
COMMISSION ACTION:
[X] APPROVED
[ ] OTHER:
Staff recorrunends approval of Budget Amend:: r:t BA02-129 and Equipment
Request EQ02-210. Staff recommends ceptance of plastic
lumber as a sole source for thO item.
CONC CE:
RECOMMENDATION:
County Attorney: ~~
Originating Dept:
Finance: (copies only :
Coordination
Mgt & Budget:
Other:
--'
DENIED
gl sAnderson
y Admi.nistrator
Pu-.""Chasing :
other :
{'
\.-
'WI'
m C- o 0
0 c: <: m
c: CJI Cñ "tJ
=ti -i :Þ
:!: :;; Õ ~
m Õ z :!:
z :Þ
-i -i m
Õ z
;;0 :-:'
m z
0
;II:
IT! C/) ~ tr ~ b' 1)
0 0 ::,.(1) ..., S-
O ~ õ' (ìJ ¡¡¡ ~
'}> OJ ::,. 0 '<: -, ?f
N --::r"" C') S!?. ~
..... g;D)Q~CD
0 (1)C/)(1)'O::J
'<:~~O~ ~
OJ "tJ :-i (1) ~ C/)
(ìJOJ::,'::J::,.
~ëL;(t)éDo-
Cl:i.-.."'b"'"'rn
g (1) OJ 50 5'
08~~'O
o ()' --
::J::Js.~~
...."tJOJO
(1) OJ .... t:: 0
~, §- ~ Q: g.
fi)CD~~-
:J~CDQQj'
'"-Cñ~~~
:Þ OJ Ò' ~ :S,.;¿: ;;0
::J .... (1) C/)
(") §,..., ::,. ~ Ò' m
(") "tJ(1)OJ~"" (")
0 o ~ <: (Jj '0' 0
c: 5}~~õ(ìJ :!:
Z :::Jo-=:7C/)C'O :!:
-i --0 CD:::) m
z "" (1) C/)"tJ ' Z
OJC/)(1)QJ"tJ
c: Q.(l):Jõ3è1 0
:!: o ::J êij' - 0 m
OJ ~o.. \D....,. !=?
m OJ (Q OJ 50 Õ'
;;0 ::':Q)"'(t)~
:to ë3- CE" ~'-
(1) OJ (1)'0 50 ~
~~':>CE:; (1) C/)
0' Q Ct 0
, (1) QJ X
();!~(QCt
(1) (1) ::J (1) 0
::J _ C/) ~
(DOOO
~g~-~
5)550
s.tQ -- I
(1).¡,.(ìJ()
<:> ,." (1)
<:> (Jj Ct~ ~
~ ::,.OJC)(1)
.... Q)=::èJ-'
'1> <:£tCt~
i\! (1)....(õ0
-(1) t::
.... §, C'J :3 Q:
'? ~ ~ Q) :::-
'"
~ (1) -'
QS:~@"
<:> 0'0,[,-
<:>
<:> "tJ C'J êi;' 0
~ ~~o"2
....
w 5"""'" Cl:J -:-,
.... (Q~::Jg.
C/) OJ
C/)
(1)
'-
....,
BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST FORM
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT Public Works - ERD/Oxbow Eco-Center
PREPARED DATE: 03/20/02
AGENDA DATE: 03/26/02
TO: 001243-7240-564000-7134
Machinery & Equipment
$1,500
FROM: 001243-7240-563000-7134
Improvements OfT Buildings
$1,500
REASON FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT:
To purchase a Four-Barrel Recycling Center for the Oxbow Eco-Center.
CONTING.ENCY BALANCE:
THIS AMENDMENT: N/A
REMAINING BALANCE:
DEPARTMENT APPROVAL:
OMB APPROVAL:
BUDGET AMENDMENT #: 02-129
DOCUMENT # & INPUT BY:
G:\BUDGEnQUA TTRO\GENERAL \FORMS\AMENDM02, wb3
.......
....I
AGENDA REQUEST
ITEM NO. C-2i
DATE: March 26, 2002
CONSENT [X]
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
Leg. [ I Quasi-JD. [
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY:
~~
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Public Works/ERe/Oxbow Eco-Center
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND:
FUNDS AVAIL. :
PREVIOUS ACTION:
RECOMMENDATION:
COMMISSION ACTION:
[ ] APPROVED
[ ] OTHER:
County Attorney: Ib...~
' 't' t "IJ
Or1g1na 1ng Dep :
Finance: (copies only):
Budget Amendment BA02-129/ Equipment Request EQ02-210
The Oxbow Eco-Center requests purchasing a four-barrel recycling
center to encourage good stewardship and 'green' practices at the
Center. The recycling system will be purchased with Department of
Environmental Protection FRDAP grant monies, which was recently
extended to allow use of excess funds. The manufacturer of the
recycling center, Plastic Lumber, is a sole source because of the
compactness and clean look of the system, which will be placed on
our front porch. The cost of the center is $1,300.00 plus
approximately $200.00 in shipping costs.
Funds are available in
transferred via the Budget
(Improvements OfT Bldg)
. .-.".., '
001243-7240-563000-7134 and will be
Amendment to 001243-7240-564000-7134.
(Machinery & Equip)
n/a
Staff recommends approval of Budget Amendment BA02-129 and Equipment
Request EQ02-210. Staff recommends acceptance of plastic
lumber as a sole source for this item.
CONCURRENCE:
DENIED
Douglas Anderson
County Administrator
Coordinatio
Mgt & Budget:
Other:
Purchasing:
Other:
m
0 m
c "tI
=ij >
3: ~
m 3:
z
-t m
z
::a :-:I
m
0
:t!=
111 en::¡:t;rQ>() ~
() 0:::rCD""O
ß s: õ" ~ en ::J t;r
-
Q> :::r C[) ~ !:2, õ'
I .....:::r~ C) ~ en
I\J ~
..... :;:D:lQ§<Þ -I
C) CD en CDCQ:::J m·
'<;~!=tc)~ ~
en Or
Q> 1:1 -I CD ;::;: CC
èi3Q>::r-:::J:::r
,.,¡jJCDëi)t;r _0
""C-
Q> ..... 1:1 .... CD s:::m
C) C[) Q> s: s'
88<:!:~CQ :þmg
ê.g~~~ G)~C
tDQ>....t::o m::oz
~. §- ~ õ: g. Zm::;!
...... cnQ)-
~~qrã=cr i!gœ
,.....¡¡;3::¡:Q.
Q> ::::- ::omO
0' ~ $. ~
:::J .... tD en ::a men:Þ
§. .... ;::;: 0' m 0-1::0
1:ItD¡¡rg.... (")
o ~ -:: en CQ' 0 c."C
C ~C)tDõ.., 3: moO
Q>-C) C[)
Z :::J~:::r~~ !: en::o."
-t .....-0 m -1"'0
Z ""tDen1:l ' Z
Q>entDQ>1:I Ceno
c Q.Q>:::JQjQj C
3: ~ 2. èij' ëi) Q. m :ÞOC
OJ c -I:þz
m 9¡ (Q Q) s: &f mr::;!
::a .....Q> en CD en ~-<
:::r a. CD :::;,'
CDQ>tDCQS: ~ -mo
IJ1 CQ ,;.;- Q> tD ~:ÞO
C)tD a. (I)
O' Q 0 õ::os:::
' CD Q> ><
() ;J Q> CQ t;r NNS:::
tD CD :::J CD 0
~C)õg¡::¡: 0-
oen
:-og~s:~ ....
I
Q) S' Q> 0 N
_.CQ ...... I 0
~~;nQ 0
0 ëì! &~:::J N
0
..... :::rQ>C)ëi)
'" Q)~Q)""
...
'" -<;tDt;r::¡:
~ (1):;00
... §'~3~
0
0, ;::;: ~ OJ :::::-
~ CD ......
Q.S'CD¡§'
0 Q CQ ~. P:"to
0
'? 1:IC)êììo
.... CDCDC)1:I
..... :::J:::J t::
~ s" '- Q) ':'1
CQtD:::JC)
.., :::r
en Q>
en
CD
'-"
....,
BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST FORM
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT Public Works - ERD/Oxbow Eco-Center
PREPARED DATE: 03/20/02
AGENDA DATE: 03/26/02
TO: 001243-7240-564000-7134
Machinery & Equipment
$1,500
FROM: 001243-7240-563000-7134
Improvements OfT Buildings
$1,500
REASON FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT:
To purchase a Four-Barrel Recycling Center for the Oxbow Eco-Center.
CONTINGENCY BALANCE:
THIS AMENDMENT: N/A
REMAINING BALANCE:
DEPARTMENT APPROVAL:
OMB APPROVAL:
BUDGET AMENDMENT #: 02-129
DOCUMENT # & INPUT BY:
G:\BUDGET\QUA TTRO\GENERAL \FORMS\AMEN DM02,wb3
. .
\.r
....."
dU811flCATlON
fOR
SOU 8OlJIIO: PIIOCIJIIDIrNT
Based upon the Purchasing Manual, the proposed pI'OCUÆment described below is being procured
pursuant to the guidelines on Sole Source Procurement. A good faith review of availabl~ sources
has been made and there is only one source for the required supply, services or COnstruction item.
1. We propose to procure the following:
4 - f::gYY-e\ ~d~~\.J..:J r!L~,
2. As a sole source procurement from:
Name of Company: :PI Ac::rt-\ C I \1VY1 ß8t2-
Contact name:j\YV1 \=\'nr.o"" Phone~3o -1 b'l- AC\f3'1
3. The basis for this sole source determination and the reason no
other vendor is suitable is:
~E~;¡~~!~S:=i~~~:~t~.
""fur (16\ of 4-¥i\£. C ey¡-\c\( \Q ~ - L'-1U..1 L~~vëb\c.. -\-r¡ ~t'", [Ost ~
--i~ ~ [~ 'oNe. \.t!Cik.kd.
~D'J..-
Date
'P-N Ir;rz.p J f)"J.WW ÚD~(~v
I Department/Division
----. ~;ß-r
Authorized nature
Nde:
1. Enter de&...ÎAÍbo I dl goods or services to be
procured.
2. EnIer name of sde __COI.....~
3. Enler1he deIo...,¡,....... and basis Jcrsde
soun:e procun!I1IerIl
4. AIIach såe sooroe letter fnm wnda and
døpørtmer¡l
5. AIIach pt'OpOII8 from WIIIdrJr 1IIh ~
.
~ \ l'\.\-t-nAeX'-\-
Title
Approved () Disapproved ( )
PURCHASING DIRECTOR
D~TE
r...... omooo
......
TO:
AGENDA REQUEST
"""""
ITEM NO.
C-2k
DATE: March 26, 2002
CONSENT [X
REGULAR
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
Leg. [ 1 Quasi-JD. [
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY:
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Public Works/ERD/oxbow Eco-Center
.:' .~.--'-)
, ,C\\(((l C~ t-=:>G l\ <Á A-
Superintendent\
""."J
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND:
FUNDS AVAIL.:
PREVIOUS ACTION:
RECOMMENDATION:
COMMISSION ACTION:
[X] APPROVED
[ ] OTHER:
County Attorney: "'~G)~
Originating Dept: t!1í$.l:5
Finance: (copies only):
Budget Amendment BA02-128 I Equipment Request EQ02-211
In an effort to enhance accessibility at the Oxbow Eco-Center, staff
is requesting to purchase three all-terrain, fat-tire wheelchairs
for use by volunteers and visitors. These items will be purchased
using funds from a DEP Florida Recreational Development Assistance
Program grant, which was recently extended to allow use of excess
funds.
Deming Designs is the sole source provider for the specially
designed wheelchair that is used in many state and national parks
because of its safety features and durability. The cost of the
wheelchairs is $6,000 including delivery.
Funds are available in
transferred via the Budget
(Improvements OfT Bldgs)
001243-7240-563000-7134 and will be
Amendment to 001243-7240-564000-7134.
(Machinery & Equip)
n/a
Staff recommends approval of Budget Amendment
Request EQ02-211. Staff recommneds acce
Design as a sole source for this i
CONCURRE
BA02-128 and Equipment
ance of Deming
DENIED
Coordinatio
Mgt .. BUdget:
Other:
Purchasing:
Other:
-...."
"""
m
D
c:
-c
s::
m
z
-I
;:c
m
~
c c
<: m
Cñ~
Õ ;:c
Z -I
s::
m
z
;:I
rn "tJ ::::~s:c: g. ;p
a :,- (D~
0 <Q (1) 0::: -. :So 0-
I\) .., (1) ¡¡j'o!::!. a 5=
, Qjo;:¡,;><:::J
I\) 3 ~ 0 O-<Q :;:) ~ C/J
...... 3 ~, ëiJ 0 3 3 -I
...... (1)
<2' 6. õ ~ g :;:) ~ m"
°s:°ëir ¡¡r C/j or-
~§(1)9Cf ~ CC
-0
oQ.o(')cu .,,-
o¡g,,><~¡¡¡ Cf 3:m
0
o· t:J- ~::::.: c:
s.cuo~§. ç¡ »mg
Q.:;:) :::: ¡¡j'- (1)
~ Q.' (1) Cf G)~C
cu ~ (') èi! :5' , m:;oz
ë§~~"êcu ~ Zm~
0- CD "11 0-
CD~:;:)Cf::U 0 ~gm
:;:)cu~§'D ::::
~ Q.- <Q )'. :;OmO
flg:~õ"tJ » ;:c mC/J»
Q.~ "tJ<Q -c m 0-1:;0
""cu~c:ii1 "tI 0 C"'T10
~~ë§g.~ ;:c 0
0 s:: moO
z ....ocu < s:: C/J:;o"'T1
-I s: C/j :;:) Cf S· m m -I"'T10
(1) cu CD CD 0 !=?
z g¡2.C§~èi! z 0-0
c: c »~C
s:: O()- Q) m
~~c:õ1'Cf !=? -I»z
ED 0,):::::::.:::J_C1>
Q......, mr--I
m ~. ~ ~ ~ Q)
~ . (1).., èi! g 3-<-<
:;:) cu :::: CD
::::....~Cf -mo
::¡-.... Cf ~»O
O~CDÕ' ~ ~
CD CD _, õ:;03:
:::r (=):::-:
cuO~':¿ en en NN3:
0::: >< cu ...... Q -
CD 0- ";' 0 QC/J
"tJ 0 C/j "tJ
cu :::: ." CD ....C/J
;:¡'1J'l°O ,_
õ' 0 0-"tJ NO
'6' 9 CD ëD gz
cuoc::::: Nm
q) <b c/) _. :;0
Q.~CDS:
-.CD Q. :<:
:;:) .., :5' 9, 0
0:::: Cf
0 c:::¡-ocu
0 --'o~~
......
I\) ::::
.>, r¡;' ~ æ:
w ~..C/)
,
-....¡
I\)
.>,
'?
0'1 fg
0>
.>,
0 :s
0
'? en
-....¡ ~
......
w
.>,
BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST FORM
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT:
PREPARED DATE:
AGENDA DATE:
Public Works - ERD/Oxbow Eco-Center
03/20/02
03/26/02
TO:
001243-7240-564000-7134
Machine & E uipment
$6,000
FROM: 001243-7240-563000-7134
Improvements OfT Buildin s
$6,000
REASON FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT:
To purchase three (3) all-terrain wheelchairs for the Oxbow Eco-Center.
CONTINGENCY BALANCE:
THIS AMENDMENT:
REMAINING BALANCE:
N/A
DEPARTMENT APPROVAL:
OMB APPROVAL:
BUDGET AMENDMENT #:
DOCUMENT # & INPUT BY:
02-128
G:\BUDGEnaUA TTRO\GENERAL \FORMS\AMEN DM02, wb3
· .
~
..",
dusnnCATION
rOR
sou SOUIKr PROCURI:MI:NT
Based upon the Purchasing Manual, the Proposed procurement described below is being procured
pursuant to the guidelines on Sole Source Procurement. A good faith review of available sources
has been made and there is only one source for the required supply, services or construction item.
1. We propose to procure the following:
ALL-~~l~~~~~ ___________________________
-----
---
------------
2.
As a sole source procurement from:
Name of Company: ~\~L6c-N _______
Contact name:~~_º-'L~~ Phoneß-.2o ~ l.f.:!ß..-~Îbc;.
o \Gh-\d..e.'m·\'t~5 ~~\. COI'Y)
The basis for this sole source determination and the reason no
other vendor is suitable is:
~ "'.1\- -kv~~t¡~ hW~ ~s VI-. 4k ~~L_
~c., oV\~ ~ ~..kL-",,-c:..~"""-t ~.,jtvo^\IJ4... Ù'_~.!!J!..!-~_-bL
~~~\("\t\, ..,gñ.CI·l ~ ~cg,....:::Iho(, (ly'::h~~~~e..L___
:>~~Y\$..ib~ -D~~ a...\\ ~ u:>\...~ ~ ~~~.
J.~ ó.wrü.l... ~\tslA...J ~ìa~ -\-to (..e..l. _
.Ji!iw--10~ tdÐ '~J'1-K.~____
u5epartmentlDivision
"- ~~
Authoriz Signature
3.
-4~-------
Date
Note:
1. Enter descriptioo of goods Of'services 10 be
procured .
2. Enter name of sole source conbading.
3, Enter the determination and basis for sole
source procurement.
4, Attach sole source letter from venda and
department.
5, Attach proposal rrom wndor with pricing.
~~~I O~5:0-~
Title
Approved (~' Disapproved ( )
i1:f¿~
____VAJi7~J
PURCHASING DIRECTOR
reviøcd05/2000
·
-
~
~
...,
BC"Jg~n!.
561-785-5834
~. 2
P3.ge 1 Jf 3
--~ .-~
V~:~[0 j (l,~ (~jCn--S
y~;> .. Beach Whee Ichif':i;::¡>gM~~:&:;,
.~t2~ ,', ,..~,...;.,;" ,."...',.~::'~.;;>;:.~::'::;i:~ll:';;~...
~~z~~~
^~ ~ . #.#~~1·~..1.~J._~~:..
<;J" . '.. ~ .. '!~ >~ ';:c', ,'^,",
~ ~ ; l\-1~·..:·~...
Get Sack to De B.each with De Bugl!!'
,.. . 7'"' ~__'S.ç: '.:
_W-Á1(.( ,0 I: /'
¡"t ~t" r-...l0~
.\.< ....Jl(.y.~1 \...." IJ.,,¡ 11..~ -
) . ..-
- -<I' ' u!x'j
u -it /;.:/ S ~1 v~ c. .
^ \ .,j ,_, r ;
¡t.::\........v
\ ..' '
,",\ .~í~.:~,..."".I -\:-'\\'-"'1 =:..-v_)~
B~.:!çh Whedcha\r by DCll\Íl1¿j Dc5' ;c.>
J .¿~ ..::- ..Hõp.uJ~?l¡r:.i\J ~
.;- ~- .- -., ~M ~'t-:a-
~
~
Imagine the joy of (eturn;ng to nature and not feeling
stranded!
Whether your heart yearns for a fun-filled stroll 011 the 8ea~h, in the woods, or hy
the river, "'Ie are excit€>d ¡;bQut providing you with a pr<)duct that wJlI change your life!
Sinc~ 1994, we h:¡V2 r.elped hundreds of disabled pgQpte, W9 know ho~v to buiid a
highti' functional, ç'ng-iastin; ~roduct that you can affGrd. You will find our products,
many state and nalional pa~i<s, from Florida to C¡¡lifornia, Washington, Minnesota - you
!13111a it! ¡fyou would m;e to order "r.e of ()ur fine chairs, simp!y çall. fax or amaH us.
One.; we have your spl:cificatio'1s, YOu can be experiencing the free<lottl, t.m and digni
or De-Bug w!tl1ìn a coupi" of weeks. We aro not just thl? designers and manufacturers
of me chair -we are also U6Srs.
As a chair user, I can p~or.:ise you that we do 2verything possible to test the c.omfc
and durabiiity of our prod:..!::ts, We've listened carefully to cur customers over the
years, and added feature5 ,Q mak:¡¡ the chair better and more functional. Even my
pernona! chaIr, which is C'jH ~"e years old, w')rks as good as the day it \·ias built.
We welcome you to cur Web Site, and hope you iind all the information you need
here to make your dec:Îsic:1. But if you don't, we'd b¡; delighted to answer any question
you may have.
If you'd like to get b¡¡ck to nature ill a high,qua'ity, affordable, comfortable De-
bug, all that you need to d::J is send us yúLJr order form willi payment, and a chair willi
b¡:r:' /."JI"..".v. b~aç h ,.,v~e~kh.:ir.':: C:ï:' : i:j =:\.!: tl1
7!16,'2031
.- ---
-------..
- ._- .------
-- -----
-.-._---
-----
.------
--- -----
-.---.
!::[~P .i!'..\\ \\. i:cachwh~ddm ¡r.ço::~' ;'n::::lc ¡s _ 2.!1d ydc ~s J;tm
7116:2001
,
AGENDA REOUEST
..."
ITEM NO.
C3A
DATE: March 26, 2002
REGULAR
PUBLIC HEARING [
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
CONSENT [ X ]
SUBMITTED BY:
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND:
OMB
PRESENTED BY: Marie Gouin
Supervisor of Elections Voting Equipment Upgrade
Last year, the State legislature approved disbursing funds to help counties
pay for upgrades to aging voter equipment. The disbursements are to be
in equal pa)'TIlents over a two-year period beginning last Fiscal Year. At
the request of the Supervisor of Elections, the Board set aside a
significant portion of the first pa)'TIlent ($107,452) in the Fiscal Year
2002 budget for the purpose of further upgrades intended to meet
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements.
The second pa)'TIlent of$146,250 should be received sometime in June or
July of this year. After discussing the matter with the Supervisor of
Elections, the Board added $53,750 to this amount (for a total of
$200,000) and budgeted the additional amount in the Supervisor of
Elections transfer account with the understanding that it would be used
for additional voter equipment upgrades.
The Supervisor of Elections is now ready to purchase the upgrades (see
attached letter) and is asking the board to:
I) Approve the purchase of73 Accu-Vote Touch Screens with Audio
Ballot, 10 additional light Optical Scan Accu-Vote machines and a
TDD unit.
2) Declare Diebold Election Systems as the sole-source vendor as
theirs "...is the only Touch Screen that can interface with the Accu-
Vote equipment presently used in our county."
G:\B UDGETI WPIAGEN DA'SIAgenda0213 '2~ so E, wpd
.......'..
The amount required to purchase the necessary
equipment is:............. .............. ................ ....... ...... ... ... ... .......$312,800
.-....i
...
,
The amount allocated to voter equipment upgrades is:
Set Aside in General Fund Contingency..............................$107,452
Set Aside in the Supervisor of Elections Account..............$200.000
Total $307,452
This leaves a shortfall of$5,348 which, with the Board's approval maybe
taken from the General Fund Contingency account.
FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds will be made available in 001-1910-564000-100
General Fund - Supervisor of Elections - Machinery & Equipment
See Budget Amendment 02-125
PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve Equipment Requests 02-204 and
02-205 (with the understanding that the cost will not exceed the stated
amount), declare Diebold Election Systems the sole source vender for the
equipment and approve Budget Amendment 02-125.
4 attachments: SOE Letter
Budget Amendment 02-125
Equipment Requests 02-204/205
[XJ APPROVED [] DENIED
[ ] OTHER:
COMMISSION ACTION:
Coordination/Signatures
County Attorney: ~, " M'"'g='", & Budgot, xxlf,¡J (VL~"""i"g,
Originating Dept: ~ Public Works: Other: SOE
-"
Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) XX
xx k(Z'
cc: Supervisor of Elections
G:\BUDGET\WPIAGENDA'SlAgonda02\3'26 SOE,wpd
'-"
The amount required to purchase the necessary
equipment is:......... ....... ................. ....... ........... ... ... ... ...... ... ...$312,800
-.J
The aniount allocated to voter equipment upgrades is:
Set Aside in General Fund Contingency..............................$107,452
Set Aside in the Supervisor of Elections Account..............$200.000
Total $307,452
This leaves a shortfall of$5,348 which, with the Board's approval may be
taken from the General Fund Contingency account.
FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds will be made available in 001-1910-564000-100
General Fund - Supervisor of Elections - Machinery & Equipment
See Budget Amendment 02-125
PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve Equipment Requests 02-204 and
02-205 (with the understanding that the cost will not exceed the stated
amount), declare Diebold Election Systems the sole source vender for the
equipment and approve Budget Amendment 02-125.
4 attachments: SOE Letter
Budget Amendment 02-125
Equipment Requests 02-204/205
COMMISSION ACTION:
CONCURRENCE:
[ ] APPROVED [] DENIED
[ ] OTHER:
Doug Anderson
County Administrator
Coordination/Signatures
County Attorney: ~ Management & Budget: x.x...!:fI (rt~urchaSing:
Originating Dept: .~ Public Works: Other: SOE
/
Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) XX
XX k (Z-
cc: Supervisor of Elections
G:\BUDGET\WPIAGENDA'SlAgenda02\3'26 SOE,wpd
'-' -..J
BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST FORM
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: OMB for Supervisor of Elections
PREPARED DATE: 03/08/02
AGENDA DATE: 03/12/02
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME AMOUNT
TO: 001-1910-564000-100 Machinery & Eauipment $312,800
FROM: 001-8191-599080-800 Supervisor of Elections $200,000
001-9910-599900-800 Continaencv $107,452
001-9910-599900-800 Conlinqencv $5,348
REASON FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT:
To purchase uparaded votina machines.
* Note: $107,452 was Dreviouslv set aside for voline machines and deducted from available
contingencv balance.
CONTINGENCY BALANCE: $740,417
THIS AMENDMENT: $5,348 *
REMAINING BALANCE: $735,069
DEPARTMENT APPROVAL:
OMB APPROVAL:
BUDGET AMENDMENT #: 02-125
DOCUMENT # & INPUT BY:
G:\BUDGET\QUA TTRO\GENERAL\FORMS\AMENDM02.wb3
\w-
'w1IÍ
"'- vi :è
° ()
.- ()
.!:2 :t:::: CO 0
1:J:':::::::3 (,)0 0
(1)1.;;..0 "i::C ....
° (t (t .~ 0..10 ,
<::>
(,) ° (I) (¡]LÒ <::>
fa () a:J 'i5 () <::>
.....10 "t
:S () .c:: :S ;:.:., ~C\ <I:)
C/) ::..,:s~o:s It)
S; 0
m "'0 .... '- ....
lU ~I::CI)(I)Q (»
Ct: () (t 10;. I:: (I) ....
"'0 () ° .- ,
-..... '- ~ ....
O>~ ~ê3"'O <::>
<::>
I:: :::3 ()
'- "'0 .... 10;. ~
.s. ~ .!!1 (¡) 0
() (I) I:: 1.;;.
N .c:: E (I) .- 0..
"'-E(t.....E
° ° ° :ê '-
° 0 .....0....... It....
N I::(,)>,0,Q Q)
. ;;:: ~~:S.81:: .~ 0
....
° .S: (I) :Q >,.2 >';;0
° I- 0..10
NN ~ ()(t(t:t:;:..... ..... (\')
'-
.c:: .c:: 0..:':::: (t I::
0::0 ....(I)(t'O~ ;:)
«Ui lU .c:: I:: (,) (t._
wN Ü ....0()0"1::
'§ ;;::; (t 0>
>M <:( (,) :S (,) (t
...J0C/)C/) fu ~~.c::()E
«WlJJlJJ ;;::;iJ.J~:S()
01->-> Ct:
(/)« I:: 'C () ::c
:::3 .... ~
-0 0..... I:: (t.S1
LL... (,) ~ ().c:: ~
o::(/) () '~ E .... ~
Ow I- :s () .9- g (I)
LL::J o .. :::3 (t C\J
-.II- .8 §- 0- a:J .c:: c¿
1-0' -.lZ () "'0 ....
(/) W .. <:(W ~CI)()~I:: 0 W
WO::C a:I:5 :::::: al
::J«w ow I:: () (I) (t C\J ::IE
-0 .2~2~~ OJ ::)
GO ~ .. §~ 0 Z
wzwc "'0 .~.c::0> '6 I-
a::w:5~ <:(D.. () ..... :::3 ..... (t :::¡
"'0 I:: '- Z
1-C):50 iE~ ._ () 0.. ~ :::3 « ::)
~ "'0(1)0> .s 0
z«oo:: ~~ eE-sl::âi
W OD.. .~ U
:E WD.. C/)W 0...9- ° () - u
c.. 0::« ;;::z (I) 5-.c:: ~ :;:: CI) «
(t (I) (,) 0> c::
::J ti1 .c:: () >, CI) '- (b
0>.... () 2:
0' Ct: ~c:I::.c::1:: u
W ü ~:ggg2 C/)
C/)
.s:::
:r: ~~(,)~..... u
ü .!!1 O>~ ~ :::¡
::) 0> I:: () ~
e CD "- ......... ..... 0
-O>15°E (b
~ (t(t.c::> ~
~ 0>.... :::, .S:
§; C5,S: cti (,) "'0 , "<t
:::¡
_"'010;.(,)(1) u 0
::) LLl::i3«~ ('oj
u .
Ü ()0>1::()0.. « ('oj
0
üo ~o..o~E R a
<:(~ :::3 (,) ._ w
:it
a
w
0::
I-
Z
w
::IE
D..
5
a
w
\..
'-tII
. .
::...
....'õ
° s:::
C/J()_
......- (t
C/J~ s:::
o ... °
u():;::; () c
() C/J '-
.c:::J"O .1.) c i:2
...... "0 ï:::
::...Q)(t Q.8 ¿,
1;;..... ¡¡¡ r--." c
œ ° 0 c
~ ~E() .....1.1) ""
~ <0
"0 C/J C/J <l)
Ci) OIC/J(t J,
S s:::().c: ....
C\
LU ._ I.) ~ ~
a::: .s.e::J ....
()Q.Q. c
.c: 01 () c
'õ .S :S
..... Õ 01
s::: ::. s:::
() '-
ffiN .....().....
.S .c: .!!!
..... .-
0 () () C/J ()
<: .c:.::c:C/J .!2 c
0 ..... ()
0 , ' .c: (t u ¡';;c
N I- :!:::: E () Q.r--.
I ~ ,.... .
.... ~ 0 s::: 2:1.1)
0 CI).....,~ ::)
0
NN LU () 1::: I.)
ü '- 0 s:::
0::0 ~ 1: ::t: .-
«ëD ::J () I.)
Ci) C/J ° e:
WN ~ ~ LU u à5 Q.
>->-M a::: ().c:¡¡¡
_...10 :S 01 s:::
~«W ¡:.: o .S .2 c¿
)(.J !;¡: Z ......:::J:t:::
)tI)C W C/JS:::"O w
:¡¡ '- "0 ID
)u:: c "01:(t
5~1- w w s::: 0 :¡¡
c ... U .2ü"O :J
of3 z c ~ "0 ~ Z
W Ci) I-
:I LL =' :¡¡ w ~ a.. '. ()....."O
::> CI) z
'1-O :¡¡ 0 w ~§(t Q) :J
~ In W 0 J: I!::: ::. C/J ·s 0
I!::: ~ e E (t
jWO:: 0 a.. Ü .' 13 0
='« w a.. § w Q. .9- .c: ~ 0
)..°c ~ ~ .... ~ C/J ::J C/J ~
(t ~s:::
W ~ .c:()o .s:
io::æ ~ t:n~ ~
31-~ e: s::: I.)
::J '- () ,
z« ::) .....õ[jJ :3
W Ü ~::=.."'--.-.; u
u
~~ < ü .!:!1 01 0 s::: «
<:
0 <t 0Is:::...() £::
~5 <: < () .- ° E
¡:: - 01 C/J (1)
<t C5 < (t (t '~.9- u
::.0 T.' CI)
g: Ci) :g~()s. -
W (1)
~ ~ -J 0i3Q.() u
C5 c i - ::JOI .¡:;
<: , c u.~CI)s::: 8-
~ ~ T'. ¡:: C
1'.: () 01 CD :;::;
a Cl LO ~ §-:S ~ <::>
<t 0 0 ~ .....
,,'..
'.,.
" ",.'....
.:
',. o.n
. 0
N
< ..< N
T .¡. 0
,. a
w
¡:.:,.,'.. :it
. z a
¡:.: .'. ::I Z W
Z ¡:.: 0 Q I!:::
W :¡¡ l- I-
:¡¡ < z <C "..,'.~ z
w W
I- Z :¡¡ l-
I!::: 0 '.", w '.' - :¡¡
a.. II..
<C ëij 0 "..- a..
:5 c l- S
a.. s: I If
w ë r a :J :J a
c w ID '") W
§£7-t7-uk rtvaLk.::7-
SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
2300 Virginia Avenue · Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982 · (561) 462-1500 . FAX (561) 462-1439
February 27, 2002
Honorable Douglas Coward, Chairman
Board of County Commissioners
2300 Virginia Avenue
Fort Pierce, FI 34982
Dear Commissioner Coward:
I am requesting the Board to give final approval for the purchase of Touch Screen
Voting Machines to meet Americans with Disabilities Act requirements as set
forth in Senate Bill 1504.
The County has already received $146,000.00 from the State of Florida, with a
second and equal payment scheduled for receipt on July I, 2002. Therefore, I am
requesting the Board to authorize the purchase of73 Accu-Vote Touch Screens
with Audio Ballot, which meets ADA requirements, at a cost of $3,500.00 per
unit totaling $255,500.00. I am also requesting that the Board make a unanimous
declaration that there is a sole source for the procurement of this equipment from
Diebold Election Systems. This is the only Touch Screen that can interface with
the Accu- Vote equipment presently used in our county.
Additionally, I would like to purchase 10 additional visible light Optical Scan
Accu- Vote machines. The combined total cost for these machines is $ 57,000.00.
Upon the Board's approval, a notification must be filed with the State of Florida
outlining our intent. A sample memo has been attached for your convenience
If there are any questions that require my attention prior to the meeting, please let
me know. Thank you for your continued cooperation.
Sincerely,
Gertrude Walker
GW/ac
250 N. W. Country Club Drive· Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986 . (561) 871-5410 . FAX (561) 871-5323
9340 S. Federal Highway· Port St. Lucie, Florida 34952 · (561) 337-5623 . FAX (561) 337-5626
E-Mail: gertrude@slcelections.com
-
73 Accu-Vote Touch Screens
$3,500.00 per unit totaling $255,500.00
Contingent upon certification of the ADA component.
10 Visible Light Optical Scan Accu-Vote machines
$5700.00 per unit totaling $ 57,000.00
1 TDD Unit for ADA (Deaf) Compliance
$300.00
Grand total of $312,800.00
xc: Doug Anderson, County Administrator
, .
~j:B~r2e02 01::9 3354545115
~
DIEBOLD ELECTION SYSTEMS
AccuVote Voting System Proposal
For
5t. Lucie County Florida
Nurnbf,!r ofPrecinots:
ITEM QTY
73
..
UNITPR1(¡;E
I'
AccuVote Units'
1
10 AccuVòt4il-OS PrecInct rabu/att)rs
Includes;
Viaibl~ Lìgh! Read Head
Modem
Printer
Carrying Case
Ballot BQx
73 AccuVote.TS 8ellot Stations
73 Audit) a.llo' KIt
146 SmðrtC.rd Encoder
365 SmartC~rd8
146 Man.geT Cards
A"c;:iII~~ Sel'Vlçes ~
G~M$ Tffli1Ji"g
E/~ction $taffr,..;nlng
73 Pol! Worker Tnlirling,
73 EquIpment Instlll1.tion " Acc8p~nçe Tøsting
73 ETfCtion Dax. Support (2 electio",,'
2
~
4
5
6
7
6
9
10
11
Sub-TQtfill
l-e!ls: Special Allowance
Vote CountIng System T9tal ~nv8&tmeot
Shlpping'/Insurance
$5,7bO:OO '
$3,150.00
$;350;00
$~OO,òO
$3,$0
$4.00
'.....,
EXTENSION'
"---
$57,000,00
$229,950,00
$25,550.00
$43,800.00
$1,277,50
$584.0'0
t
$0.00
$5.000,00
$9.733.33
$3,650.(}0
$7,300;00
$383,844.83
$4P,001'.so
$338.183.~3
TBD
PAG::: 02
~
...~ ...........--
AGENDA REQUEST
......
ITEM NO. C-3B
\..{
..
DATE:
March 26, 2002
REGULAR []
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [X ]
TO:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SUBMITTED BY:
Management & Budget
PRESENTED BY: Marie Gouin
SUBJECT:
Request to establish a $100 Change Fund for Oxbow Eco-Center Gift
Store
BACKGROUND:
On March 18, 2002, the Oxbow Eco Center submitted a request to the OMB
Director for the establishment of a ~hange Fund Account in the amount of
$100. The OMB Director is requesting Board's approval of the above
mentioned request. The Oxbow Eco-Center is requesting to maintain a $100
cash drawer to make change for patrons of the Oxbow Eco-Center Gift Store.
Once approved by the Board of Commissioners and the Clerk of Courts, the
Finance Department will make the initial disbursement to establish the Change
Fund for the Oxbow Eco-Center.
FUNDS AVAILABLE: 001-7912-531000-700
PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners give permission to
establish the Change Fund Account in the amount of $100 for the Oxbow Eco
Center.
[X] APPROVED [] DENIED
[ ] OTHER:
COMMISSION ACTION:
Airport:
Coord ination/Siq natu res
Management & Budget: xxJt.S yr,lAfr Purchasing:
Finance: XX
County Attorney: XX i~
Orig Dept
Other:
G:\BUDGE1ì WPlAGENDA'SlAgenda02\3'260xbowChangeFund, wpd
~år"'
19 02 08: 54a'--'
Bogans
561-785-....,1'"
p.1
:MEMO
Oxbow Eco-Center
Environmental Resouroes Division
To:
From:
Marie Gouin, Director OMB
Sandra Bogan, Superintendent, Oxbow Eoo-Center ~
Re:
Cash Drawer for Oxbow Gift Store
3/18/02
Per this memo, I am requesting to set-up and maintain a $100 cash drawer at
the Oxbow Eco-Center. The oash drawer will be used to make change for gift
store patrons. Funds are available in acoount #001-7912-531000-700.
Thank you.
-......---~
,,f --......,_
"",/
'-'
"""""
AGENDA REQUEST
ITEM NO. C- t+ '
DATE: March 26, 2002
REGULAR []
PUBLIC HEARING []
CONSENT [X]
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY:
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT) : Communi tv Services
Beth Ryder, Director
SUBJECT: Certificate of Participation for the Drug Control and System
Improvement Program (Edward Byrne) Grant for 2002/03 from the Florida
Department of Law Enforcement.
BACKGROUND: Since 1991 St. Lucie County has served as the coordinating
unit of government for allocation of funds from the Florida Department
of Law Enforcement Program Edward Byrne Grant. This grant is
distributed to the three law enforcement agencies, the Police
Departments of Fort Pierce, Port St. Lucie and the Sheriff's Office.
FUNDS AVAIL. N/A
PREVIOUS ACTION: None for FY02/03
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Board
Certificate of Participation
Enforcement Program.
authorize
for the
the Chair.man to sign
Florida Department of
the
Law
D as M. Anderson
ounty Administrator
COMMISSION ACTION:
[ X]
[ I
APPROVED
OTHER:
DENIED
County Attorney'_X
~
~ Purchasing:
Originating Department
Other,
Finance: check for Copy only, if applicable
t.~..¡a..ß.omiew¡~:::~:~~i.Cr..r~Ëd ·'ªl'fñë-Grã"nf="~=,
~-' '
I"
r·"···-·~..n'·',·
-,,-~_...., '
-=':" .._._"-~_.~=~=~
....;
E~g~JJ
',:
J:
~
,
,I,
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Maria Gorniewicz
Beth Ryder; William Simon
3/19/029:58AM
Next Year's Ed Byrne Grant
".
I;
¡.:,
Frannie Hutchinson has forwarded to OMB an original of a blank Certificate of Participation and related
paperwork for next year's Ed Byrne Grant.
I am sending the original to Beth Ryder and copies to Bill, Jennifer and Marie LaRosa.
Have a great day!
******************......*****
Maria "Mika" Gorniewicz
Budget Analyst
St. Lucie County BOCC
Office of Management and Budget
gorniewm@co.st-lucie.fI.us
561-462-1733 phone
561-462-2117 fax
*********************
cc:
Jennifer Hollnagel; Marie La Rosa
,
~
,
'-
,..,;
o
FltLE
Florida Department of
law Enforcement
Office of Criminal Justice Grants
Mailing Address:
Office of Criminal Justice Grants
Florida Department of law Enforcement
2331 Phillips Road
Tallahassee, Florida 32308
(850) 410-8700
James T. "Tim" Moore
Commissioner
The Honorable Frannie Hutchinson
Chairperson, St. Lucie County
Board of Commissioners
2300 Virginia Avenue
Fort Pierce, Florida 34982
I
r .. "---~-~r-...-_
MAN G'''rr(;f: ÜF ' ,
r~~;~L~.B.U-º~i ~
; ~
;'1 I B 2002 '
L.."., ---.j
st WCIS CõÙNJy FLORIDA
March 11, 2002
RE: Federal Fiscal Year 2002 Byrne State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance
Formula Grant -- Local Share
Dear Chairperson Hutchinson:
The Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) anticipates the Federal Fiscal Year
2002 (State Fiscal Year 2003) award from the United States Department of Justice to
be $15,209,331 for Local Share Edward Byrne State and Local Law Enforcement
Assistance Formula Grant funds. This is an increase over the current year funding;
however, when the matrix was run taking into account population and crime statistics,
some counties' allocation was reduced. As with last year's funding, FDLE plans to
allocate residual funds to ensure that no county's reduction is more than 10% from the
previous year. A total of $43,004 will be used for this purpose.
In accordance with provisions of Chapter 9B-61, Florida Administrative Code, FDLE has
set aside $213,112 of these funds for use by all units of government within St. Lucie
County. The Federal Fiscal Year 2002 (State Fiscal Year 2003) Program
Announcement is enclosed for your use atld provides guidance for submission of
applications for these funds. These funds may be used by local units of government to
implement projects that offer a high probability of improving the functioning of the
criminal justice system, aggressively and effectively responding to violent crime, or
reducing drug trafficking and abuse.
Chapter 9B-61.008, Florida Administrative Code, requires that, as a condition of
participation in this program, the units of government in each county reach consensus
concerning the expenditure of these funds, including the projects to be implemented as
well as the agency responsible for such implementation. Developing such consensus
will require someone to exercise leadership and assume a coordinating role in the
development of applications for these funds. FDLE recommends that the Board of
Committed to
Service' Integrity· Respect· Quality
;
\...-
FFY 2002 Local Share Byrne
Page Two
March 11, 2002
....,
County Commissioners assume this responsibility. In the event the county declines to
serve in this capacity, the Department will request the governing body of each
municipality in the county, in descending order of population, to serve as the
coordinating unit of government.
The enclosed Certification of Participation form requests the identification of an
individual coordinator. We will send this individual an application kit that will provide the
program details necessary for completion of the application. Please complete the
enclosed Certificate of Participation and return it within 30 days from the date of this
correspondence to:
Office of Criminal Justice Grants
Florida Department of Law Enforcement
2331 Phillips Road
Tallahassee, Florida 32308
Attention: Beth Hamilton
We look forward to working with you. If you have any questions or if we can provide
you with any assistance regarding the Byrne Program, please contact me or Beth
Hamilton, Planning Manager, at (850) 410-8700.
Sincerely,
C!J¿ ~~. ~
Cla~ H. Wilder
Community Program Administrator
CHW/BH/mg
Enclosures
1. Program Announcement
2. Certification of Participation Form
(Chairman of County Commission only)
,.
cc: Mayors in St. Lucie County
Law Enforcement Agencies in St. Lucie County
Project Directors in St. Lucie County
Committed to
Service' Integrity' Respect· Quality
'--
'....;
PROGRAM ANNOUNCEMENT
FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2002
Edward Byrne Memorial State and Local Law
Enforcement Assistance Formula Grant Program
The State of Florida, Department of Law Enforcen,1ent (FDLE), anticipates an
award from the United States Department of Justice for $15,209,331 in Local
Share Edward Byrne Memorial State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance
Formula Grant funds. This announcement is to notify eligible applicants of
program requirements.
Eligible Applicants
Units of local government are eligible to receive subgrants from FDLE. "Units of local
government" means any city, county, town, township, borough, parish, village, or other general-
purpose political subdivision of a State and includes Native American Tribes that perform law
enforcement functions as determined by the Secretary of the Interior.
Program StrateQY and Purposes
Units of local government applying for these federal funds must use them to implement projects
that offer a high probability of improving the functioning of the criminal justice system,
aggressively and effectively responding to violent crime, or reducing drug trafficking and abuse.
Projects must comply with the 28 federally authorized program areas and may provide
personnel, equipment, direct services, training, technical assistance, and public information.
They may include a range of activities including provision of prevention, intervention and
enforcement initiatives.
The Department strongly discourages local subgrant funding of projects of less than $25,000.
Economies of scale often play an important role in whether a project can achieve its targeted
objectives.
ProQram Development
Each county is allocated a sum of money for use by all local governments within the county.
This amount is determined through a funding matrix established in administrative rule.
..
Chapter 9B-61.008, Florida Administrative Code, requires that units of government in each
county reach consensus concerning the expenditure of these funds, including the projects to be
implemented and the agency responsible for such implementation.
Maximum coordination is required to meet this program requirement and the Department
requests the county board of commissioners to coordinate requests for all local governments
within the county. The Chairman, Board of County Commissioners, in each county so notified is
requested to return to the Department a statement of certification indicating the county's
willingness to serve as the coordinating unit of government. The certification will also identify
the individual that will serve as County Coordinator. This certification must be returned within
30 days from the date of receipt of notification. In the event the county declines to serve in this
Enclosure 1
FFY 2002 Byrne Program Announcement
Page 1
"-'
~
capacity, the Department will request the governing body of each municipality in the county, in
descending order of population, to serve as the coordinating unit of government.
To accomplish these tasks, the Department encourages each county to appoint a Substance
Abuse Policy Advisory Board, the membership of which should include at a minimum the
following persons or their authorized designee: Chief Circuit Judge, State Attorney, Public
Defender, Sheriff, Chief of Police of each municipality within the county or a Chief of Police
designated by those Chiefs of Police as their representative, Jail Administrator, Clerk of the
Court, Superintendent of Education and a representative of local drug treatment programs.
Each county is also encouraged to designate an Office of Substance Abuse Policy to assist with
these tasks.
Match Reauirements
Applicants must supply no less than 25 percent of a project's cost in cash from non-federal
funds; however, Indian Tribes are exempt from this matching requirement. These matching
funds must be funds that would not have been available for reduction of drug trafficking and
abuse and violent crime and criminal justice system improvement efforts iri the absence of
federal funds; that is, they must represent an additional local effort in addressing these
problems.
Application Reauirements and Deadlines
Chapter 9B-61 , Florida Administrative Code, governs program administration and funding.
Local governments should thoroughly review rule provisions before applying for subgrant funds.
Once the Certificate of Participation is returned to the Office of Criminal Justice Grants (OCJG),
a copy of the application package will be provided to the identified County Coordinator.
The Department must receive two (2) copies of each application for funding (both with original
signatures) no later than 5:00 P.M., Tuesday. June 4.2002. A separate application must be
submitted for each proposed project. Applications should be mailed or hand delivered to the
following:
Mr. Clayton H. Wilder
Community Program Administrator
Department of Law Enforcement
Office of Criminal Justice Grants
2331 Phillips Road
Tallahassee, Florida 32308
Applications must be accompanied by letterS of approval representing agreement among at
least 51 percent of all units of local government representing at least 51 percent of the county
population as to the allocation of dollars to each project in the county.
Questions regarding this Program Announcement should be directed to Clayton
Wilder, Florida Department of Law Enforcement, at (850) 410-8700.
Enclosure 1
FFY 2002 Byrne Program Announcement
Page 2
· .
\w-
...,J
CERTIFICATE OF PARTICIPATION
Federal Fiscal Year 2002
Date:
Mr. Clayton H. Wilder
Community Program Administrator
Office of Criminal Justice Grants
Florida Department of Law Enforcement
2331 Phillips Road
Tallahassee, Florida 32308
Dear Mr. Wilder:
This is, to inform you that the Board of County Commissioners Accepts _
Declines _ the invitation to serve as the coordinating unit of government in the
Florida Department of Law Enforcement's Edward Byrne Memorial State and
Local Law Enforcement Assistance Formula Grant Program.
For purposes of coordinating the preparation of our application(s) for grant funds
with the Office of Criminal Justice Grants, we have designated the following
person:
Name:
Title:
E-mail address:
Agency:
Address:
Telephone:
Date:
County:
~
,
Sincerely,
Chair, Board of County Commissioners
Enclosure 2
Byme Grant Program Announcement
,
~
AGENDA REQUEST
I~ NO. C-5
DATE: March 26, 2002
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [ x]
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY: Pete Keogh
Director, Parks & Recreation
SUBMITTED BY(DEPT):
Parks & Recreation
SUBJECT: Community Parks System Master Plan /Lawnwood Recreation Complex Master Plan Update
(Parks Referendum)
BACKGROUND: As part of St. Lucie County's continuing effort to assess the parks/recreational needs
and wants by its residents, the Board of County Commissioners agreed to secure professional services
to assist in the development of a "Community Parks System Master Plan" and a "Lawnwood Recreation
Complex Master Plan." At the September 18, 2001 BOCC meeting, the Board agreed to contract with
Glatting Jackson to develop both master plans. At the Board's direction, a "Steering Committee" was also
formed to help guide the process, provide input and work with staff by providing feedback. Since the
February 26,2002 update, a meeting with Trust for Public Land was held to discuss technical assistance,
the Recreation Bond Issue was discussed at the St. Lucie County BOCC/Pt. St. Lucie City Council Joint
Meeting and a presentation on the Community Parks System Master Plan was given at the Citizen Budget
Committee Meeting. (Attachments: Updated chronological listing of the Community Parks System Master
Plan/Lawnwood Recreation Complex progress which includes a copy of the Trust for Public Land
proposal.)
FUNDS AVAILABLE IN: N/A
PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A
RECOMMENDATION: N/A
~] APPROVED [] DENIED
[ ] OTHER:
COMMISSION ACTION:
Coordination/Siqnatures
County Attorney:
Originating Dept: ~
Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable)
Mgt. & Budget:
Purchasing Mgr.:
Other:
Other:
Eft. 1/97
H:\Agenda Parks Referendun.wpd
~
'.
. '-'
.....,
BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
PARKS &
RECREATION
J
MEMORANDUM
March 26, 2002 BOCC Meeting
To:
From:
Through:
Date:
Subject:
Board of County Commissioners æ..
Linda Brown, Admi~tive Manager f' - /
Pete Keogh, Director\ II,
March 26, 2002
Community Parks System Master Plan Update
.
The following is a chronological listing of the Community Parks System
Master Plan/Lawnwood Recreation Com lex Master Plan progress to date:
August 8, 2001- Proposed "Community Parks System Master Plan"
presentation by staff to the SLC Property & Homeowners Association
August 14, 2001- Proposed "Community Parks System Master Plan"
presentation by staff to the Cultural Affairs Council
September 18, 2001 - Contracts with Glatting Jackson approved.
September 18,2001- Steering Committee invitations mailed.
October 9, 2001- Executed copies of Glatting Jackson contracts received from
County Attorneys office.
October 9, 2001- Work Authorization forwarded to Glatting Jackson.
October 12, 2001- Request to Community Development/GIS to prepare a
Base Map as outlined in Part I Existing Conditions Analysis 2.4 (Please see
attachment).
1
JOHN D D~UHN, Districr No, 1 . DOUG COWA~D, Disrrict No, 2 . PAULA A, LEWIS, Disrricr No,:) . mANNIE HUTCHINSON, District No, 4 . CLIFF DA~NES, Disrnct No,S
Counry Adminisrraror - Douglas MAnderson
2300 Virginia Avenue · Phone(561)462-1515· TDD (561) 462-1428
·
"".-/
"
"
'-
....J
October 23, 2001- "Steering Committee" ratification request (Agenda # C-4).
October 24, 2001- Kick Off Meeting scheduled with Glatting Jackson & staff
(Staff has completed or is in the process of completing Part I Existing
Conditions Analysis 2.3 -Review of Existing Documents/Client
Responsibilities)
(Please see attached status update) Kick Off Meeting with staff and Glatting
Jackson was held to discuss plan. Information requested by Glatting Jackson
was provided (Status Meeting Minutes Attached).
November 2, 2001- A follow-up conference call was held with David Kutner
and Victoria Zinser Johnson, project managers representing Glatting
Jackson
and staff to begin finalizing the Community Parks System Master Plan
Schedule.
November 5, 2001- Staff provided Glatting Jackson with the attached
finalized schedule. (Updated schedule attached indicating the two additional
Commission Workshop dates).
November 9, 2001- Site visits to St. Lucie County's park and recreation areas
were completed by staff and Glatting Jackson.
November 28, 20ot-First "Steering Committee" meeting held. Meeting
facilitated by David Kutner from Glatting Jackson. (Meeting Minutes &
Hand- Outs Attached)
December 10, 2001- A Lawnwood Recreation Complex Programming
Workshop, facilitated by David Kutner from Glatting Jackson, was held.
Representatives from various sports groups and organizations were invited to
participate. (Meeting Minutes Attached)
January 8, 9, 10, 2002- Five (5) Community Parks System Master Plan Public
Workshops were facilitated by Glatting Jackson. (Meeting Minutes &
Summary Attached)
2
í
\.,..
....".¡
- ,
January 9, 2002- Glatting Jackson held a planning workshop with
representatives from several county departments. (Meeting Minutes Attached)
January 16,2002- The "Steering Committee" met for the second time.
(Meeting Minutes will be provided at a later date)
January 17, 2002- Staff met with Trust For Public Lands representatives to
discuss strategies for successfully getting a bond referendum approved.
(Information on Passing a Successful Bond Measure Attached-Additional
Information will be provided throughout the Master Planning process)
February 1, 2002- Presentation on the Parks System Master Plan, facilitated
by Glatting Jackson at the "Strategic Planning Session".
February 12, 2002- Commission Meetine/W orkshop which included a first
draft presentation of Lawnwood Recreation Complex Master Plan.
February 18, 2002- Telephone survey began (Glatting Jackson). Results
anticipated within four to six weeks.
3
"
.,
'-'
.....,
*** Please note that according to the project time line, we are on schedule. ***
cc: Doug Anderson, County Administrator
Robert Bradshaw, Assistant County Administrator
Dan McIntyre, County Attorney
Millie Delgado, Recording Secretary
Chron File
4
-<
'"
...""
.:..;f
I H I'
TRUST
~ (1 1\
PUBLIC
LAND
1l1li
March 6.2002
Ct)'H~ 't'¡'I~
Ln¡J
f¡,~ l'ruJh>
ViA FACSIMfLTE TRANSMISSION
ivlr. Douglas M. Anderson
County Administrator
St. Lucie County
2300 Virginia A venue
Ft. Pierce, foL 34982-5652
Re: Revi!i(!d Conservation finance Proposa1 for St Lucie County Parks and Open
Space Funding
Dear Doug:
Thank for taking the lÌme lo meet with me at our ot1iccs during your rccent visit
to Tall aha:;see , 1 appreciated the opportunity to lalk with yuu about the Trust for Public
Land's (TPL) Conservation Finance program. Bascd on our discussion, 1 respectfully
submit the following revised proposal to provide technical assistance to St. Lucie Cuunly
to study the feasibility of a parks and recreation ballot measure. The lotal amount
requested for these services is $17,500.
OLlr proposal to St. Lucie County includes the two rumlamental aspect:; of any
success!ulland cunservation funding meas\11'c: fcasibility research and u puhlic upinion
survey.
. Feasihility Research - TPL, with assistance I'rom 51. Lucie County staff, would
complete a feasibility study of land conscrvation rLllltling options for St Lucie
County. The feasibility study would include:
o sllmmary of the current state of thc St. Lucie Counly -- its land. its people.
and its economy. as well as the growth trcnds that have shaped it in recenl
years~
o analysis ofpossib1e alternatives [or [undin¡; a conservatiQn lanù
acquisition program, including clœtion and ballollanguage requirements;
anù
o election history of past finance and olher ballotlTleasures in St. Lucie
County, including measures for park élnd open space funding.
n(,fh.l:'\ O,Til, 0:
1,1ô N¡)rd\ M"III\"u: ~tn:~1
T.II:~,I.h\~·H;I.·1 rL j:!H;I·1\~1
(,'1',)) "'-:l.-j'JI [
1'0" ì,hll) //'1, '\ ¡;,
L~::'J,:\I DI" ¡:;.11t (:':i~l1) 21!.~~~0~¡
rOOIZOO'd L9S2#
a~., ~I,gn¿ ~Ol lsn~l
SSLrÞZZOS6 9Z:Zt ZOOZ'LO'~V~
'-'
....,
Mr. Douglas M. Anderson
March 6, 2002
Page Two
o dection history of past finance and other ballot measures in SI. Lucie County,
including measures for park and open space funding.
Cu.\·l fo/' Feasihility He,~ear('h: $2,500. aa
. Public Opinion Survey - Afler wmpleling the feasibility study, TPL would
contract with a qualified public opinion survey fimlto conduct a statistically valid
public opinion poll, throug11 randomly selected telephone interviews of registered
voters in St. Lucie County. The poll will he designed to test the following,
including:
o specific nallot language and the level orvotcr support [or a land
conservation ti.lLldin~ measure;
o allemative funding sources and amounts;
o purposes for the lIse of funds that St. Lucie County voters IÏnd most
compelling;
o liming, i.e" when is the best time to bring a measure to SL Lucie Coullty
voters; and
o variuus accountability measures that may be incorporated into the
measure.
