HomeMy WebLinkAbout0819 j
N THE DISTRICT COURT ~OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURT~i DISTR[CT jANUARY TERM 1975
GENERAL MOTQRS CORPORATION, )
)
A ppellant, ) ~
)
v• ) CA SE NO. 74 -388 .
)
~IE~~CH::..= L G, ED~Y:IRUS, )
~ .
A ppellee. ) ~
Opinion filed june 13, 1975. - -
Appeal from the Circuit Court for St. Lucie
County; W~llace Sample, judge.
~
Marjor~e D. Gadarian of Jones paine & Foster, `
! P. A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
~ V incent A. Llo d of Law Offices of M~Donald
! y
Lloyd 3 Kenney, Fort Pierce, and -
' W illi~.m S. F rates, II and Stuart E. Kocha,
E .
f West Palm Be ach, for appellee.
~
~
f
(
i , PER CLtRIAM.
~
f Upon due considerat~on of the briefs and oral argument and
~ -
; after ~n examina[ion of the record on appeal we are of the opln~on that
i
~
; no re~tersible error has been made to clearly appear. In particular,
~ we arz of the view that as a• matter of law defendant was not entitled to
~
E
~ ~ an instruction on intervening cause. See Rawls v. Ziegler, F1a.1958,
~ 1 7 So 2 1•
0 . d 60 , De La Concha v. Pinero, F1a.19~8, 104 So.2d 2~;
~ 23 Fla, ur. Ne li ence sec 34• Miam'
~ 1 , g g , . , i Coca Cola Batling Co, v. ~
~ vlahlo, F1a.1950, So. 2d 119; Cone v. Inter County Tele hone 3~ ~
i . p
~
f
~ Telegraph Co., F1a.1949, 40 So.2d 148; Courtney v. American Oil
!
Compan~~, F1a.App.1969, 220 So.2d 675. Accordingly, the judgmen[
appealed is AFFIR~~[ED.
CROSS, MAGER, and DOW~IEY, JJ., concur.
800K PAGF 8~
~ ~.M . _ - ~
~ ~ ~ .
y--
. `t~ - ~r
~3 ~ ~ ,
~ - - ~ w z