HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-162
,
1 RESOLUTION NO. 06-162
2 FILE NO.: MJSP-OS-0009
3
4 A RESOLUTION GRANTING MAJOR SITE
5 PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE PROJECT TO BE
6 KNOWN AS SWEET MEADOW ESTATES
7
8 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based
9 on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made
10 the following determinations:
11
12 1. Elliott Construction & Development Corporation, throuah aaent Thomas Lucido &
13 Associates, has applied for a major site plan approval for the 14 single family lot
14 subdivision project to be known as Sweet Meadow Estates Subdivision for
15 property located on the west side of Rogers Road approximately 600 feet north
16 of Edwards Road in the RS-3 (Residential, Single Family - 3 du/ac) Zoning
17 District for the property described in Part B.
18
19 2. The Development Review Committee has reviewed the site plan for the proposed
20 project and found it to meet minimum technical requirements of the St. Lucie
21 County Land Development Code and to be consistent with the future land use
22 maps from the St. Luce County Comprehensive Plan.
23
24 3. The proposed project is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives,
25 and standards of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the St. Lucie
26 County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code of Ordinances of the St. Lucie
27 County.
28
29 4. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property,
30 the character of the neighbor hood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, or
31 other matters affecting the public health, safety, and general welfare.
32
33 5. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the
34 proposed project on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design,
35 landscaping and screening.
36
37 6. The proposed project will be constructed, arranged and operated so as not to
38 interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance
39 with applicable district regulations.
40
41 7. The proposed project will be served by adequate public facilities and services.
42
43 8. The applicant has applied for and received certificate of capacity, a copy of which
44 is attached to this resolution as Exhibit A, as required under Chapter V, St. Lucie
45 County Land Development Code.
46
47 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St.
48 Lucie County, Florida:
File No.: MJSP-05-009
June 13, 2006
EDWIN M. FRY, Jr., CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
SAINT LUCIE COUNTY
FILE # 2917656 08/2312006 al 10:26 AM
OR BOOK 2641 PAGE 1966 - 1973 Doc Type: RESO
RECORDING: $69_50
tesolution No. 06-162
Page 1
1
2 A. Pursuant to Section 11.02.05(B) of the St. Lucie County Land Development
3 Code, the Final Site Plan for the project to be known as Sweet Meadow
4 Estates, is hereby approved as shown on the site plan drawings for the project
5 prepared by Thomas Lucido & Associates, P.A.., on January 18, 2006, and
6 date stamped received by the St. Lucie County Growth Management Director
7 on March 31, 2006, subject to the following conditions:
8
9 1. The Director of Growth Management is authorized to issue a development
10 order in such form as he may prescribe. No development shall occur and
11 the project cannot obtain any permits until a development order is issued
12 by the Director of Growth Management, or the person he designates in
13 writing to issue the development order. The Development Order shall be
14 recorded in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida with the
15 Resolution.
16
17 2. The Final Plat shall not be recorded until constructible engineering plans
18 are approved, and all common improvements are either: a) built and
19 accepted or approved by St. Lucie County; or b) secured with a developer's
20 surety held by the St. Lucie County in a form approved by the County
21 Attorney and an amount approved by the County Engineer, including an
22 amount necessary to cover the period of maintenance required by the Land
23 Development Code.
24
25 3. The resolution shall be recorded in order to provide constructive legal
26 notice of development conditions that run with the land. The act of
27 recording the resolution does not authorize development. All conditions of
28 approval and applicable code requirements must be determined to be
29 satisfied by the Director of Growth Management.
30
31 4. The Director of Growth Management shall obtain comments from the
32 appropriate county staff, legal staff, and other responsible agencies
33 regarding the satisfaction of all applicable code requirements and
34 conditions of approval prior to issuing a development order.
35
36 5, The Department of Growth Management shall confer with the County
37 Engineer, Public Works Department, Environmental Resources
38 Department, and Utilities Department to determine the number of
39 constructible engineering plans that shall be required to be submitted for
40 review. The applicant shall, following notification by the Director of Growth
41 Management, submit the required number of plans to the Department of
42 Growth Management for processing, distribution, and final action.
43
44 6. No development order shall be issued by the Director of Growth
45 Management until a complete set sealed constructible final engineering
46 plans, supporting calculations and survey data for the site work and offsite
47 improvements are approved by the Office of the County Engineer, Public
48 Works Department, Utilities Department, Environmental Resources
49 Department, Growth Management Department, Fire Department, and any
50 other agency that may be determined by the Director of Growth
51 Management to be necessarily involved in the review and approval of the
52 constructible final engineering plans for the site work and offsite
53 improvements. The determination of whether or not plans submitted by the
File No.: MJSP-OS-009
June 13, 2006
Resolution No.: 06-162
Page 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
applicant constitute a complete set of constructible plans shall be made by
the departments involved in the plan review within five business days of
the date the plans are received in the Department of Growth Management.