Cost jùr (I Public Opinioll Sllrv~y: $/5.000.00
ilased on IllC results of our feasibility stuùy and public opinion survey, TPL will be able
to make specific recommendations to Sl. Lllcie County about how to craft a parks and
recreation measurc with the vcry best cbance for ~uccess,
A draH Cl>ntr.lcl for profe.5sional services will follow under separate cover for
your review. If we can provide you with further illfonnation, please do not hesitate to
call. We look forward to assisting your community with this important effort to improve
lhe quality oflife in St. Lucic County,
~~ctfUIlY,
'OrJJJ ('U
Wi 1l~~rg~~-hiO: '-""
A . D· ,
550clate Iree r /
Conservation Fina ~e
Cc: Ms. Orenda Marshall, Director of Florida Pmgrams, Miami Office
Ms. Amy Wolf, Project Manager. Miami üftlee
roo/roo'" Jq~2#
a~1 ~I~gnd ~Ol lsn~L
SSLîtZZOsa 9Z:Z1 G002'LO'~'w
'-"'
'-"
St. Lucie County Board of County
Commissioners
... About The Community Parks Master Plan
What is the Community Parks Master Plan? It is the development of a vision
and implementation strategy for a parks system in St. Lucie County. The plan will
provide for the development of recreation and sports facilities, maintenance, manage-
ment and use of the parks in St. Lucie County to insure enhancement of the quality
of life of our residents.
Do any other communities in Florida have parks master plans? Many com-
munities use this method to meet the recreational needs of their citizens.
How will St. Lucie County pay for the implementation of a county-wide
park system? To fund a project of this size will require a voter referendum.
Is there an opportunity for the public to get involved in the Community
Parks System Master Plan? There have been five public workshops and one
Commission Workshop where the public was given the opportunity to state the
types of recreation they would like to see and where they would like for the parks
to be constructed.
Additional Commission workshops are scheduled for:
Tuesday, April 23, 2002
Tuesday, June II, 2002
1:30pm-3:30pm
1:30pm-3:30pm
St. Lucie County Commission Chambers
St. Lucie County Commission Chambers
St. Lucie County Board of County
Commissioners
2300 Virginia Avenue
Fort Pierce, FL 34982
District I:
District 2:
District 3:
District 4:
District 5:
John D. Bruhn
Doug Coward
Paula A. Lewis
Frannie Hutchinson
CI iff Barnes
Phone: 561-462-1400
Fax: 561-462-2131
Website: www.co.st-lucie.fI.us
- \....
'-"
,.,.,I
AGENDA REQUEST
ITEM NO. C-6-A
DATE: March 26,2002
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [X]
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY:
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT) : Utilities Department
William R. Blazak
SUBJECT: North Hutchinson Island WWTP Master Lift Station Rehabilitation
Purchase Order approval in the amount of $ 39,608.00 with Severn-Trent
Avatar Utility Services, LLC.
FUNDS AVAIL: 478-3600-563000-300
PREVIOUS ACTION: BOCC approved operation and maintenance contract
#C98-12-185.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the purchase order with Severn
Trent Avatar Utility Services, LLC. In the amount of $ 39,608.00,consistent
with contract # C-98-12-185, for the rehabilitation of the North Hutchinson
Island WWTP master lift station.
County Attorney:X
derson
Administrator
COMMISSION ACTION:
[ X ]
[ ]
APPROVED
OTHER:
DENIED
Purchasing
Other:
if applicable)____
Other:
Eff _ 5/96
'-"
...,..J
BOARD OF COUNTY
COWA~SSJON'ERS
UT~UTiE5
DEPARTMENT
WilLIAM GlAZA/"
DIREGOP.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Board of County Commissioners
William Blazak, Utility Director Luttr
FROM:
DATE:
March 26, 2002
RE:
North Hutchinson Island 1 Lift Station Rehabilitation
BACKGROUND:
When the master lift station on North Hutchinson Island was constructed in 1995
fiberglass lining of the station was unable to be accomplished because of budget constraints.
Currently, the lift station lining is beginning to fail in several areas and needs to be replaced. The
utility department advertised the project last year for competitive bids, Bid # 01-073, and only one
bidder responded. Funds were budgeted in the amount of $40,000.00 to complete the project and
the competitive bid that was received was for $ 80,000.00.
As a result of the minimal response from bidding and the high pricing of the proposed
work, utilities requested that our operations and maintenance contractor provide a cost estimate
to rehabilitate the station with in house labor, consistent with the existing contract pricing. Severn
Trent Avatar currently utilizes specialty crews capable of performing lift station rehabilitation in
other areas of the State and can perform the necessary rehabilitation of the North Hutchinson lift
station. The qU(~tation from Severn Trent Avatar reflects current contract pricing schedules and
the pricing for the fiberglass lining reflects Severn Trent Avatar's competitive pricing process. It is
anticipated that the actual estimated cost will be less that the quotation due to competitive pricing
of the fiberglass lining contractor, and instaIlation methods, once the project is underway with
Severn Trent.
Utilization of our available contract labor will result in a considerable savings to St. Lucie
County Utilities.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of a purchase order with Severn Trent Avatar Utility Services
in the amount of $ 39,608.00 for the rehabilitation of the master lift station at North Hutchinson
Island WWTP..
JOHN D, ßRUHN. District No, 1 . DOUG COWARD, District No 2 . PAULA A. LEWIS, District No J . Ff\ANNIE HUTCHINSON, Disrrict No, 4 . CLIFF ßARNES, Disrrict No, 5
(ounry AdminisTroror - Douglas M. Anderson
2JOO Virginia Avenue Q Fort Pierce, Fl J4982 · Phone (561) 462-1150 Q FAX (561) 462-115J
"'"
..,.J
,s'r~\/J-~j< 1~ ]
-'.----....." -- -"'-'_-,--.~-~. -..:- ._--
--~(IIrrlhre-,--]
~_:~!:-Î~~~J
March 6, 2002
¡ : ~
\,.. ,
William Blazak, Director
St. Lucie County Utilities
P.O. Box 728
2300 Virginia Avenue
Ft. Pierce, FL. 34954
~,"" î
! .
, ..,
i~' 3 :::-5
~
.' J' ,.-
::)'1- L~_;·\_,·· ~ ,~_.)\j¡,j>·j·r·l
5-::. ~r:J. l:;:,:c .~\.,',.;::2_~
Re: Lift Station Liner Project
5=, iLC
185 13 B:2rt()',-~: 31--.;·:.
Fort 0il/~rs. F1criÖ;:;. 3JS'¡ 12
Tel: 941-2ó7~7ì47
Fa:~: S41-2é7-.:.~gC()
Dear Mr. Blazak,
Attached is our proposal along with the outlined work schedule and estimated hours to complete the l~g project.
Also attached are quotations for the liner system itself. As previously discussed, one of the liner systems will
require the concrete top of the lift station to be removed, while the other (Poly-Triplex Liller System) will not.
While the Poly-Triplex system is more expensive, labor and crane service will not be required, therefor the overall
cost of the job may be less. Other considerations such as the top cracking, etc... need to be given thought.
It may be best to arrange to meet at the site visit to discuss, what is best for the County, both economically and
durability.
Please let me know your thoughts. We want to insure your Utility is gets the best its dollar.
.'
'-"
...,I
~]~~~~~~
'~1___í< \ t('l '')' J
-~. ._.~--._.... - "..--"... _:__.,,-,,~~._._-,. ---.
,-- ,--'- -"
- -
í., , ,
),
March 6, 2002
, ........-
\..:-.::.. ..;. ,-
~. ~ ----
" -..; :_: =:
William Blazak, Director
St. Lucie County Utilities
P.O. Box 728
2300 Virginia Avenue
Ft. Pierce, FL. 34954
::;-,'::¡-:'11;~:;;:t ~ "~r''''''"
~~-1
....~-' ,
;: ¡
c .s'2T-;:'~2S~ t1..~=
13.513 Bcl:-=()'--,-'~' 2>1:1.
Fen ~s. ?lG¡-:::a 33~- ~-.
;:-':;1: 94l-2:j7-774"7
PROPOSAL
Fu;(; 941-2ó7-48l~C
We hereby propose to furnish necessary Labor and Tools to perform the below listed described services.
Article I. INSTALLATION OF FffiERGLASS LINER FOR THE NORTH HUTCHINSON ISLAND WWTP
LIFT STATION.
CONTRACTOR shall complete all WORK as specified or indicated in this docwnent. The WORK is generally
described as follows:
1.1 Furnish necessary labor, Utility vehicle and required hand tools to complete installation of fiberglass
liner system. Below estimated price including cost of the Fiberglass liner and Vactor truck service (see
attachment).
* Estimate has been constructed on a time and material basis. ST-AUS will perform the services at the
contract rate schedule attached. An itemized invoice will be furnished to the owner upon job completion.
* * Expenses and time have been estimated on the attached work sheet.
Article 2. OWNERS RESPONSffiILITIES
2.1 Access and Permission to perform work.
2.2 Owner to Furnish all materials, crane, backhoe needed to perform service.
2.3 Owner will monitor by-pass pumping.
Article 3. PAYMENT PROVISIONS
CONTRACTOR shall submit Applications for payment in accordance with Contract Terms:
-
3.1 Above estimated work for the swn of .....................................$ 39,608.00 dollars
To be paid in full thirty (30) days after completion of the contracted work.
If any unforeseen problems should be discovered during the performance of the above referenced service, we will
notifY you immediately of their nature and any additional cost that may be incurred. Unless otherwise specified, rock
removal, dewatering, coverup, and haul off is not included. Severn Trent-Avatar Utility Services will not be
responsible for unmarked underground lines. Any changes requested by the ownerlbuilder are not covered by this
agreement, and must be added subsequently, at the cost agreed upon by both parties.
I have read all of this agreement and understand each item and am fully aware of this contractual agreement and the
terms set forth in this contract.
'-'
,
ACC, e~t,eJ~Y:7~ , /
,/ L . )
,/ d" f-\ ..;r1 .. ..
''iJ.j<,,-- ,¿~ j i (Q I 0 <-
Kenneth D. Irvin, L l Date
Severn Trent-Avatar Utility Services, LLC.
....,¡
William Blazak
St Lucie County Utilities
Date
'-,
Day 1
3 Men travel to Ì'iorth Hutchinson Island
Cut/Remcve concrete ¡id bShveen ~,¡\¡eÞNe!1 a~d valve bcx
Prep To remove líd from lift station
""'"
C~ê\iV Hrs Hr:y Rata Total
1 3 $ 135,00 $ 405,00
1 5 $ 135,00 $ 675.00
1 3 $ 135 00 $ 405.00
Day2
Remove Lid from US
Set up by-pass pumping system
1
1
Day 3
Removal of US piping, pumps and rail system
Pressure wash and vactor lift station
Vactor Truck and Operator for 1- 10/day
1
1
1
Day 4
Liner company on site installing fiberglass liner system
Severn Trent- Avatar Crew
1
DayS
Liner oompany on site installing fiberglass liner system
Severn Trent- Avatar Cõew
1
DayS
Liner company on site installing/finish up liner system
Severn Trent- Avatar Crew
Day 7
Re-install pumps and piping
Day 8
Re-install US cover
Pour Concrete between wetwell and valve box
Day 9
Clean up,
Travel to Ft. Myers
'Hourly Rate per contract
3 man crew
skilled Labor @ $40fhrs x 2 = $80.00
Util truck and labor @ $55fhr =$55,00
Hourly 3 man crew rate = $135.00
Vactor truck Rate
$125.00/hr
Saint Lucie County Utilities will be responsible for
cost of Crane, concrete and other associated cost
outside scope of services outlined on Proposal.
5 $ 135.00 $ 675,00
5 $ 135,00 $ 675,00
10 $ 135,00 $ 1,350.00
10 $ 135,00 $ 1,350,00
10 $ 125.00 $ 1,250,00
$ 25,938,00 $ 25,938. 00
8 $ 135 00 $ 1,080,00
8 $
135,00 $ 1,080,00
8 $ 135,00 $ 1,080,00
8 $ 135,00 $ 1,080,00
6 $ 135,00 $ 810,00
6 $ 135.00 $ 810.00
4 $ 135.00 $ 540,00
3 $ 135,00 $ 405,00
$ 39,608,00
10/05/2001 14:36
3523777591
I NruCON
'-'
..."J
INDUCON CORPORATION
2632 N. W. 43rd Street Suite F.8
Gainesvil1e, Florida 32606-7438
(352) 377-4148 Fax 377-7591 www.induconcom
Mark E. BallIett, Vice I'Iuidcut
Joe C. JenItinJ, m. PrtIi4eot
CIIriaopIIer C. NeSmilb. S=dal:yltmuu=
October 5, 2001
Fax copy only to: 941·267~4800
Ken Irvin
81 ENVIRONMENTAL
Subject:
RFQ, install fiberglass wet well liner
Re: North Hutchinson Island
Dear K.en,
Thanks for giving us the opportunity to quote this VIIOrk.
For a lump sum of $20,750.00, INÐUCON CORPORATION will provide and
install one - 114" LD. x 20'·0" wet well liner (3/4" wall thickness) to include anrwlar
space grouting. We are allowing three days to perfunn this work. Any delays in our
schedule will be billed at a rate ofS125.00 per hour.
Services provided by others: all by-pass pumping, removal of station cover,
removal of all pumps and associated piping/hardware, removal ofbench, all cleaning and
debris removal Û'Om the station, installation of new pipinglbardware and cover
repositioning.
If you have any questions or require additional informatÎDn please do not hesitate
to call.
Sincerely,
~~
Clint Jenkins., President
INDUCON CORPORATION
C: fileSTElOOSOl
PAGE 01
10/31/2001 05:15
9417723045
SEUS
'-"
..I
StU\C~fnN~Utauy Serv~
October 31, 2001
p~
Severn Trent Services
Attn: Mr. Kenneth Irvin
18513 Bartow Blvd.
Fort Myers, Florida 339J2
Re: North Hutchinsoo Island Lift Station
Dear Mr. Irvin:
We are pleased to offer a rost proposal fur the Nmh Hutchinson Island lift station lining proj«t. Please
look over the 00$t proposaJ fur the installation of the 6800 series Poly TriPlex Liner System.
Bid Item
Desc:riDtioD
DIa
DeDtJI
COlt
STS-I
Plant Lift Station
9.5'
20'
521,900,00
Warranty: 10 years/material and labor plus additional 10 years pronlted
Tenns: 25% upon signing. remamder d~ upon compJetion
It is our understanding that the Utility will provide: access to structure, r~oving of pumps, pipes and
hardware, by-pass pumping, ç]eæ¡ing and debris, provide a So)urce of water supply; location for garbage
disposal; coordinate and control sewage flow as needed duting the critical hoors of the installation process.
SunCoast will ~ovide the normal preparatory work and equipment necessary to install the liner system,
which includes cleaning, cementicious and injection grouting, where necessary.
Thank you fur the opportunity to assist your Utility in solving these environmental problems. Please give
me a call to discuss and your plans to pl"oceed. .
Please sign below and return one copy.
Thank you.
Severn Trait Senices
SunCoast Envirmmll1taI Utility Services
Licensed and Insured
CUC057128 - Underground L'1i1ity & Excavation Contractor
252.5 S.l. 19" Piau< C"p&C~ FL 3J9D.f.: ~941) 574-2743 fø.tt.(94'J,.) 772-3045
WIIIW.þ~~COØtI
PAGE 01
_2ì31120EJl
10/31/2001 04:43
g417723045
'-'
SELS
PAGE 03
..,..J
Chemical Resistan(e of Poly-Trlolex Liner Systems Base Liner Resin. Parts A& B
f
The ålemíc;u resistance of any pOlymer must be judged on more than just its perfonnance In laboratory immersion tesn. Percent
weight gain, by itself is not necessarily indicative of a cured resin's chl!.mical resistanCe, Drying to conStant weight will determine if a
sample absorbed ¡ chemical while at tile same time losing material by leaching, visual obseNatlon of color change and general
appearance Is also Important indlcatJons. of a system's suitability for JJartI~ular exposure. Every application must be IndMdually
evaluated. Exposure to a chemial to which a )Dlymer has relatIVely low reslstll1ce may be possible far a short period of time and
intermittent eJ<)osure may ..lIow for recovery, The following selective list of chemicals and their effeÇt on carefully prepared samples Is
only a guide to the resin/hardener system's strang and weak points.
5;¡mple Si:e For Immersion; ' X 3" X liS"
Sample Si<:e For Strength Retlntion: '" X 4" X , /8"
Immersion To!mperatura: 2S' Do!greas Celsius. 77 'Fahr@nheit
Immersion Time; One (1) Week
r"'.
Chemical
Weight Cain
NaOH, \ 0"
NaOH, 2S,,"
NaOH, 50%
NH OH. 28% NH
HC!.,10\16
H2S0., 20%
HNO, 10%
H po', 10%
AI:ETiC ACID
oLSC ACID
xYLEN~
DiSTILLED HIO
RT(I)
0.44
0.18
·0.09
1.21
0.76
1.15
1.18
4.40
2.94
0.31
3,24
0.57
PlC(8)
0.38
O.:S
·0.10
0.34
0.1)3
0.96
1.08
1.74
1.')9
0.,)7
0.13
OA7
S tTcngth
94.1
95.3
100.0
33.0
96,1
92.0
92.8
87.2
73.9
100.0
57,0
92.0
Flexible Strength & Modulus lI,etantion
RT(I) ~/C(S)
Modulus Strength Modulus
88.1 815.4 92.1
93.3 93.0 94.9
99.6 96,4 98.9
72.2 75,S 81.7
92.0 a9.0 93.4
86,7 88,) 90.2
86.9 a7.S 90.0
75.0 155.3 85.1
60.3 83.0 83.8
95.5 95.4 98,3
78,9 93,0 96.<3
87.9 35.4 94.5
Visual Observation; All samples were Fre! from crackiru}. crazing. swelling or dIscoloration after immersion. (1) Cur@d 7 days a.t
25'C/77'F, (2) Cured overnigl1t at ZS'Ci77'F. I'Qst·cured 2 hours at t 21'C12S0'F , Test F'eriormed By: Reichhold Chemica!. Inc"
Raleigh, NC
f-"
Polv-Triolex Liner Systems Chemical Resistance & Phvsical ProDerties
~edeved 02103/92. Date Completed 02/25/94. ChemIcal Resistance &, PhysiCaJ ~ropertleS on panel b.ut11 on 37-40/37-620
Fourteen DayS (2 weeks) Chemical Immersion at room temperature 25 "C.
Solution: (A) 10% Sulfuric (B) 20% Sulfurh: (0 Dist. W..t., 100"
5pc. Flex.St Flex. Mod. F!e.x.St, Flex,Mod. FleJ<,$l Flex.Mod.
PSI. psixlO^5 Psi. psix 10^5 PsI. pslxlO^5
aarcal 10-20 18-28 15030
1 25623 &.431 20414 7.175 25503 10.16
2 21627 7.474 25580 8.469 23471 U5
3 27108 9.023 23917 7.741 24265 7,52.
Ave. 24786 3.310 Z3307 7.795 24413 !Ul
StO.'I, 2315 53846 2154 51956 335 114410
%Ret. 89.53 37.7S 84.19 82.31 as.13 95.20
"Weight G.1.il1 ..1.762Z ..2.0202 1"0.6918
Average of 3 soecime:15..
Solution: (D) 10% Caustic (E) to% Nitric (F) 20" Nitric
9&reol U·31 10-18 10-20
25889 9.3 76 24305 7,492 26652 8.941
Z 27021 9.011 26229 g,587 27598 5.563
3 27347 9.077 24154 8,341 25396 5.411
Ave. 26753 9.157 24896 8,142 26549 8.640
St.O@'I, 625 15697 944 46966 902 22098
~Ret. 96.63 96,59 89.!B 85.98 95.90 9UJ
"""t.Gilin ..o.!Ì907 ...1.4906 ...2.3095
.~- ObservatIon on speCImens after immersion; SpecImens in Solutfons A and B developed small blisters around tile ~ge5. and some
\
'- ¡¡en~tratlon. The other specimens on solutions C. D, E. and F do not h4V'= any change in a;pearance.
TQOU p..rform..rl 5v: Reichhold Chemicals. lIT? Durham. NC
<Msword.\ T,=sr:Oata>
1a/31/2801 04:43
9417ì23045
SELS
PAGE 04
'--'
'-"
f/
f Poly-Triplex Liner System Technical Data ¡
!Test property r PT1..S- 6800 PTL.S- 5600 I PTLS- 4000 PTCG -116
, I I Schedule A Schedule a SChedule C Chimn$yGuard
! Pre-Saturatlld Fabric Weight :88 Ounces PSY 56 Ounc41S PSY \40 Ounces PSY 116 Ounce. PSY
;
!Test Performed By: Relchhold Chemicõll5, Raleigh, NC, 1999
!ASTM-D-790 ì I I
IFlexural StrenQtI'! I 22.858 psi I 24.853 psi 16,035 psi 29,316 psi I
I :Std. Dev, i 2,493 1.962 2.268 I 2.380
, ¡Flexural Modulus i 10,13 mpsi 9,41 mpsi I 8,13 mpsi I 12.92 mpsi
I 'Std. Dev. ì 0,70 i 0.70 i 08i i 0,56
, I I \ I
, I I I
1\STM-D-695 i
I ¡CompressIVe Streng"" ; 8.699 psi i 11,331 psi I 6,897 psi 13125 psi
I :Std. Dev I 1.320 I 1,113 I 748 I 1,151
I
I ¡Compressive Moèul:.;s I 9.13 m¡:¡si ! 1 1. 11 mosi ! 8,13 mpsi 1ù.83 mcsi
, ,
I ,¡Srd. Dev.
~STM-D-Q38
104
~ ,73
1.42
1.38
Tensile Strength ; 12.340 PSI 9.878 OSI 7,043 psi i 2'J.411 psi
I , I
.Std Dev, , 1079 I ô84 ! 471 1 .406
j ! ,
I Tensile Modulus 10,77 mpsi Ç',52 mpsi I 7,55 mpsi I 15.22 mpsi
Std. Oev, 0,60 0,59 I 0.51 i 174
I
Average ThicKness 0.20 Inches 0.16 Inches 0.16 Inches 0,25 Inches
Barcol !
t~ -F ront 22·35 3146 30-35 20-43
"'-,
iBacl< 37 -43 38-45 20-35 33-45
~
--
Material Content Analysis I ,
i% Resin 59,51 % , 71,51 % ! 79.68 % I 59,52 %
, ,
% Filler ; 4,71 % ô.i4~lo I 5.97% ; 5,55 %
I 1% Fiberglass I 25,78 % I 22,25 % i 14.35% 34,83 %
,
Tests Performed By: Southwestern Laboratories, Dallas, TX ¡
ASTM-D-2240 ! L !
, ,Hardness 82 Shore D i I ,
I i !
I ; ¡ I ,
ASTM-D-â38 I ~ ! I i
1.57 % I 154 % ! 1.20 % 171 %
ó% Elongation @ Max Load I ,
! Stc;, Dev, , 0,19 I 019 , 0,10 I 0.14
,
, :Ultimate Elongation : 6,00 % ! ;
I
:Test Performed By: Whitney & Associates. Peoria, II., i
Butt to Butt ResIn Bonded i , I I
i
:Sonding Srrengtt1 I 7,130 Lbs. I ! !
6" Di~.. 10.000 psi test C'/"~,(8rs ¡Concrete F;ailtrol i
I I
Permeability : Impermeable Œpermeacle ¡ Impermeacle Impermeable
I ; 1
Excavation Required? No ~ No , No I No
! ,
I I
Life Exoec~anC" i 50~ Years I 50.,. Yesr3 ¡ 50 + Yeal'$ ¡ 50'" Years
: I ¡
Warranty 10 Years I 5 Yaars I 5 Years , 5 Years
I
'-'
'--'
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
BID TABULATION SHEET
BID #01-073
NORTH HUTCHINSON ISLAND
WWTP MASTER LIFT STATION REHABILITATION
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
OPENED: September 12,2001 @ 2:00 P.M.
VENDOR BASE BID
MURRAY LOGAN CONSTRUCTION, INC. $ 80,000.00
WEST PALM BEACH, FL
NUMBER OF COMPANIES NOTIFIED": 1404
NUMBER OF BID DOCUMENTS DISTRIBUTED": 41
NUMBER OF BIDS RECEIVED: 1
"PER DEMANDSTAR.COM
C:\MYI'ILESlBIDTAB,WPD
/
/
///(//tIC,./"f''''] ~O~''~ ~.J/~~." -, -,. r "'V.....
'-' ST. LUCIE COUNTY ~
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
BIDDER'S CHECK LIST
BIDS lVL<\Y NOT BE CONSIDERED if the following documents and/or attachments are not completely filled
out and submitted with your bid.
Bef~ sending in your bid, please make sure you have completed all of the following:
Gr' Enclose two (2) sets of the Bid form (one marked original and one copy), including all
handwritten sections, and two (2) sets of any descriptive literature, brochures and/or
supporting data. Please make and retain a separate copy of this bid package for your
/records. '
Œt' Bid Form, must be complete and have a manual signature (original signature) preferably
, ,': sign'ed in blue ink. NdT í2.~~(1.C:<1
~/A Include 5% bid security in the form of a cashier's check, money order or bond (if required), No
xerox copies accepted. Originals only, please,
if Include proof of proper licensing as stated in bid documents,
!\~",...~..., ~ \ I 'LPÇ\
~ Every page that has anything hand written on it, must be imprinted with the company's name
on the top right-hand comer of the page.
~ Return bid in an envelope with the bid number and name of bid printed on the front of the
envelope, If Fed-Ex or UPS-please keep bid in a separate sealed envelope when placing it in
their packaging.
¿ Acknowledge in the bid any and all addendums issued and manually sign each addendum
sheet and submit it with your bid. It ~/,...r....IF ~ z-
~ Provide three (3) references, preferably Governmental. Include name, address and phone
number for similar work done in past year. R7/?1c;t.;o'1£W-.r '*3
~ Erasures or other d-escriptive literature, brochures and/or data must be initialed by the person
'µ{... signing the bid.
~ If you desire a copy of the bid tabulation, include a self-addressed, stamped envelope for
..J{II,., bid tabulation to be mailed back to you. '
~
PLEASE INITIAL AND RETURN WITH BID FORM
G,\COMM0N\8IDS\2001 BIDSRFPS\2001 ·073 BID,DOC.,.v. 11198
2
.-..----..:.........--...
~2~ 07 Jl OJ;31p
GLC ¡:u;~C¡¡nSIhG
5Gl 4G2 ~2D4
~..--
\w
...,.,
~~r""=.
-:.....
_._'-''''3
:i;'¡;-; ~.ï
A¡~ t~¡ds r)!I..:~i Gë
. '.' ,
;;UDf;1 ¡r.;;a
P'-:
1',. ~
~ea¡ed
~nve¡op~ addrçS5ed to
the St Luc~a County Purchasir;c
. ~
\a¡ith b~d nwmb~f. date ana iifÙ9 úf bin ~7p~n~ng.
D¡re{;t~r, ?:300 \¡~rg~:::~ ..,Ó.ft-:/9f:WB, R~o~ 228) f"c.rt ~i~~c'S; F¡ü(hJ~ 349a2~ p~arnfy markeü Or! the QL.HS.iCh3
f5i~ 1.!~"':'! ~~~
-"'~ IT'tJ', -v, 'I.,)í
NORTH HUTÇH~NSOr~ ~Sl 4.ND ~'!-~;-r? ~~~ASTEg L~?=T
ST.~ -nQ~~ ~E!=L=A~e!L~T A T~C~4
S"T LUC!~
f::C¡~)N1-!' ~.}T!!..~T!ES
f"'\=~f'''"~'"t"~A;::~!~
--.. -~,""~~,~,,,!'¡
b.!\\I'~ lo,-", \.\
f-~EPRESENTrr~G
Mo,ll~'1 LOt..4/'
ff.;o4~"Ûf~jn~n~~ tv ;;CH!1Pt~t~ the ~~.I'l·O(,~
c<? NSì:1'" '-þ..~
~L
.
"
Cor:~9an,! anrl.!~rG(Jrp-r:~r~t!~::, ~~:-~~ :~ ?c;-f~m1 a;;
req~.Ûr~d ;r; th~ ~pçcITh;~tiüns fot ihe pri~::; iJf:
-- ...........
VI ;.-;,!!:-;::
1 ~ Sii~c aid
~
SO, cr:r::t
1"1 ;¡~!~~;=~~~;: ~;-d
... A :r-;.:._ ~._. _. ~ _
~.~ r-!PHig ~.gp~,3Cem~n!
1.B 1ôã $~ð:~~ & N~~~ t-!a~h CC\:-;:;s
1.C R.;;;h;lb~:~~~~iv~ 'Of Shufew¡iid~ LjiT 5t.a~~or!
$
'"
'!>
~-
~-
"'\ 00;)-
c... ß, c::co, -
t '
kin ()bng~!~":):;
it !5 !lndsrstCL~d t'ìat th!S g¡dds; i$ bound by ih~ biridinQ dC}(':'~:...!!~!ents and th.:1! !r-;[: h~~j
be VijU¡~j!CV'¡ri QUdl1Q a De! iod ot tiU (i~y~ qft~t' h!~ 0p~~~~;,
~:":~'=..... ~.~~
--."-"¡ ,.--..
, ~:~ 8ü¿r-;J ui C~f;LTrt~{ CommiS5I;)nerSand rsserves the right ~o viaiva any ~rìfotm8;!~!~5- Q: minOf
ÎrrsgUi8ritie~. r~J~ct :=r:y E::d 2!! bIdz \.\:h~:::h ~rG ;;1,:vmp;Gte. \:-ÜfJ~j;gon8L ~bscu;e¡ Of V¡fh~~h CCi1tél:f1
addittcns net a::c\.=¡ed fúf~ ac.~ept or rèje,-j 8ny b!d if1 'f!hc!s C~ ~!1 p2;~ "....'h -:... "iirt~:;...:t ':~:..:S~. .:::r;d
8t.Ci3Pf the bid vÚ'Úch b~s¡ ~~rv~~ ì·t~&?- C~C~~~!y.
¡"¡P'.~v1L vr SiDDEn.
m\JttAA~ ,~~ ~-.STi\lc.h.....,. l.J...
.,31~ ~~rrf "DtA;\ Ñ. ~.e& fl
------
.. . .. .. ~. ......
¡ li..i~f\.cù0_
.......,.....,." --...-- -.- '2"7.Jpoz
'.....ii i. ~i.q,¡i::. ¿ii"' ~
~11~_a.~
¡-!iv¡-~i...., .
~/·
~-;rff) - 2-Y/?
-
h... j ;-- ., I,.. 1./
~- -- -----y.urø
':--i.-....¡. .__ ......,
¡JiUi-~LU 0 T
TiTLL \/14 p!!!JIOq..,1-
2~':=-
:'""!.""
.~ ,
,~~ "
-'""! ~ .-
JtHiz¡ng
C;Luiìrac:c'r snail ~lS't aj~
1ß·"
'"
!
1
~
- ,
- .. .,
ex:snng iTI~tenats.
Reo!accment
n
Q
t'Je~\! tops
c
,
ana
M r _I. ·f-£ _..-
t"'\enao;;rrs!!on
01JO¡:-...J~~ ';' ~l~~
, ....... ,-....,.. '-' -. '"--
~ = ~-.........=-." ,.. """"""'-
.... . "'--~~~~ "! ~
If -;.~ î ã::.fCld~~! r
Rii_1
. "
m::,"',=,;,,:,""'"1~
:IIULwlrC!;
c-.... ..
~ ... ~
~ --, ~---. ,,;
-
...",I
h~nj¥~~re or pip~ng that \A'Hl be replaced Ii i ¡~eü Ui
-""'- ..... . i "r .1.
'~P8:rt1C :tem~ shad renêC, pnc;H·~~.
W:;""".."i;-",~-:;
! ~~-"'!~ ~~
¡ -,.,..
~1atc.hes
¡:!'~.-;! it¡-¡¡;·; i.Rt,;;;-,.r, "
¡ r;"n..';¡ ,~;~
$8 -
,Q:X:)
.$ &{çx:o -
or Sh;.)r2V;j~nds
~ ;;~
~~¡;.
-~ --
~t~tior1
t~8 -
, CO:J
tì'\Ù¡'2fl-",,""\ LO(,I~.) (,.QN::''''¡tv~.~ l...>'
\.f
....,
ALTERNATE BID
Contractor shall list all material, hardware or piping that will be replaced in lieu of
utilizing existing materials. Specific items shall reflect pricing, including labor.
1.A. Replacem~p.t Piping evil f7-1""?.t'4 æ,ÆA ~~/$J, C, /1 '90" Þh~¡é", /1";../';7/
&" FI¡J.N¿'þ;l r I'~..¡ £../I? µ",n, ¡;:hjt:.4nl:p- f??.c I/¡? 7'D $/UvÆS ¡'''''' 44:/.....£;£".,/ \{,."Io/(-;:
V".JIT' b,~D v,{,..r w~lf.
1. B New tops and Hatches q~' ~ YS' ¡'/Z<J ~""',;.,( ¡j!..,..., ß,(<ß c.,,,-c¡( "',.j'"
n c.""sf-¡...¡-jll-.c.c c....../v~ rut" ;"1""-1.
G:\COMM0N\6IDS\20018IDSRFPS\2001-073 BID DOC~.v. 11198
-26-
mVié/¿/I~1 ~6/Ji'V '--f.......-'.I./ /'~~'
CLASSIFICATION
GENERAL êONTRACT~
p~ \ ct7_
1983-00484 "(2:3 '\} ':;':~\ l..:f~\ ';::S] ;.s.::\ .;/::;\;,;':::~,"'''., f~) ",~'1.
MURRAY LOGAN cOI'gR 'I.NC L.;I L) :'¿i;];,~~B¡''LOCATED Ar.' fj ¡
I_Or'i,,,,1 ~'UI"RAY D "....,', ,-"~ 1 :<"'"7;, -::::;,:,j'\'.\ ,~..,I '. "',1
.'-11'1 n ~ i '1\ ~..- ¡ i 11 I ',J ~ 4 '" ! - '1
DAVID LOGAN ::'~7.':J./ \.,! j ,I ,:::.::",313 J 65TH ",TRAIL ,NORTH ,--.j j
313 65TH TRAIL NORTH WEST PALM BEACH FL 33413-1763
WEST PALM BEACH FL 33413-1763
C/WIDE
$36(;.6(:
IS HEREBY LICENSED AT ABOVE ADDRESS FOR THE PERIOD BEGINNING
ON THE FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER AND ENDING ON THE THIRTIETH DAY OF
SEPTEMBER TO ENGAGE IN THE BUSINESS, PROFESSION OR OCCUPATION
OF:
TnTr~1 <f:'~~,"' ,',(
THIS IS NOT A BILL - DO NOT PAY I
GENERAL CONTRACTOR
JOHN K. CLARK, CFC
TAX COLLECTOR, PALM BEACH COUNTY
PAID. pac TAX COLLECTOR
$369.60 OCC 03 002a4 08-08-2000
THIS LICENSE VALID ONLY WHEN RECEiPTED 8Y TAX COLLECTOR
UCENSE MUST BE DISPLAYED CONSPICUOUSLY AT ESTABUSHMENT OR PLACE OF BUSINES~
. JII . ..
. ..:t1 I .
C:.ASSiF!CAï:CN
C(Jì'!T 1~('ICTiJ R
"1:- ; '1'" I "'''.
,,-, III' , '1- . I '.
:L 982-246«,.5
MURRAY LOGAN Cri~iRINC
. 0.'''1 I
LOCir~N rjlJI~RAY D,
D¡:'¡I')ID LOGr:'¡N
3:L3 65T!~ TRAIL '~01RtH
WEST PALM BEACH FL 33413-,1763
** LOCATED AT CNTY
~~ ·:~;'·4 " ~:;
.. .
313 65TH TRAIL NORTH
WEST Pi~U.j BEACH FL 33413-1n,;:-)
IS HERESY UCENSED AT ABOVE ADDRESS FOR THE PERIOD BEGINNING
ON THE FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER AND ENDING ON THE THIRTIETH DAY OF
SEPTEMBER TO ENGAGE IN THE BUSINESS, PROFESSION OR OCCUPATION
OF:
TOTr~L $94.5'
THIS IS NOT A BILL - DO NOT PAY
GENERAL CONTRACTOR
.
RG0006912/U9298/CGC041939
JOHN K. CLARK, CFC
TAX COLLECTOR, PALM BEACH COUNTY
PAID. pse TAX COLLECTOR
$94.50 ace 03 00283 08-08-2000
THIS LICENSE VAUD ONLY WHEN RECEIPTED BY TAX COLLECTOR
LICENSE MUST BE DISPLAYED CONSPICUOUSLY AT ESïABLlSHMENT OR PLACE OF BUSINES.
'::__-::~ . ,.~-=..7: -,.- :·:-~·'~",,:-:.::.~,~~:~--,·:~':-·~.:~.;:ì:;~ ;",!.:-. :J~_ "-:-.",:,,", .. :.F:-"~~: "':' ~,...'~. , ~ .~, -1 .- .;~~_'''- ", -. '.~" -. \. - .: -:... .. _._~~ : . . --, -- -.. - ~ -. . . - ..-
::'..R~~M BE~~JiÇOUNIY;ÇO~TRACTO~S :-.;':ì <':FEE ': ·'"tl~,q).o.,.:' ,',: '",
',i );;-~ ~CERTIFICATÈ'!oj:rcbMPÈTENCY ,:¥/;~'; .:, CERTIFIED ..~~,;",{:;',.:',,'i.",;.\ ': "'~,-,", :: "'.'
,,;.',,:~:, .:. ',' ..', . :'" ::"':~':..;' ~'~',.' " ' '"I:'~":) .: ',CONT~CTOR C·ÉNERÄ'r.·' :. " :,':, ,', ,'" "
- ~.'j,~ ...EXPIRESSE"""""'ÆDER30..u... . ,;_ - -,,~.-.'I:r-:; .. :.¡.)..-.I:;.~.." .....'.. .,~. ...,;:.... '. J..,_h.~. ~ ,- -
. .,,~" ",". '. . .. ~....y.~ :Kff ''200 l' ,\. '" X'.~..J! ,,' ,. -,'\:..~ 's' ..~ -. ";~ ,\,¡',:: ¡;:'.,. ). " .": . i·," " ,":, ". ,;
~.?~.:~~; . '". .... "¡-... . ,.~ .-. ..~. ;'1;": -;- '. ,:.:. ,.:.... '.. ~': ',.!' '1 .' .:', ..... ... -i:-'~ ~~~~ ~ :.~.: ': ~ . . .~·!:~~;:3.i;.~·::· ;-~'tn:...·<r;~.1"0~ ,.~... . '.. '" ". . -fi;'':; ~~~,,~ 2.. ':.:' ~t '.,!: - . .
;;,'.:.- "urin:' :"",:,''[- ~"",,.;>,:_..:...,,~. ';.........~......n,.;b· ~"... ¡¡¡ , ".:::",,~,'J J~ßQ~':8"Q ..' ~ ".,\:"." ",>:",',' .' :
..,."... '. :..' ~3. .~ .......,.,',~~;..~~-';,.J ..:: . 1I"'''''''''''''UI''''U~''~.·;.;!.___.'';'.·. .¡ \' ".. " ' ,.:,.' " ~. .'~ . --: -- '- t...', .,' .
,,',., C01'ol'TRtiL' ,.... ",' "",/, .. - ,c- ~,---- ...... ....,,,...,. '.' ¡"'t' Cì ," '~""''''y'··'·o'a/Z''l:~/,r.la ., ,cr".'. :,r,... 5:MI'! . ,
~"'~""; '.. ...i1'~~':\;~~t.fi,",iA'·';;,·.¡;":·", :~.f:.~::.·Î~~i,~'f'I:~~~~..:, .t¡.¡·.\,:õ ':..~.' :·'.--:,:r,:'''d5:·', ,~. .._~D:J .~~. .?_...:.~.....:.:;..~:.~...~':.;',: . '~:'.~
.~ ,NUMBER...\-: A·~~C· ~sc..,,·7.. !~'''J.'l.h'''''·9,'''99 ....··H~1\;'t - ....~..:,. ....11'_.....!.s;..;.~.. \..' ." "1":;1.:(":" .~....' '... .
~.:.ú=-:~ " :- ',.~'" ,..II _..'~ ~.. ..I~..~..·~,.':!'~~p~·. /A. ...,~j¢: -: ·f..~.:.¡~;·.:-;.~.¿;.t::.;.~;~:L...2:..IÇ~,;-.,,:...;.:.::-~:~.....~?h.~:".;...;-".,.~¡,~~j;¡f,~.!" ~..~. ,...':.- :..... .'
~i~E;:~m}~~~~¡~t¡~~t~L'l ~;~i~~~~{.fif~-=>
,." ,... ,., , . . ATTEST. __~,___
" 3136 5TH TRAIL NOR! H : CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY UCENSING BOARD
,..,\JlO"c;T.,'PALM. U....A~~L 1;'1,. 't'l.A,11__ I OF PALM BEACH COUNTY
~ ~V~¡(A-¡
J!Y "
c...,G;,,...( 4.../Jír&v<-':I?··:"
, ,..
'-'
""Co.
O,ït
<:::I
r.1.
~.::I
zc
0:"
~=
"
~
(/)
-::I
r
::-
-<
::-
(/)
::J
m
D
C
::J
m
o
c
-<
r
::-
~
....
"':0-
m,
n:>
:;:::'1
1'71
-1=
:>1'71
;:::z
O(~
1'71
;::I
en
o
z
.. -..- ........- ---". ..
....."':..~.. -
/-.JC'
. .... ~': .;.
=- ....~ ,",_...t .:,:..':~.
,: -:.. ...~. mC::%-4
x'..W:cr- ~'.~.~-:. ~ == m ii
:ö'I,,",co -. . ~,'Z ::;-¡¡'3
VJ UJ:= G1 ~ ~:::-~ ~~; ~ :. g,. "'Ift:
-; ~:>,':'~.~ ëi=-~
:>% ~ ..'. = CD !!."!1
-;7Q\-(..;,':';..'J:....t: ~:; =z
:Þ'\J! !~7~.~":';:.~~ ~ S! Er-r
. - ...... .. CD - I'''''
r-~r-o,:"-,,,,:. "E ;g
::=o:>.:...··~'~~ ....>
c:-¡ <:. ",,? i.'" :> ¡¡¡ '-'i"
¡;;:¡....~...'.~'.....~ Ceil ...._-Q
n:::::'zo.~.~~!.-: .;'1~n\'"r'·-Q.
=> ~c·" . ~o -a'
....n:> \'¡¡"'r:';¡:: 0
ïO~'_'¿~' . ¡-:'':''1-4' N'
4:~~ _!. ~ ... = I ~ N
z:..'m;:,-'; , . ~> ~
o....z~:'; :,'- I'\,J.;:-~n· N
;;;:J -~ - ~: 0 m-4 .
-;C :;-":;" . 0 ':jO
=\1'~ ,~,':';' ~J, ;::I
" ---t ','.' ~...~-:. . -
r- ~ '-. -.¡.- ,
w ~ .::,;'.'~:~'; .....
1".1 ~
...~
...
u
"""". --. ..~-:- =~
~ ''':''' ,~
;: '..' - --.
r,. >. _.ç:¡~ ~
:...-' -.--.
~ .-
. " . . _.
n
0(
z
:::!
. . :~..-
-'. :-~..
...,
.
"" .-
'''l:.'- þ ....)
..-. ..
·~~L~~.
·::·:t/::~'
, .
," ,~- ....-01:
. - .~.~ ";-?.:..
..,~..~.:,.,~~ .,
'.. .-
~í ~
n
o
~
,..
..0
\,¡,
.. ~.
I'"
I
I
, .
..'
"
. .,' ',: -'.:" :~t'
.;...
. ~: !.;..
..:~·~r:_~ :~
.'
~ l:\~"ii~:~~ ~.~: ~
",~.¡ tt-:~ t
~7~~~i:")¡"
.::..: . ',..... t
~':=::..:_~..:: ~
''!''\f'T~- ~ "'''1
. i':7;'~:~;¡V
.;~~¡~:!v.:
...~~_...,.t' ~
0_...._-
. ~;;.! i.~..;.~,;
...... :...
.¡";';,....:;.,....)
..".....':.'"", ~-~
; :~- LJ
" ", -",.,.-
~ -ø:'''''''
"'.0.'. .
'~7 m",! ·
~~~:~-.. I
...~~.......;.
... ,,~-:;.~~ !
. . "" ' I
Ãi~~·'Uo.
,¡,;:c.:.. J
.._~,,;.~-:.~...-. I
p-\.i z...:·~
n;.c&:""~·~ I
m ·;n~;.~' L
;;:; QO'
"'>;Z11~;~, q
. ù1 .~~::;::~ M
, . -1::1 J
-,~......~ -."0 ~
,.....·....c·
c:= , :;- \n' , ~
;; :-~:z - .~~ ~
'oz" en
c::m.' ~
'" (I ~
,_-lCII ,
c';;:J ~" rn
)0(:>'
"·'·z·O
r ':)::""
....."
. n,,;-:r
¡,/i',;::: 0
:zo ::D
~.;en~:ÎS
....r;:I..:Þ
ZCII
~'~CII; :,'
=-.~~.=- ..
-c:=o·· -
:.OZ·:·,'
~»:"".-
'~:=r- .-
"s:ï:7'~" .,
:..-;= "
1'71 "
. .,
.....:.;(;'1; ..:
'~~~';'. .
-c~'
.0-( ,
... 0:·
~.~ .'
_ z.
...;.,." ..~
".
:")...-: ::..~:
~"-!..."
, ~ ., "
" '
~
,
F
~
r
i
~
r
I
,
i
I
,
I
I
I
,
,,~. .....,:.4lt . '. J
.:....::~;.::.~c· jQ
.." - . --' -
~~~:4':;
~:; ~:7.{: ,
>,
.., '." ~
, /i·:;~,··J
. :.':, -:,';' .:...f~~;" i
0'-
om
<t::I
111
;c::;
ZC
01:1)
:::JJ:
c
ëñ
-c
r
:Þ
0(
:Þ
(/
::tI
m
C
c:=
:Ii
m
c
tD
-<
r
:>
:E
("¡
~
:¿
......
crJJ>
trt
("¡::t>
:;0'
m
-II
>m
::DZ
-<0
m
:;0
to
o
Z
~T II /,}<-4T/'orr-r
"'~~':"+ .'. :;::~:""=
.......'....._'r·' ':'..... me:::....
.....U,J .. ,.....-:,.¡-)I(=t» =-
m-co ::t!.:..::......3111
~tJ:;:]IÛ.:.'~j..)-rtZ~ = ~ ~~;
-. ::tJ>,,·.O°ëi~~
Q-J>Z ". ":::JH= CD!2J"!1'
"Dr.n-<~...· ....~ iC........ 07
:> -i . :'.ö· ·:-r~:-;·;-; ~ a :Eñi
ï:!:r~·:.oo~: :::J
3: OC ,~, ,:. c:: Q.J:J>
-!ø:::J .~C1J>J> =::t>r
t:o:::::::J>:::J orc"'U)
('¡J>ZJ> .:_2 r¡)~ ("¡
:::;:.... -< ,.~-;3: ~o
r() ::::JCtJ5ìT1Z
o:;: ,..:.J>t.')....;:.r;;-I
ZZ . .·.~n-f.. S:!-t~
0,,1 -I I:I)J>
:::::-1 ,·,H3:!IJ~-;n
-;::0" Zi710[I!r.!-I
IC 0:. i710.J)::O 0
("¡ -;-'¡rf::o
.....¡ H >::I
r...... z>
, r
J>r .....
z ~
-<r
o
:>n
::t:>
r.ïï
J>
~r
....
w
W
!:.
~.
>-
u
....
.".
ñ
...",¡
" .
n
~
i.;;
....
Z
v
::::
i71
~
....
C
....
::!
~
on
z
-;
UJ
o
,,-a
.....
....
'-J
'.....
...
...,'
..c
-0
-0
-0
o
o
'-J
.::.
~
tJ
::;:; r
0 ,..,
n
I ~
0
0 L!)
I~ .01
/
¡~ I::
:::::
I
I
i
. '
'.
-. ¡.:.
..'=".:.,....
~
r'¡ ¿,.;r z..
.,'
.. .0:,....":'"
- ~~;~i~;"j
."Il:1o''7..»
;' ¡·.n
.:..£:"",-.:..;~
,~If~~
y"2 '." - r\.)
~ ~~~: :.SJ
...-:- t.....J.
of. .~ ,1& ". .
"':'!"~' c.v
.-;: ö.~ ~·~1
.. - ,
.....'1'· ,.
~~.~;. ;'<
:¡:'o .
.-1
r '3: ..
.'-
.' '"~
. -,
- '. ...
:l,.-; :'.'
'n-' ..
00
z-:-;·
....
WI .,
-i~
c::
~r.n
:::::....
C::Z
,-- (j')
tõ r.n -;
-::"1 ::;
~~, 171
--..... '0
~~.
& ..... \I
.....~ "
n"'ï
n-: :;c 0
~S :ü
...~ 'I
.!-':ï:. 0
Zti; >
ØUJ
, .....
1::0
OZ::J
>:>C
::;::r-;¡
t?_r
.....~
t1'1D
ø:>
~'-'C~
~ rm'
J>
-¡
....
o
z
-,.. '.?- .
'~ .;"-
'- '. '.
~
f:
: ....
.. --:f-
.
. .
:. ;'~7". ~~
./ .......
\~ .;
Sep 04 01 10:08a
SLC PURCHASING
561 482 1294
/11t/,e'¡{'/}"7 <.."J...í 4;..v'f.οc:)~;"/ /-"
'-
4~t,..,. #r oL '-
ST. LUCIE COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT
ADDENDUM 1
BID #01-073
NORTH HUTCHINSON ISLAND
WWTP MASTER L1FT STATION REHABILITATION
September 4, 2001
TO ALL PROSPECTIVE BIDDERS:
The fonowing changes, additions, clarifications, and deletions amend the Bid Documents of
the above captioned Project, and shall become an integral part of the Contract Documents.
Please note the contents herein and affIX same to the documents you have on hand. Indicate
on the Bid Form that this Addendum has been received.
BID ALTERNATE 1-C . PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED SIX (6) PAGES.
post-Ir Fax Nola
7671 Date
FI'OIII
7
Phone .
Fad ~/- (Pf (,..
If you have any questions, call (561) 462-1700.
Please sign and return by mail or fax to (561) 462-1294.
NAME OF FIRM: /!/Vlt'A'.' l.otHA/ aN.!;;, f,.¡c.
SIGNATURE: ~~
,. ~tIT IC.r'S~
DATE: r~1
u~,; -= ~ r..·
.....,...,. T"""O'.,.." roo, .,......... T ...,....
.:::~:..... :- :U~:...:-::-l~.t :"'I~
~~.
-:1:0::'
.~~
Ul UJ.
.:.~.=::""'t"
\w
h1(/~'1
hG,.a..,.. Co-J/; IotA,
---
.. "'--.,-
. ... .-
¡¡"~,,::-,,,..¡;-.
..-.-.: ;;¡,:--:-...:
~\...i¥~~ j j
~_.~-~~_........._- -----
. ... .. ... ... . - ..... -........
¡-UhV. j¡~.y!f~~
~~¡¡;;;;,. - -----..-
g,jçr~~r~ ~ ~¥1~f~ i
.
~;¡,..
n_.-..,. f....._ _.
, ""'O-~"n ~~x J'J.-:.;{?
7GT;
fD~~ 4/~ I . ¡ ~ut ¡r,.
! ~.?./ /â.·~ ¡K!_¡:;-;?!s:'"
_____L -
~
--,
!
-.....-............ G:;.
~r~~Jur~ ~
jT'!i it,....__ ;/..:...._ .
<---J. .- -- "l'1T~i."!~
¡Ç(~/r::;;t" f"_'
i-;:::---______....,
1.~X!J""a if
1_-
r-3~ ~ ..\l'1 J-- l_ 91 .. -:;j/_ t-
pU'j¡:¿ i"i"T~
i;;;,.r.-"':1
-<-
~[;"-I _ _ ..., J
~... ÔAŒ ... ¡"'~¡d í2 i} ;/A.r j V ~J
ji-'f1Vnc ## . -- . -;' ..:.(
'~~;-iJ¿:¡;'-¡..."" ¡
¡r::r:;¡----·~ '..Y'"..- ......- õ , Jy_'v
1-'" ' I
,
---'
#01-0i3
~
CH:NSON ISLAND
\!~\j.~\iV~.f~.."· :_~_-~1..4.,S._: ..,.iJ ~ :~ .-. ~T A Th-i"¡ D ¡:'u l\ £;:¡i í? Ã Tir;.~i
.. - - ~ -- iI _ii ~ __i¡ . .... ¡........ 01 ¡~¡i¡¡ .1;...... i.i""i.wi¡¡"'¡ ji:,n. iVPi
5;;:;~~;!;t=; '7, 2!:~~
Tn
1\ I i
ð~r,¡.~~¡-J""A""'n I~ ~!~!""\!::!"'!.-co_
;- .;-....v.;;;.¡;~ ¡ ;¡:;; ¡: ~'¡..1!'W'...n_...,.
_. ... tt .
i ne TOnO\~!nq cna[1C~S: ;1ï:i(lrrH..,n~ {~~~rif¡f"'~tir!f'!~ !J,.~r{ ~-1.öi.ð.Tir~!'\~ ~!"'!!"':'::::'~..-1 +h"",",, D~A
- -.-.....--....--..-, -.....·--·......P... _t!!_,¡.....:; "'!~!;.;o :L..~~-...Ii
Dn~f rmønf<:: t"tt tn~ ~ "'"': ,Q t"~~tt!'·H"I!o.rI D!"'J"'\.;~"+ <"'\r'\....... I'"....."'u k__......__ __ ~.....L..___I _ _.-.....4 __
. ...;........;..........:-- -~ ~:...... _O....Vv ~!,-,,\""""'" ''''1''"''-''&, al...., .;~Î.nu 1o.'C"':t...._'~~!~ ~~~ !!~teW'!~! !J~~t !.J!
.. - . .-
1ne L:ünifBL"""Ï UOCU[T1e[l!~
P!A;:¡~µ n!1tt1 th-ø t"'!\nto-!""!t~ ho!"'ol!"'\ -a~~ ~«~v ~_--._ 4_ -g.....-.
.---- ~--- --....--....-- ..-........... -..- _...,,.... v..~~:t~ ~':J t.!::~
, .
~JOQufnen!$ you
ha~~ en h~~(L
~nd~~te ~:: !h.; 8;:.1 Farm !h~t th~s .;:\dd~nd;.;;;~
'-. .
..-.-
h..-..-.~ ~.......__-........;, 'J"'-_-1
~"\;~" ,.................¡v';...õy.
Pi ¡::iiO;¡¡;';; c;¡:;~ II-!~ AT1"J\r"lI:n T1JU.t"'Il~\ ....nO~!::.....T'....n .......
~ ............. i"-,_ ....__ . ¡; e....... t""'t t : ~"'-Í'e r~&.# _ ...... ~Lf t....._.#!.."....~!.-t._...!!::!...:' ~!:..:
!i\¡~-H(:~ H\Jf~i ~ ir!~;¡;; ~~n 11! Th'ºt..1!!Tb" .of r't
---..---~..------ ·~-·...."._.~D... ,-.......
~.l""Lt"'!I.24'"'1o
'/fÆ': #~~:="õ:.
,. '=; .,..""'~.."...,
.,. ¡¡Ai. ¡.-:¡,..:;,..... __.., _..___.___ _ ___ . _......_.. ,;.,,", ., ;;;ow.....
n J'Vä ¡¡i~i'~ -¡;;ii.ž '4U~~i.jvii~!I! \..-dH ii:lu i j ¡¡¡,ç.,¿"" Ï iU\i",
.------
i;~ã~~ ~~ljit
-- -..... ~ ---.
ºf!Y relufu UV ï1ï;;ïit Of T~I tn i ~jo¡, i 4.~7=i 7Q.â.
;. -.---- :: i
NÅ¡~'iE OF ¡;¡RM: ~"',u."'I ì L oó~/.I
92-
~
C1 -'\J 1'-1" '-.,.,., ,.( ( Jy.., \
----.. -. .--
~!~f<tfA , UKt::
----
UAii=:
'11~lol
\w
Excellellce
Sillce
1968
l-\1TÞ-d~Mi!"¡\ ~ ~ P", \.~ \
MURRAY LOGAN CONSTRUcÌJON, lNC ,...".,
General Contractors a?1
313 65TH TRAIl. NORTH
WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33413 . ~
TELEPHONE (561) 686·3948
FAX (561) 686·7465
Construction Projects within the last 5 years
Owner:
Contact Person:
Phone:
Name of Project:
Engineer:
Amount:
Completed:
Owner:
Contact Person:
Phone:
Name of Project:
Engineer:
Amount:
Completed:
Owner:
Contact Person:
Phone:
Name of Project:
Engineer:
Amount:
Completed:
Owner:
Contact Person:
Phone:
Name of Project:
Engineer:
Amount:
Completed:
Owner:
Contact Person:
Phone:
Name of Project:
Engineer:
Amount:
Completed:
City of Delray Beach
Mr. Howard Wight
561-243-7304
Barrier Island Pump Station
Hazen & Sawyer
$1,100,000.00
December 1997
Lake Worth Drainage District
Mr. Bill Winters
561-737-3335
E-3 Revetment
Bridge Design
$125,000.00
May 1997
Breakers Hotel
Mr. Bob Ivy
561-683-3113, Ext.227
Breakers D-13 Pump Station
Mock, Roos & Associates, Inc.
$1,100,000.00
March 1998
Loxahatchee Environmental Control District
Mr. Paul Brienza
561-747-5700
RAS Pump Station
Hazen & Sawyer
$270,000.00
January 1998
Northern Palm Beach County Improvement District
Mr. Bob Ivy
561-683-3113, ext227
Abacoa Reuse Pump Station
Mock, Roos & AssociatðS, Ine
$550,000.00
March 1998
'"
'-'
...."
AGENDA REQUEST
ITEM NO. C-6-B
DATE: March 26, 2002
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [X]
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY:
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT) : Utilities Department
william R. Blazak
SUBJECT: Purchase of two replacement submersible lift station pumps.
Recommending replacement with original equipment supplier. Flyght
Pumps were original supplier when project was completed. Staff requests
that Ellis K. Phelps be declared the sole source and waive the standard bid
process for purchase of the pumps. The cost of each pump is $1,901.00 for a
total purchase of 3,802.00. Request approval of EQ #02-206,
EQ #02-207 and Budget Amendment BA02-126.
