HomeMy WebLinkAbout0980 ROYAL ESTATES, INC. V.
GEORGE COPPOLA, et als.
opinion, is not, as a matter of law, an unreasonabl~ or unlaw-
ful restraint against alienation. .
.~i~'' ~
The Court has reviewed t~i~e_' Motion. to Recons ider
~ •
. - s>
filed -on behalf of RUTH W. LESTER and 'JOAN ;P. COX asking the
Court to reconsider the denial of ~heir.Motion for Summary
Judgment. After consideration of the memorandum filed on
their behalf, the Court remains of the opinion that they are
proper defendants in this case and that they are not as a matter
of law entitled to Summary Final Judgment at this time. It
is thereupon
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion for Su[~ary
Judgment filed on behalf of the Defendants, GEORGE COPPOLA.
et als., d/b/a THE COPPOLA COMPANY, a partnership, as to
Count II, and the Motion for Summary Judgment on behalf~of
the Defendants, LESTER and COX, as to Counts I and II, be and
the same is hereby denied. It is further
i ORDERED AND ADJ[JDGED that the Motion to Reconsider
!
! filed on behalf of the Defendants, RUTH W. LESTER and JOAN P.
€
~ ~
~ COX, be and the same is hereby denied. ~
k DONE AND ORDERED at Fort Pierce, St. Lucie County, ~
~
Flor ida, this ~ day of January, 1975 .
CIRCUIT JUDGE '
~
~
~ fiLEU !.h'.! "f.l'i1RJ.t-D
- Copies furnished to: S7. ~~j•;:c t•~y~A fLR.
~ * :.CU~T \V
Ben L. Bryan, Jr . , Esq. C' . -
~ Richard v. Neill, Esq. ,9 ~'M' j j ~
Smith, Mandler, Smith, Parker & Werner ~
~ ~
~
~ ~ ~
~ 3
i
~ ~
~ 3
~
~'s
~-z>
- BCCK~~ P~~E
-3-
-
= ~ -
~ ~