HomeMy WebLinkAbout0610 FIIfU AK:~ rtf COA E ~ jra~3lu
ST. V,JC~r ~.~JN~Y ~1~, '
RoG~_- 'v!TAAS Ip ~g CIVIL DIVISION OF
CtF ~ K t:, U+T ~,OURT ~
c c"~'?' c+ t'„~,,,~~,,, COUN'lY COURT IN AND POR
r~d Z~ 9 ~7 AN ~1~ ~~f LUCIS COUNIY, FLORIDA
CASS N0. 74-28-SP-O1
2:5313 ~
PBT6R B. SRTZBERGBR
Plaintiff )
-va - )
SARAN C . Ai]APtS ~ ) ~
Defenclant
)
O R U B R
A for£eiture of terms of the rental agreement do not re2ieve the tenant
from liabi2ity under said agreement that had accrued at the time of the for-
feiture. ~'here rent hae been paid in advance under an agreement that it shall
be paid, and the leasor reenters, he is entitled to retain the rent so paid,
Generally"speaking, the landlord hes a duty to minimize damages and when so doing.
should not benefit from both oid and new tenants. 1t~e old tenant, under these
conditions, ahould be reimbursed for the double rental payment by the landlord.
t
;
IC is, [h~refore, upon
CONSIllERATION, OItDERBD and ADJUDGgp that the plaintiff do have and recover ~
of and fran the defendant the sum of $125.00 plus the court costs in the amoun[ '
,
~
of $18.50.
k
DONE and ORDERED in Chambers in Fort Pierce, Florida,this ~ day of ;
February, A.ll., 1974.
f
~
~
; ~ ~
I
" , , ~ ' ' 1
, . - - . COUNIY JUDGE
f
F '
i '
i
~ . : ~ ~ . . - '
E E
~ .
~
3
~
S • ~
,y
9
.
: '.r! 224 P~~E V~:V '
- r
° ' i
Y
3
~
" _ ' . 3
_ _ ~ ~
~ .
_ . . , ~
.
h~i ..._..y_.