HomeMy WebLinkAbout0467 ~r ~
~
~ ,
IN TH$ CIRCUIT COURT FOR '
~ ST. LUCIS COUNTY, FLORIDA. ~
:i~
~ CASE NO. 70-590-CA
i?BEATRICL M. SISCO,
. ~ -
i~laintiff,
~~-VS- ~
i! !
t,R. E. SLAY, SR. and 4
~'MARGUERITE I. SLAY, his wife, j
~ ~
~i Defendants = j
!`AND
,E
,~BEATRICB M. SISCO,
.
Third Party Plaintiff . '
~i or Cross-Plaintiff,
;
; _vs- ~
`?7A1~S D. MAUCR and EVELYN ~
r
~p. MAUCR, his wife, ~
.t .
Third Party Defendants . I -
i; or Cross-Defendants. ~
,
. - 1
' ~ {
ORDER TO REMOVE FROM DISMISSAL DOCRET .
- f
THIS ACTION was heard on the motion to remove this action
.
;~rom the dismissal docket. The Court finds that it affirmatively
.
'.appears from filing of pleadings,-Order of Court or otherwise,
;~hat plaintiff has shown good cause why'this action should not ~
,
~
~e dismissed. It is therefore, upon consideration, ~ ~
' ~
~ ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: • I
3
4
(1) That this action be removed from the dismissal docket. ~ -
(2) That this action be reinstated. ~
i
; ORDERED at Fort Pierce, St. Lucie County, Florida, this ; ~
F '
f da of August, A. D. 19 - ~ ~
.
~ - j E
E ,
1 ~
f ~ i
t ~ ~
t •
; _ CIRCUIT
f l
E I
i - }
E - - j -
~
~ .
FltEa t,KU RECORDED i
ST. LUCiC "vOUNTY FLA. i
! ROC~k POITR~S l~ ~
' CIEP.K C~:.CWT COURT t ~
; • + ~
E REC4R~ YEr:ctEa ti
g ~ Z8 10 ii aH ~~J _ !
t
~
_ + 's=
~ . 315~662 '
~
f - j
1
F _ I
t !
~ B~~z~ ~ ~s7 _ E
~ -
. , E _ _ _
~.~~x..~..,> ~
.
~ -
.
s -