HomeMy WebLinkAbout1768 IN TNE C IV IL D IV IS ION OF
COUNTY COURT IN ANp FGR
SA INT LUC I8 COUNTY , F LOIt IDA
S9 CASB N0. 73-1168-SP-O1
G~ISRAL g1NANCS CORPORATION OF FIARIDA
Plaintiff
-vs - " ~
WOODROW N. & FAYB ADKISON, JR.
Defendant
0 K D B R
;
i
Defendant's ~;otion for Re-Haaring bears two points for consideration, i
Rule 7.~J50 (a) (2) states merely a party, individual or corporation, i
I
who or which has no:attorney handling such cause shall sign his er its atate- 1
ment of ~liam or other paper and state his or its address. To the Court, as
a matter of fact, this Defendant ~?as complied with said rule.
Defendant contends that the Plaintiff did not show to the Court that
its corporate taxes were paid. This point was not contested by the Defendant
until the time of trial and the Pla inti~f, under cross-examination, admitted
he did not know. This Court feels that this particular point of law should
have been affirmatively raised by ~he Defendant. The original case is
I
i BROA~iNAY BUII.I)BRS s Inc • v• W. W,~0~ CONSTRIJCTION CO . 59 ~0 2d page 2b .
l ~
E lherefore, it is uvon consideration that the Order dated the 13th
~ of February, 1974, be and the same is hereby affirmed and the Motion for Rs-
Hearing filed the 27th of March, 1974, be and the same is hereby denied. ~
DGWE AND ORDEREI) in Chambers in Fort Pierce, Florida, this ~Q ~
day of July, A.D., 1974.
~ 2
• " ~
~ • ' V
~ ' ~ ~~iNTY JUDGE
~ . : : ~ ~
~ - . ~ ~ '
. =
~ - . . _ A. =
:;'h:=; .`4\,?
~ ~ . _ _ • -
~ ~ Fil~~ A~"- Q~U'1ROE0 .
~ - . 5T. WC'~ ~.LLMTA~l.A- ~
il~~-n ' ~
CLE?R :~t~.e.:'1~ CGURt
PECt~~ .:t •r•;~EJ
J~, ~ ? "L os PN'7~
?A~;S59
$noK~
~ 1 ~ - - . s}.
~ _
` ~.r-~
~~..,:ti~
- ~ _