HomeMy WebLinkAbout1653 /
320S01 n~ ~ czPamr vocnrr cF ~ rm~~ ~
~cx~t. cu~T aF ~ao~, n~ ~,rm Fox
sr. u~r.~a axrn~r, ~o~?
J~O~i J. sffiiL~i, ana ALI~ B~'~i, )
his wifef 1~I~Q~i F. ~~AOD and ) CASB N0. 75 293 CA
IA~iBT~ M. ~iiAOD, his wifej a~nd )
RTT~1 M. )
~
. Plaintiffs, ) Oi~ER G~PANPTNG l~i'I~ON FOR
~ C~
v~- )
. )
~i CU~ ~~LVY aF' S't~I~l', IlaC. )
~
' Defendant. )
)
~rii.s actio~n was tr3red wi~out a jwcy an Octio~ber 31, 1975. After
Y~earing the testimociy of tbe Plaintiffs' wit~esses ~nd aYguopnts of
ao~unsel far hoth the Plaintiffs and the Defe,ndant, and basad upoci the
Defendant's motia~tz for dit+ect~d v~erdict after tY~e clo~e o~ tl~e P]~aiir
ti.ffs' cas~ in chi~ef, tt~e ~urt is of the aQinian that the motian is
well-fata~c3ed ancl str~uld be granted. Aoo~rdi~ly.
IT IS ADJim(~ that:
l. Defer~dant's motipn far directed verdict is hereby granbed.
2. Plaintiffs, ~1 J. ffi~R and ALICE ~R, his wife;
I~IILTQ~T F. W170D and IO~iTA M. W170D, his wife; a~d RITA M. ~[~tER,
tak,e nothin9 bY this action and the Defendant, HF.ACH Q~B QOILN~C Q?
' 3I't~RT, Il~]C. , goes henve witt~out day.
~
~ Q~ at Fbrt Pieroe, Florida an the ~ clay of Nov~ber, 1975.
i -
~
I
J . A7 r3pr,~an
' t Juc3ge
~
Qogies furni.shed votmsel
fi~EU t,4~. 4tC~i~£'0
ST. Lii:i~ ~JttN'iY~,j~1.
F,GG: Y~ TR~IS
ClEM~: s; .:u;T COtIRT~?
~
c r ~ [~'r. : 7 ; r. ' . :
~ +~loy b 2~ :P~f '~5
~
32QSQ1
~ ' 800K 245 p~GE1649
~
~
_ ,r~
- , ~'P
~
- _ _ ~ . : _