HomeMy WebLinkAbout2484 S~
1
i
2'7US0~
• v
~
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE PiI?IETEENT
I JUDICI!1L CZRCUIT OF FLORIJA, IPJ AND
FOR ST. LUCIE COUNTY.
' CASE NO.: 72-307 - Sample
HERSCHEL G . EDt1ARDS , )
) #
( Plaintiff, )
vs . )
~ F~<<U ~r;~~ n~C"'~+~~~
;1- lUG1E v~UN~Y 1, .
GENERAL P~IOTORS CORPORATION, ) q~;~;, a;,;T~Rs
PADRICK CHEVROLET COriPAI~Y and ) c~F~~ i:: CU:T CCUR~ ~
( PHOENIX OF HARTFORB, ~ - ?fr,~.:;:; ;,:;a.~~~,~~
~ Dei'endants . ) D~c 13 Z~~ PN ~73 '
~ r ~ 2:'Or;~~ -
0 R D
~ This matter comin~ on before the Court to be heard on
~
' tne Ob~ections of the Plaintiff to Interrogatories filed by the
' Defendant, GE'7ERAL ^gOTORS CORPORA.~ION, on October 10, 1973, and on
~ the oral :'~Iotion of the Defendant , GE*dERAL ?~O~'! ORS CORPORATI0~1, for
better Answers to those Interrogatories heretofore answered, and the -
~ Court havin~ heard ar~ument of counsel an~ bein~ otherY~ise fully
= advised in the prernises, it is thereupon
i ORDER~D Ai•dD ADJULGE~ as follows :
; 1. Plaintiff`s Ob~ection to Interrogatory '~to. 6 is
; i
' ~ sustained.
~
~ 2. ~11 other Objections of the Plaintiff are over-
i
2
~ rulea, and tne °laintiff :•;ill ans:~er fully all Interroratories on or
before Januar:r 1 , 1?7~? .
~
~ ~
~ 3. ~ounsel for the Plaintiff and for GF"d~~?AL i?OTORS
~
~ have agreed that they +rill exchange reports of all exnert caitnesses
~
~ (other than :~edical witnesses) ttifho they expect to call to testify at
~
~ trial. _
~ DO;~ OP,DEr~,r D this da.y of ~ecember, 1~73. ~
,
F::
~+3
Circ u e
~
(Copy furnished counsel.)
.
~''i
Sz:
~
~ 8'~~2~
-
.ti~?
~
~y _ ~ -