HomeMy WebLinkAbout1339 ~~o
k ~
oIERK t t: ~+T OQ{t~f ;
~FCO~o t~K~~~EJ ~ ~iVI1. i~IViSiON OF ;
9 a~ AM ~ 1'1 ~AINT LUC BTCOUNTY, PI.OItIUA ~
~'cO CASS N0. 7 a-632-SP-Ol
a~a~
t
~
~
CL IN'T Hl1DSON ~
Plaintiff ?
-vs - .
ARTCO SUPPLY COMPANY
Defendant
0 R ll E R
In each and every case the plai~tiff has-the burden of proof. After
hearing all the testimony, the Court is of the opinion that, as a matter of
fact, the plaintiff has not clearly demonstrated what type fixturea he
ordered. Most conclusive in the testimony Was the statements of the
plumb~r. Thfs Court fully realizes tha~ the plaintiff is dissatis£ied with
gold fixtures, however, Was guilty of laches in every term. The defendant
is bound to return $a8.7; for a new fixture and should return to the
plaintiff that used fixture which is now in his possession. ~
:
ll0*IE ANA ORDB~tEll in Chacbers in Fort pierce, Florida, this s ~
~
day of.July, A.D., I97i.
_
~ - ~ ,
. . - ~
. ~ J~
. '
_ ,.f.:,
- - - " ~Y`~ti'~'Y COUNTY JUDGB
_ =
f- ~ - . ~ r~.;
~
~
~
- BooK 229 ~~1~~8
_ - - # - - - - - ~ y,!
, r
eR~' ..i~ ~ ~ '
I ~'^~y - ~
~f.`ii
_ u ~v ~ . . .