FUNDS AVAIL.:45/-3510-564000-300
PREVIOUS ACTION: When the South Hutchinson Island project was bid in 1995
the bid specifications were for Flyght Pumps. The specifications allowed
for equal or better products to be submitted. The Flyght proposal was
selected and it allowed for a credit on the bid item at that time.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests that the Board declare Ellis K. Phelps a
sole source for Flyght Pumps and approve the purchase of two replacement
pumps in the amount of $3,802.00.Request approval of EQ #02-206,
EQ #02-207 and Budget Amendment BA02-126.
COMMISSION ACTION:
[ X] APPROVED
[ ] OTHER:
DENIED
County Attorney:X ,~~
" 'I! 'V
II' ·,1' I I, "
~ AI, ._¡.-~ ,J
Originating Dept: X \,: 1'PI ,¡ r~ .! ,I
~, - it
Finance Director:(C eck for"opy only,
Coordination/Siqnatures
Mgt. & Budget: -'~,¡ r(Y)h\ð]
Purchasing
Other:
if applicable)
Other:
Eft. 5/96
\w
BOARD OF COUNTY
COAN\AJSS!ON£RS
...."
Î
UT1UTiE5
DEPARTMENT
WilLIAM GlAZAI':;
DIREGOi1.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Board of County Commissioners
I I
....' ';Y-"'r
"' \ '\',"', j'-
I. "'.,' ,',
\/"'I~ .f~
FROM:
William Blazak, Utility Director
DATE:
March 26, 2002
RE:
Submersible Pump Purchase 1 South Hutchinson Island System
BACKGROUND:
When the South Hutchinson System was constructed Flyght pumps were utilized as a
result of the bidding process associated with the project. Bidders had the opportunity to supply
equal or better than Flyght but Ellis K. Phelps pricing was the most competitive.
The pumps that staff is requesting to purchase would be a replacement pumps for the lift
stations in the system.
The original pumps have provided service for over 6 years without failure and will be
rebuilt to provide back up and maintenance flexibility for other stations. The replacement pumps
wil1 allow for the original pumps to be rebuilt and provide emergency back up for other lift
stations in the system.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff requests that the Board declare Ellis K. Phelps as a sole source, waive the standard
bid process, and approve the purchase of two replacement pumps in the amount of $ 3,802.00
Also Request approval ofEQ #02-206,EQ #02-207 and Budget Amendment BA02-126.
JOHN D, ßRUHN, Dimicr NO.1' DOUG COWARD, District No.2' PAULA A LEWIS, District No. J . FRANNIE HUTCHINSON, Dimicr No, 4 . CLIFF GARNES, Districr No.5
Counry Adminisrrotor - Douglas M. Anderson
2300 Virginia Avenue .. Fort Pierce, Fl34982 · Phone (561) 462-1150 .. FAX (561) 462-1153
¡
BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST FORM
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT:
PREPARED DATE:
AGENDA DATE:
Uti liti es
03/11/02
03/26/02
TO:
451-3510-564000-300
Machinery & Equipment
$3,802
FROM: 451-9910-599300-800
Reserves
$3,802
REASON FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT:
Purchase two (2) pumps for the South Hutchinson Island
Wastewater Treatment System
CONTINGENCY BALANCE:
THIS AMENDMENT: N/A
REMAINING BALANCE:
DEPARTMENT APPROVAL:
OMB APPROVAL:
BUDGET AMENDMENT #:
DOCUMENT # & INPUT BY:
02-126
G:\BUDGETiQUA TTRO\GENERAL \FORMS\AMENDM02,wb3
(
.....,
"tJ
c::
C!
§-~
..::c: 'S
to e
.¿go.
~-g
'S; ~
e::::
0.::>
0.Q
-~
~Q) g
::>.Q
.Qo <"')
~- 6
Q) 0:> <:)
~ .Q~ <:)
::::: ::> ;g
'3: 0. Il)
W N "tJ- 6
zo c:: C! ,...
00 CTJ·5: Il)
-~ C/) "tJ.~ <"')
.
tn.... ~ õo ,...
eno ~ Q) Il)
~
-0 C!:S
:::ãiNN ~.È
:::ãio:::o
O<Ùi <O~
OW~ ~:2 ó::
>->-M C! C!
l-...J0 a:;;: w
E s: m
z<w :¡¡¡
::Jol- ::> 0)
~~ :J
oen< c z
uü:C C! ::>
w .S 0. I-
LLo:::l- > '~ê: z
~ :J
oofß o Q) 0
CLL::J D.. Q) E 0
D.. ¡:: ~ . 0
O:::l-O « .!!! E «
<enw ü e o.~
oWO::: ~~~
m::J< ~ V,¡ Q) 0)
>-Oc C/) 16 ¡:: Q)
l-wZ cs Q) :S
zO:::w :S<lÌC::
>- c:: '-
::Jl-C) ¡.... 'S .0 0)
OZ< :::¡ CI,) .;:; t:
c::.i!! .2
OW ¡:.:: 00:>....
w:::ãi ::J ~~.s
~ cc:.::: CI)
_D.. -...11::
0- CI,)(!)::::
::J::J :5 iI::.c:...
...JO "::::0(1)
.w ~ Cb\",,::S
::5~o
l- ~ ... ...
en 0 ~ ~J2
C/) o.;:¡; 0.
~ E:9 ::>
::>'<..:.:
~ o..¡g ~
-Q).Q
:) c:: to
C/) :I: ~c::~ <0
l.U Q) C! c:: <:)
¡:.:: ~ to c:: Q) C'J
co.æ~ ~
:::¡ ::J õ...S Q) <:)
¡:.:: 0 Q) C! E 0-
:) C/) a::EQ) l.U
:it
a
w
0::
I-
Z
W
:¡¡¡
D..
5
a
w
"0
t::
<a
§-CI>
:tJ
-'<: S;
~ e
.Qc..
~-g
'S; <a
e~
c..:J
0.Q
- ~ C)
"'" CD C)
'S .Q '"
~.2 0
C)
'"' '" C)
CD c.. "q-
;::E Ie
It)
::::: :::J 0
s: c..
"0- .....
t:: <a It)
<a .S '"
,
"O.g> .....
It)
õ 0 "q-
~~
<a-
CD ...
::...,e
Ie 5: c¿
e~ w
<a <a aI
~::: :&
E s: :J
:J '" Z
~~ I-
<a :J Z
.S c.. :J
.g> 1: 0
0
o () 0
() E «
¢: ()
'"
¡..... ..!!1 ~
~ c...!!:
ü () !!! '"
~ 't5Q)~
¡;;. ¢: C)
~ CI> :S
0 :S ~.S
~ .S 0 tt)
CI):'¡:;C:
::,! t:~~
¡..... o '" <a
::J ~~~
~ 't5::$;
...J $:~~
S --()
¡..: ~ Q)~=S
UJ :Soo
c:: ...""...
0 ,e ;è,e
U) <::¡,:::: c..
~ E Q :J
:J ><-'<:
~ o...¡g 15
1: ().Q
U)~ C) (,) ::.,
E t:: '" ......
!:!:!;¡: () <a t:: C)
'" 16 () '"
!:::¡..... ..!!11:e> ~
::,!::J 0..'- C) C)
¡.....o C) <a E 0
::JU) Q:E() llJ
:it
a
w
II::
I-
Z
w
::E
c..
:5
a
w
~j!~~íLCÖL l~:ö~ ~o~c~o~~~~
t..K.r".I""':t:..L,.r-::;:. !,.I.,õr'.t)
ï~Ç¡t.. OJ.
...,¡
,,," :<,'<.".UO ~ ..",.~,~.;;p. )'L\i,"¡HTU"~I'> '¡YHH~"TlifE 0 WAY¡, A~~ WA>!¡ ,""un IHH"'!~T ¡'1U¡''<In¡
;
i
i
'fY~$:::J.) P~Oi?O;SAl
Tv; ,sj WiCJ:!t:OiJ}jji- 'f.!),YME ~ÀY~S' ?JJ¡]i't.~~,:ttœ
I
SJ.YSJ.E'Cl; HJ.ìj'CJ.H1lS0M ~;SU}j:D 1.~:13 REPLAC£lalNT PUiMP$
j .
y ¡;~& COMPANY
S1'EVE KISS
\fla are plass& to off&i" the following e~uipment: ,
TWO (2) MP30851257 2hp lph 2601/ Flygt Giíinder Pumps
I
I '
PR!C£: $3,002.00 plus taxes,FOsl ctolY,wìlh freight allowable to jobsil. "
nns P1fOfOSAl. mu. EXì'iR£ DiM t!RTY (30) DAYS UNLESS EX1114ÐED IN ~~1]~G 131
EU.JS X. PHELPS 1& COMPANY .
NOTE; WE DO NOT SUPPLY PIPIN ,VALVES,GUIDE BARS,PRESSURE GUAGES OR SPARE
PARTS EXCEPT AS INDICA ED ABOVE.
TERMS: SUBJECT TO CREDIT APPR VAL NET 30 DAYS AFTER DATE OF INVOICE OR 100%
PAYA8LE BEFORE STARr UP OF EQUIPMENT{WHJCHE'/D COMES fIRST.) A
SERVICE CHARGE OF 1.5 0 PER MONTH' WILL 8£ ADDED TO ALL BALANCES
UNPAJD 30 DAYS AFTER ItJVOICE DATE. FAilURE TO PAY IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THESE. TERMS WILL VOID ALL WARRANTIES.
CONDmONS :1) Price is firm ba~ on our receiving complata approval and ralease for
production four ( ) weeks after drawings have been submitted by EJlis K.
Phelps &. Compan
2) PARTIAL 8LLlI'IG IJVILL BE MADE ON ANY PARTIAL SHIPMENT.
We thank you for your interest in OU'f¡eqUiPment and look forward to being of seNica to you in
the near future. A SIGNED FACSI. ~LE COPY OF THIS PROPOSAL IS ACCEPTABLE AS A
BINDiNG CONTRACT .
I
i ~ ~D 8yi2~
, , MP,ANY: .
,)'1 Lü c,o.<- a" I¡--b li;;-;Ø t;;",
DATE: 1-5-1 :2-
~
vt~( l' j fI/'-
6t'lw- ,fJrt ~
'Pv¿J¡j ;Z-J-f.JJ-
113Q 10" STREET WEST' AIVI¡RA aEAtH. flO~II)AnH' . Slil·S4Q,IHD . FA" 551·aU·1293
A~QP~A 0 FT, MY~RS 0 RIVIeRA a~AtH 0 S..VANNAiI
'-'
JU~ JltilCA.TION
FOR
!:'''T -¡:: ;:"O""P'CE' 1P"O~T1D~ "':i'\{IT
~........--. ~ u.;c\, .. J:'\.'-:;"-U~..~
....,;
(J
32..~ upon ti:.:e P1:xCT1~g :?Y.!a:¡¡rrm], me propaed procm~meI1.t descrl~d below is œ;;'g proc-.w>wd
T;"~t to the ~d.:::Jm~ on So1e Sourœ Procmement. A geed farJ1!:View of a~n:::¡ble sow.~
4 <::>
n>=s "been made and mer¡;: jz OD.'y one sO!!r~ for the required supply, service, or CODStmction item.
1.
Propose to procure
'-:;''L .-:
/:.>~..;_l -:?:~ ?'I-/~"/_:::?
/
,5/ f~<.;';J ,-/-_f "'-) 1.---/
/:/4~ -,1,1/ (:~, ,~,_:t4/L /1.:t .'7' .J .1'"
/" ./
,.
2.
.A3 a sole source procurement from:
; //>.-
. ' ,
Requisition :#
,) / .
j(: 1/7 .! 1>1./" .
/
;\
3. The oasis for this sole sourœ' de'tenDiDation and the reason no other vendor is suitable is:
/, ;;,
//-¡~. '. ;"
~. c'd
/
/
~1 // _:' /:/ ,'.' /,
"..._;;~ //::;J - / t--'.l~;;-~ /~ -~ l.iL.';'
...-"'1
'- -/
ì· .J,
r i -;
¡-I/o) 7
//
....-; __.~.,/, ..-.I -~ __ ./ /.,r:~ ?'~ I~
) '._/J,'''£. ;(,- >,/1//__;--
---
r~;:,: ;',t-
~;I
,--:;J ,.;:
/~,: .....
"."'-'
'~
,:-;:,,! /':':'f-'>,:: <1'"';/ >-;T'
j/
[/
/·"i.,
.", "·r"
~ /:(/-.. "of".; ~ .-_...
/
../
", "J ;, ,'./ +
~~ ,;.;' J.- ,.//,1,/,,> .-t/;
/ .;/
()
Date
Department/Division
Authorized Signature
TItle .
NOTE: L Enter description of gccds or scrvil::: to be proaJred.
2 Emer name of sole soorœ """'.....,.,.....
3. Enter the det=iætiœ aDd ~ fcf' sole = procu¡....ent.
4. Axtacb sole source letter fr.:m YeIIdoC' aDd depanment.
5. Proposal from veador with priåDg.
( )Approved ( )Disa.pproved
c¡ Purchasing Director
Da.te
·.....
~'::
.."
~.
- SOL E SOU R C E AUT H-O-R I Z A T ION -
DATE:
THIS IS TO tONFIRM THAT THE ATTACHED REQUISITION IS·SOl.E SOURCE
.
!-"OH THE FOLLOWING REASÖN: (CHEC~ APPROPRIATE SOX)
~~GINAL MANUFACTU~~S'RE?LACEMENT:
[] TO COMPLETE JOB REQUIREMENTS.
[tbNl. V KNOWN VENDOR.
r=l.Ol~ER (EXPLAIN-IN DETAIL)
,
"
TO THE ÐEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE I 4TrEST THIS IS A SOl.E SOURCE ITEM.
-
Oß,PARTMENT HEAD
, ..
· - -. -.. ......
;':0,978
P.2/2
'-'
...J
,'?! :/'1"7 ?l7'!:>JL<n~'1?.j3'!~ '~"',\,,;,\';¡"''j
i4.11 J:.3' d:JJ~.:t=.:1~~:t :J~~ ,..H"¡d?,~~"
~ 77'J;~'''''' ''"''''''''''''"':'.-:0=
£4:¡' ~.-:7JIJ ~.rio1..-;.-~~~. Œð.
90 Hcr,z:;¡¡ þ;<ty¡¡
Srr.vQ7'~ C;W SQ02.:/.
TfI!a~.oi1e: (7"7qJ 932-43J:3
F'Þ:: (770) 9324321
I'I.!.ar:h 21, 2001
'{.
St. Lucie County Utilities
'"
',\
S-å:jeœ: FIy~ Products.. Salœ & Service
-
--
?1~ be advis...od that Em3 !(. PbeIps &: Company is the ocly ~ 'Wnder for 'llFlygt
Products and SAS is the emy ~ sernca ~ am wammt'¡ ~"';~on in ~ State of
Fkrida (East of1l'1: Apalachicola River). Their Staft'is properly t:ained to prov.Aa you the best
service available,
,
-----"
Thank ycu fur y~ ~ in Plygt Proctuc1s WI de net hesit= to cau me if' you lmViI ¡my
~ons ~~db1g ctistn"bt..'ÛC!l or any ether ~.
Very WIy yours.
m FLYGT COR?Ol\ATIDN
~
lohnD. ~
Scuiheaat R.egiœaJ M¡¡nager
cc~ Dick Cole - E. K. Phelps Dc Co.
0"
j. ~
11F1ygt Products includß.~ pumps. mbœra, valves. and MuI~e probeia controls aœ
'9Iicl1 WllSher. '
,"
L
\..-
'....,¡
AGENDA REQUEST
ITEM NO. C-6-C
DATE: March 26, 2002
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [X]
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY:
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT) : Utilities Department
William R. Blazak
SUBJECT: Work Authorization with LBF&H for the extension of a reuse water
main on North Hutchinson Island. The amount of the Work Authorization is
$ 29{800.00 and will cover the design{ permitting and services during
construction.
FUNDS AVAIL: 441802-3600-563005-300 North Hutchinson Island Water Main
Grant.
PREVIOUS ACTION: March 6{ 2001- BOCC approved resubmittal of a grant
application to the South Florida Water Management District Alternative
Water Source Funding program. November 6{2001- BOCC accepted the 50/50
Grant Award in the amount of $82{800.00 for the project. February 26{ 2002
BOCC approved budget resolution 02-70 for the matching funds for the Grant.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Work
Authorization with LBF&H in the amount of $ 29{800.00 for the design{
permitting and services during construction for a reuse line extension on
North Hutchinson Island.
"J/
- 'I
'I~
County Attorney:X ,f /
Originating Dept: X
Finance Director:~ fo Copy only,
coordination/~i~at~
Mgt. & Budget: !.' c'¡ fYI
derson
Administrator
COMMISSION ACTION:
[ X ]
[ ]
APPROVED
OTHER:
DENIED
Purchasing
Other:
if applicablel____
Other:
Eff. 5/96
~
'..".1
BOARD OF COUNTY
COJwY\JSSJ·ONfRS
UTi UTi ES
DEPARTMENT
WilLIAM ßlAZAK
DIREGOR
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Board of County Commissioners
~ør
FROM:
William Blazak, Utility Director
DATE:
March 26, 2002
RE:
North Hutchinson Island -Reclaimed Water Main Extension
LBF&H Work Authorization Approval
BACKGROUND:
This Work Authorization is for the design, permitting and services during construction of
a reuse line that will extend to the west along A-I-A. Utilities was successful in obtaining a grant
from the South Florida Water Management District through the Alternative Water Source
Funding program in the amount of $ 82,800.00. The Utility District applied matching funds for
the project and this work authorization will allow for the design, permitting, bidding and
construction services to complete the project.
The reuse main extension will provide reclaimed water to the western portion of our
service on North Hutchinson Island. Reclaimed water will be available along A-I-A westerly to
Harbor Cove Condominiums and to the proposed County Park to be located East of Little Jim
Bridge.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the Work Authorization with LBF&H in the amount of
$ 29,800.00 for the design, permitting, bidding and services during construction, for the extension
of a reuse line on North Hutchinson Island.
JOHN 0, ßRUHN. District No, 1 . DOUG COWARD. Disrrict No, 2 . PAULA A LEWIS. Djsrrict No, :) . mANNIE HUTCHINSON, District No, 4 . CLIFF GARNES, District No, 5
Counry Adminisrroror - Douglas M. AnderSOfl
2JOO Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, Fl J4982 ' Phone (561) 462-1150 . FAX (561) 462-115J
~
.."
WOR:< AUTHO~IZATIûN #16
J'j,crth Hut¡:};¡ì1~~ì'1 r~jar.d ~2da¡m2d Water Sy,;;t~;r¡
R~us~ ?J\oi¡¡ ExJ'~7:s¡Cì1 W~:st
CCl1tl"f.lc·t No. CCO-03-234
Pursuant to that czrtaill Agreement for Continuing Engineering Services (the
"Agreement") between St. Lucie County (the "County") and LBPH, Inc. (the "Engineer") dated
March 14,2000, Engineer herzby agrees to pròvide professional enginezring services under
the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit uN', attached hereto and made a part of this
Work Authorization.
"
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County and the Engineer have executed this Work
Authorization, effective this_ day of ,2002.
BOARD OF COUNT?' CO¡Ì¡\MISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNT'!, FLORIDA
A TrEST:
By:
Chairman
Deputy C~r!<
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FOR.1A AND
CORRECTNESS:
COUNTY ATTORNEY
WITNESSES:
- 1·
~' ; , ; /¡'.,r;;, (i, -f7f
~ "~_A}'tj~~~,tI ( ".__ _-(-(~:~;-.'/~.·,../I:~¿;·'{¿/:xll·L~Cl.-
- ~ U
~ ¡ . 'Í f\..J ~ r,_ i '
i ).~~.j~(\ /\1 t, C .... ;~u.;:..;.¿h (;: i.1j..~ ¡c 1.
LBFH, INC. " , ~'-,I,lil'
/" I'
, ,;;:J.)~I r;-r- !vr
By: /1.{'-C7,,\1 II/v"
, Print Name:
~ i) -, -J
':=::"<."- ¡'¡?"J t-¡ /--,/ 'e r,~ /-
c..--c........// !¡ I ~Gl -- ._....-
Title:
I ,[ . . <"
V iC B
/}.1-- ,1 ,-. rf¡
(' I ;-::"';', , TJ' ,
".,.~,-,,,.~....... -:-1
G: \atty \agreemnt\work.aut\LBFH- W A#1 Ó
11£j"" }c'l
c~ ''=\
',S',j
. ,
,·.....·:.':,.':..c,..··: 'L··"
.~.~:,\"--'.
'-'
EXBIBJT A
TD thz Agrt:zme:nt B€tWEi:ll
St. Lucie CDUllty, Florida anrl LBF:;:C3:, ÌTIe.
NOT!~1 HTItchi:nSüTI Island Re1:hdmerl Watzr System
Reus.e Main Extension West
SECTION 1- SCOPE OF SERVICES
ENGINEER will provide the following services in accordance with applicable sections
of the AGREEMENT:
Design, permitting, bidding services, and construction administration for
approximately 6,500 linear feet of reclaimed water main. The main will
commence at the existing reclaimed water main along A-l-A and travel
south and west along A-l-A towards the planned SLC park at "Little Jim
Bridge" and Harbor Point condominiums.
Phas~ 20 - Desj~
1. Design of a southern 1 western pipeline extension to provide reclaimed
water to the western side of North Hutchinson Island. The pipeline will
consist of approximately 3,650 linear feet of 8-inch and 2,950 linear feet of
6-inch reclaimed water main west of AlA.
2. Prepare base plan and profile sheets for the project in AutoCAD fonnat.
These drawing sheets will be derived from the highway construction plans
prepared by FDOT, from survey infonnation, and from black and white
aerial photography from the City of Fort Pierce.
3. Prepare key sheet for locating each plan and profile sheet in the project
corridor.
4. Prepare design and detail sheets for utility adjustments and for new utilities
to be located within the FDOT right-of-way.
5. Detail reclaimed water main design with horizontal and vertical control,
fittings configuration, restraining length, valve locations, etc. will be
provided.
6. Work with OWNER, as necessary, to determine and detail the best
procedures to facilitate new construction connection to existing reclaimed
water mains.
7. Determine specific utility design quantities and engineering estimate of
probable construction costs.
8. Review design drawings with OWNER and incorporate revisions.
P:\99-009O\Proposa1\ars finw version-doc
Page 2 of 8
~~c
'..."J
PhBse 12 - Snney
1. Prepare a design 1 route survey of the corridor frcm the north side of the
Noru'1 Cause'Nay Bridge to û'1e westerly side of State Road AlA. The route
is approximately 6,250 feet long. Corridor limits are from edge of pavemen¡
to t'1e apparent right of way. The design 1 route survey will include:
~
Location of the existing Potable Water and Sanitary Sewer as marked by
others. Location and elevation on manholes (storm and samt3J.-Y) and
water valve boxes, fIre hyd11mts, etc. will be collected.
Baseline of survey will be established raiìdomly and referenced at each
end.
Setting of benchmarks (iron rods) at approximately 1500-foot intervals.
Integrate aerial photography ,into the base survey drawings to better
define existing topography.
It is not intended to survey the right-of-way line. Design and
construction are anticipated to be based on roadway dimensions and
offsets from the existing roadway.
,~
~
.
.
Phase 35 - Cûntract Documents
1. LBFH will prepare the contract manual, including coordination with the
OWNER to update the "front end" contract documents, prepare the bid
forms and bid item descriptions, prepare the technical specifications. The
specifications will be completed using Word '97, and in the fonowing
sequence so that the OWNER'S input and guidance can be incorporated
into the documents.
2. Contract Documents - The contract manual, including "front end"
contract documents and technical specifIcations will be completed for the
OWNER'S review and comments. Upon approval of the contract manual,
LBFH will coordinate with the OWNER'S purchasing department to
obtain a bid number, advertising date, pre-construction meeting date, and
bid opening date.
.,.
Permittin1i!
Phase 43 - FDEP Reclaimed Water Permit / Notmcation
1. Prepare and submit a FDEP General Permit application for the reclaimed
water main extension west.
2. Respond up to one "Requests for Information (RFI)" from FDEP
regarding the submitted application.
P:\99-0090\Propusal\afs fmaJ. veMioc..doc
Page 3 of8
~Ì2
....,
FhBse 45 - ¥DOT Utilit:y P'e:rmÜ
1. Pr~pare and submit a FDOT Utility Penrit appJication for the recìaimed
water main extension west.
2.
Respond to up to one &"1 from FDOT
application.
-lOVarr1~~j a
.....0 '-o..J."o
the subrrIitted
Phas,e 41- SFWNID S{;berlule and OmuterlY Re'jJor1s
1. Prepare a detailed construction 1 project schedule and submit to SF'iV1VID
per the requirements of the Contract between SLC and SFv'lJYID.
Specifically the schedule will be in accordance with Article 4.4 of this
contract. \ \
2. Prepare quarterly reports to SFWlVID documenting the activity of the
project for the previous quarter; These reports shall be as required in
Article 4.4 of the contract between SLC and SFWlVID.
Phase 62 - BiddinŒ Senkes
1. Prepare Contract Documents based on SLC standards
2. Prepare for, attend, and facilitate one pre-bid meeting.
3. Respond to Bidders questions and prepare necessary addendum.
4. Review bids and prepare summary tabulation.
5. Prepare letter for recommendation of award.
Construction Administration I Services Durin!! Construction
Phase &4 - OfficelField Engineering Services During Construction:
Pre-Construction Meeting: LBFH shall conduct one pre-construction
meeting with SLCU, the contractor, and other applicable agencies and
public utilities prior to the commencement of construction. LBFH shall
issue plans for construction to the contractor at this time, and meeting
minutes following the meeting.
Design Clarifications: LBFH shall provide the contractor with
clarifications conèerning questions about the contract documents and/or the
construction plans.
Shop Drawings: LBFH shall review shop drawings for the improvements
as indicated in the approved Plans and Specification. The shop drawings
shall be forwarded to SLCU for their review and approval.
Review Contractor's Pay Requests: LBFH shall review pay requests as
submitted by the contractor. LBFH shall verify the quantities as
P:\99~009O\Proposa.l\afs tinul vernion.Joc
Page 4 of 8
]~fb~
~l,~
~
represented on the pay request fuld ma.1çe a recoillmendaLion te SLCU to
proceed with the payment as requested, or as modified based en LBffi's
review. The contractor may submit pay requests up to one time per month.
R~yiew ChaJJ.g~ Order RE1luesís: LBFH shall review change orders
proposed by the contractor and shall provide recoJ11.JL.endations to the
SLCU for approval or denial.
Phas;e 66 . Site Yisits/Progress mspectiûJJ.5
LBFH shall provide construction observation services, and shall make site visits
to observe the construction of improvements such that an engineering
certification can be made regarding the construction of the proposed
improvements and to answer requests for clarification by\the Contractor, or St.
Lucie County. Tills estimate assumes that LBFH shall provide limited project
representation by being present at the"site at intervals appropriate to the various
stages of construction averaging: 3 to 4 hours per week for the construction
duration of 4 months.
The purpose of the project representation is to provide periodic consL.~ction
observation, in conjunction field observations by SLCU and the contract
operator, of the progress and quality of the construction work, and to determine,
in general, if the construction is proceeding in accordance with the contract
documents. The services provided are not intended to relieve the Contractors
from their complete responsibility for the means, methods, sequence of
construction and construction site safety.
LBFH shall notify the County of observed permanent work which does not
appear to substantially conform to the contract documents, prepare a written
report describing any apparent non-conforming permanent work and make
recommendations to the County for its correction. Should construction
observation be required beyond the twenty week duration, these services will be
considered Additional Services and compensated as such.
The Contractor shall notify LBFH of all tests and installations which would
require the presence of LBFH for engineering certifications as required by the
various regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over the project (i.e. pressure tests,
lift station start-up, etc.) LBFH shall coordinate when a County inspector is
required.
Phase 70 - Certification an.d Final Inspe~tion
Final Inspections: LBFH shall conduct a construction observation visit to
determine if the project is substantially complete, and a final construction
observation visit to determine if the project has been completed in
accordance with the approved Plans and Specifications and in a manner
P:\99-0090\Proposal\afs fu¡aj v~sion.doc
Page 5 of 8
C~'~}1J~
''''''. .~,
..- . J¡;:..,-
\.r-'
'...."
satisfactory to provide the necessary certifications. All remaining c1ea.ll:p
and completion items will be noted for the contractor's completion.
Ce:rmkatioD3; LBFH shall sl:bmit certification applications to the
necessary regulatory agencIes, including the required supporting
documentation.
RE'\:Drd Drawings: LBFH shall review the record information submitted
by the Contractor. Record information will be based on field
measurements and survey information provided by the Contractor. Record
drawings shall identify changes made during construction and indicat~
record infonnation required by the regulatory agencies. Based on this
review LBFH will prepare record drawings of the project"
:Reimibursab1es I Dind Expens~s
1. Any direct, non-salary expense, including, but not limited to, photocopies,
blueprints, out-of-office reproduction or photographic services, long
distance telephone calls, special mailing or delivery services, contract
services authorized by the OWNER, processing fees, legal advertisements
and notices, title search services, special materials, and survey markers.
2. Estimated sets of drawings and contract documents to be supplied:
a) Owner review - 3 sets,
b) Bidding - 12 sets, and
c) Construction - 6 sets.
SECTION 2 - DELIVERABLES
ENGINEER will provide the following Deliverables to OWN'"ER:
1. Completed applications for the following permits:
a) FDEP general permit for pipeline construction,
b) FDOT Utility Permit,
2. Ninety percent complete design plans, specifications, and cost estimates (3
sets) .
3. One Hundred,percent complete design plans, specifications, cost estimate,
and contract documents.
4. Bid tabulation and recommendation of award.
P:\99..o090\?r0posaI\ufs fUlal. version.doc
Page 6 of 8
~Ì)flJ
_-,r~~
>"".,.,"-,.,,,., ]6~~
"""'"
SECTION 3 . TDlIE OF PKRFORl'vlANCE
Execution of this authorization and receipt of a purchase order shall ccnstitute Notice'
to Proceed. ENGINF.FR. and ÜWNER agree to the following schedule:
Phase 64 - Filed 1 Office Construction Engineering
Start Compl€tioì1
Day* Day*
15 45
,
,.
.!\
1 15
30 60
60 100
120 240
120 240
240 270
Phase 20 - Design
Phase 12 - Survey
Phase 40 - Permitting
Phase 62 - Bidding Services
Phase 66 - Site Visits! Construction Observation
Phase 70 - FDEP Certification.
* From Notice to Proceed
P:\99-C090\Propo~l\:Jf5 fmal version.doc
Page 7 of 8
~~~}J
,'"""'·',c, ·~'C
-- . .,. j¡~,
,..""
SECTION 4 - IvIETII0D OF COlYIPENSATI0N
OY~'ER will compensate ENGINEER for services III accordance with the
following payment schedule:
"
Comvensation
$10,500
Phase 20 - Design
Phase 12 - Survey
$4,300 \
^,
Phase 40 - Permitting
FDEP
FDOT
$900
$1,300
$1,100
Phase 35 - Contract Documents
Compensation
Method
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
Phase 41- SFWl'vID Schedule and Quarterly Reports $ 1,100 LS
Phase 62 - Bidding Services
$1,900
LS
Phase 64 - Filed 1 Office Construction Engineering $3,000 LS
Phase 66 - Site Visits 1 Construction Observation $4,000 LS
Phase 70 - FDEP Certification. $1,100 LS
Reimbursable $600 LS
Total Design, Permit, and Services During Construction
P:\99-0090\Pr0posal\afs final 'ferSion.doc
Page 8 of 8
$29,800
~
...,;
J ~
c:--- .........
..
, J
..
¡
,:UU ¡U =
~!
~ HH ...
.. ... ~5~
... .. ... §:w;"
I ::! CJ I:
~
~.,
~ ~S
d ~-
,,;Jl ) !l§
jli i:
.Jji· iiI
~I
.r~J
k 1'1 "
~lii
II-Ii....,."..,.
I ~..,..,.,
~ '. .
tI n
i! Iii
;!I~
111: r~
"-
.. E:
a ::!
= w
!I en
Q
"õI
i
.
a
. I
Flf
-'=
';:C
I~
ii
I
.
I
I
..
,!~
n
~~
n dEW 1:IO!lE;)O'j <1I1!S pafo.Id - Z ,un~¥jJ
I. !
i' '
AGE:NDA REQUEST
If
"-'
ITEM NO. ë - i(,q
DATE: March 6, 2001
CONSE:NT [X]
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
Leg. [ ] Quasi-JD. [ ]
4 :RESENTED BY:
1;AJ! bï~ '
Bi~l BlåzaJc, Director
\J
. ". \
resubmittal of a grant application to the South
Management District Alternative Water SupplY,Funding
TO:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Uti~ities Department
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND:
FUNDS AVAIL:
PREVIOUS ACTION:
RECOMMENDATION:
. -
COMMISSION ACTION:
[ X]
[ ]
APPROVED
OTHER:
,
Authorize th-e
Florida Water
Program.
In 1996, St. Lucie County re¿eived $350,200.00 from South Florida
Water Management District Alternative Water Supply Program to fund
reuse water lines on South Hutchinson Island. Although the
Utilities Department applied for funds last year for the North
Hutchinson Island Reclaimed Water Main Extension West project, it
ranked just below the funding line. For that reason, staff
requests approval to resubmit this project to SFWMD for funding.
The grant reque~t will be for $82,800 to construct an 8" reuse
water main on North Hutchinson Island westward along AlA which
will terminate as a 6" reuse water main at the new county park
across from Little Jim's Boat Ramp. The total project cost is
$165,000.00 and requires a 50% match.
In March 2000, the Board approved submitting the grant application
and earmarked the County match of $82,800 from account number 441-
9910-599300-800.
, The Board approved submitting an application to SFWMD Alternative
Water Supply Program in March 2000.
Staff recommends that the Board authorize the submittal of a grant
application to the South Florida Water Management District and
authorize the County Administrator to sign all docume~ts
associated with the submittal of the grant ap lication.
[
] DENIED
o
Coordination/Signature
Mgt , Budge~:
Pw:c:hasi:nq:
,_'" "'=-Y' ~
Originating DePt:.uf~ : V
J'inanc:e: (copias onl.y):
AgeaJ.th2obcc. ~ci
Public Works:
other :
AGENDA REQTÆST
I-JYl NO. C-3
DATE: February 26, 2002
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [X ]
TO: ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SUBMITTED BY: OMB
PRESENTED BY: Mar\è M. Gouin
SUBJECT: Budget Resolution 02-70 for the North Hutchinson Island Water Main Extension grant awarded
by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD).
BACKGROUND: N/A
Fill'1l)S WILL BE AVAILABLE: 441802-3600-337310-300 SFWMD N Hutchinson Water Main Grant
PREVIOUS ACTION: On November 6,2001 the St. Lucie BOCC accepted the grant award and authorized
the Chair to sign the Grant Agreement.
RECOMlVIENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve Budget
Resolution # 02-70 to appropriate and expend funds :from the SFWMD N Hutchinson Water
Main Grant in the amount of $82,800.
COMMISSION ACTION:
CONCURRENCE:
[ ] APPROVED [] DENIED
[ ] OTHER:
-'
Doug Anderson
County Administrator
Coordination/Signatures
County Attorney: XX ~ f- 0J1"' Management & Budget: ~~urchasing:
Originating Dept: Public Works: Other:
Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) XX
G:\BUDGE1ì ViP\AGENDA'S\Agenda0212'26SFWMDNHI.,.grant.wpd
\...
"WfI
AGENDA REQUEST
ITEM NO. C-6-D
DATE: March 26, 2002
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [X]
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY:
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT) : Utilities Department
William R. Blazak
SUBJECT: Approval of a contract with Ocean Gate Builders in the amount of
$ 19,200.00 for the up sizing of a new water line on North Hutchinson
Island from eight inch to twelve inch diameter.
FUNDS AVAIL:449-3600-563000-300
PREVIOUS ACTION: none
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the contract with ocean Gate
Builders in the amount of $19,200.00 for the up sizing of a new water line
on North Hutchinson Island from eight inch diameter to twelve inch
diameter. Staff further requests that the Board authorize the Chairman to
execute the Agreement as approved to form and correctness by the County
Attorney.
[ X]
[ ]
APPROVED
OTHER:
DENIED
E:
COMMISSION ACTION:
·C
nderson
y Administrator
Coordination/Siqnatures
County Attorney:X:" ,";: h: . Mgt. & Budget:
. \Pí1k'k~1 .
Originating Dept:X \ ! h.~'(>¡;;,·'rV Other:
Finance Director: (Chèck for cþpy only, if applicable)____
,
Purchasing
Other:
Eff. 5/96
~
....I
BOARD OF COUNTY
CDì-MAJ5SJONER5
UTIUT~E5 ,& RECYCLHlG
DEPARJj\¡\ENT
WilLIAM ßLA.LÄi'\
DIP,EGOR
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Board of County Commissioners
/1
\¡ L..,.¡'
William Blazak, Utility Director \jJ;¿ 1{)
FROM:
DATE:
March 26, 2002
RE:
Ocean Gate Builders - Water Line Contract
BACKGROUND:
In September of2001 St. Lucie County Utilities entered into a Developer's Agreement
for utility services with the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) for Avalon State
Park on North Hutchinson Island. The terms of that Agreement require the DEP to extend water,
wastewater and reclaimed water lines from our existing terminus point to the new State Park
which is approximately 1500 feet north along S.R. A-I-A. The hydraulic requirements ofthe
water line design dictated the line to be eight inches in diameter to support fire hydrants and the
needs of the new Park to be constructed. DEP has competitively bid the required work necessary
to complete the construction of the Park facilities as well as the necessary infrastructure with
regards ti utilities.
In an effort to provide reliability to the North Hutchinson Island water system the Utility
Department contacted the DEP to determine if the new line construction could be up sized to a
twelve inch line which would handle the necessary water flow for an emergency interconnect to,
the North, with the City ofVero Beach. Up sizing of this portion of the line will minimize the
cost to the Utility,District for this section allow for eventual completion of the interconnect with
the proper line size in place. DEP indicated that the County could communicate directly with the
contractor responsible for the installation ofthe new line and enter into and Agreement to pay
them directly. ,<".
The attached correspondence confirms the DEP support of the project, the cost
confirmation of the up sizing and the County's Engineer of record for North Hutchinson
concurrence with the cost proposal.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board approve the Contract with ocean Gate Builders in the amount of
$ 19,200.00. Staff further requests that the Board authorize the Chairman to execute the
Agreement as approved to form and correctness by the County Attorney
JOHN D, C·RUlm, District No, 1 . DOUG COWARD, District No, 2 . PAULA A, LEWiS, District No,:) . mANNIE HUTCHINSON, Dlstricr No.4' CLIFF GARNES. Districr No, 5
Counry Administrator - Douglas M. Anderson
2300 Virginia Avenue " Forr Pierce, Fl34982 · Phone (561) 462-1150 · FAX (561) 462-1153
.'j ]', .~ '"'
.,:j":"'~,',. ,·,2,,·.·',.',n .
:JJ,.,.r.¡
'" " j..-l
., ", 'l ",' ",:"
¡ ."--,,
c~ _.~~_
--------
. ~-.
~ - . -
¡ ',-,' '~-;:
".' ;~
, ~
. ;-~¡n:~2(S Îur .~'-2~..i:~S
\'2j~e ~J\/ De~i:;:-:/
. ';.! I , \.~, '. ~ I
_ -; ..2:<>: 3~;3
,-d:: i>.~: .
..
, ".' . '~. ,...I! ,
...,,¡
March 5, 2002
'-
--;-' "
..~~.....
¡;/
~':-
'.~ ,-,i'~;
. . -... . _~....I
NIr. William Blazak, Director
St. Lucie County Utilities
P.O. Box 728
2300 Virginia Avenue, Suite 227
Ft. Pierce, FL 34954
~T
,..'
--
," ',~
'.>~-~_; ¡\J ~ '(
Re: North Hutchinson Island
Avalon State Park Water Main
LBFH# 97-0364
\
\
Dear Bill,
We have reviewed the information received from the contractor who is constructing
the water main extension to Avalon State Park.
Based on this information, our conversation and my conversation with the
contractor, it would appear that the $19,200 increase in cost to upsize the water
main from 8" PVC to 12" HDPE is competitive. Additionally having a 12" water
main available for future interconnect possibilities for improved reliability of the
North Hutchinson Island water system is sound engineering practice.
Please call with any questions regarding this issue or if I can be of additional
service.
Thank you, 1
LBFH~e. çjJ
// . ~;' t( L.----
... L-¡'ðfl (J v 1'1
~~kler, P.E.
CUent Service Manager
SAE/da
..
\\pc\J'rojects\97 -0364\A valon \\1M Extension Letter.doc
f~~:R-l1 -¿t.::co::: ¿¿ ~!:!¿
CL~;-iN t.:H! t.
=.c':"23::;:~-,::G
,..; . 82·<02
r-., .
! /.~¡j,
1 -~. ìlj\
'I J I'
·,l, -. I ¡1 \ ",.-..'
,-'~~J
-'>\ ~ ;;.
I \,..rC 2&1 0Ete
"Q~T~: d e~~ 1: nr
DLLL _ ..lD) .d.L"",
"-"
:¿Bô'¡ 3.::, FedsTcl Hlgh'NcV ' Sh1art. ~!crìco ;¡.qç'i6 > (cò 1) 2iJ3-6744 >
Fc:.:: {¿61) :¿BJ-1òJ3
" - MÀ~C"iIi 2.,ZCÙ2
Mì'ì. BiLL Bl...>I.ZAX
UT:l..iTIE:S ÛiRE~ T 0R
ST. LUCIE COUJ'.ìT'f UTIL'TJ:ES DE?AR1"ME:l>IT
P.O. Box 728
rOm" P¡;E¡¡¡CE. FL 349ð.4
R~: AV-"'LðN ~T:: P;l'F/j't; \IVX'ŒF¡M~ll'i1 tJPG~D~
"P:;¡O!PCSAL"
DEAR MR. 8LAZAX.
THIS ?ñDPCs;I,L ìS FOR'7H~ UPGRADE OF TJ.¡E WAT:ERUNE FROM 8-" 1'0 1- 2" *T TI-JiE
AV ALaN STATE PA."IX PROJECT. TH~ PROPOSAL. AMOUNT 15 $19,200 TO HAVE:
THE 12" '."iA ¡ ~.;":UNE ¡¡\i-j':'UCE. THIS ~RIClî INCLUDES.ALL F!?E. ATrJNGS, Ai...."P
INS'TAL1...A.TjON. PA"fM~'j"TO:S~ MACE UPON COMFL.ETJON OF !:N5TALl..AT]ON OF
MAT""d<IALS, Aj\JD NOY SE J3ASED UFON ~Ï1NG OR A?PFiO'lAi..5. As P!E1'! THE
!.EirE-"=¡ F~OM THE FLOF/IOA DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAl. PRO"T'ECTiON, WE HA.vE
A?F¡;¡OVAI.AND AWAIT,\i\JAGREEMENT FBOM ST. LUC¡ECOUNTY UTILmES. 'ì1F.
THANK YOU Ai"iD LOO;': FORWARO TO COMPI..EnNG THIS WORK FOR YOU AS W::u.
.AS FUTURE ENDEA'iORS. ~ FEELrRe TO CAU. ME WITH Â."l'f QUESí'10NS 01"(
CONCERN5TI1ATYOU MAY HAVE.
SINCZR£LY,
---~ ~--....
:~."--
TODD POR"t"Ð(
PROJ£CT MANAGER
~. '.
Cc: JIM Ross
TOTAL P.02
·
,,,A r ,,,",;.\, non.
I ... ~~,\,
ø
~~
~
~
~
§ FLOR.
Departm~:nt of
! -" --- -
Errvironm entåJ-·Ptote tti on
"""""
Jeb Bush
Governor
~D2 ¡?J.JiJ _,Q ,? '~___
Marjory Stoneman Dougl'às Bailding.! :: 'j
3900 Commonwealth Boulevard
Tallahassee::l'lorjda J.23~9-3000
~;:, Ll...)t_~~t: (~;C,=.ii.jt'.¡T/.
David 8. Struhs
Secretary
-;;._._-'--~'_..__:'_._-'
March 6, 2002
Ñ1r. William Blazak, Utilities Director
St. Lucie County Utilities Department
P.O. Box 728
Fort Pierce, Florida 34954
Re: Avalon State Park
DEP Project Number 60150
Off site Watermain Extension
Dear Mr. Blazak:
This letter is to acknowledge your recent request to upgrade the proposed eight-inch diameter
off site watermain to a twelve-inch diameter watermain at the referenced project. This office
supports your efforts to upgrade the system.
It is our understanding that your office wishes to negotiate with the State's contractor to peIform
the work. That approach to completing the construction is acceptable to this office. Currently, the
estimated cost to complete the additional work is $19,200. Your office will make payment
directly to the contractor. No change orders or contract amendments will be made to the existing
State contract.
Thank you for adopting this method. It certainly lessens the level of paperwork and coordination
associated with contract amendments and formal agreements. If you require further assistance,
please do not hesitate to contact Jim Ross, our project manager, or Chick Savering, our design
section supervisor at (850) 488-5372.
7e~~~~f I~VL/V1~~
('1\ ( VY
III. Edward BOW11'lan;cP.E.
Bureau Chief
Bureau of Design and Recreation Services
cc Jim Ross
Pete Scalco
Hugh O'Dare
"//IQ;';: Pratectien, Less ?roc=ss"
Printed on recycled paper,
-
\-
.r: .r-,.' / -, ,.....) i--;:2"
_Li i - L. '"'¡....,) ¡.;---"
'wt1' '
-,
-
-
~
ST. LUCIE COUNTY UTILITY' SERVICES DE? A RTjì¡\2NT
NORTH HUTCHINSON ISLAND DIS-rnICT
'-
~
DEVELOPER WATEJ< AND WASTEWATER SERVIce AGREE¡~\ËNT
.-
.-
,-''';
¡ ~-;
I
THIS AGREEJ1\ENT is made and entered into this /(¡Þ) day of ,¿j,~/',i¡"'-¿.,i.A.4 2001,
by and between DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, an agency of the
State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as "Developer", and ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a
political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as "Utility".
'-
;-.....
=~~
-.., ...-
'-' .~--'-
--
:---!:-;....;
::::...~
s-; ""-'-:
,- - ....."....
:~ ~ WHEREAS, Developer owns or controls lands located in St. Lucie County, Florida (the
,. ,;::t "Property"), as more fuHy described by legal description in Exhibit "A" and as shown on Exhibit
: ';;,0 ª "B", attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fuHy set out in this Agreement; and,
..:::::::. L- '--'
c:; è~
u;3-':= WHEREAS, the Developer acknowledges and agrees to abide by the St. Lucie County
,';:' ,-; ~ UtiJities North Hutchinson Island District Uniform Water and Wastewater Service Policy and
~~ :;:: Reclaimed Water Protocol (the "Uniform Service Policy"), the St. Lucie County Utilities North
:=:ª.~ Hutchinson Island District Water and Wastewater Utility Unif¡orm Extension Policy (the
,~ .~ ~ "Uniform Extension Policy"), and Rates, Fees and Charges, as amended from time to time; and,
é;:¡b
; - '~,'ª
WHEJ<EAS, the Developer acknowledges and agrees that this contract for service in
no way entitles the Developer to land densities which are greater than those allowed under
the density provisions of the Comprehensive Plan of St. Lucie County, or to development rights
as may otherwise be regulated by the Board of County Commissioners.
NOW, THEJ<EFORE, for and in consideration of these premises, Developer hereby
covenants and agrees as follows:
1. Definitions. The definitions and references used in the Uniform Service Policy
and Uniform Exte~!?n Policy shall be used for the purpose of interpreting the terms as used
in this agreement and apply unless the context indicates a different meaning.
·c,
2. Payment:,'Upon execution of this Agreement, Developer shall be responsible for
the payment of guaranteed revenue fees in accordance with the Uniform Extension Policy. In
addition, Developer shall pay, in full, connection charges for all capacity reserved hereunder
on the date of execution of this Agreement as provided in the Uniform Extension Policy. The (1
payment schedule for Developer is set forth on Exhibit ·C" to this Agreement. , . , Prt1 fJ.,L--,l/
Ctv'c~~rt:::tcw,
'~'.." i" ,þl, 8 .".,',b,~Ltt2Ì-Îj1)Î
,~ j db '..'2:J ,j
g:\atty\agreemn1'\devagmt
-1-
'J) 1i1, L,,"i' -rï'J'
y... XH../ I¡../v ! '-' .
q_I' Á..-¡{, c./ c:. é'tLL.4"·:·:I-~¡1 l1-ft I r f Ú",¿J
J- 2> uò .f ,. í2SU\.1 Ct Yh:z.
FI.. Pi -C( C:¿. rt- ] '-/1 r?L
,
'-'
....,
AGENDA REOUEST
ITEM NO. ~ 711-
DA TE: March 26, 2002
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [ X]
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY:
SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney
Daniel S. McIntyre
County Attorney
SUBJECT:
Resolution No. 02-85 - Requesting the S1. Lucie County Clerk of Circuit Court Place One Hundred Thousand
and 00/1 00 ($100,000.00) Dollars in a Separate Special Revenue Fund With Only the Interest Being Allocated for
Bluefield Ranch Improvement Expenditures.
BACKGROUND:
Please see attached Memorandum No. CA-02-375.
PREVIOUS ACTION:
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution No. 02-85 as drafted.
COMMISSION ACTION:
u sAnderson
County Administrator
[2J APPROVED [] DENIED
[ ] OTHER:
County Attorney:
Ý5
Review and Approvals
Originating Dept.
Management & Budget R1~
Other:
Purchasing :
Other:
Finance: (Check for Copy only, if apPlicabl~
Eft, 5/96
'-"
....,
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney
C.A. NO: 02-375
DATE: March 14, 2002
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 02-85
BACKGROUND:
On September 18, 2001, the Board approved the Bluefield Ranch
Mitigation Agreement with Cresent Resources, LLC. On March 5,
2002, the Board considered what course of action they wanted to
take in order to use the monies allocated for Bluefield Ranch
Improvement Expenditures. A motion and second was made, and the
Board unanimously approved to move the trust arrangement.
Staff has considered the most appropriate way to handle the
trust arrangement and has determined that rather than entering into
a trust agreement it would be in the best interest of the citizens
of St. Lucie County, and the County, to place the One Hundred
Thousand and 00/100 ($100,000.00) Dollars in a separate special
revenue fund with only the interest being allocated for Bluefield
Ranch Improvement Expenditures.
The attached Resolution No. 02-85 has been drafted for that
purpose.
........
....."
RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION:
Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution
No. 02-85 as drafted.
ReS~llY submitted,
Daniel S. McI t
County Attor ey
DSM/cac
Attachment
......'
...."
RESOLUTION NO. 02-85
A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE ST.
LUCIE COUNTY CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT
PLACE ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND AND
00/100 ($100,000.00) DOLLARS IN A SEPARATE
SPECIAL REVENUE FUND WITH ONLY THE
INTEREST BEING ALLOCATED FOR
BLUEFIELD RANCH IMPROVEMENT
EXPENDITURES
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners ofSt. Lucie County, Florida, has made
the following determinations:
1. Crescent Resources, LLC, a developer based in Georgia, owns and controls property
within St. Lucie County that will require wetland mitigation in order to obtain Federal and State
permits to proceed with commercial development.
2. Representatives of the developer have agreed to perform certain services on Bluefield
Ranch, an Environmentally Sensitive Land owned by St. Lucie County, which is in need of wetland
restoration.
3. Additionally, the Developer has remitted One Hundred Thousand and 001100
($100,000.00) Dollars to the County to be used to manage the County's Ranch Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners ofSt.
Lucie County, Florida:
I. This Board does hereby request that the St. Lucie County Clerk of Circuit Court place
One Hundred Thousand and 001100 ($100,000.00) Dollars in a separate special revenue fund with
only the interest being allocated for Bluefield Ranch Improvement Expenditures.
2. The County Administrator is hereby directed to forward a copy of this resolution to the
St. Lucie County Finance Director.
\-"
'-'
AGENDA REQUEST
TO:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT.): County Attorney
SUBJECT: Jenkins Road - North of Orange Avenue
North St. Lucie River Water Control District
Resolution No. 02-88 - Fee Simple Deed
BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum
FUNDS AVAIL.: N/A
PREVIOUS ACTION: N/ A
...."
ITEM NO. C-7B
DATE: March 26,2002
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [XX]
PRESENTED BY:
Daniel S. McIntyre
County Attorney
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board accept the Fee Simple Deed from North St.
Lucie River Water Control District, authorize the Chairman to execute
Resolution No. 02-88 and instruct staff to record the Resolution and Fee
Simple Deed in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida.
COMMISSION ACTION:
[ ~ APPROVED
[ ] OTHER:
[ ] DENIED
3r
Review and Approvals
XX Public Works: IN
xx Road & Bridge~
~
XX County Attorney:
Originating Dept,:
Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable)
G: \ACQ\ WP\J oAnn \ROA D 5 \J enkins\Agendo,wpd
XX County Enginee~
Other:
Eff 5/96
'-'
....,
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
TO:
Board of County Commissioners
FROM:
Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney
DATE:
March 26, 2002
SUBJECT:
Jenkins Road - North of Orange Avenue
North St. Lucie River Water Control District
Resolution No. 02-88 - Fee Simple Deed
The Florida Department of Transportation is preparing to begin their project that will widen Orange Avenue
(State Road 68) from just east of I-95 to Angle Road.
This widening will replace the existing rural cross-section consisting of open swale drainage with an urban
cross-section. The project will also include four travel lanes, a landscaped median and a closed stormwater
drainage system consisting of catch basins and underground pipes.
Jenkins Road north of Orange Avenue is a County-owned and maintained roadway with open drainage swales
that flow into the North St. Lucie River Water Control District Canal No. 30. The Florida Department of
Transportation design includes piping portions of Canal No. 30 lying immediately north of Orange Avenue,
The North St. Lucie River Water Control District is not prepared to maintain this type of improvement and
would like to transfer these sections to the County.
RECOMMENDA TION:
Staff recommends that the Board accept the Fee Simple Deed from North St. Lucie River Water Control
District, authorize the Chairman to execute Resolution No. 02-88 and instruct staff to record the Resolution
and Fee Simple Deed in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida.
Daniel S. McIntyr
County Attorne)!
G:\ACQ\ WP\J oAnn \ROADS\J enkins\Agenda Memo.wpd
"
lEI ,....:
d!:
0[" .-¡" '''Jr", oJ I~ '^ ~ 1
.
~,
~:
. UŠ
,,-
~¡ . id
I ~§~
"
. I~
~n b
!
.
i
~ ~ ~§~ .
~~ ~~:
§ ~§;;
~
o
,
~
N
"
~
~
~
~
" ~!.
I ~
I
I
I -
-IN
-of. (
I: "
,-
kl
;;
,.'.¡ ~
" ;
I <I,
".': ':'¡\
, .
.
~-
L
~~
I ~
~
---.---.---.-.
-rt'"...._~~------
--"::''¡jd'T.¡J-----
I~
I~
~
.'
~g§~
.~~:
r9S§~
",'
"
'"
~..'\f.
",...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
¡.
Ir-
II
II
II
II
II
II
¡e.
Ч:
ì~
I~
.
I~
ª
'/''''''101_
....J..."
W,,,. WI
r____________~~u~
Itt¡. ,r II ~ No I ~ j.j ~
w,_
In...
.
-------¡
Nurft U3I-4S )3S
::I
.. . .
00'"
~~=a
@-
=z
1m: ~
015;;
.""",ø - "'\.oJ
ß&B~~
_V>I-Ct:
>,
IF- !Eo
;;g I..
"ª' .~!
© ~ï
!Q) ~ ã~
I!!YJ :!iI
~~~
;;¡''I'!Œ
.dJ ~i'"
-:;;~--!.
1Þ=r,:
~.:~
i~¥-
¡¡:i
~
i ~ ~¡
i :l)!
"
N
~
~
"
"
~
~
~
~
~
...,¡
RESOLUTION NO. 02 - 88
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A
FEE SIMPLE DEED
ON BEHALF OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County,
Florida, that:
The foregoing Fee Simple Deed is duly accepted on behalf of St. Lucie County
this 26th day of March, 2002.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
Chairman
ATTEST:
Deputy Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
CORRECTNESS:
By:
County Attorney
North St, Lucie River Water Control District
G:\ACQ\ WP\J oAnn\ROADS \J enkins\Resolution 02-88,wpd
'-'
~
This Instrument Prepared by:
Frank H. Fee, III, Esquire
Fee, Koblegard & DeRoss
401 South Indian River Drive
Fort Pierce, Florida 34950
Return to:
FEE SIMP~ DEED
THIS FEE SIMPLE DEED, executed this ~ day of ~ ,2002, by
NORTH ST. LUCIE RIVER WATER CONTROL DISTRICT,
a quasi-public corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida
hereinafter called the Grantor, to
ST. LUCIE COUNTY,
a political subdivision of the State of Florida
hereinafter called the Grantee:
whose address is:
2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida 34982
(WhefØ\o'srused herein, the terms -Grantor" and "Grantee" shalf ¡neiuas singular and plural. heirs, 199al reprøsenlativ8s. and BSsiQns of indMduals. and
the successors and assigns 01 corporarions. wh'Hever rhe context so admits or requires. .
WITNESSETH, That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00 in hand paid by the
Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises,
releases, conveys and confirms unto the Grantee forever, all that certain land situate, lying and being in the
County of SI. Lucie, State of Florida, to-wit:
THE REAL PROPERTY MORE FULLY DELINEATED AND DESCRIBED UPON
COMPOSITE EXHIBIT "A" APPENDED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY
REFERENCE.
SAVING AND RESERVING to Grantor an easement for drainage, flowage, and water
management within any facility constructed by Grantee for such purposes located
within the herein described real property.
TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in
anywise appertaining.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever.
\w
EXHIBIT "A"
... ...
'" '"
~ ~
~
".
'..'C>. ". "lJ
"'%\" '''''',
i.:~{·~D'7
,:.~C'~..., "'....
," ·:,:R::":
': '3.1'.. ..'
-',:. ·:V"î,u.c.(t
'<s~Pf~J2'
::'~':~~.'~~
, ¡¡,
N
.
.
""
TIJrYNSHIP
34 SOUTH
TIJrYNSHIP
35 SOUTH
LOCA nON MAP
N.T.S.
PARCEL LOCA nON
¡. BEARINGS ARE REFERENCED TO FLORIOA STATE PLANE EAST lONE. NAD /983/90
ADJUSTMENT.
