HomeMy WebLinkAbout2040 f
!
~ 1
1 . • ~ ~ i
;
• ~ ~ ~
. • ' ' ~
i
one of the Ju9tices of.the Supreme Court on the 4th day of Sep- i
~
•
tember, 1974, and the plaintiff, by his attorneys, Bernstein,
Mi119, Schwartz, White and Bernstein, Richard A. Bernatein of
counsel, having appeared and presented his verified complaint,
written proof of the service of the Summons with Notice upon the
defendant, and the affidavit of reqularity of thia proceedinq, and `
. ;
testimony having been heard by thia court suetaining the alleqa-
tions set forth in the complaint, and the court having thereupor?
be~n fully advised in the premisea, and having made and;filed ita
` Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, decidinq among other
~
s - •
6 thinqs that plaintiff was entitled to a Judqment against the
defendant dissolving the marriage heretofore existing between the
partiea hereto, purs~ant to the statute because of the abandonment
of the plai.ntiff by the defendant;
NOW, on motion of BERNSTEIN; MILLS, SCHWARTZ, WFIITE AND
~
.
. BERNSTEIN, Attorneys for~the plaintiff, it is ;
pDJUDGg,D pNp DECREED, that the plaintiff is entitled to
a Judgment diaaolvinq the bonda of matrimony heretofore exiatinq
~
~ between the plaintiff and the defendant and freeing the plaintiff
~ e f and rn4ittinq the plaintiff and
~ from the obliqationa ther o Pe
~ -
defendant to remarryt and it ie .
aERN5TEIN, MILLS. . ~
S~ H W ARTZ. MIHITE
~no @ERN3TEIN
- e~oasROAOfO!?IC[~LO~.
t ~TAT[ iT~[Q
tCCMtiT[~. M['I TO~R ~DOK~ .
r
- _ _ _ -
r a+ s:
a , . , ~r - - - - - ~ -+i
' : ~~~},~..~`e"'-,t-~~ r
~ -
_ _ . . `~'r . - ..r