HomeMy WebLinkAbout1217 r ~
• ~
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR ST. LUCIB ~
~~f•i89 COUNTY, FLORIDA. ,
CAS$ N0.~74-355-CA ;
NUNZIO TAVERNESE, ~
Plaintiff ~
vs. ~
LLOYD TAYLOR,
Defendant -
FINAL JUDQ~IENT ~
This cause was tried by the Court on October 18, 1974, and `
the Court having heard the~testimony of the witnesses for the
Plaintiff and the Defendant, and the Court having examined the
. exhibits which were admitted into evidence, and the CouYt having.
heard the argument of counsel for the parties, and the Court having
examined the record and the Court being otherwise fully advised in .
~ the premises, the Court enters its finding of fact as follows: ~
1. That the contract admitted into ev~dence as Exhibit 1
was entered into between the plaintiff, NUNZIO TAVERNESE, and the
defendant, LLOYD TAYLOR.
2. That a deposit of One Hundred Dollars was paid by the
defendant TAYLOR and received by the plaintiff TAVERNESE.
3. That the contract deposit receipt agreement provided on
May 15, 1974 that the buyers are to pay an additional deposit of
~ -
Nineteen Thousand Nine Hundred Dollars to be held in escrow by
~
Lloyd Taylor until closing date, which shall became a part of the
down-payment of Sixty-three Thousand~Five Hundred Dollars. This ;
is a typewritten addition to the printed form~and has to be read
in con~unction with the printed part of the deposit receipt form.
4. The Court detezmines as a matter of fact that there
was not any part of the additional $19,900.00 deposited unde= the
terms of the contract.
~
~ 5. The testimony in reference to the $15,000.00 received by
~ the~ defendant TAYLOR and deposited into his escrow account, the
~
Court determines as a matter of fact that this aioney was not a
deposit under this contract but was received by Mr. Taylor con-
ditionally from the three individuals for a potential contract-which
was to be, hopefullq, renegotiated by a Mr. Fox which never came
i
ao~~ ~~215 ~
.
W~
- .
b ~~`k3
_
. . . _ .a~ ~T~~~~' . . . ~ . ...s