2. THIS SKETCH EXIST SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF ILLUSTRATING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION
TO WHICH IT IS ATTACHED.
3. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE CALCULATED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
4. f'////////1 HATCHED AREA TO BE DONATED TO ST. LUCIE COUNTY.
LEGEND:
4 DEL T A
AC . ACRE
Ii! BASEL I NE
FND.· FOUND
EXIST.· EXISTING
HA HECTARE
L . LENGTH
(LT) . LEFT
N. T. S.· NOT TO SCALE
PG. . PAGE
P.O.B.· POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O. C., P01NT OF COMMENCEMENT
R RADiuS
( R TJ . R J GH T
R /W . R J GH T OF WA Y
RGE.· RANGE
SEC.· SECT/ON
S.R.· STATE ROAD
S T A.· S T A T/ ON
TWP.· TOWNSH 1 P
O.R.B.· OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DISTRICT 4
RIGHT OF WAY MAPPING
3400 WEST COMMERCIAL BLVD.
FT. LAUDERDALE. FL. 33309
(954J 777-4550
NOT A SURVEY
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
RIGHT OF WAY MAPPING
RIGHT OF WAY PARCEL SKETCH
---
STATE ROAD NO. 68
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
PR(L 1M
COMPOSITE EXHIBIT "A"
(Page 1 of 3)
fiNAL
CHECKED
------------
W~P:!. I'I1LPIt.¡¡[Ð DY
P'h:lU bOIl NO,'S
---~----- --
F.O.D.T. I)I~rnICr .,
""
---~--
~._---
W.P.. NO. 4119208/2301081 SCALE, N/^
---
------
'llVI51C)fII
.n
D.ð.1E
SECTION 94070-2505
SHEET I OF 3
P.O.C.
WEST Y4 CORNER SEC. 7
P./.5TA.295+49.364
ð . 00%'11" (RT)
E.14 COR.sEC.12
FND. BOA T SPIKE
N 345,142.018
E 261,024.927
5ECTION CORNE~
FND. p.r.. 8, DISC
N 345,960.880
E 261,025.324
295+38.058
334.851 (L TJ
UJ
C>
~
D
b
C>
<:
0)
""
""
¡¿
IU ..:
~ ...
""
--J qj
3: a:
"-
a:: 0
~"
<:
,::::
V1
;.;
UJ
+27.380
16.149 (U)
,24.449
15.850 (LT)
I
I
I
I
L_____
ð = 13" 42' 31" (LT)
L = 2.93r, (9.G9')
R = 12..544 (40.50')
N 89° 3// 58/1 £
sTA.295+40.ooo
(Iil SURVEY s.R. 68) =
STA.20+oo.000
rlil SURVEY JENKINS RD.)
r'msl r';/fhIQpplng/ ,"9208/ rw~ r6B.t19n
METRIC
295+f55.720
334.673 (LT)
UJV1
~~
.~
t5l'>
0:::0:::
v; V;
",,,,
",,,,,
'Q
~~
~~
Ùù
UJ UJN
V) V)
ACREAGE
UJ
<:
:::¡
3:
"-
CC
l'>
~
I-
'(1
><
UJ
AREA = 0.9/34 HA (2.257 AC)
UJ
""
...,
D
8
<:
+68.391
15.850 (IT)
EXIST. RIW LINE
P,O.B.
295 +f53.9/0
15.876 (LT)
296
N 89° 42/ 09" E
ª SURVEY S.R.68 (ORANGE
& 1J4 SECTION LINE
AVE. )
NOT A SURVEY
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
RIGHT OF WAY MAPPING
RIGHT OF WAY PARCEL SKETCH
«
f-
V)
CI3J
STATE ROAD NO. 68
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
"
PATE
~ WALKER 10-29-01
F I NAiL
ROBERSON 11'15-DI _
CHECKEO ABEl 12-04.01
~""PSPq[P.AECBY
~====__~~ r.[J.O.T. OI'5fHICT ~
W.P.. NO. 4119208/2301081
R[VISIUN
SECTION
SHEET 2 OF J
"
DAT(
'-",
"
i
COMPOSITE EXHIBIT "A"
(Page 2 of 3)
'-'
EXH]B1T "A"
Item/Segment No. 2301081
ISectlon No. 94070-25051
State Rood No.68
St. Lucie County Description
A port I on of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Sect I on 7,
Township 35 South, Range 40 East; and 0 portion of the Southeos1
1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 12, TownShip 35 South, Range 39
East, St. Lucie County, Florida, being more por'~iculorly
described os fol lows:
Commence at a found boat spike marking the West 1/4 Corner of sold
Section 7, said point being on the Baseline of Survey for State
Rood 68 10ronge Avenue! os shown on the Florida Deportment of
Transportation Right of Way Mop for Section 94070-2505: thence
North 89"42'09- East along sold Basel ine of Survey and the South
line of the Northwest 1/4 of sold Section 7. 0 distance of 14.545
meters, 147.72 feet'); thence North 00'17'51" West at 0 right angle
to the lost described course. 0 distance of 15.875 meters
152.09 feet) to the POINT OF BEGINNING: thence
North 89"58'16" West, 0 distance of 28.653 meters (94.01 feet I;
thence North 00'01'40" Eosl, 0 distonce of 318,782 meters
11.045.87 feet!; thence North 89'59' 19- Eost, a distance of
28.553 meters 19-1,01 feet); Ihence South 00'01 '40- West, 0
distance of 318.802 meters 11,045.94 feet) to the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
Containing 0.9134 hectares 12.257 acres). more or less.
I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge ond belief the
attached legal descrlpt"lon os shown on the Right of Way Parcel
Sketch for Stote Road No. 58( Orange Avenue). I tem/Segmen'l No.
2301081, Section No. 94070·2505 is true, occurat"e and was
prepared under my direction.
I further certify Ihat sold legal description Is In compliance
with the MlnirTUrn Technical Standards os set forth by the Florida
Boord of Professional Surveyors 8 Mappers pursuant to Section
472.027 Florida Statues.
Jeffrey
Florida
Date:
Florida
~~)
.~ '/ firú,' ',ìÓ:d!
o. m l' / J
Sur yar on ~apper No. ~805
, /2- hi/ '
Deportment a Transportation
r~ 0 T t\ SUR 'j E Y .
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
R I GflT OF V/I.Y M/.I'P i r<G
RIGHT OF WAY PARCEL SKETCH
-_.._---------~-~-----
STATE ROAD NO. 58
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
~--f--~------~---
---~__....~,M'~()'.'LI)Ur ,.--.) UW,
PR(LI~_ ~~~~~~~~_ (\ / 1,' ~ 'I '7' (
F_',N~___" ~~O(f<5_"N~'.:..'~~ - J li, ~-Wd \.d / 'ßftIL
OI[ÇK(D ^UI:.L JZ'O~-Ol I 7J:·t.{rcl Ij~I.1 or '11'.,,1' ~UIIVl'lrJ,1
=__-=-_ _~~~~-.- -=~.I :==-_-=1=== ~~'. ::~~~~~ ~-:::-- ¡-r-I[~~-,~IÚU;:~iU.;-~
--~----_...-._---------- -..~------~-
-=~-=-=_, _~--=='_-===-=I~ . _W.P~. ~~!t_2(,iJI2J~~~--~I-',I/^
'____"__'m .'---- -- SEl T J ON 9·jQ70-2J05 l SHEET 3 OF 3 I
fit "I ~,llm III IJ^fI
.....,
"
COHl'OSIT::: EXllIßIT "A"
Cl'abe J of 3)
'r
\w
....¡
AGENDA REQUEST
ITEM NO.
C-7C
DATE: March 26, 2002
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [XX]
TO:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY:
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT.): County Attorney
Daniel S. McIntyre
County Attorney
SUBJECT: Indian Pines Boulevard
General Electric Capital Corporation
Resolution No. 02-89 - QUITCLAIM DEED
BACKGROUND: The Property Acquisition Division received a letter from General Electric Capital
Corporation regarding the conveyance of Indian Pines Boulevard to St. Lucie County.
The Utilities Director has requested the County accept this donation as it provides
accesS to the Holiday Pines Wastewater Treatment Plant.
FUNDS AVAIL.: N/A
PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board accept the QUITCLAIM DEED from
General Electric Capital Corporation, authorize the Chairman to execute
Resolution No. 02-89 and instruct staff to record the Resolution and
QUITCLAIM DEED in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida.
[xJ APPROVED
[ ] OTHER:
[ ] DENIED
COMMISSION ACTION:
XX County Attorney: ~
Originating Dept,:
Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable)
Review and Approvals
XX Public Works:~
XX Road & Bridge:~
XX County E~' , ~.
XX UtilitieJ¡X' --
E . 5/96
G: \ACQ\ WP\JoAnn\ROADS\Indion Pines Boulevard\Agenda.wpd
...L
,/
¡
;
;;
\0..-"-
,..., "
\
,
!
',. ~
,-
----'
,
i..
,
,
.I
i
.
~ j
.!L
'.
,
./
-,
~
---------------------------~
..-------
. .
I!!!I !!!!I
to 0
I'ì ...
I!: II!:
i
f
I
07.23 Ac)
,-----...
I "
mo-oOOI-fJOI}L5J ¡
LAND - "'40~5' Ac',
SWAMP - 2~,'9 Ac i
TOT AI.. - 162".l_~ç ,
,
/
"" ",.:.,.~\
, '
sr:U1CIE
COÚNTY
"
(JL
,
...L
...:L
..L
_.....J~~____________
15.ð Ac
D 100
,----
'DO
z
,...
o
....
..
-
W
W
I
VI
W
W
VI
64
(l
JOD
'DD
,
ð ~¥. ~~~~~ ~@M~¥W g ~~©~~[Q)~ SHEE T NUt.6ER ,
EPARED rœ i
~!
'>I~ ASSESSMENT MAP SECTION ~ ~/ ~ @If ~~
TH1á ...,. H'S 8'~ PII[PARED FOR ~ SI. LUC!E ~Tr I'ROP£RfT ~~ S.
APP .¡SER'S PU SES 00. .NO D S t()T NE SSAR LT R[Fšf~T TOWNSHIP
us S, I'UTIWI ~~cH~f .¡~:J:lT id~s ié il \V~lf~arJls.rg;[S¡;I S~~I 3@ ~. ~~~ I
IfTJ PfIJØITT APPRA.I SER CONTAINED HERrON. RANGE
'-
..,J
.'
RESOLUTION NO. 02-89
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A
QUITCLAIM DEED
ON BEHALF OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St, Lucie County,
Florida, that:
The foregoing QUITCLAIM DEED is duly accepted on behalf of St. Lucie
County this 26th day of March, 2002.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
Chairman
ATTEST:
Deputy Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
CORRECTNESS:
By:
County Attorney
General Electric Credit Corporation
G:\ACQ\ WP\JoAnn\ROAD5\!ndian Pines Boulevard\Resolution 02-B9,wpd
;
'-
...."
PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO:
PATRICIA KIMBALL FLETCHER. PA
DUANE MORRIS LLP
200 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 3400
Miami, Florida 33131
Grantee's Tax Identification No.:
Property's Folio Numbers:
1312-144-0001-000/1
1407-233-0019-000/4
QUITCLAIM DEED
THIS QUITCLAIM DEED, is made as of this , 200 2 between
GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION (f/k/a General Electric Credit C oration). a Delaware
corporation (the "Grantor") and ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (the
"Grantee").
NOW, THEREFORE, Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and No/lOO Dollars
($10.00), the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has remised, released and quitclaimed, and by these
presents does hereby remise, release and quitclaim unto Grantee and Grantee's successors and assigns forever,
all the right, title. interest, claim and demand that Grantor has in and to the following described parcel of land,
situate, lying and being in the County of St. Lucie, State of Florida (the "Propertv"), to wit:
SEE EXHIBIT A ATTACHED HERETO
This conveyance is subject to the following:
(a) any and all unpaid real estate taxes;
(b) matters reflected in the plat(s) of the Property; and
(b) all restrictions, easements, covenants and other matters of record.
TO HA VE AND TO HOLD the same, together with all and singular the appurtenances thereunto
belonging or in anyway appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest and claim whatsoever of Grantor,
"
\w
...,
either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behalf of Grantee and Grantee's succl:Ssors and
assigns forever, and "as is" without any representations or warranties, express or implied, in fact or by law,
as to the condition or fitness of the property conveyed hereto and improvements thereon.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has hereto set its hand and seal the day and year first
above wriuen.
WITNESSES:
GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL
CORPORA TION, a Delaware corporation
~:
Fri~~- ^' . --- ~)
~= ''f{~
{SEAL }
(' '-""'~~c-1.Yr
STATE OF MI- IIJÃ.
COUNTY OF h:.....-ç-,; ~
)
) 55.:
)
') The foregoing jns~ment was acknowledged befor~ me ~ \ ~ day of \0. "Î\.)o. ,,-1 . 200~
by \-<'ð'n",r->,- c...)::r.Q~.r as \)'l~ ~ ð\" "".....~ of GI!NERAL
ElECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION. f/kJa General Electric Credit Corporation, a Delaware cotporation,
who is personally known to me or 'wl.v 1.......111'-.4 AJ ;¿"llllfi..aliulI, V!J
behalf of the corporation.
My colDIl1Í5siOD expires:
PriDl Dame:
valerIe Benedetto
Notar'y ~ublic, State of Connecticut
CommiSSIOn Expires: March 31, 2003
MIA\77745,l
2
"
AGENDA REQUEST
ITEM ~ fJ.d
DATE: March 26, 2002
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [x ]
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY:
SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney
Daniel S. Mcintyre
County Attorney
SUBJECT:
Approval of Assignment of License Agreement to Lynette Macleod
BACKGROUND:
See attached memorandum
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
PREVIOUS ACTION:
RECOMMENDATION
CONCLUSION:
Staff recommends that the BOCC approve the proposed Assignment of
License Agreement to Lynette Macleod and authorize the Chairman to sign
it.
COMMISSION ACTION:
[XJ APPROVED [] DENIED
[ ] OTHER:
D. u sM. Anderson
County Administrator
[X] County AttorMY:
a-
Review and Approvals
[ JM~n~g.ment & Budget:
[ JPurçha6ing:
[ ] Information T .çh,:
[ 1 Publiç Work6 Direçtor
[ J Solid W~6te Mgr
[JFinanç.:(çh.ä for çoPy only. if appliçabl.)
[ 1 Publiç S~fety Dir.çtor
Eff.çtlv.5/96
.
'-
....,
.
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
ST. lUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Daniel S. Mclnt.yre, County Attorney
C.A. NO: 02-391
DATE: March 18, 2002
SUBJECT: Assignment of License Agreement to lynet.te Macleod
BACKGROUND:
On Tuesday, August 209, 1999, the Board of County Commissioners approved the
assignment of the Revocable License Agreement to Richard S. love and Barbara J. love. The Love's
have sold their property to Lynette MacLeod. They are closing on April 8, 2002 and wish to have
the license agreement assigned to the new owner at that time.
RECOM MENDA TION/CONClUSION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the Assignment of the
License Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement.
FROM,: PMI LTD ~
PHONE NO. : 8667643295
~. 15 2002 08:41RM Pi
,
~.... .. ....~ .~. _.....".._" ,,_. .........."_.,. .....M _ ...._......
: ßð~ f {(),'~I'y~_C~~~:l~~~--··
I' ./
__ "~~~--,.~~'Y~Njß.- 4 v t ,. ._._.__.___._......
..__~_DJ ~ { rtr\ A ~~N..___A "It' -e.,( __m_. ._,.m
"
[ F:v::J. p( ~ F (.. 3 ~ fÝ2 -:)6.)7- '
ii v. ~.__ E~--;;~- -I t¡~~ (' S"" .e~/_~·~ ~_¡;;3~__~-·--..
-------11 ;qf:.. JJ A~) S. 111 C I. III ~t;.-{.1! ~ A-#v-I.w''' -
-=---.Jß"';.- Au 1"'''' e J f ¡l..m c,Jj~ La ~.L or ".1- "'0'''' ...i-~~
! i 7 ~ ') - .(~ _.L'¡'..~d'~ /L ¡(,; 'ßo\, ~ (; t':
:!
_~..._.......I.¡..,....... _...______-ý;!.r f Z",,&£'..r J:t- ;or tf!.-!:!. .
'---'--..--.--'w··T¡··..~..,..,.., .'.... ... .........-f:--(dl) A"iI-J-r.J)
:!
; ":-, ,
;, .v'::t~ f l ¡If :
:i
ii W-r. 4,A.v ~ of all 0 ~ ~~,_.¡p_
:1
fi 4/1"'~IfT;. PtAéLr!;¡)cI p...,J 111/;/1 J"(' c,_Û£.(.:-::t.,...,,__,_..,_
!¡ ()-h ~r....;J R' 'I ;L<'f)Z. -~..~
.--._----".,'-~f--_.-- WI ç, Id ~ ~ í /wt'~ :' /l/f-A.. f ft,,) ¡t..('.(;ftlt.M ~
:' i ~ ¡4./a~'f',M pJ~(j ,/,vJ(: 4¡aç,(~/.
i. ---..-.fÁ ·"'/:!./"'-;¡!~-Jl.7-t"'"d~__..
~ /~ ~_.. ,Ç- . .", ',' ,..~___.___ m~ ~ ~~J_:~.z._t.)~ S'7S",j---
i r
¡ <r ~ S'" I - 71'>- '?7..r!,'·
--...--.'".-..-. .....~_.~_..._----
=----=--__-J <1~h--;Þ:-~- ~~--
~t~
sls h.2-
..H_......'"
.. . ..._,_.._..~_.,.- ..~ "..
...-.-....---.--.--.
0..._-
.....-.-.-..--.............."................................,...........
i
i
"
I,
¡,
,
L
!:
- _._00._____--
II
--..-"., '."-
___.___ _._ _H.
'"
;1
..'_____H
~
FROM: PMI L TD \w
FROM : MIRET TËRM
~:. ~UL1~ ...w.
PHONE NO. : 8557543295
~. 15 2002 0S:41RM P2
Hlll'I\.,.:.¡ r . ,F'F:>-: NO. ; 56:3;;;7,3315
d),.J.,.1l"W.l,L" h.l/.l:'" IIU:j ,J.... J..'
"~I.!l·_ æ l~S.~ :2:39PM PO:;
BOA~D OF COUNTY
COMMISSION€R.S
COUNTY
ATTORNEY
0anIeI 5, Mclmyrø
IWCI~r YO;J/'\<¡¡
OI"!'1f1S'tI.~l\'r.Jr.
!<n.n8l1N!' ~:IQ..$.m'~
,6.>SI5TANT COUNTY AlÎO!1.NE1
M5I$'1'ANi'COU~ ATTO~m
ASSISTANT CQJ,\IN A'lTORNEi
AuglJ!! 20, 1611i19
Mr, Paul Mirl'
767 Hidekln RlIII' Drive
Po" It, Lucie, florlcla 34H3·2798
RS: AtIIgnment 01 Revol:llble llc.n$!! A¡r.emem
D..' Mr. Mir't:
On T\IIS$d8V, A\¡9U$'t 20, 1¡"Ii!, tho ê08l'd of County Cðrnmiaior'utrs of St. I.IICÍ&
Count'!'. F/Qrlda, tøproved the assignment of 1hl Plevocable LlCI!In1l8 A¡¡Ililimen1 tQ ¡¡¡¡onard S.
lo~ ane Barber. J. Love.
ÅS a follow 1.11) tQ mv ..,I¡.r letter tð you. pl.us lit m. ~"ø,^, if yOu oesire I formal
....mel'!t for recotding purp~a,
D6M/¢at
()"~, IIIWN, ~No;,' . OCUl.!eg'>',rJ.." =._.... ~ . ~AW "'.U'~~.Þøni<:'NQ, ~ . _'EHi/!O'III'ðON, ~"I~ ~ ~ . c~"f ~..r¡~ ¡;>""'" NO ~
~"'i,.. ,,;trn¡,oo,ØIð"t!1 P~Q.I M. .",,,,tiOII
2X1OV:r;I'\IQÁvenu. . ;;;fdf)o(lf,Mjrnir1.ÀMt'~ . FCll'TP~, I'l04\Jeo;·ió:i:/ · Phon. (~1)462-1<.15
FAA (,:)6') 402-1440 . 'II)C (!!i6~) 4t;.2-1A?:^
FROM
PM I L TD '-' PHONE NO. 8667643295
ST. LUCIE CO. ATTORNEY Fa,x;561-462-1440 Jul
;"1.'_"' - ··.·.'..·.a';.~,·JC ._~. :':;'le'·· .............
,--,. 15 2002 08:42AM P3
2 '01 -J~:,2~ P.02
..
a!,;V<)(;IO,,,I,,", UCE1ISt r.ckJ!D!£N'I'
FOR tNS~ALLA~1g~ Oy DRIVEWAY ~~VEftT
't'H18 a.GJlBþ.... 1116ðe ..."t1 <'It1".:-ed i...to 1:1ù. _.L~ èey <''I'
~"",.,~ U';î:J , 1990. 1;>)' ane
1-"-0 ~~"E;;'ø,," $"" d1'Vis~o.., of ~.,... $~at::.
be"...._n In'. l.UCIJl cQ1J)rry. ¡o
ot ~loride. here~n.t~~~ ~a: ~éd
·'Coln.'!')'· eOO .\'&UJ:. ,)()UPII JQ;~I:,, UI1) I(AJIM KIÚIU: t'I:t1tE'f _ ,!\':> Kt.dd,¡on
"1ve;r P:;;j,vCiI, :Part St. 1,.\lCJ.II, 11e>t'.1da 3'!l8S. bilX'$lt.after called
"'~n4U:'e" ;
IIØI.~II. th. o_c. ar.. COM't:ruc::tuag . h<Joie C>'" property
C~.C'l'~Ð.~ 1115 J:.o~ ~~. a~øc~ l. Hld~en Rtv.~ ~~.tes IOnd
~_ to"" OWno¡!". hav" requ....f1.," perlll.1.sion fT'Ø'll -:"_1:i' 'tQ
'r."'I."::':>' " ~.t~"''':V ....'I......rt ,tJ>.'ttL1n CO'l!\i:ÿ'1Ii. d:-.''''''96 9al;....._1I "10
.i.(,~nt.Lu.~ .i.n IIttae¡"ed 8xbJt:H. wit· in ordar to gain _=11:5$ !;:C>
~e~ø ~~Q~~; anð
WK£RE&S, ~h. ~~~ he~ a~~~ to .~thori~. ~~. ~n~t~1~&t1on
!It '\:l1è 'IX';(v_ey C\l.lvoé,.t: w!.'\:h~1'\ th. ð~a~l'\ag-è ""Ba"'",,,,'" ......j.ct "to
..". o:...;z-m.. and <:<>nð:l.t.i..... ...1: f....t:h '''I. ~l'Ii. _C..ble 1..1<>,0>"""
~~;..mC'''~...
~Ow, TKEft*roaE. in OQn$~~è~~tinn of ~. ~t~.~ DOVen~$ set:
lor~~ ~~"e.ir.. ~~~ ~.~i.a agr.. 8E fo~loWB~
.
. .
Th'!' Cou"ty ."re... 1:0 !iIe'a",t '1:1'10 0-_.. .. ........."..d
roVQCabl~ ~icen.e tor the pu~". D~ l~tallin~ and m41~~ei~~ft~ ..
"";'9_~)" e"lv.;-t, .,~tÞ.\.r. 1:1'1" 1OI>Ov,,-J1...cr.it...d Ih'ainag* .....~...t ....C!.
rot -th~ PUi!'POiI. of .1'0.,1"11 th. .,,-....1: to sra,.. ,,~~... t"
Own.X'~· property.
:2 _ '1'hh: Hoen.. _1" nC".: b. ....dgnod. b~ Cho7\enl 1o·1ttv.:.ut tbIC
, s>r...cr ..., ¡;>t....... oo_.n'C o£COW\~.
~. '""~ ce,.....~ >01;>"U ba.....' th. rS\Jht 'to" te:l!'..i.natf" t:I'>~.
Avr._oon"l: ..,0:1 r...."1.... ,...."val ot '1:1'1. cul"Na..t .t owro.r*' eçètlSe
I.-.an ni_ty (90) d..:v" v:r~:t:'\:'en ""''\:L~ ~o 0Wne". .i.E, ~1'1 1:h1t ao-1.
d~,,'::t'.\;;¡on ancl j..ðoaent of 'the OOI1"'~Y ~U_If'. t~. CI....l.;;~~:;;
':nst!.o.11a;'J.o.. .........,..*..,...... ......t;h ~þ~ œaJ.n.g" requtre_rlu ..* Ih.d.!;.."
1thf'U' I:s"."." ...b4J."~.'>'cm.
1'hAÞ Cc>"...~ IÞ'>EI~~'" ""Y. ..,., 1...-. 0::
~<i'_.Lna.'I:~...... reQ".,.,.e 'lt1'16~ ~. Ovn..,. pe..'O~ _~.L.... .¡'t.r.~n 07:
~.Lh~.~.n~. ~ct~v~~~.£ wt;,h!n ~~. draina~. .a$øm~t. Mow~~.r: if
-1-
FRCM
PM! LTD \.,
PHONE NO.
8667643295 ~. 15 2002 08:43AM P4
Jul 2 '01 13:29 P.03
-'.lop. I.~ .. _',,"_ .."......~.
,
ST. LUCIE CO. ATTORNEY Fax:561-462-14~O
........_.; ; "'J'. ,.,:..:-...\~ .....,. ¡;ì~.¡-·· r-""L)r~ '''.....,
......,.
tI....<:Ì'. a.Ç'tiV''ti",~ 11.".. n':>t !¡)<!'r~ormeoð 1:0 O::M¡ s::peocH'i<;/l.t';'<'I"I< at 't,,~
:ounty 8n9~n~J. CQ~nty shall be 6nt1tled to e.e~~~R ~ts riQh~
to ~.~~.n~'t~ thi~ A~r.6M~nt.
4.
The
dr1v_.]'
culvert llhAll
boa
coostt'uctèd
an~
ltla~'ta'¡'n&d 1>01.1y at. thé _p..n.... of 0........ lH'ISe~ '1:.... .lIIp.""".jtj.on
r;>.I:
O"".....rf<·
eMtl'l.U
....6
1n
t..:u
..~U,.nç.
'W:L';n
.111
.:>.,t:,i,~ 1e.t 10m;
of COU!'l~ .." dt~.",i"'i! by 'l:M C:>1JJ'I~ ~t>$l..,..;r
"nd u dop;l.ctlld 0."1 ottt:4iCh.ð 1>xhið11: 'I". ~ :uxn.oeictl. ðt '1:1'.01.
c...lv.,rl "'!I:~ut\ Th. ..II..."lþIIt ,:,"" sl,\Þjeçt 1;c '1:11.. approval I)f ton..
CO;l.f!ty ~¡¡j,n..:'.
I!>. '.!'be Owners B"-l1 ind_MlIy .:&nc:! ho.Ld ~ ¢o..n'r:¡( harml....
t~ ~~d against ell elai... ~1.Ð111~y. ðè.~q*. ða~&9.~.
e"p~($. "..~. f~s. panal'ti..~.sut.t:... pro.".cL1ngG, , "''''t:';'cm..
L~~ coo~. of ."\~cnB. jn~'~'~~ r.a&Oftabl. a~~~~~~ ~..E o~ ~y
;c."nd ~'t .,.tv~. =l"'¡l)g Q~ in. ."'y 1otaY' .~W4 ...~Ù> 'tl:\. .......
o:::c...p.~i=, ".Mg"8:lt:. or aonuol of ")of! ._. pr-ö¡)....'t:y ~ "'::h.
o=..~ Or ita "'9_nt:it. o..rv.nts, _1"10,..... p.~. 0.. Urv1t..s.
O~ T..U~~¡n9 .l.n 1ft jury ~O pe't8Oft. ~ ~eþ..~y. 0" lQ9c of ~i~.
Or pJ:'t>p~ 1:1: MY ~~ 0:- na1::unl whatsoever. s.....'l:u_d ~\,jr:i,h9
0.....:101'$· u&_ e>f ~'ty ¡properly.
tlO W1'l'tt£e.e ~__. ;.r.. D.~~~"'. bav.. e_eo:>,.i:.o.ð t;b.l.s "'9're.....,,'I;
ð<" '-M It.y ....4 Y4l-..:' .~_. 1i..:r..t
.r-
/ " --:>
:....!þ_..~., . I~;N;¡¡-:-(.L.e
..._~-
, ' . . I
,r"'-', ~
~~;;I. .}
l
'-..,/.
S'l'A TC OF I"L QlUDa
CDUllTi 01' S~. LV<:JB
_for. _ p-.r.,..,..,1.1:r .'P.-"'. "'iIWfo .:rw1lPlf "'~1RC MtCJ ~JCI'I
MARIE H1J1E'1' ~ _ _11 ~ IUIO! au- ~o _ _ be ~ per-.o....
c!ese:rLbed ~n _d ",,",0 _...... .. r~lJi.. ....._"'. -.4
.~)...... ~ __ 'B"_ _ to_of: .aut. oJQSlMI 1ti;Itft - -..:If
_%11: M%1IIft .._,,__ ..ilt £...~..-.1; 'till: '11M ~Ø..iO ü_c:l.v
~~Bseð.
-2-
\
: PMI L TD "-'
ST. LUCIE CO. RTTORNE)' Fax:561-462-1440
''''''-L'. t""~~I( ,...~.- bT~'1:I" ~~. .
PHONE NO. : 8667643295
JuJ
~. 15 2002 08:43AM P5
13:29 P.04
~.,rI. ~7". J.:¡IiI('~.Ir" 1"'""1
FROM
7)_W~~t.ss
1..../ (+
,.y hu.ð _and
JIL.~.. 11l~.
My c:o..L..,. bpi=--_ ~
U1'81':
'2 '01
.....9·
--
oft,Lc.l...l
,.-/
~Ä..s ~ ~y of\:.
....1 .
~ '.
~l .
iiëilary 'rUe ~?
su~. of' Plor.ida v ".
~ ,
~. ~
.~
.~. ~ ,'..
.". " .~.
£,~~..
~~
:r=1"~ fI._-'
. .e1'. .... '..1,
.....~......-~ W~
(" ~~
~i?1 ~s)
IT. weu COU1ft'\'
~ OP CDÚ:JIW ..........H2;OMIIõR!I
.~ "
trY, J~. ~ ~ "-:-::-:.
~'I'" ....".
~ :~-~~ '
- -'
~. -:~~:.,~"'~
, øPl\OVanw-'1'O --ro. ai4a, ': ~
·ooaIIIi:Cftlaa& , ". ' .
. .' 'w
...
-
'3"
"
"
...
\.,
,...",
AGENDA REQUEST
,ITEM NO. ~
,
,
,
DATE: March 26, 2002
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [XXX]
TO:
BOARD OP COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SUBMITTED BY: HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
PRESENTED BY:
David Rodriguez
Human Resources Director
SUBJECT:
Third year adjustment to the pay and classification plán.
BACKGROUND:
The Board of County Commissioners approved the Pay
and Classification Study on April 4, 2000, and the
second, third and fourth year phase of the study on
April 24, 2001.
PUNDS AVAIL.: Various Punds 9910-599310-800
PREVIOUS ACTION: The Board of County Commissioners approved the Pay
and Classification Study on April 4, 2000, and the
second, third and fourth year phase of the study on
April 24, 2001.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the attached adjustment
to the pay and classification study.
COMMISSION ACTION:
[ X] APPROVED [] DENIED
[ ] OTHER:
D u as Anderson
County Administrator
O~iginating Dept.
Review and Approvals
Management . aud9.~ Pu~cha8ing I
Othe~, Othe~,
County Attorney:
Pinanc.: (Check for Copy only, if applicabl.l___
8ff. 5/96
..........
.....,I
,
,
.'
AGENDA
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PROM: David Rodriguez, Human Resources Director
DATE: March 18, 2002
SUBJECT: Adjustment to the pay and classification plan
BACKGROUND:
The Board of County Commissioners approved the Pay and
Classification Study on April 4, 2000, and the second, third and
fourth year phase of the study on April 24, 2001.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the attached adjustment to the pay and
classification study.
Respectfully submitted,
~~~'
David Rodriguez ~~
Human Resources Director
DR/mp
Attachments
........ ,.."
:RECA~FOR APRIL 2002
,
, ,
Agriculture $ 4,936
Building & Zoning $ 14,119
Central Services $ 6,811
Community Development $ 4,567
Information Technology $ 3,579
Mosquito Control $ 4,355
Public Safety $ 1,755
Solid Waste $ 10,385
Utilities $ 7,765
Veterans $ 3,758
Parks & Recreation
Aquatics
Civic Center
Community Center
Golf Course
Lincoln Park
Museum
Parks
Sports Complex
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Total (full year) $
2,531
2,180
2,727
2,912
1,360
1,413
17,325
4A32
96,910
April 1 to Sept. 30 (half year) $ 48,455
~ '
~
'...,;
,
UTILITIÈS
,
Utility Customer Services Specialist II
Pay Grade 8, Job Code 736
to Utility Customer Service Specialist III
Pay Grade 11, Job Code 939
Cost $3,478
Utility Customer Service Specialist III
Pay Grade 11, Job Code 939
to Utility Billing Supervisor
Pay Grade 14, Job Code New Cost $41287
Total Cost $7,765
AGRICUL TURE
Program Assistant
Pay Grade 10, Job Code 702
to Program Specialist /4H
Pay Grade 12, Job Code 699
Cost $1,310
Horticulture Specialist
Pay Grade 16, Job Code 619
to Commercial Horticulture Agent
Pay Grade 18, Job Code 702
Cost $3,626
Total C-ost $4,936
N
o
o
N
I
....
(1)0
0:0
WN
zO:
0<
_W
(1)-
~...J
::E<
::E(.)
O~
(.)LL.
~~
ZLL.
~I-
0(1)
(.)W
LL.~
00
OW
0:0:
<Z
00
m¡:::
~t3
Z-
~!!:
0(1)
(.)(1)
w:5
-(.)
(.)w
30:
·z
t;o
I-
(I)
o
c.
ë
w
o
z
w
:æ
:æ
°
u
w
a::
ß
Ci)
S;
LIJ
a::
o
~
Ci)
~
ë
w
>
o
0::
Q.
Q.
<
Ci)
LIJ
¡::
::ï
¡::
:::>
.=.:
z
w
:æ
I-
0::
<
Q.
W
o
ž
o
(i)
:>
ë
,
LIJ
U
S;
fE
CI) ::: '"
fE I- CO)
~~OI ~
~~~~~
Ci) U "t
:::> ~ c
U Ci) ....
)0-
I-
::ï
¡::
:::>
LIJ
U
S;
fE
Ci) ::::
§tï>
c::: ::¡ (0
~ð~co
~~
UCi)
)0-
I-
::ï
¡::
:::>
¡jj
..J
I-
¡=
Z
o
¡::
(i)
o
Q.
:g ~ ~
01 It') "t
~ t.') ::i
.... c ,..
.... r-.. co
co c co
N" co)" In"
N .... C")
t.')t.')t.')
It')
....
~
....
I
"t
....
0)
~ ~ ~
~ ~" ~.
01 ..... C")
01" t.') ...
.....
t.')
¡jj ¡jj
¡jj 0 t!) en
O<Z~I-
O!!::<o::Ü:
~>::~:5~
o«<w
., Q. Q. (/) m
ž
o
¡::
,<
~ u
~ I i
...."
....
:::J
~~CI)
~ ~ ~
-5 ~ CI)
.S '" E
o oS
~ ~ ~
~ ~ -,#
.~ en ~ ~
15 .!¿ .g I::
~ ~ ~ Ë
CD"'()1=:
.!£ :g ::; ~
~ Q) .1:: Q
Ci)è5..~
... E 'i ~
CD 0 e ~
g ~ t)):::>
.... I:: 't:I CD
~C\Q)::;
U :g ~ .S
ca ~ '-
....~c:o:g
o '_ ('Q
CI) .S U ë;¡
I:: 't:I _
.S2 I:: -0 Õ
13 C\ oS I;:::
I:: CI) Q) C5
.;:~~-
.Q 0 E C\
.2., 5} 8 ~
Q)"C I::C:
::; -'C Q) '-
t)) I:: Q) Q)
I:: C\ .Q ~
;::: ~ CI) -::
~~~-9
.2 CI) I:: CI)
.~Q..Q!
::: .~ ~ ii
~~2.~
.S! ~ .'=2 ',>;
(,) CI) ~ ¡;;,
Q) C\ .... Q)
Q. (,) .... CI)
Ci) :.... 0 ...
Q) "" I:: Q)
(,) -§ .2 E
't::; "- <ä ..s
~o.g~
'- t)).Ü) (J
CD .S CI) "C
E (,) .!!! CD
.9-ª~~
CI) C\ '" ~
:::J .Q Q) (,)
U 0 ~ I::
...... - ...... '-
I:: 't:I 5 .S
~ Q) ""
5 ~ t)) 't:I
(,,) .§ .S ~
Q) :: .S: ~
¡5:g~e
...
8
C")
.....
,
....
"-
"t
~
C")
....
I
....
C\
"t
c"
C
CO)
...
I
....
It)
"t
c"
C
CO)
...
,
....
"t
"t
it
I-
Z
::I
o
U
u
<
It)
C\
C
I
2
Ci)
U
it
a
w
a::
(/)
(/)
:3
u
w
a::
C\ 10 "
cc c cc
fa 10 r-... C\
(0)' t"7 "'t-
CI) t"7 ...
s: c
llJ c
a:: (0)
....
'tJ I
....
I) ~ r-...
ê "'t
'tJ E c'
I) .g .E c
CI)
I) <II I) CI) (0)
:5 ~ 1:1. ::3 ....
(,) I
... (,) ~ ....
N .2 I) C\
0 0 .S e:: .!Q "'t
0, ::3 0'
0 <: ·S 0 c:
~ ·S 'tJ 8 I) c
.S (0)
~ <II §- ....
..... .ê - I
mO ::3 e:: CI) ....
0:::0 ::::: CI) ~ .E 10
q; ~ "'t
UJN ..: CI) 0- ~ c-
zO::: ~ c
0 <II "" (0)
0< .!Q .1:: ~ .Q ....
CI) c: CI) <II I
_UJ ~ E .S I) ....
m)- I) :5 "'t
!Q..J §-oS! e:: "'t
::!E< c r-... ..... CI) ~ ~ ~
10 C\ " 0, CI) (,) 0
::!Eo .... r-... cc ;§ CI) .g .1::
0!Q a:: co' (0)- 0) ::3 CI)
0 C\ .... t") ãš .g ~ CI)
OLL C/) t"7 t"7 .... :>., <II I) <II
~~ s: ~ ~ ¡:: .1::
~ Q) Q)
ffi ~ :5 -.; }
ZLL e::
=>.... % cc <II ·s I)
0> ..... ~ ~
Om CI) ~ to 0 ~
OUJ .... CI) <II I)
(!) "'t e::
LL:J ~ .... I ~ e ð} .!Q
~ cc ~
00 0> 0, C :5
-.J (,)
cUJ 0 -.J ---= e:: 'tJ ò'g
w ã5 .... 02 I)
::3 ::: (1J
0:::0::: 0 >- .Q § - i:: :it
z Ö .'2, ;:)
<Z w l- e:: <II I-
00 :i w :J Q) 0 CD (,)
> ¡::: :5 ü :5 $: z
mi= :i 0 ·s e:: ::I
0 a: ;:) o,~ .~ 0
~~ ·s I) :t::
U a.. :::: - ~ CI) u
w a.. ~ ~ .!Q u
z- a: < 02 1:1. CI) c: <
:J!:!: CI) E I) ::: .Q
Om c C\ c .- 0 ~ - ~
c C\ 0> - (,) ~
om c In - 0 0
to ~ e:: <II 1:1.
UJ:3 llJ co (0)- In- I) (ij '(3 Q)
Ü 10 .... t") .!.!! Q) E Q) .1::
-0 C\. t"7 ... .Q 1:1.-
OUJ s: (,) CI) oS! C/) :>.,
C\ I)
30::: ffi t"7 ~ <II .S Q) .Q
.1:: Q) .(,) 'tJ
CI) - e:: :5 ~ .~
'z - Q)
- ..... ~
t)o ffi I- C") .g ... Q) ::3
CI) lei I) II) .E CI) 0-
.... ~ - 0> .... I C/) 0 II) ... ~
-.J .... 1:1. I)
e ::!; C") I ... ~ E CI)
m 0> .... 10 I) .!Q <II
0 CI) Ü "'t E :5 ::3 .E
~ 11'. 'tJ CI) CI)
c.. ~ c:i It, .E ..... Q) ::3 0,
Ü .... " CI) 0 .2 Ü .S
CI) ::3 e:: :::::
>- ü ~ c: i:: .Q
I- .... Q) æ 'tJ
fß :J e:: <II CI)
æ ~ ... '" e:: 10
¡:: Q) ::3 10 C\
¡:: '" (,) c
~ ::3 CI) E I) ,
:J (,) CI) .E I) .2 B
Q) 10 :5 c:
¡::: .5¿ CI) CI)
~ ¡:: ~ ::3 £ I) ü
(,) CI)
Ž :it
.:: 0 0
z ü.i ü.i ¡:: w
w 0 C) en a:
:i < C/)
I- Z ~ Z ~ I- U C/)
a: 0 ~ u:: u:: S
< Cii C) < w ¡::
a.. :; >- >- .J Z C/) U
w 15 < < < W ::I W
0 a.. a.. C/) m ., a:
'....;
~
'....I
AGRICULTURE
MEMORANDUM
-~T.-ÚJCIE :. -
COUNTY -.
f ,-¡ J -\ ...~
--. - ~--- - - -- - ~--
TO:
Doug Anderson, County Administrator
FROM:
Anita Neal. Interim County Extension Director
DATE:
January 11, 2002
RE:
Position Reclassification - Program Assistant to Program Specialist
It has come to our attention that one of our staff members. Debbie McManus, the 4-H
Program Assistant, has taken on responsibilities in her position that fall outside the realm of her
current job description. Doing so, as you would expect, has been a gradual process and her
supervisor, Susan Munyan, 4-H/ Agriculture Agent, has come to rely on and appreciate the
assistance that Mrs. McManus provides in performing these tasks.
As described in the attached job description for an Extension Program Assistant, the major
function of that position is to conduct educational programs under the direction of the Extension
Agent with whom they work. The major function listed on the job description for a Program
Specialist/4-H is to work in assisting in planning, developing, and implementing an effective
educational4-H program. As Debbie currently creates and develops program materials. secures
guest speakers for events, coordinates 4-H events and contests with school groups and 4-H clubs.
assists with program and event promotions, and assists the 4-H Agent in interpreting Extension
and 4-H policies and procedures to county 4-H volunteer leaders and to the public, it seems that
the 4-H Program Specialist's job description more accurately describes her role in this office.
Mrs. McManus does meet the minimum educational requirements of a Program Specialist
as well. She earned her Associate Degree in Early Childhood Eduèation in 1977 at the Indian
River Community College.
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners reclassifY Debbie McManus
as a Program Specialist based on the justification provided herein. Your consideration in this
matter is greatly appreciated.
ASN/ca '
œŒ@UWŒ[~
JAN 1 il 2002 i ~
, \
Attachments
Pat Clute, Employee and Labor Relations Manager ~
cc:
HUMX\ RESOURCES
ST. LUCIE CCUNTY. FLORIDA
'-"
Job Code
Pay Grade
~
699
~
Iz-
PROGRAM SPECIALIST/4-H
MAJOR FUNCTION
,
Professional work in assisting in planning, developing and implementing an
effective educational 4-H program.
ILLUSTRATIVE DUTIES
Assists in planning, developing and implementing effective educational programs
in all 4-H areas.
_!Recruits adult volunteers to be 4-H leaders.
:¡identifies key citizens and agencies who might support or work with
Programs and communicates needs of local people to 4-H Youth Agent.
identify the needs, interest and problems of youth in the county.
vlInterprets 4-H Youth Program and extension policies and procedures to county 4-H
volunteer leaders and to the public. Maintains good working relations with other
youth groups by helping keep channels of communication open. Assists the 4-H
Youth Coordinator in project or activity promotion and publicity. Organizes
special interest groups and clubs to meet particular needs and interests of youth.
Visits local 4-H volunteer leaders to assist them with local problems. Conducts
,county 4-H Youth events and activities as assigned.
~ Keeps record of activities and prepares reports. Assists with and/or makes simple
charts and other visual aids and educational materials for demonstration purposes.
4-H Youth
Helps
,¡Performs related work a~ required.
KNOWLEDGE, ABILITIES AND SKILLS
Ability to organize youth groups, establish programs. and conduct educational
classes. Ability to deal effectively with the general public and' co-workers.
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS
Associate Degree in Agriculture. Home Economics or Behavioral Sciences. Some
experience in 4-H or similar youth groups preferred.
A comparable amount of training or experience may be substituted for the mini-
mum qualifications.
lJ
...-.. ,-
¡,
,
j.
f J
'-'
c. c. t-'-~ r: ~
~
GENERAL POSITION DESCRIPTION
FOR
4-H PROGRAM SPECIALIST
I Major Responsibilities of 4-H Program Specialist
The major responsibility of this position is the inter-
pretation and delivery of relevant educational information to
the 4-H members of the county, with specific emphasis being
placed on an effort to insure the application of this knowledge.
The Program Specialist is responsible to his/her County
Extension Director for all programmatic and administrative
matters. The Program Specialist will work cooperatively in
order to integrate his/her program efforts into the total
County Extension program. The amount of time which Program
Specialist spends on specific programs components will be
determined in concert with the County Extension Director.
II Functions and Tasks of the Program Specialist
This section deals with the primary functions and tasks-
of Program Specialist's responsibility which is the interpre-.
tation and delivery of educational programs.
Function-l
Conducts educational programs in his/her designated
areas of responsibility to help people more effectively inter-
pret and use findings of science and technology.
a. Assume responsibility for developing and executing a
plan of work.
b. Involves the appropriate program advisory committee (s)
in the development and implementation of programs in
designated program area.
~
....,¡
c. Involves resources of the University of Florida and
the community to effectively implement county programs.
,
d. Identifies, recruits, and develops volunteer leader-
ship necessary to carry out the program work of the
county.
e. Assumes responsibility to the 4-H program within
his/her area of competency and/or subject matter.
f. Develops and uses appropriate systems for reporting
program accomplishments.
g. At all times functions as a professional teacher/
educator.
Function 2
Follow a sound process in developing educational
programs in his/her designated area of responsibility.
a. Works with program advisory committee in analyzing
county situation and in identifying priority problems.
b. Clearly establishes objectives, subject matter content,
and learning experiences to reach these objectives.
c. Designs and implements a variety of program delivery
methods to reach target clientele.
d. Evaluates results and accounts appropriate publics
for program accomplishments.
Function 3
Develops an understanding of the county, the needs
of its youth and Extension's role in meeting those needs.
a. Seeks to understand the county situation in terms of
social and economic factors.
b. Seeks to understand the role of County Extension
Service in effecting changes in the county situation.
c. Continuously examines own role as a change Program
Specialist.
Function 4
Understands philosophy of Extension and utilizes
effective methodology in program delivery and evaluation.
a. Seeks to understand and convey the philosophy,
objectives and policies of the Florida Cooperative
Extension Service.
b. Assists in determining and obtaining resources needed
to implement the plan of work.
~
~
,
c. Plans and provides the training needed to equip
volunteer leaders to carry out the program.
,
d. Develops and maintains two way communications with
volunteer leaders.
e. Establishes and maintains rapport with personnel
of mass media and arranges for appropriate releases
in the assigned program area.
f. Assesses the effectiveness of the program and plans
for needed modifications.
g. Utilizes results of program evaluation to initiate
changes in implementating or in re-directing the
program.
h. Understands and implements the provisions of the
Affirmative Action Plan.
C"')
o
o
N
I
N
C/)O
It: 0
WN
Zit:
oct
-W
C/)-
~..J
~ct
~U
o~
Uu.
~~
Zu.
::II--
OC/)
UW
u.::I
00
OW
It: It:
ctz
00
m~
~t3
Z-
::I!:!:
ou)
uu)
w:3
-u
Uw
3 It:
t-=z
C/)O
I--
CiS
o
c.
~
S
IJ.J
It
Il') Q
.... ....
C\ C"
~ ....~
~
o
~
~
o
>-
OJ
I-
::::J
~
CI)
~
ö
w
o
z
w
:E
:E
o
o
W
It:
~ ~ ~
0) .... Q
C\- C")- ~~
C\ .... C"
~ ~ ~
l-
V)
::ï
~
u
~
V)
:E
~
o
a:
:t:
,
"'"
o
W
I-
U)
W
:;)
a
w
It:
....
IX:)
I'-.
~f
C\ C\ ~
12 .... IX:)
C\
Il')
....-
C\
~
o
w
~
It:
D..
D..
<C
~ ~
IX:) IX:)
....- C\'
C\ ....
~ ~
I-
~
¡:!:
V)
ëi)
V)
<:(
:E
~
(!)
o
a:
:t:
.
"'"
IJ.J
U
[
o
~
o
~
8
ç
~
o
u
I'-.
IX:)
"'"
0)-
C\
C\c~
12 .... Il')
&5
0)'
....
~
¡:.:
z
w
:E
I-
It:
~
W
o
ž
o
ii5
:>
õ
f¡¡ ~ ~
~ ~ !U
o 's; !;;
If '5 õ
:t: \1 §
..¡. .c I:'!
:s ",
\1 0 ""
~ :>., Q"
\1 :t: .!:2
~ ..¡. ~
=@ tn '"
u ·s '"
~13Cb
~-6:S
ì 8 ·ê
~'tJ~
:;:, t: ::::
o (! S!
o tn ...
(! c: "-
Cb :;:: ~
Iõ;, fa .........
~ :§ ~
~ <:: c:
"_ 0 1
1ñ 8 (I)
:S I:'!- E
Cb Cb ~
c: m Ö!
o o<;¡ e
.e ~ Q"
.S ~ g...:
I:'! tnïS.~
¡g .S Q .~
:>.,.S ~ CD
Cb.ê~t%
:S'tJ
~ 16 ~ ~
OtntnÖ!
'tJ ·s .S e
<I>:1::ic:a::
::. :;:¡ c:
õt¡(!:t:
ii';~Q."¡'
~ .!:2 .S ~
.ê c: 1:: :::
c:,g&O
.2 .¡¡; <:( ~
:t::: 0 c:
~ Q,,:J¡: <I>
Q" .~ "'t E
.....:SCb~
~c::S'5
~ .~ .f2 g-
::¡ 0 .!:2 \;.
<:(I:'!~C:
<I> ~ .2
E Q" 'tJ (¡
~ Cb c: 0
0)~(!-6
o . Cb
ð:: .....:; ~ Q,)
~ c: -!::
:J¡: ~ ~ ....
"'t 'õ Cb ~
Cb<l>'tJ<I>
~t%~E
c
c
C")
C
c
c
C\
....
Il')
o.b
....
I'-.
C")
I
....
C
C
:it
I-
Z
:;)
o
u
u
<C
~
C")
¡::
fu
Q
:it
a
w
It:
U)
U)
:3
o
W
It:
Received: 31 8/02 9:48AM; Fax
M
CI
CI
~
N
IIJCI
o::CI
WN
zO::
0«
-W
IIJ>
!:!L.J
:¡E«
:¡E()
o~
()LL.
>0::
1-0
zLL.
::JI-
01lJ
()W
LL.::J
0°
OW
0::0::
«z
00
ca¡:::
>«
I-()
z-
::J!:!:
01lJ
()IIJ
«
W...J
-()
()w
3 a::
'Z
~o
¡:::
ëñ
o
Q.
_> ST LUCIE CO HUMAN Hc~OURCES; Page 2
",
3/~2 9:28 AM FROM: Fax St. Lucie County Extension TO: 2361
CD
~
o
>-
CD
....
:;,
~
ä
w
c
z
w
:¡¡:
:¡¡:
o
o
W
II::
llJ
Ü
tE
o
<:
o
Ùj
<:
~
GJ
>-
....
<:
:;,
o
Ü
a
llJ
C/)
s:
llJ
C(
o
<:
C/)
~
c
W
to-
(/)
W
:::I
a
w
II::
....
<:
llJ
<.'J
<t
llJ
a::
2
:5
Ü
¡.::
C(
o
:t
-I
<:(
õ
ffi
~
~
o
Ü
ë
w
>
o
II::
0..
0..
<
~
to-
Z
W
0::
0::
:::I
o
.:;
z
w
:¡¡:
~
~
w
c
ž
o
iñ
:>
ë
"t-
CO)
(\
a;j
'I'
~~:
10
o
o'
CO)
~
....
C/)
:J
~
Ü
~
CI)
llJ
a::
:;,
....
....J
:;,
Ü
¡.::
C(
o
:t
"t-
co
r-..
0'
'I'
0) ~ ~
~ 't- 0;)
~
cD
~
~ ~ ~
o 10 IQ
CO)' ~ C<'Ì
~ ~
...... 'I' ....
~ ~ :g
(\. ~ ...:
~~:t
r-.. co 'It
10 0) 10
10 CO) 01
0)' '1" C<'Ì
~~:t
ûi w
~ ~ û)
~~~It
~~$ffi
0.. 0.. y. en
,
:§~~ ~Q)
!¿ - c::
Q) ~ 0 ,>
E~õ ~
ð &¡ c:: .!::
ü~~{J..c:_Q)
(1 I/) 0 '¡
I/) E '-I/) ,S;
~ I/) CD
~ 0> ~ :S ,g>
C1)ee.s;'5J
,CI Q. Q. J!! ìii
~g>s·S;:G
~'t:~~~
~'O Q.
:>., '- c: .Q .§
]!~-"@I/)
~ '0 ~ ,5; ~
o ~ .... ::s '0
~g>~~~
~ '- !II I/)
98-.Qiij·S;
E:Qj'O_ I/) c:
Q»~~Eo
§~.2-~~
.Q 55 ~ ~ ~ '~
,S; <I) <;¡ llJ Q. CD
.....Q Q)Ü CD'1J
g¡:G iij'"-~.Q
:>....c:..c:!!:S.Q,
<;¡c::.Q'§o>'~
co.Q-§ç'S;..c:
Q..=-= ~ 52 q....
CD~I/):",,g~
:SQ.E~~
.... I/) ~ ::s CD .§
~£O>'O'1Jg¡
o eCD:.-__
¡.~':¡CDQ)
~CD~::s.,¡:S
o.Q<;¡:§§'O
~~-65:t:~
I/) E ,S; () ~ CD
~it:!II:;Q..Q
c:: J!! § .Q '!::CD CD
01/)-'0 c:
:¡:;Q>'"5-£&
ï¡;~:2~.... II)
o ....0.....E co
Q.c::t'¡¡¡ ..c:
~.Q';;:;:S"@I/)
<tJ ~ .~ C; .!::: :.::::
'_ I/) !¿ '- ::s (1
~2.~~ª,'~
C/) - "'C1) I/) Q.
55 "'_CDCI)
~o>o~l/)~
:!<tÜOC::.2
'š !IJ J! ~ .~ -::s
!.2""-'O-
't:.2-CD'Q:2
o '5 co I/) ...
:t,Q¡g¡~~
CD 1:: E ¡:; 't:
f= ~ '- 0c: (1 .!
r-....(Q._>.....
z
o
~
o
iL
~
:::I
PAGE: DO' 002
.....,
o
o
CO)
C
o
o
(\
"t-
IC)
.}¡
,...
"-
'1
"t-
o
o
ü;
to-
Z
:::I
o
o
o
<
~
cI¡
/2
Q
~
ð
w
0::
(/)
(/)
:)
fd
0::
.....
....;
,
BUILDING & ZONING
Building Code Supervisor
Pay Grade 19, Job Code 620
to Building Code Supervisor
Pay Grade 21, Job Code 620
Cost $ 7,853
Currently, the Building Code Supervisor makes less than one of
the Building Inspectors, this is more than the standard increase
to bring this 14 year employee in line.
1 position of Building & Zoning Clerk
Pay Grade 6, Job Code 612
to Building & Zoning Technician'
Pay Grade 11, Job Code 735
Cost~6,266
Change in Policy
Currently, InspectorsfPlans Examiners receive 10% for
each State License/Certification they receive as an incentive to
pass the State exam. It is recommended we reduce and limit the
incentive increases according to the list below:
.
Total Cost $14,119
Page 1 of 2
,
~
.
~<
"
"
" ~ - ~ ~~
æ .f.".
@ It) CI:I :J. ,
(£) -' ""...ï;
CI:) ~ ~ ~~.
s: ~: :;
lU ~~
a: <.
:~:"
~. I- ,
:..;. () ~
~~ <
a.. " ~
.. :E ,!(¡ ~
-:..:: .*-
l- e: '6
M w .2 "" 8
0 a .. Co:) .~ c5
0 ~ " c ; & ~
C'\I ~ ::J n Q)
I CD ... ..s ~
C'\I ". 0 ê¡j
en 0 a .. ,!(¡
.,
a: 0 :>- ~ ..s -
C'\I It)
W CI:I Q) ... LO
a: g. Q)
z .... "';" t~_ .c:: ~ -
0 <C :;) CI:) ]: (J) .\21 ~
W 0... .!(¡ .c:: C1I
Cñ ~ '~ ~ .
