HomeMy WebLinkAbout0008 . ~
~ IN TIiE CIVIL DIVISION OF COUl1TY COURT -
- 33~21F ~
IN At1D FOR SAINT LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
ORDER DISMISSIP~G CIVIL ACTION CASES
FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION •
It appearing that the Court and the Court findinq that the here-
inafter named Civil ~lction cases have lain dormant for a long time and
have not been prosecuted as required by la~a, and pursuant to the power
vested in the Court, it is thereupon, ~
ORDERI;D, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows:
1. :'hat the follawing Civil Action cases be and the same are hereby
dismissed for Want of Prosecution at the cost of th~ cost of the Plaintiff
or Plaintiffs in each cause: ~
,1~if1 75-936-SP SUNRISE F7RD COMPANY VS STEPHE:ti1 i~IATIIEW TRAVIS
75-914-SP_ ZALES JEWF.LERS VS EVELYN HILLS
G~ 75-865-SP AL'S EQUIP_MENT RENTALS VS JOHN P. P7ILLIAMS
i,~ 75-862-SP ALiS E(~UiYl+ir:~i~ RENfiEii,S V~ ALAid DC.3LAP dba ;.IFESTYLE
LA.NDSCAPE .
~i~ 75-288-SP ELLEN GRINER VS JOHN VIILLIAM WHEELER
~j 75-850-SP RUBIN BROTHERS, INC. VS JOSEPH F. I30Wl~1AN
.
75-1051-SP HARRY T. LUNDGREPJ VS HOWARD'RODGERS
f7 75-1Q68-SP J.M. FIELDS, INC. VS RONALD H. LLOYD
75-1076-CC FRASER ENGINEERING & TESTING V~ :d.G.E. INC.
Cy 75-1082-SP AL' S EQUIPME?IT RENTALS VS LOYAL TIiOt~IAS
~G ?5-1094-CC EAGLE FIyA~iCE+CORP. VS GEORGE HOPKINS
75-109G-SP EaGLE FINAP7CE CORP. VS RALPH H. PATTERSON A2JD LOLA
PATTERSON -
~Z 75-11J5-SP FAITH CNRI5TIAII SCHOOL VS JOHiV ORTADO & MRS. JOHN
ORTADO
/3 75-1115-SP '~I.S. BADCOCK CORP. VS I~IINNIE(aka :iindy) DUNCAi~
/y 75-1131-SP JOYCE MOTnRS, IAIC. VS BENJAI~lIN 'i'~'?`iBS, SR. '
i~ 75-1133-SP S~:AGGS APPLIA*JC~S VS DONALD LA~~GEL
f~ 75-1134-SP SKAGGS APPLIA*iCES VS G.C. TgpMAS
75-1140-SP SKAGGS APPLIANCES VS IKE TUCKER
75-1146-SP HAYNES and HAYNES II~S. CO. VS TIi40'I'HY SCOTT HAiJES
f~ 75-1149-SP EAGLE FIPJANCE C~RP. VS E~,IJAH HILL A~]D DOROTHY HILL
~--U 7 5-118 5-SP iV . S. I3ADCOCK CORP . VS ARTHUR WYCNE
E ,r t ~.V~ ~ "
. _ _ , ~W