HomeMy WebLinkAbout0210 1
~ f
~1
j
~ , ~
j; IN THE CIRCOIT COURT FOR ~9~~~
, ST. LUCIE COt7NTY. FIARIQA. ~
~i CASE NO. 74-3~1-CA
;i
iN RE: The Marriage of
i'
i~ DAVID HICKMAN, Husband,
„
i~
f' a~I1d
i~ '
; VSRTIE LEE HICKMAN. Wife.
i:
i; - ~
,
~ t
I FINAL JUDGI~NT
1~' DYSSOLUTiON OF MARRIAGE
l~
' THiS CAUSE came on for hearinq on August 21, 1974, upon
~ petition for diasolution of marriage and ansWer, and VERTIE LEE
,
HICKMAN, petitioner, having appeared With counsel, Douglas P. ~
ared
Lawless, Es~uire, and DAViD HICRMAN, respondent, havinq appe
ii with counsel, Gerald S. James, Esquire, and the Court having hearc~
_ 1,: .
the testimony of the parties, their witnesses~ and~havinq con9i-
i;
;f dered evidence, argwnents of counsel and being otherWise fully
advised in the premises, ti~e Court finds, decides as follows:
i
ii
1. This Court has jurisdiction of the parties and subject
matter of this action.
t;
;i 2. The niarriage b~tween petitioner and respondent is
1~
~E dissol~ed because it is irretrievably b~oken.
~
3. The care, custody and control of the minor child af the
p<3rties, DAVID ALI,EN HICKMAN, age 14 years, is granted to the ~
petitioner, subject to the respondent's right of reasonable ~
~s ~
" visitation privileqes.
R~ ~
~
1; 4. The Stipulation executed by the parties on the
1974, introduced into evidence marked
3ay of ~ .
;
1! petitioner's Eahibit 1, was freely entered fnto by the parties ~
i
after a full disclosure and under the circumstances that appear ~
` from the evidence to be for the best in~erests of the parties ~
and their child; and in its entirety, the Stipulation ia incor- {
~
porated by reference into this Judgment, and the parties are ~
ordered to comply with all ~erias of the Stipulation. ~
[ ~
5. Except as to the dissolution of marriage granted to j ;
~
~
~
~
~
,
,
SQOK I~I;r ~~O 3
!
ii
- ~
_ -