>- ~ ~~ ~ 't:J ~ -
en >i Q) ~
..J -= Q! Ìij "Ot
:E <C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -
(J ti It) , .è-
:E It) It) Q' oS Q)
en '," a: è' o;j oj ~ §
0 u
ü: , a ~ - IO~ Q (3
() ~ """ ~~ ~ 0
CI) u
>- a: s: 10 " .s .!(¡ Q)
~ 0 ~ - , ..s
~ ~ 01 I::
Z U. C ; ,S; .0 ..s
::> ~ w ~ ~ .~
è' '- 8-
0 en ., I- CI) ~ c5 I::
(f) 10
() W lU c - ~ Q
::I w a ~ C\ ~ Q) Q) Q)
U. ::J , ..s ..s .0
0 0 , 0 a C\ CI)
c c\. I: "- -
w w U 0 C1I C1I
0 a: w a: ~ ~ Q) ..s .c::
C '. CD
a: z Ö CIJ' ; 5 ~ Q
<C Z w ~ a ~ .. .s C1I § -
0 0 :E w CI)
> .. S ~ ~ ~ I-
m ~ :E 0 z
0 CI:I u ::J
>- a:1 " CI) Q Q)
~ (J u a... " CI) e: 'E 0
w a.. ~ e u
z u: a: < ," 1 ..2 ê u
::I Cñ ^ ~ ~
0 ~ ~ .... .0:' ~ U
en C1I
(.) .. 0) ':; E Q) Q
<C ~}' ..s ~
w ..J .. a: to)' ..... - 5 .!(¡
ë3 (.) a ~ - 10 f, .!(¡ ~
CI) ~ ~:'. ~ ~
::I W s: ~ ~. Q)
..J a: ffi .~ g. c:: .S;
'" .2 E
...= z .. >- to) (J) .!!2 C1I
en 0 ,. ...J ê5 It) ). ~ ::.: ~
~ -, I- CI:) ~ ~ is
", z Co ~. 01 <II g
Cñ ~ ~ w l.!.J ~ 0) .S; e:
a: a - r..:. { 01 ~ ~
0 ~ ~ a: a "Ot .1:: '5 Cl ~
c.. ~ :::: ::J u ~ !.' ì5 CI:I Q)
U ~~ =s ..s 'It
a: -J '1, (!) 10 ¡: CI:I Cb 't:J c:
~ ,'- ~ ~ ..s .2
~ .. .,. I::
'., ~ CD .!!2
a " ..s oS C1I
a S .;.. ~ .~
u u ,~ è - a
'[ I:: 0 ~
~ lU .; CI:I e: -ê õ
§ a ., f!! .~ ~ :§
a , ::;
0... U T:; U .s 'S
CI:I
. W " Ž
~ ...J -
Z I- W W 0 0
w ¡:: W ~ w
:E Ž z c CJ en .. a:
I- 0 C < Z :,; I- j' () (f)
a: 0 ¡:: 0 a: < a: ü: .:¡ ü: (f)
< Cñ u CJ a: < w « ¡:: <
a.. s: Cñ CD ~ >- ...J Z I- ; ...J
(f) U
w 0 0 « « w 0' ::J
C ë a.. .., a.. a. (/) CD ~ " w
"") IX:
N
o
o
N
I
~
mO
0::0
wN
zO::
0«
_w
m>-
~...J
:!E«
:!EO
o~
uu.
~~
zu.
:::11-
0m
OW
u.:::I
00
CW
0::0:::
«z
00
co¡:::
~(3
z-
:::I~
o(/)
urn
wS
-0
Uw
:30:::
·z
tño
¡:::
Cñ
o
c.
o
w
o
z
w
~
~
o
u
w
e::
CI)
~
It
~
Ü
:::¡
CD
:::>
Cl
.:.:
z
w
~
l-
e::
«
Q..
w
o
@
CI)
S
~
o
<:
CI)
~
J:
Ü
~
(!)
<:
~
o
N
......
C')
<cì
Lt') ....- -,-.
~,..~
"<l-
e
,..
o
w
>
o
e::
Q..
Q..
«
llJ
Ü
<:
S
~
o
Ü
llJ
Q
o
Ü
ffi
....J
Ü
(!)
<:
~
o
N
C\
.... CQ
CQ
:ž
o
ëñ
:>
õ
û.i
..J
I-
¡::
Z
o
¡::
ëñ
o
Q..
û.i û.i
û.i 0 CJ
o«z>=~
o ~ ë2 e:: ii: ,:j
~>->-:5~t:
o«««wo
"") Q.. Q.. (I) aJ I-
\I') e 10
C') C') 10
C\ e C\
\1')" ,..' iii
~ ~ ...
,.. e ....
,.. ...... CIQ
CIQ e CIQ
c\' C')' It'Ì
~ ~ ~
"<I-
"<I-
c\i
,..
e e 10
~ ;g ~
...... C\- 0).
\I') ,.. C\
r-: ~ ~
....
~
"<l-
e
a:)
f
~
t
l
1
...
Q)
.s
.....
o
-
t::
Q)
~
tt!
~
Q)
.s
.!;
0)
.t::
.S
,¡g
0)
0)
e
(.)
.8
0)
.~
~
"E
tt!
o
.Q
.c:
B
'§:
0)
.s
'§:
0)
t::
.8
tt!
0)
~
.~
Q..
~
~
Q)
·s .
:J ~
e ~
~ ~
0) 0)
-ê .!;
t::
-ð 2
.!; 'C
t:: t::
~ ~
'(;) ,c::
o .:::
~~
.!!J ê
¡:: 8.
z
o
¡::
«
u
ii:
¡::
(I)
;:)
"")
~
,
~
o
e
c
C\
....
II')
I
.....
"<I-
C\
I
....
0)
"<I-
:it
I-
Z
;:)
o
o
o
«
.....
c
c
,
C\
c
c::
.2
.0)
:;;
is
0)
.!;
;!2
'S
CD
,
:it
o
w
e::
If)
If)
«
..J
u
w
e::
,
""
...¡
Inspector/Plans Examiner %
,
Increase
Starting salary must qualify for a State Provisional
Building Inspector License
End of Probation period must have Provisional 5
License to continue employment
Pass Exam and obtained Standard 1&2 Dwelling 10
Inspector State License pre-approved by the
Building Official
Pass Exam and obtained Standard 1&2 Family up to 10
Plans Examiner State License pre-approved by the
Building Official
Pass Exam and obtained Standard State License up to 10
pre-approved by the Building Official
Pass Exam and obtained Standard State License up to 5
pre-approved by the Building Official
Pass Exam and obtained CBO from ICe pre- up to 5
approved by the Building Official
Any additional License pre-approved by the up to 2
Building Official
Page 2 of 2
,
~
....,,¡
,
,
,
CENTRAL SERVICES
Automotive Mechanic
Pay Grade 10, Job Code 833
to Heavy Equipment Mechanic
Pay Grade 14, Job Code 827
Cost $5,357
One position of Maintenance Tech V
Pay Grade 9, Job Code 872
to Maintenance Specialist
Pay Grade 12, Job Code (New)
Cost $1,454
Total Cost $6,811
Change Division name
from General Maintenance to General Construction
\
~ Q) .æ
(t :oS (t
..... t:: .:;
0 0 :§
~ E
(t .92 Q)
N (,) 3:! <::I
00 <::I
0 Q) e ::. ...
° .::c ~ ¿,
N .s Q. <::I
I .E (t .!Q <::I
.... .!Q ~ C\
C/)O .!!1 ...
c::O 00 ~ It)
I
WN (t Q) È ...
Q) :oS ~
zc:: 00 ~ .!!1
0<C 00 ...
0 "0 e I
_W .!!1 t:: ...
C/)- (t Q. <::I
111 <::I
~...J .E t:: Ìij
:i<C <::I "- "-~ "0 Q) .S:!
10 C\ t'-r.. ¿~ E t::
:iU ... "- :. ¡ t:: (t
Ü <0" CO)" 111 .9- ~
O~ 'ë: ::. (,)
~ C\ .... ~~ tr Q)
Uu. fo<) fo<) Q) Q) E
~gj ~ ;!J: E .E
!It .9- Q)
ü ¡ 5-~ :oS
zu. ~ .....
0 a:¡ ~ Q) Q) 0
;:)1- w I- C\ i!. ;..,-2 ~
OC/) I- cò \it :> t::
(f) a1 .... I 111 (t (t
UW "- (,)
,w C\ "'t' ~¥' ~ E
u.;:) :J ~ a:¡ .... a:¡ Q)
Q¡ .::c
00 ·0 0> " Q) .s
ë S .,..: .\J :oS -2
cW w ~,
w a:: C1 .... Q¡ Q) .E
c::c:: c llJ -2 :oS .S:! :it
<CZ z ë >- , "0 S: t::
W " (t I-
00 ~ w :::. t:: 0 13 z
> LìS (t t::
m¡::: ~ 0 :' 3:! .!Q Q) :J
~t3 0 a:: ::t Q) ~ E 0
0 c.. I;:: .... 0
w c.. Q) CI) t:: 0
z- a:: <C :oS '« Q) c:c
;:)~ .:; ...: E
oC/) <::I <0 Q t:: .9-
uC/) <::I "'t' N '5 Q) ::.
~ a:¡ In E tr
w:3 I- C\" ..; 0 .9- Q)
Iii <0 .... C")' 0 ::. ~
-U Ü ....- fo<) ... 0) tr
Uw 111
Ii ~ C\ .E Q) II)
3c:: fo<) .!!1 ~~
I- ~ 00 (t 111
·z ::t >- (t Q) ....
~O ø ü 0> ~ ::.
..J ~ C\ Q) 0
::¡ I- 00 Q)
¡::: Z "<i :oS '1:)
I ~ CO) <::I .... .E t::
ëij CI) w CO) Q)
llJ llJ a:: a:¡ .... I t:: t:: CI)
ø ¡::: "- (t 0
0 Ü '« 0::: "'t' .§ CI) ~
c.. s: ø :J 0 oi E 111 ai
ffi 0 ::E II) .92 ~ :§
a:: -2
'« ~ 00 ~
CI) ø Q) e ~
....J ~ ::> :oS Q..... ...
~ '« '1:) _ t:: .g 8
(t Q)
Q) .:; E
¡...: s: Q) ..... I
~ .s- i: 8
ili ffi t:: (,)
~ Q) g.Q CI)
ü CI) E Q) (t ü
W ~~ Ž :it
¡:.: ..J I 0 0
Z I- W W w
w ¡::: W ¡::: a::
\ 0 C> ci) . <C
~ Z Z 0 ~ z ~ I- 0 (f)
I- 0 (f)
0::: 0 0 ~ ¡¡: ,:j ¡¡: :s
c:c Cñ ¡::: 0 CI :s w C:C. ¡:::
c.. :> Cñ /Xl >- >- Z l- (/) 0
w 0 0 c:c c:c c:c w 0 :J W
0 i5 c.. "",) c.. c.. (/) /Xl I- "",) a::
<0 ..... "-
"- a:¡ In
"'t' a:¡ C")
fo<) IÒ
~ fo<)
'.....,
10 0) ;,¡
..- C")
ß C\ C\ ~
, ..-- ~ ~
CI) ~ ..,.
::;;
~ Q)
:S
....
tn 0
~ ~
·s ~
<\I
Q.~
N ~ .ß! 0
0 0 ~'tJ 0
..-
0 ~ U c: C
N .~ CO 0
I .8 g- O
.... C\
cnO 0 ~ ..-
,,0 ..'!! 10
Q) ,
WN <\I CI) ,..
zO:: 't:: 'tJ C\
~ c: 0)
0< <\I ..-
CI) ,
_W ~ S CI) ..-
cn>- tn 0
~...J c: ~ 0
Q)
:¡æ< 0) ..- 0 e. Q)
0 0 ..- Q)
:¡æ0 10 <0 .... <\I E
lO- r-) 0)" : U
O~ 'tJ c:
I- C\ ,.. ~ .2
OLL ~ ~ c:
CI) <\I CI)
~~ - t)) .~
-.J
~ ·s E
ZLL U .Q E
~ 10 E 0
:J.... 0 ~U
Of/) CI) Il'i Q. Q)
OW UJ ..- (3' S
c I
LL:J u ..- "t::: L.
~ ..- 'õ~
00 0
ë ~ c::i .2! Q.
OW W ..- Q) ::3
,," 0 ~ .\,1 ~ -
Z CI) Q)
<Z w 0 ~ <\I CI) I-
00 :æ w ~ .Q 0
> .g z
£O¡:: :æ 0 ..'!! ~
0 0:: .8 <\I 0
~ê3 c:
u Q", ·52 ~ u
w Q", u
Z- 0:: « ~ CI) «
:J!:!: .c: 0
Of/) c C\ co u Q.
Of/) c <0 It) ~ .52
~ C") co ~
w:3 I- 0) C")- ....- ~
~ C\ ,.. ~ ~
-0 ~ ~- ~ c:
Ow ~ C\ <\I ~
3" :t: ~ c: ~
Q)
(!) u .s CD
·z ~ ~ .S 1.1 :§
~o .... c:
Q Q:) ~ ~ Q)
UJ Q)
¡:: -.J M E
S u R:! ,.. I tn.æ
Ci) ~ ~ 0) I c: .S ::::::
co ~ Q:) '- co co
0 <: 0) ;g E ...
..- .e
a. S 0 ~ ai c5'tJ
IE ¡::: .....æ 0
~ ~ o <\I ~
II) ~ § è '::;
-.J 'tJ 10
~ CI) :e ~ c:: C\
~ CI) .c: <II 0
¡...: o .... I
Q. 0 ·2 <")
¡¡j Q) 'tJ '1:j 0
~ c: ::3 II)
U '« <II <II U
ù.i -
¡:.: ..J 0
Z I- ù.i ò,. w
¡:: w 0::
w ù.i 0 C) ci)
:æ Z z 0 ~ z ~ I- en
I- 0 en
0:: 0 0 ~ u: «
« Cñ ¡::: u C) « w ..J
Q", :> ëi5 CD >- >- ..J Z U
w 0 0 « « « w w
0 Õ c.. ., Q", c.. en CD 0::
-..I
\.r
....,.¡
COMMUIIY DEVELOPMENT
,
,
,
Marketing Services Coordinator
to Business Retention Specialist
Title Change Only - Vacant position
Title Change Only
One position of G.I.S. Analyst III
Pay Grade 19, Job Code 738
to G.I.S. Specialist
Pay Grade 20, Job Code New
Cost $4,567
Total Cost $4,567
"
M
o
o
N
I
N
enO
0::0
WN
zO::
o<c
_W
en>
~..J
:æ<c
:æCJ
O~
ULL.
~~
ZLL.
=»t-
Oen
uw
1.1..;:)
00
OW
0::0::
<CZ
00
m¡::
~ë3
Z-
;:)!:!:
Oen
CJen
w:3
-CJ
Uw
30::
",:z
enO
¡::
ü5
o
c.
ë
w
c
z
w
::E
::E
o
(J
w
a::
....
~
~
o
-J
~
lU
Q
ç
~
~
u
¡:.:
z
w
::E "I
~ ~"
c:( ëñ,
Q. :>'
w _,
c c'
,
!III""
~.:
Q':"
lUf
CI) ~,'
s: :,~~~
lU ~:
Ct:: :f:
'<: ~
I Q.
~
I-
W
o C)
~ C
:J
a:I
CI)
~
1
ë
w
>
o
a::
Q.
Q.
c:(
"
1
Ii >
....I
l-
I Z
W
a::
a::
:J
(J
.,
~
(!)
,
..
,~
c
W
l-
V)
W
:J
a
w
a::
w
.~
I-
¡::
Z
o
¡::
ëñ
o
Q.
....
CI)
::¡
5
~
CI)
CI)
(!i
C")
"t
c:)
C'I
~
10
~1::)f.9
~ C'I c.;
I::)
0)
"t
0)
(()
~
==
0)
(()
r-.:
C")
10
~
~ 0) I
...... .... 1'0.
"t
C\j
C'I
(()
"t
i4
....
~
-J
~
'«
CI)
(!i
~ gj ~b
~ co 0) ì.~
~ f.9 :;;
(() (() I")
~ Ñ ~
t:x:J- (()- IÒ
C") .... It)
f.9f.9....
C'I It) 1'0.
f.::! 0) ,..
.... C") C)
..,: It)- 0'"
i4~~
w w
wcC)
c~z>~
8C)~a::ffi .:,j
a:I»:3z~
QQ':Q':~~g
"
I'
.
.
1
I,,'
"
~1¡~
~.QQlco
'1::: ffi :s Q)
~""".Q;S
OJ~q;.f!2
.Qt::,g~
.9~~~
Õ co Q) ~
~ :S it:
.~ ! Q) tJ)
Q. ;S.S
3:: Q) .... s:
OJ :S ~ g
t::'õ (1).2
co t:: ~ Q)
.9 .0 ~ ¡:;
.S: ~
- ...... ~
::::: .~ Q)
.... t:: .Q
<I) '- E
~.§ :::
ê ì5 t::
'«~~
~ t:: oS!
co '-
(!) .... ~
tJ).c:: ~
t:: .~ 0
:.¡:: ~ ..0
·21 Q) co
)( > Q)
Q) 0 ,c::
Q) Q) ¡.;:
:5;:;
.....
o
t::
.Q
Õ
E
e
Q.
Q)
;S
cD
<I)
co
!!!
(,,)
.5;
~
co
t::
o
:e
co c::
.Q ,g
e (is
Q. 0
oð Q.
....
~ 53
·5 CIÌ 16 ..\,)
~ê.§§
_ ::: <I) (,,)
'- 0 .¡;, .5
.S! <I) '0 ~,
co !!! co .ë:
!!! oS! ~;::
tJ) co oS! 0
co "t) co
...tJ)~<I)iJ
.£2 .S ~ 16 :so
Q) E ~ ~
:t1:::,~~
5;:(1)0:::....
e<l)Q)-oS!
cotJ)(,,)!2
Q. Q) '- .5 v,
.9.QQ)~C:
;::: ;; c:: $I>
·21 .~ 0 co -
t:: ~ U) S
,0 Õ t:: U) (,,)
~ :;:: ~ ..s! t::o
(,,) 'r;¡ CI) (,,)
~o-!!!Q.
.~ Q. (!) t:: -§
~ .U) tJ).0 Q)
~ ,.., c::: .¡:: CI)
(,,) ~ .- 'r;¡ co
Q) .!:: 0 .Q
~...;'§Q.~
.S! ~ U) .!!2 (,)
:g .!!! Õ .c:: ~
::J ~ ~ ~ .$
t:rc%COÕâ)
~~ï~~
¡t:: ,,, - E :;,
r- 'W '\I "- """1
ž
o
¡::
c:(
(J
u:::
¡::
V)
:J
""')
"""
....
(,,)
co
Q.
.§
....
Q)
~
:::
.Q
I
co
'<i.
It)~
t::
¡:¡ co
oS!....
(,,) 16
!!! .§
:S U)
'~ .::J U)
;:¡, is'' co
c:: co E
~ ~:;;¡
- co c::
'r;¡ c:: .c::
o ,52 (,,)
~2
J!! e
~ Q.
t:: '*-
~ It)
::J
(,,)
<I)
co
.§
.~
'5
;S
.~
c::
~
.~
Q.
:t::
J!!
U)
....
c::
~
::J
(,,)
..
(() 1'0.
.... .... 10
t:x:J !!'> It)
H""¡
f.9f.9....
C'I !::: ~
~ ~ ~.
.....t:x:JCIQ
C'I- (()- oò
:! .... It)
""f.9'"
(() (() C'I
t:x:J0)t:x:J
,.. 0 C'I
t:x:J- CJ:i "t~
I") .... It)
f.9f.9...
I::)
I::)
....
8
o
C\
....
10
C
~
....
~
....
it
I-
Z
:J
o
(J
(J
~
....
I::)
I::)
~
CI)
(!i
~
lU
~
o
u
ð
w
a::
V)
V)
:3
(J
w
a::
\w
,
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Analyst
Pay Grade 20, Job Code 547
to Analyst Supervisor
Pay Grade 21, Job Code 550
\
....,
,
Cost $ 3,579
. .
N
o
o
N
.
.....
enC
D::C
WN
ZD::
o<c
-W
en>-
en...J
:¡¡:<c
:¡¡:(J
05!2
(JLL
~~
ZLL
:JI-
Oen
(JW
LL:J
0°
OW
D::D::
<cZ
00
m¡::
>-<c
I-(J
Z-
:JLL
Oen
(Jen
<c
W...J
(J(J
:JW
...JD::
·Z
&:>0
I-
en
o
c..
,
......
::
I:
i
a ~,
~ ,'4
:s: 1\
lJ.J ;~-c
a:: ,i;
~,
M, I-
JiU
;¡;;<C
1';. c.
,ª
.1-
W
o (!)
<: 0
::J
CD
,
"
CI).
~:.
ö
w
o
Z
w
:¡¡:
:¡¡:
o
(,,)
w
~
o
.. W
I-
U)
, w
::J
" "
w
0::
ö
w
>
o.
0:::
c. '
c.,
<C :r
~
¡f'.
.;r
7.
CI)
~
S>
ffi
CI)
~
¡::
~
¡..;:
CI)
~
~
a
<:(
>- i
ø i
o ,', >-
-.J ,,. ..J
o I-
<: , Z
G:r ~
~ ~
<:" (,,)
01'.',
¡:: I';
~k
~I
-12
.:.:
Z
W
:¡¡:
I-
~
<C
c.
w
o
;
I
I
ž1
0,
ëi) I .
$'
Õ
";:;.
ê5
CI)
S>
ffi
§¡
CI)
......
~
-J
~
<:(
co
~
oi
0)
C")
fcS'
o ,.... ~
:2 C\ .;,
C\
C\j
"t
C\
a:f
C")
~
......
~
-J
~
<:(
~ 0 I
Ii) C\ 8
oi
"t
0)
co'
C")
~
W
..J
I-
¡::
Z
o
¡::
ëi)
o
c.
t
},t
<
00) O)~;
0) co ......-
0) ~ IO..I~
~ ~~
~
ì
~
.ft'
:.,;..-
:4¡;
co ...... C")
o co 0)
C\ co c
C\j' co' 0>"
"t ~ It)
~ ~ ~,'
~
co 0) "'t i
C\ 0) ,..
LC) C\ It).
~ co' IÒ
C\ .... It) «'
0)- ~ ~!7
~ ~ 1;
c:)
C\
C")
......
Ii)
~
W W
WOe! en
o<cz).:1-
o~<Co::Ü:
~>~5~
o<c<c<cw
"") c. c. U) CD
Ž
o
¡::
<C
(,,)
.:,j' ü:
¡5 > ~
g: ~
~.
~ .~
:6~Q)
(I) (I)
1;5 ...: Q)
;"'Q)~
C6 0,
t:: ~ ;:.:.
'c:( ra ~
'O~~
!:l. Q) 0
:::J :s :g
e 0 t::
0,.... 0
... ;.., 0
Q) :;:: en
t:: 0 (I)
I:: e 11:1
11:1 :;:; .Q ..:
CQ '-' oS .....
Q)'t:::{g;::
.c: ~ ;§
- Q).!::: U)
~ ~ Q) I::
Q)~:S0
!/)t::,,!i}
- ...... c:: Cb
~ ~ 11:1 I;;
o :::J (I) '0
Q) 0 I:: (I)
I:: 0 .Q 11:1
o -I:: ~ e
. :: .\,2 11:1
~l28:-e
~ tII Q)
.~ "==' ..c:
è: 11:1 - ....
Q) t:: ä3 0
~ <:( ::: -I::
:::J ... :::J 0
CI) CD 0 11:1
- £ "tJ en
(I) 0 t:: ~o
~... 11:1
11:1:::J CD
I::-E~QI
<:( CD '-'
o e t:: ~
:0. 11:1 0 ~
..: -0
(I) e 0, I::
tII Q) .5; ~
-I:: ~ .5; E
- 11:1:::J
~ 1:: E
E !1 Q) .-
1:: ~ ct.5;
11:1 - ~ E
ct tII Q) -I::
Q) I:: E ~
" <:( 0 ::
~-
Q) 0 (I) I::
:Sg.~~
g.e~o
oo,°~
I;; (I) Q)
(! è 'b 1:
UJ QJ Q) '-
E '¡¡j :g §
Q) CI) Q) ~
~ .\,2 :S .§
CI) :g :S ·E5;
oS Q .~
11:1 Q) C6 ~
a :S Q) 11:1
Q) I/) " -I::
:SQ)I/)~
.5; ~ i ~
:S~C6E
.~ 0 t:: :::J
;.., ... <:( 0
:::: Q)'õ~
t:::S I/)
~og.~
:::J CD e ê
ü :S 0, <:(
,0
,t
.~"
~"
..
..
"
I
"
L
,
.
,'-.
,
I."
"
"
e E'
11:1 Q)
'5j:S
'ês~
Cþ :::J
~ .Q
.Q~
à;,!!!
0, s:
t:: Cþ
e .5;
¡;¡"
tII t::
Cþ 11:1
.Q g.
;::: e
.~ 0,
e êã
Cþ :S
:S~
(I)_ 0
.... ~
~ Cþ
-.Q
ê E
<:( Q)
~ E
o ...
g..:g
e õ
o,Cþ
.!:2 :5
:S ...
Cþ-E
~ g.
~ ti
o jg
.e 11:1
t:: CD
~ E
.- 0
:g 0
ct~
... -
o :;:
.!2 ~
~ à;
g.~
CI) Cþ
.... E
~-I::
C6 ~
t:: CD
<:(-1::
:6 .\,2
-I::
.e s:
û) ·s
~EÊ
ê ~ ¡g
<:( (I) ....
CD~1:
t:: 11:1 .91
o 0
0, " :t:
.§ :6 CD
'Q5 Q) e
V) .g> 0
~ CD E
e ~ 11:1
o 0
.Ç;-I::'::::
~..::c .::::
....,
,
,
o
o
....
6
o
o
C\
,....
Ii)
:g
0)
....
I
,....
o
o
,¡¡;
I-
Z
::J
o
(,,)
(,,)
~
,....
o
o
¿
U
It
,¡¡;
"
w
0::
U)
U)
<C
..J
()
w
0::
·
~
....,
,
,
,
MOSQUITO CONTROL
5 temporary MEO I positions
Pay Grade 6, Job Code 819
to be changed to 5 part time with limited benefits
Pay Grade 6, Job Code 821
Total Cost $4,355
\\
,
N
o
o
N
I
....
mO
od~
Wo:::
z<
Qw
m>-
m.J
~<
~o
o~
01.1.
~~
zu.
:JI-
om
OW
u.:J
0°
w
co:::
0:::
<z
00
m~
~ë3
Zii:
:J-
Om
om
w:3
-0
Ow
:Jo:::
.J
·z
1-0
m_
I-
Cñ
o
Do
,
,
.
,"'
~
o
>-
II!
-..
:::>
~
",
"
Ii]
Cf.)
S
~ (
.f I-
u
It: ~
I: ~
I-
o q~
<=g
,. a:I
"
I:,
.'
Cf.) ,~
~
I
ë
w
o
z
w
::¡¡:
:E
o
u
w
Il::
o
W
I-
en
w
-:J
o
w
Il::
I
o
w
>,
o
Il::
Q.'
Q.'
< ,;
í
~
"1"
~-
t
1
,
~ ~
I-
...J ...J:i Z
o 0,' W
g: g:1: ~
<= <=I';:J
o O,~ u
ü ü,
e e·
:s :S'
g gl~~
~ ~I'~
I
.
.
I·
I,.
Z "
~I·
>1
õl
,:.:
Z
W
::¡¡:
l-
ll::
<
Q.
W
o
-
o
~
~
.
ûi
-I
I-
¡::
Z
o
¡::
U)
o
Q.
~ ~
OJ
I,<)
..,. ..,. OJ
~ ~ ~ ;'
-i -- 1lJ-
I,<) I,<) I,<)
-
C\ IlJ
OJ
..,.
..,.
I'\Ì
_I,
;g
a:i
..,. 0) CO) .,'
~ ~ ~!;
..,.- I,<) 11)"
I,<) I,<)
..,.
..,.
I'\Ì
-
..,.
c
a:i
ûi ûi
ûi 0 C> en
o ~ Z ;;.: I-
8 C> ~ Il:: ffi
a:I >- >- :s Z
Q ~ ~ :i ~
.:.ï I
~
g
II)
0)
~,
.
",
,
"
.
..
,
\
,
-0
.91
~ Q
CI) .!§
1J-s
~ CI)
Q) .s
.Q c:
.E 0
-0 E
~ ~
':; ~
0' u
~ æ
.!2 c:
c: 8
·9 .~
~ UJ
o c:
I:t III
."> s
:5 ~
CI) 0
.2 E
~-t:
1: ~
Q) 0
E ....
::"'-0
...Q.S!
I:t III
E ,9-
Q) .S:!
è1:
III III
(5 .~
~ 5
Q) ....
-;; 'Vi
'I> 0
::..,I:t
o .~
ì5.¡::
~
..... .,¡
o ~
:: Q)
'I> c:
':;; ~ -.:
~-OQ)
... Q) ~
Q :-- -,
i:~.e
Q) .c: III
E ~ :(
.~ _ t:
5- 0 ~
~ ~ ¡
~ Q) Q
LL .S .S
Q) ~ ~
S~J:2
... Q. Q)
æ.E.s
c
C
IlJ
¿,
C
C
C")
-
II)
¿,
C")
C\
10
,¿
..,.
-
:it
I-
Z
:J
o
U
u
~
II)
c
c
ri->
c
o
~
- I)
o1§
~~O)
Ë - 10
~,gOJ
~~
ž
o
¡::
<
u
u::
¡::
en
~
:it
o
W
Il::
fI)
fI)
:s
u
w
Il::
,
. III
, ,.
;':'
., ~
; ~, "
~.
0 10 In~
@ (,J ~ a~
': ' (,J
CI) ') ;.
:s
~ ; "'^.
¡;;,i-
I- "'"~, 1J
() cr' ~
« ~
a.. - '0; t::
~ -- I/)
,'~ ~ '1::
--,;: -5
I- ù
"'" !!! 0
N W I/) 0
0 0 C) ,0 (I) :S 10
0 =2 ': 0 - .Q t:: ¿
N ;:) .!2 0
I ~ T m " E 0
.... 1J C")
0 .~ ~ .....
f/) 0 0 '- 10
0:: . :;) - C
N >- . :;)
UJ -- b- (.) ~
0:: IX) !!! Q)
Z l- .' I/) 10
0 <C :::> } - .~ t:: Ih
UJ CI) 0
ëñ ~ t:: (.) ..,.
>- ~ " .. .Q .....
f/) ...J - .!S
'- II)
== " I/)
<C ..,. ..,. CO 0 t::
C'I 10 CO CI. IV
== 0 co C'I 0 .
f/) ..,.- .....- If:>- .~ :S
0 ü: (,J (,J ~ :S ~
U I/) 0
>- 0:: :;) E
1ií
.- 0 Ci) ~
Z u.. 0 - ~
::J .- - ..,. t::
W ..,. Q) .!2
0 f/) I- a C'\Î ~
u UJ CJ) ~ ..... ..... 1J
::J w ~ 10 , .J2 Q)
u.. a ;:) ~ ..,. ~ 1ií
0 ë 0 0 .9-
UJ w cC Q) ~
C 0:: w 0:: ~ t:: :it
0:: 0 ~ IV
<C Z z ë .~ I-
W 0 Z
0 0 :¡: w ~ t::
> ;:)
m ¡::: :¡: 0 .0 0
.J!! :e
~ <C 0 0:: Q) I/) ()
0 () a.. 0 ()
w a.. ;" ~ Q.. ~
Z u.. 0:: < " .~
::J f/) 1;, 0) fI) '5.:, ~ ~
0 ..,.
f/) ,t;> C'I 10 0) it:
0 :3 ~, co C") ....~ Q) uj
:,t,~ ..,." (,J añ:f ....
UJ , 0 œ:
(,J .. '. ~ Q)
õ 0 ç t::
UJ ~. ,(I) Q)
::J .., s: .Q
0:: .. !!! L.:
...J > 1J Q)
.. ... Q) ~
¡..: z ::¡ - I/) ..,. oS! :!::
f/) 0 : 0 'S: ..,. - :§ oS!
¡::: I- ~ IV C'\Î t:: IV
-.J ð z a 0) ..... (I) .c: I/)
a w ..... 10 E '§
f/) 0:: ~ (I) co , IV
g: g: ~ ..,. .~ t::
0 0:: 0 - 0
C. =2 =2 ;:) ~ cC :;) 0 I/)
, b-
0 a () e! ~ IV
Ü Ü Q)
CI) I/) 10
~ ~' " fE CD ~ 8
:§ t::
:s :s i '.. '8: :3
j CD 't:
0 0 :S IU oS! 0
CI) CI) ... Q.. CD ~
0 ~I;¡: , ¡f
~ .E :S
I' I" :it
I,' W Ž
" 0
¡:.: ..J 0 W
Z I- W W ,j ¡:: 0::
w ¡:: W 0 C) I_ci) (3 rn
:¡: Ž z 0 ~ z ~ I- .. T' CJ)
t:: , 0 0 ~ ii: ii: :3
0 ,,' ¡:: () C) ..J I':
« § .' , :5 w ~k ¡:: ()
a.. ëñ m >- >- z CJ) w
w > 0 Q < < « w el ;:) 0::
0 ë a.. a.. a.. CJ) m ..,
N
o
o
N
I
~
ClJO
o::~
Wo::
Z<
Qw
CIJ~
CIJ....
-<
:EO
:ECIJ
0-
oIL.
~~
ZIL.
::::11-
0m
OW
IL.::::I
0°
W
Co::
0::
<Z
00
mi=
~<
1-0
Z-
::::I~
oCIJ
om
w:S
-0
Ow
::::10::
....
'Z
1-0
CIJ_
I-
ëñ
o
D..
I" W
1
I
I"
I
~
:s
~
~
o
>-
Ct)
I-
::::>
~
In
I~ I-
01:' ~
<=1, g
m
,
I
I'
CI) I ~
UJ I,
>-1
I
I
ö
w
o
z
w
::!:
::!:
o
u
w
a::
ö,
w
>
o
a::
Il.
Il.
c(
~;:
,f.~
~
~
,¡i'
F<::~
l~
~
I-
-J -J Z
o 0 w
g: g: !2
<= <= ::>
o 0 u
ü ü..
~ ~"
::; ::;i
c c'~
~ ~:'
~ ~,~
;
!
';
¡:.:
Z
w
::!:
~
c(
Il.
W
o
ž'
0'
iñ
-I'
>1
01
,
o
W
I-
Cf
W
::>
CJ
w
a::
-
o
~
~
""
""
(\j
.... ....
~ <0 ,
""
o
Q:j
c:
<0
o ~ :;
UJ Ü (\j
~~~<o""
~ C1) 00 '
< q, ;g
I:! ~ Q:j
<5
}
û.i
..J
I-
¡::
Z
o
¡::
iñ
o
Il.
o ""
~C\
0'1
~
o I.C) It)
~ g ~I
",,- ....- Iþ'
~ ~ ~I
I
1
1
I
I,
~ It
011'
~I;,
I,
I,;
I:,
I'
I;:
it
1
o ~ ~ i:
~ C") C")"
'If!t-- ~ &n"~
~ ~~"
û.i
o
o
u
m
Q
û.i û.i
o C) ci)
~ Z > I-
C)~a::it.:..¡
»:5z;:
C(C(~WO
Il. Il. UJ ID I-
I'
I,
"t:I
q,
ï.¡:: b)
.~ .¡§
~-6
f!! C1)
q, :5
.Q §
oS E
"t:I q,
.f!! .~
5 '5
0- (.)
f!! q,
0)
.!(! §
c: (.)
.9 ><
~ 'èi)
o c:
Q. <0
.~ :5
:5 !!!
C1) 0
~ E
;;¡'è:
1: ~
q, 0
§,b
.9~
Q. <0
E .9-
CD .(.)
~1§
E!! <0
o .!!1
~ §
(þ ~
--; '(;)
CD 0
::..,Q.
~ .!2
~~
CD CI)
'õœ:
1: :g
.q, Q)
:; .Q L.:
!!! "t:I CD
.... .æ g:
~ :è J2
I:: .::::
CD .c: <0
~ '§ ¡(¡
'" I::
.~ Õ ~
!!! ~ m
CI) q, 01
Cl::u. E .S;
'- 01
CD :t: 01
S co Q
.... Q. Q)
tfoS:5
I'
I
I
I
I
I,
',.,-.
"-,.
I,
I'
1
I
I',
I-
I
L'
I"
ž
o
¡::
c(
u
¡:¡:
¡::
Cf
~
\
o
o
<0
¿,
o
o
C")
....
I.C)
¿,
C")
C\
<0
,;.,
""
....
:ä;
I-
Z
::>
o
u
u
~
r-.
o
o
,
C")
o
C
~
"
:ä;
CJ
w
a::
Cf
Cf
:5
u
w
a::
N
o
o
N
I
....
enO
Qd~
Wo::
z<
Ow
en>
en..,
:E<
:EO
osa
OLL
~~
ZLL
::;)1-
oen
OW
LL::;)
0°
W
co::
0::
<Z
00
aJi:::
~ë3
Z-
::;)~
Oen
oen
w::S
-0
Ow
::;)0::
...I
'Z
1-0
en_
t:
en
o
D..
,
,
,!IF
,
,
1-
fð
CJ)
S
lu
0::
~
o
>-
CD
.....
::>
~
I-
o
<
a..
~
I-
W
o '_ C>
~ '~ C
I :;)
':' III
I
I
1-·
~,
CJ)
~
ö
w
c
z
w
:E
:E
o
o
w
a::
c
W
l-
I/)
W
I, :;)
o
w
a::
I
Ö
w'
>'
0-
a:: I,
a..:
a.. ,
< .
+'
Jr
'!I'!-
r:
..
¥
:~
't
""
....J
o
g:
8
~
:s
0'
CJ)
~
f
,. ~
I-
<51 ffi
Q: I a::
1'1 a::
~ I: :;)
01. 0
Ül,
~I'·
:s I:
O''.
Cl)t
~F;
,:.:
z
w
:E
~
<
a..
w
c
.."
~I'
-I
~I;
>..,.
C
-
o
~
~
õ ~
~~
~ ~
~~
ill
oJ
I-
¡:: ,
z
o
:¡::
iñ
o
a..
....
N ~
co
0)
.... <0
co
ill ill
ill c c>
c ë2 z :>:
8 c> ë2 a::
III>->-::)
Q ~ ~ ~
:
-
I;
o It) It)
~ ~ g:,
~ ~
:'
::
;:
.
'<t "':t- Q):
N ~ co
co N 0
;:; ~ ~'
..,.
..,.
N
....
..,.
o
c:xj
..,. 0) C":f
~ ~ ~ ~
...- 6ø9, &n"~:'
~ "'1
.1
"':t-
"':t-
N
....
I
"':t-
O
c:xj
I,
I
I
I:
,
¡~
I
I/) I '
I- 1 '
ii: .. I
w ~I
Z 1-1:
~ gl
;
,
:
.
;:
,
,
"
I-
I
,
I
\
'0
.!!,!
~ 0>
Ii) c:
Ii) 't:
-tJ.g
~ Ii)
Q) :5
.Q c:
~ ~
'0 CD
~ .~
"S "5
I::r 0
.~ ~
c: 8
~ .~
Ii) Ii)
o c:
Q. III
.~ :S
:5
Ii)
.2
III
ìií
o
:5
è
o
o
CV)
....
10
C
CV)
N
~
oJ..
'<t
....
~
E
~
o
1: ~
Q) 0
E "-
:"''0
.Q II>
Q.(;¡
E .9-
Q) ,0
~"€
!II III
å ,~
~ g
Q) ::::
-; ri3
Q) 0
:..,Q.
~ .!!2
~¡::
Q)
~!i
o I;::
~ ¡g
,Q) Q)
~ .Q ..:
~'oQ)
... ~ ~
~~~
Q) .c: III
E'§::i
.!g - §
g. 0 Ii)
~ ~ a;
fQQ)~
l.I.. .§·t
CD "- ~.
1:: 01
:Scn~
... Q. Q)
¡f~:5
:it
I-
Z
:;)
o
o
o
~
co
o
o
.
CV)
o
0'
~
Z
o
¡::
<
o
ii:
¡::
I/)
~
:it
o
w
a::
I/)
I/)
:5
o
w
a::
.
N
o
o
N
I
....
tn°
D::~
WD::
z<
Qw
tn>-
tn..J
:ë<
::eO
0!!2
ou..
~gs
Zu..
::JI--
Otn
OW
u..::J
0°
w
CD::
D::
<Z
00
m¡::
~ê3
zu:
::J-
otn
otn
w:S
-0
Ow
::JD::
..J
·Z
1--0
tn_
I--
Ci)
o
c.
,
~
o
>-
CQ
I-
::>
~
1"'"
I,
,
1
I",
~I;
::;1"
~I,
I
I, ~
I ~
1 ~
01,' ~
<=1 g
III
1
1
1
CI)
~I
I
1
I
ö
w
o
z
w
:æ
:æ
o
o
w
a::
o
W
I, ~
en
w
:J
a
w
a::
ë
w
>
o
a::
c..
c..,
< ,
-,
'T::i:
.~-
'.
>
..J
~
-J -J Z
o 0 w
g: g: ~
<= <= :J
o 0 0
ü ü
~ ~
S SI'
g g....
~ 01
<: ~
¡:.:
Z
w
:æ
~
<
c..
w
o
ž
o
iñ
:>
õ
-
o
~
~
.....
C\ <0
co
- E
o 0
~ æ 0>
Il.CI)~<O
~~ ;;
~ ::. 0:)
-,
W
..J
~
¡::
Z
o
¡::
iñ
o
c..
.
:
,
.'
~ ~ ~ ;
"-, " '
~ ~,
,
,
;
'..
~
"
"
c ~ ~
~ ~ c
~. ...... Iñ
~ ~ ~
~
~
('.,j
.....
I
~
C
0:)
,
~ g ~~,
~ ~ ~;
~
~
('.,j
.....
I
w w
WOC) Ii)
O~Z~~
8 C) ~ a:: ffi
III > > ~ Z
Q ~ ~ ~ ~
1
.. I '
~I
~
o
~
;
-'
-,
m
:
,
Ž
I 0
¡::
<
o
ü:
¡::
en
~
"
.!!;!
~ t))
¡;¡ .¡§
~-5
~ It)
Cb :5
.Q :5
.s E
" Cb
.~ .~
::. :;
b' (J
~ Cb
It)
.~ :5
~ .~
It) It)
o t:
Q.t1
.~ S
:5 e
!3 0
ã; E
~j
II) 0
§,:;
..QJ!
Q. 111
E .s.
II) .l.I
~"€
~ 111
o .~
~ t:
Q) ~
; .~
~Q.
..9 .~
~¡::
II)
....0 .f!
Iò:::
:t ~
.Cb II)
s; .Q ..:
~ " II)
~ ~ g:
1::§oE
II) 111
E :5 It)
.~ ! ~
6- 0 g
~ ~ :¡¡
12 Cb ~
u.. .§ .S;
Cb - S2!
.c: 1:: õ'
- 111 "'"
... Q. Cb
rf.s:5
\
g
<0
C
C
C
I')
.....
10
6
I')
~
Ii>
~
.....
:it
~
Z
::I
o
o
o
~
0>
C
c
8
c
~
,
:it
a
w
a::
en
en
~
o
w
a::
~
..
...."
,
,
PUBLIC SAFETY
Marine Safety Coordinator
Pay Grade 15, Job Code 763
Marine Safety Coordinator
Pay Grade 17, Job Code 763
Cost $1,754.59
One position of Communications Officer I, part-time
Pay Grade 13, Job Code 727
to Data Entry Clerk
Pay Grade 13, Job Code New, part-time
Cost -0-
One position of Communications Officer I, part-time
to Evidence Technician
Pay Grade 13, Job Code New
Cost -0-
03/20/2002 139:44 ~ -- -=I.[=,-,
551-452-1598 EMERG MGT 2
'-' PAGE En
-.J
, .
..II
ail... '.
~as
~ ... IoI"Q
, >.Olt-l ,..¡ ...as
a:I : 0 ~ I;) :I 0 ,
Q,. a; ~41 00'"
...Q,I IDOIIIQ
Q,I'ri Ù"g1W1W ~'¡"¡IW Q.
Q: ~ = 0 Q ().~ =
CII4I111 Qi4l~
rtI~.~ '¡"¡w IW CQ
.cCCUQ '\WClCI
Qa;Q:;IGlr-4 CliO
"cW:>Ù!IQ.a .,..,.
'¡"¡8,"cn cJCl4I...,¡,,¡
o CI :f''' "O.c I II
.¡,,¡ iii cJ :II ... .§ ,¡,,¡ .¡,,¡ r,I
~ i a:I 0 ø·,. W'''
()"Q >.;..."d IIIW
~ CI Ù .a 'Q'" ø....c
GlII: II'C-; ...
.a Q "C.~ Ø\ .a
N "0 a:I >. þo Q ~ Q
cn~ .... "'W«Im'¡"¡r-4"ØÙ
::I 1/1 Q III 1oI:; III =
;~ OGlIt-I~"'IIIOllla:l'"
..c'~ 1\1 ø·~ "Q ,..¡
~ 11/ ... 11/ III ~.CIO Q CII 0
.ri "'!."oIIIOIiI.c 0
1;1 ~r-I 41 cJ 112 101 ,¡,,¡ .... ,¡,,¡ N
Q.~"dCUOolllO ,¡,,¡
:a.c'¡"¡l-if""'l g)llll I ø.. I
:II .~ ·~CU Jr-I'Q.lI! 8
§~ ~ ù ,/I) .a "0 ~ 'tI >. r-I Q.I '1"4
,¡,,¡:o II ~ ="'''0 N
...c OIW"Q'tI ..,¡"IllW Q ""'
z: ÞSø. c : >.. 11"1
~~ ~ III CI III 101 ,¡"I a:I ,.., GI J
~ :I GI'C OQ'" ,eQ
f2 a.I ... 0 GlIW 0 m_ III ,¡,,¡ .c 0
N
ê § 101 ...c... I-i C . ... ,¡,,¡ 0\
8m "0 ail" «IGI,"",OUOCl N
~. «Ir-I..-I cJ.¡,,¡m.aJ:l I
~ ..0 )....=.0101 4I"'¡:S'" .-4
E 0 CII=e"'¡ClII tlll'''¡ 8
1.1.= ~ . .~ 101 00 ØI:> 1%1" :II
o~ ("') ...'tIQ.lOQ"'¡ ØI!.co
~ N O~.aIW8.....111 1100
..... ccO\"" ,¡,,¡ CIOCI="'''
Is ~ NI"'I-Þ a:I "0 0 00 CI fa =....
~ .. . . Q ø...Clg,a ~ ...
~ NCOO '~'a:I .a.,.ù.co III !2
:z; ..0 '-4' I' N "0'" >. "QIlOO'01I
~ -<t Ø\NN I-i 0 ,¡,,¡ 0 :I .! :s ,-41::1 "0 ð
~ ,.,,.., . .. .. .. O"'CI"'¡III..-I Oaslll
~t~ I ..o.,.¡ -4' co..o'" 811~..-Ir-4U .a Q U
~ I' .-4 N.-4-<t Q :I"'¡ II C CI ..:. oo·,.¡ .~
- ~_..... .,. .a,Q .,.,C"O Q.I C
5US >'''0 II GO ,¡,,¡ r-4 1oI...c....
"1-4,1:1 ...... O"l:lCa:I
~Š ~ Q.lOÙCl III"I:IÙ~o,.Q
1W8a:1.cIlCl" 1110
III "g,¡,,¡=.... II. ......c
VI .¡,,¡ Q ,¡,,¡co
~&1 IiC III. ail '1"4 10 . . co
~ QcJlIQ~ .r-I......cll..."
3a: ~ c...." 1III·"¡..-I_.a"'¡1.Io4
.,.¡...ù ~UII ::1110
tJ~ ¡ ...«II-iQ 1II)aiI,C'"
~::I O=..-IIW"O c:: 8:'" ø.
~IW ø. 101 0
C '¡a:I'''¡~III>'
E ... ,¡,,¡ Q.Q ,8,¡,,1QCI'"
E a::: -4' a:lGI ÙO...·......II
~ a::: Ø\ 'c.c~"'¡'''1I '8§a:lþo
a ~ .-4 ...,¡,,¡ ~"'r-4" :
~ - CIOOClO .0 0 Q,I III 0 1iO''' 0
~ (I) OQQ GIlD s.ClloIiù "1:1111
en . . . l>a:I. 'Q'¡"'¡
Þr.: -4'N..o CI ... ,..¡..... . ~ ~ Q II
~ lie ""' ..00..0 .,.¡ .. CI CI 3 .' .a CI'¡:¡ 0
~ I-i ..0 "'Ø\-<t ....Q,¡,,¡,C ... ,C·,.ÙCIQ
~ ~ ~ ,.,"" .. .. .. Q "CI III .....,. II ,¡,,¡ .. III o,.
~ ..0.-4 ,..,1/1("') .0 III CI "Z II:IIHI III "0
CI Ia3 I' N"'¡"" .a...'W 0,8Qg,QQ
~ III ..... HooooO:Z:1,) :I 111=
I-i
.. a .. :ž I
~
~ 0'
j .. § n .. ~
.~ ª
~ ~ ä ~~~ffi ;: .,
R; I m It) u
º ~ I/J
.. ... .... '"
-
'-' >.,J
0 0 0 ¡::
~ ~ "" Q)
Q)
,0
(f.
(\
..c:
Q) .
..c: Q)
" (f. C()
'. ¡::
.¡,J (\
(\ ,.¡
..c:
M 0 .¡,J >,
0 ~ (\
0 ¡:: 0..
N 0
. .,.¡ .¡,J
N .¡,J ¡::
UJO c.,) Q)
0::0 ¡:: ,.¡
WN ;: ,.¡
zel: ~;:
0< CI) c.,)
,0
-W ~ o Q)
cn)- ."..c:
5!2-1 .¡,J
:!:< 0 0 Q)
,..... CO CO ..c: ¡::
:!:O \0 Ie)
05!2 VJ 0;) CO' .¡,J .,.¡
~ ~ ..
Ou. VJ ,.¡ Q)
f::0:: VJ oc()
~ ~¡::
z~ ~ (\ ~
0 0 ¡::..c:
~I- UJ 0 o u
Ocn ~ ~< .,.¡
en ~ .¡,J 0
OW UJ ~H (\ ¡::
u.~ ::> ....~ c.,)
00 Ö cr U~ .,.¡"t;
OW UJ ~ ~ ¡:: ~
UJ a:: ><H .,.¡ (\
0::0:: c ~VJ (f.
Z Ö H (f."t; :it
<Cz UJ Z~ (\ Q)
00 :::E UJ ~~ H"t; ~
CJ- :::E > H c.,) Q) Z
~< 0 <VJ Q).' ::>
0 a:: 0
() 0. ~~ ,.¡ ¡:: tJ
z~ UJ 0. Q) '()
a:: c:( o '-" 0...¡,J
~!:!: o ¡:: c:(
ocn 0 0 ,.¡ Q)
oUJ CO CO 0..8
\0 Ie) Q)
w5 ~ CO- co' Q) c.,)
~ .. ..c:~
-0 ~ .¡,JH
OW ~ 0..
30:: u ¡:: Q)
H .,.¡ ,.¡
·Z ¡:,..,
t;o ¡:,.., Q) ;,
¡::: 0 r'I") Q) Q)
tf. -:t >,¡::
ëñ z VJ r--. 0
E 0 z ~ HO
0 H 0 * o..z
D. ~ H 8
¡:,.., H Q)
< U < .
tf. H U -:t C()C()
Z H -:t ¡:: ¡::
U 0 Z . .,.¡.,.¡
H ~ 0 ~ ,.¡H
.... ~ r'I")~ Q)"t;
CQ 0 ~ ~* .¡,J ¡::
0 U 0 ¡:: ~
:I., u ~..c:
~
~ Ž :it
" ~ 0'\
0 cr
z W W ¡:: UJ
W C 0 c:( a::
:::E II) en
~ z :>: I- ()
l- ii: .J ii: en
a:: o~a:: 5
c:( >->-5 w c:( ¡:: - 33-
D. z ~ II) ()
w c:( c:( c:( w 0 ::> UJ
c 0. 0. II) ID ~ ., a::
\...- '..".¡/
I:) I:) C) I:
a ~ ~ ~
UJ C1J
(/) C1J
S ..c
UJ ~
Q:; t\I
..c:
.
C1J C1J
..c: èO
I:
.0.1 t\I
t\I ¡,.¡
..c:
M 0 .0.1>,
0 <: t\I
° I:~
N 0
I .,.¡ .0.1
N .0.11:
(/)0 Ù C1J
0::0 I: ¡,.¡
UJN ;:¡ ¡,.¡
zO:: \,..;:¡
0< ù
(/) ..c
-UJ ~ o C1J
00>- '~..c:
~..J .0.1
:æ< C) C) C1J
~ co ..c:1:
:æO It) Ie .µ.,.¡
o~ ~- co-
Ou. ~ ~ ¡,.¡ C1J
~o:: OèO
\,..I:
z~ '"-1 t\I
I:..c: ~
~I- U o ù
Z .,.¡
o(/) '"-1 .0.1 0
OUJ Q t\I I:
u.~ H Ù
00 > '''¡''C:!
0 '"-1 \,..I:
cUJ UJ Z .,.¡ t\I
c::0:: 0 '"-1< tI)
Z Ö :EH ~"C:! :it
«z UJ HU t\I Q)
00 :E UJ HH ,..¡"C:! ~
m- :E > IZ Ù C1J Z
~~ 0 H:I: Q) :::J
0 c:: Q::;U ¡,.¡ 1:' 0
0 D. <'"-1 Q) ,~
z~ UJ D.
c:: < p,.,H ~.µ
~!:!:: o I: <
o(/) C) ¡,.¡ C1J
O(/) ~ ~8
It) Q)
UJS ..... ~- C1J Ù
-0 Q::; ~ ..c:t\I
OUJ .µ"'¡
w ~
30:: U I: C1J
H .,.¡ ¡,.¡
·z r.:..
tJo r.:.. C1J )
I- 0 C"1 C1J C1J
tn tn ~ >,1:
00 Z Z I' 0
>< 0 ..... ,..¡o
0 H H 0 4IIt- ~z
D.. '"-1 ~ H 8
r.:.. H Q)
< U < .
tn H U ~ èOèO
Z H ~ I: I:
U ::J Z . .,.¡ ..-1
H :E ::J ..... ¡,.¡,..¡
,..:¡ :E :E C"1"'" Q)"C:!
~ 0 :E .,..,4IIt- .0.1 I:
::J U 0 I: t\I
p,., U '"-1..c:
.,..,
.,.., Ž :it
¡:.: 0'\ ,
0 a
z Ui Ui ¡:: UJ
UJ c::
:E Ž 0 C) < U)
~ ~z).: 0 U)
c:: 0 CI ~ c:: ¡¡: :5
< U) :5 ¡:: - 33-
D.. > ~ ~ < U) 0
UJ ::> UJ
0 0 D. D.. "") a:
'-
,
SOLID WASTE
Solid Waste Superintendent
Pay Grade 20, Job Code 573
to Assistant Solid Waste Manager
Pay Grade 22, Job Code 573
....I
Cost $ 4,552
Compliance Technician
Pay Grade 14, Job Code 769
to Pay Grade 16, Job Code 631 Foreman III
Cost $ 1,769
2 positions
Heavy Equipment Operator II
Pay Grade 11, Job Code 826
to Heavy Equipment Operator III
Pay Grade 13, Job Code New
Cost $ 4,064
Total Cost $10,385
'....,¡
.£ e
<II
~ Q N 1~
.... ~ ,
5J "
COO) 14 ~
C/J ~ C'
æ e .
.~ i
0::
,: ~ :1 ~
..' :I! ..
.~ - ~-2
N t¡¡ ¡;~~ C
0 g c
0 i ~ i C"')
0 ~, §
~ :::;¡
,~
,..
t/)g ~ ~ ~ C\
....
Ir)
D::N C
We:: r~ -
2~ ~ CO ....
C/)' "';1
~' (1 ~ -
~ }:I c
~-J ....
:i< ffi (\ ~
C\
:iU ~
o~ ~ ~- r:J:)' 1 ! a
~ ....
uu. ~ 14
~~ ~ h~
¡... ~ 'õ .!2
Q ~
=>.,. w ~ <¿:) ~ ~.8
Ot/) ~ c"
uw (/) C/) It) <D Q::¡
W ~ (\ i' e: 0
u.::I 8 It) C\ ..:. <II -
C/) N '- ~ ~
00 c '( .... e: ~ ~
OW w ~ c"
LU a:: 2; t! C
~: 0 It) '" ~ 15
z C/) II) :6 -=
LU Q ~ I-
00 ~ ~ j~~ z
C:II= :I! 0 0 ;:)
~j 0 a:: Ö C/) <tI 8
u ~ '" ~ ~
z- w C/) ~
::J!!:: IX ~ c:
oU) r:J:) c ~, ~ ~ ;§
~~ ..- ....
~ ~ It) .... ., e: ~ 15
æ ~ r-." f' 11)' u
.... 'I & ~
-u 0 ~ ~ "
Uw ~ .. :~
30::
:::0 ~ .::
'z >- ~ .... C/) _ ~
~~ It) <b ¡g ,
~ 0:: <¿:) ",
§ It)' " 't; ~ <II
:z ~ ~ It) ~ ~ i
t/) w ;::
~ C/) Ir)
~ ~ r:J:) ~ e
~ ::¡ It)' ~ ~ ~
~ I' U C/) '"
êj ;§ 'ì3 ~ ~
CI) ,:
~ :« " :1 ~ c:
3:: ,. 0
<.J ;! Ö ," . <II
Q) :5
~ 0 ~ I ~
~. C/)
:::;¡ "
Q.. C/) ,,- \
~.J
~ .< ~ ð
I
LU W ~ ~ , ~
:I >= ~
¡ § ~ ~ ü:
Q. ~ ~ ~ ~ u
w 0 ~ LU
£0"d ¿869<::9tot9S 3~S~MalìOS0~3I~nì~S Wd tot=£0 <::0-8Ø-èl~W
\...I
co .... ~
E3 ~ g¡ t
...... ...
VJ ~
æ·
Q:: ·s
c t ~
«
,0. ~
':I
. -
':. I¡j J!!
N 0' 8 !
8 ~ .:
C"\I ::] .g
. ~
.... ~
mO
~c ~
wN "
~~ I 'Y. ~
en ;. ~
~
~~ I i
8 ; ~ \I)
~C.J ë
:J:U) "f"-" "",," otr ~
0- ¡¡~ ~
(,)LI. 3!
~~ ~
ZLI. Q - æ :::
- âi
~.... ~ -
Oen ~ (")' E
(,)W Ii] ~ ..... <.0 ~ ~ ::i
LI.~ ::] ~ ~ ....
