HomeMy WebLinkAbout2821 dIt1m
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
304'~24 NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN
AND FOR ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
Civil Action No. 75-26-CA ~
RUTH ELANE PHILLIPS, .
Plaintiff, .
vs. .
RYERSON & HAYNES R~ALTY, INC.,:
a Delaware corporation, doing •
business as HIGH POINT OF .
FORT PIERCE,
3
Defendant. . 3
. ~
~
FINAL JUDGMENT ~t
~
,
THIS CAUSE, coming on to be heard upon Plaintiff's ~
;
Motion for Final Judgment based on Default entered in this matter ~
s
against Defendant, the Plaintiff having appeared before this ~
Court, and the Court having considered the pleadings, affidavits ~
t
and state~ents af the rZaintiff, a,~d ha~•ing heard an3 co.^.sid~r~d ~
arguments of counsel, the Court finds:
1. Corporate service was duly made upon Robert ~
~ Herrick, a Vice President of Defendant corporation, RYERSON &
HAYNES REALTY, INC. ~
~ ~
~ 2. The "Purchase Agrzement" dated May 2, 1974, regard- ~
~
~ €
= ing Apartment A, Building 707, of HIGH POINT OF FORT PIERCE ~
~ .
f f
r CONDOMINIUM SECTION ONE, between the parties is rescinded. i
- ~
5 2
y 3. The "Purchase Agreement" dated May 2, 1974, regard- 3
~ i
~ ing Apartr.?ent B, Building 707, of HIGH POINT OF FORT PIERCE #
~ CONDOMINIUM SECTION ONE, between the parties is rescinded. .
~
~
µ 4. The Defendant is indebted to the Plaintiff for the '
~
s. return of the deposits of $2,522.00 and $2,191.50 for a total of
~
~ $4,713.50.
5. Plaintiff relied upon the material and information ~
~
set forth in the brochure published by the developer and did €
hire the firm of McRoberts & Fenniman, Chartered, and that
reasonable attorney's fees for said firm in this matter is $650.0 .
~
-
r~ BOOK~~ ~ASE28~~ ~
~
~y:
McROBERTf • FENNIMAN. CNARTEREO. ATTORNEYS AT LAW. STUART. FLORIDA
1
;
f~ }
~ t
~
_ ~
1"' , ~'^.,.nF.
~y F~e
u? ~ +~4
~
*a.,.3~'`~"-kr....:~4....._ - ."K«.~