HomeMy WebLinkAbout2205 ~
IIV 1t~ CIRCUIT OOURT OF Tl~ NINETEF~TIH
~ J[IDICIAL CIIiCUIT, IN Ai~ POR ST. Li1CIE
~ ~ I OOI~fIY' FIARIUA. .
~ N0. 75-359 CA
FLI.F.N A. DE AN1~II0,
Petitioner,
vs.
D(XVALD B. DANDI~I, - ~
t
~ RP•SpOlldBilt _ ~ i
s
;
~
~ ORDER
1~IIS CAUSE was duly presented by the State Attorney and the
Respondent haviTMg been present in Court, and the Court bei.r~g advised ~n
the pr~nises, it is the finding of this Cowct that:
1. The custody of the child referred ta in the Petition-
}~erein, DAtidV ELLF7V I~f~N, was awarded to the Respon~ent, DONAi~ B. DAt~JN,
by previous Order of this Court, to-wit: Final Judg~rent of Divorce
dated January 31, 1972.
It is therefore,
pRDERID Aim ADJt~GF~D that the Petitioai herein be and the same
is hereby denied.
DOI~IE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida, this
j'~'day of August, 1975.
i
~ ~
!
~
~
i `
E
~
~
~
~ ' _~l F~l~' i~.i ~~f~
S ~ ~ p~~('~r
~ .
~ ~f~';i,: frliT'~~~ ~ t
_ ~trv~ :.+,e1 ~CtiitT ~
~ arr/},'. ,'.=.Fn -
t
;
~ p~ ~~1 9 21Ah'75 ~ .
~
~ ~
~ ~
~ 3:~~"~"~"
~ s
~ ~
,
~ ~ soRx~~ PACE2`~~ ~
~
~
~ r
~
~^~.-~:ti ~y},t"
''R`"' l~-`.`d ..F '~.M.Yz £s::yA~,.'~.., ~ ' S'vY-~~~°'s^~~q5.
r'~'-~~:? ~ a'
' f _
=