HomeMy WebLinkAbout1863 _ .
' _ . _ _ #
, - ~ .
~ ' , .
. ~
~
~ ~J
i
~ , ii~i~
~
1
I IN TtiE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEF.N'FH
24~,~~p Ji1DICI1IL CIRCUIT OF FLORIUA IN A^7D FOR
p~i.!rf AF1\CH COUNTSt CIVIL ACTION
~ Case ho. 71 C 53;10 Smith
, d
t
~ FIAREhC~ C1IRSILLO, * ~
' CtC . ~ *
i - .
: S - ie
' ~ Plaintiffs, *
j _ * FINAL JL?DGMEN'P -
i - vs . * . ~i
~ * ~ ~
~
~ ~ 3at~s t•s. B~~vro~n, ~x. , * ~
* N
i -
' Defendant. * ~
. ) N ~ T
1 r-- _ . . . t
1 ^ This cause came on for hearing before ~ti~;_Dece~er ~
~ ~ - ~ . .
~ o
27, 1972, after due notice to both Plaintiff and Defemiant,
upon Plaintiff's Complaint and Defendant's Answer, and the
Court having noted no appearance by the Defendant, JAlSES
; t~i. BEAUFORD, JR., and after hearing testimony presented by
i
; the Plaintiff an3 considering exhibits ad.mitted into
~
~ evidence and being fuily advi~ed in the premises, the Court
3
~ finds that the accident which occurred on Septeriher 14, 1969
i ~ and the in;uries su~tained by FLOREr7CE C1IRSIL~,O were a direct ~
i -
r
~ } and proxir?ate resu?t of the negligence of the Defendant,
f
~ 3A2•i~'S :i. BF~IUFOP.D, JR. , accordingly, it is °
s
~ ORDFRED A`ID ADJITDG~D that a final judgm~nt is h~reby
~ ' rer.dered in favoz of Plaintiff, FLORE?+CE C11F2SILL0, for the
s
~ use ar.d b~ne£it of ST11TE FAR2•1 l~SUTUILL A(FO;:CII~LE ZNS[JRIILICE
~ ;
~ : CO.~.PAtI`j, znd that the said Pla~ntiff do have and recover of
~ and fro:*~ the D~fer.dant, JAt~i~'S ri. BEAUFORD, JR. , the aum of
~ ` $1,73'..45, plu~ costs in the aTOUnt of $25.C~0, for which
i ~
~
~
~
~ ?
~ ~ ' ~
- ~ ~~3~3 Fctf 11~~ ~
~ ~ ' ~
~ j f ~
~
x~ t ~
i
16~ ' . ~ _ ~ .
~ . . .
. .s. _ . . ` ~ . ~
(
~ E
~ f
i
;
~ ~ t i
~ ~
~ . . . - U R i ~ ...,..~..r-. .
soox2l~ P.,~~~861 ~ .
~ -
~
a - - - _ _
x~'~ ~ F "",.~~~'y,~~,,M~
Y 5' s ~ ~ ~ _ ~ .,."`~'Y'
w~~~'L..,+~~.i~~'s+.~~T'~:4X'~ . . vu ~