HomeMy WebLinkAbout0168 , . _ _ .
~
i _ ~ ~
3'~'~'094 T n~ ~ c~rr aov~, n~ ~ P+o~ ~
' . ST. IJtaCIE OOC~Ti'Y, FtAEt1~A
. CASB Nl~. 75-1034 CA '
PE~BR ON 00.,
Plaintiff, _
vs.
S'T~R O~STR[ICI'I+ON C~O. CE~ FP. . - ,
PIF.~£, IA~C. ,
Defenc3ant,
at~d ~
~OQt Q+t Nl~I'I~1 I~tt RS-~~AR1IdG .
S'~R ~S't't~,`!'I~i t70. 0~' FT. .
Pffi~.E, INC. , ATD ~ GN 1~'~i P~t ATI~Y' S -
~ird Party Plaintiff, I~5
vs.
~o~rrus .
VIICII~G ~Tl'II~S ~~DQ+1~ CtfRK ClNt COURT
~--r•o;, :r~RlFIEO..,....f..
. ~a ~ -n~~a~m. ~ _ ,h~N t3 ~A os ~I~ "t~ ~
~ ~
: . -~7~.
~is ca~e ao~g on to~ ~e nea~a befo~e the Daat on the motsrori v~
Zhird Party Defexrlant, VIItING da[~MNITffi ~~QRATI~T's for re-hearir~q, `
and the C~xirt hearing arc~n~ent of vo~el and be3ng o~theYwi.ee fully advisec~
in the p~+enises, it is 2~ereby
O~EI~D ArID AU7~ that the M~tiron fa~r Fae-haaring of the Qaurt's
Finat Jud~aait in fav~o~ of 1litra Farty Pl,aintiff, ~it OONSTR~TIO!d 00.
FT. PI~, INC. r ar~d a4ainst Zlzird Fart~' Defendant, VIRIl~ ~+MNIR'IFS
OO~ATI~I, be and tl~e same is herdyy denied. It is fuftY~er ~ -
~F~D Ai~ID AD??[IDGBD tt~at the Oo~tart retains jurigdiction of this
cause bo assess vosts of these prooeedings. It is fia-ther
0~ A1~ID ADlTt7DC~D that 3'h~rd Party Defendant, VIICIIaG OG~PIITI}~
OO~O~i'1'ION's I~+btion to assess att~~y's fees in faw~ of T4~ird Party
~ Defer~ant, VIItING OCMKINITgS oOIiPQ~tA1'ION, against Zhircl PartY~ Plaintiff , .J_
~ ~S~
S'!~R CN 0~. ~ FT. PI~E, INC. , be aI1c3 t.t1e sa~e is hereby c7erLied.
,
Da+~ Ai~ ~ in Martin ~ty. Florida, this ~ day of 1~r, 1977.
~
r
~ . '
- tJ
Geral,d S. James, Esquire
Ieonar~d Jaffe, F.~quire
Devitt Adams, Eaquire p ~ A.y, ~
_ d00N ~ ~V
~
~ osiw.o s. .uurss. ~rroaN~r wT u?w. ~o~r o~~ ~ox soN. ~OIlT II[RCL. FCOIIIOA i~ta[0. r~u?NOKi sos.4si,seoo