HomeMy WebLinkAbout1171 2~(?41'7 ~ ~ Ciyi4 DIVISION OF
COUITY COU~? IN AND !OR
SAII~1T LUCI6 COl~11Y~ FLORIWI
CASE N0. 74~323•SP-O1
CARROLL G. ALL6N
Plaintiff
-va-
ARTH1AS TlARaN '
Dafandant -
0 R D R R
Plaintiff Was an indapendent drivsr for North Awetican Van
Linea. Ha delivarad a portion of the household goods balonging w th~
defendant. H~cawe ths othe~r portion of ths housahold goods ~+ere ~ot
dsliver~d until another date, dsfandant •topped-pa~ent oa his p~rsonal
check to the plaintiff. In no way did the dafendant s!?ov that the
plaintiff Waa neglige~t or reaponsible for the late delivary of tha
merchan~iae. If a cawe of action e~ciata, it exists batve~~ the second
driver or Narth Aserican Van Lines aad the da€a~ia nt Arthur Ptaro~• It is
therefore,
pRpgRgp MIp ApJ1mGBD that the plaintiff do have and rscover
i .
~ of and fros the defendant ths sia of a679.65 plw the coat of this action.
~ pp~,~g ~ip pxpgRgp in Chae~bera in Fort Pierca, Florida, this ;
;
~
28th day of Auguat, A.O., 1974. ~
,
?
. ~
- _ COi~i1Y JUDGB
. ~ - . .:w-¢~' ~rw7c.3~1 /
. - . _ . . M~Q .~o aEC~+~~~
_ - . . - . . ST. tUC{E COUN
" - ' kO~EA POITRA3
" ~ ~IEP,K C1~CUiT COYItT
RECORD MEF:FIE~
;
~iiC 19 ~ ~ OS ~
~~K 231 ~ 1171
T~ - - -
L ~
..z ~ . ~ ~i< ~
. ~ ~_r$'.'"4~ ~ ..~u,