HomeMy WebLinkAbout2375 a~L0R0E~ .
E~ a~~ ~Nt~ f~ ~
S~t'~UG'~t i
C~L Rt t
``l~~`1' ~~=~'-1
Rt?` „
~n vE ~v
~ ~
fEa21D ~0 24 -
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
NINETEENTH jUDICIAL CIRCUIT,
IN AND FOR ST. LUCIF COUNTY,
FLORIDA
/
Case No. 73~-CA "J" Geiger
E. A. HICKS and LOUISE ) j
HICKS, his wife,
)
Plaintiffs, ~
)
vs O R D E R
)
DAVID B. PUTNAM,
)
Defendant. ) ~
THIS CAUSE coming on for hearing upon Defendantts Motion
to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint and the Court having heard
argument from attorneys for the respective parti,es, and the Court '
being fully advised, it is therefore
ORDE RED AND ADJUDGED
1. Defendantls Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Compiai.nt
! is hereby denied.
' 2. At such time time that this matter shall be before the Court
~
~
~
E for final hearing that trial shall be heard in two stages, the first stage
~ -
€
~ shall be for the purpose of establishing the contract alluded to in second
~ amended complaint of Plaintiffst and the second stage shall relate to the
~
~
~ suit on the promissory note. ,
~ DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, St. Lucie County, Florida,
~
~
this ~ 8~~ay of February, A. D. 1975~ ~ rr' 'E ~ Fe
~ /o ~ /'1 7~
~
~ •
~
~ AZt:.~.J G.~c~.'E r-~?~
~ Copies furnished: ~
~
~ Robert T. Gilligan, Esq. Gerald S. James, Esq.
~ Attorney for Plaintiffs Attorney for Defendant
~ 140 South Federal Highway Pbst Office Box 3089
~ Dania, Florida 33004 Fort Pierce, Florida 33450
~ 927-9246 461-2500
~
~ .
~
~ 6001f ~
~ ' 6 ~~237z
~
~ P ~ ~
. . -