~ -
oCS ffi CJ ..... Q c:
OW ~ co" :s ë
a: N
~~ Q .2& :It
z Ö'
oêi ~ ~ i ~ ~
:I
tD¡:: 8 0 ::)
~~ ~' ~ ~ 0
u
~ ; ~ u
z- «
~!:::
aU) ... <") .... ~ .~
C.JU) ~ It') ~
It') .....
w:) ~ ~:! & P
-(,) .., ..,
C.Jw q: : ~
3~ G
~
'z >- :t: 01 <;: e
Iño ...I Ü ..... :~ .2
c:>
E !ž i:! ~ a:f . <;: .!2
~ "I- (") ¡:: ~ ,¡~
en ~ ..... ~
0 ~ ¡";:'!:j
c. ~ ::] ~" ~ ~
~ (,J
~ CI) ~ .Iii ~
~ ~ OJ
(J u 8 '5
~ c (.) ãr
~ ~t
0
0.. CI)
ð
~
~
u
~
t>e-d ¿869Z9..t9S 3~S~Malìose~3I~nì~S Wd !;;I:s;e Ze-8e-èJ~W
"WIll
:'4 ..."
'~f:
~-''';
',0
~:~
idi
,::J:
"'".;
..... C'I ,., ~
<") <0 01
ß C'J C'I 10 ;".
~?>'.
, .....' It') .,.... :;,~
CI) It') ~ J~~
S :~~
LlJ ~,-,_.
ç~~
C( ~i¡¡;
i~"J:
,~
~';¡J ~-
~® ~
::¡ a
f~ ~
~~~ c::
Q) a
¡~ g. ~ C
N .... C
0 0 1{ Q) 0 <")
C¡j ,
0 <: -;~ .....
N .<:¡ IJ.J c
I CO .:x '" :r: c
..... ~ '~:; co ø C'I
(fJ 0 0 " :E .....
0 ..~ Q) I!')
D:: >- "~.~ ..... 0
N ¡~ <;:: a
W CO ,~ 12 .....
c:: ø "t-
Z f-- Q) c:: <")
« :rt- u
0 ::::¡ 0 ,
CI) ~ .....
W ~ ~ ø c
(fJ >- a '" "I"
~ ø
(fJ -J ....
:æ¡ « 10 C'I " Q) ~
10 co ,., g.
:æ¡ U 01 C 0 ø
(fJ r< "1"- ~' 'E Ìii
0 C'I ..... ~ Q)
U u.. ~ ~ 1.: ~
ì: D:: f-- .9- ....
0 ~ ::J 0
- 0- Q)'
Z u.. c - Q)
~ - C'I :§
:J I- w Q C( 01 ~
0 (fJ ~ S ~ $ <ri a 15
en ..... 1.:
U W ~ w 0 LlJ <") I '¡¡¡
:J :::I ~ ..... a
u.. .¡ IJ.J <: "t- ¿ ",-
0 a ;,.' 0 >- LlJ ~
c::
W C ~ w ::::. Q ..... Q) 0
c w c::: 0 ..... :::. '-
c:: .- ù5 -
c ;~ co co :it
c:: Z .t:: u
« z w c ~ :r: -2 <tI ~
W :::. Z
0 0 :!: 7t-! ~
> :~;j -2 :::I
CD I- :!: 0 ,,",' co Q) 0
0 c::: ;.;<"{ '" (.)
ì: « '~ '" ::J
U (.) a.. ,,~ Q) " (.)
w a.. ì u " <I:
Z u.. c::: < Q) ~
:J c:: '5
(fJ "t- C "I" ,~
0 C'I C'I "I" 0-
(I) ;~ - ~
U <0 co "I" '-
« <0- <")- 0' --
W -J l! C'I ..... "I" co .!:2
c::
U ,~ It') It') ~ ~ '"
U 4., ~
:J W lffi f-- ~
-J c:: ~ ~ Q) ~
--ff{: :::: g. ...:
¡...: Z >- ~ " 0
(I) 0 ...J Q C( <") ~ LlJ .E
~ 0 <ri !5
I- z S f-- <0 ..... ~ :r:
w 0 ffi C'I ..... I ~ -2 a
(I) c::: co ..... I!') ,~
0 c::: LlJ "I" ::::: 1.:
>- c) u CD
:::I Q ~ ø :;.
a.. CI) ::::. ..... :E co
~ ¡:: (.) ù5 0 t:n .t::
C( ~ è ~
~ CI) ;~ :r: co '"
~ .<:¡ '" Ìii
<tI
0 Q) è3 :E
:::ï Q :E ~ $1
CO :::ï :E "
::::¡ 0 ~ c:: .t::
Q CI) <tI '"
'It
W Z 0
¡:..: ...J 0 W
Z I- Iii ¡::: c:::
¡::: w
w Iii c e" <I: en
:!: z en en
c ~ z > I- (.)
I- 0 0 ~ ü: .:.¡ ü: <I:
c::: ¡::: (.) e" c::: ...J
< < w ¡:: ¡::: (.)
a.. Cñ m >- >- ...J Z en w
w 0 0 <I: <I: < w 0 :::I c:::
c a.. "") a.. a.. en m I- "")
\....t ,,~ ....;
:~
;~
i~
"" <0 ~~
<0 a ..... '~
a a "" ""-~
LlJ c\' ~ ~I
CI) ~
S; .\1
LlJ ~~
a:: í
I- ~
U ¥,,~ . ~' ~
" <C I .E
0..
~ ~ c::
~ () Q
I- t5. g. ~
W ~ a
N C) .... a
0 0 ~ () 0 C')
0 ~ C -¡¡:¡ ,
~ ~ .Q LlJ ~
N a
I en IJJ 'i '" ::t a
..... ¿ I cu () C\
0 ....
en 0 l:J :S It)
a::: 0 >- i!i () .... 6
N ~ Q
W en ~ 1:: ....
Z a::: i-- () () ""
< 0 c:: C')
0 :J Q ,
CI) ~ ....
W Q ~ () a
en >- ~ Q '" ""
~ q¡
en .J ....
:!!i < a It) () ()
a <0 g. ~
:!!i u co C\ ()
en C')' C')' .... q¡
0 c::
C\ .... ()
~ ~ -c::
U u. E: 3:
>- a::: i-- ,9- ....
~ 0 a¡ ::J Q
- t:r ()'
Z u. - C\ ()
¿ - .E:
::J ~ Q a:: 0'> ~ .;:;,
0 en :5 2 S: <ri Q -'C
..... E:
U W C') ,>2
0 ffi LlJ .... '"
u. ::J LlJ ~ "" ~ ",'
0 0 >- ""
c ...: c::
W ~ Q () ,£1
C w 0 ..... ::.
a::: c L5 cu (¡¡ :it
a::: z -c:: 0
< Z c ::t .E cu I-
W W ~ Z
0 0 :æ > è .E ::>
CD ~ :æ 0 cu () 0
0 a:: '"
>- < '" ::J U
U 0.. () l:J ()
~ U W 0.. 0 l:J <C
Z " <C () ~
u. c::
::J en <0 co "" ,!<1 '5
0 en C') It) 0'> .... D-
U r-- co It) '- ~
< ....' C\' ~ -'
W .J C\ ..... ("') cu .!<1
c::
U ~ ~ ~ 2 .!<1
U
::J W i-- ~ ¡::
...J a::: a¡ () -
- g. 0..:
¡....: Z ¿ - r-- 0
en 0 Q a:: C') ~ LlJ -E
~ S 0 <ri .2 ::t ::;
i-- <0 .... ..... Q
0 ffi C\ .... , ~ .E
en LlJ co It) .!<1
"" "'" E:
0 >- ci 0 ()
Q ~ () ~
a. U) ~ ..... :S cu
::.::: L5 0 0> -c::
a:: ,!; s- ()
~ ::t -¡¡:¡ '" 3:
.Q '" q¡
cu
Ü () <3 :S
::¡ :S ~ '"
en -c:: l:J ~
:J ~ c:: -c::
Q cu '"
ü.i :it
z 0
~ ...J 0 W
Z I- ¡:: a::
¡:: w w
w ü.i C C) <C en
:æ en
z c ~ z :>: !:: u en
I- 0 0 ~ .:..¡ ü: <C
a:: E a:: u.. ...J
<C U C) <C w <C ¡:: ()
0.. (J) IJJ >- >- ...J Z I- en w
w 0 0 <C oct oct w 0 ::> a::
0 0.. .., 0.. 0.. en IJJ I- ..,
M
o
o
N
I
N
C/JO
a:~
Wa:
Z«
OW
C/J~
5Q...J
:¡:«
:¡:U
05Q
ULL
~~
ZLL
::JI-
OC/J
UW
LL::J
0°
OW
a: a:
«Z
00
IJJI-
~ë3
Z-
::JLL
0C/J
uC/J
«
W...J
-U
Uw
3a:
'Z
~o
I-
C/J
o
a.
"..'
:
8
U)
s )
lJ.J .,....
0::>
..: l-
) ~
I c..
1 " :!E
I; I-
W
ø
c
:::¡
III
01
<:,
.
I
U) I,j
~
I
c
W
C
Z
W
:!E
:!E
Q
U
W
e:::
c
, W
I-
en
" ~
;0
W
,e:::
c
W
>,.',
Q.
e:::
c.. ",
c..
«
I
U)
lJ.J
Ü
S
0::
lJ.J
U)
<:
~
~
~
>-
...J
l-
I ffi
e:::
1 e:::
I :::¡
I U
I
I
,
,
,
..
..'
Z.
21
en
:;:1
C
¡:.:
Z
W
:!E
l-
e:::
«
c..
W
c
~
-
-
ffi
ü
[
o
U)
lJ.J
Ü
s
ffi
U)
<:
ê
~
<x:>
C\
Q:j
~ ~
lJ.J -.:- ,
<: ..... cc
c;,
.....
.....
"'J.
ffi
ü
[
o
U)
lJ.J
Ü
s
ffi
U)
<:
~
~
~
LO
a
l(j
.....
<x:> a "'J.
~ ~ .:-
a
o
.....
"'J.
W
...J
I-
¡::
Z
o
E
en
o
c..
a <x:> Q)
"I" ..... I(.
..... <0 ""
C'). "'J. C')-
"'J. "J.
I
I
~ ~ ~I';
~- ~ ~I'·
"'J. "J.
"I" ..... I(
a <0 <0
C') ..... -.:-
.,.:: <0" ....:
C') "'J. CO)
"'J. "J.
üi W ,;
üi C CJ ci:i
c~z>1-
gCJ~~fu ~'
III)-)-...JZI-
Q«««WO
"'") c.. c.. en III I-
.
I
(l)
:S
... c:
.E S
. '~
E ~
~ :S ::)
8's:2
a. ~ CD
o..~£
~ Q .S
~~~
.... :::s u
o 't:: <tI
- 0 ::.
~o.CD
u2"E
c: (l) 0
o ~ u
U ::::: Q)
(l) (l) .Q
.c:: ~ c:
~ '5: ~
~ e CJ)
:;: 0. 0
OJ c: 0.
,E; ,2 ,!!1
0. :t:: .c:
(l) '" -
(l) 0 "I:J
~ o.;:¡
c: ,'" 0
- - .c::
:S '"
c:: ~
~ -Š ~
'(jj 0 (õ
o :;: ~
0. ::., ~
Õ)t:æ
::. 0 u
~ Õ ~
è <: (l)
_ u
c: ~ c:
(l) ", ,S1
c: ~ 10....;
<tI c: ~
,!!1 ~ ~
<tI
ô' :;: ~
(I) ,~ 0
è.c:E
~ 0 13
~ ~ J~
Ii:: ¡g '¡¡¡
o 0.
Qj :::: .£
u 0 ~
'~ (I) c:
(l) :::. :::s
U) <tI <3
c: ....
~ 0 CD
c: :S
~ :2 :;:
~ .s 0
rn c:: ~
Õ ~ :s!
c: ~ ð
o 0. :;:
~ ,S '5
o (l) .Q
o..c::
t: -. c:"
(l) ",' (l)
t: Q) ~
:::s CD .e
C,,) <- co
(l) 0. ~
to ~
¡:: Q5 -5
Z
o
¡::
«
U
u:
¡::
en
:::¡
"'")
.8
c:
,,_2
...:
.£ a:J 'ëij
\..) :5 8-
,~ c:" <tI
ã ~ ,S
(l) ~ (l)
:S"I:J.Q
::., <tI :s!
.Q c: :::s
:S - 0
'~ 0 :;:
-. CD :::::
Cìi ~ 0
(l) u ~
~ (l) ....
~ ~ <tI
~ £ CI)
~ ,E; <tI
(l) ... ~
0> 0 ::>
~ t5 CI)
<tI ,~ <tI
'" ã ....
E .8
,_ CD u
co .c:: ~
Q~~
.c::Q....
u 0. C)
~ :::s ¡::
ui 'ð 0,
E ~ c:
~ co .~
.c:: ~ ~
~ 'S ,~
~ e
~ 0. ,!!1
'-"I:J ~
è ;:¡ '2:
~ ~ ~
,~ :::: E:
(l) 0 0
U (I) U
e :::. c:
0. 0 ~
"'O-~
c: 0 (l)
<tI (I) ::.
ø :::. (l)
CI) cc :S
c: .... 0
25 0 -
U c:
.8 2
o 'õ)
U) 0
:::. 0.
ê:
~ ~
.E 3
"> U
(l) C)
'" c:
't: a
<tI ...
"tJ Q
~ c:
c: ,0
<J.) ~
:S~
(l)' '¡;¡
,s ~
- õ
~ ~
<tI
~
~
'5
0-
~
(l)
,">
-e
(l)
~
....
'" 0
c: ø
:£ ~
.E ..92
c: CD
(l) .c::
'" -
~ ~
~ 'S
~ e
(]) 0.
~ "tJ
.Q ~
~ '"
o 0.
E :::s
... e
Q 0>
~ .8
c: ~
<tI co
E (l)
~ ~
.
....,I
a
a
LO
¿
o
o
C\
.....
LO
¿
.....
C')
LO
,
.....
o
o
:it;
I-
Z
:::¡
o
U
U
~
.....
o
o
.
C\
o
(I)
:::.
:it;
o
w
e:::
en
en
«
...J
U
W
c:::
~~(nn'll~
U MAR - 8 2002
FOR PURPOSES OF BUDGET REOUEST o""Ly
VETERANS SERVICE OFFICER IT
,
HU¡v'''''·: RESOURCES
.~T. L~C: ::S~'JTY, FLORIDA
MAJOR FUNCTION: Specialized administration work advising, counseling, and assisting veterans in
matters pertaining to their rights and benefits under various federal and state statutes.
KNOWLEDGE, ABILITIES Ai'ffi SKILLS NEEDED TO PERFORiv! THE ESSENTW, JOB
FUNCTIONS OF THE POSITION:
Knowledge: Knowledge of the law, rules, and regulations governing veteran's benefits under federal and
state statutes.
Abilities/Skills: Ability to exercise good judgment in counseling and assisting in the solution of
veterans' problems. Ability to enlist and retain the respect, confidence, and cooperation of veterans and
veteran's agencies. Ability to interpret and enforce various federal and state statutes dealing with
veteran's affairs. Ability to establish and maintain effective working relatioasmps with superiors,
coworkers, veterans, their dependents, civic groups, and the general public. Ability to express oneself
clearly and concisely, orally and in \VTiting. Basic typing skills required.
Ability to counsel and assist individuals with discretion. Ability to work in coniuction with
professional, medical and lee:al persons~ posses public relations and speakine: ability.
Ability to take a teamwork approach to the iob bv cooperatine: with others. offerine: to help others
when needed. and considerine: lare:er department or team e:oals rather than individual concerns.
Includes the ability to build a constructive team spirit where team members are committed to the
e:oals and obiectives of the team.
Must be self-directed and work under a minimum if supervision.
ESSENTIAL JOB FUNCTION: J1¡laintains communications with the veteran's community and all
veterans' organizations, as well as the civic and business community. Acts as back up to Department
Director in order to assist claimants with the more involved claims requiring a higher level of
e;r:perience,
Participates in and attends conferences and conventions relating to the field of veterans affairs so as to be
current and knowledgeable on all matters affecting veterans benefits. Must attend the Florida
Department of Veteran Affairs annual re-certification training program.
Advises and assists veterans or their dependents in presenting claims for disability compensation,
pension, medical care, insurance, burial, vocational rehabilitation, loans, job counseling, and other
claims for benefits which they may be entitled to under federal and state statutes. Prepares claim forms
and briefs and assembles necessary information to establish the validity of the claim. Reviews claim
information, briefs available records and evidence, and prepares reswnes as needed. Contacts doctors
and other individuals relative to furnishina official affidavits and evidence for individual claimants.
~ .
Page 1 of 2
\.t
....,
VETERANS SERVICE OFFICER II
ESSENTIAL JOB FUNCTION (CO~lL.'WED)
Inputs information on assistance µrovided into computer Dro~ram on a dailv basis.
Mav partici{Jate in development of outlines for in-house traininO' sessions as necessarv to inform
staff of new or chanO'in~ laws re2:ardin2: veteran benefits.
Represents veterans before various officials as necessary to establish veterans claim. Prepares and
presents talks to civic groups on matters perta,Íning to veterans affairs. Contacts employers relative to
employment opportunities for disabled veterans.
Individuals mav perform other duties as assi!?ned. inc1udin!? workin!? in other funtional areas to
cover absences or relief. to equalize peak work periods. or otherwise to balance workload.
ESSENTIAL PHYSICAL SKILLS: Use of both hands and fingers with dexterity. Good hand/eye
coordination. Very frequent use of good near vision, good hearing. Occasional walking and frequent
standing. Ability to occasionally lift 30 lbs.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION REQUIRE~1ENTS: Constant work inside the office in a
sedentary posture. Off site work when counseling claimants residing in Assisted Living Facilities and/or
Nursing Homes.
WORK HAZARDS: None,
SAFETY EQUIPlVlENT USED OR NEEDED: None
EDUCATIOl'i": Two-year degree from an accredited university or college.
EXPERlENCE: Two years responsible administration experience and minimum of one vear
experience as a Veteran Service Officer. A comparable amount of training or experience may be
substituted for the minimum education qualifications.
LICENSE, CERTIFICATION OR REGISTRATION: Must be an Honorably Discharged Veteran.
~fust have current accreditation from a Veteran Service Officer course. Valid Florida driver's license
and a good driving record.
Page2 of '2
. ,~ :~. ....,
~
""
~
~; :;;¡
~ ~.
.:;::s' ",.
;;;:
í ~
St' a ';- ';- .~ Q)
J1} ~ "'"' '"' ,->' c::
co co -,. c::
~~ ... eu
a ~t ~ ~ 9= 0
lU ~ [;1. U) ~
(¡) :1~ .!1: eu
s: ~. ,,"' $ ~
lU ~ 'i:¡ Q)
~ ~ .£2 ()
0::: "5 0 Q.
! f- i "b 0 0
t) () Q. Q)
¥ ~ , æ~ ..t:: $
.æ. c.. ~ ü ()
~ ::¡: I U) ..t:: .....-
!il .....
..... ..... Q) <0
iII f- eu .2 :::. e
..' UJ I~ :s Q) .....
I r-..
N 0 C) ;;!i D>"b $ 6
0 a .~ e: Q) 0
0 <: ",. ::J ~, ..... J: a
N ';)~ ':,'11'- ..... a
c:¡ ~ Ct! 0 uj C')
I £' :::: ,...
..- - ~ Ct! uj :S It)
en 0 ~ Q) ,
0 0 U) c:: <0
a:: ~ $ Q) 0 .....
N r..- i1.l Ct! :::.,. N
W a:: ~ .at :::... $ ~ E r-..
Z ':It ~ () ..... ..... ,
ct a... .....
a C/J (¡) 1.X Ii§. :S c:: E Q) e
W ~ lUl~ ....... Q) E e
en >- :it Q) E Q)
>- '" E
en -l ~ <0 <0 .... & U) 1::: è
ct 0) r-.. ..... 1Ci :::¡ Ct! :::¡
~ "" Ct! ~ U)
;: ~ co l() "I' :£ Q.
~ Ü - c- Ü
:I:- 0:) ,... i () 0 ()
a en ;>" ¡¡ ~ ~ '"' () "b a.....t::
.ç ~ .Q E-
u... ~~ lU
Ü s; <: Q !f! U) .~ () DJ
a:: N .' a ~..c:.......r.::
>- -,!:: lU 7;.
0 £; <Ó () ~ Q) '§
I- a - ,. CD ~
Z u... N ~ a a It) ;;- C::()E"b
- - <0
::> I- '<t '" UJ - UJ ('0')" 'j~ () :::.,..-
i f- Ü l- ii:';' ~o"ï~
a en ,... ,." :s:-1:::Q)
U) ¡::: ~ ~ -
ü w w UJ r-.. ;I! Q.eu
J't § :J , () E a...:S
u... ::> ~ ~ ::J C ¢.:. E () () 0
0 0 .. a 0 ~ a ~
0 a ff UJ C\i .~ '- "- 0
w w ~ c:: <:C 0) ~; '"ì" () Q) $
0 c:: ct 0 =:' lU co -, 1::: '§'$_ ~
c::: 0 z i' ~ co' !!t eu..........."b I-
ct Z Z w 0 '" ¡::: ~ ~ a...::::: 'ëti c:: <:
a a ::¡: UJ ~ I- ~ 0.2-Ct! ::J
w > 0::: ..... U) 0
CJ ~ ø ::¡: a ~ "" U)~"",.::c:
a c:: .to (f ~ c:: c:: () Q) ü
>- ct t) a.. ! ~ o o..t:: () ü
I- Ü w a.. '- ....... $. <:(
z u... c:: ~ ~Q)O
::> U)..t::_Ct!
<0 N '" 0--
a en 0) <0 It) a... 0)- <:( ~
en co r-.. (0
Ü ~ 0:) ~ ",- C:-O) >...: Ct!
w ~ ~ ¡uO)o"b
..... ~~-c::
Ü ü I ¡ o c:: ê Q)
w e a...._._ :::.
::> c::: Q. e ª E~"E()
-l ",. <Ó 'i
~; ~ l() ()-oU)
I- Z <: Ü);l >- - ~ <0 '" ..... a... 0 .....
". .....I - """ ()U)Oo
a 0 C'). "
en ü ~, f- Ü ,... ~ E";:;- :::.,..).(
I- ¡::: ¡::: ã¡' z ¡::: lU ~
~ § UJ § ~ r-.. , t ~~.......êi)
en .. c:: ¡::: e $:: -t: Ct! ~ "b-
a 0::: 0 ijI, c:: a l- e -~ Ct! C/) Ct! c::
D- Ü ~ I ::J <:C 0::: N ;, a... () C/) :::¡
lU () 0> ""
0::: <: (f co i%. C'J .S "b e
a 0 ~ co' ?$' è~ c:: ~
~ :µ Ct! 0)
<: ¡::: "I. .- :¿ eu
~ '4" U) Ü N
~ ~ c
<:C ù3 -~ U) '- ,
.... c:: -
C/J ~ m Ct! N
~ 0::: :t~ 13 () :::¡ 0 c
0::: 0 ~ "" () ~ D- o
z~ 0 0:::
(f lU p.r. a.::: <:(
0::: W ~: Q.
"'" :ü;
~ "'.
új ..
1ì t7 z , 0
, ¡:..: i .....I a UJ
~] f- a.. c::
z ~ ¡::: új w UJ .. ª ~
UJ 0 C) (/) en
::¡: .. z 0 ~ "" () en
z :Ï: Z >- f- .~ ~
f- a r;' a a <t c:: ü: .....I -:.~ ü: ...J
c:: ¡¡: E () <:J c:: ~ w <t ;; ¡::: L)
<t (/) .. (/) c:¡ ~ ~ .....I Z f- U) UJ
c.. :; ~ a a ~ w a . :::¡ c::
UJ '-
0 0 a.. ..., a.. a.. U) c:¡ f- ", ...,
N
o
o
N
I
.....
C/)O
~~
W~
Z~
OW
C/)>-
C/)..J
~~
~(.)
0C/)
(.)LI-
>-~~
f-O-
ZLI-£:!
::Jf--:t
OC/)
(.)WW
LI-::J~
O~Q
Q~~
~ZQ
oorE
ca¡:::e>
>-~~
f-(.)
ZLI-
::JC/)
OC/)
(.)~
W..J
(.)(.)
::JW
..J~
f-Z
C/)O
f-
C/)
o
[l.
[2
>-
~
O~
:<:~
1ii,
~
'~
~:
~
CI)
UJ :~
>- ;.;:~
""'"
"-
~
~.
~.
~
;..
"',
1?CI
" w
~t;;
~1f. UJ
;:¡
~O
;çW
j¡,o::
~
'.t'i.
CI .:K
W-
> ¡"<c
O~
0::
c..
c..
~
CI
W
CI
Z
W
:2E
:2E
o
ü
W
0::
:<:
o
¡::;
US
Q:::
Ü
UJ
Q:::
a
z
<:(
CI)
~
Q:::
~
~
.,
'Ei
~
û)~, >-....J
ü~1-
¡:::~z
:3~~
o a; C!:
<C~ ;:¡
'-'-;:::ü
Z '"",
o~
¡::;f
<:('"
l.LjS
Q:::~
o~
UJ :"
Q::: ;!!'
J~
'R
~~
~~
;;:
'I:
z~
0;,.
en~
~ ¡.
o 'J:
I-
Z
W
:2E
I-
0::
<t
c..
W
o
-
-
~
u:
UJ
Z a
UJ a
CO tó
a ~
~ ~.
~ "- t.<>
:J
~
UJ
:¿
¡::;
I-
Q:::
<:(
Q
ü
¡::;
:3
o
<:(
::::
a
a
~ ~
UJ co
I- C'i
UJ ....
~ "- t.<>
¡::
I-
Q:::
~
ü
¡::;
:3
o
<:(
W
....J
I-
¡::
Z
o
t:
en
o
c..
~
.~
-Jf¡
~
~
i
a ""'" ~ ~
b9-~ "r-~
_ IX) '~,¡,
t.<> ~:~
-;;t..
"~:
'~
~
-
...
~,
~-
.;s
~ ~ ~~
0::>- ....- o' l!
bC) f:.9. "-'-'I*!
~~,
.,.:
-ji
~
~
'3'.,
~
'3
¥;
'j.':'
-
~
;~
1>
~.
''6
i
,
a
a
c..¡
0)
0::>
0::>-
t.<>
Ie N
0) Ie
0::> "-
cr;¡' ~
t.<>
a
a
c..¡
0)
0::>
0::>-
t.<>
w W
W CI C) cij
CI ~ Z .. I-
8g~~ü:
a:: ~ W
~~~~@
..., c.. c.. en [!)
.,
....
.:..i'i
~:t
~ .~~
0""
I- ~
jII'
If·
~
.¡;
§
:r
~
'"
~:
c: Q)
C\] §
(/)
C\]~
~ ~
q) C/) Q)
-S-o..
't:J g 0
~ 0.. Q)
"t5 Q) ~
C/) ..s:: ......
..... - Q)
!2 è3 ::.
:;¡-';:;;Q)
D) 't:J ~
~ ~ 0
C\]õ:I:
~~¡¡)~
Q)-
~~Q)C:
~~5'E
Q)-o."",
~~EQ)
Q)EQ)E
~ 1::: è- ~
C\]
C\] 0.. ~ C/)
<..JQ)oQ)
Q) 't:J o....s::
..Q r:- -
~ .C/) ~ D)
\.::::S-c:
Q) Q) Q) .§
c: Q) E 't:J
Q) ~.-
s: o"'ì' t2
~-1:::Q)
0..C\]..s::
Q) E 0..-
._s Q) Q) 0
Q) ..... 0
1 ~ Q) ~
1::: .::;: ~ _
C\]-.............
Q. :::: '-.:; \.j
""' C\] c:
.8~.....rc
C/) ~ C/)..::c
c:t:~~
2°~~
.¡¡¡ Q) 0
o..s:::::::C\]
0.. -_ <:C ~
è- g; 0...: C\]
roO).2't:J
C5 .,... q:¡ c:
o...S.S ~
E:o:::"EQ)
Q) - 0 C/)
- 0.. 0 I....
E ~ü ~
:;:: CJ.) ~"-
I~"""CI)
1::: C\] ~ -
(tjÚ')C\]'t:J
Q.Q)Ú')§
C"') c: 't:J 0
ï::: t: ~
~ C\] ~..;.
.- """ 'u C\]
~ <: .S:: Q)
q:¡ c: - ~
__ Q.) (tJ_
~s=g.g
a: ~ <:( 0..
-t¡O'
~-
~
*.
.,;.~
~l
'" Z
~, 0
" ~
~
u...
¡::
en
;:¡
...,
J
co
a
....
"-
¿,
a
a
(")
....
'0
tb
....
N
"-
,
.,...
a
a
:i:t
I-
Z
:::>
o
ü
ü
<:(
"-
N
a
,
N
a
ü
Q:::
'I:t:
o
w
a::
en
en
~
....J
ü
W
0::
N
o
o
N
I
'<""
enO
c:::0
UlN
zC:::
O~
en>-
en...J
~<t
~ü
Oen
üLL.
>-C:::N
I-og
ZLL.~
::JI-'<:t
Oen
üUlUl
LL.::J~
OßO
Oc:::<t
~zO
ooæi
IJ)I-l':>
>-<t<t
I-ü
ZLL.
::Jen
°en
ü<t
Ul...J
Üü
::JUl
...Je::::
'z
t;o
!::
en
o
c..
".t
'h
'iC
i
dE
3:'
:s::
a~
ll.J::'<
Cl)jJ
$I
ll.Jre
a::i
'" I-
.¡ ü
;;;;q:
'ga-
.>P.::
~
i I-
'10' W
~I~
~
".
£i
~
w.
:t'
C/) ~.
lJ.J~
~ ,~:
.:
~
~
,",'
~~
:T'
#;
.~
:1
~ c
~ w
:i tï;
;:¡ W
¡~
~a
~' W
~a:
D~
W;f..
>~
~~
a-
n.
q:
CI)
~
D
W
D
Z
W
::
::
o
ü
W
e::
:2:
o
¡::
ì¡j
a::
ü
lJ.J
a::
a
:2:
"t
CI)
:0::
a::
~
Ð:
...
¡j)1~
ü .1-
¡::s:z
"t"!'w
::J~e:::
0,1) e:::
~::J
~¡t)
:2: _.
O!i'
¡::~
"tJl>
lJ.J:;¡
a::~
ü ,I;.
~f
::;
0:
~-
i
¡,:.
!'\t
¡¡:
Z"
o~
ëñ¡;:
;;1;
-:r;
o ..
I-
Z
W
::
I-
a:
q:
a.
W
o
,.,
.¡,
.~
'.
~
p-
i,j,
<")~
C ,t'
0I';i
~;,;
~
I
::;:
i
~
¡¡j.
¡
I
.!,1
""
!
$'
<.à;,
~
4
~'
:~
~
~
~
;:;: ~ :::::!it
co f',.. c.o ~
0')....- - ~
~ ~ ~'i:!
~$.
~¡
;¡¡¡.
~
$01.
~
¡
~;
~
~
;:;
'?;'
'Š:
~
::;¡
£
'"
~,
!i'
....;
~
ji
':I:'
c
.....
t-.
tll
".
;¡¡¡¡
,,",
~
~
~
'~
i:'
-~~
J;\
i
'1
!
3::
~
~-
ffi~
~:
',;r'
~ Z
'" Q
WWW ~ ~
DC> II) :::,-.....
g~Z>=I-..~ ~
üCJ<te:::Ü:...J~u..
ro >-;::5 ~ ;::~ t;
Q~~~~8r,~
-
~
iI:
lJ.J
:2: 0
lJ.J 0
.en C\.Ì
a ~
~ ~-
....
s:¡ 0') ~
::J ~
:::;: 0
:::.. 0
lJ.J 0:.
¿ 0:.
¡:: Zi
I-
a::
~
ü
¡::
~
o
"t
-
-
o
o
Q C\.Ì
¿ r--.
~ ~
ll.J ....
¿O')~
~ ~
I- 2S
a:: 0:.
~ 0:.
0,
~
ü
¡::
~
o
<:(
W
...J
I-
¡=
Z
o
!:::
II)
o
a.
o (T)
~ 0
0')
~
,
, ,
;:;: ~
0:. 0:.
0')' ~
~
;.
e: (!)
ro e:
°
CI) (!)
<15~"§
"SCI)(!)
"tJ - 0..
(!) 0 0
.¡: 0
u 0.. (!)
CI) (!) ~
~ :S ..:
- '- (!)
&-2 ~
e"tJs
ro ~ °
~Q:r:
-.;::::: . (Jj
OroCl)'¡:
S: CI) (!) C
~~~g
.¡: Q~
-.1: Q~
(!) (!) E: E
~ E: (!) E:
ro 1:::: è ::J
U ro ""
(!) 0.. ~ CI)
..Q Q,) 0 Q,)
CI) "tJ o..:s
¡;:: .!:2 E: Q'¡
(!)'¡:~e:
t:: - .-
Q,) Q,) Q,) S
..Q(!)E:"tJ
:,..,'-
"tJo"ï~
~Q.1::::Q,)
'ê E: i1:s
;.:::: Q,) Q,) 0
~ Q,) '- 0
r::- Q,) S
Q,) .S:: ~ -
E:::::::::"tJ
&- - t::
~~.8CQ
1:::: CI)
ro~,-~
0.. e: (!) Q,)
o°'¡:(!)
_(!)QS:
CI)'¡::::::ctI
§ -'o::c ~
:;:;~....:ctI
~Q)o"tJ
Q.....tiJe:
o...S .S ~
E ~"E Q,)
Q,)-oCl)
-Q. '-
¡g ~8 °
.S:: Q; :::....~
~~......CI)
1:::: ctI ~ "tJ-
ctI C/) ctI e:
9-Q,)C/) ::J
C"') .S"tJ e
~(á~~
ëìj ::¿ u t1J
CI) '- Q,)
ro e: - :,..,
_Q,)t1J_
~s: §.g
ct~o::c Q.
"wi
to
o
.....
r--.
,
a
o
a
C')
.....
Lt')
~
....
C\
r--.
,
....
o
a
:i:I:
I-
:2:
::J
o
Ü
Ü
"t
0:.
C\
o
,
C\
a
Ü
a::
,
:it;
a
w
e::
II)
(/)
q:
...J
ü
W
e:::
"
N
o
o
N
I
......
(/)0
e:::0
WN
Ze:::
0<
_W
(/)>-
~-I
~<
~ü
o~
ÜL1.
>-e:::N
t-og
ZL1.£;:!.
:Jt-~
o (/) ..
UWUJ
L1.:J~
OßO
Oe:::<
~ZO
oo~
rct-~
>-«
t-ü
Z-
:JL1.
o(/)
U(/)
<
W-I
-ü
Uw
3e:::
'z
~o
t:
(/J
o
a..
.
a
lLJ "
U)
s:
lLJ
ct:
o
<:
U)
~
o
w
o
z
w
:E
:E
o
t.)
w
e::
ä~
w
>
o
e::
a.
a.'
-<
<:
o
¡:::
US
ct:
Ü
lLJ
ct:
a
<:
«;
~
ct:
ìf:
~
~
<:
lLJ
ü
Ü
S;
Ü
'-
<:
o
¡::
US
ct:
Ü
lLJ..
ct:f
JP'
J
z
o
en
~
o
I-
Z
w
:E
l-
e::
-<
a.
w
o
l-
t.)
-<
a.
:E
I-
W
t?
o
:J
a)
~
Lï::
L!.I
::: <:
f- L!.I
<: CI:I "1"
~a t:;
C/) ¡:: ",'
~ ~ ~ OJ'"
«;-.JI'-.. OJ
L!.I ~ ~
ü ..¡
G: W ....
lL. ~
o ¡::
f-
ct:
0:
>-
-J
I-
Z
W
e::
e::
:J
t.)
~
_ ffi
- <:
J:: lJJ
Ü CI:I
~ a ~
lJ.J ¡:: ~-
~~~<D'7
~-.JOJ ~
"'- ~ '0
~ ",-
3; ~ .....
~ ¡::
f-
Q:
0:
LU
-J
t:
I-
Z
o
t:
en
o
Cl.
't' <D (;)
't' C") CQ
I'-.. -.:- .....
I>'? ...... ~-
I>'? "'"
<D I'-.. ~
0) LO LO
0) <D <0
-.:-' ".j ¡....-
..... '-9- .....
I>'? ~
~ ~ ~
C\ Ç\ ~
~- .....- 1<')-
..... '-9- .....
I>'? "'"
Lù w
Lù 0 t? (/J
g~~:>:t:
t.) t? c:: e:: u.
-< w
m>->--Jz
0-<-< -< w
., a. a. en m
z
o
¡::
-<
ü
~ i §
o i ~
1-, -,
'~
::!!
W
"'"
~
'-
~ ~ -2
~ "5 c:
~ 0--0 Q
c: 0>-0 Q.) ~
o e co .~ ~ Q)
~o...Q.!:::coQ..
Q '-:::;: 0>1::--
.2 CD C3'S.~ ~
'- E: 5; ~ .:2 .~
Q¡::: -~Q)
- ..... Q.) "- """-
CQ::J.!:::~Q(.)
·s C/) "- co c:: Q)
"2-0 "'--o.!:::
Q ,... CD CD ._ -
... '" c: "- '"
Q co co c: C1J C1J
Ü....CDQ~
'- ~ 23 t2 (.) .~
Q.) I:: I:: Q.) CD _
¡: CD '- Q. C( ::J
CD Ü .:2 ~ CD -0
Ü :::.....!::: I~.:.!::: Q)
(.)~f-,: ~- E:
'S § Q.S C1J
'- ¡::- .2 Q..c: '"
ü¡;:;CDE:-::::Q)
.....¡:- --
Q<:: _CD~.!:::
0","-5;-
§ü¡:-g",~
:.:::: -1:: CD CQ .~ .!:::
"ëì) co E: CI) ;:: 1......
Q 0... :::.... Q.'- Q)
Q. co¡::-:8¡:
.E:Q.~"'Q)
Q) Q-- ctJ C:"
:S(.)ct1(.) 0'-'
I:: ....Q.(.):::::
-0-'- D> CD '" '-
Q) -J ,S E: Q) .~ ¡:
NQ.)"'¡:::I.::.ÜC1J
¡:::S~::¡5Q)V5
~ -0 (.) '" .c: :S 'ë;;
'-c:e.... -(I)
octJQ.-2O>CQ'::<:
~ '- -0 CD'S c: Q)
",~1::"tJ$0(.)
C1J c: ctJ ctJ 0 ~ ::::
$(3~E:i3Q)O
- C3D>-Q.c:
c: :::.... ~ I:: ..... -- C1J
Q.) :- '_ co C1J
- ,... (.)
E: c: Q.) CD -- ._ 0
1::::JQ...o(.)~~
ctJ E: ctJ Q.) ctJ U C1J
Q. E: Q. ~ .:2 Q) .::2
aQ) 0:::: '" -0 .t:: Q
ÜctJC:CD-.t::
§Q.)~~"f3Cti$
.- t: '- ctJ ctJ .t:: Q)
""- 0 \..:. ""- U
C1J.~-o C1J:::::-o'
~ 0... ..... Q. '::<: Q) :;::
(.) OQ) -0
Q.)1::~'-'bQCI)
a:~",Q.Q.)C:(.)
ccC:Ý')Q.):;::
-oQ.)"-Q.)ctJ..oQ)
~.!:::CD.!:::.c:-o;¡;
"-.!::: $ t:--.......
CI)'-"- :::¡:::¡.....
~-2CD<-Q.Q"tJ
~'E:ct1 .!:::c:
,,-C' ._ CI) CI) '"
......""" ;.::: CtJ U Q) ........ "V
'- (.) Q.) '- -- (I)
Q.),Q,,- Q..Q. 1::::
:Së;;¡C1JCI)Q.'bo
c::§:SCD::JQ)Q..
CD Q..!::: _. CI) c: CI)
,t:: '" .~ :õ -0 .2J Q)
:s:~sctJ~~:S
(;)
C")
(;)
,
C\
(;)
ü
ct:
(Q
C)
....
I'-..
6
C)
C)
C")
.....
'0
,
<D
.....
~
,
.....
C)
C)
:i:t:
I-
<:
~
o
ü
ü
«;
¡
i
j[
i
i
~
ï,
i:
?"
:it
a
w
e::
en
en
-<
-J
t.)
I.IJ
e::
\w
PARKS
3 positions of Maintenance Technician I
Pay Grade 4, Job Code 814
to Spray Technician
Pay Grade 9, Job Code New
RECREATION
"'"
Cost $17,325.04
Lincoln Park Community Center
2 positions of Maintenance Tech I - Temporary
Pay Grade 4, Job Code 814
to Maintenance Tech I - part time with limited benefits
Pay Grade 4, Job Code 814
Sports Complex
2 positions of Maintenance Tech I
Pay Grade 4, Job Code 814
to Maintenance Tech II
Pay Grade 6, Job Code 816
Page 3 of 3
Cost $1,360
Cost $4,432
~
o
o
N
I
N
enO
~O
UJN
z~
O~
_w
en>-
~...J
:E~
:EU
O~
uu.
>-~
~O
Zu.
:J~
Oen
UUJ
u.:J
Oa
oUJ
~~
~z
00
c:c~
>-~
~U
z-
:J!:!:
Oen
uen
~
UJ...J
-U
Uw
3~
¡...:z
enO
¡::
en
o
c.
a
llJ'
C/)
:.;,
llJ
a::
o
w
o
z
w
~
~
o
u
w
a::
t-
U
~
a..
~
t-
~18
...::J
~aJ
""
'it
¥
!
(/)1
lU
>-~
~
~
;;<'
~
~,
;is.
'"
iê
""rJ)
':1 W
::J
o
w
a::
<=
o
¡::
~
a::
~
a::
<>ð
~
a::
Cf:
¡:.:
z
w
~
t-
a::
~
Cl.
W
o
>-
...J
t-
Z
W
a::
a::
::J
u
<=
«:
Õ
~
J::
ü
~
>-
«:
0:::
Q
C/)
0>
C\
<c ~
80)'7
..... r--
'<:"
0;
.....
<=
~
ü
~
J::
Ü
~
Lu
Ü
<=
~
~
<=
~
r--
r--
'<:" c:i
..... -.:- .....
co J:¡
.....
r--:
W.
...J
t:
t-
Z
o
E
rJ)
o
a..
~ g ~
co 0> t-.
'<:"- ~ It')
~ ~
co r--
0> Ll')
<c '<I"
0>- c-.;
..... ......
~ ~
c r--
c c
~ Ll')
r-- ..,.:
co .....
'<:"- ~
.....
~
Uj w
Uj 0 C) (/)
§ffi~~ffi
~ ~ ~ ~ ffi
..., 0.. Cl. rJ) aJ
-..I
()
::;
-
o
c: en
o ">.
::::; =a Q)
co ~ c:
"§ ~ E
a. Q) «
(¡; U
- -a a)
c: ª ~
~ "~ ,g
B~~
C) to ~§
.!: ::J ë;;
"E E ~
o en '-
r.J 0> Q)
r.J c: 0-
~ :§ e
".; "5 0-
.... .c Q)
.£ c: £:
co Q) :5
.!:! E '3
õ.E
a. Q) Q)
co > en
() 0 ~
'C 0>
r.J -g ~
.- ::J ,-
U; 0 ..c:
~ ro "3
co ~ c:
C ·~.9
Q) ~ ~
E a. 0
t: en a.
.... Q) en
(J [/) .-
> 0 ..r::
o :5 t-
O>
.... 0
o e
'- -' ro
t: '-
c: 0 Q)
o U g-
tóu;-
_.!:!Q)ea5
Cl. ë :c
t'Co~
a>t:u"¡ij
U ro - >
'C >. :ß ro
~ ga.g.
E 0 -g .>::
:JE:=g
.9 1: aJ
:g c: Q)
.....wu.!!!
N -0 ~ =
a::> ::J .c ..r::
~ æ-g~
::s :s en '"
-:;; CD "2: :¡
èi5 c: Q) g
"_2 §- 0
{Jro"'u
.¡: -=; Q) Q)
OJ.c u
~ ~ (5 ~
......
c
c
<'1
c
~
Q
~
I
~
.;~
'""
...
~
o
o
t--
o
o
o
N
.....
It')
o
.....
N
"';-
.....
o
o
:i:¡;
t-
Z
::J
o
U
U
-=:
z
o
¡::
~
ü
ü:
¡::
rJ)
::J
...,
:i:¡;
o
w
a::
rJ)
(/)
-=:
...J
ü
w
a::
M
o
o
N
I
N
enO
~O
WN
Zet:
O~
en)-
en..J
:E~
:E()
Oen
()u.
>-et:
1-0
Zu.
::>1-
Oen
()W
u.::>
0°
OW
et:~
~Z
00
r:a¡:::
>-~
I-()
Zu.
::>en
°en
()~
W..J
()l>
::>W
..Jet:
·Z
~O
I-
en
o
a.
c
w
c
z
w
::¡:
::¡:
o
u
w
a::
a
t.U!!t-
CJ)'
>~
t.Uœ
O:::~
""
ä!il-
i~
I~
~t:i
O~' C)
<:~c
~ª
~.
~~
7~
~
;;:¡
""
CJ)j;
~~
<t
..:t
~.
~
-1f
to
~}:
~. C
~~ w
;........
""U')
~w
:t ::¡
oS C
¡¡; ~
if
c~
g;~
o~
a:: ~.
a.~
a. ,""'
«~
¡:
~
~
;;t
2;
""
,~
~
~~
111-
,g Z
.=W
;)ï; IX:
,'II a::
iG
i
....
~
~'
0:::'
":t
a..~
~
',~
~,
:::!I
""
...
ž~
º
U')
~
c
<:
o
¡:::
ùS
0:::
Ü
t.U
0:::
..¿s
CJ)
:x:
0:::
ct
¡:..:
z
w
::¡:
~
«
a.
w
c
<:
~
ü
:2:
:r:
ü
~
)..
<:<::
0:::
Q.
CJ)
--
<:
'<t
Ü
:2:
:r:
ü
~
LU
Ü
<:
~
~
<:
~
û.i
-I
I-
¡:::
Z
o
E
U')
o
a.
0'>
C'o
r.o ~
~ ~ ~
'q'
0;
t--
t--
~ 0
~ ~ ~
0:> L()
--
r-.:
r.o a
C'o L()
co 0)
'<i~
~
0:> t--
0'> L()
r.o '<t
0)- C'o-
..- ..-
~ ~
a t--
a a
c'\Ì L()
t-- ...:
0:> ..-
'<i~
..-
~
Q)
t--
I"')
cri
N
~.
UJ UJ
U ~ ~ ~
~~~«ffi
.., a. a. (/) m
...I
C
:5
-
o
c '"
o ;;;¡ -¡p-
~ :-_~ E
::: '- .9
a. Q) «
; '-'
- '0 Q)
C ~ ~
.... E Q)
~¡=,g
.8 ~ ~
:2
ü)
Q)
0.
~
~
i
I
C)ü)
c ~
'E E
o en
o CD a5
'-' C 0.
« ':§ 0
u) 'S 0.
.... .c Q)
.8 C :5
<Q Q) E
.!: E '~
õ. E "'
a. Q) ~
ra > :g
Q) g, E
:::: '0
u c: ~
êð ð :ë
~ rn '~
C') c:
~.~ ~
Q) ro en
E 5. 0
c: en 0.
'- Q) '"
~ ~ ~
o E I-
C)
o "ê
~ C
.2 <3
êii û)
~ ~
t: '0
c C
U to
1J >-
~ g>
'Ë 0
.- E
-I 0
It') -
It') c:
......w
~
I-
Z
::¡
o
u
u
«
o
o
t-
o
o
o
N
......
It(
o
......
N
t-
o
......
o
o
...:
o
"iiJ
'-
Q)
c.
o
e ci
"ED
o to
'-' ro
ü) >
Q) ro
o.c.
1J ~
Q) t5
;.;:: co
1: cc
Q)
'-' en
N Õ ~ £
~ ::1 .c E
.! m -g .~
:J ::1 en '"
_-:; CD .~ :s
Q) '-'
U)cc.c
cu .2 ~ 0
1J"iiJ"'u
"¡: -S CD (1)
oC').c'-'
ü:e:o:g
C'o
o
a
,,:.,
a
~
a..
'Z
o
~
u
ü:
¡::
U')
::¡
..,
:it
C
w
IX:
U')
en
~
u
w
a::
....,
co Q
N lO
a a::> 0')
IJ.J SI. ~ ~ C)
CI) ~ ~ J::
::; ~ ....
J -
IJ.J 0
a:: ~':'t c: (/
~. .S! ->-
!\'{ ¡- i::J ()
"" ü ~ ~ c:
""-' <I: ãi <: ...
~ c.. :e ..9
... ;¿
s¡; ~ c. ()
; ... u
¡- C) cD
:!!! ë "
;¡¡; LI.J ª (/
C"") ~ c:
0 0 :f. ... ,~ ()
0 :::: w Ci :J g
~ ... ;:) "" 0 -
CJ "" .£ () ()
N -. ~ .c 1:J
en 0 ~, CI ü; ;g
0 ~ c:
ex: "" :J (/
N iI" ,"ê " E ()
w ex: .;(; ;¡¡¡ ... c.
Z "" 0 II) ...
<C ;;: u CI ()
0 CI) ~ u c: c.
W ~ Š <I: :2 0
en >- .. - 'S ìï
en 'þo ui
..J ;;t .c ()
- ...
~ <C ':;:' a::> "- 0 :S
-!: 0') 10 ~ c:
~ t) );( co -.:- () :S
en !'t 0')" C'\" u E ';:: 0
0 ~ .... - ã. c 0
t) u. ... ~ ~ ... t-
~: C. () () ô
ex: rtI > (/
>- :2: 0 0 0
0 - Q) CI :S 0
I- " ~
., 3:! N
Z U. ~. Ci 0 U -0 ~ ....
~ c: 'I(
:J I- LI.J ~ 0') :;:; :J 1:
0 -£ ¡- N fI 0 0
en ~ en :::t <0 '<t Q) ... '~ ....
t) w 0 c. C'iJ N
-';.i. LI.J N 0') .... .~ t-
:J :¡. ~ Q CI
U. ;:) r-:. :;&; rtI c: c: .
-
a .~ 0 :; ë '>, ,g ....
0 ~ >- -.:- 0
W Ci LI.J oi ~ Q) C'iJ .¡¡; 0
c ex: LI.J Q: '« E ìï 0
a:: ~.....
ex: Ci ;ç "" c: II) c.
z 0.. ,. :it
it ~ ... CD ,'!1
<C Z LI.J Ci x;,' CI) C) II) ..c:
0 0 ~ LI.J ~ i > 0 r- ¡-
> 0 :S z
c::a ~ ~ 0 ~~ !Ii CI ;:)
..:
>- <C 0 c:: :; ... 0 0 0
ü c.. .;!í 0 ... ro ü
l- t) ... - ë:
LI.J c.. ,¡¡, c: ... Ü
Z c:: <I: ~ 0 CD
U. .~ c. <I:
:J ... u 0
en &' ~
0 "" Q "- ü; 0 cD
en Þo Q Q u 0)
t) .... 10 ;;: ... :c
<C "" ¡::! a.. ë:
",", .... ...: t ~
W ..J :.to 1:J 0
,< a::> -
t) ~ :2: ~ C) c: u ct:I
t) -.:-- U ct:I >
:J W ¡ ~ .... >- II) ro
ex: 0 ~ 1:J CI () c.
...J ~ ~ :ê 0 C. :J
0 1:J ->::
~ Z ., >- :::t E E 0) u
en 0 ;z .J 0 "- :::¡ <: C'iJ
<)¡ ¡- "- 0 :e CD
I- :::: ~ z ~ C I(') ë ()
0 -.:-
~ LI.J - -.:- - I(') UJ u ,'!1
en ¡:: ~ \.1J , ....
c::: co 10 N - C'iJ :S
0 ùS 0 0
~ c::: :2: - co >-
c.. ;:) r-.: '<I' :J .c :S
a:: 5f. ü ~ C'iJ -0 ';::
0 ... Q) () ()
i :¡ ...
\.1J ~ :J II) II)
:§ CD .~ ...
a:: Æ :J
I :2: c- O) u C")
Oð ~ IJ) c. C Q
~ CI) rtI .Q :J 0 Q
ro II) u ,
::x: 'or. 1:J C")
a:: a:: i! .¡: :5 () CD Q
.c u ~
~ ~ ~~ 0 CI ~
~ ü: 0) ...
... 0 0 0..
~.:
.A.
::.
:t LI.J Z :it
¡:.: ~ .J , 0
¡- 0 ,
z ~ ¡:: W LI.J ¡:: LI.J
LI.J W c:::
~ ,., z ~ " C/) <I:
z Ci ~ >= t- Ü C/)
t- o 0 0 ü: ü: IJ)
~ ëi5 E u " ~ LI.J ¡:: :)
c.. :> (/) CJ ~ ~ z IJ) u
UJ .". 0 0 <I: w ::> w
Ci Õ a. , a. a. en CD , c:::
, ,.... Q) '-'
CI)":'::
Q) Q)
:>...:S ~
~ D)
." CU c:: I., .
C) C) C)" c:: :.::: Q) CI)
.', ~ co ¡g " o U o.."b
<.0 '-::J c::
fij ~ ~ "b"'=="b12
C:"bc::::J~
C/J/ ~~0.gQ)
3 Q) U Q)
lLJ . Q) .CI)Q;)~
a::: ',',', ~ c:: Q) '.... c::
E I- "b .~ CD.... 0
U ...... :>... 0
, c:: CU 0 CD CI)
ex: CU U - c::
[, 0- I, ......0E-D)::J
} :E I' .J:::- CUI.,
.9'J CI) CD ã3 CI) "ò"
" - C)
".., tü c:: :ï:: CD :::. Q) '""
" '-.......J:::cuE r-..
N 0 .","," t:) 6
0 o---c::':..;::
<: I Cl ~c¡¡....c¡¡<I.1 C)
0 ~ "b CI) 0 E C)
N I IIJ cry
. CD <1.1 <1.1 :::.:.- 0 -
'<"" ~ §;., E as CI) Ll)
C/) 0 cD
e::: 0 <I.1Q~~"b '""
N . c:: 0.. c:: C\,
we::: I" I· CI) E c¡¡ c¡¡ r-..
lá I' ,
z« .- cu CI) - -
C/) C/J I, <1.1 <1.1 "-I :>...:::.:. C)
Ow ~ lLJ ~. ,.¡ D1Q)ttlC"as C)
C/)>- ).: ..' ~ .S a: ~ ~
C/)....J ,~:~ <.0 co "I'
:2:« ;,~.~ cry ..... It') ~ ...... c:: '- c¡¡
~, "ò" cry. "'. ". ~oCl)
~ ~ o :J ...... c:: CI)
:2:U r-: ..... ~, U"""ttI :>...
O~ Ii ffi ~ ~ c:-~Q)ttI
'. <1.1(") Q) o.."b
uu.. I.'· - C) I·, ---.J::: 0
>-e:::N , :¡: æ C) ~ Q) C/) .~ ~
I-O~ Ü c:¡ C\Ï I.' Q) Q) '-
~ cry CI) ~ I., "'"
zu..£:::! Cl a C\, I <I.1:S:S~ ::;:,
~I--.:t ., UJ lLJ ¡:: ,..... , -:>......... c:: cu
o C/) .. I- ..... .g-ttlCD"b
;~ (/) ü ~ "ò" ~ <1.1 ð"bü I.,
U ww '0 w <: '"" "ò" , ,',
u..~1- ~ ~ ~ co C) .c: Q):>...<I.1
00« " 0 C) ue:~",==o..
Cl UJ ~ $ <ó ,. CI) cu :::. c:: CI)
wO UJ 'a:: lLJ cry , I., O::J ~ :i:t
oe:::« Cl , <: :¿ "ò" c¡¡ e: ~'E ::J
~zO ~ "," ""5 <1.1 o..E 0 I-
z Cl .. ¡:: ~ D1.J::: CI) .J::: <:
OO~ UJ UJ ,,', " '- 0 :::>
::E l- e: r-: E ü .~
> a::: 0
::E 0 '.."
a11-~ ; a:: D1>":~<I.1"b ü
>-«« 0 a:: .S ~ D)-C: <1.1 Ü
U 0- q;
I-U UJ 0- 0 ~c::er-:~
z- a:: ex: ., ;'; o <1.1 ~
~;
~!:: " <.0 r-.. ~~ ~uo..uj<l.1
0C/) .. ~ cry cry c:: ~ -ê ·ê g.
uC/) "ò" <.0 C ,,>
-.:- r-.." ~ 0:; ,," <1.1 c:: 0 ro CI)
« Ü ~ ~ <1.1 ::J 0.. ~ ._
W....J .Q E CI) 0 c::
-U E.. - -¡:- " ~Eg>E-.2
Uw E .; J:: ::J "
~e::: o . Q 0 ttI 0 '- Q) ~
....J Ü Ü -c:: .J::: U c:: ...... Q)
->:: " >- ~ :¿ ... CI) Q) Q) .J:::
'z <: ~ .e:
~O ... ...J CI) '- :::. E C/)
0 cc lLJ <I.1.c:Q)
Q I- Q):::~:;:;Q)
¡:: z Ü l1J r-..
I- .E;: :¿ "ò" r-.. 2C¡¡C::1:::S
L¡j UJ <: ..... "ò"
C/) 8 '. a:: ~ ¡:: co c:i - CI) cu c¡¡
a::: a:: ..... , 0.. - _ 0.. cc
0 ü ,S " ~ ~ I- ~ E cu 0
c.. .....J . a::: , ., Q)::;oe:E
lLJ '-- :: U
a::: ~ Ii <: a:: Ll) èQ)"5tt1c¡¡
..... "
a ~ to-: I ~ CI) CI) ~ r-..
<: ¡::I ~ cu CI) E D1 cry
.. è5.S!2 ã3 [2 C)
q; L¡j, o.."'==i:t:::: ~ 0.. ~
C/J a:::: " E ,~ ttI D) Q) C)
::x:: ü
a::: ~I" ~t5c::[2¢: a:::
a:: a::: c¡¡ ttI 0..
I' I' =Þ:
': UJ , Z 0
¡:.: ...J 0 UJ
t: úi ¡::: a::
z 1 UJ
W t- UJ Cl t:) (/) ex: (/)
(/)
:E z Cl ex: z >= I- U ex:
I- z 0 0 a:: ex: u: u:
º a:: ...J ...J
a:: E u t:> c:: ex: UJ ex: ¡::: u
ex: (/) (/) IIJ >- >- ...J z 1-1 en UJ
0- :> 0 0 ex: ex: ex: UJ g, ~ c::
UJ a. 0- en IIJ -,
0 0 0- ...,
N
o
o
N
,
..-
c/)0
e:::~
We:::
Z«
OW
C/)>-
C/)-I
~«
~(.)
