HomeMy WebLinkAbout1775 IIt T~ CII~CUIT CO~TRT 0!' T6i ~fIlRH ~
Jt~IRL CZ~CQYT ~ l~`L~O~tDA, IX
AT~! t+0~ O~C~J1 OOUM!![~ ~iA7tIDA
I!~ C~i~Ci1rY MO. ~401
s~.sz~ss~x v. ~cooc3w~, * ~5~~ ~
#
Plaintiff, *
~
vs. +
s
CALV Il~ I.~s lb000C~~, tr
r
D~f~daut. *
r
r~ ~ s• w~? t~~ f• t r•
F~A~, D~CREE O! DIVOA~C$
.~r ~i~~~r`r~r~
THI8 ca?U8t camne on fvs trial on th~ lOth day of ~ebruary,
D., 1967, at ltissi~ae~, ~losida, an~d the Oourt bavinq qiven full
conaird~ration bo all o! the evidenca, ~in~da and determines: thi~
~
Court ha4 juriadictioa of the parties and the subjact mattsr of this '
,
~uitt t1;at th~ =elationahip o! hueban~d at~d wife ~o~w e~cieta between ths
, .
P1a1AtSff and th~ D~fwdantt that tho equitise aro witb tho plaiatif!
and aqainet th~ D~l~ndant, and the Plaintiff, ELIZ~BiTB V. Mcc'~OOGA~f, ~
la entitled to a divorco. It is tt?~roupon
oqm~RID ~iD n~cali~ aa ~ouar+s:
1. Tbat the marriaq~ betveeaa the plaiatiff, ELIZASS"~ V.
Mc~(i00G1~t, arid the Defendant, CAtVM LEE 1fcK'~OOG1~t, bs and the aame is
hereby dis~olv~d, aad the eaid parti~ and each aE them ar~ f~rever
lr~ed fr~+ the bonds of matrimony herot~ofor~ exi~tinq bet`+ae~ tha~
and fro~a the obligat3rotis arising tha~c~f~^o~. ~
a
2. ~hat ths Stipulatloa a~d aqr~aiaeat previroualy ~ut~rvd
in~o by ths partia harrt~o aAd introduc~d into ovideace aa Plaintiff•a
~ibit lb. 1, i~ acc~ptod by tb~ Qo~urt aad it i~ h~rsDy inoorporated
by s~ieraona~ ss a part ot thi• l~~nal Docre~ and th~ pastiae hwcato
;
as~ baroby os+~~sed bo oo~ly Mitb ~h~ p~+ovisLons th~s,ot. ~
F
i
3• '!!?it 1~~ D~l~RrdaAt, C.l1~af/t! .Y~i ~AOC~1~t, hlt~y Os~cl~s~d ~
to pay th~ c~hild ntpport psyaotar o~ ~5.00 p~r ~]c aa provid~'! in ~
PACf 17~e
s,,: ~ .
.