HomeMy WebLinkAbout2194 . '
, • ; • • ' ' f
~
IN THE DISTRICT CCxJRT C~F APPEAL OF THE STATE C?F FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICI' Jt! T.Y TE`RA~i 14'15
B~,ZBARA CHASON, )
)
Appeliant, )
~ -
- v. ) CASE NO. 74 -15b2.
) ~
FRFD F. ADAiV1S and JOHl~~ P, ) .
HOKE~ indivfdualty, and as ali ) ~
surviving Board of Dimctors artd/or )
~ Trustees of H& A RENTAI.S, INC.
a dissotved corporation, and RALPH ) ,
F. J. WNEELER, d/b/a t~VHEELER ) _
ELECTRIC, )
. ~
Appetiees, )
Opinion filed August 22, ~.975.
App~a[ from the Circuit Cucirt for ~
St. L,ucie County
; . ~
VUailace Sample, judge.
Pet~r S. Penrose of Hai~es & Penr.ose,
North Pai m Beach, for apoeltant.
Gerald S. James, Fort Pierce, for
Appeliees-Fred F. Adarns a~td John P.
Hoke~ indit~iduaily, and ~3s atl suntiving
6oard of Directors and,/or 'Tnlst~es of
f~ & A Rentats, Ine.
DOWN~Y, J.
In October I969, H& A Rc~ntats, inc. , entered into an Agree-
mcnt for DEed with appeilant whtch provided for H&~ Rentals, inc. ,
to convey certain real property in St. Lucie County to appellant for the.
" sum of ~11, 000, ~ayable $100 per mon[h (plus interest}. App~ilant
entered into possession pursuant to said agreerrtent and subsc~quently
the propertS• was conveyed to the appelleE~s.
Appellant made the monthly payments until approx imatel}~
Febivaly 1971, In October 1971~ appe~tees brc~ught ~uit t~ forectose
the Agreement for Ueed alleging that appellant was tn default more
ao~~44 P~2~94 ~
. ~ _ . -
~ _ . : ~
- a~~~..~`-~ -