HomeMy WebLinkAbout0722 FIIED R'+.~ ~c~L~oEO ,
gT. tUC~C •'"U~TY fU1.
R( Gi ~~,~V¢T t,~ /r
RF C'" f - ' ~ 4t -
o~ 3 3 3a eK _
IN THE C IRQI IT COURT OF THE N INETEENTH
JUI~~(: i~il. ~ZItt~3IT Ifi1 i~?~'B ~R 3T. IL'C~~ ;
COUNTY, STA1E OF FIARIDA. ~
NO. 74-738 CA
DIYISION OF ADMINISTRAT ION, ) . ~
STATL OF FLORIDA DEPEIRTI~'ED1'r
~ OF TRANSPORTATION, )
plaintiff, ) ~
vs. j PARCELS_ NO. 101 and Np. 804 =
THE WEAI,DEN COI~ANY, e t al. , ) ~
Defendants. ) ~
~
~ ~
F
- [
ORDER DIRECTING REIEASE OF FUNDS ~
~ t
This cause coming an t o be heard on Pe tit ion of the
Defendants, MARY F. SCOTT and IESLIE W. SCOTT, her husband, for
~
an Order directing the release ot tunas in t~ne Kegisiry vL i:i~i.b
Court, and the Court being advised herein finds- that said Petition
ers are, in fact, entitled to said funds, it is therefore - ~
; pRDERED AND ADJ[JDGED that the Clerk of this Court forthwith ~
I - ~
~ pay ove r t o MARY F. SOO'IT and IESLIE W. SoOTT , he r hus band ,
I ;
$109,895~00 as a G~od Faith Estimate of Value of Parcel No. LOL ~
- i
here in - involved, and $1,710.00 as a Good Faith Estimate of Value ;
of Parce L No. 804 here ~.n involved; }
DONE ANU ORDERED at Fort Pierce, St. Lucie County, ~
Florida, this ~ day of December, 1974. ~
~
_
f
i .i e ~
~
CHARLES E. SECHT
.,rTO~r wT uw
aur~ ~~c aF
<_r ~vciE oOUniY nutDws
, ti ~ oa~wcE wvENNE • ANTE
F OR T R EIkE, iIOiNDA »Ip ~
?.O. ~OX ir
- i70N Mf-lM1 O ~ ~
~@~!?~ P~GE
~
. f
s~-~`?°`~
~s?-'~c,. . . _ . . - _ . - . ~