HomeMy WebLinkAbout1811 i
r~
IN TE~ CI9IL DIVISION OF
. COQNTY COURT IN AND FQR
SAINT LIICIE COQNTY,FLORIIX
2-f~~sSB CASS N0. 74-426-SP-ol
;~1AAEI8 BOL~
Plaintiff
-vs-
D. C. WHITC~
Defendant
~
!
~
OR_.=~R - i
t
The plaintiff hae not eatablie2ied to the satigi'aatian of the Cowrt that ~
~
dame~ge dc~e to the rug other thgn no~l wear and tee~r. Spo~ '
there s+e~e aRY
,
;
painting, as deearibed by all parties, ~as indeed v~satisfactory by uein6 `
the ~rrong shade of pe?int. This Court does not aritiaize the efforta made by ,
the tene?nt and feele t2~at the tenant's efforte, hor~rever, caused the entire ,
bsdroom to be painted. It is, therefore
pRDIIiED aND ADrIUDGED that the plaintiff do have and recover of and from
the defendant the aum of ~65.00 plus the aoet of this action in the amaunt of
=18.50. ~
~p~Tg AND pgDg~ED in Chgmbera in Fort Pierce, Florida, this ~~y
! af July, A.D., 1974-
~
~ -
~
~
~
~
~ ~ - COQNTY JITDG ~
~ f _
sLE,~ r~~ti~JCD
~ _ ST_ ~t1C?F ~~uMT1r fu
_ Ro~: ~;;~;FaS
~~~-K c.;.;;; - coc;~r
~ PF~r"-' V. _ - : ~
- Jd~ l1 917 An'1~1
?.~~88
P~~~1811
-
~~..;':~~,.>s~.~.:;--~;..~ ;
- _ ~ - ~
` ;
~r
_ 4 _ ~ _ _ _ . _