Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-316 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 ~y 10: bm 1) , f'{)11) p (¡J 1") r;/ rJ RE-RECORDING '!D CHANGE NUMBER WHIŒI IS THE RESULT OF A SCRIVENOR' S ERROR 06-316 RESOLUTION NO. ~ FILE NO.: MJSP 06-006 A RESOLUTION GRANTING MAJOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS TREASURE COAST LEXUS, A CAR DEALERSHIP AND SERVICE SHOP WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. Nick Bishop presented a petition for Major Site Plan approval for the project to be known as Treasure Coast Lexus, a proposed 87,287 square foot car dealership and service facility proposed to be located at 5121 South Highway U.S. 1. 2. The Development Review Committee has reviewed the Major Site Plan for the proposed project and found it to meet all technical requirements and to be consistent with the future land use maps of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. The proposed project is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County. 3. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities or other matters affecting the public health, safety, and general welfare. 4. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect on the proposed project on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping and screening. 5. The proposed project will be constructed, arranged, and operated so as not to interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable district regulations. 6. The project site will be served by adequate public facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. Pursuant to Section 11.02.04(A) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the Major Site Plan for the project to be known as Treasure Coast Lexus, is hereby approved as depicted on the site plan drawings for the project prepared by Culpepper and Terpening, Inc. dated October 13, 2006, and date stamped received by the 51. Lucie County Growth Management Director on October 16, 2006, subject to the following conditions: EDWIN M. FRY, Jr., CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT SAINT LUCIE COUNTY FILE # 2958737 11f06l2006 at 11 :02 AM T . RESO OR BOOK 2694 PAGE 2433 - 2439 Doc ype. RECORDING: $61_00 Resolution No. 06-239 Page 1 File No.: MJSP-06-006 October 24, 2006 AJO:!!(I')m ~7Jhi!: i o[!j..~_ ;;tJON Z ~~:sE~ G>......1i:~." .. J:;¡s¡m;:o ~"'Co(");< :-":Þ~Oc... 8~i€~J~ tj8~f2 ,~ m ~!J. ;:0 "'15 " ~~ ~ -I.. ... ~:!:: :::t ~ m '" 0 m :;; <fO 0 o c ::¡ o o c ;:0 ... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 1. No Development Permits order shall be issued by the County until complete sets of sealed constructible final engineering plans, supporting calculations and survey data for all site work and offsite improvements are submitted to the County and approved by the Public Works Department, Utilities Department, Environmental Resources Department, Growth Management Department, St. Lucie County Fire District, and any other agency or County Department that may be determined by the Director of Growth Management to be necessarily involved in the review and approval of the constructible final engineering plans for the site work and offsite improvements. The determination of whether or not plans submitted by the applicant constitute a complete set of constructible plans shall be made by the departments involved in the plan review within five business days of the date the plans are received in the Department of Growth Management. 2. Prior to the issuance of a St. Lucie County (SLC) Vegetation Removal Permit, the final wetland delineation and impact avoidancelminimizationlmitigation plan must be approved by wetland jurisdictional agencies. Copies of correspondence demonstrating this approval shall be provided to SLC for review. 3. Prior to the issuance of a SLC Vegetation Removal Permit, if any prior unresolved wetlands violations are found by the Department of Environemnatal Protection (DEP), the applicant must take whatever compensatory actions DEP requires, including wetland delineation and avoidancelminimizationlmitigation recommendations from jurisdictional agencies 4. Prior to the issuance of a SLC Vegetation Removal Permit, the applicant shall provide the Environmental Resources Department (ERD) with a corrected Boundary Exhibit, which is consistent with the overall approved Site Plan increasing the Wetland B buffer width to 50 feet. 5. Prior to the issuance of the final certificate of occupancy, any areas within the littoral and upland buffer areas that are not currently well-vegetated or that are left bare due to the removal of exotic vegetation, shall be planted back with sufficient, appropriate native vegetation, The upland buffer surrounding the preserved wetland and pond shall consist of overstory, understory, and ground cover vegetation. 