HomeMy WebLinkAbout2562 I!i ZHE CIVIL DIVISION ~
COU~ItT COUAT IN AND ~OR
~.s ~!T LUCIS CO~iTY, PIAaIDA -
a~~1~8 CASi N0. 74-1429
RpY SPOR d/b/a
AI~FRAt~ LalIlED
pla intif f
-vs -
BJORMAN AIRC~AI~Z SBitVICB
D~fandant
ORDBB ~ '
Aa act of God ia an unusual, eztraordinary~ audden, and unenptctad
~aaifsstatioa of the foresa of aatvre, vhich ~an cannot s~esist. ~Rian an in~ury
;
is dus to an act of God, tha gsnasal rnla ia that thers ia no liabilit~ on the ~
;
grassd of nagligence. Wttien an act of God, howvsr, co~bines or concura Mith ~
tha negligencs of tba defeadant to produca an irjury, th4 dsfendant ia liable ~
if the injwcy vould not h4va reaulted but for hi~ o~m negligent conduct or ~
~
o.t•ston. ~
:
T't~e Court finds, aa s satter of fa~t, the defendant vaa ~ indesd ~
; negligent vhea he did eot •ecurely tia tbe airplane. This Court find~ that the
~ tail abould hav~e been tisd u praacribsd aod the tia-dawns attached to the Winga
E .
i ~
~ ~rare of such poor qualit~ rope tbat a reaaonabl~ prudent ~san ~rould have re- ~
~ placed the~ vith a better ~aterial. It is, tharefore i
~ ~
~ O~D8~t8~D AND ADJtIDGBD ihat the plaintiff do have and recovar of and ~
~ ' ~
~ froa the defendant the avo of $387.00 plus the coat of thia action in th4 '
aaount of $18.50.'
DONB Ai~ O~tDBRBD thia 2~ day of January, 1976.
~
~
~ ~
~ ~ '
a COU11'Y JIAX'sB
~
~
~ . - ~
~ i~WCi~ c0~i~y
~ °
• - _ - CLERK
Cl~tt POITRA= ?1
~ ~ ~ECORp yERlijfp
CO~- , t t~
~ - ,~w1~ 11 ,
~ PN l~ ~
~
~ 30n~48
~
~
~
~
~
~ ~
~
~ _
- ~ ~