HomeMy WebLinkAbout1808 IN THB C IItCU IT COURT OF 1H8
N INBTBBN TH JUD IC IAL C IRCU IT
- IN ANU FOR SAINT LUCIS COUNTY,
FLOItIDA
- ~ c~ss rro. ~3 - 7o~f
I~IARGARET PSTTIS 2s~'8~s
-~5-
RICKY PSTTIS -
0 R D E R
The estranged Wife filed a Petition in her residenc state for aupport
by her husband under the Unifonn Reciprocal Bnforcement of Support Act.
No divorce proceeding,s has occurred Co the knowledge of the husband who
appeared in open Court. No children Were bdrn ae iseue af the marriage ~
Wt?ich was, according to the testimony of the hu8band, brief in duration. '
Does the "RunaWay Fathers" law afford aupport under factual situation?
~~hen Florida is the responding state, the existance of a duty of suppdrt
is determined under the laws of Florida. No proceedinga based upon a
foreign support order were instituted whictt, ia the exception to the afore- ~
mentioned rule. The question of Whether or not the husband has a duty of ~
~
support should be determir~ed by an action of disolution of marriage. 1fie
Uniform R~eciprocal Support Act ia not a form in which the righta of parties
entitled to a disolution action ahould be determined; consequently, the
; Petition is hereby ~nied.
~ Datea this ~ day of ~ , A.U., 1973.
~
~
~ ~
f ~ -
,
i •
~ .
; ACTINt~ CIRCIIIT J ;
,
}
s
~ <
:
t
a ~
~ -
's
- flLtDlyr~ GfCORDEO
_ ST. lU~~c" "O~N?'Y FLA.
: ~c~c~= =1,*Ras i~ ~
~ C!.f.Fr r .~_!!T CObRT
; R~~' p' FF's ;s~ f
Nflr 6 ~4 is PM'73
: . 26'~855
F
7
- ' ~;k ~
B~CX ~
{
_ - _ .