Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0056 , N'i'HE C I V IL 1) IV I5 IUtV OF COUN`1'Y COUk'r IN ANU F4R SAIN'1~ I.UCI~ COUN'lY, FLORIAA _ ~'cw~A~ CASS No. 73-78b-SP-01 rv~s~,t~ TN$ ONE NOIt'iH 3HOP ) Plaintiff ~ ) -vs - ) ; ELOISE CHANEY llefendant ~ ~ r . ~ ) i s O R U E R i ~ ~ A rep2evi~i action ca~ only be enter[ained when there is retai~ed title contract. It is obvious to the Court that this is a statement on accounL with Lhe defenda*~t zd~i[ting some oblibation, She denies, h~wever, ever receiving a black light ar.d she slleges she returned a broket; 2ight for repair. It is oblioatory u~on th~ plaintifF to prove ezch and every allegation, 'ihis includes < , deliv~ry of the ;rerchandise wre~ Chere is no sioned receipt or other sign of ~ ; i delivery. A judgment, there:ore, ca~ nnly be a~t~red Lor the sum of the ite~rs admitted in Court. IL is, there~ore, uro~~ CO~S?JER~1'iIn~~ ORllE:tEt) a~~d AD,)U!X~F:O that the ~lainti~f sh~ll h3ve of and ; fr~~ t;;e~ 3efenda~~t the sum oi j116.60 plus the cost of this action in the amount ~ • ~ ; of $tR.50. ~ - i ; }3~*tE an~ ORUEtiEll in Ch~mbers iti For:. Pierce, Florid~., this 7~ day oi _ . ~ Sep:.er.,b~r, ~.J. , 1973. ~ 3 ' ~ ~ ~ , - 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ` . ~ _ _ ~ : . . . COLTI~*TY 1UU~E ~ - - ' ~ • r . ~ a: ~ - fiL£~3 F~r: b:-~;- R E " St: IUCIC ~OttH~t ~ ' R3~.c N TRAS ~ CLf ` ~ i CCUi1T - ar^;~ :r, ':F i`~`t f~ ~ ~'Z3 ~ ~Q ; ~ r~ ~ ~ r 264442 - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ Q ~ _ t 4001c ~~v PAGi ~ _ . . J ~ ~+i'4 v ~ . • ; . , . ` ~ s{ ` -~e ' ~"y~'e'~Pa?~ `~'~'y.-_ Lw.e4 ~ . . 5, ~x ~ . . ..e . ~ .?,~j-~,` ~ z