HomeMy WebLinkAbout2034 .
1F28.~2
u~ ~ sx~t c~?~s caa~rr,
~ ss. uicis co~nr, it~o~m~?
CASS ~i0. 67-1Z-210S
Cj:t~ nc -i r~,~,Q~
P~O~'ESSI~IIL esCVRITIBS : ST. iUC-~~ ppt;;~N
CO1tPOR~?TIOM. t t. Wi1lIAM 6.1Y~ Sq~p ~
: hereby oerMp the within ~nd forogoi~
plain~iff, t ~o be ~ t?ue and ca?ett c~r ol th~-on~al
a it ippats on RecorQ ~d fik in tlk.Oflice
= o~ !he Srt~aN paina ~t
vs.
' Florlda. ~~,e~~!~
= MAT~I ~ ~
.
Bi~tA1eD R, OZ~l30~T. ~ my ~~'oi'SAd. . -
= Z Y .c
Dofe~ndant. _ , ~9~
, _ _ , ,
~ _ .
~~~..~~.~~~w= ww~!! ~1; y
^ ~ f~ . :c , .
R~r
lL_:.-,y,~' ; ` {:J
-
qMR , . -
~ -
THI8 C~?VSE caning on for hsaring this 20th day~'o~~D~cember,
1967, snd i! appearing to ths Oowct that servic~ as authori~~d by
lsw va~ had upon the Defendant, and the Oourt haviag con~idsred the
evidence prsie~tsd 1oy ths Plai~tif! in e~pport o! ita clal~m, and it
appearing bo the cburt that the Da~e~dant ia indabted t~o ths Plaintii~f
in tha sutn of FIVB HUbDR~D, SaVE~iTY
~BVg~T and 61/100 ($577 .61 ~ DQLLARS,
` plus inter~t as allo~red by la+w, t7~urt ~o~ta, and a ssasonabl• attarnays •
fee for Plaintilf's att~ornaya, and the ~urt being lully advised in
th~ prratass,
ZT IS T~SRBUPO~t ORDBRBD AKD ADJtIDG~ that a~inal J'udgpent
be, and 3,~ h~rsDy, snterrd in ~av~or o! ths plaintitf, pRO~BBgIqtAL
SIDCURI?ZS8 ~OApORAT2CN, aqaio~t ths Dofet~dant, BEA~utD A. aI880lT, in
tho a~ouat ot t=VE I~JaD1t8D, 9sV~i~Y-8sVE1~ aad 61/Y00 t$5T7.61) DOrLL~RB,
plus iut~zat o! $ a a• 4~ Oourt oo~ts of sc~ Plu~
S~
3~ a rsa wnabl~ atburney~ • fu for plaintif t• s att~orn~ya,
tor all d! ~+hich 1~t ~x~c.~utiron isau~. ~
~ l~ ORD~tm at T~ort Pi~res, ~lorl~+cla, this I~ day oi
D~c~s, 1?.D.. 1967.
Fit~O aND RECOR~O • "
- ST. LUCIE COU~t'TY, FLA, - ~I [ c.%<. CC«,~~ ~J. ~T~
c ,
r n _ ~ L~ 8~sa11 Cla Lets ~u~ct .flidqs
-L~~~`~ -
'6~ n~r 22 d 1G : QO
~
f
1 t. .L ,,;;1. , .(~!';j
- :t ~
W~I~~W ~~1W./~i,~