HomeMy WebLinkAbout1737 , ,
2~i ~38''7 IN THS CIVIL UIVISION OF
COUNTY COURT IN AND FOR
SAINT LUCIB CO1~1TY, FLORIUA ~
CASB N0. 74-470-SP-O1
CHItISTINS LYW,Y
Plaintiff
!
-vs- ~Tr`` Of~CO~UNT1'R~ j
..,..eo.., m no m~ nn
j~n _!'~QER'OITl~!! .1~ L
Ji-t?LGiL1i. a a+1.asi+ua v s ~k~F~K QiRGNIT Qpj~RT ~ ~
Defendant ~tGORp VrR~~~~~
~~t io~?~~r~
0 R D B R
In eacn and every case the plaintiff has the burdea of proof. From `
the evidence presented, this Court can not tell ~+hether or not the defendant
is reaponsible for the gasoline containing foreign particles causing damage
to plaintiff's new car.
While the plaintiff's attorney's logic that the gasoline muat have been
bad because tllis was the first tank full of gas purchased by this new car
owner is reasonable, it is susceptible to the defendant's argument that we do
not know if the foreign matter was in the gas tank before the plaintiff
purchased the car. Our system of justice requires that the plaintiff in this
instance have the burden of proof which has not been sustained. It is,
therefore, upon
CONSIDERATION, ORDERED and ADNllGBll that the plaintiff go hence Without
'4 day and take nothing by this cause. -
~ rl~ da of
f DONB ANll ORDERED in Chambers in Fort Fierce, Florida, this y
~
~ May, A.D.~ 1974.
~ y ~
~ • ,Y' ~ .
• _ "
„`:'`;~L-~~iifi~7lj~r,~ ,
~ .'a~~ ~ ~ .t , _ f
~ ~i~.1's.:~' •••~i~ I~ ~~t•~y ~*N
f;``~.i .'~~~::~jC. ~:r~ • VDU?~al JVW~
~t; ~
t~~j_~~,..~:.~.. . ~ _
.~v ~~.~'a#~':~1~.`f'.
i : .
_ ' ~ ~ ~'F~ti}~t:,,._a;•f '
' : ~:;%,;~i 'a.~~ : r- - -
`o !-"'r ~ r d ':1~. " -
;5~,,;~;;;~~C: :r` ~ .
: ~~~yk~ ,
'ra :~}rtswZ._
I~.~~ry ',i~. a'i?SY.
a~~Nfi~/fi.f.].f.:l~i~~~1Z., "~J. .
'/~~17::1~11:i1~ . ..t.-
R . e
tt
{
E t i PAGE ~~5
~ ~ ; _ - -
- _ ,
`