HomeMy WebLinkAbout0118 2854~ti
IN THE CIRCUIm COURT~ NINETE~~TN
JUDICIAL. CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ~
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
CASE NO. 74-92 CA (Alderman)
STEPHEN hIKITAS and
IiATHERINE NIKITAS,
Plaintiffs, -
-vs-
PAUL PRAPPAS and
MARGRET PRAPPAS,
Defendants.
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO
STRIKE DEFENDANTS' AMENDED AFFIItMATIVE DEFENSES
This cause came on for hearing on plaintiffs' motion ta
strike Paragraphs 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, a, 9 and 10 of defendants'
amended affirmative c2efenses, and the Caurt having heard argument
o~ counsel for the parties, duly considered the merits of the
motion and being otherwise fully advised, it is
ORDERED that said motion be granted as to Paragiaphs 5,
~
9 and 10; otherwise the same is hereby denied.
D(?NE AND ORDERED at Fort Pierce , Florida, this~L~ day ~
~ 1
~ _of June, 1974.
s
t
~
.
Circ it Judge '
~
Copies furnished counsel: -
Otis R. Parker, Jr., Esquire, Attorney for Plaintiff, P. O. Box
1000, Fort Pierce, Florida 33450
Raymon~ E. Ford, Esquire, Attorney for Defendant, P. O. Box 3307,
Fort Pierce, Florida 33450.
285442
~
FIIED ~nL ~:CJROED
ST.IUCIE C~JNi1r FIA.
~ R4~~~ a0'*RAS -
~ CIE:tK G~-~tJ;T COURT
x REGR+~~ VFf"F1c~.,~..~.
~
~ Jur~ 1~ 4 i4 PM'~~ ~~a
~ `ij
~
~
~ _
FEE, PARlC[Q2 & FEE, P. A.
POSi OFF GE BOX 1000 YO~K~~~ `f7~F
FORT PIERCE. FLORIDA 33450 '
a
TEL[PHONE:130B)461-3020 !
~
~ ~ ' -
-wr`#~r~+~~~,r4 5" _ : ~`s " ~'4
Y~ ~ ~ ~s.''~"7~. * ~
~.°.."`.r:r
{rs,~~ ,7 ~ -
c~ 'c ~ r r
. . ~
K j` ~ ~i
~ ~ ~
~a~ .
_ _ ~ _'~~~~r sF ~3' ,~~X~ _,::r'~~,:i ~ _