6. Prior to the issuance of a SLC Vegetation Removal Permit, the habitat preservation areas must be covered by a Conservation Easement dedicated to, or made in favor of, St. Lucie County, The following information shall be provided in order to process the conservation easement: 1) signed draft conservation easement, 2) site plans or map of conservation easement areas, and 3) legal description and number of acres of conservation easement. 7. Prior to the issuance of a Vegetation Removal Permit, an executed (signed) copy of the easement document must be provided. Within 60 days of the issuance of a permit, a recorded copy of the easement document will be required to be provided ERD. 8. Prior to the issuance of a SLC Vegetation Removal Permit, the applicant shall provide a revised Reserve Area Management Plan (PAMP), including management measures aimed toward maintenance of the pine flatwoods habitat value. Proposed measures should maintain understory openings and promote File No.: MJSP-06-006 October 24, 2006 Resolution No. 06-239 Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 B. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 regeneration of the canopy and herbaceous forage vegetation for resident species, such as the gopher tortoise. 9. Prior to the issuance of a SLC Vegetation Removal permit, the applicant shall provide a revised tree mitigation plan, site plan, and landscaping plan, incorporating all of the additional on-site tree preservation agreed upon in Applicant's October 18, 2006, letter to ERD, 10. Prior to the issuance of a SLC Vegetation Removal Permit, the applicant shall re- survey the uplands on-site for gopher tortoises. Survey results shall be provided to SLC and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). Any tortoises found on-site must be avoided or relocated, preferably on-site. The approved relocation permit and documentation of FWC's approval shall be provided to SLC ERD. 11. Prior to the issuance of a Vegetation Removal Permit, the applicant shall provide a revised tree mitigation plan, site plan, and landscaping plan to ERD (see Condition # 9 above), The property on which this major site plan approval is being granted is described as follows: COMMENCING ATTHE CENTER OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST; THENCE S.89°53'07"W., ALONG THE EAST-WEST QUARTER SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 3, A DISTANCE OF 331.00 FEET; THENCE S,00020'19''E,, PARALLEL TO SAID NORTH-SOUTH QUARTER SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 3, A DISTANCE OF 544,50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 125.50 FEET; THENCE N.89°53'07"E., A DISTANCE OF 289.00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY No, 1 (120,00' WIDE); SAID POINT BEING 42.00 FEET WEST OF, AS MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO, THE NORTH-SOUTH QUARTER SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 3; THENCE S.00020'19''E., ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 487,02 FEET TO A POINT LYING 165,00 FEET NORTH OF, AS MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO, THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 3; THENCE S.89°53'56'W., PARALLEL WITH SAID SOUTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 619.56 FEET TO A POINT LYING 661.55 FEET WEST OF, AS MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO, THE NORTH-SOUTH QUARTER SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 3, THENCE S,00020'19''E., PARALLEL WITH SAID NORTH-SOUTH QUARTER SECTION LINE, A DISTANCE OF 165.00 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 3; THENCE S.89°53'56"W" ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 331,16 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 3; THENCE N.00016'42''W., ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 316.80 FEET; THENCE N.89°53'07"E., A DISTANCE OF 261.38 FEET TO A POINT THAT IS 731.00 FEET WEST OF,AS MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO, THE NORTH-SOUTH QUARTER SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 3; THENCE N.00020'19''W., PARALLEL TO SAID NORTH-SOUTH QUARTER SECTION LINE, A DISTANCE OF 580.00 FEET TO A POINT THAT IS 425.00 FEET SOUTH OF, AS MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO, THE EAST -WEST QUARTER SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 3; THENCE N.89°53'07"E., PARALLEL WITH SAID EAST-WEST QUARTER SECTION LINE, A DISTANCE OF 200,00 FEET; THENCE S,00020'19''E., A DISTANCE OF 119.50 FEET; THENCE N.89°53'07"E., A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. File No.: MJSP-06-006 October 24,2006 Resolution No. 06-239 Page 3 1 2 3 4 C. 5 6 7 8 9 10 D. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 E. 19 20 21 22 23 F. 24 25 26 27 28 29 G. 30 31 32 33 34 H. 35 36 37 38 I. 39 40 41 42 J. 