Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2966 . ~ ~ ~ ~ . rac~~ - ~ . ii' . IN TI~' CIRCUIT OOURT ~OF TH8 ELBVSNTH JUDICZAL CIRCUIT IN AND F'OR DADE OOUNTY, FLORID~A, IN CHADiCBRY, D10. 66C 6403 (Judqe J s W.IGeh ) ~ Filsd thi.-~da~ ~D.1~~ PATRICIA LISK, ~~~y o _ D.19~~ • 1 ' Plaintif ) C~rcudt Minute Book = . . ORDE~A1J~a_3r _~Q _ATTORNEY FEE ~ -va- ) ~ B. THBRMAN - ..~s: ~„s uit ~ : : ALFRED FIILL LISK, JR.. ) f~:~, ~ D~Ui7 ' ~3 Defendant. ~ i ~ .i.`71~06 : ~ THIS CAUS$ caaainq on to be heard on the Attorney for ~ the Plaintiff, NSAL J. DUNN's Petition for Attorney Fees; and D~ . l ~ the Court"Tiavinq entered its Order on the 25th day of Janu~ry, 1968, wherein it wass ORDSRSD AI~ID A~DJUDGED that determina- i ~ tion of costs and attorney's feea shall be reserved until auch time as NEAL J. DUNN, Attorney for the Plaintiff, PATRICIA LISK, ~ ~abmits proper proof desiqnating time epent, work acc~nplislaed, ` • . s~ osts ~nd expenses . " •.rcJ Q~ -~'ti Q `<< That the Court record reflects that Notiae of this Hear- ' , J . ~ ,ingcy~as mailed directly to the Defendant, aince it appears from ~ = ~v ~ w~ :~#~te record that the Defendant fi l,ed a Petition,. in persona, on . ' the 16th day of January, 1966. i•'. : • _ ~ Y: ~ Testimony presented to the Court by the Pet~ta.~e~:,~ai~d ~ , - - ~ his witness indicate that the Petitioner has devo#ed~:,fn=_~xce8s„of . ; - . ~ _ _ . ( ~ : ' - ' forty-four (44) office houre on thi s matter since ~~he date ~ ~ - ~ l `v : . August 19, 1966, which included time spent at hearing~ before this , Court, negotiation that reflects i~ the Order dated Ja?nuary 20, ' 1968 nun~erous 'phone ca118 to the Defendant and other intereated ~ parties directly involved in this matter; the Petitioner'a file ~ ~ reflects over forty-one (41) lettere written concerning case ~ ~ ? ~ 'problems and developinq secured payments for the support of the ; ~ ~ ~ minor children of the partiea involved, in an amount in excess of ' ~ j~ $25-,000.00, arid the Court beinq otherwise informed of the• prob- ! ; llems and context of this matter and havinq reeerved the deterno~ina- ? , ? ~tion of costa and attorney feea by its order of JaAUary 25, 1968, _ nt~?~ J. DuKN ! ~rowncr wT 4?w ~ iatii A~titLt1l Yw~o~~s ~ ~a,.r~. i~-~~ow aa~sa I ~~iN~ t Tc.c?~o~t a7l~7i~t ~ { ~ -~5 -w,a~~„._ ~.s-~' r_ : _ . . _ - ~ _ ,~"'_S~ . .