HomeMy WebLinkAbout1662 , . • ~ . .
. • , • • E
t
, ~ .
~ nate. Provided~that durinq such removal ths grantees sha~ll be
pravided adequate ingree• and eqrees to thei~c groperties for the
purpoee of operating a citrua grove ~nd its developaaent. 1~1~iD
• AL30 PROV=D8D that in the event the eaid dike and roadway ahould
,
. be moved to the $a?stward ae hereinabave provided, the grsntore
, `
covenant and agree th~t the road eo constructed upon ite removal` ~
~ to the Baet ahall be a paseable and ueable road eubs~antially
equivalent in utility to the road eo replaced. T'he purpose of
~ thia proviso ia that the grantees, their heirs, adminietrators and
assigna, ahall have a qood, ueable and safe road for the.develop- .
ment, operation and nwintenance of a citrus grove to the Narth of
the location of the easement granted in thia Paragraph 4.
5. It is the aense and intention of~all of the parties -
hereto that it :aay be advieable that the dikee~maintained by each
of them at the Sast of their reepective-propertiee along or on eaid
60-foot easement shall be of a height of not lese than thirty (30)
feet above aea level.or eight (8~ feet above ground level, which-
ever is the higher. 8awever, no party hereto hereby undertakes to
.
erect or maintain his dike at any specified level. In the event
i
. that any party hereto shall erect a dike along or near the line of
E said 60-foot easement, eo as to protect his p~operty from water
L
E
fram the east in constructing the road hereafter mentioned, no other
` party hereto ahall lawer or weaken, or directly or indirectly cause
4 .
` ~ to be lawered or weakened, any euch dike so erected by any other
~ party hereto. In no event shall ariy dike erected by a party hereto
be reduced by any other party in conatructing the road hereinafter
~ ~ .
f inentioned belaw. a 3-1/2 foot top and a elope of one (1) foot to one (1)
; .
; foot. .
~ ~ 6. Some of the partiee hereto may wieh to construct a
~
r
~ ; roadway~along the top of the dike on said 60-foot eaeement. They
~ .
, . are agreed that there is not sufficient spoil~withia said dike to
permit the construction of any euch desired roadway at the required
~ ~ _ ~ -5- ~oRr 85 ~~i1
u?~r on~oa ar. Ros~s ~o RoosRa ~~wcs. r~o~eww •
j ~ • .