HomeMy WebLinkAbout1004 DOMINION OF CANADA ) i EO ~?~~~E~v~~L
~ s~i1rC+E OuM r
PROViNCE OF ONTARiO ) ~~E~~ ~^;;i11T COURT
) aFCAR~ vf4~~j~f0......~+.••
COUNTY OF PEEL ~ ~ 2~ ZQ AH ~~3
~ i~JOSSJ
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day,•before me, an .
officer duly authorized in the Province aforesaid and in the
County aforesaid to take acknowledgments, personally appeared
CLIFFORD A. HAINES and ULVA M. HAINES, his wife,
to me known to be the persons described in and who executed
the foregoing instrument and they acknowledged before me that
, they. executed the same.
. 4 WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and
a-
g~COVince aforesaid this 6th day of March, 1973. _
. ' } : , ' ~ •
. ~ ~ _
t.• . , _
. ,-.s-
,1: ~ . _ . . . . :
. ~ ~ys.
h ~ J;;` ~ = i ~
, - ~ , + »
% ~ ,
i 2 . . . .
r ' • Uti • .t'
~ . 1~ ~ ~1n . /
~i ~ • ~ ~
I ~ ' .
~ ` Charles Blaine Bowy ~r # ` ~ :
- A Notary Public in ~ ~ ;fQr~~e =
Province af Ontario fd~i~,~~f~~#II~
. ,
„ .
, - - _ - .
-
~ - - , - ; , ~
_ ~ _ . , . ; - - - -
. - ~ ~ r - 1':' "'c' ° - r,,, . . ' ~ . ~ .
c ~ . . i ~ . . . . . . -
: . ~ _ ' . = > . = . . .
~x~ . . 1~.~;.~~~e ~ Deputy fCItr~- ~ . : . _x k - ~ =
. ~so~cs of 4~ariv ~ Toxnt ~ ~ Bxa~pton - _ - au c~ti ~
PB+e 1 m ax ~ r~?~ ~ on~, c.n.a.: c~t =
co~ ~ PEEL . _ ; ; . ~
; vE the Co~mc~? Cou~t aE tbe satd:.Counts, ehc :~aid Goure ~s • C•ou~t of Re4ord. h.~ b~ .
I . a ~
~ - ~ Qjssh~ es folW~rr~
r .
~ CHARLBS BLAINE BQWYER - _
~ to du .aid P~ovince, who.e nainc ts aubscrtbod co tlte amched Inscs+uQent, ..w ac t~ie mne ~
~ of wMccibiiqi thercto~ .s ~j~t~pc~ ~u~tj~t ia and for the ~tt cif •(~tiD, ~a~tDs,
i aul~ wmmi~doned and dut~ awthorl:ed b7? the laws thereof m ad~niniaer oatha. t~ t~1te
~ affid~vics and to certit~ the P~ ~~s a~ other inmv~net?ts in a~iti~ oo be Teco:ded
wi~+in tLe said Provtnc~
~ I have compac«1 ~e s~n~cu~e cf d~e sa~ No~T public subscdbed _ co d~e aaached '
~ ~rummc wiih _ the spedmea ~wre of che ~aid Na~r Publtc filed ta t~is office wd ver{i~; -
~ . - ,
E bdievc rbe said d~nature co be _ f~~ ~
- I bave compared the imprasiou of che ~eal oa che atn+ehed Iaacumenc +vith tbe -
E ' specimen impre~don of ~he sai oE c~e satd Noca~ Publie Hled in ~his office ~ad vedly
3 believe tbe uid impreaioa of cba uat co be ~a?ufae.
'r ~ _ ~ ~ . ~
~tt Qlestimatt~ ~t~ I have bereunw ~ec m~ Hand md offici~?1 ~eal ~t
i
c 1Zth a.~? ~ ~ March ~c 73
~ No 46 . _ . ..~1.-- ~
~ . _ -
k so p.a..~a~~ . _ . ~ `
4 t a!r. ~ . . ~ - . . . - . - . . s-. - . - ' . _ . . .
§
!
~
~ s~ k ?.1.~ 10~~
~ ~~Y ~ 1, , . - ~s 'm~~w-
e~""~ s~£~,~,~
a~;.
, ~