HomeMy WebLinkAbout1839 26'7881 ~{v
fIIED AN~ ~?EC~ROEp
ST. LUCiE CO~MTY F~A. IN THS CIVIL DIVIS IQ~I OF
t1D;::- c J~;AAS
C~E-.~ C:• ; ~,t ~ouRT ' COl~11Y COURT IN AND FOR
PFr,~~-~ ,~r~~~~ SAINT LUCIB COUNZY~ FLARIDA
1~ 1 IU oo AN'13 ~g No. ~3-899_Sp-o~
26`7881
JULIt~S F. SCRIBA d/ b/ a ) '
BO~S APPLIANCB RBPAIR C0.
piainciff ~
-ve- )
LOUIS NADBAU )
Defendant
~
O R D B R
Plaintiff brings Chis auit on a etop paya~ent check. He was hired to
repair a refrigerator-deepfreeae cambination belonging to the defendant. At
the time of making the repaira, allegedly, he told the defendant's rooa~a~ate
to defrost. The appliance malfunctioned apoiling the food therein. At the
time of making the aecond repair the defendant related to the Court that her
i
rooaamate related to her that the plaintiff atated a part malfunctioned. lhia
of courae ia hesraay teatimony. The plaintiff atated the appliance malfunctioned ;
because of the esceasive ice. It is regretable the defendant's raocnmate did
not appear to te$tify directly before the Court. Zhere is no such charge as
not proven. 1'he plaintiff haa proven his case and the defendant's defense
:
remaina not proven; hence, muat fail. It is, therefore, upon
CONSIDBRATION, ORDER.SD and ADJtA1G8D th.1t the plaintiff do have and
recover of and from the defendant the aum of $31.15 plus the coat of this
action. ~
DO~JE AND ORDERBD in Chambers in Fort Pierce, Florida, this t~ day
of November, A.D. , 1973.
~
_ - - - ~
~ , ~
- A
ly . . •
~ , ' ' ~
~ , ' - ^i " CQVI\il J4WG
_ 1
_ }
~ . . i
:t` ~
~ . • ~
~
i
Z
L~L« i~~ .+L~r~ 4