HomeMy WebLinkAbout1228 . - ~ . . • ~
_ ~
,
, . . ~
. ;
1 Case No. A 96061 ~ ~
. ~
2
3
3 223323 _ _ ; . : ' i ~ '
. ~
4 : ~
f'AMELA BOOTHBY
5
s IN THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT pF THE STATE OF NEVADA ;
~ IN AND FOR~THE COUIVTY OF CLARK t
8
9 JANET A. CARR,
10 Plaintiff,
11
vs.
12 IZICNARD J. CARR, ~
13 Defendant.
14 ~
~
f
i 15 FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
~ AVD DECREE OF DIVORCE
F
~ 16 BE IT REMEMBERED that this Cause came on regularly for
7
1?
trial, Plaintiff appearing personally and by her attorneys, GUILD, ~
F lg ~ ;
; HAGEN & CLARK, and the Defendant appearing by his attorney,
~ +
~ 19 RICHARD BRYAN, ESQ. Evidence was introduced and the case was ~
~ 20 =
~ submitted for decision. Whereupon the Court rendered its decision #
~
~ _21 in favor of the Plaintiff. The Court f inds that all of the
~ 22 ~
~ allegat~ons of the Complaint are true.
~ 23
~ AS CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, the Court finds that the Plaintif
~ 24
r; is entitled to a final and absolute decree of divorce from the
25 ~
= Defendant upon the grou nds of incompatibility of the parties in
26 .
- marriage. '
27
NOW THEREFORE, IT HEREB~' IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND
28 ;
'_:E DECREED as follows: ~
- 29
= 1. That Plaintiff be, and she hereby is, granted a
- 30
decree of divorce dissolving the bonds of matrimony now and
.
3U!LG, MAGEN
r, e CIARR
A?TGRNEIS AT LArlf
' ioz ROFi wRr
F:NO, NEYADA ,
- ~ ~ 1y9 P~~E i2~? - i
e~so~ b00K '
~