HomeMy WebLinkAbout1948 .
~
~ 211f~'7~
IN THE CIRCUTT OOIRT OF THfi t9TH
" -JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, tN AND FUR ST. ~
LUCIB CUUNTY, FLOR IDIA.
IN CHANCFRY 6816-E
AOCLPHUS IVEIS, ) ` -
Piaintiff, )
vs. )
VERONICA WEIS MILLHt, ) r ~
Defendant, ) ~
_ LIS PENDENS
TG: T1~iE DEFENDANTS, ADOLPHUS VYEIS, FIRST REDERAL SAVINGS TSc
LOAN ASSOCIATION OF FORZ' PIIItCE. AND ALL OTHERS WHOM iT MAY
CONCIIt N :
- YOU ARE HEREBY NOrTIF IED of the insti tuit on of th e above
styted action by the above named defendant again5t Adolphus
IVeis asking enforcement of the Pina t Decree of Di.vorce entered
on Uctober t9, 1961, as recorded in Chancery Order Book SO
of. the public records of St. Luci~ County Florida, atso asking
z
the Court to selt the various interests in the property to
Nhich you claim an interest at a pubiic sale, said property
being d'escribed as:
LOT 4 and Nor th 23 feet of Lot 5, btock 1, NEBRASKA COUtT
SUBDIVISION, as per ptat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5,
page 48, pubtic records of St. Lucie County, Florida.
and being located in St. Lucie County, Ptorida.
The above named defendant further asserts tha t her claim
under the above mentioned Ainal Decree of Divorce is superior
to the mortgage hetd by the Pirst Federat Savings & Goan of
Fo•t Pierce entered on May tl, t9~1, as recorded in officra~~
records baok votume t92 page t192 of the pubtic records of
St. Lucie County Atorida, such mortgage agreement having been
entered into with prior notice of the above me ntioned Finat
Decree of Divorce. ~
In the event that the proceeds of such a sale are not
sufficient fo meet yo'ur obtigations under the afore~entioned
Ca
Final Decre~' o~-Divorce, the plaintifF a~outd ask the Court
'to hold you personaily liabie and the amoe~nt of the difference
~ betviceen the assessed vatue af said property pius one haif of
any rentat income that has been rec~ived by the defendant which
r~
has exceeded the mar tgage obligation aa stated in the afore-
~'irc~~~t C~t. Min, Z,;~,1~;3 i~46
-~.-t_<:.~__