7.
The Director of Growth Management is authorized to evaluate project
concurrency, and to issue a certificate of concurrency upon his
determination that all requirements for concurrency management have
been satisfied. No Development Order shall be issued prior to the issuance
of a Certificate of Concurrency.
8.
As a part of any Final Plat of the proposed project, the petitioner, his
successors or assigns, shall conveyor dedicate by plat to St. Lucie
County, the east 15 feet of the subject property along Rogers Road for
additional right-of-way, as well as an additional five foot easement for
future right of way. To the extent permitted under the County's Code and
Compiled Laws, any such dedication may be considered eligible for Road
Impact Fee Credits.
9.
Prior to the issuance of a St. Lucie County Vegetation Removal Permit the
developer, his successors or assigns shall submit construction drawings
to the Environmental Resource Department review and approval. All tree
barricade locations, along with all of the conditions outlined below shall be
shown on the construction drawings.
· A conspicuous, suitable protective barrier (highly visible so that equipment
operators can see the limits of permitted construction activity) shall be placed
and maintained around the perimeter of the protected area to form a continuous
unbroken boundary, around individual protected trees at a minimum distance of
ten (10) feet from the radius of the dripline from all protected trees prior to the
commencement of onsite construction activities.
· Protective barriers shall remain in place until issuance of a certificate of
occupancy. In the event that any protective barriers are removed or altered all
land clearing and site alteration work will be stopped until the barriers are
restored and any necessary corrective actions taken to repair or replant any
vegetation removed or damaged as a result of these encroachments.
· The tree preservation area shall be maintained in its natural state so as not to
alter the water and oxygen content of the soil and impair its natural function.
· No grade changes or excavation of any sort may be made within the barricaded
areas.
· An area as large as possible should be given to individual trees preservation
areas, at least encompassing the dripline areas of the tree's crowns'.
· Depending on the amount the grade is to be raised around the tree preservation
island, we recommend transitional slopping of the raised grade to the natural
grade, or tree wells around the outer edges of the driplines, with drain tiles or
something similar to ensure that water will not pond around the roots of the
tree's.
· Typically tree roots extend far beyond the crown of the tree, if any excavation or
other activities are expected outside of the dripeline, the roots should first be
pruned (to the depth of required excavation) to severe them cleanly (large
concrete saws can be effective).
· If underground utilities must be routed through a protected root zone area,
tunneling under the roots shall be required.
· Irrigation shall be installed outside of the dripline of all protected trees.
· No soil shall be removed from within a vegetation preservation area.
· No fill material, construction material, concreto, paint, chemicals, or other foreign
materials shall be stored, deposited or disposed of within a vegetation
preservation area.
File No.: MJSP-05-009
June 13, 2006
Resolution No.: 06-162
Page 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
· No signs, permits, wires, or other attachments shall be affixed or attached to
protected vegetation.
· No equipment, including passenger vehicles, shall be driven, parked, or stored or
repaired within designated vegetation preservation areas.
· Supplemental irrigation for the trees will be necessary.
· Any tree pruning for clearance during construction must be performed by a
qualified arborist and not by construction personnel.
· Please be advised that trees destroyed due to construction damage are required
to be mitigated for at a ratio of 4:1*
10. Prior to the issuance of a St. Lucie County Vegetation Removal Permit a
condition of approval of the site plan shall be that the applicant delivers the
required mitigation of 802.5 inches to the St. Lucie County's Nursery.
11. The applicant/developer shall provide a five foot pedestrian easement
immediately adjacent to the right of way along Rogers Road. The
applicant/developer shall construct the sidewalk within this easement.
B.
The property on which this Major Site Plan is being granted is described as
follows:
THE SOUTH Yz OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL; THE NORTH
% OF THE WEST Yz OF THE NORTHEAST Yo OF THE NORTHEAST Yo OF
SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE
COUNTY, FLORIDA LESS THE NORTH 46.00 FEET AND THE EAST 15.00
FEET THEREOF FOR THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF PUBLIC ROAD AND
CANAL
SUBJECT LANDS CONTAIN 7.66 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
(PROPERTY TAX ID# 2430-112-0001-010/1)
(Location: West side of Rogers Road, approximately 600 feet north of
Edwards Road.)
C.
The approvals and authorizations granted by this Resolution for the purpose of
obtaining building permits on this property, shall expire on June 13, 2008,
unless the developer has obtained a building permit for the major site plan
described in Part A or an extension has been granted in accordance with
Section 11.02.06(B)(2), St. Lucie County Land Development Code.
D.
The Final Site Plan approval granted under this Resolution is specifically
conditioned to the requirement that the petitioner, Elliot Construction &
Development Corporation, including any successors in interest, shall obtain all
necessary development permits and construction authorizations from the
appropriate State and Federal regulatory authorities, including but not limited
to; the United States Army Corp of Engineers, the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection, and the South Florida Water Management District,
prior to the issuance of any local building permit of authorizations to commence
development activities on the property described in Part B.
