HomeMy WebLinkAbout0470 fflt0 A+1, r,~Cpq~4A, ~
Sr. WCIE iOUNT~ IlV 'i'HE CNIL llIVISION OF
C~ERKCC~ ~~UIT pp~~T COUNTY COURT IN AND FOR
2'73h83 RFC~RO YF~~?tfp 5A~1T Ll1CIS COUNTY ~ FLORIllA
~tr 15 110l PN ~SS N0. 73-1150-SP•Ol
~
TERRY TN6RIOT
Plaintiff ~ 2'73h83
-va - )
HENDfiRSON CLEAVES, M.D. )
llefendant '
)
O R D E R
Plaintiff had his eyea examined by the defendant and thereafter received
four unexceptable preacriptiona. The defendant then recoumended treatment by
another and wrote his report to the secnnd examiner, plaintiff noa wiahes his
initia~ examination fee returned.
In each and every case the plafntiff has the burdon of proof. Certainly.
the plaintiff received services, the value of which was initially extabliahed.
This Court feels, as a matter,of fact, that negligence had not been establiehed.
It cannot be shown that the defendant's aervices were inept except by inference
i.e. the rendition of an acceptable prescription on the first visit to another.
The plaintiff has not established his case. It is, therefore, upon
Coneideration, Ordered and Adiudged that the plaintiff go hence without
~ day and take nothing by his cauee.
Done a~d Ordered this 1 y day of January,.A.D., 1974.
- l
~
_ ~
~ ~ County Judge
_ eoo~ 223 0~ 4?~0