HomeMy WebLinkAbout1368
I
j.' I
:! .,
s s >" p r !l
, \.
O,ll,
loot
22 PMt615
s 1. t Vfr[ (OIJ~nt H A,
;In litt ~ GIomt. ~ <<1~~ ~ af ~
jJbdt of ~
Olctm.tv .t ....
}
} .....
\
;
I, CHM 8.. LIMPUB, CWk Q{ the C~tY CA.'iI!Jrt ft1 Mid tw t.M County and 8!atIJ &f~k1.
do ~-t!hy ~ that the fOAC":>W3 ~_ " ~ a.od ~ \'W)' an.d Uianl tr~t of
flnat Judgment In th. ca.. er T.BoC. ASSOCIATES. INCq, · New York
Corp~ratlcnf Plaintiff, vs. aCKER ASSOCIATtS, INC., . Corporation.
11entlcal with ECKERS ASSOCIATES, IRe.. a Corporation, Defendant,
C.~SE NO. 11,542, Recorded In Minute BOQk 9. P'ge 347 and 348; Judgment
Dock.* t 4, Page 10
118 ~ MlOO wW' ~rS&n~ the ftM and ~ Qflflllid Cou,rt,
AND 1 fi1.JR'fli&H C"RRTI,-y that UVl ..Xi C.o-.wty ('>>un ~ a (~,..ut. of Hi:coro li'ith !l11
o15roo ~ a.nd U\at 1 8m the cullt.r.xlla.fl 01 \.be t$)t,JrtU M..i of t.he /IN.! of AM <.A:Nft And thAt lhi.!l
.Uf'$tation i,g'l.n due fonn Ami in ~l<<'<htnoe IiliJt.h tDa i,;o\T~ (,t ;.};ol; S~~ :;.! .!!'h:#",
IN TF..8TIMONY WHERF..Q.' I Mvt' betrontJ) i!Irt u'l.}' hllnci .and di~ed the dlklAl I!lMl of
Mid Cowt Rt tile C.o<..J.rt H~ W Od..ndc, {~ (A)Unt},; ~, thm the 11 t ~y of No'.n,mbe r
A D. 19 61
0lA'S. E. LIMf'\.n, . , Cut!':
--,wC~~-7-' '~~-./" ~~'~._~->-.-
Hy4..:....., :,,:;J::/~^?':!tH'::(~--,-- ",- D. C.
'/ ..
10001 (0)
. fU,.J] '} i\~M, ~t1RDtD~<
rr~ ..OttWj.t~ni.BL(;K
r;tl N()"I ,ft. -ft1 2: (} 1
ROGER POitRAS. UtKK
$1. ustlE ~.Wi1.tJliR!Qi
, I'll '~1
.- If - _ ;~
. _ " ""'J(~ "",, '
. . 9. _ .
, .-.."
. !
,,"j' /..
~ ~ ~ .. '<-. . '. .', ':. . .... -'.'.