File No.: MJSP-05-009
June 13. 2006
Resolution No.: 06-162
Page 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
E. A copy of this Resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described
in Part A, which plan shall be placed on file with the St. Lucie County Growth
Management Director.
F. A copy of this Resolution shall be mailed, return receipt requested to the
developer and agent of record as identified on the site plan applications.
G. A copy of this Resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described
in Section A, which plan shall be on file with the St. Lucie County Growth
Management Director.
H. This Resolution shall be recorded in the Public Records of St. Lucie County.
After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows:
Chairman Doug Coward AYE
Vice-Chairman Chris Craft AYE
Commissioner Joseph E. Smith AYE
Commissioner Paula A. Lewis AYE
Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson AYE
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 13th day of June, 2006.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
ATTEST
.........-ç:$:s.¡~'"
D";:-\JIT CGuR
rr.~f\'-:--'" !'.'\:
/,/-'~ /~ ";"""
I,::::/,'~' \('
'." '/: ~~,'~'\ '~
. ¡ /" I .'
b', !f¡!j~ ))~
,j", \'""..J ;:
:~:.,~~/«;~~
"f'\" I.~ ~rH\, ~~:;;
.~ .-:-<-<:""'~
BY
lap
H:\Planning\Sweet Meadow Lane\RESOLUTION
File No.: MJSP-OS-009
June 13, 2006
Resolution No.: 06-162
Page 5
1
2
3
4
Exhibit "A"
5
6
7
8 . General Location Map
9 . Area Subject to the Major Site
10 Plan Approval
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
File No.: MJSP-OS-009
June 13, 2006
Resolution No.: 06-162
Page 6
c:
0
oð :¡::¡
CO
c: .... cI- <0
0 0 Q') .¡ 0
a. '" ~i~ 0
0 '"
:¡::¡ .... ~.~ <Ô
U 0 0 , ¡t >-
:J 0 I ro
.... I.{) ::;:
-- a " '0
CJ) c: [I'
c: (]) a.. .~ ~ ro
~ c.
o E (f) "
~~ Ci
00. ..., ." c.
~ ace . ì ro
- Ii, ::;:
.0 0 \\c..
,."
(]) " <
W > ,../¿pd' 0"
(]) \..'ð~o
0 . ..,¡e(
~,
~ '~''''*''.
j
"~ ""''',or
>-
ë
o
o
Ü
;;;
>
ö'
o
.
'6
E
,oo~ "',$
.
.~ I""'~ '",.."
:
.~ ...'s
I""'~ "".~
f
'.
>-
ë
o
o
Ü
c
''e
.
::¡
]
,
A1uno:) aaqo4::1aa} Q
A petition of Elliot Construction & Development Corporation for a Major Site Plan
ApproVal for the project to be known as Sweet Meadow Estates
I I
I
7 16 \
8
\ I L..........
I
¡--_SEARSßT_ 0 0
.'"
'" I' . 0
UJ ,rJ) '"
I-¡-¡- " " :¡; ,UJ rJ)
'e, n
<s: ¡~. '"
0 UJ
- "
0
I '"
I
I -
"--- 18 117 "
I -
I
- HAPPINESS ST-
LJ
8// 10 11 12 13
/ 9
/
r- /
~±1
a::'20 21 2
~. Acrss RD ~
<S:';'I'
W 0'1918 17
-
I I I
1 1
I 1 1 I I I I
I 1 1
I I I 1 I I
1 ¡--r- I 1 f--
I 1 I 1 I 81191~ l
415 6 17 I ,1111 Ie 14115 16117
I I I
I I 819 I I 1 I
I 1 I I
I 1 I I I
I I I I
I I I I I EDWARDS RD
~
51 52 64 1 I,
"
-
3B 50 '" '" gj 2
f& r-;- 0
62 '"
37 49 54 >' N
Z
-' ¡¡:f-- e,
Z' 38 48 ~ 55 61 , :s
UJ , ,
-' O' f-- rJ)
f!Ji! ~!" " UJ 56 60 5
> - f--
::¡
::2: 57 59 6
34 ~!40 46 /.
:¡; - ---------- ~
33 :;...=..::... - - 58 ~~ \
32 ~ 41 45 V
~~~ 7
~«; 23 ---/
~ 24 43 8 /
/
'" V 9 / I J/
6' 22 / ~(
\ 21 10 / ~
/ " /, )
20 /
MJSP 05-009 ~ Subject property sr.£~~~~ N
A
{jrtnYtlí ;A((, 7JO(femertl ZJe;aY/'Inen1
'....'.,..: City of Ft. Pierce Map prepared May 5, 2006