HomeMy WebLinkAbout0194 ';'1 is~ t~t~ !'i? ~C~'.' ~.CxiR"i' (~I~ A~'i'LAI , t~~'= "1'I-{C S'f
ATl: 4F rLORIl~A
}'CI.~R~I~}i L)151~IZll:'i' j:~\t'ARY TEIZNI 1975 ;
~
.
ROQLR'1 LLE FAV4RS and ) -
13~~llDY L. SAtiS[NG, ) :
)
A~pellant s, )
) ;
v. ) CASE tiOS. 73-552 ?
) 73-553. [
~
"T~-t~ I~ IRESTU~tE TIRE & RUBBER ) ~
COViPANY, an Ohio corporation, ) ~
I=ORQ \rtOTOR CQMPArY, a cor- ) ~
poration, and SLNRISE iVIOTOR ) ~
CON~PAi:~', ~ Florida corporation, ) ~
)
Appellees, ) ~
~
~ Qpinion filed February 14. 1975. i
~
Consolidated appE;als from the Circuit ~
Court for St. I,ucie County; ~4'ailace ~
~
Sample, ]udge. ~
i
~
C. R. !~tcDonald, Jr, , ~=ort l'ierce, • . ~
s
for appel.iar:ts. ' ~
;
~1onroe L. ':vicj~o~ald and Briar. C,'. ~ ;
~ Sanders of Sanders ~~c~,wan I~'[ims S i
Mcl~or.aldt ~rla~do, for Appellee-Ford; ~
George H, vioss of Jones Paine 8: Foster, _
Vero t3each, for ~lppellee-Sunrise.
PER C~'R1AM. .
Plaintiffs, Rober: i.ee Favors ar,d 3uddy L._ ~at~sing, take this
! consoliciated appeal from a fi r;al i~dgment in favor of defendan*.s, Ford
:1oCOr C;oRl~at~}~ a~~~ Suririse Mlotor C-ompa?~~T, en:ez~~~j lnr the criai court
~ -
~
~ af~c:r dismissal oi ~Iai:~tiffs' si~th ar?~ended complaints (although filed
i~i s~~a:-ate cases, *re six~h amcnded ~.omplair,ts are ident~~al except
~ .
for the rames of the c2ain~ants and ~}~ill hereafter be r~ferreci to as - . i
1f "t?-_ .:o~~~~Iaint" . ;~4otion of ~h~ third defendant, Tt}e 1=irestone ~'ire & ~
)
;
' '~~boer- t;ompam-, ~o :~iG:;:iss tl?~~ com~Iaint was der.ied by the triat
coi3rt ar,ci tt~ie case remains p~~~ding below against ;his defer,dant. ~rhe
t~.:~ ar,~s will her~after be referred to as Foi-d, S~:r-~risF: ~t~d
~:or~. ~
;
BOOK~J9 PACE :
, ;
~ -
_ ;
t. . _ . . r_K~