O~
(.)LL
>-O:::N
I-oe
ZLL~
::>I-o::t
o C/) ..
(.)L1JW
LL::>I-
OC«
wO
00:::«
~zO
OOZ
_w
CJI-~
>-««
1-(.)
Z-
::>!:::
0C/)
(.)~
W-I
-(.)
(.)L1J
::>0:::
-I
·Z
~O
I-
en
o
a.
.
"
I
a
LU
CI)
s:
LU
0:::1
, l-
t)
- <t
I' 0..
i" ~
I-
W
t:)
o
::J
,cc
o
~
CI)
~
CI) -:
~
)~'
:;:/
~
.
.,
o
W
l-
I' ~
L ::J
I a
W
c::
o
W
o
Z
W
~
~
o
t)
W
c::
,. -
01
We
>,
01
c::"
0..1
0..'
<t ,_,
.'
.'
~
o
¡:::
lfj
0:::
ü
LU
0:::
a
~
<:(
CI)
~
0:::
èî:
~~
Ü
E
E
o
ü "
-t:
C\)
Q
>-
...J
l-
e: ' Z
o . W
u c::
:§ ,'. ~
--- t)
~
o
¡:::
~
0:::
ü
LU
0::: ,
.:-:
Z
W
~ Z
~ 0
<t If)
c.. :>
W
o 0
r::
G::
_ LU
:J: ~
ü LU
co
¡:: a
LU ¡::
~ ~ ;: '<"
~ ~ D:)
¡:: s:
~ LU
~ ~
I-
0::
èî:
-;::-
:J:Q Õ
~:¿ ::
~~ .3.
üLU'<" I'-
~:¿,..~I'-
~ ¡::: D:) ~
LU I- ""
I- 0::
~ èî:
~
-
W
...J
I-
¡::
Z
o
E
If)
o
c..
<::> <::> <::>
"" D:) D:)
c.o <0
"" ~
c.o Ct) ~ '~.
C") ,.. 1<)'"
~ 2 a~
<::>
<::>
('.j
C")
C'.
,..
, ,..
""
<::>
<::>
<ó
C")
~
1'-'
""
c.o I'- C"),'
C") C") 1'-_
~ c.o <:)"
1'-' "" 0::; '"
"" ~ ~
I,
I
I
I
1.0
,..
r--:
""
ù.i ù.i
W 0 t:) If)
o <t Z :>: I-
8ffi~~ffi ~
cc>->-...JZ I-
o<t<t<tw 0
, a. c.. If) cc I-
I
I
I
;
,
:
.
','
I
I
I
I
,
,
Q)
U)~
Q) Q)
:2;~
(1J t:: I...
§t5~{j
'- ::J
'b~'b[:2t::
t:: 'b t:: ::J Q)
Q)'baa~
~-q:u,cæ
Q) CI) co 3:;
3:; t:: Q) I'-.. t::
...... ,!2 Q) .... a
c: ..... ~ a
(1J~-§.Q)~
..... 0 0) ¡:::¡
,c-E<tJ-
.~.~ Q) Q; CI)
c: ,c Q) ;:" Q)
I........,c(1JE
~Cë~c::.::
'b CI) a (1J E
Q) Q) Q)~' a
-g~EæCl)
Q) .S2 (~ 3:; 'b
t:: Q. VJ t::
,~ E cci ~ (1J,
Q) Q) N ~~
0) Q) ~ Ct;¡ æ
¡::.E Q 'b :>.
- ><:>.
~..... t:: '- Ct;¡
:::: Q CI)
o ::J "- .... CI)
u -..:;; ctJ ... ~
~ c;) Q; ~.g;
""'-,c 0
~ æ C/) ,~ ~
CI) '- Q) I... :.;:;
Q):S:S~ :::.:.
:g~"'iõåi.g;
Q)a'bOl...
,c Q) ~ Q)
~~~~Q.
I... Ct;¡ 5 § ~
~~I...E::J
::J Q) Q. ~ 0
tn CI)~..c:
Q) ¡:: '- a ><
I... E ° '-
0) CI)
t::"":¡::Q)"Q
'- ~ O),c Q)
~t::[2f-,:"'iõ
a Q) ¡.;;
3:;uQ.vjQ)
~CI)Q)Q.
t:: ~ 1:::'i::: a
Q) t:: a Ct;¡
Q) ::J Q. ¡.;; .~
~§~~§
;:" <;: t:: <;: .....
Ct;¡ a '- Q) ~
,cut::"-Q)
CI) Q) Q) ,c
CI) '_ ;:" ~ ",
Q) ,c Q) ,_=== VJ
Q):::'b Q)
6'(1Jt::1::::S
õ.CI)(1J(1J.....
Eètiõ Q.(1J
()c:a~E
~ Q) ,c Ct;¡ Ct;¡
!;....~ ~ CI) '-
¡::CI) I...E 8'
a .~ Q) <tJ I...
Q. =s; it:: '- Q.
E '_ (1J 0) Q)
lQ) 13 t:: [2 F
r-Ct;¡(1JQ.r-
Z
o
¡::
<t
t)
u..
¡::
If)
::J
,
.....,
~
<::>
.....
I'-
,
<::>
<::>
<::>
C")
,...
1.0
<b
,...
C'.
I'-
,
,...
<::>
<::>
:it
I-
~
:::J
o
Ü
ü
<:(
(Q
CO)
<::>
N
<::>
Ü
0::
,
:j;
a
w
c::
If)
If)
<t
...J
t)
W
c::
,
. '" ri I,; ..,
, ,
,'" :
,,'.
"" .7,.;;
1'··. .... ';to <0 ~~
~: \l"J <0 ....
a co C") C\ .(¥,
,.~ ..... io9o C\'
Lu :~,
U) '. io9o "'"
~ ~.~~.~ '~~~
Lu ~
0:: ,-
ii~
~E .....
I- ;?;'
~,;.... 0 ~.
*1 ~ ;:Jt
~;~,~
~~ c.. ~~-'
:2 ~,
;¡¡:. .....,
.- :1~ ....
~ I- ~. Q) Q
.......;. LU !"{ :5 Q
("') ~, <:J ti: t-..
0 0 ~. 0 ,
<: 0 i Q
0 =:J .2 Q
N QJ tn Q
, {f; ~ c-..
N ~ tf:: "" ....
en 0 0 1t <.J Il')
,
~ 0 >- :&f ~ .2 ....
N .~ ~~ Q
W QJ ~ Q) c-..
....
Z ~ f-. ~~' 0 Il')
« ::) :~. ~ t-..
0 C/) Z! ~ J:: ,
W Q ?; ....
~ ~ & <0
~ " ~
en >- ~ ',ö , , '" ';to
en z:L :I~ Q)
..J i C") ~ \l"J Q)
::2: « ~ C\ 0)' >-
::2: t) ~ t-.. co 1l"J..~.2
en ~ <0' ...: CQ ", c-
O "þ .... .... C\ ;;'1 E
t) u.. ~? ~ "'" ~ ~ Q)
-
c::: ~it - .;;:: ....
>- ''';'; :r: .~ .E
I- 0 ~ 0 .;¡:,
¥: ~ "C
Z u.. ~. 0 ~ ~
~ I- w .... :J
~ I- 1L1 .... "i. 0
0 en t"'t
en 0 <0 c..¡ ....
t) UJ -'~ OJ
~ LU <: .... <0 .... :.~.
u.. ~ .~: =:J ~ co ..;. ~ OJ
a ¡i.~ 0 Q ~
0 0 '" cO ;.,,,:
UJ ~~~ w ~ t:
W e::: ~$1\.
0 c::: ...... ""
0 ~ ~ ?~ Z
~ Z ~.1.~ :ït;
« z LU 0 ~ :§ ,.~ Q)
w ...., :5 I-
0 0 :2 > ~J '0 tñ z
CJ :2: 0 12: Q) Q) =:J
I- ~ .~ .0 OJ 0
>- « 0 e::: <.::: t~.... rn
Ü c.. 4. ~ .2 .:.:. Ü
l- t) w C- u Ü
z e::: ~ '" rn ~
u.. Q) c.
~ :;:¡
0 en c-.. t-.. 0) :§ Q¡
en t-.. Q t-..
t) co Il') C") t: c:
« ..... ..... <0' 0 Q)
UJ ..J - .c
<: .... .... C\ <.J
t) ..'¡.. ~ io9o '4 ~ c:
'-' ~ :::; ~ e
UJ ~
~ ~ ~: 0 ",..
..J ~ ~ <.J <J1
"" c:
¡....: Z >- :r: - Q)
<: ~~-;; ...J Ü t-.. ~ D-
en 0 0 .~- I- ~ t-.. i:. E
¡:: ¡..;;~. '"
I- ~~' z .... c:i ~ .... e
L5 .... u
w Lu .... .... ... ....
en e::: co .0 ~, Q) Q)
0 > <J1
0 0:: :i,i-¡' e::: <: ..... yf~ 0 ctJ
Ü ~ r-.: ~
Co. =:J ~ ,'.,~ t: Q)
Lu ~~. '-
>< :=t, Ü .... u
Q: :;N n.;; B
Q) .:.... .!: c-..
ì5. ~¡¡. ~ ~,('.; Q
a ~ ~":" J:: '- Q
<: E: <: ;<j', OJ .2 ,
'« 0 ~ ~:~.... C")
Ü ~f~ J:: <J1 ~
U) Q)
~ CI) . .8 'ü
Q: 1:: Q) c: C/)
0 Q)
Cf. ~ ~~.~ :;:¡ OJ ~
'., 0 Q
" rn
~;: ....
.. :it;
w ., z
¡:..: ...J 0 0
~...~ I- .. LU
Z - ¡:: w w .. " ¡:: e:::
w ..
:2: z w 0 (.:J en ~~. ~ en
z 0 ~ z != , 5:2
l- I" 0 >- , en
e::: 0 E: 0 e::: ~ e::: LL. ...J LL. ~
<t I Ü (.:J e::: <t w <t -, ¡:: ...J
V) ,"
c.. ~ en tn >- >- ...J Z l- V) Ü
W 0 0 <t <t ~ w 0 -, =:J W
Q 0 c.. -, c.. c.. en tn I- -, e:::
,
~ ~ " -....I
" ,
"
". 'S
..
~<:'i.
.,.. "I' <0
'::i'. l() <0 .,..
a '.,òC Q) '" '"
LU !~!~: .,.. ~ ",'
U) J:,~ ~ "'"
3: ~
LU
CI:::
I-
~ U
¡,¡;:., <.:
-,'0'
......- 0..
¡ ~
...
I- a> <::>
;;;; UJ :: <::>
C"? c::> r--
0 0 ;~ 0 6
< ~.i 0
0 ;::¡ .2 <::>
N <::>
. CQ [) a> ""
N ~ :r..:i:" - .,..
'" l()
C/') 0 0 u ,
~ 0 >- ~:::; .2 .,..
N <::>
UJ CI} .~ a> ""
...
z ~ f- ::~:;¡. I~~ l()
« ::;¡ "," r--
a U) ,
W Q .,..
~ 5: <0
C/') ~ ~ ~2 .' "I'
,
C/') ~ .1 a>
...J ~ '" "" LO' a:>
::E « £ C\ r-- 0'1 >.
::E t) r-- Q) LO 0
-, to' Q)'" c..
C/') ..., .,..
~~
a ";.40- .,.. .,.. '" .JÖi. E
f..E. ~ ~ "'" :.:?Ço
t) u.. ~..:;L, a>
ì - -#';-
~ - ~f ...
~ :r:: 0
I- a () ~. ....
~~ "C
Z u.. 0 I:: ,~. c::
::J I- ;;'t~ UJ "I' !;:; ::¡
I- LU "I' ~: 0
a C/') ~~ en () to c\Ì ~..'. ...
t) UJ ,;.;'-? UJ < "<- <0 .,.. i;;: OJ
::J Q) .... ,~ OJ
u.. ;::¡ ~ Œ
a 0 <::> 1'.:'~ c::
a ..
w 0 ~ UJ I:: cò t£' c::
0 ~ UJ c::: ª '"
0 ~ ~ .=
~ z ~
« z w 0 Ifi:'" ~ ~~ a>
UJ ~:.;, :~ .t: I-
a a ~ > ;:¡ ~;: - en z
OJ ~ 0 ~: ;::~ a> CIJ ;::¡
I- 0 ::€' ~' ..c 0> 0
~ « c::: :co ~. co
U ~I~ .2 -'" u
l- t) w u U
Z c:: <II co ~
u.. a:> a.
::J II ::¡
a C/') ~ i'-. ~[I~ ~
C/') <::>
t) Q) l() <") c:: c::
« "" "1'- .,..- <0- 0 CIJ
UJ ...J "" - .c
~ < "<- .,.. ~:~ ~
t) to'> to'> c::
t) "" S .52
W ~. s~
::J ~ .... ~ () * ro
...J ~ -~ u '"
>:::. '" c:
¡....: Z >- :r:: t~: .... CIJ
< ..J Ü r--. ~ c.
C/') a 0 .~~. l- I:: r--. -, E
l- i=: ~~:, z c::i r:;: '" 0
"I' .... U
US UJ LU "<- ~ "<- ~ ....
C/') c::: Q) J, Q> Q)
"0'·' () > '"
a CI::: ';õ'"-' c::: < .,.. $ 0 CtI
a.. () ;::¡ ~ r-..: .!tf c: Q)
LU .. u ~' ... '-
x u
CI::: ~ iþ I:: ;::..... .2 .~ '"
a 0- *~ ..c: '- Q
<::>
< E ~ ~ ::C: .~ .2 ~
":( 0 f
() ~ .t: '" ~
~ CIJ
'" ~' ~ .2 'ü
CI::: 1:: ',"" a> c: U)
0 ':-Ä Q)
CE 0- ~. ::¡ 0> õ:
<2~ 0 CtI
...'
~~ "
, :it
UJ .. Z
¡:.: ..J 0
l- " 0
z ~.r" w
¡= w UJ ¡= c:::
w w 0 (? .. ~~
~ en <.:
z z 0 <! z :>: !:: u en
I- i:- 0 0 c:: <.: '. en
c:: 0 c::: Ll. ..J , Ll. <.:
<! en !:: u (? c::: <! UJ <! .. ¡= ..J
.-
0.. ~ en [) >- >- ..J Z I- en u
w I. 0 0 <! <! <.: UJ 0 .. ;::¡ UJ
0 0 0.. -, 0.. 0.. en CD I- -, c::
\w
......,
FORT PIERCE COMMUNITY CENTER
,
1 position of Recreation Supervisor I
Pay Grade 9, Job Code 652
to Recreation Supervisor II
Pay Grade 10, Job Code 653
Cost $1,704
1 position of Maintenance Tech I - Temporary
Pay Grade 4, Job Code 814
to Maintenance Tech I with benefits
Pay Grade 4, Job Code 814
Cost $1,023
GOLF COURSE
Office Assistant I
Pay Grade 6, Job Code 1031
to Office Assistant III
Pay Grade 10, Job Code 1031
Cost $ 2,912
MUSEUM
Two positions of Maintenance Tech - Temporary
Pay Grade 1, Job Code 802
to Maintenance Tech
Part time with limited benefits
Pay Grade 1, Job Code 802
Cost $1,413
Page 2 of 3
N
o
o
N
.
....
cnO
0:::0
UJN
zO:::
o~
_W
cn>-
~..J
~~
~ü
o~
ÜLL.
>-O:::N
r-Og
ZLL.£::!
::Jr-~
o CIJ ..
üWW
LL.::J~
oge
eo:::~
~Ze
oo~
CCr-<!:I
>-~~
r-Ü
Z-
::J!:!::
ocn
ücn
~
W..J
-Ü
Üw
30:::
'z
t;o
r-
CIJ
o
c..
Ci)
~
Ci)
~
c
w
c
z
w
::iE
::iE
o
u
w
e::
c
w
>
o
e::
a.
a.
~
~
o
¡:::
i1i
a::
ü
LU
a::
Q
~
<;(
Ci)
~
a::
Ci:
-¡:-
Õ
E
E
o >-
<.J ....J
CD I-
f2 Z
W
CD '0::
ã:: 0::
~ ::J
Ü
~
o
¡:::
i1i
a::
ü
LU
a::
¡:.:
z
w
::iE
l-
e::
~
a.
w
o
I
~i
~i
~~
o ~;
I-
U
~
a.
~
I-
W
~
C
::J
c:J
0) "'"
- 0
(') t-..
~ ..:
.....
a::
o
Ci)
s:
a::
LU
§S
Ci)
~
o
¡:::
i1i
a::
<.J
LU
a::
¡e
C\Ï
co
C\
,-
(')
(') 0
~ -- ,.....
t-..
c:)
(')
co
0'
C\
~
a::
o
Ci)
s:
a::
LU
Q
:::J
Ci)
~
o
¡:::
i1i
a::
ü
LU
a::
o co co
_ co 0)
t-.. (') 0
r-.: 0' co'
C\ _ C'o'
~ ~ .....
If)
t-..
.,¡.
.....
r--..
0)'
'"
~
C\
LO 0)
CD
C")
C")
R
CD
0)-
-
~
W
...J
!::
I-
Z
o
E
(/)
o
a.
w ù.i
w c ~ (/)
C <1: Z I-
o e:: <1: ~ ü:
u ~ e:: <1: w
~ ~ ~ :;t if¡
...., a. a. U) III
IE
~ I~
I- ,
0,
I-
I
!i Q
~
ü
ü:
¡::
U)
::J
-,
.....,
~1:::
~tl:
.....
C) CD ui
.... .s::: C)
Q)-~
4::âj~
~-,Q
L.... ~ ëi5
C) 0 c::
ì:: .f/) 0
Q)~o..
Ü Q) ~
:::...,0......
~::J..Q
c: CI) .0
::JQ)..:::'
E: F ~
E:r-:;::
o . c:
ü"tJQ)
..:.::c:J;2
~ ¡g CD
'" ¡;;; ::.
Q. E: C!J
c:o.s:::
aU..:.::
U .- ....
c: .::: (1J
:.::Jc:Q
Q) 0 c:
--~o
~ Q) Ü
tt; o...s
....."tJ-J
(1Jc:.....
..s::: 0 (1J
.....u_
Cl)Q)-;:
(1J CI) 0
CD cu CI)
.s::: '-
E: ..... è
(1J CI) cu
CI) (1J 0..
Q):::::-65
:S (1J
cu.....cu
.Qo:S
"tJ ..s"tJ
:¡_c:
o :: (1J
.s::: 0 ....
CI) CI) cu
c: .~ ì::
.2 Q) ,o.¿
..... 0.. '-'
~ 65 ~
Q "ë;:
CI) c: ::J
~2E
..... (1J E
tt;~o
O)uü
c: cu cu
~a::~
(1J (1J Q)
ù5 .:2 èt
o
o
r--..
6
o
o
C\
-
If)
.0
-
C\
r--..
,
....
o
o
:i:I:
I-
~
:::J
o
Ü
ü
<;(
If)
C")
o
,
C\
o
ü
a::
,
~
a
w
c::
U)
U)
~
...J
U
W
e::
.
N
o
o
N
I
.....
enO
o::~
UJo::
Z<2:
OUJ
en>-
en..J
:¡:<2:
:¡:U
O~
uu..
>-O::N
I-oe
zu..~
:JI-"<t
oen
UUJUJ
u..:J1-
oß~
00::<2:
~zo
ooZ
_LU
[DI-e"
>-<2:<2:
I-U
Zu..
:Jen
Of/)
U<2:
UJ..J
uU
:JUJ
..JCt::
'z
~o
I-
en
o
c.
"
.
1'1
',.
J:-
c
i
,..,¡{
"-IE
IJ.J.,
C/J ~.
~!f
IJ.J ,.
0::[
~
i~
~ a.
~ ~
~
~. t¡j
... 0'\
o !;;,~.': v
~.IV Cl
~ ª
~"
v;
~
"
~
~
V;$;
IJ.J "
:>-:~
"
J:"
~,
t
"
'"
;
;>
~
~
'i
'if Cl
.~ ~
(/)
UJ
::)
- 0
, UJ
.. ""
~. .....
o T
~ I
~?
Cl.!.'
~!
~~
-~
ü~
.?;o"
"ë: ;:.
::J :?
E 1:
E ~
8·f
6 >-
8f, ...J
~ t ~
i5.:1:UJ
'1::::'OC
~í~
--~ü
::2:j,
Q ~
I-!r
l5 ~'
0:: ~.
üt
l.U~
0::'::
i
..
o
UJ
o
z
UJ
~
~
o
u
w
oc
::2:
o
¡::
lfj
0::
Ü
IJ.J
0::
a
::2:
"::(
v;
::.::
0::
Ci:
~
z
w
~
I-
oc
<
Cl.
W
o
~l
z'
0:'
(j)'
~
0'
f:2
_ ffi
:!:: ~
Ü CD
~ a
l.U ~ .....-
o .- .....
::2:~~"t~
~ ~ <:::>
~ Š
~ l.U
~~
I-
0::
Ci:
-.::
5 a. 5
~ ~ -:
IJ.J~ ~
ü IJ.J "I" r-..
::2: ~ ..... "t r-..
~¡::<o C
~ b: ~
::2:Ci:
~
-
Lù
...J
I-
¡:::
Z
o
E
(/)
o
Cl.
Ü,j Ü,j
w 0 ø
o ë2 Z
8 ø ë2
tX) >- >-
0«
...., a. Cl.
Q '"
~ C'\
Q
Q
Q
c-.i
'"
C'\
¡;
;¡
l
~
~
0) .,.... C ~
r-.. <0 co;'
"""'" 0') ...... ff1
oy--- ~ ('1')' i-
z;~ Z;!
~
..
~
~
·
Q
Q
(Ò
'"
"I"
r-..-
i.'¡.
R! ~
..... Q)
..... ~
.....
i.'¡.
·õ.::
~
~ ~:
Q!¡
"r- ~~
~ ~~;
~.
~
f~
:'1;'
~
~~;
;;
l
~
~
~~
?
:r
.~
~.
·
~~
ft,
....~
co, ..
.....~
s
N" :-:
~~
;»;
~.
..
t:
"
~;
,
t
~"-
:c
ý,
¡
..
J.
Ž:
'"
~..
!:
~
':
~.
;,
;¡
~:
t.
't
f.
.
.,.,
~ ~ ~-
a= ü: .:.¡¡
.A W < ,.
:ïZI-~
< w 9 i
(/) OJ ....,'
10
.....
,...;
i.'¡.
,
,",
:~.
"",
en
c::
¡~
E
~-o
-0 en c::
c:: 2 c¡¡
~ Q.-
Q) Q) ....
Q) -c:: ~
~ -;.~
-0 CI) Q)
~c¡¡§-
.....~CI)
..c:: (,,)
.Q3.t:: '::::::.--
c::;--
.... ..... ....
..2::::~
-0 ~.~
Q) CI) Q)
-OQ)Q.
Q) - ;:¡
Q).QCI)
c:: c¡¡
CI) c:: Cö
~- Q) '-
Q) 0 r::::
en~ 0
~cc:=:;
a> -0 c¡¡
:::.- (,,)
o ;:¡ 0
(,,)0-
r:::: ~ .S:2
a>r:::::S
..c::0.....
~ f2 co
CI) Q) CI)
Q) Q. Q)
-S-Q)
-oco:::""
Q)c.Q
..c::.Q Q.
(,,):::: E
CI) -0 a>
....-0
co co a>
- E
;:¡ .S:2 ._
en,.r:::: .....
~¡....::::::
.2
en..:C"')
.S a>
~c:~
o Q) r::::
~ (,,) 0
r::::~~
a>'- co
Q) c::
.Q ;:¡ ~
Q) E Q)
:::.E¡-r::::
c¡¡0r-
..c::(,,)
CI) .CI) cri
~ {; ê
:::......... a>
o co :::.
õ.. -S:2 ~
E co
a>c:~
0-;::-
~ ¡u ....
...." E .~
~ CI) en-O
o .~ C 0
/"""I -"_ ~
....'- en ~,
E'~ r:::: ;:¡
a> 't3 ï:: C,,)
¡"::'CO.QCö
"
.'
:~
).
n
~
~
~
·
..
Z
o ,
¡:::
<
~
LL
¡::
(/)
::)
....,
....",
Q
¡:;:
,
Q
Q
Q
'"
.....
10
,
10
-
~
,
-
Q
Q
it
I-
::2:
::;)
o
o
ü
"::(
<0
'"
Q
N
Q
Ü
0::
,
:j;
o
w
oc
en
en
<
...J
U
W
oc
.
N
o
o
N
I
.....
enO
c::r:~
Wc::r:
z«
Qw
en>-
~-I
:E«
:E(.)
O~
()u..
>-c::r:
1-0
Zu..
:JI-
oen
()W
u..:J
0°
OW
c::r:c::r:
«Z
00
tal-
>-«
1-(.)
Zu..
:J-
Oen
()~
W-I
-()
(.)W
3c::r:
'z
t;o
I-
en
o
a.
.
.....
,
I
I
a
lJ.J
(¡J
S;
lJ.J
0::
~
a':
lJ.J "
~,
>,
~ .'
" I-
,:',"Ü
,<I:
/ ~
I.,
i: tü
01 C>
~I §
IX)
o
~
I
I
(¡J
~
(¡J
~
.j-
.'"
;
,
ë
w
o
z
w
:¡:
:¡:
o
Ü
w
a::
'0
W
I-
,(/)
,~ w
'. Õ
.: w
a::
ë..
w
>
o "
a::
a.. ~,
a.
<;;
~
$"
'9'
~
o
¡::
US
0::
()
lJ.J
0::
a
~
~
(¡J
~
0::
ö:
UJ ,.
ü _
~,
~: ~
~!. ~
~I'··,', ~
~'a::
<: 1< ::I
UJ Ü
(¡J-
0::,
51
Ü ,"
l.L
-J
o
(!) ,
,
~
z
w
:¡:
I-
a::
q:
a.
w
o
..
z
o
(/)
~
o
-
-
-
I-
~
~
(¡J
ëì)
(¡J
~
UJ
ü
G::
l.L
o
~
C\
"-
e)
>-
.,... -J
CO') <:> 0::
<:> .,... :::J
.... 0
::r:
-
I-
~
~
(¡J
ëìj
CI)
~
UJ
ü
G::
l.L
o
~
....
co
r-.:
>-
.... -J
CO') ~ 0::
<:> :::J
.,... 0
:t
'w
...J
I-
¡:::
Z
o
t:
(/)
o
a.
'<t co C'o ,
"- CO') .....
'<t '<t 0')
C\" ~ C'o'
~ ~
.:
.'
.
::
I:
I;'
I
1
,
I
,',
,
~ .
<0 0') It) f.
~ ~ ;:!:.
..... ...... C\- (0)' ".
~ ..... ~ .....
~ ~ io'."
.....
I:
,
I-
~
~
o
~
.,... .,...
"- CO')
..: <0
co <:> .,...-
<:>C\~
C'\Ì cr)'
..... ~
I-
~
~
o
~
ü.i w
ü.i 0 C> (/)
o q: Z >= I-
o a:: <I: a:: ü:
ü c> a:: q: w
CD >- >- ...J Z
o <I: q: <I: W
..., a. a. (/) CD
~~
"
.'ò:
:i;
N~
~~Q~
~ i~
.,.. il
" Z
o
':, ¡:::
.', <I:
! Ü
.:..¡ '." ü:
q:, ¡:::
I- (/)
o ::I
I- ...,
'...
i
I
I'
,
I
I·
.
.
~
o
E:
J:::
l>
;:¡
E:
<J)
~
'E
()
c::
g
.¡;;
o
~
()
£
(ïj
£
<J)
;:¡
o
':;:
.Q
o CI)
.!,2 .9.:1
- '5
'- "0
()- -
f:2
;:¡ ~
o 0
;; O¡
o .c::
(!) ê
~ .g
c:: ()
::s ~
e .!,2
e>-
'Cõ ~
l.L 0
êt3 1:
c:: ~
o ....
'- ::s
.¡;; l>
o ()
~¡::
,!,2
J::: .
;:: c::
o .0
~1
:ã ~
.¡;; "0
c:: .Q
o .~
~-
~ 1:
(\
() (¡j
:S "ë.;
O¡ <J)
.c:: ~
.t: ()
¡¿ l>
(\ ¡¡::
~ 0
~ :5
.... c::
..ê (\
~ £
-'~
,
"
:
':
I'·
:':
,
,
..
~
Q) <:>
:S .....
..... m
-E c::
~~
:Q 8.
.¡;;
c:: -
o -
~ ~
2: ~
"0 '"
c:: '"
(\ ~
'" Q)
,9.:1 .g
- =
.g 0
O¡ c::
c:: (\
:.;:;; 0
<J) -
')( "0
() .¡g
£5 .~
(\
J::: 15
.~ ~
() ()
·s .Q
:§ t::
Q) ,2
-g .¡;;
..... 0
O¡~
~ .!,2
~:S
~ 15
<1J :S
c:: O¡
·2 'S
15 (¡)
l> Q)
t;:: ::s
.¡;; c-
~ ~
~ .~
c:: Q)
.2 f:2
- ::s
.9- 0 Q)
t5ü"O
tI) ....... ~
~ õ ~
.Q (!) <1J
o () ~
...... J::: ()
() - £
J::: .....-
- cc a
æ~E:
..>::: (\ 0
.2 ~ ~
1:: t;:: .Q
¡g ~!5
Q) 'E
c:: 0 ~
<1J l> 0
.s §-.g
..
""'"
<:>
<:>
"-
,
<:>
<:>
<:>
CO')
.,...
It)
6
LO
C\
"-
,
co
....
"t'
:i:t:
I-
Z
::I
o
Ü
ü
~
0)
CO')
c\,
<:>
ü
0::
:i:t:
o
w
a::
(/)
(/)
q:
...J
Ü
W
a::
.
IN
o
o
IN
I
......
mO
a:::~
wa:::
z~
Ow
en>-
m...J
:E~
:Eu
Om
uu.
>-a:::~
1-0-
zu.~
:JI-'<t
om
uww
u.:J1-
OCJ~
wO
oa:::~
~zo
OO~
ccl-~
>-~~
I-U
Zu.
:Jen
Om
u~
w...J
uU
:Jw
...Ja:::
·z
~o
I-
en
o
a..
. ,
-
I
'~
~'
[¡J Ij:
CI) _
5;'
UJ
0::
I-
~ ~
:::
I-
UJ
o ~
~,', g
CIJ
~
.:'
','
'.
CI)
~
CI) :~
UJ1:
>-£
M
;~.
~;,
~
"'
o
UJ
o
z
UJ
:::
:::
o
u
UJ
a:
o
'UJ
I-
,,' en
UJ
:J
k,O
I> ~
o
UJ
>
o
a:
a. "
a.,
<1:'
-
....
~
~
o
¡::
ù5
0::
Ü
UJ
0::
a
~
«
CI)
::x:
0::
~
:¿'
::J ,>.
UJ~
CI)
::J
:¿
¡:.:
z
UJ
:::
I-
a:
<I:
a.
UJ
o
z
o
en
:>
o
~
u:
UJ
J:: ~
Ü UJ
¡:: ~
t3¡::
<:~~...
~ ~ co
¡::$
<: UJ
~ ~
I-
0::
~
,,'
-¡:
J:: ::>
Ü Q 0
¡:: :¿ ::
UJ ¡:: .3
ü UJ C\, '<:t
<::¿o....C\,
~ ¡:: co 0)
UJI- ~
I- 0:: .,;.
<:~ 0)
~ ~
,
>-
..J
I-
Z
t LlJ
a:
" a:
¡: ::J
~, Ü
.'
ü.i
...J
I-
¡::
Z
o
t:
en
o
a..
"
o co
~ "I-
co
~
<0 C\,
<0 "I-
C\, <0
0')" "'<:'-..
~ ~
-¡:
::>
o
..c::
...
'.3
'<:t
C\
0)
~
'<:t
0)
IÒ
~
c.o ~ ,.-.;
~ ~ ~::
0)' ~ 0-:'
~ .....:,
~L
.'
ü.i w
ü.i C C) en
g~~~æ
ü C) a: <I: W
CIJ >- >- ...J z
o <I: <I: <I: UJ
..., a.. a.. en CIJ
J'
cot
"I- ,;
co '.
Wt).''';;
c
G:
co..
c...
~~
0" ;€
~t
:
"
c:'
:2
'b
"t:J Q)
(tJ E
c::';::;
~2
~ 0
:J ~
0_
-;~
:::. c:
'61 0
"t:J ~
c: (tJ
(tJ Q)
~ C3
Ji¡::
~
-OJ
J¿ ,S
.~ E
- :J
CI) CI)
(tJ c:
Q) 0
~ u
Q)
~ E
Q:;::
-è
-e Q)
(tJ :::.
~ .~
.2..t:::
u
Q) '-
E~
o
u c:-
Q) 0
::::..:=:
(tJ U
..c~
~õ
Q) U
Q) _CI)
è: E
:J :J
- Q)
o CI)
:::. :J
C3~
~ Q)
~:SE
tièª
(tJ 0 CI)
Q)-:J
~á3:¿
(ij :::. Q)
I.;. c: ....
Q) "- :::::
:::. 0_
Q) - (tJ
CI) CI) CI)
- Q) c:
CJ) :J 0
(tJ c: ._
-"- -
Q) è: 'ëï¡
..t::: 0 0
- u Q.
Q3::::::::
:::. (tJ (tJ
O"¿;j"¿;j
.-
~
'",
.'
"
::,
':
.'
I:.
(-
..;
~
-
,
,
"
,:
..
..
i:
>'
;~
.'
~,
,
I
-
';.~
..
:t
,
,
I
I'
z
o
¡::
<I:
~
u.
¡::
(f)
:J
...,
:
.:.ï
<I:
I-
o
I-
,
o
o
"-
,
o
o
o
("')
...
I()
6
...
0)
"-
.
...
o
o
:ii
I-
~
::J
o
Ü
ü
«
C\,
("')
o
,
C\,
o
Ü
0::
,
:j¡;
o
W
a:
en
(f)
<I:
...J
Ü
UJ
a:
~
'-'
AGENDA REQUEST
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Mosquito Control District
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND:
FUNDS AVAIL. :
PREVIOUS ACTION:
RECOMMENDATION:
COMMISSION ACTION:
[ X]
[ ]
APPROVED
OTHER:
. C.9""ty Attorney:
'-óriginating Dept:
Finance:
..""
ITEM NO. C-g
DATE: March 26, 2002
CONSENT [X]
REGULAR [
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
Leg. [ 1 Quasi-JD.
PRESENTED BY:
Jim David
Director
Authorize the Board of County Commissioners to approve the sub~itt~l
of a grant application to Florida Inland Navigation District a"d
approve Resolution 02-91 for Assistance Under the Florid~ Inla"d
Navigation District ¡'laterwa:ys Assistance Program. In addition,
authorize the Chair to sign the grant application and the Interloc~l
Agreement authorizing the Mosquito Control District to aQ"inister
the Florida Inland Navigation District Grant.
The Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND) funds projects from
shoreline stabilization to environmental education programs ê.nd
facilities. The proposed grant application is for $50,000 to assist
with the construction of an observation tower I outdoor classroom
and fishing pier at Vitolo Family (Middle Cove) Park - Riverside,
located approximately 4.5 miles south of the Ft. Pierce Inlet on
South Hutchinson Island. Purchased with Florida Communities Trust
and St. Lucie County Environmentally Sensitive Lands Bond funàs,
this 107-acre park also provides hiking trails along the Indi~n
River Lagoon for school groups and visitors. The proposed projec~
also fulfills educational and access commitments made from t~,e
County to the Department of Community Affairs in a Florid~
Communities Trust application and agreement (Project # 95-0ó5-P5Eì.
Matching funds will come from Florida Department of Co:¡mmnity
Affairs Coastal Management Program (CMP). Ranked third in the
state, the CMP application for Vitolo Family (Middle Cove) Park will
receive funding and grant contracts should be signed in May. Indi~n
River Lagoon License Plate funding of $16,816 will also be a ~atch.
The Board approved submitting the grant application for access
improvement for Middle Cove Park on September 25, 2001.
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve -,"=
submittal of a grant application to FIND and approve Resolution 02-
91 for Assistance Under the Florida Inland ,Navigation District
Waterways Assistance Program. In addition, authorize the Chair ~o
sign the grant application and the Interlocal Agreement authoriziDg
the District to administer the FIND grant.
gl sAnderson
u y Administrator
coordination/Si~ures
Mgt & BUdget:.c}W!i ~ &] Purchasing:
Public Works: Other:
DENIED
'-'
....,¡
ATTACHMENT E-6
RESOLUTION FOR ASSISTANCE #02-91
UNDER THE FLORIDA INLAND NAVIGATION DISTRICT
WATERWAYS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
WHEREAS, THE St. Lucie County BOCC is interested in carrying out the
(Name of Agency)
following described project for the enjoyment of the citizenry of St. Lucie Co un ty
and the State of Florida:
Project Title Vitolo Family Park at Middle Cove - Public/ADA Access
Total Estimated Cost $ 113, 716. 0 0
Enhancement
Brief Description of Project: Construction of an Outdoor Environmental
Meeting Area / 2-Story Observation Tower, Two Observation Platforms,
a Fishing pier and Purchase and Installation of a Web Carn.
AND, Florida Inland Navigation District financial assistance is required for the program
mentioned above,
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the St. Lucie County Board of County
~ameofAgenry) Commissioners
that the project described above be authorized,
AND, be it further resolved that said St. Lucie County BOCC
~ame of Agency)
make application to the Florida Inland Navigation District in the amount of 44
% of the
actual cost of the project in behalf of said St. Lucie County BOCC
~ame of Agenry)
AND,beitfurtherresolvedbythe St. Lucie County BOCC
~ame of Agenry)
that it certifies to the following:
1. That it will accept the tenns and conditions set forth in FIND Rule 66B-2
F.A.C. and which will be a part of the Project Agreement for any assistance awarded under
the attached proposal.
2. That it is in complete accord with the attached proposal and that it will carry out
the Program in the manner described in the proposal and any plans and specifications attached
thereto unless prior approval for any change has been received from the District.
FonnNo.90-11 (Rev. 10-14-92)
(1)
'-'
~
3. That it has the ability and intention to fmance its share of the cost of the project
and that the project will be operated and maintained at the expense of said St. Lucie County
Board of County Commissioners
(Name of Agency)
for public use.
4. That it will not discriminate against any person on the basis of race, color or
national origin in the use of any property or facility acquired or developed pursuant to this
proposal, and shall comply with the terms and intent ofthe Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, P. 1. 88-352 (1964) and design and construct an facilities to comply fully with statutes
relating to accessibility by handicapped persons as wen as other federal, state and local
laws, rules and requirements.
5. That it will maintain adequate financial records on the proposed project to
substantiate claims for reimbursement.
6. That it will make available to FIND if requested, a post-audit of expenses
incurred on the project prior to, or in conjunction with, request for the final 10% of the
funding agreed to by FIND.
This is to certify that the foregòing is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly and
legally adopted by the St. Lucie County BOCC
at a legal meeting
held on this 26th day of March
2002.
Attest
Signature
Title
Title
Form No. 90-11 (Rev. 10-14-92)
(2)
'-'
~
ATTACHMENT E-3
PROJECT INFORMATION
Total Proj ect Cost: $ 113 , 716
FIND Assistance Requested: $ 50, 000
Assistance % oftotal cost 44%
Amount and Source of Applicants Matching Funds:·" Indian River Lagoon License Plate
FY 02 - $16,816; Florida Coastal Management Program - $34,900; St. Lucie
County Mosquito Control District-$12jOOO (upfront permitting / design cost)
Other Assistance applied for (name of program and amount) n/ a
Ownership of Project Site (check one):
Own X
Leased
Other
Ifleased, please describe lessor term and conditions:
"
Project type (check one, or more of the following proj eet elements that are part of your proj ect).
. -
Public navigation channel dredging
Public navigation aids and markers
Public boat ramps and launching facilities
Public boat docking and mooring facilities
Public shoreline stabilization
Inlet management
Waterway signs and t>:uoys for safety, regulation or infonnation
Public spoil 'disposal site development
Waterways related environmental education programs and facilities
Public fishing and viewing piers
Public waterfront boardwalks
Waterways boating safety programs and equipment
Beach renourishment
Other waterway related projects
X
Permits Required:
A~encY
Yes No N/A
Date Applied For
Date Received
WMD
DEP
ACOE
COUNTY/CITY
Other
Yes Minor structure
vp.~ Minor Structure
Form No. 90-22a (New 10-14-92, Rev.OS-OO.)
'-"
...,./
ATTACHMENT E-l
WATERWAYS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
PROJECT APPLICATION
APPLICANT INFORMATION - PROJECT SUMMARY
Applicant: St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners
Project TitIe: vitolo Family Park at Middle Cove - Public/ADA Access Enhancement
Liaison Agent: Contact Person: Jim David. st. Lucie Mosquito Control District
Title: Director of st. Lucie County Mosquito Control District
Address: 2300 Virginia Ave. Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982
ZIp Code: 34982
Telephone: 561/462-1686
FAX: 561/462-1565
, I hereby certify that the information provided in this application is true and accurate.
Signature:
Date:
PROJECT SUMMARY NARRATIVE (please summarize the project in 2 paragraphs or less.)
Middle Cove Park is a 107-acre marsh area surrounded on the western side
by an earthen perimeter spoil berm approximatelv 30 feet in width. The
berm has been stabilized with a hikinq and bicycle path. The marsh is
part of a series of contiguous mangrove 'swamps located on the east shore
of a back barrier island on the Indian River Laqoon. The ecosystem
includes hiqh salt-marsh species. manqrove swamp. and AlA frin<;¡inç¡
tropical hanunock uplands. Dolphin, manatee, -jumpinq mullet. and over
eighteen wadinq bird species. ospreys. and shore birds can be observed
from the site. The purpose of this project is to provide improved
environmental educational facilities and access to the Park.
If funded, FIND grant monies will:be matched with dollars from the
Florida Department of Community Affairs Coastal Management Proqram,
Indian River Lagoon License Plate FY02 Proqram, and st. Lucie Countv
Mosquito Control District to construct a two-storv observation tower. the
first story platform of which will additionally be used as an outdoor
classroom or meeting area. Funds will also be used to construct two
observation platforms and an observation/fishing pier. A WebCam will
also be purchased and installed for ADA access and educational purposes.
Form No. 90-22
New 10/14/92, Rev.8/24/00.
\r
..,
Scale: 1 II - 750'
Middle
Cove
River
Legend
· Picnic area m.,.~J'Ä Bike rack
· Trash can = Dike walkover
 Sign 11 Aerator station
· Fishing platform Gate
II Rest area I- Fishing dock
Indian
Lagoon
~
~
.!f).
Dual pump & aerator station
(existing)
Dual pump & aerator station
(proposed)
Combination dike walkover
picnic area
educational site
Mosquito
impoundment bcundary
Indian
Atlantic
River
Ocean
Lagoon
N
+
5Þ~,A;~
._, '~ ~~2'-:;-~'7?~
roximate.
'-'
....I
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
"Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home"
JEB BUSH
Governor
STEVEN M. SEIBERT
Secretary
January 16, 2002
Ms. Jody Rosier Bonet, Grants Writer
St. Lucie County
2300Virginia Avenue
Fort Pierce, Florida 34982
RE: Florida Coastal Management Program - Coasta'l Partnerships Initiative FY 2002-2003
Project Applications
Dear Ms. Bonet:
Enclosed for your information is a copy of the "Notice of Application Evaluation Scoring and
Intent to Award" for Fiscal Year 2002-2003 applications submitted to the Florida Coastal Management
. Program's Coastal Partnerships Initiative.
As required by Rule 9M-l, Florida Administrative Code, an evaluation committee consisting of
five members reviewed all the applications and evaluated and scored them according to the criteria
established in the rule. The enclosed notice identifies all applications within each initiative category, the
score received by each application, and the ranking of the applications within each initiative category
based upon the scores.
Rule 9M -1 requires that the scores and rankings of applications be published in the Florida
Administrative Weekly. Any person whose substantial interests are affected may request a hearing
pursuant to Sectjon 120.57, Florida Statutes, within 21 days of publication of the notice. Failure to
request a hearing within the applicable time period shall constitute a waiver of the right to a hearing. The
Notice of Application Evaluation Scoring and Intent to Award has been submitted to the Florida
Administrative Weekly for publication on Friday, February 1,2002.
If you have any questions, please contact me at the Florida Coastal Management Program,
Department of Community Affairs, 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100,
telephone (850) 414-6562,
Sincerely,
~~
L. Christine McCay, ~tal Administrator
Florida Coastal Management Program
cc:
I
¡.~: 1 R is r-;
.,"~" n ." F2 D,
-,,; ~!nl
J1AN ,'/'I{
r¡ 2 5 ~-~-'fi! i
.:~ '0.... ! : L' ; ;
- "~ J'
2555 S HUM A R D 0 A K B 0 U LEV A RD· TAL LA HAS SEE. F L 0 ·RTtJA-3-2.3~ - 21 00- ¡
Phon e: (850) 488-846 61S U ncom 278-8466 FAX: (850) 921-07 81/Su'l)corn 29,1-..P.T81---! I
Internet address: http:{{www.dca.state.fl.us---~ '. ',.J-,c:;,~= :
--- " .
HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOI'.MENT
..~~= ~"'''~~r~ '-"_1.. ~_,I~~.....I -.
fcm
Don McLan, Central Services Project Manager
Enclosure
CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIELO OFFICE
CO~~UNrTY P!-A"i!HN.G
~~~~GENCy' ,!~~~~!",~~
""
..".,
NOTICE OF APPLICATION EVALUATION SCORING
AND INTENT TO AWARD
FLORIDA COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2002-2003: COASTAL PARTNERSHIPS INITIATIVE APPLICATIONS
All eligible applications were evaluated by the Evaluation Committee using only the information
included in each application and according to the evaluation criteria listed in Rule 9M-1, Florida
Administrative Code. Each application was evaluated within the initiative category in which it
was submitted. WITHIN EACH INITlA TIVE CATEGORY, the listing shows the total number
of points awarded to each application (which is the sum of all five individual evaluators' scores)
and the ranking of each project.
At the time of this notice and posting of scores, the amount of funding available for application
awards is unknown. The Florida Coastal Management Program is usually notified of the total
amount of its coastal management funding in March by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration. The actual total amount of money available and the amount of funding
determined to be appropriate for each project will affect the specific number of proposals that
can be funded. However, no projects scoring less than 2~0 points will be awarded funding. This
is based on a minimum of 50 points awarded by an individual evaluator multiplied by five
evaluators. As specified in Rule 9M -1, F .A.C., 25% of available funding (when the amount is
known) will initially be directed to each initiative category. Projects will be funded in order of
score and rank, based upon availability of funding, and subject to final approval by the National
. Oceanic and Atmospheric Administ~ation.
Coastal Partnerships Initiative FY 2002-2003
Proposal Identification Numbers
Numberin2: Key
Remarkable Coastal Places -
Community Stewardship -
100s
200s
Access to Coastal Resources -300s
Working Waterfronts - 400s
Proiect Number and Title Submitted Bv I Total Pts. Rank
101: Indian River LagQon Scenic St. Lucie County 308 2
Highway Designation
102: River to Sea Preserve at Flagler County 1344 1
Marineland
201: Resource Ranger Club West Florida RPC/Escambia County 313 2
202: Wetlands Model Demonstration, a Bay Area Resource 286 3
Middle School Outreach Program Council/Escambia County
,
203: Florida Keys GreenS\veep Nature Conservancy/Monroe County 336 1
2002/2003
204: Sea Turtle Educational Materials Palm Beach County 1271 4
30 I: Shoreside Park Parking and Town of Palm Shores 327 2
Handicapped Accessibility and Repairs
302: Inlet Park Recreational Town of Palm Beach Shores 218 below
Enhancement Planning minimum
"'"',
""
--'
303: Venice South Beach Pier/Parking/ City of Venice 296 tie 6/7
Beach Access
304: Island City Park Preserve Public City of Wilton Manors 269 12
Access Improvements
305: Town Center Boardwalk Planning City ofFort Orange 270 11
306: South Causeway Island Picnic St. Lucie County 275 9
Pavilions
307: Middle Cove Park Fishing/ St. Lucie County 314 3 *~ *:
Observation Pier
308: Olde Eau Gallie Riverfront Pier City of Melbourne 265 13
Enhancement
309: Pleasant Oceanside Beach City of Deerfield Beach 297 5
Renovations ,
310: Chapman Field Park General Plan Miami-Dade Countÿ, 299 4
311: Smokehouse Bay Bridge Pedestrian City of Marco Island 256 15
Underpass
312: Ais Lagoon House Shoreline City of Palm Bay 342 1
Stabilization
-
313: Cónstruct Up to Three Public Okaloosa County 285 8 '
Access Structures over Dunes on
Okaloosa Island
314: Public Beach Access Improvement Town of North Redington Beach 272 10
Program
315: One Mile Wonder Walks City of Mexico Beach 296 tie 6/7
316: Riverwalk Boan~walk Expansion City of Port St. Lucie 257 14
Program
317: Proposed Analysis of Maule Lake's City of North Miami Beach 244 below
Shoreline and Public RÏI!ht-of-Wavs minimum
40 I: Manatee Pocket Walk - Phase I Martin County 332 2
Construction '
402: Panacea Visitors Center Project Wakulla County 369 1 ,
403: Eau Gallie Riverfront Areas Master City of Melbourne 307 4
Plan
404: Dinner Key Restrooms Renovation City of Miami 215 below
minimum
405: Daytona Beach Working Daytona Beach Partnership 311 3
Waterfronts Initiative
~
:...:.~
'...,¡
2002-2003 SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEi\fEi'iT DISTRICT
FUNDING APPLICA TION FORlyI
1~Y£S,211
AppI1cation No: IRL - 02
(District to provide)
The undersigned Applicant, has read all of the tenns and conditions of the Indian River Laaoon
License Plate Funding Program Guidelines And Application, and certifies that aU ot the
information contained within this Application and subsequent Attachments and Exhibits is true
and correct to the best of its knowledge.
Applicant's Legal Name (Organization Name):
Saint Lucie County Mosquito Control District
Contact Person:
James R. David ,
Applicant's Address:
3150 Will Fee Rd., Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982
Telephone Number: ( 561 ) 462 - 1686 Pax. Number: ( 551) 426 - 1565
Type of O!:.[anization: Date of Incorporation:
, @overnmerít~ Not-far-profit State of Incorporation:
FEID Number: 59-6000835
Project Location (county): &.lucie) Martin and/or hIm Beach
-
Project Title:
Mosquito Impoundment Restoration, Public Access! Awareness .
Brief Project Description:
Improve Water Quality to 500 acres of mangrove swamp habitat and increase
public access to the Indian River Lagoon
Attachments:- Please attach information to address each of the items listed below:
1) Describe the project goal(s) and how the goal(s) will be accomplished, Include appropriate drawings.
Submittals for habitat restoration and storrnwater retrofit projects must include p!~ view and cross section(s)
drawings. If planting is part of the project, a planting plan must also be submitted.
2) Provide a project location description and attach a location map. If more than one COWlty will benefit from
your project, explain the multiple county benefits, If your project is located in the watershed, please clearly
explain the benefits to the receiving water body.
3) Explain the expected habitat restoration, water quality, and/or environmental education benefits of the
proposed project.
4) Provide a project schedule and justification for being able to meet the project schedule. All projects
must be completed within one year of execution of the funding program Agreement.
Funding Requested Per County:
St. Lucie $56,816 Martin $ Palm Beach S Total $ 56,816
Page 1 of 2
~S241
14
"'-'
~----'
~
*C
Cost Breakdown and Schedule
Task Descriptisn License Plate Cost-share Cost-Share Expected
Funding Funding Source Completion
Amount Amount Date
Pump Station/New Pump¡s 20,000 73,273 I noaa/slcmcd I 05/15/03
New
Convert Pump Sta/Pumf 20,000 3,000 slemed 05/15/03
,
Outlook/Fishing Pier 10,500 30,000 I deal slcmed 05/15/03
Web Cam 6,316 2,000 slemed 05/15/03
I - I
Regulatory Approvals: Are any regulatory approvals needed for the proposed project?
~ No If yes, please fill in the table below:
-
Approval
Agency Type of Received? Expiration Comments
Approval Date
Yes No
FDEP/ ACOE I Std Gen Permit X 11/15/06 I Pump Stations
FDEP/ ACOE Minor Structure X I Outlook/Fish Pier
I I I
I I I
I
Authorized Person's Name: James R. David
s¡gn,O%:!þ:: ~ jþ:/ Title: ])redo-r-
PrintN . Jõ.ttttt5 ¡2 f)Æ-Ut!J Print Title: /)/ ,-..e..c--h-r
Remember to complete and attach Exhibit "An
Page20f2
~$~2~
15
--
...""
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this _ day of ,2002, by and between
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as
"County", and ST. LUCIE COUNTY MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT, a special taxing
district, hereinafter referred to as "District".
WHEREAS, the County intends to apply for a 2002-03 Waterways Assistance Program
Grant (the "Grant") from the Florida Inland Navigation District ("FIND"); and,
WHEREAS, the grant application will be entitled "Vitolo Family Park at Middle Cove _
Public /ADA Access Enhancement" and seeks grant funds for the construction of various site
improvements required under the County's Grant A ward Agreement with the Florida Communities
Trust for Middle Cove (the "Project"); and,
WHEREAS, the Project will benefit the District's land management program; and,
WHEREAS, in light of the benefits to the District's land management program, the District
is willing to assist the County in the financial and administrative responsibilities under the FIND
grant should it be awarded.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained
herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. GENERAL. This Agreement is entered into pursuant to Section 163.01, Florida
Statutes, Florida Interlocal Cooperation Act.
2. COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES. The County shall submit a 2002-03 Waterways
Assistance Program grant application to FIND for the Project. In the event the County is awarded
1-
AGENDA REQUEST
..,¡
ITEM NO.C-10-A
DATE: March 26,2002
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [X]
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY;
SUBMITTED BY; Purchasinq Department
Michael Rath, Purchasinq Director
SUBJECT: Rejection of RFP No. 02-034, Parking Garage Management
BACKGROUND: On February 27,2002 proposals were opened for the Management of the' Downtown
Parking Garage including a component to build-out two additional floors. Fifteen hundred ninety-seven
(1597) vendors were notified, twenty (20) proposal documents were distributed and one (1) proposal was
received from Paul Jacquin & Sons, Inc. The sole proposal received did not provide for the required
management component, only proposing to build the additional two stories. Therefore, this proposal was
considered non-responsive.
FUNDS AVAIL.; N/A
PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends rejection of the proposal received in response to RFP No.02-
034, Parking Garage Management.
COMMISSION ACTION:
~] APPROVED [] DENIED
[ ] OTHER:
CE:
------.,
D u nderson
o ty Administrator
County Attorney:(X)
921/
Mgt. & Budget
Originating Dept:
Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable)
Other:
Purchasing Mgr. :(X)
Other:
;vµ!-
Eft. 1/97
,""_ ·"~·'_'·_'_W"".""·~_~"'~'"_'" _~.,'
.,
AGENDA REQUEST
...J
ITEM NO. C-10-B
DATE: March 26, 2002
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ J
CONSENT [XJ
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY:
SUBMITTED BY: Purchasinq Department
Michael Rath, Purchasinq Director
SUBJECT: Award of Bid No. 02-043, Temporary and Emergency Supply and Dispensing of Gasoline and
Diesel Fuel
BACKGROUND: On March 6, 2002 bids were opened for Temporary and Emergency Supply and
Dispensing of Gasoline and Diesel Fuel for the Central Services Department. A temporary fueling
facility is required during the tank removal at the Central Services Garage. Additionally, the resulting
contract will provide emergency fueling operations in the event of an emergency or disaster, which
may render the County's facility inoperable.
Six hundred sixty-four (664) vendors were notified, forty-six (46) bid documents were distributed and one
(1) bid was received. The Central Services Department has reviewed the bid received and recommends
that the bid be awarded to the sole bidder, Holmes Oil Corp. Inc., at a discount of $.02 from the daily
pump price for both Gasoline and Diesel Fuel. Recommendation and tabulation attached.
FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds are available in the Service Garage, Gas, Oil and Grease Account No.
001-1920-552500-100.
PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends award of Bid No. 02-043, Temporary and Emergency Supply
and Dispensing of Gasoline and Diesel Fuel to the sole bidder, Holmes Oil Corp. Inc., and authorization
for the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney.
COMMISSION ACTION:
[X] APPROVED [] DENIED
[ ] OTHER:
County Attomey:(X)
'1
C;_()
{/!.J
Mgt. & Budget (X)
Purchasing Mgr.:(X)
,/")
.t.iL--
I\- ,
Originating Dept::
Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable)
Other:
Other:
Eft. 1/97
""
~
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
TABULATION SHEET - BID 02-043
TEMPORARY AND EMERGENCY SUPPLY AND DISPENSING OF GASOLINE AND
DIESEL FUEL
OPENED: MARCH 6, 2002 @ 3:30 PM
BID INFORMATION HOLMES OIL CO., INC.
FT. PIERCE, FL
DISCOUNT FROM DAIL Y PUMP PRICE $ .02 - PER GALLON
UNLEADED (87 OCTANE)
PUMP PRICE AS OF MARCH 1, 2002, $ 1.199 - PER GALLON
INCLUDING ALL TAXES
DISCOUNT FROM DAILY PUMP PRICE, $ .02 - PER GALLON
DIESEL NO.2 UNDYED
PUMP PRICE AS OF MARCH 1 2002, $ 1.229 - PER GALLON
INCLUDING ALL TAXES
NUMBER OF COMPANIES NOTIFIED*:
NUMBER OF BID DOCUMENTS DISTRIBUTED*:
635 Plus 29 local vendors
17 Plus 29 local vendors
NUMBER OF BIDS RECEIVED:
1
*per demandstar.com
~
AGENDA REQUEST
...,,¡
ITEM NO. C-10-C
DATE: March 26, 2002
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [X]
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY:
SUBMITTED BY: PurchasinQ Department
Michael Rath. Purchasinq Director
SUBJECT: Award of Bid No. 02-039, Purchase of One (1) Track Excavator (Long Reach)
BACKGROUND: On February 27, 2002 bids were opened for Purchase of One (1) Track Excavator
(Long Reach) for the Road and Bridge Division. Six hundred fifty-eight (658) vendors were notified,
twenty (20) bid documents were distributed and two (2) bids were received. The Road and Bridge
Division has reviewed the bids received and recommends that the bid be awarded to the low bidder, L. B.