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 CONTAINING 503,927 SQUARE FEET OR 11.57 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. The approvals and authorizations granted by this Resolution for the purpose of obtaining building permits on this property shall expire on October 24, 2008, unless building permits have been issued or an extension in accordance with Section 11.07.05(F) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code has been granted. The Major Site Plan approval granted under this Resolution is specifically conditioned to the requirement that the petitioner, Nick Bishop, including any successors in interest, shall obtain all necessary permits and authorizations from the appropriate Local, State, and Federal regulatory authorities prior to the issuance of any local building permits or authorizations to commence development activities on the property described in Part B. The Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, shall remain valid for the period of Major Site Plan approval. Should the Major Site Plan approval granted by this resolution expire, a new certificate of capacity shall be required. The St. Lucie County Growth Management Director is hereby authorized and directed to cause the notation of this resolution to be made on the Official Zoning Map of St. Lucie County, Florida, and to make notation of reference to the date of adoption of this resolution. The Director of Growth Management shall coordinate the issuance of further site Development Permits. No final site construction authorizations or site Development Permits shall be issued until all requirements for such permits are met. A copy of this resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described in Section A, which plan shall be placed on file with the St. Lucie County Growth Management Director. A copy of this resolution shall be mailed, return receipt requested to the developer and agent of record as identified on the site plan applications. This resolution shall be recorded in the Public Records of St. Lucie County. The recording of this resolution does not authorize the commencement of anyon-site development activities without obtaining such further development permits as may be required. All applicable conditions of approval as set forth above, and all applicable code requirements must be met to satisfaction of the County before final site construction permits are issued. File No.: MJSP-06-006 October 24, 2006 Resolution No. 06-239 Page 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Doug Coward AYE Vice-Chairman Chris Craft AYE Commissioner Paula A. Lewis AYE Commissioner Joseph E. Smith AYE Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson AYE PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 24th day of October 2006. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONI¡: '{S ; ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA· <0" <- '. .:;; '(}'~~-'F) / ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM J ANDCORR~S~ County Attorn y File No.: MJSP-06-Q06 October 24, 2006 , '): > Resolution No. 06-239 Page 5 1 2 3 4 5 Exhibit "A" 6 7 8 9 Certificate of Capacity 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 File No.: MJSP-06-006 October 24,2006 Resolution No. 06-239 Page 6 CERTIFICATE OF CAPACITY 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 (772)-462-2822 Date: 10/23/2006 Certificate No. 2542 This document certifies that concurrency will be met and that adequate public facility capacity exists to maintain the standards for levels of service as adopted in the St Lucie County Comprehensive Plan for: 1. Type of development 87,287 square foot car dealership and service Number of units 0 Number of square feet 87,287 2. Property legal description & Tax ID no. 340350200670004; 340331100050006 West side US Hwy 1, south of Midway Rd. Treasure Coast Lexus 3, Approval: Building Permit Resolution No, 06-239 Letter 4. Subject to the following conditions for concurrency: ~ . Res. No. 06-239. Owner's name Nick Bishop Address 835 NW Greenwich Court Port St. Lucie FL 34983 6, Certificate Expiration Date 10/24/2008 This Certificate of Capacity is transferable only to subsequent owners of the same parcel, and is subject to the same terms, conditions and expiration date listed herein. The expiration date can be extended only under the same terms and conditions as the underlying development orderissued with this certificate, or for subsequent development order(s) issued for the same property, use and size as described herein, ¡'ð {l ¡.IrK' Growth Management Director: St Lucie County, Florida Signed 7? øf!- ~/l \,.~ , Date: 1012312006 A.'K..OD( c. Concurrency Review by: Signe¿7~ ' Date: 10123/2006 Monday, October 23, 2006 Page 1 of 1