Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0348 ~ . ~ , Regular Meeting -2- Au~u~t 30, 1976 ~ 1 ; City Manager Jackson said receiving this letter and putting these cor.iments on the site plan is the legal advice we're receiving to do which will get us in as good a position as we can. The other alternative is to require the development or developer to conform to City standards as far as streets, t sidewalks, curbs and gutters are concerned. City Attorney Bi~ennan said by going the route of record~ng the site plan with the stipulatior~s on it, it gives notice ana tne only way we can give notice to anybody that buys any property in Section II. - Mayor Bryan asked if it would be possible to record the ori~inal ~ of this letter as an attachnent to tne site plan and City ~ Attorney Brennan stated it would be. City Manager Jackson said we were able to determine that a person who is a prospective condominium buyer does not receive one of these two or three page offering statements with everything set out. ~ 24ayor firyan asked if there was anvt~~inR that would advise purchasers in High Point that ~he develot:ers have advised the City the_y da not exoect to ask for City m2intena~ce of streets or other iacilit~es CTld they will not rr.eet City specifications. City Manager Jac;cson said Mr.~Jefferson had sugoested if the developer agreed to do something like this and put this on file with the City it would be helpful, but there is nothing that advises the prosgective buyer unless his l~wyer happens to discuss that with him. _ Mayor Bryan asked what r~~otion would be envis~oned as`being ~DDT'O~ ri.ate. City Attorney Brenr:an said a;notion to approve the site plan with the restrictzons and tne stipulation that it's not ~aing to be to our speciiications and we won't be ~ takin~; over the mazntenance of the roads. The site plan is to be r~~~rded with a letter attached. i.o~~ ~n ::as made by Cor.ur:issioner Long, seconded by Corrunissioner ~ l,esli~, and unanir~~ously approved to lift the consider~tion of a.~proval of Site Plan relative to Hign Point of Fort Pierce ~ Phase II from the table. Motion was made by CoT~**~issioner Leslie, s~c~:~~ed by Cor~L;iissioner Erowr,ing and unanirnously aFproved that the si~e plan be approved subject to the agreer:?ent with tne developer of High Point that they are not going to construct the r.~ads or the drainage system in accordance with City specifications and the City will not be responsible for the maintenance of either the road system or the ~-ra:nage system at any present time or any futu^e time, and tnat responsibility will eventually go from the developer to t~e ~~c~ividual owners of the condominiums. Mr. Sche?Ihase said he wanted to thank the City Eng~n~ering Der.rr~:r.-_.~t for what they've done relative to High Point. He wishe~ to ~~~ke it clear tnat neve^ at any time had he ad~ressed the Cor~~:~ission on this subject that he was opposed ~o the developr.:ent of Section II even though he'd be accused by one of the members of the developer. This is to certify that this is a true and accurate copy of an excerpt from the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Commission of the City of Fort Pierce, Florida, held on Au~ust 30, 1976, concerning the cons~~:'~ivnal approval of the site plan of High Point of Fort Pierce, Pl~~fse II.. ~ • ~ . ~Wi$ne,s~->ray h~~. ~d the Official Seal of the City of Fort Pierce, Florida, tTi3S the~29:th dsy of September, 1976. . ~ i ; • . 1 ' ~ ~ i ' ' ~ ~ ~ •~'1 ~ ~~t~ ~ ~ - i; ~-R-- 7~5~2 7 A w ity Clerk