Smith, Inc., with the extended warranty, for a total price of $184,225. Recommendation and tabulation
attached.
FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds are available in the Transportation Trust Fund, Road & Bridge,
Drainage, Machinery & Equipment Account No. 001-1920-552500-100.
PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends award of Bid No. 02-039, Purchase of One (1) Track Excavator
(Long Reach) to the low bidder, L. B. Smith, Inc., for a total price of $184,225.
COMMISSION ACTION:
E:
[x] APPROVED [] DENIED
[ ] OTHER:
County Attomey:(X)
!~
'( (
"I
Coordination/Siqnatures
Mgt. & Budget (X) Á.l fPlfVC1
Other:
/1
~
Purchasing Mgr.:(X) ,¿
Originating Dept::
Finance: (Check fbr Copy only, if Applicable)
Other:
Eft. 1/97
'"
'..ø'
t
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
ROAD & BRIDGE DIVISION
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Michael Rath, Purchasing Director
Scott Herring, Road and Bridge ManagerÇ1;Ø--
Ray Murankus, Drainage Operations Supervisor f(J1
March 12, 2002
VIA:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Bid 02-039
After reviewing the bid packages submitted for Bid number 02-039 (Long Reach
Track Excavator), we recommend that the low bidder, L. B. Smith Inc. be awarded
the bid.
L. B. Smith, Inc. submitted a bid of $181,200.00 for a Volvo EC240BLCR with an
extended warranty available at $3,025.00.
Nortrax Equipment Co. submitted a bid of $203,250.00 for a John Deere 230CLC
with an extended warranty available at $3,500.00.
The purchase of the Volvo EC240BLCR should include the extended warranty
available at $3,025.00 bringing the package total to $184,225.00.
Please contact me at extension 2511 should you have any questions regarding this
matter.
RTM/sb
cc: Don Pauley, Fleet Manager
Dewey Hudman, Project Manager
..
....
.. z z z
(1) c: c: c:
.. 3: 3: 3:
0- c:J c:J c:J
() m m m
3 ~ ~ ~
DI 0 0 0
:::J
0- "11 "11 "11
(II !!! c:J 0
-
DI ë 0
.. 0 3:
n en 0
0 ~ 0 "tJ
3 þ
m 0 z
0 c: m
m 3:
<: m en
m z z
!:::' -t 0
en -t
0 =ñ
(j) m
-t 0
22 . ~
c:J
c:
-t
m
~
I\)
I\) 0
Ø)
UI
00
:Ez o.
mo þ'
en::c :5m
-t-l m'
-CIJ
~~ ~š:
=i
c:Jm :J:
~D -
0c: z
x- 0
-"'0 .
~š: <
m m
z z
-I 0
0 0
0 ::c
CIJ
~ ~
N ..¡,
0 C»
W ..¡, ~
Ìt.J Ìt.J
U1 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
c.. m š:
0 0< :þ
NJ: "
Wz ~O m
0 -
00 o. š:
.m DJ< 0
·0
om 0 0
::c ::c m
m .
~ ~ =em
:þ><
W ~w ;:a-l
ÜI 0 ;:am
0 N :þz
0 U1
(:) (:) ZO
0 0 ~~
"Wi'
0 "'0"
"'0 :EC:
m -::c
z ;:a 0
m OJ:
0 »:þ
OCIJ
"T1 QOm
m DJO
DJ ::c"T1
::c -0
c: °z
:þ C)m
::c m
-
-< ..¡,
-
N -I
~..... $!
N
0 0
0 "
N
@ m
><
0 DJ
W ~ -10
C »:þ
C ~ DJ::C
"'0 cO
š: 0 ·0
::c ~"T1CIJ
-
. -0:-'
0 00.
z zc:c:
C) ClJzo
::c :J:-I¡;;
m -<
» moo
0 ~OO
:J: .š:c
- DJŠ:z
Oëñ~
oCIJ
N-
.0
Cz
wm
<Ø::c
CIJ
\.--
\.;
AGENDA REQUEST
'wi
ITEM NO. c-11L
DATE: March 26,2002
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [x ]
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY: Paul Julin
Project Manager
SUBMITTED BY(DEPT):INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE(Central Services)
SUBJECT: Approval to issue Request for Bids upon selection of qualified firms.
BACKGROUND: Through Board approval Central Services contracted Sims Wilkerson
Engineering to evaluate security needs at the Rock Road Jail. It was determined that the security
system needed complete replacement. Once this evaluation was completed we then went out for
RFQ to qualify prospective vendors. A Board approved selection committee has been appointed.
This Committee has reviewed and selected qualified vendors (please see attached). Staff would
, like to issue a Request for Bids to these qualified vendors.
FUNDS AVAIL: 316-1940-546200-1527 (maintenance Improvement project)
PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners allow staff to issue
Requestfor BIds to qualified vendors as approved by the selection committee for the replacement
of the security system at Rock Road Jail.
MISSION ACTION:
PC] APPROVED [] DENIED
[ ] OTHER:
~nderson
nty Administrator
Coordination/Sianatur..
County AttorneY~ DJ"ft.
Originating Dep .
Finance: (Check for Copy only. If Applicable)
Mgl & Budget
Purchasing Mgr.:
Jß-
Other:
Other:
Eft". 1/97
H:\A~end..-J..il RFQ.wpd.
'-'"
""'"
THE FOLLOWING VENDORS RESPONDED TO THE RFQ:
1. ALARM PAR~NERS - FT. PIERCE
2. DELMARVA SYSTEMS CORPORATION - WILMINGTON, DE
3. ENERGY ERECTORS, INC. - LEESBURG, FL
4. ESITECH SECURITY GROUP, INC. - RICHMOND, VA
5. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. - ORLANDO, FL
6. INTEGRA TED SYSTEMS INC. - SAN ANTONIO, TX
7. NORMENT SECURITY GROUP - MONTGOMERY, AL
8. SEMCO INTEGRATED SYSTEMS - JACKSONVILLE, FL
9. - SIEMENS BUILDING TECHNOLOGIE.S, INC. - MIRAMAR, FL
I PM"":" 01098 st Lucie Cou~ Jail$Ystems RFQ.dòC-"·' '::~
, =~:~~':
.~.~
. ..,~ .,-
, :.:':'~=_ Page 1~ I
Irro.
--
,
'....J
EVALUATION OF QUALDICATIONS
Part IV
4-1 EVALUATION METHOD AND CRITERIA
A. General The County shall be the lOIe judge of its own belt interests, the propaeaI, and
the resulting acceptance R8jotilltell agr18m8Rl The County reserves the rfglrt to investigate the
financial capability. reputøtion. integri4'. &kill, busin.. experience and quality of perforrnlll1ce under
similar opendions of each Propœer, includng stockholders and principals before maJclng an 8W11'd.
Awards, if any. will be based on both an objective and Slbjective comparison of Qualifications 8nd
Proposers. The County's decisions will be final.
The County's evalullllion criteria will include, but shall not be limited to, consideration of the
following:
1, Years of experience
MAX, POINTS
(1 year = 5 points) 25
2, Si~;!2r Or"jects
s. PLC System
b. CCTV System
c. Shaker Fence Detection System
d, Touch Screen Control Interface System
e. Intercom System
Reference Questionnaire
25
3
4, Company Staff
a, SSI Superintendent
b, Security control systems PLC programmer
c. Factory trained personnel (Notifier)
5, Local Vendor Partnership
6, Warranty Service
a. Within 200 miles travel distance
b, Service calls within 4 hours max.
(5 points)
(5 points)
(5 points)
(5 points)
(5 points)
(Average of responses)
15
15
(5 points)
(5 points)
(5 points)
10
10
(5 points)
(5 points)
TOTAL
100
B. Selection The Board of Coun4' Commissioners may conduct the selection process or at
the option of the Board, it may be referred to the Competitive Selection Committee (the "Committee").
Either the Board or the Committee will review all Qualifications received and establish a list of
Proposers deemed to be qualified. The minimum score to qualify based on the criteria set forth above
shall be 85 points out of a total of 100. P.lterRati'lely, tl1e iaan; FRay lIirest the CaFRFRittee tø establish a
"GRaft list" af na fe"'er than three Pra",asers withawt e&tal¡líshiRg a pRarity ar~er. The "shaft list" ¡¡hall be
&wl¡r:Rilted ta the Baard aRd the BBar~ may raRk the PrapBseFS in Brller af prefereRse, Tile CaFRmittee ar
the [¡Bard may relwest aral pre68ntatieR tram the Pfepasers 'MleA establishiRg the "'Rarity list. If three ar
fewer Ql.JalifisatiaAE are reGeived, all Pre",aGer& &11311 I¡e iRslwded iR the selestÎ9R praseæ aE dessR¡e~
~
If the list af 11Ialifielil PrBpsserE Ehalll¡e &ll¡mitted te t::¡e ¡¡aard fer appre"aL At the efiltiaA gf the
[¡Bard, either the BaarEl ar t::¡e CBmmittee &hall attempt t9 Regetiate a sSRtlrast with the mast fair,
campetitive aRd reasaRal¡le, If the CaFRFRittee ar the [¡aarEl iE wRable ta Regatiate a satisfastar:y SeRV'ast
wit::¡ tl1e fjFSt Pra",sser, RegBtiatiaRs 'Nith tl1at Prepa6er &hall I¡e teFmiRated aREI the Cammittee er tile
Bearlil mall attempt tø negaliste a saRtraGt "<itll tile Re~t FRast Iwalilied swsGe&&fu1 ¡jdller Prapaser. If
these RegatiatiaRs are Rat 6WSG86sfwl, Re!laliatiaR6 sllalll¡e tørl'Rinated \'<ith tl1e E8GaRd EWGGe&dwl ¡idller
RFQ . 02-XXX
~
12
··,·,'··....._.·".·'_·,.;..·~,'...·...ft,_", k ....",._..._~.._"-<- .,'-...__......, _ ,,___,_..,~._'_,,_.,," ,._"._. . __......,___.,
- ~ . '.~'-~'.~.,
--
CI
..
~
'-'"
...,
II 0 Naaco N~~OO ~~N.O mNooc
~i - -~- -----
-
:II !
I ~i
)1 · ..... ..... ..... .....
i~
!!- ¡ : ~ ~ II
ill t Lj1 J~ dI !
e! ~~J~ §J
I I I,I,I ~J~II II~I, i III
¡ f !J~ } j I i Ji ~ il)
.
--
I
c
!!
I!
.
Œ
.
.s
:;
..,
:;
.
~
'"
CI
.
Q.
.........'
~j ~·~oo ~~ooo. ~~~~o ~~ooo
~ --- -,~ ------
to- -
of:
I
il "'·...'00 ",~ClOCl
i
1ÐU)lI)aoQ 11)11)000
IE ..... ..... ..... .....
, -
I !
. .
=
. i
~. II:
f ~ I j
If 'I ~ t I
I jl~11 JBIII IJlfl iilll
~
,,; ,
i d II f ,II'
1)11 I I Jilf I' 18 I J,I,
l'Efti JfIJI~ JJjJif J~IJlj
.
.s
:;
.,
:;
.
Q.
....,
-
'-'
.....,
- -
o 0
..; ~ CII
o CO E ro
-g c:g c
~ ~ Æ ;@ :§ .!;;
1ü :]..... ~ Q)....CII
U 0 0 0 ~ 0
.Q:6 'UC C OC:
c æ E:2 "0 \) ·ê
~ 1:: .5 0 cis.!;; CII
"" co ...... . ...... c,
....C,co-õ) - 0><
CII>-C.Cllc: CII CCII
c:C>-~C § CII,C
[~[~~ ~ ~!
õSgc.c. ~ ~ê
C ~ \) "* ã! ã! .~ 6
~.Q~õ..~ C B.~ui
.-.-_E_ ~ J!!Q.t)
"O°õ8.... .... \)>.0)
.~ ECII 0) CII> ~......~ ..; ~ ..; .!J:!, æ 'õ'
- _ E ._ 0 CII ~ CII 0 c,....
..'" c:oc:;o..û)
B=:g~z1äz1äCII:::~
äi .!!! û) L- ]j a. û) Co (.) 0 :rš
'C .-...... - >.::: >. c c: co
ClIo o......c......c!_.....
c. ~ õ coco 0 co 0) .~ ro
S :2 c :2 ~ EC, c EC, '4i C c
:.:. 0 C :2 c· is 8 :2 0 a::: ui ,g
WWZ,CI CUI.!!!\)
-, I -...... CII
I- I Ü I l!)=- -1-= t::
OD..CJ)wCJ)~N!:QNmuo
z«cww::J:Õ(I)õCJ)J!!\)
i-
c
j
o
U
0)
:5
E
e
-
"0
0)
>
ëii
\)
2!
......
o
c:
£!
"3
/I)
2!
2!
ëi'i
c:
c:
.Q
1ií
0)
j
a
0)
\)
c:
2!
oS!
0)
a:::
-
"i
..,
b
c:
8
.I
3
.,
I
...
~'--
I- 0 0 0 0 0 ID 0 0 0 0 LO LO <0
m 0 .... N
CJ)
(I) LO LO LO LO LO LO N LO LO 0 0 LO LO N
ã5 N .... .... C»
l!) LO 0 It)
CJ) LO It) It) LO LO LO on It) It) It) .... It) It) ci
Z N C»
¡Q LO co 0 LO LO ~,
It) It) LO It) It) CIÒ LO It) It) .... ('I)
N C»
; V
-¡ It) LO It) It) LO LO '<t LO LO 0 0 0 0 &Ö
::J: N on <0
l!) co 0 co
LO LO LO LO LOLO LO It) It) LO LO cw)
(I) N CIÒ .... C»
W
W '<t 0 V
LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO cw)
W N CIÒ .... C»
~ '<t 0 '<t,
LO It) LO LO LO LO LO LO It) LO It) ,..;
C N N .... co
D.. 0 OIt)OOLO 0 0 0 0 0 It) It) 0
« N
-
l è
.-.. i E
;,
~ LO i t
....
íñ'Cñ - It) .-..
LO ëL~ 0 --- ! IØ
.-.. ...
N >< J9 CD It) i CD
t LOLO E --- -
--- --- co c. ... 0 -- ~
__sEE :E LO E CD .... !
It) ~ --- It) i!
i --- --- j .. ---
I!. J9c.SS ~ ...... c.
C 0 :ë LO C ~
>- C. LO /I) /I) ¡¡¡ CD Z --- ¡
I ..... >- >- "0 ¡ J
~Ë(I)(I)s c ¡
c c D..
issr 0 S 0 c é ~ JI
:¡:s C ~
·i ~ /I) 'C -' 1'1 !
~u. E CD ~ ~ D.. D..
j J J ~ I!
OGií~ a ::J
B UJ UJ I
15 I~U¡§>-:~ c ~ ëñ
I ~ en
.oU"OCD oS! I'd .d U ] Ii .d
- '. CD
a:::
..- N ('I) v It) CD
K
'C
-
1'1
:IE
c
o
i»
Ii C
UJ 1'1
..a.
., E
~ 0
!!(.)
f
a.
CD
"0
t!
If
~
l1li
I
~
CJ)
II
Ò
C
en -
,n - /I)
v en .~
en- en II. 01
Z /1)'0
W II E-õ
ßc.QlC
c:~..~
-e~~
rñ C> UJ I-
Eb"OCI
CD 1:: S c:
1ií::JI!!'6
~ ~ i'S
"oUJ......m
Q).......Ern
~ ~ 8 :¡j
:¡PEEE
ë 0 CD.~
_ZUJUJ
a
en
W
II
Ò
-c
w-
W -
II C.
.::J
0. g e
-< -C)
ÍIi~~i~l
illwM¡
i~~li~
'-'
AGENDA REQUEST
...J
ITEM NO..k..11B
DATE: March 26, 2002
-::e:nv~~~.(i.. ThL..::hd-urL.>
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [X]
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY:
SUBMITTED BY: Purchasinq Department
Michael Rath. Purchasina Director
SUBJECT: Award of Bid No. 02-044, Construction of Two (2) Tennis Courts at Lawnwood recreation
Area
BACKGROUND: On March 13,2002 bids were opened for-the construction of Two (2) Tennis Courts at
Lawnwood Recreation Area for the Central Services Department. Six hundred sixty-two (662) vendors
were notified, eleven (11) bid documents were distributed and two (2) bids were received. The Central
Services Department has reviewed the bids received and recommends that the bid be awarded to the
low bidder, Fast Dry Courts in the total amount of $85,717. Recommendation and tabulation attached.
FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds are available in Lawnwood Recreation Area Maintenance
Improvements Account No. 316-1930-563000-75009.
PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends award of Bid No. 02-044, Construction of Two (2) Tennis
Courts at Lawnwood Recreation Area to the low bidder, Fast Dry Courts, and authorization for the
Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the CountY Attorney.
COMMISSION ACTION:
pq APPROVED [] DENIED
[ ] OTHER:
County Attorney.(X)
,J(
Coordination/Signatures
Mgl & BUdgetP9~
other.
Originating Dept::
FInance: (Check iJr Copy only, if Applicable)
o
-;L-
Purchasing Mgr.:(X) ¡\,~
Other.
Eft. 1/97
. t
.. z z
CD c: c:
., 3: 3: 3:
Q. I:D I:D I:D
CD m m m
3 :;rJ :;rJ :;rJ
III
::I 0 0 0
Q. 'TI 'TI 'TI
1/1 ~ I:D n
-
III a 0
., c
0 en c 3:
0 :;rJ "tI
3 0 :I>
m n z
n c:
m 3: m
<: m en
m z z
!=? -I ~
en
c 'TI
ëñ ¡:;;
-I C
:;rJ .~
æ
c:
-I
m
c
.~
N
....
....
en
en
N
"tI"'O "tI"11
:1>)> 0»
r"'O 3: en
3:_ "tI~
nO :I>
-0 zo
~O 0:::a
I:D-(
~O ~O <
z
en nO m
~c: Z
~ c
:::a 'TI:::a 0
c: r~
0 en :::a
::! en
0
z
-
z
0
.
0
-f0 D:J
~ mZ :Þ
~ zen en
co ...,¡ z-f m
JJ) cø -:::0 ~
ëø enc
Con 00 C
0 ..,¡,
p ...,¡ 0:::1 .
0 Q cO ::¡
0 0 :::OZ m
-f0 s:
en." ..¡,
N
-
Z »
en
~ r
~
m
~ -Eß r :::a
.!" ,þ. rr z
ëø -to.) ~
en Q»
Con 0
0 0 ::::to m
. Q ~2
0 .
0 0' ~ :::¡
-
0 m
z s::
» I\)
r
»
"11 r
m ~
z m
~ ~ Q :::a
en cø Z
0 0 Z ~
P 0 Q
Q - m
0 "'0
0 0 0 ,
en ~
~ m
en s::
(..)
0 ...., 0
"'0 m 0
m z z
z ~ en
m ~ ~
0 :::a
.. r- c:
s:: en 0
m ~
» ~ Õ
:::a
0 z
::::t 0 0
m
..,¡, en "11
~(..) ~
to.)
0 0
0
to.) -
to.)
-
@ ~
to.) m
.. z
0 z
0 - tc
"'0 en 0
s:: 0 ~:Þ
0 tc;:C
c: c:O
~ ro
~"11en
~ -O~
00r-
~ Zc:c:
enZO
::::t~ñi
Z moO
:IE ~OO
0 ,s::c:
0 tcs::z
0 6ëñ~
"'0 oen
~ 1\)-
,0
" Oz
,þ.m
,þ.;:c
en
, . r,MiE~eì ~~th '~Lawll:'-:"0v6b,i~Ço~rts :Twp ~Ne:~
"W~ .. " "" "''''
P?ge 1 I
From:
To:
Date:
SUbject:
Don McLam
Michael Rath
Monday, March 18, 2002 2:24PM
Lawnwood Tennis Courts - Two New
Central Srevices Is recommending the combined low bid of FAST DRY COURTS for the work to be done
under BID # 02-044, Please prepare this item for BOCC approval.
CC:
Linda Brown; Patti Raffensberger; Roger A Shinn
03/22/02
F7.ABWARR
FUND
145
TITLE
'-'
ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD
..."",
PAGE
1
WARRANT LIST #25- 16-MAR-2002 TO 22-MAR-2002
FUND SUMMARY- MOSQUITO
Mosquito Fund
GRAND TOTAL:
EXPENSES
PAYROLL
30/125.76
0.00
30/125.76
0.00
'-'
...."
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
John D. Bruhn
District 1
Doug Coward
District 2
Paula A. Lewis
District 3
Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes
District 4 District 5
AGENDA
March 26, 2002
1. l\'IINUTES
Approve the minutes of the meeting held February 12, 2002.
2. GENER--\L PUBLIC COMMENT
CONSENT AGENDA
1. WARR-\:.'TS LISTS
Approve Warrants List No. 20 through No. 25.
2. MOSQlJlTO CONTROL
A. Quality Industries, Inc. Agreement Amendment- Consider staff recommendation
to approve the proposed First Amendment to the February 27, 2001 Agreement,
and authorize the Chairman to execute the amendment.
B. Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND) Grant - Consider staff recommendation
to approve and sign the Interlocal Agreement with the Board of County
Commissioners authorizing the Mosquito Control District to administer the
grant at Vitolo Family / Middle Cove Park.
NOTICE: All proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need
a record of the proceetlings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record ofthe proceedings is made. Upon the requestofanyparty to the proceedings,
individu:Jls testifying dudng a hearing will be sworn in. Any polrt)' to the proceedings will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during
a hearing upon requt'st Anyone ,\ iCh a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager
at (561) 462.1777 or TOIJ (561) 462-1"'!S at Ic::¡sr forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting.
'-'"
'''wtI
MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT
ST. LUCIE COUNty, FLORIDA
REGULAR MEETtNG
Date: February 12,2002
Tape: 1
Convened: 9:47 a.m.
Adjourned: 9:47 a.m.
Commissioners Present: Chairman, John D. Bruhn, Paula A. Lewis, Frannie Hutchinson,
Cliff Barnes, Doug Coward
Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator, Robert Bradshaw, Asst. County
Administrator, Heather Young, Asst. County Attorney, Ray Wazny, Public Works
Director, Jim David, Mosquito Control Director, Don West, County Engineer; A. Millie
Delgado, Deputy Clerk
1. MINTUES
It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded 'by Com. Barnes, to approve the minutes of the
meeting held February 5, 2002; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously.
2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS
None
3. CONSENT AGENDA
It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Hutchinson, to approve the Consent
Agenda; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously.
1. WARRANT LIST
The District approved Warrant List No. 19
2. MOSQUITO CONTROL
A. Declaration of Surplus Property- The District approved to surplus
equipment identified to interested Mosquito Control Districts at the
values estimated for those items, consider "Best Offers" and approved
to publicly auction the surplus equipment that is not successfully bid
upon by another District.
B. Indian River Lagoon License Plate Program FY 2002/Grant
Application- The District approved the application in the amount of
$56,816.
C. Equipment Request No. 02-191- The District approved the equipment
request for the purchase of a replacement computer desk in the amount
of$2,205.
There being no further business to be brought before the District, the meeting was
02/15/02
F7.A.BWARR
,
FUND
TITLE
'-'
ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD
....,
WARRANT LIST #20- 09-FEB-2002 TO 15-FEB-2002
FUND SUMMARY-MOSQUITO
145
Mosquito Fund
GRAND TOTAL:
EXPENSES
10,051. 40
10,051.40
PAGE
1
PAYROLL
23,272.49
23,272.49
02/22/02
F7.ABWARR
FUND
TITLE
'-'
ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD
""
WARRANT LIST #21- 16-FEB-2002 TO 22-FEB-2002
FUND SUMMARY- MOSQUITO
145
Mosquito Fund
GRAND TOTAL:
EXPENSES
9,069.98
9,069.98
PAGE
1
PAYROLL
0.00
0.00
03/01/02
F'7.i!\BWARR
FUND
TITLE
'-'
ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD
...",
WARRANT LIST #22- 23-FEB-2002 TO 01-MAR-2002
FUND SUMMARY- MOSQUITO
145
Mosquito Fund
GRAND TOTAL:
EXPENSES
23,204.23
23,204.23
PAGE
1
PAYROLL'
21,885.06
21,885.06
03/08/02
F7.ABWARR
FUND
145
TITLE
'-
ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD
...."
WARRANT LIST #23- 02-MAR-2002 TO 08-MAR-2002
FUND SUMMARY- MOSQUITO
Mosquito Fund
GRAND TOTAL:
EXPENSES
10,674.28
10,674.28
PAGE
1
PAYROLL
0.00
0.00
03/15/02
F'7.ABWARR
FUND
145
TITLE
'-
ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD
.....,
WARRANT LIST #24- 09-MAR-2002 TO 15-MAR-2002
FUND SUMMARY- MOSQUITO
Mosquito Fund
GRAND TOTAL:
EXPENSES
15,896.99
15,896.99
PAGE
1
PAYROLL
22,607.50
22,607.50
\,.,
....."
"'
AGENDA REQUEST
ITEM NO. C- l.A'
DATE: March 26, 2002
TO: MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT[X]
PRESENTED BY:
SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Mosquito Control
James R. David
SUBJECT: Quality Industries, Inc. - First Amendment to February 27,2001 Agreement
BACKGROUND: Attached is a copy of a proposed First Amendment to the February 27, 2001
Agreement between the Mosquito Control District and Quality Industries, Inc., for the manufacture and
maintenance of mosquito control lift pumps, ref. Contract no. C01-02-345. The amendment will clarify
the agreement such that the payment of new pumps and repairs shall be based upon the unit prices bid
by the contractor in Bid Solicitation No, 01-024.
FU N DS A V AI L.: 145-6230-546000-600 Equipment Maintenance; 145112-6230-564000-6950 Machinery
& Equipment - NOAA CIP Bear Point Integration and other Grant accounts as they become available
PREVIOUS ACTION: Original Contract Executed February 27,2001
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the proposed First Amendment to the
February 27,2001 Agreement between the Mosquito Control District and Quality Industries, Inc., and
authorize the chairman to execute the Amendment.
~nty Attorney:
Originating Dept.
fJ¿
. Review and A r
~agement & Budget i') I
'"
Other:
jt:
COMMISSION ACTION:
[x] APPROVED [] DENIED
[ ] OTHER:
Other:
Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicableL
Eft. 5/96
·
..
.-
MEMORANDUM
TO:
MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD
FROM:
JAMES R DAVID, MOSQUITO CONTROL DIRECTOR
DATE:
March 8, 2002
SUBJECT: Quality Industries, Inc. - First Amendment to February 27,2001 Agreement
BACKGROUND: Attached is a copy of a proposed First Amendment to the February 27,
2001 Agreement between the Mosquito Control District and Quality Industries, Inc,. for the
manufacture and maintenance of mosquito control lift pumps, ref. Contract no, C01-02-
345. The amendment will clarify the agreement such that the payment of new pumps and
repairs shall be based upon the unit prices bid by the contractor in Bid Solicitation No, 01-
024.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the proposed First
Amendment to the February 27,2001 Agreement between the Mosquito Control District
and Quality Industries, Inc., and authorize the chairman to execute the Amendment.
-
/-
AGENDA REQUEST
"""
ITEM NO.
C-2B
DATE: March 26, 2002
CONSENT
[Xl
REGULAR
]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
Leg. [ Quasi-JD.
TO: MOSQUTIO CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Mosquito Control District
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND:
FUNDS AVAIL. :
PREVIOUS ACTION:
RECOMMENDATION:
COMMISSION ACTION:
[X]
[ ]
APPROVED
OTHER:
County Attorney:
~ginating Dept:
Finance:
):.
~
AgeMQCdistrictFIND
PRESENTED BY:
Jim David
Director
Authorize the Mosquito Control District Board to sign the Interlocal
Agreement with the Board of County Commissioners authorizing the
Mosquito Control District to administer the Florida Inland
Navigation District Grant to construct the educational facilities
(observation tower/outdoor classroom and fishing pier) and implement
the educational programming at Vitolo Family / Middle Cove Park.
The Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND) funds projects from
shoreline stabilization to environmental education programs and
facilities. The proposed project is an observation tower / outdoor
classroom and fishing pier at Vitolo Family / Middle Cove Park -
Riverside, located approximately 4.5 miles south of the Ft. Pierce
Inlet on South Hutchinson Island. Purchased with Florida Communities
Trust and St. Lucie County Environmentally Sensitive Lands Bond
funds, this 107-acre park also provides hiking trails along the
Indian River Lagoon for school groups and visitors. The proposed
project also fulfills the access and educational commitments made
from the County to the Department of Community Affairs in a Florida
Communities Trust application and agreement (Project # 95-065-P56).
Matching funds will come
Affairs Coastal Management
License Plate program.
from Florida
Program and
Department
the Indian
of Community
Ri ver Lagoon
The District Board approved submitting an application to the Indian
River Lagoon License Plate program for a portion of this project on
February 12, 2002.
Staff recommends that the District approve and sign the Interlocal
Agreement with the Board of County Commissioners authorizing the
Mosquito Control District to administer the Florida Inland
Navigation District Grant at Vitolo Family / Middle Cove Park.
DENIED
'-- .J
Anderson
Administrator
Mgt & Budget:
Public Works:
Purchasing:
Other:
'-'
"wi
ATTACHi\IENT E-l
WATERWAYS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
PROJECT APPLICATION
APPLICANT INFORt\1ATION - PROJECT SUMMARY
Applicant: st. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners
Project TitIe: vitolo Family Park at Middle Cove - Public/ADA Access Enhancement
Liaison Agent: Contact Person: Jim David, st. Lucie Hosqui to Control District
Title: Director of st. Lucie County Mosquito Control District
Address: 2300 Virginia Ave. Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982
Zip Code: 34982
Te1ephone: 561/462-1686
FAX: 561/462-1565
I her~by certify that the information provided in this application is true and accurate.
Signature:
Date:
PROJECT SUMMARY NARRATIVE (please summarize the project in 2 paragraphs or less.)
Hiddle Cove Park is a lOT-acre marsh area surrounded on the western side
bv an earthen perimeter sDoil berm aDDroximatelv 30 feet in wi rH-n 'Pn",
berm has been stabilized with a hikinq and bicycle path. The marsh is
part of a series of contiguous mangrove 'swamps located on the east shore
of a back barrier island on the Indian River Laqoon. The ecosystem
includes hiqh salt marsh species, manqrove swamp. and AlA fringing
tropical hammock uplands. Dolphin, manatee, lumpinq mullet, and over
eiqhteen wadinq bird species. OSDreVS, and shore birds can be observerì
from the site. The purpose of this project is to provide improved
environmental educational facilities and access to the Park.
If funded, FIND grant monies will:be matched with dollars from the
Florida Department of Community Affairs Coastal Manaqement Proqram,
Indian River Lagoon License Plate FY02 Proqram, and St. Lucie County
Mosquito Control District to construct a two-storv observation row"'.... rnA
first story platform of which will additionally be used as an outdoor
classroom or meeting area. Funds will also be used to construct two
observation platforms and an observation/fishing pier.' A WebCam will
also be purchased and installed for ADA access and educational purposes.
Form No. 90-22
New 10/14/92, Rev.8/24/00.
'-'
'wi
ATTACHMENT E-3
PROJECT INFORMATION
Total Project Cost: $ 113,716
FIND Assistance Requested: $ 5 ° , ° ° °
Assistance % oftotal cost 44%
Amount and Source of Applicants Matching Funds:, Indian River Lagoon License Plate
FY 02 - $16,816; Florida Coastal Management Program - $34,900; St. Lucie
County Mosquito Control District-$12,OOO (upfront permitting / design cost)
Other Assistance applied for (name of program and amount) n / a
Ownership of Project Site (check one):
Own X
Leased
Other
If leased, please describe lessor term and conditions:
Project type (check one, or more of the following project elements that are part of your project).
Public navigation channel dredging
Public navigation aids and markers
Public boat ramps and launching facilities
Public boat docking and mooring facilities
Public shoreline stabilization
Inlet management
Waterway signs and b_uoys for safety, regulation or information
Public spoil disposal site development
Waterways related environmental education programs and facilities
Public fishing and viewing piers
Public waterfront boardwalks
Waterways boating safety programs and equipment
Beach renourishment
Other waterway related projects
X
Permits Required:
Agency
Yes No N/A
Date Applied For
Date Received
WMD
DEP
ACOE
COUNTY/CITY
Other
Yes Minor Structure
VPR Minor Structure
Form No. 9D-22a (New 10-14-92, Rev.OS-DD.)
Indian
River
Lagoon
Indian
River
Lagoon
N
+
Scale: 1" - 750'
~""'../',,-,'- ~~
~~,-.,~ ,'~
._, '~- ~~.: .'..,.. ",' ,
Middle
Cove
Legend
· Picnic area ~ Bike rack
· Trash can = Dike walkover
 Sign tÒ. Aerator station
· Fishing platform Gate
· Rest area .... Fishing dock
Ð
Ð
~
Dual pump & aerator station
(existing)
Dual pump & aerator station
(proposed)
Combination dike walkover
picnic area
educational site
Mosquito
impoundment boundary
Atlantic
Ocean
roximate.
'-'
....,
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
"Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home"
JEB BUSH
Governor
STEVEN M. SEIBERT
Secretary
January 16,2002
Ms. lody Rosier Bonet, Grants Writer
St. Lucie County
2300Virginia Avenue
Fort Pierce, Florida 34982
RE: Florida Coastal Management Program - Coastal Partnerships Initiative FY 2002-2003
Project Applications
Dear Ms. Bonet:
Enclosed for your information is a copy of the "Notice of Application Evaluation Scoring and
Intent to Award" for Fiscal Year 2002-2003 applications submitted to the Florida Coastal Management
Program's Coastal Partnerships Initiative.
As required by Rule 9M-l, Florida Administrative Code, an evaluation committee consisting of
five members reviewed all the applications and evaluated and scored them according to the criteria
established in the rule. The enclosed notice identifies all applications within each initiative category, the
score received by each application, and the ranking of the applications within each initiative category
based upon the scores.
Rule 9M -1 requires that the scores and rankings of applications be published in the Florida
Administrative Weekly. Any person whose substantial interests are affected may request a bearing
pursuant to Section 120.57, Florida Statutes, within 21 days of publication of the notice. Failure to
request a hearing within the applicable time period shall constitute a wai\'er of the right to a hearing. The
Notice of Application Evaluation Scoring and Intent to Award has been submitted to the Florida
Administrative Weekly for publication on Friday, February 1,2002.
If you have any questions, please contact me at the Florida Coastal Management Program,
Department of Community Affairs, 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100,
telephone (850) 414-6562.
Sincerely,
~~
L. Christine McCay, ~tal Administrator
Florida Coastal Management Program
/cm
, , ., n ~
cc: Don McLan, Central Services Project Manager :, ;~7 [I , ,f;ì,
. ~!!if·
Enclosure ' JAN 2 5 .- - ,.' ! ¡ i :
....~ ~-~ ,: i L: j i
2 5 5 5 S HUM A R D 0 A K B 0 U LEV A RD· TAL L A HAS SEE, F L 0 'RTt)-A-~.2.3.i. 9 - 2 1 0 0 -'
Ph 0 n e: (850) 488-84 66/Su ncorn 278·8466 FAX: (850) 921-078 1/Su'ncom 291·ÕT8'1--! j
Internet address: http://www.dca.state.fLus--.-,-': '. 'J=,",~= I
.'---- '--
CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE COMMUNITY PLANNING EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOP.MENT
2796 Overseas Highway. Suite 212 2555 Shumard Oa~ Bculevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak. Boulevard -
Lb~t¡"'nn 1=1 ~nnr;n_"'7 Tallahassee. FL 323;-9-2100 Tallahassee, Fl32399-2100 Ta:lahassee. FL 32399-2100
~ '..."I
NOTICE OF APPLICATION EVALUATION SCORING
AND INTENT TO AWARD
FLORIDA COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2002-2003: COASTAL PARTNERSHIPS INITIATIVE APPLICATIONS
All eligible applications were evaluated by the Evaluation Committee using only the information
included in each application and according to the evaluation criteria listed in Rule 9M-l, Florida
Administrative Code. Each application was evaluated within the initiative category in which it
was submitted. WITHIN EACH mITIA TIVE CATEGORY, the listing shows the total number
of points awarded to each application (which is the sum of all five individual evaluators' scores)
and the ranking of each project.
At the time of this notice and posting of scores, the amount of funding available for application
awards is unknown. The Florida Coastal Management Program is usually notified of the total
amount of its coastal management funding in March by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration. The actual total amount of money available and the amount of funding
detel111ined to be appropriate for each project will affect the specific number of proposals that
can be funded. However, no projects scoring less than 2~0 points \vill be awarded funding. This
is based on a minimum of 50 points awarded by an individual evaluator multiplied by five
evaluators. As specified in Rule 9M-l, F.A.C., 25% of available funding (when the amount is
known) will initially be directed to each initiative category. Projects will be funded in order of
score and rank, based upon availability of funding, and subject to final approval by the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administ~ation.
Coastal Partnerships Initiative FY 2002-2003
Proposal Identification Numbers
Numbering Kev
Remarkable Coastal Places -
Community Stewardship-
100s
200s
Access to Coastal Resources -300s
Working Waterfronts - 400s
Proiect Number and Title Submitted Bv Total Pts. Rank
101: Indian River Lag90n Scenic St. Lucie County 308 2
Highway Designation
102: River to Sea Preserve at Flagler County 344 I
Marineland
201: Resource Ranger Club West Florida RPClEscambia County 313 2
202: Wetlands Model Demonstration, a Bay Area Resource 286 3
Middle School Outreach Program CounciVEscambia County
203: Florida Keys GreenSweep Nature Conservancy/Monroe County 336 1
2002/2003
204: Sea Turtle Educational Materials Palm Beach County 271 4
301: Shoreside Park Parking and Town of Palm Shores 327 2
Handicapped Accessibility and Repairs
302: Inlet Park Recreational Town of Palm Beach Shores 218 below
Enhancement Planning minimum
~
...,J
--'
303: Venice South Beach PierIParkingl City of Venice 296 tie 6/7
Beach Access
,
304: Island City Park Preserve Public City of Wilton Manors 269 12
Access Improvements
305: Town Center Boardwalk Planning City of Port Orange 270 11
306: South Causeway Island Picnic St. Lucie County 275 9
Pavilions
307: Middle Cove Park Fishing/ St. Lucie County 314 3 *~ *
Observation Pier
308: Olde Eau Gallie Riverfront Pier City ofMelboume 265 13
Enhancement
309: Pleasant Oceanside Beach City of Deerfield Beach 297 5
Renovations
310: Chapman Field Park General Plan Miami-Dade CountY. 299 4
311: Smokehouse Bay Bridge Pedestrian City of Marco Island 256 15
Underpass
312: Ais Lagoon House Shoreline City of Palm Bay 342 1
Stabilization
313: Cónstruct Up to Three Public Okaloosa County 285 8
Access Structures over Dunes on
Okaloosa Island
314: Public Beach Access Improvement Town of North Redington Beach 272 10
Program
315: One Mile Wonder Walks City of Mexico Beach 296 tie 6/7
316: Riverwalk Board_walk Expansion City of Port St. Lucie 257 14
Program
317: Proposed Analysis of Maule Lake's City of North Miami Beach 244 below
Shoreline and Public RiQ:ht-of-Wavs mInImum
40 I: Manatee Pocket Walk - Phase I Martin County 332 2
Construction
402: Panacea Visitors Center Project Wakulla County 369 I
403: Eau Gallie Riverfront Areas Master City of Melbourne 307 4
Plan
404: Dinner Key Restrooms Renovation City of Miami 215 below
ffilnImUm
405: Daytona Beach Working Daytona Beach Partnership 311 3
Waterfronts Initiative
~
~
....."
2002-2003 SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMEì\'T DISTRICT
FUNDING APPLICA TION FOllivI
1iill:$2~1
AppIlcation No: IRL - 02
(District to provide)
The undersigned Applicant, has read all of the terms and conditions of the Indian River Lagoon
License Plate Funding Program Guidelines And Application, and certifies that all of the
information contained within this Application and subsequent Attachments and Exhibits is true
and correct to the best of its knowledge.
Applicant's Legal Name (Organization Name):
Saint Lucie County Mosquito Control District
Contact Person:
James R. David
-
Applicant's Address:
3150 Will Fee Rd., Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982
Telephone Number: ( 561 ) 462 - 1686 Fax. Number: ( 561) 426 - 1565
Type of Organization: Date of Incorporation:
( GovemmerÍtàD Not-for-profit State of IncorporaÜon:
FEID Number: 59-6000835
Project Location (county): 6t. I ucie Martin and/or Palm Beach
Project Title:
Mosquito Impoundment Restoration, Public Access! Awareness .
Brief Project Description:
Improve Water Quality to 500 acres of mangrove swamp habitat and increase
public access to the Indian River Lagoon
Attachments:- Please attach informaÜon to address each of the items listed below:
1) Describe the project goal(s) and how the goal(s) will be accomplished. Include appropriate drawings.
Submittals for habitat restoration and stormwater retrofit projects must include plan view and cross section(s)
drawings. If planting is part of the project, a planting plan must also be sub!IÙtted.
2) Provide a project location description and attach a location map. If more than one county will benefit from
your project, explain the multiple county benefits. If your project is located in the watershed, please clearly
explain the benefits to the receiving water bcx:ly.
3) Explain the expected habitat restoration, water quality, and/or environmental education benefits of the
proposed project.
4) Provide a project schedule and justification for being able to meet the project schedule. All projects
must be completed within one year of execution of the funding program Agreement.
Funding Requested Per County:
St. Lucie .$ 56,816 Martin .$ Palm Beach S Total .$ 56,816
Page 1 of 2
~IT~:2ÆI
14
'-"
---...:..~
..,I
*C
Cost Breakdown and Schedule
Task Descripti,on License Plate Cost-share Cost-Share Expected
Funding Funding Source Completion
Amount Amount Date
Pump Station 1 N ew Pump¡s 20,000 73,273 noaa/ skmed 05/15/03
New I
Convert Pump Sta/PumF 20,000 3,000 sf cmcd 05/15/03
Outlookl Fish ing Pier 10,500 30,000 dca/ slcmed 05/15/03
Web Cam 6,316 2,000 slcmcd 05/15/03
.
Regulatory Approvals: Are any regulatory approvals needed for the proposed project?
~ No If yes, please fill in the table below:
Approval
Agency Type of Received? Expiration Comments
Approval Date
Yes No
FDEPI ACOE Std Gen Permit X 11/15/06 Pump Stations
FDEPI ACOE Minor Structure I X I Outlook/Fish Pier
I
Authorized Person's Name: James R. David
s¡gna:fh:: ~ ~ Title: ])~
PrintN . Jã.(¡rt(5 ¡¿ f)A-tJ(!J Print Title: 7)1 {~-!cs-r--
Remember to complete and attach Exhibit "An
Page 2 of2
~$:2~1
15
'-'
...,
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this _ day of
, 2002, by and between
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as
"County", and ST. LUCIE COUNTY MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT, a special taxing
district, hereinafter referred to as "District".
WHEREAS, the County intends to apply for a 2002-03 Waterways Assistance Program
Grant (the "Grant") from the Florida Inland Navigation District ("FIND"); and,
WHEREAS, the grant application will be entitled "Vitolo Family Park at Middle Cove -
Public / ADA Access Enhancement" and seeks grant funds for the construction of various site
improvements required under the County's Grant A ward Agreement with the Florida Communities
Trust for Middle Cove (the "Project"); and,
WHEREAS, the Project will benefit the District's land management program; and,
WHEREAS, in light of the benefits to the District's land management program, the District
is willing to assist the County in the financial and administrative responsibilities under the FIND
grant should it be awarded.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained
herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. GENERAL. This Agreement is entered into pursuant to Section 163.01, Florida
Statutes, Florida Interlocal Cooperation Act.
2. COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES. The County shall submit a 2002-03 Waterways
Assistance Program grant application to FIND for the Project. In the event the County is awarded
1-
'-'
'...".¡
the FIND Grant, the parties shall coordinate Project activities in accordance with the terms of the
FIND Grant.
3. DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES. In the event the County is awarded the FIND
Grant, the District shall provide oversight for the Project on behalf of the County. The parties shall
coordinate Project activities in accordance with the terms of the FIND Grant.
4. AMENDMENT. The Agreement may only be amended by a written document
signed by all parties and filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of St. Lucie County, Florida.
5. TERMINA TION. Either party may terminate this Agreement upon one hundred
eighty (180) days prior written notice to the other party.
6. NOTICES. All notices, requests, consents, and other communications required or
permitted under this Agreement shall in writing (including telex and telegraphic communication) and
shall be (as elected by the person giving such notice) hand delivered by messenger or courier service,
telecommunicated, or mailed by registered or certified mail (postage prepaid), return receipt
requested, and addressed to:
As to District:
With a COPy to:
St. Lucie County Mosquito
Control Director
2300 Virginia Avenue, Annex
Fort Pierce, Florida 34982
St. Lucie County Attorney
2300 Virginia Avenue
Administration Building Annex
Fort Pierce, Florida 34982
As to County
With a copy to:
County Administrator
2300 Virginia Avenue
Administration Building Annex
Fort Pierce, Florida 34982
St. Lucie County Attorney
2300 Virginia Avenue
Administration Building Annex
Fort Pierce, Florida 34982
or to such other address as any party may designate by notice complying with the terms of this
2-
'-'
"""
section. Each such notice shall be deemed delivered: (a) on the date delivered if by personal
delivery, (b) on the date telecommunicated if by telegraph, (c) on the date of transmission with
confirmed answer back if by telex, and (d) on the date upon which the return receipt is signed or
delivery is refused or the notice is designated by the postal authorities as not deliverable, as the case
may be, if mailed.
7. AUDIT. The County agrees that District or any of its duly authorized representatives
shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after expenditure of funds under this Agreement, have
access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of
the County involving transactions related to this Agreement.
The District agrees that the County or any of its duly authorized representatives shall, until
the expiration of three (3) years after expenditure offunds under this Agreement, have access to and
the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of the District
involving transactions related to this Agreement.
8. PUBLIC RECORDS. The County and the District shall allow public access to all
documents, papers, letters, or other material subject to the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida
Statutes, and made or received by them in conjunction with this Agreement.
9. ASSIGNMENT. No party shall assign this Agreement to any other persons or firm
without first obtaining the other parties' approval.
10. FILING. This Agreement shall be filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of S1.
Lucie County, Florida, prior to its effectiveness.
11. GENERAL. This Agreement embodies the whole understanding of the parties.
There are no promi~es, terms, conditions, or obligations other than those contained therein, and this
3-
'-'
..",,¡
Agreement shall supersede all previous telecommunications, representations, or agreements, either
verbal or written, between the parties hereto.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused the execution by their duly authorized
officials as of the dates below stated.
ATTEST:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
DEPUTY CLERK
CHAIRMAN
DATE:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
CORRECTNESS:
COUNTY ATTORNEY
ATTEST:
ST. LUCIE COUNTY MOSQUITO
CONTROL DISTRICT
BY:
DEPUTY CLERK
CHAIRMAN
DATE:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
CORRECTNESS
COUNTY ATTORNEY
g: \atty\agreemnt\inter loc\mcd- find, wpd
4-
03/22/02
FZABWARR
FUND
184
'-""
ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD
....,
PAGE
1
WARRANT LIST #25- 16-MAR-2002 TO 22-MAR-2002
FUND SUMMARY- EROSION
TITLE
Erosion Control Operating Fund
GRAND TOTAL:
EXPENSES
PAYROLL
1,689.13
0.00
1,689.13
0.00
'-'
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
EROSION DISTRICT
.....i
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
John D. Bruhn
District 1
Doug Coward
District 2
Paula A. Lewis
District 3
Frannie Hutchinson
District 4
Cliff Barnes
District 5
AGENDA
March 26, 2002
1. MINUTES
Approve the minutes of the meeting held February 26,2002.
2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT
CONSENT AGENDA
1. W ARRA...NTS LISTS
Approve Warrants List No. 21 through No. 25
2. PUBLIC WORKS
Engineering / Beach Inlet Monitoring· Consider staff recommendation to
approve Amendment No.2 to Work Authorization No.2 (C-00-12-181) with
Taylo.r Engineering, Inc. and authorize the Chairman to execute the amended
work authorization.
NOTICE: All proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board
at these meetings will need a record of the proceeclings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceeclings
is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifling during a hearing "ill be sworn in. Any party to the
proceedings will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a
disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-
1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting.
'-'
AGENDA REQUEST
-..I
ITEM NO. C-2
DATE: March 26, 2002
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [X]
PRESENTED BY:
TO: ST. LUCIE COUNTY EROSION DISTRICT
SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115
J
SUBJECT: Beach & Inlet Monitoring: Amendment NO.2 to Work Authorizatio No.2 (C-OO 12-181) with Taylor
Engineering, Inc. to increase the amount of compensation by $32,585.00 for additional services.
BACKGROUND: Work Authorization NO.2 was approved by the Board on February 21, 2001 for Taylor
Engineering, Inc. to continue with the County's comprehensive beach and inlet monitoring program for the 3rd and
41h years. On May 8, 2001 the Board approved Amendment No.1 decreasing the amount of compensation to be
paid to Taylor Engineering, Inc. $169,850.00 to $157,410.50. This request is to amend the existing work
authorization to include additional services ($32,585.00) related to sea turtle monitoring for the 2002 nesting
season, resulting in an increase to the total contract amount from $157,410.50 to 189,995.50. Sea turtle
monitoring was required for three consecutive years as part of the FDEP permit for the 1999 beach nourishment
project and was not anticipated beyond that point. However, in order to access the beach and repair and maintain
the geotubes, FDEP is requiring sea turtle monitoring as a permit condition. Also, the sea turtle monitoring
information gathered this nesting season should be helpful in the future permitting process of long term shoreline
stabilization solutions for this area.
FUNDS AVAIL.: Funds for the additional engineering services will be made available in the following accounts:
Erosion District: 184-3710-563005-3712 ($16,292.50); Erosion Control-Conservation
FDEP (98SL 1): 184203-3710-563005-3712 ($16,292.50); Fort Pierce Beach Restoration Grant.
PREVIOUS ACTION:
November 10, 1998: Board approved grant agreements with FDEP for beach & inlet activities.
April 27, 1999: Board approved work authorization with Taylor Eng. for 1st and 2nd year monitoring.
December 12, 2000: Board approved master consultant's agreement with Taylor Engineering, Inc.
February 21, 2001: Board approved work authorization with Taylor Eng. for 3rd and 41h year monitoring.
May 8,2001: Amendment NO.1 approved decreasing the contract amount from $169,850 to $157,410.50.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Erosion District Board approval of Amendment No.2 to Work
Authorization No.2 (C-00-12-181) with Taylor Engineering, Inc. and execution of said amended work authorization
by the Chairperson.
COMMISSION ACTION:
[~ APPROVED
[ ] OTHER:
[ ] DENIED
"'coo", AlWm" ,3i ~
[x]Originating Dept. Public Works t u
[x]Mgt. & Budget
[x)Co. Eng 1t.1\e> /
I
[xJBudget & Revenue Coordinator ~f'I \"\
[x]Finance Department (Grants)~
,
\w
-.i.00-12-181
(W A #2, Amend #2)
SECOND AMENDMENT TO
WORK AUTHORIZATION NO.2
Engineering Services Related to Beach & Inlet Monitoring
Work Authorization No.2 between St. Lucie County Erosion District (the "District") and
Taylor Engineering, Inc. (the "Consultant"), for Beach & Inlet Monitoring Services, dated February
13,2001 (the "Agreement") and the first amendment to said work authorization dated May 8,2001,
is hereby amended to increase the amount of the compensation to be paid to the Consultant to a total
not to exceed One Hundred Eighty-Nine Thousand, Nine Hundred Ninety-Five Dollars, and Fifty
Cents ($189,995.50). The Consultant's "Scope of Services", "Work Compensation Sheet", and
"Project Schedule" have also been amended and attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibits
"A", "B", and "C", respectively. All other terms and conditions of Work Authorization No.2 (C-OO-
12-181) shall be the same and remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Second Amendment to Work
Authorization No.2 (C-00-12-181) to be executed and delivered on the dates below.
WITNESSES:
ST. LUCIE COUNTY EROSION DISTRICT
BY:
CHAIRPERSON
Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
CORRECTNESS:
COUNTY ATTORNEY
WITNESSES:
TAYLOR ENGINEERING, INC.
BY:
Print Name:
Title:
R/WP/MISOTA YWRWAAMD2
Date:
"ar-2D-D2 D9:51am FrDm-TAYLOR ENGINEERING INC
9D41319841
T-891 PD2/D2 F-145
..
'-'
...",
Exbibit A
Scope of Work
Fon Pierce MarÍDe Ttlrde Monitoring :z002
Taylor Engineering, Inc. will engage the locallD8line turtle permit bolder, Ecological Associates, lnc" to
penonn marine tunle nest m01\itorin¡¡ of the Fort Pierce beach nourishment project area. Nest monitoring
sha1I be performed in accordance with the procedures of Specific Condition II.d of FDEP permit No,
OI26215-00l·JC. Daily surveys will be conducted nom March 1,2002 through September 15,2002 and
periodically thereafter until October 31,2002 or until all marked nesrs have hatched, whichever is later. A
representative sample of nests shaU be marked to monitor nest fate and derennine reproductive success
during the 2002 nesting season.
On completion of the 2002 monitoring we will prepare and sublDlt to St. Lucie County a tetter repon of
the daily nest monitoring activiries and reproductive success.
\\,«vcr2I1'ROPOSAlII'2002.Q23 ~\I. J.uci.Cuunty 2oo21'unk MOllltonl1!\p2002.023 SOW,doc
Mar-13-02 0~:~5~m FrDm-TAYLOR ENGINEERING INC
9047319847
T-865 P 04/05 F-655
;
'-
Exhibit B
Work Compensation Schedule
TAYLOR ENGINEERING. INC.
Fort Pierce Matine Turtle Monitoring 2002
..."
TASK 1: Marine Turtle Monitoring
Labor Days Cost Task Totals
Vice President 1.000 960,00
Administrative 1,000 400,00
Total Man-Days 2,000
Labor Cost 1,360.00
Non-Labor Units Cost
rurtle Monitor Subcontract (Ecological As60c,) 1,0 31.225.00
Total Non-labor Cost 31,22500
Total Task 1 32,58500
Project Total S 32,585.00
P2002-02~ St. Lucie Co, Turtle Monitor Add On,xls
~r-13-D2 04:45pm
Frcm-TAYLOR ENGINEERING INC
9D41319841
T-885 P 05/05 F-855
1<·'I,'II'·i1'
I I 'i;,,"
111
, '¡,:
II!
¡;. !!'.
i'II"
:a
;. ~
E! .= E
n. ! E
~ "ii ~
... E ~
i ~ I
...
co
..
...
GO
c
...'C ~o
uO
e=
Ole
~o ..
U oS ~
't:.!! 11 ..
*I ·C ~ .!!
.0 D.~ .. :.ï "
... ""
;¡: ...... ~ ~ ... ... co
>C o. ::;) :;) n.
w .c ë ... ... ""
:;'C E .. .!! ..
!~ Õ i ~ 'is
0::
u"
1I')t!
..
it
~
0
...
.
CI
c:
'C
.2
'j;;
a
::
Q)
i:
::J
I-
m
c:
II "L':
i~ 1:
Z >- 0
oK:= ~
.. 111 Q1
r.o a:
Ii ~
!! -tI
1J,-:~
~ tIJ rr. :i
N
..
i
£
II)
"'N
~~
~~
'<1.-
" §
"CIJ
-~.;
n.D
'-
..."
EROSION DISTRICT
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
REGULAR MEETING
Date: February 26, 2002
Tape: I
Convened: 9:54 a.m.
Adjourned: 9:54 a.m.
Commissioners Present: Chairman, Frannie Hutchinson, Doug Coward, Cliff Barnes,
John D. Bruhn, absent, Paula A. Lewis, absent
Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator, Robert Bradshaw, Asst. County
Administrator, Dan McIntyre, County Attorney, Ray Wazny, Public Works Director, Don
West, County Engineer, A. Millie Delgado, Deputy Clerk
I. MINTUES
It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve the minutes of the
meeting held January 8, 2002; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously.
2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS
None..
3. CONSENT AGENDA
It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve the Consent
Agenda; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously.
I. The District approved Warranl List Nos. 15 through 20.
2. Public Works- The District approved waiving the bidding process and
awarded contracts to 1) Underwater Engineering Services, Inc., not to exceed
$43,100 for the maintenance and repair ofthe geotubes and 2) Stewart Mining
Industries, Inc., not to exceed $10,000 for beach compatible fill to be
delivered to South Jetty Park and execution of said contracts by the
Chairperson contingent on review and approval of said contracts by the
County Attorney.
There being no further business to be brought before the District, the meeting was
adjourned.
Chairman
Clerk of Circuit Court
'"'
03/01/02
ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD
F7.ABWARR
....,
WARRANT LIST #22- 23-FEB-2002 TO 01-MAR-2002
FUND SUMMARY- EROSION
FUND
TITLE
184
Erosion Control Operating Fund
GRAND TOTAL:
EXPENSES
1,512.27
1,512.27
PAGE
1
PAYROLL
2,413.54
2,413.54
'-
03/08/02
ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD
F7.ABWARR
..."",
WARRANT LIST #23- 02-MAR-2002 TO 08-MAR-2002
FUND SUMMARY- EROSION
FUND
TITLE
184
Erosion Control Operating Fund
GRAND TOTAL:
EXPENSES
5/815.27
5,815.27
PAGE
1
PAYROLL
0.00
0.00
\.¡'
03/15/02
ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD
FZABWARR
....,
WARRANT LIST #24- 09-MAR-2002 TO 15-MAR-2002
FUND SUMMARY- EROSION
FUND
TITLE
184
Erosion Control Operating Fund
GRAND TOTAL:
EXPENSES
1,876.61
1,876.61
PAGE
1
PAYROLL
2,413.54
2,413.54