HomeMy WebLinkAbout0800 ~
1
ti IN CIP.CUIT COURT, NINETEENTh
JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA.
CASE ~~0. 74-47 CA
HORACIO A. SOTOyONGO, ~
)
Plaintiff, )
. )
-vs- )
)
I,A~4RivCE F . BRINSTER anc,i )
DiARY I. BRINSTER, his cvife, ) t
) _
Defendants, ) FINAL JUDGMEPIT ~
) (Petition or Intervention by the :
-and- ) ESTATE OF SEYMOUR SPEN) ~
)
MONROE SPEN, Trustee of the ) ~
HENRY SPEN AND COMPANY, INC., )
and EMPLOYEES' PROFIT SHARIVG ) ~
RETIREMr.NT TRUST, and THE ) ~
ESTATE OF SEYMOUR SPEN, )
) ~
Intervenors. )
i
- #
THIS CAUSE coming or. to be heard, without jury, before the_ _
,
~
,
Court on June 8, A. D., 1976, on the Petition for Intervention by the
:
i
ESTATE OF SEYMOUR SPEN, against LA~~RENCF. F. BRINSTE~ and MARY I. BRI27STER, ~
~
his wi~e, and up~n the Counterclaim filed by LAWRENCE F. F~RIt1STER and ~
MARY I. BRINSTER, his wife, seeking declaratory judgment to nullify the ~
claim of the ESTATE OF SEYMOUR SPEN, and the defenses to the respective ~
affirmative pleadings, and the Court co:~sidering all the evidence, testi-
mony and review of authorities submitted by counsel, finds and determines
;
that the ESTATE OF SEYMOUR SPEr] has failed to prove either COIIIVT I or =
~
COUNT II of their Petition by the greater weight of the evinence and
Defendants, LAWREN~E F. BRIhSTER and MARY I. BRINSTER, his wife, a~e
entitled to finalJudgment herein against Petitioner, the ESTATE OF
;
SEYI•IOUR SPEN . ~
f
That the Defendants-Counterplaintiffs, LAWRENCE F. BRIt1STER
and MARY I. BRINSTER, his wife, have proven the allegations of their ;
F
i
Counterclaim by the greater weight of the evidence and are entitled
to a final judgment; therefore, it is
~
. ;
;
~{l ~~eJtJ P~(~ ~ i
~
~
~
OERALO 8. JAMES. ATTORNEY AT LAW. POST OFFICE BOX 308D. FORT PIERCE. FLORIDA 33450. TELEPHONE 305.181.2b00
_ - -
_ . , . ~
r