HomeMy WebLinkAbout0736 _ ~
'
`a. Chattel 1~ortgage recorded in Official Records ~oo}: 15'l,
Page 521, said Puk~lic Records, extended by_the filing of an affidavit
recorc~ed in Official Records Rook 217, Page 1368, said Public
Records, further secur3ng "tiote 2" and encumberin~ the chattels
described therein; - ~
b. Security Agreement datec~ December 18, 1972, further securing
"tlote 5", encumbering collateral described therein and perfected by the
filing of a Financing Stater.?ent in official Records I~oak 209, Paqe
370, and rerecorded in Official Records Book 249, Fage 1894, said
Pukilic Records, and on December 29, 1972, under File tdo. ~7~121
with the Secretary of State, Ta~lahassee, Florida;
c. Security Agreement dated Decer.~ber 18, 1972, further securing
":7ote 4'', encumbering collateral described therein and perfecEed by
~ ~ ~
the filing of a Financing Statement in Official Records I3ook 209,
Page 372, and rerecorded in Official Records Book 209, Page 1896,
said Public Records, and under File No. 374120 with the
~ecretary of State, Tallahassee, I'lorida. .
6. 1~I1 indebtedness evfdenced an~ secured by the aforesaid
instruments is due and owing to the Plaintiff by virtue of the
; -
r - _
i fact that the Defendant tiOF CI ~RUS GR~V~':S , Ir'C has defaulted
~
~ .
pursuant to the terms thereof in that the installr~ents of principal
and interest due and payable on June 1, 1976, have not been paid.
~ I3y reason of said defaults, the Plairrtiff has exercised its option
to declare the respective principal balance of each of the aforesai~?
r notes and r~ortgages now due and payable.
i . _ .
~ 7. The interest clair•ted by the Defendant 's'F~' £'XCI'AtdGT: P%A~'I02U1L
! . .
i
j EANI: nF TAMPA•in and to the subject property is junior, inferior -
;
i
~ and subordinate to the Plaintiff's lie~, anc~ said nefendant shall ~
~ take nothing hy~way o~ its counterclair~; provided, however, that the
' interest claimecl by TItS: I:XCI11?1GE P:ATIO?;AL I~A~JI; ~F T~tPA in crops
. t
on the suhject properties which have become growing crops in the ~
proc~uction seasons of 1975 and I976, respectively, is su~erior to
~that o€ the Plaintiff ir said crops.
?'he interest clair.ted by the Defenc?ant SI'X~*i 't'~LRFP.T PROnGCTS ;
_ i
~O. , also known as SFXTO~~< TALRO?'T PRQDUC ~'S Cn in ancl to the subject
: ~Q~~~ :'.1~ ~
. -5-