HomeMy WebLinkAbout1911
e
0.1/1 ~~\~i,...:2fLf...&
(-'c
J"l'--
_{ , I
- \.',
Q. R.
=1 c r,
,..,
j
r. ~\ ~K
(, T. L ,,: c: E C'! S" ~, f LA.
IN '1'HK COUftf O. UCOJU) IN AND
----.oJt--BJlOVAIlI) COUNft. PLOA IDA
NO: 4801-D
F IR.:iT ~JATIONAL BANK IN FORT
LAUDERDALE, a national bank-
ing. association,
~
Plaintifr,
vs
GEORGE T. JAMIESON and
ELIZABh'TH JAMIESON,
-----------.
.
.
Defendants.
PINAL JUDGMENT
This cause coming on to be heard on the motion or
l)Lllntiff for the entry ')f Final Judgment herein, and it ap-
~';J.rlnf, t) ti1C CDurt that the Plaintiff hal riled a sworn
;J t.d. t~r..ent ,:If aCC')U:1 t, togethor with the original promissory
,.Jte tllJreln sued upon, setting forth that the Defendants,
GE)RGE T. JI\HIES:):~ and ELIZABETH JAMIESO~, are Juatly in-
.icbt.:!d to the Plaintiff herein in the amount of $350.00
t-~r' nCli)ill <.lnll $60.0j interest as of March 10, 1961; and
tha l;. Uw Plaintiff l1ereill has filed affidavits ')f two at-
r )rneY3 t-'r.J.ctlclng bef.,)l'u this court in regard to a rea-
sonable attorneysl fee jn this suit; and it appearing to
t,l1(~ c,urt that service Jf process was duly and regularly
!lc.J.d UPOI) the Defendants, Elnd that a Default was entered
dgainst 3uid IRfendants f'Jr their failure to answer or
')thorwls~ )-,lead to Plaintiff' B Complaint as required b:;r
law; a~d the court being 0therwlse duly advised in the
premlsc3, upon conslderatl:Jn thereor, it ls, therefore,
)RUERED A~D ADJUDGED that t~e Plalntiff, FIRST
'!ATl/):-.JAL i31ViK IN FORT LAUDERDALE, recover (MID the De-
fe~l,jant8, Gf~ORGE T. JA~IESON and ELIZAB~"TH JAMIESOr-., the
~