HomeMy WebLinkAbout1208 ~ , +
r
1F2298
,
l~ ~
~I _ . ~ ~
1 ~ LA'rJ OFFICES OF - ~Noo
~i DAhZEL M. FADF.NRECHT a~ ~SEO~
2i? FRED L. JOHNSTON, JR. 6~ F
~I422 ttorth Douty street ~,~..,3~ 't
3 Hanford California i a. ~ ~
~ ~ D
~ Telephone: 584-4449 _ -
4,~ NOV 2+~ ~ysj ~
~lA~torneys for Plaintiff i
5 eYMARJOR~ (
~'l~~~~Mg I
6 ~j ~ o~,u-Y ~
~
.
8~~ SUPERIOR COURT OF 1KE STATE OF CALIFOR1~iIA
9;; IN AIvD FOR THE COUNTY OF KINGS
1' . ~
lOj~ * * *
i, ~
11;iMARY VIRGIDiIA LANGEL, N0. 18457 j~
i j
12~f Plaintiff, IYTERLOCUTORY JUDG1~~2~T OF
DIVORCE (Default) j
13;~ -vs- 1
~
14~t~pNALD JOSEPH LANGEL, - 4
' I
- 15 Defendant . ~
!
16: The above entitled action came on regularly to be heard
,
171?on th` 15th day of November, ~967. DANIEL M. FADENR~CHT and FRED L.
. ,
18~; JO:~~iSTON, JR., by FRID L. J0:-CdSTON, JR. appeared as attorney -(s) fori
t
19;~plaintifP. On proof made to the satisfaction oP the court, the ~
20l~court finds that dePendant has been duly served witn process nerein 1
21~•
yand has not appeared or answered the complaint filed herein or taken+
2?;'any other proceedinas within the time provided by law, and the de- j
23;~fault oi said defendant has been duly entered; that all the alle- ~
~
24i;gations of plaintiff~s ~omplaint are true, and•that a divorce ought ~
25;~to be granted to plaintiff ~ro~? defendant on the ground of defendantf~s
!
Ho~ extrene mental cruelty. ;
27~; IT IS ADJUDGED as an interlocutory ~udg~aent herein that ~
.28?,plaintiff is entitled to a divorce fro~ defendant on the above s~ateii
i:
29~~ ground; that when one year shall have expired iro~ October 2, 1~67,i ~
i~ ~ ~
30~:the date of service of a copy af the summons and coc?plaint herein
! ~
31~~upon defendant, the court on tne motion of either party hereto, or
: i
32~'upon its own motion, may enter a finai ~udgment herein grantin; a ;
~
l
uw orr~us o? -
us
DwNS[L M. FwOG~t[CxT~~ ~
FwcO L. lONr~aTON. JR ~ 1~ I
~..~.~~R„N.1~ ;
wviwwa.cnuroiwu ~i n~? i
BCOK 169 PAGE 1~ ~V ~ '
x~
-