HomeMy WebLinkAbout0469 F ~EO ~NO REC~tl~E4
S~.IUCiE COUM r u~.
ROG~R POITRA= r
clEa~ c:RCU~T coullT ~ ~Mp,~,f ~ ~
~ RECOR~ VEN~i1E0r.,~.,~ ~+`.t~(„~
~T te Os IN THE CIVIL DIVIBION O~
COU~11Y COl1R? II~1 AND ~Oa
- SAINT LUCIa CO'lNTlf~ ~I.OaIDA
29411'7 c.~sa ~o. ~4-9s~-sp
GILBEAT BIWWN - ~ -
Plaiatiff
)
-va- ) ~
) .
D. C. i~lI'1~0ltB and
ODJ1 V . M~l I1~CQlB ) - ~
Daftndants .
ORDSx
in sach and av~ry caae tha plaintiff haa tht burden of proof.
This •uit vas for a pro-ration of tha 1973 taxea. 14~sra vas no aignad contract
and the plaintiff vas bound to establiah his case. tfis-Courtddid not hsar
' dirsct t~stiaon~ that th~ defsndant~ orAlly prcai~ad to pay thsir portion
of ths taxss. Though cwto~aary, it can only b~ snforced by apscif ic ague-
•ent. Sincs the plaiatiff has oot eatablished 6is burdsn of proof, it is ~
OxDBRBD AND AQTI~3GBD that the plaintiff go hance vithout day
aad take nothing b~ this cauas. ~
DONB AND ORDBRED at gort Piarce; Florida, this 17th daT cf
i -
~ October, 1974.
~
. . , ~ ` ~ _
. : , . ' ,
~ QOU~ITY
_ `
~ - ~
~ -
~ " .
~ ~33 P~ 469
~ -
~ , . . - .
~t ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~:,-ri...z_ .