HomeMy WebLinkAbout2930 . ~
- It~ ~ CIVIL DIVISION 0~
~ . COUiTY COUAZ IN Al1D ~Oa ,
SAINT LUCIS COUi1?, ~tAaIDA
3
i
c~ss No, ~a•~~o-sr-oi ~
~ ~565
A 0 A IIiC. d/b/a AD~AMS
OUTDOOa AWtaTIS~1C ;
plaintiff '
-va - ~
~T PIE~C6 PBESS !
D~faadant ~
~ OR.-DER
As stipulated in opan Court br and betvaQn ths parties, thia Cowct
contacted tvo iedepsc~dsnt fis~a sng~ag~d ie a aisilar bnsine~a to that of the
plaietiff. After total axplanatioa of th~ facta involved, eacb randered an ;
~
opinion favorabls to that of the plaintiff. Thi• Court Well ~ceslizes ths ~
~
pointa raised by ths dsfendsnt Whsrsin he shar~d old billa and ttr nsW bill ;
shoving a tresandow ineresae. M agrapient sade in opan Coutt is binding. ~
It i~, therefore -
pgpgRgp /1~tp ADJUpGBD that ths plainti~f do havs and rscovsr of and
froa the dafandant tiu 4u~ of $313.92 plus the cost of thia action in the
asount of $18.50, for all of vhich lat sxscutior.
~ DQ~IE AND O~D~RBD ia Cha~bsrs in Fort Pi~ree, Florida, this 16th
~ :
~ _ i
~ day of August. A.D. , 1974. ~
~ ~
~ - - - ~ ~ {
~ . .
~ ~ ~ 4,~:_! :e~ •~~!'ir ~ ~ ~L' .
; - ,~yq>~, " 1~..° COUIiTY J[mGB
, .
' t ` y ~ i
_ - . .
. t: • •-~r_='f' -
~tr.~
. ; ~ t y
, -'~.~d~.r a~ .
. ,C~;t'•
. . - .'`-'t- .••~'.°1S'~..~ r..
~ ..ra ,f` ?J ~oi~r~ 1~
~f`=~;~_ ;:Ft~;;i`'f2 i
~ ' .~t`". , .j.:.: iT~~
tt ~ 'u C~;DEO
~ • _ , t RGi.~" fa,;xRis lA- -
~ ~ ` `%T C: L:4t ~
~ ~ ;
~ ~ ~ sk PM ~1~ ~
~ i
~ ~
~
~ ~
~ ~
~ - ~ooK ~30 ~ ~9~ - ~
y~. _ ~
- - , . ~
~ ~
_3..~__ _ _,r~ . . ti~~~.