HomeMy WebLinkAbout1388 6. THE FOLLOWING LANGUA6E IS HEREBY STRUCK FROM THE HUSBAND~S
ANSWER AND C~UNTERCLAIM:
~A) AS TO PARAGRAPH 2 THEREOF THE FOLLOMIN6 LAN6UA6E,
AUSA MORTI S WHICH MlOULD PRECLUDE PROBJITE OF THE
ESTATE; ~
~B) AS TO PARA6RAPH 8 THEREOF THE FOLLQMIN6 LAN6UA6E,
u...~ ND HAS REASON TO BELIEYE THAT THE MIfE IS 6UILTY OF
ADULTERY AND, TNEREFORE, SHOULD NOT BE ENTITLED TO ANY ALIMONY."
UPON AGREEMENT OF COUNSEI SAID PARA~6RAPN IS REMORDED TO STATE
AS FOLLOwS:
"THE NUSBAND FURTHER REAUESTS THIS COURT NOT TO 6RANT THE NIFE
ANY ALIMONY, REHABILITATIVE OR PERMANENT, AS THE NIFE IS
6UILTY OF ADULTERY AND, THEREFORE, SHOULD NOT BE ENTITLED
TO ANY ALIMONY." -
WIFE-PETITIONER SHALL HAYE TEN t1O) DAYS TO FILE AN ANSMER
TO HUSBAND~S COUNTERCLAIM AS AMENDED.
DATED THts __L~ DAY OF 1975, IN
FORT PIERCE~ FLORIDA.
~
~
~
IRCUIT ~UD6E
~
I COPY FURNISHED COUNSEL
i
~
~UPERT ~ASE~ SMIT~, ESA.
~ ILLIAM OOD, SA.
~
~
~
~
~
~ '
~
~ ~
~
. - ~ _
M=~y N~
ri ii•?# ~ iw~ ~
~ ~~z 1?Elttf~j~.~.~
~ ~ a ~ ~M'x5
~
~ .
~ - ~Q!~s
~ ~r ~
~ :
~o ~ "t ;
~ ;
~ ;
~ 3
~
~
~
~
~
~ 6~~23fi ~1387
~ ~ -
~
~
_ ~ ~ . _ _ ~ ~ ~