HomeMy WebLinkAbout2117 .
. • , . . 3~ -
- , _ ~ 8Z4
~ _ ~ . .
. - . , - ~ ~ : ~ ~
• ~ 34F~ 1. • ~ ~ i • -
' ' ' p-:ti, r . ; ~ l'
a . . . . . .
t v-"i z~+`J i nr ~ ~ ~t ~ ~I" .
~ FE 3 2 r ,~7.~ . ~
,
`r~~I ~i. . . ~ s - w~ -
~u• : + . E~. • . ~ ~ :
CGWY ~ t f f:;~ f:~I~ai.~ =r'
RfiAf• ~cu ,1 ; t',£
~.lOHN J. GE~OB1.E ?~oae:S CC~r~;: w;
~ 2 CKURCH L'AN8
tf t~10NTYtLLE~ N. J. 07045
(201 J 33 i•QO50 ~t~ f
AT70ltN~Y FOR Plaineiff A t~~
~
- SliPERIOR COL ~T 4F \~W JERSEY
PZQ't7ltlj]~ CI-i~1;tiCER1' 1.~IVISIOv
• . MORRIS- COU~TY
~NI~IE PURCARO,
. Docket No. N, 3217-74
vs.
Defcntlant
NICHOL.AS PtJRCARO~ Crv~L Ac~ro~v
j FIl~?AL JUD~VIEI~T
I
I
This matter coming on to be : card in the presence of ;~hn j. Genob2e,
Esq. , attorney for plaintif~, a;:d Appet, App~t and Burgio, Es ;a. ; u:rorneys -
for defendant ohn E. ~ur zo : sc:. a earin • u n Com l~i.~~ and u n `
~ T . ~ : PP b~ P~ P ~
proofs being taken in open Coart, and rhe Court having heard and ;,o:~sidered
the proofs in this action and the argument of counsel, and, u;~on ~:a:~~tiff's
motion, the Complaint havin~ been amcr?ded to conform with ~~~e ~vidence pre-
sented 'zn support thereof, and it appearing that piaintiff and dc~e;:~1.::i~ were
joined in marriage on the llth day of April, I953, and that plaanti~`f ~.nd defend
ant have bee~n separated and have Iived separate and apart in diffe:ent habitati ns "
~
t
~ 1
!
BOOK z~5 PA
~2114
- _ - .L~~ ~ - - - . .
~ ~ -
_